Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) is a slowly progressive form of infective endocarditis, characterized by bacterial infection of the endocardial surface of the heart, particularly the valves, with an insidious onset over weeks to months unless complicated by embolic events or valvular rupture. Historically recognized in the late 19th century and once nearly always fatal, SBE's prognosis improved dramatically with the advent of antibiotics in the mid-20th century. Unlike acute forms, SBE typically involves low-virulence organisms and presents with nonspecific symptoms, often delaying diagnosis.[1] Unlike acute forms, SBE typically involves low-virulence organisms and presents with nonspecific symptoms, often delaying diagnosis.[2]The primary causative agents of SBE are viridans group streptococci, such as Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans, which commonly originate from oral flora and enter the bloodstream via dental procedures or poor oral hygiene.[1] Other frequent pathogens include enterococci, Streptococcus gallolyticus (formerly Streptococcus bovis), HACEK group organisms (Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Kingella), and occasionally coagulase-negative staphylococci or Staphylococcus aureus in less virulent strains.[2] Risk factors predominantly involve preexisting cardiac abnormalities, including congenital heart defects, rheumatic valvular disease, prosthetic heart valves, and prior endocarditis, which provide sites for bacterial adhesion and vegetation formation.[3] Additional predisposing conditions encompass intravenous drug use, immunosuppression, indwelling catheters, hemodialysis, and poor dentition, with higher incidence in males over age 60.[1] The annual incidence of infective endocarditis, of which SBE is a common form, in the United States is approximately 15 cases per 100,000 population as of 2025, reflecting its relative rarity but potential for severe complications like heart failure or systemic emboli.[4]Clinically, SBE manifests with constitutional symptoms such as low-grade fever, fatigue, weight loss, night sweats, anorexia, and arthralgias, often accompanied by a new or changing heart murmur in about 85% of cases.[1] Embolic phenomena may occur, leading to splenomegaly, petechiae, Osler's nodes, Janeway lesions, or Roth spots, while pulmonary symptoms like dyspnea or cough can arise from right-sided involvement.[3] Diagnosis relies on the modified Duke criteria, requiring either pathological evidence of endocardial involvement or a combination of major criteria (positive blood cultures for typical organisms and echocardiographic confirmation of vegetations) and minor criteria (predisposing factors, fever, vascular phenomena, immunological findings).[1] At least three sets of blood cultures are essential for pathogen identification, supplemented by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography to detect vegetations or abscesses.[2]Treatment of SBE centers on prolonged intravenous antibiotics tailored to the identified pathogen and susceptibility, typically administered for 4 to 6 weeks to achieve cure rates exceeding 80% in native valve cases.[1] Empiric regimens often include vancomycin plus gentamicin, with de-escalation to penicillin G or ceftriaxone for streptococcal infections; prosthetic valve involvement may necessitate longer durations or combination therapy.[2] Surgical intervention is indicated in approximately 25-50% of cases for refractory infection, heart failure, large vegetations (>10 mm), or recurrent emboli, involving valve repair or replacement.[1] Prophylaxis with antibiotics prior to high-risk procedures, such as dental work, is recommended for patients with prosthetic valves, prior endocarditis, or certain congenital defects to prevent SBE onset.[3]
Introduction
Definition and Classification
Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) is a slowly progressive subtype of infective endocarditis defined as an infection of the endocardial surface of the heart, most commonly involving previously damaged heart valves, with an indolent clinical course developing over weeks to months.[1] This form arises from the colonization and persistent infection by less virulent microorganisms, leading to gradual inflammation and vegetation formation on valvular or endocardial structures.[1] Unlike more aggressive infections, SBE often manifests in individuals with underlying predisposing valvular abnormalities, such as rheumatic heart disease or congenital defects.SBE is classified within the broader spectrum of infective endocarditis, distinguished primarily by its clinical tempo and microbial etiology from acute bacterial endocarditis, which features rapid onset over days to weeks driven by highly virulent pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, and from culture-negative endocarditis, where standard blood cultures fail to identify the causative agent despite evident infection.[1] The historical term "endocarditis lenta," reflecting its protracted nature, was used to describe this entity in early 20th-century literature.[5] Under contemporary frameworks, such as the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, SBE is integrated into the infective endocarditis classification system, which emphasizes clinical presentation (acute versus subacute/chronic), anatomical involvement (native versus prosthetic valves), and diagnostic criteria incorporating microbiological, imaging, and clinical evidence rather than rigid separation into bacterial subtypes.Without treatment, SBE exhibits a gradual progression, typically spanning weeks to months and potentially extending up to a year, culminating in significant valve destruction, heart failure, or systemic embolization if major complications arise.[1][6] This timeline underscores the importance of early recognition within the infective endocarditis continuum to prevent irreversible cardiac damage.
