Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Save Ralph

Save Ralph is a 2021 stop-motion animated mockumentary short film written and directed by Spencer Susser, produced by Humane Society International as part of its #SaveRalph campaign to end animal testing for cosmetics worldwide.^[1]^[2] The film centers on Ralph, a laboratory rabbit voiced by Taika Waititi, who is interviewed about his daily routine enduring toxicity tests, blinding eye drops, and other procedures for shampoo and lipstick safety assessments, presented in a satirical style that underscores the ethical concerns of such practices.^[1]^[3] Featuring a voice cast including Ricky Gervais as the interviewer, Zac Efron as Ralph's cousin Bobby, and Olivia Munn as lab rabbit Marshmallow, the production employed dark humor and celebrity appeal to humanize the animals involved, with regional versions using local actors like George Lopez for Latin American audiences.^[1]^[4] Released on YouTube, the film garnered over millions of views and contributed to legislative momentum, including bans on sales of animal-tested cosmetics in four U.S. states and advocacy for the federal Humane Cosmetics Act.^[1]^[5] The short received critical acclaim for its animation and message, earning the Grand Prix for Good at the 2022 Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, two Webby Awards, and a place on the Academy Awards shortlist for Best Animated Short Film, though it highlighted debates on the balance between animal welfare and product safety validation through non-animal alternatives.^[5]^[6]^[7]

Production

Development and creation

Humane Society International commissioned Save Ralph in 2020 as a central element of its #SaveRalph global campaign to prohibit cosmetic animal testing worldwide, targeting countries where such practices continued despite regulatory progress elsewhere.^[1] The initiative responded to ongoing testing in jurisdictions lacking comprehensive bans, building on precedents like the European Union's prohibition on animal testing of finished cosmetic products effective September 11, 2004.^[8] Funding originated from HSI's advocacy resources, positioning the film as a tool to mobilize public and policymaker support for legislative change.^[9] Spencer Susser was brought on as writer and director, initiating work on the project in 2020 amid COVID-19 lockdowns that influenced remote collaboration aspects.^[10] Produced by Jeff Vespa through entities including Alldayeveryday Productions and Blue-Tongue Films in partnership with HSI, the effort prioritized advocacy efficacy over commercial aims.^[2] Susser's vision centered on a mockumentary format to humanize the animal testing experience, selecting stop-motion animation for its capacity to convey physical realism and emotional weight, as he noted the need for the protagonist to "feel real" in representing actual laboratory animals.^[1] This stylistic choice aimed to differentiate the film from conventional advocacy videos, enhancing its potential to drive empathy and action against industry practices.^[10]

Technical aspects and animation

Save Ralph employs stop-motion animation, utilizing handcrafted physical puppets for the anthropomorphic rabbit protagonist and supporting characters, alongside custom-built sets mimicking cosmetics testing laboratories. This technique involves capturing thousands of individual frames by incrementally adjusting the models' positions, creating fluid motion that underscores the tangible, physical nature of the depicted experiments. The production, handled by London-based Arch Model Maker, focused on intricate detailing to convey realism in the animals' modeled injuries, such as scarred tissue and impaired features achieved through specialized puppet modifications rather than digital effects.^[11] The film's runtime totals approximately four minutes, enabling a concise yet impactful presentation of its advocacy message within the constraints of a non-profit initiative funded by Humane Society International. Completed in early 2021 ahead of its April 6 release, the animation process prioritized efficiency, leveraging practical effects to simulate the aftermath of toxicity tests—like blindness and skin damage—on the rabbit models, thereby avoiding reliance on CGI while amplifying the advocacy's call for empirical alternatives to animal-based methods. This hands-on approach, as noted in production insights, fosters a visceral viewer connection to the causal consequences of testing practices, aligning technical choices with the goal of promoting cruelty-free innovation.^[1]^[12]

Voice cast and contributions

The principal voice cast of Save Ralph centers on Taika Waititi as Ralph, the laboratory rabbit who narrates his experiences as a cosmetics tester in a mockumentary style interview.^[2] Supporting roles feature Zac Efron as Bobby, a fellow rabbit; Ricky Gervais as the interviewer; Olivia Munn as Marshmallow, another rabbit; Pom Klementieff; and Tricia Helfer as Cottonballs, a hamster.^[13] These actors' involvement, drawn from a multinational lineup, leveraged their established fame to extend the short film's visibility beyond niche advocacy audiences.^[4]

