Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Elite

In political and sociological theory, the elite refers to a small minority group within society that possesses and exercises disproportionate control over political, economic, and cultural resources, inevitably dominating the majority through superior organization, expertise, or force, irrespective of the nominal form of government.^[1] This framework, known as elite theory, was pioneered by Italian thinkers Gaetano Mosca and Vilfredo Pareto in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, who argued that all societies feature a ruling class distinguished by its governing capacity and that democratic ideals mask this underlying oligarchic reality.^[2]^[3] Mosca's doctrine of the "ruling class" emphasized that minorities rule majorities via a "political formula"—an ideological justification for their dominance—while Pareto described elite circulation, wherein vigorous new elites supplant decadent ones through traits like cunning ("foxes") or strength ("lions"), preventing stagnation but ensuring persistent inequality.^[4]^[5] Complementing this, Robert Michels formulated the "iron law of oligarchy" in 1911, observing that even ostensibly egalitarian organizations, such as socialist parties, devolve into elite control due to the technical necessities of leadership and the inertia of bureaucracy.^[6] These theories highlight defining characteristics of elites, including their reliance on non-democratic mechanisms for stability and their vulnerability to internal decay, which empirical studies of power distribution—from corporate boards to political bureaucracies—have substantiated as recurrent patterns across history.^[7] Controversies arise from elite theory's challenge to egalitarian narratives, as it implies that mass participation yields superficial reforms at best, often co-opted by entrenched minorities, a view corroborated by analyses of modern institutions where decision-making concentrates among interconnected financial, military, and administrative leaders despite widespread suffrage.^[8]

Definition and Core Concepts

Etymology and Semantic Evolution

The term "elite" originates from the Latin verb eligere, meaning "to choose out" or "to select," formed from the prefix e- ("out") and legere ("to pick" or "to gather").^[9] This root emphasized selection based on quality or suitability, as seen in the past participle electus ("chosen").^[10] In Old French, it evolved into eslite or élite, the feminine form of the past participle of eslire ("to elect" or "to choose"), initially denoting chosen elements or superior selections, often in contexts of extraction or refinement.^[10] The word entered English in the mid-18th century as an adjective describing the superior or picked portion of a group, with the earliest recorded use in 1738 referring to a select body.^[11] By the early 19th century, "elite" had solidified as a noun in English, signifying "a choice or select body, the best part," borrowed directly from French élite ("selection" or "choice").^[9] ^[12] Early usages retained a neutral connotation of excellence or qualitative superiority, applied to military units as "elite troops"—chosen for prowess—or to analogous selective processes in nature and society, without implying inherent privilege or disdain.^[9] This semantic field highlighted merit-based distinction, as in 18th-century references to refined or superior strata in qualitative hierarchies.^[11] In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, thinkers like Vilfredo Pareto adopted "elite" to describe individuals or classes exhibiting the highest indices of ability, intelligence, or capacity in their domains, framing it as a descriptive category devoid of moral or honorific valuation.^[13] ^[14] Pareto's usage, for instance, positioned elites as those graded highest in traits enabling dominance, emphasizing empirical qualities over normative judgment.^[14] This maintained the term's original focus on selection and competence. From the 1960s onward, particularly amid countercultural movements and rising populist rhetoric, "elite" increasingly acquired pejorative overlays in discourse, portraying such groups as detached, self-serving, or corrupt in opposition to "the people."^[15] This shift contrasted with its prior neutral excellence, often weaponizing the term in critiques of institutional power without addressing underlying selection mechanisms.^[12]

Sociological and Theoretical Definition

In sociological and theoretical terms, elites constitute a minority segment of society that exercises disproportionate control over political, economic, and cultural institutions through superior organizational capacities, resource accumulation, or psychological attributes enabling effective governance. This formulation aligns with Gaetano Mosca's ruling class postulate, which asserts that in every organized society, a numerically restricted ruling class—differentiated by its aptitude for coordination and leadership—inevitably dominates the majority, as the complexity of social coordination precludes universal participation in decision-making.^[16] The scarcity of elite positions arises from inherent limitations in human cognitive and motivational traits, concentrating authority among those best equipped to wield it, a dynamic observable across diverse regimes from monarchies to democracies.^[17] Vilfredo Pareto extended this framework by classifying elites according to residui—persistent psychological dispositions—with "lions" embodying traits of force, conviction, and risk tolerance suited to conquest and stability, contrasted against "foxes" relying on intellect, adaptability, and persuasion for maintenance amid opposition. These attributes underscore elites' functional necessity: lions secure dominance through audacious action, while foxes navigate entropy via innovation, ensuring elite renewal or circulation rather than egalitarian diffusion. Empirical validation emerges from network analyses revealing elite cohesion via interlocking directorates in corporations and policy bodies, where a small cadre—often under 1% of the population—orchestrates systemic outcomes.^[18]^[19] Quantifiable indicators further delineate elites, such as thresholds where the top 1% commands 20-40% of national income and assets, correlating with Gini coefficients exceeding 0.4 in advanced economies, signaling concentrated influence rather than broad distribution.^[20]^[21] Institutional control manifests in board memberships and lobbying efficacy, where elite networks amplify leverage disproportionate to population share. Historical records evince no sustained instances of mass rule devoid of elite intermediation, as purported egalitarian experiments devolve to oligarchic cores due to coordination imperatives, refuting notions of scalable direct democracy.^[22]^[17] This persistence challenges egalitarian presuppositions, grounded instead in causal mechanisms of talent asymmetry and incentive structures favoring hierarchy. The term elite denotes a minority group that effectively wields disproportionate power and influence over societal institutions, decisions, and resource allocation, whereas the upper class is characterized primarily by high levels of accumulated wealth, income, and social prestige without necessarily entailing active control or leadership roles.^[17] Elite status requires functional engagement in directing outcomes—such as through corporate governance, policy formulation, or cultural gatekeeping—distinguishing it from passive wealth holders, like those reliant on inherited assets who exert minimal causal impact on broader systems.^[23] Sociological analyses emphasize that power inequalities stem from disparities in force, wealth, and skills, but upper-class membership alone does not confer elite agency unless channeled into institutional dominance.^[17] This boundary clarifies why phenomena like the "idle rich"—individuals with substantial fortunes but detached from productive or directive activities—fall outside elite categorization, while entrepreneurial figures who leverage capital to restructure industries qualify as elites due to their demonstrable influence on economic trajectories.^[23] Empirical patterns in the U.S. reveal that only a fraction of extreme wealth translates to power elite positions; for example, top executives in profit-making firms constitute a small subset of the upper echelons, underscoring that mere affluence does not equate to elite functionality.^[24] Meritocracy, by contrast, describes an aspirational mechanism for elite selection based on demonstrated talent, effort, and performance metrics, but it is not synonymous with the elite concept itself, as elites can consolidate via non-meritocratic routes like hereditary transmission or patronage networks.^[25] While meritocratic processes correlate with outcomes—evidenced by data showing 69% of Forbes 400 list members as self-made through business creation rather than inheritance—elite formation exhibits variance, with sectors like politics displaying higher rates of ascriptive entry (e.g., familial dynasties holding 10-15% of congressional seats in recent cycles).^[26]^[27] Critiques dismissing merit as illusory often overlook causal links between measurable traits like cognitive ability and sustained achievement, as longitudinal studies confirm higher IQ and conscientiousness predict leadership ascent independent of origin.^[28] Thus, elites may operate within meritocratic frameworks but persist even where such ideals falter, highlighting selection as a contingent rather than definitional feature.

Historical Foundations

Elites in Ancient Civilizations

In ancient civilizations, elites—typically consisting of rulers, priests, nobles, and warriors—emerged as hierarchical coordinators essential for managing resource-intensive activities like irrigation, defense, and surplus production, which underpinned societal stability and technological advancement in agrarian settings where egalitarian coordination proved insufficient for scale.^[29] Archaeological evidence from settlements such as those in Mesopotamia and the Nile Valley reveals elite-controlled storage facilities and monumental architecture, indicating their role in directing labor surpluses toward specialization in crafts, administration, and ritual, rather than subsistence farming alone.^[30] This structure arose from the causal demands of environmental constraints, such as seasonal flooding, necessitating centralized decision-making to avert famine and enable population growth beyond kin-based groups.^[31] In Egypt, pharaohs unified the Nile region around 3100 BCE, establishing a divine kingship that integrated political and religious authority to oversee basin irrigation systems, channeling floodwaters into canals and basins for predictable harvests that generated surpluses supporting a scribal bureaucracy and priestly class.^[29] High priests managed temple complexes, which by the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BCE) controlled vast landholdings and labor forces, preserving astronomical and administrative knowledge vital for agricultural timing.^[32] Elite tombs at sites like Saqqara, filled with imported goods and inscriptions detailing resource allocation, attest to how this hierarchy funneled agricultural yields into non-productive displays and infrastructure, fostering stability across 3,000 kilometers of riverine territory but also entrenching dependency on coerced labor.^[30] Greek elites in the 5th century BCE, exemplified by hoplite warriors from propertied hoplitai classes, provided the military backbone for city-state defense through phalanx formations requiring bronze armor and land ownership, which correlated with political influence in assemblies and cultural patronage.^[33] In Athens, aristocratic figures sponsored philosophical inquiry, with landholders like Anaxagoras and later Pericles-era patrons enabling intellectual output in ethics and governance that advanced civic institutions amid Persian threats.^[34] This elite-driven model sustained cultural efflorescence, as evidenced by temple inscriptions and vase paintings depicting hoplite valor, though it limited participation to approximately 10-20% of adult males capable of affording equipment.^[35] Roman patricians, the hereditary noble elite dominating the early Republic from 509 BCE, directed engineering innovations such as the Aqua Appia aqueduct completed in 312 BCE under censor Appius Claudius Caecus, delivering over 100,000 cubic meters of water daily to sustain urban populations exceeding 1 million by channeling springs via gravity-fed conduits spanning 16 kilometers.^[36] They also oversaw road networks like the Via Appia (312 BCE), totaling over 400 kilometers of paved arteries by 200 BCE, which facilitated legionary mobility and grain transport, empirically linking elite initiative to imperial consolidation across 5 million square kilometers.^[37] Inscriptions on milestones and aqueduct arches credit patrician oversight, underscoring how such hierarchies enabled hydraulic and infrastructural feats beyond plebeian capacities, though reliance on slave labor for maintenance foreshadowed vulnerabilities in innovation post-Republic.^[38]

Elites in Feudal and Early Modern Societies

In feudal Europe, from approximately the 9th to the 15th centuries, elites primarily comprised hereditary nobility who upheld social and political order through military service and land tenure under the manorial system. Lords received fiefs from overlords or monarchs in exchange for providing knights and maintaining local defense against external threats such as Viking raids (circa 793–1066) and Magyar incursions (9th–10th centuries), decentralizing authority to ensure stability in fragmented post-Carolingian realms.^[39] This structure relied on vassal loyalties, with elites extracting surplus from serf labor to equip armored cavalry, whose prowess deterred disorder and enabled conquests like the Norman invasion of England in 1066.^[40] Pre-Black Death (1347–1351), elite-controlled manors optimized agricultural output via the heavy plow and three-field rotation, yielding roughly 3–5 grains per seed sown in England and northern France, sufficient to sustain 10–20% of the population as non-agricultural elites despite low overall productivity of 4–7 bushels per acre.^[41] Intra-elite rivalries, however, often undermined this order, as competing noble factions vied for royal favor and land, exemplified by England's Wars of the Roses (1455–1487), where Lancastrian and Yorkist houses clashed over succession claims, resulting in an estimated 105,000 deaths and the decimation of over half the noble peerage through battle, execution, and attainder.^[42] Such conflicts arose from weak monarchs like Henry VI (r. 1422–1461, 1470–1471), whose incapacity exacerbated noble ambitions, leading to localized anarchy until the Tudor consolidation under Henry VII in 1485.^[43] The late medieval revival of long-distance trade, fueled by Crusades (1095–1291) and population growth to 70–80 million by 1300, prompted adaptation as merchant elites ascended in autonomous Italian city-states like Florence and Venice, where guilds and banking families supplanted feudal lords by the 13th century.^[44] These elites, amassing wealth from Mediterranean commerce in spices and textiles (e.g., Venice's annual trade volume exceeding 100,000 ducats by 1400), invested in republican governance and naval exploration, transitioning hierarchies from martial to commercial dominance.^[45] In 15th-century Florence, the Medici banking dynasty illustrated this shift, channeling profits from European loans—such as funding the English crown's 1470s debts—to patronize humanists like Marsilio Ficino and artists including Sandro Botticelli, commissioning works that revived classical antiquity and advanced anatomical studies in sculpture.^[46] This patronage, peaking under Cosimo (r. 1434–1464) and Lorenzo de' Medici (r. 1469–1492), not only elevated cultural output but integrated merchant capital into governance, as Medici influence secured de facto rule despite nominal republicanism, prefiguring early modern statecraft without reliance on mass institutions.^[47]

