Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Strategic and Policy Forum

The President's Strategic and Policy Forum was a voluntary advisory established by U.S. President-elect Donald J. Trump on December 2, 2016, consisting of prominent chief executives from major corporations to provide recommendations on economic policies aimed at enhancing productivity, job creation, and overall growth. Chaired by , chief executive of The Blackstone Group, the forum drew members including of and Robert Iger of , selected for their expertise in business operations and market dynamics. The group convened several sessions in early 2017 at the , focusing on priority areas such as regulatory reform, trade agreements, infrastructure investment, , and workforce training to address perceived barriers to American competitiveness. These discussions informed executive actions on and , though the forum lacked formal policymaking authority and operated as a for private-sector perspectives. The forum's tenure ended abruptly on August 16, 2017, after a majority of members voted to disband in response to President Trump's public statements attributing responsibility for violence at the Charlottesville rally to participants on , leading to high-profile resignations and Trump's subsequent dissolution of the group. This episode highlighted tensions between corporate leadership and the administration's approach to domestic political divisions, marking the forum as a short-lived experiment in blending input with governmental strategy.

Formation and Purpose

Announcement and Establishment

On December 2, 2016, President-elect Donald J. Trump announced the establishment of the President's Strategic and Policy Forum during a press release in New York, New York. The forum was designed to convene prominent business leaders to offer direct input to the incoming administration on national challenges, with an emphasis on leveraging their expertise in driving economic expansion. Trump stated that the group would "bring together some of America's most highly respected and successful business leaders to meet frequently with the President on a range of issues facing our country," highlighting their role in advising on job creation and productivity enhancement. Stephen A. Schwarzman, chairman, CEO, and co-founder of The Blackstone Group, was appointed as the forum's chairman. The initial roster comprised 16 members, selected for their leadership in finance, manufacturing, technology, and energy sectors: The first meeting was scheduled for the during the initial week of February 2017, marking the forum's operational commencement following Trump's on January 20, 2017. Subsequent announcements expanded membership, including additions like of and and of on December 14, 2016, reflecting ongoing recruitment to broaden industry representation.

Stated Objectives and Mandate

The Strategic and Policy Forum was announced on December 2, 2016, by then-President-elect Donald J. Trump, with the stated purpose of assembling leading business executives to furnish the with candid advice on the effects of policies on economic conditions. The forum's core mandate centered on harnessing private-sector perspectives to advance national economic priorities, including job creation for American workers and enhancement of productivity through and reduced bureaucratic obstacles. Objectives explicitly highlighted in the establishment announcement included fostering business expansion, , and hiring by minimizing government-imposed , thereby aligning policy recommendations with practical experiences from industry leaders rather than theoretical or frameworks. Members were tasked with providing individualized, non-consensus views to inform executive decisions under the "" framework, emphasizing measurable outcomes like high-wage employment opportunities over abstract ideological goals. Operational guidelines stipulated frequent meetings—beginning with an initial session at the in early February 2017—to ensure ongoing, direct counsel to the , distinct from formal bureaucratic channels. This structure aimed to prioritize empirical insights from CEOs on policy impacts, such as regulatory reforms promoting competitiveness, without binding the administration to collective endorsements.

Leadership and Composition

Chairmanship

The President's Strategic and Policy Forum was chaired by , Chairman, CEO, and co-founder of The Blackstone Group, a major . Schwarzman was selected for the role by President-elect upon the forum's announcement on December 2, 2016, with the chairmanship commencing alongside the forum's formal operations in early 2017. As chairman, Schwarzman was responsible for leading the forum's 27 members—primarily CEOs of leading U.S. corporations—in providing direct, non-bureaucratic advice to the on key issues including , , job creation, and regulatory reform. This structure emphasized rapid, expert input from leaders to inform executive policy, bypassing traditional advisory channels. Schwarzman facilitated the forum's initial meeting on February 3, 2017, at the , where Trump outlined priorities such as and energy deregulation, underscoring the chairman's role in aligning corporate perspectives with administration goals. The chairmanship ended with the forum's disbandment on August 16, 2017, following resignations tied to public backlash over the 's Charlottesville remarks, though Schwarzman had privately expressed strong disapproval of those statements prior to the .

