Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

STOVL

Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) is a type of fixed-wing aircraft capability that enables operations from short runways or improvised surfaces by combining a brief horizontal takeoff roll with the ability to land vertically, without requiring a conventional runway for landing.^[1] This configuration bridges the gap between traditional fixed-wing aircraft and pure vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) designs, allowing for enhanced operational flexibility in constrained environments such as aircraft carriers or forward bases.^[2] STOVL technology emerged from mid-20th-century efforts to develop versatile military aircraft capable of helicopter-like landing while maintaining high-speed cruise performance akin to conventional jets.^[2] Pioneering work in the 1950s and 1960s by British engineers led to the first practical STOVL aircraft, with the Hawker Siddeley P.1127 experimental jet achieving its inaugural hover in 1960 and paving the way for the Harrier family.^[3] The Harrier GR1, powered by the Rolls-Royce Pegasus engine, entered Royal Air Force service in 1969 as the world's first operational STOVL combat aircraft, renowned for its vectored-thrust system that redirects engine exhaust for vertical lift.^[3] Over 800 Harrier variants were produced between 1969 and 2003, serving with the RAF, U.S. Marine Corps, Italian Navy, and Spanish Navy in roles including close air support and carrier operations.^[3] Key technological principles of STOVL include thrust vectoring, where engine nozzles pivot to provide downward thrust for hovering, and supplementary systems like lift fans for added vertical lift during takeoff and transition.^[1] The Pegasus engine's four vectorable nozzles exemplify this, enabling the Harrier's short takeoff rolls of around 300-500 meters (depending on load) while supporting vertical landings with minimal ground effect issues.^[2] Modern advancements incorporate shaft-driven lift fans and advanced propulsion, as seen in the Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II, which uses a Rolls-Royce LiftSystem integrated with the Pratt & Whitney F135 engine to achieve STOVL performance.^[3] The F-35B, operational since 2015 with the U.S. Marine Corps and allies including the UK, supports short takeoffs from amphibious assault ships and vertical landings on austere sites, enhancing expeditionary warfare capabilities.^[4] STOVL aircraft have proven vital for naval and Marine Corps missions, allowing operations from smaller vessels without catapults or arrestor wires, thus expanding power projection in littoral environments.^[4] Historical challenges included hot gas reingestion during hover, which reduces engine efficiency, and the need for stability augmentation systems to counter ground effects.^[2] Despite these, STOVL designs like the Harrier demonstrated combat effectiveness in conflicts such as the Falklands War of 1982, where vertical operations from carriers and improvised platforms like the Atlantic Conveyor played a key role. Ongoing developments focus on stealth integration, with the F-35B representing the current pinnacle of single-engine STOVL for multirole strike missions.^[4]

Overview

Definition and Characteristics

Short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) refers to a class of fixed-wing aircraft designed to perform take-offs from relatively short runways, capable of clearing a 15 m (50 ft) obstacle within 450 m (1,500 ft) of the start of the takeoff run, while capable of vertical landings using redirected engine thrust.^[5] This capability enables operations from austere or improvised airfields, distinguishing STOVL from conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) aircraft that rely on longer runways for aerodynamic lift generation. STOVL aircraft form a subset of vertical/short take-off and landing (V/STOL) systems, bridging the gap between pure vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) and traditional fixed-wing operations.^[6] Key characteristics of STOVL aircraft include the use of vectored thrust engines, which allow the propulsion exhaust to be directed downward for vertical lift and then redirected rearward for conventional forward flight.^[7] These aircraft typically feature high thrust-to-weight ratios exceeding 1:1 to enable hovering and vertical maneuvers, ensuring the engine output surpasses the aircraft's gravitational force during low-speed or stationary phases.^[8] Additionally, they incorporate balanced fuel and payload configurations to maintain center-of-gravity stability throughout flight regime transitions, preventing unwanted pitching or rolling moments as thrust vectors shift.^[9] The operational envelope of STOVL aircraft encompasses short take-off distances of 150–500 meters under loaded conditions, sustained hover capabilities for precise positioning, and vertical descent rates controlled to minimize ground effect disturbances.^[5] Fuel consumption in vertical modes, such as hover or landing, is significantly higher—approximately three to four times that of conventional cruise flight—due to the elevated thrust demands without aerodynamic assistance.^[10] Unlike pure VTOL designs, which rely entirely on vertical thrust from a stationary position and thus incur greater engine stress and reduced payload-range efficiency, STOVL leverages a rolling take-off to generate partial wing lift, thereby conserving fuel and extending mission endurance.^[6] STOVL aircraft differ from pure VTOL designs primarily in their hybrid operational mode, which combines a short takeoff roll to generate aerodynamic lift from the wings with vertical landing capability. This approach allows STOVL fixed-wing aircraft to carry significantly heavier payloads—often 20-30% more than equivalent VTOL configurations—by reducing the reliance on engine thrust alone for liftoff, thereby enabling greater fuel or weapons loads.^[11] However, unlike VTOL aircraft that require no ground infrastructure and can lift off directly from unprepared surfaces, STOVL demands a minimal prepared area, such as a short runway or ski-jump ramp, to achieve the necessary forward speed for wing-borne lift.^[12] In contrast to conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) and short takeoff but arrested recovery (STOBAR) aircraft, STOVL provides enhanced operational flexibility by minimizing infrastructure needs, allowing deployments from amphibious assault ships, forward operating bases, or damaged airfields without long runways or arresting gear. CTOL fighters typically require runways exceeding 800 meters for safe takeoff under load, while STOBAR systems rely on ski-jumps for launch but necessitate conventional landing runs and recovery systems, limiting their use to larger carriers.^[13] STOVL, by enabling vertical landings, supports operations on decks as short as 137 meters (450 feet) with appropriate aids. STOVL represents a specialized subset of V/STOL (vertical or short takeoff and landing) capabilities, focusing exclusively on high-speed, fixed-wing military jets rather than rotary-wing helicopters or slower convertiplane designs that dominate broader V/STOL applications. Helicopters, for instance, achieve vertical flight through rotor systems and are inherently limited in forward speed and range compared to STOVL jets, which transition to efficient wing-borne cruise after short takeoff.^[14] This distinction emphasizes STOVL's role in tactical strike and fighter missions, excluding the hover-centric, lower-velocity profiles of rotary-wing V/STOL variants. A key trade-off for STOVL is a performance penalty of approximately 9-15% in combat radius compared to equivalent CTOL designs, stemming from the added weight of lift systems like swiveling nozzles or lift fans, which reduce internal volume for fuel and increase drag in vertical modes.^[15] Despite this inefficiency, STOVL's advantages in deployment flexibility—such as operating from austere locations or smaller vessels without catapults—often outweigh the range limitations in scenarios prioritizing rapid response and survivability over extended loiter times.^[13]

