Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Supergiant

A supergiant star is any star of very great intrinsic and relatively enormous size, typically several magnitudes brighter than a and occupying the uppermost region of the . These rare stellar objects represent an advanced evolutionary stage for massive stars, with diameters often reaching several hundred times that of and luminosities up to nearly 1,000,000 times greater, though their low density results in tenuous outer envelopes. Supergiants are classified using the luminosity class I in the Morgan-Keanan system, subdivided into Ia for the most luminous supergiants and Ib for less luminous examples, and they span a broad range of spectral types from hot blue O and B classes to cool red M types. Notable examples include the Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis), a variable star in the constellation with a radius about 764 times that of , and the blue supergiant Rigel (Beta Orionis), which is approximately 79 times the Sun's radius and 120,000 times its . Other prominent supergiants are (Alpha Cygni), a white supergiant in Cygnus, and Antares (Alpha Scorpii), a red supergiant in Scorpius. These stars are visible to the naked eye due to their extreme brightness, often ranking among the most luminous objects in their host galaxies. Supergiant evolution begins with massive main-sequence stars (initial masses of 8–40 solar masses) that exhaust their core hydrogen fuel and expand rapidly after igniting fusion. Depending on mass and , they may alternate between blue and phases, fusing progressively heavier elements like carbon and oxygen in their cores. Their lifetimes are brief—only a few million years—compared to the billions of years for Sun-like stars, culminating in core-collapse supernovae that enrich the with heavy elements. This end leaves behind either a or , marking the final chapter in the lives of these colossal stellar behemoths.

Definition and Classification

Spectral Luminosity Classes

The Morgan-Keenan (MK) system, introduced in 1943, extends the Harvard spectral classification by incorporating classes to denote a star's evolutionary stage and intrinsic brightness based on observational spectral features. In this framework, supergiants are assigned to luminosity class I, further subdivided into Ia for bright supergiants (also called luminous supergiants) and Ib for less luminous supergiants, reflecting differences in and atmospheric expansion. These classes distinguish supergiants from lower-luminosity categories like giants (class III) and main-sequence stars (class V), where line profiles indicate higher atmospheric densities. The historical roots of this classification trace to the early , when refined the Harvard system through her work on the Henry Draper Catalogue, establishing the OBAFGKM sequence based on absorption line strengths that correlate with temperature. advanced the understanding in her 1925 doctoral thesis by demonstrating that spectral variations across these types arise primarily from temperature differences rather than compositional ones, enabling a more physical interpretation of stellar spectra. Building on this, William W. Morgan and Philip C. Keenan formalized the extensions in the MK system, incorporating gravity-sensitive diagnostics to separate evolutionary stages. Luminosity class assignment for supergiants relies on the widths and shapes of specific spectral lines, which broaden with increasing and ; supergiants exhibit characteristically narrow lines due to their low gravity. Key criteria include the Ca II K-line (at 3933 Å), whose core depth and wing extent weaken in supergiants compared to dwarfs, reflecting reduced collisional broadening, alongside Balmer lines (e.g., Hδ) that appear sharper and less winged. Other gravity-sensitive features, such as the G-band (CH molecule around 4300 Å) and metallic lines like Fe I, show enhanced luminosity effects in class I, with ratios like Si IV 4089 to Hδ used for finer distinctions in early-type stars. Supergiants span the full spectral type range from O (hottest, >30,000 K) to M (coolest, <3,500 K), though they are most common in O, B, and K-M subtypes corresponding to blue and red phases. Within class I, Ia supergiants display even narrower line profiles and stronger luminosity criteria than Ib, such as more pronounced emission components or P Cygni profiles in hot stars (O-B types) due to greater mass loss, while Ib show intermediate widths closer to bright giants. For instance, in A-F types, Ia lines like Mg II exhibit asymmetric outflows, contrasting with the more symmetric absorptions in Ib.

Evolutionary Context

Supergiants represent a late evolutionary stage for massive stars with initial masses exceeding 8 solar masses (M⊙), which begin their lives on the main sequence by fusing hydrogen in their cores. These stars spend the majority of their brief lifetimes—typically 3 to 10 million years—on the main sequence as hot O- or B-type dwarfs before exhausting central hydrogen reserves. Following this phase, the inert helium core contracts under gravity, igniting hydrogen shell burning around it, which causes the envelope to expand dramatically and transitions the star into supergiant status within the subsequent 1 to several million years. This expansion marks the onset of post-main-sequence evolution, where core helium fusion soon begins, further influencing the star's path. The supergiant phase encompasses distinct sub-stages driven by internal nuclear burning and structural changes. After core contraction and the onset of shell hydrogen burning, the star ascends the red giant branch or enters the blue supergiant regime during core helium fusion, with the exact trajectory depending on mass and mass-loss rates. Blue supergiants, characterized by high surface temperatures, typically represent an early post-main-sequence stage for more massive progenitors (above ~20–30 M⊙), where the star remains compact and hot while burning helium in the core. In contrast, red supergiants emerge as a temporary cool, extended phase for stars in the 9–30 M⊙ range during core helium fusion, often involving a "blue loop" excursion to hotter temperatures and back during the later stages of helium burning, reflecting instabilities in the envelope during advanced shell burning. These phases last from hundreds of thousands to a few million years, comprising the final 10–20% of the star's life before further evolution toward carbon burning or mass ejection. Metallicity plays a crucial role in modulating the duration and stability of supergiant phases by affecting mass-loss rates through stellar winds. In lower-metallicity environments, such as those in the , reduced line-driving in winds leads to weaker mass loss, allowing supergiants to retain more envelope mass and prolong their lifetimes in both blue and red stages, potentially stabilizing against pulsational instabilities. Higher metallicity, as in the , enhances wind strength, accelerating envelope stripping and shortening the red supergiant phase while favoring blue supergiant persistence or direct evolution to . Spectral classes serve as observational markers of these evolutionary stages, with O and B types indicating blue supergiants and M types denoting red supergiants.

