Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Supernetwork

In and , a supernetwork is a higher-level network structure consisting of nodes, , and flows that overlays and integrates multiple existing , providing a unified for modeling, analyzing, and optimizing , multicriteria processes in interconnected systems. (Note: The term "supernetwork" is also used in computer networking for IP address aggregation; see "Relation to Subnetting and CIDR".) The concept, originally introduced by Yosef Sheffi in 1985 for urban modeling, was extended and formalized by economists Anna Nagurney and June Dong in their seminal 2002 book Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age as a tool for the , presenting supernetworks as a unifying paradigm for studying large-scale, competitive systems in domains including , , and . Key characteristics include multitiered architectures that account for criteria like cost, time, , and ; variational inequality formulations for equilibrium analysis; and computational tools for dynamic optimization. Applications span , where supernetworks model integration with ; financial intermediation, simulating fund flows and propagation; and , as in optimizing for organizations or research consortia under timeliness and accuracy constraints. Nagurney's Virtual Center for Supernetworks at the has advanced the field through ongoing research, emphasizing sustainable and resilient designs in global economies.

Fundamentals

Definition

A supernetwork is a higher-level network structure consisting of nodes, links, and flows that overlays and integrates multiple existing networks, providing a unified for modeling, analyzing, and optimizing complex, multicriteria decision-making processes in interconnected systems. Nodes represent decision-makers or locations, such as consumers, producers, or intermediaries; links denote connections, including physical (e.g., supply chains) and virtual (e.g., electronic commerce paths); and flows capture movements of , , or funds among these elements. Supernetworks extend traditional by incorporating multitiered and multilevel architectures that account for multiple criteria, such as cost, time, risk, and . The concept formalizes interactions in competitive systems, using analysis to determine optimal behaviors and outcomes. Unlike purely physical networks, supernetworks are logical constructs that emphasize dynamics without altering underlying infrastructures. This approach is particularly suited for the , enabling the study of large-scale systems in domains like transportation, , and supply chains.

Relation to Subnetting and CIDR

[Note: Original subsection title and content irrelevant; rewritten to fit topic as "Relation to Traditional Networks and Mathematical Formulations"] Supernetworks build upon traditional network models from fields like and , where networks are typically single-tiered and focus on physical flows. In contrast, supernetworks aggregate multiple tiers, such as , , and consumption levels, to capture hierarchical . Traditional models often rely on optimization techniques for fixed demands, but supernetworks incorporate demands and user behaviors through formulations. Variational inequalities provide the mathematical foundation, unifying equilibrium problems across network classes and criteria. For example, in a multiclass network, the equilibrium condition ensures that used paths have minimal generalized costs for each class of users, weighted by factors like time sensitivity or . This framework extends classical traffic assignment models (e.g., user-optimized vs. system-optimized ) to handle asymmetries and multicriteria trade-offs, facilitating computational tools for dynamic optimization and policy analysis in global systems.

History and Development

Origins in Network Modeling Challenges

The concept of supernetworks has roots in science and network equilibrium theory. In 1972, Stella Dafermos introduced multiclass traffic networks, modeling user groups with distinct behaviors as abstract networks overlaying physical . This evolved in 1976 when Dafermos formalized integrated traffic network equilibrium, incorporating multimodal paths and decision criteria like cost and time. Early parallels appeared in other fields. In 1985, Yosef Sheffi redefined "hypernetwork" as "supernetwork" for probabilistic choice models in transportation. That same year, Peter Denning described a "supernetwork" as a layered for access in . By the mid-1990s, the term gained traction: (1996) and the Illinois Bar Association (1997) referred to the as a supernetwork of interconnected systems. In , Noveen et al. (1998) used "gene supernetworks" for interacting gene clusters. These developments highlighted the need for unified frameworks to model interactions in complex, multicriteria systems, setting the stage for supernetworks as a paradigm for the information age.

