Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Spherical shell

A spherical shell is a three-dimensional geometric defined as the space between two concentric spheres of differing radii, generalizing the of a two-dimensional annulus to three dimensions. In and physics, spherical shells serve as fundamental models for analyzing symmetric structures and fields. The volume of such a shell, with outer radius R and inner radius r, is given by the difference in volumes of the two spheres: \frac{4}{3}\pi (R^3 - r^3), while the total surface area comprises the outer and inner surfaces: $4\pi R^2 + 4\pi r^2. These properties arise from integrating over the shell's geometry using spherical coordinates, where the differential is dV = \rho^2 \sin\phi \, d\rho \, d\phi \, d\theta. Spherical shells are classified as thin when the thickness t = R - r is much smaller than R, approximating a surface, or thick otherwise, influencing their . One of the most notable applications in physics is Newton's , which states that the gravitational (or electrostatic) field inside a uniform spherical of mass (or charge) is zero, while outside it behaves as if all mass (or charge) is concentrated at the center. This theorem, proven by in his Principia Mathematica (1687), underpins models of planetary motion, stellar interiors, and electrostatic shielding. For instance, it explains why objects inside a hollow Earth-like experience no net gravitational pull from the shell itself. In engineering, spherical shells are critical for designing pressure vessels, domes, and hulls due to their high strength-to-weight ratio under uniform loading, though they are prone to under external pressure. Beyond classical contexts, spherical shells appear in advanced fields like quantum electrodynamics, where they model Casimir forces between concentric boundaries, and in geophysics for simulating Earth's mantle convection in a spherical shell geometry. Their isotropic symmetry makes them ideal for computational simulations in fluid dynamics and heat transfer, ensuring uniform boundary conditions.

Definition and Geometry

Definition

A spherical shell is a three-dimensional geometric figure that generalizes the two-dimensional annulus to higher dimensions, consisting of the region bounded by two concentric spheres of different radii. Specifically, it is the solid region lying between an inner sphere of radius r and an outer sphere of radius R, where R > r \geq 0, forming a hollow layer with spherical symmetry. This structure assumes familiarity with basic , where a is the surface comprising all points in three-dimensional at a fixed distance (the ) from a central point, and a denotes the solid interior enclosed by that . The inner boundary of the shell corresponds to a spherical void (the ball of radius r), while the outer boundary defines the enclosing sphere of radius R, creating a configuration that is rotationally invariant about the common center. Visually, a spherical shell appears as a uniformly curved, hollow enclosure symmetric about its center, with the thickness of the layer given by R - r; when thin (small R - r), it approximates a surface of negligible depth. Derived properties such as and surface area arise directly from these defining radii.

Geometric Parameters

A spherical shell is characterized by two primary geometric parameters: the inner radius r and the outer radius R, satisfying R > r \geq 0. These radii define the boundaries of the shell as the region between two concentric spheres centered at a common point, establishing the shell's overall scale and hollow structure. The thickness t of the shell, defined as t = R - r, serves as a key measure of its radial extent and helps classify the shell as thin or thick depending on the ratio of t to R. This parameter is particularly useful for assessing the shell's structural uniformity across its . The of for the spherical shell is located at the shared of the inner and outer spheres, ensuring rotational invariance about this point. In spherical coordinates, the shell consists of all points where the radial distance \rho from the satisfies r \leq \rho \leq R, with angular coordinates spanning the full . Geometrically, the shell represents the difference between two solid balls of radii R and r, excluding the interior void. These parameters directly influence the shell's volume and underpin approximations in analyses of thin or thick configurations.