Distinction from Other Evolved Stars

Supergiant stars are distinguished from other evolved stars primarily by their extreme luminosities and sizes, which place them in luminosity class I on the spectral classification system, above the class III giants but below the rare class 0 hypergiants. While giants represent an intermediate stage of evolution for stars of moderate mass, supergiants arise from more massive progenitors and exhibit significantly greater expansion, leading to luminosities often exceeding 10,000 times that of the Sun compared to the thousands for giants of similar spectral type. Hypergiants, in contrast, push the boundaries further with luminosities up to millions of solar values and pronounced atmospheric instabilities, such as luminous blue variable (LBV) outbursts, which are less common in supergiants. A key differentiator is surface gravity, quantified as log g, where supergiants typically have values around 0 to 1, lower than the 1.5 to 2.5 for giants due to their expanded envelopes but higher than the negative log g values for hypergiants, which reflect even lower pressures and greater mass loss rates. On the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, supergiants occupy the upper right region, spanning blue, yellow, and red phases with absolute magnitudes brighter than -5, distinct from the red giant branch where giants cluster at magnitudes around -1 to -3. Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, evolving from low- to intermediate-mass progenitors (1–8 M⊙), can reach comparable luminosities to red supergiants but originate from less massive stars and feature different nucleosynthesis, dominated by s-process elements rather than the CNO-cycle enhancements in supergiants.
Stellar TypeLuminosity (L/L⊙)Radius (R/R⊙)Surface Gravity (log g)Progenitor Mass (M⊙)Key Features
Giants~10³–10⁴~10²–10³1.5–2.51–8Stable expansion; moderate mass loss; along red giant branch on HR diagram.
Supergiants~10⁴–10⁵>10³0–1>8High luminosity across spectral types; significant but not extreme mass loss; class I position above giants.
Hypergiants~10⁵–10⁶>>10³<0>20–40Extreme instability and outflows (e.g., LBV phase); near Humphreys-Davidson limit on HR diagram.
AGB Stars~10³–10⁴~10²–10³0–11–8Thermal pulses and dust production; s-process nucleosynthesis; end in planetary nebulae.
Observational challenges arise in borderline cases, particularly yellow supergiants (YSGs), which represent transitional phases between blue and red stages and can be difficult to classify due to rapid evolutionary loops and contamination from foreground giants or extinction effects. These YSGs often exhibit variability that blurs distinctions from hypergiants, complicating distance and mass estimates in crowded fields like the . Evolutionary overlaps further challenge categorization, as some super-AGB stars (6–12 M⊙ progenitors) mimic supergiant luminosities and envelopes but follow distinct paths, often ending in electron-capture supernovae—a subtype of core-collapse supernovae—rather than iron-core collapse supernovae.

Physical Characteristics

Luminosity and Brightness

Supergiant stars exhibit extreme luminosities that distinguish them from less evolved stellar types, with absolute visual magnitudes typically ranging from -5 to -9. This corresponds to bolometric luminosities between approximately 10,000 and over 1,000,000 times that of the Sun (L⊙), making them among the most luminous objects in galaxies. These values reflect the stars' capacity to outshine entire clusters of ordinary stars, with examples like blue supergiants achieving near the upper end due to their high-energy output. The total luminosity L of a supergiant is governed by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, expressed as L = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T^4, where R is the stellar radius, T is the effective surface , and \sigma is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. In supergiants, the combination of expanded radii—often hundreds of times the solar value—and surface temperatures that, while varying across spectral types, contribute to the enormous results in this heightened output. The law underscores how even moderate temperature differences can amplify when paired with large radii. Several factors influence the luminosity of supergiants beyond basic . Core fusion rates, driven by the star's initial , determine the energy generation rate, with more massive cores producing higher luminosities through advanced nuclear burning stages. Envelope opacity, particularly in cooler supergiants where molecular lines and impede escape, modulates the effective transport and can enhance or suppress observed brightness. Additionally, the evolutionary stage plays a key role, as supergiants brighten during post-main-sequence expansion before stabilizing or declining in later phases. Accurate measurement of supergiant luminosity relies on that account for and intervening material. The , m - M = 5 \log_{10} (d/10) where m is the , M the , and d the in parsecs, allows derivation of intrinsic brightness from apparent observations, often using trigonometric parallaxes or cluster associations for calibration. Interstellar extinction corrections are essential, as absorption dims by up to several magnitudes; this is quantified via the A_V or color excess E(B-V), derived from multi-wavelength photometry to recover the true flux. These methods ensure reliable estimates, critical for placing supergiants on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.

Temperature and Spectral Types

Supergiant stars exhibit a wide range of surface temperatures, spanning from approximately 20,000 K to 50,000 K for blue supergiants of spectral types O and early B, which dominate the hottest end of the sequence. These high temperatures result in spectra characterized by prominent absorption lines of ionized helium (He II) and metals, such as C III and N III, alongside weaker neutral helium (He I) features in the hotter O subtypes. As temperatures decrease to the blue supergiant regime of later B types (around 10,000–25,000 K), neutral helium lines strengthen while He II weakens, marking a transition in ionization balance. Yellow supergiants, with effective temperatures between 6,000 K and 8,000 K and spectral types F and G, display spectra where Balmer hydrogen lines (Hα, Hβ) reach their peak strength due to optimal excitation conditions. In these intermediate temperatures, metallic lines from elements like Fe I and Ti II become more prominent, contributing to broader absorption features compared to hotter supergiants. Red supergiants, the coolest class at 3,500–4,500 K with spectral types K and M, show spectra dominated by molecular bands such as TiO and VO, which form in the extended, low-temperature atmospheres, along with strong neutral metal lines like those of Ca I. The observed temperature variations in supergiants are tied to evolutionary processes involving shell burning, where stars can execute "blue loops" in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. During core helium burning, the hydrogen-burning shell's interaction with the overlying -rich layers can cause rapid expansion and contraction, driving the star from a cool phase back to hotter blue or temperatures before returning. This oscillatory behavior, observed in models of intermediate- to high-mass stars (8–40 M⊙), arises from opacity changes and energy transport shifts at the H/He interface, influencing the duration and extent of each phase. Surface temperatures of supergiants are often estimated using color indices like B–V, which correlate with via blackbody approximations adjusted for atmospheric effects. For instance, intrinsic B–V values range from negative (∼–0.3 for O/B types) to positive (∼+1.0 for K/M types), providing a photometric proxy for spectral classification and temperature calibration in distant systems. These indices, combined with strengths, enable precise determinations without full spectroscopic analysis.

Size, Mass, and Surface Gravity

Supergiant stars possess enormous sizes, with radii typically ranging from 10 to 1,000 solar radii (R⊙), while red supergiants can extend up to approximately 1,500 R⊙. These dimensions are determined through high-resolution techniques such as near-infrared with the Interferometer (VLTI), which resolves the photospheric angular diameters of individual stars, and lunar occultations, which provide precise measurements by observing the patterns as the passes in front of the star. The progenitors of supergiants begin with initial masses between 8 and 20 or more solar masses (M⊙), but their current masses are reduced due to substantial mass loss over their post-main-sequence evolution. Surface gravities of supergiants are notably low, with logarithmic values (log g) ranging from 0 to -1 in cgs units, in stark contrast to the log g ≈ 4 characteristic of main-sequence stars. This diminished gravity stems directly from the fundamental relation g = \frac{GM}{R^2}, where the G, M, and greatly expanded R combine to yield a weak effective pull at the surface, thereby influencing atmospheric expansion and stability. The expansive envelopes of supergiants lead to highly tenuous density profiles, with mean densities around $10^{-6} g/cm³, orders of magnitude lower than the solar value of about 1.4 g/cm³. This low gravity contributes to the broadening of spectral lines observed in luminosity class stars.