Actor	Role
Taika Waititi	Ralph (rabbit)
Zac Efron	Bobby (rabbit)
Ricky Gervais	Interviewer
Olivia Munn	Marshmallow (rabbit)
Tricia Helfer	Cottonballs (hamster)
Pom Klementieff	Lab animal

Celebrities contributed their voices voluntarily as endorsements aligned with animal welfare causes, rather than as compensated performances in a commercial production.^[4] For instance, Gervais and Munn have publicly advocated against animal exploitation in industries like cosmetics, enhancing the film's credibility within activist circles.^[15] Voice recordings occurred remotely in early 2021, facilitating participation from actors across different locations during ongoing COVID-19 restrictions.^[3] This approach minimized logistical barriers while harnessing star power to promote Humane Society International's campaign against animal testing.^[7]

Content

Plot summary

Save Ralph is presented as a mockumentary-style interview conducted with Ralph, a rabbit serving as a test subject in a cosmetics laboratory.^[2] Ralph details his routine, starting with force-feeding ingestion tests for products like shampoo, which induce vomiting.^[3] He then demonstrates eye irritation testing involving chemical drops, resulting in blindness in one eye and deafness in one ear from prior procedures.^[16] Ralph introduces his living quarters with his family, including young rabbits, and proceeds to the lab where he interacts with colleagues: a hamster afflicted with tumors from repeated dosing, a beagle dog rendered blind through toxicity assessments, and a guinea pig experiencing fur loss.^[3] ^[16] Despite visible physical deformities such as chemical burns and organ damage, Ralph conveys enthusiasm for his role in ensuring product safety.^[7] The sequence culminates in Ralph advocating for the continuation of such testing practices while ironically aligning with a call for cruelty-free product alternatives.^[3]

Core themes and advocacy elements

The film centers on the advocacy position that animal testing for cosmetics represents unnecessary infliction of suffering on sentient beings, with Humane Society International estimating that approximately 500,000 animals endure and perish annually from such procedures globally before regulatory prohibitions took effect in many jurisdictions.^[17] This portrayal frames the practice as ethically indefensible given the availability of alternative testing methods and the non-essential nature of cosmetic products. Through its mockumentary format, Save Ralph deploys anthropomorphism—depicting the test subject rabbit Ralph as a relatable, articulate figure—to foster viewer identification with laboratory animals, amplifying emotional resonance over detached clinical description.^[1] Employing dark humor alongside graphic depictions of harm, such as blindness and organ damage inflicted on Ralph, the narrative draws implicit parallels to historical practices now universally condemned, underscoring that cosmetic testing persists despite bans in over 40 countries by 2021, including the entire European Union, Australia, Brazil, Canada, and others.^[18] This advocacy element positions regulatory progress as evidence of viable alternatives, urging expansion to remaining markets where testing remains legal. The film's structure as a faux testimonial intentionally leverages these techniques to humanize victims, transforming abstract statistics into visceral personal stories to propel anti-testing sentiment.^[19] As the cornerstone of HSI's #SaveRalph initiative, launched in 2021, the production explicitly promotes global legislative bans on cosmetic animal testing while encouraging consumer selection of cruelty-free certified products to diminish market demand.^[9] The campaign targeted 16 nations comprising half the global cosmetics market, utilizing the film's viral reach—over 100 million views—to advocate for policy shifts akin to those achieving prohibitions in prior adopters.^[20] By conflating individual purchasing power with systemic change, it frames boycott of tested products as a direct mechanism to eradicate the practice, emphasizing ethical consumerism as a catalyst for industry-wide reform.^[21]

Release and Promotion

Premiere and distribution

Save Ralph world premiered on April 6, 2021, through a live online event hosted on YouTube, featuring the short film followed by a panel discussion with its creators.^[22] The release was orchestrated by Humane Society International (HSI) via its official YouTube channel and website, enabling immediate global access without geographic restrictions in markets where animal testing for cosmetics remained legal, such as China.^[3] This digital-first strategy aligned with HSI's advocacy goals, prioritizing widespread dissemination over commercial exhibition.^[1] Lacking a theatrical rollout typical of feature films, the four-minute stop-motion short was distributed freely online to amplify its message against cosmetic animal testing, leveraging video-sharing platforms for organic sharing and viral growth. HSI positioned the premiere to coincide with international pressure campaigns targeting jurisdictions without bans, facilitating petitions and awareness drives in regions like Asia where regulatory hurdles persisted.^[2] The film was later presented at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity in June 2022, screened for advertising and creative industry audiences to influence policy discourse and corporate practices, rather than general public viewing.^[5] This selective event-based distribution complemented its primary online availability, focusing on targeted exposure to decision-makers without paid broadcasting or streaming partnerships.^[23]