Emergence of Modern Elites Post-Industrial Revolution

The Industrial Revolution, beginning in Britain circa 1760, fundamentally altered elite structures by elevating control over mobile capital and industrial processes above static land ownership as the primary source of power and influence.^[48] This shift dismantled the preeminence of hereditary agrarian elites, as mechanized production and market expansion rewarded innovators capable of scaling operations through investment and organization, yielding verifiable productivity accelerations—such as Britain's industrial output rising at 3-4% annually from 1760 to 1800.^[49] In causal terms, the era's dynamics favored a minority skilled in coordinating labor, resources, and technology under comparative advantage principles, displacing broader societal reliance on traditional hierarchies with concentrated entrepreneurial authority.^[50] By the late 19th century, this evolution crystallized in the United States through figures like John D. Rockefeller, who established Standard Oil in 1870 and consolidated 90% of U.S. oil refining by 1880 via cost-cutting efficiencies and supply chain dominance, amassing a fortune equivalent to $400 billion in contemporary terms.^[51] Similarly, Andrew Carnegie built his steel empire starting in the 1870s, leveraging the Bessemer process to reduce production costs by over 80% and supplying infrastructure demands, culminating in the sale of Carnegie Steel to J.P. Morgan in 1901 for $480 million.^[52] These magnates represented a new bureaucratic-entrepreneurial elite, transitioning wealth creation from feudal rents to dynamic capital deployment in sectors like oil and steel, where fortunes were forged through innovation rather than primogeniture.^[53] Elite initiatives in infrastructure underscored these changes, with U.S. railroads expanding from 23 miles of track in 1830 to 193,346 miles by 1900, enabling resource reallocation that boosted manufacturing productivity by up to 43% in connected counties.^[54] This network integration drove aggregate economic expansion, as evidenced by analyses showing U.S. productivity would have lagged 25% behind 1890 levels without rail development, forestalling equivalent output losses of trillions in scaled modern dollars.^[55] Although concentrations of power prompted antitrust measures like the Sherman Act of 1890 targeting trusts, the era's real GDP growth—averaging 3.7% annually from 1870 to 1900—affirmed net gains from elite-orchestrated industrialization, outpacing regulatory constraints and validating the productivity primacy of skilled directional minorities.^[56]^[57]

Theoretical Frameworks

Classical Elite Theory (Mosca, Pareto, Michels)

Gaetano Mosca introduced the foundational concept of the ruling class in his 1896 treatise Elementi di Scienza Politica, arguing that all societies, irrespective of their formal structure, are governed by a minority elite possessing superior organizational skills, political acumen, and often coercive power, while the majority remains inert and subordinate due to inherent disparities in capacity for collective action.^[58] Mosca substantiated this through comparative historical analysis, noting that even in ostensibly democratic or revolutionary systems—such as ancient republics or feudal monarchies—the effective rulers constitute a cohesive minority that monopolizes decision-making, as the masses lack the coordination and expertise required for self-rule.^[59] This organizing minority perpetuates itself via juridical defenses, myths of legitimacy, and selective recruitment, rendering universal suffrage illusory rather than substantive.^[60] Vilfredo Pareto, developing ideas from his economic writings around 1901 onward and culminating in Trattato di Sociologia Generale (1916, translated as The Mind and Society), conceptualized elites as the uppermost stratum of society—roughly the top 20% in abilities like innovation and force—and emphasized their dynamic "circulation" through cycles of ascent and decline.^[61]^[62] He classified elite types by psychological "residues": "lions" (Class I, favoring direct force and conservatism) dominate in stable phases, while "foxes" (Class II, relying on cunning and adaptation) prevail in fluid ones; stagnation occurs when elites close ranks, excluding vigorous newcomers, prompting violent overthrow by rising non-elites with lion-like traits, as evidenced in Pareto's examinations of historical upheavals like the fall of Roman aristocracy or French revolutionary shifts.^[13]^[63] This mechanism underscores elite inevitability, as non-elites cannot sustain governance without transforming into a new elite, countering democratic optimism with patterns of recurrent minority dominance.^[64] Robert Michels complemented these views in Political Parties (1911), positing the "iron law of oligarchy" based on his sociological study of European labor movements, particularly the German Social Democratic Party, where egalitarian ideals yielded bureaucratic hierarchies.^[65]^[66] He observed that organizational imperatives—such as delegation, expertise needs, and mass inertia—empower a professional cadre of leaders who, insulated by information asymmetries and self-perpetuating networks, diverge from rank-and-file interests, even in avowedly democratic socialist unions and parties that centralized authority despite anti-oligarchic rhetoric.^[67]^[68] Michels' empirical data from party congresses and union structures revealed how participatory mechanisms erode, as leaders exploit psychological conservatism among followers and the "tactical necessity" of expertise, ensuring oligarchic control in all complex associations.^[69] These theorists collectively challenged egalitarian democratic ideals by grounding their claims in historical empirics, such as the post-1917 Bolshevik consolidation where revolutionary masses ceded power to a Leninist vanguard elite, mirroring predicted patterns of minority rule amid ideological promises of equality.^[16]^[70]

Iron Law of Oligarchy and Circulation of Elites

The iron law of oligarchy posits that large-scale organizations, including democratic ones, inevitably develop bureaucratic structures that concentrate power in the hands of a few leaders due to the technical necessities of administration, specialization of tasks, and the psychological inertia of followers who defer to expertise.^[6] This mechanism manifests as leaders insulating themselves from base accountability through control of information flows, party apparatuses, and resources, leading to oligarchic persistence even in avowedly egalitarian groups. In the case of Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD) prior to World War I, the party's expansion into a mass organization by 1910 resulted in a professional bureaucracy that prioritized institutional survival over revolutionary goals, with executives dominating decision-making and marginalizing rank-and-file input.^[68] Complementing this persistence is the circulation of elites, where ruling groups are eventually supplanted not by mass democracy but by rival elites exploiting the incumbent's decadence or failure to adapt. Vilfredo Pareto described this as a cyclical process involving "lions" (elites relying on force, tradition, and direct rule) and "foxes" (elites using cunning, persuasion, and innovation), with circulation occurring when the dominant type's residues—psychological predispositions—decline, allowing the other to seize power amid societal disequilibrium.^[71] Stability favors oligarchic entrenchment, as evidenced by low turnover rates: in the U.S. House of Representatives, incumbent reelection has exceeded 90% in every election cycle since 1980, reflecting advantages in fundraising, name recognition, and gerrymandered districts that deter challenges.^[72] Circulation typically accelerates during crises, where failing elites yield to newcomers better suited to the exigencies. The French Revolution of 1789-1799 exemplifies this, as aristocratic elites, weakened by fiscal collapse and ideological ossification, were displaced by bourgeois revolutionaries and military figures; emigration of nobles (over 100,000 by 1792) altered local power structures, enabling a new elite stratum to consolidate via the National Assembly and later Napoleonic institutions, without dissolving hierarchical rule.^[73] Empirical patterns across stable democracies underscore an entropic drift toward oligarchy, where procedural reforms fail to generate sustained turnover, challenging assumptions of inherent self-renewal in mass systems.^[74]

Pluralist Counterarguments and Empirical Critiques

Pluralist theories, exemplified by Robert Dahl's concept of polyarchy introduced in works like Who Governs? (1961), posit that power in democracies disperses across multiple competing interest groups rather than concentrating in a unified elite, with outcomes reflecting bargaining among diverse actors in local and national arenas. Dahl's empirical analysis of New Haven, Connecticut, during the 1950s argued that no single ruling elite dominated, as mayoral elections and policy decisions involved shifting coalitions of ethnic, business, and labor groups, challenging classical elite theorists' claims of inevitable oligarchic control.^[75] Critiques of pluralism highlight how apparent group competition masks underlying elite cohesion, particularly through network analyses of interlocking corporate directorates. G. William Domhoff's research, building on C. Wright Mills' The Power Elite (1956), mapped U.S. corporate interlocks in the late 20th century, revealing dense connections among boards of major firms—such as over 2,500 corporations linked via shared directors in 2010s data—that facilitate unified policy agendas on issues like taxation and deregulation, contradicting pluralist assumptions of fragmented interests.^[76] These networks, often involving finance and manufacturing sectors, enable elite coordination without overt conspiracy, as directors from firms like JPMorgan Chase and ExxonMobil overlap with policy-planning groups, prioritizing class-wide goals over pluralist vetoes.^[77] Quantitative studies further undermine pluralist optimism by demonstrating policy bias toward elites. In a 2014 analysis of 1,779 U.S. policy issues from 1981 to 2002, Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page found that when economic elites (top 10% income) favored a proposal, it had a 45% success rate, compared to near-zero influence for average citizens' preferences when diverging from elite views, even controlling for interest group pressure; business groups amplified this skew, while mass organizations had negligible effects.^[78] This disparity persists despite polyarchic institutions like elections and lobbies, suggesting veto-player mechanisms—central to pluralism—create illusions of access while elites retain agenda-setting power through campaign finance and media influence.^[79] While pluralists acknowledge elite resources, they emphasize competitive pluralism's role in occasional concessions, as in civil rights advancements via coalition shifts. Empirical evidence, however, reveals such outcomes often align with elite interests or require minimal disruption, with unified elite preferences (e.g., on trade liberalization) prevailing over mass opposition in 70-80% of cases per regression models, indicating causal dominance by interconnected upper strata rather than balanced polyarchy.^[78]^[77]

Composition and Typology

Political and Bureaucratic Elites

Political and bureaucratic elites consist of elected officials, high-level appointed administrators, and senior civil servants who hold concentrated authority in formulating and executing state policies. These actors, often numbering in the low thousands within a nation of millions, enable efficient governance by leveraging specialized expertise and hierarchical decision-making structures, which are essential in large-scale polities where universal direct participation would lead to paralysis due to coordination costs and information asymmetries.^[80] In the United States, for instance, these elites exert disproportionate influence over policy outcomes, as evidenced by empirical analyses showing that preferences among affluent and organized interests—frequently channeled through political insiders—predict legislative adoption far better than mass public opinion.^[78] Prominent examples include national heads of state, cabinet secretaries, and directors of intelligence agencies such as the CIA, who manage executive functions and national security apparatuses. U.S. presidential cabinets illustrate elite entrenchment, with a majority of appointees in administrations over the past seven decades hailing from a narrow set of elite universities like Harvard and Yale, fostering interconnected networks that prioritize insider recruitment.^[81] The revolving door phenomenon further binds these elites to sustained influence, with over 388 former members of Congress tracked as active lobbyists, facilitating bidirectional flow between public office and private advocacy roles.^[82] While these elites have demonstrated efficacy in crises—such as the Allied "Big Three" leaders (Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin) whose strategic coordination mobilized resources for victory in World War II by 1945—their insulation raises risks of capture by narrow interests, potentially skewing policies toward elite priorities over broader societal needs.^[83] This dynamic underscores a tension: elite hierarchies accelerate decisive action but can entrench self-perpetuating power, as seen in policy responsiveness patterns favoring economic insiders.^[78]

Economic and Corporate Elites

Economic and corporate elites consist of high-level executives, such as chief executive officers (CEOs) of Fortune 500 companies, and major investors who wield significant control over private sector resources through ownership and decision-making authority.^[84] These entities collectively generate approximately two-thirds of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), underscoring their central role in national economic output.^[84] Ownership concentration amplifies this influence, with the top 10% of U.S. households holding 93% of all stocks as of 2023, enabling elites to direct capital allocation toward expansion and risk-taking.^[85]^[86] These elites have historically propelled wealth creation through innovation rather than mere extraction, as evidenced by 19th-century industrialists like Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller. Carnegie's vertical integration in steel production reduced costs and scaled output, with Carnegie Steel accounting for 25% of U.S. steel production by the 1890s, fostering infrastructure growth and lowering material prices for consumers.^[87] Similarly, Rockefeller's Standard Oil achieved efficiencies that dropped kerosene prices from 58 cents per gallon in 1865 to 8 cents by 1885, expanding access to lighting and fueling economic expansion without relying solely on monopolistic rents.^[88] Such advancements correlated with broader productivity gains, as patents and process innovations by these figures aligned with U.S. industrial GDP surges from $13 billion in 1870 to $97 billion by 1900 (in constant dollars). In the post-1970s era, corporate elites in regions like Silicon Valley exemplified this pattern by pioneering semiconductor and software breakthroughs, creating millions of jobs through scalable enterprises. The venture capital model, refined by firms like Kleiner Perkins in the 1970s, funded startups that evolved into giants such as Apple and Intel, contributing to over 3 million direct tech jobs by the 2020s and indirect employment multipliers exceeding 5:1.^[89] Innovation outputs, including patents, show strong empirical ties to growth: U.S. intellectual property-intensive industries, driven by elite-led firms, comprised 41% of economic output in 2019 and exhibited a 75.7% correlation with productivity increases across decades.^[90]^[91] Critiques portraying these elites as primarily rent-seeking—pursuing unearned gains via regulation or market distortions—find partial support in cases of lobbying for barriers, yet aggregate evidence favors net positive impacts. While rent-seeking can divert resources from productive uses, as models predict firms reallocating toward protection amid tech progress, historical and econometric data link elite-driven patenting to sustained GDP per capita rises, countering stagnation narratives.^[92]^[93] For instance, IP-intensive sectors outpaced non-IP growth by 1.5 times annually from 2014 to 2019, demonstrating causal pathways from elite innovation to societal wealth expansion.^[94] This dynamic persists in private markets, distinct from state capture, where competition enforces efficiency over extraction.

