Secretor status
Secretor status is a genetic trait that determines an individual's ability to secrete ABO blood group antigens—such as A, B, AB, or H (for type O)—into bodily fluids including saliva, mucus, sweat, tears, digestive secretions, and breast milk.[1] This phenotype is controlled by the FUT2 gene on chromosome 19, which encodes the enzyme α-1,2-fucosyltransferase 2; functional alleles (Se) enable antigen secretion, while non-functional variants (se) result in non-secretor status.[2] The trait follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, meaning individuals with at least one functional FUT2 allele are secretors.[3] In most populations, approximately 80% of individuals are secretors, though prevalence varies by ethnicity and geography—for instance, higher rates of non-secretors (up to 20-25%) occur among Caucasians compared to other groups.[1] Secretor status can be determined through laboratory testing of saliva or other secretions for the presence of soluble ABO antigens, often alongside Lewis blood group typing, as non-secretors typically express only Lewis^a antigen while secretors express Lewis^b.[4] Beyond its role in blood group phenotyping, secretor status has significant health implications, particularly in modulating susceptibility to infections and influencing the composition of the gut and vaginal microbiota.[5] Non-secretors lack the fucosylated glycans that serve as receptors for certain pathogens, conferring resistance to noroviruses, but increasing vulnerability to urinary tract infections and Crohn’s disease.[6] Secretors, conversely, may face higher risks for prolonged viral gastroenteritis due to altered microbial interactions and antigen presentation.[7] Non-secretors are associated with higher risks for certain autoimmune conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis.[7] These associations highlight secretor status as a key modifier in host-pathogen dynamics and personalized medicine approaches.[3]Overview
Definition
Secretor status refers to the phenotypic expression determining whether an individual secretes water-soluble ABO blood group antigens—A, B, and H—into various bodily fluids, including saliva, semen, plasma, and gastrointestinal secretions.[1] This trait is independent of the presence of these antigens on red blood cell surfaces, allowing for identification through fluid analysis.[8] Individuals are classified as secretors if they express these antigens in their secretions, enabling detection via serological inhibition tests on fluids like saliva; in contrast, non-secretors lack this expression in bodily fluids despite possessing the antigens on erythrocytes.[9] Approximately 80% of the population are secretors, with variation across ethnic groups, though this status does not alter the underlying ABO blood type.[8] The discovery of secretor status traces to the early 20th century, when Japanese researcher I. Yamakami first identified A and B antigens in saliva in 1926, prompting further investigations into soluble blood group substances.[10] By 1930, studies by Lehrs and Putko formalized the distinction between secretors and non-secretors through comparative analyses of saliva and blood typing, establishing it as a key phenotypic marker in blood group research.[11] Secretor status shows a basic linkage to the Lewis blood group system, serving as a phenotypic indicator; for instance, non-secretors commonly display the Le(a+b-) phenotype due to the absence of secreted H substance conversion.[4] This phenotype arises from the functional activity of the FUT2 gene, which encodes an enzyme essential for antigen secretion in fluids.[12]Biological Mechanism
Secretor status is determined by the physiological process of synthesizing and secreting histo-blood group antigens in bodily fluids, primarily through the activity of α-1,2-fucosyltransferase enzymes in secretory tissues such as salivary glands and intestinal mucosa. These enzymes, encoded mainly by the FUT2 gene, catalyze the addition of fucose in an α-1,2 linkage to precursor type 1 carbohydrate chains (Galβ1-3GlcNAc), forming the H antigen, which serves as the foundational structure for ABO blood group antigens in secretions.[13][14][2] In individuals with functional secretor status, the secreted H antigen acts as a substrate for ABO glycosyltransferases expressed in the same tissues. These transferases add N-acetylgalactosamine (for A antigens) or galactose (for B antigens) to the terminal galactose of the H structure, enabling the production and secretion of soluble A, B, and H antigens into fluids like saliva and plasma.[15][16][3] Non-secretors lack a functional α-1,2-fucosyltransferase due to FUT2 inactivity, preventing H antigen synthesis in secretory tissues and thus the formation of soluble A, B, or H antigens in bodily fluids. Cell-surface expression of these antigens on erythrocytes and other cells, however, remains unaffected, as it is mediated by the paralogous FUT1 enzyme active in non-secretory tissues.[13][14][2] This mechanism intersects with the Lewis blood group system, where the presence of functional FUT2 in secretors allows for the conversion of Le^a antigen—produced by the α-1,3/4-fucosyltransferase FUT3—into Le^b by adding an additional α-1,2-fucose to the precursor chain, yielding the characteristic Le(a-b+) phenotype in secretors with active FUT3.[17][18]Genetics
