Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Suess effect

The Suess effect denotes the dilution of atmospheric radiocarbon (¹⁴C) concentration resulting from the admixture of (CO₂) derived from combustion, which lacks ¹⁴C due to over geological timescales. First quantified by Austrian-American in 1955 through measurements of tree-ring ¹⁴C levels, the effect manifests as a secular decline in the ¹⁴C/C ratio, with atmospheric Δ¹⁴C values dropping by approximately 30‰ from pre-industrial baselines to the late . This isotopic perturbation extends to stable (¹³C), driving a parallel decrease in δ¹³C values primarily from the isotopically light signature of fossil-derived CO₂. The phenomenon complicates for post-industrial samples, as the reduced atmospheric ¹⁴C flux imparts an artificial age offset, necessitating calibration curves that account for influences since circa 1850. Observed globally via networks such as those at , the Suess effect's magnitude correlates with cumulative emissions, exceeding natural variability and propagating into the ocean and terrestrial through carbon exchange. While primarily a consequence of industrialization, its quantification has informed models of dynamics, revealing CO₂'s dominance in recent atmospheric δ¹³C trends over biogenic or sources.

History and Discovery

Initial Observations

The initial observations of what would later be termed the Suess effect emerged from measurements of radiocarbon (¹⁴C) concentrations in tree rings, which serve as proxies for atmospheric composition. In September 1955, Austrian chemist published findings demonstrating that ¹⁴C levels in wood formed after approximately 1850 were systematically lower than in pre-industrial wood, indicating a recent decline in atmospheric ¹⁴C content. Suess attributed this anomaly to the influx of ¹⁴C-depleted (CO₂) from the combustion of fossil fuels, such as and later , which release ancient carbon lacking detectable ¹⁴C due to over geological timescales. These early tree-ring analyses, conducted using solid carbon counting techniques available at the time, quantified the dilution as a measurable offset from expected equilibrium levels assumed in nascent methods developed by . Suess's work underscored that industrial emissions, accelerating since the mid-19th century, were altering the atmospheric ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio independently of natural variations, thereby introducing a systematic bias into age determinations for recent samples. Prior to these observations, atmospheric ¹⁴C was presumed stable over recent millennia, but Suess's data revealed an perturbation detectable in annually resolved dendrochronological records from regions like the . This discovery prompted refinements in isotopic calibration and highlighted the traceability of signatures in the global .

Development of the Concept

The concept of the Suess effect originated with observations of declining radiocarbon (¹⁴C) concentrations in tree rings from the 19th and 20th centuries, which Hans E. Suess attributed to the influx of ¹⁴C-depleted from combustion diluting the atmospheric ¹⁴C reservoir. In his seminal 1955 paper, Suess analyzed ¹⁴C levels in modern wood samples, finding values approximately 3% lower than in pre-industrial wood, a deviation he linked directly to industrial emissions beginning around the mid-19th century. This challenged the assumption of constant atmospheric ¹⁴C used in early methods developed by in the late 1940s, prompting Suess to propose adjustments for post-industrial samples. Suess's work built on concurrent concerns about CO₂ accumulation, as evidenced by his 1957 collaboration with , which modeled the incomplete oceanic absorption of CO₂ and highlighted the long-term atmospheric buildup. Early measurements involved counting beta decays from ¹⁴C in extracted from tree rings spanning 1850–1950, revealing a progressive decline correlating with global and later oil consumption records. These findings provided pre-Keeling Curve evidence of rising atmospheric CO₂ from human activity, with Suess estimating the dilution's magnitude based on carbon's negligible ¹⁴C content relative to biospheric and oceanic sources. Subsequent refinements in the late and incorporated stable data (¹³C) to distinguish signals from natural fluctuations, solidifying the effect's causal link to rather than land-use changes alone. By the , the term "Suess effect" gained usage to denote this isotopic dilution, influencing paleoclimate reconstructions and models, though initial quantifications underestimated the effect's persistence due to limited emission inventories. Peer-reviewed validations, such as those cross-referencing tree-ring series with early ice-core data, confirmed the effect's detectability as early as the 1880s in records.

Key Measurements and Data Series

The Suess effect was first quantified through radiocarbon measurements in tree rings by in 1955, using samples from sequoias and bristlecone pines, which indicated a decline in atmospheric ¹⁴C/¹²C ratios starting around 1850 due to dilution by -derived CO₂ lacking ¹⁴C. These early data revealed a reduction of roughly 10-20% in specific ¹⁴C activity from pre-industrial levels to the 1950s, corresponding to a Δ¹⁴C decrease of approximately 20‰ between 1850 and 1950. Suess's analysis attributed this trend directly to industrial emissions, marking the initial of isotopic dilution. Subsequent measurements in the late and , including direct atmospheric sampling and additional tree ring records from sites in and , confirmed the ongoing decline, with Δ¹⁴C values dropping by 2-3% per decade in the early-to-mid prior to nuclear testing interference. For instance, records from , , and , , showed pre-bomb Δ¹⁴C levels around -15‰ to -25‰ by 1950 relative to 1850 baselines, consistent with increasing CO₂ inputs estimated at 10-20 GtC cumulatively by that period. These datasets highlighted regional similarities despite varying emission sources, underscoring global atmospheric mixing. Modern compilations integrate these historical series with high-precision () data from over 100 tree ring records spanning 1750-2015, enabling model forcings that quantify the Suess effect's contribution to pre-industrial baselines. Key post-1950 series from monitoring stations, such as those at (1950s onward) and Cape Grim (1970s onward), track the effect's persistence amid bomb-spike recovery, with Δ¹⁴C declining further by ~30‰ from peaks to 2000 levels, largely attributable to emissions exceeding 300 GtC since 1750. These , corrected for nuclear influences, provide baselines for distinguishing anthropogenic signals from natural variability.

Underlying Mechanism

Isotopic Composition of Fossil Fuels

, derived from ancient , possess carbon isotopic compositions that are depleted in both radiocarbon (¹⁴C) and the heavy stable isotope (¹³C) relative to modern atmospheric CO₂. The absence of ¹⁴C in results from complete over millions of years, yielding a Δ¹⁴C value of approximately -1000‰, defined as "dead" carbon with no measurable radiocarbon content. This signature enables precise tracing of -derived CO₂ emissions, as combustion releases CO₂ lacking any ¹⁴C component, diluting the atmospheric ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio—a core aspect of the Suess effect. For stable carbon isotopes, fossil fuels exhibit δ¹³C values reflecting their photosynthetic origins, primarily from plants that preferentially incorporate ¹²C, leading to depletion relative to pre-industrial atmospheric δ¹³C of about -6.5‰. Typical ranges vary by fuel type: averages around -24‰, petroleum products such as around -27‰ to -28‰, and is more depleted at -40‰ to -45‰ due to additional kinetic during . These values, measured via on combusted CO₂, show with the least variation and enrichment among fuels, oil intermediate, and gas the most negative, influencing the magnitude of atmospheric δ¹³C decline upon mixing.
Fuel TypeTypical δ¹³C (‰)Δ¹⁴C (‰)
-24.1-1000
-26.5 to -31.4-1000
-44.0-1000
These isotopic traits arise from biological fractionation in source materials and minimal post-depositional alteration, with global emission inventories weighting mixtures toward and historically. Empirical measurements confirm that fossil fuel CO₂ emissions thus imprint a consistent low-¹³C, zero-¹⁴C signal, distinguishable from biogenic or oceanic sources with higher isotopic ratios. Variations in δ¹³C across deposits (e.g., regional seams from -23‰ to -25‰) are documented in geochemical databases, but the overall depletion drives the secular decrease in atmospheric δ¹³C by 1.5‰ since 1850.

