Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Saeed Chmagh

Saeed Chmagh (1 January 1967 – 12 July 2007) was an Iraqi media worker who served as a driver and camera assistant for Reuters news agency in Baghdad. Chmagh joined Reuters in 2003 and supported photographers in covering the Iraq War, often transporting them through hostile urban environments amid sectarian violence and insurgent activity. He was a father of four children. On 12 July 2007, Chmagh was killed alongside Reuters photographer during a U.S. Army helicopter airstrike in the New district, an area of recent combat between U.S. forces and suspected militants. The attack resulted in 12 deaths, including the two Reuters staffers, with U.S. aircrew footage later leaked by depicting the engagement where camera equipment was misidentified as weapons and the journalists as armed . The incident, dubbed "Collateral Murder" by , prompted a investigation and a U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command probe; the military concluded the crew followed in a dynamic environment with RPGs and AK-47s reportedly observed, while contested that the victims were non-combatants clearly engaged in . Subsequent van fire on rescuers wounded two children, further fueling debate over proportionality and positive identification in . No criminal charges resulted from U.S. reviews, highlighting tensions between operational fog-of-war decisions and for civilian casualties in operations.

Personal Background

Early Life and Family

Saeed Chmagh was born on January 1, 1967, in Iraq. Chmagh was married and the father of four children, for whom he served as the primary financial provider; he also supported his sister's family amid the economic hardships faced by many Iraqi civilians during the pre-invasion period under international sanctions and domestic authoritarian rule.

Pre-Reuters Employment

Saeed Chmagh was born on January 1, 1967, in . Publicly available records provide scant details on his professional activities prior to joining , where he served as a driver and camera assistant beginning before the U.S.-led invasion of in March 2003. No verified accounts from reputable sources document specific roles in local media, freelance work, or other employment in 's journalistic or support fields during the 1990s or earlier, amid the constraints of Saddam Hussein's regime on independent reporting. His entry into international news support likely reflected the opportunities emerging for local hires in Baghdad's foreign press corps as conflict risks escalated in the post-sanctions era.

Professional Career

Role at Reuters

Saeed Chmagh was employed by as a driver and camera assistant, having joined the agency prior to the United States-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. In this capacity, his primary responsibilities included transporting Reuters journalists and photographers to assignment locations across and surrounding areas, often navigating through insurgent-held neighborhoods, threats, and frequent military checkpoints that complicated mobility in the city's environment. Chmagh's logistical support was integral to ' Baghdad bureau operations during the height of the from 2003 to 2007, a period when the agency relied heavily on local Iraqi staff to facilitate on-the-ground coverage amid restricted foreign correspondent movements due to security risks. He assisted with camera setup and equipment handling during field operations, enabling photographers to capture events in high-risk zones such as eastern districts prone to militia clashes and . editor-in-chief David Schlesinger noted Chmagh's "outstanding contribution to reporting on the unfolding events in ," highlighting how such support roles sustained the agency's ability to document daily violence and political developments despite the loss of multiple staff members in the conflict.

Reporting in Wartime Iraq

Iraq emerged as the deadliest conflict for journalists following the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, with the Committee to Protect Journalists documenting at least 150 journalists and 54 media support workers killed by October 2011, many during the peak insurgency years of 2003-2007. Annual media worker deaths escalated from 15 in 2003 to 47 in 2007, primarily due to targeted killings by insurgents, crossfire in urban combat, and misidentification amid chaotic engagements where non-combatants lacked distinguishing markers. Reuters, as a major international wire service covering the war, suffered significant losses, with seven staff members killed since the invasion, including instances of fatalities from U.S. military actions such as the April 8, 2003, tank shelling of the Palestine Hotel that claimed cameraman Taras Protsyuk. Prior to 2007, at least four Reuters journalists had been killed by American forces, underscoring the perils of operating in environments where insurgents embedded among civilians, forcing reporters into proximity with armed groups to document events. Saeed Chmagh, employed by as a driver and camera assistant in since before the 2003 invasion, played a crucial role in facilitating on-the-ground coverage of the . His responsibilities included transporting photographers and reporters to active conflict zones, navigating and roadside bombs, and assisting in capturing footage of clashes between coalition forces, Iraqi security, and militants. Chmagh's persistence in high-risk areas contributed to ' extensive documentation of daily violence, including suicide bombings and activities, despite the absence of protections that some foreign correspondents utilized, leaving local staff like him exposed to both insurgent threats and military operations. The operational challenges stemmed from the asymmetric nature of the conflict, where journalists in attire operated without clear identifiers in densely populated urban settings, often near combatants who exploited cover. This proximity, necessary for firsthand , heightened risks of collateral engagement, as aerial or rapid ground assessments struggled to differentiate workers from potential threats in real-time scenarios devoid of formal distinctions. Chmagh's approach exemplified the resolve required, prioritizing empirical coverage of dynamics over safer, remote alternatives, thereby aiding global understanding of Iraq's causal realities amid biased institutional narratives that sometimes downplayed such hazards.