Mathematical Properties

Volume

The volume V enclosed by a spherical shell with inner radius r and outer radius R > r is the difference between the volumes of two solid spheres of radii R and r, yielding the formula V = \frac{4}{3} \pi (R^3 - r^3). This expression arises directly from subtracting the enclosed volume of the inner sphere from that of the outer sphere, where the volume of a solid sphere of radius a is \frac{4}{3} \pi a^3. An alternative form factors the difference of cubes as V = \frac{4}{3} \pi (R - r)(R^2 + R r + r^2), which explicitly incorporates the shell thickness t = R - r and is useful for analyzing how volume depends on small variations in thickness. To derive the formula via integration, consider the spherical shell in spherical coordinates (\rho, \phi, \theta), where the volume element is dV = \rho^2 \sin \phi \, d\rho \, d\phi \, d\theta. The limits are \rho from r to R, \phi from 0 to \pi, and \theta from 0 to $2\pi. The triple integral for the volume is V = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^\pi \int_r^R \rho^2 \sin \phi \, d\rho \, d\phi \, d\theta. First, integrate with respect to \rho: \int_r^R \rho^2 \, d\rho = \frac{1}{3} (R^3 - r^3). Next, integrate with respect to \phi: \int_0^\pi \sin \phi \, d\phi = [-\cos \phi]_0^\pi = 2. Finally, integrate with respect to \theta: \int_0^{2\pi} d\theta = 2\pi. Multiplying these results gives V = 2\pi \cdot 2 \cdot \frac{1}{3} (R^3 - r^3) = \frac{4}{3} \pi (R^3 - r^3). This approach leverages the symmetry of the sphere, where the \sin \phi factor accounts for the varying "width" in the polar direction. Due to dimensional homogeneity, the volume scales with the cube of the linear dimensions; if all radii are multiplied by a factor k, the volume becomes k^3 V. The units of volume are cubic length, consistent with the formula's structure. In the special case where r = 0, the shell reduces to a solid ball of radius R, and the formula simplifies to the standard sphere volume V = \frac{4}{3} \pi R^3.

Surface Area

The outer surface area of a spherical shell, defined by its external radius R, is identical to the surface area of a solid sphere of radius R, given by the formula $4\pi R^2. Similarly, the inner surface area, corresponding to the internal radius r, follows the same formula as $4\pi r^2. These expressions derive directly from the standard surface area formula for a sphere, since the bounding surfaces of the shell are concentric spheres. When considering both bounding surfaces, the total surface area of a closed spherical is the sum of the inner and outer areas, $4\pi (R^2 + r^2). This total accounts for the complete of the shell's material and differs from scenarios involving open or cut shells, where only exposed (e.g., outer or inner) areas may be relevant, excluding the unexposed side. In thin shell approximations, where R - r is small, the surface areas relate to estimates by approximating the enclosed material as a layer with average surface area times thickness, though exact calculations use the precise inner and outer areas.

Moment of Inertia

The of a spherical shell, assuming constant and about a passing through its , quantifies its resistance to in rotational . For a thin spherical shell, where the inner radius approaches the outer radius R, the simplifies to I = \frac{2}{3} M R^2, with M denoting the total . This formula arises from integrating the contributions of elements, leveraging the shell's azimuthal around the . For a thick spherical shell with uniform density \rho = \frac{M}{V}, where V = \frac{4}{3} \pi (R^3 - r^3) is the volume enclosed between outer radius R and inner radius r, the about a central is given by I = \frac{2}{5} M \frac{R^5 - r^5}{R^3 - r^3}. The involves expressing the mass element dm = \rho \, dV in spherical coordinates, computing the distance squared from the axis for each element, and performing the volume integral over the shell's thickness, exploiting symmetry to equate moments about all diameters. In the limit as r \to 0, this recovers the solid result I = \frac{2}{5} M R^2. Compared to a sphere of the same M and outer R, the spherical shell exhibits a higher , as is distributed farther from the —\frac{2}{3} M R^2 for the thin case \frac{2}{5} M R^2 for the . This difference highlights the shell's greater rotational under equivalent external torques.

