Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Roundabout interchange

A roundabout interchange is a type of grade-separated interchange that utilizes one or more circular, unsignalized intersections—known as roundabouts—at the terminals where freeway ramps connect to a crossing , allowing continuous traffic flow around a central while yielding to circulating vehicles. This design replaces conventional signalized or stop-controlled intersections, reducing conflict points and enhancing by eliminating right-angle and head-on crashes common in traditional setups. Roundabout interchanges come in various configurations to suit different spatial and traffic constraints, including single-roundabout designs where all ramps feed into one central roundabout spanning the freeway as an overpass or underpass, double-roundabout setups with separate circles on either side of the freeway connected by a single bridge, and three-level variants that stack roadways for complex multi-highway connections. These interchanges are particularly effective for moderate to high-volume urban or suburban corridors with significant turning movements, such as left turns, where limited right-of-way or queue storage space is available. Key advantages of roundabout interchanges include improved through shorter off-ramp queues, random headways that facilitate smoother freeway merging, and reduced needs, such as narrower bridge widths due to the absence of auxiliary lanes. benefits are substantial, with zero crossing conflict points in single-roundabout designs compared to six in conventional interchanges, along with fewer merging and diverging points, leading to lower crash rates overall. Design features like raindrop-shaped central islands help address differences and prevent wrong-way entries, while the yield-controlled entry promotes consistent speeds and minimizes high-speed rear-end collisions. These elements make roundabout interchanges a preferred alternative in modern for balancing capacity, , and cost.

Definition and History

Definition and Basic Concept

A is a grade-separated designed to connect a major with one or more minor roads, where a central serves as the primary for managing traffic flows from the minor roads and ramps, while the passes over or under the via bridges or structures. This configuration ensures that through traffic on the major remains uninterrupted at a separate grade, eliminating direct crossings with intersecting roads. In basic operation, vehicles from the minor road or entering ramps approach the roundabout and join a one-way circulatory around a central , yielding to any circulating before proceeding to their desired exit. Exiting vehicles then use dedicated ramps to merge onto the major highway, with the preventing conflicts between highway speeds and local turning movements. This flow promotes continuous movement without signals, as all entries require yielding, which reduces delays and enhances predictability. Unlike standard at-grade roundabouts, which accommodate intersecting roads at the same level and handle all traffic—including potential high-speed through movements—in a single plane, the roundabout interchange prioritizes and by fully separating the major from the circulatory system. This distinction avoids direct highway crossings, allowing higher speeds on the mainline while using the roundabout to resolve local and ramp interactions. At its core, the circulatory roadway acts as the central hub, with entry and exit points geometrically arranged to minimize and ensure smooth transitions between movements. This design evolved from early 20th-century rotary concepts but adapted them for grade-separated applications to address modern traffic demands.

Historical Development

The concept of the , which forms the basis for grade-separated interchanges, originated in early 20th-century with the work of French architect Eugène Hénard, who proposed a one-way circular in 1903 to manage urban congestion. This innovation laid the groundwork for modern circular intersections, though initial implementations remained at-grade until the mid-20th century. The first grade-separated roundabout interchanges emerged in the during the 1950s, coinciding with the rapid expansion of the motorway network, such as integrations along the opened in 1959. These early designs addressed the need for efficient junctions on limited land, with the first examples appearing around 1956. In the and , adoption accelerated from the , driven by cost efficiency and spatial constraints in densely populated areas, leading to hundreds of such interchanges on major routes like the and M25 motorways. Early notable implementations included variations like the grade-separated junction at Junction 23 near Park, exemplifying the versatility of the design for motorway connections. By the late , these interchanges had become the predominant form of grade-separated junction in the region, with over 500 in operation across the and as of recent assessments. North America lagged in adoption, with roundabout interchanges remaining rare until the , influenced by safety studies from the (FHWA) following reports on successes in the early . The first notable U.S. example was the two-roundabout interchange at I-70 and Vail Road in , completed in 1995, marking a shift toward broader implementation. Globally, use expanded in after the 1980s, particularly in countries like and the , where designs emphasized safety and flow efficiency. and implementations in the 1990s further refined variants suited to high-volume traffic, influencing international standards. In recent trends as of 2025, adoption continues to grow in amid rapid network development.

