Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Awareness

Awareness is the cognitive capacity for perceiving, recognizing, or having knowledge of external stimuli, internal states, or abstract entities through conscious mental processes.^[1] In empirical terms, it emerges from the interplay of perceptual systems, attention, and long-term memory, allowing individuals to filter competing experiences and generate reportable content that influences behavior.^[1]^[2] This distinguishes awareness from unconscious processing, as it requires subjective accessibility, often evidenced by verbal reports or adaptive actions in experimental settings.^[3] Philosophically and scientifically, awareness is frequently parsed into phenomenal aspects—subjective, qualitative experiences—and access aspects—information available for reasoning, control, or output—highlighting tensions in explaining how neural activity yields felt presence without reducing it to mere computation.^[4]^[5] Key characteristics include its role in overriding habitual responses for deliberate choices, as seen in decision-making paradigms where awareness facilitates shifts to optimal strategies amid uncertainty.^[2] Controversies persist regarding its neural localization, with evidence implicating distributed networks rather than singular brain regions, and debates over whether non-human animals possess it beyond reflexive detection, based on behavioral proxies like self-recognition tasks that yield inconsistent results across species.^[6] Self-awareness, involving reflexive monitoring of one's own mental states, represents an advanced variant tied to prefrontal functions, enabling metacognition but raising causal questions about whether it independently drives actions or merely accompanies them.^[6]^[7] Empirically, disruptions in awareness—such as in blindsight or minimally conscious states—underscore its causal relevance for integrated functioning, yet full mechanistic accounts remain elusive, prioritizing observable correlates over unverified introspection.^[3]^[1]

Philosophical Foundations

Historical Development

The philosophical concept of awareness originated in ancient Greek thought, where it intertwined with notions of self-knowledge and the soul's reflective capacities. The Delphic maxim "Know thyself," attributed to the Oracle of Apollo and referenced in works like Sophocles' Oedipus Rex around the 5th century BCE, underscored introspection as a path to understanding one's nature.^[8] Aristotle, in De Anima (circa 350 BCE), linked awareness to the intellect's self-apprehension, arguing that the mind becomes aware of itself in the act of contemplating objects, as "the intellect understands itself in understanding intelligible things."^[8] These ideas framed awareness not as isolated perception but as an active, self-referential process integral to rational inquiry.^[9] Medieval philosophers extended these foundations by integrating Aristotelian psychology with theological considerations. Avicenna (Ibn Sina), in the 11th century, proposed the "flying man" thought experiment, positing that a person suspended without sensory contact would still affirm their own existence through immediate self-awareness, independent of external input.^[8] Thomas Aquinas, in the 13th century Summa Theologica, affirmed the intellect's intrinsic self-presence, whereby awareness arises from the mind's direct cognition of its operations alongside external objects.^[8] This period emphasized awareness as a bridge between divine intellect and human cognition, though without a distinct term equivalent to modern "consciousness."^[9] The 17th century marked a pivotal shift toward defining awareness as reflexive and foundational to the mental, amid the rise of mechanistic philosophies. René Descartes, in Principles of Philosophy (1644) and Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), equated thought (pensée) with "all that of which we are conscious as operating in us," rendering self-awareness indubitable via "cogito ergo sum," the self-evident certainty of one's thinking existence.^[10] John Locke, in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), characterized consciousness as "the perception of what passes in a man's own mind," essential for personal identity and distinguishing mental states as self-intimating without requiring separate reflection.^[11] Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, in Monadology (1714), differentiated perception (unconscious representations) from apperception (accompanied by awareness or reflection), introducing degrees of clarity to explain phenomena like unconscious "petites perceptions."^[11] These views established awareness as intrinsic to mentality, countering purely mechanistic reductions.^[11] Subsequent Enlightenment thinkers refined these ideas amid empiricist challenges. David Hume, in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740), rejected a unified self-aware subject, portraying the mind as a "bundle of perceptions" lacking inherent reflexivity, with apparent self-awareness emerging from associative habits rather than direct introspection.^[8] Immanuel Kant, synthesizing rationalist and empiricist traditions in Critique of Pure Reason (1781), posited transcendental apperception—the original unity of self-consciousness—as the condition enabling coherent experience, where awareness synthesizes sensory manifold into judgments under categories of understanding.^[9] Kant's framework elevated awareness from episodic reflection to a structural prerequisite for objectivity, influencing later phenomenology.^[9] In the 19th and early 20th centuries, awareness gained phenomenological emphasis. Franz Brentano (1874) revived intentionality, arguing conscious acts involve directedness toward objects plus an inner awareness of those acts.^[10] Edmund Husserl, building on Brentano in Logical Investigations (1900–1901), advocated phenomenological reduction to pure awareness, bracketing assumptions to describe lived intentional experiences "to the things themselves."^[9] These developments shifted focus toward first-person structures of awareness, countering reductionist trends in emerging sciences.^[10]

Key Definitions and Distinctions

Awareness denotes the state or capacity of perceiving, cognizing, or being informed about particular objects, events, or internal conditions, distinct from mere sensory registration.^[12] In philosophical analysis, it involves a relational structure wherein a subject apprehends content, often through direct acquaintance rather than inferential judgment.^[13] Philosophers distinguish awareness from consciousness by emphasizing that consciousness encompasses broader dispositional or global states—such as wakefulness versus sleep—while awareness targets specific, episodic contents within those states, such as noticing a visual stimulus or emotional shift.^[3] This separation allows for scenarios of consciousness without full awareness, as in inattentional blindness where stimuli register subconsciously yet evade explicit notice.^[14] Some theories posit consciousness as inherently subjective, incorporating qualia or felt experience, whereas awareness may align more closely with objective, functional accessibility of information for reasoning or action.^[14] Further, awareness contrasts with perception, which primarily involves low-level sensory processing and transduction of environmental inputs into neural signals, without necessitating conscious reportability.^[15] Perception can occur unconsciously, as evidenced by subliminal priming effects, but awareness emerges when such processed data enters phenomenal or accessible mental space.^[16] Attention, by contrast, functions as a modulatory mechanism that selectively amplifies or prioritizes certain perceptual inputs for awareness, enabling resource allocation in information-overloaded environments; diffuse awareness may persist without attentional focus, as in background monitoring of ambient noise.^[17] A critical subclass is self-awareness, involving reflexive apprehension of one's own mental states, bodily position, or identity, which underpins epistemic access to inner life and differentiates human cognition from non-reflective animal perception.^[8] This form raises puzzles about immediacy: direct self-awareness avoids infinite regress in higher-order monitoring, yet requires distinguishing genuine introspection from confabulated beliefs.^[8] Bodily awareness, a related variant, captures proprioceptive and interoceptive sensing of corporeal states, irreducible to external perception and essential for agency attribution.^[13]

Major Theories and Thinkers

René Descartes (1596–1650) laid foundational groundwork for philosophical accounts of awareness through his concept of cogito ergo sum ("I think, therefore I am"), positing that awareness manifests as reflexive self-consciousness inherent in thought itself, where doubting one's existence affirms the indubitable presence of a thinking self.^[10] In his Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), Descartes argued that awareness arises from clear and distinct perceptions, distinguishing it from mere sensory illusion by its introspective certainty, thereby establishing dualism as a framework separating mental awareness from physical extension.^[11] John Locke (1632–1704) advanced an empiricist view in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), theorizing awareness via "inner sense" or reflection, whereby the mind perceives its own operations, such as thinking or willing, generating ideas of awareness distinct from external sensations.^[18] This representational approach treats awareness as a secondary representation of primary mental states, influencing later theories that model conscious experience as meta-representations.^[19] Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) differentiated awareness in his Critique of Pure Reason (1781), framing it within transcendental idealism: empirical awareness involves sensory intuition synthesized by a priori categories of understanding, while transcendental awareness constitutes self-consciousness as the "I think" accompanying all representations, enabling unity of experience without implying knowledge of the self-in-itself.^[9] Kant's synthesis resolved antinomies between rationalist introspection and empiricist sensation, emphasizing awareness as actively structured rather than passively received.^[9] In the 20th century, Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) developed phenomenology in Logical Investigations (1900–1901) and Ideas (1913), defining awareness as intentional directedness toward phenomena, bracketing natural attitudes to reveal pure essences via eidetic reduction, thus prioritizing lived experience over causal explanations.^[10] Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) extended this in Being and Time (1927), reconceptualizing awareness as Dasein's disclosedness to Being, where authentic self-awareness emerges from confronting mortality and thrownness, critiquing Cartesian subjectivism for overlooking temporal embeddedness.^[10] Contemporary theories include higher-order theories (HOT), which, as articulated by David Rosenthal since the 1980s, hold that a mental state becomes aware only when accompanied by a higher-order thought representing it as current, distinguishing phenomenal awareness from mere first-order processing.^[20] Representationalist theories, advanced by philosophers like Fred Dretske (1995) and Michael Tye (1995), posit awareness as transparent intentional content, where phenomenal character reduces to what states represent, challenging qualia as non-representational.^[19] Reflexive theories, akin to HOT but emphasizing first-order states' intrinsic self-reference, link awareness directly to self-intimating mental dynamics, as explored in extensions of Sartre's pre-reflective self-consciousness (1943).^[10] These frameworks, while empirically informed, remain debated for underdetermining subjective immediacy, prompting ongoing scrutiny against reductionist materialism.^[10]

