Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sanction

A sanction is an authoritative decree, permission, or penalty, embodying dual senses derived from the Latin sancire, meaning "to decree," "to make inviolable," or "to confirm by a sacred rite," which evolved to encompass both ratification of actions and enforcement through punishment for noncompliance.^[1]^[2] In legal and normative contexts, it signifies formal approval that renders a rule binding or, conversely, a provision for retribution such as fines, restrictions, or coercive measures to deter violations, reflecting the term's inherent ambiguity as a contronym where endorsement and condemnation converge from a shared root in authoritative validation.^[3]^[4] This duality persists in modern usage: as a verb, to sanction can denote explicit authorization of conduct, while as a noun in diplomacy and international law, sanctions typically describe targeted economic, trade, or diplomatic penalties imposed by states or organizations to compel behavioral change, such as asset freezes or export bans aimed at upholding global norms without resorting to military force.^[5]^[6] Notable applications include multilateral regimes under the United Nations Charter, where Chapter VII empowers the Security Council to enact binding measures against threats to peace, though efficacy often hinges on enforcement compliance and can inadvertently burden civilian populations more than intended targets. The concept's evolution underscores tensions between sovereign decree and collective coercion, with historical precedents tracing to ancient treaty penalties and League of Nations efforts, yet contemporary debates highlight variable success rates and risks of escalation.^[7]

Legal and institutional sanctions

Positive sanctions: Approvals and endorsements

In legal and institutional contexts, positive sanctions denote formal permissions, ratifications, or authoritative endorsements that legitimize actions, agreements, or policies, thereby enabling their execution and enforceability. Derived from the Latin sanctio—a term rooted in the verb sancire, meaning "to make sacred," "to consecrate," or "to decree as inviolable"—the concept originally emphasized binding confirmation by a higher authority, evolving into English usage by the 15th century as a reference to official decrees or laws that confer validity rather than impose penalties.^[1]^[3] This positive connotation persists in modern jurisprudence, where such sanctions reinforce compliance by granting legitimacy and associated benefits, such as legal protection against challenges, distinct from coercive measures that deter noncompliance. A primary example is the ratification of treaties, which requires legislative endorsement to transform executive negotiations into binding international commitments. In the United States, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution stipulates that the President "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur," serving as a positive sanction that authorizes the treaty's domestic effect and judicial enforceability.^[8] This process, applied to over 1,700 treaties since 1789, underscores how positive sanctions incentivize adherence by integrating agreements into national law, with non-ratified proposals lapsing without force.^[9] Within domestic contract law, ratification functions as a positive sanction when a principal retroactively approves an agent's unauthorized acts, rendering the agreement fully binding and enforceable as if originally authorized. For instance, under principles codified in the Restatement (Third) of Agency, such approval voids any prior defects and obligates parties to perform, thereby reinforcing compliance through the incentive of mutual legal recourse rather than punishment for breach.^[10] Similarly, governmental approvals for regulated activities—such as licensing for controlled exports—act as positive sanctions, permitting operations only upon verified adherence to statutory criteria, with revocation reserved for violations but initial grant emphasizing enabling legitimacy over deterrence.^[11] These mechanisms highlight positive sanctions' role in fostering voluntary alignment with institutional norms by tying authorization to predefined standards of conduct.

Negative sanctions: Penalties and enforcement

Negative sanctions in legal systems encompass punitive measures imposed by judicial or regulatory authorities to enforce compliance with laws and deter violations, including monetary fines, coercive detention, professional disqualifications, and property seizures. These penalties target individuals, attorneys, or entities found to have engaged in misconduct, such as frivolous litigation or ethical breaches, with the intent to restore order and prevent recurrence. In the United States, such sanctions derive from statutory rules and inherent court powers, applied after due process to ensure proportionality.^[12]^[13] A prominent example is Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which mandates sanctions against attorneys or parties who present pleadings, motions, or papers not grounded in fact after reasonable inquiry, lacking legal merit, or filed for improper purposes like harassment. Courts may impose non-monetary directives, monetary penalties payable to the court or opposing party, or order dismissal of offending claims, with motions requiring specific descriptions of violative conduct and a 21-day safe harbor for withdrawal. Application rates vary by district, but surveys of federal judges indicate Rule 11 motions arise in about 10-15% of civil cases involving perceived abuse, though actual sanctions are granted judiciously to avoid chilling legitimate advocacy.^[12]^[14] Corporate penalties exemplify escalating enforcement post-legislative reforms, as seen in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which responded to scandals like Enron by enhancing fines and imprisonment for securities fraud and false certifications. The Act raised maximum penalties for willful violations to $5 million in fines and 20 years' imprisonment for executives, alongside corporate fines up to $25 million; U.S. Sentencing Commission data show these enhancements substantially increased average sentences for affected offenses, with victim loss enhancements amplifying terms by 10-20 levels in guidelines calculations. Enforcement statistics reflect heightened application, with Securities and Exchange Commission actions yielding billions in penalties annually, though initial post-Act financial restatements surged 66% to over 1,600 in 2005 before stabilizing amid improved internal controls.^[15]^[16]^[17] Enforcement mechanisms include civil contempt, where courts coerce compliance with orders through indefinite detention or escalating daily fines until obedience, distinct from criminal contempt's punitive focus. Federal courts hold inherent authority to issue such sanctions for disobedience obstructing justice, as affirmed in precedents limiting them to remedial purposes. Professional disqualifications, like attorney disbarment for ethical violations under state bar rules, remove licenses for misconduct such as evidence tampering; for instance, a New Hampshire attorney was disbarred in 2024 after destroying a computer and altering metadata prior to an ethics hearing, illustrating permanent exclusion to protect public trust. Asset forfeitures serve as in rem penalties against property tied to crimes, with the Department of Justice and Treasury seizing over $45 billion from 2000 to 2019, often administratively in 80-85% of cases without judicial contest, funding law enforcement while aiming to disrupt criminal enterprises.^[18]^[19]^[20] Regarding deterrence, these sanctions theoretically reduce recidivism by imposing costs exceeding benefits of noncompliance, yet empirical studies reveal mixed causal effects. Meta-analyses of criminal sanctions indicate harsher penalties yield no overall reduction in reoffending rates, with a slight 3% increase observed across jurisdictions, emphasizing sanction certainty over severity as the primary deterrent factor. For non-incarceratory measures like fines or disbarments, evidence suggests targeted application lowers repeat violations in professional contexts, as sanctioned firms post-SOX exhibited fewer reporting errors compared to unsanctioned peers, though selection bias and compliance investments confound strict causality.^[21]^[22]^[23]

