Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Naval Reactors

The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, commonly known as Naval Reactors, is a joint federal organization of the and the Department of the Navy that is solely responsible for researching, designing, constructing, operating, maintaining, and regulating the plants powering the U.S. Navy's and carriers. Established as a government-owned, contractor-operated entity, it employs approximately 8,000 personnel across specialized laboratories and facilities dedicated exclusively to naval , ensuring the safe and reliable operation of these systems without any environmental or radiological incidents in over 75 years. The program's origins trace back to 1946, shortly after , when it was authorized under the Atomic Energy Act to develop for naval applications, with assuming leadership in 1948 to spearhead submarine propulsion efforts. A pivotal milestone came in 1955 with the commissioning of the , the world's first nuclear-powered , which demonstrated the technology's viability by signaling "Underway on " during its initial sea trial on January 17, 1955. Subsequent achievements included the Nautilus's historic under-ice transpolar voyage in 1958 and the development of the in 1957, which served as a prototype for commercial while advancing naval reactor technology. Over its history, Naval Reactors has engineered 33 distinct reactor plant designs, operated 273 reactor plants, brought 562 reactor cores critical, and accumulated more than 7,600 reactor-years of operation, safely propelling naval vessels for over 177 million miles as of 2025. Today, the program sustains a fleet of 77 nuclear-powered ships, comprising 11 aircraft carriers and 66 (including 48 attack submarines, 14 ballistic missile submarines, and 4 guided-missile submarines), powered by 97 pressurized-water reactors that enable extended underwater endurance and high-speed operations without refueling for up to 30 years. Its safety record remains unmatched, with zero reactor accidents, no discernible environmental effects from operations, and average personnel radiation exposures maintained below natural background levels through rigorous protocols and advanced engineering. Key facilities include the in , for core design and development; the in , for advanced engineering; the Kesselring Site near , for prototype testing and training; and the at the for examining . Construction and maintenance occur at six shipyards, including and , supporting a of about 50,000. Looking ahead, Naval Reactors continues to innovate for future naval superiority, leading the design of the Columbia-class submarines to replace the Ohio-class fleet starting in 2031 and collaborating on the partnership to provide nuclear-powered to by the 2040s, all while upholding its commitment to technological excellence and operational safety.

History

Establishment

The origins of Naval Reactors trace back to the immediate post-World War II period, when the sought to extend the technological advancements of the to naval applications. In 1946, Congress passed the Atomic Energy Act, which established the (AEC) to succeed the and oversee all nuclear research and development, including potential military uses beyond weapons. That same year, the , recognizing the strategic advantages of for —such as unlimited submerged endurance without reliance on air-breathing engines—initiated studies on reactor technology. Captain , then a naval officer, was assigned to to evaluate nuclear power plants, drawing on extensions to explore propulsion feasibility. These efforts culminated in the formal establishment of the program in 1948 under oversight. On August 4, 1948, the created the Nuclear Power Branch (Code 390) within the to coordinate development, marking the program's official inception as a joint - initiative. In February 1949, Rickover was appointed as the branch's head, bringing his technical expertise and relentless advocacy for submarines to drive the program forward. His leadership emphasized rigorous standards and close collaboration with laboratories, such as those at Argonne and Oak Ridge, to adapt civilian reactor concepts for maritime use. The legal foundations of Naval Reactors were initially rooted in the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, which granted the authority over nuclear matters while allowing Navy contracts for propulsion research. This framework was later strengthened through 12344, issued by President on February 1, 1982, which delineated the program's responsibilities for reactor safety, , and under dual Navy and (later Department of Energy) control. These provisions were codified and preserved by 98-525 in 1984 and 106-65 in 1999, ensuring the program's enduring structure and independence. Early challenges in establishing Naval Reactors were formidable, particularly in securing funding and expertise amid post-WWII and tight budgets. The faced internal skepticism about nuclear propulsion's practicality, compounded by limited access to classified data and a scarcity of fissionable materials, which prioritized atomic weapons over naval experiments. Rickover overcame these hurdles by personally recruiting top engineers through intensive interviews, forging partnerships for resources, and lobbying for support, despite bureaucratic resistance and the need to pioneer entirely new materials, components, and fabrication techniques for shipboard reactors.

Key Milestones

The Naval Reactors program achieved its first major milestone with the development of the S1W prototype reactor, which reached criticality in March 1953 at the in , paving the way for the world's first nuclear-powered . This breakthrough enabled the construction of the , which was launched on January 21, 1954, in , demonstrating the feasibility of for submerged operations without reliance on air-breathing engines. Under the leadership of Admiral , whose tenure shaped the program's early rigor, the Nautilus commissioned on September 30, 1954, and signaled "underway on nuclear power" on January 17, 1955, marking the dawn of nuclear naval warfare. Building on this success, the program advanced surface ship propulsion with the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), the first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, launched on September 24, 1960, and commissioned on November 25, 1961. Powered by eight A2W reactors developed by Naval Reactors, the Enterprise revolutionized carrier operations by enabling unlimited range and high-speed endurance, supporting sustained deployments without frequent refueling. This innovation extended to strategic deterrence through the Polaris program in the 1960s, where Naval Reactors provided S3G and S4G reactors for the George Washington-class submarines, enabling the first submerged launch of a Polaris A-1 missile on July 20, 1960, from USS George Washington (SSBN-598). The inaugural Polaris patrol commenced in November 1960, lasting 66 days and establishing continuous sea-based nuclear deterrence with subsequent SLBM evolutions like Poseidon in the late 1960s. By the , Naval Reactors facilitated the transition of key fleet components to all-nuclear propulsion, including the full conversion of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet's force to by 1975, enhancing operational flexibility during the . Over its history as of 2025, Naval Reactors has operated 273 reactor plants, achieved criticality in 562 cores encompassing 33 distinct designs, and accumulated more than 177 million steaming miles with exemplary safety, underscoring the enduring impact of these Cold War-era advancements.