Historical Development

Early Concepts and Prototypes

The earliest concepts for vertical or short take-off and landing (V/STOL) aircraft emerged in the late 1940s, driven by military needs for operations from austere bases and small carriers. In the United States, the Navy sponsored tail-sitting designs, where the aircraft would take off and land vertically on its tail before tilting forward for conventional flight. Notable examples included the Lockheed XFV-1, a turboprop-powered prototype that conducted initial flight tests in the early 1950s but struggled with transition stability due to its unconventional posture. Similarly, the Convair XFY-1 "Pogo" achieved its first vertical flight in August 1954 and completed 32 full transitions to horizontal flight during its testing program from 1954 to 1956, yet it highlighted persistent issues with pilot visibility and control during hover. These tail-sitters represented a foundational exploration of pure vertical capabilities, influencing later hybrid STOVL approaches by demonstrating the feasibility of attitude transitions despite operational limitations.^[16]^[2] Theoretical advancements in lift augmentation also took shape in the early 1950s, particularly through jet flap concepts developed in Britain. The jet flap theory, introduced by I.M. Davidson in 1956, proposed directing engine exhaust through slots along the wing's trailing edge to create a high-velocity "virtual flap" that enhanced lift for short take-offs without full vertical capability. This approach was extensively studied in England during the mid-1950s and influenced U.S. research by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA, precursor to NASA), which tested powered-lift configurations in wind tunnels to address STOL performance. Such ideas laid the groundwork for integrating propulsion with aerodynamics in STOVL designs, prioritizing efficiency over pure vertical lift.^[17] Prototypes in the 1940s and 1950s built on these concepts, focusing on jet-powered vertical risers that blended VTOL with transitional flight. In Britain, the Rolls-Royce "Flying Bedstead" (officially the Thrust Measuring Rig), powered by two Nene turbojet engines each producing around 5,000 lbf of thrust, achieved its first tethered hover in 1954 at the Royal Aircraft Establishment. This open-frame testbed validated jet-lift hover control but exposed challenges like hot-gas re-ingestion into the engines during ground effect. Across the Atlantic, the U.S. Ryan X-13 Vertijet, equipped with a Rolls-Royce Avon turbojet, made its maiden flight in 1955 and demonstrated a full vertical take-off and landing from a platform on April 11, 1957, as part of a program that accumulated approximately 500 test flights. In France, SNECMA pursued annular-wing VTOL experiments, culminating in the Coléoptère prototype, which began ground tests in the late 1950s using a SNECMA Atar engine for vertical thrust; its design aimed to encircle the exhaust for stability but faced stability issues in early tethered trials starting in 1959. These efforts marked a shift toward jet-based hybrids, as pure tail-sitters proved impractical for routine operations.^[2]^[16] Early prototypes revealed critical challenges that redirected STOVL development away from pure vertical designs toward short take-off compromises. Hover instability was rampant, with tail-sitters like the XFY-1 exhibiting high sensitivity to crosswinds and ground effects, requiring rates of up to 0.5 rad/sec² for roll control that exceeded pilot capabilities without augmentation. High fuel consumption during vertical phases—often 2-3 times that of conventional flight—severely limited payload and endurance, as seen in the X-13's restricted mission radius. These drawbacks, compounded by gyroscopic precession and visibility constraints, led researchers to favor vectored-thrust and lift-augmented systems by the late 1950s, emphasizing short rolls for momentum. A pivotal milestone came with the Hawker P.1127, which initiated development in 1957 and achieved its first tethered hover on October 21, 1960, using a Bristol Siddeley Pegasus engine with swiveling nozzles to enable controlled vertical lift and transition.^[2]^[16]^[17]

Cold War Advancements

The maturation of STOVL technology during the Cold War was marked by significant breakthroughs in the 1960s, culminating in the first operational aircraft. Building on earlier experimental influences like the Hawker P.1127, which demonstrated vectored-thrust principles, the Hawker Siddeley Harrier achieved its first production flight on December 28, 1967.^[18] This milestone was enabled by the Rolls-Royce Pegasus engine, a turbofan design featuring four swiveling nozzles that directed thrust for both vertical lift and forward propulsion, allowing seamless transitions between hover and conventional flight. The Harrier's success validated the vectored-thrust approach for military applications, shifting STOVL from prototypes to deployable assets amid escalating East-West tensions. United States involvement accelerated in the early 1970s, with the U.S. Marine Corps adopting the AV-8A Harrier variant in 1971 to enhance close air support and amphibious operations.^[19] This integration reflected broader U.S. interest in STOVL for dispersed basing, prompting studies by firms like McDonnell Douglas on advanced fighter concepts, including vectored-thrust and lift-plus-cruise configurations to meet Navy and Marine requirements for short-field operations.^[16] These efforts emphasized lightweight, high-maneuverability designs capable of operating from austere forward sites, aligning with NATO's need for rapid response in potential European conflicts. Parallel Soviet programs explored STOVL for carrier-based aviation, with the Yakovlev Yak-36 experimental prototype flying in the mid-1960s to test lift-jet integration.^[20] This evolved into the Yak-38, which entered limited service in the 1970s as a VTOL strike fighter for Kiev-class carriers, though its two-lift-jet plus main engine setup restricted payload, endurance, and hot-weather performance, confining it primarily to shipboard trials without achieving full STOVL operational versatility.^[21] A pivotal validation came during the 1982 Falklands War, where British Sea Harriers employed STOVL capabilities for deck operations and forward basing, achieving air superiority with minimal losses and demonstrating the tactical value of vertical landings in contested environments.^[22] This combat success reinforced NATO doctrines on dispersed operations and short takeoff from improvised sites, influencing allied planning for resilient airpower in high-threat scenarios.^[23]

Post-Cold War Evolution

Following the end of the Cold War, STOVL development shifted toward upgrades of existing platforms and the consolidation of new programs amid defense budget constraints. The McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II received significant enhancements in the AV-8B+ variant, incorporating the Raytheon AN/APG-65 multimode radar for improved all-weather air-to-air and air-to-surface capabilities, with the first deliveries to the U.S. Marine Corps occurring in 1993 and production continuing into the early 2000s.^[24] This upgrade built on the Harrier's Cold War legacy by extending its operational life for post-conflict missions such as those in the Balkans and the Middle East. Meanwhile, Soviet STOVL efforts, exemplified by the Yakovlev Yak-141 supersonic VTOL prototype, were abruptly terminated in 1991 due to the dissolution of the USSR and the ensuing economic collapse, which halted funding for advanced naval aviation projects.^[20]^[25] The 1996 launch of the U.S. Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program marked a pivotal consolidation in STOVL evolution, originating from the 1993 Joint Advanced Strike Technology initiative to develop a multirole aircraft family replacing aging fleets like the Harrier. In November 1996, the Department of Defense selected Boeing and Lockheed Martin to compete in demonstrating conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), carrier variant (CV), and short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) designs, emphasizing commonality to reduce costs across services.^[26] Lockheed Martin's X-35 was ultimately chosen in 2001 for production as the F-35, with the STOVL F-35B variant prioritized to meet U.S. Marine Corps and allied Royal Navy requirements for amphibious operations.^[27] In the 2000s and 2010s, STOVL operations reflected a transition from legacy aircraft to next-generation platforms, including the retirement of the UK's Harrier GR7/GR9 fleet in December 2010 as part of the Strategic Defence and Security Review to streamline forces and redirect resources toward the F-35B.^[28] The F-35B achieved initial operational capability with the U.S. Marine Corps' VMFA-121 squadron on July 31, 2015, enabling a squadron of 10 aircraft for global deployment in roles like close air support and armed reconnaissance. As of 2025, the U.S. Marine Corps continues to phase out the AV-8B Harrier, with full retirement expected by 2027, while expanding F-35B operations.^[29]^[30] Global adoption of STOVL persisted into the 2020s through continued operations of upgraded AV-8B+ Harriers by Italy and Spain, supporting expeditionary warfare from light carriers like Spain's Juan Carlos I and Italy's Cavour. As of 2025, Italy operates around 16 AV-8B+ Harriers with retirement planned by 2028 due to sustainment issues, while Spain's approximately 12 aircraft are expected to continue until around 2030, though without a confirmed STOVL successor following the decision against acquiring F-35B variants. These fleets influenced modern STOVL requirements by demonstrating sustained utility in NATO missions, such as Mediterranean patrols and rapid response deployments, while bridging the gap to F-35B integration.^[31]^[32]^[33]

