Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Syntex

Syntex S.A. was a pioneering pharmaceutical company founded in in 1944 by American chemist Russell Earl Marker, Hungarian chemist Emeric Somlo, and German chemist Federico Lehmann, focused on the large-scale production of steroid hormones through Marker's innovative degradation applied to diosgenin extracted from Mexican yams. Although Marker departed the firm in 1945 after disputes, Syntex persisted and flourished under leaders like George Rosenkranz, becoming a global leader in synthetic steroids for therapeutic use, including early contributions to production and, most notably, the synthesis of norethindrone on October 15, 1951, by chemist Luis Miramontes in collaboration with and Rosenkranz. This breakthrough progestin, norethindrone (19-nor-17α-ethynyltestosterone), marked the first orally active compound potent enough to suppress reliably, forming the basis for combined oral contraceptives licensed to companies like and Searle, which commercialized "" in the early and profoundly influenced reproductive health and . Syntex expanded operations to the as Syntex Corporation in the , diversifying into agents such as naproxen (Naprosyn) and veterinary products, while maintaining its expertise amid competitive pressures from U.S. pharmaceutical giants. The company encountered major setbacks in the late when its soy-based infant formulas, Neo-Mull-Soy and Cho-Free, were reformulated to lower sodium content but inadvertently resulted in critically low levels, causing hypochloremic , , and severe neurological damage in affected infants; a 1979 recall followed widespread cases, prompting multimillion-dollar lawsuits and contributing to the U.S. , which imposed stricter federal quality controls. Syntex was ultimately acquired by Holding . in 1994 for $5.3 billion, integrating its portfolio into the Swiss firm's operations.

Founding and Early History

Origins in Mexico (1944–1950)

Syntex S.A. was established in in January 1944 by American organic chemist Russell E. Marker, émigré Emeric Somlo, and Austrian Federico A. Lehmann, with the aim of industrializing Marker's chemical process for synthesizing progesterone from diosgenin, a steroidal sapogenin extracted from the tubers of the Dioscorea mexicana. Marker, who had resigned his position at Pennsylvania State College in 1943 after developing the "Marker degradation"—a series of reactions involving oxidation and subsequent transformations to convert diosgenin to progesterone—contributed his proprietary synthesis methods, holding approximately 40% ownership, while Somlo and Lehmann provided financial backing and local as refugees seeking opportunities in . The company's name derived from "synthesis" and "Mexico," reflecting its focus on leveraging abundant local yam resources, which Marker had identified as a viable, low-cost source of precursors during exploratory trips starting in 1941. In its initial setup in , Marker oversaw the first industrial-scale conversions, producing several kilograms of progesterone in 1944 alone, with output exceeding 10 kilograms by early 1945, demonstrating the process's feasibility for therapeutic production at a fraction of the cost of animal-derived methods. This marked a pivotal shift from laboratory curiosity to commercial viability, as progesterone—essential for replacement therapies—could now be manufactured affordably without relying on scarce or extractions prevalent in U.S. and European labs. However, tensions arose over profit distribution, with Marker expecting a larger share given his exclusive of the process; in May 1945, a dispute led him to abruptly sever ties, departing Syntex without disclosing full procedural details, which he alone fully mastered. Marker subsequently founded a rival venture, Laboratorios Botanica-Mexicana, taking his expertise there until 1949. Despite Marker's exit, Syntex persisted by adapting the process through reverse-engineering and recruiting new talent, including chemist George Rosenkranz, who joined to reconstruct and refine the synthesis pathways. By 1950, the company had stabilized operations, emerging as a key supplier of progesterone, testosterone, and related sex hormones derived from diosgenin, laying the foundation for Mexico's amid demand for affordable pharmaceuticals. This period solidified Syntex's role in circumventing U.S. restrictions and supply shortages, as Marker's innovations—though initially guarded—enabled scalable production in a geopolitically neutral .

Initial Focus on Steroid Synthesis from Yams

Syntex's initial efforts centered on the commercial extraction and conversion of diosgenin, a steroidal sapogenin abundant in wild Mexican yams of the genus , into , a key previously scarce and expensive to produce from animal sources. Founded in early 1944 in , the company leveraged Russell Marker's patented Marker degradation process—a five-step chemical transformation involving treatment, oxidation, and rearrangement—to achieve this efficiently. Diosgenin was sourced primarily from cabeza de negro yams ( species), whose roots could weigh up to 100 kg and yielded viable quantities of the precursor through alcohol extraction, enabling costs far below those of earlier methods reliant on sarsasapogenin from U.S. plants. By March 1944, Syntex had produced its first kilogram of progesterone, priced at $50 per gram, a reduction from the prior market rate of $80 per gram had achieved in smaller-scale U.S. lab runs yielding over 3 kg in 1942. Operations involved rudimentary facilities where yams were collected from regions, processed to isolate diosgenin (initially around 1-2% dry weight yield), and converted via 's method, which Marker refined through 11 publications between and 1942. This focus addressed wartime shortages of animal-derived steroids and positioned Syntex as a pioneer in plant-based manufacturing, with Marker overseeing production of over 10 kg of pure progesterone by late 1944. The strategy proved viable due to Mexico's unregulated yam harvesting and low labor costs, contrasting with U.S. patent and regulatory hurdles that had frustrated Marker's earlier attempts. However, disputes over profit-sharing led Marker to depart in May 1945, selling his 40% stake and relocating processes to a new venture, though Syntex, under new leadership including George Rosenkranz, resumed and expanded yam-based synthesis by late 1945, transitioning to higher-yield barbasco yams (up to 5% diosgenin). Through 1950, this core activity supplied progesterone for therapeutic uses like menstrual regulation, laying groundwork for broader steroid derivatives while establishing Mexico as a global hormone production hub.

