Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

S9G reactor

The S9G reactor is a pressurized water nuclear reactor designed by General Electric for propulsion and electricity generation in the United States Navy's Virginia-class attack submarines.^[1] It delivers approximately 210 megawatts thermal (MWt) power, producing 40,000 shaft horsepower (30 megawatts shaft) to drive a single pump-jet propulsor.^[1]^[2] The reactor features a high energy density core that enables a 33-year service life without refueling, significantly reducing operational costs and maintenance needs.^[1]^[2] Key design innovations of the S9G include natural circulation cooling, which allows operation at full power without relying on coolant pumps, enhancing reliability and reducing mechanical complexity.^[1] It incorporates an advanced steam generator with improved corrosion resistance, smaller size, and higher heat transfer efficiency compared to previous naval reactors.^[1] The reactor has a compact design that fits within the 33-foot (10.1-meter) hull diameter of the Virginia-class submarines.^[1] These features contribute to quieter operation, surpassing even advanced foreign designs in acoustic stealth, which is critical for submarine missions.^[1] The S9G entered operational service without a land-based prototype, debuting on the lead ship USS Virginia (SSN-774), commissioned in October 2004.^[1] It powers the Virginia-class fleet; as of November 2025, 24 submarines are operational, with plans for 24 more to reach a total of 48, including Block V variants with approximately 10,800 tons displacement, scheduled for delivery starting in 2025.^[2]^[3]^[4] By minimizing radiation exposure to personnel and generating less radioactive waste over its lifespan, the S9G supports extended submerged operations and aligns with the Navy's goals for long-term strategic deterrence.^[1]

Overview

Description

The S9G reactor is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) developed specifically for the United States Navy to power its nuclear submarine fleet.^[5] As a compact naval propulsion system, it integrates advanced features for enhanced efficiency and reliability in underwater operations.^[2] Its primary functions include generating electricity for onboard systems and providing mechanical power for propulsion in attack submarines, enabling sustained high-speed submerged travel without frequent surfacing.^[5] The reactor operates through a standard PWR cycle: controlled nuclear fission in the uranium-fueled core heats primary coolant water under high pressure, which transfers thermal energy to a secondary loop to produce steam; this steam then drives turbines connected to electric generators and the propulsion shaft.^[6] The design and development were led by the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), a key facility under the Naval Nuclear Laboratory responsible for naval reactor engineering, with General Electric (GE) serving as the primary contractor for construction and integration.^[7] ^[5] Initially deployed exclusively in the Virginia-class (SSN-774) submarines, the S9G entered service with the lead ship USS Virginia, commissioned in October 2004.^[1]

Role in Submarine Propulsion

The S9G reactor serves as the primary power source for the Virginia-class submarine's propulsion system, generating steam that drives two turbine engines connected to a single shaft and pump-jet propulsor. This configuration enables the submarine to achieve submerged speeds exceeding 25 knots while maintaining operational efficiency throughout its 33-year service life without refueling.^[5]^[8]^[1] A key aspect of the S9G's integration is its contribution to acoustic stealth, facilitated by the reactor's natural circulation cooling and low-vibration design, which supports quiet running modes essential for undetected operations in contested waters. The pump-jet propulsor, developed by BAE Systems and originally inspired by Royal Navy designs, further enhances this stealth by enclosing the propulsor blades, reducing cavitation noise when paired with the reactor's steady power output.^[9]^[10] In addition to main propulsion, the S9G provides auxiliary electrical power through steam-driven generators, supplying energy for critical submarine systems including sonar sensors, electronic warfare equipment, and weapon launch mechanisms. This integrated power generation ensures self-sufficiency during extended missions, with the reactor's output of approximately 210 MW thermal supporting both propulsion and onboard demands without external dependencies.^[11]^[8] The S9G's compact, modular layout is specifically engineered for compatibility with the Virginia-class's 33-foot (10.1 m) diameter pressure hull, aligning with constraints inherited from the Los Angeles-class while allowing flexible arrangement of propulsion components to optimize space and maintain structural integrity. Each submarine employs a single S9G reactor to power its sole propulsion shaft, streamlining the overall system for reliability and reduced maintenance.^[1]^[5]