Membership Selection and Composition

The President's Strategic and Policy Forum was initially composed of 16 members, selected by President-elect Donald J. Trump and announced on December 2, 2016, to leverage their private-sector expertise in advising on economic policy. The selection criteria emphasized business leaders with demonstrated success in areas such as job creation, productivity, and innovation, drawn from Fortune 500 companies and equivalent institutions across multiple industries; no public application or competitive process was outlined, with invitations extended directly based on their executive roles and strategic insights. Stephen A. Schwarzman, Chairman, CEO, and Co-Founder of The Blackstone Group, served as the forum's chairman, a role designated by Trump to coordinate discussions. The initial membership included executives such as (Chairman and CEO, ), (Chairman and CEO, & Co.), (Chairman and CEO, ), (Chairman and CEO, ), (President and CEO, ), and (Chairman, President, and CEO, ), representing sectors including automotive, finance, asset management, entertainment, retail, and technology. Additional inaugural members encompassed (CEO, ) for healthcare, (President and CEO, ) for management consulting, and (Vice Chairman, ) for energy analysis, ensuring a broad cross-section of economic influencers. In December 2016, the forum expanded with the addition of (CEO, and ) and (CEO, ), bringing the total to 18 members to incorporate perspectives from emerging technology and transportation sectors. The composition remained predominantly male and oriented toward large-scale corporate leadership, with members collectively overseeing trillions in assets and millions of employees, though it faced attrition through resignations in 2017 prior to the forum's dissolution.

Operations and Activities

Key Meetings and Discussions

The President's Strategic and Policy Forum held its inaugural meeting on February 3, 2017, at the , where President outlined a comprehensive agenda focused on economic priorities including immigration policy, regulatory reform, and issues, opportunities for , and infrastructure development. emphasized the forum's role in delivering actionable advice from business leaders to drive job creation and growth, contrasting it with less substantive prior advisory groups. A second key meeting occurred on April 11, 2017, prioritizing high-paying job creation for American workers as the top agenda item, with progress highlighted on regulatory reductions and economic initiatives. Discussions involved open exchanges between forum members and secretaries, covering implementation of goals in areas such as and revival. No additional formal meetings are documented after April , as the forum's activities ceased amid internal resignations and its subsequent disbandment in August . These sessions represented the primary venues for strategic input from CEOs on matters, though outcomes were advisory rather than binding.

Policy Recommendations and Influence

The Strategic and Policy Forum focused its discussions on economic policies aimed at fostering job creation and growth, including reduction, regulatory streamlining, development, , , and workforce participation for women. In its first meeting on February 3, 2017, President Trump solicited member input on these areas, announcing intentions to develop a bill to lower corporate and individual rates while targeting regulations like the Dodd-Frank Act for reform to ease lending and business operations. CEO , a forum member, was specifically tasked with advising on banking industry deregulation. Forum chair Stephen Schwarzman emphasized leveraging private sector resources for policy execution and pursuing bipartisan approaches to national challenges. Subsequent sessions addressed similar pro-growth themes, with members like CEO Jeffrey Immelt contributing perspectives on competitiveness. The forum produced no formal reports or public policy recommendations during its operation from February to August 2017. Its influence on administration actions, such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 or executive orders on deregulation, remained informal and unquantified, constrained by early member resignations—including those of Uber CEO Travis Kalanick in February 2017 over immigration policy and Tesla CEO Elon Musk in June 2017 following the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement—and the group's full disbandment in August 2017 amid backlash to the president's Charlottesville remarks. Schwarzman later attributed post-2017 market gains partly to deregulation and tax policies aligned with forum discussions, though without attributing direct causation to the group.