Atmospheric Mixing and Dilution

The release of from introduces isotopically depleted CO₂ into the atmosphere, which lacks radiocarbon (¹⁴C) due to its ancient origin, thereby diluting the overall ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio. This dilution occurs as the CO₂ disperses and integrates with the existing atmospheric reservoir through turbulent mixing driven by winds, , and . The process is efficient because the atmospheric of CO₂ molecules exceeds mixing timescales by orders of magnitude; individual CO₂ molecules persist for years to centuries, allowing repeated mixing cycles that homogenize isotopic compositions. Zonal (east-west) mixing within hemispheres occurs on timescales of weeks, facilitated by large-scale circulation patterns such as jet streams, while meridional (north-south) interhemispheric exchange takes approximately 1 year, primarily via and mean meridional circulation. Vertical mixing within the , where most CO₂ resides, achieves uniformity over days to weeks through turbulence and convective processes, minimizing effects on isotopic ratios. These short mixing times relative to annual fossil fuel emissions—totaling around 9-10 GtC per year in recent decades—ensure that the Suess effect propagates rapidly, resulting in a spatially coherent decline in atmospheric Δ¹⁴C observed at stations worldwide. Although emissions are regionally concentrated (e.g., over industrial areas in the ), the well-mixed nature of the limits local isotopic depletions to near-source plumes, with gradients dissipating within hundreds of kilometers. Global models confirm this uniformity, showing hemispheric Δ¹⁴C differences of less than 10‰ post-mixing, far smaller than the pre-industrial variability or the cumulative Suess-induced decline of over 200‰ since 1850. This dilution mechanism underpins the Suess effect's reliability as a tracer for CO₂, as the isotopic signal reflects the cumulative input fraction rather than transient local perturbations.

Interplay with Carbon Cycle Dynamics

The introduction of fossil fuel-derived CO₂, which lacks ¹⁴C and is depleted in ¹³C relative to biogenic carbon, perturbs the natural isotopic equilibrium of the atmospheric carbon pool, initiating a cascade of changes across the global carbon cycle. This anthropogenic input, estimated at approximately 10 GtC per year in recent decades, dilutes atmospheric Δ¹⁴C by up to 30% since 1950 and decreases δ¹³C by about 1.5‰ over the industrial era, with the signal propagating via fluxes to oceanic and terrestrial reservoirs. Carbon cycle dynamics, including air-sea gas exchange rates (typically 10-20 mol m⁻² yr⁻¹ in surface waters) and terrestrial net primary production (around 120 GtC yr⁻¹), modulate the rate and extent of this propagation, while the Suess effect itself alters interpretations of natural variability in these fluxes. In oceanic dynamics, the Suess effect manifests through the invasion of low-isotope CO₂ into surface waters, where it is partially buffered by and biological pumping, leading to a global surface δ¹³C decline of 0.9‰ from pre-industrial levels as of 2010. Three-dimensional models of circulation and simulate this as varying regionally, with the strongest decreases (up to 1.2‰) in subtropical gyres due to sluggish ventilation and high CO₂ accumulation, contrasted by weaker signals in zones like the . This isotopic perturbation influences carbonate chemistry and export production, potentially amplifying effects on calcifying organisms, while the observed penetration depth (reaching 1000 m in some basins) informs estimates of the 's cumulative uptake of 140-150 GtC carbon since 1750. Terrestrial biosphere interactions involve photosynthetic uptake and respiratory return fluxes, where discriminate against ¹³C (by 4-5‰ on average), incorporating the diluted atmospheric signal into and soils, resulting in a land ¹³C disequilibrium flux of about 2 GtC yr⁻¹ equivalent as of the early . Ecosystem responses, such as fertilization from elevated CO₂ enhancing productivity in some (e.g., boreal forests), accelerate signal incorporation, while disturbances like introduce variability; models attribute roughly 25-30% of annual emissions to land sinks, with the Suess effect enabling discrimination of this from trends via . This feedback can shift net biome production, influencing long-term carbon storage in vegetation and . Overall, the Suess effect's propagation reveals asymmetries in partitioning, with models predicting slower deep-water equilibration (centuries-scale) compared to faster terrestrial turnover (decades), and integrated assessments using isotopic disequilibria to refine attributions—e.g., uptake inferred at 2.5 ± 0.6 GtC yr⁻¹ from ¹³C trends in the 1990s-2010s. These dynamics underscore the Suess effect's role as a tracer for perturbation strength, though uncertainties in mixing rates (e.g., buffer factor of 10-15) necessitate ongoing observations from networks like NOAA's Global Monitoring Laboratory.

Isotopic Signatures

Effects on Radiocarbon (¹⁴C)

The Suess effect reduces the atmospheric concentration of radiocarbon (¹⁴C) by diluting the ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio with CO₂ from fossil fuel combustion, which contains negligible ¹⁴C due to radioactive decay over millions of years. This influx of ¹⁴C-free carbon, beginning with the Industrial Revolution around 1850, has caused a progressive decline in atmospheric Δ¹⁴C, defined as the per mil deviation of ¹⁴C/¹²C relative to a pre-industrial standard. By 1950, prior to nuclear weapons testing, measurements from tree rings and direct atmospheric sampling indicated a Suess-induced decline of 15–25‰ in Δ¹⁴C compared to pre-industrial levels. Model simulations incorporating historical fossil fuel emissions confirm that this decline accounts for at least 85% of the observed Δ¹⁴C reduction by mid-century, with the remainder attributable to natural variability. The magnitude of the decline accelerated with rising emissions; for instance, global atmospheric Δ¹⁴C fell by approximately 25‰ between 1890 and the mid-20th century, reflecting cumulative inputs of several gigatons of carbon annually by the . testing in the temporarily reversed this trend by injecting bomb-produced ¹⁴C, elevating Δ¹⁴C to peaks exceeding +800‰, but post-1963 moratorium, the Suess effect resumed dominance, driving Δ¹⁴C below zero by the and to around -300‰ by 2020 in the absence of ongoing bomb influence. This ongoing dilution propagates to the surface ocean and terrestrial biosphere via carbon exchange, reducing ¹⁴C levels in marine by 10–20% and in vegetation by similar proportions since 1900, as evidenced by and tree-ring records. These changes necessitate corrections in for samples post-dating industrialization; uncorrected assays of modern organic materials yield ages up to several decades too old due to the lowered atmospheric ¹⁴C baseline. In , the effect complicates proxy reconstructions, requiring from natural ¹⁴C fluctuations like solar modulation or geomagnetic variations, which are smaller in amplitude (typically <10‰ per century pre-industrially). Conversely, the distinct ¹⁴C signature enables quantification of CO₂ fractions in emissions or sinks, as Δ¹⁴C deficits directly trace inputs against biogenic carbon with near-modern ¹⁴C levels. Regional variations amplify the effect in urban areas, where local emissions can depress Δ¹⁴C by an additional 50–100‰ relative to remote sites.