Molecular Basis
The secretor status in humans is primarily determined by the FUT2 gene, located on chromosome 19q13.33, which encodes the enzyme galactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferase 2 (also known as alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase).[13] This enzyme catalyzes the addition of a fucose residue in an alpha-1,2 linkage to the terminal galactose of type 1 chains on glycoproteins and glycolipids, thereby forming the H antigen in mucosal secretions and other bodily fluids such as saliva, tears, and milk.[2] The presence of functional FUT2 activity defines the secretor phenotype, enabling the expression of ABO histo-blood group antigens in these secretions, while its absence results in the non-secretor phenotype.[19] The FUT2 gene interacts closely with the nearby FUT1 gene, also on chromosome 19q13.33, which encodes a paralogous alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase responsible for H antigen synthesis on red blood cell surfaces.[20] Both enzymes are required for the complete expression of ABO blood group antigens: FUT1 provides the H precursor on erythrocytes, while FUT2 extends this to secretory tissues; the ABO locus on chromosome 9 then modifies the H antigen with N-acetylgalactosamine (for A) or galactose (for B) to form the respective antigens.[21] In individuals with Bombay phenotype (homozygous FUT1 null mutations), even functional FUT2 cannot compensate for the lack of H antigen precursor, underscoring their interdependent roles in antigen biosynthesis.[22] Loss-of-function mutations in FUT2 are the molecular basis for the non-secretor phenotype, which occurs in homozygous or compound heterozygous individuals. A prevalent example is the nonsense mutation W143X (rs601338, G428A), which introduces a premature stop codon in exon 7, truncating the enzyme and abolishing its activity; this variant is common in European populations, with homozygosity rates around 20%.[19] Other inactivating mutations, such as frameshifts or missense changes disrupting catalytic domains, similarly impair fucosyltransferase function, leading to undetectable H, A, and B antigens in secretions.[23] FUT2 exhibits an epistatic relationship with the FUT3 gene (Lewis locus) on chromosome 19p13.3, which encodes alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferase responsible for Lewis antigen synthesis. In non-secretors lacking FUT2 activity, the absence of H type 1 precursor prevents FUT3 from forming Lewis b (Le^b) antigen, resulting in a Lewis a-positive, b-negative phenotype (Le(a+b-)) in those with functional FUT3.[24] This interaction highlights how FUT2 acts upstream in the glycosylation pathway, modulating the expression of Lewis antigens in secretions.[25]Inheritance Patterns
Secretor status follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, where the functional allele of the FUT2 gene, denoted as Se, is dominant over the non-functional allele, se. Individuals with at least one functional Se allele (genotypes Se/Se or Se/se) exhibit the secretor phenotype, secreting ABO blood group antigens in bodily fluids such as saliva and plasma, while only those homozygous for the non-functional allele (se/se) display the non-secretor phenotype.[2][14] The transmission of secretor status adheres to Mendelian principles for a single autosomal locus. For example, when both parents are heterozygous (Se/se), the expected genotypic ratio among offspring is 1:2:1 (Se/Se : Se/se : se/se), corresponding to a phenotypic ratio of 3:1 (75% secretors : 25% non-secretors). This can be illustrated using a Punnett square:| Se | se | |
|---|---|---|
| Se | Se/Se | Se/se |
| se | Se/se | se/se |
Detection and Determination
Serological Methods
Serological methods for determining secretor status primarily involve analyzing bodily fluids, such as saliva or plasma, to detect the presence of soluble ABH blood group antigens secreted by individuals with the dominant FUT2 allele. These techniques rely on the inhibition of agglutination between specific antisera and red blood cells by secreted antigens, a principle first utilized in early 20th-century blood group studies.[28] The most common approach is the absorption-inhibition assay, where saliva samples are mixed with anti-A, anti-B, or anti-H sera, and the mixture is tested for its ability to inhibit agglutination of corresponding red blood cells; inhibition indicates secretor status due to the presence of soluble antigens binding to the antibodies.[29] The hemagglutination inhibition test provides a standardized protocol for this detection. Saliva is collected (typically 10 ml), centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the supernatant, boiled at 56°C for 30 minutes to inactivate enzymes like amylase, cooled, and recentrifuged. Doubling dilutions of blood group-specific antisera (e.g., 1:2 to 1:1024 in saline) are prepared in test tubes. Equal volumes (100 µl) of processed saliva are added to test tubes with antisera, while saline serves as a control; the mixtures are incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Then, 100 µl of a 3% suspension of group-specific red blood cells is added to all tubes, followed by another 30-minute incubation at 37°C. Agglutination is observed macroscopically: secretors show reduced agglutination (lower titer, e.g., 1:16) in test tubes compared to controls (higher titer, e.g., 1:128) due to antigen-mediated inhibition, while non-secretors exhibit no titer difference with full agglutination in both.