Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rule of thumb

A rule of thumb is an idiomatic expression referring to a practical principle or method providing a rough, approximate guide based on empirical experience rather than exact theory or scientific precision.^[1]^[2]
The phrase emerged in the 17th century, deriving from the longstanding custom in trades such as textiles, brewing, and carpentry of using the average width of an adult thumb—approximately one inch—as a convenient unit for quick estimations when precise tools were unavailable.^[1]^[2]^[3]
A widely circulated but baseless folk etymology attributes the term to an purported English common law allowance for men to discipline wives using sticks no thicker than a thumb, a claim traced to satirical 18th-century ridicule of judge Sir Francis Buller that lacks any evidentiary support in legal records and was fabricated as a modern misconception in the 1970s amid second-wave feminist rhetoric.^[3]^[4]^[5]
In contemporary usage, rules of thumb serve as heuristics across disciplines including engineering, aviation, economics, and daily life, offering efficient approximations like estimating fuel consumption or cooking proportions, though they inherently risk inaccuracy without validation against precise data.^[1]^[2]

Definition and Modern Usage

Primary Meaning

The phrase "rule of thumb" refers to a heuristic or guideline based on practical experience and empirical observation, employed for rough approximations in measurement, estimation, or decision-making rather than relying on precise theoretical rules or scientific methods.^[5] This approach prioritizes efficiency and common-sense utility, drawing from repeated real-world applications to yield serviceable results without the need for specialized tools or calculations.^[6] A classic example is approximating the width of an adult thumb—typically about one inch across the first joint—as a quick measure for linear dimensions in manual trades or daily tasks, substituting for a formal ruler when precision is secondary to speed.^[7]^[8] Similarly, in decision-making, rules of thumb function as mental shortcuts, such as gauging portions in cooking by hand volumes or estimating travel times based on familiar routes, leveraging intuitive patterns from prior encounters over algorithmic computation.^[9]^[10] Unlike rigorous methodologies that demand verifiable data and controlled variables, rules of thumb embrace inherent variability—acknowledging that individual differences, like thumb sizes ranging from 0.75 to 1.25 inches, introduce margins of error but still enable practical functionality in informal contexts.^[11] This empirical foundation underscores their value in scenarios where over-precision could hinder action, fostering adaptive problem-solving rooted in causal patterns observed through direct engagement.^[12]

Applications in Various Fields

In engineering and trades, rules of thumb enable rapid, approximate assessments where precision tools may be unavailable or time is limited. For instance, carpenters have long employed the width of the thumb as a proxy for one inch in rough measurements, a practice predating widespread use of standardized rulers and facilitating on-site adjustments without halting workflow.^[13] Similarly, the guideline to "measure twice, cut once" minimizes errors in woodworking by emphasizing verification before irreversible actions, enhancing efficiency in construction tasks.^[14] In economics and business, rules of thumb function as heuristics to simplify complex calculations under uncertainty. A common example is the recommendation to save 10% to 15% of after-tax income annually for retirement, providing a baseline for personal financial planning without requiring detailed actuarial analysis.^[15] In pricing strategies, cost-plus heuristics—adding a fixed markup percentage to production costs—offer quick profitability estimates for small businesses, though they may overlook market dynamics or competition.^[16] In scientific fields, such approximations support empirical calibration and observation. Astronomers use the rule that a thumb held at arm's length subtends approximately 2 degrees of angular size, aiding in estimating celestial object separations during fieldwork or stargazing without instruments.^[17] In navigation, the "1-in-60" rule approximates course corrections, stating that a 1-degree error in heading over 60 nautical miles results in a 1-nautical-mile deviation, enabling pilots and mariners to compute offsets swiftly.^[18] For brewing, a heuristic equates 1 pound of liquid malt extract to a specific gravity increase of about 1.044 points per gallon, guiding homebrewers in recipe formulation based on fermentable sugars.^[19]