Effects on Stable Carbon (¹³C)

The Suess effect on stable carbon isotopes results in a progressive decline of the atmospheric δ¹³C value, as fuel-derived CO₂, which is depleted in ¹³C relative to pre-industrial atmospheric CO₂, mixes into the atmosphere. , derived primarily from that fractionate against ¹³C during , exhibit δ¹³C values averaging around -25‰ to -30‰ (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite scale), compared to pre-industrial atmospheric δ¹³C of approximately -6.4‰. This input dilutes the heavier fraction, driving a measurable decrease that serves as a for anthropogenic emissions. Direct measurements from global monitoring networks, such as those at initiated in the 1970s, record a decline from about -7.0‰ in the early 1980s to -8.5‰ by the late 2010s, with an average rate of approximately -0.02‰ per year. Ice core records from sites like Law Dome, , extend this trend back to the mid-19th century, confirming a total drop of roughly 2‰ since pre-industrial times, closely tracking cumulative emissions. Unlike the complete absence of ¹⁴C in fossil CO₂, the ¹³C depletion arises from biological rather than zero inventory, yielding a subtler but persistent signal proportional to the anthropogenic CO₂ fraction in the atmosphere. This atmospheric decline propagates to the ocean-atmosphere carbon exchange reservoirs, with surface seawater (δ¹³C_DIC) decreasing by 0.5‰ to 1‰ since 1850, as evidenced by and proxy records corrected for vital effects. Terrestrial biospheric δ¹³C in tree rings and vegetation also reflects this imprint, shifting toward more negative values due to uptake of isotopically light atmospheric CO₂. The effect's magnitude scales with emission rates, with modeling studies attributing over 90% of the observed δ¹³C decline to combustion rather than land-use changes or natural variability.

Distinction from Natural Variations

The Suess effect produces a distinctive decline in atmospheric radiocarbon (Δ¹⁴C) that cannot be attributed to natural variations, as CO₂ is entirely devoid of ¹⁴C due to its geological age exceeding multiple half-lives of the (approximately 5,730 years). Natural atmospheric ¹⁴C levels fluctuate on decadal to centennial scales due to changes in flux modulated by solar activity and geomagnetic field strength, typically varying by 10-20‰ around a pre-industrial of near 0‰, but these are oscillatory rather than unidirectional. In contrast, the Suess-induced dilution manifests as a steady, irreversible decrease, from pre-industrial values to about -20‰ by 1970 and further to -30‰ or more by 2000, precisely matching the cumulative input of ¹⁴C-free CO₂ from combustion estimated at 100-150 GtC since 1850. This temporal correlation and isotopic distinguish it from natural processes, which recycle ¹⁴C-containing carbon and lack a for large-scale ¹⁴C depletion without corresponding production changes unobserved in records like tree rings or ice cores. For stable carbon isotopes (δ¹³C), the Suess effect drives a rapid atmospheric decline from pre-industrial levels of approximately -6.5‰ to -8.5‰ by the early , a shift exceeding natural variability by an . Pre-industrial δ¹³C variations, inferred from cores and proxies, remained within ±0.2-0.5‰ over millennia, driven by minor shifts in productivity or circulation that equilibrate without net isotopic forcing. fuels, with δ¹³C values of -23‰ to -30‰ from their biogenic origins, introduce disproportionately ¹²C-enriched CO₂, and the observed trend's magnitude—about 2‰ over 150 years—aligns with emissions rather than natural dynamics, which would require implausibly large, undetected changes in vegetation cover or marine export to replicate. Although terrestrial ecosystems (δ¹³C ≈ -25‰) and uptake partially buffer the signal through isotopic , radiative-convective models and observations confirm the primary driver as input, with feedbacks amplifying the decline by no more than 20-30%. This dual-isotope fingerprint—¹⁴C dilution uniquely tied to ¹⁴C-free sources and δ¹³C decline scaled to low-¹³C inputs—enables robust attribution, as no combination of natural reservoirs (atmospheric mean δ¹³C ≈ -6‰, oceanic ≈ 0‰ ) can produce the observed co-trends without violating constraints. Empirical data from direct measurements since the 1950s, such as those from the and observatories, show the isotopic ratios tracking fossil emission inventories within 10% uncertainty, underscoring the origin over cyclic or transient natural forcings.

Applications in Climate and Earth Sciences

Attribution of Anthropogenic CO₂

The Suess effect serves as a primary isotopic tracer for attributing the post-industrial rise in atmospheric CO₂ to anthropogenic emissions, particularly from fossil fuel combustion, by introducing carbon depleted in both radiocarbon (¹⁴C) and the stable isotope ¹³C relative to pre-industrial levels. Fossil fuels, formed from organic matter millions of years old, contain effectively zero ¹⁴C due to radioactive decay (half-life of 5,730 years), resulting in a dilution of the atmospheric ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio upon combustion. Measurements from ice cores, tree rings, and direct atmospheric sampling document a decline in Δ¹⁴C—the deviation of the ¹⁴C/¹²C ratio from a standard—from near-zero pre-1850 values to approximately -50‰ by the early 1960s, prior to the nuclear bomb spike, with an average annual decrease of about 2% during the 1950s–1960s coinciding with rapid fossil fuel use escalation. This temporal correlation with global CO₂ increase from 280 ppm in 1850 to 420 ppm by 2023 underpins attribution, as natural carbon cycle fluxes—such as oceanic outgassing or terrestrial respiration—exchange ¹⁴C-bearing carbon and would not produce such dilution without a net source imbalance inconsistent with isotopic equilibrium. Complementary evidence from stable carbon isotopes reinforces this attribution. Atmospheric δ¹³C—the ratio of ¹³C to ¹²C relative to a Belemnite standard—has declined from -6.4‰ in the mid-19th century to around -8.5‰ currently, driven by CO₂ with δ¹³C values of -25‰ to -30‰ due to preferential uptake of lighter ¹³C by ancient . Natural oceanic CO₂, with δ¹³C near 0‰ to +1‰, would enrich rather than deplete atmospheric δ¹³C if responsible for the rise, while net terrestrial fluxes pre-industrially balanced uptake and release without net ¹³C depletion or ¹⁴C dilution. The combined signatures—¹⁴C absence and ¹³C depletion—uniquely match inputs, distinguishing them from volcanic (higher δ¹³C) or sources (¹⁴C-present), and align with inventories estimating 100–120 of the atmospheric CO₂ excess as after accounting for sinks. Quantification via the Suess effect partitions contributions precisely; for instance, the observed Δ¹⁴C decline implies that -derived CO₂ constitutes about 20–30% of total atmospheric carbon by the 1960s, scaling to higher fractions today when isolating pre-bomb trends and correcting for and exchanges. These isotopic budgets, validated against independent emission records from fuel consumption data since 1751, confirm that human activities account for the net CO₂ accumulation, with regional enhancements (e.g., urban Suess effect amplification) further tracing local impacts. While measurement precision has improved via since the 1980s, enabling sub-per-mil resolution, the effect's attribution holds across proxies like corals and sediments, underscoring causal linkage without reliance on assumptions alone.