Technical Principles

Propulsion and Lift Systems

STOVL aircraft employ specialized propulsion systems designed to generate sufficient vertical thrust for hover and short take-off while maintaining efficient forward flight. Vectored thrust engines form the cornerstone of this capability, featuring swiveling nozzles that redirect engine exhaust to provide lift. In the Rolls-Royce Pegasus design, four rotatable nozzles enable up to 100% thrust redirection by swiveling through approximately 90-100 degrees, allowing the engine to vector its full output downward for vertical operations or rearward for conventional propulsion.^[34] To enhance lift beyond direct engine thrust, STOVL systems incorporate augmentation techniques such as reactant bleed air or dedicated fan mechanisms. These methods optimize the engine's multi-role performance by amplifying vertical thrust without proportionally increasing overall engine size or weight.^[35] Operational power management in STOVL propulsion involves tailored settings to balance lift demands across flight phases. Take-off typically requires engine ratings of 100-120% maximum thrust to enable short rolls and acceleration, while hover mode demands sustained high power.^[36]^[37] Hybrid propulsion configurations combine direct jet thrust with auxiliary lift devices for balanced vertical performance. The Rolls-Royce LiftFan in the F-35B, for example, integrates a shaft-driven counter-rotating fan that delivers 50% of the total hover lift, supplemented by vectored engine exhaust and roll posts, ensuring distributed thrust for stability during transition.^[38]^[39]

Aerodynamic and Control Mechanisms

STOVL aircraft encounter unique aerodynamic demands during transition phases from wing-borne to jet-borne flight, where precise pitch control is essential to manage the shift in lift sources. Nozzle scheduling plays a critical role in this process, coordinating thrust vector deflection to sustain lift while preventing stall during the low-speed regime. This scheduling is often integrated with flight control systems to blend aerodynamic and jet-borne control authority seamlessly.^[40]^[14] Stability challenges at low speeds arise primarily from vortex effects, where ground-induced vortices form due to jet impingement and forward motion, leading to unsteady airflow that can induce pulsations and reduce control effectiveness. These vortices, observed in VTOL configurations, can cause up to 85% size reduction in mean flow unsteadiness when mitigated, but without intervention, they contribute to lateral and directional instability during hover initiation or approach. Ground resonance, an oscillatory instability analogous to rotorcraft phenomena, may also emerge from interactions between landing gear and aerodynamic forces, exacerbating low-speed handling issues. Such challenges are addressed through reaction control valves (RCVs), small thrusters utilizing engine bleed air to provide supplemental pitch, roll, and yaw moments; for instance, in the YAV-8B Harrier, RCVs deliver peak control powers of 0.14–0.45 rad/sec² in pitch and 0.15–0.30 rad/sec² in yaw, consuming 2–96% of available bleed air depending on maneuver intensity.^[41]^[42] Aerodynamic control surfaces are augmented for hover and low-speed operations, with enlarged rudders providing yaw authority through differential deflection and strakes generating stabilizing vortices to enhance pitch and directional control. In the Harrier family, these strakes contribute to vortex management at low speeds, improving yaw response when traditional surfaces lose effectiveness below 30 knots. Fly-by-wire systems integrate these effectors, enabling automatic mode switching between conventional and powered-lift flight regimes to maintain consistent handling qualities; for example, the F-35B employs fault-tolerant fly-by-wire laws that coordinate surface deflections with vectored thrust for bandwidths exceeding 5 rad/sec in pitch during transition.^[43]^[40] Performance metrics underscore the efficiency of these mechanisms, with integrated systems blending vectored thrust as a key enabler for mode transitions. Stability margins are maintained via thrust reserves, providing 5–10% excess thrust to counter gusts up to 15 knots; simulations on the YAV-8B show maximum hover weight ratios of 0.975 (2.5% margin) on airfields, reduced slightly for shipboard operations to account for environmental perturbations. These margins ensure robust control against disturbances.^[40]^[44]

Notable Aircraft and Applications

Harrier Family

The Harrier family originated from the experimental Hawker Siddeley P.1127, which achieved its first tethered hover on October 21, 1960, and first untethered vertical flight on November 19, 1960, powered by the innovative Rolls-Royce Pegasus vectored-thrust turbofan engine that enabled short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) capabilities through four rotatable nozzles.^[45] This prototype underwent extensive testing, leading to the development of the Kestrel FGA.1 in 1964, a refined version evaluated by a tripartite squadron involving the UK, US, and West Germany, which demonstrated practical STOVL operations with the Pegasus 5 engine producing approximately 15,000 lbf (67 kN) of thrust. The success of the Kestrel paved the way for the production Harrier GR.1, which entered Royal Air Force (RAF) service in 1969 with the Pegasus 6 engine upgraded to 19,000 lbf (84.5 kN) dry thrust, marking the first operational STOVL combat aircraft. Key variants of the Harrier family expanded its roles across land- and sea-based operations. The AV-8A, a US Marine Corps (USMC) adaptation of the GR.1/Mk 50, was introduced in 1971 with minor modifications for American avionics and entered service to support close air support missions from forward bases.^[19] The Sea Harrier FRS.1, a navalized variant for the Royal Navy, debuted in 1979 and featured the Blue Fox radar for air interception, allowing it to operate from aircraft carriers without catapults or arrestor wires.^[22] In the 1980s, the second-generation Harrier II emerged, including the USMC's AV-8B and RAF's GR.5/7, powered by the enhanced Pegasus 11-series engine delivering up to 21,750 lbf (96.8 kN) dry thrust for improved lift and range, with larger wings and composite materials for better performance.^[46] Operationally, the Harrier family proved its versatility in major conflicts. During the 1982 Falklands War, Royal Navy Sea Harriers achieved 20 confirmed air-to-air victories against Argentine aircraft without any losses in dogfights, providing critical air cover for British forces over 1,435 sorties.^[22] In the 1991 Gulf War, USMC AV-8B Harriers conducted approximately 3,400 close air support and interdiction sorties against Iraqi targets, operating from both land bases and amphibious ships to support ground advances. Over its production run from 1967 to 1997, more than 800 Harrier aircraft of all variants were built, serving multiple nations in attack, reconnaissance, and fighter roles.^[47] Retirement of the Harrier family has proceeded variably by operator. The UK phased out its Harrier GR.9 and T.12 fleet in December 2010, transferring some airframes to the US for spares.^[48] Italy plans to retire its AV-8B+ fleet by 2028 due to maintenance challenges and the introduction of the F-35B.^[32] Spain continues operating its AV-8B/VA-2 Matador aircraft, with retirement expected around 2030 pending a successor.^[49] India decommissioned its Sea Harrier FRS.51 squadron in 2016 after three decades of service aboard INS Viraat.^[23]