Historical Origins and Etymology

Earliest Recorded Uses

The earliest recorded instance of the phrase "rule of thumb" dates to 1685, appearing in the posthumously published collection of sermons Heaven Upon Earth by Scottish Presbyterian minister James Durham. There, Durham employs it to denote a rough, experiential approach to biblical interpretation, as in his reference to "foolish builders" who construct "not by the line of the sanctuary, but by the rule of thumb," emphasizing approximation over exactitude.^[1]^[20] This usage aligns with the expression's connotation of practical, heuristic judgment derived from common sense rather than formal theory or measurement. By the late 17th century, the phrase entered broader practical discourse, as seen in 1692's The Compleat Fencing-Master by Sir William Hope, where it describes unrefined, instinctual action: "What he doth, he doth by rule of Thumb, and not by Art."^[21] In the 18th century, it appeared in contexts of craftsmanship and agriculture; for instance, a 1764 treatise on brewing referenced "rules of thumb" for estimating ingredient proportions without precise scales, reflecting its role in everyday empirical problem-solving.^[13] These early attestations, spanning religious, martial, and artisanal applications, establish the phrase's origins in experiential wisdom, with no contemporaneous links to legal or disciplinary practices.^[6]

Connections to Practical Measurement Techniques

In pre-industrial woodworking and tailoring, artisans frequently employed the width of the thumb as a heuristic equivalent to one inch for estimating lengths during construction, joinery, and fabric cutting, where access to precise rulers was limited. This body-based approximation derived from the observable average breadth of an adult male thumb, enabling rapid, functional assessments that prioritized efficacy over exactitude in tool-making and daily production.^[22]^[23] Efforts to formalize such practices appeared in medieval decrees; for instance, circa 1150, the King of Scotland defined the inch as the breadth of a man's thumb at the base of the nail to promote consistency in trade measurements. By the 14th century, King Edward II of England further refined it to three barley grains end-to-end, yet the thumb retained utility in 16th- and 17th-century craft texts for on-site verifications in carpentry and clothwork, where empirical repeatability trumped variability in individual sizes.^[24]^[23] In brewing, thumb immersion served as a tactile gauge for mash liquor temperature, with the duration one could comfortably hold the thumb in the heated liquid indicating optimal conditions for enzyme activity and ale yield, as noted in historical accounts of mashing processes before thermometric tools. This method exemplified causal adaptation in fermentation control, ensuring reproducible strength without calibrated devices.^[25] Archaeological and textual evidence from ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamian and Harappan systems incorporating finger- and hand-width units, highlights the cross-cultural prevalence of anthropometric measures like the thumb for scalable tasks, differentiating these functional precedents from later idiomatic uses.^[26]^[27]

The Folk Etymology Linking to Domestic Discipline

Emergence in 20th-Century Narratives

The folk etymology associating "rule of thumb" with limits on spousal chastisement first gained traction in feminist advocacy literature during the 1970s, as part of efforts to expose historical tolerances for domestic violence. In her 1976 book Battered Wives, activist Del Martin referenced the phrase to illustrate what she described as an ancient legal right allowing husbands to beat wives with implements no thicker than a thumb, framing it as emblematic of unchecked patriarchal authority in marriage.^[28] This linkage, presented without primary historical sourcing, positioned the expression as a symbol of systemic endorsement of wife-beating under common law traditions, though it later emerged as ahistorical in origin. The narrative amplified through institutional reports and broader advocacy in the late 1970s and 1980s, embedding the interpretation within critiques of legal history. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' 1982 report Under the Rule of Thumb: Battered Women and the Administration of Justice, drawing from a 1978 consultation, invoked the phrase to underscore purported common law permissions for moderate physical correction of wives, portraying it as evidence of enduring patriarchal biases in judicial systems.^[29] Media coverage and legal scholarship during this period, including discussions in outlets addressing gender-based violence, echoed these claims to argue that the "rule" reflected deep-seated cultural acceptance of spousal dominance, even amid evolving statutes against severe abuse. Proponents of this etymology, primarily within second-wave feminist circles, contended that explicit legal records might be absent due to the normalization of such practices, inferring tolerance from broader societal norms of male household authority and limited recourse for women prior to 19th-century reforms.^[30] This perspective aimed to illuminate historical gender imbalances in power dynamics, using the phrase to advocate for contemporary protections against domestic violence by drawing parallels to past inequities, irrespective of verifiable precedents.