Key Scientific and Technological Contributions

Breakthroughs in Hormone Research

Syntex's foundational breakthrough in hormone research stemmed from Russell Marker's adaptation of the Marker degradation process to convert diosgenin, extracted from the Mexican yam Dioscorea mexicana (known as cabeza de negro), into progesterone. This semi-synthetic route, implemented upon Syntex's founding in 1944, marked the first industrial-scale production of the hormone, slashing costs from thousands of dollars per gram—via prior animal-sourced extraction—to approximately $50 per gram and enabling kilogram quantities. The process involved sequential chemical transformations, including saponification, oxidation, and degradation steps, to yield bioidentical progesterone from the plant sterol, bypassing limitations of natural isolation methods. In 1949, Syntex researchers achieved an economical synthesis of cortisone acetate from diosgenin, providing an alternative to labor-intensive extractions from animal adrenal glands or complex total syntheses. This advancement facilitated broader access to the for treating and other inflammatory conditions, though it was soon supplemented by microbial processes using Syntex-supplied progesterone as a precursor. The synthesis underscored Syntex's expertise in scaling transformations, positioning the company as a key supplier in the burgeoning market. The period from late 1949 to 1951 represented a pinnacle of productivity in Syntex's research, culminating in the October 15, 1951, synthesis of norethindrone (19-nor-17α-ethynyltestosterone) by and colleagues. This orally active progestin, derived from diosgenin via modifications including 19-demethylation and 17α-ethynylation, exhibited potent progestational activity and laid the groundwork for combined oral contraceptives, with a filed in November 1951. These innovations collectively transformed research by demonstrating viable plant-based routes to therapeutically essential , fueling the Mexican steroid industry's dominance in global supply by the 1950s.

Development of Norethindrone and the Oral Contraceptive

In 1951, chemists at Syntex Laboratories in synthesized norethindrone (also known as norethisterone), the first orally active progestin with sufficient potency for contraceptive applications. The compound, chemically 19-nor-17α-ethynyltestosterone, was derived from diosgenin extracted from Mexican yams through a series of chemical transformations that enhanced its oral bioavailability compared to natural progesterone. This breakthrough addressed a key limitation in prior progestins, which were ineffective when taken orally due to rapid in the liver. The synthesis was achieved on October 15, 1951, by a team led by , with Luis Miramontes performing the final reaction steps under the direction of George Rosenkranz, Syntex's research head. Djerassi's approach involved ethynylation of a 19-nor precursor, building on earlier Syntex work in steroid chemistry to produce active hormones from plant sources. Rosenkranz, who had joined Syntex in 1945, oversaw the scaling of these processes, enabling efficient production that made commercialization viable. Syntex recognized norethindrone's potential for contraception early, licensing it in 1952 to Gregory Pincus for clinical testing after initial confirmed its progestational activity at low doses. Pincus, collaborating with John Rock, conducted human trials starting in 1954 in and , demonstrating that combined with an like mestranol, it prevented effectively with minimal side effects at 10 mg daily doses. The U.S. approved the first oral contraceptive, Enovid (containing 9.85 mg mestranol and 10 mg norethynodrel, a Syntex ), in 1957 for menstrual disorders and in 1960 for contraception. Syntex commercialized its own formulations, launching Norinyl in 1964 with 2 mg norethindrone and 0.1 mg mestranol, marking a shift to lower-dose regimens that reduced risks while maintaining . Norethindrone's development exemplified Syntex's edge in steroid synthesis, leveraging Mexico's resources and avoiding U.S. restrictions on Marker’s methods, though initial U.S. marketing was through licensees like Pharmaceutical. By the 1960s, norethindrone derivatives powered most oral contraceptives, transforming through reliable, hormone-based control.

Synthesis of Cortisone and Anti-Inflammatories

In late 1949, following Russell Marker's departure from Syntex S.A., chemists George Rosenkranz and Carl Djerassi led efforts to adapt and extend Marker degradation techniques for synthesizing complex steroids from diosgenin, a sapogenin extracted from Mexican yams (Dioscorea species). This plant-derived starting material offered a scalable, cost-effective alternative to prior methods relying on scarce animal sources like bile acids, which had limited cortisone production to mere grams at prohibitive costs—up to $1,000 per gram in the late 1940s. By June 1951, Syntex researchers achieved a 20-stage of cortisone acetate from diosgenin, marking a pivotal advancement in steroid chemistry. The process involved sequential degradation, oxidation, and manipulations to introduce the characteristic Δ4-3-keto structure, 11β-hydroxy, and 17α,21-dihydroxy-20-keto essential to cortisone's activity. This breakthrough enabled bulk production, rapidly positioning Syntex as a major supplier of cortisone for therapeutic use, particularly in treating and other inflammatory conditions where clinical trials in 1948–1949 had demonstrated dramatic efficacy but were constrained by supply shortages. Cortisone's anti-inflammatory effects stem from its suppression of immune mediators like prostaglandins and cytokines via binding, reducing , pain, and tissue damage in autoimmune and allergic disorders. Syntex's facilitated its widespread adoption, with production scaling to support international distribution by the early , though initial yields were modest due to the multi-step nature of the route. Concurrently, Syntex explored analogs, including precursors, enhancing potency and reducing side effects like sodium retention compared to . Extending this expertise, Syntex developed non-steroidal anti-inflammatories in the 1970s, culminating in naproxen, a derivative introduced in 1976. Naproxen's synthesis involved Friedel–Crafts alkylation followed by Willgerodt–Kindler reaction for arylacetic acid formation, offering superior gastrointestinal tolerability over earlier NSAIDs like aspirin. This compound inhibits enzymes, blocking synthesis to alleviate inflammation in conditions such as and , with clinical data showing efficacy at 250–500 mg doses daily. Syntex's pivot from steroidal to non-steroidal pathways underscored its role in diversifying anti-inflammatory therapies, though regulatory scrutiny later highlighted risks like cardiovascular events associated with prolonged use.