Design Principles

Basic Configuration

In the basic configuration of a interchange, a central is positioned at ground level to accommodate minor road traffic and connecting movements. The major , such as a motorway, is elevated on a bridge that spans directly over the , providing uninterrupted passage for through traffic on the primary route. Entry and exit ramps from the link to the circulatory lanes of the , allowing vehicles to weave and merge without crossing the mainline flow. This setup ensures while facilitating all turning movements between the and crossroad. Ramp design in this configuration typically incorporates 1 to 2 per to handle moderate traffic demands efficiently. Entry ramps to the are arranged for free-flow , enabling vehicles from the to merge smoothly onto the elevated roadway. Exit ramps, conversely, include dedicated deceleration lanes adjacent to the circulatory path, permitting safe speed reduction before rejoining the and minimizing potential rear-end conflicts at merge points. Slip roads are engineered for a desirable minimum design speed of 70 km/h to align with operational needs. Bridge integration forms a critical element, often utilizing single-span or multi-span structures to cross the roundabout and reduce the overall interchange footprint. These bridges are spaced to support the of the highway, typically requiring two separate spans in standard two-bridge layouts to avoid excessive roundabout diameters that could lead to unsafe circulating speeds. This approach is particularly advantageous in compact urban environments where land constraints limit expansive designs. Traffic management within the roundabout relies on unsignalized operation, with yield control at all entry points to prioritize circulating vehicles. Entry signage and geometric features enforce speed reductions to approximately 40-50 km/h (25-30 mph), promoting safer and reducing collision risks. The configuration demands a minimum site area of 5-10 acres to accommodate the layout, including verges and visibility sightlines, and is best suited for low- to medium-volume highways carrying up to 40,000 vehicles per day based on projected peak-hour flows.

Geometric and Operational Elements

Roundabout interchanges incorporate specific geometric standards to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow at grade-separated junctions. The circulatory diameter, measured as the inscribed circle encompassing the central island and circulating lanes, typically ranges from 100 to 200 feet for multi-lane configurations suitable for high-volume interchanges, allowing accommodation of design vehicles such as trucks while maintaining operational efficiency. Entry path radii are designed between 65 and 230 feet (20-70 m) to achieve deflection through curved approaches that control entry speeds by forcing vehicles to slow and reduce collision risks at yield points, with tighter radii for single-lane (around 50-100 ft) and larger for multi-lane setups. Lane widths in the circulatory roadway and entries are standardized at 12 to 16 feet (3.7-4.9 m) to support smooth merging and circulation without excessive lane changing. The inscribed circle diameter is selected based on design vehicle swept paths, traffic volume, and standard templates from guidelines such as the FHWA Roundabouts Informational Guide and DMRB CD 116, prioritizing deflection for speed reduction over arbitrary geometric formulas, aligning with optimization for volumes typical of interchanges. Operationally, weaving sections are minimized through precise ramp alignment to the circulatory roadway, directing entering tangentially to reduce lane changes within the . Sight lines are ensured for 400 to 500 feet on approach roads to provide drivers with adequate visibility of circulating and yield points, complying with sight distance requirements. provisions in roundabout interchanges often include underpasses or overpasses to maintain , avoiding conflicts with high-speed ramps. Speed management features include entry flares that allow vehicles to accelerate smoothly into the circulatory path after yielding, enhancing capacity without compromising deflection. on the central contributes to visual calming, reinforcing lower speeds through aesthetic and perceptual cues that encourage cautious driving. These elements adhere to guidelines from the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB CD 116, version 2.1.0 as of 2023) and AASHTO's A on of Highways and Streets (7th edition, 2018), which emphasize achieving 85th speeds under 25 in the circulatory roadway to optimize and flow.
Geometric ElementStandard RangePurpose
Circulatory Diameter100–200 ftAccommodates multi-lane circulation and design vehicles
Entry Path Radius65–230 ftAchieves deflection for speed control via curvature
Lane Widths12–16 ftEnsures smooth merging and reduces lane-changing
Approach Sight Distance400–500 ftProvides visibility for safe yielding