International sanctions

Types and mechanisms

International sanctions are classified into broad categories such as comprehensive economic measures, diplomatic restrictions, and targeted (or "smart") sanctions designed to minimize unintended humanitarian impacts. Comprehensive economic sanctions typically involve trade embargoes that prohibit or restrict imports and exports to the targeted state, aiming to curtail overall revenue and economic activity.^[24] Diplomatic sanctions include the severance of official relations, suspension from international organizations, or limitations on high-level engagements, while targeted measures focus on specific sectors or individuals, such as arms embargoes banning military-related trade, financial restrictions like exclusions from global payment systems (e.g., SWIFT messaging for cross-border transactions), and selective bans on commodities essential to prohibited activities.^[25]^[26] Targeted sanctions, often termed "smart" sanctions, prioritize precision by imposing asset freezes, travel bans, or sectoral prohibitions on designated entities, officials, or elites rather than broad populations. For instance, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006) mandates member states to freeze assets, funds, and economic resources of North Korean government entities and individuals linked to proliferation activities, alongside a general arms embargo and catch-all provisions on nuclear- and ballistic missile-related items.^[27]^[28] These mechanisms operate on the principle of disrupting illicit revenue streams and raising operational costs for targeted actors, verifiable through observable reductions in trade volumes and financial flows, as evidenced by post-2014 sanctions on Russia correlating with a 0.2 percentage point annual drag on GDP growth from 2014–2018 per International Monetary Fund estimates, alongside broader stagnation relative to global averages.^[29]^[30] Enforcement relies on a combination of multilateral coordination through bodies like the UN Security Council, which issues binding resolutions implemented via national legislation, and unilateral actions by states such as the United States through agencies like the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). OFAC administers sanctions by designating entities for asset blocking and trade prohibitions, enforcing compliance via civil penalties, investigations, and coordination with financial institutions to screen transactions.^[6]^[31] Secondary sanctions extend this reach by penalizing non-sanctioning third parties—such as foreign firms or banks—for engaging with targeted entities, often by threatening denial of access to the sanctioning state's financial system, thereby incentivizing global adherence without requiring universal consensus.^[32]^[33] This layered approach disrupts causal pathways of support to regimes, elevating internal costs through forfeited revenues and restricted access to international markets, while allowing exemptions for humanitarian goods to mitigate civilian harm.^[34]

Historical development

The concept of international sanctions as a coercive tool emerged prominently in the interwar period with the League of Nations' imposition of economic measures against Italy following its invasion of Ethiopia on October 3, 1935.^[35] The League applied partial trade restrictions, excluding key items like oil, arms, and loans, but these failed to halt the aggression due to incomplete enforcement by major powers such as Britain and France, who prioritized appeasement policies; sanctions were lifted on July 15, 1936, after Italy's conquest, exposing the limitations of multilateral economic pressure without unified commitment or military backing.^[36]^[37] Post-World War II, the United Nations formalized sanctions under Chapter VII of its Charter, adopted June 26, 1945, which empowers the Security Council to identify threats to peace (Article 39) and impose non-military measures (Article 41) binding on all member states.^[38] The first UN sanctions regime targeted Southern Rhodesia in 1966 under Resolution 232, marking the shift to institutionalized enforcement, though early applications were sporadic amid Cold War divisions.^[25] By the end of the Cold War, the Security Council had established only a handful of regimes, but since 1966, it has created 31 in total, addressing conflicts, apartheid, and non-proliferation.^[25] During the Cold War, sanctions expanded through unilateral actions, exemplified by the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba initiated October 19, 1960, under President Eisenhower in response to nationalizations and Soviet alignment, escalating to a full trade ban proclaimed February 7, 1962, by President Kennedy.^[39]^[40] This reflected broader superpower rivalries, where sanctions supplemented containment strategies but often bypassed UN mechanisms due to veto risks. The 1990 Gulf War prompted a pivotal evolution, with UN Resolution 661 imposing comprehensive sanctions on Iraq August 6, 1990, prohibiting all trade except humanitarian aid, which correlated with severe civilian impacts including halved per capita income, widespread malnutrition affecting over 500,000 children under five by 1995, and shortages of medical supplies amid regime intransigence.^[41]^[42] These outcomes, documented in UN reports and field assessments, drove a doctrinal shift toward "smart" or targeted sanctions by the late 1990s, focusing on elites via asset freezes and travel bans rather than broad embargoes, as piloted in Iraq revisions and subsequent regimes to mitigate unintended humanitarian costs while preserving pressure on policymakers.^[43]

Recent applications and case studies

In December 2003, Libya announced the abandonment of its weapons of mass destruction programs, including nuclear, chemical, and long-range missile capabilities, following years of UN and unilateral sanctions that restricted oil exports and economic activity.^[44] The measures, imposed since the 1990s but intensified post-2001, limited Libya's ability to sell oil—its primary revenue source—causing significant economic contraction that pressured the regime to negotiate dismantlement for sanctions relief.^[45] International verification confirmed the elimination of key facilities and materials by 2004. UN and U.S. sanctions targeting Iran's nuclear program from 2010 onward led to a sharp decline in crude oil and condensate exports, dropping from an average of 2.6 million barrels per day in 2011 to 1.4 million barrels per day in 2014, with revenues falling from $81 billion in 2011 to $38 billion in 2013.^[46] ^[47] These restrictions, enforced via bans on purchases by major importers and financial isolation, contributed to Iran's pursuit of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), under which sanctions were partially lifted in exchange for nuclear curbs.^[48] Post-2018 U.S. withdrawal, reimposed sanctions halved exports again by 2020, though evasion and partial waivers sustained some flows.^[49] Ongoing UN sanctions since 2006 against North Korea for missile and nuclear tests have documented widespread evasion, particularly through China, including illicit coal and oil trade via ship-to-ship transfers and falsified documentation.^[50] UN Panel of Experts reports from 2019-2023 highlighted Chinese entities facilitating over 100,000 tons of refined petroleum smuggling annually, exceeding UN caps, and cyber-enabled revenue generation bypassing asset freezes.^[51] ^[52] Despite these, sanctions froze North Korean assets abroad and restricted dual-use exports, though enforcement gaps persisted as noted in the panel's final 2024 report before its mandate expired.^[53] Following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, coordinated Western sanctions—including EU and U.S. bans on energy imports, SWIFT exclusions for major banks, and a G7 oil price cap—reduced Russia's fossil fuel export revenues, with monthly figures dropping to levels unseen since 2020 by early 2023 and overall GDP contracting 2.1% that year.^[54] ^[55] IMF analyses estimated cumulative real income losses of 6-8% relative to pre-war baselines through 2030, partly from $100 billion-plus annual energy revenue shortfalls before redirection to non-Western markets.^[56] Approximately $300 billion in Russian central bank assets were frozen globally by mid-2022, primarily in Europe and the U.S., supporting Ukraine aid mechanisms by 2025.^[57] U.S. sanctions on Venezuela's oil sector, intensified in 2019 via PDVSA asset blocks and secondary restrictions, contributed to production and export declines, with crude outputs falling over 50% from 2018 peaks and exports dropping 11.5% in early 2025 amid new tariffs on importers.^[58] These measures targeted regime financing, freezing billions in overseas assets and limiting access to diluents for heavy oil processing, though partial 2023-2024 waivers allowed temporary export rebounds before re-tightening.^[59] Empirical data from shipping trackers showed tanker loadings averaging under 800,000 barrels per day in sanctioned periods, exacerbating economic contraction.^[60] In 2019, U.S. export controls restricted Huawei's access to American semiconductors and technology, causing a 30% revenue drop to 636.8 billion yuan in 2021 from pre-sanction highs, with smartphone sales plummeting 40% globally due to Google service bans.^[61] By 2024, however, revenues rebounded to over 704 billion yuan (about $99 billion), driven by domestic chip development and diversification into cloud and automotive sectors, demonstrating adaptation despite ongoing entity list designations.^[62] U.S. firms reported $33 billion in lost sales to Huawei from 2021-2024 as collateral impact.^[63]