Historical Context
The recognition of subacute bacterial endocarditis traces back to the late 19th century, when William Osler provided the first comprehensive clinical description in his 1885 Gulstonian Lectures delivered to the Royal College of Physicians. Osler termed the condition "malignant endocarditis," distinguishing it from acute forms by its insidious onset, prolonged course over weeks to months, and association with embolic phenomena and valvular vegetations, often superimposed on pre-existing heart damage.[7] He emphasized its high fatality rate and characteristic peripheral manifestations, such as splinter hemorrhages and clubbing. The term "endocarditis lenta," highlighting its slower progression compared to rapidly lethal variants, was later coined by Hugo Schottmüller in 1903. Osler's nodes, tender subcutaneous nodules on the pads of fingers and toes, were described in his 1909 writings.[8]In the early 20th century, understanding shifted from associations with syphilitic or rheumatic origins to a clear bacterial etiology, facilitated by microbiological advances. Prior misconceptions linked the disease primarily to rheumatic fever, viewing it as a chronic extension of valvular inflammation from streptococcal pharyngitis, or to syphilitic aortitis in some cases, leading to diagnostic confusion with non-infectious endocarditides.[9] By 1903, Hugo Schottmüller isolated Streptococcus viridans from blood cultures in patients with the subacute form, establishing it as the predominant causative agent and redirecting focus toward infectious pathogenesis.[5] The term "subacute bacterial endocarditis" was formalized in the 1930s through clinical-pathological studies that differentiated it from acute and chronic forms based on duration, microbiology, and host response, reflecting growing evidence of its bacterial nature.[10]Before the antibiotic era, subacute bacterial endocarditis carried a near-100% mortality rate, with patients succumbing to progressive heart failure, emboli, or secondary infections over months despite supportive care.[11] A pivotal milestone occurred in 1944, when Leo Loewe and colleagues reported the first successful treatments using penicillin, achieving cure in several cases of Streptococcus viridans infection through prolonged intravenous administration, marking the dawn of effective therapy and dramatically altering prognosis.[12]
Epidemiology and Risk Factors
Incidence and Demographics
Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE), a subtype of infective endocarditis characterized by an insidious onset and progression over weeks to months, occurs within the broader estimated incidence of infective endocarditis of 3 to 10 cases per 100,000 person-years in developed countries.[13] This rate is higher among elderly populations, with peak incidence occurring after 60 years of age, and is elevated in individuals with underlying congenital heart disease.[1] The median age at diagnosis is approximately 58 years, reflecting the influence of aging-related comorbidities and increased use of invasive cardiac procedures.[1]Demographically, SBE affects males more frequently than females, with a male-to-female ratio of about 2:1.[13] Incidence trends indicate a gradual increase since 2020, attributed to aging populations, prolonged survival among those with rheumatic heart disease, and rising rates of healthcare-associated infections.[13] As of 2022, age-standardized incidence in the United States reached 14.4 cases per 100,000.[14] In Europe, population-based studies have documented rising rates, with age-standardized incidence climbing from around 7 to 14 cases per 100,000 in high-income areas between 2000 and 2022.[15]Geographically, SBE and related forms of infective endocarditis show marked variations, with higher rates in low-resource settings due to prevalent untreated valvular diseases from rheumatic fever.[13] In the United States, annual cases of infective endocarditis total approximately 40,000 to 50,000, of which subacute presentations like SBE constitute a significant portion, often linked to predisposing conditions such as prosthetic valves.[16]
Predisposing Conditions
Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) primarily affects individuals with underlying cardiac abnormalities that facilitate microbial adhesion to damaged endocardial surfaces. A major predisposing cardiac condition is valvular damage resulting from prior rheumatic fever, which leads to chronic valvular deformities such as mitral or aortic regurgitation, thereby increasing susceptibility to infection.[2] Rheumatic heart disease remains a significant risk factor, particularly in developing regions where it accounts for a substantial proportion of SBE cases.[17]Congenital heart defects, including bicuspid aortic valve and ventricular septal defects, also predispose patients by creating turbulent blood flow and endothelial injury sites vulnerable to bacterial colonization.