Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Spinor bundle

A spinor bundle is a complex vector bundle associated to the of a smooth equipped with a , constructed via the of the double cover Spin(n) of the special orthogonal group SO(n). This structure lifts the oriented orthonormal frame bundle from SO(n) to Spin(n), enabling the definition of spinors as sections of the bundle, which transform under double-valued representations and are essential for describing fermionic fields in on curved spaces. The existence of a spin structure—and thus a spinor bundle—on an n-dimensional oriented manifold requires the vanishing of the second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2 in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z}_2), a topological obstruction that is satisfied, for example, by all parallelizable manifolds and n-spheres. For even dimensions, the spinor representation decomposes into chiral components S_n = S_n^+ \oplus S_n^-, leading to positive and negative spinor bundles whose sections correspond to left- and right-handed spinors in . In odd dimensions, the representation is irreducible, yielding a single spinor bundle. Spinor bundles underpin the Dirac operator, defined as \delta = C \circ \nabla, where C denotes Clifford multiplication by tangent vectors and \nabla is the lifted to the bundle; this governs the of fields and appears in the for manifolds, relating analytic and topological invariants. Extensions include Spin^c bundles, which incorporate a U(1) factor for charged s and exist on all oriented 4-manifolds via a determinant with first congruent to w_2 modulo 2. These structures are fundamental in and , modeling electrons and other half-integer spin particles on spacetimes like with signature (3,1).

Background Concepts

Spinors and Clifford Algebras

The \mathrm{Cl}(V, g) associated to a finite-dimensional real V equipped with a non-degenerate g: V \times V \to \mathbb{R} (or equivalently, the induced Q(v) = g(v,v)) is the associative unital generated by V subject to the relations v \cdot v = Q(v) \cdot 1 for all v \in V, where \cdot denotes the multiplication and $1 is the unit element. More precisely, it is constructed as the quotient of the T(V) by the two-sided ideal generated by elements of the form v \otimes v - Q(v) \cdot 1. This satisfies a : for any associative unital A and any linear map \iota: V \to A such that \iota(v)^2 = Q(v) \cdot 1_A for all v \in V, there exists a unique homomorphism \Phi: \mathrm{Cl}(V, g) \to A extending \iota. Clifford algebras were introduced by in his 1878 paper, where he generalized the algebras of complex numbers, quaternions, and Grassmann's to higher dimensions as "geometric algebras" for synthesizing vector operations. In the specific case of the \mathbb{R}^n with the standard positive definite inner product (denoted \mathrm{Cl}(n) = \mathrm{Cl}(\mathbb{R}^n, \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle)), the algebra \mathrm{Cl}(n) is a algebra over \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{C}, or the quaternions \mathbb{H}. Spinors arise as elements of the spinor space S, which provides the spinor representation of the spin group \mathrm{Spin}(n) \leq \mathrm{Cl}(n)^\times, the connected double cover of the \mathrm{SO}(n). For even dimensions n = 2m, S decomposes as S = S^+ \oplus S^-, where S^+ and S^- are the chiral (half-spinor) components, each of dimension $2^{m-1} over \mathbb{C}; the full space S has dimension $2^m = 2^{n/2}. For odd dimensions n = 2m + 1, there is a single irreducible spinor space S of dimension $2^m = 2^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}. This representation is realized over \mathrm{Cl}(n), where \mathrm{Spin}(n) acts by left multiplication on minimal left ideals of the algebra. The classification of these spin representations was established by in 1913, who identified them as the fundamental non-tensorial representations of the orthogonal Lie algebras \mathfrak{so}(n), with spinors transforming under projective representations of \mathrm{SO}(n). In low dimensions, real spinors admit explicit matrix realizations via the generators of \mathrm{Cl}(n). For n=2, \mathrm{Cl}(2) \cong M_2(\mathbb{R}) and the spinor space S is \mathbb{R}^2, with generators represented as \gamma_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}, satisfying \gamma_i^2 = I and \{ \gamma_i, \gamma_j \} = 0 for i \neq j. The group \mathrm{Spin}(2) \cong \mathrm{SO}(2) acts via rotations on this 2-dimensional real space. For n=3, \mathrm{Cl}(3) \cong M_2(\mathbb{C}) and the spinor space S is \mathbb{C}^2 \cong \mathbb{R}^4, with generators \gamma_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}, where \gamma_i^2 = I and anticommutation holds off-diagonal; \mathrm{Spin}(3) \cong \mathrm{SU}(2) acts faithfully on this space, corresponding to the structure underlying 3D rotations.