Empirical effectiveness

Empirical analyses of international sanctions, drawing from comprehensive databases such as the one compiled by Hufbauer, Schott, Elliott, and Oegg in Economic Sanctions Reconsidered (covering over 200 cases from 1914 to 2006), indicate a modest overall success rate of approximately 34% in achieving stated policy objectives, defined as significant changes in target behavior such as policy reversals or concessions. Success is higher in cases post-1990, reaching around 40%, reflecting shifts toward multilateral coordination and targeted measures.^[64] These figures counter blanket assertions of total inefficacy, as sanctions demonstrably contribute to outcomes in over one-third of instances, often through compounding economic pressures that elevate opportunity costs for target regimes.^[65] Comparative studies highlight differences between targeted and comprehensive sanctions: targeted measures, focusing on elites, sectors, or entities (e.g., asset freezes or export bans on specific technologies), exhibit higher efficacy in avoiding broad humanitarian backlash while pressuring decision-makers, with success rates estimated at up to 44% in some aid-suspension variants akin to targeted tools, versus 26% for broader economic sanctions.^[66] Comprehensive sanctions, imposing wide trade or financial restrictions, achieve coercive leverage through deeper economic disruption but risk lower net success due to evasion via third-party trade or domestic adaptation, though they correlate with GDP per capita declines of 2.8% in targets over initial years post-imposition.^[67] World Bank assessments of sanctioned economies, such as Russia's post-2022 experience, confirm contractions of 2-3.6% in GDP under severe export embargoes, verifiable through trade data disruptions.^[68] ^[54] Case-specific evidence underscores causal impacts on regime behavior. Post-2022 Western sanctions on Russia, including export controls on dual-use technologies, have depleted over 50-70% of stored armored vehicles, artillery, and tanks by mid-2025, per open-source intelligence tracking of storage bases and battlefield losses, while microchip shortages hampered production of precision-guided munitions.^[69] ^[70] These constraints, absent pre-invasion, correlate with slowed advances and increased reliance on allies like North Korea, evidencing sanctions' role in raising military sustainment costs.^[71] Similarly, intensified U.S. and multilateral sanctions on Iran from 2010-2015 contributed to nuclear concessions in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as economic isolation—manifest in oil export halts and inflation spikes—prompted rational recalculations by Tehran, with pre-deal GDP growth stagnating below 1% annually.^[72] Such reversals, while not universal, affirm sanctions' utility in altering high-stakes policies when paired with diplomatic isolation, per event-study methodologies isolating sanction shocks from confounders.^[67]

Controversies and balanced viewpoints

Critics of international sanctions frequently highlight their humanitarian toll, arguing that broad economic restrictions function as a form of siege warfare, disproportionately affecting civilian populations through shortages of food, medicine, and essential goods while failing to dislodge targeted regimes.^[65] In the case of 1990s Iraq sanctions, initial UNICEF surveys suggested a sharp rise in under-5 mortality rates post-1991, fueling claims of hundreds of thousands of excess child deaths attributable directly to restrictions; however, subsequent analyses, including revised demographic data and regime behavior factors like resource hoarding by Saddam Hussein's government, indicate multifactorial causes including war damage, internal mismanagement, and pre-existing health declines, with mortality rates returning to pre-sanctions levels by the early 2000s.^[73] ^[74] Left-leaning perspectives, often amplified in academic and media outlets, emphasize these collateral damages as evidence of sanctions' moral equivalence to aggression, while right-leaning analyses counter that regimes insulate elites from pain, channeling suffering selectively and exaggerating civilian harm to garner international sympathy and undermine enforcement.^[65] Proponents defend sanctions as a non-lethal alternative to military intervention, noting their capacity to impose costs without direct casualties—unlike invasions, which have historically produced far higher death tolls, as seen in post-2003 Iraq where over 200,000 civilian deaths occurred amid regime change efforts.^[75] Empirical studies affirm limited overall success rates, with unilateral measures achieving policy goals in roughly 13% of cases since 1970, yet multilateral variants show higher efficacy when paired with diplomatic isolation, as in contributing to South Africa's apartheid transition by enforcing trade isolation that pressured economic elites and facilitated the 1994 democratic shift, though internal resistance played a primary role.^[65] ^[76] Sanctions evasion by third parties, such as China's facilitation of Russian oil exports via shadow fleets and financial networks post-2022, further dilutes impact, enabling targeted states to sustain aggression while highlighting enforcement gaps that anti-sanction narratives often overlook.^[77] A balanced assessment reveals sanctions' trade-offs: while civilian hardships occur, causal evidence debunks narratives of mass starvation as primary outcomes, attributing much distress to regime priorities over distribution; alternatives like military escalation carry empirically higher risks of prolonged conflict and fatalities, underscoring sanctions' role in calibrated coercion despite imperfect results.^[78] ^[79] This perspective counters institutionalized biases in source selection, where mainstream critiques may prioritize humanitarian anecdotes over disaggregated data on evasion and regime agency.