Dissolution

Precipitating Events

The occurred in , on August 12, 2017, organized by white nationalist and alt-right groups to protest the removal of a Confederate statue, drawing counter-protesters and resulting in violent clashes that culminated in the death of one counter-protester, Heather Heyer, when a car drove into a crowd. President Trump issued an initial statement that day condemning "hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides," which drew criticism for not explicitly naming white supremacists or neo-Nazis as responsible. On August 14, 2017, during a press event at , he remarked that there were "very fine people on both sides" among the protesters, while also stating that neo-Nazis, white nationalists, and the should be condemned "totally," attributing the equivalence to the presence of non-violent statue defenders on one side versus antifa-linked violence on the other. These statements prompted a wave of resignations from Trump's business advisory groups, including the Strategic and Policy Forum (). On August 14, Merck CEO resigned from the related Manufacturing Council, citing the need to stand against hate and explaining his departure as a response to the Charlottesville events. This was followed by resignations from CEO and CEO from the Manufacturing Council on August 16, with Krzanich stating that the events undermined the council's unity. For the SPF specifically, members faced internal pressure; by August 16, the group—chaired by CEO Stephen Schwarzman—held a vote and agreed to disband itself, with a member statement indicating the decision was to condemn Trump's Charlottesville remarks and preserve the forum's prior policy contributions without further division. The 's self-dissolution on August 16, , amid these resignations and broader corporate backlash, directly precipitated the end of the forum, as ongoing departures eroded its viability; subsequently tweeted that he was disbanding both the SPF and Manufacturing Council to avoid pressuring remaining members, framing it as his proactive choice rather than a reaction to the SPF's independent disbandment vote. This sequence reflected heightened scrutiny of corporate ties to the administration following the violence and 's equivocal language, which critics attributed to insufficient condemnation of far-right , though maintained his remarks distinguished between lawful protesters and violent actors on multiple sides.

Process of Disbandment

The members of the Strategic and Policy Forum convened on August 16, 2017, and collectively decided to disband the group amid escalating resignations from corporate executives following President Trump's public remarks on the Charlottesville violence. The forum issued a joint statement at approximately 1:42 p.m. that day, condemning the violence in Charlottesville and announcing the decision to dissolve as a unified action by its participants, citing the ongoing national debate over those events as rendering continued operations untenable. This member-driven disbandment occurred independently but overlapped with parallel developments in 's other business advisory bodies, such as the Manufacturing Council, where individual CEO exits had already prompted similar pressures. In response, President announced via later that afternoon that he was terminating both the Strategic and Policy Forum and the Manufacturing Council "rather than putting pressure on members," framing the move as a proactive to preempt further attrition. No formal procedures or transitional mechanisms were publicly detailed in the announcements, marking the end of the forum's activities effective immediately, with its final meeting having occurred in July 2017. The rapid sequence—member consensus followed by presidential endorsement—effectively concluded the forum's existence without replacement or archival continuity, as confirmed by subsequent reporting on the absence of successor entities.