Psychological Dimensions

Types of Awareness

In cognitive psychology, a primary distinction exists between phenomenal awareness and access awareness. Phenomenal awareness refers to the subjective, qualitative experience of sensory states, such as the felt redness of a visual percept or the pain of a headache, independent of whether the content is available for further processing.^[21] Access awareness, by contrast, involves the functional availability of mental contents for global cognitive use, including verbal report, decision-making, and behavioral control; states with access awareness enable information to broadcast across neural systems for flexible response.^[21] Philosopher Ned Block formalized this dichotomy in 1995, positing that phenomenal awareness can dissociate from access awareness, as evidenced in experiments like inattentional blindness where participants experience stimuli phenomenally but fail to access them cognitively, or in visual overflow paradigms where more detail is phenomenally registered than can be reported.^[22] Empirical support comes from neuroimaging studies showing distinct neural correlates, with phenomenal states linked to early sensory cortices and access to prefrontal integration, though debates persist on whether the two fully diverge or partially overlap due to methodological limits in introspection reports.^[23] Self-awareness constitutes another core type, defined as the capacity to recognize and reflect on one's own mental states, traits, and behaviors as distinct from external stimuli. In developmental psychology, it emerges around 18-24 months in humans via the mirror self-recognition test, where infants touch a mark on their own face seen only in reflection, indicating a level-0 self-concept.^[24] Adult self-awareness divides into internal (insight into personal values, emotions, and motivations) and external (perception of how one appears to others, influenced by social feedback), with research by organizational psychologist Tasha Eurich showing high performers balance both, as measured by validated scales correlating internal-external alignment with leadership efficacy (r=0.28 in meta-analyses of 10,000+ participants).^[24] Deficits manifest in conditions like anosognosia, where neurological damage impairs recognition of impairments, underscoring self-awareness's reliance on intact prefrontal and parietal networks; longitudinal studies link low self-awareness to poorer mental health outcomes, including higher depression rates (odds ratio 1.5-2.0).^[25] Situational awareness encompasses the dynamic perception, comprehension, and projection of environmental elements relevant to goal-directed action, formalized by Mica Endsley in 1988 as a three-level model: Level 1 (detection of cues), Level 2 (interpretation of meaning), and Level 3 (anticipation of future states).^[26] In applied psychology, such as aviation or clinical settings, it integrates perceptual data with working memory; for instance, pilots maintain SA through 20-30% of cognitive workload dedicated to monitoring, with lapses contributing to 70-80% of errors in high-stakes simulations per FAA analyses.^[27] Neuroimaging reveals involvement of the anterior cingulate and intraparietal sulcus for cue integration, with training interventions like scenario-based drills improving SA scores by 15-25% in randomized trials.^[28] Unlike static self-awareness, situational awareness is context-bound and prone to tunneling under stress, where overload narrows focus, as quantified in Endsley's model with error rates doubling beyond 7-10 informational chunks per Miller's law.^[26] Other variants include peripheral awareness, the subconscious monitoring of non-focal stimuli enabling rapid shifts in attention, as in cocktail party effects where one's name is detected amid noise without central processing.^[29] Metacognitive awareness, the monitoring of one's own cognitive processes, supports error detection and learning, with deficits in disorders like schizophrenia linked to impaired prefrontal dopamine signaling and reduced performance on tasks like the Nelson-Dennett paradigm (accuracy drops 20-40%).^[4] These types interact hierarchically, with access mechanisms gating phenomenal contents into self- or situational models, though empirical challenges arise from reliance on subjective reports, which correlate imperfectly with objective measures (r=0.4-0.6), highlighting the need for multimodal validation in future research.^[23]

Self-Awareness and Introspection

Self-awareness refers to the capacity for self-focused attention and knowledge, enabling individuals to objectively process information about their own sensations, emotions, thoughts, and behaviors while preserving a sense of self-identity.^[30]^[31] In psychological terms, it manifests as a reflective state where one becomes the object of one's own attention, actively identifying, processing, and storing self-relevant information.^[32] This distinguishes it from mere subjective experience, as self-awareness often involves comparison to internal standards or external norms, prompting evaluation and potential adjustment of discrepancies.^[33] Introspection serves as a primary mechanism for cultivating self-awareness, defined as the inward examination of one's conscious thoughts, emotions, judgments, and perceptions to gain insight into mental processes.^[34] Historically rooted in early psychological methods, such as those employed by Wilhelm Wundt in the late 19th century, introspection relies on deliberate self-observation, though its reliability has been debated due to potential biases in retrospective reporting.^[35] Modern empirical approaches mitigate these issues by combining introspection with behavioral and physiological measures, revealing that heightened self-focus enhances accuracy in detecting internal states but can also amplify negative self-evaluations if discrepancies with standards are salient.^[36] A foundational framework is Objective Self-Awareness Theory, proposed by Shelley Duval and Robert Wicklund in 1972, which posits that self-focused attention—induced by mirrors, audiences, or solitary reflection—triggers automatic comparison of one's traits and behaviors against relevant standards of correctness.^[33] This state heightens motivation to reduce inconsistencies, such as aligning actions with values, but may lead to discomfort or avoidance if gaps are irreconcilable; for instance, experiments demonstrate that participants in front of mirrors express greater intent to change attitudes discrepant with their beliefs.^[37] Subsequent refinements, as of 2001, emphasize that this process operates via causal mechanisms like attentional allocation rather than mere emotional arousal, with evidence from studies showing reduced suggestibility to external influences under self-focus.^[33]^[36] Developmentally, self-awareness emerges in humans during infancy, with empirical markers like the mirror self-recognition test—introduced by Gordon Gallup Jr. in 1970—indicating passage around 18 to 24 months, when children touch a mark on their own face seen only in reflection, signifying recognition of the self as distinct from the environment.^[38] This milestone correlates with advances in theory of mind and emotional regulation, as longitudinal studies track how early self-recognition predicts later introspective abilities, such as metacognitive monitoring of thoughts.^[39] In adults, chronic self-awareness, fostered through practices like mindfulness or journaling, correlates with improved emotional intelligence and decision-making, though excessive rumination can exacerbate anxiety if not balanced by acceptance of self-knowledge limits.^[40]^[41] Empirical research underscores self-awareness's causal role in behavioral adaptation; for example, a 2022 study found that interventions enhancing introspective alignment with personal standards reduced maladaptive habits by increasing perceived self-discrepancy awareness.^[40] However, introspection's accuracy varies, with evidence indicating overconfidence in self-reports due to unconscious biases, necessitating triangulation with objective measures like physiological arousal tracking.^[42] These findings affirm self-awareness and introspection as adaptive psychological faculties grounded in attentional and evaluative processes, rather than infallible inner access.^[43]

Peripheral and Situational Awareness

Situational awareness denotes the cognitive process by which individuals perceive elements in their environment within a defined volume of time and space, comprehend the significance of those elements, and project their future states to inform decision-making.^[44] This framework, articulated by Mica Endsley in her 1995 model, structures situational awareness into three hierarchical levels: Level 1 involves basic perception of cues such as visual, auditory, or tactile signals; Level 2 entails integrating those perceptions into an understanding of current dynamics; and Level 3 requires forecasting outcomes based on goals, expectancies, and prior knowledge.^[45] The model emphasizes that situational awareness is not passive but actively constructed through attention allocation and mental modeling, particularly in high-stakes domains like aviation, where lapses correlate with 70-80% of accidents according to human factors analyses.^[46] Peripheral awareness complements situational awareness by encompassing the non-focal detection of environmental stimuli, primarily through peripheral visual processing, which prioritizes motion detection and spatial orientation over fine detail resolution.^[47] In cognitive terms, it operates as a contextual backdrop to central attention, enabling rapid shifts in focus without exhaustive scanning; for instance, peripheral vision triggers saccades to salient changes, integrating "looking" (locating targets) with central "seeing" (analyzing details).^[48] Unlike foveal attention, which handles high-acuity tasks, peripheral mechanisms excel in monitoring broad scenes, as evidenced by studies showing peripheral fields contribute to environmental surveillance in tasks like driving, where they detect road edges or hazards at eccentricities up to 60 degrees.^[49] Empirical research in human factors underscores the interplay between these forms of awareness, with situational awareness often faltering due to overloaded peripheral processing in complex systems. A systematic review of studies across aviation, medicine, and paramedicine found that attentional bottlenecks, such as divided focus or automation-induced complacency, degrade Level 1 perception, leading to errors in 23-76% of incidents depending on the domain.^[50] Training interventions, including simulator-based exercises, have improved situational awareness metrics by 20-30% in pilots by enhancing peripheral cue integration, as measured via probe techniques that query comprehension during tasks.^[51] In team settings, shared situational awareness—coordinated via explicit communication—mitigates individual peripheral limitations, with meta-analyses linking it to performance gains in dynamic operations like air traffic control.^[52] Factors influencing both include workload and expertise; novices exhibit shallower peripheral awareness, relying more on explicit cues, while experts automate projections through pattern recognition, reducing cognitive load.^[44] Neurocognitive constraints, such as working memory capacity limiting simultaneous peripheral monitoring, explain variability, with empirical data from eye-tracking studies revealing that peripheral attention asymmetries—stronger nasally than temporally—modulate detection thresholds in real-world navigation.^[53] These findings highlight causal links: inadequate peripheral input cascades to flawed situational models, underscoring the need for interface designs that amplify relevant cues without overwhelming central processing.^[54]