Marketing campaign

The #SaveRalph marketing campaign, led by Humane Society International, linked the film's release to targeted advocacy for banning animal testing in cosmetics across 16 countries accounting for roughly 50% of the global cosmetics market. Petitions integrated with the #SaveRalph hashtag urged regulatory changes in these holdout nations, building on prior bans like the European Union's 2013 prohibition on selling animal-tested cosmetics within its borders.^[20]^[24] Celebrity partnerships amplified reach, with figures such as Taika Waititi, Ricky Gervais, and Zac Efron sharing dubbed versions of the film on social media to evoke discomfort with testing procedures and drive petition signatures exceeding 3 million, alongside calls for consumer boycotts of implicated brands. Over 100 influencers and actors leveraged their platforms for similar promotions, contributing to 440 million TikTok views and 100 million total online impressions.^[25]^[20]^[21] The strategy emphasized cosmetics-specific testing, avoiding conflation with medical necessities, and timed releases to coincide with legislative windows in priority markets, fostering viral momentum through user-generated content and shares that highlighted the film's mockumentary style to underscore ongoing industry practices.^[26]^[1]

Reception and Impact

Critical and public reception

Upon its April 2021 release, Save Ralph garnered acclaim from film critics for its meticulous stop-motion animation and Taika Waititi's charismatic, world-weary voice performance as the titular rabbit. Animation World Network described the short as delivering an "emotional punch," praising its craftsmanship in conveying the horrors of animal testing through a mockumentary format. Creative Review highlighted how the film's stark visuals effectively spotlighted the "harsh realities" of laboratory conditions, crediting director Spencer Susser and animator Andy Gent for blending humor with heartbreak.^[7]^[11] Audience reception was similarly enthusiastic, with the short achieving over 100 million online views and 440 million impressions on TikTok within weeks, driven by its viral discomfort-inducing narrative and celebrity voices including Waititi, Zac Efron, and Ricky Gervais. User ratings averaged 8.4 out of 10 on IMDb from over 6,600 votes, with reviewers calling it a "simple but effective" PSA that provoked strong empathy for test subjects. In animal rights communities, it fostered positive sentiment, spurring more than 3 million signatures on petitions to ban cosmetic animal testing globally.^[27]^[2]^[27] Views on its persuasive power were mixed, with high emotional resonance acknowledged but some questioning its simplification of pharmaceutical and safety testing protocols. While the film's graphic depictions elicited visceral reactions—described by viewers as "shaken to the core"—critics and online discussions noted potential for manipulative framing, as it focused on cosmetics testing while glossing over regulatory contexts where animal models remain standard for human risk assessment.^[28]^[29]^[30]

Awards and recognition

Save Ralph garnered recognition primarily within animation, advertising, and advocacy-oriented awards circuits, reflecting acclaim for its creative execution and thematic advocacy against animal testing. At the Annecy International Animated Film Festival in 2022, the film won the Cristal for Best Commissioned Film, honoring its stop-motion animation and commissioned production quality.^[31] It also secured the Grand Prix for Good at the 2022 Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, the top honor for nonprofit campaigns, acknowledging its effectiveness in public service messaging.^[32]^[33] In design and animation honors, Save Ralph received a Yellow Pencil from the D&AD Awards in 2022 for Animation Production Design, produced by Arch Film Studio, validating its technical craftsmanship in stop-motion techniques.^[34]^[35] The film earned the Annie Award for Best Sponsored Animated Production in 2023, recognizing excellence in sponsored content animation.^[6] Despite these accolades, Save Ralph did not receive major cinematic awards such as an Academy Award nomination, attributable to its short format, advocacy focus, and competition in the Best Animated Short category; it was shortlisted for the 95th Oscars in 2022 but did not advance to nomination.^[36] It received a nomination for Best Public Service & Activism Video at the 26th Annual Webby Awards, further affirming its impact in digital advocacy spaces.^[37] No significant new awards have emerged post-2023, though its prior wins continue to be cited in animal rights campaigns for awareness-raising efficacy.^[38]