Types and Variants

Single-Level Roundabout Interchanges

Single-level roundabout interchanges consist of a configuration where the central , connecting ramps, and minor road all operate at the same elevation, typically with the major passing overhead on a . This setup replaces the traditional at-grade of a with a , allowing vehicles exiting the major road to merge into circulating traffic without signal control. The design minimizes vertical elements within the roundabout itself, facilitating smoother flow for turning movements while maintaining for the primary roadway. These interchanges are particularly suitable for rural or secondary where demands are moderate and right-of-way constraints are less severe than in settings. They excel in handling high left-turn volumes from ramps onto the minor road, outperforming signalized diamonds by reducing queues that can spill onto the major highway. Examples include adaptations in partial cloverleaf hybrids, where loop ramps connect to the for efficient weaving avoidance on lower-speed arterials. Key design specifics emphasize horizontal geometry to accommodate storage and deflection without elevation changes. Wider medians along the minor road provide space for ramp deceleration and storage, often extending splitter islands up to 60 (200 ) in rural contexts to control approach speeds. The absence of vertical separation within the increases the overall footprint and land requirements compared to compact signalized options but lowers construction costs through narrower structures, as auxiliary lanes for turns are eliminated. Inscribed circle diameters typically range from 30 (100 ) for single-lane setups to 45 (150 ) for multilane, with entry radii of 10–30 (33–98 ) to deflect speeds appropriately. In terms of traffic handling, single-level roundabout interchanges perform best for average daily traffic volumes under 20,000 vehicles on the minor road, where circulating flows remain below capacity thresholds for single- or double-lane designs. They provide consistent gaps for merging onto the major highway, reducing delays during peaks compared to fixed-time signals. For constrained sites, mini-roundabouts with diameters under 30 (100 ) can integrate ramps, featuring traversable central islands of 4–13 (13–45 ) to fit tight geometries while maintaining yield control. A distinctive aspect is the provision of direct at-grade access for minor road through-traffic, bypassing the need for additional bridges or ramps at the level, which simplifies and enhances for local users. However, to ensure safety amid higher-speed ramp approaches, grade-separated paths—such as overpasses or underpasses—are often incorporated alongside the at-grade crosswalks in splitter islands.

Stacked and Dumbbell Variants

Stacked roundabouts represent a multi-level adaptation of the basic interchange, designed to accommodate high-capacity junctions in space-constrained environments. This three-level typically features a at the top level for through traffic, an intermediate level for ramps handling turning movements, and a ground-level for local access roads. The design minimizes horizontal land take by stacking elements vertically, offering a more compact footprint than traditional grade-separated interchanges while maintaining continuous flow for right-turning vehicles. However, it often limits direct left turns, which are instead routed via dedicated slip roads to enhance overall capacity and reduce . In the , stacked roundabouts are commonly employed on major motorways (M-roads) to integrate freeways with arterial routes efficiently. Notable examples include the M4 Junction 32 Coryton Interchange and the Junction 18 Simister Interchange, where the vertical arrangement allows for full access between roads without extensive bridging. A prominent international instance is the Rottepolderplein interchange near , , which utilizes a three-level stacked to connect the A9 and A200 motorways, demonstrating the variant's applicability in dense settings. These designs prioritize right-turn prioritization at the core , with slip roads added for left-turn movements to support balanced traffic distribution. Dumbbell interchanges offer another advanced variant for grade-separated junctions, particularly suited to sites with moderate traffic volumes and limited space. This configuration consists of two parallel roundabouts positioned at either end of a single bridging roadway that spans the major , enabling continuous flow akin to a full . The bridging structure facilitates all turning movements without the need for multiple overpasses, promoting smoother operations by distributing traffic across the dual hubs rather than concentrating it at one point. Typically signal-free, dumbbells can incorporate synchronized signaling at the roundabouts if peak volumes exceed standard capacities, though this is uncommon in standard implementations. The dumbbell's capacity generally approaches that of a single full roundabout interchange but is influenced by the bridge's width and roundabout sizing; larger dual-carriageway bridges and expanded roundabouts can mitigate throughput limitations. In the UK, over 200 such interchanges exist, often on expressways and upgraded A-roads, exemplifying their cost-effectiveness and space efficiency compared to more complex alternatives. For instance, the M6 Junction 31 Samlesbury and M62 Junction 31 Normanton employ this layout to handle regional traffic with minimal disruption to the primary route. Overall, dumbbells provide a balanced solution for achieving diamond-like functionality while leveraging roundabout principles for safety and flow.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Safety and Environmental Benefits