Riemannian Manifolds and Spin Structures

A Riemannian manifold is a pair (M, g), where M is a smooth n-dimensional manifold and g is a Riemannian metric on M, providing a smoothly varying positive definite inner product on each tangent space T_p M. For the manifold to be oriented, the tangent bundle TM is equipped with a consistent choice of orientation on each fiber, making TM an oriented vector bundle. The associated frame bundle P_{\mathrm{SO}(n)}(M) is the principal \mathrm{SO}(n)-bundle over M whose fibers consist of all ordered oriented orthonormal bases (frames) of the tangent spaces T_p M with respect to g. A spin structure on the oriented (M, g) is a principal \mathrm{Spin}(n)-bundle P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) over M together with a bundle \Phi: P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) \to P_{\mathrm{SO}(n)}(M) covering the identity map on M, such that \Phi is a fiber-preserving with each fiber map being the canonical double covering \mathrm{Spin}(n) \to \mathrm{Spin}(n)/\{\pm 1\} \cong \mathrm{SO}(n). This lift exists if and only if the second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2(TM) \in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}) vanishes. When w_2(TM) = 0, the set of isomorphism classes of s forms a torsor over H^1(M; \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}), meaning spin structures differ by elements of this cohomology group, which classifies their equivalence. For example, the S^3 admits a unique , as its groups H^1(S^3; \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}) = 0 and H^2(S^3; \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}) = 0 imply w_2(TS^3) = 0 with no nontrivial choices. In contrast, the complex projective plane \mathbb{CP}^2 does not admit a because w_2(T\mathbb{CP}^2) \neq 0 in H^2(\mathbb{CP}^2; \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}), specifically the nonzero class corresponding to the generator.

Construction of Spinor Bundles

Definition via Spin Structures

Let (M, g) be an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold equipped with a spin structure, which provides a principal \mathrm{Spin}(n)-bundle P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) that double covers the orthonormal frame bundle P_{\mathrm{SO}(n)}(M). The spinor bundle S(M) is defined as the associated complex vector bundle S(M) = P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) \times_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)} S, where S denotes the complex spinor representation space of \mathrm{Spin}(n), a faithful representation on a complex vector space of dimension $2^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}. This construction yields a complex vector bundle over M of rank $2^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}, with fibers isomorphic to S. For even dimension n = 2k, the spinor representation space S decomposes into chiral components S = S^+ \oplus S^-, where S^+ and S^- are the eigenspaces of the operator \omega = i^k e_1 \cdots e_n in the (acting via left multiplication) with eigenvalues +1 and -1, respectively; each has complex dimension $2^{k-1}. The corresponding decomposition of the spinor bundle is S(M) = S^+(M) \oplus S^-(M), where S^\pm(M) = P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) \times_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)} S^\pm, and the transition functions between local trivializations are induced by the canonical projection \mathrm{Spin}(n) \to \mathrm{SO}(n), reflecting the double cover structure. In local coordinates, over an U \subset M where the is trivialized by a frame \{e_i\}, the spinor bundle restricts to a trivial bundle U \times S, and sections (spinor fields) transform under changes of frame via the matrices \rho(g) \in \mathrm{GL}(S, \mathbb{C}) for g \in \mathrm{Spin}(n). For a fixed , the spinor bundle is unique up to as a associated to that structure; however, distinct spin structures on M (classified by H^1(M; \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z})) generally yield non-isomorphic spinor bundles.