Atmospheric Variability

Supergiant stars display notable photometric variability, primarily categorized as semi-regular () or irregular types, arising from pulsational and convective activities in their extended envelopes. These variations typically exhibit amplitudes of up to 2–3 magnitudes in visual bands, with characteristic periods spanning from several days to multiple years, as observed in red supergiants like those in the . Such low-amplitude, multi-periodic behaviors distinguish them from more regular pulsators, reflecting the complex interplay of atmospheric dynamics. Due to their low , these stars' atmospheres are particularly susceptible to such instabilities, facilitating large-scale motions. The underlying pulsation mechanisms in supergiant envelopes operate primarily through the kappa mechanism, an opacity-driven process where increased opacity in ionizing zones traps heat and drives expansion, and the epsilon mechanism, a heat-engine effect involving periodic modulation of energy generation in the outer layers. In red supergiants, the kappa mechanism dominates in the and ionization regions, leading to nonlinear pulsations with periods of hundreds of days, as modeled for stars like . These mechanisms contribute to the semi-regular light curves by causing periodic radius and temperature changes, though irregular components often arise from . Luminous blue variables (LBVs), a hot supergiant subclass, experience extreme atmospheric variability through "great eruptions," massive outbursts that eject significant material over years. These events produce characteristic P Cygni line profiles in spectra, with blue-shifted absorption indicating high-velocity outflows of up to thousands of kilometers per second, as seen in historical eruptions of P Cygni itself. Such ejections can increase by several magnitudes, highlighting the instability of LBV envelopes under radiative pressures. Spectroscopic observations of supergiants reveal dynamic atmospheric changes through radial velocity shifts of several kilometers per second and asymmetric line profile variations, driven by large-scale cells and propagating shocks. In stars like HD 14134, line profiles show sub-features and broadening on timescales of days, reflecting supersonic convective flows that propagate through the low-density outer layers. Long-term monitoring, such as for α Cygni, confirms these variations correlate with photometric cycles, providing insights into the turbulent nature of supergiant winds.

Chemical Abundances and Composition

Supergiant stars exhibit distinct chemical abundance patterns in their atmospheres, reflecting the outcomes of nuclear processing in their interiors and convective mixing events. In blue supergiants, the CNO cycle leads to enhanced production of nitrogen relative to carbon and oxygen, resulting in elevated N/O ratios that can reach values up to 1 or higher, as observed in detailed spectroscopic analyses of B-type supergiants. These ratios serve as indicators of rotational mixing and first dredge-up during the main-sequence phase, where processed material from the stellar core is brought to the surface. In contrast, red supergiants display evidence of deeper convective dredge-up, enriching their atmospheres with helium (up to Y ≈ 0.3–0.4 by mass fraction) and heavier metals from the hydrogen-burning shell, as inferred from non-LTE models of their spectra. Overall abundance patterns in supergiants often resemble compositions in their early post-main-sequence phases, but deviations emerge due to evolutionary processing. Light such as and are significantly depleted, with abundances typically log ε(Li) < 1.5 in F- and G-type supergiants, compared to values around 1.9, owing to high temperatures in convective zones that destroy these fragile nuclei. Similarly, shows underabundances by factors of 10–100 relative to , consistent with and burning in massive star envelopes. Some red supergiants, particularly those with extended envelopes, exhibit enhancements in s-process like and ([Ba/Fe] ≈ +0.3 to +0.6), attributed to in thermally pulsing phases, as seen in the M supergiant α Ori. These abundances are derived primarily through curve-of-growth analysis of absorption lines, which relates equivalent widths to column densities under local thermodynamic equilibrium assumptions, and refined with non-LTE modeling to account for deviations in , extended atmospheres. Non-LTE corrections are crucial for supergiants, as they can alter derived abundances by 0.1–0.5 dex for elements like iron and magnesium due to escape from optically thin lines. Variations between supergiant types are pronounced: supergiants show enrichment (ΔY ≈ 0.05–0.1) from burning, enhancing He I lines in their spectra, while red supergiants form metal oxides, prominently TiO bands in M-type spectra, signaling oxygen-rich compositions with [Ti/O] near but amplified by low temperatures.

Evolutionary Pathways

Formation from Massive Stars

Supergiant stars originate from the of massive protostellar cores within dense regions of giant molecular clouds, where initial stellar masses exceed 8 masses (M⊙) to enable eventual core-collapse supernovae. These clouds, typically spanning 10–100 parsecs with masses around 10^5–10^6 M⊙, fragment under and self-gravity, forming dense clumps (densities ~10^5 cm^{-3}, temperatures 10–20 K) that collapse non-homologously to produce hydrostatic protostellar cores. Accretion from surrounding envelopes, often via circumstellar disks, builds the protostar's mass, with rates on the order of 10^{-5} to 10^{-3} M⊙ yr^{-1}, allowing growth to supergiant progenitors despite radiative and mechanical feedback. This process favors monolithic collapse or competitive accretion models in clustered environments, ensuring the high masses necessary for post-main-sequence expansion into supergiants. Upon reaching sufficient mass, typically during ongoing accretion, these stars ignite core and settle onto the zero-age (ZAMS), marking the start of stable burning for approximately 3–40 million years, depending on initial mass (e.g., ~10 Myr for ~15 M⊙ stars and ~5 Myr for ~25 M⊙). This phase is characterized by rapid nuclear energy generation via the , sustaining high luminosities while rapid rotation (up to 200–300 km s^{-1}) and magnetic fields (kilo-Gauss strengths) regulate internal mixing and stability, potentially influencing angular momentum transport and disk accretion. On the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, ZAMS massive stars occupy the upper left, with effective temperatures of 30,000–50,000 K (O and early B spectral types) and luminosities around 10^4 L⊙ for lower-mass examples, scaling to 10^5 L⊙ or higher for more massive ones. Environmental factors in star clusters further shape this early evolution, where binary interactions and dynamical encounters accelerate the path to post-main-sequence phases. Up to 60–70% of massive stars form in or multiple systems, with close orbits leading to , mergers, or ejections that alter spin rates and envelopes, hastening departure from the compared to isolated stars. Cluster dynamics, including core collapse and stellar collisions in dense regions (e.g., Cluster), enhance mass accretion for the most massive members, promoting rapid evolution toward supergiant status.