Prominent Figures and Leadership

Founders: Russell Marker, Emeric Somlo, and Federico Lehmann

Syntex S.A. was founded in in 1944 by Russell E. Marker, an organic specializing in ; Emeric Somlo, a Hungarian entrepreneur with experience in hormone extraction; and Federico A. Lehmann, a German who served as chief at the prior firm Laboratorios Hormonas, S.A. The trio established the company to exploit Marker's patented "Marker degradation" process, which enabled efficient conversion of diosgenin from head yams ( species) into progesterone and other hormones, bypassing costly animal-sourced extractions prevalent at the time. Ownership was divided with Somlo holding 52% of shares, Marker 40%, and Lehmann 8%, reflecting Somlo's business investment and Marker's contribution of two kilograms of synthesized progesterone as startup capital. Russell Earl Marker (March 12, 1902–March 3, 1995) provided the core scientific innovation, having developed his degradation method while at Pennsylvania State College, where he resigned in 1943 to pursue independent commercialization amid frustrations with academic and industry patent restrictions. In Mexico, Marker sourced yams from local markets, established extraction facilities, and trained initial staff in the nine-step chemical process yielding high-purity progesterone at scales unattainable elsewhere, producing 800 grams within months of founding. His hands-on role extended to overseeing early production, though interpersonal tensions with Somlo prompted his abrupt departure in 1945, after which he destroyed process notes to protect the technology and pursued rival ventures. Emeric Somlo, a immigrant who had fled , brought entrepreneurial expertise from co-founding Laboratorios Hormonas in the late , where the firm imported animal organs for rudimentary isolation sold to international pharmaceutical buyers. As Syntex's primary financier and operational leader, Somlo secured yam supplies, facilities, and distribution channels in , leveraging the country's lax regulations and abundant plant resources to enable rapid scaling of Marker's synthesis into commercial progesterone output by mid-1944. His sustained the company post-Marker, facilitating hiring of subsequent researchers like George Rosenkranz. Federico A. Lehmann García (January 26, 1898–unknown), born in Marktbreit, Germany, contributed chemical oversight from his role at Hormonas, where he managed synthesis of natural estrogens and androgens from livestock sources. At Syntex, Lehmann handled laboratory setup and quality control for the yam-based processes, bridging Marker's theoretical advances with practical manufacturing amid Mexico's limited industrial infrastructure. His minority stake underscored a technical rather than capital role, supporting early exports of progesterone to U.S. firms like Parke-Davis by 1945.

Key Researchers: Carl Djerassi and George Rosenkranz

Carl Djerassi (1923–2015), an Austrian-American chemist specializing in synthetic organic chemistry, joined Syntex Laboratories in Mexico City in 1949 as a research chemist. Recruited by George Rosenkranz, Syntex's scientific director since 1945, Djerassi led efforts to synthesize medically viable steroids from abundant plant sources like Mexican yams (Dioscorea species). In 1951, his team developed an efficient process for producing cortisone, a key anti-inflammatory hormone previously scarce and expensive, by microbial transformation of diosgenin extracted from yams. This breakthrough enabled Syntex to supply cortisone commercially, addressing shortages during the early post-World War II era when demand outstripped natural extraction methods from animal bile. George Rosenkranz (1916–2019), a Hungarian-born chemist trained at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, assumed the role of Syntex's research director in 1945, overseeing synthesis amid the company's shift from Russell Marker's founding processes. With an expansive research budget, Rosenkranz assembled a team of elite organic chemists, including Djerassi and later Alejandro Zaffaroni, focusing on progesterone derivatives for therapeutic applications. Under his leadership, Syntex achieved the synthesis of norethindrone (norethisterone) in 1951—a 19-norprogestin compound orally active as a contraceptive—through collaboration between Rosenkranz, Djerassi, and Mexican chemist Luis Miramontes, who performed the critical ethynylation step on a scale. This molecule's potency and oral marked the first viable progestin for hormonal , licensed to U.S. firms like and , propelling Syntex's global influence in reproductive . Their partnership exemplified Syntex's emphasis on scalable, plant-based steroid chemistry, diverging from reliance on animal-derived precursors and enabling cost-effective production. Djerassi advanced to associate director of chemical research before departing Syntex in 1956 for , while Rosenkranz ascended to vice president of research and later president, steering the company's expansion into diversified pharmaceuticals. Their work yielded over 20 patents on modifications, underpinning Syntex's dominance in analogs and progestins by the mid-1950s, though initial contraceptive applications faced regulatory delays until clinical validation in the .

Commercialization and Business Expansion

Entry into the U.S. Market (1950s–1960s)

Syntex first accessed the U.S. in through the establishment of Chemical Specialties, an entity focused on distributing its intermediates and compounds to American buyers. This move enabled early sales of bulk hormones derived from Mexican yams, capitalizing on demand for and progestins amid post-World War II medical advancements. Lacking the infrastructure for domestic manufacturing and broad marketing in the 1950s, Syntex relied on licensing its patented norethindrone—a key progestin synthesized in 1951—to established U.S. firms. Primary licensees included Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary), which marketed it as Ortho-Novum, and Parke-Davis, though the latter later relinquished rights due to concerns over potential boycotts. These agreements, often involving royalties on sales, facilitated U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals and distribution without Syntex bearing full regulatory or promotional costs; by the early 1960s, multiple companies offered 2 mg norethindrone formulations for contraception. On June 25, 1957, Syntex incorporated as Syntex Corporation in the United States, formalizing its legal presence and paving the way for expanded operations. This entity initially emphasized licensing and technical collaborations rather than independent production. By 1959, Syntex shifted its operating headquarters to Palo Alto, California, transitioning from a Mexico-based bulk supplier to a multinational with growing U.S. ambitions. The marked Syntex's pivot to direct U.S. commercialization, exemplified by the launch of its branded oral contraceptive Norinyl, containing norethindrone and mestranol, which it marketed itself after FDA approval. This product, priced competitively and backed by on , generated significant revenue and positioned Syntex as a player in the burgeoning contraceptive sector, though initial skepticism persisted due to regulatory uncertainties and market volatility. Concurrently, Syntex expanded licensing for steroids like Synalar (), approved in 1961, further embedding its compounds in U.S. and therapies. These steps, combining partnerships with , propelled U.S. sales growth amid rising demand for synthetic s.