Development

Historical Background

The S9G reactor evolved from the S6G reactors used in the Los Angeles-class (SSN-688) submarines, which had powered the U.S. Navy's fleet during the Cold War era but required adaptations for emerging post-Cold War operational demands.^[1] Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Navy sought smaller, more cost-effective submarine designs to replace aging vessels, emphasizing affordability and versatility over the large, high-endurance platforms optimized for deep-ocean anti-Soviet missions.^[12] This shift influenced the reactor's development to support multi-mission capabilities, including littoral operations in shallower waters near coastlines.^[13] The S9G was initiated as part of the New Attack Submarine (NSSN) program, launched in the late 1980s to modernize the attack submarine fleet.^[14] Conceptual design work began around 1988-1990, driven by the need to balance advanced performance with fiscal constraints in the post-Cold War budget environment.^[14] Full-scale development was authorized in the early 1990s, with the program receiving Milestone 0 approval from the Defense Acquisition Board in 1992, allowing progression to detailed engineering under the oversight of Naval Reactors.^[15] By the mid-1990s, the NSSN effort had formalized the S9G's role, produced by General Electric, as the propulsion core for what became the Virginia-class submarines.^[16] Key strategic drivers for the S9G included reducing crew size through automation, lowering lifecycle costs via streamlined maintenance, and extending refueling intervals to align with a submarine service life exceeding 30 years.^[1] These features addressed the Navy's transition to a leaner force structure, enabling sustained operations without frequent overhauls while supporting diverse roles from intelligence gathering to strike missions.^[17]

Design Process

The design process for the S9G reactor was led by the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), a government-owned, contractor-operated facility managed by General Electric under the oversight of the U.S. Department of Energy's Naval Reactors program.^[1] This collaboration ensured that the reactor met stringent naval requirements for compactness, reliability, and safety in submarine applications. Development began in the late 1980s as part of the broader Virginia-class submarine initiative, with core engineering and component design activities intensifying through the 1990s at KAPL facilities in New York.^[18] The first production unit was completed around 2000, aligning with the construction timeline for the lead Virginia-class submarine, USS Virginia (SSN-774), which was laid down in 1999.^[1] Key innovations during the design phase focused on enhancing performance while simplifying operations. Engineers emphasized increased energy density to provide higher power output within a smaller footprint, alongside the integration of advanced materials in critical components like the steam generator to improve corrosion resistance and extend operational life.^[19] The design also prioritized modularity in select systems, such as piping and instrumentation, to facilitate easier access and maintenance, reducing the need for extensive crew intervention compared to prior generations.^[18] These features were informed by lessons from earlier reactors, aiming for a 33-year service life without refueling.^[2] Testing and validation relied on advanced computational modeling and component-level trials rather than a dedicated full-scale prototype, a departure from earlier naval reactor programs due to matured technology and cost considerations.^[1] Key elements, including core features and thermal-hydraulic behaviors, were evaluated at KAPL's existing prototype facilities, such as the Kesselring site in New York, to simulate submerged operational conditions under varying power demands.^[20] This approach validated the design's safety and efficiency, with manufacturing of the initial units occurring at General Electric's facilities to ensure quality control and integration with submarine hull systems.^[19] The overarching goals included significant reductions in lifecycle costs relative to predecessors like the S6G reactor, achieved through simplified components, fewer maintenance requirements, and enhanced reliability that minimized downtime.^[18] For instance, the new steam generator design addressed corrosion issues in older models, potentially lowering long-term operational expenses by improving durability and reducing inspection needs.^[21] These efficiencies supported the U.S. Navy's objectives for affordable, high-performance propulsion in next-generation submarines.^[22]