Controversies and Reception

Criticisms of Corporate Involvement

Critics argued that the heavy involvement of corporate executives in the Strategic and Policy Forum created inherent conflicts of interest, as members advised on policies directly impacting their industries and firms. For instance, Stephen Schwarzman, CEO of Group and the forum's chair, participated in discussions on and infrastructure spending that aligned with interests, including potential preservation of favorable tax treatment, raising questions about self-serving influence rather than impartial advice. Similar concerns extended to other members, such as CEO and CEO , whose companies stood to benefit from and incentives promoted by the administration. Watchdog groups highlighted the forum's composition as enabling undue corporate sway over executive branch priorities, with members leveraging proximity to the president for advantages. A analysis found that forum participants, including executives from firms like Dow Chemical and , engaged in extensive federal —totaling over $100 million in expenditures from to mid-2017—on issues like trade, energy, and that overlapped with forum discussions. criticized the setup as prioritizing corporate profits, noting that of the 19 CEO members, most remained silent or supportive on early policies like the January 2017 travel ban, which minimally disrupted business operations despite broader economic implications. These critiques, often from progressive-leaning organizations, portrayed the forum as a conduit for , though empirical evidence of arrangements remained limited to disclosures rather than proven improprieties. The dominance of large multinational corporations in the forum—representing sectors like , , and —drew accusations of skewed representation, sidelining input from small businesses, labor unions, or non-corporate economists. Detractors contended this corporate-centric approach fostered policies favoring over worker wages or antitrust enforcement, as evidenced by the forum's early recommendations for tax cuts and reduced regulations that disproportionately aided high-capital industries. ethics filings further underscored potential overlaps, revealing that some advisers retained substantial investments in companies affected by forum-influenced policies, prompting calls for stricter recusal rules. Despite these concerns, proponents viewed the involvement as harnessing private-sector expertise for efficient governance, countering claims of bias with the forum's short lifespan and lack of formalized outputs.

Responses to Charlottesville and Moral Posturing

Following the in , on August 12, 2017, where white nationalists clashed with counter-protesters and a car ramming killed one woman while injuring dozens, President issued statements attributing responsibility to "many sides," noting that violence occurred from extremists on both sides of the confrontation. This drew widespread condemnation from media and political figures for perceived equivocation in denouncing neo-Nazis and white supremacists explicitly, though later clarified that he condemned those groups by name. Members of the Strategic and Policy Forum, focused on economic and , responded by convening emergency calls; on August 16, , they voted unanimously to disband the group, issuing a statement that "the debate over [their] participation has become a distraction from the important mission of the Forum" and expressing intent to condemn the president's remarks on the violence. Key participants included executives like PepsiCo's , GM's , and IBM's , who cited moral outrage over Trump's Tuesday equating the rally's instigators with counter-protesters as a breaking point, despite prior tolerance of the administration's disagreements. The move followed a wave of individual resignations from the parallel Manufacturing Council, with SPF leaders framing disbandment as a unified stand against perceived failure to unify or lead decisively. Trump responded by announcing the dissolution of both the Forum and Manufacturing Council via Twitter, stating he felt "no pressure from the business world" and praising remaining supporters, while deriding departing executives as "grandstanders." Critics of the CEOs' actions, including administration allies, argued the resignations constituted posturing, as the councils addressed and rather than issues, and the executives had overlooked earlier controversies like the administration's immigration policies or tape. Empirical evidence of selective outrage emerged in subsequent years, with several resigning CEOs—such as those from Dow Chemical and —attending Trump-hosted dinners and engaging on business matters by 2018, suggesting the episode served more as damage control amid employee and consumer feedback than irreconcilable principle. Mainstream coverage often amplified the resignations as a corporate awakening against , yet this narrative overlooks causal drivers like threats and media amplification, which pressured firms despite no evident policy linkage to the Forum's economic mandate.