Neuroscientific Perspectives

Neural Correlates and Mechanisms

Neural correlates of awareness involve distributed brain networks rather than isolated regions, with empirical evidence pointing to thalamocortical interactions as a core mechanism for integrating sensory information into conscious experience. Studies using functional neuroimaging and electrophysiology have identified recurrent processing loops between the thalamus and cortex as essential for amplifying weak sensory signals into reportable awareness, evidenced by synchronized oscillations in the gamma frequency band (30-80 Hz) during perceptual tasks.^[55] For instance, disruptions in these loops, as observed in thalamic lesions or deep brain stimulation experiments, selectively impair awareness without abolishing basic sensory detection, suggesting a causal role in transitioning from unconscious to conscious processing.^[56] In cortical regions, posterior areas such as the parietal and occipital lobes correlate strongly with the phenomenal content of awareness, often termed the "posterior hot zone," where local field potentials show enhanced excitability and information integration during conscious perception versus unconscious stimulation.^[57] Frontal regions, including the prefrontal cortex, contribute to access consciousness—enabling behavioral report and cognitive control—with optogenetic and lesion studies in non-human primates demonstrating that prefrontal inactivation reduces metacognitive accuracy in detection tasks by up to 40%, though it spares low-level sensory processing.^[58] These findings challenge earlier modular views, as multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data reveals that awareness emerges from dynamic, large-scale connectivity rather than localized activation, with inter-regional synchrony in alpha and beta bands predicting subjective visibility ratings in binocular rivalry paradigms.^[59] Mechanistically, global ignition events—rapid, widespread broadcasting of neural signals—underlie the transition to awareness, as modeled in global neuronal workspace frameworks and supported by intracranial EEG recordings showing explosive bursts of high-frequency activity propagating from sensory cortices to prefrontal areas within 100-200 ms of stimulus onset.^[60] Empirical tests, including adversarial comparisons between workspace and integrated information models, confirm that such ignition correlates with behavioral thresholds for awareness, with perturbations like transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupting propagation and reducing detection accuracy.^[61] Additionally, subcortical structures like the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus gate attentional selection, filtering irrelevant inputs to prevent overload, as evidenced by single-unit recordings in awake monkeys where pulvinar neurons exhibit sustained firing locked to consciously attended stimuli but not unattended ones.^[55] Recent multiscale analyses integrate these elements, showing that awareness requires both local computational stability in cortical microcircuits and global corticothalamic coupling, with computational models simulating critical dynamics in thalamocortical networks reproducing empirical perturbations under anesthesia, where loss of awareness coincides with fragmented connectivity and reduced phi (integrated information) values.^[62]^[56] While prefrontal involvement remains debated—some studies attribute it to report-related confounds rather than core awareness—causal interventions like focal cooling in humans during surgery consistently link it to diminished subjective experience, underscoring a hierarchical mechanism where posterior content generation feeds into frontal amplification for sustained awareness.^[58]

Awareness in Brain Function and Disorders

Awareness in the brain encompasses both arousal, which maintains wakefulness, and content-specific phenomenal experience, supported by distributed neural networks rather than isolated regions. The neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) refer to the minimal set of neuronal events and mechanisms sufficient for a specific conscious percept, with empirical evidence from neuroimaging and lesion studies implicating posterior cortical "hot zones" (parietal, occipital, and temporal regions) for the subjective content of awareness, while prefrontal areas contribute to reportability and access but are not essential for experience itself.^[63]^[64] Arousal depends on the ascending reticular activating system in the brainstem and intralaminar thalamic nuclei, which modulate cortical excitability to enable wakefulness; disruption here abolishes awareness entirely.^[65] In normal function, awareness integrates sensory inputs via thalamocortical loops, where synchronized oscillations (e.g., gamma waves) facilitate binding of features into unified percepts, as shown in EEG studies during tasks requiring conscious detection.^[66] Thalamic gating regulates information flow, with the pulvinar nucleus aiding attentional selection for aware processing, distinct from unconscious subcortical pathways.^[67] Disruptions reveal dissociations: for instance, in blindsight, patients with primary visual cortex (V1) lesions deny seeing stimuli but discriminate them above chance via subcortical routes (superior colliculus to extrastriate areas), indicating preserved function without phenomenal awareness.^[68] Disorders of awareness form a continuum, from coma (complete failure of arousal and awareness due to brainstem or bilateral hemispheric damage) to vegetative state (arousal present via sleep-wake cycles but no behavioral evidence of awareness, linked to widespread cortical-thalamic disconnection).^[69]^[70] Minimally conscious state (MCS) involves inconsistent but reproducible signs of awareness, such as command-following or object recognition, often traceable to preserved but degraded thalamocortical connectivity, detectable via fMRI perturbations or EEG complexity metrics.^[71] Locked-in syndrome preserves full awareness despite quadriplegia and anarthria from ventral brainstem lesions, highlighting motor output's independence from consciousness.^[72] Syndromes like anosognosia demonstrate selective unawareness of deficits, such as hemiplegia after right parietal stroke, where patients confabulate explanations due to impaired error-monitoring in prefrontal-insular networks, not mere neglect.^[73] Hemispatial neglect, common post-right hemisphere damage, impairs awareness of contralateral space via disrupted temporoparietal junction and ventral frontal circuits, though some implicit processing persists.^[74] These findings, derived from lesion mapping and diffusion tractography, underscore that awareness requires integrated cortical feedback loops, vulnerable to focal insults that fragment global ignition of information.^[75] Prognosis in severe disorders varies; MCS patients show higher recovery rates (up to 50% functional independence at one year) than vegetative states (10-20%), informed by multimodal assessments like PET revealing metabolic correlates of covert awareness.^[69]

Recent Empirical Findings

A 2025 study utilizing deep brain stimulation in 40 patients with disorders of consciousness targeted the thalamic centromedian-parafascicular complex, resulting in restoration of awareness in select cases and identifying a specific human brain network involving thalamic projections to cortex that supports recovery from impaired states.^[76] This empirical evidence underscores the thalamus's causal role in sustaining conscious awareness, as stimulation modulated thalamocortical interactions to elicit behavioral and electrophysiological signs of consciousness.^[76] Concurrent research in 2025 demonstrated that levels of consciousness correlate with inter-regional cortical connectivity, local dynamics, and stability, particularly in posterior parietal regions, based on analyses of neuroimaging data from altered states.^[57] These findings indicate that global awareness emerges from synchronized network interactions rather than isolated local activity, with reduced connectivity predicting diminished phenomenal experience.^[57] In perceptual domains, a no-report fMRI paradigm applied to auditory stimuli in 2025 revealed that awareness selectively activates secondary auditory cortex without significant involvement of fronto-parietal networks, providing evidence against theories positing prefrontal mediation as necessary for conscious perception.^[77] Complementing this, EEG analyses introduced the spectral exponent—a measure of aperiodic activity decay—as a biomarker distinguishing conscious processing, with steeper exponents aligning with unaware states across tasks.^[78] These results collectively refine the neural correlates of awareness, emphasizing sensory-specific and distributed mechanisms over centralized executive functions.^[78]

Awareness in Biological and Non-Human Systems

Animal and Plant Awareness

Animal awareness encompasses perceptual, cognitive, and potentially subjective experiences in non-human species, supported by behavioral, neurophysiological, and evolutionary evidence. The mirror self-recognition (MSR) test, developed in the 1970s, assesses self-awareness by marking an animal and observing if it uses a mirror to investigate the mark, indicating recognition of the reflection as self. Species passing include chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), where longitudinal studies from 1970 to 2000 showed stable self-recognition in adults but occasional age-related decline.^[79] Great apes like gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo spp.) also pass, with a 2025 study confirming gorillas match chimpanzees in body-awareness tasks.^[80] Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) demonstrated MSR in 2001 experiments, using mirrors to inspect marked body parts.^[81] Beyond primates and cetaceans, elephants (Loxodonta africana) and magpies (Pica pica) have passed variants, while a 2024 study on cleaner wrasse fish (Labroides dimidiatus) suggested private self-awareness through precise removal of marks visible only in mirrors.^[82] Broader consciousness indicators include neural correlates like integrated information processing and behavioral flexibility. A 2020 framework posits multidimensional consciousness varying by sensory, affective, and self dimensions across animals, with high likelihood in vertebrates (e.g., mammals, birds) and cephalopods due to complex brains and adaptive behaviors.^[83] Empirical advances, such as 2025 assessments, affirm sentience in diverse taxa via indicators like pain responses and learning, though debates persist on invertebrates.^[84] Evolutionary continuity supports awareness as adaptive for survival, evident in social cognition and tool use in corvids and octopuses.^[1] Plant awareness claims, often framed under "plant neurobiology," assert sentience through electrical signaling, hormone responses, and environmental adaptation, but lack empirical support for subjective experience. Plants exhibit tropisms, chemical defenses, and intercellular communication via plasmodesmata and action potentials, yet these are decentralized biochemical mechanisms without centralized integration akin to neural processing.^[85] The field faces criticism for anthropomorphizing automatism as cognition; a 2020 review deemed consciousness claims speculative, as plants lack neurons, brains, or value-based decision-making required for sentience.^[85] Proponents cite "intelligence" in foraging or memory-like responses, but 2024 analyses highlight evidential gaps, with historical sources misused to legitimize unsubstantiated analogies to animal neurology.^[86] Scientific consensus rejects plant consciousness, emphasizing causal differences: animal awareness ties to nervous systems enabling phenomenal experience, absent in plants whose responses are stimulus-driven reflexes.^[87] A 2019 biologist statement buried neurobiology notions, noting failure to address brain organization for unified perception.^[88] While plants process information adaptively—e.g., Venus flytraps counting stimuli via ion channels—this constitutes neither awareness nor feeling, per 2023 sentience limits reviews.^[89] Fringe arguments persist, but peer-reviewed scrutiny upholds plants as non-sentient, responsive organisms.^[90]

