Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solana Generating Station

The Solana Generating Station is a 280 MW gross capacity concentrating solar power plant located near Gila Bend in Maricopa County, Arizona, approximately 70 miles southwest of Phoenix, utilizing parabolic trough collectors to focus sunlight onto heat transfer fluid for steam generation. It incorporates molten salt thermal energy storage, enabling dispatchable electricity production for up to six hours after sunset, marking the first such utility-scale implementation in the United States. Completed in October 2013 at a cost exceeding $2 billion, with partial financing from a U.S. Department of Energy loan guarantee, the facility supplies power sufficient for around 70,000 homes primarily to Arizona Public Service customers. Developed by Solar, the plant spans about three square miles and features over 2,700 mirrors, representing a significant advancement in solar thermal technology by addressing through , though its parent company's subsequent financial distress, including Abengoa's 2015 filing, raised concerns about long-term viability. Despite these innovations, operations have been marred by underperformance, generating less than projected energy in early years due to technical issues and weather variability. The station has encountered environmental and safety controversies, including 21 air quality permit violations between 2013 and 2016—such as exceeding emission limits for nitrogen oxides and failing required monitoring—resulting in $1.5 million in fines from the Department of Environmental Quality, alongside incidents like transformer fires in 2017 and leaks of leading to . Now owned by Sustainable Infrastructure, Solana continues to operate, contributing to goals but exemplifying challenges in scaling CSP amid reliability and regulatory hurdles.

History

Development and Construction

The Solana Generating Station project originated from efforts by , a subsidiary of the Spanish engineering firm , to deploy large-scale concentrating solar power (CSP) technology in the United States, targeting utility-scale power purchase agreements with . Development planning included site selection near , leveraging high and land availability, with an environmental assessment finalized by the U.S. Department of Energy in May 2010 to evaluate impacts on local ecology and water use. Financing was secured through a combination of private investment and public support, including a $1.45 billion from the U.S. Department of Energy issued in December 2010 under the Loan Programs Office to mitigate risks associated with the innovative system. The total project cost reached approximately $2 billion, reflecting the scale of installing over 2,700 collectors across 3.2 square miles. Construction broke ground in December 2010, with serving as the () contractor responsible for fabricating and installing the solar field, systems, and power block components. The build phase spanned nearly three years, involving specialized labor for precision alignment of mirrors to achieve optical efficiencies above 70% and integration of the storage tanks capable of holding 1,380 million pounds of . Challenges included managing extreme desert temperatures affecting material curing and ensuring minimal groundwater drawdown, addressed through dry-cooling systems to comply with water regulations. The facility achieved mechanical completion and began initial on October 7, 2013, marking the first U.S. CSP with six hours of dispatchable thermal storage at commercial scale. Post-construction testing validated the system's ability to deliver baseload-like output, with contracting to purchase the full 250 MW net capacity output at a fixed rate.

Commissioning and Initial Operations

The Solana Generating Station achieved its initial synchronization with the on October 7, 2013, marking the production of its first megawatt-hours of electricity through the solar thermal system. This milestone followed construction that commenced in December 2010 and represented the first U.S. deployment of large-scale integrated with concentrating solar power, enabling six hours of post-sunset. Commercial operations commenced later that month in October 2013, with the plant ramping up to full capacity of 280 megawatts gross output, sufficient to power approximately 70,000 homes under a long-term with Arizona Public Service. Initial performance validated the system's ability to store in molten nitrate salts during peak sunlight hours and release it to generate steam for the turbines during non-solar periods, achieving the targeted 900,000 megawatt-hours of annual clean energy production. Early operations focused on grid stability testing and optimization of the heat transfer fluid circulation, with no major disruptions reported in the startup phase. Developed by Solar under a U.S. Department of Energy , the station's commissioning underscored advancements in dispatchable solar thermal technology, distinguishing it from photovoltaic alternatives by providing firm power independent of real-time insolation. Subsequent monitoring confirmed reliable initial output, with the storage system enabling over 38% in the first years, exceeding non-storage solar baselines due to extended operational hours.