Post-Cold War Evolution

Following the end of the in the early 1990s, the U.S. Navy underwent significant fleet reductions, with the nuclear-powered submarine force shrinking from 139 vessels in 1990 to 73 by 2000, driven by decreased strategic threats and budget constraints. Despite these downsizing efforts, the Naval Reactors program maintained robust activities to support emerging platforms, particularly the Virginia-class attack submarines, whose began in 1998 as a cost-effective successor to the truncated Seawolf-class program, with the lead boat commissioned in 2004. This sustained investment ensured the program's technical expertise remained intact amid broader naval contractions. In 2000, the Naval Reactors program was integrated into the newly established (NNSA) within the Department of Energy, a semiautonomous entity that consolidated nuclear weapons management, nonproliferation efforts, and naval propulsion activities under a unified framework. This alignment strengthened ties to nonproliferation initiatives, allowing Naval Reactors to leverage NNSA's resources for secure fuel cycle management and international safeguards collaboration while preserving its joint Department of Energy-Department of Defense operational model. The integration facilitated enhanced oversight and efficiency in handling highly production for naval use, aligning propulsion technology with broader national security goals. The program's enduring impact was highlighted during its 75th anniversary in , marking 75 years since its 1948 establishment and noting the operation of 273 reactor plants across the fleet, with 562 cores taken critical across 33 distinct designs. By the early , Naval Reactors had shifted strategic focus toward expansion in support of carrier strike groups, powering - and Ford-class aircraft carriers that enable global through integrated naval operations, and the recapitalization of the SSBN fleet via the Columbia-class submarines, for which it completed design of a novel plant to replace aging Ohio-class systems. As of 2025, construction of the Columbia-class continues, with the of the lead boat, (SSBN-826), laid in June 2024, on track for delivery in 2031. These efforts underscored the program's adaptation from Cold War-era expansion to a more focused, high-reliability mission in a multipolar security environment.

Organization and Management

Leadership Structure

The leadership of Naval Reactors, formally the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, is headed by the , a position held by a four-star appointed for a fixed eight-year term—the longest standard assignment in the U.S. military. This director concurrently serves as the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors within the (NNSA) of the Department of Energy, providing unified oversight across both naval and energy domains. The director reports directly to both the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the , ensuring integrated decision-making between the Department of Energy and the Department of the without intermediary layers. The program's headquarters, located at the , maintains a compact staff of approximately 500 federal and military personnel who provide centralized technical and policy direction. Subordinate to the director are specialized divisions focused on reactor design and development, operational oversight of nuclear-powered vessels, and management of facilities such as prototype plants and laboratories; these are supported by field offices embedded with the fleet and at contractor sites to ensure real-time compliance and performance monitoring. The following table lists all directors since the program's inception, with their terms of service:
DirectorTerm of Service
Adm. 1949–1982
Adm. Kinnaird R. McKee1982–1988
Adm. Bruce DeMars1988–1996
Adm. Frank L. "Skip" Bowman1996–2004
Adm. Kirkland H. Donald2004–2012
Adm. John M. Richardson2012–2015
Adm. James F. Caldwell Jr.2015–2024
Adm. William J. Houston2024–present

Management Principles

The Naval Reactors program operates under a philosophy rooted in the principles established by Hyman G. Rickover, emphasizing conservatism in design and operation, strong central technical control, and verbatim compliance with established procedures to ensure unwavering safety and reliability. This approach fosters an ethos of excellence in all endeavors, with a zero-defect tolerance achieved through rigorous oversight, including frequent audits by trained personnel and independent reviews by bodies such as the and the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Technical decisions are invariably based on engineering facts rather than cost or schedule pressures, prioritizing long-term performance and personnel safety over short-term efficiencies. A of this is the integrated contractor- model, where responsibilities for , , testing, , , and of naval plants are unified under a single authority as mandated by 50 U.S.C. § 2406 and § 2511, and Presidential 12344. Since the late 1950s, Bechtel Plant Machinery, Inc. (BPMI) has served as the prime contractor, collaborating closely with Naval Reactors to handle design, procurement, quality control, and delivery of major nuclear components, while maintaining centralized oversight by a small staff to integrate efforts across and sectors. This model avoids compartmentalization, ensuring seamless accountability from a dedicated who holds authority over Department of Energy and Department of the elements. Cost-control mechanisms are embedded in the program's operational framework, including fixed-price incentive contracts for reactor core production to incentivize efficiency without compromising quality, as evidenced by historical awards for cores that balanced pricing with performance incentives. Additionally, reactors are designed as life-of-the-ship plants, such as those lasting the full 33-year service life of Virginia-class submarines, which minimizes refueling needs and associated lifecycle expenses through upfront for rather than frequent interventions. These strategies support affordable fleet powering while upholding the program's safety imperatives. Naval Reactors maintains independence from standard Navy acquisition processes through its unique joint governance by the Department of Energy and Department of the Navy, with direct reporting lines that enable rapid decision-making and bypass typical bureaucratic layers to accelerate technical advancements. This structure, overseen by field representatives reporting directly to the program director, facilitates focused oversight of nuclear-specific requirements without interference from broader naval procurement timelines.