Product Portfolio and Licensing Agreements

Syntex's product portfolio during its U.S. market entry in the and emphasized steroid hormones derived from diosgenin in Mexican yams, including progestins for contraception and corticosteroids for uses. The company's breakthrough compound, norethindrone (synthesized in 1951), formed the basis of oral contraceptives, with Syntex launching Norinyl—a low-dose formulation containing 2 mg norethindrone and 0.1 mg mestranol—following FDA approval in 1963 and market introduction in 1964. Syntex also produced corticosteroids such as and prednisolone via efficient semi-synthetic processes from plant sterols, supplying bulk intermediates for therapeutic applications in and allergies. To penetrate the U.S. and global markets despite its initial Mexican base, Syntex relied heavily on licensing agreements for technology transfer and distribution. By 1964, three companies, including Syntex itself, were marketing 2 mg doses of its norethindrone, reflecting licenses granted to partners like Ortho Pharmaceutical for Ortho-Novum and Schering Corporation for worldwide distribution of norethisterone-based products. These deals enabled rapid commercialization while Syntex focused on R&D and bulk production, as evidenced by ongoing negotiations for international collaboration and licensing pacts documented in company records from the era. Such arrangements were crucial for scaling, though they sometimes delayed Syntex's direct approvals behind competitors like G.D. Searle, which marketed a similar progestin earlier.
Key ProductDescriptionLaunch/Marketing YearLicensing Notes
NorinylOral contraceptive with norethindrone and mestranol1964 (Syntex)Basis for licensed versions by (Ortho-Novum) and others
Norethindrone (bulk)Progestin active ingredient1950s onwardLicensed to Schering for global marketing; multiple U.S. firms by 1964
/PrednisoloneAnti-inflammatory corticosteroids1950s (bulk supply)Process licensed for U.S. therapeutic production
This portfolio and licensing strategy fueled revenue growth, with oral contraceptives becoming a cornerstone, though later overshadowed by anti-inflammatories like naproxen in the 1970s.

Regulatory Challenges and Misconduct

Involvement in IBT Toxicology Fraud (1970s)

In the late 1960s, Syntex Laboratories contracted Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories (IBT) to conduct chronic toxicity studies on naproxen, marketed as Naprosyn, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for arthritis treatment. The rat study commenced in November 1969, with animals sacrificed in September 1971; IBT delivered an initial report in October 1971 containing incomplete data. Syntex rejected the preliminary findings as inadequate in mid-November 1971, with company toxicologist Dr. Robert Hill issuing a to IBT Joseph Calandra over discrepancies and delays. IBT responded with a revised on March 3, 1972, which included wholly fabricated and urine analysis results, falsified gross data in Appendix II, and a forged signature from pathologist Philip Smith—elements prepared by IBT technicians James Plank and Paul Wright without underlying examinations or records. Syntex submitted this to the FDA, securing approval for Naprosyn shortly thereafter. FDA audits in 1976 exposed the Naprosyn study as exemplifying IBT's systemic fraud, with inspectors finding no supporting for clinical observations and confirming invention of key safety metrics. Syntex was alerted to the irregularities and commissioned a repeat study to substantiate naproxen's profile, enabling continued marketing despite the invalidation. The episode contributed to broader scrutiny of IBT, culminating in 1983 convictions of executives including toxicology manager Moreno Keplinger for mail fraud tied to the Syntex report and others, based on interstate transmission of falsified documents. Syntex faced no regulatory penalties but settled a class-action suit for $2.8 million over alleged nondisclosure of risks to product approvals and stock value. Naprosyn persisted as a major revenue driver for Syntex into subsequent decades.

Baby Formula Chloride Deficiency Crisis (1979)

In early 1978, Syntex Laboratories reformulated its soy-based infant formulas, Neo-Mull-Soy and Cho-Free, by removing sodium chloride to address concerns about excessive sodium intake in infants, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. This change, combined with a prior decision in December 1977 to discontinue routine chloride assays and subsequent shifts in soy protein isolates and water processing at manufacturing facilities, resulted in chloride levels dropping to approximately 2 mEq/L—far below the labeled 9-11 mEq/L and essential daily requirements for infants. The formulas, which held 10-12% of the soy-based market share, were not relabeled or retested adequately for nutrient compliance, leading to widespread distribution of deficient products estimated to have been consumed by around 20,000 infants. By mid-1979, pediatricians began reporting cases of hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis among infants fed these formulas, characterized by symptoms such as failure to thrive, anorexia, constipation, hypokalemia, dehydration, lethargy, irritability, and microhematuria. The Centers for Disease Control documented at least 115-141 confirmed cases across multiple states by August 1979, with diagnoses accelerating after January 1, 1979; no fatalities occurred, but affected infants required chloride supplementation for recovery, and some exhibited persistent issues like elevated blood pressure or developmental delays. Long-term follow-up studies indicated no significant cognitive impairments by ages 9-10, though isolated language deficits were noted in some cohorts. Syntex convened experts in late July 1979 upon receiving reports and, following FDA district office recommendations on July 31, initiated a voluntary Class I recall on August 1, 1979, notifying physicians, pharmacies, and the public while destroying over 2 million cans at a cost exceeding $4 million; despite 95% effectiveness by November, residual stock persisted on shelves into late 1979. The crisis prompted FDA inspections of Syntex facilities in August 1979 and congressional hearings on November 1, 1979, exposing regulatory gaps in pre-market verification for formulas treated as foods rather than drugs. Syntex maintained the reformulation stemmed from good-faith health motives but faced class-action lawsuits alleging negligence, , and violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic , with ultimate for damages. The U.S. Department of Justice declined criminal prosecution in despite FDA recommendations, citing insufficient intent evidence. This incident directly catalyzed the (Pub. L. No. 96-359, signed September 26, 1980), which mandated minimum levels—including —pre-shipment testing, and enhanced recall procedures to prevent future deficiencies. Syntex ceased production in 1981 amid ongoing litigation extending into the 1990s.

Later Developments and Acquisition

Growth and Diversification (1980s–1990s)

During the early 1980s, Syntex expanded its operations beyond core pharmaceuticals, achieving robust sales growth from $313.6 million in 1977 to $710.9 million in 1981, equivalent to a 23 percent annual compound growth rate. This period marked a strategic push into non-pharmaceutical sectors, with the company establishing five new divisions by 1980 focused on beauty care, contact lenses, dental products, diagnostic equipment, and . Acquisitions such as Den-Tal-Ez in the dental segment significantly bolstered revenue, contributing approximately one-third of total sales in 1980. Syntex maintained heavy investment in pharmaceutical , aiming to launch significant new products to sustain momentum, though diversification helped offset reliance on established lines like anti-inflammatories. Key initiatives included a 1988 with to develop an over-the-counter formulation of naproxen (Naprosyn), alongside efforts through Oncogen, a profit-sharing that yielded four commercial products from collaborative . However, not all endeavors succeeded; the company invested over $100 million in the anti-ulcer drug enprostil during the late 1980s before discontinuing it due to inadequate efficacy against competitors. By the late and into the , Syntex reported steady profitability, with reaching $303.2 million in 1989, a 2 percent increase from the prior year, amid broader product lines encompassing veterinary drugs and scientific instruments. Despite these advances, the firm navigated a challenging characterized by intensifying competition and regulatory pressures, which tempered growth and foreshadowed its eventual acquisition.