Transitions Through Supergiant Phases

After the exhaustion of in the core of a massive , typically following its main-sequence phase, the inert core contracts under , heating up and initiating hydrogen shell burning around it. This process releases gravitational potential energy, leading to the rapid expansion of the star's envelope on the Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale of approximately 10^5 to 10^6 years, transforming the star into a supergiant with radii hundreds of times larger than its main-sequence size. As the helium core reaches temperatures around 100 million Kelvin, core helium burning ignites via the , producing carbon and oxygen, while the hydrogen shell continues to burn. In some evolutionary models, particularly for intermediate-mass stars (typically 3–12 M⊙), this phase involves a "" where the star temporarily evolves blueward on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram due to changes in the opacity and energy transport in the envelope, before returning to the branch. For more massive progenitors, blueward evolution can occur due to mass loss or structural changes. Evolutionary paths depend on initial and rate; lower and higher favor prolonged phases over red. Subsequent exhaustion of helium in the core triggers further contraction and the onset of carbon burning at temperatures exceeding 600 million Kelvin, re-establishing or deepening the phase as the envelope expands anew. The phase, often associated with core burning, lasts roughly 1 million years, representing a brief interlude in the post-main-sequence evolution. In contrast, the phase endures longer, typically several million years, owing to the extended convective envelopes that slow the structural adjustments and prolong the thermal timescales during shell and core burning. These transitions are not always monotonic; instabilities arise from overlaps between burning shells, such as the and shells, which can cause episodic changes in energy generation and envelope structure, leading to blue-red oscillations observed in some supergiants. Such dynamics are reproduced in computational models using codes like MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics), which simulate the nuclear burning sequences and envelope responses to predict these excursions.

Mass Loss and Envelope Dynamics

Supergiant stars undergo substantial mass loss via stellar winds, with rates varying by spectral type: typically 10^{-9}–10^{-6} M_\odot yr^{-1} for hot supergiants and 10^{-6}–10^{-4} M_\odot yr^{-1} for cool supergiants. In hot supergiants, such as O- and B-type stars, this mass ejection is primarily driven by line-driving, where radiation exerts pressure on ions through absorption in numerous lines, as formalized in the Castor-Abbott-Klein (CAK) theory and its extensions. For cool supergiants, particularly red supergiants, the dominant mechanism involves accelerating newly formed dust grains, which couple to the gas and initiate outflows. These winds achieve terminal velocities of 100–2,000 km/s in hot supergiants, manifesting as P Cygni profiles in optical and spectra, where blueshifted absorption reveals the expanding against from the receding side. In red supergiants, velocities are lower, typically 10–30 km/s, but the sustained ejection still removes significant mass over evolutionary timescales. The envelopes of red supergiants feature deep convective zones that drive intense mixing, transporting processed material outward and destabilizing the atmosphere to amplify mass loss through enhanced pulsations and . This convective activity creates extended, low-density layers where dust formation is favored, further boosting the efficiency of radiative driving. Ejected material accumulates into circumstellar shells of gas and , which can obscure the supergiant's and reduce its apparent brightness, especially in optical bands where is pronounced. These shells also disperse stellar into the , gradually enriching it with heavy elements and influencing local . The characteristically low of supergiants lowers the energy barrier for initiation, enabling persistent outflows across both and phases.

Astrophysical Significance

Progenitors of Supernovae

Supergiant stars serve as the primary progenitors for core-collapse supernovae, the explosive endpoints of massive . These events occur in stars with initial masses typically ranging from 8 to 20 solar masses (M⊙), where the star's , after progressing through successive stages of burning, reaches a point of instability. For standard core-collapse supernovae, progenitors are often red or blue supergiants that have undergone significant mass loss, stripping outer envelopes in some cases to produce Type Ib or events, while retaining leads to Type II supernovae. In rarer instances, extremely massive supergiants exceeding 100 M⊙ can trigger pair-instability supernovae, where electron-positron in the oxygen causes a catastrophic , though such events are exceptional and primarily theoretical for III stars. The core-collapse mechanism begins when the star's central iron core, formed after silicon burning, surpasses the of approximately 1.4 M⊙ and can no longer generate energy through fusion to counteract gravitational contraction. This triggers rapid implosion as the core density rises, with infalling material rebounding off the compressed core to drive a that disrupts the , releasing enormous energy in the form of neutrinos, kinetic , and . The process culminates in the formation of a or remnant, depending on the progenitor's mass, and is responsible for the diversity of spectral types in core-collapse supernovae, including hydrogen-rich Type II and stripped-envelope Types Ib and Ic. Observational evidence strongly supports supergiants as direct progenitors, with pre-explosion imaging allowing identification of these stars in nearby galaxies. A seminal example is Supernova 1987A in the , whose progenitor was the Sanduleak -69° 202, a ~20 M⊙ star that had evolved off the branch shortly before explosion, confirming the link between supergiant phases and core collapse. Similar detections of progenitors for Type IIP supernovae, such as those with luminosities around 10^5 L⊙, further validate theoretical models, though a noted deficit of very luminous progenitors above log(L/L⊙) ≈ 5.1 suggests evolutionary biases or observational limits. Not all massive supergiants explode visibly; some undergo failed supernovae, collapsing directly into black holes without producing a detectable outburst, particularly for progenitors above ~20–25 M⊙ where the explosion energy is insufficient to unbind the envelope. Evidence for this comes from the disappearance of red supergiant candidates like N6946-BH1, which dimmed dramatically without a supernova signature, implying a quiet core collapse and black hole formation. These events highlight that while most supergiants in the 8–20 M⊙ range culminate in successful explosions, higher-mass counterparts often evade detection, influencing the observed supernova rate.

Contributions to Stellar Nucleosynthesis

Supergiant stars, as the evolved phases of massive progenitors, play a pivotal role in stellar nucleosynthesis through their advanced core burning stages, where fusion processes build heavier elements up to the iron peak. Following core helium exhaustion, these stars undergo carbon burning at temperatures around 6 × 10^8 K, primarily producing neon-20 and magnesium-24 via the 12C(12C,α)16O and related reactions. Subsequent neon burning at approximately 1.5–2 × 10^9 K converts neon into oxygen-16 and magnesium-24 through photodisintegration and alpha captures, while oxygen burning at 1.5–2 × 10^9 K synthesizes silicon-28, sulfur-32, and other alpha elements via alpha-particle reactions like 16O(16O,α)28Si. Finally, silicon burning at temperatures exceeding 3 × 10^9 K quasi-statically assembles iron-peak nuclei (e.g., 56Fe) through a complex network of alpha captures, photo-disintegrations, and charged-particle reactions, marking the endpoint of exothermic fusion in stellar cores. In red supergiants, convective mixing events, such as the first and subsequent mixing, transport freshly synthesized material from the hydrogen- and helium-burning shells to the stellar surface, altering the atmospheric compositions observed in these stars. This mixing occurs during convective episodes, bringing up processed material and enriching the in CNO-cycle products and some alpha elements. Such surface enrichment is evident in the enhanced carbon, nitrogen, oxygen abundances detected in many red supergiants, providing direct observational tracers of internal nucleosynthetic processes. Upon core collapse, the ensuing supernovae explosions enable explosive nucleosynthesis. While core-collapse supernovae have been proposed as sites for the rapid neutron-capture (r-) process, particularly for lighter r-process elements via neutrino-driven winds, the dominant astrophysical site for heavy r-process elements (A ≳ 90) beyond the iron peak is binary neutron star mergers. In the high-entropy environment of supernova shocks, some neutron-rich isotopes can form through neutron captures, but their contribution to heavy elements is limited compared to mergers. Nucleosynthetic yield models demonstrate that supergiant progenitors are the dominant galactic sources of oxygen and , with a 20 M_⊙ star ejecting approximately 3–4 M_⊙ of alone during its explosion. Integrated over a Salpeter , massive stars (15–40 M_⊙) contribute over 70% of the interstellar medium's oxygen and significant fractions of , magnesium, and , as quantified in comprehensive evolutionary calculations that account for both hydrostatic and explosive burning. These yields are essential for reproducing observed galactic abundance gradients and the alpha-element enhancement in metal-poor populations.