Influence on policy and public awareness

The release of Save Ralph in April 2021 coincided with ongoing advocacy efforts by Humane Society International (HSI) to end cosmetics animal testing, amplifying discussions in jurisdictions without bans, such as Canada, where the film was explicitly tied to campaigns urging legislative action.^[39] In Canada, cosmetics animal testing remains legal for domestic sales, though industry groups like Cosmetics Alliance Canada acknowledged the film's role in spurring dialogue, with work on potential restrictions continuing as of 2021 without subsequent bans enacted.^[40] Similarly, China's regulatory update on May 1, 2021, exempted imported "general cosmetics" (e.g., shampoos, lotions) from mandatory animal testing if alternative safety data is provided, reducing requirements amid broader global pressure for non-animal methods, though no evidence attributes this shift directly to the film.^[41] By 2025, no major international bans on cosmetics animal testing have been verifiably caused by Save Ralph, with policy changes reflecting pre-existing trends toward alternatives like in vitro testing rather than isolated advocacy impacts.^[42] On public awareness, the film's viral reach—garnering millions of views shortly after premiere—elevated visibility of cosmetics testing practices, positioning it as a key tool in HSI's campaign to highlight alternatives' viability.^[1] Consumer surveys post-2021 indicate sustained growth in preferences for cruelty-free products, with 73.9% of respondents in a 2023 study expressing intent to purchase such items, driven by ethical concerns amid market expansion from $7.7 billion in 2025 projections.^[43] ^[44] However, this aligns with longer-term trends, as earlier data showed 35% of consumers seeking cruelty-free labels by 2019, suggesting the film reinforced rather than initiated shifts, with limited longitudinal studies isolating its effects amid competing factors like regulatory easing and brand marketing.^[45] No comprehensive empirical data as of 2025 credits Save Ralph with transformative long-term behavioral changes beyond heightened short-term discourse.

Criticisms and Broader Context

Artistic and narrative critiques

Critics have pointed to the film's reliance on anthropomorphic animals, particularly the endearing portrayal of Ralph the rabbit, as a form of emotional manipulation that prioritizes sentimental appeal over substantive nuance in depicting animal testing.^[46] A viewer review likened this approach to "weepy" charity advertisements, arguing it guilt-trips audiences into emotional responses without addressing broader contexts like necessary medical research.^[46] This technique, while effective for advocacy, risks reducing complex ethical and scientific debates to simplistic pathos, potentially fostering outrage without encouraging critical examination of alternatives or regulatory frameworks.^[47] The narrative structure, constrained to a four-minute runtime, has been faulted for oversimplifying laboratory conditions and ethical trade-offs inherent in testing protocols. One assessment contended that the topic "cannot be explained in two sentences or four minutes of film," highlighting how the story glosses over viable alternatives, limits on cruelty, and the spectrum of testing purposes beyond cosmetics.^[48] By focusing narrowly on Ralph's personal hardships without acknowledging welfare standards or phased regulations in many jurisdictions, the mockumentary format amplifies a one-sided victim narrative, sidelining discussions of justified applications such as pharmaceutical safety validations.^[46] The ironic humor embedded in the mockumentary—evident in Ralph's deadpan defense of his role amid visible afflictions—has drawn scrutiny for potentially diluting the subject matter's gravity. While intended to underscore absurdity, this tonal choice may trivialize real-world suffering, appealing primarily to audiences predisposed to anti-testing sentiments while distancing stakeholders familiar with industry practices.^[48] Such elements reinforce a propagandistic bent, as noted in analyses framing the film as myth-making that leverages familiarity and emotional heuristics over balanced discourse.^[47]