Personnel Practices

The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) employs nearly 8,000 engineers, scientists, technicians, and support personnel across military and civilian roles to support the design, operation, and maintenance of nuclear-powered naval vessels. This workforce is divided between active-duty personnel, who handle operational duties, and civilians primarily at the Naval Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) sites such as and , as well as the prime contractor Plant Machinery, Inc. (BPMI), which manages approximately 1,200 employees focused on procurement, quality assurance, and component delivery. Hiring practices emphasize selectivity to ensure high technical competence and reliability, targeting nuclear-trained officers for military roles and civilian engineers with advanced degrees in relevant fields such as or . All personnel must be U.S. citizens eligible for security clearances, with civilians requiring a Department of Energy () "Q" clearance due to the sensitive nature of technology, while initially obtain at least clearance prior to advanced training. prioritizes candidates from top academic programs and those with prior nuclear experience, often through commissioning programs like the Nuclear Propulsion Officer Candidate (NUPOC) for officers. The training pipeline for NNPP personnel is rigorous and standardized, beginning with the Naval Nuclear Power School (NPS) in , where both enlisted sailors and officers receive six months of intensive instruction in nuclear theory, reactor physics, and engineering principles equivalent to a master's-level . Following NPS, trainees advance to prototype reactor training at facilities such as the (KAPL) in , or in , where they spend an additional six months operating full-scale land-based prototypes under simulated shipboard conditions to qualify for duty. This hands-on phase emphasizes practical skills in reactor startup, control, and emergency response, ensuring personnel can maintain the program's exemplary safety record. Career progression within the NNPP prioritizes technical expertise and operational experience over rapid promotion, with military officers typically rotating between sea duty on nuclear submarines or aircraft carriers—where they serve as engineering officers—and shore assignments at Naval Reactors headquarters or NNL facilities for design and oversight roles. These rotations, often lasting 2-3 years each, allow personnel to apply prototype training in real-world scenarios while contributing to improvements, fostering a merit-based advancement where proficiency in nuclear systems directly influences leadership opportunities. Civilians under BPMI and NNL follow parallel paths, advancing through specialized roles in , testing, and , with opportunities for cross-training between sites to build comprehensive expertise. To sustain high standards and address workforce challenges, the NNPP implements retention programs focused on competitive compensation, , and work-life balance, including incentives for top talent and initiatives to attract diverse candidates from underrepresented groups in fields. These efforts align with broader inclusion and diversity policies, emphasizing merit-based selection while promoting and to retain skilled personnel amid demanding roles.

Program Operations

Design and Development

The design and development of naval nuclear reactors under the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) encompasses a rigorous lifecycle from initial concept through prototyping, testing, and integration into vessels, ensuring military effectiveness, safety, and reliability. This process begins with and at facilities like the Bettis Laboratory in and Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in , where engineers evaluate advanced technologies and simulate operational conditions. Prototypes are then constructed and tested at land-based sites, including the Naval Reactors Facility at (INL) for spent fuel examination and core performance validation, and the Kesselring Site in for operational testing under realistic power demands. Following successful land-based validation, the designs are refined for shipboard integration by naval shipyards, with final commissioning occurring after extensive crew training and system checks. Central to this development is the use of pressurized water reactors (PWRs), which have been the standard design since the program's inception due to their proven reliability and adaptability to naval constraints. These reactors are optimized for and surface ships by emphasizing , high , and reduced acoustic signatures to enhance —achieved through low flow rates and pump power that minimize noise while delivering sustained propulsion. For instance, highly (HEU) fuel enables small core volumes that fit within tight hulls, providing endurance for missions lasting years without refueling and supporting high-speed maneuvers essential for tactical operations. The , developed for the Virginia-class attack , exemplifies these adaptations, featuring a life-of-the-ship core designed to operate for approximately 33 years, which simplifies logistics and boosts submerged by eliminating refueling needs. Collaboration with industrial contractors is integral to the process, with Plant Machinery, Inc. (BPMI) managing design efforts at Bettis Laboratory and Fluor Marine Propulsion operating the Knolls Laboratory to develop components and systems. Historically, and contributed significantly to early prototypes; for instance, developed the S1W land-based PWR plant that informed the design, laying the foundation for subsequent iterations. These partnerships ensure that prototypes undergo iterative testing for efficiency and safety before vessel integration. Recent developments highlight a focus on modularity to improve scalability and maintenance. The A1B reactor for the Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers incorporates modular components that enhance power output for electromagnetic aircraft launch systems while allowing easier upgrades and repairs, reducing lifecycle costs and increasing operational availability. This approach builds on lessons from prior designs, prioritizing affordability and technological advancement within the NNPP's oversight.

Facilities and Infrastructure

The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, managed by Naval Reactors, maintains its headquarters at the in Washington, D.C., where it oversees the overall direction, policy, and technical leadership for the development and operation of naval nuclear propulsion systems. This central office coordinates joint efforts between the Department of Energy and the Department of the Navy, ensuring integrated management of research, design, and fleet support activities. Key research and development facilities include the in , which focuses on the engineering, design, and procurement of naval reactor plants, having led the initial development for the and continuing to support carriers like the and classes. Complementing this is the in , dedicated to reactor plant design, particularly for submarines, including contributions to the Seawolf, , and classes through innovations in pressurized water reactors. Additionally, the Kenneth A. Kesselring Site in West Milton, New York, operates land-based nuclear propulsion prototypes, such as the S8G plant, to provide hands-on training for Navy personnel on reactor operations. The program relies on six nuclear-capable shipyards for the construction, refueling, overhaul, and inactivation of nuclear-powered vessels, including four public facilities— in , in , in , and in —and two private yards, in and in , for carrier refueling, submarine construction, and complex overhauls. These sites handle intricate tasks like reactor refueling, which involves cutting into the hull to replace spent cores while maintaining radiological safety. Spent nuclear fuel from naval reactors is managed at the (NRF) within the in , where the Expended Core Facility examines, packages, and stores irradiated fuel assemblies to verify performance data and support future designs. This facility processes fuel from decommissioned vessels, ensuring long-term dry storage and environmental compliance. At-sea maintenance is facilitated by two dedicated submarine tenders, the (AS-39) and (AS-40), which provide forward-deployed repair services for nuclear-powered submarines, including component repairs and support outside major periods.

Operations and Maintenance

The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program supports a fleet of over 77 nuclear-powered vessels, including 11 aircraft carriers and 66 , powered by 97 active reactors as of 2025. This infrastructure enables global naval operations, with maintenance and refueling conducted at six specialized —two private and four public—that handle overhauls, repairs, and inactivation to ensure operational readiness. Day-to-day reactor management at sea involves continuous of radiological conditions and parameters to maintain safe and efficient operation. Crews employ real-time systems to track levels, ensuring exposures remain below natural , with no personnel exceeding limits in the program's . metrics, including output and integrity, are routinely assessed through onboard , allowing operators to adjust systems proactively during missions that span months without surfacing. Refueling cycles vary by vessel class, typically occurring every 10 to 33 years to align with the designed core life, minimizing downtime and lifecycle costs. For instance, Virginia-class submarines operate without refueling for their full 33-year , while Nimitz-class carriers undergo a single midlife refueling around the 25-year mark after an initial operational period of over 20 years. These refuelings coincide with major overhauls lasting 20 to 25 years into a vessel's life, performed at shipyards where the reactor core is replaced, systems are upgraded, and structural integrity is verified to extend up to 50 years for carriers. Decommissioning follows a structured process to safely dispose of reactor plants at the end of vessel service, with over 135 warships recycled and 144 reactor compartments securely packaged for burial at the . The procedure begins with defueling the , followed by removal of the compartment, decontamination of surrounding areas, and to confirm no adverse impacts, achieving a flawless record with no major incidents across more than 75 years and 7,600 reactor-years of operation.