[28] As a proxy method, Lewis phenotyping on red blood cells uses anti-Le^a and anti-Le^b antibodies to infer secretor status, leveraging the interaction between FUT2 (secretor) and FUT3 (Lewis) genes. The Le(a+b-) phenotype strongly correlates with non-secretor status, as these individuals lack the FUT2 enzyme to convert Le^a to Le^b; conversely, Le(a-b+) indicates secretors. This serological typing via agglutination assays achieves high concordance (nearly 100% for common phenotypes) but identifies rare Le(a-b-) cases ambiguously, requiring further confirmation.[4] These methods demand fresh saliva samples to prevent antigen degradation and are potentially influenced by oral infections or dietary factors altering salivary composition, though boiling mitigates some enzymatic interference. These methods achieve high accuracy (80-100% sensitivity in validation studies) for determining secretor status, though the Lewis phenotyping approach may require confirmation for rare Le(a-b-) cases. Non-secretor prevalence is about 15-20% in many populations but varies by ethnicity, and the techniques have largely been superseded by genetic testing in contemporary forensic and clinical laboratories for greater precision and non-invasive genotyping.[29][30]Genetic Testing
Genetic testing for secretor status primarily involves molecular analysis of the FUT2 gene to identify polymorphisms that determine whether an individual is a secretor or non-secretor.[2] These methods provide a direct assessment of the underlying genotype, which correlates strongly with phenotypic expression of secretor status.[31] PCR-based genotyping is a foundational approach, involving amplification of specific FUT2 exons followed by sequencing or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis to detect key single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), such as rs601338 (G428A), which introduces a W143X nonsense mutation leading to non-secretor status.[32] This technique allows for the identification of both common and compound heterozygous variants by targeting multiple SNPs in a multiplex format, enabling precise classification even in populations with diverse allele frequencies.[32] Allele-specific PCR and TaqMan assays offer enhanced efficiency for high-throughput applications, particularly in population studies, by using real-time fluorescence detection to distinguish secretor (functional) from non-secretor (nonfunctional) alleles without post-amplification processing.[33] For instance, predesigned TaqMan SNP genotyping assays target rs601338 to rapidly quantify allele copies, achieving high sensitivity and specificity suitable for large-scale screening.[33] These methods are particularly valuable for confirming secretor status in cases where serological phenotyping is inconclusive, such as in Lewis-negative individuals.[2] Integration of whole-genome or exome sequencing has expanded detection to rare FUT2 variants beyond common SNPs, facilitating the study of compound heterozygotes and novel loss-of-function alleles in research cohorts.[34] This approach, often applied in genomic studies, reveals weak secretor phenotypes or uncharacterized nonfunctional alleles that standard genotyping might overlook.[35] Recent advances include emerging point-of-care spectroscopic methods, such as infrared spectroscopy for reagent-free classification of secretor status in bodily fluids like human milk.[36] Compared to serological methods, genetic testing is non-invasive, utilizing samples like blood or buccal swabs, and offers 100% accuracy in genotype determination, including carrier status for non-secretor alleles in heterozygous individuals.[2] While costs remain higher—typically ranging from $50–200 per test in clinical settings—and availability is more limited to specialized labs, these techniques are increasingly accessible for research and personalized medicine applications.[37]Health Implications
Infectious Disease Susceptibility
Secretor status significantly influences susceptibility to various infectious diseases, primarily through the expression of histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs) like the H antigen on mucosal surfaces, which serve as receptors or binding sites for pathogens. Individuals with non-secretor status, resulting from FUT2 gene null variants, lack these antigens in secretions and on epithelial cells, altering pathogen-host interactions and conferring resistance to certain viruses while potentially increasing vulnerability to others. This genetic trait modulates infection risk across viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens, with evidence from cohort studies and outbreak analyses highlighting strain-specific effects.[3] Non-secretors exhibit strong resistance to norovirus infections, the leading cause of viral gastroenteritis worldwide. The absence of functional FUT2 enzyme prevents the synthesis of HBGAs, which most norovirus strains (particularly the predominant GII.4 genotype) require for cellular attachment and entry. Challenge studies and outbreak investigations from 2005 to 2020 demonstrate that non-secretors are largely refractory to infection, showing no symptoms or immune responses upon exposure, while secretors face substantially higher odds of symptomatic disease—approximately 4.2 times greater in meta-analyses of 18 studies.