Conceptual framework in sociology and psychology

In sociology, social sanctions function as mechanisms of social control, comprising rewards for conformity to norms and punishments for deviance, thereby enforcing behavioral expectations and preserving group order.^[80]^[81] Émile Durkheim conceptualized sanctions as spontaneous societal reactions to norm violations, which express collective moral outrage and reinforce solidarity by affirming shared values among conformists; for instance, punitive responses to crime unify the group, enhancing cohesion through ritualized disapproval.^[82] These processes operate at micro-levels in group dynamics, where sanctions shape interactions without formal institutions, distinguishing them from state-enforced penalties. Psychological research underscores the dual nature of sanctions: positive forms, such as verbal praise or approval, incentivize adherence, while negative forms, like ridicule or exclusion, deter violations through anticipated disapproval. Solomon Asch's 1951 line-judgment experiments illustrated this, revealing that 75% of participants conformed at least once to a majority's erroneous perception under group pressure, with overall conformity rates reaching 37% across critical trials, driven by fear of social rejection as a negative sanction.^[83] In organizational behavior, empirical data confirm that positive sanctions, including performance-based incentives, elevate productivity; meta-analyses indicate bonuses correlate with 10-20% gains in output metrics, though negative sanctions like penalties can amplify short-term effort by up to 15% while risking morale erosion.^[84] Sanctions manifest as external (group-imposed, e.g., ostracism) or internal (self-generated, e.g., guilt from norm violation), with the latter fostering deeper compliance via emotional self-regulation. Cross-national surveys across 67 countries demonstrate internal sanctions—rooted in anticipated shame—exert the strongest deterrent effects on rule-breaking, outperforming external threats in predictive power for behaviors like dishonesty.^[85] Over time, repeated exposure promotes norm internalization, where external pressures evolve into autonomous adherence; agent-based models of cultural evolution show this transition sustains cooperation in iterated social dilemmas, as internalized norms reduce enforcement costs.^[86] Cross-cultural studies reveal sanctions' causal role in cooperation, with societies employing stringent enforcement—such as third-party punishment—exhibiting elevated prosociality; for example, ethnographic data from 57 countries link higher sanction prevalence to reduced free-riding in public goods scenarios, explaining up to 25% variance in collective action success.^[87]^[88] This pattern holds empirically, as experimental games in diverse populations confirm that visible sanctioning boosts contributions by 30-50% compared to low-enforcement baselines, underscoring sanctions' function in aligning individual actions with group welfare through verifiable behavioral incentives rather than abstract ideals.

Types and applications

Social sanctions are classified into formal and informal categories, with each further subdivided into positive and negative subtypes based on their enforcement mechanisms and effects. Formal sanctions are codified rules enforced by institutions or authorities, such as school expulsions for repeated truancy or workplace demotions for ethical breaches, ensuring structured accountability within organized settings.^[80]^[89] Informal sanctions emerge organically from interpersonal dynamics, including community gossip that stigmatizes nonconformity or spontaneous applause for cooperative acts, relying on social pressure rather than official decree.^[81]^[90] Positive sanctions incentivize norm adherence through rewards like familial praise for academic effort or institutional bonuses for team collaboration, enhancing motivation via approval and status elevation.^[91] Negative sanctions deter deviance via disapproval, such as peer ridicule in communities or exclusion from social networks, amplifying conformity costs.^[92] In anthropological studies of tribal societies, informal negative sanctions like reputational harm for adultery or food-sharing violations predominate, with empirical data from cross-cultural analyses showing physical or social penalties in over 60% of documented cases to maintain group cohesion.^[88] Real-world applications span families, communities, and institutions, often validated by experimental evidence of peer influence. In families, negative sanctions like privilege revocation for dishonesty reduce recurrence by reinforcing boundaries, while positive ones such as commendation build habitual compliance.^[93] Community-level informal sanctions, including boycotts against rule-breakers, enforce reciprocity, as observed in small-scale groups where gossip alone curbs free-riding by 20-40% in resource allocation tasks.^[94] Institutional uses include educational rewards like certificates for prosocial behavior, boosting participation rates, or corporate sanctions under diversity policies, where penalties for discriminatory conduct correlate with 10-15% higher retention among diverse employees by signaling inclusive norms, according to firm-level surveys.^[95] Social experiments underscore these dynamics' potency. Asch's 1951 conformity trials revealed participants yielding to incorrect peer judgments in 37% of critical trials, demonstrating how informal group pressure elevates norm compliance over individual perception.^[83] Variants of Milgram's obedience studies showed peer dissent slashing full compliance from 65% to under 20%, highlighting sanctions' role in curbing blind adherence to potentially deviant directives. In contemporary contexts, negative informal sanctions via online shaming, as during the 2017 #MeToo surge, prompted norm shifts, with U.K. surveys post-movement finding 38% of respondents reporting altered views on acceptable interpersonal conduct and 79% of firms noting cultural changes in harassment tolerance.^[96]^[97]

Other uses

In philosophy and ethics

In moral philosophy, sanctions function as incentives or deterrents—rewards for virtuous actions and penalties for vices—to sustain ethical order amid human inclinations toward self-interest. Social contract theorists like Thomas Hobbes viewed external sanctions as foundational to civilized society; in Leviathan (1651), he described the sovereign's coercive laws, backed by threats of punishment, as the sole remedy against the brutal insecurities of the state of nature, where rational fear compels individuals to authorize such enforcement for mutual preservation.^[98] John Locke extended this framework, integrating divine and social sanctions to motivate adherence to natural law, arguing that violations provoke both internal remorse and external reprisals, thereby aligning personal conduct with universal moral duties discoverable through reason.^[99] Immanuel Kant shifted emphasis to internal sanctions, portraying conscience as an autonomous tribunal that self-imposes guilt or approbation upon breaching the categorical imperative, independent of empirical consequences or external coercion.^[100] This deontological perspective contrasts with utilitarianism, where Jeremy Bentham classified sanctions as physical, political, moral, or religious sources of pleasure and pain, calibrated to maximize aggregate utility by deterring harmful acts through calculated penalties.^[101] Utilitarians prioritize consequential deterrence, critiquing deontological rigidity for potentially overlooking net welfare gains, while deontologists counter that intrinsic duties preclude treating persons as mere means, rendering sanction legitimacy contingent on moral desert rather than outcomes alone. Debates on negative sanctions, particularly in retributivism, affirm their ethical validity when proportionate to wrongdoing, as they restore moral balance without devolving into vengeance; empirical analyses reveal that retributive punishments influence sentencing more than pure deterrence rationales, yielding deterrent effects via perceived certainty and swiftness rather than severity excess.^[102]^[103] Integrating empirical ethics counters moral relativism by highlighting cross-cultural universals, such as near-universal sanctions against harm infliction, where judgments of deserved penalties converge despite contextual variances, rooted in shared perceptions of suffering as a moral trigger.^[104]^[105] This evidence supports causally realist accounts of ethics, where sanctions enforce objective norms grounded in human vulnerability to injury, transcending cultural biases toward parochial exceptionalism.