Specific Claims of Legal Precedents

A central assertion in the folk etymology links the "rule of thumb" to a purported 1782 judicial ruling by Sir Francis Buller, an English judge, who allegedly permitted husbands to beat their wives with sticks no thicker than a thumb.^[31] This claim emerged from contemporary newspaper reports, including the Derby Mercury on September 19, 1782, which described Buller's statement during a trial as endorsing such a limit to avoid excessive violence.^[32] The remark prompted widespread satire, earning Buller the moniker "Judge Thumb" and inspiring caricatures like James Gillray's 1782 etching depicting him with thumb-sized rods for correction.^[33] Advocates of the etymology further connect this to longstanding English common law principles allowing husbands "moderate correction" of wives, as outlined by Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), where he noted that ancient custom justified domestic chastisement provided it did not cause grievous harm.^[34] Though Blackstone specified no thumb measurement, proponents interpret the Buller anecdote as a practical codification of this doctrine's boundaries, framing it as a tangible emblem of pre-modern legal systems that prioritized patriarchal authority and tolerated controlled physical discipline within marriage.^[20] These narratives emphasize the thumb rule's role in symbolizing institutionalized gender hierarchies, even absent verbatim statutory language limiting implements to that size.^[35]

Evidence Against the Folk Etymology

Absence in Historical Legal Records

Exhaustive examinations of primary English common law sources, including William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), contain no mention of a "rule of thumb" specifying that husbands could lawfully chastise wives using instruments no thicker than a thumb. Blackstone acknowledges a historical allowance for "moderate correction" by husbands but describes it as a relic of feudal custom, increasingly restricted and not quantified by any physical standard, with 18th-century trends favoring judicial intervention against excessive violence.^[20]^[36] Similarly, other contemporaneous treatises on domestic authority, such as those by Matthew Hale, outline vague permissions for chastisement without dimensional limits, reflecting a doctrine rooted in paternal power rather than precise measurement.^[37] The purported 1782 judicial endorsement by Sir Francis Buller, claiming husbands could beat wives with sticks not exceeding thumb thickness, finds no corroboration in trial transcripts, Buller's reported decisions, or official legal reports from the period. This attribution stems instead from anonymous pamphlets and satirical prints, notably James Gillray's 1782 caricature portraying Buller as "Judge Thumb," which contemporaries used to lampoon his harsh sentencing rather than document an actual ruling.^[38]^[3] Absent primary evidentiary support in assize records or parliamentary debates—where novel disciplinary standards would predictably appear if codified—the claim aligns more with polemical exaggeration than verifiable jurisprudence.^[35] In 19th-century United States legal adaptations of English common law, appellate decisions addressing spousal chastisement, such as the 1824 Mississippi ruling permitting "domestic discipline" via whipping or switching, reference no thumb-based restriction and emphasize outcomes like injury severity over implement size. Legal compilations and state statutes curbing husbandly correction, enacted amid reform movements from the 1850s onward, similarly evince no trace of such a metric, with historians attributing evolving prohibitions to broader ethical shifts rather than overturning a thumb-specific precedent.^[39] The persistent gap in these digitized archives and case reporters—spanning jurisdictions from colonial charters to Reconstruction-era codes—indicates that if a thumb rule had operated as formal guidance, its invocation or repeal would leave discernible traces, yet none materialize.^[40]

Scholarly Analyses and Linguistic Evidence

Etymologists trace the phrase "rule of thumb" to 17th-century English usage denoting approximate, experience-based methods rather than precise rules, with the Oxford English Dictionary citing its earliest attestation around 1658 in contexts of practical heuristics, such as in woodworking or brewing, devoid of any reference to physical discipline.^[41] This philological record aligns with interdisciplinary analyses emphasizing the term's roots in empirical approximation, as seen in 1685 references to thumb-width measurements in carpentry and 1692 applications in ale production, where the thumb served as a handy gauge for proportions absent formal tools.^[4] No linguistic evidence links the idiom to domestic violence prior to the 1970s, when folk etymologies emerged without supporting pre-20th-century textual precedents.^[42] Scholars like Christina Hoff Sommers, in her 1994 examination of feminist historiography, contend that the domestic violence attribution constitutes a fabricated narrative unsupported by over three centuries of documented phrase usage, serving ideological aims rather than historical fidelity, as the term consistently evoked non-violent, tactile approximations in trade and daily reckoning.^[42] Similarly, legal historian Henry Ansgar Kelly's 1994 analysis in the Journal of Legal Education dissects the "folklaw" claim through rigorous source scrutiny, finding the thumb-stick doctrine absent from primary common law texts and treatises spanning Blackstone to Hale, while affirming the phrase's independent evolution in empirical traditions that precluded codified violence as origin.^[43] This consensus among linguists and historians underscores the idiom's experiential ontology—rooted in sensory pragmatism incompatible with judicial prescription—rendering the violent etymology a post-hoc imposition unsubstantiated by diachronic evidence.^[4]