Carbon Sink Partitioning

The decline in atmospheric δ¹³C due to the addition of ¹³C-depleted fossil fuel CO₂, known as the ¹³C Suess effect, provides a tracer for partitioning anthropogenic CO₂ uptake between terrestrial and oceanic sinks through isotopic mass balance. Fossil fuel CO₂, with δ¹³C values typically around -28‰, dilutes the pre-industrial atmospheric δ¹³C of approximately -6.5‰, but the observed decline is moderated by differential fractionation during sink uptake. Terrestrial photosynthesis discriminates against ¹³C more strongly (effective discrimination of ~4‰ in net CO₂ flux) than oceanic air-sea exchange (~0.9‰), causing land sinks to enrich atmospheric δ¹³C per unit CO₂ sequestered more than ocean sinks. This "isotopic rectifier" effect results in a slower δ¹³C decline than expected from fossil emissions alone, allowing deconvolution of sink contributions using time series of atmospheric CO₂ concentrations and δ¹³C measurements. The partitioning method involves solving a system of equations balancing total anthropogenic CO₂ (emissions minus atmospheric accumulation) with land (S_land) and ocean (S_ocean) uptakes, constrained by the δ¹³C budget: the Suess-induced decline equals the isotopic input from fossil CO₂ minus the rectification from sinks. Pre-industrial steady-state assumptions and constant fractionation factors are key, though violations from land-use changes or environmental shifts introduce uncertainties. Early applications, such as analysis of NOAA global flask samples from 1983–1991, estimated terrestrial uptake at 1.2 ± 0.6 GtC/yr and oceanic uptake at 2.0 ± 0.7 GtC/yr, indicating land absorbed ~35% of the net sink during that period. Subsequent studies using extended records have refined this, showing land and ocean sinks partitioning roughly equally in recent decades, with each absorbing ~25–30% of annual anthropogenic emissions from the 1960s onward, though interannual variability linked to El Niño events can shift efficiency toward oceans. The ¹⁴C Suess effect complements ¹³C analysis but is complicated by testing spikes; it drives ¹⁴C efflux from and reservoirs due to atmospheric dilution, informing disequilibria that refine sink partitioning in models. Disequilibria arise because and respond differently to declining atmospheric isotopes: terrestrial ecosystems release older, ¹³C-enriched carbon via heterotrophic , while oceans exhibit slower isotopic equilibration. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including biases from non-steady-state dynamics and spatial variability in ocean uptake, necessitating with modeling and other tracers for robust estimates. Overall, Suess effect-based partitioning underscores the terrestrial sink's outsized role in mitigating ~30% of emissions, driven by vegetation regrowth, though its sustainability amid remains debated.

Corrections in Proxy Records

The Suess effect introduces a systematic depletion in both stable (¹³C) and radiogenic (¹⁴C) carbon isotopes within records that span the industrial era, such as tree-ring cellulose, lacustrine organic sediments, marine carbonates, and speleothems, necessitating targeted corrections to reconstruct pre- baselines or natural variability. Without adjustment, the fossil fuel-derived isotopic signal masks climatic or ecological signals, as atmospheric δ¹³C has declined by approximately 1.8‰ since and Δ¹⁴C by 20–30‰ pre-bomb spike due to dilution by ¹⁴C-free CO₂ emissions. These corrections rely on high-resolution atmospheric references from ice cores or dendrochronologically dated tree rings to quantify the anthropogenic offset. In δ¹³C tree-ring proxies, corrections subtract the time-specific decline in atmospheric δ¹³C (δ¹³C_atm) from observed plant δ¹³C values to recover intrinsic discrimination (Δ¹³C), using equations of the form δ¹³C_corrected = δ¹³C_observed - (δ¹³C_atm(pre-industrial) - δ¹³C_atm(sample year)). Standardized curves from compilations of ice-core and air data provide the δ¹³C_atm offsets, with typical adjustments ranging from 0.5‰ in the early to 1.5–2‰ by 2000. McCarroll and Loader () outline a framework for such adjustments, emphasizing spline-fitted atmospheric trends to avoid over-correction from concurrent CO₂ fertilization effects on . Regional tools like the SuessR extend this to or proxies by modeling exponential uptake of CO₂, yielding site-specific corrections (e.g., ~1.3‰ for North Pacific regions in recent decades) based on (DIC) decline rates. For lacustrine and δ¹³C_org or records, corrections estimate the fraction of CO₂ (f_ff) assimilated via : δ¹³C_corrected ≈ δ¹³C_observed + f_ff × (δ¹³C_pre-industrial - δ¹³C_fossil fuel), where δ¹³C_fossil fuel averages -25‰ to -30‰ and f_ff is derived from global emission inventories or local CO₂ records. In autotrophic lakes like , this restores productivity proxies by removing up to 1–2‰ offsets in post-1950 layers, often validated against independent ²¹⁰Pb dating. A proposed millennial-scale model integrates historic δ¹³C_atm reconstructions to standardize corrections across ~1000 years, minimizing assumptions about local mixing. Radiocarbon proxy records require adjustments for the Suess-induced Δ¹⁴C decline, particularly in or systems where uptake delays the signal by decades. Tree-ring Δ¹⁴C series, calibrated via annual counting, directly inform IntCal curves that embed the Suess trend for post-1850 atmospheric dating, but non-terrestrial proxies (e.g., corals, shells) add reservoir corrections plus a Suess offset modeled from bomb-¹⁴C penetration depths (~100–300 years ). Paired δ¹³C-Δ¹⁴C analyses or global models refine these, reducing chronological uncertainties in varved sediments or laminated archives by anchoring to known atmospheric declines. Uncorrected records can overestimate ages by centuries in recent samples, though post-bomb spikes aid verification.