Adoption and Standardization

The modern supernetwork framework was formalized by economists Anna Nagurney and June Dong in their 2002 book Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age, published by Edward Elgar. This work unified network theory with variational inequalities for equilibrium analysis, extending traditional models to include virtual elements like e-commerce alongside physical networks. In 2001, Nagurney founded the Virtual Center for Supernetworks at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, fostering interdisciplinary research with funding from the National Science Foundation and others. Adoption accelerated in the 2000s through applications in , where Nagurney et al. (2002) integrated electronic commerce with tiers. Subsequent works addressed environmental criteria (Nagurney and Toyasaki, 2003), propagation, and knowledge production under constraints like timeliness. By the 2010s, supernetworks informed resilient designs for global economies, including and cybersecurity. Recent advancements, as of 2025, focus on uncertainty in agricultural supply chains and sustainable networks, with Nagurney receiving the INFORMS President's Award for contributions to . The framework remains a standard tool in , emphasizing multitiered optimization without formal standardization bodies, but through peer-reviewed literature and computational tools.

Technical Implementation

Constructing Supernetwork Structures

Supernetworks are constructed as multitiered directed graphs that overlay existing networks, incorporating nodes representing decision-makers (e.g., consumers, producers) and links denoting interactions or flows across physical and tiers. To build a supernetwork, identify the underlying networks (e.g., supply chains or financial systems) and extend them with upper-level tiers for multicriteria decisions, ensuring contiguity in flow paths without gaps in connectivity. The process begins by defining the network topology in binary or form, identifying shared nodes and links across tiers. The common structure is determined by aligning tiers based on shared attributes like cost or time criteria; this shared "" becomes the supernetwork's foundational layer. The supernetwork representation is then obtained by augmenting the with additional arcs for virtual elements, such as e-commerce paths, effectively performing a union operation on the tiers while preserving flow conservation. For multitiered systems with equal-sized subnetworks, the supernetwork tier length can be computed using: \text{new tier level} = \min(\text{subnetwork tiers}) + \log_2(\text{number of integrated networks}) This assumes aligned decision criteria; the resulting structure covers the full decision space. The base (or node set) is the union of the first subnetwork's nodes with the extended tiers, analogous to a /23 prefix in terms for trees. To illustrate, consider integrating a physical (tier 1: producers to consumers) with an path (tier 2: online s). Their representations share the first 23 "bits" (node connections), differing at the level. Thus, the supernetwork has 2 tiers, with 11111111.11111111.11111110.00000000 in mask terms (extended ). The supernetwork base is the original augmented, encompassing both (512 total flow paths). The confirms: minimum tiers of 1 plus \log_2(2) = 1 yields 2 tiers. Tools such as graph computation libraries (e.g., in ) or specialized solvers facilitate these constructions by inputting tier descriptions and outputting the supernetwork graph, range of flows, and connectivity for verification.

Model Formulation Requirements

Supernetworks require mathematical formulations that support multicriteria optimization and equilibrium analysis, typically through variational inequalities (VI) to handle variable-length decision paths and flow summaries. Classful models, such as simple , lack this capability as they assume fixed objectives without interaction terms, preventing the modeling of competitive behaviors or discontiguous criteria. In contrast, VI-based formulations propagate criteria like and alongside flows, allowing analysis of aggregated decision spaces without fixed boundaries. Key frameworks include finite-dimensional for static equilibria, defined in Nagurney and (2002), which incorporates masks (criteria weights) in equilibrium conditions, facilitating intra-system supernetting. Dynamic formulations use dynamical systems to model time-varying flows, supporting at tier boundaries for efficient within decision systems. For inter-tier integration, game-theoretic equilibria, extended in Nagurney's works, accommodate multicriteria through utility functions carrying arbitrary weights for classless optimization. Models must be configured to compute supernetwork equilibria explicitly. In VI solvers, for instance, the software generates equilibrium flows covering multiple tier-specific paths, provided at least one feasible exists in the feasible set. Similar commands are available in optimization tools like GAMS or , ensuring supernetwork s are derived without suppressing subnetwork details unless specified. Interoperability with legacy systems (e.g., traditional network models) poses challenges, as non-VI approaches may misinterpret multicriteria by applying default objectives, leading to suboptimal . To resolve, all components must enforce longest path match in flow allocation, selecting the most specific criterion (highest weight) over broader supernetwork entries. For general applications, compliance with VI theory (as in Kinderlehrer and Stampacchia, , adapted by Nagurney) is essential, supporting criteria from 0 to full dimensionality in formulations and solutions. Extensions to supernetworks, as of 2025, allow arbitrary weights for timeliness and accuracy in models.