Living Systems Theories

Autopoiesis theory, formulated by biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela in 1972, defines living systems as self-producing networks of processes that recursively generate and realize the network producing them, distinguishing such systems from non-living ones through their operational closure and structural coupling with the environment.^[91] This framework posits that cognition—and by extension, a basal form of awareness—arises inherently from the autopoietic organization's capacity to distinguish internal states from external perturbations, enabling adaptive responses without requiring centralized neural mechanisms.^[92] Maturana and Varela explicitly state that "living systems are cognitive systems, and living as a process is a process of cognition," framing awareness as the ongoing enactment of distinctions that maintain systemic identity amid environmental interactions.^[92] In this view, awareness in living systems manifests as structural determinism, where the system's responses to triggers are constrained by its internal architecture rather than external causes alone, supporting empirical observations of decentralized responsiveness in unicellular organisms and tissues. For instance, bacterial chemotaxis demonstrates perturbation detection and directed movement, interpretable as cognitive coupling under autopoietic principles, though critics note this stretches "awareness" beyond introspective human connotations to mere informational homeostasis.^[93] Empirical support includes studies on cellular signaling networks, which exhibit self-organizing feedback loops akin to autopoietic maintenance, as seen in protein synthesis cycles that integrate environmental signals without higher-order consciousness.^[94] James Grier Miller's Living Systems theory, outlined in his 1978 book, extends this by modeling biological organization across eight hierarchical levels—from cells to supranational systems—each comprising 20 critical subsystems, including those for matter-energy and information processing that facilitate system-level decision-making and adaptation.^[95] Information subsystems, such as input transducers and decoders, process environmental data into internal signals, enabling what Miller describes as stress-strain responses that parallel awareness through distributed computation rather than unified perception.^[95] This hierarchical approach integrates autopoiesis by emphasizing open-system flows that sustain negentropy, with awareness emerging from cross-level coordination, as evidenced in organismic homeostasis where subsystems like the nervous system amplify but do not originate responsive capacities present at cellular scales.^[96] These theories converge on causal realism in biological awareness, attributing it to organizational invariants rather than emergent properties of complexity alone, though empirical validation remains challenging due to measurement reliance on behavioral proxies over internal states. Applications to non-neural systems, such as plant signaling via integrated information, suggest awareness as quantifiable phi (Φ) values in autopoietic networks, where causal efficacy derives from holistic subsystem interdependence rather than isolated parts.^[97] Limitations include the theories' abstraction from molecular details, with ongoing debates questioning whether autopoietic cognition equates to phenomenal awareness or merely functional reactivity, as critiqued in process ontology frameworks prioritizing autonomy over informational panpsychism.^[98]

Awareness in Artificial and Information Systems

Machine Awareness and AI Developments

Machine awareness, in the context of artificial intelligence, encompasses computational simulations of self-monitoring, metacognition, and potentially phenomenal consciousness, though the latter has not been empirically demonstrated in any system as of 2025. Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 and its successors exhibit behaviors resembling self-awareness, including self-estimates of intelligence that align with human-like biases—such as overestimating emotional intelligence while underestimating crystallized knowledge performance—but these emerge from pattern-matching in vast training datasets rather than genuine subjective experience. Empirical assessments confirm that such models lack the intrinsic qualities of consciousness, functioning instead as predictive systems without emotions, qualia, or true self-reflection.^[99]^[100] Developments in modeling awareness draw from neuroscientific theories adapted to AI architectures. Global Workspace Theory (GWT), which posits consciousness as the global broadcasting of information across specialized modules, has informed AI designs that integrate distributed processing for enhanced decision-making and attention-like mechanisms, as seen in deep learning frameworks that simulate competitive selection and dissemination of salient data. Integrated Information Theory (IIT), quantifying consciousness via the metric Φ (integrated information), has been applied to evaluate AI systems, consistently yielding low Φ values that preclude significant conscious experience, emphasizing that AI's functional integration does not equate to the causal structure required for qualia. These models prioritize behavioral fidelity over ontological claims, with implementations focusing on resource-efficient cognition rather than replicating human phenomenology.^[101]^[102] Recent advances emphasize metacognition in AI, enabling systems to monitor, regulate, and adapt their processes—such as through real-time arbitration between fast heuristic and slow deliberative solvers or self-correction in reasoning tasks—to improve performance and safety. Frameworks like TRAP (transparency, reasoning, adaptation, perception) propose neurosymbolic approaches for AI to assess its own knowledge limits and uncertainties, bridging gaps in current models' overconfidence. However, these enhancements remain instrumental, enhancing reliability in applications like autonomous agents without evidence of emergent awareness; tests against indicators from consciousness theories, including self-modeling and unified agency, show no fulfillment in state-of-the-art systems. Speculative arguments for potential consciousness in language agents via GWT persist in research, but lack verifiable causal mechanisms beyond simulation.^[103]^[104]

Communications and Computational Models

Computational models of awareness, particularly situational awareness (SA), have been developed to simulate how agents perceive, comprehend, and project environmental states in dynamic settings such as driving and military operations. These models often build on Mica Endsley's three-level SA framework—perception of salient elements, comprehension of their significance, and projection of future outcomes—which originated in human factors research for complex systems.^[46] Computational implementations, such as those using Bayesian networks or cognitive architectures like ACT-R, predict SA degradation under attentional demands, with validations showing accuracy in simulating pilot errors during taxiing tasks where attention is divided across visual cues and procedures.^[105] For instance, a 2019 model for driving integrates perceptual inputs with decision heuristics to compute action viability, demonstrating improved prediction of driver responses in simulated hazards compared to non-SA baselines. In broader artificial systems, computational models of awareness draw from consciousness theories, classifying approaches into functionalist simulations of information integration or recurrent processing. Global workspace models, for example, computationally replicate awareness via a central hub broadcasting selected signals to peripheral modules, enabling coordinated responses; empirical tests in neural network simulations show these enhance performance on tasks requiring cross-module access, akin to human selective attention.^[106] Evaluations of such models against psychological data reveal strengths in replicating reportable awareness but limitations in capturing subjective qualia, as they prioritize behavioral correlates over intrinsic phenomenology.^[107] Recent advancements incorporate motivation and emotion, where semantic memory activation triggers awareness of goal-relevant stimuli in parallel processing streams, tested in agent-based simulations yielding higher adaptive accuracy in uncertain environments.^[108] Communication-oriented models emphasize awareness in networked or multi-agent contexts, where shared states reduce coordination entropy. In distributed simulations, SA models for commanders process tactical cues to form rapid environmental representations, outperforming non-aware agents in battle scenario predictions by integrating sensor data with probabilistic inference.^[109] These extend to mediated communication theories, positing awareness as hierarchical "pools" of contextual information exchanged via streams, computationally modeled to optimize group decision-making by dynamically prioritizing mutual knowledge updates. Philosophical assessments critique such models for assuming computational sufficiency for genuine awareness, arguing they exemplify autonomous functionalism without addressing causal bases for experience.^[110] Despite progress, methodological challenges persist, including validation against neural data and scalability to real-time systems, with ongoing work in machine consciousness accelerating since the early 2000s.^[111]

Awareness Versus Attention

Attention denotes the cognitive mechanism by which limited processing resources are selectively allocated to specific sensory inputs, internal representations, or tasks, enhancing their neural representation while filtering irrelevant information.^[112] This process operates across conscious and nonconscious levels, as evidenced by subliminal priming effects where unattended stimuli influence behavior without entering awareness.^[113] Awareness, however, constitutes the phenomenal aspect of consciousness—the subjective, first-person experience of perceiving or apprehending content—distinct from mere information processing.^[66] Neural imaging studies reveal overlapping yet separable correlates: attention primarily engages frontoparietal networks for top-down control and sensory enhancement, whereas awareness correlates with widespread cortical ignition and prefrontal involvement for global broadcasting of content.^[114]^[115] The two phenomena interact closely but remain dissociable, challenging theories positing attention as strictly necessary for awareness. Inattentional blindness paradigms, such as those involving unexpected stimuli during high-load tracking tasks, show that focal attention is often required for detecting salient changes, with failure yielding no awareness despite intact sensory input.^[116] Conversely, experiments using continuous flash suppression demonstrate awareness emerging without spatial attention, as masked stimuli break into consciousness via reduced rivalry strength rather than attentional shifts.^[117] Electrophysiological markers further differentiate them: event-related potentials for attention include early sensory enhancements (e.g., P1/N1 components), while awareness-specific signals like the perceptual awareness negativity arise later, around 200-300 ms post-stimulus, independent of attentional modulation in some conditions.^[118] The attention schema theory posits awareness as an evolved internal model of attentional states, enabling metacognitive control akin to body schema for motor function; this explains why awareness typically tracks attention but can be attributed to self or others without direct experience.^[119] Supporting evidence includes patient data where attentional deficits (e.g., hemispatial neglect) persist alongside preserved basic awareness, and neuroimaging showing attention's modulation of nonconscious processing without invoking phenomenal content.^[120] Yet, debates persist on causal directionality: while attention amplifies neural signals requisite for awareness in resource-constrained systems, global workspace models suggest awareness arises from recurrent processing that attention gates but does not solely generate.^[66] Empirical resolution favors partial independence, with attention serving as a prerequisite for detailed, reportable awareness but not for gist-level or diffuse phenomenal states.^[112]