Influence on Galactic Ecosystems

Supergiant stars exert profound influence on their host galaxies through their intense emission, which ionizes vast volumes of surrounding interstellar gas to create H II regions. These regions, often spanning tens of parsecs, result from the high-energy photons emitted by hot O- and B-type supergiants, leading to the expansion of ionized bubbles that compress adjacent molecular clouds and trigger the of new star-forming cores. Such radiative feedback not only shapes the structure of star-forming nebulae but also regulates the efficiency of by dispersing dense gas in some areas while promoting it in others. In galaxies like the , these processes contribute to the of star formation, where supergiant-driven H II regions foster the birth of subsequent massive stars. The explosive endpoints of supergiant evolution further amplify their galactic impact via feedback loops involving core-collapse supernovae. These events eject synthesized heavy elements—such as oxygen, carbon, and iron—into the (), significantly enriching its and altering its thermal properties. The injected metals enhance gas cooling rates, enabling more efficient fragmentation and collapse of clouds to form new stars, thereby influencing the pace and distribution of next-generation across galactic disks. remnants from red supergiants, in particular, create chemically heterogeneous structures that propagate these enrichments over kiloparsec scales, sustaining a cycle of chemical evolution and structural feedback in galactic ecosystems. This process links the death of massive stars to the vitality of ongoing galactic . Supergiant populations also function as direct tracers of recent massive rates (SFRs) in galaxies, owing to their brief post-main-sequence lifetimes of approximately 3–10 million years. In the and nearby galaxies, the observed density and spatial distribution of O and B supergiants reveal bursts of within the last 10–20 million years, providing a snapshot of high-mass stellar birth rates without reliance on indirect indicators like emission. Red supergiants similarly probe somewhat older episodes, allowing astronomers to reconstruct the episodic nature of SFRs and correlate them with galactic structure, such as spiral arms. These tracers enable quantitative estimates of SFRs, typically in the range of 1–3 solar masses per year for the , highlighting supergiants' role in mapping the dynamic history of galactic stellar populations. In rare cases, low-metallicity supergiants can produce gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) through the mechanism, where the core collapse of a rapidly rotating star forms a and launches relativistic jets. These events, predominantly from blue supergiants with initial masses above 25 solar masses, occur in metal-poor environments that reduce wind mass loss and preserve . GRBs ionize and heat the ISM over extragalactic distances, potentially seeding metal enrichment in distant regions and influencing early galaxy formation in low-metallicity dwarf systems. Such phenomena underscore the extreme endpoints of supergiant evolution and their sporadic but potent contributions to galactic chemical and dynamical ecosystems.

Notable Supergiants

Prominent Blue Supergiants

One of the most prominent blue supergiants is Rigel (β Ori), a B8 Ia star with a bolometric luminosity of approximately 120,000 L⊙ and a distance of 860 light-years. It stands out for its exceptional brightness, making it the seventh brightest star in the night sky with an apparent visual magnitude averaging 0.13, and for its variability as an α Cygni-type pulsator, where its magnitude varies between 0.05 and 0.18 over periods from days to months due to non-radial pulsations and associated changes in radial velocity and spectral line profiles. Another key example is Deneb (α Cyg), an A2 Ia supergiant possessing a luminosity of about 196,000 L⊙. This star plays a crucial role in calibrating extragalactic distance scales, as its parameters derived from Hipparcos parallax measurements provide benchmarks for spectroscopic methods applied to more distant blue supergiants. Deneb's distance, estimated at around 2,600 light-years, aligns with its membership in the Cygnus OB7 association, a loose cluster of massive stars within the Cygnus molecular cloud complex. Observationally, prominent blue supergiants like these are often linked to young stellar associations, such as Deneb's connection to Cygnus OB7, which highlights their role in recent regions. Some also display LBV-like variability, characterized by irregular photometric and spectroscopic changes akin to those in , including enhanced mass ejection episodes observed in stars like P Cygni (B1-Ia). These stars are vital for investigating hot wind dynamics, where their strong, radiatively driven outflows—reaching terminal velocities of thousands of km/s—reveal clumping, velocity plateaus, and mass-loss rates through UV and optical . Their properties also aid in probing early evolutionary stages by constraining models of post-main-sequence and in massive stars.

Iconic Red Supergiants

One of the most iconic red supergiants is (α Orionis), a classified as spectral type M1-2 Ia-Iab with a of approximately 126,000 times that of and a radius extending to about 887 solar radii. Positioned at a distance of roughly 548 light-years from Earth, its relative proximity enables extensive observational scrutiny of its pulsating behavior and atmospheric dynamics. In July 2025, astronomers using the Gemini North telescope confirmed the detection of a companion star orbiting at approximately 8 AU with an estimated mass of 0.7–1 solar masses, providing new insights into its binary nature and evolutionary dynamics. gained widespread attention during the Great Dimming event of 2019–2020, when its visual brightness dropped by about 1.2 magnitudes over several months, attributed to a massive surface ejection that cooled the and formed an obscuring dust cloud. Another prominent example is (α Scorpii), classified as M1.5 Iab with a radius of approximately 680 solar radii and a companion star system consisting of a B2.5 V main-sequence star with a projected separation of about 529 astronomical units. The presence of this companion, with an estimated mass of around 7 solar masses, facilitates refined mass determinations for itself, placing it at about 14 solar masses through evolutionary modeling and orbital constraints. This binary configuration highlights the role of companionship in probing the internal structures and evolutionary timelines of red supergiants. Observational studies of these stars reveal extensive dust shells formed through episodic mass loss, as evidenced in by infrared excesses and the dust veil responsible for its dimming, while similar circumstellar envelopes surround with low dust content but notable silicate features. Additionally, both exhibit strong SiO emissions, such as the v=3-2, J=8-7 transitions detected in via observations, which trace the kinematics of their expanding molecular layers and provide insights into wind acceleration. These features link red supergiants to historical supernova candidates, where analogous dust and signatures in remnants suggest pre-explosion mass ejections. The cultural and scientific significance of these nearby red supergiants, particularly at 548 light-years, lies in their accessibility for high-resolution and , allowing detailed probes of late-stage , , and mass-loss mechanisms that precede core-collapse events. complements this by offering a benchmark for binary interactions in cool giants, enhancing models of envelope dynamics during the phase.