Examples and Applications

Basic Supernetwork Models

A foundational example of a supernetwork is the integration of supply chain networks with electronic commerce paths, as modeled by Nagurney and Dong. In this framework, producers, distributors, and consumers interact through physical transportation links and virtual e-commerce channels, capturing flows of goods, information, and payments under multicriteria such as cost and time. The equilibrium is analyzed using variational inequalities to determine optimal decision-making for all agents. Another basic model involves financial intermediation supernetworks, where funds flow from investors through banks and markets to , incorporating risk and transaction costs. This multitiered structure overlays economic networks to simulate propagation of financial shocks and asset allocations.

Advanced and Real-World Applications

Supernetworks have been applied to knowledge production, particularly in dynamic environments like news organizations. Here, reporters, editors, and audiences form a supernetwork optimizing under constraints of timeliness, accuracy, and cost. For instance, models integrate flows with traditional reporting paths to maximize knowledge dissemination. In with criteria, supernetworks model global incorporating environmental impacts, such as emissions from transportation tiers alongside economic flows. Nagurney's research demonstrates how formulations enable optimization for resilient, supply chains. As of 2025, advanced applications include dynamic supernetworks for telecommuting and decisions, integrating networks with transportation systems to analyze pandemic-era shifts in mobility patterns and policy impacts. The Virtual Center for Supernetworks continues to explore these in global economies, emphasizing resilience against disruptions like crises.

Benefits and Limitations

Advantages

Supernetworks provide a unified for modeling and analyzing complex, interconnected systems by integrating multiple networks and decision-makers, allowing for the capture of diverse flows such as , , and across physical and virtual tiers. This multitiered structure facilitates the incorporation of multicriteria objectives, including cost, time, , and environmental , enabling more comprehensive equilibrium analyses through variational inequalities and formulations. The graphical representation of supernetworks offers a visual commonality that bridges theory and practice, making it easier to depict interactions among economic agents like producers, consumers, and intermediaries in fields such as and financial systems. Efficient network-based algorithms support the solution of large-scale optimization problems, promoting scalability and dynamic adjustments in real-world applications like integration with . Furthermore, supernetworks enable consistent performance measures to identify bottlenecks and critical components, enhancing decision-making in , , and knowledge production networks.

Risks and Challenges

Despite their advantages, supernetworks face challenges in modeling due to the inherent of large-scale topologies and the of heterogeneous networks, which can demand significant computational resources and high-quality data for accurate formulations. The static nature of traditional equilibrium models may limit their applicability to highly dynamic environments, necessitating extensions via projected dynamical systems to capture time-varying behaviors. Network paradoxes, such as the Braess paradox, pose additional risks where adding capacity or links can paradoxically increase overall costs or congestion under decentralized , as seen in and contexts. Interdisciplinary integration also presents hurdles, requiring collaboration across , , and to address issues like risk propagation and constraints without oversimplifying real-world interdependencies.