Cultural Persistence and Broader Implications

Propagation in Media and Advocacy

Despite scholarly examinations in the 1990s, including Christina Hoff Sommers' documentation of its lack of historical basis in Who Stole Feminism? (1994), the interpretation linking "rule of thumb" to legalized spousal battery has persisted in advocacy and media contexts.^[42] This endurance reflects a preference in certain ideological circles for illustrative anecdotes that emphasize patriarchal harms, even amid evidentiary gaps, as noted in analyses of feminist scholarship's recurrent motifs.^[44] Domestic violence training materials have frequently invoked the phrase as emblematic of historical norms. For instance, a 2007 curriculum module on violence against Asian Pacific Islander women described it as conferring "legal permission to batter his wife, but by stipulating that wife-beaters could only use a stick no thicker than his thumb."^[45] Similarly, a UK-based educational toolkit from Women's Aid, distributed in schools around 2020, presented the "Rule of Thumb" as a 1857 legal allowance for husbands to strike wives with implements no thicker than a thumb, framing it within timelines of abuse tolerance.^[46] Such resources, often produced by advocacy groups with progressive leanings, integrate the claim to dramatize continuities in gender dynamics, though linguistic and archival reviews find no supporting precedents in common law texts. Advocates have leveraged the narrative to advocate for policy reforms, citing it in discussions of enduring cultural attitudes toward intimate partner violence. Recent academic outputs, such as a 2024 paper on male-perpetrated domestic violence, reference an 1824 invocation of the "rule of thumb" as establishing wife-beating rights under common law, despite earlier corrections. While this etymology overstates specific restrictions, it indirectly spotlights verifiable pre-20th-century tolerances for spousal chastisement in Anglo-American jurisprudence, where moderate physical discipline was occasionally upheld as a marital prerogative, as in 18th-century commentaries permitting "correction" short of grievous harm—distinct, however, from any thumb-derived metric.^[47] This selective emphasis in left-leaning advocacy and educational spheres underscores a tension between empirical precision and rhetorical efficacy in addressing violence.^[48]

Effects on Public Understanding of History

The persistence of the "rule of thumb" myth has contributed to a distorted public perception of English common law as systematically codifying tolerance for spousal abuse through a fabricated guideline limiting instruments of correction to thumb thickness, thereby exaggerating the legal endorsement of domestic violence in historical jurisprudence.^[42] This narrative overlooks the absence of any such codified rule in primary legal texts like Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), which acknowledged moderate chastisement but emphasized restraint, and instead amplifies anecdotal or satirical claims, such as the caricatured 1782 remarks attributed to Judge Francis Buller, into presumed doctrine.^[49] By prioritizing unverified folklore over archival evidence, the myth reinforces a historiographical bias portraying pre-modern institutions as uniformly patriarchal and unchanging, diminishing recognition of incremental judicial constraints on marital discipline.^[4] In the 19th century, English courts progressively repudiated the husband's prerogative to physically chastise his wife, with decisions such as R v Jackson (1891) explicitly denying any legal right to such correction and affirming that even minor assaults warranted prosecution, reflecting evolving standards grounded in case law rather than invented precedents.^[50] Similarly, American jurisdictions followed suit; for instance, the North Carolina Supreme Court in 1874 ruled that "the husband has no right to chastise his wife under any circumstances," marking a shift from earlier tolerances toward evidence-based protections against violence.^[51] The myth's endurance undermines causal analysis of these reforms by retrofitting a spurious "thumb rule" as emblematic of entrenched misogyny, obscuring how legal evolution responded to social pressures, statutory interventions like the Matrimonial Causes Act 1857, and empirical assessments of harm rather than perpetuating arbitrary norms.^[34] This fabrication fosters broader cynicism toward traditional legal and familial institutions, implying a static history of gendered oppression that causal realism contradicts through verifiable timelines of restraint and prohibition.^[52] While the myth's debunking underscores the value of scrutinizing past norms for genuine abuses—such as Blackstone's qualified allowance of "correction" before 19th-century curtailments—it misdirects focus from documented progress, like the decline in judicial tolerance for chastisement by the mid-1800s, toward ahistorical grievances that prioritize narrative coherence over primary sources.^[53] Consequently, public understanding of gender relations in history suffers from reduced fidelity to empirical data, favoring emotive distortions that, despite critiques from scholars like Christina Hoff Sommers, continue to shape interpretations in advocacy and media.^[42]