Associated Bundle Approach

The associated bundle construction offers a general method to form vector bundles from principal bundles equipped with group representations. For a principal G-bundle P \to M over a smooth manifold M and a representation \rho: G \to \mathrm{GL}(V) on a finite-dimensional vector space V, the associated vector bundle E = P \times_G V is the quotient space (P \times V)/G under the right action (p, v) \cdot g = (p g, \rho(g^{-1}) v) for g \in G. Fibers of E over points in M are isomorphic to V, and a connection on P induces a compatible connection on E. Applying this to spinor bundles, the group G = \mathrm{Spin}(n) acts via the principal \mathrm{Spin}(n)-bundle P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) arising from a on the (M, g) of dimension n, with the representation \rho being the spinor representation of \mathrm{Spin}(n) on the complex spinor space \Delta_n \cong \mathbb{C}^{2^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}}. The spinor bundle S(M) is then the P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) \times_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)} \Delta_n, whose fibers consist of transforming under the double cover of rotations. In even dimensions n=2m, the spinor representation decomposes into chiral half-spinor representations \Delta_n = \Delta_n^+ \oplus \Delta_n^- on spaces of $2^{m-1} each, yielding half-spinor bundles S^+(M) = P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) \times_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)} \Delta_n^+ and S^-(M) = P_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)}(M) \times_{\mathrm{Spin}(n)} \Delta_n^- as associated bundles. Tensor powers of these, such as S(M) \otimes S(M) or S^+(M) \otimes S^-(M), serve as associated bundles for higher-spin fields via the corresponding symmetric or exterior representations of \mathrm{Spin}(n). The spinor bundle S(M) inherits a Clifford module structure over the tangent bundle TM, where sections of TM act on sections of S(M) via fiberwise Clifford multiplication X \cdot \psi = \rho(\gamma(X)) \psi for X \in TM_x and \psi \in S_x(M), with \gamma the Clifford map from the to the \mathrm{Cl}(n). This action is skew-Hermitian with respect to the Hermitian metric on S(M) induced from \Delta_n and compatible with the on TM.

Properties and Operations

Sections as Spinor Fields

A section of the spinor bundle S(M) over a Riemannian spin manifold M is referred to as a spinor field, denoted \psi: M \to S(M), which assigns to each point x \in M a spinor in the fiber S_x(M). For smoothness, such sections are required to be smooth maps that transform under local frames according to the spinor representation of the Spin group, ensuring compatibility with the bundle's structure group. Locally, spinor fields can be expressed in trivializations of the bundle using the spinor representation \Delta_n: \mathrm{Spin}(n) \to \mathrm{GL}(2^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}, \mathbb{C}). The space of all smooth global sections, denoted \Gamma(S(M)), forms a complex vector space under addition and , providing the arena for defining spinor fields across the entire manifold. To endow this space with a structure, one considers the L^2 of \Gamma(S(M)) with respect to the inner product induced by the Riemannian g on M, given by \langle \psi, \phi \rangle_{L^2} = \int_M \langle \psi(x), \phi(x) \rangle_{S_x} \, d\mathrm{vol}_g(x), where \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_{S_x} is the Hermitian inner product on the . This L^2(S(M)) is essential for functional analytic studies on spin manifolds. On \mathbb{R}^n equipped with the flat metric, the spinor bundle is trivial, allowing constant spinor fields that are invariant under and serve as basic examples of global sections. More generally, on manifolds with reduced , such as Calabi-Yau manifolds with in \mathrm{SU}(n), there exist covariantly constant spinor fields, which are parallel sections preserved by the due to the special representation. These spinors play a key role in understanding the geometry of such spaces. (Joyce, Riemannian Holonomy Groups and Calabi-Yau Manifolds) In analytic contexts, the sections \Gamma(S(M)) are dense in the Sobolev spaces H^k(S(M)) for any k \geq 0, a that facilitates techniques and regularity results in the study of bundles over compact manifolds. This density ensures that fields can approximate more general L^2 or Sobolev spinors, supporting applications in partial differential equations on spin manifolds.