Reactor Technology

Core Designs

The Naval Reactors program began with the S2Wa pressurized water reactor (PWR), a Westinghouse design that powered the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), the world's first nuclear-powered submarine, commissioned in 1954 and achieving initial criticality on December 30, 1954. This early core marked a pivotal shift from experimental sodium-cooled concepts, such as the short-lived S2G on the USS Seawolf, to reliable PWR technology optimized for submerged endurance and compactness. Over subsequent decades, core designs evolved through iterative generations, incorporating advancements in fuel efficiency, thermal management, and materials to meet escalating demands for stealth, power density, and longevity in submarine and surface ship applications. By the late 20th century, designs progressed to the S8G for Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines, emphasizing natural circulation for reduced acoustic signatures, and culminated in the S9G for Virginia-class attack submarines, a compact, high-efficiency core introduced in the 2000s that supports quiet operation via natural convection and enhanced corrosion-resistant alloys. Core designs across the program uniformly employ highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel, typically enriched to approximately 93% , in PWR configurations that prioritize safety, reliability, and operational simplicity without reliance on fuel reprocessing. These reactors generate via pressurized light water moderation and cooling, driving turbines for and , with initial designs like the S2Wa producing around 70 MW power. A hallmark is the extension of lifetimes to exceed 30 years without refueling in advanced classes, achieved through optimized and robust cladding materials such as , eliminating mid-life overhauls for submarines like the Virginia-class (33-year life) and enabling . This approach contrasts with earlier cores requiring refueling every 1-2 years, reflecting conservative that balances high with proliferation-resistant fuel management. Representative variants illustrate the program's adaptability to vessel-specific needs, with seven primary submarine designs in the S-series—such as S2W for early attack s, S5W for Polaris-class boats, S6W for Los Angeles-class, and S8G/S9G for modern strategic and attack roles—tailored for stealth and endurance. For surface ships, five key designs power cruisers and carriers, including the D2G (, ~148 MW thermal per unit) for nuclear cruisers like the USS Bainbridge (commissioned 1962), where two reactors provided 60,000 shaft horsepower, and the A4W (, ~550 MW thermal per unit) for Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, where two reactors deliver 260,000 shaft horsepower with a single mid-life refueling after ~25 years to support 50-year service lives. These variants maintain modular architectures for and testing, ensuring compatibility with diverse forms while adhering to standardized PWR principles. Early explorations of alternative coolants, such as lead-bismuth eutectic for fast-spectrum reactors, were considered in the for potential compactness and higher operating temperatures but ultimately abandoned due to challenges and operational complexities, leading to the of PWR as the program's enduring architecture. This decision facilitated scalable designs with proven safety margins, influencing all subsequent innovations in core geometry and neutronics for enhanced efficiency without deviating from water-based systems.

Fuel Cycle Management

The Naval Reactors program sources its highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel from U.S. government stockpiles of excess material originally produced for nuclear weapons, ensuring a secure domestic supply without reliance on commercial enrichment facilities. This HEU is processed at the in , where it undergoes purification, conversion into forms suitable for fuel fabrication, and accountability measures to support naval needs. Y-12 has provided this processed HEU for over 60 years, fabricating it into elements for reactor cores used in and aircraft carriers. Fuel core fabrication occurs primarily at the Bettis and Knolls Atomic Power Laboratories, government-owned facilities operated by contractors under the Department of Energy, where the processed HEU is assembled into compact, high-performance reactor cores optimized for long-life naval applications. These laboratories handle the design, prototyping, and production of assemblies, integrating and geometries to meet stringent performance requirements. Historically, the has produced over 500 reactor cores across more than 30 distinct designs since 1948, enabling the operation of nuclear-powered naval vessels. At the end of their service life, spent naval reactor fuel is transported to the at for indefinite dry storage in secure casks and vaults, adhering to U.S. policy that prohibits reprocessing to minimize risks associated with plutonium separation. This approach avoids the creation of additional weapons-usable materials, with all spent managed under strict safeguards without chemical treatment or . To enhance long-term storage capabilities, the Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization Project (SFHP) is underway at the Idaho site, upgrading facilities for safer handling, examination, and containment of spent assemblies through modern infrastructure. The enrichment levels of naval reactor fuel, typically exceeding 93% U-235, remain classified to protect sensitive design information and deter nuclear proliferation by limiting insights into high-assay HEU production techniques. This secrecy aligns with broader nonproliferation objectives, as HEU's direct usability in weapons underscores the program's emphasis on secure supply chains and restricted access.

Safety and Performance

Safety Protocols

Naval Reactors operates under a unique dual oversight structure, combining internal program standards with regulations from the and the U.S. Navy. This framework, established by and codified in statutes such as 42 U.S.C. § 7158, ensures independence from routine licensing while adhering to DOE safety orders like 10 CFR Part 830 for nuclear safety management. Designs and operations align with criteria in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, for general design requirements, including protection against reactivity excursions and engineered safety features, and incorporate elements of 10 CFR Part 70 for the domestic licensing of handling. Personnel safety protocols emphasize rigorous and conservative radiological exposure controls. All radiological workers complete initial training courses lasting 16 to 32 hours, covering limits, control, and practical demonstrations, followed by biennial requalification that includes oral examinations and drills simulating mock scenarios such as events or failures. Shift supervisors undergo additional specialized instruction, including a six-month program at the Navy's and over three years of reactor-specific qualifications. To minimize exposure, Naval Reactors enforces administrative limits of 2 per year—stricter than the federal occupational standard of 5 per year under 10 CFR Part 20—with actual averages below 0.1 annually since the and 0.004 per person in , ensuring levels well under civilian nuclear industry norms. Reactor designs incorporate multiple redundancies to prevent radiological releases, featuring layered barriers such as robust cladding, primary systems, and secondary structures that exceed commercial standards. Safety systems include automatic shutdown mechanisms, or "scrams," triggered by sensors detecting anomalies like power fluctuations, ensuring prompt reactor trip without operator intervention. These features have maintained an impeccable record, with no melts or significant degradation occurring throughout the program's . Environmental safety is upheld through stringent controls and continuous monitoring at facilities like the in . Effluents from liquid discharges, such as or , undergo real-time radiological and chemical analysis, with no programmatic radioactive releases detected in recent years including 2023 and all non-radiological parameters compliant with the Clean Water Act and state standards. is surveyed via extensive well networks (e.g., over 50 wells), air emissions are tracked with fixed monitors, and annual reports confirm public doses remain negligible compared to natural , demonstrating effective prevention of environmental impact.