Intellectual, Cultural, and Media Elites

Intellectual, cultural, and media elites encompass academics at prestigious institutions, journalists and broadcasters, and creative professionals in entertainment and the arts, who shape public discourse through idea generation, narrative framing, and cultural output. These groups hold sway over intellectual trends, ethical norms, and perceptual priorities by controlling access to platforms, funding, and validation mechanisms within their domains. Unlike economic elites focused on material production, their influence operates via soft power, disseminating ideologies that permeate education, entertainment, and news consumption. Empirical data reveal pronounced ideological uniformity among these elites, particularly in the United States. A 2024 analysis of Yale University faculty registrations found 88% Democrats versus 1.1% Republicans, yielding a ratio exceeding 78:1.^[95] At Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, a 2025 survey showed 63% of respondents identifying as liberal (29% very liberal, 34% somewhat), with conservatives comprising under 10%.^[96] Such disparities extend beyond self-identification; a 2024 Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression survey indicated only 20% of faculty believed a conservative would fit well in their department, compared to 71% for liberals.^[97] Media elites display analogous skews. The 2022 American Journalist Study, surveying over 1,600 U.S. journalists, reported 36% Democratic affiliation—up from 28% in 2013—against 3.4% Republican, with the remainder independents often aligning left on policy issues.^[98] ^[99] Cultural elites in Hollywood mirror this pattern: in the 2018 midterms, 99.7% of political donations from top executives tracked by The Hollywood Reporter went to Democrats or Democratic-leaning entities.^[100] OpenSecrets data for the motion picture industry corroborates sustained Democratic dominance in contributions, with ratios often exceeding 90:1 in election cycles.^[101] This homogeneity enables agenda-setting, whereby elites elevate select issues to prominence, as formalized in McCombs and Shaw's 1972 theory and amplified by post-1960s media expansions like television networks, which centralized narrative control.^[102] Journalists and academics frame topics—such as civil rights or economic policy—prioritizing attributes that align with prevailing views, thereby influencing public salience without dictating opinions outright. Cultural outputs, from films to literature awards, reinforce these frames, embedding them in popular consciousness. While such cohesion has facilitated advancements, including patronage of innovative arts and rigorous scholarship on diverse topics, it harbors risks of insularity. Ideological uniformity fosters echo chambers, where reinforced consensus amplifies biases and erodes scrutiny of internal assumptions, as evidenced by group polarization dynamics in homogeneous networks.^[103] In academia and media, this manifests as underrepresentation of dissenting empirical findings, potentially skewing policy discourse toward unexamined priors and diminishing institutional credibility when public perceptions of bias emerge—74% of Republicans and 45% of Democrats viewed most journalists as biased in a 2025 Pew survey.^[104] Causal analysis suggests self-selection and institutional incentives perpetuate this, prioritizing conformity over pluralism and inviting capture by narrow worldviews.

Mechanisms of Elite Formation

Merit-Based Selection and Achievement

Merit-based selection into elites emphasizes pathways grounded in individual talent, innovation, and sustained effort, often through competitive mechanisms that prioritize demonstrated competence over ascriptive factors. In bureaucratic contexts, this manifests in standardized examinations designed to identify high performers irrespective of background; for instance, the United Kingdom's Northcote–Trevelyan Report of 1854 advocated replacing patronage with open competitive exams for civil service entry, a system formalized in 1855 that elevated capable individuals to administrative roles based on intellectual merit.^[105] ^[106] Similarly, in private sectors, entrepreneurship serves as a primary avenue, where founders risk capital and innovate to capture market value; Mark Zuckerberg, from a middle-class family, coded the initial version of Facebook in 2004 while at Harvard, scaling it into a global enterprise valued at trillions through rapid iteration and user growth.^[107] Empirical data affirm that such achievements correlate with cognitive abilities and conscientiousness, enabling upward mobility into economic elites. As of June 2025, Forbes data indicate that 67% of the world's 2,838 billionaires are self-made, having built fortunes primarily through business ventures rather than inheritance, underscoring the role of entrepreneurial merit in wealth accumulation.^[108] Examples include Jeff Bezos, who launched Amazon in 1994 from a modest garage setup after leaving a Wall Street job, leveraging e-commerce innovation to amass a net worth exceeding $200 billion by 2025; and Elon Musk, who immigrated from South Africa and co-founded Zip2 in 1995, selling it for $307 million in 1999 before building subsequent ventures like PayPal and SpaceX through technical expertise and risk-taking.^[109] These cases illustrate how variance in outcomes stems from differential talents, countering narratives that dismiss elite success as rigged, as populists often do by overlooking heritable and developed abilities that drive competitive advantages. Research on cognitive stratification further supports merit's causal role in elite formation. Herrnstein and Murray's 1994 analysis in The Bell Curve posits a "cognitive elite" emerging in meritocratic societies, where high intelligence—measured by IQ—predicts occupational success and socioeconomic position, with top percentiles disproportionately occupying elite roles due to assortative matching and performance sorting.^[110] Hauser's 2002 study corroborates this, finding that cognitive ability accounts for substantial variance in occupational attainment independent of family background or education, with higher IQ individuals achieving elite statuses at rates far exceeding population averages.^[111] Such evidence highlights how merit-based systems filter for productive traits, fostering innovation and efficiency, though they amplify inequalities arising from innate differences rather than fabricating them ex nihilo.^[112] Inherited privilege provides offspring of elites with initial advantages, such as access to capital, mentorship, and entry-level opportunities through family ties, yet empirical analyses indicate that such privileges rarely sustain multi-generational dominance without accompanying competence. Studies of family successions in publicly traded firms reveal performance declines, with return on assets dropping by 18% and market-to-book ratios by 12% following inherited control, suggesting market mechanisms penalize incompetence regardless of lineage.^[113] Regression to the mean further constrains dynastic persistence; for instance, analysis of elite surnames in England from 1170 to 2012 shows intergenerational correlations weakening over time, with extreme advantages diluting toward population averages due to genetic and environmental variance.^[114]^[115] Social networks, encompassing familial connections and alumni or professional affiliations, function primarily as efficient signaling devices rather than conduits for unearned rent-seeking, enabling rapid identification of reliable partners in high-stakes environments. In elite career trajectories, overlapping networks among historical figures demonstrate how prior ties accumulate capital by bridging organizational paths, facilitating trust-based collaborations that enhance coordination without necessitating formal credentials.^[116] Theoretical models of network formation highlight a trade-off where selective signaling maximizes aggregate social capital by prioritizing quality links over broad diffusion, aligning with causal dynamics in competitive systems where networks reduce asymmetric information costs.^[117] While nepotism occurs—such as kinship ties among executives correlating with reduced investment efficiency—its prevalence remains secondary in non-family corporations, where performance-based retention dominates, as family hires face heightened scrutiny and turnover risks if underperforming.^[118]^[119] Historically, disruptions like World War I exemplified elite circulation overriding inherited privilege; British aristocracy, dominant pre-1914, suffered disproportionate losses and economic erosion from death duties and land sales, yielding ground to meritocratic industrial and financial newcomers by the 1930s.^[120]^[121] Continental European nobilities faced analogous declines, with monarchies collapsing and agrarian bases undermined, compelling adaptive networks among survivors while opening avenues for bourgeois elites.^[122] This pattern underscores that relational factors amplify but do not supplant competence in fluid socio-economic systems, where networks serve as filters for proven ability rather than barriers to outsiders.

Educational Institutions and Elite Reproduction

Elite universities serve as key filters in the reproduction of elites, signaling credentials that facilitate access to high-status positions, though empirical evidence indicates this role is often correlative rather than strictly causal. In the United States, Ivy League institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, along with peers like Stanford and MIT (collectively termed "Ivy-Plus"), produce a disproportionate share of leaders relative to their enrollment, yet only 11.8% of 2023 Fortune 100 CEOs attended an Ivy League school for their undergraduate degree, and 9.8% hold an Ivy League MBA.^[123] This overrepresentation stems partly from self-selection, as applicants from high-income families—often with legacies, athletic recruits, or donor connections—receive admissions boosts uncorrelated or negatively correlated with later success metrics like earnings.^[124]^[125] One in six Ivy League students has a parent in the top 1% income bracket, reinforcing reproduction of pre-existing privilege through formal credentialing.^[126] Causal analyses reveal limited direct effects from elite attendance on elite outcomes, as pre-admission traits like family background and academic preparation predict success more robustly than the institution itself.^[127] A study of admissions data found Ivy-Plus attendance yields smaller earnings premiums than previously assumed, attributing much of the observed correlation to selection biases rather than institutional value added in skill honing or training.^[124] While these schools may refine analytical and networking abilities, the premium often reflects signaling in credentialist labor markets, where degrees from top institutions act as costly signals of underlying talent or resources, but non-elite paths yield comparable results for many.^[128] Credentialism has driven escalating costs, exacerbating barriers to broad access and inflating the perceived necessity of elite education for elite reproduction. U.S. college tuition and fees rose 169% from 1980 to around 2020, outpacing wage growth for young workers by a factor of nearly nine, with private nonprofit four-year institutions seeing average annual costs climb from $11,840 in 1981-82 to over $24,920 by the 2020s (adjusted for inflation in some metrics).^[129]^[130] This inflation correlates with heightened emphasis on credentials as entry tickets to elite roles, creating an arms-race dynamic where perceived prestige justifies price hikes, yet empirical paths to leadership bypass such institutions—e.g., Walmart CEO Doug McMillon graduated from the University of Arkansas, a public flagship, and numerous Fortune 500 leaders hail from state universities rather than Ivies.^[123]^[131] In the United Kingdom, Oxbridge (Oxford and Cambridge) exerts stronger influence, with 75% of senior judges and 66% of permanent secretaries being graduates as of 2025, far exceeding their share of UK higher education output.^[132] This pattern underscores institutional filtering in Westminster systems, where formal degrees from these ancient universities credential entrants to political and bureaucratic elites, though self-selection from private schools (attended by 7% of the population but overrepresented in admissions) amplifies reproduction.^[133] Non-elite trajectories persist, as evidenced by CEOs like those of FTSE 350 firms where only 15% attended Oxbridge, highlighting that while universities institutionalize elite pathways via credentials, alternative routes grounded in achievement endure.^[134]

Functions and Impacts

Leadership, Innovation, and Societal Progress

Elite leadership in innovation stems from the concentration of high-competence individuals who direct resources toward breakthrough technologies, as evidenced by Schumpeterian models where creative destruction—through which superior innovations displace incumbents—drives aggregate productivity growth.^[135] Empirical studies confirm this process as a core mechanism of economic advancement, with innovative entrants and incumbents reallocating resources to higher-value uses, yielding sustained total factor productivity (TFP) gains across sectors.^[136] In competitive environments, such competence naturally stratifies into elite positions, enabling efficient scaling of discoveries that broad-based efforts alone cannot achieve, countering views that decry hierarchy by demonstrating its role in causal progress.^[137] Historically, industrial elites like Henry Ford exemplified this dynamic; in 1913, Ford implemented the moving assembly line at his Highland Park facility, slashing Model T production time from over 12 hours to 93 minutes per vehicle and reducing costs to $850, which spurred mass adoption of automobiles and multiplied U.S. manufacturing productivity by factors of 10 or more in related industries.^[138] This innovation not only elevated Ford to economic preeminence but catalyzed broader societal shifts, including urban mobility and supply chain efficiencies, with assembly-line principles contributing to a 1914-1929 GDP per capita growth averaging 2.7% annually in the U.S.^[139] In contemporary settings, elite entrepreneurs such as Elon Musk have accelerated technological frontiers; founding SpaceX in 2002, Musk's firm achieved the first privately funded liquid-fueled orbital launch in 2008 and reusable Falcon 9 landings by 2015, cutting launch costs from approximately $200 million to $60-90 million per mission and enabling over 300 successful missions by 2025, which has spurred a global commercial space economy projected to exceed $1 trillion by 2040.^[140] Such elite-driven ventures correlate with outsized patent impacts, where top innovators file inventions that underpin 20-40% of sectoral growth in IP-intensive industries, accounting for 41% of U.S. economic output in 2019.^[90] Metro areas with higher patent densities from elite-led R&D see 6.5% faster economic growth over a decade compared to low-patent peers.^[93]