The July 12, 2007 Baghdad Airstrike

Strategic and Tactical Context

In July 2007, amid the U.S. military surge to counter escalating and insurgent strongholds, eastern —including the New Baghdad district—served as a primary theater for operations against Sunni extremist groups affiliated with . U.S. and Iraqi forces conducted house-to-house searches and patrols in densely populated, rubble-strewn neighborhoods, where insurgents exploited urban terrain for ambushes using small arms, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), and machine guns. Ground units in the area reported near-daily engagements, with armed militants firing from rooftops, alleys, and vehicles to disrupt coalition movements and supply lines. Apache helicopters from U.S. units were deployed overhead to support these ground elements, particularly after initial reports of attacks on patrols or vans suspected of carrying in the vicinity. Their role involved scanning for threats at altitude, where visual cues like clusters of armed men or weapon silhouettes dictated engagement decisions amid the high operational tempo of , which saw Multi-National Division forces averaging dozens of captures and seizures weekly. The district's tactical environment was defined by pervasive risks from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and , with tracking over 1,000 monthly attacks across in mid-2007, many concentrated in Baghdad's eastern sectors. Insurgents frequently operated in small, mobile groups that merged with civilian traffic and foot movement, using the district's markets and residential zones to stage assaults while minimizing exposure to fixed defenses. This blending complicated threat discrimination from the air, as militants discarded uniforms and leveraged everyday objects for cover, heightening the imperative for swift aerial to prevent ground forces from being overrun in confined urban spaces.

Sequence of the Engagement

On the morning of July 12, 2007, two U.S. AH-64 helicopters from the 1st , 227th observed a group of approximately 10 individuals gathered in an open area of Al-Amin al-Thaniyah in New , , near a U.S. ground patrol from the 2nd , 2nd Infantry . footage captured members of the group carrying rifles and an launcher, with some individuals crouching and pointing objects toward the patrol's HMMWVs; two men in the group, photographer and driver , carried cameras that from the aerial distance resembled weapons. At approximately 10:00 a.m. local time (around 06:20 ), the lead , Crazyhorse 18, fired 30mm cannon rounds in multiple bursts at the group after receiving approval from ground commanders, resulting in the deaths of eight men, including Noor-Eldeen, and wounding Chmagh, who was seen crawling away severely injured. Roughly 12 minutes later, a black minivan approached the scene from the east; two unarmed men exited the van and moved toward the wounded Chmagh, loading him into the vehicle before driving west at high speed. The crew reported observing the men making movements consistent with handling an toward the van and requested permission to engage, which was granted due to the perceived threat to nearby ground forces; fired two missiles and additional 30mm rounds, striking the van and killing the driver, the second man, and Chmagh, while wounding two children inside the vehicle who were en route to a . U.S. ground units, including fighting vehicles, arrived at the primary impact site shortly after the initial engagement and at the van site around 06:31 , securing the areas and recovering two rifles, one launcher (with no warhead), and a digital camera from the initial group location. The total casualties from both strikes numbered 12 dead, comprising 10 adult men—including the two Reuters staff—and two children who succumbed to injuries.

Casualties and Immediate Aftermath

The killed Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, aged 22, and driver Saeed Chmagh, aged 40, along with ten other Iraqis in the Al-Amin al-Thaniyah neighborhood of eastern . Preliminary reports attributed the incident to an amid reported clashes between U.S. forces and in the area. confirmed the deaths of its staff members shortly after, with bureau chief Yates initiating urgent inquiries into the circumstances while highlighting potential inconsistencies in initial accounts. Eyewitness statements contradicted military claims of active , asserting that no clashes were occurring and that the group targeted included unarmed and journalists observing from a distance. Chmagh survived the first volley but was gravely wounded; subsequent civilian rescue efforts, including a van arriving to evacuate casualties, drew further fire, resulting in the death of the van driver Saleh Matasher Tomal and injuries to two children aboard. Medical response was delayed due to the ongoing zone, complicating immediate aid to survivors.

