Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Techdirt


Techdirt is an American technology policy blog founded in 1997 by Mike Masnick, who serves as its editor and operates it under his company Floor64. The site analyzes the intersection of government policy, legal frameworks, and technological innovation, applying an economic lens to evaluate impacts on , consumer rights, and societal progress. With over 73,000 posts and approximately one million monthly visitors, Techdirt has established itself as an influential voice among policymakers, executives, and activists, frequently critiquing regulatory overreach and regimes perceived to hinder competition and creativity. Notable for series like "Stupid Patent of the Day," which highlights questionable patents, the blog has contributed to public discourse on issues such as opposition to the (SOPA) and scrutiny of patent trolling practices. It has faced controversies, including a 2017 defamation lawsuit filed by over articles disputing his claim to have invented , which was ultimately dismissed in favor of Techdirt on anti-SLAPP grounds.

Founding and History

Origins and Early Development (1997–2005)

Techdirt originated on August 23, 1997, when Mike Masnick launched an emailed newsletter titled Up-To-Date, distributed to his business school colleagues to discuss emerging technology and business developments amid the nascent internet era. Masnick, who had enrolled in Cornell University's MBA program in 1996 after developing an interest in Silicon Valley innovations from afar, drew on economic perspectives to analyze how policies could affect digital markets. In early 1998, the newsletter transitioned to a website for archiving content, adopting the Techdirt name, and by March 1999, it evolved into a blog format, enabling more frequent commentary on technology-policy intersections. Early posts focused on critiques of regulatory and legal frameworks perceived to hinder , including examinations of where abundance contrasted with traditional scarcity models, and initial concerns over expansion and inefficiencies. Masnick's analysis emphasized causal effects of policy on technological progress, such as how overbroad protections could suppress new business models during the dot-com expansion. Specific early coverage included vulnerabilities in online services and failures of early web portals, reflecting a commitment to evidence-based scrutiny of hype versus reality in tech adoption. A pivotal milestone came in 2000 with Techdirt's in-depth commentary on , the file-sharing service launched in 1999, featuring posts on its CEO interview, hacks enabling broader sharing, artist lawsuits like Metallica's, and industry resistance, arguing that litigation overlooked opportunities for adaptation to digital distribution economics. The platform also addressed implementations of the 1998 (DMCA), highlighting provisions like anti-circumvention rules as tools for stifling competition and , which Masnick linked to broader innovation barriers in the post-DMCA landscape. This period established Techdirt's approach of privileging data-driven critiques over institutional narratives on enforcement.

Growth and Evolution (2006–Present)

In the wake of its foundational period, Techdirt experienced notable expansion in readership during 2011–2012, driven by its extensive critique of the (SOPA) and (PIPA). Site analytics from 2011 indicated that "SOPA" ranked among the leading search terms directing traffic to Techdirt, highlighting the opposition campaign's role in amplifying its reach. This visibility prompted operational formalization under Floor64, Inc., a corporation established by founder Mike Masnick to manage Techdirt's publishing and related activities. By the 2010s, Techdirt broadened its format beyond text-based blogging to include audio content, adapting to evolving digital consumption patterns. In March 2024, it debuted Ctrl-Alt-Speech, a weekly co-produced with Everything in Moderation and hosted by Masnick and Ben Whitelaw, dedicated to dissecting current events in online speech regulation. Complementary series, such as "This Week in Techdirt History," emerged to contextualize policy debates through archival reviews, with episodes continuing into 2025. Confronting industry-wide pressures like eroding ad revenues, Techdirt pursued diversified funding mechanisms to maintain independence. Experiments with web monetization, including integrations with for micropayments, supplemented traditional models. , such as one from Grant for the Web enabling specialized content on payment innovations, further bolstered operations. Reader-driven support via subscriptions to premium features, including the Techdirt Insider community, has emphasized direct audience contributions over reliance on intermediaries. As of 2025, Techdirt's output has increasingly addressed intersections of , speech rights, and , as seen in its proposal for a " " to prioritize user agency against platform and regulatory overreach. Pieces examining tech policy's democratic ramifications, including critiques of expanded government speech controls, underscore an enduring anti-censorship stance amid ongoing digital challenges. This trajectory affirms Techdirt's resilience as an independent outlet after 28 years.