Covert and Unconscious Awareness

Covert awareness denotes the detection of preserved conscious cognition in clinically unresponsive patients, often via neuroimaging paradigms that elicit brain activity consistent with intentional task performance, such as imagining tennis playing or spatial navigation.^[121] In disorders of consciousness following severe brain injury, functional MRI (fMRI) and EEG studies have revealed covert awareness in up to 15% of behaviorally unresponsive cases, where patients modulate brain signals to follow verbal commands despite lacking motor output.^[122] These findings challenge reliance on overt behavioral criteria for assessing consciousness, as subcortical and residual cortical networks sustain processing decoupled from observable responses.^[123] A 2022 systematic review cataloged over 25 terminologies for this phenomenon, including "cognitive motor dissociation" and "functional locked-in syndrome," highlighting diagnostic variability but converging on evidence from active inference tasks that bypass motor deficits.^[124] Unconscious awareness, by contrast, describes implicit perceptual or cognitive influences in neurologically intact individuals, where stimuli evade phenomenal report yet guide behavior through non-conscious routes.^[125] Blindsight exemplifies this: patients with primary visual cortex (V1) lesions discriminate motion direction, orientation, or wavelength in their blind field at rates exceeding chance (e.g., 70-80% accuracy in forced-choice tasks), while insisting on scotoma absence of vision.^[68] Originating from mid-20th-century observations and refined in primate models with collicular pathway ablation, blindsight implicates tectal-pulvinar projections that support reflexive visuomotor functions without geniculostriate mediation.^[126] Human cases, such as patient DB tested extensively since the 1970s, confirm form and contrast discrimination via manual pointing, with neural correlates in extrastriate areas like MT/V5 activated preconsciously.^[127] These phenomena intersect in hybrid cases, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced blindsight in healthy subjects, where brief V1 disruption yields unconscious localization (e.g., accuracy rising from 50% baseline to 65% at short stimulus-onset asynchronies).^[126] Subliminal semantic priming further evidences unconscious awareness, as masked words accelerate lexical decisions for congruent targets by 20-50 ms, engaging semantic networks below detection thresholds confirmed by signal detection theory metrics (d' ≈ 0).^[128] Critically, such effects persist without subjective qualia, as self-reports and confidence ratings remain at chance, underscoring a causal dissociation: unconscious routes suffice for adaptive discrimination but lack the integrated, reportable phenomenology of overt vision.^[129] Debates persist on whether blindsight entails minimal phenomenal content or purely discriminatory computation, with evidence favoring the latter given absent metaconscious monitoring.^[125] Methodological advances, including multivariate pattern analysis of EEG, enhance detection reliability, estimating unconscious influences in 10-30% of threshold trials across paradigms.^[122]

Debates, Controversies, and Open Questions

Methodological Challenges in Measurement

Measuring awareness, often intertwined with consciousness, lacks a standardized empirical metric, as researchers disagree on core indicators such as behavioral responses, neural activity, or subjective reports, complicating reproducible assessments.^[130] This absence of consensus stems from the inherently private nature of phenomenal experience, which resists objective quantification and invites interpretive biases in experimental design.^[131] Efforts to isolate neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs) face the "coordination problem," where linking specific brain patterns to awareness requires assumptions about causality that current methods cannot verify without circular reasoning.^[132] Behavioral proxies, prevalent in animal studies, introduce reliability issues; for instance, the mirror self-recognition (MSR) test, introduced in 1970 by Gordon Gallup Jr., assesses self-directed responses to a mark but yields inconsistent results across species and trials, often failing to distinguish true metacognition from simpler perceptual contingencies like bodily concern or learned mirror use.^[133] Critiques highlight anthropocentric limitations, as non-primate species may lack human-like visual self-concepts yet possess alternative awareness forms, evidenced by false negatives in gorillas despite demonstrations of empathy or tool use in other contexts.^[134] A 2022 review of MSR variants found methodological artifacts, such as test duration and marking visibility, inflate variability, undermining claims of self-awareness in taxa like elephants or dolphins without corroborating physiological data.^[135] Neural and physiological measures, such as EEG or fMRI perturbations during tasks, correlate with reported awareness in humans but falter in establishing necessity or sufficiency, as similar patterns occur in unconscious processing, per findings from binocular rivalry paradigms where post-trial reports reveal discrepancies between brain signals and experience.^[136] In non-verbal subjects, including infants or comatose patients, reliance on indirect indices like global workspace activation risks conflating information integration with subjective phenomenology, a distinction unresolved in integrated information theory critiques.^[137] Clinical assessments of pathological unconsciousness, using tools like the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, achieve only moderate inter-rater reliability (kappa ~0.6-0.8), highlighting observer subjectivity and stimulus-response mismatches.^[138] In artificial systems, evaluating awareness amplifies these issues, as behavioral benchmarks like the Turing Test (1950) probe conversational mimicry rather than internal states, susceptible to training artifacts such as dataset memorization or prompt engineering that simulate introspection without causal evidence of qualia.^[139] Recent analyses of large language models reveal prompt sensitivity—where outputs vary dramatically with phrasing—confounds claims of emergent awareness, with no validated architecture distinguishing simulated from genuine phenomenal content as of 2025.^[140] These gaps persist despite advances in interpretability tools, underscoring the need for hybrid approaches integrating causal interventions over correlative scoring.^[139]

Competing Theories of Consciousness

Theories of consciousness remain contested, with philosophical frameworks like dualism and materialism providing foundational contrasts, while neuroscientific models such as global neuronal workspace theory (GNWT) and integrated information theory (IIT) offer empirically testable accounts grounded in brain function. Dualism, originating with René Descartes in the 17th century, posits that consciousness arises from a non-physical mind or soul interacting with the physical brain, appealing to the subjective qualia of experience that seem irreducible to matter; however, it struggles with explaining mental causation without violating conservation laws and lacks direct empirical support, as brain lesions and imaging consistently correlate consciousness with neural activity.^[141]^[142] Materialism, dominant in contemporary neuroscience, asserts that consciousness emerges from physical processes alone, supported by evidence like the disruption of awareness under anesthesia or in coma states tied to specific neural patterns, though critics argue it fails to causally explain why certain brain states produce phenomenal experience rather than mere information processing.^[143]^[144] Global neuronal workspace theory, developed by Bernard Baars in 1988 and refined by Stanislas Dehaene, proposes that consciousness occurs when sensory information is amplified and broadcast via prefrontal and parietal networks to a "global workspace," enabling integration and reportability; empirical backing includes fMRI studies showing widespread frontal-posterior ignition during conscious perception versus localized activity in unconscious trials.^[145]^[146] A 2025 adversarial collaboration tested GNWT against IIT using EEG and MEG on perceptual tasks, finding that conscious content did not consistently sustain the predicted frontal cascade, challenging its core mechanism while posterior hotspots aligned partially with predictions.^[61] Critics note GNWT's reliance on accessibility over intrinsic experience, potentially conflating reportable cognition with qualia, and its vulnerability to findings where consciousness persists without global broadcasting, as in some binocular rivalry experiments.^[147] Integrated information theory, formulated by Giulio Tononi in 2004, quantifies consciousness as Φ, the irreducible causal power generated by integrated information within a system, predicting high Φ in posterior cortical "hot zones" rather than frontal areas; it derives support from perturbations where disrupting thalamocortical loops reduces Φ and abolishes awareness, and adversarial tests showing posterior dominance in conscious processing.^[146]^[61] Yet, the 2025 experiment revealed that IIT's predictions faltered under content-specific manipulations, with no clear Φ escalation for conscious over unconscious states, and detractors argue its panpsychist implications—attributing consciousness to any sufficiently integrated system, even simple circuits—lack falsifiability and inflate the scope beyond observable biology.^[61]^[147] Higher-order theories (HOT), advanced by David Rosenthal since the 1980s, contend that a mental state becomes conscious only when accompanied by a higher-order representation or thought about it, explaining phenomena like blindsight where first-order processing occurs without awareness; evidence includes metacognitive judgments tracking confidence in perceptual decisions via prefrontal activity.^[148]^[149] Critiques highlight the "higher-order thought" regress—requiring infinite meta-representations—and failure to account for animal or infant consciousness lacking explicit self-monitoring, with empirical challenges from cases of conscious vision without detectable higher-order signals. Panpsychism, revived in modern form by philosophers like Galen Strawson, posits consciousness as fundamental to matter, avoiding emergence issues but facing the "combination problem" of how micro-experiences aggregate into unified macro-minds, with scant empirical traction beyond avoiding materialism's explanatory gaps.^[150]^[151] These theories compete on predictive power and causal closure, yet none fully resolves the "hard problem" of why neural mechanisms yield subjective experience, underscoring ongoing empirical and conceptual divides.^[152]

The Hard Problem and Causal Explanations

The hard problem of consciousness, a term coined by philosopher David J. Chalmers in 1995, delineates the explanatory gap between objective physical processes and subjective phenomenal experience, particularly why neural activity in the brain gives rise to qualia or "what it is like" to have awareness.^[153] Chalmers distinguishes this from the "easy problems," which concern functional mechanisms such as the causal roles of awareness in enabling reportability, attention, or behavioral control—issues amenable to empirical investigation via neuroscience and computational modeling.^[153] In the domain of awareness, the hard problem posits that even a complete causal mapping of brain states to cognitive functions fails to account for the intrinsic, first-person nature of experience, as physical descriptions remain third-person and extrinsic.^[153] Causal explanations, predominant in physicalist frameworks, seek to derive awareness from mechanistic interactions, such as recurrent neural processing or global broadcasting of information, as proposed in theories like global workspace theory by Bernard Baars in 1988 and refined by Stanislas Dehaene in works up to 2014. These accounts elucidate how awareness causally influences integration and action—for instance, how thalamocortical loops correlate with conscious perception in experiments showing neural ignition patterns around 300 milliseconds post-stimulus—but they address correlations and functions rather than the generation of subjectivity itself. Empirical data from neuroimaging, such as fMRI studies linking prefrontal and parietal activations to conscious access, provide verifiable causal pathways for reportable awareness, yet Chalmers argues these leave the "explanatory double" unresolved: why do such processes feel like anything at all?^[153] Critiques of causal reductions highlight potential violations of causal closure principles under physicalism, where non-physical experience would either epiphenomenally shadow brain events without causal efficacy or necessitate dualist interventions incompatible with observed determinism.^[153] Proponents of reductive causalism, including Daniel Dennett in his 1991 book Consciousness Explained, contend the hard problem is illusory, dissolving into heterophenomenology—treating reports of experience as data for functional analysis without positing ineffable qualia. However, this stance has been challenged for conflating access consciousness (functional availability) with phenomenal consciousness, as evidenced by dissociation cases in blindsight patients who exhibit unconscious visual processing without subjective awareness. Ongoing debates underscore that while causal models advance predictive neuroscience—e.g., optogenetic manipulations in rodents demonstrating causal necessity of specific circuits for perceptual awareness—they do not bridge the ontological divide, prompting explorations of naturalistic dualism or panpsychism as alternatives.^[153]