Modeling and Future Projections

Historical Simulations

Historical simulations of the Suess effect utilize models to hindcast the dilution of atmospheric ¹³C and ¹⁴C isotopes driven by emissions since the . These models incorporate time-dependent emission inventories, often commencing around 1750, and simulate the transfer of ¹⁴C-depleted carbon through atmospheric, oceanic, and terrestrial reservoirs. By comparing simulated isotopic trajectories against observational datasets from ice cores, tree rings, and direct measurements, researchers validate model dynamics and quantify the signal's propagation. The box-diffusion model exemplifies such approaches, replicating historical atmospheric CO₂ rise, δ¹³C decline, and ∆¹⁴C depletion from pre-industrial baselines through the , with outputs aligning closely to proxy records like Law Dome data. Simulations from this model project the Suess effect's onset aligning with coal combustion surges post-1850, yielding a δ¹³C atmospheric drop of about 0.8‰ by 1950 relative to 1800 levels. These hindcasts distinguish fossil-derived dilution from natural fluctuations, such as solar-modulated ¹⁴C production variations. Impulse-response and multi-box models further dissect the Suess effect's magnitude, estimating a pre-bomb ∆¹⁴C reduction of roughly 20‰ from 1850 to 1950, equivalent to the admixture of 5-10% fossil carbon in the atmospheric CO₂ pool by mid-century. These simulations account for discrimination amplifying the ¹³C/¹⁴C interlinkage, where terrestrial uptake preferentially removes lighter isotopes, modulating the net decline observed in air samples from the onward. Validation against Institution records confirms model fidelity, with discrepancies typically under 2‰ for ∆¹⁴C post-1900. More complex Earth system models, integrating ocean circulation and vegetation feedbacks, extend these simulations to assess regional Suess gradients, revealing faster oceanic uptake of depleted carbon in the by the early 1900s. Such hindcasts underscore the effect's detectability from 1850, with cumulative fossil emissions exceeding 100 GtC by 1950 driving the primary isotopic shift, independent of land-use changes. Uncertainties arise from emission inventory precision and mixing rates, but simulations converge on the Suess effect dominating isotopic trends over natural cycles in the industrial era.

Scenario-Based Forecasts

Scenario-based forecasts of the Suess effect utilize Earth system models to project isotopic dilution under standardized emission pathways, including Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), which vary in cumulative fossil fuel CO₂ emissions through 2100 and beyond. These simulations account for continued atmospheric δ¹³C and Δ¹⁴C declines driven by fossil fuel inputs, with the effect's magnitude scaling with emission intensity; lower pathways like RCP2.6 or SSP1-1.9 limit further dilution post-net-zero emissions around mid-century, while high pathways like RCP8.5 or SSP5-8.5 sustain substantial declines into the 22nd century due to persistent fossil fuel dependence. In atmospheric projections, models indicate that under RCP8.5, the Suess effect drives δ¹³CO₂ below -3‰ relative to preindustrial levels by 2100, compared to stabilization near -2.5‰ in RCP2.6 after emissions peak and decline. Similarly, Δ¹⁴CO₂ dilution intensifies in high-emission cases, potentially dropping below -200‰ by late century, complicating future radiocarbon-based age estimates without corrections. Oceanic propagation lags atmospheric changes by decades due to air-sea , with globally averaged surface δ¹³C Suess effect forecasted at -1.6‰ under RCP2.6 versus -2.2‰ under RCP8.5 by 2050, reflecting slower equilibration in marine carbon reservoirs. Extended simulations to 2500 across RCPs (2.6, 4.5, 6.0, 8.5) reveal that δ¹³C shifts exceed -4‰ in high-emission pathways, enabling differentiation of post-industrial samples from paleorecords via the amplified Suess signature, whereas low-emission cases show partial recovery post-2100 as biospheric uptake dominates. These forecasts underscore the effect's utility in validating model carbon sinks but highlight dependencies on uncertain emission trajectories and feedbacks like thaw, which could enhance dilution if unmitigated. In frameworks, broader socioeconomic ranges amplify projection spreads, with sustainability-focused SSPs yielding minimal additional Suess impact compared to fossil-intensive variants. Projections of the Suess effect over centuries hinge on uncertain future trajectories of emissions, which directly determine the magnitude of isotopic dilution in atmospheric and oceanic carbon reservoirs. Under (RCP) scenarios, the surface ocean δ¹³C Suess effect is forecasted to vary widely, reaching between -1.8‰ and -6.3‰ by 2100, reflecting differences in cumulative CO₂ inputs from low-emission (e.g., RCP2.6) to high-emission (e.g., RCP8.5) pathways. These ranges underscore how policy-driven emission reductions or failures thereof introduce substantial variability, with mitigation efforts potentially limiting further depletion while unchecked growth amplifies it. Carbon cycle feedbacks exacerbate these uncertainties, as the airborne fraction of fossil CO₂—typically 40-50% historically—may evolve due to potential saturation of and sinks. Enhanced growth from CO₂ fertilization could temporarily bolster uptake, but risks like thaw or degradation might diminish sink efficiency, prolonging atmospheric isotopic decline beyond emission-driven expectations. circulation changes, including slowdowns in meridional overturning, further complicate oceanic penetration of the Suess signal, with model intercomparisons revealing discrepancies in deep-water δ¹³C projections up to several per mil over millennia. For radiocarbon (Δ¹⁴C), long-term trends face analogous issues, where continued emissions could drive atmospheric levels below preindustrial values, mimicking ancient signatures and confounding paleoclimate interpretations without precise forecasts. analyses of box-diffusion models indicate that parameter uncertainties in rates between reservoirs contribute ±10-20% variability to predicted Suess trajectories, emphasizing the need for refined system models incorporating socioeconomic drivers like (SSPs). Overall, while the Suess effect's persistence is assured under business-as-usual emissions, its amplitude and equilibration timescales remain contingent on unresolved dynamics in global carbon partitioning.