Roche Acquisition and Dissolution (1994 Onward)

In May 1994, Holding Ltd., a Swiss pharmaceutical giant, announced its agreement to acquire Syntex Corporation for approximately $5.3 billion, offering $24 per share in cash to Syntex shareholders. The deal, driven by Syntex's declining sales of key painkillers and uncertainties surrounding U.S. , aimed to combine 's global reach with Syntex's U.S.-focused diagnostics and drug portfolio, forming the world's fourth-largest pharmaceutical company by revenue. Regulatory approvals followed, including clearance on June 21, 1994, and U.S. consent contingent on divesting Syntex's Syva diagnostics subsidiary to address antitrust concerns in immunoassay testing markets. The acquisition closed on September 1, 1994, after committed to selling the U.S. portion of Syva within a year. Immediately thereafter, initiated major restructuring, announcing plans to eliminate up to 5,000 positions across the combined entity—roughly 8% of its workforce—to streamline operations amid stagnant sales growth. Layoffs commenced in November 1994, targeting redundancies in administrative, , and research functions, with Syntex's Palo Alto headquarters seeing over 1,000 job cuts by early 1995 as functions like a biomedical facility were relocated there temporarily. Syntex's corporate identity was phased out, with its primary research operations rebranded as Bioscience in 1995, focusing on neuroscience and cardiovascular drug development at the downsized site. Over the ensuing years, Roche further consolidated Syntex's legacy assets, leading to the effective dissolution of its independent operations. The Palo Alto facility, a 1 million-square-foot complex employing around 1,000 by the late , was slated for closure in as part of broader cost-cutting tied to Roche's acquisition, with most R&D shifting elsewhere. Other Syntex sites faced similar fates: the , operation—acquired via Syntex—was sold in 2011 and reoperated as Corden Pharma; Ireland's Clarecastle plant, originally built by Syntex in the 1980s, ceased pharmaceutical production in 2020 after Roche's 2015 decision to exit small-molecule there. By the mid-2010s, Syntex's product lines and infrastructure had been fully integrated or divested, marking the end of its distinct existence within Roche's portfolio.

Broader Impact and Criticisms

Achievements in Pharmaceutical Innovation

Syntex achieved pioneering advancements in steroid hormone synthesis, leveraging diosgenin extracted from Mexican yams as a cost-effective starting material. In June 1951, researchers at Syntex completed a 20-stage synthesis of from diosgenin, providing a more economical alternative to previous methods that relied on expensive animal acids or complex multi-step processes. This breakthrough reduced production costs dramatically, facilitating broader clinical use of cortisone for treating and other inflammatory conditions, as the compound's anti-inflammatory properties had been demonstrated earlier but were limited by scarcity. Concurrent with cortisone work, Syntex chemists synthesized norethindrone (19-nor-17α-ethynyltestosterone) on October 15, 1951, marking the first orally active progestin potent enough for contraceptive applications. This innovation stemmed from modifications to progesterone structures to enhance oral , building on Russell Marker's earlier Marker degradation process for precursors. Licensed to pharmaceutical firms like and Searle, norethindrone became a core component in the first approved oral contraceptive, Enovid, in 1960, revolutionizing reproductive health by enabling reliable hormonal without daily injections or mechanical devices. Syntex's expertise also yielded (Synalar), a topical introduced in the 1960s for dermatological conditions, which propelled the company's commercial viability through effective anti-inflammatory action with reduced systemic side effects. In non-steroidal arenas, Syntex developed naproxen, a derivative NSAID, with its racemic form first patented in 1968 and the active S-enantiomer optimized for efficacy. Commercialized as Naprosyn in 1976, naproxen offered potent analgesia and anti-inflammatory effects for conditions like , with a longer than competitors such as ibuprofen, allowing once- or twice-daily dosing. Later innovations included nicardipine (Cardene), a approved in 1988 for and , demonstrating Syntex's expansion into cardiovascular therapeutics via targeted vascular relaxation. These developments, driven by figures like and Alejandro Zaffaroni, underscored Syntex's role in scaling steroid chemistry into industrially viable pharmaceuticals, influencing global drug accessibility and therapeutic paradigms.

Health Risks, Societal Effects, and Ethical Critiques

Syntex's oral contraceptives, which utilized the company's pioneering norethindrone progestin, were linked to elevated health risks in early formulations, including venous thromboembolism, , and , primarily attributable to higher doses common in 1960s-1970s pills. These risks prompted Syntex to halt certain in 1970 after observing unusual changes in dogs, signaling potential -related toxicities. Lawsuits underscored these concerns; for instance, in 1979, women filed claims against Syntex alleging harm from the pill, with one seeking $1 million for a allegedly caused by inadequate warnings. Similar U.S. cases, such as Dunkin v. Syntex Laboratories (), accused the company of in failing to warn physicians and users about known side effects. The company's naproxen (marketed as Naprosyn from 1976) presented gastrointestinal risks like ulceration and , as well as cardiovascular events including , consistent with NSAID class effects observed in long-term use. FDA scrutiny in 1976 questioned Syntex's animal data submission for naproxen, requiring resubmission due to concerns over reliability from Bio-Test Laboratories. Additionally, facility operations contributed to hazards; the Syntex in , , was designated a for groundwater contamination with volatile organic compounds and metals, necessitating risk assessments to protect nearby human populations from potential ingestion or exposures. Societally, Syntex's role in scalable steroid synthesis for oral contraceptives facilitated widespread access to reliable from the , correlating with empirical increases in women's labor force participation (rising from 38% in 1960 to 51% by 1980 in the U.S.) and delayed , enabling career investments as shown in causal analyses of adoption effects. This shift supported autonomy and reduced unintended pregnancies, though some studies note downstream associations with rising rates and fertility postponement. Ethical critiques center on Syntex's alleged withholding of data for contraceptives during 1970 Senate hearings and subsequent lawsuits, where plaintiffs charged the firm with prioritizing over transparent risk communication. In 1991, Syntex settled with the FDA for $2 million over misleading Naprosyn promotions that understated cardiovascular and gastrointestinal hazards, violating labeling standards. Critics, including congressional reviews, further faulted the company for delayed responses to early warning signals on product safety, such as in contraceptive testing and promotion, reflecting broader pharmaceutical tensions between innovation speed and precaution.