In arts, entertainment, and media

In film, The Eiger Sanction (1975), directed by and starring Clint Eastwood, portrays an art professor and former assassin recruited by a secret organization to perform "sanctions"—targeted killings—while climbing the Eiger mountain, blending espionage with mountaineering peril.^[106] The story adapts Trevanian’s 1972 novel of the same name, where the protagonist Jonathan Hemlock navigates moral ambiguities in executing sanctioned hits for intelligence agencies.^[107] A sequel novel, The Loo Sanction (1973) by Trevanian, continues Hemlock’s exploits in a British academic espionage plot involving authorized retribution.^[108] Television series have featured episodes titled with "sanction" to denote punitive or authorized actions. In Archer season 6, episode 3 ("The Archer Sanction," aired January 22, 2015), spies undertake an assassination mission in the Swiss Alps, parodying thriller tropes of covert approvals for elimination.^[109] The sci-fi series V includes "The Sanction" (1984), where human resistance fighters confront alien enforcers executing ordered purges against dissenters.^[110] Similarly, Justice League Unlimited’s "The Doomsday Sanction" (2005) involves superheroes imposing a lethal penalty on a rampaging villain, framing it as a justified extreme measure.^[111] Literature employs "sanction" in thrillers to signify endorsed vengeance or penalty. William W. Johnstone’s Sanction (1981) depicts a narrative of retribution in a conflict-laden setting, using the term for formalized punitive acts.^[112] More recently, Ray Fawkes’s Sanction (2023 graphic novel) follows Soviet-era detectives pursuing a serial killer under regime-approved investigative leeway, highlighting tensions between official permission and ethical limits.^[113] These works often leverage the dual meaning of sanction—as both permission and punishment—to explore authority’s coercive edge in fictional intrigue.