[38] This protection extends to most genogroup II strains but is less absolute for rare variants that bind alternative receptors. Secretors are more susceptible to Helicobacter pylori, a gram-negative bacterium implicated in chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. The presence of fucosylated HBGAs in gastric mucin provides binding sites for H. pylori adhesins, such as BabA, facilitating colonization and persistent infection. Experimental models and human studies indicate that secretors have an intrinsic higher risk of acquisition, with non-secretors showing reduced bacterial adherence and lower infection rates; this association holds independently of other risk factors for gastroduodenal disease, including increased ulcer prevalence in infected secretors.[39] Associations with rotavirus and other enteric viruses are more variable, often reflecting altered disease severity rather than absolute resistance. In pediatric populations, secretors typically experience higher infection rates and prolonged symptoms, such as diarrhea, due to HBGA-mediated viral binding, while non-secretors show reduced susceptibility to certain strains (e.g., VP4-specific genotypes). A 2020 study in South African children confirmed that FUT2 non-secretor status lowers rotavirus detection rates and mitigates severe outcomes, though some strains evade this barrier, leading to milder or asymptomatic cases.[40] Non-secretors are linked to vaginal microbiota dysbiosis and elevated risks of candidiasis and urinary tract infections (UTIs) through disrupted glycan profiles in mucosal secretions. The lack of secreted HBGAs alters bacterial adhesion and community structure, promoting Lactobacillus-depleted states that foster overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens like Candida albicans. Recent research (2021–2024) shows non-secretors with high-diversity microbiomes exhibit heightened inflammatory responses and infection susceptibility, including recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, where absent antigens impair epithelial defenses against yeast attachment.[41] Similarly, non-secretor women face increased recurrent UTI incidence, particularly from Escherichia coli, as modified glycan environments enhance bacterial persistence in the urogenital tract.[31]Associations with Chronic Conditions
Non-secretor status, determined by homozygous loss-of-function variants in the FUT2 gene such as Trp154Ter, has been linked to increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), including myocardial infarction, particularly among individuals without the A1 blood group allele. In a large-scale genetic analysis, non-secretors exhibited a higher odds ratio for CAD (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02–1.04) compared to secretors in non-A1 cohorts, with protective effects observed in A1 carriers (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99). This association is attributed to altered cholesterol metabolism, as non-secretors in non-A1 groups showed elevated non-HDL cholesterol levels, potentially exacerbating lipid dysregulation and vascular inflammation.[42] In autoimmune conditions, non-secretor status confers heightened susceptibility to Crohn's disease through disruptions in gut microbiome composition and function. Genome-wide association studies have identified FUT2 variants, such as rs602662, strongly linked to Crohn's disease risk (combined P = 4.90 × 10⁻⁸), with non-secretors—comprising about 20% of Caucasians—demonstrating reduced expression of fucosylated glycans on intestinal mucosa that normally modulate bacterial adhesion and diversity. This leads to altered microbial profiles favoring pro-inflammatory taxa, as evidenced in Fut2-null mouse models showing impaired commensal interactions and increased mucosal inflammation. Additionally, FUT2 non-secretor variants are associated with lower plasma vitamin B12 concentrations, impairing absorption due to reduced intrinsic factor secretion and heightened susceptibility to Helicobacter pylori-induced atrophic gastritis; for instance, carriers of the rs601338 nonsense mutation exhibit significantly reduced B12 levels (P = 4.11 × 10⁻¹⁰), contributing to nutritional deficiencies that may exacerbate autoimmune gastrointestinal disorders.[43][44] Secretor status has been hypothesized to influence oral health outcomes, including periodontal disease, via differential expression of ABO antigens that affect bacterial adhesion in the oral cavity. Studies indicate that secretors may be more prone to periodontal disease, with one analysis showing higher disease prevalence among secretors secreting BH substances compared to non-secretors, potentially due to enhanced antigen-mediated colonization by periodontal pathogens.[45] Regarding oral squamous cell carcinoma, non-secretor status appears as a potential risk marker, with multiple case-control studies reporting higher proportions of non-secretors among patients (e.g., 44% in cases versus lower in controls), linked to reduced salivary ABO antigen secretion that may alter local immune surveillance and microbial dysbiosis promoting carcinogenesis. A 2024 systematic review found the odds of non-secretor status to be approximately 3.8 times higher in patients with oral cancers and oral potentially malignant disorders, highlighting antigen-mediated mechanisms.[46] In reproductive health, maternal secretor status influences pregnancy outcomes, particularly in cases of ABO incompatibility leading to neonatal hemolysis. Among blood group O mothers, secretors produce higher levels of pathogenic anti-A/B IgG antibodies (elevated IgG1 and IgG3), significantly associating with hemolytic disease in newborns (P = 0.028), especially for anti-B in group B infants (P = 0.032); this is attributed to increased hyper-immunizing exposure events facilitated by secreted antigens.[47]Epidemiology