Roundabout interchanges enhance safety primarily through reduced vehicle speeds and fewer high-severity collision types compared to traditional signalized diamond interchanges. Studies by the (FHWA) indicate that converting signalized intersections to roundabouts can reduce severe injury and fatal crashes by approximately 78 percent, largely because entry speeds are limited to 15-25 , eliminating the high-impact T-bone and head-on collisions common at higher-speed signalized junctions. Geometric deflection in the design forces vehicles to slow upon entry, further minimizing speed differentials and crash severity. A key factor in these safety gains is the reduction in conflict points. Roundabout interchanges feature only eight major vehicle conflict points—primarily yielding merges at entry—compared to 32 potential conflicts in conventional at-grade signalized intersections, where crossing and merging maneuvers are more frequent and hazardous. Additionally, the grade-separated nature of interchanges prevents wrong-way entries onto high-speed ramps, a mitigated by the isolated roundabout terminals. Environmentally, roundabout interchanges promote efficiency by eliminating full stops, leading to savings of 23-34 percent relative to signalized alternatives, as vehicles maintain smoother, lower-speed flows without idling. This reduction in acceleration cycles also lowers emissions, with studies estimating reductions in by 15-45 percent and implied CO2 decreases tied to savings. is further mitigated through central landscaping, which absorbs sound and integrates green spaces, enhancing urban aesthetics while curbing auditory impacts from traffic. For and cyclists, roundabout interchanges incorporate dedicated underpasses and separated paths at ramp terminals, providing safer crossings away from vehicular flows. These features result in 10-40 percent fewer and incidents compared to designs relying on overpasses or at-grade signals, as lower entry speeds and clear visibility reduce conflict risks during crossings.

Capacity Limitations and Challenges

Roundabout interchanges generally exhibit limitations of 1,500 to 2,000 vehicles per hour per entry , significantly lower than the 2,500 or more vehicles per hour achievable at full signalized interchanges. This constraint arises from the yield-controlled entry , where vehicles must merge into circulating , limiting overall throughput compared to dedicated signal phases that allocate time more efficiently. During peak periods, bottlenecks frequently occur at these merge points, as high circulating flows reduce entry gaps and lead to queuing, potentially causing upstream congestion on approach roads. Operational challenges further compound these limitations, particularly in scenarios with heavy left-turn volumes exceeding 25% of total traffic, where circulating vehicles block entries and result in unacceptable delays and queues on affected legs. In regions prone to and , the curved circulatory roadway heightens hydroplaning risks, as vehicles navigate turns at reduced speeds on slippery surfaces, exacerbating loss of traction and control. Additionally, oversized vehicles such as trucks often require dedicated bypass to complete maneuvers without encroaching on adjacent or the central , as standard geometries may not accommodate their wide turning radii. Maintenance demands also pose ongoing challenges, with higher cleaning costs associated with debris accumulation on circulatory islands and splitter areas, necessitating frequent sweeping to prevent hazards. For elevated or stacked variants, bridge inspections contribute to increased lifecycle expenses due to structural monitoring requirements. Equity concerns arise when and cyclist paths are inadequate, potentially disadvantaging non-motorized users by forcing them into high-speed merge zones or lacking sufficient separation, which can deter usage in diverse communities. Retrofitting existing sites to address these issues often involves significant costs driven by land acquisition, geometric adjustments, and multimodal accommodations. To mitigate these limitations, auxiliary lanes can be added to facilitate smoother merges, while hybrid designs incorporating signals at entries have demonstrated capacity increases of up to 50% by prioritizing high-volume movements. Studies from the indicate that vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) technologies can boost roundabout capacity by approximately 20% through optimized gap detection and coordinated entries for connected vehicles. variants offer a brief reference for enhanced flow in constrained high-volume settings by linking parallel circulatory paths.