US Military Investigations

Initial Inquiry and Findings

The U.S. Central Command conducted an initial internal investigation into the July 12, 2007, engagement shortly after the incident, focusing on compliance with () and the law of armed conflict. The review determined that the helicopter crew's actions were lawful, as the targeted individuals were reasonably perceived as an armed threat based on visual cues from the aircraft's targeting systems and radio reports from ground units under fire nearby. Pilots mistook Namir Noor-Eldeen's camera for an rifle due to its similar at operational distances, while the group's movements—clustering and maneuvering in a manner resembling preparing to engage—aligned with hostile intent indicators under prevailing . Key evidence supporting the findings included weapons recovered at the scene, such as two AK-47 rifles, an RPG launcher, and associated ammunition, which corroborated the crew's observations of armed personnel. Radio communications captured the pilots' real-time assessments of threats, including reports of rocket-propelled grenades and small-arms fire in the vicinity, with no indication that the crew was aware of the presence of journalists amid the chaotic urban combat environment. The subsequent arrival of a van to evacuate wounded was interpreted as potential reinforcement by armed actors retrieving weapons, prompting the secondary engagement in line with procedures for perceived hostile actions. The investigation found no evidence of deliberate targeting of personnel or deviation from , attributing the casualties to the inherent uncertainties of fog-of-war conditions in a high-threat area where frequently blended with civilians. No disciplinary actions or criminal charges were recommended or pursued against the crew, as the engagement was deemed a tragic but justified response to a perceived imminent danger rather than or . This assessment emphasized procedural adherence, with the crew having positively identified hostile indicators prior to firing, consistent with U.S. for aerial support in operations.

Rules of Engagement Analysis

The United States military's Rules of Engagement (ROE) in Iraq in 2007 authorized personnel to use necessary and proportional force, up to and including deadly force, against individuals committing hostile acts or demonstrating hostile intent toward U.S. or coalition forces. A hostile act encompassed actions such as firing weapons, while hostile intent referred to imminent threats like aiming firearms or positioning for attack, determined through positive identification (PID) based on reasonable certainty from observable indicators. These directives, derived from standing ROE and mission-specific supplements, emphasized self-defense and unit protection in counterinsurgency operations, where forces responded to dynamic threats without requiring an actual shot fired if intent was evident. In aerial operations, such as those conducted by AH-64 Apache helicopters supporting ground units in urban settings, ROE permitted engagement upon visual confirmation of armed personnel consistent with hostile activity, often relayed via ground controllers under fire. Urban warfare imposed tactical constraints, including split-second judgments from altitudes of 1,000 to 2,000 feet using forward-looking infrared (FLIR) and video feeds, where distinguishing fine details like civilian attire versus combatant gear was limited by distance, dust, and obscured lines of sight. Crews prioritized PID of threats to enable rapid neutralization, reflecting doctrinal emphasis on force protection when insurgents exploited civilian proximity for ambushes or indirect fire. Causal analysis of engagement decisions under these highlights how unmarked individuals carrying elongated objects—potentially misidentified as weapons from aerial perspectives—near confirmed armed groups could trigger perceived hostile intent, absent clear indicators. This aligns with first-principles of combat identification, where available sensory data drives action amid incomplete information, rather than exhaustive . In contrast to peacetime standards requiring near-absolute and post-threat response, Iraq's asymmetric necessitated preemptive measures to counter concealed threats like rocket-propelled grenades or improvised devices, prioritizing safety over minimized in high-threat zones. Such frameworks acknowledged the inherent uncertainties of urban insurgency, where empirical patterns of insurgents blending with populations elevated the cost of hesitation for operating forces.

Video Release and Disclosure

WikiLeaks Publication

On April 5, 2010, published a video titled "Collateral Murder," compiled from leaked classified U.S. captured by the gun cameras of two during the . The release included audio from the helicopter crew's radio transmissions, depicting the targeting and firing on a group of individuals on the ground, followed by the arrival of a van and additional strikes on it. The published material consisted of an edited version approximately 18 minutes long, which WikiLeaks described as censored to obscure profanity, alongside the full unedited raw footage spanning 39 minutes. This raw version provided a continuous view of the engagement from initial surveillance through the resolution, material that had remained undisclosed to the public prior to the leak due to its classified status. The U.S. authenticated the footage as originating from their helicopter systems but objected to ' title and selective editing, asserting that the presentation failed to incorporate surrounding operational context from the broader mission.

Verification and Initial Responses

The U.S. confirmed the of the -released video on April 6, 2010, stating it depicted the that killed Reuters staffers and Saeed Chmagh, and was consistent with their prior investigation finding no violations. verified the footage matched their records of the incident, noting they had sought the raw video via Act requests since 2007 without success, and renewed calls for full disclosure of related documents to clarify the context. Initial media coverage surged, with outlets including , , and highlighting the unedited audio of helicopter crew communications, which included remarks such as "Look at those dead bastards" and laughter following the strikes, prompting public shock over the apparent nonchalance amid civilian casualties. , while reaffirming the engagement's legality based on perceived threats from armed individuals, faced scrutiny for the video's revelation of details absent from earlier briefings, though no immediate policy changes were announced. Saeed Chmagh's family in viewed the video shortly after its release, confirming the visual sequence of his wounding and subsequent death in the van rescue attempt, which intensified their grief but also brought acknowledgment that the footage substantiated long-held accounts of . Family members expressed mixed relief that the unredacted evidence had surfaced, revealing the attack's reality despite the emotional toll of reliving the loss without new accountability.