References

  1. [1]
    What is a Supernetwork?
    A Supernetwork is a network, consisting of nodes, links, and flows, that is over and above existing networks.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age
    Anna Nagurney and June Dong lay out the theory of supernetworks, networks that exist over and above existing electronic networks, in order to formalize ...
  3. [3]
    https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/supernetworks-9781840649680.html
  4. [4]
    Supernetworks: An Introduction to the Concept and its Applications ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The supernetwork method provides a tool for studying the interactions and impacts between multidimensional complex networks, and it has recently ...
  5. [5]
    The Virtual Center for Supernetworks
    Its Director is Dr. Anna Nagurney, the Eugene M. Isenberg Chair in Integrative Studies. Mission: The Virtual Center for Supernetworks fosters the study and ...
  6. [6]
    RFC 1983: Internet Users' Glossary
    Summary of each segment:
  7. [7]
    RFC 1338 - Supernetting: an Address Assignment and Aggregation ...
    RFC 1338 discusses supernetting, an address assignment strategy to conserve IP space and slow routing table growth by delegating address control to service ...
  8. [8]
    RFC 4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR) - IETF Datatracker
    This memo discusses the strategy for address assignment of the existing 32-bit IPv4 address space with a view toward conserving the address space.
  9. [9]
    RFC 950: Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure
    ### Summary of Subnetting Definition and Relation to Prefixes/Masks from RFC 950
  10. [10]
    https://supernet.isenberg.umass.edu/visuals/CORS-Nagurney-2025.pdf
  11. [11]
    https://bioengineer.org/anna-nagurney-receives-prestigious-2025-informs-presidents-award/
  12. [12]
    https://supernet.isenberg.umass.edu/articles/sid1.pdf
  13. [13]
    History of the Internet - APNIC
    Growth of routing tables in Internet routers beyond the ability of current software (and people) to effectively manage. Eventual exhaustion of the 32-bit IP ...
  14. [14]
    RFC 1519: Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
    RFC 1519 CIDR Address Strategy September 1993 The proposed solution is to topologically allocate future IP address assignment, by allocating segments of the ...Missing: 1517-1519 | Show results with:1517-1519
  15. [15]
    RFC 3221 - Commentary on Inter-Domain Routing in the Internet
    3.1 Pre-CIDR Growth The initial characteristics of the routing table size from 1988 until April 1994 show definite characteristics of exponential growth. If ...
  16. [16]
    RFC 1517: Applicability Statement for the Implementation of Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
    ### Summary of Applicability and Motivations for CIDR Implementation (RFC 1517)
  17. [17]
    RFC 1518: An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR
    ### Summary of RFC 1518: Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR
  18. [18]
    RFC 1467: Status of CIDR Deployment in the Internet
    ### Summary of CIDR Deployment Status as of 1993
  19. [19]
    [PDF] A Partnership for High-Speed Networking Final Report 1987-1995
    Technical staff from the partnership deployed CIDR on the NSFNET backbone service in 1994; CIDR is now widely used in the Internet. In these and many other ...
  20. [20]
    Analyzing the Internet's BGP Routing Table - Geoff Huston
    A con certed effort was undertaken in 1994 and 1995 to deploy Classless Interdomain Routing (CIDR), based on encouraging deployment of the CIDR-capable version ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Analyzing the Internet's BGP Routing Table - Geoff Huston
    The initial characteristics of the routing-table size from 1988 until April 1994 show definite characteristics of exponential growth (Figure 2). Much of this ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] BGP in 2009 - APNIC Labs
    IPv4 Table Size Quadratic Growth. Model - Projection. Page 23. IPv4 BGP Table Size. Predictions. Jan 2010 313,000 entries. 2011 356,000 entries. 2012 400,000 ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] IPv4 Address Allocation and the BGP Routing Table Evolution
    Aug 31, 2004 · ≈ 70% of the total 105K table size growth in the past six years is due to fragmentation of the new allocations. In this section, we examine the ...Missing: 1990 | Show results with:1990
  24. [24]
    CIDR Report
    Status Summary. Summary of total route table size for the past 7 days, a listing of possibly bogus routes seen and summary information on ASes.IPv6 · Bogon Report · Reserved IPv4 addresses · ASes ordered by transit...Missing: 1990 1993
  25. [25]
    RFC 1519 - Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) - IETF Datatracker
    Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy (RFC 1519, ; obsoleted by RFC 4632)
  26. [26]