Technical Design

Core and Fuel System

The S9G reactor employs a compact pressurized water reactor (PWR) core optimized for the spatial constraints and power demands of Virginia-class submarines. This configuration utilizes highly enriched uranium-235 fuel, with enrichment levels of approximately 93%, to achieve high energy density and reactivity reserves necessary for prolonged submerged operations. The core's design emphasizes neutron economy through a tight lattice arrangement, enabling efficient fission while minimizing size.^[19]^[23] Fuel elements in the S9G core consist of uranium-zirconium alloy plates, typically comprising 85% uranium and 15% zirconium, encapsulated in Zircaloy cladding to provide corrosion resistance and structural integrity under high neutron flux. These elements are assembled into hexagonal configurations that enhance moderation and heat removal while supporting the core's compact footprint. The fuel assemblies are developed by the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory and manufactured by BWXT Nuclear Fuel Services, which oversees the naval nuclear propulsion program's engineering and testing.^[19]^[7]^[24] Light water serves as both the moderator and primary coolant in the S9G core, slowing neutrons for efficient thermal fission while absorbing heat generated by the reaction. The system operates under elevated pressure of about 2,250 psi to maintain the coolant in a subcooled liquid state, preventing void formation and ensuring stable heat transfer even during natural circulation modes. This integrated approach to moderation and cooling contributes to the core's reliability in dynamic submarine environments. The S9G core is engineered for high burnup, allowing the fuel to extract a significant fraction of its fissile content over extended periods without compromising performance. This characteristic supports the reactor's operational lifespan of 33 years, matching the Virginia-class submarine's service life and enabling full-power capability throughout. Consequently, no refueling is required during deployment; the core is replaced only upon decommissioning the vessel at the end of its lifecycle.^[25]^[1]

Steam and Propulsion Components

The S9G reactor utilizes an advanced steam generator design as part of its pressurized water reactor system, featuring a new concept that incorporates improved corrosion resistance and enhanced heat transfer efficiency compared to predecessors. This design enables reduced coolant flow requirements in the primary loop while maintaining effective steam production. The steam generators form a critical barrier, isolating the radioactive primary coolant from the secondary loop to prevent contamination of the non-radioactive steam cycle. The primary system operates as an all-welded, closed loop that includes the reactor vessel, piping, pumps, and steam generators, ensuring structural integrity and minimizing leak risks.^[1]^[6] In the propulsion setup, steam from the generators drives a series of high-pressure and low-pressure turbines, which in turn power electric generators for shipboard electricity and a main propulsion turbine connected to a single-shaft pump-jet propulsor. This configuration converts thermal energy from the reactor into mechanical propulsion, with the secondary steam plant delivering approximately 40,000 shaft horsepower to the propulsor for submarine movement. The system emphasizes reliability through innovations such as natural circulation cooling in the core, which allows operation at significant power levels without relying on primary coolant pumps, thereby reducing the number of moving parts and potential failure points. Electromagnetic pumps were evaluated in earlier naval reactor concepts for silent operation but were not adopted in the S9G design, favoring conventional electric pumps where necessary.^[5]^[1]^[6] Maintenance features of the steam and propulsion components prioritize longevity and accessibility, with the steam generators designed for reduced overall maintenance needs due to their compact size, lighter weight, and corrosion-resistant materials. The modular aspects of the steam generator allow for potential in-situ inspections and repairs, supporting the reactor's 33-year operational lifespan without refueling. These elements contribute to lower life-cycle costs and minimized crew exposure to radiation during upkeep.^[1]

Specifications

Power Output

The S9G reactor, powering the Virginia-class submarines, has a rated thermal power output of approximately 210 megawatts thermal (MWt).^[2] This heat generation capacity supports the reactor's role in providing sustained energy for propulsion and auxiliary systems during extended submerged operations. The secondary steam plant driven by the S9G converts this thermal energy into mechanical power, delivering up to 40,000 shaft horsepower (shp), equivalent to about 30 megawatts (MW), to a single pump-jet propulsor.^[1] This output enables high-performance maneuvering essential for tactical submarine missions. The reactor achieves a thermal efficiency of around 30-35%, consistent with pressurized water reactors (PWRs) optimized for naval applications where compact design and rapid response prioritize over maximum thermodynamic conversion.^[26] This efficiency level balances power density with the need for reliable, high-speed submerged operation exceeding 25 knots.^[27] As a naval PWR, the S9G features inherent load-following capabilities, allowing it to adjust power output dynamically for tactical maneuvers—such as sudden accelerations or evasions—without compromising stability or requiring external adjustments.^[19]