Lockheed Martin F-35B

The Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II represents the pinnacle of modern STOVL technology, selected as the STOVL variant of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program on October 26, 2001, when Lockheed Martin's X-35 design was chosen over Boeing's X-32 to meet U.S. Marine Corps requirements for a stealthy, multi-role replacement for legacy aircraft.^[50] Development progressed through the system development and demonstration phase, culminating in the F-35B's maiden flight on June 11, 2008, at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, validating its short takeoff and vertical landing capabilities in conventional mode initially.^[51] The aircraft achieved initial operational capability (IOC) with the U.S. Marine Corps on July 31, 2015, when Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 121 (VMFA-121) declared full mission readiness with 10 aircraft at Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, Japan.^[29] Central to the F-35B's STOVL functionality is its Rolls-Royce LiftSystem, featuring a LiftFan that generates 20,000 lbf (89 kN) of vertical thrust, driven via a power shaft from the Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-600 engine, which provides 191 kN (43,000 lbf) of thrust with afterburner in conventional flight.^[38]^[52] This integrated system enables short takeoffs with heavier payloads and vertical landings, while the aircraft's design includes swiveling exhaust nozzles and lift-preserving doors to maintain balance during hover. Additionally, the F-35B demonstrates compatibility with ski-jump ramps, as proven in 2015 land-based tests at Patuxent River simulating operations from UK and Italian carriers, allowing enhanced takeoff performance with full internal fuel and weapons loads.^[53] In terms of operational capabilities, the F-35B offers a combat radius exceeding 450 nautical miles on internal fuel, supporting extended strike missions without external stores that could compromise its low-observable stealth profile.^[54] Its internal weapons bay accommodates up to 5,700 pounds of precision-guided munitions, such as Joint Direct Attack Munitions, while preserving radar cross-section, and the aircraft integrates advanced sensor fusion for real-time threat assessment. Pilots benefit from the Gen III Helmet Mounted Display System, which overlays 360-degree situational awareness, targeting cues, and night-vision imagery directly onto the visor, enhancing decision-making in contested environments.^[55] The F-35B has been deployed extensively by the U.S. Marine Corps from Wasp-class amphibious assault ships, such as USS Essex during multinational exercises, enabling expeditionary operations from austere bases or sea platforms.^[56] The United Kingdom integrated the F-35B into its Queen Elizabeth-class carriers starting with HMS Queen Elizabeth's maiden deployment in October 2021, marking the first operational sorties from the ski-jump-equipped vessel. Internationally, Italy operates F-35Bs from its Cavour carrier, with deliveries ongoing to support NATO commitments, while Japan received its initial batch of three F-35Bs in August 2025 at Nyutabaru Air Base for Izumo-class integration, with additional deliveries planned through 2026, expanding STOVL capabilities in the Indo-Pacific.^[57]

Other Examples and Variants

The Yakovlev Yak-141, developed by the Soviet Union as a supersonic STOVL fighter intended for carrier operations, conducted its maiden flight on March 9, 1987. Equipped with a triplex engine configuration including two dedicated lift jets and a main RD-41 turbofan capable of vectoring thrust for vertical operations, the prototype demonstrated short takeoff and vertical landing capabilities during testing. The program advanced to four prototypes before cancellation in 1991, primarily due to the dissolution of the Soviet Union and subsequent funding shortfalls, preventing transition to production.^[20] The Yakovlev Yak-38, an operational STOVL aircraft for the Soviet Navy, entered service in 1978 as the first production VTOL carrier-based fighter. Powered by a single Tumansky R-28 main engine supplemented by two Rybinsk R-28V-8 lift jets for vertical operations, it supported anti-submarine and strike roles from Kiev-class carriers. Approximately 38 Yak-38s were built before retirement in the early 1990s due to reliability issues and the program's limitations in payload and range. In the United States, early STOVL experimentation included the Convair XFY-1 Pogo, a tail-sitting VTOL prototype from the 1950s designed to provide defensive capabilities for naval vessels without catapults. Powered by a single Allison T40 turboprop driving contra-rotating propellers, it achieved its first tethered hover in April 1954 and successfully transitioned from vertical to horizontal flight later that year, reaching speeds up to 500 mph in level flight. Although pilot visibility and stability issues limited its practicality, the Pogo's design influenced later vectored-thrust concepts in STOVL development.^[58]^[59] NASA's LEAPTech initiative in the 2010s investigated distributed electric propulsion systems adaptable to STOVL configurations, conducting ground and flight tests on a modified Tecnam P2006T aircraft with 13 electric motors along the wing leading edge. These experiments, part of broader efforts in electrified aviation, demonstrated enhanced lift for short-field operations and potential vertical thrust augmentation, though focused primarily on efficiency rather than full VTOL. Related concepts like the Puffin electric tailsitter further explored battery-powered vertical lift for compact urban aircraft.^[60]^[61] Emerging STOVL efforts include rumored Chinese developments such as the J-18 concept, speculated in the 2020s as a stealthy carrier-based fighter with vertical landing capabilities to support Type 003-class vessels. Drawing from historical VTOL studies like lift-fan integrations on J-6 prototypes, these unverified designs aim to counter U.S. naval aviation advantages, though no flight tests have been publicly confirmed.^[62]^[63] In Israel, the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) Rotem Alpha, a VTOL loitering munition drone prototype unveiled in 2023, represents a tactical STOVL variant for precision strikes. Weighing approximately 6 kg with a 10 km range, it integrates vertical takeoff for rapid deployment from confined spaces and electro-optical guidance for autonomous targeting, building on IAI's broader unmanned systems expertise.^[64]

Operational Advantages and Challenges

Strategic and Tactical Benefits

STOVL aircraft provide significant basing advantages by enabling operations from shorter flight decks, such as the approximately 260-meter decks on amphibious assault ships like the U.S. Navy's America-class LHAs, or austere forward bases, thereby allowing forces to conduct surprise strikes without reliance on large, vulnerable conventional runways.^[65]^[66] This flexibility doubles the number of available platforms for deployment compared to conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) aircraft, positioning STOVL assets closer to contested areas for rapid response in close air support missions.^[67] In tactical roles, STOVL enhances distributed lethality by permitting aircraft like the F-35B to disperse across island chains or mobile refueling points in scenarios such as the Indo-Pacific, complicating enemy targeting while maintaining offensive capabilities in denied environments.^[68] These operations support close air support and counterair tasks from shifting locations, often relocated within 6-9 hours to evade detection, thereby increasing survivability and operational tempo.^[68] Logistically, STOVL reduces the need for extensive airfield infrastructure, avoiding the high costs associated with building or upgrading forward bases—such as the $32 million U.S.-funded enhancements to Philippine airfields in 2024—which can otherwise run into tens of millions per site.^[69] By operating from sea-based or expeditionary sites, STOVL achieves higher sustained sortie generation rates, typically 3 sorties per day with surges to 4, compared to 2-3 for CTOL variants on carriers, while lowering overall life-cycle costs through decreased maintenance and personnel requirements.^[65] This efficiency stems from simplified turnaround procedures on amphibious platforms, free from catapults and arresting gear, enabling quicker mission cycles in support of Marine Air-Ground Task Forces.^[65] In U.S. Marine Corps Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) operations during the 2020s Indo-Pacific theater, STOVL has bolstered power projection without fixed bases, as demonstrated by the 15th MEU's deployment aboard USS Makin Island, where F-35B aircraft provided enhanced flexibility and lethality for regional deterrence and response.^[70] Similarly, during Exercise Steel Knight 24 in late 2024, F-35Bs from VMFA-214 conducted distributed operations from San Clemente Island, a Pacific atoll analog, integrating with airlift for forward arming and executing defensive counterair in simulated contested scenarios, underscoring STOVL's role in expeditionary advanced basing.^[71] These case studies highlight how STOVL enables sea basing concepts, projecting force from mobile platforms to sustain operations in archipelagic environments against peer adversaries.^[65]