Location and Infrastructure

Site Characteristics

The Solana Generating Station is located in , near Gila Bend, approximately 70 miles (113 km) southwest of , at coordinates 32.917° N, 112.967° W. The site encompasses 1,920 acres (777 hectares) of predominantly flat desert terrain, which was previously used for , facilitating the installation of large-scale solar infrastructure with minimal topographic obstructions. This arid, open landscape in the provides high solar exposure essential for operations, though the site's former farmland status raised considerations under federal protections like the Farmland Protection Policy Act during development approvals. Access to the facility is via State Route 238 and nearby roads, with the plant address listed as 57750 S. Painted Rock Dam Road, Gila Bend, 85337.

Facilities and Scale

The Solana Generating Station features a large-scale parabolic trough solar field spanning approximately 3 square miles (1,920 acres or 7.8 km²), designed to capture and concentrate sunlight using an array of 808 loops comprising 3,232 solar collector assemblies (SCAs) of the EuroTrough (E2) model. Each SCA measures roughly 500 feet in length, 25 feet in width, and 10 feet in height, with the total solar field aperture area exceeding 2.2 million square meters to maximize thermal energy collection via heat transfer fluid (Therminol VP-1) heated to around 735°F. The field incorporates over 32,000 individual collector assemblies, each equipped with 28 curved mirrors that focus sunlight onto absorber tubes running parallel to the troughs. The power block includes two 140 MW steam turbines operating in a at 100 bar pressure, yielding a gross of 280 MW and a net output of 250 MW after accounting for auxiliary loads such as pumps and cooling systems. Wet cooling towers support the steam condensation process, integrated with the overall infrastructure to convert heated fluid into electricity. Thermal energy storage is provided by a two-tank indirect system (60% , 40% ), capable of storing up to 6 hours of full-load generation (over 1,000 MWh thermal equivalent) in 12 insulated tanks, each with a 140-foot and 45-foot , holding a total of 125,000 metric tons of salt maintained between 550°F and 730°F for dispatchable output.
Key Facility MetricsValue
Nameplate Capacity250 MW net
Solar Field Loops808
Solar Collector Assemblies3,232
Aperture Area2,200,000 m²
Storage Duration6 hours
Storage Tanks12 (125,000 metric tons total salt)

Technology

Parabolic Trough System

The parabolic trough system at Solana Generating Station employs concentrating solar power technology, where parabolic mirrors mounted on north-south aligned structures track the sun's east-west movement to focus solar radiation onto linear absorber tubes. The mirrors achieve a concentration ratio of approximately 70-80 suns, directing heat to receiver tubes containing a synthetic oil heat transfer fluid (HTF) that circulates through the system. These evacuated tubes, equipped with selective coatings and glass envelopes, minimize thermal losses while the HTF reaches temperatures up to 400°C. The solar field spans an aperture area of 2,200,000 m² across roughly 3 square miles (7.7 km²), featuring 808 collector loops subdivided into 3,232 , with four SCAs per loop. Each SCA consists of multiple mirror facets—totaling over 32,000 assemblies with 28 curved mirrors per assembly—curved to form the parabolic shape for precise focusing. The design, derived from Abengoa's EuroTrough-inspired collectors, optimizes energy capture in the high environment of , with an annual direct normal irradiance of about 2,784 kWh/m². This configuration enables the system to generate for , with the heated HTF either directed immediately to heat exchangers or diverted to storage tanks for dispatchable power output. The troughs' single-axis tracking ensures continuous alignment, though performance is subject to factors like mirror cleanliness, tracking accuracy, and optical efficiency, which typically yield field thermal efficiencies around 60-70% under optimal conditions.