References

[1]
Sanction - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Latin sancire meaning "to decree or confirm," sanction means both "a law or decree" and "to approve or impose a penalty," reflecting its ...
[2]
sanction - American Heritage Dictionary Entry
In English, the word sanction is first recorded in the mid-1500s in the meaning "law, decree." Not long after, in the 1600s, it also came to be used to refer to ...
[3]
SANCTION Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
sanction implies both approval and authorization. the President sanctioned covert operations. accredit and certify usually imply official endorsement attesting ...
[4]
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/sanction_n?tl=true
[5]
What are sanctions? - Government.se
Sanctions are economic and political measures that aim to influence the behaviour of a state, a group or individuals.
[6]
Sanctions Programs and Country Information
The sanctions can be either comprehensive or selective, using the blocking of assets and trade restrictions to accomplish foreign policy and national security ...International Criminal Court... · Where is OFAC's country list? · Cuba Sanctions<|separator|>
[7]
Sanctions: meaning, history and consequences - TheArticle
Aug 24, 2022 · Sanctions were to consist of “severance of all trade financial relations.” A sanction came to signify a prohibition.<|separator|>
[8]
Article 2 Section 2 Clause 2 | Constitution Annotated - Congress.gov
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.
[9]
ArtII.S2.C2.1.1 Overview of President's Treaty-Making Power
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the ...
[10]
Ratification Definition: What Is Ratification in Contract Law?
Apr 3, 2025 · Ratification of a contract involves its formal confirmation or approval - making it a legally binding agreement.
[11]
Ratification Contract Clause Examples - Business Contracts | Justia
This page contains Ratification clauses in business contracts and legal agreements. We have organized these clauses into groups of similarly worded clauses.
[12]
Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers ...
(2) Motion for Sanctions. A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates ...
[13]
The Contempt Power of the Federal Courts | Federal Judicial Center
This essay chronicles the history of the contempt power in the federal courts with a focus on changes over time in judicial interpretations of the scope of the ...
[14]
[PDF] Report of a Survey of United States District Judges' Experiences and ...
RULE 11 SURVEY. PURPOSE AND INSTRUCTIONS. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (Rule 11) provides sanctions for presenting a pleading, written motion, or other ...<|separator|>
[15]
Increased Penalties Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The impact of these victim related enhancements is substantial. The amendment targets offenses committed by officers or directors of publicly traded companies ...
[16]
SOX Violations: 4 Examples of Multi-Million Dollar Penalties
Executives who willfully provide false certification (meaning that they had intent to deceive) can face fines up to $5,000,000 and imprisonment of up to 20 ...Sox Protections For... · Tips From The Expert · Board And Audit Committee...
[17]
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Comprehensive Overview - AuditBoard
Aug 9, 2024 · The initial impact of SOX was clearly evident by looking at the number of restatements in 2005 and 2006. Restatement rose 66% in 2005 to 1,600 ...
[18]
contempt of court, civil | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Civil contempt of court refers to disobedience of an order of the court which carries quasi-criminal penalties rather than direct criminal penalties.Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
[19]
ArtIII.S1.4.3 Inherent Powers Over Contempt and Sanctions
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that federal courts possess inherent authority to punish contempt—i.e., disobedience of a court order or obstruction of ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
[20]
Lawyer disbarred for destroying his computer, altering metadata ...
Apr 25, 2024 · A New Hampshire lawyer has been disbarred based on allegations that he destroyed his computer before an ethics hearing and altered metadata.
[21]
The effects of punishment on recidivism
Aug 15, 2022 · The overall findings showed that harsher criminal justice sanctions had no deterrent effect on recidivism. On the contrary, punishment produced a slight (3%) ...Missing: legal | Show results with:legal
[22]
Federal Government - Policing for Profit - Institute for Justice
Between 2000 and 2019, the Department of Justice forfeited more than $30.8 billion and the Department of the Treasury forfeited nearly $15 billion, for a total ...
[23]
[PDF] The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism1
Prison produced slight increases in recidivism, and should not be used with the expectation of reducing criminal behavior.
[24]
What Are Economic Sanctions? | Council on Foreign Relations
Sanctions take a variety of forms, including travel bans, asset freezes, arms embargoes, capital restraints, foreign aid reductions, and trade restrictions.Introduction · What are economic sanctions? · When are sanctions used?
[25]
Sanctions | Security Council - UN.org.
The measures have ranged from comprehensive economic and trade sanctions to more targeted measures such as arms embargoes, travel bans, and financial or ...
[26]
[PDF] UN Sanctions - Security Council Report
Nov 25, 2013 · The report then discusses the five main types of UN targeted sanctions: diplomatic, travel bans, asset freezes, arms embargoes and commodity ...
[27]
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1718 ...
All Member States are required to freeze the assets, funds, and economic resources of the entities of the Government of the DPRK and Korean Workers' Party, that ...
[28]
[PDF] FACT SHEET ON THE 1718 DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC ...
Types of Sanctions. General arms embargo (w/catch-all provision); travel ban and asset freeze; embargo on all items relevant to the DPRK's nuclear, ballistic ...
[29]
[PDF] What the literature says about the effects of sanctions on Russia
Apr 12, 2023 · IMF (2019) estimates that sanctions reduced Russia's annual GDP growth by 0.2 percentage points on average in 2014–2018. The results of Pestova ...
[30]
The impact of Western sanctions on Russia and how they can be ...
May 3, 2021 · Second, sanctions have hit the Russian economy badly. Since 2014, it has grown by an average of 0.3 percent per year, while the global average ...
[31]
Civil Penalties and Enforcement Information
Search OFAC's Sanctions Lists ... Tri-Seal Compliance Note: Obligations of foreign-based persons to comply with U.S. sanctions and export control laws ...2024 · 2023 · 2022 · Settlement Agreements
[32]
Primary And Secondary Sanctions Explained
Secondary sanctions are designed to prevent third parties from trading with countries subject to sanctions issued by another country - even if these third ...
[33]
What are Primary & Secondary Sanctions? - ComplyAdvantage
May 13, 2021 · Secondary sanctions are economic sanctions issued against foreign companies or individuals that are trading with countries subjected to primary ...
[34]
[PDF] Economic Sanctions: An Overview - International Trade Commission
Types of Sanctions. Sanctions may be primary or secondary in relation to the sanctions target. Primary sanctions include international trade restrictions ...
[35]
League of Nations Applies Economic Sanctions Against Italy - EBSCO
The sanctions were eventually lifted on July 15, 1936, following a decline in member support and the perception that they were failing. This episode not only ...
[36]
[PDF] 1935 SANCTIONS AGAINST ITALY: WOULD COAL AND CRUDE ...
The failure of the League was largely due to the ambiguous policy followed by the two main powers within the League: Britain and France. The Italian.
[37]
“The Worst of all Worlds:” Oil Sanctions and Italy's Invasion of ...
Jun 14, 2008 · The League's unwillingness to impose an oil sanction and its evident failure to prevent Italy's conquest of Abyssinia discredited the League and ...
[38]
Chapter VII: Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches ...
The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations.
[39]
Cuba Sanctions - United States Department of State
The United States maintains a comprehensive economic embargo on the Republic of Cuba. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo.
[40]
Cuba Embargoed: U.S. Trade Sanctions Turn Sixty