Content Focus and Editorial Approach

Primary Topics and Themes

Techdirt applies an economic framework emphasizing innovation and market dynamics to analyze , prioritizing causal explanations of how regulations affect competition and growth over prescriptive advocacy. This lens critiques interventions that impose , such as expansive regimes, while highlighting data-driven outcomes from open systems. A central theme involves skepticism toward robust and protections, positing that they often erect and reduce competitive incentives, contrary to claims of fostering creativity. Techdirt contends that empirical observations, including the proliferation of , demonstrate accelerated innovation under weaker exclusivity, as collaborative models enable rapid iteration without licensing frictions. For instance, analyses reference cases where patent thickets delayed advancements in fields like , arguing that such systems prioritize over genuine inventive progress. Coverage of free speech extends to robust defenses of intermediary liability protections under of the Communications Decency Act, framing it as essential for enabling diverse online expression without imposing editorial burdens on platforms. Techdirt debunks proposals for repeal or reform by citing historical data showing that pre-230 litigation chilled , leading to market-driven moderation rather than systemic censorship. On net neutrality, it advocates nuanced positions, challenging alarmist views with evidence of investment continuity under light-touch rules, such as broadband expansions post-2017 deregulation, while cautioning against overregulation that could distort incentives. Business model discussions underscore "economics of abundance," where ' infinite reproducibility shifts value creation toward services, relationships, and connectivity rather than enforcement. Techdirt promotes strategies leveraging unlimited supply to expand —termed "infinite demand"—evidenced by creator successes in bundling access with experiences, contrasting maximalism's focus on exclusionary controls that empirically correlate with stagnant sectors like pre-streaming. This approach draws on that abundance amplifies opportunities, supported by case studies of platforms thriving via network effects over proprietary locks.

Notable Publications and Series

Techdirt features weekly compilations titled "Funniest Comments of the Week" and "Most Insightful Comments of the Week," which aggregate selected reader responses to recent articles, highlighting humorous or analytically sharp contributions to foster . These roundups, often published on Fridays, draw from thousands of comments submitted across Techdirt's posts, emphasizing user-generated insights on topics like online moderation and without editorial filtering beyond selection for wit or depth. A prominent in-depth series stems from Mike Masnick's "Protocols, Not Platforms" framework, first detailed in a Techdirt essay advocating decentralized protocols over centralized platforms to address free speech and moderation challenges in digital spaces. Expanded in Masnick's 2022 book of the same name, the series includes ongoing Techdirt articles and discussions applying this model to alternatives like federated networks, critiquing platform monopolies through technical and economic analysis. The , launched in 2015, delivers episodic breakdowns of technology policy and industry events, featuring interviews and panel analyses on issues such as and regulatory overreach. With over 430 episodes by October 2025, it covers timely developments, including decentralized media structures and critiques of practices.

Key Personnel and Operations

Mike Masnick's Role

Mike Masnick founded Techdirt in 1997 as an email newsletter that evolved into a prominent focused on , , and . As editor and primary contributor, he has authored nearly 50,000 posts, shaping the site's analysis through a lens informed by his MBA from Cornell University's Johnson Graduate School of Management. Masnick's intellectual framework emphasizes pro-innovation economics, drawing on principles that favor open systems and competition over barriers like expansive regimes, which he argues enable and hinder broader . This perspective critiques policies that prioritize incumbent protections, advocating instead for frameworks that promote productive entrepreneurship and technological advancement. In his writings, Masnick has extended this approach to policy critiques, including examinations of innovation incentives and government interventions in markets. By the 2020s, his focus intensified on free speech, promoting "protocols, not platforms" as a decentralized model to enhance expression and reduce centralized control risks. He has voiced concerns over potential government-tech collusions that undermine open discourse, aligning with a staunch defense of unrestricted speech online.