Global Prevalence
Secretor status exhibits significant global variation, with approximately 80% of the world's population classified as secretors due to functional FUT2 alleles, while non-secretors comprise about 20%, reflecting a non-secretor allele frequency of roughly 0.45 across diverse populations.[31] This overall distribution is derived from large-scale genetic surveys aggregating data from multiple ancestries, highlighting the recessive nature of non-secretor status.[2] In Caucasian and European-descended populations, secretor prevalence ranges from 75% to 85%, with data from the 1000 Genomes Project indicating about 76% secretors among individuals of European ancestry, based on the frequency of the common non-functional rs601338 variant (allele frequency ≈0.49).[48] Asian populations show notable heterogeneity: East Asian groups, such as Japanese and Chinese, have non-secretor rates of 20-30%, primarily driven by the se385 allele, while some South Asian subgroups exhibit higher non-secretor frequencies, such as approximately 26% in Bangladeshis and up to 44% in Pakistanis.[31][49][50] Among indigenous populations, non-secretors are rare in Native American groups, with secretor rates approaching 100% in certain tribes as documented in anthropological genetic studies.[51] Similarly, Australian Aboriginal communities display high secretor prevalence, often exceeding 75% in cohort analyses from northern regions as of 2023.[52] These patterns underscore the role of genetic drift and selection in shaping FUT2 variation across continents, as explored in population genetics research up to 2022.[2]Population Variations
Secretor status, determined by functional variants in the FUT2 gene, exhibits significant variation across global populations, influencing the expression of ABH histo-blood group antigens in bodily secretions. Worldwide, approximately 80% of individuals are secretors, while 20% are non-secretors due to homozygous loss-of-function mutations in FUT2.[53] These frequencies differ markedly by ancestry and geography, reflecting historical migration, genetic drift, and selection pressures related to pathogen exposure.[2] In populations of European descent and Caucasians, non-secretor prevalence is around 20-25%, primarily driven by the rs601338 (G428A, Trp143Stop) allele.[2] In contrast, East and Southeast Asian groups have non-secretor rates of approximately 20-25%, primarily associated with the rs1047781 (A385T, Ile129Phe) variant (se385 allele).[53][49] Mesoamerican and Native American populations, including those in Latin America, display some of the highest secretor frequencies, reaching up to 95%, linked to low prevalence of non-functional alleles like Se357 and Se428.[53][2] Certain regions in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East exhibit elevated non-secretor proportions. For instance, in Burkina Faso, a majority of individuals are Lewis antigen-negative, which correlates with non-secretor status in some contexts; recent studies as of 2025 indicate ~19% non-secretors due to stop mutations in children.[2][54] In the Philippines, Tanzania, and Saudi Arabia, non-secretor phenotypes can exceed 50%.[53] South Asian populations, such as those in Bangladesh, show approximately 26% non-secretors, with the Le(a+b−) phenotype prevalent at around 26%, influenced by SNPs like rs601338-AA; rates reach up to 44% in Pakistanis.[31][50] These variations underscore the role of FUT2 in population genetics, with non-secretor alleles potentially conferring resistance to certain pathogens like norovirus, thereby shaping allele frequencies through natural selection.[53] Admixture in modern populations, such as in Latin America, further complicates patterns, blending high-secretor Native American ancestry with other influences.[2]| Population/Region | Approximate Secretor Prevalence | Key Notes/Source |
|---|---|---|
| Europeans/Caucasians | 75-80% | Driven by G428A allele; 20-25% non-secretors.[2] |
| East/Southeast Asians | 75-80% | ~20-25% non-secretors; A385T (se385) variant common (frequency ~0.4).[53][49] |
| Mesoamerican/Native Americans | Up to 95% | Low non-functional alleles like Se428.[53] |
| Bangladeshis/South Asians | ~74% | ~26% non-secretors; Le(a+b−) at 26%; up to 44% in some groups (e.g., Pakistanis).[31][50] |
| Pakistanis | 56.4% | 43.6% non-secretors in studied cohort.[50] |
| Select African/Middle Eastern (e.g., Burkina Faso, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia) | 50% or less | Up to 50%+ non-secretors; Lewis-negative common; ~19% stop mutation non-secretors in Burkina Faso children (2025).[53][2][54] |