[2] Prosthetic heart valves represent another high-risk category, with an approximate annual incidence of endocarditis ranging from 0.3% to 1%, elevated in the early postoperative period due to surgical site vulnerabilities and foreign material.[18] A history of prior endocarditis further amplifies risk, with odds ratios for recurrence exceeding 200 in affected individuals.[19]Non-cardiac factors contribute to SBE susceptibility, though less dominantly than in acute forms. Intravenous drug use is a notable risk but occurs less frequently in SBE compared to acute bacterial endocarditis, as it more often involves aggressive pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus.[2] Immunosuppressive states, such as HIV infection or diabetes mellitus, impair host defenses and heighten vulnerability to opportunistic bacteremia.[2] Poor dental hygiene or untreated oral infections can introduce causative bacteria, typically low-virulence streptococci, into the bloodstream via transient bacteremia, facilitating endothelial seeding in predisposed hearts.[2]
Etiology and Pathogenesis
Causative Microorganisms
Subacute bacterial endocarditis is predominantly caused by less virulent bacteria that lead to a gradual onset of symptoms. The primary causative microorganisms are viridans group streptococci, which account for 40-60% of cases.[20] Species such as Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans are commonly implicated, originating from the oral flora and typically entering the bloodstream via dental procedures or routine oral activities like toothbrushing in individuals with gingival disease.[20][21]Secondary pathogens include enterococci, responsible for 10-20% of cases, primarily Enterococcus faecalis, which arise from the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract.[22][20] The HACEK group of fastidious, gram-negative bacteria—comprising Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella species—causes 5-10% of subacute cases, often linked to oral or upper respiratory tract sources.[20][23] In patients with prosthetic heart valves, coagulase-negative staphylococci, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, become more prevalent, contributing to late-onset subacute infections associated with prosthetic materials.[20][22]Approximately 10-15% of subacute bacterial endocarditis cases are culture-negative, often due to prior antibiotic exposure suppressing growth in blood cultures or involvement of fastidious organisms.[24] Non-HACEK gram-negative bacteria remain rare overall (approximately 2% of infective endocarditis cases) and are associated with higher morbidity, particularly due to antibiotic resistance.[25] These pathogens adhere to damaged valvular endothelium, initiating vegetation formation, as detailed in pathophysiological mechanisms.[20]
Pathophysiological Mechanisms
Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) typically begins with endothelial damage on cardiac valves, often due to turbulent blood flow from congenital or acquired abnormalities, exposing subendothelial collagen and creating a nidus for bacterial adhesion.[1] Circulating bacteria, primarily low-virulence organisms such as viridans group streptococci, adhere to this damaged surface via specific adhesins, including dextranpolysaccharides that promote binding to fibronectin and fibrinogen in the platelet-fibrin matrix. This initial colonization occurs during transient bacteremia from oral, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary sources, with the slow-growing nature of these pathogens allowing weeks to months of progression without immediate destruction.[1]Following adhesion, bacteria proliferate within the sterile thrombus, leading to vegetation formation as platelets and fibrin encapsulate the microbial colonies, forming protective biofilms that shield them from host defenses and antibiotics. These vegetations, composed of bacteria embedded in a dense extracellular matrix, propagate gradually, causing valve thickening and regurgitation through mechanical distortion rather than acute perforation.[1] The biofilm structure fosters persistent infection by limiting immune cell penetration and promoting antigenic variation, contributing to the subacute course characteristic of SBE.The inflammatory response in SBE involves a type III hypersensitivity reaction, where circulating immune complexes containing bacterial antigens and antibodies deposit in vessel walls and glomerular capillaries, activating complement and recruiting neutrophils to incite tissue damage.[26] This mechanism underlies glomerulonephritis, observed in 20-40% of cases, with immune complex-mediated inflammation leading to mesangial proliferation and focal necrosis in the kidneys. Additionally, cytokine release from adherent monocytes and endothelial cells amplifies the local and systemic inflammatory cascade, promoting further thrombus extension and endothelial activation without overt septic shock.
Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Subacute bacterial endocarditis typically presents with an insidious onset of subjective symptoms that develop gradually over weeks to months, often mimicking a protracted viral illness.[27]Systemic symptoms predominate and include low-grade fever below 39°C, night sweats, profound fatigue, malaise, and unintentional weight loss.[27][28] Arthralgias and myalgias occur in approximately 44% of cases as part of nonspecific musculoskeletal complaints.[29]Cardiac-related symptoms are subtle and may manifest as dyspnea on exertion secondary to early valvular insufficiency.[13]Chest pain is rare unless associated with embolic events.[29]Other manifestations include anorexia and headache, contributing to a flu-like presentation that frequently delays diagnosis, with an average interval of about 6 weeks from symptom onset.[29][1]
Physical Signs
Physical examination in subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) often reveals cardiac abnormalities indicative of valvular involvement. A new or changing regurgitant murmur, typically aortic or mitral, is present in approximately 85% of cases and reflects vegetation-induced valve dysfunction.[29]Tachycardia is commonly observed, usually secondary to fever.[1] In advanced cases, signs of heart failure such as jugular venous distension may appear due to progressive valvular insufficiency.[30]The classic peripheral stigmata of SBE arise from immune complex deposition and septic emboli. Osler nodes, tender subcutaneous nodules on the pads of fingers or toes, occur in 10-25% of patients.[29] Janeway lesions, nontender erythematous or hemorrhagic macules on the palms or soles, result from septic emboli and are less common.[29] Splinter hemorrhages, linear reddish-brown streaks under the nail beds, are seen in 15-50% of cases.[29] Roth spots, oval retinal hemorrhages with pale centers, are retinal manifestations found in about 5% of patients.[29]Additional findings include splenomegaly in 30-50% of cases, attributable to chronic inflammation or emboli.[29] Digital clubbing may develop in prolonged untreated infections.[29] Petechiae on the conjunctivae, oral mucosa, or extremities are nonspecific but frequent, occurring in up to 20-40% of SBE patients.[29][30]
Diagnosis
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical evaluation of subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) begins with a thorough history and physical examination to identify insidious symptoms and risk factors that raise suspicion for this condition. Patients typically present with a prolonged course of low-grade fever, fatigue, malaise, weight loss, and night sweats lasting weeks to months, often without an obvious source of infection.[1]Key historical elements include predisposing risk factors such as underlying valvular heart disease, recent dental procedures, intravenous drug use, prosthetic heart valves, or immunosuppression, which are present in the majority of cases.[1]Physical examination may reveal subtle findings like a new or changing heart murmur in up to 85% of patients, splenomegaly, or nonspecific signs such as petechiae and splinter hemorrhages, prompting further investigation despite the subacute, nondramatic onset that differentiates SBE from more fulminant acute forms.[1]The cornerstone of diagnosis is the application of the Modified Duke criteria, a standardized framework that integrates clinical, microbiological, and imaging data to classify infective endocarditis, including SBE.[17] Major criteria include persistently positive blood cultures for typical organisms such as viridans group streptococci or evidence of endocardial involvement on echocardiography, such as vegetations or abscesses.[24] Minor criteria encompass predisposing cardiac conditions or injection drug use, fever greater than 38°C, vascular phenomena like embolic events, immunologic phenomena such as Osler nodes or glomerulonephritis, and microbiological findings not meeting major criteria.[24]Diagnosis is classified as definite infective endocarditis with two major criteria, one major and three minor criteria, or five minor criteria; possible diagnosis requires one major and one minor criterion or three minor criteria.[24] The 2015 update to the criteria, aligned with European Society of Cardiology guidelines, demonstrated approximately 80% sensitivity for definite diagnosis.[31] The 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria further refined this by incorporating advanced imaging modalities, such as cardiac computed tomography and [18F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography, as major criteria to enhance detection, particularly in prosthetic valve endocarditis, with validation studies showing improved sensitivity ranging from 70% to 84% while maintaining high specificity.[24][32]
Laboratory and Imaging Studies