Approximations and Special Cases

Thin Shell Approximation

In the thin shell approximation, the thickness t = R - r of the spherical shell is assumed to be much smaller than the inner radius r, typically satisfying t/r < 0.1, allowing simplifications that treat the shell as a nearly planar surface locally curved over a large radius. This regime is prevalent in analyses where full three-dimensional integration is computationally intensive, such as in elastic deformation models for lightweight structures. The volume is approximated by V \approx 4\pi r^2 t, obtained by multiplying the inner surface area by the thickness, which provides a good estimate when higher-order effects are negligible. This formula derives from the exact volume V = \frac{4}{3}\pi (R^3 - r^3) via Taylor expansion around small t: substituting R = r + t yields V = 4\pi r^2 t + 4\pi r t^2 + \frac{4}{3}\pi t^3, where the leading term dominates and subsequent terms are discarded. The relative error in this approximation is of order O(t/r), arising from the quadratic and cubic terms, and remains below 10% for t/r < 0.1. For the total surface area, comprising inner and outer contributions, the approximation is $8\pi r^2, as both surfaces are nearly identical in the thin limit. For greater precision, the mean radius r_m = r + t/2 may be used, yielding total area approximately $8\pi r_m^2, which adjusts for the slight difference in curvatures. This approximation facilitates efficient modeling of thin-walled spherical structures, such as or biological membranes, by avoiding exhaustive radial integrations while capturing essential geometric behavior. Compared to the exact volume formula, it simplifies calculations significantly for small t/r, with errors scaling linearly with the ratio.

Thick Shell Analysis

In thick spherical shells subjected to internal or external pressure, the stress distribution varies nonlinearly through the wall thickness, requiring exact solutions from linear elasticity theory rather than uniform approximations. Lame's equations provide the analytical framework for these stresses, derived from the equilibrium of a spherical element and compatibility conditions in spherical coordinates. The radial stress \sigma_r and hoop stress \sigma_\theta (which are equal in the tangential directions due to symmetry) at a radius r (where a \leq r \leq b, with a the inner radius and b the outer radius) are given by \sigma_r = A - \frac{2B}{r^3}, \quad \sigma_\theta = A + \frac{B}{r^3}, where the constants A and B are determined from boundary conditions: \sigma_r(a) = -P_i (internal pressure) and \sigma_r(b) = -P_o (external pressure). For an internally pressurized shell with P_o = 0, these yield \sigma_r = -\frac{P_i a^3 (b^3 - r^3)}{r^3 (b^3 - a^3)} and \sigma_\theta = \frac{P_i a^3 (2r^3 + b^3)}{2r^3 (b^3 - a^3)}, showing that \sigma_\theta is tensile and maximum at the inner surface, while \sigma_r is compressive and transitions from -P_i at the inner surface to zero at the outer. This variation highlights the concentration of hoop stress near the inner wall, which can lead to yielding if the thickness-to-radius ratio is significant. Buckling analysis for thick spherical shells extends classical thin-shell criteria, accounting for through-thickness effects and nonlinear behavior under external pressure. The classical buckling pressure for thin shells is P_{cr} = \frac{2E (t/R)^2}{\sqrt{3(1-\nu^2)}}, where E is the Young's modulus, t the thickness, R the mean radius, and \nu the Poisson's ratio; however, for thicker shells, this underpredicts stability due to shear and radial inertia contributions, necessitating adjustments via variational methods or series solutions. Numerical evaluations show that for wall thickness ratios t/a > 0.2 (where a is the inner radius), the critical pressure increases over thin-shell predictions in the elastic regime, with further nonlinear corrections for post-buckling paths involving dimple formation or axisymmetric collapse. These adjustments are derived from solving the linearized stability equations with thickness-dependent boundary conditions. When the thickness-to-inner-radius ratio exceeds approximately 0.1, thin-shell approximations become inaccurate, as they neglect gradients and transverse , leading to errors exceeding 15% in predictions and up to 25% in deformation estimates under uniform . In such cases, exact Lame-type solutions or advanced simulations are essential for reliability. Numerical methods like finite element analysis (FEA) are particularly valuable for thick shells under non-uniform loads, such as localized pressures or thermal gradients, where axisymmetric assumptions fail. FEA discretizes the shell into 3D solid elements, incorporating full elasticity equations to capture local concentrations and modes, often using shell-specific formulations that blend membrane, , and effects for computational efficiency. For instance, nonlinear FEA has been applied to predict in thick vessels with irregular loading, revealing imperfection-sensitive not captured by analytical models. Thick shell analysis is critical in applications like high-pressure vessels in chemical , where wall thicknesses can approach 20-50% of the to withstand internals (e.g., up to 100 ), and in modeling planetary interiors, such as Mars' treated as a thick shell under and thermal stresses. In planetary cores, these methods assess lithospheric stresses from convective loading, with FEA simulations showing variations influencing tectonic patterns.