Controversies and Perspectives

Criticisms of the Incident

Critics, including former Baghdad bureau chief Dean Yates, have described the as "cold-blooded ," alleging that U.S. forces engaged in reckless fire without an active threat, mistaking Namir Noor-Eldeen's camera for a launcher and targeting a rescue van that injured two children. Witnesses interviewed by , numbering 14 in total, reported no firefight or insurgent activity in the area at the time, contradicting initial U.S. claims of combat operations. Yates further accused the U.S. military of a through falsified reports, stating that initial statements on July 12, 2007, denied harm to children and portrayed the victims as nine armed with AK-47s and RPGs, despite video evidence showing civilian casualties and no immediate weapons. The Guardian's 2020 investigation, based on Yates' accounts and military logs, claimed generals presented staged evidence to editors, including selective video clips and weapons, to justify the engagement while withholding the full gunship footage. The release of the video, titled "Collateral Murder," framed the incident as deliberate targeting of journalists, highlighting crew communications such as "Look at those dead bastards" and the subsequent attack on Saeed Chmagh's rescuers as evidence of callous disregard for non-combatants, fueling broader anti-war sentiments. founder criticized the rules of engagement as fundamentally flawed, arguing they permitted such actions without sufficient verification. The (CPJ) labeled the footage "deeply disturbing" and raised concerns over the U.S. military's failure to verify targets before firing, particularly the unprovoked strike on the van carrying Saeed Chmagh, which resulted in child injuries; CPJ demanded a thorough, transparent investigation into the rules of engagement and accountability for the deaths of Noor-Eldeen and Chmagh. itself pressed U.S. officials for an objective probe into the airstrike, expressing dissatisfaction with the military's initial inquiry that found no wrongdoing.

Military and Pro-Engagement Defenses

The U.S. military's investigations into the concluded that the helicopter crew identified a perceived threat with reasonable certainty and adhered to (ROE), which require positive identification of hostile intent before firing. The Army's (CID) and subsequent Central Command (CENTCOM) reviews found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing, attributing the engagement to misidentification of cameras as weapons amid a dynamic urban environment where insurgents frequently ambushed coalition forces. Weapons including rifles and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) were recovered at the scene, supporting the pilots' initial assessment of an armed insurgent group rather than civilians, though contested the timeline of their placement. Operational context in New Baghdad justified preemptive action, as the area was part of an ongoing surge operation against , with fire and small-arms attacks reported in the vicinity that morning, creating conditions for rapid threat escalation. Pilots observed the group pointing objects—later identified as cameras but resembling AK-47s and an launcher from 2 kilometers altitude—and converging in a manner consistent with insurgent tactics, such as staging ambushes near U.S. patrols. The subsequent van arrival was interpreted as potential reinforcement or by combatants, a common insurgent practice, rather than civilian aid, especially given the lack of visible medical markings or distress signals in . Pro-engagement analyses emphasize that the incident exemplifies combat stress and perceptual errors inherent to aerial targeting in , where pilots rely on thermal and visual feeds without ground-level verification, rather than deliberate malice. Audio transcripts reflect heightened arousal and as coping mechanisms among aircrews under sustained operational tempo—not evidence of intent to target non-combatants—but standard confirming compliance before engagement. Such defenses prioritize and mission continuity over post-hoc scrutiny, noting that insurgents deliberately embedded among civilians and media personnel to exploit narratives, contrasting with the absence of any U.S. policy or orders directing attacks on journalists. Empirical data from operations indicate thousands of similar misidentifications without criminal intent, underscoring causal realities of urban combat where hesitation risks U.S. casualties.