References

[1]
Awareness and consciousness in humans and animals – neural and ...
Jul 14, 2022 · According to our definition of awareness and consciousness, the interaction of perceptual, long-term memory and attentional systems could ...
[2]
Awareness: An empirical model - Frontiers
Dec 8, 2022 · Here, we consider awareness as an end-stage experience that results from the filtering and processing of several possible experiences happening ...Abstract · Decision-making processes... · Developing a mathematical... · Discussion
[3]
What do we mean by "conscious" and "aware"? - PubMed
This paper explores their complexities by way of a series of contrasts: (1) states of consciousness, such as wakefulness and sleep are contrasted with awareness ...Missing: research | Show results with:research
[4]
Types of Consciousness: The Diversity Problem - Frontiers
The neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) can also be interpreted in terms of the distinction between awareness as either experience or access to information ...
[5]
Consciousness and inference to the best explanation: Compiling ...
We present an inference to the best explanation (IBE) process on the basis of empirical support that is applicable in debates between competing theories of ...
[6]
The cognitive neuroscience of self‐awareness: Current framework ...
Dec 3, 2023 · Self-awareness can be defined as the ability to take oneself as the object of awareness (Morin, 2011). Although this definition may suggest the ...
[7]
Self-Awareness Might Not Have Evolved to Benefit The Self After All
Jul 16, 2024 · We propose that subjective awareness lacks any independent capacity to causally influence other psychological processes or actions.<|separator|>
[8]
Self-Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 13, 2017 · Human beings are conscious not only of the world around them but also of themselves: their activities, their bodies, and their mental lives.
[9]
Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The most important detailed theory of mind in the early modern period was developed by Immanuel Kant. His main work Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1965) is ...
[10]
Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 18, 2004 · Leibniz was the first to distinguish explicitly between perception and apperception, i.e., roughly between awareness and self-awareness. In the ...
[11]
Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness
Jul 29, 2010 · In the seventeenth century, “consciousness” began to take on a uniquely modern sense. This transition was sparked by new theories of mind and ideas.Descartes and the Cartesians · Spinoza · Developments in England · Leibniz
[12]
Fundamental awareness: A framework for integrating science ...
In this philosophical system, only statements verifiable either logically or empirically would be cognitively meaningful.
[13]
Bodily Awareness - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Each of us can be aware of our body via vision, sound, smell, and so on. We also can be aware of our own body “from the inside,” via proprioception, ...
[14]
A philosophical consideration of awareness - ScienceDirect.com
This paper addresses the philosophical problems involved in relating consciousness and awareness. It begins with a brief survey of the history of solutions to ...
[15]
Perception Lecture Notes: Attention and Awareness
You are always moving your eyes around to foveate key visual features. This is the most direct way to shift attention, called overt attention.
[16]
Regular Article Parallels between Perception without Attention and ...
These results suggest that perception with and without awareness and perception with and without attention are equivalent ways of describing the same ...
[17]
Attention - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 8, 2009 · Attention is involved in the selective directedness of our mental lives. The nature of this selectivity is one of the principal points of disagreement between ...The Eighteenth and... · Theories of Attention · Explanatory Roles for Attention
[18]
Representational Theories of Consciousness
Representational theories of consciousness explain awareness of mental states as a kind of representing, such as in Lockean 'inner sense' or 'higher-order ...
[19]
Representational Theories of Consciousness
May 22, 2000 · The aim of a representationalist theory of consciousness is to extend the treatment of intentionality to that of consciousness, showing that if ...3. Arguments In Favor Of The... · 4. Objections To The... · 4.5 Counterexamples
[20]
Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness
Apr 3, 2001 · Higher-order theories of consciousness try to explain the difference between unconscious and conscious mental states.
[21]
[PDF] Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology ...
Ned Block argues, “the machinery of cognitive access ... Block's basic hypothesis postulating the existence of phenomenal consciousness without cognitive access.
[22]
[PDF] 17 Two Kinds of Consciousness | UCLA Philosophy
Block distinguishes phenomenal consciousness from access consciousness. He writes that a state is access conscious 'if, in virtue of one's having the state, a ...
[23]
Phenomenal consciousness and cognitive access - PMC - NIH
Jul 30, 2018 · One notable position is that of Ned Block who suggests that phenomenal content overflows cognitive access. I will review the evidence and ...
[24]
What Is Self-Awareness? (+5 Ways to Be More Self-Aware)
Apr 1, 2020 · ... types: internal self-awareness and external self-awareness. Internal self-awareness is about how well we see ourselves and our strengths ...Ways to Increase Your Self... · Self-Awareness & Emotional...
[25]
Emergent Awareness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
This model includes three interdependent types of awareness. 1. Intellectual awareness: The ability to understand at some level that a function is impaired ...
[26]
[PDF] Review of Situational Awareness: Concept, Theory, and Application
This paper considers the applicability of situation awareness concepts to safety in the control of complex systems. Much of the research to date has been ...
[27]
Situation awareness - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · Situation awareness involves perception of the elements in the environment, comprehension of what they mean and how they relate to one another, ...
[28]
Situational Awareness in the Context of Clinical Practice - PMC - NIH
Dec 4, 2023 · Situational awareness (SA) facilitates clinical reasoning, diagnostic accuracy, and appropriate goal-directed performance, and it enables ...
[29]
Conscious Awareness | Overview, Definition & Types - Lesson
Conscious awareness is a twofold state of being, in which the mind is both awake as well as cognizant of its surroundings.
[30]
self-awareness - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · n. self-focused attention or knowledge. There has been a continuing controversy over whether nonhuman animals have self-awareness.
[31]
Self Awareness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Self-awareness is the capacity to objectively process information about oneself, including sensations, emotions, and thoughts, while maintaining self-identity.
[32]
Self‐awareness part 1: Definition, measures, effects, functions, and ...
Self‐awareness represents the capacity of becoming the object of one's own attention. In this state one actively identifies, processes, and stores information ...
[33]
Objective Self-Awareness Theory: Recent Progress and Enduring ...
Objective self-awareness theory has undergone fundamental changes in the 3 decades since Duval and Wicklund's (1972) original formulation.
[34]
Introspection and How It Is Used In Psychology - Verywell Mind
Apr 1, 2025 · Introspection is a psychological process that involves looking inward to examine one's thoughts, emotions, judgments, and perceptions.
[35]
Introspection - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 2, 2010 · Introspection is generally regarded as a process by means of which we learn about our own currently ongoing, or very recently past, mental states or processes.
[36]
[PDF] Does Self-Focused Attention Enable Accurate Self-Knowledge? By
Researchers have argued that self-focus makes people more aware of their attitudes; less suggestible regarding internal states; more resistant to placebo ...
[37]
Using Self-Awareness Theory and Skills in Psychology
Jan 7, 2020 · IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 8(1), 15–26. Silvia, P. J., & Duval, T. S. (2001). Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring ...What Is Self-Awareness... · Look at the Work of Duval and...
[38]
The development of self-recognition: a review - PubMed
The definitive test is whether or not the infant is capable of using the reflection to notice and respond to a mark on the face or head by touching the mark.
[39]
Implications of mirror self-recognition for self-awareness.
Mirror self-recognition (MSR) may indicate bodily awareness, not necessarily introspective self-awareness, which may require language. MSR can occur without ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
The Importance of Awareness, Acceptance, and Alignment With the ...
Feb 25, 2022 · We define self-connection as consisting of three components: 1) an awareness of oneself, 2) an acceptance of oneself based on this awareness, and 3) an ...
[41]
Self-knowledge: Limits, implications, and paths to change
This review highlights recent developments in the study of individual and trait-level differences in self-knowledge, with a focus on the moral domain where ...
[42]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-743
[43]
Defining Self-Awareness in the Context of Adult Development
Feb 28, 2021 · “Self-awareness involves the cerebral exercise of introspection. This attribute reflects the cognitive exploration of own thoughts, feelings, ...Method · Inclusion Criteria · Findings<|separator|>
[44]
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Situation awareness is presented as a predominant concern in system operation, based on a descriptive view of decision making.<|separator|>
[45]
Endsley, M.R.: Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic ...
Aug 6, 2025 · SA has been defined by Endlsey [6] as three levels -"i) the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, ii) ...
[46]
7 Situation Awareness | Modeling Human and Organizational ...
Situation awareness is the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning, and the ...
[47]
Demystifying visual awareness: Peripheral encoding plus limited ...
Jan 22, 2020 · However, a peripheral vision explanation implies that perception is richer than previously thought. In the classic selective attention ...
[48]
Peripheral vision is mainly for looking rather than seeing - PubMed
The saccades engendered by peripheral vision allows looking to combine with seeing to give human observers the impression of seeing the whole scene clearly ...
[49]
Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review - PMC
May 17, 2022 · Peripheral vision is used to monitor the environment (e.g., road edges, traffic signs, or malfunctioning lights), in ways that differ from basic ...
[50]
A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Situation Awareness
We examined the specific characteristics of SA in these fields and, by integrating the characteristics with human factors/ergonomics principles, ...
[51]
Towards a theoretical framework for situational awareness in ...
Endsley (1995b) describes SA as “the perception of the elements in the environment […], the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status ...
[52]