Steam Generation and Power Block

The power block at Solana Generating Station utilizes a steam , a conventional adapted for , to convert captured into electrical output. The system features two steam turbines, each rated at 140 MW gross capacity, providing a total gross generation of 280 MW, with net output around 250 MW after accounting for parasitic loads. Steam conditions include a high-pressure stage at 100 bar (1,450 psi), enabling efficient expansion through the turbines. Wet cooling towers facilitate steam condensation, recirculating water in a closed loop to maintain cycle efficiency under Arizona's arid conditions. Heat transfer from the solar field or storage occurs indirectly via a synthetic oil-based (HTF), such as Therminol VP-1, heated to 393°C in the collectors. This hot HTF delivers energy to shell-and-tube heat exchangers, where it superheats , generating high-pressure without direct contact between the HTF and side to avoid . The process mirrors plants but relies on solar-derived , with the HTF inlet at approximately 293°C ensuring thermal matching. then flows to the high-pressure sections, followed by reheating if needed, before entering low-pressure stages for maximum work extraction. Molten salt storage integration enables continuous operation: during solar collection, excess HTF heat charges the two-tank system (hot salt at ~388°C), storing up to six full-load hours of in 125,000 metric tons of salt mixture. For dispatchable power, hot salt pumps through dedicated generating heat exchangers to reheat the HTF loop, bypassing the field and sustaining post-sunset at about 70% round-trip . This indirect configuration—HTF to salt for charging, salt to HTF for —minimizes material degradation, as the corrosive salt remains segregated from the power block.

Energy Storage

Molten Salt Storage Mechanism

The molten salt storage at Solana Generating Station employs a two-tank indirect , marking the first such implementation in a U.S. parabolic trough plant. This configuration uses molten salts as the medium, with a total capacity equivalent to six hours of full-load generation, storing over 1,000 MWh of to enable dispatchable power output during non-solar periods such as nighttime or . The comprises twelve elevated tanks, each 140 feet in diameter and 45 feet high, containing approximately 125,000 tons of salt. The salts form a eutectic mixture of 60% and 40% , which remains liquid at operational temperatures between approximately 290°C (cold tank) and 565°C (hot tank), minimizing thermal losses through storage. Charging occurs when excess heat from the solar field—transferred via the synthetic oil-based (biphenyl/diphenyl oxide, or Xceltherm, heated to 393°C)—is diverted to shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Cold salt is pumped from the cold tank, absorbing heat from the HTF to reach hot-tank temperature, while the cooled HTF returns to the field or power block; the heated salt flows to the hot tank for storage. Discharging reverses the process: hot salt is circulated through heat exchangers to reheat cooler HTF drawn from the power block or field (inlet at 293°C), transferring stored to produce for the without concurrent input. Cooled returns to the cold tank, maintaining stratified temperature differentials across the tanks to optimize efficiency and reduce parasitic pumping losses. This indirect approach decouples the collection from storage, allowing flexible operation while leveraging the high of molten salts for cost-effective, high-temperature retention. The system's integration enhances the plant's to over 37%, compared to non-storage CSP .

Integration with Generation

The molten salt thermal energy storage system at Solana Generating Station employs an indirect two-tank design, integrating with the parabolic trough solar field and steam Rankine cycle through heat exchangers that facilitate thermal energy transfer via the heat transfer fluid (HTF), Therminol VP-1 synthetic oil. During charging, excess hot HTF—reaching up to 393°C after absorption of concentrated solar heat—is diverted from the power block to shell-and-tube heat exchangers, where it transfers energy to the molten nitrate salt mixture (60% sodium nitrate, 40% potassium nitrate) previously stored in cold tanks at approximately 290°C, elevating the salt to around 390°C for retention in hot tanks. This process stores up to 1,680 MWh of thermal energy, equivalent to six hours of full-load generation. For discharge and integration with generation, hot molten salt is pumped from the six hot storage tanks through separate heat exchangers to reheat cooled HTF circulating in a closed loop, restoring it to operational temperatures before directing it to the heat recovery steam generators (HRSGs). The reheated HTF then produces high-pressure steam (1,450 psi) to drive two 140 MW steam turbines, mirroring the direct solar heating pathway but enabling continuous output independent of real-time insolation. Cooled salt returns to the six cold tanks, completing the cycle and minimizing corrosion risks associated with direct salt-HTF contact. This hybrid operation—prioritizing direct HTF-to-steam during peak solar hours and storage dispatch during off-peak or nighttime—yields a system of approximately 38%, with the plant capable of delivering 280 MW for up to six hours post-sunset, enhancing grid dispatchability in Arizona's evening periods. The indirect configuration leverages the HTF's compatibility with existing trough collectors while exploiting molten salt's superior thermal stability and capacity over oil-only storage, though it introduces efficiency losses of about 5-10% in heat exchange steps.