Limitations and Engineering Hurdles

STOVL aircraft face significant payload and range limitations primarily due to the additional weight and complexity of lift systems, such as the lift fan and thrust-vectoring nozzles in designs like the F-35B. These systems reduce internal fuel capacity by approximately 28%, with the F-35B carrying 13,100–13,500 pounds compared to the F-35A's 18,250 pounds, resulting in a combat radius of over 450 nautical miles for the F-35B versus more than 590 nautical miles for the F-35A on internal fuel.^[54]^[72] Overall, STOVL configurations impose 20-40% penalties in weapons load or fuel compared to conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variants, exemplified by the F-35B's maximum takeoff weight of 60,000 pounds versus the F-35A's 70,000 pounds, limiting mission endurance and ordnance carriage in vertical or short takeoff modes.^[72] Maintenance demands for STOVL aircraft are notably higher owing to the thermal stresses and mechanical wear on vectoring nozzles and lift components during vertical operations. Nozzle systems experience accelerated degradation from repeated high-temperature cycling, necessitating more frequent inspections—often 2-3 times those of CTOL aircraft—to monitor for cracks, erosion, and alignment issues.^[73] This contributes to lower aircraft availability rates, with F-35B mission-capable rates around 50% as of fiscal year 2024 compared to approximately 56% for the F-35A and 70-75% for legacy CTOL fighters like the F-16, driven by the specialized upkeep required for STOVL propulsion elements.^[74]^[75]^[76] As of 2025, efforts to address these challenges include software updates and engine modifications to boost availability, though costs continue to rise.^[76] The intense exhaust from STOVL vertical landings poses environmental challenges, including jet blast temperatures reaching 500–1,000°C that can damage decks and endanger personnel through heat exposure, tire bursts, or debris propulsion.^[77] To mitigate these effects, flight decks on STOVL-capable ships require specialized heat-resistant coatings, such as thermal spray nonskid (TSN) systems composed of ceramic-aluminum bonds capable of withstanding peaks over 1,000°C without degradation.^[78]^[79] STOVL variants also incur higher acquisition costs, typically 20-30% more than CTOL counterparts, due to the engineering for lift integration and specialized materials. For instance, the F-35B's flyaway unit cost stands at approximately $136 million as of 2025, compared to $110 million for the F-35A.^[80]

Future Developments

Emerging Technologies

Advanced materials are playing a pivotal role in enhancing STOVL performance by enabling lighter, more heat-resistant components essential for vectored thrust systems. Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) are increasingly applied to engine nozzles and hot-section parts, offering weight reductions compared to conventional metallic alloys while maintaining structural integrity at elevated temperatures.^[81] In the F-35B's F135 engine, CMCs contribute to overall weight savings in high-temperature exhaust components, improving fuel efficiency and operational range without compromising durability.^[82] Adaptive engine technologies represent another key innovation, with variable-cycle designs optimizing thrust and efficiency across flight regimes critical for STOVL operations. The GE XA100 adaptive cycle engine, capable of powering the F-35B variant, delivers approximately 25% better fuel efficiency through its three-stream architecture, which adjusts airflow dynamically for high-thrust vertical lift or efficient cruise.^[83] This technology also provides a 10% increase in thrust, enhancing short takeoff performance while reducing thermal signatures.^[84] Digital enhancements, including AI-assisted flight controls, are addressing the complexities of STOVL transitions by automating stability and reducing cognitive demands on pilots. Lockheed Martin's MATRIX autonomy system, demonstrated for U.S. Marine Corps rotary-wing applications, enables smoother handling in adverse conditions and offloads routine tasks, with potential relevance to fixed-wing STOVL platforms.^[85] Building on the current F-35B as a baseline, these systems integrate sensor fusion with predictive algorithms for real-time adjustments. Hybrid propulsion concepts are emerging to further electrify STOVL architectures, combining gas turbines with electric components for improved lift efficiency. Electric lift fans and distributed electric propulsion systems, inspired by NASA's research into hybrid-electric ducted fans, enable precise vertical thrust with reduced noise and emissions, as explored in lift-plus-cruise aircraft designs.^[86] Adaptations of distributed propulsion are being considered for unmanned STOVL drones to achieve shorter takeoff distances.^[87] Ongoing testing milestones underscore these advancements' maturation. The F-35B Block 4 upgrades, incorporating production lots from 2025 onward and full integration through 2028, feature enhanced sensor suites for superior environmental awareness during STOVL modes, with operating and support costs per flight hour stabilizing around $35,000 as of fiscal year 2025.^[88]^[89] In Europe, the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) program, advancing since 2022, includes conceptual studies for adaptable propulsion amid multinational collaboration.^[90]

Potential Civilian and Military Roles

STOVL technology holds significant potential for expanding military applications, particularly through unmanned variants that could enable swarming tactics in contested environments. Concepts for unmanned VTOL aircraft, such as Shield AI's X-BAT vertical take-off and landing fighter jet, are being developed as drone wingmen or standalone platforms to support manned operations with enhanced autonomy and reduced risk to pilots.^[91] These systems could integrate with carrier-based operations, leveraging STOVL's compatibility with amphibious assault ships to project power from mobile bases, as seen in the UK's HMS Prince of Wales, which can accommodate up to 24 F-35B aircraft for NATO exercises as of November 2025.^[92] In austere and Arctic environments, STOVL platforms like the F-35B are adapting to harsh conditions, enabling operations from unprepared sites and supporting extended reach in regions with limited infrastructure.^[93] As of 2025, European navies face STOVL gaps, such as Spain's planned retirement of Harrier aircraft without a direct replacement, highlighting ongoing challenges in naval aviation.^[33] On the civilian front, hybrid STOVL designs are emerging to support urban air mobility, with companies like Manta Aircraft developing HeV/STOL platforms such as the ANN series for short-range passenger transport from minimal infrastructure.^[94] These aircraft combine vertical landing capabilities with short takeoff efficiency, offering ranges of 300-800 km for business and personal use, potentially integrating with evolving eVTOL ecosystems by 2025 and beyond.^[94] For disaster relief, STOVL could facilitate rapid evacuations and supply deliveries to runway-denied areas, allowing operations from small pads in remote or damaged zones to enhance response times during emergencies.^[95] Adoption faces key challenges, including regulatory evolution and economic hurdles. The FAA's 2024 final rule for powered-lift aircraft establishes certification pathways for STOVL and VTOL systems, enabling commercial operations like air taxis while addressing pilot training and safety standards in the 2020s.^[96] However, high operating costs—often around $35,000-42,000 per flight hour for military STOVL aircraft as of 2025—and complex Part 135 certification processes pose barriers to widespread civilian use, limiting accessibility beyond military contexts.^[76] Emerging AI controls may briefly mitigate these by optimizing unmanned operations, but broader integration remains nascent.^[97]