Contributors and Organizational Structure

Techdirt functions as a collaborative platform under Floor64, Inc., a privately held small business that emphasizes a lean operational model with freelance contributors rather than a large hierarchical staff. Key non-founder contributors include Karl Bode, a Seattle-based freelance reporter specializing in telecommunications, media, politics, and consumer rights issues. Leigh Beadon serves in editorial roles, managing tasks such as curating insightful reader comments and contributing to podcast production. Other occasional contributors, like technology consultant Timothy Geigner, provide specialized input on tech-related topics. The organization's structure prioritizes independence through an ad-free, reader-supported funding approach, exemplified by public campaigns such as the 2017 Techdirt Survival Fund, which raised resources for legal defenses and ongoing operations. This model, described as a "proven economic framework," avoids reliance on and fosters via open fundraisers and tools like the Techdirt Insider for reader feedback. In recent years, Techdirt has shifted toward podcast-heavy output to diversify and sustain viability amid platform dependencies, partnering with initiatives like Everything in Moderation for series such as Ctrl-Alt-Speech, which incorporates expertise from specialists. This evolution maintains operational agility within Floor64's small-team framework, reducing exposure to algorithm changes through direct reader support and owned channels.

Legal Controversies

Shiva Ayyadurai Defamation Lawsuit (2017–2019)

In January 2017, Shiva Ayyadurai filed a $15 million defamation lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against Floor64, Inc. (the operator of Techdirt), its founder Mike Masnick, and contributor Leigh Beadon. The suit targeted 14 Techdirt articles published from 2012 to 2016 that questioned Ayyadurai's assertion of inventing email as a teenager in 1978 while working at the U.S. Postal Service. Ayyadurai also alleged intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and intentional infliction of emotional distress, claiming the posts falsely portrayed him as a fraud and damaged his reputation and business prospects. Techdirt's articles defended their position by referencing empirical historical evidence, including declassified documents and technical specifications showing email-like messaging systems on as early as 1971, developed by engineers such as , predating Ayyadurai's system. The site argued that Ayyadurai's claims lacked support from contemporaneous records and conflicted with established timelines of networked electronic mail protocols. On September 6, 2017, U.S. District Judge Dennis Saylor dismissed the case with prejudice as to the claims, ruling that the challenged statements constituted non-actionable opinions or rhetorical protected under the First Amendment, rather than verifiable assertions of fact that could be proven false. Saylor further held that Ayyadurai failed to demonstrate "actual " or that Techdirt knowingly published falsehoods, emphasizing that disputes over historical interpretations do not equate to when grounded in documented evidence. The judge also dismissed the related claims, noting they could not circumvent First Amendment protections by recasting allegations. Ayyadurai appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Techdirt funded its defense through reader campaigns that raised over $100,000, highlighting community support for journalistic scrutiny of claims. On May 14, 2019, the parties announced a full settlement resolving all claims, with Techdirt making no admission of liability; a joint statement described the agreement as enabling both sides to focus on their respective endeavors without further litigation.

Other Legal Challenges and Defenses

Techdirt has encountered various legal threats from holders and industry critics seeking to suppress reporting on contentious issues, often manifesting as veiled demands or cease-and-desist notices rather than formal suits. In 2014, for instance, game developer issued vague legal threats against reviewers and commenters criticizing his work, prompting Techdirt coverage that highlighted the on discourse; such threats were diffused through public exposure rather than litigation, underscoring Techdirt's strategy of leveraging transparency to counter intimidation. Similar patterns emerged in IP disputes, such as a 2014 threat by against a modder, which Techdirt critiqued as overreach, avoiding escalation by emphasizing principles without direct suits against the site. Beyond traditional litigation, Techdirt faced operational disruptions framed as security challenges, exemplified by a December 2024 incident where an attacker manipulated classification systems to label the site as a phishing domain, temporarily blocking access for users via major browsers and services. This event illustrated "Masnick's Impossibility Theorem," articulated by Techdirt founder Mike Masnick in 2019, which posits that content moderation and security filtering at scale inevitably produce false positives alongside necessary blocks, as aggressive anti-abuse measures create trade-offs that ensnare legitimate content. The misclassification was reversed after Techdirt's public disclosure and appeals, demonstrating resilience through empirical demonstration of systemic flaws rather than legal recourse. In defending against these pressures, Techdirt has consistently invoked of the , which immunizes platforms from liability for , enabling unmoderated commentary sections critical to its journalism without fear of vicarious suits. This protection has empirically sustained investigative reporting on tech abuses, as Masnick has documented in analyses showing how its absence would amplify litigation threats against small outlets. Complementing this, anti-SLAPP statutes—designed to dismiss —have served as a bulwark; while most invoked in high-profile cases, Techdirt's advocacy and experiences reveal their role in deterring early-stage threats from powerful entities wary of expedited dismissals and fee-shifting. These mechanisms have allowed Techdirt to maintain operations amid adversarial scrutiny, prioritizing factual critique over suppression.