Operations and Performance

Production Metrics and Capacity Factors

The Solana Generating Station operates with a gross electrical of 280 MW and a net of 250 MW, utilizing collectors to heat for steam generation and power production. The facility's system, providing up to six hours of dispatchable output, supports generation extending into evening hours, with design parameters targeting an annual of 38% to 43%. This equates to an expected annual output of 900 GWh to 944 GWh, displacing approximately 480,000 metric tons of CO₂ emissions yearly under optimal conditions. In practice, achieved capacity factors have been lower, ranging from 33% to 36.4% in operational reviews, reflecting challenges such as suboptimal solar field efficiency, heat transfer losses, and storage system limitations inherent to technology. These figures imply actual annual generation closer to 720–800 GWh based on net capacity, though aggregated EIA data for the owning entity reports approximately 961 GWh in a referenced year, potentially capturing variability from favorable periods. Performance has been further impacted by maintenance issues, including extensive repairs to the molten salt storage system from 2021 to mid-2023, which reduced availability and prompted capital expenditures exceeding $39 million in 2022 alone. Such incidents underscore the reliability constraints of CSP plants, where mechanical complexity and material degradation—such as salt freezing or —can erode output beyond initial design projections.

Reliability Incidents and Maintenance

The Solana Generating Station has experienced several reliability incidents, primarily related to weather events and equipment failures. In late July 2016, a monsoon-driven microburst damaged , resulting in a multi-day outage followed by prolonged operational disruptions lasting months due to repair needs. A subsequent report indicated the storm caused weeks of downtime, highlighting vulnerabilities in the arrays and supporting systems to . Equipment-related issues have also impacted reliability. In July 2017, two fires occurred, contributing to unplanned and necessitating repairs. Earlier, in 2015, the plant faced a range of operational problems, including generator repairs that reduced output below expected levels, attributed to initial teething issues in the complex steam generation and storage integration. Maintenance efforts have focused on addressing these early-stage deficiencies. By 2018, operators reported resolving most maturity-related problems, improving overall system stability through targeted upgrades to handling and collector maintenance protocols. Routine maintenance includes periodic cleaning of mirrors to mitigate dust accumulation in the arid environment and inspections of the tanks to prevent leaks, though specific downtime metrics post-2018 remain limited in public records. These interventions have aimed to enhance dispatchability from the thermal storage, but the plant's exposure to regional monsoons underscores ongoing risks to mechanical components.

Economics and Financing

Costs and Subsidies

The Solana Generating Station's total cost amounted to $2 billion as of its completion in 2013, encompassing the collectors, system, and associated power block infrastructure. This figure reflects the for a 280 MW gross , with specific costs per kilowatt estimated around $7,143/kW based on contemporaneous adjusted for the project's and technology. Financing for the project included significant federal support through a $1.45 billion issued by the U.S. Department of Energy in December 2010, which facilitated lower-interest debt by assuming default risk and enabling construction start-up. Additionally, the plant qualified for a 30% federal investment under incentives, further offsetting upfront capital requirements and reducing the effective cost to private investors. These mechanisms, part of broader efforts to deploy concentrating solar power, lowered the financing burden but exposed taxpayers to potential losses if the project underperformed, as evidenced by Abengoa's later financial difficulties. Operational costs, including for the complex trough mirrors and salt storage systems, have not been publicly detailed at a granular level, though the plant sustains approximately 85 annual operations jobs, indicative of ongoing fixed expenses typical for utility-scale solar thermal facilities. Absent specific disclosures, levelized cost estimates for similar plants suggest operations and contribute substantially to long-term , often exceeding those of photovoltaic alternatives due to complexity.