Applications and Examples

United Kingdom and Ireland

The features a high density of roundabout interchanges on its motorway , with over 500 such junctions documented, contributing significantly to traffic management. One prominent example is the Lofthouse Interchange, connecting the and M62 motorways near , which opened in 1970 as a three-level stacked design featuring roundabouts on bridges over the motorways, free-flowing slip roads, and a for certain movements. Located at coordinates 53.73194°N 1.51306°W, it handles approximately 100,000 vehicles per day (projected to reach 107,000 by mid-2050s), serving key routes between Newcastle, , , and . Upgrades in the late , including free-flow links, reduced congestion by about 30%, though issues persist and further improvements are under consultation as of 2021. Another key UK example is the Swanley Interchange, linking the M20 and M25 near , constructed in the 1970s and fully operational by 1977 in a dumbbell style with free-flow links and a high-level bridge. This design replaced an earlier 1966 trumpet junction for the A20 Swanley Bypass, incorporating direct slip roads added in the early to accommodate growing traffic from southeastern . The dumbbell configuration uses paired roundabouts connected by a linking road, allowing efficient merging and diverging while minimizing in a densely populated area. In Ireland, the M50 orbital motorway around integrates multiple interchanges, with the Red Cow Interchange serving as a critical example, opened in 1990 as part of the initial M50 Western Parkway project. Originally a signalized with the N7 Road, it was upgraded between 2008 and 2010 to a grade-separated featuring flyovers, loops, and free-flow links, alleviating severe congestion at what was once dubbed the "Mad Cow " due to its chaotic flows. This site exemplifies integration with Ireland's toll systems, as the M50 operates under a barrier-free tolling regime since 2008, with electronic collection points near the interchange facilitating seamless revenue capture for over €2.5 billion collected as of 2025. Roundabout interchanges in the UK and adhere to standards such as CD 116 for , ensuring optimal entry widths, circulatory roadways, and visibility to enhance safety and flow. In the 2020s, frequent upgrades have incorporated () charging infrastructure at motorway service areas adjacent to these interchanges, with government funding of £10 million announced in 2025 enabling off-grid ultra-rapid chargers (150 kW+) at sites along major routes to support the growing fleet. These enhancements, including nearly 200 new bays at operator Extra locations by 2026, address for long-distance travel. Overall, more than 300 such sites across the UK and Ireland have bolstered the region's low motorway fatality rate of 0.75 per billion vehicle kilometers in 2023, with roundabout designs reducing severe collision risks through yield-based merging and lower speeds compared to traditional signals or weaves.