Criticisms and Debates

Measurement and Interpretive Challenges

Direct atmospheric measurements of the Suess effect, primarily through δ¹³C analysis via , achieve modern precisions of approximately 0.01‰, but historical records before the 1970s rely on proxies such as tree rings or air from ice cores, which introduce uncertainties from local contamination, species-specific isotopic fractionations, and post-depositional processes like CO₂ production that can alter signals by up to 0.1-0.5‰. For Δ¹⁴C, provides uncertainties of 2-5‰ in contemporary samples, yet early data and of the nuclear bomb spike—peaking at +200‰ in the —add modeling errors that can exceed 10% in isolating the dilution trend. Quantification further depends on accurate fossil fuel emission inventories, which carry 5-10% uncertainties from incomplete historical data on , oil, and combustion, compounded by temporal variations in fuel-specific δ¹³C values (e.g., -23‰ for versus -40‰ for ), leading to potential misattribution of the dilution magnitude. In oceanic records, where the signal propagates via air-sea exchange, estimates of the full δ¹³C Suess effect since preindustrial times exhibit ±15% uncertainty due to sparse spatial sampling, variable buffer factors, and incomplete mixing in deep waters. Interpretive difficulties stem from isotopic disequilibria in carbon sinks, as terrestrial discriminates more strongly against ¹³C (~4‰) than oceanic uptake (~1‰), and responses to rising CO₂—such as reduced —can produce δ¹³C shifts comparable to or exceeding the direct dilution in regional records, complicating global attribution. Correction methods for proxy data vary widely, including simplistic fixed offsets, linear rates (e.g., -0.02‰/yr post-1950), and nonlinear regional models incorporating lags, often resulting in inconsistencies across studies that amplify errors beyond instrumental limits and hinder comparative analyses. models amplify these issues through sensitivity to parameters like sizes and exchange rates, yielding 10-20% uncertainties in partitioning the Suess effect from natural variability or land-use changes.

Alternative Causal Factors

Variations in atmospheric radiocarbon production rates, primarily driven by flux modulated by activity and geomagnetic , have been evaluated as a potential contributor to the Suess effect decline in Δ¹⁴C. Reconstructions from cosmogenic isotopes like ¹⁰Be in ice cores and tree rings indicate that production rates over the industrial era (circa 1850–1950) exhibited cyclical variations of approximately ±5–10% associated with cycles, but no net long-term decrease sufficient to account for the observed ~20% dilution in atmospheric ¹⁴C/C ratio during that period. Weakening of the geomagnetic since the , estimated at 5–10% per century, would instead predict a modest increase in production rates, opposing the measured decline. Perturbations in the terrestrial , including enhanced and land-use changes such as , have been proposed as sources of ¹⁴C-depleted CO₂ that could mimic aspects of the Suess effect. has a mean radiocarbon age of decades to centuries, resulting in specific ¹⁴C activities 1–10% below atmospheric levels, and cumulative land-use emissions contributed an estimated 15–25% of the total anthropogenic CO₂ rise before 1950. However, the magnitude of ¹⁴C depletion from these sources is far smaller than from fuels, which are devoid of ¹⁴C due to their geological age exceeding the isotope's 5,730-year , and isotopic models confirm that terrestrial fluxes alone cannot replicate the observed atmospheric trends. Oceanic processes, such as reduced deep-water ventilation or upwelling of ¹⁴C-depleted intermediate waters, could theoretically release older carbon to the atmosphere, but empirical evidence from dissolved inorganic carbon inventories and transient tracer observations shows the oceans have acted as a net sink for both anthropogenic CO₂ and bomb-produced ¹⁴C since the mid-20th century, contradicting large-scale degassing scenarios. Fringe analyses, such as those recalculating specific ¹⁴C activity to attribute only ~23% of post-1750 CO₂ emissions to fossil sources with the remainder to natural exchanges, have been critiqued for overlooking the dilution dynamics and failing to align with independent emission inventories and δ¹³C trends. Overall, these alternative factors lack the empirical support to supplant the dominant role of fossil fuel combustion in driving the Suess effect.

Implications for Policy Narratives

The Suess effect, through the observed depletion of atmospheric δ¹³C by approximately 2‰ since pre-industrial times and the corresponding decline in Δ¹⁴C to levels approaching zero, unequivocally fingerprints CO₂ as the dominant contributor to the ~120 rise in atmospheric CO₂ concentrations by 2020, as natural sources like or would impart opposing isotopic shifts. This evidence undercuts policy narratives, often advanced in skeptical circles, that portray the CO₂ buildup as primarily natural—such as from enhanced productivity or degassing due to slight warming—which fail to account for the requisite isotopic dilution absent in biogenic or carbon cycles. Skeptical interpretations have occasionally misused the effect by conflating short-term carbon residence times (days to years via exchange processes) with long-term adjustment times (centuries for net removal), suggesting human CO₂ dissipates rapidly and thus exerts negligible influence; however, the enduring isotopic perturbation refutes this, indicating that roughly 20-35% of emissions persist in the atmosphere for millennia, sustaining elevated concentrations. Such misapplications, as seen in claims attributing isotope trends to a "more productive " rather than fossil dilution, have fueled narratives minimizing the need for emission curbs, yet these are contradicted by and isotopic models showing human inputs exceed natural variability in driving the net accumulation. In policy contexts, the Suess effect bolsters narratives justifying anthropogenic-focused interventions like carbon pricing or phase-outs, as it confirms humans have perturbed the in a manner traceable to industrial emissions exceeding sink capacities by ~5 GtC annually. Yet, debates arise over extending this attribution to climatic outcomes, where mainstream advocacy sometimes elides uncertainties in CO₂'s net radiative impact amid feedbacks, with empirical estimates varying widely (1-5°C per doubling) and alternative factors like land-use changes complicating sink partitioning—prompting critics to caution against policies presuming unambiguous causality from isotope signatures alone. Sources advancing alarmist framings, often from institutionally biased outlets, may over-rely on the effect to imply irreversible tipping points without proportional evidence, whereas rigorous analysis demands separating source identification from debated forcing quantification.