Revenue Model and Viability

The Solana Generating Station derives its primary revenue from a 30-year (PPA) with Public Service (), which commits to buying 100% of the plant's output at a rate of approximately 14 cents per . This structure secures an estimated $4 billion in over the agreement's term, driven by annual generation of about 900,000 megawatt-hours. The PPA, influenced in part by 's renewable portfolio standards, provides stable cash flows to service debt and operations, though the fixed rate reflects regulatory mandates rather than purely market dynamics. Project financing underscored the revenue model's dependence on federal support, including a $1.45 billion from the U.S. Department of Energy in 2010 and a 30% investment tax credit, which together covered a substantial portion of the $2 billion for the 280 MW facility. These mechanisms lowered the , enabling construction despite high upfront specific costs exceeding $7,000 per kilowatt. Economic viability hinges on this subsidized framework, as the plant's (LCOE) is estimated at around 20 cents per kWh—above the PPA price—highlighting that unsubsidized operations would likely yield losses. Independent analyses have pegged pre-subsidy LCOE closer to 19 cents per kWh, factoring in the plant's 36% from integrated storage. Abengoa's bankruptcy, amid broader overleveraging in concentrating solar power projects, did not halt Solana's output; revenue from APS sales continued to repay the DOE loan, with assets restructured under new ownership to maintain operations. While the plant has proven technically sustainable, its long-term profitability remains tied to incentives and mandated offtake, amid a sector shift toward lower-cost .

Environmental Aspects

Resource Use and Footprint

The Solana Generating Station occupies a total land area of approximately 7.8 square kilometers (1,920 acres or 777 hectares) in , with the solar field spanning 1,757 acres (711 hectares). Annual water consumption at the site is estimated at 3,000 acre-feet, achieved through the use of air-cooled condensers that substantially reduce evaporative losses compared to wet-cooled systems. This represents 75% to 85% less water usage than the prior agricultural operations on the same farmland, which relied heavily on irrigation from sources like the . Operational resource demands beyond include periodic maintenance of the mirrors and replenishment of , though specific quantities for ongoing consumption are not publicly detailed in project assessments; the plant's storage system, containing over 1.2 million metric tons initially, experiences minimal thermal degradation requiring limited top-offs. The site's transition from to has resulted in a net decrease in regional draw while maintaining a fixed physical footprint that displaces prior crop production without expanding into undeveloped land.

Emissions and Regulatory Issues

The Solana Generating Station, a concentrating solar power facility, is designed to produce electricity with minimal direct during operation, relying on captured via parabolic troughs and stored in . It is projected to avoid approximately 475,000 metric tons of emissions annually compared to equivalent generation, sufficient to power around 70,000 households without combustion-related pollutants from the source. However, auxiliary systems, including natural gas-fired heaters used for molten salt thawing and heat transfer fluid (HTF) circulation, contribute to regulated air emissions such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds. In practice, the plant has exceeded permitted emission limits due to equipment malfunctions and operational lapses. Between 2014 and mid-2015, Arizona Solar One LLC, the operator, committed 21 air quality violations at the facility, including surpassing NOx thresholds, failing to perform required stack tests, and improperly removing or bypassing emission control devices like selective catalytic reduction systems. These infractions prompted enforcement by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), culminating in a $1.5 million settlement in September 2016. As part of the resolution, the operator committed to over $4 million in facility upgrades, enhanced monitoring, and corrective actions to restore compliance with Clean Air Act permits. Additional incidents involved HTF leaks and transformer failures releasing hazardous substances like —a toxic, inhalable compound—into the air, though regulators declined further fines in some cases where protocols were followed during breakdowns. The U.S. of Energy's Environmental for the anticipated low cumulative emissions from operations, below , but post-commissioning data revealed higher-than-modeled impacts from auxiliary use and maintenance issues. No major subsequent regulatory actions have been publicly documented as of 2018, though ongoing permit compliance requires periodic reporting to ADEQ and the EPA.