Applications

In Physics

In physics, the spherical shell plays a fundamental role in understanding gravitational and electrostatic fields due to its symmetry. The , first derived by in his in 1687, states that a uniform spherical shell of M and radius R produces no net gravitational force on a test located inside it (r < R), while the field outside (r > R) is identical to that of a point M concentrated at the center, given by \vec{g}(r) = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \hat{r}. This result can be derived modernly using the analog of , \oint \vec{g} \cdot d\vec{A} = -4\pi G M_{\text{enc}}, where for a Gaussian surface of radius r < R, the enclosed M_{\text{enc}} = 0, yielding g(r) = 0; for r > R, M_{\text{enc}} = M, so g(r) = -\frac{GM}{r^2}. An analogous theorem holds in for a uniformly charged spherical shell of total charge Q and radius R. Applying , \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\epsilon_0}, the inside is zero (E(r) = 0 for r < R) since Q_{\text{enc}} = 0, while outside it behaves as a point charge, E(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q}{r^2} for r > R. The inside the shell is constant and equal to the surface value, V(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Q}{R} for r \leq R, reflecting the absence of field and thus no change in potential with position. For a thick spherical shell with uniform \rho, inner a, and outer b, the fields follow from superposition of thin shells. The (or electric field analog for uniform volume charge) is zero for r < a (no enclosed ), varies between a < r < b according to the enclosed up to r, g(r) = -\frac{4\pi G \rho}{3} \frac{r^3 - a^3}{r^2} \hat{r}, and for r > b is that of the total at the center, g(r) = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \hat{r} where M = \frac{4\pi \rho}{3} (b^3 - a^3). This linear variation in the enclosed contribution within the shell material highlights the theorem's extension to finite thickness. In , the spherical shell potential models a particle confined within a spherical , such as between infinite walls at radii a and b > a, where V(r) = 0 for a < r < b and otherwise. The radial wavefunctions are linear combinations of spherical j_l(kr) and functions n_l(kr), satisfying boundary conditions \psi(a) = \psi(b) = 0, leading to discrete energy levels E_{nl} = \frac{\hbar^2 k_{nl}^2}{2m} determined by the roots of the transcendental equation involving these functions for each angular momentum quantum number l. This framework is seminal for understanding bound states in central potentials, with applications in and quantum dots. In , spherical shells model the Casimir effect between concentric spheres, where vacuum fluctuations induce attractive forces between the boundaries. The Casimir energy for ideal conductors is calculated using mode summation or zeta-function regularization, yielding a force scaling as F \propto -\frac{\hbar c \pi^3}{240 R^4} for small separations, with extensions to spherical geometries providing insights into nanoscale interactions. In , the spherical shell geometry simulates , modeling the between the core-mantle (inner radius ≈ 3480 km) and the surface (outer radius ≈ 6371 km). Numerical simulations solve the Navier-Stokes equations under Boussinesq approximation, revealing patterns of plumes and slabs that drive , with applications in predicting seismic activity and geomagnetic field generation.