Europe and Worldwide

In continental Europe, roundabout interchanges have been implemented to handle high traffic volumes at key motorway junctions, often incorporating multi-level designs for efficiency. The Rottepolderplein interchange near Haarlem in the Netherlands, constructed in the 1970s, exemplifies this approach as a three-level stacked roundabout connecting the A9 and A200 motorways, with free-flowing flyovers for through traffic and a central circulating ring for ramp connections. Located at approximately 52.3167°N 4.6833°E, it facilitates seamless integration between regional routes while minimizing land use. Recent cost-saving measures in the Netherlands have led to increased adoption of dumbbell variants, which use two smaller roundabouts connected by a bridge instead of a single large structure. Further east, the has incorporated turbo roundabout designs at various motorway junctions in the , focusing on safety enhancements that guide with lane markings and barriers to reduce conflicts. These implementations prioritize reduced crash severity by lowering entry speeds at ramp terminals. In , the E4 Stockholm Bypass project, ongoing since 2015, features grade-separated roundabout overpasses at interchanges, emphasizing eco-friendly designs with integrated noise barriers, green corridors, and minimized earthworks to align with environmental standards. These elements support sustainable urban mobility by diverting traffic from city centers while preserving local ecosystems. Across North America, adoption remains limited but is growing, particularly in Canada and the United States, where roundabout interchanges address congestion at freeway ramps with proven safety gains. In Canada, the Golden Ears Bridge approach on Golden Ears Way, opened in 2009, includes a grade-separated single-lane roundabout at the 113B Avenue interchange, improving access across the Fraser River by replacing signalized crossings and reducing delays for local traffic merging onto the provincial highway. In the U.S., implementations are sparse, with examples like the SR-167 corridor in Washington state incorporating roundabout ramp terminals in the 2010s to enhance flow near Puget Sound ports. By 2025, the Federal Highway Administration reports over 11,000 roundabouts nationwide, reflecting gradual expansion driven by federal safety countermeasures. Worldwide, roundabout interchanges appear in diverse contexts, adapting to local infrastructure needs in emerging markets. In Turkey, the O-4 motorway network, expanded in the 2000s, features partial roundabout configurations at select junctions to manage Istanbul-area traffic, though full grade-separated designs remain uncommon due to terrain challenges. Australia's M1 Pacific Motorway has seen hybrid variants in the 2010s, such as at Exit 49 near Eight Mile Plains, where roundabouts were integrated with signalized elements before upgrades, balancing cost and capacity on the busy Sydney-Brisbane corridor. Emerging markets like India and Turkey show rising adoption of roundabout interchanges for their cost advantages due to reduced bridge requirements and simpler land acquisition. A notable trend in involves rising adoption of interchanges for their cost advantages, as seen in pilot projects across and . This economic appeal supports rapid without excessive spending. However, challenges persist, especially in the U.S., where cultural resistance to yielding rules hampers widespread use; drivers accustomed to stop-sign dominance require campaigns to build familiarity and reduce hesitation at entries.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Chapter 8 - Roundabouts: An Informational Guide
    8.4.3 Analysis of roundabout interchanges. The traffic performance evaluation of the roundabout interchange is the same as for a single conventional roundabout.
  2. [2]
    Single Roundabout - Interchange
    A single roundabout interchange has no crossing conflict points, two fewer merging conflict points, and two fewer diverging crossing points.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR)
    The raindrop interchange, alternatively referred to as a roundabout interchange, uses the concept of roundabouts at the grade-separated interchange.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Roundabouts: An Informational Guide
    single large roundabout as in the circular roundabout interchange, but with a ... interchange—a grade-separated junction of two roadways, where movement from one ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] MODERN ROUNDABOUTS FOR OREGON #98-SRS-522
    The first concept of gyratory operation was invented by Eugene Henard in 1903, where all the traffic would be required to circulate in one direction (see Figure ...
  7. [7]
    Roundabout Interchange - Roads.org.uk
    Feb 14, 2017 · The capacity of a roundabout interchange is such that they can also be used to connect two major roads together. In some places, where engineers ...
  8. [8]
    History of the Modern Roundabout | City of Winston-Salem, NC
    When the first roundabout freeway interchange in the nation was built in 1995 (at the I-70 interchange in Vail, Colorado), roundabouts then numbered about a ...Missing: Vinters Maryland<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] International comparison of roundabout design guidelines - TRL