Reception and Criticisms

Positive Reception and Influence

Techdirt has been rated "High" for factual reporting by , which evaluates sources based on sourcing, fact-checking, and adherence to journalistic standards. This assessment highlights the site's reliance on verifiable data and expert analysis in covering , distinguishing it from outlets with lower factual scores. The site's detailed critiques and amplification of expert perspectives played a role in mobilizing opposition to the (SOPA) and (PIPA) in 2011–2012. Techdirt published extensive breakdowns of the bills' technical flaws and potential for overreach, such as mechanisms that could disrupt , contributing to the coordinated protests—including the January 18, 2012, blackout—that led to both bills being shelved by on January 20, 2012. Techdirt's early and ongoing commentary on intermediary liability has influenced discussions on of the . For instance, a December 2020 article by contributor Cathy Gellis arguing that [Section 230](/page/Section 230) functions as a procedural safeguard rather than a was cited in a 2024 report overviewing the law's scope and debates. This reflects the site's prescience in addressing platform moderation challenges, with its analyses referenced amid 2020s congressional hearings scrutinizing content liability. Founded in 1997 by Mike Masnick under Floor64, Techdirt has maintained editorial independence for nearly 28 years through community support, including reader donations that sustained operations during legal pressures in the late . This model has enabled consistent, evidence-based advocacy for policies grounded in economic and technical realities, such as balanced approaches to innovation versus regulation.

Criticisms and Debates

Techdirt's coverage has been criticized for a left-center tilt, manifested in story selection that emphasizes regulatory advocacy, such as strong support for rules, while giving less prominence to free-market alternatives. rates the site as left-center biased on this basis, noting that its policy positions and framing moderately favor left-leaning interventions in tech markets. The site's persistent skepticism of robust intellectual property protections has provoked pushback from creators' advocates and pro-IP commentators, who argue it overlooks causal links between IP enforcement and incentives for original production, potentially fostering free-riding that stifles investment in . A series on the Intellectual Property & Innovation blog accuses founder Mike Masnick of committing logical fallacies in downplaying 's role in advancing "science and the useful arts" under the U.S. Constitution, asserting that Techdirt's positions empirically undervalue evidence from industries reliant on IP exclusivity. Similarly, proponent David Newhoff has faulted Masnick's analyses for prioritizing derision over rigorous examination of IP's economic contributions, claiming such rhetoric contributes to a broader erosion of creators' rights in digital ecosystems. Debates have also arisen over perceived shifts in Techdirt's commentary on platform , with earlier pieces in 2019 rejecting claims of inherent conservative censorship by as overstated myths, contrasted against post-2020 critiques of government-influenced "censorship industrial complexes." Critics interpret this as inconsistent, potentially reflecting reactive adaptation to political winds rather than unwavering first-principles commitment to platform liability protections under , though Techdirt defends its stance as consistently opposing state coercion while affirming private moderation rights.