Operational Record

The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP), managed by Naval Reactors, has maintained an exemplary safety record over more than 75 years of operation, with zero reactor accidents and no significant releases that have impacted or the . Since the first criticality in , the program has accumulated over 7,600 reactor-years of safe operation across 273 reactor plants, including 33 distinct designs, demonstrating exceptional reliability in demanding conditions. Occupational exposures remain minimal, consistently lower than those in the commercial industry, with annual reports confirming doses well below regulatory limits. Independent audits have highlighted operational challenges, particularly in infrastructure projects, while affirming the absence of safety lapses. The U.S. (GAO) 2024 report on the Spent Fuel Handling Project (SFHP) detailed significant cost overruns of $1.31 billion—from an initial $1.69 billion estimate in 2018 to $3 billion in 2022—and schedule delays pushing completion from fiscal year 2025 to 2028, attributed to issues, disruptions, subcontractor performance problems, and construction quality defects. However, these issues did not compromise protocols or reactor operations, as Naval Reactors officials confirmed the facility's ongoing safety integrity, with problems leading only to temporary work stoppages and rework without radiological incidents. Key performance metrics underscore the program's reliability, including over 177 million miles safely steamed by nuclear-powered vessels as of 2025, supporting a fleet of 97 operating reactors that power more than 40% of the U.S. Navy's major combatants. This high operational availability has enabled strategic dominance without interruption from failures. Additionally, Naval Reactors contributes to nonproliferation efforts through secure management practices, including the 1992 cessation of enrichment for naval use and a 2005 commitment to downblend excess highly stocks, reducing proliferation risks associated with naval cycles. Early challenges in the program's history, such as minor environmental and safety issues at facilities during the and , were addressed through corrective actions without resulting in harm to personnel or the public. For instance, historical incident reports from over 1,700 events since inception identified no fuel degradation or major releases, with all resolved via enhanced design and monitoring standards that now exceed commercial requirements. These experiences informed ongoing maintenance practices, ensuring sustained performance across the nuclear fleet.

Contemporary Developments

Leadership Transitions

On January 10, 2024, Admiral William J. Houston relieved Admiral James F. Caldwell Jr. as Director of Naval Reactors in a ceremony at the , concluding Caldwell's approximately 8.5-year tenure that began on August 14, 2015. Houston, a 1990 graduate of the University of Notre Dame and a career submariner, previously served as Commander of the U.S. Naval Submarine Forces, Submarine Force Atlantic, and Allied Submarine Command from 2021 to 2023, where he emphasized enhancing fleet readiness and operational capabilities for submarine forces. This leadership transition ensures continuity in key programs, including the development of propulsion systems for the , despite ongoing budgetary constraints that have delayed aspects of the program and increased costs beyond initial projections. Historically, Naval Reactors directors have all been officers, a rooted in the program's origins with , who served the longest term as from 1946 to 1982—over 35 years—establishing the foundational standards for safety and reliability.

Ongoing Projects

Naval Reactors is leading the research, development, and design efforts for a new reactor plant to power the Columbia-class submarines (SSBNs), which will consist of 12 boats to replace the aging Ohio-class fleet. This initiative includes the fabrication of life-of-ship reactor cores and comprehensive safety analyses, with construction of cores for the second and third ships already underway in serial production. As of October 2025, the lead ship's reactor is on track for delivery to support the first Columbia-class submarine's commissioning in 2031, with the lead boat approximately 60% complete and major modules ready for assembly. A key infrastructure project under Naval Reactors' purview is the Spent Fuel Handling Project (SFHP) at the Idaho National Laboratory, aimed at upgrading facilities to process and store spent nuclear fuel from naval reactors. Initiated in 2018 with an original completion target in fiscal year 2024 and a budget of $1.69 billion, the project has faced significant setbacks, including multiple revisions that have delayed operational start to fiscal year 2028 and escalated costs to approximately $3 billion—an increase exceeding $2 billion. As of mid-2024, construction continues, but the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the lack of independent cost estimates and root cause analyses, highlighting risks to long-term fuel management as unprocessed spent fuel accumulates. As of November 2024, crews continued upgrades to the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, with expansions planned for fiscal year 2025 to support long-term infrastructure. In support of the security partnership, Naval Reactors provides oversight and facilitates technology sharing for systems destined for 's future conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines. Under the trilateral agreement signed in August 2024, the , alongside the , will transfer submarine-specific materials, equipment, and technical information to enable to acquire Virginia-class submarines starting in the and develop the design for construction at Osborne Shipyard. This collaboration emphasizes non-proliferation safeguards, with prohibited from enriching or reprocessing fuel, ensuring alignment with international treaties like the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. As of October 2025, announced an upcoming payment under the agreement, and November 2025 discussions at highlighted progress in qualifying Australian firms for , though overall advancement remains slow. Efforts toward sustainability in naval reactor fuel include exploratory assessments of transitioning from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU), which could reduce risks by minimizing HEU use. However, Naval Reactors remains committed to HEU for its superior , compactness, and life-of-ship endurance, with the existing U.S. stockpile of approximately 140 metric tons projected to sustain operations for over 50 years, including through the service life of the Columbia-class submarines into the 2080s. Technical studies, such as the 2014 congressional report, have deemed LEU feasible but less practical due to larger sizes, increased costs, and potential operational drawbacks, with no firm adoption established as of 2025.