References

  1. [1]
    Supergiant star | Massive, Luminous, Bright - Britannica
    Supergiant star, any star of very great intrinsic luminosity and relatively enormous size, typically several magnitudes brighter than a giant star.
  2. [2]
    Hertzsprung-Russell diagram | Definition & Facts - Britannica
    Large, bright, though cool, stars called giants and supergiants appear in the upper right, and the white dwarfs, dim, small, and hot, lie in the lower left. The ...
  3. [3]
    Glossary term: Supergiant Star - IAU Office of Astronomy for Education
    Supergiants are the largest and most luminous stars. They can be several hundred times larger than the Sun and many thousand times more luminous.
  4. [4]
    Supergiant - eSky - Glyph Web
    There is no strict formal definition of a 'supergiant', but typically the term is used to describe stars with an absolute magnitude brighter than about -3.
  5. [5]
    Supergiant Star - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    For the heavier stars, there are two sub-classes: Red supergiants (RSGs) with a high-density wind and Blue supergiants (BSGs). The latter have a thin, high- ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Supergiant Star - Universe Today
    Feb 12, 2009 · A good example of a blue supergiant is Rigel, also in the Orion constellation. Rigel has a 17 times the mass of the Sun, and 66,000 times the ...
  8. [8]
    Supergiant Stars | Definition, Characteristics & Names - Lesson
    Some popular discovered red supergiants include UY Scuti and Betelguese, while some blue ones are Deneb and Rigel. Interestingly, supergiants last for 10 to 50 ...Supergiant Star Overview · Supergiant Star Life Cycle · Supergiant Star Names
  9. [9]
    SUPERGIANT Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Oct 9, 2025 · The meaning of SUPERGIANT is something that is extremely large; especially : a star of very great intrinsic luminosity and enormous size.
  10. [10]
    Astrophysics of Red Supergiants - AAS Nova
    perhaps 8–40 solar masses in size — exhausts its hydrogen fuel, evolves off of the main ...
  11. [11]
    Stellar Evolution - Chandra X-ray Observatory
    Jul 3, 2012 · The Supergiant Branch: Stars greater than ~8 solar masses evolve horizontally onto the supergiant branch, located in the extreme upper right ...
  12. [12]
    Red Supergiant Stars - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    In its late evolution, a star having an initial mass in the range of 8 to about 30 solar masses becomes a red supergiant, developing a compact, dense, heavy- ...
  13. [13]
    Stellar Evolution - | The Schools' Observatory
    Supergiants have the largest radius of all known stars. They evolve from main-sequence stars. · Supernova are huge explosions in space. · A neutron star is the ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] A Digital Spectral Classification Atlas - Appalachian State University
    Jan 30, 2009 · The MK Spectral classification system was founded by W.W. Morgan and P.C. Keenan in the year 1943, with the publication of the first ...
  15. [15]
    Gray, Napier, & Winkler, Luminosity Classification. I. - IOP Science
    The hydrogen lines and the Ca II K line are best matched at a spectral type of F1 V. ... II, whereas the metallic line luminosity criteria suggest II+. 9 ...
  16. [16]
    Stellar classification | Types, Spectral Classes & Luminosity
    Most of this work was done by three assistants, Williamina P. Fleming, Antonia C. Maury, and Annie Jump Cannon. As the work progressed, the types were ...
  17. [17]
    Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin: the woman who found hydrogen in the ...
    Mar 8, 2022 · The original Harvard system was developed by Annie Jump Cannon, who re-ordered and simplified the prior alphabetical system. This image ...
  18. [18]
    25: Luminosity Class and the HR Diagram - Physics LibreTexts
    Feb 18, 2025 · Luminosity classes (I-V) are based on absorption line widths, with I being supergiants and V being dwarfs. The HR diagram plots luminosity vs ...
  19. [19]
    Gray, Graham, & Hoyt, Luminosity Classification. II. - IOP Science
    For instance, the Ca II K line, the hydrogen lines, the G band, and certain parts of the metallic line spectrum (especially the MK luminosity criteria) are ...
  20. [20]
    Spectral type, temperature, and evolutionary stage in cool supergiants
    Red supergiants have late spectral types (SpTs) and low effective temperatures. Traditionally, very luminous stars of spectral types K and M have been known ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Luminosity class - Oxford Reference
    ... Ia–0 Extreme supergiants (sometimes called hypergiants). Ia Luminous supergiants. Iab Normal supergiants. Ib Underluminous supergiants. II Bright giants. III ...
  22. [22]
    I. Ultraviolet and visible spectral atlas of A-type supergiants
    The most luminous A-supergiants present two different types of profiles characteristic of mass outflow. In some stars the Mg II lines are asym- metric with ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Giants, Supergiants and Hypergiants - arXiv
    Jul 9, 2025 · Hypergiant stars represent stellar evolution at the extremes, displaying evidence of intense stellar winds combined with luminosities and radii ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Super-AGB Stars and their role as Electron Capture Supernova ...
    Mar 20, 2017 · We assess the contribution from super-AGB star nucleosynthesis in a Galactic perspec- tive, and consider the (super-)AGB scenario in the context ...
  26. [26]
    Don't Believe the Hype(r): The Yellow Supergiants of Westerlund 1
    Yellow hypergiants (YHGs) are often presumed to represent a transitional post-red supergiant (RSG) phase for stars ∼30–40 M⊙.Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  27. [27]
    YELLOW AND RED SUPERGIANTS IN THE LARGE MAGELLANIC ...
    Due to their transitionary nature, yellow supergiants (YSGs) provide a critical challenge for evolutionary modeling. Previous studies within M31 and the ...
  28. [28]
    Massive Stars in the Galaxies of the Local Group - Philip Massey
    Their high masses result in high luminosities, with energy outputs on the order of a million times that of the sun. While on the main-sequence as O-type stars, ...
  29. [29]
    Quantitative spectroscopy of B-type supergiants
    The less massive stars (i.e. M ≲ 30 M⊙) with bolometric magnitudes larger than about −9.5 to −10 mag evolve into red supergiants (RSGs) with extended hydrogen- ...
  30. [30]
    Modified Gravity and the Flux-weighted Gravity–Luminosity ...
    Jun 18, 2021 · With absolute visual magnitudes up to −10 mag BSGs are beacons in the universe and much brighter than other stellar distance indicators such as ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    22.1 Evolution from the Main Sequence to Red Giants – Astronomy
    The fusion of hydrogen to form helium changes the interior composition of a star, which in turn results in changes in its temperature, luminosity, and radius.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Lecture 22: Why Stars Become Red Giants