Policy Impact and Legacy

Advocacy in Tech Policy Debates

Techdirt emerged as a prominent voice in the opposition to the (SOPA) and the () during 2011–2012, publishing over 100 articles that aggregated economic impact analyses, including estimates of up to 1.3 million U.S. job losses from disrupted services, and highlighted risks to innovation from mandatory . These efforts extended beyond traditional advocacy groups by fostering cross-ideological coalitions, such as tech firms, organizations, and even some content creators, contributing to the January 2012 protests—including the blackout on January 18—that pressured 80 members to withdraw support and led to SOPA's indefinite postponement on January 20, 2012. In critiques of patent trolls, Techdirt has consistently argued since the mid-2000s that non-practicing entities exploit weak examination standards and litigation incentives created by federal policies, such as fee-shifting rules under the America Invents Act that fail to deter frivolous suits, resulting in over $29 billion in annual U.S. economic costs by 2011 estimates. Recent analyses, including a 2025 examination of USPTO memoranda, emphasized how venue shopping in troll-friendly districts like the Eastern District of Texas perpetuates for startups, advocating for stricter reviews and transparency in patent ownership to address government-enabled distortions rather than outright abolition. Techdirt's examinations of telecom monopolies have focused on enabling regional dominance, such as FCC policies allowing incumbents like and to block through state-level bans in over 20 states as of 2023, which stifle competition and inflate prices—U.S. households paying 30–50% more for slower speeds than peers. By documenting covert , including campaigns against community networks, Techdirt has pushed for reforms to prioritize competitive alternatives over subsidizing monopolists, linking these barriers directly to federal decisions that reduced incentives for deployment. Amid 2020s calls for repeal following high-profile disputes, Techdirt defended the provision's empirical role in enabling diverse speech platforms, citing data from over 200 court cases upholding intermediary immunity as fostering growth without proportional liability spikes, and critiquing repeal proposals for ignoring how platforms already moderate under good-faith standards. In 2025, it advanced affirmative policy through a proposed , outlining user entitlements to portability, , and to balance platform accountability with free expression, distinct from liability expansions.

Broader Contributions to Discourse

Techdirt has propagated the theoretical framework that greater openness in business models enables industries to adapt and thrive amid technological disruption, a concept articulated by founder Mike Masnick as early as and exemplified in entertainment following the era. This perspective posits that restrictive approaches, such as aggressive anti-piracy enforcement, hinder innovation, while embracing connectivity fosters new revenue streams like direct fan engagement and diversified distribution. Empirical validation appears in Techdirt's annual "Sky is Rising" reports, which draw on U.S. data to demonstrate sustained growth in creative sector employment and output—from $860 billion in 2008 to over $1.2 trillion by 2023—attributing expansion to internet-enabled models rather than contraction from file-sharing. These analyses challenge narratives of digital destruction, showing post- adaptations like streaming services correlating with industry revenue recovery and job increases exceeding pre-2000 levels. In tech policy discourse, Techdirt has influenced libertarian-leaning skepticism toward regulatory interventions by emphasizing data-driven evidence of , such as stifled innovation and amplified harms from overreach. Masnick's writings consistently highlight how laws like expanded terms or platform liability shifts fail to achieve stated goals while distorting markets, drawing on economic studies and historical precedents to argue for market-led solutions over top-down mandates. This counters mainstream advocacy for tech regulations—often optimistic about curbing or monopoly power—by citing cases like Europe's data protection rules inadvertently consolidating market power among compliant incumbents. Extending to 2025 intersections of technology and democratic processes, Techdirt critiques proposals tying AI or to electoral safeguards, warning that such measures risk eroding open protocols in favor of centralized controls, as seen in analyses of algorithmic and user empowerment deficits. Techdirt's operational model exemplifies resistance to platform dependency, maintaining through independent infrastructure like newsletters, podcasts, and site-hosted archives rather than algorithm-driven social feeds. This approach, rooted in Masnick's for protocols over platforms since the mid-2010s, sustains output without reliance on third-party gatekeepers, as evidenced by consistent publishing—over 80,000 articles archived by 2025—and via comment sections and donor-supported newsletters. Into 2025, this independence facilitates adaptations to challenges like scraping debates, where Techdirt argues for preserving open access to avoid broader barriers, positioning it as a in enduring, non-captured intellectual production.