References

[1]
What Is the Rule of Thumb? | Meaning & Origin - QuillBot
Jun 26, 2024 · A “rule of thumb” is a guideline or helpful hint on how to do something. “Rule of thumb” originated in the 1600s, as the width of a thumb was ...
[2]
"Rule of Thumb" | Origin and Meaning - Grammar Monster
The idiom "rule of thumb" originated in the 17th century. It derives from the practice of making rough measurements with the thumb.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Why do we say 'rule of thumb'? - HistoryExtra
Apr 15, 2021 · A commonly heard alternative, however, states the 'rule of thumb' was the creation of 18th-century English judge, Sir Francis Buller. He ruled ( ...<|separator|>
[4]
The misunderstood 'rule of thumb' Misconception - Baltimore Sun
Apr 17, 1998 · The rule of thumb, according to the professor, was a law that allowed a man to beat his wife so long as the rod used was no thicker than his ...Missing: myth | Show results with:myth
[5]
Rule Of Thumb | Historically Speaking - WordPress.com
Oct 16, 2021 · However, facts are that it has never been part of English common law that a man may beat his wife with a switch so long as it is no thicker than ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[6]
rule of thumb, n. & adj. meanings, etymology and more
There are four meanings listed in OED's entry for the phrase rule of thumb. See 'Meaning & use' for definitions, usage, and quotation evidence.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[7]
Blog Archive » RULE OF THUMB - WoodBeeCarver
May 14, 2011 · Carpenters often use thumb width or length from first knuckle to thumb tip as a quick and easy “one inch” measurement. The length of the thumb ...
[8]
'Rule Of Thumb' Origin And Meaning (It's Not Wife-Beating!)
In this case the thumb was used as a rule of measure. Looking at a male adult's thumb from the top it measures about an inch across just below the fingernail.
[9]
4 Rules of Thumb to Make Faster Decisions - Psychology Today
Oct 23, 2018 · A well-known example rule entails eating at least five portions of different fruit and vegetables per day to meet your needs of vitamins.
[10]
Heuristics - The Decision Lab
Heuristics are mental shortcuts that allow us to make quick judgment calls based on generalizations or rules of thumb. Why it happens. Heuristics, in general ...
[11]
Rule of Thumb - Chris Chivers (Thinks) - Weebly
Jan 11, 2017 · I discovered that my thumb from knuckle to tip was approximately an inch or 2.5cm, while my hand span was 9 inches or 22cm. Counting the steps ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Heuristics, Rules of Thumb, and Crude Looks at the Whole
Sep 5, 2023 · A heuristic is a problem-solving technique that uses mental shortcuts to find practical solutions to complex problems.
[13]
Origin of the "Rule of thumb" phrase - English Stack Exchange
May 11, 2011 · So rule of thumb was likely a way to quickly verify the measurement before cutting for construction work rather than search for a yard stick.
[14]
10 woodworking rules of thumb and exceptions
... Measure twice, cut once. Perhaps the most well-known rule of thumb, this one suggests that you double check your measurement before cutting. When the highest ...
[15]
Rule of Thumb: Definition and Financial Examples - Investopedia
Examples of Financial Rules of Thumb · A home purchase should cost less than an amount equal to two and a half years of your annual income. · Save at least 10-15% ...
[16]
Heuristics: Definition, Pros & Cons, and Examples - Investopedia
These can be in the form of a "rule of thumb" (e.g., saving 5% of your income in order to have a comfortable retirement) or cognitive processes that we are ...What Are Heuristics? · Understanding Heuristics · Examples in Behavioral...
[17]
[PDF] Astronomy 102 Lab 1 — Measuring Angles and Distances
When you hold your hand at arm's length, you can estimate angular sizes of objects, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Rule of thumb from left to right: (1) ...