References

  1. [1]
    Changes to Carbon Isotopes in Atmospheric CO2 Over the Industrial ...
    Oct 23, 2020 · This dilution effect, which drives δ13C and Δ14C downward, is termed “The Suess Effect.” In 1955, Hans Suess published the first observations ...
  2. [2]
    Natural atmospheric 14C variation and the Suess effect - Nature
    Aug 30, 1979 · The dilution of the atmospheric 14 CO 2 concentration by large amounts of fossil-fuel derived CO 2 which do not contain any 14 C is commonly called the Suess ...
  3. [3]
    Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon ...
    Sep 11, 2017 · The 13C-Suess effect, like that for 14C, is driven primarily by the input of CO2 from fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are slightly depleted in 13C ...
  4. [4]
    The Suess Effect - Beta Analytic article by Dr. Maren Pauly
    Mar 8, 2022 · It impacts both stable and radioactive carbon isotopes in the atmosphere due to the significant amount of fossil fuels being continuously emitted.
  5. [5]
    Education - Stable Isotopes NOAA GML
    Globally, as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels continue to increase, both Δ14C and δ13C are decreasing over time. This is called the Suess Effect – named after ...
  6. [6]
    Radiocarbon Concentration in Modern Wood - Science
    Radiocarbon Concentration in Modern Wood. Hans E. SuessAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 2 Sep 1955. Vol 122, Issue 3166. pp. 415-417. DOI: 10.1126/science ...Missing: effect initial
  7. [7]
    Changes to Carbon Isotopes in Atmospheric CO2 Over the Industrial ...
    This dilution effect, which drives δ13C and Δ14C downward, is termed “The Suess Effect.” In 1955, Hans Suess published the first observations of 14C dilution ...
  8. [8]
    Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood
    Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science. By: H. E. Suess. Metrics. Web analytics dashboard Metrics definitions ... 1955. Language, English. Larger Work ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Suess Effect: 13Carbon-14Carbon Interrelations *rw), Fg, (F ...
    The Suess Effect is a term which has come to signify the decrease in 14C in atmospheric CO2 owing to ad- mixture of CO 2 produced by the combustion of ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Carbon Dioxide Exchange Between Atmosphere and Ocean and the ...
    By ROGER REVELLE and HANS E. SUESS, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, California. (Manuscript received September 4, 1956).
  11. [11]
    The Suess effect: 13Carbon-14Carbon interrelations - ScienceDirect
    The Suess Effect is a term which has come to signify the decrease in 14 C in atmospheric CO 2 owing to admixture of CO 2 produced by the combustion of fossil ...
  12. [12]
    The Suess Effect Revisited: It's not what you may think - ADS
    The Suess effect is commonly characterized as a dilution, or even a decrease, of atmospheric 14 CO 2 due to emission of 14 C-free CO 2 from fossil fuel ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Radiocarbon Concentration in Modern Wood - jstor
    HANS E. SUESS River, New Guinea, more than 300 mi. U.S. Geological Survey, from the sea; these fish undoubtedly go. Washington, D.C. very far beyond that ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] RADIOCARBON - NOAA
    Figure 3A shows measured atmospheric *14C levels from 1955 to the present in New Zealand. (data from T.A. Rafter, M.A. Manning, and co- workers) and Germany ( ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Compiled records of carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO2 for ... - GMD
    Dec 5, 2017 · We compiled historical data for 114C in CO2 from tree ring records and atmospheric measurements to produce the histor- ical atmospheric forcing ...
  16. [16]
    Atmospheric radiocarbon measurements to quantify CO2 emissions ...
    Nov 22, 2019 · These observations have been used to calculate the contribution of fossil fuel sources to the atmospheric CO2 mole fractions; this can be done, ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  17. [17]
    Pre-Bomb Δ14C Variability and the Suess Effect in Cariaco Basin ...
    Jul 18, 2016 · The implied Suess effect trend (−3%/decade) is nearly as large as that observed in the atmosphere over the same time period.
  18. [18]
    Estimation of Atmospheric Fossil Fuel CO2 Traced by Δ14C - MDPI
    Thus, there are no 14C in fossil fuels because they are all depleted during long-term radioactive decay. Since fossil fuel CO2 contains no 14C whereas CO2 from ...
  19. [19]
    14 C and Fossil Fuels - Education - Stable Isotopes NOAA GML
    Scientists can use 14C measurements to determine how much 14CO2 has been diluted with 14C-free CO2 in air samples, and from this can calculate what proportion ...
  20. [20]
    What 13 C Tells Us - Education - Stable Isotopes NOAA GML
    Recall that the Suess Effect is the observed decrease in δ13C and Δ14C values due to fossil fuel emissions, which are depleted in 13C and do not contain 14C.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The annual cycle of fossil-fuel carbon dioxide emissions in ... - Tellus B
    The characteristic δ13C values assigned to coal, oil and gas, respectively were −24.1, −26.5 and −44.0 parts per thou- sand (Andres et al., 2000). The values ...
  22. [22]
    Characterization of the δ 13 C signatures of anthropogenic CO 2 ...
    We present a study characterizing the δ 13 CO 2 signatures of the dominant anthropogenic sources of CO 2 in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).
  23. [23]
    Source Attribution of Atmospheric CO 2 Using 14 C and 13 C as ...
    Jun 17, 2022 · Here we conducted regular observations of the atmospheric CO2 mixing ratio and its carbon isotope compositions (i.e., Δ14C and δ13C) in Xi'an ...
  24. [24]
    Impact of fossil fuel emissions on atmospheric radiocarbon ... - NIH
    First observed by Hans Suess in 1955 using tree ring records of atmospheric composition (4), the dilution of 14CO2 by fossil carbon provided one of the first ...
  25. [25]
    Toward Low‐Latency Estimation of Atmospheric CO2 Growth Rates ...
    Aug 13, 2024 · North-south interhemispheric mixing timescales are roughly 1 year, and east-west mixing timescales are weeks, which means that flux ...
  26. [26]
    How we measure background CO 2 levels on Mauna Loa
    A distinguishing characteristic of background air is that CO2 changes only very gradually because the air has been mixed for days, without any significant ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Radiocarbon: A key tracer for studying Earth's dynamo, climate ...
    Nov 5, 2021 · Regional measurement of this “Suess effect” allows estimation of local industrial CO2 emissions (3). ... atmospheric mixing would affect the ...
  28. [28]
    A global estimate of the full oceanic 13 C Suess effect since the ...
    Feb 13, 2017 · Abstract. We present the first estimate of the full global ocean 13C Suess effect since preindustrial times, based on observations.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] 13C Suess effect in the world surface oceans
    Suess effect. We employ a three-dimensional carbon cycle model which makes use of a seasonal average of the circulation field from a 15-level ocean ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] The ocean carbon sink – impacts, vulnerabilities and challenges - ESD
    The ocean regulates atmospheric CO2, taking up about 25% of annual human emissions. CO2 is a key greenhouse gas, and oceans have a key role in the global  ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Ecological processes dominate the 13C land disequilibrium in a ...
    In the 1950s, Hans Suess realized that not only the addition of 14C-free CO2 to the air altered the atmospheric 14C/12C ratio but that this change was recorded ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Projected reversal of oceanic stable carbon isotope ratio depth ...
    Mar 15, 2022 · Modern ocean 13C Suess effect. The oceanic δ13C-DIC changes from the preindustrial era to 2018 are assessed using a Monte Carlo experiment ( ...
  33. [33]
    Atmospheric 14 C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO 2 release ...