Broader Implications for Journalism in Combat Zones

The incident involving Saeed Chmagh underscored the inherent vulnerabilities of journalists operating independently in urban environments, where frequently blended with civilians, complicating threat identification from aerial platforms. Journalists often forwent prominent markings on vehicles to evade deliberate targeting by non-state , who viewed personnel as potential spies or propagandists, thereby heightening the risk of misidentification by forces mistaking cameras or equipment for weapons. In from January 2003 to October 2007, 77 workers were violently killed, with 57% attributed to or unknown perpetrators, 9% to forces, and the remainder to Iraqi security, political groups, or criminals, illustrating that non-state posed the predominant lethal threat despite selective focus on Western actions. This disparity reflects causal realities of , where exploited civilian shields and journalists' necessity to embed locally for access, sometimes leading to proximity with armed elements without overt affiliations. Media-military tensions intensified post-incident, with advocacy groups demanding enhanced coordination protocols, such as real-time communication channels or designated safe zones, yet these clashed with operational imperatives like preserving tactical surprise and minimizing force exposure in fluid battlespaces. Independent reporting offered unfiltered perspectives but amplified personal risks, as unilateral s lacked the protective umbrella of units, contributing to 's status as the deadliest conflict for media workers, with over 150 journalist fatalities from 2003 onward, the majority unsolved due to insurgent . programs, expanded during the with over 600 journalists attached to U.S. units, mitigated some dangers by providing and while fostering dialogue, yet critics argued it skewed coverage toward narratives, underemphasizing impacts and limiting investigative depth due to access restrictions and pressures. These dynamics prioritized verifiable field threats—such as armed civilian movements mimicking insurgent tactics—over retrospective politicized critiques, emphasizing that robust must balance non-combatant protections with soldiers' split-second decisions amid obscured intentions. Empirical patterns from suggest that while coalition errors warranted scrutiny, systemic insurgent targeting and the fog of urban combat rendered absolute safeguards illusory, prompting ongoing debates on models blending with vetted access to uphold journalistic integrity without endangering forces or reporters. outlets, often aligned with institutional biases favoring anti-military framings, disproportionately amplified such incidents while downplaying parallel insurgent killings, distorting public risk assessments.

Legacy and Impact

Family and Reuters Tributes

Saeed Chmagh, aged 40 at the time of his death on July 12, 2007, was a father of four children whose loss compounded the human toll on his extended family in . Reuters chief executive Tom Glocer conveyed sympathies to Chmagh's family, friends, and colleagues, acknowledging the personal devastation amid the agency's professional operations in a high-risk . The release of helicopter footage on April 5, 2010, by intensified the family's ongoing grief, as they viewed it broadcast on that evening. Chmagh's 19-year-old son, Samir, recounted the experience as deeply painful, emphasizing that the video clarified the crew's awareness of the men's journalistic equipment, including cameras, before the strike. While female relatives wept openly, male family members maintained composure during the screening, confronting visual evidence of the incident's brutality. Reuters regarded Chmagh as a key local staff member, serving as driver and camera assistant essential to their bureau's fieldwork. His killing represented the sixth such loss for the agency in since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, underscoring the cumulative sacrifices of its personnel in the conflict zone.

Influence on Media-Military Relations

The release of the Collateral Murder video in April 2010 intensified public scrutiny of U.S. military (ROE), particularly regarding the identification of potential combatants versus civilians, including journalists, in dynamic urban combat settings. U.S. Central Command's investigation concluded that the crew's actions on July 12, 2007, complied with prevailing ROE, as the operators reasonably perceived armed threats—including an and AK-47s—amid ongoing insurgent activity in New Baghdad, leading to no prosecutions or disciplinary actions against the personnel involved. This outcome fueled debates on ROE transparency, with advocates calling for clearer protocols on distinguishing equipment from weaponry, though no substantive doctrinal revisions directly attributable to the incident were implemented in subsequent U.S. operations. The event highlighted the acute dangers faced by unembedded journalists in conflict zones, where split-second decisions under fire can result in tragic misidentifications, as evidenced by the mistaking of a for an launcher. It reinforced the broader reality of warfare's indiscriminate risks to all parties, yet drew criticism for disproportionate outrage directed at coalition forces relative to insurgent perpetrators; the (CPJ) recorded at least 150 journalists and 54 media workers killed in from 2003 to 2011, with the majority attributed to insurgent targeting, , or rather than coalition actions. Post-2010 developments showed limited institutional evolution, with the video serving more as a catalyst for ongoing discussions on whistleblower disclosures and the authenticity of decontextualized footage than as a driver of . While it strained perceptions of trust between military embeds and —exacerbated by accusations of selective editing omitting combat context—it perpetuated realist assessments of causal factors in wartime engagements, emphasizing fog-of-war constraints over intentional malfeasance. These dynamics continue to inform analyses of leaked materials, underscoring tensions between operational and demands for evidentiary without yielding verifiable shifts in or guidelines.