    May 1, 2011 · Radiative star with Kramers Opacity gives maximum luminosity. 3.Large density discontinuity can occur between envelope and core. Sunday, May ...
  33. [33]
    NED-D Distance Methods Explanation and Examples
    May 28, 2020 · Thus, the brightest AGB Stars in the galaxy NGC 0253, with a maximum apparent visual magnitude of mV = 24.0, have a distance modulus of (m-M)V = ...Missing: range | Show results with:range
  34. [34]
    A NEW DISTANCE TO M33 USING BLUE SUPERGIANTS AND THE ...
    The analysis yields stellar effective temperatures, gravities, interstellar reddening, and extinction, the combination of which provides a distance estimate via ...
  35. [35]
    Impact of binary interaction on the evolution of blue supergiants
    The vast majority of O and B-type massive stars with masses 8–30 M⊙ will evolve to blue supergiants (BSGs) of spectral types B and A, before cooling further ...2. Stellar Evolution Models · 3.1. Primary Stars · 4. Discussion<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Yellow Supergiants and Post-red Supergiant Evolution in the Large ...
    Jul 6, 2023 · Due to the high foreground contamination in the temperature range of the yellow supergiants (4500–8000 K), we have limited our selection of LMC ...Missing: FG | Show results with:FG
  37. [37]
    Monitoring luminous yellow massive stars in M 33
    The absorption spectrum of the star is typical of a yellow supergiant and both works by Massey et al. ... In the temperature range 4750−6000 K of star 2 however, ...Missing: FG | Show results with:FG
  38. [38]
    Blue loops of intermediate mass stars - Astronomy & Astrophysics
    During the core He-burning phase, intermediate mass stars may evolve from the red-giant branch (RGB) to the blue-giant region and return in the HR diagram (HRD) ...
  39. [39]
    The evolutionary properties of the blue loop under the influence of ...
    The blue loop can occur when the hydrogen burning shell merges with the hydrogen–helium abundance discontinuity. We find that the blue loop extension strongly ...
  40. [40]
    Parameters of galactic early B supergiants - Astronomy & Astrophysics
    In addition, E(B−V) derived from the (B−V) color index always overestimates the real interstellar extinction. This trend is also found for the investigated B ...
  41. [41]
    1. INTRODUCTION 2. TEMPERATURE INDICATORS - IOP Science
    Indeed, a good color-temperature relation will prove valuable for any spec- troscopic analyses for which the S/N is too low or the wave- length coverage is ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    The evolution of red supergiant mass-loss rates - Oxford Academic
    Single stars with initial masses between 8 and 25 M⊙ are predicted to evolve to become red supergiants (RSGs) before they end their lives as core collapse ...
  44. [44]
    Progenitor properties of type II supernovae: fitting to hydrodynamical ...
    These detections have constrained the progenitors to be red supergiant (RSG) stars in the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS) mass range of ∼8–20 M⊙ (Smartt 2015; ...
  45. [45]
    The atmospheric structure and fundamental parameters of the red ...
    We adopted a surface gravity of log (g) = −0.5 for red supergiants. With these models, we obtained the Rosseland angular radius. Then, we derived the ...
  46. [46]
    Spectroscopic evidence for a large spot on the dimming Betelgeuse
    Aug 5, 2021 · b The uncertainty of surface gravity (log g) is taken as the difference between the 84th and 50th percentile as the upper limit, and the ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    22.1 Evolution from the Main Sequence to Red Giants – Astronomy
    As stars age, they evolve away from the main sequence to become red giants or supergiants. The core of a red giant is contracting, but the outer layers are ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Variability in red supergiant stars: pulsations, long secondary ...
    We study the brightness variations of galactic red supergiant stars using long-term visual light curves collected by the American Association of Variable Star ...
  49. [49]
    Atmospheric dynamics and the mass loss process in red supergiant ...
    lines, regarding the low surface gravity of RSG. RSG lower atmospheres are convectively unstable. Already 30 years ago. Schwarzschild (1975) claimed that ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Radial Stellar Pulsations - Princeton University
    (i) modulating the nuclear reaction rate in the core (epsilon mechanism); and more importantly,. (ii) by modulating the radiative luminosity (kappa mechanism).Missing: supergiant driven
  51. [51]
    Nonlinear pulsations of red supergiants - Inspire HEP
    The oscillation periods range between 45 and 1180 days. The pulsational instability is due to the kappa-mechanism in the hydrogen and helium ionization zones.Missing: epsilon opacity engine
  52. [52]
    An Investigation into the Variability of Luminous Blue Variable Stars ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · Luminous blue variables (LBVs) are enigmatic, evolved, massive stars. Their variability has been observed to be episodic with large eruptions.
  53. [53]
    An indication for the binarity of P Cygni from its 17th century eruption
    Abstract. I show that the 17th century eruption of the massive luminous blue variable (LBV) star P Cygni can be explained by mass transfer to a B-type bina.
  54. [54]
    Short-term Spectroscopic Variability of the Early Post-AGB Stage ...
    Oct 8, 2021 · The observed short-term variations are attributed to large-scale convective flows and shock waves in the extended atmosphere of a cool pulsating ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Spectroscopic Variability of Supergiant Star HD14134, B3Ia
    Jun 19, 2017 · Profile variations in the Hα and Hβ lines in the spectra of the star HD14134 are investigated using observations carried out in 2013–2014 and ...Missing: shocks | Show results with:shocks
  56. [56]
    Pulsating Red Supergiants and Their Resulting Type IIP Supernovae
    Feb 28, 2020 · The mechanism driving these pulsations is not fully understood, but they are thought to be driven by a κ mechanism in the hydrogen ...Abstract · Introduction · Modeling Radial Pulsations · Exploding Pulsating ModelsMissing: epsilon | Show results with:epsilon
  57. [57]
    Evolution of surface CNO abundances in massive stars
    The nitrogen-to-carbon (N/C) and nitrogen-to-oxygen (N/O) ratios are the most sensitive quantities to mixing in stellar interiors of intermediate and massive ...
  58. [58]
    Mixing of CNO-cycled matter in massive stars
    A tight trend in the observed N/C vs. N/O ratios and the buildup of helium is found from the self-consistent analysis of main-sequence to supergiant stars for ...1 Introduction · 2 Theoretical Considerations · 4 Conclusions
  59. [59]
    The surface abundances of red supergiants at core collapse
    A star with an initial mass above 20 M ⊙ exploding in the RSG phase should have an unequivocal signal of a low [C/N] abundance.
  60. [60]
    MAGIS (Measuring Abundances of red super Giants with Infrared ...
    We establish a new abundance analysis procedure for RSGs that circumvents difficulties faced in previous works, and test the procedure with ten nearby RSGs.