    Model calculations indicate that in 1950 industrial CO2 emissions are responsible for at least 85% of the Δ14C decline, whereas natural variability accounts for ...
  34. [34]
    SuessR: Regional corrections for the effects of anthropogenic CO2 ...
    May 19, 2021 · This phenomenon, called the Suess effect, can confound comparisons of marine δ13C data from different years. The Suess effect can be corrected ...
  35. [35]
    How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is ...
    Oct 12, 2022 · Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.Missing: δ13C | Show results with:δ13C<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Using the Suess effect on the stable carbon isotope to distinguish ...
    Dec 7, 2016 · The depletion of 14C due to the emission of radiocarbon-free fossil fuels (14C Suess effect) might lead to similar values in future and past ...Missing: dilution | Show results with:dilution
  37. [37]
    Sedimentary Anthropogenic Carbon Signals From the Western ...
    Jan 27, 2022 · The decrease was attributable to the significant input of anthropogenic CO2 (13C Suess effect) to the atmosphere. Previous studies of δ13C in ...
  38. [38]
    Partitioning of ocean and land uptake of CO 2 as inferred by δ 13 C ...
    Mar 20, 1995 · Using δ13C measurements in atmospheric CO2 from a cooperative global air sampling network, we determined the partitioning of the net uptake ...Missing: delta13C | Show results with:delta13C
  39. [39]
    How Well Do We Understand the Land‐Ocean‐Atmosphere Carbon ...
    Apr 8, 2022 · Their isotopic analysis suggested that El Niño typically enhanced the efficiency of the ocean sink and decreased the uptake by the land sink.
  40. [40]
    Ecological processes dominate the 13 C land disequilibrium in a ...
    Mar 13, 2014 · Isotope fractionation of land photosynthesis dominates over the 13C Suess effect ... Schimel (1995), Partitioning of ocean and land uptake of CO2 ...
  41. [41]
    Can bottom-up ocean CO2 fluxes be reconciled with atmospheric ...
    The rare stable carbon isotope, 13C, has been used previously to partition CO2 fluxes into land and ocean components. Net ocean and land fluxes impose ...
  42. [42]
    A Large Northern Hemisphere Terrestrial CO2 Sink Indicated by the ...
    CIAIS, P, PARTITIONING OF OCEAN AND LAND UPTAKE OF CO2 AS INFERRED BY DELTA-C-13 MEASUREMENTS FROM THE NOAA CLIMATE MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTICS LABORATORY ...Missing: delta13C | Show results with:delta13C
  43. [43]
    Compiled records of atmospheric CO2 concentrations and stable ...
    To fully exploit the potential of tree ring δ13C proxy, atmospheric CO2 ... Suess effect' (Keeling, 1979) has resulted in a strong decline in δ13CO2 ...
  44. [44]
    (PDF) Correction of tree ring stable carbon isotope chronologies for ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This correction was necessary due to the declining trend observed in δ 13 C values during the industrial period, which was caused by the burning ...
  45. [45]
    Stable isotopes in tree rings | Request PDF - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Stable isotopes in tree rings could provide palaeoclimate reconstructions with perfect annual resolution and statistically defined confidence limits.
  46. [46]
    The need to correct for the Suess effect in the application of δ13C in ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The need to correct for the Suess effect when applying δ13C in organic matter in lacustrine sediment deposited during the anthropocene as a ...
  47. [47]
    A ~1000-year 13C Suess correction model for the study of past ...
    Nov 20, 2019 · Here, I propose a standard 13 C Suess correction model for the past ~1000 years using three prehistoric/historic records of atmospheric δ 13 C.
  48. [48]
    The Worldwide Marine Radiocarbon Reservoir Effect: Definitions ...
    Feb 16, 2018 · This article explores data from the Marine Reservoir Database and reviews the place of natural radiocarbon in oceanic records.
  49. [49]
    Revising chronological uncertainties in marine archives using global ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · Here we propose a novel chronostratigraphic approach that uses anthropogenic signals such as the oceanic 13 C Suess effect and spheroidal carbonaceous fly-ash ...
  50. [50]
    RADIOCARBON VARIATIONS IN ANNUAL TREE RINGS WITH 11 ...
    Apr 30, 2024 · We can clearly see a decreasing trend in Δ 14C levels due to the Suess effect, as well as the anticorrelation in radiocarbon variations with 11 ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Modeling the global 13C-Suess effect
    Oct 18, 2021 · This phenomenon, called the 13C Suess effect, can be used to discern the pathways of anthropogenic carbon in the Earth system.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Changes to Carbon Isotopes in Atmospheric CO2 over the Industrial ...
    Dec 9, 2020 · δ13C and Δ14C downwards, is termed “The Suess Effect.” In 1955, Hans Suess published the. 123 first observations of 14C dilution using tree ring ...
  53. [53]
    Using the Suess effect on the stable carbon isotope to distinguish ...
    Dec 7, 2016 · The Suess Effect is a term which has come to signify the decrease in ¹⁴C in atmospheric CO2 owing to admixture of CO2 produced by the combustion ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Future Changes in δ 13 C of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon in the Ocean
    Oct 1, 2021 · Projected future changes in the Suess Effect can be expected to impact studies of marine ecosystems using oceanic δ13C observations ...
  55. [55]
    Radiocarbon Production Events and their Potential Relationship ...
    Nov 19, 2019 · The rate of production is proportional to the cosmic ray flux entering the Earth's magnetosphere, which is in turn modulated by the ...
  56. [56]
    Toward Reconciling Radiocarbon Production Rates With Carbon ...
    Feb 3, 2022 · For example, during the Last Glacial Maximum, Δ14C was ∼400‰ higher compared with preindustrial times, but the 14C inventory was 10% smaller.Missing: industrial era
  57. [57]
    Constraints on natural global atmospheric CO2 fluxes from 1860 to ...
    Nov 27, 2015 · Spatiotemporal patterns of carbon-13 in the global surface oceans and the oceanic suess effect. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13, 307–335 ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity, Non-fossil ...
    Feb 1, 2022 · The specific activity of 14C in the atmosphere gets reduced by a dilution effect when fossil CO2, which is devoid of 14C, enters the atmosphere.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Comment on “World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity, Non
    The premise of this argument is incorrect, and indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of the causal link between anthropogenic emissions and rising ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  60. [60]
    Carbon isotopes do not show that humans' climate impacts are too ...
    Apr 26, 2024 · Carbon isotope ratios are actually one of the key measurements that show human-caused emissions are responsible for climate change.
  61. [61]
    How do human CO2 emissions compare to natural CO2 emissions?
    Sep 17, 2023 · The Suess effect does not show that the CO2 increase is due to emissions. It only shows that we do emit CO2. This we perfectly know without ...
  62. [62]
    REMINISCING ON THE USE AND ABUSE OF 14C AND 13C IN ...
    Feb 24, 2022 · If we (mistakenly) were to dilute 2.0 ppm/year at −19‰ (a rough average for the depletion of fossil fuels and cement relative to the atmosphere ...
  63. [63]
    Assessing the lifetime of anthropogenic CO 2 and its sensitivity ... - BG
    Jun 19, 2025 · Our findings indicate that depending on the magnitude of the emission, 75 % of anthropogenic CO 2 is removed within 197–1820 years of the peak CO 2 ...
  64. [64]
    Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions - PNAS
    Irreversible climate changes due to carbon dioxide emissions have already taken place, and future carbon dioxide emissions would imply further irreversible ...