References

  1. [1]
    Russell Earl Marker | Science History Institute
    In March 1944, Marker, Somlo, and Frederico Lehmann, Hormona's chief chemist, formed a new company called Syntex. Somlo and Marker did not get along well, and ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  2. [2]
    The mother of the pill - PubMed
    The first synthesis of an active ingredient of the pill was performed on October 15, 1951, at Syntex in Mexico City.
  3. [3]
    Russell Marker Creation of the Mexican Steroid Hormone Industry
    In 1951, Syntex researchers synthesized the first useful oral contraceptive from Marker's starting material. Syntex and its competitors in Mexico thus became a ...
  4. [4]
    Steroid research at Syntex: “the Pill” and cortisone - ScienceDirect.com
    The period from late 1949 through 1951 was an extraordinarily productive one in steroid chemistry and especially so at Syntex SA in Mexico City.
  5. [5]
    The Syntex Scandal and Federal Regulation of Baby Formula - CAFE
    Jul 28, 2022 · Syntex recalled the low-chloride formulas in August 1979, spending $4 million to notify doctors and pharmacies of the change and to destroy two million cans of ...
  6. [6]
    $$27 MILLION FOR 2 VICTIMS OF BABY FORMULA - Chicago Tribune
    Mar 1, 1985 · Two 6-year-old boys who suffered brain damage after drinking a baby formula were awarded $27 million in damages Thursday night by a Cook County jury.
  7. [7]
    Roche Will Acquire Syntex for $5.3 Billion : Mergers: California firm's ...
    May 3, 1994 · Last December, Syntex lost U.S. patent protection on its flagship products--the prescription painkillers Naprosyn and Anaprox. The Palo Alto ...
  8. [8]
    The birth of the pill | Feature - Chemistry World
    Aug 27, 2010 · Syntex rapidly became the leading supplier of sex hormones including progesterone, testosterone and various oestrogens, all made from diosgenin.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  9. [9]
    Russell Earl Marker and the Beginning of the Steroidal Pharmaceutical Industry
    ### Summary of Syntex Origins in Mexico (1944–1950)
  10. [10]
    Steroid research at Syntex: "the pill" and cortisone - PubMed
    Syntex applied for a patent in November 1951. In November 1954, clinical results of norethindrone used to treat various menstrual disorders and fertility ...
  11. [11]
    Carl Djerassi | Science History Institute
    Norethynodrel differed from norethindrone in the location of just one double bond in the molecule. Djerassi maintained a 20-year relationship with Syntex, while ...
  12. [12]
    Oral Contraceptives - American Chemical Society
    It was in Djerassi's lab at Syntex in Mexico City that the first chemical synthesis of an oral contraceptive steroid, norethindrone, was achieved in 1951.
  13. [13]
    The Development of Synthetic Hormones | American Experience - PBS
    Working for Syntex, a pharmaceutical company based in Mexico, Djerassi invented norethindrone. This synthetic progesterone was not only orally effective, it was ...Missing: founding 1944 focus
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    The Organic Chemistry Behind "The Pill"
    Feb 13, 2015 · In 1951 ... Norethindrone can be made in six steps from estradiol using the steps shown below. synthesis-of-norethindrone-carl-djerassi-syntex.
  16. [16]
    Progestin: Synthetic Progesterone | Embryo Project Encyclopedia
    Nov 17, 2008 · In 1951 Carl Djerassi developed norethindrone at Syntex, SA ... Syntex because of the opportunity to focus on steroid synthesis.
  17. [17]
    Oral history interview with George Rosenkranz
    May 17, 1997 · In 1945, Rosenkranz joined Syntex Corporation in Mexico as Scientific Director. His immediate work was on progesterone synthesis. Rosenkranz ...Missing: progestin | Show results with:progestin
  18. [18]
    Full article: History of oral contraception - Taylor & Francis Online
    Nov 22, 2010 · The main contraceptive effect of the pill being inhibition of ovulation, it may be called a small miracle that this drug was developed long ...
  19. [19]
    Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Ibuprofen and Naproxen - NIH
    When Syntex introduced naproxen in 1976, a synthetic procedure was adopted based on the traditional Friedel–Crafts alkylation [59] and Willgerodt–Kindler ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Russell Earl Marker (1902–1995) - The Endocrinologist
    In 1944, he started a new company in Mexico, Syntex (from Synthesis and Mexico). Marker received 40% of the shares in return for his 2 kilos of progesterone.
  21. [21]
    The campfire stories of Russell Marker, a pioneer of chemistry
    May 31, 2023 · The story of Marker with Syntex is described in detail by Pedro Lehmann (1934–2003, son of Federico Lehmann), but the exact way in which Marker ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Early history of steroid chemistry in Mexico: the story of three ...
    Some brief historic notes are provided on the three founders of Syntex: Russell E. Marker, Emeric Somlo, and Federico A. Lehmann G., and on the early days ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Carl Djerassi: Chemist and Entrepreneur - Eugene Garfield
    In 1951,. Djerassi and his team at Syntex won the race; they found a relatively simple way to make cortisone using a readily available raw material, the Mexican ...
  24. [24]
    The Pill | Scientific American
    Sep 1, 2009 · In 1951 Syntex chemist Carl Djerassi—who would later become famous for his prodigious literary output—synthesized a plant-derived progestin ...
  25. [25]
    George Rosenkranz | Science History Institute
    In 1951 Syntex synthesized the first effective oral contraceptive substance (norethindrone). Under his direction the firm went on to become the leading supplier ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  26. [26]
    (PDF) Carl Djerassi – Lives in a Lifetime, in: Journal of Reproductive ...
    Djerassi led a team at Syntex that synthesized the first orally active progestin, Norethisterone, in 1951, pivotal for the development of the oral contraceptive ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Carl Djerassi, Stanford professor and world-renowned chemist ...
    Jan 31, 2015 · He made seminal contributions to the use of highly sensitive analytical tools – including mass spectrometry, magnetic circular dichroism and ...