In Engineering

Spherical shells are widely employed in engineering as pressure vessels for storing gases and liquids under , owing to their uniform distribution that minimizes requirements. The hoop in a thin-walled spherical shell is given by \sigma = \frac{P R}{2 t}, where P is the , R is the radius, and t is the wall thickness, which is half that of a cylindrical under the same conditions, allowing for thinner walls and reduced weight. This design efficiency makes spherical vessels preferable for applications requiring high-pressure containment, such as liquefied gas storage, compared to cylindrical alternatives that experience higher and uneven stresses. Under external pressure, spherical shells are susceptible to , a critical mode for thin-walled structures. The classical critical buckling pressure for elastic thin spherical shells is P_{cr} = \frac{2 [E](/page/E!) t^2}{R^2 \sqrt{3(1 - [\nu](/page/nu)^2)}}, where [E](/page/E!) is the modulus of elasticity and [\nu](/page/nu) is , originally derived by Zoelly in 1915 and refined by subsequent analyses. Design considerations often incorporate the to assess plastic buckling, ensuring the shell remains stable against collapse in applications like hulls. Manufacturing of spherical shells typically involves processes such as , where a rotating disk is progressively shaped against a , or , which uses controlled detonations to deform thin metal sheets into hemispherical components that are then welded. Common materials include high-strength steels for durability in pressure environments and composite materials, such as carbon fiber-reinforced polymers, for lightweight applications in aerospace, achieved through or layered layup techniques. Prominent examples include Moss-type spherical tanks on liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers, which provide efficient storage at cryogenic temperatures while minimizing sloshing; spherical pressure hulls in deep-sea submersibles like the , optimized for withstanding hydrostatic pressures; and spherical propellant tanks in rockets, such as those for in NASA's lander, which reduce surface area for better . Key failure modes in engineering spherical shells encompass yielding due to excessive tensile stress and instability from buckling under compressive loads, both addressed through rigorous analysis to prevent catastrophic collapse. Design adheres to standards like the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII, which specifies rules for stress limits, thickness calculations, and safety factors to mitigate these risks in pressure vessel construction.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] ELASTIC AND PLASTIC BUCKLING OF SPHERICAL SHELLS ...
    A spherical shell is therefore the region between two concentric spheres of differing radii. A shell is called “thin” if the ratio of its thickness to its ...
  2. [2]
    Gravitation Inside A Uniform Hollow Sphere
    The gravitational force inside a hollow sphere shell of uniform areal mass density is everywhere equal to zero, and may be proved by the following argument: ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Nonlinear buckling behaviour of spherical shells - Harvard University
    The nonlinear axisymmetric post-buckling behaviour of perfect, thin, elastic spherical shells subject to external pressure and their asymmetric bifurcations.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Weyl problem and Casimir effects in spherical shell geometry
    Apr 29, 2013 · However there is a class of geometries (spherical shells in even number of dimensions, separate contributions of interior and exterior modes) ...
  5. [5]
    Spherical Shell -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A spherical shell is a generalization of an annulus to three dimensions. A spherical shell is therefore the region between two concentric spheres of differing ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  6. [6]
    Sphere -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A sphere is defined as the set of all points in three-dimensional Euclidean space R^3 that are located at a distance r (the "radius") from a given point ...
  7. [7]
    Ball -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The n -ball, denoted B^n , is the interior of a sphere S^(n-1) , and sometimes also called the n -disk. (Although physicists often use the term "sphere" to ...
  8. [8]
    SphericalShell - Wolfram Language Documentation
    SphericalShell[c, {rinner, router}] represents a filled spherical shell centered at c with inner radius rinner and outer radius router.
  9. [9]
    Surface Area and Volume of a Hemisphere and Spherical Shell
    A sphere is the set of all points in three-dimensional space lying at the same distance (the radius) from a given point (the centre). Spherical shell: Outer ...
  10. [10]
    Calculus III - Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates
    Nov 16, 2022 · In this section we will look at converting integrals (including dV) in Cartesian coordinates into Spherical coordinates.
  11. [11]
    Volume -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    V=L×W×H. The volume can also be computed for irregularly-shaped and curved solids such as the cylinder and cone. The volume of a surface of revolution ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  12. [12]
    Spherical Shell - Geometry Calculator - Rechneronline
    Surface area refers to inner and outer boundary surfaces. The surface of a spherical shell refers to the outer and inner surfaces. ... average about 20 ...
  13. [13]
    Spherical shell - Wikipedia
    In geometry, a spherical shell (a ball shell) is a generalization of an annulus to three dimensions. It is the region of a ball between two concentric spheres ...Missing: parameters | Show results with:parameters
  14. [14]
    Moment of Inertia, Sphere - HyperPhysics
    The process involves integrating the moments of inertia of infinitesmally thin disks from the top to the bottom of the sphere. This involves polynomial form ...
  15. [15]
    Moments of inertia - Dynamics
    The total mass of the spherical shell is m=ρ(43πr23−43πr13) m = ρ ( 4 3 π r 2 3 − 4 3 π r 1 3 ) , so we can write the moment of inertia as IC,z=815m341r23−r13(r ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] a review of analytical methods used to determine the modal ...
    The differential equations used in the present analysis are based on the usual assumptions of linear thin shell theory, i.e., that the shell is thin (usually.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Hybrid Shell Model for Aeroelastic Modeling
    Jan 23, 2019 · In the thin-shell approximation the shell thickness h is assumed to be much smaller than a typical shell dimension L, as suggested by Figure 3.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Integral Calculus: Mathematics 103 - UC Davis Math
    Jan 2, 2010 · The volume of a spherical shell (hollow sphere with a shell of some small thickness, τ) is approximately. V ≈ τ · (surface area of sphere)=4πτr2 ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS
    Jan 7, 2018 · SOLUTION. • The volume of such a spherical shell is approximately the surface area at the inner radius times the thickness, 4πr2∆r.
  20. [20]
    (PDF) Analysis of thick-walled spherical shells subjected to external ...
    In this study, elastoplastic and residual stresses in a thick-walled spherical vessel under external hydrostatic pressure has been investigated.
  21. [21]
    CRITICAL PRESSURES FOR THE BUCKLING OF THICK-WALLED ...
    These solutions are used to derive the buckling criterion, and numerical values are obtained for the resulting critical pressures. For thin shells these values ...
  22. [22]
    Thick Pressure Vessels | Engineering Library
    If the ratio of the minimum radius of curvature of a wall to its thickness is less than ten, stresses may no longer be considered constant throughout the wall ...
  23. [23]
    General non-linear finite element analysis of thick plates and shells
    A non-linear finite element analysis is presented, for the elasto-plastic behavior of thick shells and plates including the effect of large rotations.
  24. [24]
    Thick shell tectonics on one‐plate planets: Applications to Mars
    A theory for stress distributions in thick lithospheric shells on one-plate planets is developed based on the zero frequency equations of a self-gravitating ...
  25. [25]
    Principia mathematica (Latin ed.) - Online Library of Liberty
    Newton's most famous work Principia (1687) explains the laws governing the motion of physical objects. Principia rests on the new branch of mathematics that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Gravity Force Inside a Spherical Shell - HyperPhysics
    The net gravitational force on a point mass inside a spherical shell of mass is identically zero! Physically, this is a very important result.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Newton's Shell Theorem - KSU Math
    the spherical shell is the integral of the contributions of all of the rings: E = Z s=r+R.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  28. [28]
    On Newton's shell theorem - NASA ADS
    In the present letter, Newton's theorem for the gravitational field outside a uniform spherical shell is considered. In particular, a purely geometric proof ...
  29. [29]
    Electric Field, Spherical Geometry - HyperPhysics
    It follows that inside a spherical shell of charge, you would have zero electric field. Field outside charged sphere. Index · Electric field concepts ...
  30. [30]
    Electric Field of a Spherical Conducting Shell
    The electric field outside a charged, spherical, conducting shell is the same as that generated when all the charge is concentrated at the centre of the shell.
  31. [31]
    Electric potential of a charged sphere - HyperPhysics