Laboratory diagnosis of subacute bacterial endocarditis relies heavily on microbiological studies, particularly blood cultures, which remain the cornerstone for identifying the causative pathogen. At least three sets of blood cultures, each consisting of aerobic and anaerobic bottles, should be obtained from different venipuncture sites over a 24-hour period prior to antibiotic administration to maximize yield and detect continuous bacteremia typical of this condition.[33] In subacute cases, caused by less virulent organisms, cultures are positive in approximately 90% of instances, with growth typically detected within 48-72 hours, although fastidious organisms may require extended incubation up to 5 days for detection.[1][34]For culture-negative endocarditis, which occurs in 5-10% of cases due to prior antibiotic exposure or fastidious organisms, molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on blood or excised valve tissue are recommended to detect bacterial DNA directly.[35] Serologic testing may be employed for HACEK group organisms (Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Kingella) in suspected culture-negative scenarios, although these bacteria typically grow in standard media with extended incubation under carbon dioxide-enriched conditions.[34]Inflammatory markers provide supportive evidence but are nonspecific. Mild leukocytosis is common, reflecting the subacute nature of the infection, while erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are elevated in nearly all patients.[36]Procalcitonin levels are elevated in approximately 60% of cases, aiding in distinguishing bacterial from nonbacterial etiologies, though sensitivity varies with disease duration.[37]Urinalysis often reveals microscopic hematuria or proteinuria in up to 50% of patients, indicative of renal embolic phenomena or immune complex glomerulonephritis.[38]Imaging studies, primarily echocardiography, are essential for visualizing endocardial involvement and fulfill major diagnostic criteria such as the modified Duke criteria. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) serves as the initial modality, detecting vegetations, abscesses, or valvular regurgitation with moderate sensitivity (60-70%) in native valve cases.[39] Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indicated subsequently for higher resolution, particularly in prosthetic valves or when TTE is inconclusive, offering sensitivity exceeding 90% for small vegetations (<5 mm) and perivalvular complications.[39] Three-dimensional echocardiography enhances assessment of valve anatomy and function, providing superior spatial resolution for complex lesions and surgical planning.[40] Emerging modalities like 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) are recommended by the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis when echocardiography is nondiagnostic, with class I evidence for detecting periprosthetic infections.[39]
Management
Antibiotic Therapy
Antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for subacute bacterial endocarditis, a form of infective endocarditis typically caused by less virulent organisms such as viridans group streptococci, enterococci, and HACEK group bacteria, requiring prolonged intravenous administration to achieve bactericidal activity against endocardial vegetations.[17] Therapy is guided by identification of the causative microorganism, with empiric regimens initiated promptly while awaiting culture results to cover common community-acquired pathogens.[17]Empiric therapy for community-acquired subacute bacterial endocarditis in native valves typically involves vancomycin combined with ceftriaxone to provide coverage against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, viridans group streptococci, enterococci, and HACEK organisms, with the regimen adjusted within 24-48 hours based on blood culture results and susceptibility testing.[17] For suspected enterococcal involvement, gentamicin is added to the empiric regimen for synergistic effect, particularly in cases of ampicillin-susceptible strains.[17] In prosthetic valve endocarditis or nosocomial cases, broader coverage with vancomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin may be considered initially.Once the pathogen is identified, targeted therapy is tailored to susceptibility profiles. For penicillin-susceptible viridans group streptococci (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤0.12 mcg/mL), monotherapy with aqueous penicillin G (12-18 million units per day intravenously in divided doses) or ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously once daily) is administered for 4 weeks in uncomplicated native valve cases with symptoms lasting less than 3 months.[17] Alternatively, the addition of gentamicin (1 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours for the first 2 weeks) shortens the total duration to 2 weeks for highly susceptible strains, though this is reserved for patients without renal impairment due to potential nephrotoxicity.[17] For relatively resistant viridans group streptococci (MIC >0.12 mcg/mL but <0.5 mcg/mL), a 4-week regimen combines penicillin G or ceftriaxone with gentamicin for the initial 2 weeks, extending to 6 weeks if symptoms exceed 3 months or complications are present.