Controversies

Performance Criticisms

The Solana Generating Station has been criticized for underperforming relative to its projected annual output of approximately 900,000 megawatt-hours, with actual falling short in early years of operation. In , the plant produced 643,443 megawatt-hours, and while output increased modestly in 2017, it remained below expectations, leading to additional debt servicing costs for owner due to contractual shortfalls. Operational reliability issues compounded these shortfalls, including frequent generator repairs and other mechanical problems reported as early as 2014, shortly after the plant's commercial commissioning. A severe microburst storm in 2016 inflicted structural damage to mirrors and infrastructure, exacerbating downtime and contributing to further production declines in subsequent months. The plant's initial net capacity factor of 29.5% in its first full year of data (2014) drew scrutiny, as the storage system—designed to enable a targeted 38% factor through extended dispatchability—failed to deliver consistent improvements amid these incidents. Critics, including analysts reviewing U.S. CSP projects, have attributed such gaps to inherent technological challenges in systems, including losses and vulnerability to dust accumulation in desert environments, though Solana's later stabilized at around 36% in averaged metrics. In September 2016, Solar One LLC, the operator of the Solana Generating Station, settled with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) by agreeing to pay a $1.5 million for 21 air quality violations occurring between June 2014 and February 2016. The violations encompassed failures to perform required performance tests under the facility's air permit, unauthorized removal or modification of control equipment, exceedances of limits during startup and shutdown periods, and other permit noncompliance issues. As part of the settlement, the operator committed to expenditures exceeding $5 million on equipment upgrades, repairs, and enhanced monitoring to prevent future breaches, alongside submission of compliance plans to ADEQ. Subsequent incidents highlighted ongoing operational risks tied to compliance. In October 2018, a rupture in a (HTF) pipeline at the plant released approximately 8,000 gallons of the fluid, which contains diphenyl oxide and , prompting a notice of violation from the Maricopa County Air Quality Department due to potential emissions. No injuries occurred, and no monetary fine was imposed, as investigators determined the operators had adhered to existing protocols during the equipment failure, though the event underscored vulnerabilities in the plant's system's fluid containment. The parent company Abengoa SA's financial distress in 2015 indirectly raised compliance concerns, as it filed for creditor protection in amid $10 billion in , triggering shareholder lawsuits in the U.S. and alleging through misleading disclosures of financial health. These proceedings did not halt Solana's operations, which were insulated by its separate U.S. structure and a $1.45 billion U.S. Department of Energy ; federal officials confirmed in December 2015 that plant functionality would persist unaffected. Ownership later transferred to Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure plc in 2017 as part of Abengoa's restructuring, mitigating direct legal spillover to the facility. No major litigation directly targeting Solana's construction, permitting, or labor practices has been documented, though the plant's air permit compliance has remained under ADEQ scrutiny post-settlement, with periodic reporting requirements enforced to align with Clean Air Act standards.