Clifford Multiplication and Dirac Operators

Clifford multiplication provides an algebraic action of the on the spinor bundle, realized through the associated Clifford bundle. Specifically, it defines a bundle map \mathrm{Cl}(TM) \otimes S(M) \to S(M), where \mathrm{Cl}(TM) is the complexified Clifford bundle of the TM equipped with the metric g, and S(M) is the spinor bundle. Locally, with respect to an orthonormal frame \{e_i\} on TM, Clifford multiplication by a v = \sum v^i e_i acts on a spinor section \psi \in \Gamma(S(M)) as v \cdot \psi = \sum v^i (e_i \cdot \psi), satisfying the defining anticommutation relations \{e_i \cdot, e_j \cdot\} \psi = 2 g_{ij} \psi for all \psi. The Dirac operator D is the primary on sections of the spinor bundle, acting as a elliptic D: \Gamma(S(M)) \to \Gamma(S(M)). It is defined using the \nabla, the lifted to S(M), via the local expression D\psi = \sum_i e_i \cdot \nabla_{e_i} \psi, where the sum is over an orthonormal frame \{e_i\} and employs the Einstein summation convention. This construction ensures D is formally with respect to the L^2 inner product on \Gamma(S(M)) induced by the Riemannian , making D a on the L^2(M, S(M)) when M is compact. The principal of the \sigma_D(x, \xi): S_x(M) \to S_x(M) is given by Clifford multiplication by the cotangent \xi, specifically \sigma_D(x, \xi) = \xi^\sharp \cdot, where \xi^\sharp is the dual in T_x M. This renders D a Dirac-type , with ellipticity arising from the non-degeneracy of the Clifford action. In even dimensions, the index of the chiral D^+: \Gamma(S^+(M)) \to \Gamma(S^-(M)) on a compact spin manifold M is computed by the Atiyah-Singer index theorem as \mathrm{index}(D^+) = \int_M \hat{A}(M), connecting the analytical index to the topological invariants of M.

Applications

In Mathematical Physics

In theoretical physics, spinor bundles provide the geometric framework for describing fermionic fields on curved spacetimes, enabling the formulation of and in the presence of . A key application is the for particles on a M, where the wave function \psi is a section of the spinor bundle S(M). The equation takes the form i \hbar \gamma^\mu \left( \partial_\mu + \frac{1}{4} \omega_{\mu ab} \gamma^{ab} \right) \psi = m \psi, with \gamma^\mu obtained via Clifford multiplication by the vielbein fields, incorporating the \omega_{\mu ab} to ensure under local Lorentz transformations. This formulation captures the coupling of spinors to , essential for understanding particle dynamics in strong gravitational fields. In , spinor bundles facilitate the local approximation of curved spacetimes as flat via Fermi coordinates, where the metric reduces to the Minkowski form along a , allowing s to behave as in within small neighborhoods. This is crucial for analyzing quantum effects near black holes, such as for Dirac fields, computed using Bogoliubov transformations that mix positive- and negative-frequency modes of spinor solutions across the event horizon, leading to thermal particle emission observed by distant observers. In , fermionic fields are realized as sections of bundles over Minkowski or curved backgrounds, enabling the quantization of Dirac fields while respecting the spin-statistics . Anomalies in these theories, arising from the non-invariance of the measure under chiral transformations, are quantified and canceled using the Atiyah-Singer index applied to the on the bundle, ensuring consistency in gauge theories like the . During the 1980s, spinor bundles gained prominence in supersymmetry and supergravity, where the gravitino—a spin-3/2 field—is a section of the tensor product of the spinor bundle with the cotangent bundle, requiring the manifold to admit a spin structure for supersymmetric vacua. This framework linked spinor geometry to higher-dimensional supergravity theories, such as 11-dimensional supergravity, facilitating the unification of bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom on spin manifolds.