References

  1. [1]
    Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh - THE BARON
    Born: Iraq, 1 September 1984. Joined Reuters: 2003. Died: Baghdad, 12 July 2007. Born: Iraq, 1 January 1967. Joined Reuters: 2003. Died: 12 July 2007.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  2. [2]
    Saeed Chmagh Killed - Committee to Protect Journalists
    Driver and camera assistant Chmagh was killed along with photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen in eastern Baghdad during what witnesses described as a U.S. helicopter ...Missing: biography facts
  3. [3]
    Saeed Chmagh: The Life and Legacy of a Reuter's Journalist
    Jul 2, 2024 · Chmagh's career began with local reporting in Iraq, where he quickly gained a reputation for his fearless approach to journalism. His ability to ...Missing: biography facts
  4. [4]
    Reuters staff killed in Iraq - The Guardian
    Jul 12, 2007 · Saeed Chmagh was a father of four. "Once again we are left mourning colleagues who have met an untimely death while doing their job in Iraq," ...Missing: biography facts
  5. [5]
    Video Shows US Killing of Reuters Employees - The New York Times
    Apr 5, 2010 · The attack killed 12, among them the Reuters photographer, Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and the driver, Saeed Chmagh, 40. Reuters employees were ...
  6. [6]
    Leaked U.S. video shows deaths of Reuters' Iraqi staffers
    Apr 5, 2010 · The helicopter opened fire on the small group, killing several people and wounding others. Minutes later, when a van approached and began trying ...
  7. [7]
    Pentagon Cites Weapons Found At Scene Of Killings In Iraq Video
    Apr 5, 2010 · Update at 8 a.m., April 6: An investigation into the 2007 killing in Baghdad of 12 civilians -- including two employed by the Reuters news ...
  8. [8]
    Return to Ward 17: Making peace with lost comrades - Reuters
    Apr 18, 2018 · I was the Iraq bureau chief for Reuters when Namir, 22, and Saeed, 40, were shot dead by a U.S. Apache helicopter on the streets of Baghdad on ...Missing: biography facts
  9. [9]
    For 2 Grieving Families, Video Reveals Grim Truth
    Apr 6, 2010 · The attack left 12 people dead, including Namir Noor-Eldeen, a 22-year-old Reuters photographer, and Mr. Chmagh, 40, a driver and assistant for ...Missing: biography facts<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Iraq Video: Collateral Murder? Or Fog of War? - Atlantic Council
    Apr 6, 2010 · Iraq Video: Collateral Murder? Or Fog of War? Wikileaks massacre photo. A disturbing video which seems to show American soldiers shooting ...
  11. [11]
    2 Iraqi Journalists Killed as U.S. Forces Clash With Militias
    Jul 13, 2007 · Chmagh had worked for Reuters since before the United States-led invasion in 2003 and had four children. He also supported his sister's family ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  12. [12]
    Friends and colleagues, gone but not forgotten - THE BARON
    Oct 14, 2013 · Saeed was killed, along with the minivan driver and several others. He is survived by his wife and four children. In April 2008, Palestinian ...
  13. [13]
    Reuters photographer, driver killed in Baghdad
    Dec 12, 2007 · Photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and driver and camera assistant Saeed Chmagh, 40, were killed by a US strike that claimed the lives of nine other Iraqis.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  14. [14]
    Saeed Chmagh and the Impact of War on Journalists
    Jul 2, 2024 · Saeed Chmagh worked as a driver and assistant for Reuters. His job involved transporting journalists to and from their assignments, often ...
  15. [15]
    Reuters photographer and driver killed in Iraq
    Aug 9, 2007 · LONDON, July 12 (Reuters) - An Iraqi photographer and driver working for Reuters in Iraq were killed in Baghdad on Thursday in what police said ...
  16. [16]
    Iraq war and news media: A look inside the death toll
    Mar 18, 2013 · One of the journalists killed by U.S. forces was Reuters cameraman Mazen Dana. A veteran conflict journalist and a 2001 CPJ International ...
  17. [17]
    Violent deaths of media workers associated with conflict in Iraq ... - NIH
    May 15, 2014 · Details collected on violent deaths of media workers in Iraq (2003–2012). ... Saeed Chmagh were killed by airstrike from coalition forces ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    FACTBOX-Details of Reuters staff killed in Iraq
    Jun 17, 2008 · Seven Reuters staff have been killed in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Details of the deaths follow: 2003: * April 8 - Reuters ...
  19. [19]
    Reuters seeks US army video of staff killed in Iraq
    Jul 11, 2008 · Photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and driver Saeed Chmagh, 40, were killed in a U.S. helicopter air strike in eastern Baghdad on July 12, 2007 ...Missing: death | Show results with:death<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Iraq: Journalists in Danger
    CPJ compiled a detailed statistical profile of journalists and media workers killed on duty in Iraq, from the beginning of the U.S. invasion in March 2003 ...
  21. [21]
    Reporting in Iraq: A "Catastrophe" for Journalists - PBS
    A record 93 reporters and media assistants were killed in Iraq last year, bringing the total number of journalists killed since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq ...
  22. [22]