Scientific debates on animal testing

In the context of cosmetics regulation, animal testing has proven largely dispensable following the validation of in vitro alternatives in the 2010s, including reconstructed human epidermis models for skin irritation and corneal equivalents for eye damage, which demonstrate predictivity rates exceeding 80% concordance with human outcomes in OECD guideline studies.^[49] These methods, such as the EpiSkin assay adopted in 2010, address primary endpoints like acute local toxicity without requiring whole-organism exposure, enabling the European Union's 2013 ban on cosmetic animal testing while maintaining safety assurances for non-systemic effects.^[50] Empirical post-ban data from the EU indicate no surge in consumer adverse events attributable to untested ingredients, underscoring the sufficiency of these alternatives for low-risk product categories.^[51] However, extrapolating cosmetics-focused critiques to pharmaceutical development overlooks animal models' established role in detecting systemic toxicities, where in vitro systems falter on complex, multi-organ interactions. For instance, historical analyses reveal that animal testing has causally contributed to identifying rare but severe adverse effects, such as those evaded in early thalidomide evaluations due to protocol omissions rather than model inadequacy; retrospective rodent studies confirmed teratogenicity mirroring human phocomelia when pregnant models were employed.^[52] FDA-mandated preclinical animal studies have historically filtered out approximately 50% of potential human toxicities before clinical trials, reducing post-market withdrawals compared to pre-regulatory eras lacking such screens, though concordance remains imperfect at 40-70% across species for idiosyncratic reactions.^[53] ^[54] Emerging non-animal technologies like organ-on-a-chip systems replicate tissue-level responses with human cells but exhibit limitations in scalability and endpoint complexity, failing to predict chronic or low-dose toxicities in up to 60% of cases involving immune or metabolic cascades, per validation trials against historical animal-human data.^[55] These platforms excel in isolated organ mimicry but underperform for holistic safety profiling, with empirical failure rates in preclinical forecasting higher than integrated animal models for endpoints like carcinogenicity or neurotoxicity, necessitating hybrid approaches to mitigate under-detection risks.^[56] Full regulatory replacement remains constrained by gaps in validating rare event detection, as evidenced by ongoing FDA roadmaps prioritizing stepwise reduction over outright bans to preserve causal safety margins.^[57]

Economic and regulatory perspectives

The global cosmetics industry, valued at approximately $336 billion in 2024, relies on safety testing protocols to mitigate liability risks from product-related adverse reactions, with animal testing serving as one established method despite available alternatives.^[58] In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not mandate animal testing for cosmetics but accepts it as valid substantiation for safety claims, allowing manufacturers to import and sell products tested abroad to meet international market requirements, such as those previously enforced in China.^[59] This contrasts with the European Union, where a comprehensive ban prohibits the sale of cosmetics tested on animals anywhere in the world since March 11, 2013, under Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, prompting U.S.-based firms to offshore testing to non-banned jurisdictions for global compliance while avoiding domestic bans on sales.^[60] Critics of advocacy films like Save Ralph argue that such portrayals overlook regulatory trade-offs, including the potential for slowed innovation if unvalidated alternatives replace animal models without equivalent predictive reliability for human outcomes, thereby increasing economic costs from product failures or litigation.^[61] Animal testing, while expensive—often exceeding $100,000 per study—provides causal data on toxicity that supports liability defenses in the U.S., where tort claims can exceed millions; abrupt bans risk shifting these burdens to consumers via higher prices or reduced product diversity, particularly in a market where non-animal methods like in vitro assays cost far less but may require FDA validation for equivalence.^[61] Perspectives emphasizing economic freedom and human prioritization, often aligned with conservative analyses, contend that absolute ethical prohibitions ignore sector-specific job dependencies in contract research organizations, though quantitative data on cosmetics-related employment losses remains limited due to the industry's pivot toward alternatives.^[62] Following the film's 2020 release, select cosmetics firms accelerated cruelty-free certifications to capture growing consumer demand for ethical labeling, enabling market differentiation without regulatory mandates; however, this shift has not eliminated offshoring for exporters targeting non-banned markets, preserving economic incentives for testing in regions like parts of Asia.^[24] Regulatory inertia in the U.S., absent a federal sales ban, underscores ongoing tensions between ethical imperatives and practical validation needs, with FDA encouragement of alternatives failing to fully displace animal data in liability-sensitive contexts.^[63]