References

  1. [1]
    Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program
    We are government owned/contractor operated and manage research and engineering facilities devoted solely to naval nuclear propulsion work.
  2. [2]
    Powering the Navy | Department of Energy
    The government-owned/contractor-operated Naval Reactors Facility, located within the Idaho National Laboratory, examines naval spent nuclear fuel and ...
  3. [3]
    Naval Reactors Celebrates 75 Years - Naval Sea Systems Command
    Jul 31, 2023 · Over the last 75 years, Naval Reactors has operated 273 reactors plants, taken 562 reactor cores critical including 33 different designs, and steamed more than ...
  4. [4]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  5. [5]
    Naval Nuclear Propulsion Overview
    U.S. naval nuclear propulsion plants use a pressurized-water reactor design that has two basic systems: the primary system and the secondary system.
  6. [6]
    Naval Reactors Celebrates 75 Years - Navy.mil
    Jul 31, 2023 · Hyman G. Rickover was assigned to the Navy Bureau of Ships, the organization responsible for ship design. Rickover recognized the military ...
  7. [7]
    The Development of Nuclear Propulsion in the Navy | Proceedings
    This group was headed by Captain Hyman Rickover, now vice admiral. In April of 1946, the Naval Research Laboratory forwarded a report to the Bureau of Ships ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Rickover and the Nuclear Navy - Department of Energy
    He created, and remained in charge of, the most significant naval engineering program of all time, and yet even this tremendous advance in our navy's ...
  9. [9]
    Executive Order 12344 - National Archives
    (a) the safety of reactors and associated naval nuclear propulsion plants, and control of radiation and radioactivity associated with naval nuclear propulsion ...Missing: legal 98-525 106-65
  10. [10]
    [PDF] 98 STAT. 2492 PUBLIC LAW 98-525—OCT. 19, 1984 ... - GovInfo
    Oct 19, 1984 · The provisions of Executive Order Numbered 12344, dated February 1, 1982, pertaining to the Naval Nuclear Propulsion. Program, shall remain ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Public Law 106–65—OCT. 5, 1999 - Congress.gov
    Oct 28, 1999 · TITLE I—PROCUREMENT. Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations. Sec. 101. Army. Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. Sec. 103. Air Force.Missing: 12344 | Show results with:12344
  12. [12]
    They Harnessed the ATOM - the first Navy prototype nuclear plant
    Oct 10, 2014 · • April 1948 - Formal project established at Argonne National Laboratory ... Former ANS president Wilkins's role in Manhattan Project highlighted.
  13. [13]
    Navy History Matters - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Jan 10, 2023 · USS Nautilus (SSN-571), the world's first nuclear powered submarine, was launched on Jan. 21, 1954. On Jan. 21, 1954, the world's first nuclear ...
  14. [14]
    Enterprise VIII (CVAN-65) - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Jul 8, 2015 · Enterprise went to sea for the first time as a commissioned ship for her shakedown cruise, on 12 January 1962, on that date also being announced ...
  15. [15]
    USS Enterprise (CVN-65) Aircraft Carrier - Naval Technology
    Oct 12, 2020 · The USS Enterprise (CVN-65) aircraft carrier was powered by eight nuclear reactors. Credit: Mate Airman Rob Gaston / US Navy photo.
  16. [16]
    Polaris: A True Revolution | Proceedings - June 2006 Vol. 132/6/1,240
    In late 1957 the Navy plan called for six Polaris submarines to be at sea by 1965. The George Washington went to sea in late 1960 and there were six Polaris ...
  17. [17]
    NR HISTORY | NR-HA.org - Naval Reactors Historical Association
    On August 4th, 1948, the Vice Admiral Mills (Chief BuShips) established the Naval Reactors Branch (Code 390) and in February 1949, Captain Rickover became the ...
  18. [18]
    Nuclear Power in Aircraft Carriers | Defense Media Network
    Nov 23, 2014 · For a time, in the 1970s, there was a legal requirement that all U.S. combatants of over 8,000 tons be nuclear-powered, unless the president ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Ending the Production of Highly Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactors
    27 However, the size of the US nuclear submarine fleet has declined from. 139 in 1990 to 73 (18 ballistic missile submarines and. 55 attack submarines) in 2000 ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Navy Virginia (SSN-774) Class Attack Submarine Procurement ...
    The Navy has been procuring Virginia (SSN-774) class nuclear-powered attack submarines. (SSNs) since FY1998. The three Virginia-class boats that the Navy ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Post-Cold War Submarine Force Changes - DTIC
    Jun 14, 2019 · This research identifies the changes to the submarine mission because of the changing international landscape and the personnel and funding ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - Disasters and Emergency Management
    Jan 1, 2000 · establishment of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) on March 1, 2000, as provided ... Naval Reactors and included within the NNSA ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    National Nuclear Security Administration | LANL
    Apr 28, 2023 · NNSA was created in 2000 when Congress passed the National ... Naval Reactors) together under a new semiautonomous agency still housed within DOE.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] GAO-02-358 Nuclear Security: Lessons to Be Learned from ...
    Mar 29, 2002 · Bettis reports to the naval reactors program within NNSA. Naval reactors is a semiautonomous entity within NNSA, with a unique security ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] United States Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program
    Naval Reactors maintains an outstanding record of over 166 million miles safely steamed on nuclear power. The Program currently operates 98 reactors and has ...
  26. [26]
    Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines - SSBN - Navy.mil
    Feb 27, 2025 · Representing a generational recapitalization of the SSBN force, Columbia-class will ensure continuous sea-based strategic deterrence into the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] NAVAL NRC Defense-In-Depth Brief.
    Simple, enduring, lean structure. ▫Director tenure 8 years 4-Star Admiral/Deputy Administrator in NNSA. Director tenure 8 years, 4 Star Admiral/Deputy ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Naval Reactors
    The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program is an integrated program carried out by two organizational units, one in the Department of Energy and the other in the ...
  29. [29]
    Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) - Military - GlobalSecurity.org
    Director of Naval Reactors, Start term, End term. Adm. Hyman G. Rickover, Feb 1949, Feb 1, 1982. Adm. Kinnaird R. McKee, Feb 1, 1982, Oct 22, 1988.
  30. [30]
    Admiral William J. Houston | Department of Energy