Feb 2, 2022 · 1960 President Dwight D. Eisenhower imposed the first economic sanctions against Cuba's revolutionary government, though they fell short of a full embargo.
[41]
Iraqi Sanctions, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law - MERIP
Six years of the most severe Security Council sanctions in history have failed to dislodge the regime of President Saddam Hussein.
[42]
[PDF] A Decade of Sanctions against Iraq: Never Again! The End of ...
The Security Council imposed comprehensive economic sanctions against Iraq after the invasion of. Kuwait, SC Res. 661 (1990). After the end of hostilities ...
[43]
"Smart Sanctions Revisited" by C. Joy Gordon
Targeted sanctions—often referred to as “smart sanctions”—began in large measure as a response to the UN Security Council sanctions imposed on Iraq in 1990 ...
[44]
Chronology of Libya's Disarmament and Relations with the United ...
December 19, 2003: Libya's Foreign Ministry publicly renounces the country's WMD programs. Tripoli promises to eliminate its chemical and nuclear weapons ...
[45]
Was Libyan WMD Disarmament a Significant Success for ...
Aug 31, 2004 · The sanctions, however, left Libya unable to sell its most profitable export, which caused the country's economy to suffer greatly. The UN ...
[46]
Under sanctions, Iran's crude oil exports have nearly halved in ... - EIA
Jun 24, 2015 · Iran's crude oil and condensate exports averaged 1.4 million b/d in 2014. In 2011, prior to sanctions, Iran exported 2.6 million b/d, most of which went to ...Missing: decline 2010-2015
[47]
Iran Sanctions: A Successful Episode | PIIE
Jan 29, 2016 · Iran crude oil exports increased from $18 billion in 2001 to $81 billion in 2011 (see figure 1). However, in 2013 exports dropped to $38 billion ...
[48]
Iran - International - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Jul 20, 2021 · According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Iran's oil and natural gas export revenue was $26.9 billion in FY 2015–2016, decreasing more ...
[49]
New Estimates of Iran's Petroleum Exports and Income after ... - CSIS
The sanctions impeded Iran's ability to sell oil, resulting in a near 1.0-million b/d drop in crude oil and condensate exports in 2012 compared with the ...
[50]
North Korea defies sanctions with China's help, UN panel says
Apr 17, 2020 · North Korea sharply stepped up trade in coal and oil products last year in defiance of UN sanctions through the apparent help of China's shipping industry, a ...
[51]
China Supported Sanctions on North Korea's Nuclear Program. It's ...
Nov 3, 2023 · A growing mountain of evidence that shows Beijing is helping cash-strapped North Korea evade a broad range of international sanctions designed to hamper ...
[52]
G7, others ask China to stop North Korea sanctions evasion in its ...
Jul 21, 2023 · The Group of Seven, European Union and three other countries plan to appeal to China for help to stop North Korea evading United Nations ...
[53]
Security Council Fails to Extend Mandate for Expert Panel Assisting ...
Mar 28, 2024 · Security Council fails to extend mandate for expert panel assisting sanctions committee on Democratic People's Republic of Korea.Missing: via | Show results with:via<|separator|>
[54]
Impact of sanctions on the Russian economy - consilium.europa.eu
It is estimated that in 2022, Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) dropped by 2.1%. Russia's economy may continue to shrink in 2023. Its GDP is forecast to ...
[55]
https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/three-years-war-ukraine-are-sanctions-against-russia-making-difference
[56]
[PDF] Medium-term Macroeconomic Effects of Russia's War in Ukraine and ...
They estimated that Russian real income is reduced by 6% (relative to baseline values) already in 2022 and reaches 8% losses by 2030. They also present short- ...
[57]
What is the status of Russia's frozen sovereign assets? | Brookings
Many experts (and the Central Bank of Russia) put the figure between $300 and $330 billion. In 2022, most of the frozen assets were debt securities denominated ...Missing: OFAC | Show results with:OFAC
[58]
Venezuela's oil exports fall 11.5% over US tariffs and sanctions ...
Apr 2, 2025 · Venezuela's oil exports fall 11.5% over US tariffs and sanctions, shipping data show · 42 tankers departed Venezuela carrying 804,677 bpd of oil, ...
[59]
Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate
However, exports increased by some 12 percent in 2023, due in part to an easing of U.S. sanctions on the country's oil and gas sector. Turbulent economy.
[60]
Sanctions and Oil Production: Evidence from Venezuela's Orinoco ...
We provide difference-in-differences estimates showing that financial and oil sanctions led to large oil production losses among firms that had access to ...
[61]
China's Huawei sees 'business as usual' as U.S. sanctions impact ...
Dec 30, 2022 · That represents a tiny increase from 2021, when revenue hit 636.8 billion yuan, and marked a 30% year-on-year sales tumble as the U.S. sanctions ...
[62]
Huawei shrugs off US sanctions with fastest growth in four years
Mar 29, 2024 · Revenues rose by nearly 10% to 704.2bn yuan (£77bn) as the Shenzhen-based company enjoyed a rebound within its consumer segment, which includes ...
[63]
https://itif.org/publications/2025/10/27/backfire-export-controls-helped-huawei-and-hurt-us-firms/
[64]
Failure and success of economic sanctions - CEPR
Mar 27, 2012 · Since 1990 the use of economic sanctions doubled and with better results: 40% is considered successful.2 The empirical lessons of the history of ...
[65]
Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Economic Sanctions | PIIE
Thus, the 33 percent success rate for US sanctions was virtually identical to that for the sample as a whole. A striking result of our analysis, however, is the ...
[66]
Carrots as Sticks: How Effective Are Foreign Aid Suspensions and ...
Mar 28, 2024 · A quantitative analysis estimates the success rate of imposed aid suspensions to be 44 percent and that of economic sanctions to be 26 percent.Introduction · Data And Methods · Results<|separator|>
[67]
The economic effects of international sanctions: An event study
The estimated effects are economically relevant, as an average target country's GDP per capita, for instance, declines by 2.8 percent over the first two years ...
[68]
[PDF] An Empirical Approximation of the Effects of Trade Sanctions with an ...
A blanket embargo on Russian exports to Europe has larger consequences. The effect on the. Russian economy is a substantial 3.6 percent fall in GDP; The effect ...
[69]
OSINT Study: Russia Has Exhausted Over Half of Its Stockpiles of ...
The Russian military has depleted more than half of its stockpiles of armored vehicles and artillery held in storage. This finding comes from OSINT ...
[70]
Where does Russia get its Microchips? - OSINT For Ukraine
Jul 30, 2025 · In late September 2022, reports began to surface from Russia, reporting on the lack of microchips in the Russian military arsenal. While Russia ...
[71]
The Impact of Sanctions and Alliances on Russian Military Capabilities
Jan 10, 2025 · Sanctions have hindered Russia's military capabilities by raising procurement costs, increasing reliance on allies and straining its economy.
[72]
The Self-Limiting Success of Iran Sanctions - Brookings Institution
The argument in favour of sanctions is grounded in the historical evidence that Iranian policy is often shaped by a rational assessment of costs and benefits.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[73]
Changing views on child mortality and economic sanctions in Iraq
Jul 24, 2017 · The results of the survey indicated that the under-5 death rate in Iraq had increased hugely between 1990 and 1991 and had then continued at a very high level.Missing: debunked | Show results with:debunked
[74]
The Iraq Sanctions Myth - Pacific Standard
Apr 26, 2013 · Iraqis did suffer a lot under the sanctions regime, but the child mortality rate was not highly elevated throughout the 1990s and just before ...Missing: revised | Show results with:revised
[75]
Human | Costs of War | Brown University
Costs of War research examines the human toll of U.S. military operations and spending, for U.S. service members, veterans, military contractors, and allies ...
[76]
[PDF] SANCTIONS ON SOUTH AFRICA: WHAT DID THEY DO?
It asks what role those sanctions played in the eventual demise of the apartheid regime and concludes that the role was probably very small. An alternative ...
[77]
Treasury Disrupts Russia's Sanctions Evasion Schemes
Jan 15, 2025 · ... China ... The purchase of Keremet Bank was intended to create a sanctions evasion hub for Russia to pay for imports and receive payment for ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[78]