References

[1]
In HSI's 'Save Ralph,' a lovable spokesbunny makes a case for ...
“Save Ralph” is a powerful stop-motion animation short film featuring Oscar winner Taika Waititi as the voice of Ralph, who is being interviewed for a ...
[2]
Save Ralph (Short 2021) - IMDb
Rating 8.4/10 (6,662) Ralph, a bunny being interviewed for a documentary, goes through his daily routine as a tester in a lab.
[3]
Save Ralph - A short film with Taika Waititi - YouTube
Apr 6, 2021 · Introducing Ralph, the spokes-bunny of Humane Society International's global campaign to ban animal testing for cosmetics.
[4]
'Save Ralph' Set Designer on Film Starring Zac Efron, Ricky Gervais
May 7, 2021 · Directed by Spencer Susser, the short film “Save Ralph” features the voices of Taika Waititi, Ricky Gervais, Zac Efron and Olivia Munn. It ...<|separator|>
[5]
Humane Society International's Save Ralph animated film awarded ...
Jun 27, 2022 · Save Ralph, the star-studded stop-motion animated short film by Humane Society International, has been awarded the Grand Prix for Good.Missing: reception | Show results with:reception
[6]
Save Ralph (Short 2021) - Awards - IMDb
Save Ralph won 9 awards including Best Commissioned Film at Annecy, Best Factual at BAA, and Best Commercial Film Animation at Ray Harryhausen Awards.
[7]
Oscar Shortlisted 'Save Ralph' Delivers an Emotional Punch About ...
Jan 10, 2023 · On the Oscar shortlist this year for Best Animated Short is Save Ralph, written and directed by Spencer Susser and produced by Susser, Lisa ...Missing: reception | Show results with:reception
[8]
Ban on animal testing
The testing ban on finished cosmetic products applies since 11 September 2004. The testing ban on ingredients or combination of ingredients applies since 11 ...
[9]
Taika Waititi, Ricky Gervais, Zac Efron, Olivia Munn and more star in ...
It engages viewers to help ban animal testing of cosmetics once and for all. Save Ralph director, Spencer Susser says: “Animals in cosmetic testing labs don't ...
[10]
How Spencer Susser and His Team Animated a Victimized Rabbit in ...
Jan 10, 2023 · I started working on Save Ralph in 2020, at that funny time in the world when we were all locked in our house not sure if it was safe to go ...
[11]
New animated short emphasises the harsh realities of animal testing
Apr 9, 2021 · Anti-animal cruelty charity, Humane Society International (HSI), has launched Save Ralph, a short film to spotlight the realities of animal ...
[12]
The Sentient Cinematography of Save Ralph
Sep 4, 2025 · Shot in the style of a documentary, and written and directed by Spencer Susser, the film is a four minute long stop motion short created for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
Save Ralph | Cast and Crew - Rotten Tomatoes
Cast & Crew ; Spencer Susser ; Taika Waititi · Ralph ; Zac Efron · Bobby ; Ricky Gervais · Interviewer ; Tricia Helfer · Cottonballs.
[14]
Save Ralph (Short 2021) - Full cast & crew - IMDb
George Lopez · Ralph. (voice: Spanish Version). Olivia Munn · Olivia Munn · Marshmallow. (voice). Diem My · Diem My · Interviewer. (voice: Vietnamese Version).
[15]
Taika Waititi stars in Humane Society anti-animal testing short 'Save ...
Apr 14, 2021 · Taika Waititi voices a test rabbit in "Save Ralph," a Humane Society short that also features Ricky Gervais, Zac Efron, Olivia Munn, ...
[16]
Save Ralph: The Powerful Short Film Exposing Animal Testing
Apr 13, 2021 · Save Ralph depicts the life of a laboratory rabbit, or "tester", named Ralph. Blind in one eye, deaf in one ear, and suffering from chemical ...
[17]
Animals in Cosmetics Testing - Humane World for Animals
We estimate that globally around 500,000 animals suffer and die just for cosmetics each year.
[18]
Cosmetics animal testing FAQ | Humane World for Animals
Internationally, 45 countries have prohibited cosmetics animal testing, including every country in the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, ...
[19]
Save Ralph - D&AD
Save Ralph is a poignant and heartbreaking stop-motion animated short film calling for an end to cosmetic testing on animals around the world.
[20]
Save Ralph - CEF Impact Media Research
“Save Ralph” is a short stop motion animation released by the Humane Society International as part of their campaign to end animal testing in the cosmetics ...<|separator|>
[21]
Humane Society International's campaign gets 100 million+ online hits
May 11, 2021 · The latest marketing campaign from Humane Society International (HSI), Save Ralph, has amassed 100 million online views and more than three million petition ...<|separator|>
[22]
Save Ralph Premiere and Panel Discussion - YouTube