References

  1. [1]
    About Techdirt.
    Started in 1997 by Floor64 founder Mike Masnick and then growing into a group blogging effort, the Techdirt blog relies on a proven economic framework to ...
  2. [2]
    Mike Masnick's Techdirt Profile
    Oct 18, 2025 · Mike is the founder and CEO of Floor64 and editor of the Techdirt blog. He can be found on Bluesky at bsky.app/profile/mmasnick.bsky.social on Mastodon at ...
  3. [3]
    An Internet Veteran's Guide to Not Being Scared of Technology
    Jul 30, 2023 · Mike Masnick, who founded Techdirt in 1998, writes for an influential audience of lawmakers, CEOs and activists. Somehow, he's still an optimist about the ...
  4. [4]
    Stupid patent of the month stories at Techdirt.
    Stupid Patent of the Month: Alleged Cult Leader Wants to 'Improve Performance' · Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter! · Wednesday.
  5. [5]
    Inventor of Email Loses Libel Case Against TechDirt - Fortune
    Sep 6, 2017 · With TechDirt, the case began early this year when entrepreneur Shiva Ayyadurai filed a $15 million libel complaint over articles that ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Mike Masnick - Public Participation Project
    Mike Masnick is the founder & editor of the popular Techdirt blog as well as the founder of the Silicon Valley think tank, the Copia Institute.
  7. [7]
    25 Years Ago Today… Techdirt Got Started!
    Aug 23, 2022 · That was exactly 25 years ago, and that began dragging me down the path of what became Techdirt early the following year (when I realized it ...
  8. [8]
    How this blogger became one of the most influential voices in tech ...
    Jan 21, 2016 · In 1996, Masnick enrolled in Cornell University's Johnson Graduate School of Management to obtain an MBA. “I was on the East Coast in the middle ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  9. [9]
    How to hit paydirt amid an infinite supply | Technology - The Guardian
    Nov 1, 2007 · Techdirt's founder Mike Masnick discusses the blog's origins and how it developed a novel kind of corporate intelligence service.<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Mike Masnick here. Founder of Techdirt, blogger, net neutrality ...
    Jul 22, 2014 · Been blogging on Techdirt since before blogging was a word (over 45,000 posts!), talking about open internet and internet policy since before " ...
  11. [11]
    Interview with Napster's CEO | Techdirt
    Comment Options: · Techdirt Daily Newsletter.From The Come-On,-Eileen... · Re: Viability? · Re: Re: Re: Revolutionary?
  12. [12]
    Metallica Sues Napster | Techdirt
    ... 2000 10:50am - Mike Masnick. This one I think is pretty silly. The band Metallica is suing Napster and three universities for not blocking Napster ... Techdirt ...
  13. [13]
    Napster Hack Lets You Share More Than Just Music - Techdirt.
    Mar 22, 2000 · The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
  14. [14]
    Architect Of The DMCA Admits It Hasn't Worked Out - Techdirt.
    Mar 26, 2007 · The one that let you tape 4 hours (initially) of TV shows – that would be VHS in case you didn't know. As to the lack of posts – TechDirt does ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Techdirt 2011: The Numbers.
    Jan 5, 2012 · Even more telling, here are the top three search terms that brought people to Techdirt in 2011: techdirt; sopa; tech dirt. Where are you all ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Masnick declaration 4875-5479-6363 v.15 - NetChoice
    Feb 17, 2023 · Identity of Declarant. I am the founder and CEO of Floor64, Inc., a California small business that operates a widely-read blog at Techdirt.com ( ...
  17. [17]
    Announcing Ctrl-Alt-Speech: A New Podcast About Online Speech
    Mar 7, 2024 · Welcome to Ctrl-Alt-Speech, a brand new a weekly news podcast co-created by Techdirt's Mike Masnick and Everything in Moderation's Ben Whitelaw.
  18. [18]
    This Week In Techdirt History: October 19th – 25th
    Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast from Techdirt and Everything in Moderation. Send us your feedback at podcast@ctrlaltspeech.com and ...
  19. [19]
    Web monetization stories at Techdirt.