    Admiral Houston assumed his duties as Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program in January 2024.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  31. [31]
    Naval Reactors Conducts Change of Command - Navy.mil
    Jan 11, 2024 · Adm. Bill Houston relieved Adm. Frank Caldwell as Director, Naval Reactors, in a ceremony at the Navy Yard.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  32. [32]
    Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Adm. Rickover Principles - DVIDS
    Nov 28, 2023 · the Nuclear Navy." Principles include: conservatism in design and operation; strong central technical control; verbatim compliance with
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Statement of HG Rickover (Director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion ...
    May 24, 1979 · BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE IIAVAL REACTORS PROGRAM. PRINCIPLES OF DESIGB AND ENGINEERING. FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE NAVAL NUCLEAR PROPULSION.
  34. [34]
    BPMI: Home
    Since the late 1950s, BPMI has been a dedicated prime contractor for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP). We support the design, purchase, ...What We Do
  35. [35]
    [PDF] NSIAD-85-92 Overpricing on Naval Nuclear Contract - GAO
    rate to firm fixed-price quotes received from ... Naval Reactors Office and Babcock and Wilcox. ... work under the B&W core contracts. Barnes was.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] NAVAL REACTORS Independent Analyses of Cost, Schedule ... - GAO
    Dec 12, 2024 · Naval Reactors' work breakdown structure is a product-oriented structure with an associated, detailed dictionary for each element. The.<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Naval Reactors Approach to Oversight - EHSS Welcome
    direct field representatives reporting to the Admiral to other field activities that provide oversight and direct reporting to our Director. NEAL R. GROSS.
  38. [38]
    What We Do - BPMI
    We've been supporting the U.S. Navy for nearly seventy years. · Since 1956, BPMI has been a dedicated prime contractor for the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.Missing: personnel | Show results with:personnel
  39. [39]
    Naval Reactors Engineer - Navy.com
    Preliminary training and eventual staff assignments center around Naval Reactors headquarters at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. At headquarters, you will ...
  40. [40]
    Frequently Asked Questions - Careers at Naval Nuclear Laboratory
    Answer. No, all Naval Nuclear Laboratory employees must be U.S. citizens in order to obtain a DOE security clearance.Missing: selective | Show results with:selective
  41. [41]
    [PDF] MILPERSMAN 1306-502 - MyNavyHR
    Jun 14, 2007 · A security investigation and clearance are required for the Nuclear Propulsion Program. (1) A SECRET clearance is required for all students.
  42. [42]
    Nuclear Power School - Naval Sea Systems Command
    Train officer and enlisted students in the science and engineering fundamental to the design, operation and maintenance of naval nuclear propulsion plants.
  43. [43]
    Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL)
    Knolls led the design of the reactor plant on the U.S.' only nuclear-powered ocean engineering and research submarine; the newest fast attack submarines ( ...
  44. [44]
    Master of None: The Nuclear Surface Warfare Officer Career Path ...
    The SWO(N) career progression was designed when the Navy had nuclear-powered cruisers and there was a need for officers with both skill sets to command them ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Statement of Admiral William Houston
    May 22, 2024 · In concert with our ongoing focus on research and development, we are implementing new ways to bring in and retain the nation's top talent at ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Navy Releases Updated Inclusion and Diversity Policy
    Feb 27, 2020 · The Navy announced updates to its inclusion and diversity (I&D) policy in NAVADMIN 051/20, released Feb. 27, emphasizing tenets of inclusion.Missing: Reactors | Show results with:Reactors
  47. [47]
    Safety, Security, & Quality - BPMI
    We are proud of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program's (NNPP) outstanding record of over 157 million miles safely steamed since its inception in 1948.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] NAVAL REACTORS - International Panel on Fissile Materials
    LEU in current naval reactor fuels and core designs would reduce core life by a factor of 3 to 4. Today's ships would then require 2 to 3 refuelings instead ...Missing: Gray Book 2023 statistics miles<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Naval Reactors | LinkedIn
    The mission of the Naval Reactors, is to provide militarily effective nuclear propulsion plants and ensure their safe, reliable, and long-lived operation.
  50. [50]
    Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory - Careers Naval Nuclear Laboratory
    Bettis led the engineering, design, procurement, and construction of the first naval nuclear propulsion plant, the prototype plant for the USS NAUTILUS.Our History · Uss Nautilus Runs On Nuclear... · First Submerged Transit Of...Missing: headquarters | Show results with:headquarters
  51. [51]
    Shipyards/SIOP - Naval Sea Systems Command
    The Navy's four public shipyards -- Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY), Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNSY), Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance ...Phnsy & imf · Norfolk Naval Shipyard · Portsmouth Naval Shipyard · Contact Us
  52. [52]
    PHNSY Celebrates 75 Years of Naval Reactors
    Aug 4, 2023 · PHNSY & IMF is one of four Navy shipyards with the capability to overhaul, repair, refuel and inactivate nuclear powered ships, and has been ...
  53. [53]
    Careers at NLL - locations | Naval Reactors Facility (NRF)
    Prototype Reactors, Testing & Training. Until 1995, NRF operated prototype reactors to train nearly 40,000 Navy personnel, as well as for testing purposes.Missing: civilian 4000
  54. [54]
    Submarine Tenders (AS) > United States Navy > Display-FactFiles
    Oct 13, 2021 · Spear-class tenders Emory S. Land and Frank Cable are important assets intended to serve into the mid-2020s. Both ships remain commissioned U.S. ...Missing: Reactors names
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Modernizing the U.S. Aircraft Carrier Fleet - RAND
    The current Navy plan is to replace Nimitz-class ships as they reach retirement age—i.e., as they exhaust the nuclear fuel supplied in their midlife reactor ...
  56. [56]
    Nuclear Submarines and Aircraft Carriers | US EPA
    Jul 29, 2025 · The nuclear reactor compartments are cut out, carefully sealed and taken to an approved disposal site. After the vessel's hazardous materials ...What You Can Do · The U.S. Department Of... · The U.S. Environmental...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Evolution of Naval Reactor Design - Stanford University