References

[1]
VTOL/STOL Aircraft - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A VTOL aircraft is defined as an aircraft with vertical take-off and landing capabilities and cruising speeds equal to those of ordinary fixed-wing aircraft.
[2]
[PDF] Historical Overview of V/STOL Aircraft Technology
For over 25 years a concerted effort has been made to derive aircraft that combine the vertical take- off and landing capabilities of the helicopter.Missing: STOVL definition
[3]
50 years of STOVL | Rolls-Royce
Since the Harrier GR1 entered service with the Royal Air Force in April 1969, we've been powering pioneering Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[4]
Why Single-Engine STOVL? | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
In the early 1970s, the Marine Corps selected the British-built AV-8A Harrier as its close air support aircraft and worked in conjunction with the Royal Air ...
[5]
Introduction – V/STOL Aerodynamics and Modeling - UCF Pressbooks
The formal NATO definition (since 1991) is: A Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing aircraft is a fixed-wing aircraft capable of clearing a 15 m (50 ft) obstacle ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[6]
VSTOL (Vertical or Short TakeOff and Landing) - GlobalSecurity.org
Oct 24, 2014 · VTOL refers to a capability for Vertical TakeOff and Landing, as opposed to Conventional TakeOff and Landing (CTOL). VTOL is the broadest ...
[7]
[PDF] 25047 AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A VECTORED ...
The investigation of a vectored-thrust V/STOL aircraft configuration has been con- ducted in the Langley V/STOL tunnel. The rear-position vectored-thrust nozzle ...
[8]
[PDF] NASA Supersonic STOVL Propulsion Technology Program
Both types of aircraft require high thrust to aircraft weight ratio pro- pulsion systems.
[9]
[PDF] THE AERODYNAMICS OF V/STOL AIRCRAFT - DTIC
This publication contains the lecture notes prepared for the AGARD-VKI Lecture Series on The Aerodynamics of V/STOL Aircraft" which took place at the von Klrmنn ...
[10]
[PDF] survey paper on vtol propulsion covering
SUMMARY. The main propulsion characteristics affecting the usefulness of Vertical Takeoff and Landing aircraft are similar to those of conventional aircraft ...
[11]
[PDF] An Examination of the Factors Affecting the Thrust ... - DTIC
thrust—to—weight ratio required is about 1.3, or two 22 ,700—lb thrust engines. T. I. Page 25. WEIGHT BREAKDOWN COMPARISON FOR VTOL PERFORMANCE. An approximate ...
[12]
[PDF] Recent Progress in VSTOL Technology
It is a privilege and a pleasure to have this opportunity to talk to you about progress in vertical and short takeoff and landing. (V/STOL) aircraft.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[13]
[PDF] Final Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on V/STOL ...
currently meet the requirements of a high performance CTOL aircraft. The wrong question has been asked, i.e., what type of V/STOL can replace high.
[14]
[PDF] Assessment of Aerodynamic Performance of V/STOL and STOVL Fi ...
SUMMARY. A summary of the research efforts in the United States to assess the aerodynamic performance of V/STOL and STOVL fighter/attack aircraft is ...Missing: trade- | Show results with:trade-
[15]
Developing an Affordable Fighter for the Future - RAND
The range penalty for an Air Force derivative of an STOVL design was less—9 percent (3.8-percent gross-weight penalty). Using the STOVL rather than the CTOL as ...
[16]
[PDF] V/STOL Concepts in the United States-- Past, Present, and Future
In the late 1940s, a U.S. Navy program to permit VTOL operation from small ship platforms spawned several tail-sitter designs;. i.e., the vertical attitude.Missing: 1950 Roe sitting
[17]
[PDF] The NASA Experience in Aeronautical R&D: Three Case Studies ...
... Jet Flap was studied extensively in England during the 1950s, and many of the STOL configurations that NACA and NASA tested in the late 1950s and early 1960s.
[18]
[PDF] The Continuing Requirement for V/STOL in the Close Air ... - DTIC
Jun 9, 2023 · The first production model Harrier flew on 28 December 1967, this was the first aircraft of a production contract calling for 60 that would form ...<|separator|>
[19]
40+ years of legacy: U.S. Marine Corps graduates its last two AV-8B ...
Apr 9, 2024 · The platform's predecessor, the British-built AV-8A Harrier, entered the Marine Corps inventory in 1971. The aircraft's vertical and short ...
[20]
When Western pilots got to fly the V/STOL Yak-38 and Yak-141
Sep 3, 2025 · These two types built on the design bureau's success in creating the USSR's first V/STOL jet, the Yak-36 technology demonstrator, which had ...
[21]
The forgotten Soviet VTOL jets | Australian Military Aviation History
Jul 24, 2025 · In response to a 1961 contract for a single-seat VTOL fighter, Yakovlev proposed the Yak-36 (NATO: “Freehand”) with twin engines, each feeding a ...
[22]
The BAe Sea Harrier - Warfare History Network
Oct 5, 2023 · The BAe Sea Harrier, the naval version of the world's first successful V/STOL jet fighter, proved invaluable to the U.K. victory in 1982 ...Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[23]
Vertical Ambition: The Harrier and the History of V/STOL Combat ...
Aug 14, 2025 · This article presents a detailed chronicle of the Harrier's development, its operational career, its many iterations, and the technical genius ...Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[24]
Harrier II Plus (AV-8B) VSTOL Fighter and Attack Aircraft
Feb 22, 2024 · The Harrier II Plus is equipped with the Raytheon APG-65 digital radar to provide day and night and adverse weather capability. The APG-65 is a ...Missing: rollout | Show results with:rollout
[25]
How The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter May Have Benefited from Soviet ...
Apr 24, 2018 · After the Yakovlev-Lockheed partnership was publically revealed in 1995 and formally ended in 1997, but the Yak-141's unique designs persisted.
[26]
[PDF] Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program - DTIC
Jan 11, 2002 · The Marine Corps and the. Royal Navy plan to procure a short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) version of the plane to replace their current ...
[27]
[PDF] F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program - Every CRS Report
Jul 19, 2007 · The CTOL aircraft demonstrated concepts for an Air Force land-based (CTOL) variant and a Navy carrier-based (CV) variant, with the STOVL.
[28]
Harrier bids a final farewell - GOV.UK
Dec 15, 2010 · Harrier bids a final farewell. Tributes were paid today to mark the Harrier aircraft's retirement after 41 years of service.
[29]
U.S. Marines Corps declares the F-35B operational
Jul 31, 2015 · The US Marine Corps' F-35B Lightning II aircraft reached initial operational capability July 31, 2015 with a squadron of 10 F-35Bs ready for world-wide ...
[30]
Evolution of the Spanish Navy's Harriers - Key Aero
Feb 19, 2025 · Between 2025-2026, the US Marine Corps will eventually cease their Harrier operations, while Italy is planning to retire their AV-8B fleet in ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s<|separator|>
[31]
https://www.key.aero/article/evolution-spanish-navys-harriers
[32]
Rolls-Royce Engines: Pegasus - Graces Guide