Risk of Capture, Corruption, and Stagnation

Elites face inherent risks of regulatory capture, where powerful interests influence policy to their advantage, leading to cronyism that undermines public welfare. In the 2008 financial crisis, the U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) allocated $700 billion, with approximately $250 billion directed to stabilize large banking institutions, disproportionately benefiting systemically important banks deemed "too big to fail."^[141] Empirical analysis indicates that political connections influenced TARP fund distribution, exacerbating perceptions of favoritism toward connected elites.^[142] Such interventions can encourage moral hazard, as evidenced by increased risk-taking among recipient banks post-bailout.^[143] Corruption among elites manifests through entrenched oligarchic tendencies, as theorized in Robert Michels' "iron law of oligarchy," which posits that organizations inevitably concentrate power in a few hands due to bureaucratic necessities and leadership expertise gaps.^[6] This can foster stagnation by resisting innovation and accountability, particularly when elite consensus enforces uniform policies without diverse scrutiny, as seen in broad institutional support for expansive fiscal responses during the early 2020s economic disruptions despite varying long-term efficacy.^[144] However, Vilfredo Pareto's concept of elite circulation counters this inevitability, suggesting that periodic replacement of elites through competitive processes prevents decay and sustains dynamism.^[145] Mitigation strategies emphasize merit-based selection and robust legal frameworks to curb corruption risks. Systems prioritizing meritocratic recruitment correlate with reduced corruption, as merit reduces opportunities for nepotism and enhances performance.^[146] Singapore exemplifies this, achieving a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 83 in 2023 through stringent merit-based civil service and anti-corruption enforcement, contrasting sharply with Venezuela's score of 10, where patronage networks prevail amid resource mismanagement.^[147]^[148] Competitive markets and rule-of-law institutions further promote elite turnover, averting stagnation by rewarding efficacy over entrenchment.^[149]

Empirical Evidence on Economic and Political Outcomes

Firms led by CEOs with elite educational backgrounds, such as degrees from Ivy League or top-tier universities, exhibit superior financial performance metrics compared to those without. Empirical analyses indicate that such elite-educated CEOs are associated with higher shareholder value creation, evidenced by stronger growth opportunities, improved credit ratings, and reduced cost of capital, based on panel data from U.S. public firms spanning 1992–2019.^[150] Similarly, CEO characteristics, including elite networks and expertise, significantly influence firm-level outcomes like return on assets and Tobin's Q, with causal estimates from instrumental variable approaches isolating leadership effects from firm-specific factors.^[151] In broader economic contexts, inclusive elite structures—where political and economic elites operate within institutions that limit extraction and promote broad participation—correlate with sustained prosperity. Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson's cross-country analyses demonstrate that nations with inclusive institutions, characterized by elites incentivized toward innovation rather than rent-seeking, achieve higher long-term GDP per capita growth rates, as seen in comparative studies of colonial legacies and institutional persistence from 1500 onward.^[152] Instrumental variable regressions using settler mortality rates as exogenous shocks to institutional quality further substantiate that inclusive elite dynamics causally drive economic divergence, outweighing mere elite concentration.^[153] Post-World War II U.S. economic expansion, averaging 3.5–4% annual real GDP growth from 1946–1973, benefited from elite-driven policy expertise in areas like monetary stability and infrastructure investment, fostering broad-based stability without widespread stagnation.^[154] This period's success highlights how competent bureaucratic elites, selected via meritocratic channels, contributed to low unemployment (under 5% for much of the era) and productivity gains, countering narratives of elite irrelevance.^[155] Critiques of inequality measures like the Gini coefficient emphasize their failure to account for intergenerational mobility, which has remained relatively stable in the U.S. despite Gini rises from 0.35 in 1979 to 0.41 in 2017.^[156] ^[21] Studies using absolute mobility metrics show that 50–60% of children born in the 1980s out-earn their parents, undermining claims that elite concentration inherently erodes opportunity; instead, elite quality—proxied by educational attainment—enhances systemic mobility via innovation spillovers.^[156] Causal evidence from IV designs on elite education further prioritizes human capital quality over distributional quantity for aggregate outcomes.^[157]

Contemporary Dynamics

Elite Overproduction and Structural Instability

Elite overproduction occurs when a society generates more aspirants for elite positions—typically highly educated or ambitious individuals seeking power, wealth, or status—than the available opportunities can accommodate, resulting in frustrated competitors who destabilize social structures through intra-elite conflict. Peter Turchin, in his structural-demographic theory, identifies this dynamic as a key driver of political instability, where surplus elites fragment into rival factions, erode cooperation, and exacerbate inequality as winners capture disproportionate resources.^[158]^[159] This process intensifies during periods of economic stagnation or slow elite position growth relative to aspirant numbers, leading not to unified elite solidarity but to zero-sum competition that spills into broader societal discord. In the contemporary United States, elite overproduction is evident in the mismatch between expanding higher education and limited high-status jobs. By the early 2020s, the underemployment rate for recent college graduates aged 22-27 hovered around 41 percent, with many working in roles below their qualification level despite credentials signaling elite aspirations.^[160] Unemployment among young graduates aged 23-27 averaged 4.59 percent in 2025, higher than pre-pandemic norms and reflecting structural barriers to absorbing the influx of degree-holders into professional tracks.^[161] Turchin correlates this with rising wealth concentration, where the top 1 percent's income share surged from 10 percent in 1980 to over 20 percent by 2020, as competitive pressures among aspirants favor rent-seeking over productive innovation.^[162] Turchin's framework draws on historical cycles analyzed in works like Secular Cycles, applying the theory to cases such as late Imperial Russia, where rapid growth in the nobility outpaced administrative and land positions, fostering resentment and factionalism that contributed to the instability preceding the 1917 revolutions.^[159] In these patterns, elite overpopulation precedes crises by undermining state fiscal capacity and elite cohesion, with parallels to modern data showing U.S. political violence indices peaking in the 2020s alongside stagnant median wages for educated workers amid elite wealth spikes.^[163] Critiques of the theory, such as Yascha Mounk's 2024 analysis, contend it lacks empirical rigor, arguing that U.S. elite numbers—measured by top earners or Ivy League slots—have not proportionally exploded relative to population, and instability stems more from cultural polarization than surplus aspirants.^[164] Nonetheless, Turchin substantiates his claims with broader indicators like professional degree proliferation and correlates them to inequality trends, where Gini coefficients for wealth rose from 0.80 in 1989 to 0.85 by 2022, reflecting intra-elite dynamics over mass immiseration alone.^[165] The implications center on heightened intra-elite rivalry fueling populism, as disaffected aspirants form counter-elites challenging entrenched powers through anti-establishment movements, evident in the 2010s-2020s surge of figures like Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders mobilizing frustrated educated voters against perceived insider corruption.^[166] This generates structural instability via policy gridlock and eroded trust, rather than direct mass uprisings, as surplus elites amplify divisions within ruling coalitions while avoiding outright collapse through adaptive reforms.^[167]

Global Elites and Transnational Influence

Global elites, comprising multinational corporate executives, policymakers, and NGO leaders, operate across national boundaries through forums that facilitate cross-border coordination on economic and policy issues. These networks include the World Economic Forum (WEF), established in 1971 as a not-for-profit foundation in Geneva to engage political, business, and civil society leaders in shaping global agendas, particularly via its annual Davos meetings.^[168] Similarly, the Bilderberg Meetings, initiated in 1954, convene approximately 120-150 participants from Europe and North America, including industry experts, finance officials, and academics, for off-the-record discussions aimed at fostering transatlantic dialogue rather than binding decisions.^[169] Such groups, alongside influence exerted through institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO), founded on January 1, 1995, to regulate international trade rules and negotiate agreements, enable elites to prioritize interconnected supply chains and market access over purely domestic concerns.^[170] These transnational interactions have contributed to globalization's empirical benefits, notably in poverty alleviation. Between 1990 and 2019, the global extreme poverty rate—defined by the World Bank as living below $1.90 per day (adjusted for purchasing power)—fell from 37.8% to 8.9%, lifting roughly 1.2 billion people out of destitution, driven by expanded trade, foreign investment, and export-led growth in developing economies.^[171]^[172] Studies attribute much of this to liberalization policies coordinated through elite forums and bodies like the WTO, which reduced trade barriers and integrated markets, yielding faster poverty declines in export-oriented regions such as East Asia compared to more closed economies.^[173] This coordination has also spurred innovation diffusion and capital flows, with foreign direct investment correlating positively with employment and output growth in recipient countries, though gains vary by local institutions.^[173] However, such borderless elite coordination generates policy externalities, including labor market disruptions in high-income nations. Offshoring of manufacturing jobs, facilitated by global trade pacts, has heightened economic insecurity in industrialized countries, with empirical analyses showing that increased openness substitutes domestic employment with overseas production, exacerbating wage stagnation for low-skilled workers without commensurate retraining offsets.^[174] Migration pressures arise indirectly from uneven globalization outcomes, as trade liberalization boosts remittances and networks in origin countries but strains receiving nations' infrastructure when policy coordination overlooks asymmetric development impacts.^[175] While these networks are verifiable and promote mutual gains through dialogue, their influence remains constrained by sovereign national policies and market forces, lacking the omnipotence implied in unsubstantiated conspiracy narratives; for instance, WTO disputes often reflect competing state interests rather than elite fiat.^[170]

Populism, Anti-Elite Sentiments, and Responses

Populist movements surged in the mid-2010s, exemplified by the 2016 election of Donald Trump as U.S. President and the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom, where voters rejected establishment globalization policies amid perceptions of elite detachment from working-class concerns.^[176] These events aligned with symptoms of elite overproduction, where an excess of aspirants for elite positions intensifies intra-elite competition and fuels broader societal instability, as theorized by cliodynamicist Peter Turchin.^[177] Historically, similar anti-elite sentiments precipitated the French Revolution of 1789, driven by resentment against aristocratic privileges and fiscal mismanagement by the nobility and clergy, which exacerbated economic hardships for the Third Estate.^[178] Anti-elite rhetoric in populism often masks bids by counter-elites—dissatisfied aspirants seeking to displace incumbents—rather than pure grassroots revolt, according to Turchin's analysis of historical cycles.^[176] Empirical data links populism's rise to periods of economic stagnation, such as post-Great Recession unemployment spikes in Europe correlating with support for radical right parties, though causation extends beyond elite actions to include globalization shocks and cultural identity threats.^[179] While valid grievances over wage stagnation and regional decline incentivize reform demands—evident in interpersonal inequality predicting populist votes in declining areas—not all surges stem from elite failure; some reflect misattributed blame amid broader structural shifts like automation.^[180] Elite responses to such sentiments vary between co-optation, where incumbents adopt populist elements like trade protections to neutralize threats, and insulation, doubling down on institutional defenses against perceived irrationality.^[181] In democratic contexts, co-optation has historically stabilized regimes by integrating challenger demands, as seen in selective policy concessions post-Brexit, whereas insulation risks entrenching divides by dismissing populism as mere backlash without addressing underlying incentives for accountability.^[15] Turchin notes that without reducing elite overproduction through mechanisms like expanded opportunity or elite contraction, responses merely delay cycles of instability.^[165]