Operational Lifespan

The S9G reactor is engineered for a core life of 33 years without refueling, synchronized with the expected hull life of Virginia-class submarines to eliminate mid-service refueling overhauls.^[1]^[18] This design relies on highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel at approximately 93% U-235 enrichment, enabling high energy density and sustained operation over the reactor's lifespan.^[2]^[28] The fuel composition, typically a uranium-zirconium alloy, supports this extended duration by providing a compact core with sufficient fissile material for prolonged neutron economy.^[19] Due to the high burnup achieved in the S9G core—often exceeding 100 GWd/t—the reactor produces minimal radioactive waste compared to commercial reactors with shorter fuel cycles.^[19]^[2] Fission products and actinides are largely contained within the spent fuel elements, which are designed for secure encapsulation and eventual disposal in a geological repository once available.^[28] Radiation levels from the core remain managed through inherent shielding and the reactor's modular construction, minimizing environmental release risks throughout its operational life.^[20] To ensure core integrity, the S9G undergoes periodic non-refueling inspections during submarine maintenance availabilities, including engineered decking and sea refit availabilities (EDSRA) and depot modernization periods (DMP).^[29] These overhauls involve non-destructive testing, such as ultrasonic and radiographic examinations of fuel assemblies and pressure vessels, to detect any material degradation without accessing the core internals.^[30] At the end of its service life, the S9G core is decommissioned through removal of the entire spent fuel assembly at specialized naval facilities, followed by processing and interim storage at the Naval Reactors Facility in Idaho.^[31] The reactor compartment is then segmented and disposed of under the Navy's Ship-Submarine Recycling Program, ensuring containment of residual radioactivity during transport and burial at approved sites like Hanford.^[32]^[33]

Deployment

Integration in Virginia-class

The S9G reactor is integrated as a single unit within the engineering compartment of each Virginia-class submarine, a 7,800-ton vessel designed for stealthy multi-mission operations.^[34] This placement ensures balanced weight distribution and efficient power delivery to propulsion and auxiliary systems throughout the hull.^[1] The reactor design remains uniform across Blocks I through IV of the Virginia-class, with no fundamental changes to the S9G core, though Block III submarines incorporate ancillary updates such as the Large Aperture Bow sonar array for enhanced sensor capabilities.^[34]^[27] Its compact configuration fits within the submarine's overall dimensions of 377 feet in length and a 34-foot beam, optimizing internal space for berthing, weapons storage, and operational equipment while supporting the platform's versatility in littoral and blue-water environments.^[34]^[5] The S9G supplies electrical power to key subsystems, including advanced sonar suites for underwater detection, vertical launch systems or payload tubes for cruise missiles, and mechanisms for deploying unmanned underwater vehicles during missions.^[5]^[11]^[35] Construction and integration of the S9G occur at General Dynamics Electric Boat in Groton, Connecticut, and Huntington Ingalls Industries' Newport News Shipbuilding division in Virginia, where modular assembly techniques allow for precise installation during hull fabrication.^[36]^[37]

Commissioning and Operations

The S9G reactor first entered service with the commissioning of USS Virginia (SSN-774) on October 23, 2004, marking the initial operational deployment of this advanced nuclear propulsion system in the U.S. Navy's fleet.^[1] Subsequent Virginia-class submarines, all equipped with the S9G, began commissioning in 2006 with USS Texas (SSN-775), enabling a steady integration into the submarine force.^[5] As of November 2025, 24 S9G-powered Virginia-class submarines were operational, forming the backbone of the Navy's attack submarine fleet, with all units in the class relying on this reactor for propulsion.^[34]^[38] The reactors have demonstrated proven reliability during rigorous naval exercises, supporting extended underwater missions without reported major incidents or failures.^[2] Mid-life enhancements for Virginia-class submarines, including those with the S9G reactor, involve comprehensive depot modernizations to extend service life, such as the ongoing refurbishment of USS New Hampshire (SSN-778) at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, which focuses on maintenance and upgrades to ensure full operational capability.^[39] These upgrades support evolving mission requirements, including compatibility with Block V configurations featuring the Virginia Payload Module for increased missile capacity. S9G-equipped submarines have conducted global deployments across the Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic regions, contributing to anti-submarine warfare, intelligence gathering, and deterrence operations amid strategic challenges from peer adversaries.^[40]^[41]