[PDF] Situation Awareness and Team Performance
Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P. & Shrestha, L. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors ...
[53]
Attentional asymmetries in peripheral vision - Klatt - 2024
Jul 15, 2023 · Here, we test if the attention window is indeed symmetrical with regard to its shape and resolution during peripheral vision.Background · Method · DiscussionMissing: awareness | Show results with:awareness<|separator|>
[54]
Probing the deployment of peripheral visual attention during ...
Dec 21, 2022 · To navigate everyday environments, the brain must deploy visual attention to relevant sensory stimuli to assist in formulating a movement plan ...Abstract · Introduction · Materials and Methods · Discussion
[55]
Thalamic contributions to the state and contents of consciousness
May 15, 2024 · Conclusion. We have argued that thalamocortical loops are a crucial component in the neuronal mechanisms controlling both conscious state and ...
[56]
A thalamocortical substrate for integrated information via critical ...
Nov 8, 2023 · (A) Many theories and empirical findings agree that conscious awareness is supported by thalamocortical and corticocortical interactions ...
[57]
Cortical connectivity, local dynamics and stability correlates of global ...
Sep 30, 2025 · Analyses revealed significant correlations between consciousness levels and inter-regional connectivity, particularly in posterior parietal, ...
[58]
An integrative view of the role of prefrontal cortex in consciousness
May 15, 2024 · The PFC has been shown to play a critical role in controlling the levels of consciousness as observed during anesthesia.
[59]
Human visual consciousness involves large scale cortical and ...
Nov 29, 2022 · Distinguishing the neural correlates of perceptual awareness and postperceptual Processing. J. Neurosci. 40, 4925–4935 (2020). Article ...
[60]
Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace ...
The GNW theory emphasizes the role of long-range loops between cortical areas, which are linked with feedforward and feedback connections. These more widespread ...
[61]
Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated ...
Apr 30, 2025 · Different theories explain how subjective experience arises from brain activity. These theories have independently accrued evidence, ...
[62]
An integrative, multiscale view on neural theories of consciousness
Mar 5, 2024 · Based on recent empirical progress, we show that many aspects of the various theories of consciousness do not necessarily contradict each other, ...
[63]
Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems - Nature
Apr 20, 2016 · Several brain regions and physiological processes have been proposed to constitute the neural correlates of consciousness.
[64]
Are the Neural Correlates of Consciousness in the Front or in the ...
Oct 4, 2017 · In this Perspective, we will critically review the evidence for the role of the “front” versus the “back” of the cortex in supporting consciousness.
[65]
The Current of Consciousness: Neural Correlates and Clinical Aspects
Jun 12, 2023 · In this review, we summarize the current understanding of consciousness including its neuroanatomic basis. We discuss major theories of consciousness.
[66]
The Neural Correlates of Consciousness and Attention: Two Sister ...
The neural correlates of consciousness have been defined as the minimal neural mechanisms that are together necessary and sufficient for experiencing any ...
[67]
Neural Correlates Of Consciousness - ScienceDirect.com
Neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) are defined as the minimal neuronal mechanisms jointly sufficient for any one specific conscious percept or experience, ...Introduction to Neural... · Experimental Approaches to...
[68]
The nature of blindsight: implications for current theories of ...
Blindsight regroups the different manifestations of preserved discriminatory visual capacities following the damage to the primary visual cortex.
[69]
Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis ...
Dec 14, 2020 · In this framework, coma is defined as the complete absence of arousal and awareness, the vegetative state (later renamed 'unresponsive ...
[70]
Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State - MSD Manuals
A vegetative state is absence of responsiveness and awareness due to overwhelming dysfunction of the cerebral hemispheres.
[71]
The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria
6-10 Disorders of consciousness include coma and the vegetative state (VS). Patients in coma have complete failure of the arousal system with no spontaneous eye ...
[72]
The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of ...
Those who recover from coma may enter or pass through a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, a MCS or locked-in syndrome. Multiple scales have ...
[73]
Sage Reference - Encyclopedia of the Mind - Anosognosia
Anosognosia means “without knowledge of disease.” Joseph Babinski introduced the term in 1914 to describe apparent unawareness of hemiplegia (paralysis of ...Anosognosia · General Features · In Acute Brain Damage
[74]
When visual metacognition fails: Widespread anosognosia for visual ...
We review several forms of anosognosia for visual deficits: Anton syndrome, anosognosia for partial visual deficits, and anosognosia for eye diseases.
[75]
New insights into the neuronal correlate of blindsight using diffusion ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Firstly, HH patients suffering from anosognosia may be unaware of their visual field defect. Secondly, HH patients can present with ...
[76]
A human brain network linked to restoration of consciousness after ...
Jul 21, 2025 · We describe 40 patients with disorders of consciousness undergoing deep brain stimulation targeting the thalamic centromedian-parafascicular complex.
[77]
Neural correlates of consciousness in an auditory no-report fMRI study
May 21, 2025 · Auditory awareness was associated with significantly increased activity in secondary auditory but not in fronto-parietal areas.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025<|separator|>
[78]
The Neural Correlates of Consciousness: A Spectral Exponent ...
This study evaluates the spectral exponent (SE)—a neurophysiological biomarker quantifying the decay slope of electroencephalography (EEG) aperiodic activity ...
[79]
An 8-year longitudinal study of mirror self-recognition in ...
These results show that mirror self-recognition is a highly stable trait in many chimpanzees, but may be subject to decline with age.
[80]
Gorillas match chimpanzees in self-awareness study - News
Mar 17, 2025 · A new study finds that gorillas perform just as well as chimpanzees in tests that require awareness of their own bodies.Mirror Test · Don't Just Sit There · The Evolution Of...
[81]
Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: A case of cognitive ...
Two dolphins were exposed to reflective surfaces, and both demonstrated responses consistent with the use of the mirror to investigate marked parts of the body.
[82]
Cleaner fish with mirror self-recognition capacity precisely realize ...
Sep 11, 2024 · Recent research has indicated the potential for cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus) to possess a sophisticated level of private self-awareness.<|separator|>
[83]
Dimensions of Animal Consciousness - PMC - PubMed Central
How does consciousness vary across the animal kingdom? Are some animals 'more conscious' than others? This article presents a multidimensional framework for ...
[84]
Evaluating animal consciousness - Science
Feb 20, 2025 · Evaluating animal consciousness. An emerging field shows how animal feelings can be studied scientifically.
[85]
Debunking a myth: plant consciousness - PMC - PubMed Central
Nov 16, 2020 · We conclude that claims for plant consciousness are highly speculative and lack sound scientific support. Keywords: Plant and animal ...
[86]
Plant "intelligence" and the misuse of historical sources as evidence
Sep 14, 2024 · Plant neurobiology has been criticized on scientific grounds, but there has not been close scrutiny of the use of historical sources as a form ...
[87]
Are Plants Conscious? - Skeptical Inquirer
There is no evidence that plants have consciousness, as they lack the necessary nervous systems and value systems. Consciousness is linked to animals with ...
[88]
Group of biologists tries to bury the idea that plants are conscious
Jul 4, 2019 · Taiz told the Guardian: “Our criticism of the plant neurobiologists is they have failed to consider the importance of brain organisation, ...
[89]
[PDF] Limits to sentience - WBI Studies Repository
Jun 11, 2023 · There is a consensus among most scientists who write about sentience that sentience means having the capacity to have feelings (Kirkwood.<|separator|>
[90]
A critical review of plant sentience: moving beyond traditional ...
Jun 21, 2024 · “Plant neurobiology is a newly initiated field of research aimed at understanding how plants perceive their circumstances and respond to ...
[91]
[PDF] Autopoiesis and Congition: The Realization of the Living - Monoskop
which Maturana and Varela posit for the characterization of such systems - namely, that they are autonomous, self-referring and self-constructing closed.
[92]
Autopoiesis and Cognition - Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela
The two questions have a common answer: living systems are cognitive systems, and living as a process is a process of cognition.
[93]
Hypothesizing the body's genius to trigger and self-organize its ...
Nov 19, 2013 · Holarchical, homeokinetic, and general living systems theories. Koestler specified an open hierarchical system (OHS) comprised of holons that ...
[94]
(PDF) Living Systems, Complexity & Information Systems Science
development. In short, the application of systemics, complexity, complex adaptive systems, and living systems theories, are yet. to be fully discussed in ...
[95]
The Nature of Living Systems - James Grier Miller - organism.earth
General systems behavior theory is concerned with a special subset of all systems: the living ones. Even more basic to this presentation than the concept of ...
[96]
Introduction: The nature of living systems - Miller - Wiley Online Library
Living systems theory (LST) is concerned with eight levels of living systems, each of which is composed of 20 critical subsystems that carry out essential ...Missing: awareness | Show results with:awareness
[97]
Awareness and integrated information theory identify plant ... - NIH
The integrated information theory indicates plant awareness involves information of two kinds: (1) communicative, extrinsic information as a result of the ...
[98]
[PDF] , Biological Autonomy & the Process View of Life (12 August
Aug 12, 2025 · Against the current prevalence of evolution-centred explanations of life, the theory of biological autonomy intends to raise awareness for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[99]
Signs of consciousness in AI: Can GPT-3 tell how smart it really is?
Dec 2, 2024 · AI models don't have experiences, emotions, or self-awareness. They can't feel joy or sorrow, nor do they possess a sense of “self” that ...
[100]
AI shows no sign of consciousness yet, but we know what to look for
Aug 30, 2023 · The latest generations of artificial intelligence models show little to no trace of 14 signs of self-awareness predicted by prominent theories of human ...
[101]
Deep learning and the Global Workspace Theory - ScienceDirect.com
The Global Workspace Theory (GWT) refers to a large-scale system integrating and distributing information among networks of specialized modules.
[102]