    Mar 7, 2016 · Naval nuclear reactors are designated by a letter representing its powered vessel, a number referring to the generation of the core design, and ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 - 2015
    The S2G core was replaced in 1958 with the “spare” Nautilus core, S2Wa, and the propulsion plant was modified and the turbine blades replaced to operate ...
  59. [59]
    Nuclear-Powered Ships
    Feb 4, 2025 · ... first test reactor started up in USA in 1953. The first nuclear-powered submarine, USS Nautilus, put to sea in 1955. This marked the ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] LIFE-OF-SHIP REACTORS AND ACCELERATED TESTING
    The life-of-the-ship (LOS) reactor is, as the name implies, a reactor that is built to last with- out refueling for the operating life of a vessel. The U.S. ...Missing: budgeting | Show results with:budgeting
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Design of an Actinide Burning, Lead or Lead-Bismuth Cooled ...
    ... reactors. A lead-bismuth cooled fast reactor was considered in the United States in the 1950s. However, it was abandoned in favor of sodium cooling for two ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Tritium and Enriched Uranium Management Plan Through 2060
    Of note, new sources of fuel for naval reactors will be needed in approximately 2060 and HEU inventories currently used to meet non-defense national ...
  65. [65]
    Naval Reactors - Y-12 National Security Complex
    The Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program is an integrated program carried out between NNSA's Defense Programs and Naval Reactors. Y-12 also assists the Naval ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] The Y-12 National Security Complex - DOE Information Center
    Y-12 provides highly enriched uranium used in the fabrication of fuel for reactors in the Navy's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines under an ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] GAO-11-230 DOE Nuclear Waste - Government Accountability Office
    Mar 23, 2011 · By 2035, any. Naval spent nuclear fuel that arrived at Idaho National Laboratory prior to 2026 must be removed from Idaho. Page 13. GAO-11-230 ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Ending the Production of Highly Enriched Uranium for Naval Reactors
    For a submarine reactor operating at an average of one- sixth of full power, the corresponding refueling interval would be about seven or 11 years. These ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Components of Naval Nuclear Fuel Transparency - NATO
    The United States and Russia both have extensive naval propulsion programs which use highly enriched uranium (HEU) in the reactor cores. Their naval programs ...
  70. [70]
    None
    ### Summary of Dual Oversight of Naval Reactors by DOE and Navy, Relation to 10 CFR 50 and 70
  71. [71]
    [PDF] U.S. Department of Energy ORDER - DOE Directives
    Jan 19, 1993 · For reactor facilities which do not require a containment, confinement barriers and associated systems shall provide defense against the ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Appendix A to Part 50—General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power ...
    The criteria cover overall requirements, fission product barriers, protection systems, fluid systems, reactor containment, and fuel/radioactivity control.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE FROM NAVAL ...
    The policy of the Naval Reactors Program is to reduce exposure to personnel from ionizing radiation associated with Naval Reactors' Department of Energy ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Environmental, Health, and Safety Practices at Naval Reactors ...
    To evaluate radiological controls at Naval Reactors laboratories and sites, we reviewed their programs for controlling access to radioactive materials and ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT
    This report presents the results of the radiological and non-radiological environmental monitoring programs for 2022 at the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF).
  76. [76]
    Secretary Del Toro Presides Over Naval Reactors Change of ...
    Jan 10, 2024 · Adm. William Houston relieved Adm. James F. Caldwell as Director, Naval Reactors in a ceremony at Naval Reactors Headquarters. “Admiral Caldwell ...Missing: J. Jr.
  77. [77]
    Admiral James Caldwell Jr. > United States Navy > Search
    He assumed his duties as the Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program in August 2015. Caldwell's awards include the Distinguished Service Medal, Defense ...
  78. [78]
    Admiral William Houston > United States Navy > Search
    Admiral Houston is a native of Buffalo, New York and graduate of the University of Notre Dame with a degree in Electrical Engineering.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  79. [79]
    U.S. Sub Force Commander Houston Nominated For Naval ...
    May 4, 2023 · Vice Adm. William Houston was nominated for the rank of admiral and to serve as the director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.Missing: transition 2024 relieves F.
  80. [80]
    Report to Congress on Navy's Columbia-class Submarine Program
    Sep 30, 2025 · Issues for Congress for the Columbia-class program include the impact of an estimated 17-month delay in the delivery of the first Columbia-class ...
  81. [81]
    Columbia Class Submarine: Overcoming Persistent Challenges ...
    Sep 30, 2024 · Since 2018, the Navy reported receiving more than $2.6 billion to invest in the submarine supplier base and help achieve Columbia class ...
  82. [82]
    Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Change of Command - Navy.mil
    Aug 17, 2015 · Adm. Caldwell, a submariner and 1981 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, becomes the 7th Director, Naval Reactors. He has served in a variety of ...
  83. [83]
    Hyman G. Rickover - Atomic Heritage Foundation - Nuclear Museum
    In 1946, Rickover traveled to Oak Ridge as part of a project to develop a nuclear electric generating plant. There Rickover became convinced that nuclear- ...Missing: 1948 AEC
  84. [84]
    Reactors for Columbia, Virginia Subs 'In Progress', Say Navy ...
    May 22, 2025 · The naval reactors program for the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines and updated Virginia-class attack boat are “in progress,” the senior civilian ...Missing: evolution 1990s
  85. [85]
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · This report provides background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Columbia (SSBN-826) class program.
  86. [86]
    AUKUS agreement for cooperation on naval nuclear propulsion
    The agreement will enable the UK and the US to transfer submarine-specific material and equipment for Australia's future nuclear powered submarines.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Replacing Highly Enriched Uranium in Naval Reactors
    In its 1995 report, the Navy evaluated cost factors for two options: (1) LEU cores in the design space with refueling; and (2) life-of-the-ship LEU cores.<|separator|>