In Differential Geometry

In differential geometry, spinor bundles play a crucial role in studying the geometric properties of Riemannian manifolds, particularly through the analysis of special types of spinor sections and associated operators. Killing spinors are sections \psi of the spinor bundle satisfying the equation \nabla_X \psi = \lambda X \cdot \psi for all vector fields X, where \nabla denotes the Levi-Civita connection lifted to the spinor bundle, \cdot is Clifford multiplication, and \lambda is a real constant. The existence of such non-trivial Killing spinors imposes strong restrictions on the manifold's geometry, implying reduced holonomy groups. For \lambda = 0, the equation reduces to parallel spinors, which characterize manifolds with special holonomy, such as G_2 in dimension 7, where the holonomy representation preserves a parallel spinor. In general, the integrability conditions derived from the Killing equation lead to constraints on the curvature tensor, linking the spinor bundle's structure to the manifold's holonomy. The presence of a non-zero parallel spinor \psi (i.e., \nabla \psi = 0) further implies that the manifold is Ricci-flat. This follows from the Weitzenböck formula applied to s, which relates the Laplacian to the : |\nabla \psi|^2 = \frac{1}{4} \mathrm{Scal} \, |\psi|^2. For a parallel , the left side vanishes, forcing \mathrm{Scal} = 0. Combined with the action of the endomorphism on the —via the integrability condition \nabla_X \nabla_Y \psi - \nabla_Y \nabla_X \psi = R(X,Y) \psi = 0—this yields vanishing , as the generates an under which the Ricci tensor must act trivially. Such manifolds admit structures with reduced in the Ricci-flat groups like \mathrm{SU}(n), \mathrm{Sp}(n), G_2, or \mathrm{Spin}(7). A fundamental relation in this context is the Lichnerowicz formula for the Dirac operator D acting on sections of the spinor bundle: D^2 = \nabla^* \nabla + \frac{\mathrm{Scal}}{4}, where \nabla^* \nabla is the rough Laplacian on spinors. This formula connects the spectrum of D to the scalar curvature \mathrm{Scal}, showing that positive scalar curvature implies no zero eigenvalues for D on compact manifolds, with the lowest eigenvalue bounded below by \inf \mathrm{Scal}/4. It provides a bridge between spinorial analysis and curvature obstructions, enabling vanishing theorems for harmonic spinors (kernels of D) under curvature assumptions. Spinor bundles also feature prominently in the for asymptotically flat Riemannian manifolds, which asserts that the mass is non-negative and zero only for flat metrics. Witten's proof constructs harmonic spinors \psi (satisfying D\psi = 0) on the manifold, extending from asymptotic behavior at , and integrates a positive expression involving the spinor to bound the mass. Specifically, the dominant energy condition ensures the integral of |\nabla \psi|^2 plus terms involving the and the square of the is non-negative, yielding the mass via boundary terms. An alternative geometric proof by Schoen and Yau uses minimal techniques but aligns with spinorial methods in restricting configurations. These results highlight spinor bundles' role in rigidity theorems for asymptotically flat spaces with non-negative .