Debates and Controversies

Meritocracy vs. Nepotism in Elite Access

Standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT demonstrate predictive validity for academic success in elite institutions, correlating with first-year GPA, retention rates, and graduation outcomes more reliably than legacy status or non-cognitive factors alone.^[182] ^[183] Longitudinal analyses from selective colleges, including Princeton University's internal reviews of test-optional policies implemented during the COVID-19 era, reveal that students submitting scores achieved stronger academic performance than non-submitters with comparable high school records, prompting the reinstatement of testing requirements for admissions starting in fall 2027.^[184] In contrast, legacy admissions—favoring children of alumni—confer a substantial admissions advantage, boosting acceptance odds by a factor of approximately 3 across applicant ability levels, yet recipients often enter with lower standardized test scores than non-legacies, raising questions about selection purity.^[185] Empirical comparisons underscore merit-based mechanisms' edge: blind meritocratic evaluations, such as those emphasizing test scores and objective achievements, outperform nepotistic preferences in fostering competent elite cohorts capable of sustained high performance. Princeton data indicate legacies comprise over 30% of admits among connected applicants versus under 5% overall, but post-admission outcomes show no consistent superiority, with some studies finding legacies slightly less likely to earn top grades despite equivalent or adjusted baselines.^[186] ^[187] Nepotism, by prioritizing relational ties over verifiable competence, empirically correlates with diminished organizational innovation and human capital accumulation; cross-firm analyses reveal merit-driven enterprises exhibit higher productivity and adaptability than those rife with familial favoritism.^[188] ^[189] Causally, such practices erode institutional trust by signaling unequal opportunity, as evidenced in audits of family-influenced sectors where perceived favoritism reduces employee commitment and creative output.^[190] Post-2023 Supreme Court rulings in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and related cases, which invalidated race-conscious affirmative action in higher education, have intensified scrutiny of non-meritocratic dilutions like DEI-mandated preferences, prompting some elite universities to pivot toward class-based or test-centric criteria amid observed declines in underrepresented minority matriculation at medical schools and selective programs.^[191] These shifts highlight tensions between equity-driven interventions and blind merit, with data suggesting the latter better aligns with predictive success metrics over holistic reviews prone to subjective bias. Nepotism's persistence in legacy systems and corporate boards perpetuates access barriers, as Swedish civil service longitudinal records from the 19th to 20th centuries demonstrate: despite formal merit reforms, aristocratic nepotistic networks delayed full competence-based transitions, stifling broader talent mobilization.^[192] Critiques span ideological lines, with left-leaning analysts like Michael Sandel positing meritocracy as a "myth" that masks inherited advantages and systemic inequalities, arguing it justifies elite self-congratulation while overlooking preparatory disparities in education and networks.^[193] Conversely, conservative perspectives frame meritocracy as a threatened foundational ideal, essential for societal competence and innovation, endangered by DEI expansions and nepotistic holdovers that prioritize identity or connections over empirically validated ability.^[194] Empirical adjudication favors the latter, as randomized or blinded selection protocols in professional exams and promotions yield higher long-term elite efficacy than relational heuristics, underscoring causal realism in access mechanics.^[195]

Elite Consensus on Policy and Cultural Shifts

Elite consensus refers to the substantial alignment among influential figures in politics, business, academia, and media on major policy directions, often reflecting shared ideological frameworks rather than mere coincidence. From the 1980s to the 2008 financial crisis, a neoliberal consensus dominated, emphasizing deregulation, privatization, free trade, and fiscal austerity, which shaped policies across Western economies and international bodies like the IMF.^[196] This alignment was driven by empirical observations of economic stagnation in the 1970s and subsequent growth under market-oriented reforms, though it overlooked accumulating risks such as financial instability and inequality.^[197] On globalization and immigration, elite views diverge markedly from public opinion, with leaders in foreign policy and business circles showing strong support for open borders and reduced controls. A 2002 Chicago Council survey found that only 14% of U.S. foreign policy elites viewed immigration as a critical threat to national interests, compared to 60% of the general public.^[198] More recent analyses confirm this pattern, with elites consistently assigning lower priority to immigration enforcement than the broader population, attributing benefits to labor mobility and demographic needs despite evidence of wage pressures on low-skilled workers.^[199] Similarly, on climate policy, elites exhibit high homogeneity, with near-universal endorsement of anthropogenic causes and calls for aggressive mitigation among policymakers and scientists, rooted in IPCC assessments but potentially amplified by institutional pressures favoring consensus over outlier data on adaptation costs.^[200] Cultural shifts in the 2010s and 2020s saw elite consensus coalesce around identity-focused paradigms in academia and media, prioritizing group-based equity over individual merit. Analyses of media content reveal a surge in identity-oriented coverage, with outlets increasingly framing issues through lenses of race, gender, and intersectionality, correlating with overrepresentation of progressive viewpoints in faculty hiring—where self-identified liberals outnumber conservatives by ratios exceeding 10:1 in social sciences.^[201] This dominance, while justified by proponents as addressing historical inequities, has been critiqued for fostering homogeneity that marginalizes dissenting perspectives on causal factors like class versus identity in inequality.^[202] Such alignments carry risks of groupthink, where elite decision units prioritize uniformity, suppressing empirical challenges as seen in post-2008 critiques of neoliberalism's inequality effects.^[203] Dissenting elites, including heterodox economists like those questioning unrestricted trade's net benefits amid deindustrialization, highlight how consensus can overlook causal realities such as offshoring's role in wage stagnation, evidenced by rising Gini coefficients in adopting nations.^[204] While often evidence-based—neoliberal policies correlated with global poverty reduction from 1.9 billion in 1981 to under 700 million by 2015—the disconnect with voter priorities underscores potential biases from insulated networks, prompting scrutiny of whether expertise or self-interest drives uniformity.^[205]

Measurement Challenges and Empirical Verification

Defining and measuring elites empirically is fraught with challenges stemming from multifaceted criteria encompassing economic resources, political authority, institutional positions, and social networks, which resist unification into a single quantifiable index. Positional approaches, which identify elites via occupancy of high-status roles such as CEOs of Fortune 500 companies or cabinet members, overlook diffuse influence exerted through advisory capacities or philanthropy, while income-wealth metrics like the top 1% threshold—often pegged at annual earnings exceeding $500,000 in the United States as of 2023—understate total control due to asset concealment in trusts and offshore holdings.^[206]^[207] Reputational methods, relying on nominations from knowledgeable informants to gauge influence, introduce subjectivity and selection bias, as respondents may prioritize visible actors over subterranean power brokers.^[208] Data limitations exacerbate verification difficulties, particularly in assessing power concentration and causal impact on outcomes. Wealth registries, such as Forbes billionaire lists totaling 2,781 individuals globally in 2023 with aggregate net worth surpassing $14 trillion, capture only declared assets and exclude non-monetary leverage like intellectual property dominance or regulatory capture. Network analyses of board interlocks among corporate elites demonstrate connectivity—e.g., a 2011 study finding that 0.1% of shareholders control 80% of major U.S. firms via ties—but struggle to distinguish correlation from causation in policy influence, as elite cohesion may reflect shared incentives rather than coordinated dominance.^[209] Empirical tests of elite unity, drawing on biographical data showing overlapping educational pedigrees (e.g., Ivy League attendance rates exceeding 50% among U.S. political elites since 2000), yield mixed interpretations, with pluralist critiques arguing that observable decision-making disperses power across veto groups, rendering monolithic elite control unverifiable.^[210]^[211] Methodological hurdles in elite studies further impede robust verification, including access barriers where elites leverage gatekeeping and confidentiality to evade scrutiny, and the small, geographically dispersed sample sizes that inflate sampling errors. Decisional approaches, tracking involvement in pivotal events like the 2008 financial bailouts where a core group of Treasury officials and bankers shaped outcomes, provide snapshots but falter in generalizing to systemic patterns due to incomplete records and retrospective biases.^[212] Computational methods, such as parsing digitized newspapers for co-mentions to infer political elites, offer scalability—identifying, for instance, recurring clusters in U.S. coverage from 2015 onward—but depend on media framing, which academic analyses note often amplifies certain actors while marginalizing others amid institutional biases toward establishment narratives.^[209] These constraints underscore that while aggregate indicators like Gini coefficients (0.41 for U.S. income inequality in 2022) signal stratification, attributing causality to elite agency requires triangulating disparate sources, a process vulnerable to overreliance on self-reported or proxy data. Overall, empirical verification demands cautious inference, prioritizing longitudinal datasets over cross-sectional snapshots to mitigate endogeneity, yet persistent gaps in transparency limit conclusive claims about elite efficacy or overreach.^[213]