    Iraq Can Be a Deadly Assignment for Journalists - ABC News
    Jan 28, 2007 · "Now," Simon said, "the primary risk to journalists is not crossfire, it's murder." Anne Garrells has covered the war for National Public Radio ...Missing: insurgency | Show results with:insurgency
  23. [23]
    Journalists in Iraq – A Survey of Reporters on the Front Lines
    Nov 28, 2007 · A majority of journalists surveyed (57%) report that at least one of their Iraqi staff had been killed or kidnapped in the last year alone—and ...Missing: risks | Show results with:risks
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Surge, 2006-2008 (The U.S. Army Campaigns in Iraq) - GovInfo
    To turn the tide, it deployed additional U.S. troops to protect the Iraqi population, cut off insurgent forces from their bases of support and supply, and ...
  25. [25]
    Coalition, Iraqi Troops Begin Clearing Sadr City | Article - Army.mil
    More than 600 Multi-National Division Baghdad Soldiers and 550 Iraqi security forces began a clearing operation in the eastern Baghdad district known as ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Iraq Index | Brookings Institution
    “Series of bombings strikes Iraq, 3 in Shiite area and another near Green Zone in Baghdad”, Associated Press Worldstream, July 23, 2007. 21 killed and 26.
  27. [27]
    What happened in Iraq? - The Washington Post
    Feb 21, 2012 · On July 12, 2007, during a long, hot mission, American soldiers searched houses in a ruined maze of a neighborhood in east Baghdad.
  28. [28]
    U.S., Iraqi Soldiers Continue Operations in Iraq | Article - Army.mil
    Jul 25, 2007 · Combined Iraqi and U.S. forces captured 48 suspected terrorists, killed one insurgent and seized weapons and bombs in Iraq over the past ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Iraq Index | Brookings Institution
    ... Baghdad ambush”, Agence France Presse, June 29, 2007. 5 killed and 7 injured by roadside bomb. Richard A. Oppel and Stephen Farrell, “Sectarian Attacks Kill ...
  30. [30]
    Understanding Current Operations in Iraq - Small Wars Journal
    Jun 26, 2007 · Our concept is to knock over several insurgent safe havens simultaneously, in order to prevent terrorists relocating their infrastructure from ...
  31. [31]
    IRAQ: Insurgents' Tactics - Council on Foreign Relations
    Attacks are increasingly focusing on Iraqi civilians and security forces instead of U.S. forces. · Many of the insurgent attacks in recent weeks have grown more ...Missing: 2007 | Show results with:2007
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Report of Investigation UP AR 15-6
    Apr 6, 2010 · Recovered by Media Exploitation Team from Canon EOS Media Cards vic. Exhibit R – Photos of US Army HMMWV Dated 12 July 2007. Recovered by Media ...
  33. [33]
    CENTCOM Releases Report on Apache Gun Camera Video From Iraq
    Apr 6, 2010 · The Army carried out an investigation into the civilian casualties that resulted from the events of July 12, 2007, and the final AR 15-6 report ...
  34. [34]
    Media Workers Killed in 2007: Saeed Chmagh - Refworld
    Driver and camera assistant Chmagh was killed along with photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen in eastern Baghdad during what witnesses described as a US helicopter ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  35. [35]
    Journalists Killed in 2007 - Motive Confirmed: Namir Noor-Eldeen
    The victims included Noor-Eldeen's driver and camera assistant, Saeed Chmagh. ... Initial reports suggested that the air strike took place during clashes ...
  36. [36]
    Video shows deaths of two Reuters journalists in Iraq in 2007 - CNN
    Apr 5, 2010 · Reuters said the deaths of Chmagh and Noor-Eldeen "were tragic and emblematic of the extreme dangers that exist in covering war zones."Missing: 2003-2007 | Show results with:2003-2007
  37. [37]
    Iraq war logs: Apache attack's child victims speak out - The Guardian
    Oct 25, 2010 · Cockpit video of gunship attack that killed 19 and gravely injured two children was first major leak of Iraq war material
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Shoot - The National Security Archive
    Any persons demonstrating hostile intent or committing a hostile act may be engaged using necessary and proportional force, up to and including DEADLY FORCE ...Missing: CENTCOM urban 2007
  39. [39]
    The Law of War: Restrictive Rules of Engagement and Increased ...
    A hostile act triggers the right to use proportional force in self[-]defense to deter, neutralize, or destroy the threat. Hostile Intent: The threat of imminent ...
  40. [40]
    Appendix E: Rules of Engagement for U.S. Military Forces in Iraq
    ... hostile and may be attacked subject to the following instructions: a) Positive identification (PID) is required prior to engagement. PID is a reasonable ...Missing: urban 2007 intent
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Rules of Engagement: An Unclassified Primer - DTIC
    There are other definitions used in ROE, however, they are the classified enunciations of such things as "hostile act" and. "hostile intent." These analytical ...Missing: 2007 | Show results with:2007
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Attack Helicopter Operations in Urban Terrain. - DTIC
    Because they must first see the target before they engage it, pilots can positively identify enemy forces or hostile activity (such as sniper or mortar fire ...Missing: intent | Show results with:intent