    Outside a charged sphere, the potential is like a point charge. Inside, the potential is constant at the surface value, as the field is zero.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Chapter 13 Gravitation 1 Newton's Law of Gravitation
    Shell Theorem #2 A uniformly dense spherical shell exerts no gravitational force ... Outside the spherical shell, the limits of s are from r − R to r + R ...Missing: field | Show results with:field
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Gravitation (Symon Chapter Six)
    Let S be a spherical shell of constant density and total mass M with inner radius a and outer radius b, centered on the origin. Find the gravitational field g(r) ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Classical Mechanics Lecture Notes
    Furthermore, we can then see that the sphere does not need to be of a uniform density, only the each sphere has to have a uniform density. This is why the ...
  36. [36]
    Infinite Spherical Potential Well - Richard Fitzpatrick
    Infinite Spherical Potential Well. Consider a particle of mass $m$ and energy $E>0$ moving in the following simple central potential: ...Missing: shell | Show results with:shell
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Free particle in spherical coordinates - bingweb
    Sep 3, 2017 · The particle is free inside the spherical shell. Outside the shell, the potential energy is infinite. We consider either proton or neutron ...
  38. [38]
    D.77 Impenetrable spherical shell
    is the constant potential inside the shell, which can be taken to be zero without fundamentally changing the solution. Because the wave function must be zero at ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] PRESSURE VESSELS - MIT
    different stresses in differ- ent directions — occurs more often than not in ...
  40. [40]
    Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels - eFunda
    The hoop stress is twice as much as the longitudinal stress for the cylindrical pressure vessel. This is why an overcooked hotdog usually cracks along the ...
  41. [41]
    Pressure Vessels – Strength of Materials Supplement for Power ...
    thick wall pressure vessels is determined by the ratio between the mean radius of the vessel and the thickness of the wall. If this ratio is greater than 10 ...
  42. [42]
    Design buckling pressure for thin spherical shells - ScienceDirect.com
    The classical buckling pressure of elastic thin spherical shell was obtained by Zoelly (1915) and Van der Neut (1932)(1.1) q c = 2 E [ 3 ( 1 − ν 2 ) ] 1 / 2 ( h ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Pressure Vessels Stresses Under Combined Loads Yield Criteria for ...
    The hoop stress σh and the longitudinal stress σl are the principal stresses. To determine the longitudinal stress σl, we make a cut across the cylinder similar ...
  44. [44]
    Explosive forming of thin-wall semi-spherical parts - ScienceDirect
    This paper discusses the special forming method of thin-wall semi-spherical parts, introducing the basic fundamentals of explosive forming, ...
  45. [45]
    STEELHEAD COMPOSITES INCREASES METAL SPIN-FORMING ...
    May 30, 2018 · Steelhead Composites announces ability to spin- form liners, bottles and vessels in titanium, stainless steel and carbon steel.Missing: spherical explosion
  46. [46]
    Composite Shell - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Spherical shells are integral parts of modern engineering design since they are cost-efficient, strong and rigid to satisfy application requirements. Utilizing ...Sustainable Fibre-Reinforced... · 4 Composite Shells · 1.1 Composites
  47. [47]
    Kawasaki Develops New Moss-type Tank for LNG Transport Vessels ...
    Jun 5, 2017 · The tank's aluminum-alloy panels form spherical walls, minimizing sloshing caused by ship movement and thus eliminating the need for loading ...Missing: examples shells engineering submarine rocket
  48. [48]
    Strength optimization design of spherical hulls for deep-sea ...
    Nov 1, 2023 · The spherical pressure hull is the most important structure to ensure the safety of people in a deep-sea submersible.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Slosh Baffle Design and Test for Spherical Liquid Oxygen and ...
    This lead the program to develop and integrate baffles into the full-scale Morpheus tanks, requiring additional design, modeling and testing, an ongoing effort ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  50. [50]
    Plastic Instabilities in Spherical Vessels for Static and Dynamic ...
    Then, a general plastic instability condition for spherical shells subjected to displacement-controlled and short-duration dynamic pressure loading is given.Missing: modes yielding
  51. [51]
    [PDF] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Evaluation and ...
    4.3 – Analysis of Spherical Shells. 4.4 – Design Criteria and Formulas for ... ASME BPVC are organized based on protection against the failure modes listed below.