    In the UK, all roundabouts have broadly the same design, whether they are mini-roundabouts or form part of a large grade-separated junction. Entry flaring, ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Roundabouts: An Informational Guide – Second Edition
    Since U.S. experience was limited, the FHWA Roundabout Guide was based largely on. European and Australian guidelines. ... New Zealand Standard AS/NZS ...
  11. [11]
    India's Infrastructure Growth: Key Developments and Insights - IBEF
    Oct 31, 2025 · Get the latest insights on India's booming infrastructure sector, with key developments driving growth in roads, ports, and energy.
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Layout of Grade Separated Junctions - Standards For Highways
    2.12. The two most common forms of grade separated roundabout are the two bridge and dumbbell types - see Fig 2/3 and TA 42 (DMRB 6.2). The dumbbell type can ...
  14. [14]
    Roundabout interchange - Roader's Digest: The SABRE Wiki
    ### Summary of Roundabout Interchange Configuration
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Chapter 6 - Geometric Design - Roundabouts: An Informational Guide
    Basic geometric elements of a roundabout. Exhibit 6-2. Roundabout design ... In some cases, a roundabout designed to accommodate design year traffic vol-.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Geometric Design of Roundabouts - Standards For Highways
    Summary: This document gives advice and standards for the geometric design of roundabouts with regard to traffic operation and safety. Amendments and.
  18. [18]
    14.13 Roundabout Interchange - Texas Department of Transportation
    A major advantage roundabout interchanges provide is a reduced bridge width over the freeway due to the omission of auxiliary turn lanes that are often required ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Roundabouts and Roundabout Interchanges - NET
    Roundabout interchanges are particularly cost effective in that the overpassing bridge can be shorter due to the elimination of turning lanes on the surface ...Missing: savings | Show results with:savings
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Chapter 4 - Operation - Roundabouts: An Informational Guide
    The capacity of the entire roundabout is not considered, as it depends on many terms. However, Exhibit 1-13 provides threshold average daily traffic volumes for.Missing: interchange | Show results with:interchange
  21. [21]
    Three-Level Stacked Roundabout | Roads.org.uk
    Feb 17, 2017 · A three-level stacked roundabout, or 'stackabout', is a junction with a flyover to avoid it in two directions, handling traffic turning from ...
  22. [22]
    Dumbbell | Roads.org.uk
    Feb 14, 2017 · Typically, a dumbbell can't quite match the capacity or speed of a full roundabout interchange unless the two roundabouts are made very large ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Roundabouts - FHWA - Proven Safety Countermeasures
    By converting from a signalized intersection to a roundabout, a location can experience a 78 percent reduction in severe (injury/fatal) crashes and a 48 percent ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Chapter 5 - Safety - Roundabouts: An Informational Guide
    Many studies have found that one of the benefits of roundabout installation is the improvement in overall safety performance. Several studies in the U.S. ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Benefits of Roundabouts - FDOT
    Fewer crashes, 90% fewer fatalities and 75% fewer injuries · Fewer severe crashes · 10 to 40% fewer pedestrian/bicycle crashes · Roundabouts are safer for beginner ...
  27. [27]
    Chapter 7 - Signalized Intersections: Informational Guide, August 2004
    ... intersections in urbanized areas have critical lane volumes upwards of 1,800 vehicles per hour.(74). The v/c ratio, also referred to as degree of saturation ...Overview of intersection traffic... · Pedestrian LOs based on...
  28. [28]
    'Super circles' to lessen rush-hour traffic congestion | ScienceDaily
    Mar 13, 2014 · "The one classic dilemma with roundabouts, though, is that some have capacity issues during peak hours. Once they break down, they get ugly and ...
  29. [29]
    Snowfall and roundabouts make for tricky driving conditions
    Dec 12, 2017 · Snowfall and roundabouts can be a bad combination, and with the addition of six new roundabouts this year in Marquette, driving can be tricky.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Trucks at Roundabouts
    A right turn bypass lane may be provided. Large trucks may cautiously encroach on adjacent lanes when no other vehicles are nearby. Hatched buffer areas may ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Incorporating Maintenance Costs and Considerations into Highway ...
    roundabout; they also require inspection and replacement on a regular basis. The striping equipment is large and has a wide turning radius. Maintaining ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Life Cycle Impacts of Intersection Control Type ...
    May 5, 2016 · that both roundabouts and signalized intersections will incur a maintenance cost of $2,500 ... NCHRP Report 483: Bridge Life-Cycle Cost Analysis.
  33. [33]
    Roundabouts: Mixed Results for Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
    To cross such an intersection safely, pedestrians are instructed to use the crosswalks, just like at any other intersection, and cross each adjoining street one ...