Apr 6, 2021 · Stick around after the feature to watch a panel discussion with the creators of Save Ralph! Introducing Ralph, the new spokes-bunny of the ...
[23]
Save Ralph - Cannes Lions 2022 - YouTube
Jun 24, 2022 · youmark.it - Grand Prix for Good.
[24]
Why the 'Save Ralph' short went viral - CTPost
Apr 15, 2021 · Taika Waititi's raw and painful short film that reminds us of how much animals suffer when subjected to cosmetic tests.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[25]
Ricky Gervais and Zac Efron's New Film Demands an End to Animal ...
Mar 30, 2021 · Short film Save Ralph features a variety of celebrities ... The parties involved in Save Ralph took to social media to promote the short film.
[26]
How #SaveRalph Raised Awareness of Cosmetics Testing on ...
The #SaveRalph campaign tells the story of a rabbit named Ralph, whose job is to have human cosmetics tested on him in a laboratory. HSI launched the campaign ...Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
[27]
https://marketinggazette.co.uk/2021/05/11/hsis-save-ralph-campaign-makes-its-way-to-achieving-campaign-targets/
[28]
[MISC] Shaken to the core after watching this short film about animal ...
Apr 7, 2021 · Shaken to the core after watching this short film about animal testing for cosmetic products, by Zac Efron, Ricky Gervais and Taika Waititi.Save Ralph - A short film with Taika Waititi : r/videos - RedditHave you ever purchased an item or service because a celebrity ...More results from www.reddit.com
[29]
Did the 'Save Ralph' short film result in any change? Did they stop ...
May 16, 2021 · No but at least it made more people feel bad. Most people are sickos who think science or medicine is worth nazi experiments.
[30]
Save ralph" analysis and peer review | English homework help
Nov 22, 2021 · The short film Save Ralph is likely to convince people that have not thought about animal testing. But the short film will not convince people ...Missing: backlash | Show results with:backlash<|separator|>
[31]
About > Archives > Award winners
Film Index. Cristal for a Commissioned Film. Save Ralph. Save Ralph Film Index. Jury Award for a Commissioned Film. Aline. Aline Film Index. Graduation films ...
[32]
HSl's Save Ralph Film Wins Grand Prix for Good at Cannes Lions ...
Jun 29, 2022 · Save Ralph, the star-studded stop-motion animated short film by Humane Society International, has been awarded the Grand Prix for Good, ...
[33]
2022 Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity Award Winners
SAVE RALPH · Contract for Change · Hope Reef (Case Film) · Long Live the Prince · Super. Human. | Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games Trailer · Liquid Billboard · The Wish ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
Save Ralph | D&AD Annual 2022
Save Ralph is a poignant and heartbreaking stop-motion animated short film ... Past Black Pencil Winners · In Memoriam. Previous annuals. 2021 · 2020 · New ...
[35]
2022 D&AD Awards Award Winners - AdForum
AWARD: Yellow Pencil ADVERTISER: Humane Society of the United States. 2022 D&AD - Yellow Pencil - Animations. Production Design. SAVE RALPH. BRAND: Humane ...
[36]
95TH OSCARS® SHORTLISTS IN 10 AWARD CATEGORIES ...
Dec 21, 2022 · Fifteen films will advance in the Documentary Short Film category for the 95th Academy Awards. ... “Save Ralph”. “Sierra”. “Steakhouse”. LIVE ...
[37]
Save Ralph nominated for best Public Service & Activism video in ...
HSI's #SaveRalph campaign tackles the disturbing issue of animal testing in an original and unexpected way—using the story of one bunny to shine a light on the ...
[38]
https://www.vegnews.com/save-ralph-cannes-award-animal-testing
[39]
Save Ralph campaign — ban animal cosmetics testing | Toronto Sun
Apr 6, 2021 · Save Ralph is a new animated (stop motion) short about the cruelty of animal testing in the cosmetics world. Incredibly, Canada still ...
[40]
CA Responds to HSI Global 'Save Ralph' Campaign
Apr 21, 2021 · CA Responds to HSI Global 'Save Ralph' Campaign; Work Continues to Develop Cosmetic Animal Testing Legislation in Canada. Posted Date: 21 ...
[41]
New Chinese Cosmetics Regulation Now In Force – Animal Testing ...
The most significant change is that General Cosmetics can now be imported into China without animal testing.
[42]
China's Animal Testing Laws in 2023 - Everything You Need To Know
Jun 9, 2023 · On May 1, 2021, China implemented updates and changes to its animal testing laws. Under the new regulations, some cosmetics may qualify for an exemption.
[43]
Exploring consumer purchase intention towards cruelty-free ...
Our survey involved 326 participants, revealing a significant tendency towards cruelty-free product purchase intention, reaching 73.9%.