Innovations

Advancements Over Predecessors

The S9G reactor, succeeding the S6G design employed in earlier Los Angeles-class submarines, incorporates substantial enhancements in performance and efficiency. A primary advancement is its higher energy density compared to the S6G, enabling a more compact core volume that supports equivalent or greater power generation over the submarine's full service life without refueling.^[1]^[42] Specific technical details remain classified, with public information based on estimates. In terms of physical attributes, the S9G features a more compact design with reductions in size and weight for key components relative to the S6G, optimizing submarine stability, maneuverability, and available space for additional payloads or systems.^[1]^[42] This downsizing is facilitated by innovative component designs, such as advanced steam generators that minimize bulk while preserving functionality. Acoustic stealth is markedly improved through natural circulation cooling and reduced equipment bulk, resulting in lower operational noise signatures that surpass those of the S6G and enhance the Virginia-class submarines' detectability resistance.^[1]^[42] Economically, the S9G contributes to lifecycle cost reductions for the Virginia-class compared to previous designs, primarily from streamlined manufacturing with fewer components, extended core longevity, and decreased maintenance demands over the reactor's 33-year lifespan.^[1]^[42] Furthermore, material innovations include upgraded alloys engineered for superior resistance to stress corrosion cracking, which bolsters long-term reliability and reduces degradation risks under harsh operational conditions.^[1]^[42]

Safety and Efficiency Features

The S9G reactor incorporates passive safety systems that enable natural circulation cooling, allowing operation at a significant fraction of full power without mechanical pumps and facilitating decay heat removal during emergency conditions, enhancing reliability in submerged operations.^[1]^[13] This design leverages density differences in the coolant to facilitate passive flow, reducing the risk of pump failures and minimizing acoustic signatures, which supports both safety and stealth requirements.^[19] Redundancy in the S9G is achieved through multiple independent control systems and emergency shutdown mechanisms, including control rods that enable rapid SCRAM insertion to halt fission reactions.^[23] These features provide layered protection against operational anomalies, ensuring the reactor can maintain stability or shut down safely even if primary controls are compromised, in line with naval nuclear propulsion standards.^[20] Radiation shielding in the S9G is optimized for the compact submarine environment, utilizing materials such as lead and water to attenuate gamma and neutron radiation, thereby limiting crew exposure to acceptable levels during prolonged missions.^[19] This integrated shielding complex minimizes spatial demands while effectively containing emissions, contributing to the overall habitability of the Virginia-class vessel. Efficiency enhancements in the S9G include advanced thermal insulation to reduce heat losses and integrated leak detection systems that enable early identification of potential breaches, thereby minimizing operational downtime and maintenance needs over the reactor's 33-year lifespan.^[1] These measures, combined with the reactor's high energy density core, support sustained performance without refueling.^[13] The S9G design ensures environmental compliance through low radiological emissions during operation and specialized protocols for secure fuel handling, including certified shipping containers that maintain containment integrity.^[43]^[20] This approach aligns with regulatory standards for naval nuclear systems, preventing unintended releases and facilitating safe core management throughout the lifecycle.