  34. [34]
    'Super roundabout' project to help improve traffic flow in Tallahassee ...
    Feb 18, 2025 · It is now projected to cost roughly $70 million. Plans for the project began in 2010, with updates being made in 2019, causing it to stall due ...Missing: retrofitting | Show results with:retrofitting
  35. [35]
    Signalization options to improve capacity and delay at roundabouts ...
    The results showed that signalized roundabout intersections effectively increased capacity by as much as 50% in some cases, reduced delay and queue length ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Developing Highway Capacity Manual Capacity Adjustment Factors ...
    May 1, 2022 · Both single- and double-lane roundabouts are studied under various CAV market penetration rates and conflict flow rates in this paper. A ...
  37. [37]
    M1 - M62 | Roads.org.uk
    This part of the M1 was opened to traffic in 1966, and this junction was built as part of the contract, a roundabout and some little stubs of motorway pointing ...Missing: history first
  38. [38]
    M1/M62 Lofthouse junction: Views sought on motorway revamp plans
    Nov 4, 2021 · A public consultation into plans to improve a busy motorway junction near Leeds is under way. About 75,000 vehicles a day use the Lofthouse ...Missing: history capacity coordinates<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Swanley Interchange - Roader's Digest: The SABRE Wiki
    Mar 13, 2025 · It was built for 2 lanes plus hard shoulders either way (the M20 is the same configuration at the lowest level) so when the M25 came it was ...
  40. [40]
    Red Cow Interchange - Roader's Digest: The SABRE Wiki
    Mar 1, 2025 · It was constructed in 1990 with the opening of the M50 in the area, and named after the townland of the same name.
  41. [41]
    M50 Motorway - Dublin
    The roundabouts were signalised shortly afterwards and long tailbacks began to develop. Most infamous of all was Junction 9, the Red Cow roundabout, which was ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    Extra to boost motorway sites with nearly 200 new Ionity chargers
    Aug 12, 2025 · Motorway service operator Extra MSA plans to almost quadruple its EV charging provision within the next 16 months.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] 2023 Road Safety Performance Overview - GOV.UK
    In 2023, the fatality rate on Britain's motorways was 0.75 per billion vehicle kilometres travelled. This is amongst the best performing motorway networks ...
  45. [45]
    Knooppunt Rottepolderplein - Wegenwiki
    Feb 15, 2025 · Het knooppunt Rottepolderplein is een knooppunt in Nederland, uitgevoerd als rotonde met twee doorgaande fly-overs. Het knooppunt ligt ten ...
  46. [46]
    MIRT-verkenning Rottepolderplein
    Het Rottepolderplein tussen Haarlem en Amsterdam is een druk knooppunt in de Metropoolregio Amsterdam (MRA). Het knooppunt ligt vlakbij luchthaven Schiphol.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Turbo Roundabouts: A Review of Practices in the Czech Republic ...
    May 29, 2024 · This report reviews turbo roundabouts in the Czech Republic, Netherlands, and Poland, motivated by US interest to combat property damage ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Safety evaluation of Czech roundabouts
    Some example photographs are presented in Figure 1. Although roundabout conversions are relatively common in the Czech Republic, their safety impact has not ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] E4 The Stockholm bypass - DiVA portal
    The interchanges Lindvreten södra and the Lindvreten norra consist of grade separated roundabout overpasses. which will be located in the middle of what is cur-.
  50. [50]
    113B Ave. / Golden Ears Way NB Ramps - Roundabouts Database
    Roundabout Details. 113B Ave. / Golden Ears Way NB Ramps. Type: Roundabout; Status: Existing; Functional Class: Freeway Ramps (Grade-Separated); Lane Type ...Missing: interchanges | Show results with:interchanges
  51. [51]
    SR 167 Completion Project | WSDOT - | WA.gov
    New interchanges at I-5, 54th Avenue East and the connections to SR 509. New sidewalks and a widening of SR 99 from the new roundabout through the existing 70th ...
  52. [52]
    National Roundabouts Week | FHWA - Department of Transportation
    The U.S. is now home to over 11,000 roundabouts and counting! Roundabouts are an FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasure, shown to reduce fatal and injury crashes by ...Missing: interchanges | Show results with:interchanges
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Proposed Design Principles for Modern Roundabouts
    Jun 17, 2000 · The objective is to incorporate modern roundabouts as a standard intersection type in new comprehensive Turkish design guidelines.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Are Roundabouts Safe and Economically Viable Replacing ...
    Cost of implementation refers to all costs associated with the implementation of a roundabout to replace an existing ramp terminal including design, land ...
  55. [55]
    Can American Drivers Learn to Love Roundabouts? - Bloomberg.com
    Jan 6, 2025 · Part of the American roundabout resistance may be simple unfamiliarity: The US lags far behind roundabout-crazy countries like France, the ...