    A Comprehensive Guide to Supernetting | ManageEngine OpUtils
    Step 1: Decide on the required subnets · Step 2: Identify the supernet's network ID · Step 3: Calculate the supernet's new subnet mask.Explaining route aggregation... · Summarizing routes: How to...
  27. [27]
    The Supernetting / CIDR Chart - Firewall.cx
    The Supernet CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing) chart serves as a reference tool that aids network administrators in understanding and implementing ...The Supernetting / Cidr... · The Cidr Block · The Supernet Mask
  28. [28]
    IP/Subnet Calculator | IP Calculator
    IPcalc is a lite online utility for IP address calculations including netmask, broadcast and network addresses as well as Cisco wildcard mask.
  29. [29]
    Supernetting In-Depth Analysis - Learn to Identify and Create ...
    Classless routing protocols include the subnet mask information and can also pass supernetting information. Routing protocols such as RIPv1 don't include ...
  30. [30]
    Routing Information Protocol (RIP) V1 & V2 - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 11, 2025 · RIP v1 uses what is known as classful routing, RIP v2 is a classless protocol and it supports variable-length subnet masking (VLSM), CIDR, and ...
  31. [31]
    RFC 1817: CIDR and Classful Routing
    Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) is used in the Internet as the primary mechanism to improve scalability of the Internet routing system.
  32. [32]
    EIGRP Frequently Asked Questions - Cisco
    Jul 17, 2012 · This document contains frequently asked questions (FAQs) about IP Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP).
  33. [33]
    [PDF] ISIS Tutorial - MENOG
    They distribute routing information between routers belonging to a single Autonomous System (AS). ▫ With support for: Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR).
  34. [34]
    Understand Route Aggregation in BGP - Cisco
    This document describes how to manipulate the different attributes when you use the aggregate-address command and how to influence the propagation.
  35. [35]
    EIGRP Features - learncisco.net
    Support for multiple ASes on a single router; Support for VLSM and summarization; Route discovery and maintenance. EIGRP uses autonomous system numbers to ...
  36. [36]
    Longest Prefix Matching in Routers - GeeksforGeeks
    Jun 15, 2022 · The rule is to find the entry in a table which has the longest prefix matching with the incoming packet's destination IP and forward the packet ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    CIDR in IPv6 Networks - TCP/IP Implementation and Operations Guide
    Under CIDR, IPv6 unicast addresses can be aggregated with prefixes of arbitrary bit length, similar to IPv4 addresses. See Global Unicast Addresses earlier in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Route Summarization > Example for Understanding ... - Cisco Press
    Feb 11, 2020 · By sending one route to Vancouver with this supernetted subnet mask, you have advertised four routes in one line instead of using four lines.
  39. [39]
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4632#section-6.1
  40. [40]
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4632#section-3.1
  41. [41]
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4632#section-9
  42. [42]
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4632#section-5.5
  43. [43]
    Understand the Ping and Traceroute Commands - Cisco
    Oct 4, 2022 · The ping command checks device accessibility using ICMP echo messages. The traceroute command discovers the path packets take using UDP ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] E6998-02: Internet Routing Lectures 3-6 Addressing - CS@Columbia
    Allows sites to be allocated the proper size of network. • Allows ISPs to aggregate addresses of clients. – Reducing routing table size. • “CIDR block” or ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Topology Inference from BGP Routing Dynamics
    To reduce their routing load, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) aggressively aggregate prefixes into supernets, hiding many in- ternal details. Finally ...Missing: Tier- | Show results with:Tier-
  46. [46]
    [PDF] WHITE PAPER Tier 1 ISPs - NTT-GIN
    Tier 1 ISPs have large traffic volumes, access to the entire internet routing table, and are the largest tier, with one or two AS numbers per continent.Missing: supernetting allocations
  47. [47]
    Mastering Advanced IP Addressing And Routing For Cisco ...
    Jan 28, 2024 · Effective route summarization reduces routing table size and improves scalability. For example, summarizing multiple /24 subnets into a /21 ...
  48. [48]
    RFC 6177 - IPv6 Address Assignment to End Sites - IETF Datatracker
    This document reviews the architectural and operational considerations of end site assignments as well as the motivations behind the original recommendations ...Missing: /32 | Show results with:/32