[17]Enterococcal endocarditis requires combination therapy for synergy, with ampicillin (2 g intravenously every 4 hours) plus gentamicin (1 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours) for 4-6 weeks in native valve cases, or 6 weeks in prosthetic valve involvement; gentamicin dosing targets peak levels of 3-4 mcg/mL and trough levels below 1 mcg/mL to minimize toxicity.[17] For high-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci, ampicillin is combined with ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously every 12 hours) for 6 weeks as an alternative.[17] HACEK organisms are treated with ceftriaxone monotherapy (2 g intravenously once daily) for 4 weeks in native valves, extending to 6 weeks for prosthetic valves, without routine gentamicin due to lack of added benefit and risk of adverse effects.[17]Monitoring during therapy includes serial blood cultures obtained every 24-48 hours until clearance is confirmed, typically after 2-3 negative sets, to assess response and detect treatment failure.[17] Therapeutic drug monitoring for vancomycin (trough 10-20 mcg/mL) and gentamicin is essential, alongside regular assessment of renal function, complete blood counts, and inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein. Resistance considerations are critical; for viridans group streptococci with MIC >0.12 mcg/mL, extended durations or combination therapy is mandated to ensure efficacy, while vancomycin-resistant enterococci necessitate alternatives like daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg intravenously daily).[17]Since 2020, outpatient intravenous therapy has emerged as an option for stable patients after initial inpatient stabilization (at least 10-14 days), particularly with once-daily ceftriaxone for streptococcal or HACEK cases, provided there are no signs of heart failure, abscesses, or persistent fever, and close follow-up is ensured through multidisciplinary endocarditis teams. This approach, supported by trials demonstrating noninferiority to full inpatient care, reduces hospital stays while maintaining outcomes comparable to traditional regimens.
Pathogen Group
Regimen
Duration (Native Valve)
Key Notes
Viridans Group Streptococci (susceptible, MIC ≤0.12 mcg/mL)
Surgical interventions are indicated in subacute bacterial endocarditis when medical therapy alone fails to control the infection or its complications, particularly in cases involving left-sided native or prosthetic valve involvement.[41] The primary indications include heart failure resulting from valve destruction, which occurs in approximately 40% of cases and manifests as severe regurgitation, obstruction, or refractory pulmonary edema leading to cardiogenic shock.[41] Other key indications encompass recurrent systemic emboli, especially with prior embolic events; large vegetations exceeding 10 mm in diameter; perivalvular abscess formation or extension of infection; and persistent bacteremia lasting more than 7 days despite appropriate antimicrobial treatment.[41] These criteria are established to prevent irreversible cardiac damage and systemic embolization, with surgery recommended by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team to optimize timing and patient selection.[41]The most common procedures involve valve repair or replacement, with aortic and mitral valves affected in the majority of left-sided cases requiring intervention.[41] Valve repair is preferred when feasible to preserve native tissue and reduce long-term complications, while replacement uses mechanical or bioprosthetic valves based on patient factors such as age and comorbidities.[41]Debridement and drainage of abscesses or infected perivalvular tissue are integral to source control, often combined with reconstruction of the affected annulus or root.[41] According to the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, urgent surgery should occur within 7 days for most indications, including uncontrolled infection or high embolic risk, though emergencyintervention within 24 hours is mandated for acute heart failure or shock.[41]Outcomes of surgical management demonstrate significant benefits, with early intervention reducing overall mortality by 20-30% compared to medicaltherapy alone in complicated cases.[41] In-hospital mortality post-surgery ranges from 10-30%, influenced by factors such as prosthetic valve involvement and comorbidities.[41]Perioperative risks, including stroke and renal failure, are notably higher in elderly patients over 75 years, where mortality can exceed 20% due to frailty and delayed presentation.[42] Since 2020, the adoption of minimally invasive approaches, such as right mini-thoracotomy for mitral valve procedures, has increased, offering comparable efficacy to sternotomy with reduced recovery time and complications in selected patients.[43]
Prognosis and Complications
Clinical Outcomes
Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE), typically involving native heart valves and less virulent organisms such as viridans group streptococci, carries an in-hospital mortality rate of 10-20% with appropriate antimicrobial therapy and early intervention.[44] This rate rises to 25-40% in cases involving prosthetic valves or significant complications such as heart failure or embolic events, reflecting the challenges of biofilm formation and tissue invasion on artificial materials.[45] Overall mortality has improved from historical rates of around 20% in the late 20th century, attributable to advances in diagnostic imaging, timely antibiotics, and surgical techniques that facilitate earlier detection and management.[17] Recent data as of 2024 indicate stable to increasing incidence and mortality trends in infective endocarditis, with in-hospital rates around 15% but rising in some populations due to aging and comorbidities.[46]Key prognostic factors influencing recovery include advanced age greater than 65 years, which correlates with reduced physiological reserve and higher comorbidity burden; renal failure, often exacerbated by sepsis or antibioticnephrotoxicity; and delayed treatment beyond 14 days from symptom onset, allowing progression of valvular destruction.[47] With optimal therapy, 1-year survival reaches 70-80%, though this drops in the presence of staphylococcal involvement or prosthetic material.[48] Complications such as congestive heart failure or persistent bacteremia further worsen outcomes by necessitating urgent interventions.In the long term, approximately 20% of survivors require valve surgery within 5 years due to recurrent infection, progressive regurgitation, or structural deterioration.[49] Neurological sequelae from systemic emboli affect 20-30% of patients, manifesting as stroke, mycotic aneurysms, or cognitive deficits, and independently contribute to reduced quality of life and higher late mortality.[50] These outcomes underscore the importance of multidisciplinary care to mitigate embolization and monitor for late complications.
Prevention Strategies
Prevention of subacute bacterial endocarditis primarily involves targeted antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk individuals undergoing specific procedures, alongside general hygiene and infection control measures to minimize bacteremia risk. According to the 2021 American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement, antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended only for patients at highest risk of infective endocarditis, including those with prosthetic heart valves, previous infective endocarditis, certain congenital heart diseases (such as unrepaired cyanotic conditions or repaired with prosthetic material within the prior 6 months), or cardiac transplant recipients with valvulopathy. This prophylaxis is indicated specifically for dental procedures that involve manipulation of gingival tissue or the periapical region of teeth, or perforation of the oral mucosa, due to the potential for transient viridans group streptococci bacteremia. The standard regimen consists of a single oral dose of amoxicillin 2 g administered 30 to 60 minutes prior to the procedure; alternatives include ampicillin 2 g intravenously or intramuscularly, or cephalexin 2 g orally for penicillin-allergic patients (excluding those with severe reactions). Notably, clindamycin is no longer recommended as an alternative due to increased risks of severe reactions such as Clostridioides difficile infection. Prophylaxis is not routinely advised for gastrointestinal or genitourinary procedures, as evidence does not support its benefit in these settings.The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines align with this selective approach but further de-emphasize routine prophylaxis for low-risk patients, reserving it for high-risk groups undergoing high-bacteremia-risk invasive dental procedures, while stressing individualized risk assessment. Beyond procedural prophylaxis, general preventive strategies focus on reducing opportunities for bacterial entry into the bloodstream. Maintaining excellent oral hygiene through regular brushing, flossing, and professional dental cleanings is crucial, as poor dental health is a common source of bacteremia from oral streptococci.[51] Prompt treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, such as those caused by Staphylococcus aureus, is essential to prevent hematogenous seeding on damaged valves.[51] Patients with congenital heart disease or other predisposing valvular conditions should receive education on endocarditis symptoms and the importance of seeking immediate medical attention for signs of infection.Additional measures include pneumococcal vaccination (preferably with the conjugate vaccine followed by polysaccharide if needed) and annual influenza vaccination for at-risk patients to reduce invasive pneumococcal disease and influenza-associated infections, which may increase bacteremia risk and subsequent endocarditis in vulnerable individuals.[51] These strategies collectively aim to lower the incidence of subacute bacterial endocarditis by addressing both procedural and everyday infection risks in susceptible populations.[51]