Effectiveness of sanctions: Who suffers the most — and why - Kiel ...
Jul 16, 2025 · An analysis of global data since 1920 shows that trade sanctions cause only moderate damage on average: if trade amounting to 1 percent of GDP ...<|separator|>
[79]
[PDF] International Sanctions against Violent Actors
Sanctions are widely regarded as preferable alternatives to military intervention where diplomacy is determined or predicted to be ineffective in compelling ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
[80]
3.2I: Sanctions - Social Sci LibreTexts
Feb 19, 2021 · Sanctions are mechanisms of social control. As opposed to forms of internal control, like cultural norms and values, sociologists consider sanctions a form of ...
[81]
Social sanctions - overview, meaning, examples, types and ...
Feb 12, 2020 · Social sanctions enforce a standard of behaviour that is deemed socially acceptable and this is essential for society to regulate itself and ...
[82]
[PDF] emile durkheim on sanctions and solidarity
Jan 1, 2004 · Durkheim's theory suggests that there was something more to lynchings than racially motivated murders committed by multiple individual ...
[83]
Asch Conformity Line Experiment - Simply Psychology
May 15, 2025 · Solomon Asch experimented with investigating the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.Procedure · Findings · Conclusion · StrengthsMissing: sanctions | Show results with:sanctions
[84]
Employee incentives: Bonuses or penalties? - IZA World of Labor
Penalty contracts lead to higher productivity than performance-based bonuses, but at the cost of employer/staff relations.Missing: sanctions | Show results with:sanctions
[85]
What Deters Crime? Comparing the Effectiveness of Legal, Social ...
Results indicated that across countries, internal sanctions had the strongest deterrent effects on crime. The deterrent effects of legal sanctions were weaker ...
[86]
Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization
May 22, 2017 · We study theoretically the evolutionary origins of human capacity to internalize and follow social norms.
[87]
Cross-societal variation in norm enforcement systems - Journals
Jan 22, 2024 · Although prior work has documented cross-cultural regularities in norm enforcement, substantial variation exists in the prevalence and forms of punishment ...
[88]
Norm violations and punishments across human societies - PMC
Punishments for norm violations are hypothesised to be a crucial component of the maintenance of cooperation in humans but are rarely studied from a comparative ...Missing: internalization | Show results with:internalization
[89]
Informal & Formal Social Sanctions | Definition & Examples - Lesson
Social sanctions are attempts to control behavior. Formal sanctions are written and have official consequences of obeying or disobeying the law.Social Control · Norms · Social Sanctions
[90]
Informal Social Control - Simply Psychology
Oct 6, 2025 · Informal social control encompasses the rewards (positive sanctions) and punishments (negative sanctions) used in everyday life to encourage ...Examples · Negative Informal Sanctions... · Positive Informal Sanctions...Missing: external | Show results with:external
[91]
Deviance and Control – Introduction to Sociology 2e - WisTech Open
Positive sanctions are rewards given for conforming to norms. A promotion at work is a positive sanction for working hard. Negative sanctions are punishments ...
[92]
Sanctions in Sociology: 6 Types and easy definition - Helpful Professor
Jan 9, 2023 · Internal sanctions refer to responses and reactions derived from internal resources, such as one's emotions. External sanctions come from ...
[93]
Social Sanctions ‎ ‎In sociology, social sanctions are the ways society ...
Sep 13, 2025 · At the same time, families, religious groups, and friends use informal sanctions like advice, warnings, and corrections to guide people ...
[94]
Sociology and the Power of Sanctions in Compliance - ThoughtCo
Aug 2, 2019 · Scornful looks, shunning, boycotts, and other actions are forms of informal sanctioning.
[95]
DEI and Retention: How Inclusive Practices Boost Employee Loyalty
Apr 30, 2024 · Extensive research consistently demonstrates the significant impact of DEI initiatives on employee retention rates. A study by Deloitte ...
[96]
Milgram experiment - Wikipedia
The experiments unexpectedly found that a very high proportion of subjects would fully obey the instructions, with every participant going up to 300 volts, and ...
[97]
Explaining Societal Shifts in Victim Blaming and Perpetrator ...
Jul 7, 2025 · In a U.K. nationally representative survey, 38% of people agreed that their perceptions of acceptable behavior had changed following the #MeToo ...
[98]
[PDF] Social Movements and HR: The Impact of #MeToo | SHRM
First, our research indicated that the #MeToo movement had affected corporate culture, as 79 percent of firms reported distinct differences, and of this change ...
[99]
Hobbes' two accounts of law and the structure of reasons for political ...
Aug 13, 2013 · In different characteristic passages of Leviathan and his other political works, Hobbes claims that coercion is the crucial feature of law, ...
[100]
Moral Motivation and the Role of Sanctions in Locke's Moral Theory
Aug 6, 2025 · First, Locke holds that our moral rules are founded on universal, divine natural laws. Second, such moral laws are taken to be discoverable by ...
[101]
[PDF] Kant on Conscience - Stanford University
The only “punishment” we suffer before the inner court of conscience is the painful feeling -- a moral feeling, not an empirical one -- that arises necessarily ...
[102]
[PDF] The Sanctions of Utilitarianism' - The British Academy
'Political' for Bentham means a legal sanction, that is penalties artifi- cially attached by law to kinds of action hence forming additional motives for people ...
[103]
The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment
Study 1 demonstrated that retribution information is more relevant to punishment than either deterrence or incapacitation information. Study 2 traced the ...Missing: retributivism | Show results with:retributivism
[104]
The Problems of Empirically-Informed Arguments for and against ...
Nov 19, 2024 · Retributivism holds that the state ought to punish wrongdoers because punishment is what wrongdoers deserve for their past criminal behavior ( ...
[105]
Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across ...
Mar 7, 2024 · We find that individuals who experience anger and disgust over a norm violation are more likely to endorse confrontation, ostracism and, to a smaller extent, ...Missing: internalization | Show results with:internalization
[106]
[PDF] Morality in Our Mind and Across Cultures and Politics
Oct 7, 2024 · Abstract. Moral judgments differ across cultures and politics, but they share a common theme in our minds: perceptions of harm.
[107]
The Eiger Sanction (1975) - IMDb
Rating 6.4/10 (24,108) The Eiger Sanction: Directed by Clint Eastwood. With Clint Eastwood, George Kennedy, Vonetta McGee, Jack Cassidy. Classical art professor and collector Dr.Full cast & crew · Trivia · Filming & production · Plot
[108]
The Eiger Sanction (Jonathan Hemlock, #1) by Trevanian | Goodreads
Rating 4.0 (12,780) The Eiger Sanction is an early 70s thriller which tries to chase some of that James Bond money. Although there are some entertaining parts and a germ of a good ...
[109]
The Loo Sanction (Jonathan Hemlock, #2) by Trevanian | Goodreads
Rating 3.8 (2,480) I greatly enjoyed The Loo Sanction, Trevanian's follow-up to The Eiger Sanction. A spy thriller structurally similar to an Ian Fleming Bond book, it was ...
[110]
"Archer" The Archer Sanction (TV Episode 2015) - IMDb
Rating 8.2/10 (1,472) The Archer Sanction ... Archer, Lana, and Ray travel to the Swiss Alps to carry out an assassination while Cyril, Pam, and the rest of the gang capitalize on ...Missing: television | Show results with:television
[111]
"V" The Sanction (TV Episode 1984) - IMDb
Rating 6.7/10 (268) The Sanction ... Seeking to free his son Sean from the Visitors, Donovan grapples with an insidious, powerful alien named Klaus.Seeking to free his son Sean from ...
[112]
Justice League Unlimited (TV Series) Episode: The Doomsday ...
Mar 14, 2024 · The Doomsday Sanction is an episode of season 2 of Justice League Unlimited. It premiered on February 19, 2005.Missing: titled | Show results with:titled
[113]
https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Sanction/Ray-Fawkes/9781960578624
[114]
Sanction | Book by Ray Fawkes, Antonio Fuso, Emilio Lecce, Dave ...
Sanction by Ray Fawkes - To catch a rampaging serial killer in Soviet era Leningrad, two detectives must match wits with the murderer while battling the ...