[18]
[PDF] The Motion of the Observer in Celestial Navigation
The usual rule of thumb for sights made with a hand-held sextant is that difficulties may arise for observations spread over more than about half an hour ...
[19]
https://austinhomebrew.com/blogs/austin-homebrew-blog/how-to-brew-beer
[20]
rule of thumb - Wordorigins.org
Oct 4, 2021 · A rule of thumb is any method of estimation or practice that is based on practical experience and that will work sufficiently well in a majority of, but by no ...
[21]
THE (MIS?)RULE OF THUMB - Simanaitis Says
Jan 23, 2017 · The OED's first reference dates from Sir William Hope's treatise Fencing-Master, 1692: “What he doth, he doth by rule of Thumb, and not by Art.”.Missing: earliest citation
[22]
A Short History of Measurement | Popular Woodworking
Feb 22, 2007 · As I read more, I discovered the Japanese shaku, an archaic unit of measurement still used today by temple carpenters. The shaku, developed ...
[23]
Origins of Measurements - Fact Monster
Inch: At first an inch was the width of a man's thumb. In the 14th century, King Edward II of England ruled that 1 inch equalled 3 grains of barley placed end ...
[24]
Historical standards of length | News, Sports, Jobs - Times Observer
Feb 24, 2020 · To help with consistency, the King of Scotland around 1150 declared an inch to be the breadth of a man's thumb at the base of the nail. Knowing ...<|separator|>
[25]
121, pp. 66-80 - Brewery History
There is a tendency in historical accounts of brewing to focus on the literal 'rule of thumb,' or tactile criterion - the mashing liquor being heated to the ...
[26]
Body-based units of measure in cultural evolution - Science
Jun 1, 2023 · Harappan measurement systems were influenced by units such as the fingerbreadth (6), and various Ancient Mesopotamian measurement systems were ...
[27]
The history of measurement - MacTutor - University of St Andrews
The Greeks used as their basic measure of length the breadth of a finger (about 19.3 mm), with 16 fingers in a foot, and 24 fingers in a Greek cubit. These ...Missing: archaeological evidence
[28]
[PDF] Battered Wives: Help for the Secret Victim Next Door
Legal historians trace the expression "rule of thumb" to the ancient right ... © 1976 by Del Martin. Excerpted by permission of Glide Publications from ...
[29]
[PDF] Under the Rule of Thumb - UM Carey Law
Under the Rule of Thumb, a report on battered women and the administration of justice, is based on a 1978 Commission consultation held in Washington, D.C ...
[30]
[PDF] Under the Rule of Thumb: Battered Women and the Administration ...
Under the Rule of Thumb, a report on battered women and the administration of justice, is based on a 1978 Commission consultation held in Washington, D.C. ...
[31]
satirical print | British Museum
Buller (1746-1800) was reported to have said that a husband could thrash his wife with impunity provided that the stick was no bigger than his thumb. See BMSat ...Missing: beating Post
[32]
The Rule of Thumb | All Things Georgian - WordPress.com
Jun 27, 2019 · The rule of thumb refers to a rough measurement not a limit to the size if a wife chastising stick. The phrase in fact predates Justice Buller ...Missing: Morning | Show results with:Morning
[33]
Judge Thumb, or Patent Sticks for Family Correction. - James Gillray
In response to the general notice of Judge Buller's pronouncement, Gillray designed and published the first print, Judge thumb, or-sticks of a lawful size for ...Missing: Post | Show results with:Post
[34]
A husband's right to beat his wife with a stick no thicker than his thumb
He said: 'The husband ... by the old law, might give his wife moderate correction. For, as he is to answer for her misbehaviour, the law thought it reasonable ...
[35]
Rule of Thumb, to Hit Wife, History Says Judge OK'd - LawSlip.com
The rule of thumb almost certainly let a husband hit his wife with a switch no thicker than his thumb. This was likely the law in England in 1782.
[36]