References

[1]
S9G Next Generation Reactor / High Energy Density Core
Jul 2, 2016 · The S9G reactor has increased energy density, natural circulation cooling, and a 33-year service life without refueling, and is rated at 210 ...
[2]
Nuclear-Powered Ships
Feb 4, 2025 · The smaller US Virginia-class SSN submarine first commissioned in 2004 has has a S9G reactor of about 210 MWt driving a 30 MW pump-jet ...
[3]
NSSN Virginia-Class Attack Submarine - Naval Technology
Aug 7, 2020 · The main propulsion units are the GE pressure water reactor S9G designed to last as long the submarine, two turbine engines with one shaft ...Missing: contractors | Show results with:contractors
[4]
Naval Nuclear Propulsion Overview
U.S. naval nuclear propulsion plants use a pressurized-water reactor design that has two basic systems: the primary system and the secondary system.Missing: S9G | Show results with:S9G
[5]
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL)
Our History. Established in 1946 in Niskayuna, NY, under contract between the General Electric Company and the Manhattan Engineering District, Knolls' ...
[6]
https://www.navsup.navy.mil/Viper-Home/NNPO/
[7]
BAE Systems awarded $92 million U.S. Navy contract for Virginia ...
Oct 3, 2024 · BAE Systems has been awarded a $92 million US Navy contract to continue building propulsors for the Virginia-class submarine program.
[8]
U.S. Navy Virginia-Class vs. Astute-Class: Which Submarine Is the ...
Oct 23, 2025 · While both submarines offer exceptional sensor capabilities, the Virginia-class benefits from greater modularity and long-term adaptability.
[9]
Virginia-class SSN-774 - Attack submarines. - Army Recognition
The Virginia class is powered by an S9G nuclear reactor, which generates electricity for propulsion and onboard systems. The reactor drives a pump-jet ...Virginia-Class Ssn-774 · List Of Current... · Technical Data<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
It's What's Inside That Counts | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
The first major US weapon system designed for the post-Cold War era, the NSSN features revolutionary design processes and characteristics.
[11]
[PDF] 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 - 2015
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) is one of two government-owned, ... General Electric Marine Reactor. 630A Nuclear Steam Generator. In 1961 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
The U. S. Navy: New Approach to Submarines | Proceedings
Development of the New Attack Submarine (NSSN) is moving rapidly, promising to provide the U.S. Navy with a highly versatile undersea craft.
[13]
NEW ATTACK SUBMARINE: OPTIONS FOR THE FUTURE
The DAB reviewed the NAS in 1992 and granted approval for the program to proceed with Milestone 0, permitting the Navy to begin exploring conceptual design ...Missing: initiation | Show results with:initiation
[14]
[PDF] ARCHIVED REPORT - Forecast International
Aug 3, 2000 · S9G. New reactor developed by General Electric to power the new Virginia class SSN-774 (a.k.a. NSSN). This single pressurized-water reactor ...
[15]
The NSSN: A 21st Century Design | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
The objective of the New Attack Submarine Program is to produce a multi-mission, easy-to-upgrade submarine with the acoustic performance of the Seawolf (SSN-21) ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
[16]
Evolution of Naval Reactor Design - Stanford University
Mar 7, 2016 · For example, the designator for the S9G reactor found on the Navy's current Virginia-class fast attack submarines contains an S for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Nuclear Naval Propulsion - IntechOpen
The S9G is a PWR built by General Electric with increased energy density, and new plant components, including a new steam generator design featuring improved ...Missing: contractors | Show results with:contractors
[18]
[PDF] Naval Reactors - GlobalSecurity.org
Naval Reactors is responsible for all naval nuclear propulsion work, beginning with technology development, and continuing through reactor operation and, ...
[19]
S9G Next Generation Reactor
Feb 27, 1999 · The new reactor which will have increased energy density, and new plant components, such as the new concept steam generator, with improved ...Missing: innovations modularity
[20]
[PDF] Signature redacted - DSpace@MIT
... reactor in the Virginia Class submarine, the S9G. This design has advanced steam generators and improved corrosion resistance, thereby reducing the ...