References

[1]
The Elite Theory of Power - Triumph IAS
Jan 23, 2020 · The Elite Theory of Power is a fundamental concept in political science that argues that societies are inherently divided into two groups: the ruling elite and ...
[2]
[PDF] Elitism in Gaetano Mosca's Treatment - OICC Press
In his theory of ruling class, he stresses the minority including military elites, clerics, and blue-bloods should govern the society. He remained natural ...
[3]
Vilfredo Pareto: A Return to the Libertarian Roots of Elite Theory
Jun 12, 2025 · Vilfredo Pareto's work in uncovering the truth about elites—how they gain power, and how they lose it—is essential to any fight for liberty ...
[4]
The Ruling Class : Mosca,Gaetano. - Internet Archive
Nov 14, 2006 · The Ruling Class ; Publication date: 1939 ; Topics: SOCIAL SCIENCES, Politics, Forms of political organization. States as political power.Missing: elite | Show results with:elite
[5]
Pareto's Circulation of Elites: Characteristics and Criticisms
Following the Machiavellian formula, Pareto states that the elites are able to manipulate and control the masses by resorting to two methods: Force or Fraud, ...
[6]
Robert Michels, the iron law of oligarchy and dynamic democracy
May 21, 2020 · The principle of oligarchy in modern democratic parties, therefore, arises from the “technical indispensability of leadership” (Michels, 1962, p ...
[7]
Power Elite Theory: Definition and Examples - Helpful Professor
Jan 8, 2023 · Power Elite Theory is a sociological theory that explores how power is distributed among a small number of individuals in a given society.Power Elite Theory Case... · 1. Corporate Elites · 2. Financial Elites<|separator|>
[8]
The Elite: Definition and Identification - The Sociology Place
Nov 18, 2022 · According to Khan (2012), The elites are “those who have vastly disproportionate control over or access to a resource. Within this definition we ...Definitions Of The Elite · Elites Are Not Omnipresent... · Reputational Method
[9]
Elite - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Elite, from Latin eligere via Old and French, means "a choice or select body, the best part," first used for "chosen person" in Middle English and later as ...
[10]
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/elite
[11]
elite, n.² & adj. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the word elite is in the mid 1700s. OED's earliest evidence for elite is from 1738, in the writing of J. Breval.
[12]
A Brief History of the Word “Elite” and How it Became a ... - Medium
Apr 1, 2025 · elite (n.) “A choice or select body, the best part,” 1823, from French élite “selection, choice,” from Old French eslite ( ...
[13]
Vilfredo Pareto - Elites - Hans Zetterberg
Pareto favors opportunity for all competent members of society to advance into the elite, but he is not motivated by feelings of pity for the underprivileged.
[14]
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/9789
[15]
Beyond left versus right, beyond elites versus populists | Brookings
May 15, 2025 · In this context, “populism” may be understood as a worldview that divides society into “the pure people” and “the corrupt elite.” Populists ...
[16]
Introduction. Elite Theory: Philosophical Challenges - PubMed Central
Feb 10, 2022 · Elite theory, from the 19th century, posits that societies are ruled by a minority, and that all societies, including democracies, are ruled by ...Classical Elitism · Democratic Elitism · Elitism In The Age Of...
[17]
The Theorıes On The Power: Elıte Theory
Those people who are known as the “ruling elite” accomplish all political functions, hold and exercise decisive power. Briefly, they control the rest of society ...
[18]
Lions and foxes: revisiting Pareto's bestiary for the age of late pluto ...
Apr 15, 2020 · Pareto's 'lions and foxes' is a zoological image associated with him, used in political sociology and popular press to explain social and ...
[19]
Pareto''s Theory of Elite Cycles: A Reconsideration and Application
Vilfredo Pareto theorized that over time psychosocial propensities of ruling elites – manifested by predominant personality traits, mentalities, beliefs, and ...<|separator|>
[20]
Income and Wealth of the One Percent in the United States, 1989 to ...
Jan 29, 2025 · Figure 1 illustrates trends in inequality from 1989 through 2022 visualized with the Gini coefficient. The Figure gives separate estimates ...
[21]
Trends in U.S. income and wealth inequality - Pew Research Center
Jan 9, 2020 · Ranging from 0 to 1, or from perfect equality to complete inequality, the Gini coefficient in the U.S. stood at 0.434 in 2017, according to the ...Missing: elites | Show results with:elites
[22]
WEALTH INEQUALITY AND ACCUMULATION - PMC
We review trends in wealth levels and inequality and evaluate wealth's distinctiveness as an indicator of social stratification.Wealth Inequality And... · Part Ii: Wealth Patterns And... · Wealth Determinants: Wealth...
[23]
The Class-Domination Theory of Power - Who Rules America?
People have to be high-level employees in institutions controlled by members of the upper class to be considered part of the power elite. Receiving a ...
[24]
Joshua Rauh: What the Forbes 400 List Says about American Wealth
Apr 22, 2013 · In 2004, top executives of publicly traded companies made up only 5 percent of the top 0.01 percent of the wealthiest people in the United ...
[25]
Elite Formation in the Educational System: Between Meritocracy and ...
If there is equal access to better education, then it is possible to speak of a meritocracy. The elites within such a meritocracy are considered to be ...
[26]
Most Billionaires Are Self-Made, Not Heirs | Chicago Booth Review
Most individuals on the Forbes 400 list did not inherit the family business but rather made their own fortune. Kaplan and Rauh found that 69 percent of those on ...
[27]
The Wealth of Billionaires: Where It Came From, Where It Is, and ...
May 13, 2024 · The great wealth of America's richest people came from the businesses they created, not inherited wealth. Billionaires' wealth is concentrated in company stock.
[28]
Meaning of Merit: Talent versus Hard Work Legitimacy | Social Forces
Sep 30, 2023 · In this paper, we draw on 71 interviews with elites in Denmark and the UK to compare self-justifications of meritocratic legitimacy.
[29]
Social Structure in Ancient Egypt - World History Encyclopedia
Sep 21, 2017 · The society of ancient Egypt was strictly divided into a hierarchy with the king at the top and then his vizier, the members of his court, priests and scribes.
[30]
Ancient Egyptian Society: Elite, Commoners, Diversity
Egyptian society was stratified into a small elite and a large number of commoners. Excavations of tombs have shown clear differences between the elite and non ...Missing: irrigation 3000<|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] The Paradox of Civilization Pre-Institutional Sources of Security and ...
The rise of civilization involved economic surplus production (“prosperity”) and states that could provide surplus protection (“security”).Missing: specialization | Show results with:specialization
[32]
Ancient Egyptian Social Organization, from the Pharaoh to the Farmer
Apr 6, 2022 · Ancient Egyptian society was a strictly divided hierarchy. The king, chosen by the gods to rule, was at the top with layers underneath.
[33]
Warfare in Ancient Greece - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Oct 1, 2000 · Known as hoplites, these soldiers were characteristically equipped with about seventy pounds of armor, most of which was made of bronze.
[34]
A Greek Hoplite's Day in Ancient Greece: A Spear of ... - TheCollector
Dec 19, 2023 · We can define Greek hoplites as the wealthy citizen-soldiers of the ancient Greek city-states, men who were armed with spears and shields.
[35]
Mass, Elite, and Hoplite-Farmer in Greek History
As perhaps the foremost authority on Greek hoplite warfare, Victor Hanson's decision to write a work detailing the life of the hoplite-farmer (or farmer-hoplite) ...Missing: 5th BCE
[36]
The Aqueducts and Water Supply of Ancient Rome - PMC
One of the earliest examples of the exploitation of groundwater to sustain human civilization is the aqueduct system of ancient Rome. Although some of the ...
[37]
[PDF] The Appian Way: From Its Foundation to the Middle Ages
there is the extraordinary, unique engineering of the. Roman road and aqueduct; there are villas and solemn sepulchers; there are the vast spaces, devoid of ...<|separator|>
[38]
[PDF] Salus Patriae: Public Health and the Roman State
... innovations in the development of public health. The Romans were extremely ... Roman aqueduct, the Aqua Appia, was constructed in 312 BCE during the.
[39]
https://blogs.4j.lane.edu/davis_j/files/2018/09/HA-Chapter-02.pdf
[40]
86.03.03: Medieval Life: Squires, Maidens and Peasants
More powerful lords had many vassals to maintain their power. This system of personal loyalties became the basis of the form of government called feudalism, a ...Missing: 9th 15th
[41]
The Economic Impact of the Black Death – EH.net
The lion's share of the Black Death's effect was felt in the economy's agricultural sector, unsurprising in a society in which, except in the most urbanized ...
[42]
The Wars of the Roses: Consequences & Effects
Feb 19, 2020 · There were additional reasons why the wars rumbled on such as the ceaseless rivalry for wealth amongst the nobility, disagreements over ...A Dynastic Conflict · A Fragmented Kingdom · Nobles & BattlesMissing: intra- | Show results with:intra-
[43]
The Wars of the Roses - The Wars of the Roses
Causes of the Wars of the Roses ... The Wars of the Roses were the result of decades of political and military clashes. Defeats at the hands of the French widened ...<|separator|>
[44]
Art in the Italian Renaissance Republics, c. 1400–1600 - Smarthistory
Art in Private Homes and Palaces. The wealthy elites of the Italian merchant class who dominated the republican city-states could afford to live like ...Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
[45]
https://historyguild.org/italy-during-the-renaissance/
[46]
The Medici Family and Their Influence on the Renaissance
Rating 4.8 (294) Aug 18, 2025 · What is Patronage: Wealthy families, like the Medici, supported artists financially, using art to project power and status. Key Medici Artists: ...
[47]
[PDF] Medici Influence in 15th Century Movements
During the Renaissance period, the Medici family has played a fundamental role in encouraging the spread of humanism ideas. As humanist believed, spirit of ...
[48]
Social Change in the British Industrial Revolution
Apr 26, 2023 · However, there was another defining characteristic of the elite that joined land during the Industrial Revolution: capital.
[49]
https://x.com/JosephJacks_/status/1980099863581954048
[50]
[PDF] PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION:
Productivity growth during the Industrial Revolution was slow, with steam having a small, delayed impact. Technological change, including embodiment, was key. ...
[51]
America's Gilded Age: Robber Barons and Captains of Industry
The wealthy elite of the late 19th century consisted of industrialists who amassed their fortunes as so-called robber barons and captains of industry.
[52]
Tycoons Of The Gilded Age: The Robber Barons Who Made Their ...
Jan 25, 2022 · Adam IP Smith tells the story of a new breed of ruthless businessmen who made fortunes from oil, steel and railroads in the second half of the 19th century.
[53]
giants of wealth: carnegie, rockefeller, and morgan - OpenEd CUNY
Steel magnate Andrew Carnegie, oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller, and business financier JP Morgan were all businessmen who grew their respective businesses.
[54]
https://www.ushistory.org/us/25b.asp
[55]
Railroads, Reallocation, and the Rise of American Manufacturing
Mar 2, 2020 · The authors estimate that absent an expanded rail network, US aggregate productivity would have been 25 percent lower in 1890, equaling about $3 ...Missing: 1830-1900 | Show results with:1830-1900
[56]
Sherman Antitrust Act: Definition, History, and What It Does
The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark U.S. law, passed in 1890, which outlawed trusts, monopolies, and cartels to increase economic competitiveness.
[57]
Fact of the Week: US GDP Would Have Been 25 Percent Lower in ...
Mar 9, 2020 · It finds that doubling a county's access to railroads increased manufacturing productivity by 43.2 percent over this period and that, collectively, GDP would ...Missing: 1830-1900 economic
[58]
The Concept "Political Elite": Lessons from Mosca and Pareto
3 In a frank assessment of forty years of labor, Mosca complained that while there had been a general acceptance of the ruling class idea, his "doctrine" had ...
[59]
[PDF] Gaetano Mosca and the Theory - of the Ruling Class
(*) Gaetano Mosca was born at Palermo on April 1, 1858, and from 1898 taught as. Professor of constitutional law at the University of Turin. He was transferred ...
[60]
(PDF) Elites: History of the Concept - Academia.edu
In Mosca: The Ruling Class an initial, broad deﬁnition, 'élite' encompasses all individuals Gaetano Mosca (1858–1941) posits in his work entitled Ele- with the ...
[61]
[PDF] The Mind And Society-a Treatise On General Sociology
Page 1. The Mind and Society. A TREATISE. ON GENERAL SOCIOLOGY by Vilfredo Pareto ... circulation between elements in society. Elites and their circulation ...
[62]
THE THEORIES OF ELITES : IMPACT AND RELEVANCE - jstor
Mosca makes some interesting observations on the point of heredity. He says that all political classes tend to become hereditary in fact if not in law.16 ...
[63]
The Elite and the Ruling Class: Pareto and Mosca Re-Examined - jstor
The impossibility of an entirely free circulation of elites is particularly true of Pareto's "governing elite." Later, in his Trattato, Pareto ties this ...
[64]
toward formalization and extension - of pareto's theory - jstor
The criterion that a theory contain at least one derived statement that is testable-in-principle has now been met for Pareto's theory of elite circulation.
[65]
[PDF] Robert Michels and the Iron Law of Oligarchy - Cornell eCommons
Michels, R. ([1911] 1962). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical. Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Collier Books. Minkoff ...
[66]
[PDF] Breaking the iron law : Robert Michels, the rise of the mass party ...
Jan 1, 2011 · Robert Michels outlined his argument in the classic work Political Parties: A. Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern ...
[67]
the iron law of oligarchy : a dilemma for - jstor
European socialist parties. These parties, he showed, wanted democracy and fought for adult suffrage, free speech, and popular participation, yet they ...
[68]
There's No Substitute for Mass Working-Class Parties - Jacobin
Sep 24, 2021 · Robert Michels developed his “iron law of oligarchy” after seeing the bureaucratization of the early socialist movement.
[69]
Political Parties; a Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies ...
Gaetano Mosca speaks of “the falsity of the parliamentary legend.” He ... the ruling class—an identification from which Bakunin, Marx's pupil, drew ...
[70]
[PDF] Gaetano Mosca's Political Theories: a Key to Interpret the Dynamics ...
Mosca's theory bases itself essentially on both juridical-constitutional and historical-political considerations; on the contrary, Pareto's theory founds on an ...
[71]
Pareto's two types of elites: lions and foxes — Remains of the Day
Apr 9, 2017 · Pareto's thesis was that elites always rule. There is always the domination of the minority over the majority. And history is just the story ...
[72]
Reelection Rates Over the Years - OpenSecrets
Few things in life are more predictable than the chances of an incumbent member of the U.S. House of Representatives winning reelection.
[73]
[PDF] Emigration during the French Revolution: Consequences in the ...
As a result, some areas experienced a significant change in the composition of the local elites whereas in others the pre-revolutionary social structure ...