Sep 24, 2020 · The engine employs a simple thrust vectoring system that uses four swivelling nozzles, giving the Harrier thrust both for lift and forward ...
[33]
Propulsion Systems for Supersonic V/STOL Aircraft
The plenum chamber burning can then be used to provide the thrust augmentation that may be required for take-off and landing as well as for in-flight ...
[34]
[PDF] p(ASA-C-151se8) APPIICATICiS O 2ELINCHE V/S1ot kIflc tZ CCfCT
Fuel Flow Rate @ Climb, lbs per min (kg/min). Fuel Flow Rate @ Hover, lbs/min (kg/mn). Fuel Flow Rate @ Loiter, lbs/min (kg/mmn). Fuel Flow'Rate @ Maximum ...Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[35]
[PDF] A Short Take-Off/Vertical Landing (STOVL) Aircraft Carrier (S-CVX).
characteristic of the sonar to define. Using a processing time of 10 msec, the Detection. Threshold becomes 31 dB. 128. Page 131. 3. Mine Detection Range. At ...
[36]
Rolls-Royce LiftSystem
The system is a descendant of the Pegasus engine, comprised of the Rolls‑Royce LiftFan®, Driveshaft, 3 Bearing Swivel Module (3BSM) and Roll Posts. Rolls‑Royce ...Missing: four | Show results with:four
[37]
Lockheed Martin F-35B Exceeds STOVL Thrust Requirement
Apr 23, 2009 · "We demonstrated 41,100 pounds of vertical thrust against our requirement of 40,550 pounds. This means we will deliver excellent margin for the ...
[38]
[PDF] F-35_Air_Vehicle_Technology_Overview.pdf - Lockheed Martin
Jun 29, 2018 · In addition to achieving powerful lift thrust, a STOVL aircraft must achieve sufficient control power in each axis to successfully transition ...
[39]
(PDF) Reduction in size and unsteadiness of a VTOL ground vortex ...
Aug 10, 2025 · A very low-frequency pulsation or 'puffing' instability was observed. Since this unsteadiness could not be correlated with any other ...
[40]
[PDF] YAV-8B Reaction Control System Bleed and Control Power Usage ...
Hence, small RCS valve deflections could bleed off nearly all of the available air at the initiation of the approach, while the same valve deflection at high.
[41]
[PDF] Flight Evaluation of Advanced Controls and Displays for Transition ...
Pitch Control-. For pitch control in transition or hover, an attitude-command/attitude-hold response type was implemented, as shown in figure A-1. The ...
[42]
How does the F-35 transition to flight after vertical takeoff? - Quora
May 7, 2020 · With the main engine nozzle and lift fan, the system provides pitch control. if you want to nose down, give the main engine nozzle a little more ...Is there any footage of the F-35B transitioning from VTOL/STOVL to ...How does the engine on the F35B (STOVL) transition from ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com<|separator|>
[43]
[PDF] Moving-Base Simulation Evaluation of Thrust Margins for Vertical ...
It was appropriate to capitalize on this experience and capability to substantiate the generalized requirement for thrust margin to control a STOVL aircraft.Missing: gusts | Show results with:gusts
[44]
[PDF] The AV-8B Decision - DTIC
By April of 1969 the first Harrier squadron was in service with the RAF. ... "The Hawker Siddeley Harrier," Interavia, March 1968. 3. Taylor, Peter P.M. ...
[45]
AV-8B Harrier II - Naval History and Heritage Command
Dec 9, 2022 · Speed: 630 mph ; Ferry range: 1,700 nautical miles unrefueled ; Power plant: one Rolls-Royce Pegasus F-402-RR-404 vectored thrust turbofan engine
[46]
Boeing (BAe Systems / McDonnell Douglas) AV-8B Harrier II
Oct 3, 2023 · The initial production model and beginning of the Harrier lineage was the Hawker Siddeley Harrier. ... Total Production: 500 Units Contractor(s): ...
[47]
Aviation Feature – UK Harrier retirement: three years on | GAR
Dec 15, 2013 · The Harrier's UK retirement was a shocking, momentous event on December 15, 2010, after over 40 years of service, with final flights at RAF ...Missing: Italy Spain India
[48]
Spain Rules Out F-35, Looks Instead To European Alternatives
Aug 7, 2025 · The Harriers are expected to be retired by 2030, and this recent decision could leave Spain without a direct replacement. Spain has ordered ...
[49]
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program: Background, Status, and ...
On October 26, 2001, the Lockheed Martin team was selected to develop ... STOVL aircraft for the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps and the U.K. Royal ...
[50]
Lockheed Martin F-35B STOVL Stealth Fighter Achieves Successful ...
Jun 11, 2008 · Lockheed Martin F-35B STOVL Stealth Fighter Achieves Successful First Flight - Jun 11, 2008.Missing: IOC 2015
[51]
F135 Engine - Pratt & Whitney
With more than 40,000 lbs. of thrust, unmatched low-observable signature, world-class thermal management, and the most advanced integrated engine control system ...Engine Core Upgrade · History · Français · US Economic ImpactMissing: 191 | Show results with:191
[52]
F-35B Lightning II Completes First Land-based Ski Jump Launch
Jun 24, 2015 · F-35B Lightning II Completes First Land-based Ski Jump Launch ... compatibility with British and Italian aircraft carriers. “This test ...
[53]
Aircraft Facts - 1st Marine Aircraft Wing
U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II's with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) ... Combat Radius (Internal Fuel), >450 nautical miles (833 km). Maximum Range ...Missing: weapons bay helmet- display
[54]
Everything You Need to Know about the F-35B
Dec 9, 2024 · Pilot-Centric Technology: The F-35B's helmet-mounted display system projects critical mission data directly onto the pilot's visor, including ...Missing: 450 nm
[55]
https://www.f35.com/f35/news-and-features/Everything-You-Need-to-Know-about-the-F35B.html
[56]
Japan receives first batch of F-35B stealth fighter jets from US
Aug 9, 2025 · The jets arrived at Nyutabaru Air Base in the Miyazaki prefecture on August 7, 2025. A fourth aircraft, originally scheduled to arrive the same ...Missing: Wasp- | Show results with:Wasp-
[57]
Convair XFY-1 Pogo | National Air and Space Museum
The Convair XFY-1 Pogo is one of many attempts made after World War II to devise a practical Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) combat aircraft.Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[58]
Historic Aircraft - The Tail-sitters, Part II—Convair - U.S. Naval Institute
The Convair XFY-1, or "Pogo," was a tail-sitting VTOL aircraft with a modified delta-wing, vertical tail, and castering wheels for vertical takeoff. It had a ...Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[59]
LEAPTech to Demonstrate Electric Propulsion Technologies - NASA
Mar 16, 2015 · NASA researchers will perform ground testing of a 31-foot-span, carbon composite wing section with 18 electric motors powered by lithium iron phosphate ...
[60]
NASA Puffin Electric Tailsitter VTOL Concept
Electric propulsion offers dramatic new vehicle mission capabilities, not possible with turbine or reciprocating engines.Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[61]
J-18 Red Eagle VSTOL (Jianjiji-18 Fighter aircraft 18) / F-18
Oct 25, 2021 · China has been rumored since at least 2011 to be working on a STOVL [short take off / vertical landing] aircraft, with the UK/US AV-8 ...
[62]
China's J-18 Snowy Owl: Myth or Reality? - The Aviationist
Jan 26, 2012 · Rumours on the Internet have persisted that China has been building a stealthy STOVL (Short Take Off Vertical Landing) aircraft in a similar vein to the F-35 ...