Broader Political and Economic Evaluations

The Strategic and Policy Forum's structure aimed to inject practical expertise into economic , reflecting a that prioritized operational efficiency over ideological conformity in policymaking. Formed on December 2, 2016, and convening its first meeting on February 3, 2017, the group focused discussions on regulatory reform, , , , and workforce development, with the explicit goal of advising on measures to enhance and job creation. Politically, this approach contrasted with prior administrations' reliance on academic economists or representatives, seeking instead to counter perceived bureaucratic inertia through corporate leaders' firsthand knowledge of dynamics. However, the Forum's disbandment on August 16, 2017—precipitated by members' withdrawal following President Trump's remarks on the Charlottesville events—illustrated how non-economic controversies could undermine advisory mechanisms, revealing a causal disconnect between substance and reputational risks for participants. Conservative analysts critiqued the CEOs' exit as signaling elite discomfort with populist disruption rather than substantive disagreement, while left-leaning outlets portrayed it as ethical repudiation, though the latter often downplayed the Forum's apolitical economic mandate amid broader institutional biases against Trump's agenda. Economically, the Forum's truncated six-month lifespan constrained its tangible outputs, with no formal recommendations leading to enacted legislation directly attributable to the group, though its deliberations paralleled early executive orders on regulatory streamlining that eliminated 22 rules for every new one added by mid-2017. This brevity highlighted limitations in leveraging transient advisory bodies for sustained influence, as Trump's subsequent policies—such as the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reducing the corporate rate from 35% to 21%—drew more from campaign pledges and congressional dynamics than Forum input. Broader evaluations suggest the initiative underscored tensions between globalist corporate priorities and domestic manufacturing revival, with members like Blackstone's Stephen Schwarzman advocating productivity enhancements that aligned with deregulation but clashed with protectionist tariffs later imposed. Empirical outcomes under Trump included GDP growth averaging 2.5% in 2017-2019 and unemployment falling to 3.5% by late 2019, but disentangling Forum contributions from wider factors like fiscal stimulus remains challenging, pointing to the realism that advisory forums serve more as signaling devices than causal drivers in polarized governance. The episode reinforced that economic policymaking requires insulation from extraneous pressures to realize first-order gains in efficiency and growth, a lesson evident in the administration's pivot to unilateral executive actions post-dissolution.

Legacy

Short-Term Impacts on Policy

The Strategic and Policy Forum, active from February to August 2017, provided business leaders' input on immediate economic priorities during its limited meetings, aligning with the administration's early executive actions on deregulation. In the inaugural session on February 3, 2017, CEO participants emphasized reducing regulatory barriers, including CEO Jamie Dimon's recommendation to reform aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act to ease lending constraints for businesses. This perspective reinforced the administration's pre-existing deregulatory momentum, as evidenced by , signed on January 30, 2017, which required federal agencies to identify two regulations for repeal for every new one issued, aiming to achieve net reductions in regulatory costs. By mid-2017, the administration had initiated over 800 deregulatory actions across agencies, targeting environmental, financial, and labor rules, though direct causation from forum advice remains unquantified in official records. Forum discussions also addressed tax policy simplification and rate reductions to boost competitiveness, with members like General Motors CEO Mary Barra noting repatriation of manufacturing jobs amid anticipated reforms. These inputs paralleled the administration's April 2017 tax reform blueprint, which proposed lowering the corporate rate to 15% and broadening the base, setting the stage for congressional negotiations. However, the , enacted on December 22, 2017, post-dissolution, drew from wider stakeholder consultations, limiting the forum's attributable short-term legislative impact. On , the group advocated public-private partnerships to accelerate projects, influencing the administration's June 2017 "Rebuilding Infrastructure in America" principles, which prioritized $1 in investments via tools like user fees rather than . Yet, no major infrastructure bill passed in 2017, with short-term effects confined to executive directives easing permitting processes under the . Overall, the forum's short-term policy influence manifested primarily through validation of executive-level deregulatory and preparatory steps rather than enacted legislation, as its dissolution curtailed sustained advisory roles. Business confidence metrics rose in early 2017, with the National Association of Manufacturers' optimism index climbing amid perceptions of pro-growth shifts, though economists attribute this more broadly to campaign signals than forum-specific outputs. Critics, including some academic analyses, argue the group's corporate composition biased recommendations toward profitability over broader economic equity, potentially overlooking labor market disruptions from rapid deregulation. Primary White House transcripts indicate no formal implementation reports from the forum, underscoring its role as an informal sounding board amid the administration's unilateral early actions.