Artificial intelligence, consciousness and psychiatry - PMC - NIH
Sep 16, 2024 · If IIT is right, attributing consciousness to AI is truly an “existential” mistake – because consciousness is about being, not doing, and AI is ...
[103]
Fast, slow, and metacognitive thinking in AI | npj Artificial Intelligence
Oct 1, 2025 · We now illustrate in detail the operation of real-time metacognition (which arbitrates between S1 and S2 solvers) and of reflective ...Introduction · Results · Methods
[104]
[2410.11407] A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and ...
Oct 15, 2024 · A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory. Authors:Simon Goldstein, Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini.Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
[105]
[PDF] A Computational Model of Attention/Situation Awareness
A computational model of attention and situation awareness (SA) was developed and used to predict pilot errors in the task of taxiing from runway to terminal.
[106]
[PDF] Computational models of consciousness: A taxonomy and some ...
computational models of consciousness: a taxonomy and some examples. 153 has been variously expounded recently; for example, in terms of virtual machines by.
[107]
[PDF] Computational Models of Consciousness: An ... - ResearchGate
computational models of consciousness (or aspects of it), on the basis of the available psychological data, as well as the existing philosophical accounts ...
[108]
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_32.pdf
[109]
[PDF] Situation Awareness of Commanders: A Cognitive Model
ABSTRACT: This paper discusses a computational model of situation awareness (SA) for military command and control in complex battle situations.
[110]
[PDF] A philosophical assessment of computational models of ...
Jun 27, 2021 · We see that computational models of consciousness would best be considered as being examples of the Auton- omous View. The 1960s saw the ...
[111]
[PDF] Studying consciousness with computational models
Efforts to create computational models of consciousness have accelerated over the last two decades, creating a field that has become known as artificial ...
[112]
The neural correlates of attention and awareness - Nature
Mar 25, 2022 · Attention and awareness have distinct neural correlates. This finding brings us closer to understanding how consciousness arises in the brain.
[113]
Nonconscious perception, conscious awareness and attention - PMC
Attention modulates most conscious cognitive processing and most, but not all, nonconscious processing is attention dependent. Nonconscious tasks that require ...
[114]
Growing Evidence for Separate Neural Mechanisms for Attention ...
Here we provide an overview of these and related empirical studies on the distinction between the neuronal correlates of attention and consciousness.
[115]
Neural Dissociation between Visual Awareness and Spatial Attention
Mar 5, 2008 · In the present study, we directly assessed the amount of overlap between the neural correlates of visual awareness and spatial attention. We ...
[116]
Blinded by the load: attention, awareness and the role of perceptual ...
Awareness sometimes appears to be restricted to the contents of focused attention, yet at other times irrelevant distractors will dominate awareness. This ...
[117]
The relationship between attention and consciousness - Journals
Jul 30, 2018 · Here, we aim to provide a fresh perspective on the role of attention in conscious perception, reconciling certain aspects of GNWT and RPT.
[118]
Perceptual Awareness Negativity—Does It Reflect ... - Frontiers
ERP Markers of Awareness and Attention. Neural mechanisms of spatial and feature-based attention share many similarities with the postulated early NCC - both ...
[119]
Effects of Awareness on the Control of Attention | Graziano Lab
In the attention schema theory, awareness is the internal model of attention. Just as the brain contains a body schema that models the body and helps control ...
[120]
Attention, awareness, and the right temporoparietal junction - PMC
Jun 14, 2021 · The reason why awareness usually tracks attention is that it serves as a model of attention, much as the brain's model of the arm typically ...
[121]
Covert consciousness - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
... covert awareness (Cruse et al., 2014; Fernandez-Espejo et al., 2014; Gibson ... Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 13(4), 879–906. [Google Scholar] ...
[122]
Neuroimaging for detecting covert awareness in patients with ...
Multiple tasks and neuroimaging modalities increase the likelihood of detecting covert awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness.<|separator|>
[123]
Functional neuroimaging in disorders of consciousness
These tools are now being used to detect residual and covert awareness in behaviourally non-responsive patients with an acquired severe brain injury and predict ...
[124]
What names for covert awareness? A systematic review - Frontiers
Aug 4, 2022 · The aim of our study was to identify the terms used to indicate the presence of covert awareness through the years, and to promote an ...
[125]
Blindsight and Unconscious Vision: What They Teach Us about the ...
In this review, we discuss the residual abilities and neural activity that have been described in blindsight and the implications of these findings for ...Missing: covert | Show results with:covert
[126]
Action-blindsight in healthy subjects after transcranial magnetic ...
Clinical cases of blindsight have shown that visually guided movements can be accomplished without conscious visual perception.
[127]
Form discrimination in a case of blindsight - ScienceDirect.com
The first extensively tested blindsight case, has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his ...
[128]
Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation
Aug 10, 2025 · EFFECT OF ASYMMETRY OF SEMANTIC ACTIVATION IN UNCONSCIOUS AWARENESS OF AMBIGUOUS LEXIS. June 2017 · Bulletin of Kemerovo State University.
[129]
Visual perception and phenomenal consciousness - PubMed
Blindsight, a neurological example of visual processing in the absence of phenomenal vision, could help to elucidate the neuronal basis of phenomenality ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[130]
Methodological issues in consciousness research - PubMed Central
Sep 23, 2025 · In consciousness studies, we have no way of measuring consciousness, i.e., there is no agreement on what to measure, or which empirical ...
[131]
The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience - PubMed
The study of consciousness is considered by many one of the most difficult contemporary scientific endeavors and confronts several methodological and ...
[132]
Epistemological challenges for neural correlates of consciousness
The main challenge is the "Problem of coordination," which hinders experimental study. Local approach faces disagreements, while global approach is less ...
[133]
Wild recognition: conducting the mark test for mirror self-recognition ...
Jan 22, 2025 · The prevailing methodology for determining self-awareness is to test for visual self-recognition using mirror-image stimulation and a 'mark test ...
[134]
a review and evaluation of mark test replications and variants
Jan 7, 2022 · Mirror self-recognition (MSR), widely regarded as an indicator of self-awareness, has not been demonstrated consistently in gorillas.Missing: behavioral critiques
[135]
Is Mirror Test Still a Reliable Way to Investigate Self-awareness in ...
Mirror-self recognition (MSR) is a behavioral indicator of self-awareness in young children and only a few other species, including the great apes, dolphins ...
[136]
Grand Challenges in Consciousness Research Across Perception ...
Nov 26, 2021 · Further relevant epistemological and methodological challenges implicated in consciousness research need to be carefully addressed, with the ...
[137]
Editorial: Methodological issues in consciousness research, volume II
Apr 2, 2025 · Methodological issues in consciousness research include how to measure awareness, establish its absence, and isolate neural correlates, and ...
[138]
Measuring states of pathological (un)consciousness - NIH
Methodological and technical challenges. The estimation of clinical diagnosis by means of data-driven approaches can be done in several ways (Noirhomme et al ...<|separator|>
[139]
AI Awareness - arXiv
Apr 29, 2025 · In artificial intelligence, social awareness can be defined as an AI system's ability to model and respond to human mental states and social ...
[140]
Artificial intelligence (AI) awareness (2019–2025) - ScienceDirect.com
This systematic review examines the evolution of AI awareness research and identifies critical knowledge gaps for future investigation. Using the SPAR-4-SLR ...
[141]
Dualism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 19, 2003 · Dualism is one of three classic responses to the mind-body problem alongside materialism and idealism (Wolff 1751). Materialism says that the ...<|separator|>
[142]
[PDF] What is Consciousness? Part II: Materialism vs Dualism - LSE
Materialism clashes with deeply held intuitions about the distinctness of mind and body. This challenge is formulated precisely and powerfully in ...
[143]
The Neuroscience of Consciousness
Oct 9, 2018 · Conscious experience in humans depends on brain activity, so neuroscience will contribute to explaining consciousness.
[144]
Neuroscience Has Never Provided Much Evidence for Materialism
Oct 24, 2023 · Great neuroscientists weren't dualists in spite of the evidence but because of it. Their research really did not support a materialist view ...
[145]
GWT: A Leading Consciousness Theory Depends on Information ...
Oct 15, 2021 · Instead, in 1988 the psychologist Bernard Baars proposed the concept of a 'global workspace', where information is integrated in a small group ...
[146]
Reconciling Current Theories of Consciousness
Mar 4, 2020 · These include two major and perhaps competing theories, the integrated information theory (IIT) and the global neuronal workspace (GNW) theory, ...
[147]
Comparing theories of consciousness: why it matters and how to do it
Aug 18, 2021 · We chose GNW and IIT as they are similar in scope and influence, even though they differ in multiple ways. GNW was developed by enriching a ...<|separator|>
[148]
An Overview of the Leading Theories of Consciousness
Nov 25, 2023 · Leading theories of consciousness include HOT, GWT, IIT, re-entry, and predictive processing theories. Other well-developed theoretical ...
[149]
Higher-order awareness, misrepresentation and function - PMC
Higher-order theories take this commonsense observation as basic to understanding how conscious states differ from mental states that are not conscious. ...
[150]
Panpsychism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 23, 2001 · Panpsychists believe that there is much more consciousness in the universe than is commonly assumed; indeed at least some fundamental entities ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[151]
The issues with higher order theories of consciousness
Jan 2, 2020 · But two of your critiques ... What makes panpsychism practical is that we know consciousness exists because we experience it ourselves directly.
[152]
Theoretical Models of Consciousness: A Scoping Review - PMC
This scoping review analyzed 68 articles that described 29 theories of consciousness. We found heterogeneous perspectives in the theories analyzed.
[153]
[PDF] Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers
Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. David J. Chalmers. Philosophy ... For some conceptual clarification of the various problems of consciousness, see.