  28. [28]
    George Rosenkranz, 102, a Developer of the Birth Control Pill, Is Dead
    Jun 23, 2019 · Dr. Rosenkranz's work on hormone synthesis drew the attention of scientists abroad, and in 1945 he was recruited to join Syntex in Mexico City.
  29. [29]
    Syntex Syva Alumni Association Collection
    Syntex's origins date back to 1933, when Hungarian chemist Emeric Somlo and German chemist Frederic Lehmann established Laboratorios Hormona, a small Mexican ...
  30. [30]
    Syntex Serves as Model for Young Firms : Now Major Player in Drug ...
    Oct 13, 1985 · Rich in knowledge but lacking resources to make and market such a pill, Syntex sold the substance during the 1950s and 1960s to major U.S. ...
  31. [31]
    The Translators: Sectoral Roles in Contraceptive Research ... - NCBI
    In the United States, those were Syntex, Searle, Upjohn, Wyeth, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and the Syntex-Ortho partnership. Other U.S. firms were engaged in the ...
  32. [32]
    The Mother of the Pill - ScienceDirect.com
    Syntex's licensee, Parke-Davis, on the other hand proved to be overly cautious, fearing a Catholic-inspired boycott of its products, and waived its rights to ...
  33. [33]
    McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation - Justia Law
    Syntex calls its product "Norinyl," while "Ortho-Novum" is the trade name used by Ortho. Each contraceptive consists of 2 milligrams of the progestogen ...
  34. [34]
    Syntex Corporation | Encyclopedia.com
    Originally Syntex was founded in Mexico in 1944 by two German refugees. Company scientists concentrated their efforts on manufacturing bulk steroid chemicals ...
  35. [35]
    Syntex Collection of Pharmaceutical Advertising
    Syntex, S.A. was a pharmaceutical company formed in Mexico City in 1944 by Russell Marker (1902-1995), an American chemist who worked for the Ethyl Corporation.
  36. [36]
    THE BROAD GROWTH AT SYNTEX - The New York Times
    Apr 9, 1982 · The good news of 1979 was offset by the linkage that year of two Syntex infant formula products to weight loss and serious blood disorders in ...
  37. [37]
    Syntex - wikidoc
    Aug 20, 2012 · Syntex SA was a pharmaceutical company formed in Mexico City in 1944 by Russell Marker to manufacture therapeutic steroids from the Mexican yam.Missing: Laboratories | Show results with:Laboratories
  38. [38]
    Norethisterone Acetate - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Schering marketed this compound worldwide under license from Syntex (this was the substance that Parke-Davis used when they finally entered the oral ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Syntex Syntex of Syntex of Syntex
    In 1968, Alex came to us with the idea of a new venture dedicated to his novel concepts on drug delivery, and eventually the decision was made to launch such a ...
  40. [40]
    Syntex - Wikipedia
    Controversies. An investigation by several animal protection NGOs shows that Syntex is involved in the export of Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin produced in ...Missing: events | Show results with:events
  41. [41]
    United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Moreno L. Keplinger ...
    The alleged fraud here involved a report sent to Syntex Corporation ("Syntex") including blood and urine data and an Appendix II relating to gross pathology.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] IBT Scandal - Amicus Schneider 1983 - Center for Food Safety
    The numbers juggling, however, did not satisfy Syntex. In mid-November 1971, two weeks after IBT mailed the Naprosyn report to Palo Alto, Dr. Robert Hill, a ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] FDA Oral History, Bressler
    Apr 23, 1999 · The Naprosyn study was the worst one, and that study had to be repeated by Syntex, because this animal study was graphited. In the one case, and ...
  44. [44]
    Ex-Officials of Chemical-Testing Lab Found Guilty of Falsifying Results
    Oct 21, 1983 · CHICAGO, Oct. 21, 1983 -- Three former officials of Industrial Bio-Test (IBT) Laboratories, once widely used by government and industry to ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] MB82244: Infant Formula: National Problems - Every CRS Report
    Apr 27, 1984 · Coincidental to the removal of salt from the formulas, a decision was made to drop routine chloride assaying of Syntex formulas.Missing: crisis | Show results with:crisis
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    Infant Metabolic Alkalosis and Soy-Based Formula -- United States
    Nov 15, 1996 · Cases of metabolic alkalosis diagnosed since January 1, 1979, in infants with a history of failure to thrive, anorexia, or constipation.Missing: crisis | Show results with:crisis
  48. [48]
    Roche Bioscience | Encyclopedia.com
    Despite legal problems, Syntex continued to expand during the early and mid-1980s. ... Although Syntex had healthy earnings growth during this period, the success ...
  49. [49]
    COMPANY NEWS; Syntex and P.&G. Set Joint Venture
    Mar 9, 1988 · The Syntex Corporation, a pharmaceutical company based in Palo Alto, Calif., said it had agreed in principle to form a 50-50 joint venture ...
  50. [50]
    Has Syntex Run Out Of Steam? - Bloomberg.com
    Jul 11, 1993 · Now, analysts say, Syntex' best hopes for big products--an oral version of its antiviral drug Cytovene and a drug to fight organ transplant ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  51. [51]
    Syntex Corp.: The Palo Alto-based pharmaceutical firm...
    Sep 1, 1989 · Syntex Corp.: The Palo Alto-based pharmaceutical firm reported a profit of $303.2 million for 1989, up 2% over the previous year.
  52. [52]
    COMPANY NEWS; Roche Set To Acquire Syntex
    May 3, 1994 · Syntex shares had dropped from more than $53 in January 1992 to $12.75 as recently as April 22 as investors reacted to the loss of United States ...
  53. [53]
    SYNTEX ACCEPTS BITTER MEDICINE FROM ROCHE
    May 3, 1994 · Ailing pharmaceuticals-maker Syntex Corp. took bitter medicine Monday and agreed to be taken over by giant Roche Holding Ltd. of Switzerland ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    EU OKs Roche acquisition of Syntex - UPI Archives
    Jun 21, 1994 · The European Union Tuesday approved the acquisition of the U.S.-based human and veterinary pharmaceutical company Syntex Corp. by the Swiss ...