[74]
Incumbent politicians enjoy record reelection in an aging Congress
Oct 12, 2023 · While the 2022 elections marked unprecedented success for congressional incumbents, the so-called incumbency bias is nothing new. Members of ...
[75]
A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model | American Political Science ...
Sep 2, 2013 · A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013. Robert A. Dahl.
[76]
Interlocks and Interactions Among the Power Elite
This document presents new findings about the American power structure based on the connections among 2,563 corporations, 6 business leadership and ...
[77]
The Corporate Community - Who Rules America?
Interlocking directorates -- defined as the linkages among corporations created by individuals who sit on two or more corporate boards.
[78]
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and ...
Sep 18, 2014 · Economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy.
[79]
[PDF] Who Gets What They Want from Government? - Princeton University
This paper reports the first findings from a project that examines the extent to which different social groups find their policy preferences reflected in ...
[80]
Full article: The choice of efficiencies and the necessity of politics
Jul 29, 2020 · The argument for the political nature of efficiency is set out in terms of both Pareto optimality and aggregate welfare maximisation.
[81]
Presidential Cabinets Have Been Dominated By College Elites Long ...
May 5, 2021 · Every administration in the past seven decades had a cabinet where the majority of appointees came from elite colleges, with the exception of ...
[82]
Overview - OpenSecrets
Revolving Door factoid: There are 388 former members of Congress who lobby in the OpenSecrets Revolving Door. Lawmakers with the most revolvers.Search · Federal Agencies · Former Members of Congress · Top Industries
[83]
The Big Three | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
In World War II, the three great Allied powers—Great Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union—formed a Grand Alliance that was the key to victory.
[84]
Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Companies in 2025 Were Founded by ...
Aug 20, 2025 · Fortune 500 companies are huge drivers of the U.S. economy, representing about two-thirds of the country's gross domestic product. States where ...
[85]
The wealthiest 10% of Americans own 93% of stocks even with ...
Jan 10, 2024 · The richest Americans own the vast majority of the US stock market, according to Fed data. The top 10% of Americans held 93% of all stocks, ...
[86]
The Richest 1 Percent Own a Greater Share of the Stock Market ...
Jan 16, 2024 · The richest 10 percent of US households own roughly $42.7 trillion in stock market wealth, with the richest 1 percent owning $25 trillion.
[87]
Andrew Carnegie and the 19th-century 'robber barons' have lessons ...
Jan 21, 2025 · Carnegie dominated mass production of steel in the last quarter of the 19 century, at a time of massive industrial expansion in the US.
[88]
Robber Barons: Definition, Impact, and Criticism in the Gilded Age
Rockefeller, became wealthy through innovation and efficiency. Of the goods and services they provided, supply grew, and prices fell rapidly, greatly boosting ...
[89]
Silicon Valley: Building on a Culture of Looking Forward - CHM
Change is good. That belief has been at the heart of Silicon Valley's innovative tech culture since the beginning. In the 1970s Silicon Valley referred to a ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[90]
Intellectual property and the U.S. economy: Third edition - USPTO
Industries in the United States that intensively use IP accounted for 41% of domestic economic activity, or output, in 2019. That year, the IP-intensive ...
[91]
The Innovation Puzzle: Patents and Productivity Growth
Mar 29, 2024 · The correlation between creative patents per capita and productivity growth over the decades is 75.7%.
[92]
[PDF] Technological Progress and Rent Seeking - Wharton Finance
Mar 19, 2025 · Our model's central prediction is that firms respond to industry-wide technological progress by disproportionately reallocating resources toward ...
[93]
[PDF] Patenting Prosperity: - Brookings Institution
Research has established that patents are correlated with economic growth across and within the same country over time.
[94]
[PDF] Intellectual property and the U.S. economy: Third edition - USPTO
12 Notably, the utility patent–intensive industries grew at the economy-wide average despite the uncertainty created by court rulings on subject matter ...
[95]
NEW: Faculty Political Diversity at Yale: Democrats Outnumber ...
Sep 23, 2024 · The report identified 312 Democrat faculty (88%) and only 4 Republicans (1.1%), a ratio of around 78 to 1.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[96]
More Than 60 Percent of Harvard FAS Faculty Identify as Liberal on ...
Sep 3, 2025 · Approximately 29 percent of faculty respondents said they were “very liberal” and 34 percent said they were “somewhat liberal.” Just 9 percent ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[97]
FIRE SURVEY: Only 20% of university faculty say a conservative ...
Dec 12, 2024 · While 71% of faculty said that a liberal individual would fit into their departments either “very” or “somewhat” well, only 20% said the same of a conservative ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[98]
Survey of journalists, conducted by researchers at the Newhouse ...
May 5, 2022 · In 2022, slightly more than 36% of U.S. journalists say they identify with the Democrat Party, up about eight percentage points from 2013. The ...Missing: bias | Show results with:bias
[99]
Key Findings From The 2022 American Journalist Study
May 6, 2022 · This present study, based on an online survey with 1,600 U.S. journalists conducted in early 2022, updates these findings and adds new ones ...
[100]
Top Hollywood Execs Give Overwhelmingly to Democrats for Midterms
Oct 12, 2018 · Nearly all (99.7 percent) the donations made by members of the THR 100 have gone to Democrats or Democratic-leaning organizations.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[101]
Motion Picture Production & Distribution Summary - OpenSecrets
Opensecret's money profile for the Motion Picture Production & Distribution industry/interest group. See contributions and lobbying history.Missing: Hollywood | Show results with:Hollywood
[102]
Agenda Setting - LSU Faculty Websites
Agenda-setting is the idea that the news media don't tell people what to think, but what to think about. Media actors do more than relay information and opinion ...<|separator|>
[103]
Danger in the internet echo chamber - Harvard Law School
Mar 24, 2017 · It's group polarization, which means that if you listen to people like you, you'll probably get more extreme and more confident too. If ...
[104]
3. How Americans view journalists and their role in society
Aug 20, 2025 · For instance, 74% of Republicans and 45% of Democrats say that most journalists are biased. And while 51% of Republicans say most journalists ...
[105]
Re-investigating the influence of China on the British civil service ...
Apr 8, 2024 · In the UK, civil servant selection was arranged through patronage until the publication of the 1854 Northcote–Trevelyan Report, which led to ...
[106]
Timeless values in an age of change - Civil Service Blog
May 24, 2015 · This year is the 160th anniversary of the Civil Service Commission, which grew out of the 1854 Northcote-Trevelyan report on the Civil Service.
[107]
Ages of 23 Tech Founders When They Started Their First Companies
Feb 27, 2020 · Mark Zuckerberg, Evan Spiegel, and the two Google cofounders were all already millionaires before they turned 30. Although those tech founders ...
[108]
Self-Made vs. Inherited Billionaires: Global Ranking by Country
As of June 2025, a total of 2,838 billionaires were counted worldwide, according to Forbes. Of these, 67% are considered self-made, while 33% inherited their ...
[109]
Tech Entrepreneurs Who Started From Nothing - Smart Devices Hub
Oct 13, 2025 · Jeff Bezos: From Modest Beginnings to E-Commerce Giant. Jeff Bezos ... With minimal technical background, he founded Alibaba in his apartment.
[110]
'The Bell Curve', Explained: Part 1, the Emergence of a Cognitive Elite
May 12, 2017 · Meanwhile, high cognitive ability means, more than ever before, that the chances of success in life are good and getting better all the time.
[111]
[PDF] Meritocracy, Cognitive Ability, and the Sources of Occupational ...
Aug 17, 2002 · Professional occupations do not score higher than unskilled laborers on IQ tests because the professionals have had more education or have ...
[112]
Does The Bell Curve Ring True? A Closer Look at a Grim Portrait of ...
Herrnstein and Murray conclude that public policies can do little to raise IQ. Given the important role they assign IQ in determining social outcomes, this ...
[113]
[PDF] Inherited Control and Firm Performance
Empirically, I find that family successions harm firm performance: return on assets falls by 18 percent and market-to- book ratios by 12 percent within three- ...
[114]
[PDF] Regression to Mediocrity? Surnames and Social Mobility in England ...
Jun 30, 2010 · ... average, the average value of y0 will be 0. Page 5. substantial regression to the mean.7 A coefficient of 0.5 implies that if a parent has.
[115]
Regression to the Mean of Elite Surnames. The strength of the...
The strength of the intergenerational correlation, b, can be measured by the rate of decline of elite surnames to the average of all surnames. Source ...
[116]
Overlapping social circles in historical elite career networks ...
Presents career networks as a way to assess capital accumulation over the organisational trajectories of elites which brings past ties into elite studies.
[117]
Signaling in social network and social capital formation - jstor
The model highlig a trade-off between maximizing the total amount of social capital in a socie distributing it equitably across individuals. Keywords Social ...Missing: elite | Show results with:elite
[118]
[PDF] Family first? Nepotism and corporate investment
We provide evidence that kinship ties among high-ranked employees hinder in- vestment. In our analysis, we find that a one standard deviation increase in KIN is.
[119]
The Bright Side of Nepotism? Family CEOs, Turnover, and Firm ...
Nov 3, 2023 · We estimate a dynamic model of CEO turnover where executive candidates can be found in the family, within the firm, or outside.
[120]
How the World War I Era Broke the British Aristocracy - History.com
Sep 11, 2025 · The years around the Great War marked a turning point for Britain, stripping power and privilege from the long-dominant landowning elite.Missing: circulation | Show results with:circulation
[121]
The Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy | Department of History
Sep 7, 1999 · The British aristocracy lost much of their prosperity, prestige, and political significance by the end of the 1930s, reinforced after WWII.Missing: circulation elites
[122]
The Decline of the European Aristocracy - Old Magazine Articles
"The three great military monarchies which have lately fallen to pieces - Russian, Austro-Hungarian and German - were all based upon an aristocracy of large ...Missing: circulation elites
[123]
Most Fortune 500 CEOs didn't attend Ivy League colleges
Jun 14, 2023 · Of the 2023 Fortune 100 CEOs, only 11.8% attended an Ivy as undergrads, and only 9.8% hold an Ivy League MBA. Doug McMillon, CEO of Walmart, the ...
[124]
Diversifying Society's Leaders? The Determinants and Causal ...
Ivy-Plus colleges have much smaller causal effects on average earnings, reconciling our findings with prior work that found smaller causal effects using ...
[125]
Admission Practices At Elite Colleges Add To Advantages Of The ...
Jul 24, 2023 · The biggest boost was given to high-income legacy applicants, who are five times more likely to be admitted to an Ivy-Plus college than peers ...
[126]
Prestige shouldn't equal privilege in college admissions - The Gamut
May 9, 2024 · One in six students in an Ivy League have a parent in the top 1%. Elite colleges self-select rich students, creating a disturbing inequity that ...
[127]
Diversifying Society's Leaders? The Determinants and Causal ...
Jul 20, 2023 · The three factors that give children from high-income families an admissions advantage are uncorrelated or negatively correlated with post- ...
[128]
The Causal Effects of Admission to Highly Selective Private Colleges
Jul 25, 2023 · Children from families in the top 1% are more than twice as likely to attend an Ivy-Plus college (Ivy League, Stanford, MIT, Duke, and Chicago) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[129]
The gap in college costs and earnings for young workers since 1980
Nov 2, 2021 · College costs have increased by 169% since 1980—but pay for young workers is up by just 19%: Georgetown report · Share Article via Facebook<|separator|>
[130]
College Tuition Inflation: The Rising Price Of Education | Bankrate
Aug 13, 2025 · College tuition costs have increased at four-year institutions, climbing from roughly $11,840 a year in 1981-82 to $24,920 a year at in-state ...College tuition inflation rate... · College tuition inflation by state
[131]
Where Top Fortune 500 CEOs Attended College
Of the CEOs at the top 10 companies on the Fortune 500 list, one attended an Ivy League school and eight were educated as undergraduates at public colleges.Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[132]
Elitist Britain 2025 - The Sutton Trust
Sep 18, 2025 · Senior judges also remain the profession with the highest proportion of Oxbridge graduates, up 4 percentage points at 75%. Creative ...
[133]
Privately educated still have 'vice-like grip' on most powerful UK jobs
Sep 17, 2025 · Those institutions were also dominant among senior civil servants, with 66% of permanent secretaries being Oxbridge graduates. About a third of ...
[134]
UK dominated by the privately educated and Oxbridge graduates
Jun 29, 2019 · In business, 41 percent of the CEOs of FTSE 350 companies were educated in private or grammar schools and 15 percent went to Oxbridge. These ...
[135]
[PDF] creative destruction | MIT Economics
Recent evidence on the pace of creative destruction. There is abundant recent empirical evidence supporting the Schumpeterian view that the process of ...Missing: top majority<|separator|>
[136]
[PDF] What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?
Creative destruction will be the central force that drives innovation, invariant firm size distribution and aggregate productivity growth on a balanced growth ...
[137]
Schumpeter's Vindication: The Enduring Link Between Scale and ...
Oct 16, 2025 · The authors provide evidence that most total factor productivity (TFP) growth from 1983 to 2013 resulted from this “own innovation” by ...Missing: majority | Show results with:majority
[138]
Elon Musk - Visionaries on Innovation - The Henry Ford
As a cofounder of X.com (later PayPal), SpaceX and Tesla Motors, he has created organizations focused on commercializing innovations in all three.Missing: elite entrepreneurs examples
[139]
Henry Ford and Elon Musk - Medium
May 8, 2025 · The similarities between Ford and Musk are striking. For example, many people think Ford invented the automobile, the assembly line, and mass production.<|separator|>
[140]
Elon Musk's 10 greatest inventions changing the world - CNBC
Nov 14, 2015 · There's more to Musk than just the companies you've heard of. Here's a look at his wide range of revolutionary ideas, patents, products and companies.Missing: entrepreneurs Ford
[141]
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) - Treasury
Approximately $250 billion was committed in programs to stabilize banking institutions ($5 billion of which was ultimately cancelled). Approximately $27 billion ...
[142]
The politics of bailouts: Estimating the causal effects of political ...
Feb 6, 2021 · In this paper, I examine the effect of political connections on the allocation of funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to the US financial ...