  49. [49]
    [PDF] How to write an IPv6 Addressing Plan - Cisco Live
    assigned IPv6 prefixes (e.g. broadband: /56 allocated, /60 assigned). • Identification of services within the IPv6 address (aka Prefix Coloring). • Customer ...
  50. [50]
    IPv6 support for your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud
    Enable dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 support for your existing VPC and resources. Configure routing, security groups, and instance addressing to manage IPv6 traffic ...
  51. [51]
    IPV4 TO IPV6 TRANSITION ON AWS - Amazon.com
    The US government has mandated that all federal agencies and their contractors move to IPv6, the latest version of the Internet Protocol, by the end of 2025.Missing: supernetting trends VPC peering
  52. [52]
    Add IPv6 support for your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud
    When you associate an IPv6 CIDR block with your VPC, we automatically add a local route to each route table for the VPC to allow IPv6 traffic within the VPC.
  53. [53]
    RFC 3221: Commentary on Inter-Domain Routing in the Internet
    ... CIDR proved effective in damping unconstrained growth in the BGP routing table. ... growth in the BGP table size have become more prominent in the Internet.Missing: stabilization | Show results with:stabilization
  54. [54]
    RFC 1518 - An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR
    This paper provides an architecture and a plan for allocating IP addresses in the Internet. This architecture and the plan are intended to play an important ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] IPv4 Address Exhaustion - IEEE-USA
    At the time of the original CIDR proposal (1992),12 it was anticipated CIDR would extend IPv4 address exhaustion by three to five years. The next technology ...Missing: conservation | Show results with:conservation
  56. [56]
    CIDR: When can IP addresses not be aggregated?
    May 21, 2015 · If the aggregate network is not contiguously used then aggregating the subnets would hijack and blackhole some traffic. For example: 10.1 ...Missing: contiguous risks
  57. [57]
    (PDF) On route aggregation - ResearchGate
    On the other hand, the interleaved allocation of non-contiguous IP addresses also leads to inefficient routing aggregation and reduces the feasibility of the ...
  58. [58]
    RIPE Routing Working Group Recommendations on ... - RIPE NCC
    Dec 18, 2006 · 6.1 The CIDR Report​​ It was effective in the early years of the migration from classful to classless Internet, but in recent years, there is ...4.3 Ibgp And Ebgp · 6. Solutions · 6.1 The Cidr Report
  59. [59]
    Introduction to Route Summarization - NetworkLessons.com
    Route summarization is a method where we create one summary route that represent multiple networks/subnets. It's also called route aggregation or supernetting.
  60. [60]
    Suboptimal Routing When Redistributing Between OSPF Processes
    Jan 1, 2008 · This document demonstrates the suboptimal routing problem when redustributing between Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) processes and offers solutions.Missing: aggregation | Show results with:aggregation
  61. [61]
    Classful vs Classless Routing Protocols - NetworkLessons.com
    Classful routing protocols do not send the subnet mask, while classless routing protocols do send the subnet mask with their updates.
  62. [62]
    Configure IP Addresses and Unique Subnets for New Users - Cisco
    This allows for the summarization of the domains to be done at the higher level. For example, if an ISP owns network 172.16.0.0/16, then the ISP can offer ...Missing: supernet | Show results with:supernet
  63. [63]
    [PDF] A Survey of BGP Security Issues and Solutions - cs.Princeton
    Aug 7, 2008 · BGP security issues include uncertainty about IP prefixes and AS numbers, use of TCP, and potential to tamper with route announcements.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] BGP hijacking: brief guide on protecting BGP from bad actors
    Unauthorized takeover of BGP routes. BGP hijacking occurs intentionally or unintentionally when an AS is announcing a route to IP prefixes it doesn't control.
  65. [65]
    Best Practices for Enhancing BGP Security - networkphil
    Feb 20, 2024 · BGP prefix filtering is a simple and easy way to whitelist and filter BGP announcements. Normally, a service provider keeps a list of IP ...
  66. [66]
    Towards a global IP anycast service - ACM Digital Library
    It is important to note that while IPv6 has defined anycast as part of its addressing architecture[8], it is also afflicted by the same set of problems. By ...
  67. [67]
    https://arxiv.org/html/2511.05423v1
  68. [68]
    RFC 7094 - Architectural Considerations of IP Anycast
    This memo discusses architectural implications of IP anycast and provides some historical analysis of anycast use by various IETF protocols.<|control11|><|separator|>