[44]
Cruelty-free Cosmetics Market Size & Forecast Report, 2032
May 29, 2025 · The global cruelty-free cosmetics market size is anticipated to rise from US$ 7.7 Bn in 2025 to US$ 13.2 Bn by 2032. It is projected to witness a CAGR of 8.1% ...
[45]
88% of Top Beauty Brands Fund Animal Testing ... - Cruelty-Free Kitty
Oct 4, 2021 · According to a 2019 study by GlobalData, 35% of consumers actively look for "cruelty-free" claims on beauty products.
[46]
Save Ralph (2021) | Ratings, Reviews, Info and Trailer on Criticker
... reviews ... Save Ralph. Save Ralph. 2021. Animation ... I'm all for reducing the needless suffering of animals, but this kind of emotional manipulation is on par ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[47]
You Are Not Immune to Propaganda - A Little Bit Human
Apr 12, 2022 · But why was Save Ralph so effective? They certainly didn't employ any of the underhanded tactics we commonly associate with propaganda…or maybe ...
[48]
Save Ralph (Short 2021) - User reviews - IMDb
'Save Ralph (2021)' is a simple but effective stop-motion short film that acts as a PSA about the inherent (and, frankly, obvious) cruelty of animal testing, ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[49]
Alternative in vitro models used in the main safety tests of cosmetic ...
This review presents, in relation to the regulatory requirements, the main alternative in vitro models used in the safety tests of cosmetic products.Missing: post- 2010 empirical success
[50]
Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing
May 1, 2011 · In summary, the experts confirmed that it will take at least another 7–9 years for the replacement of the current in vivo animal tests used for ...
[51]
Alternative in vitro models used in the main safety tests of cosmetic ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Objective: This review presents, in relation to the regulatory requirements, the main alternative in vitro models used in the safety tests of ...
[52]
Studies of Thalidomide's Effects on Rodent Embryos from 1962-2008
Mar 7, 2014 · ... failure of rodent models to inform scientists of Thalidomide's teratogenicity in humans ignited debate about the proper use of cross-species ...Missing: myth empirical
[53]
Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials
Nov 25, 2019 · Examples include penicillin (fatal to guinea pigs) (39), paracetamol (toxic in dogs and cats) (40), and aspirin (embryo toxicity in rats and ...
[54]
Safety Testing - Science, Medicine, and Animals - NCBI Bookshelf
Once a drug is shown to be effective in animals and to have a low incidence of side effects, it proceeds to safety assessment testing. These tests are conducted ...
[55]
Organ-on-a-chip: current gaps and future directions - PMC - NIH
Apr 19, 2022 · It needs to define the endpoints that will be measured in relation to the conventional endpoints, either human or animal, what measurement ...
[56]
Roadblocks confronting widespread dissemination and deployment ...
Jun 15, 2024 · Organ on Chip platforms hold significant promise as alternatives to animal models or traditional cell cultures, both of which poorly ...
[57]
[PDF] Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies
Apr 10, 2025 · This roadmap outlines a strategic, stepwise approach for FDA to reduce animal testing in preclinical safety studies with scientifically ...
[58]
Cosmetics Market Size, Share, Growth, & Industry Report, 2032
The global cosmetics market size was valued at $335.95 billion in 2024 & is projected to grow from $354.68 billion in 2025 to $556.21 billion by 2032.
[59]
Animal Testing & Cosmetics - FDA
Mar 4, 2022 · The FDA doesn't require animal testing for cosmetics, but manufacturers may use it. FDA supports humane methods and alternatives, and ...
[60]
Prohibitions on cosmetics testing in the EU and elsewhere
From 11 March 2013, the EU completed the prohibition on the sale of cosmetics animal-tested after that date anywhere in the world. The prohibition applies to ...
[61]
Costs of Animal and Non-Animal Testing - Humane World for Animals
Oct 23, 2012 · Animal tests can cost hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, while non-animal tests are much cheaper, like in vitro tests at $20,000 for ...
[62]
The Effects of Animal Testing on Economics - Free Essay Example
Jun 9, 2022 · By banning animal testing altogether, it allows for alternative techniques to be released widespread, as well as prevents businesses from ...
[63]
Cosmetics Safety Q&A: Animal Testing - FDA
Feb 25, 2022 · The FDA does not require animal testing for cosmetics, but manufacturers may use it to establish safety, and FDA supports alternatives.