References

  1. [1]
    Solana Generating Station - Concentrating Solar Power Projects
    Oct 21, 2022 · This page provides information on Solana Generating Station CSP project, a concentrating solar power (CSP) project, with data organized by background, ...
  2. [2]
    Powering the energy transition | Assets | Solana - Atlantica
    Solana is a 250 MW net (280 MW gross) solar plant located in Maricopa County, Arizona, approximately 70 miles southwest of Phoenix. Solana uses a conventional ...
  3. [3]
    SOLANA | Department of Energy
    An innovative energy storage system provides Solana with 'night-time' solar that allows electricity production for up to 6 hours without the sun.
  4. [4]
    Top Plant: Solana Generating Station, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Dec 1, 2014 · Construction of the $2 billion project began in December 2010, and the plant began electricity production on Oct. 7, 2013.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  5. [5]
    Solana Solar Power Generating Station, Arizona, US
    Dec 1, 2013 · Solana Solar Power Generating Station, with an output capacity of 280MW, is one of the largest concentrating solar power (CSP) plants in the world.
  6. [6]
    Solana Generating Station - Alliance Industrial Group
    Solana Generating Station is the largest parabolic trough solar power plant in the world and the first US solar plant with molten salt thermal energy storage.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Large solar plant fails to reach its energy capacity
    Jun 16, 2015 · The massive solar power plant built near Gila Bend with the help of a $1.45 billion federal loan so far has failed to generate as much power as promised.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  8. [8]
    Solana solar plant to pay $1.5 million in air-quality fines - AZCentral
    Sep 26, 2016 · The department said the plant's 21 air-quality violations include exceeding the pollution levels allowed by its permits, failure to conduct ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    Solana Solar Generating Station - Global Energy Monitor - GEM.wiki
    May 8, 2025 · Solana Solar Generating Station is an operating solar thermal farm in Maricopa County, Arizona, United States.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - Department of Energy
    May 22, 2010 · Will Gila Bend get the power that is supplied by Solana? The power generated by the Solana Generating Station would be transmitted via ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  12. [12]
    Abengoa's Solana, the US's first large-scale solar plant with thermal ...
    Solana is the first large-scale plant to be developed by Abengoa in Arizona. With a capacity of 280 MW gross, it will be the largest concentrating solar power ...
  13. [13]
    Arizona Public Service's Solana Begins Commercial Operation
    Oct 14, 2013 · Solana, located near Gila Bend and about 70 miles southwest of Phoenix, Arizona, began construction in 2010 and, on Monday, Oct. 7 ...
  14. [14]
    First U.S. Concentrating Solar Power Plant with Thermal Storage ...
    The 280-MW plant, near Gila Bend in Arizona about 70 miles southwest of Phoenix, employs molten salt to store about six hours of thermal energy at full power, ...
  15. [15]
    Abengoa starts operation of Solana solar thermal power plant in US
    Oct 10, 2013 · Spain-based Abengoa has started commercial operation at its Solana solar thermal power plant located near Gila Bend and around 70 miles southwest of Phoenix in ...
  16. [16]
    Solana Generating Station | Solar Farm in Gila Bend, AZ - GridInfo
    Solana Generating Station Details ; Solana Generating Station (56812) · 57750 S. Painted Rock Dam Road, Gila Bend, AZ 85337 · Arizona Solar One LLC (56023).
  17. [17]
    [PDF] ABENGOA SOLAR - ESMAP
    ▷ The parabolic mirror concentrates the sunrays in the evacuated tube where it is heated at approximately 400ºC. ▷ This oil exchanges its heat with water,.<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Molten salt-based nanocomposites for thermal energy storage
    Solana Generating Station operating with 2700 parabolic troughs uses a molten salt heat storage facility with 125,000 tons of molten salt [55]. The thermal ...
  19. [19]
    A 140 MW Solar Thermal Plant in Jordan - MDPI
    This paper aims to compute the performances of a smaller version of Solana power plant, with half the solar field, and 1 of 2 turbines in the power cycle.<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Cost and production of solar thermal and solar photovoltaics power ...
    With 6 hours of TES, the capacity factors of the Solana plant, CSP PT, solar only, are up to 33%, however much lower than the design value of 43%. The CSP ...