[63]
DSEI 2023 IAI: Unveils Its New VTOL Loitering Munition called ...
Sep 13, 2023 · Rotem Alpha is a Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) Tactical Loitering Munition and the newest member of IAI's loitering munition family.
[64]
[PDF] STOVL: The Best Future for Marine Air - DTIC
SEA BASING. In addition to STOVL's flexibility and cost advantages, the aircraft possesses the ability to support Sea Basing, the future of Marine Corps and ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
[65]
A Leatherneck JSF Is Just Right | Proceedings
To do that they have to be able to launch quickly and proceed swiftly to the target. Basing close to the target enhances responsiveness, and STOVL aircraft have ...
[66]
[PDF] Distributed STOVL Operations and Air-Mobility Support
As presently envisioned by Marine planners, DSOs will improve the op- erational flexibility, survivability, and lethality of F-35Bs by operating them from.
[67]
U.S. Funding $32M Upgrade to Air Base in the Philippines
Aug 9, 2024 · The Pentagon awarded a $32 million contract to upgrade an airfield in the Philippines as part of a broader US program to upgrade and improve Manila's military ...<|separator|>
[68]
F-35B Expeditionary Basing and the Pacific | Defense.info
Apr 25, 2021 · “The F-35B has been a game-changer in this theater, and I'm grateful for the flexibility and lethality that the entire USS Makin Island/15th MEU ...
[69]
We Went With Marine F-35Bs As They Fought A Mock War From A ...
Jan 22, 2025 · F-35Bs and C-17As fighting their way to, from, and out of the island is the best glimpse yet at what Pacific combat may look like for Marine Joint Strike ...
[70]
[PDF] F-35 Lightning II Program Status and Fast Facts - Lockheed Martin
Apr 1, 2020 · Maximum weight. 70,000 lb class. 60,000 lb class. 70,000 lb class. Propulsion*. (uninstalled thrust ratings). F135-PW-100. 40,000 lb Max. 25,000 ...
[71]
[PDF] F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
FUSL testing conducted on the first flight test aircraft. (CTOL aircraft AA-1) provided aircraft flight control, electrical, propulsion, and fuel system ...
[72]
Air Force Confirms F-35As Are Mission Capable Half the Time
Jun 27, 2024 · The F-35A mission capable rate for fiscal 2023 was 51.9 percent, with the Air Force blaming spare parts availability for the decline from the previous year's ...
[73]
Availability, Use, and Operating and Support Costs of F-35 Fighter ...
Jun 12, 2025 · Programwide operating and support costs exceeded $5 billion in 2023. The F-35 has three variants: the F-35A, operated by the Air Force; the F- ...
[74]
Large-scale wind tunnel tests of an ejector-lift STOVL aircraft model
shows the tolerance of concrete to a jet blast It can be seen that for jet temperatures above 2000°F, the residence time is less than 1 second; above 1000'F it ...<|separator|>
[75]
[PDF] state of the art thermal spray for corrosion protection and non-skid ...
Thermal Spray Nonskid (TSN) coatings are QPL. (NAVY) approved for application on a wide platforms of ships that support the F35B, V22 vertical landing aircraft.
[76]
Thermal Spray SafTrax TH604 Non-Skid - Thermion Inc
A highly tolerant, temperature resistant (HTTR) thermal spray nonskid (TSN) to mitigate the impact of vertical landing airframes, Joint Strike Fighter (F-35B) ...
[77]
Economic Impact - F-35 Lightning II
A. For Production Lots 15 through 17, the average flyaway cost of an F-35A was $82.5 million; $109 million for an F-35B, and $102.1 million per F-35C.
[78]
[PDF] Evaluation of Ceramic Matrix Composite Technology for Aircraft ...
The CMC mixer nozzle will offer reduced weight and improved mixing efficiency to provide reduced fuel burn. The main objectives are to evaluate the ...
[79]
Ceramic Matrix Composites to Make Breakthroughs in Aircraft ...
Aug 5, 2025 · CFRC CMC exhaust nozzles prepared by PW have been applied in F119 aero engine powered F22 fighters ( Figure 4) and F135 aero engine powered F35 ...
[80]
GE Aviation's XA100 Adaptive Cycle Engine Completes Detailed ...
This engine will increase combat aircraft thrust more than 10%, improve fuel efficiency by 25%, and provide significantly more aircraft heat dissipation ...Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[81]
XA100 Next Generation Adaptive Engine Could Now Power F-35B ...
Sep 22, 2022 · General Electric is now pitching its advanced XA100 engine for all three F-35 variants and has an eye on future aircraft programs, too.
[82]
Demonstrating MATRIX Flight Autonomy to the U.S. Marine Corps
Sep 9, 2025 · ... flight tasks or significantly reduce a human pilot's workload when weather conditions worsen or mission complexity increases,” he said.Missing: STOVL | Show results with:STOVL
[83]
Design and Sizing of a Dual-Purpose Hybrid-Electric Ducted Fan Lift ...
Dec 29, 2021 · This paper demonstrates parametric definition and sizing of all-electric and hybrid-electric variants of a dual-purpose ducted fan lift-plus-cruise aircraft ...
[84]
X-57 Maxwell Overview - NASA
Sep 13, 2018 · The X-57 will undergo as many as three configurations as an electric aircraft, with the final configuration to feature 14 electric motors and ...
[85]
F-35 Set to Receive Critical Upgrades in 2025 Production Lots
Block 4 will bring a tranche of new sensors to the F-35, including an all-new radar and EOTS suite for improved situational awareness. The sensor side of the F ...Missing: 2025-2028 | Show results with:2025-2028
[86]
[PDF] The FCAS and MGCS Weapon Systems and Franco-German ... - Ifri
FCAS and MGCS are the latest Franco-German defense programs, meant to represent cooperation, but face infighting and delays.
[87]
Shield AI's unmanned fighter jet concept pitched as a drone ...
Oct 21, 2025 · Shield AI's new unmanned, vertical-takeoff-and-landing fighter jet concept is designed to be a drone wingman or a standalone aircraft, ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[88]
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/03/f-35-set-to-receive-critical-upgrades-in-2025-production-lots/
[89]
F-35 Pilots in Alaska Learning to Operate in Harsh Arctic Conditions
Aug 16, 2022 · The US Air Force is stocking up on stealth jets in Alaska, and its pilots are learning to thrive in harsh Arctic conditions.
[90]
Manta Aircraft: HeVSTOL
MANTA AIRCRAFT is an aircraft design and technology development company, focused on performance V/STOL arquitecture for Urban Air Mobility and special missions.
[91]
Can STOVL Technology Enhance Passenger Aircraft Safety?
Jan 22, 2025 · Emergency Evacuation Aircraft: STOVL-enabled planes could be designed for disaster relief or evacuation missions in areas lacking runways.
[92]
With New Rule, FAA is Ready for Air Travel of the Future
Oct 22, 2024 · The agency today issued a final rule for the qualifications and training that instructors and pilots must have to fly aircraft in this “powered- ...
[93]
Why are there not more VTOL aircrafts used for civilian purposes, in ...
Mar 20, 2024 · And the ownership cost of the VTOL would be $40–50,000 per hour, or about $10,000 for the Gulfstream, and about $2000 per hour for a Jet Ranger.
[94]
[PDF] Future Need for VTOL/STOL Aircraft - Defense Science Board
As with any new aircraft, prototypes facilitate cost evaluation, production scale-up, and test validation of flight characteristics. Experimentation is also.