  55. [55]
    Roche Holding Ltd. - Federal Trade Commission
    Jun 20, 1995 · The order permitted Roche to acquire Syntex, but requires Roche to divest Syva to a Commission approved buyer. The purpose of the divestiture is ...
  56. [56]
    Roche/Syntex - Citeline News & Insights
    Sep 5, 1994 · Roche's $5.3 bil. acquisition of Syntex is completed Sept. 1 after Roche agrees to divest within a year the U.S. portion of Syntex' Syva ...Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution
  57. [57]
    COMPANY NEWS; ROCHE TO ELIMINATE 5,000 JOBS AFTER ...
    Oct 18, 1994 · Roche began its takeover bid for Syntex, based in Palo Alto, Calif., in June. Roche had 56,082 employees at the end of 1993 and Syntex had ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    COMPANY NEWS; LAYOFFS BEGIN FOR HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE
    Nov 30, 1994 · Stagnant sales in the first nine months of the year and a $5.3 billion acquisition of the Syntex Corporation prompted the parent, Roche Holdings ...Missing: shutdown | Show results with:shutdown
  59. [59]
    BUSINESS: Syntex lays off 1000 employees - Palo Alto Online
    Jan 18, 1995 · The Roche Group also recently announced that it will close down a New Jersey biomedical research facility and move those functions to Syntex's ...
  60. [60]
    BUSINESS: Syntex to lay off 800, change name - Palo Alto Online
    May 3, 1995 · Syntex was purchased by Roche Holding Ltd. in October for $5.3 billion and has been transitioning into operations as a research center for the ...
  61. [61]
    CORRECTED: More Layoffs Coming at Roche (NOT Genentech)
    Jul 27, 2009 · Roche said the Palo Alto site is slated for closure in 2010. Roche's Palo Alto presence came through its 1994 acquisition of Syntex.
  62. [62]
    Roche confirms closing of Palo Alto complex - The Mercury News
    Sep 2, 2008 · Roche has been here since it acquired locally based pharmaceutical manufacturer Syntex in 1994, although it downsized the facility after that ...
  63. [63]
    Roche site in Boulder to be sold, operated as Corden Pharma
    Aug 3, 2011 · Roche established its presence in Boulder 16 years ago when it purchased Syntex Corp., a Mexico-based company specializing in the ...
  64. [64]
    Shock at news that Roche to leave Clarecastle - The Clare Herald
    May 17, 2016 · The company confirmed its plans to exit the Clarecastle facility following a review of Roche's worldwide manufacturing network for small molecules.
  65. [65]
    F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. - Company-Histories.com
    1994: The company acquires Syntex Corporation, which becomes Roche Bioscience, a major R&D development site. 1995: Fritz Gerber becomes chief executive officer.
  66. [66]
    Alejandro Zaffaroni. The Archetypal Bioentrepreneur | LSF Magazine
    Jan 13, 2016 · Rosenkranz and Zaffaroni saw an opening to transform Syntex from a bulk supplier of steroids into a full-fledged pharmaceutical company. The ...
  67. [67]
    Naproxen - American Chemical Society
    May 19, 2009 · Its preparation in racemic form was first reported in 1968 in a patent awarded to Syntex.
  68. [68]
    Scientific methodology applied - PubMed
    ... naproxen, a new drug that resulted from an investigation to find a superior anti-inflammatory agent. It was synthesized by Harrison et al. in 1970 at the Syntex ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  69. [69]
    Alejandro Zaffaroni Receives 2006 Biotechnology Heritage Award
    Apr 9, 2006 · "Alex Zaffaroni helped to guide Syntex to success in the 1950s, and has gone on to give the world a half-century of life saving innovations ...
  70. [70]
    Oral Contraceptive Formulations - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The estrogen component of combined hormonal contraceptives contributes to risk of deep venous thromboembolism (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    SYNTEX DROPPING BIRTH PILL TESTS - The New York Times
    Jan 20, 1970 · It is the estrogen in the pills that is being associated with the more serious side ef fects of oral contraceptives, among them blood clots.Missing: risks | Show results with:risks
  72. [72]
    The State - News from July 31, 1986
    Jul 31, 1986 · An out-of-court settlement has been announced in connection with a lawsuit filed by 21 British families who blamed strokes, heart attacks ...
  73. [73]
    Dunkin v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc., 443 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Tenn ...
    The Dunkins contend that defendants negligently breached a duty to adequately warn the prescribing physician, the general medical community, and Gail Dunkin ...
  74. [74]
    Naproxen Side Effects: Common, Severe, Long Term - Drugs.com
    Oct 8, 2025 · NSAIDs may cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, which can be fatal.
  75. [75]
    Syntex Assails F.D.A. Over Report Of Concern's Anti‐Arthritis Drug
    Oct 20, 1976 · Schmidt, Syntex said that the agency had made no final decisions to withdraw Naprosyn and could not do so legally at this time. Further, the ...Missing: IBT fraud
  76. [76]
    Syntex Facility National Priorities List (NPL) Superfund Site, Verona ...
    A risk assessment at the conclusion of the monitoring program to ensure the remedy remained protective of human health and the environment. Syntex collected ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women's Career and ...
    Women and men who delay marriage because of the pill can thereby give rise to a social multiplier effect.33 Careers will be fostered indirectly through a ...
  78. [78]
    The Story of Syntex | Wynne Jones | News
    Apr 28, 2021 · The invention of the contraceptive pill has transformed the lives of women allowing for more freedom, choice and for the progression of equal rights.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  79. [79]
    Introduction of the pill and its impact - ScienceDirect
    Availability of the pill had an impact on various aspects of social life, including women's health, fertility trends, laws and policies, religion, interpersonal ...
  80. [80]
    Syntex Settles With F.D.A. - The New York Times
    Oct 11, 1991 · The maker of the arthritis treatment Naprosyn has agreed to conduct a $2 million campaign to correct what the Food and Drug Administration called misleading ...