  21. [21]
    Arizona Solar One LLC | Electricity Generation Summary - GridInfo
    EIA Annual Generation, 960.8 GWh. EIA Power Plants, 1. Fuel Types ... Solana Generating Station, Gila Bend, Arizona, 871 GWh, Sep 2013, Jul ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] integrated annual report - Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure
    Mar 4, 2024 · ... energy generated by 50% by 2035 from a 2020 base year. ✓ Reduce our hazardous and non-hazardous waste4 per unit of energy generated by. 30 ...
  23. [23]
    Solana Solar Plant's Poor Performance Gets Worse After Damage ...
    Sep 22, 2016 · Solana, the highly touted $2 billion solar plant near Gila Bend, was knocked out for a few days by a storm in late July and won't work right ...Missing: reliability incidents
  24. [24]
    Underachieving Solana Solar Plant Keeps Polluting Arizona's Air
    Nov 28, 2018 · Officials didn't fine Solana because plant operators were following the rules when equipment failed.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  25. [25]
    [PDF] FINAL-DOE-Loan-Guarantees-Report.pdf
    Mar 20, 2012 · Solana Generating Station, dated December 2, 2010, where DOE committed to a $1.445 billion loan guarantee and the Treasury committed to a ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Renewable Energy Cost Analysis: Concentrating Solar Power - IRENA
    The costs that can be examined include equipment costs (e.g. wind turbines, PV modules, solar reflectors), financing costs, total installed cost, fixed and ...
  27. [27]
    Solana, the First Large-Scale Solar Plant with Thermal Energy ...
    Oct 17, 2013 · Arizona Public Service (APS) will purchase all of the electricity produced by the solar plant for 30 years through a PPA. The total investment ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Political Entrepreneurship: The Case of Abengoa - IER
    Sep 7, 2011 · [Arizona Public Service] has agreed to buy $4 billion worth of electricity from the [Solana] plant over the next 30 years, in part because to ...Missing: financing | Show results with:financing
  29. [29]
    Abengoa's Arizona Solana solar power plant enters service - Reuters
    Oct 9, 2013 · The plant, which cost about $2 billion to build, has a thermal ... China reports $30.5 billion in economic losses from natural disasters so far in ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Energy Storing Solar Plant Gets Official Green Light - CleanTechies
    Dec 24, 2010 · I computed Solana's levelized cost of the solar electricity (LCOE) to be US$ 192.18/MWh (US¢19.22/kWh) [143.62 €/MWh]. I assumed 6 solar ...
  31. [31]
    Feds: Parent company's financial woes won't affect Solana solar plant
    Dec 3, 2015 · Solana is generating revenue by selling power to Arizona Public Service Co. That revenue is being used to repay a $1.45 billion U.S. loan used ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Comparison of actual Levelized Cost of Electricity of solar thermal ...
    The capacity factor is the ratio of actual generating power to nominal power. As the resource is not constant, capacity factors are very far from unity.Missing: Station | Show results with:Station<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Solana Solar Project - Abengoa
    Solana is a 280-MW (gross) utility-scale concentrating solar power (CSP) plant that has been built by Abengoa outside of. Phoenix, Arizona.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Arizona air regulators slap Solana solar facility with $1.5M fine
    Sep 29, 2016 · ... Solana Generating Station it operates in Gila Bend, including ... Explore the latest initiatives being introduced to ensure grid reliability ...
  36. [36]
    Arizona Solar Power Plant Pays $1.5 Million In Emissions Violation ...
    Sep 23, 2016 · The Solana Generating Station in Gila Bend will also invest millions in upgrades and repairs after 21 violations over one and a half years.
  37. [37]
    Concentrated solar power in the USA: a performance review
    Apr 24, 2017 · Nameplate capacities (MWp) are about 10% higher. Only the Solana plant has storage capability (reported to be 1.68GWh), but no details are ...
  38. [38]
    Once a Darling, Spanish Solar Company Abengoa Faces Reckoning
    Mar 17, 2016 · Saddled with debt from its expansion, the company is scrambling to avoid what would be the largest bankruptcy in Spanish corporate history.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  39. [39]
    Abengoa unit wins U.S. court nod to join restructuring plan | Reuters
    Oct 19, 2016 · A leading bankrupt subsidiary of Abengoa SA <ABG.MC> won U.S. court approval on Wednesday to join a $10 billion debt-restructuring agreement ...