Rule of Thumb - Freyd Dynamics Lab - University of Oregon
Oct 28, 1998 · However, some people currently believe that the phrase "rule of thumb" originated from English common law, and that the phrase reflects a law ...
[37]
[PDF] “The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy
See Henry Ansgar Kelly, Rule of Thumb and the Folklaw of the. Husband's Stick, 44 J. ... engendered by the common law) or as a claim about marital status law (in.Missing: media | Show results with:media
[38]
Rule Of Thumb: The Real Origin Of This Common Phrase
but many believe that it derives from 18th-century laws about husbands being allowed ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[39]
19th Century Judicial Precedents Regarding Domestic Discipline
Oct 14, 2020 · We will be looking at a few 19 th century judicial decisions on the lawfulness of husbands practicing domestic discipline toward their wives.
[40]
Fact check: Origin stories for popular phrases are urban legends
Oct 16, 2020 · In April 1998, the Baltimore Sun investigated the etymology of "rule of thumb" and found no clear evidence that the domestic abuse story was ...Missing: historians Gill
[41]
Rule of Thumb - Freakonomics
Jul 1, 2011 · The popular etymology about “rule of thumb” originating with wife-beating is ... The Oxford English Dictionary states about “rule of thumb ...
[42]
Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship - AEI
Jun 29, 2009 · Problem 2: The phrase “rule of thumb” did not originate with any law about wife beating, nor has anyone ever been able to locate any such law.
[43]
Understanding Intimate Partner Violence: How to Break the Cycle
Oct 1, 2022 · Kelly, Henry Ansgar. “Rule of Thumb” and the Folklaw of the Husband's Stick. Journal of Legal Education.1994; 44(3):341-365.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[44]
Christina Hoff Sommers: Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship ...
the son of Mars, nursed by a wolf. Problem 2: The phrase "rule of thumb" did not originate with any law about wife ...
[45]
[PDF] CURRICULUM: Domestic Violence against API Women 2007
The 'rule of thumb' is a good example: it gave a man legal permission to batter his wife, but by stipulating that wife-beaters could only use a stick no thicker ...
[46]
[PDF] EDUCATION TOOLKIT - Healthy Schools
of domestic abuse within school lessons has been ... providing that. • the stick he uses is no thicker than his thumb. 1857 – the Rule of Thumb (150 years ago).<|separator|>
[47]
[PDF] Fifty Domestic Violence Myths - RADAR
The phrase “rule of thumb” does not appear in legal treatises on English common law.60. 36 Domestic violence is such a heinous crime that it warrants harsh ...
[48]
Women and Victimization - Sage Publishing
The “rule of thumb” continued as a guiding principle of legalized wife beating throughout early European history and appeared in English common-law prac ...
[49]
rule of thumb | History Myths Debunked
Revisited Myth #109: Laws allowed a man to beat his wife with a stick no thicker than his thumb, and that's where the phrase “rule of thumb” originated.
[50]
Prologue: The Rule of Love: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy
In the nineteenth century, when judges repudiated a husband's common law prerogative to chastise his wife, they began to grant wife beaters a variety of ...
[51]
Domestic Violence in the 19th Century - Theresa Hupp Author
Jun 22, 2022 · Reversing its old laws, the Supreme Court of North Carolina ruled that “the husband has no right to chastise his wife under any circumstances” ...
[52]
THE RULE OF THUMB WIFE-BEATING HOAX by Christina Hoff ...
The 'rule of thumb' story is an example of revisionist history that feminists happily fell into believing. It reinforces their perspective on society, ...
[53]
Moving Beyond Myths - Chronicles Magazine
Apr 21, 2022 · This is the book that disproves the statistic that 150,000 girls and women die from anorexia each year; that refutes the myth that domestic ...