Long-Term Perspectives and Critiques

The Strategic and Policy Forum's abbreviated existence—from its establishment on December 2, 2016, to disbandment on August 16, 2017—limited its capacity for enduring policy influence, with the group convening only sporadically and not meeting after April 2017. Analyses of its outputs reveal no formal reports or legislative blueprints directly attributable to the forum, underscoring its operational inefficacy amid internal hesitations and external pressures. While chair Stephen Schwarzman maintained informal channels to the administration, contributing to discussions on tax policy that culminated in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—which Schwarzman later described as a "whopper" for economic stimulus—the forum itself produced negligible structured recommendations. This paucity of tangible results has prompted evaluations framing it as a symptomatic failure of ad hoc advisory bodies reliant on transient elite consensus rather than institutionalized mechanisms. Critiques from economic observers highlight the forum's dissolution as emblematic of corporate leaders' prioritization of reputational risk over sustained policy engagement, particularly as member firms like and benefited from subsequent deregulatory measures despite resignations. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, while condemning initial participation as tacit endorsement of Trump's agenda, acknowledged the resignations as a principled stand, yet broader assessments question whether such moral departures forfeited opportunities for pragmatic input on and , areas where the forum's emphasized long-term competitiveness. Empirical reviews of Trump's economic tenure note that key achievements, including a 2.5% average GDP growth rate from 2017 to 2019 and reductions from 35% to 21%, advanced independently of the forum, suggesting its absence imposed no material hindrance and exposing potential overreliance on celebrity CEOs whose commitments proved conditional. Longer-term perspectives underscore causal disconnects between the 's intent and outcomes, with some analysts attributing its collapse to misaligned incentives: executives, facing backlash post-Charlottesville, opted for symbolic disavowal amid minimal substantive friction, as evidenced by continued private equity gains under the administration. This dynamic has informed skepticism toward similar public-private forums, revealing vulnerabilities to politicized optics over evidence-based advising; for instance, Schwarzman's post-forum advocacy aligned with pro-growth policies that boosted Blackstone's by over 50% from 2017 to 2020, without forum mediation. Conservative commentators critique the episode as illustrative of hypocrisy, where CEOs invoked ethical imperatives selectively, ignoring prior alignment on , while progressive sources decry it as unchecked plutocratic access, though without quantifying beyond advisory norms. Overall, the forum's legacy cautions against unstructured conclaves, favoring direct action that empirically correlated with pre-pandemic peaks of 7.8 million added by February 2020.