[21]
[PDF] Replacing Highly Enriched Uranium in Naval Reactors
It includes a technical assessment of less risky low-enriched uranium (LEU) alternatives and recommendations to enable conversion to such alternate technologies ...
[22]
[PDF] Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018
Service life is 33 years, as defined in Virginia-class Submarine Operational.
[23]
Pressurized Water Reactor - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The efficiency is around 33%. The PWR is the most popular reactor in use globally, with over 250 in operation. The most important commercial PWR was developed ...
[24]
Virginia Class SSN | Submarine Industrial Base Council
The Virginia Class is a nuclear-powered fast attack submarine, 377 feet long, 33 feet wide, displacing 7,800 tons, with a 25+ knot speed, and a crew of 132. It ...Missing: S9G compatibility
[25]
[PDF] Ending the Production of Highly Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactors
During the 1980s, the U.S. Navy ordered four to five metric tons of U-235 in HEU per year.27 However, the size of the US nuclear submarine fleet has declined ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[26]
The Capacity of the Navy's Shipyards to Maintain Its Submarines
Mar 25, 2021 · The next large maintenance event for the Virginia class, a depot maintenance period, is more extensive than an EDSRA. CBO projects those ...
[27]
[PDF] JOINT FLEET MAINTENANCE MANUAL (JFMM ...
Nov 7, 2023 · (ai) VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE PROGRAM ERH832-1699 - Weapons Stowage and Handling Equipment Test Loads/Methods and Inspection Procedures. 13.1 ...
[28]
As spent nuclear fuel sits at plants across Midwest, the U.S. Navy ...
Oct 17, 2022 · Since 1957, the U.S. Navy has completed almost 1,000 shipments from various ports to the Idaho National Laboratory, via routes that run through ...
[29]
Spent naval nuclear reactor compartments: Part of Hanford's ...
Jul 20, 2023 · The Ship-Submarine Recycling Program (SRP) is the process that the United States Navy uses to dispose of decommissioned nuclear vessels. SRP ...
[30]
[PDF] final environmental assessment on the disposal of decommissioned ...
The Navy is decommissioning ENTERPRISE and must dispose of the reactor compartments, after the vessel is defueled and decommissioned.<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Attack Submarines - SSN > United States Navy > Display-FactFiles
Jul 1, 2025 · The new bow also replaces the 12 individual Vertical Launch System (VLS) tubes with two large diameter 87-inch Virginia Payload Tubes (VPTs), ...Missing: S9G compatibility
[32]
First Forward-Deployed UUV Mission via Torpedo Tube - 19FortyFive
Jun 1, 2025 · USS Delaware, a Virginia-class submarine, achieves a naval first by launching and recovering a Yellow Moray UUV via torpedo tube in EUCOM.<|separator|>
[33]
Navy Awards Contract Modification for Two Additional Virginia-Class ...
Apr 30, 2025 · Naval Sea Systems Command has awarded a two-ship contract modification on the existing Virginia-class submarine Block V contract to General Dynamics Electric ...
[34]
Virginia Class - General Dynamics Electric Boat
VPM incorporates four additional large-diameter payload tubes in a new hull section located amidships, enabling the submarine ... Length: 377 feet; Hull ...<|separator|>
[35]
Virginia-class submarine USS New Hampshire enters depot ...
Sep 7, 2025 · The midlife availability will cover extensive maintenance and refurbishment to support the vessel's full service life. Work on the submarine ...Missing: enhancements upgrades
[36]
Virginia-class attack submarine is the new 'backbone' of Navy's ...
Oct 10, 2025 · The Virginia-class is now operating in the south and central Indo-Pacific region, where China is the major “peer adversary.” A Russian sub ...Missing: operational | Show results with:operational
[37]
Nuclear Submarines in the Arctic: Limiting Strategic Anti-Submarine ...
Dec 4, 2018 · Included in the total inventory of attack subs are 12 newer versions, the Virginia-Class, of which more are being built. They also engage in ...
[38]
None
Summary of each segment:
[39]
[PDF] S-6213 Shipping Container-Safety Analysis Report For Packaging ...
Jun 11, 2024 · The S9G power unit in the S-6213 PUSC SARP with its Addendum evaluates the VIRGINIA Forward Fit. (VAFF) core as authorized contents in the S- ...Missing: features | Show results with:features