References

  1. [1]
    Spinor bundles - Mathematics for Physics | An Illustrated Handbook
    Any manifold that can be defined with no more than two coordinate charts is then spin, and therefore any parallelizable manifold and any n n -sphere is spin. As ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] A cursory introduction to spin structure - Berkeley Math
    Let Fr(P) denote the bundle of oriented frames over X. We define a spin structure on a bundle P→X to be an element of H1(Fr(P); Z2) which restricts to the ...
  3. [3]
    Clifford Algebras - SageMath Documentation
    Sep 6, 2013 · The Clifford algebra C l ( V , Q ) is defined as T ( V ) / I Q where T ( V ) is the tensor algebra of V and I Q is the two-sided ideal generated ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Lecture 1: Clifford algebras: basic notions - Spin Geometry
    By definition, the Clifford algebra C (V,Q) is universal for Clifford maps to associative algebras.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Applications of Grassmann's Extensive Algebra
    BY PROFESSOR CLIFFORD, University College, London. I PROPOSE to communicate in a brief form some applications of Grass- mann's theory which it seems unlikely ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Spin and Clifford algebras, an introduction - arXiv
    Jul 15, 2010 · A matrix representation of a Clifford algebra is an isomorphic algebra of matrices, which thus obeys the same multiplication table. (Such matrix ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Matrix Representations of Clifford Algebras - Clear Physics
    This article shows how to construct matrix representations for Clifford algebras of any signature in any number of dimensions. Contents. 1 Clifford algebra: ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Chapter 11 Riemannian Metrics, Riemannian Manifolds - UPenn CIS
    Definition 11.1. Let M be an n-dimensional smooth manifold. For any open subset, U ✓ M, an n-tuple of vector fields, (X1,...,Xn), over U is called a frame ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The first and second Stiefel-Whitney classes; orientation and spin ...
    Dec 6, 2017 · Spin structures and w2. Let M be an orientable connected Riemannian n-manifold, and let ξ : E → M be its oriented orthonormal frame bundle ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES
    The text which follows is based mostly on lectures at Princeton. University in 1957. The senior author wishes to apologize for the delay in publication.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Spin structures on manifolds
    The class in H2(M,Z2) defined by the fαβγ is essentially the second Stiefel–Whitney class of M, and the pinor bundle can be defined if and only if this class ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Meet spin geometry Spin structures and spin manifolds
    Note that as the Stiefel-Whitney classes are homotopy invariants by Wu's formula, being spinnable. 3. Page 4. is also a homotopy invariant. Assuming that our ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Spin structures
    with a spin structure ζ : PSpin(E) → PSO(E). A real spinor bundle of E is a ... Let S(E) be a real spinor bundle of E. Then. S(E) is a bundle of ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Lectures on Dirac Operators and Index Theory - UCSB Math
    Jan 7, 2015 · A connection on the principal bundle naturally induces connections on its associated vector bundles. Thus if E = P ×ρ W where ρ : G → GL(W) is ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Lecture Notes on Spin Geometry - arXiv
    Nov 21, 2019 · The spinor bundle Sn associated to P is the vector associated to the. 11In this particular case, the spin structure is itself a 1-cocycle ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Spin Geometry
    Mar 1, 2021 · spinor bundle of M for the spin structure PSpin(M) is the associated vector bundle ... Let M be a Riemannian spin manifold with spinor bundle ΣM, ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] THE DIRAC OPERATOR 1. First properties 1.1. Definition. Let X be a ...
    Mar 30, 2012 · Definition. Let X be a Riemannian manifold. Then the tangent bundle TX is a bundle of real inner product spaces, and we can form the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Index of Elliptic Operators: I - MF Atiyah, IM Singer
    Feb 25, 2002 · This is the first of a series of papers which will be devoted to a study of the index of elliptic operators on compact manifolds. The main ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] An absolute quantum energy inequality for the Dirac field in curved ...
    May 15, 2007 · 2.1 Spin structures and spinors on curved spacetimes. We begin by reviewing the geometry necessary to discuss the Dirac field in a curved.<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Basic quantum mechanics for three Dirac equations in a curved ...
    Mar 19, 2010 · Abstract. We study the basic quantum mechanics for a fully general set of. Dirac matrices in a curved spacetime by extending Pauli's method.
  22. [22]
    Geometric post-Newtonian description of massive spin-half particles ...
    Nov 7, 2023 · We use generalised Fermi normal coordinates in a tubular neighbourhood of γ and expand the Dirac equation up to, and includ- ing, the second ...
  23. [23]
    How the Hawking effect affects multipartite entanglement of Dirac ...
    Mar 18, 2014 · In this paper, the effect of Hawking radiation on the multipartite entanglement of Dirac particles in the background of a Schwarzschild ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] 3. Anomalies
    In this section we will primarily be interested in anomalies associated to fermions.
  25. [25]
    Physics - Project Euclid
    In this paper we present a formulation of super-gravity in terms of fibre bundles [4] which we claim overcomes the objections to the concept of super- space ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  26. [26]
    Mathematical Physics Real Killing Spinors and Holonomy
    The study of the exceptional dimension 6 pro- vides us with a construction method of Riemannian manifolds with exceptional holonomy group G2. The recipe is as ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Geometry of Killing spinors in neutral signature - arXiv
    Sep 9, 2015 · Supersymmetric solu- tions are characterized by the existence of at least one Killing spinor obeying a certain kind of first order differential ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] arXiv:2003.11255v2 [math.DG] 21 May 2021
    May 21, 2021 · If M has nontrivial parallel spinors, M must be Ricci flat. In this case, either dim ker(∇) ≤ J (n) which yields the claim or else dimker ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Lecture 8: Parallel and Killing spinor fields - Spin Geometry
    We will first revisit parallel (or covariantly constant) spinor fields, which were already discussed in §6.3, from the point of view of the holonomy ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] On Witten's Proof of the Positive Mass Theorem
    This paper gives a mathematically rigorous proof of the positive energy theorem using spinors. This completes and simplifies the original argument presented ...
  31. [31]
    Proof of the positive mass theorem. II
    The positive mass theorem states that for a nontrivial isolated physical system, the total energy, which includes contributions from both matter and gravit.