References

  1. [1]
    President-elect Trump Establishes the President's Strategic and ...
    Dec 2, 2016 · President-elect Donald J. Trump today announced that he is establishing the President's Strategic and Policy Forum.
  2. [2]
    Trump Strategic and Policy Forum Includes Dimon, Iger, Schwarzman
    Dec 2, 2016 · "President-elect Donald J. Trump today announced that he is establishing the President's Strategic and Policy Forum," said the press release ...<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Trump's Strategy and Policy Forum chaired by Schwarzman ...
    Aug 15, 2017 · President Donald Trump has closed both the Strategy and Policy Forum and the Manufacturing Council, the president confirmed via Twitter on Wednesday.Missing: administration | Show results with:administration
  4. [4]
    Remarks by President Trump in Strategy and Policy Forum
    Feb 3, 2017 · We're going to cover some of the immigration things. We're going to cover regulatory, I believe. We're going to cover tax and trade, women in ...
  5. [5]
    Remarks at a Meeting of the President's Strategic and Policy Forum
    Apr 11, 2017 · Chao. Donald J. Trump (1st Term), Remarks at a Meeting of the President's Strategic and Policy Forum Online by Gerhard Peters and John T.
  6. [6]
    Trump announces President's Strategic and Policy Forum
    President-elect Donald Trump announced on December 2, 2016, the formation of the President's Strategic and Policy Forum, composed of business leaders who ...
  7. [7]
    Trump's Strategic and Policy Forum to disband: source - Reuters
    Aug 16, 2017 · Members of US President Donald Trump's Strategic and Policy Forum have decided to disband the group, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters on ...
  8. [8]
    Trump abruptly ends manufacturing council after CEOs disband ...
    Aug 16, 2017 · Members of the Strategic and Policy Forum agreed to end the group Wednesday in order to "condemn" Trump's defiant remarks about violence at a ...
  9. [9]
    Trump Announces End To Manufacturing Council After Multiple ...
    Aug 16, 2017 · President Trump has ended both his manufacturing council and Strategic and Policy Forum, following the resignations of many CEOs who had served
  10. [10]
    Inside the C.E.O. Rebellion Against Trump's Advisory Councils
    Aug 16, 2017 · All of them wondered whether it was time to step down from the Strategic and Policy Forum, an elite group formed late last year to advise the ...
  11. [11]
    President-Elect Donald J. Trump Announces Travis Kalanick of Uber ...
    Dec 14, 2016 · Earlier this month, President-elect Trump established the President's Strategic and Policy Forum and announced an initial round of 16 members.
  12. [12]
    These are the 16 CEOs who've agreed to serve on Trump's ... - Quartz
    Here's the Strategic and Policy Forum member list in full: Stephen A. Schwarzman (Forum Chairman), Chairman, CEO, and Co-Founder of Blackstone;; Paul Atkins, ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  13. [13]
    Elon Musk and Travis Kalanick are joining Donald Trump's strategic ...
    Dec 14, 2016 · Uber CEO Travis Kalanick and SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk will be joining what's known as Trump's Strategic and Policy forum.Missing: objectives mandate
  14. [14]
    Who Is on Trump's Business Advisory Council?
    Feb 3, 2017 · The Strategic and Policy Forum is chaired by Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman, who recruited the advisory committee's members.Missing: composition | Show results with:composition<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2017 Remarks at a Meeting of ...
    Remarks at a Meeting of the President's Strategic and Policy Forum. February 3, 2017 ... We have a full agenda, unlike a lot of other meetings that happen of this ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2017 Remarks at a Meeting of ...
    Apr 11, 2017 · Trump, 2017. Remarks at a Meeting of the President's Strategic and Policy Forum. April 11, 2017. The President. Thank you all for being here ...
  17. [17]
    Trump's CEO Brain Trust Hasn't Done Much - Bloomberg.com
    Aug 2, 2017 · Donald Trump, center, speaks during a Strategic and Policy Forum meeting at the White House, Feb. ... deregulation and tax reform. We will ...
  18. [18]
    Blackstone's Schwarzman says markets at record levels because ...
    Jun 22, 2017 · Schwarzman, who chairs President Donald Trump's Strategic and Policy Forum, pointed to growth-friendly aspects of deregulation and ...
  19. [19]
    A Trump strategic council featuring business giants is disbanding
    Aug 16, 2017 · Correction: The headline of this story has been updated to reflect that the Strategic and Policy Forum is separate from the manufacturing ...
  20. [20]
    Trump Disbands 2 Business Advisory Councils After String Of ... - NPR
    Aug 16, 2017 · Trump said in a tweet that he is ending the Manufacturing Jobs Initiative and the Strategic and Policy Forum "rather than putting pressure on ...Missing: meetings | Show results with:meetings