[143]
US government TARP bailout and bank lottery behavior
We find that the TARP bailout increased the likelihood of bank lotteryness and risk shifting. Lottery-like bank equities are riskier after TARP and exhibit ...
[144]
[PDF] GOVERNING PRIORITIES | American Enterprise Institute
Policy shouldn't slow that process down by encouraging and incentivizing employers to maintain pre-virus employment levels. The same dynamic is at play at the ...
[145]
Power Dynamics: Michels' Iron Law of Oligarchy & Pareto's Lions ...
Oct 17, 2023 · The iron law of oligarchy and the differentiation between foxes and lions in Pareto's theory have significant implications for understanding modern power ...
[146]
[PDF] civil service management and corruption - GI ACE
Where employees are recruited based on their professional merit – rather than political or personal criteria – they tend to be less corrupt. This may be because ...Missing: elites | Show results with:elites<|control11|><|separator|>
[147]
2023 Corruption Perceptions Index: Explore the… - Transparency.org
Singapore5. 82. Sweden6. 82. Switzerland6. 79 ... Venezuela177. 11. Somalia180. Click on any country in the map or index to see its full score.2023 · View latest · 2022
[148]
https://www.statista.com/statistics/811741/venezuela-corruption-perception-index/
[149]
What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and ...
Jun 13, 2023 · Articles that studied the overall merit-based system found positive relationships with government performance and democratic stability. A third ...
[150]
Do CEOs with elite education matter? Evidence from shareholder ...
Additionally, firms led by elite-educated CEOs demonstrate stronger growth opportunities, better credit quality, and lower capital costs, aligning with the ...
[151]
The effect of CEOs on firm performance - Mackey - 2008 - SMS - Wiley
Oct 30, 2008 · The extent to which CEOs influence firm performance is fundamental to scholarly understanding of how organizations work; yet, this linkage ...
[152]
[PDF] INSTITUTIONS AS A FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF LONG-RUN ...
Abstract. This paper develops the empirical and theoretical case that differences in economic in- stitutions are the fundamental cause of differences in ...
[153]
Institutions and prosperity: The 2024 Nobel laureates - CEPR
Oct 29, 2024 · In a 2006 study, Acemoglu and Robinson formalise how elites may view economic growth as a double-edged sword that could increase the ...
[154]
Economic Recovery: Lessons from the Post-World War II Period
Sep 10, 2012 · The decade following World War II is fondly remembered as a period of economic growth and cultural stability.Missing: elite expertise
[155]
The Post World War II Boom: How America Got Into Gear - History.com
May 14, 2020 · After years of wartime rationing, American consumers were ready to spend money—and factories made the switch from war to peacetime production.Missing: elite | Show results with:elite
[156]
Three Myths about U.S. Economic Inequality and Social Mobility
Apr 6, 2022 · Although income inequality has risen since the late 1970s, the trend in social mobility has remained largely stable in recent decades. Rising ...
[157]
[PDF] THE USE OF INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES IN HIGHER ...
The instrumental variable (IV) estimation strategy is one approach that researchers can use to estimate the causal impact of various higher education–related ...
[158]
How Elite Overproduction Brings Disorder - Peter Turchin
Nov 20, 2013 · The first is on the relationship between inequality, elite overproduction, and cooperation (or, rather, failure of cooperation).<|separator|>
[159]
Structural-Demographic Theory - Peter Turchin
A tool for understanding long-term social pressures that lead to revolutions, civil wars, and other major outbreaks of socio-political instability.Missing: 1917 | Show results with:1917
[160]
The Labor Market for Recent College Graduates
The unemployment rate averaged 5.3 percent, in line with the first quarter, and the underemployment rate held steady at just over 41 percent.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[161]
Recent College Grads Bear Brunt of Labor Market Shifts
Aug 25, 2025 · Young college graduates between ages 23 and 27 are experiencing unemployment rates that average 4.59% in 2025—a stark contrast to the 3.25% rate ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[162]
America Is Headed Toward Collapse - The Atlantic
Jun 2, 2023 · The second, and more significant, is elite overproduction—when a society produces too many superrich and ultra-educated people, and not enough ...
[163]
[PDF] A Structural-Demographic Analysis of American History - Peter Turchin
... structural-demographic theory is provided by the three theory-motivated and empirically supported generalizations discussed at the end of Secular Cycles.
[164]
There Is No Surplus Elite in America - by Yascha Mounk
Dec 5, 2024 · Peter Turchin's thesis that “elite overproduction” explains America's instability is conceptually confused and empirically false.
[165]
Are we overproducing elites and instability? - Niskanen Center
Jun 28, 2023 · Peter Turchin predicted the tumult. He points to our large class of aspiring elites competing for power without advancing the living standards of most ...
[166]
The Elite Overproduction Hypothesis - by Noah Smith - Noahpinion
Jul 4, 2025 · ... Peter Turchin's theory of elite overproduction. Basically, the idea here is that America produced a lot of highly educated people with great ...
[167]
Who Are the Elites? - Peter Turchin
Nov 27, 2016 · Elite overproduction can develop in a variety ways. No wealth accumulation needs to be involved. In polities governed by administrative elites ...
[168]
History - The World Economic Forum
In 1971, during the first phase of our development, the Forum established itself as a not-for-profit foundation, promoting stakeholder responsibility.
[169]
Bilderberg Meetings
The annual Bilderberg Meeting has been a forum for informal discussions to foster dialogue between Europe and North America.Brief history · Frequently Asked Questions · Participants 2024 · Participants 2023
[170]
The WTO in brief
The WTO operates the global system of trade rules, helps developing economies build their trade capacity and seeks to create a more inclusive trading system. ...
[171]
March 2024 global poverty update from the World Bank
Mar 26, 2024 · We estimate that COVID-19 increased extreme poverty in the world, as measured by the international poverty line of $2.15, from 8.9 percent in 2019 to 9.7 ...
[172]
Poverty - Our World in Data
According to the World Bank, the number of people in extreme poverty increased by around 50 million between 2019 and 2020, marking the first substantial rise ...
[173]
Globalization and Poverty - National Bureau of Economic Research
The evidence strongly suggests that export growth and incoming foreign investment have reduced poverty everywhere from Mexico to India to Poland.
[174]
[PDF] Globalization, Offshoring and Economic Insecurity in Industrialized ...
This paper shows that extensive offshoring has raised both actual and perceived labor market insecurity in industrialized countries.<|control11|><|separator|>
[175]
[PDF] The impact of offshoring and migration policies on migration flows
The empirical results suggest strong direct substitutability between migrant and offshore workers from the same origin country and the absence of policy driven ...Missing: elite | Show results with:elite
[176]
Intra-Elite Competition: A Key Concept for Understanding the ...
Dec 30, 2016 · Simply put, it is the excessive expansion of elite aspirant numbers (or “elite overproduction”) that drives up intra-elite competition. Let's ...
[177]
End Times: Elites, Counter-Elites and the Path of Political ...
Elite overproduction led to state breakdown in imperial China, in medieval France, in the American Civil War - and it is happening now.But while we are far ...
[178]
A brief history of the long-standing mistrust between the French ...
Aug 16, 2021 · The search for scapegoats within the elites is also a very French trait: today, the ÉNA graduates known as “enarques”; under the Revolution, ...
[179]
The Great Recession and the Rise of Populism - Intereconomics
Differences in unemployment during the crisis correlate with views that immigration harms the country's economic life. However, we uncover no evidence that ...
[180]
interpersonal inequality, economic decline and the rise of populism ...
The results show that inequalities and economic decline, coupled with racist and anti-immigration attitudes, are powerful predictors of populism, although there ...
[181]
Responses to Populism Require Understanding Why Voters Lose ...
Oct 9, 2023 · When voters lose faith in experts, they vote for anti-elite populist leaders who promise to drain the swamp in the civil service.<|separator|>
[182]
Do SAT and ACT scores boost student performance? Princeton says ...
Oct 16, 2025 · The university found that academic performance was stronger among students who chose to submit test scores compared to those who did not. As ...
[183]
Admission-preference study raises legacy questions
Aug 24, 2018 · A study by Princeton researchers of students whose SAT scores indicate that they received favored treatment for admission to select colleges ...Missing: GRE predict
[184]
Breaking Admissions News: Princeton - Crimson Education
The decision follows five years of internal data showing stronger academic outcomes among score submitters, a trend echoed in recent research (see below), ...<|separator|>
[185]
The impact of legacy status on undergraduate admissions at elite ...
Legacy status increases admission odds by a factor of 3.13, and this advantage is found across the student ability spectrum.
[186]
How do Princeton's legacy students stack up to their peers? We ...
Jul 19, 2023 · According to data from Princeton in 2018, over 30 percent of applicants with a legacy connection are admitted, compared to less than five percent overall.
[187]
The academic performance of legacies - ScienceDirect.com
Legacies are slightly less likely to receive top grades, but generally perform at least as well, or even better, than non-legacies.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[188]
Nepotism, human capital and economic development - ScienceDirect
This paper suggests that nepotism affects economic development by hindering human capital development.
[189]
Invisible handcuffs: Nepotism culture and SMEs' innovation
This paper investigates how nepotism culture affects SMEs' innovation behavior. Nepotism culture decreases the probability of SMEs' innovation.
[190]
(PDF) A Study On The Effects Of Nepotism, Favoritism And Cronyism ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Hypothesis 1: Nepotism has a significant negative effect on organizational trust in family firms. Hypothesis 2: Favoritism has a significant ...
[191]
Medical School Admissions After the Supreme Court's 2023 ...
Aug 26, 2025 · In this study, URiM student matriculation into US medical schools declined after the 2023 SCOTUS ruling, with an emergent disparity in ...<|separator|>
[192]
[PDF] NEPOTISM AND MERITOCRACY - Göteborgs universitet
Dec 16, 2014 · The empirical analysis shows that even while nepotism declined in Sweden, the proportion of civil servants belonging to the old aristocratic ...
[193]
The myth of meritocracy, according to Michael Sandel
Jan 5, 2021 · The myth of meritocracy is not merely self-deluding, Michael Sandel argues in his new book, but it also fuels our divisiveness.Missing: left threatened
[194]
In Defence of Meritocracy - The Centre for Independent Studies
Jul 6, 2023 · Critics of merit-based advancement argue that universities increase inequality by enrolling students who come mainly from middle-class and wealthy families.
[195]
[PDF] Top Civil Service: Meritocracy or Nepotism?*
We find evidence consistent with the existence of indirect nepotism: relatives tend to apply more to exams including a practical test (for which coaching ...
[196]
Neoliberalism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 9, 2021 · ... elite consensus about how economies around the world should be run. This led to a “Washington Consensus” that caused policy interventions ...
[197]
2008: The Demise of Neoliberal Globalization - Immanuel Wallerstein
The Washington Consensus promised renewed economic growth to everyone and a way out of the global profit stagnation. Politically, the proponents of neoliberal ...
[198]
Elite vs. Public Opinion - Center for Immigration Studies
As already discussed, 60 percent of the public, compared to 14 percent of elites, think that immigration is a critical threat to the nation. Table 1 shows that ...
[199]
Elite and Popular Opinion on Illegal Immigration, 1994–2018
Oct 17, 2023 · Weakliem finds that on average, elites do consistently assign a lower priority to controlling immigration than does the public.
[200]
Elite Influence on Climate Change Skepticism: Evidence from Close ...
Many theorize that public opinion follows political elite on climate change skepticism, yet evidence of a causal link is lacking.
[201]
The rise of and demand for identity‐oriented media coverage
Jul 1, 2024 · We first document the rising salience of different social identities using natural language processing tools to analyze all tweets from 19 media outlets.
[202]
Why Does Identity Matter More than Ideas? Blame It on Media
Nov 4, 2024 · A byproduct of media evolution, identity politics has come to dominate cadre policy across many areas and on many levels, expanding from ...
[203]
The Polythink Syndrome and Elite Group Decision‐Making - Mintz
Jan 22, 2016 · Polythink, a group decision-making dynamic whereby different members in a decision-making unit espouse a plurality of opinions and offer divergent policy ...
[204]
Why Economists Cling to Discredited Ideas - The American Prospect
Mar 9, 2015 · To be sure, there are dissenting economists. A few even win Nobel prizes. But in the academy, free-market ideas are still the dominant ones ...
[205]
[PDF] Consensus and Dissension Among Economists: An Empirical Inquiry
Nevertheless, there is much less consensus. (or even marked dissension) on other mone tarist propositions such as Propositions 12,. 16, or 20. The propositions ...
[206]
The Sociology of Elites - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · The study of elites is the study of power and inequality, from above. It involves looking at the distribution of social resources.
[207]
Wealth as One of the “Big Four” SES Dimensions ... - Oxford Academic
Jul 2, 2021 · We find that wealth is a distinct dimension of SES that is very different from education, occupation, and income.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[208]
Sage Reference - Encyclopedia of Power - Elite Theories
... theoretical criticisms with empirical verification. Early elite theorists used reputational analysis to empirically base their claims.
[209]
https://brill.com/view/journals/coso/14/3/article-p386_4.xml
[210]
The Empirical Side of the Power Elite Debate: an Assessment and ...
Recently, empirical data have been considered for elite backgrounds, elite interlock, elite unity, and elite influence on public policy, but interpretation of ...Missing: verifying | Show results with:verifying
[211]
The Empirical Side of the Power Elite Debate - jstor
From the earliest writings in social science there have been lively debates over the extent to which societies are dominated by elites. Recently, empirical ...Missing: verifying | Show results with:verifying
[212]
Full article: Navigating power dynamics in elite interviews
Aug 28, 2024 · This article argues that the power relations between researchers and elite respondents are not static; rather, they are shaped by the specific socio-political ...Missing: verifying concentration
[213]
(PDF) Researching Elites and Power Theory, Methods, Analyses
This open access book describes how elite studies theoretically and methodologically construct their object.