  43. [43]
    Us Military Rules Of Engagement And - Informed Comment
    Aug 10, 2005 · Hostile act/hostile intent is not a blank check to use all force available. The force used must still be reasonable in intensity, duration, and ...Missing: CENTCOM urban 2007
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Emerging State Practice on Self-Defense and Hostile Intent - GPPi
    Jun 20, 2017 · more aggressive than other forces—U.S. soldiers overall tended to be fighting in more ... intent ROE was standing, and in a clear hostile intent ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
  45. [45]
    The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq
    ... hostile.” He said hostile intent would be demonstrated if (1) a target fired at a soldier, (2) a target carried a weapon, or (3) a target was driving toward ...Missing: doctrine | Show results with:doctrine<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Collateral Murder
    In this particular case, some of the people killed were journalists that were simply doing their jobs: putting their lives at risk in order to ...Download · Transcript · Collateral Murder · TimelineMissing: police | Show results with:police
  47. [47]
    Iraq Video Brings Notice to a Web Site - The New York Times
    Apr 6, 2010 · WikiLeaks did not merely post the 38-minute video, it used the label “Collateral Murder” and said it depicted “indiscriminate” and “unprovoked” ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Massacre Caught on Tape: US Military Confirms Authenticity of Their ...
    Apr 6, 2010 · AMY GOODMAN: Reuters driver Saeed Chmagh survived the initial attack. Here he's seen trying to crawl away as the helicopter flies overhead.
  49. [49]
    Wikileaks reveals video showing US air crew shooting down Iraqi ...
    Apr 5, 2010 · A secret video showing US air crew falsely claiming to have encountered a firefight in Baghdad and then laughing at the dead after launching an air strike that ...
  50. [50]
    Video shows 'US attack' on Iraqis | News - Al Jazeera
    Apr 6, 2010 · 'Collateral murder': Watch the full video · Blog: WikiLeaks vs the Pentagon. Listening Post: WikiLeaks. Al Jazeera is not responsible for the ...
  51. [51]
    WikiLeaks Iraq Killings Video: Slain Journalist's Family Reacts ...
    Despite the pain of seeing Saeed die, the family are glad the footage has been released. "Thank god the truth has been revealed and the blood of innocent ...
  52. [52]
    Families of Victims of 2007 US Helicopter Killing React to Leaked ...
    Apr 12, 2010 · Journalists from the investigative team in Iceland that released the now-infamous US military video on WikiLeaks traveled to Baghdad ...Missing: airstrike | Show results with:airstrike
  53. [53]
    'All lies': how the US military covered up gunning down two ...
    Jun 14, 2020 · Former Reuters journalist Dean Yates was in charge of the bureau in Baghdad when his Iraqi colleagues Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh were killed.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  54. [54]
    Video shows U.S. attack that killed Reuters staffers in Iraq
    Apr 5, 2010 · Disturbing video footage showing a 2007 US military airstrike that killed about a dozen Iraqis in eastern Baghdad, including a Reuters cameraman and assistant, ...
  55. [55]
    Video of Journalists' Death Answers Some Questions, but Raises ...
    Apr 6, 2010 · The Army's rules of engagement and the Geneva Conventions require "positive identification of hostile intent before shooting." The military says ...Missing: strike | Show results with:strike
  56. [56]
    Embedded Journalists in Iraq: War Stories | PBS News
    Apr 1, 2003 · Terence Smith assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the Pentagon's "embedding" program and its effect on news coverage of the war in Iraq.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] controlling the media in iraq - Contexts Magazine
    The results show embedded reporters put forward a highly military-focused vision of the war, covering bombing and civilian fatalities and using Iraqis as a ...
  58. [58]
    Iraq: The deadliest war for journalists - Al Jazeera
    Apr 11, 2013 · However, Iraq's impunity rate, or the degree to which perpetrators have escaped prosecution for killing journalists, is the worst in the world ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  59. [59]
    Reuters photographer and driver killed in Iraq
    Aug 9, 2007 · The cause of their deaths was unclear, although witnesses spoke of an explosion in the area. Iraqi police said either a U.S. air strike or a ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] WikiLeaks and the Afterlife of Collateral Murder
    ... July 12, 2007, U.S.. Apache attack helicopter attack upon individuals in New Baghdad. Among the more than 23 people killed by the 30-mm cannon fire were two ...Missing: mission | Show results with:mission
  61. [61]
    Not 'Collateral Murder' but Tragedy of Mistaken Identity
    The video, posted by “whistleblower website” WikiLeaks, is titled “Collateral Murder” and has become an Internet sensation, drawing millions of hits on YouTube.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  62. [62]
    Attacks on the Press 2005: Iraq - Committee to Protect Journalists
    Feb 16, 2006 · Insurgent attacks remained the leading cause of media deaths. In several cases, armed groups hunted down and murdered journalists. The motives ...