  21. [21]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/ceo-timeline-who-quit-white-house-councils-when-and-how-trump-reacted-1502916614
  22. [22]
    Business councils disband over Trump remarks - BBC
    Aug 16, 2017 · Before Mr Trump's announcement, the Strategy and Policy Forum announced it was a joint decision to disband the council. Businesses have been ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Impact of Corporate Response To Controversial Presidential ...
    Oct 19, 2021 · Trump's advisory councils. Two councils served at the pleasure of the President: the Strategic &. Policy Forum and the Manufacturing Jobs ...
  24. [24]
    Trump says that he's disbanding manufacturing council - CBS News
    Aug 16, 2017 · Mr. Trump made the announcement on Twitter and said that he was also disbanding the Strategy and Policy Forum, another business advisory group.<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Trump Dissolves Business Advisory Councils as CEOs Quit
    Aug 17, 2017 · Leaders of another council, called the Strategic and Policy Forum, said they were disbanding the body because the Charlottesville debate had ...
  26. [26]
    Trump's billionaire adviser stands to gain from policies he helped ...
    Apr 18, 2017 · Billionaire investor Steve Schwarzman's newfound status as a trusted outside adviser for President Donald Trump has created blurred lines.
  27. [27]
    President Trump's advisory council members gave more than their ...
    Oct 25, 2017 · Muilenburg was a member of the president's American Manufacturing Council, while McNerney sat on the president's Strategic and Policy Forum.<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Month One of Trump's Presidency: Enriching His Private Business ...
    Feb 20, 2017 · Trump holds the first meeting of his Strategic and Policy Forum, a team of 18 corporate CEOs chaired by Stephen Schwarzman, CEO and co ...
  29. [29]
    Ethics Documents Suggest Conflict Of Interest By Trump Adviser - NPR
    Mar 14, 2017 · Federal records indicate that a key adviser to President Trump held substantial investments in 18 companies when he joined Trump in meetings ...Missing: Forum | Show results with:Forum
  30. [30]
    Trump's Virginia comments last straw for disenchanted CEOs - Reuters
    Aug 16, 2017 · President Trump answers questions about the violence, injuries and deaths in Charlottesville in New York ... Strategic and Policy Forum. "I think ...
  31. [31]
    Trump disbands manufacturing council amid fallout over ... - PBS
    Aug 16, 2017 · President Donald Trump says he's ending a pair of White House advisory councils that were staffed by corporate chief executives.
  32. [32]
    New Outcry as Trump Rebukes Charlottesville Racists 2 Days Later
    Aug 14, 2017 · Mr. Trump, after two days of issuing equivocal statements, bowed to overwhelming pressure that he personally condemn white supremacists.
  33. [33]
    A Year After Charlottesville, Not Much Has Changed For Trump - NPR
    Aug 11, 2018 · President Trump's response to the Charlottesville rally drew sharp criticism from his own party, but the backlash from Republican leaders ...
  34. [34]
    Business leaders continue to resign from manufacturing council ...
    Business leaders continue to resign from manufacturing council amid Trump criticism. The president referred to the departing CEOs as "grandstanders" on Twitter.Missing: moral posturing
  35. [35]
    CEOs who quit Trump panels after Charlottesville now his dinner ...
    Aug 7, 2018 · Several of the CEOs attending the dinner resigned from Trump advisory boards in August of 2017, after Trump said protesters were partly to blame ...
  36. [36]
    Former Trump advising CEO: We got "pressure" after Charlottesville
    Dec 15, 2017 · The backdrop: CEOs started quitting Trump's councils one after another in the days after Charlottesville. The Strategic and Policy Forum ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Are corporations becoming the new arbiters of public morality? - Vox
    Aug 17, 2017 · They resigned from the advisory positions, prompting the president to eventually just shut the councils down completely. The CEOs' resignations ...
  38. [38]
    Trump Business Council, Strategic and Policy Forum, Why CEOs Left
    Aug 17, 2017 · President Donald Trump's biggest gatherings of business leaders fell apart, and according to reports Trump's own comments are to blame.
  39. [39]
    An Evenhanded Analysis of Trump's Economic Policies
    Dec 19, 2024 · Trump's detractors provide deeply negative economic estimates of his policy statements on tariffs and immigration.
  40. [40]
    Blackstone's Schwarzman on tax reform: 'This is a whopper' - CNBC
    Dec 5, 2017 · Steve Schwarzman, chairman and CEO of Blackstone, calls the tax reform working its way through Congress a game changer.
  41. [41]
    Larry Summers rails against CEOs on Trump's business councils
    Aug 15, 2017 · Summers, a longtime critic of Trump, wrote that Trump's initial failure to denounce white nationalists after the weekend's violence in ...