  61. [61]
    Lithium abundance in atmospheres of F- and G-type supergiants ...
    The star's parameters Teff and log g were redetermined with our method; the Li abundances were corrected and, in particular, non-LTE corrections were included ( ...
  62. [62]
    s-Process Elements in the M Supergiant α Ori - ScienceDirect.com
    We present new results on a study of the weak s-process elemental abundances in the M supergiant a Ori (M2Iab). We have conducted the abundance analysis ...
  63. [63]
    Quantitative spectroscopy of B supergiants in the Galaxy, the LMC ...
    Using model atmospheres with the parameters listed in Table 3, non-LTE curves ofgrowth were constructed for the lines of interest by performing the non-LTE line ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Red Supergiant Stars as Cosmic Abundance Probes. III. NLTE ... - HAL
    ABSTRACT. Non-LTE calculations for Mg I in red supergiant stellar atmospheres are presented to investigate the importance of non-LTE for the formation of Mg ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  65. [65]
    The Helium Fractions of Blue Supergiants and the Effect of ...
    ... supergiants which have moderate nitrogen enhancements. A slight helium enrichment accompanied by more substantial changes in the surface abundances of ...
  66. [66]
    THE TEMPERATURES OF RED SUPERGIANTS - IOPscience
    We present a re-appraisal of the temperatures of red supergiants (RSGs) using their optical and near-infrared spectral energy distributions (SEDs).
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
  69. [69]
    High-Mass Stars - Astronomy 1101 - The Ohio State University
    Ignites Helium burning to C & O: Rapid Phase: ~ 1 Myr; He burning in the core; H burning in a shell; Starts building a C-O core. Star becomes a Blue Supergiant.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] modules for experiments in stellar astrophysics (mesa): planets ...
    This paper describes the major new MESA capabilities for modeling giant planets, asteroseismology, and the treatment of rotation and evolution of massive stars.
  71. [71]
    Red Supergiant Mass Loss and Mass-Loss Rates - MDPI
    This review discusses the causes, nature, importance and observational evidence of mass loss by red supergiants.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Theory and Diagnostics of Hot Star Mass Loss - arXiv
    Jun 13, 2022 · Massive stars' strong stellar winds direct their evolution, affect atmospheric structure, and mass loss rate depends on iron opacity. Mass loss ...
  73. [73]
    The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription
    Mass loss of red supergiants (RSG) is important for the evolution of massive stars, but is not fully explained. Several empirical prescriptions have been ...
  74. [74]
    The mechanism(s) of core-collapse supernovae - Journals
    Sep 18, 2017 · Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are the explosions that attend the deaths of massive stars. Despite decades of research, several aspects of the mechanism that ...Introduction · Modern view of stellar core... · Neutrino-driven explosions in...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] advanced stages of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis
    During the stages after helium burning, L in the heavy element core is given by pair neutrino emission and the. Kelvin Helmhotz time scale becomes quite short - ...
  76. [76]
  77. [77]
    [1012.4917] Explosive nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae
    Dec 22, 2010 · In this work, we present nucleosynthesis studies based on trajectories of hydrodynamical simulations for core-collapse supernovae and their ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars - UNT Digital Library
    Aug 30, 1995 · and to stellar observations pertinent to Galactic chemical evolution is given in Paper Ill. (Timmes, Woosley, & Weaver 1995a). 2. THE ...
  79. [79]
    Properties of Galactic early-type O-supergiants - A combined FUV ...
    Locally, massive stars are responsible for the ionization and expansion of their surrounding HII ... triggering star formation (e.g. Zavagno et al. 2007; Martins ...
  80. [80]
    Feedback by massive stars and the emergence of superbubbles
    The bright arc towards the top left of the Orion clouds is Barnard's loop, probably a shell due energy injection from the Orion clouds. It delineates the extent ...Missing: ecosystems | Show results with:ecosystems
  81. [81]
    Modeling UV Radiation Feedback from Massive Stars. II. Dispersal ...
    Young H ii regions formed around star particles quickly break out of their dense natal clumps, and in the larger-scale turbulent cloud, some lines of sight ...
  82. [82]
    Energy Input and Mass Redistribution by SNe - IOP Science
    The role of supernovae (SNe) as sources of heavy elements and energy to the interstellar medium (ISM) has been confirmed by numerous observations and ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Bridging the gap: from massive stars to supernovae - PMC
    These objects produce tremendous amounts of energy and new, heavy elements that enrich galaxies, encourage new stars to form and sculpt the shapes of galaxies ...Missing: metals | Show results with:metals
  84. [84]
    Supernova remnants of red supergiants: From barrels to loops
    Supernova remnants (SNRs) are chemically enriched nebulae made of gas and dust left behind following the explosive death of certain stellar objects that do not ...
  85. [85]
    Red supergiants and the past of Cygnus OB2
    We investigate the past star formation history of Cygnus OB2, the nearest very massive OB association, using red supergiants as a probe.<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    TOWARD A UNIFICATION OF STAR FORMATION RATE ...
    Nov 11, 2011 · The star formation rate (SFR) of the Milky Way remains poorly known, with often-quoted values ranging from 1 to 10 M☉ yr−1.
  87. [87]
    Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Collapse of Blue Supergiant ...
    Ultra-long gamma-ray bursts (ULGRBs) are a distinct class of GRBs characterized by durations of several thousands of seconds, about two orders of magnitude ...
  88. [88]
    Gamma-ray bursts and their use as cosmic probes - PMC
    The core collapse of a low-metallicity blue supergiant into a black hole (BSG) has also been proposed as a possible progenitor channel [34,29]), although ...
  89. [89]
    RIGEL. I. THE MOST HIGH-PRECISION PHOTOMETRY AND ...
    Rigel (β Ori, B8 Ia) is a nearby blue supergiant displaying α Cyg type variability, and is one of the nearest Type II supernova progenitors.
  90. [90]
    Fast and slow winds from supergiants and luminous blue variables
    Table 1 lists the Monte Carlo predictions for our canonical 60 M⊙ supergiant over a range of effective temperatures. The stellar parameters are identical ...
  91. [91]
    What is Betelgeuse? Inside the Strange, Volatile Star - NASA Science
    May 3, 2023 · Betelgeuse has since been classified as a "semiregular variable star," which is a type of variable star that periodically waxes and wanes in ...