    Recently, Techdirt began a new monetization experiment with Coil. It's a system for making payments on the web, but it's not just another micropayment service ...
  20. [20]
    Techdirt.
    ... Ctrl-Alt-Speech · Deals · Jobs · Support Techdirt. Expand All Posts Collapse All Posts ... This Week In Techdirt History: October 19th – 25th · Techdirt. from the ...Mike Masnick · About Us · Ctrl-Alt-Speech · How To Support Techdirt
  21. [21]
    We Deserve Better: A New Social Media Bill of Rights | Techdirt
    Jul 17, 2025 · The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
  22. [22]
    The FTC Wants More Control Over Online Speech. That's A Big ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter! We don't spam. Read our privacy policy for more ...
  23. [23]
    Intellectual Property Is Neither Intellectual, Nor Property: Discuss
    Sep 12, 2019 · ... property rights” supporters why “intellectual property is not property.” If you've been reading Techdirt for any length of time, most of the ...
  24. [24]
    Is Intellectual Property Itself Unethical? - Techdirt.
    Jun 11, 2010 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt.
  25. [25]
    Rethinking Intellectual Property Rights - Techdirt.
    Sep 13, 2002 · Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter! We don't spam. Read our privacy policy for more ...
  26. [26]
    Intellectual property stories at Techdirt.
    Posts about intellectual property written by Tim Cushing, Dark Helmet, Mike Masnick, and Techdirt.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  27. [27]
    Hello! You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong About ...
    Jun 23, 2020 · So, no, the "good faith" provision is of no use to you in whatever argument you're making." Source: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/ ...
  28. [28]
    https://www.techdirt.com/2025/10/20/before-advocating-to-repeal-section-230-it-helps-to-first-understand-how-it-works/
  29. [29]
    Section 230 stories at Techdirt.
    If you've read Techdirt for basically any length of time, you'll know that I feel the exact opposite on this topic. Repealing, or really almost all proposals to ...
  30. [30]
    Revisiting The Replicator Analogy: How Infinite Goods Create More ...
    Sep 11, 2009 · It is because of this post that I am no longer going to visit techdirt ever again. This analogy is pathetic (read above posts if you want to ...
  31. [31]
    Trying To Explain The Economics Of Abundance In Two Minutes Or ...
    UPS recently asked us to create a series of three videos, where we try to explain some of the stuff we talk about here on Techdirt in under ...
  32. [32]
    And Here Come The Attacks On 'Free' Economics - Techdirt.
    May 22, 2009 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt.
  33. [33]
    How To Improve Online Comments: Test Whether People Have ...
    Mar 10, 2017 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt. TechDirt ... Funniest Comments of the Week". Reply View in chronology. Make this ...
  34. [34]
    Forget Shadow Banning, Now Elon Is Shadow Boosting Accounts ...
    Mar 28, 2023 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt. TechDirt ... funniest comments of the week. Reply View in chronology. Make this ...
  35. [35]
    MPEG-LA Follows Through On Its Promise To Go After Google For ...
    Feb 14, 2011 · ... Techdirt · Most Insightful, Funniest Comments Of The Week On Techdirt · France The Latest Country To Approve Internet Censorship. MPEG-LA ...
  36. [36]
    Protocols, Not Platforms: A Technological Approach to Free Speech
    Aug 28, 2019 · That approach: build protocols, not platforms. I don't know that this is the right solution. I don't know that it will work. But I do think it ...
  37. [37]
    Protocols not platforms stories at Techdirt.
    Aug 5, 2025 · Bluesky was originally seeded by Jack Dorsey in response to his reading my Protocols, Not Platforms paper. The project moved along (somewhat ...
  38. [38]
    Protocols, Not Platforms: A Technological Approach to Free Speech
    Aug 21, 2019 · Moving to protocols, not platforms, is an approach for free speech in the twenty-first century. Rather than relying on a “marketplace of ideas” ...
  39. [39]
    Techdirt Podcast Editions
    Techdirt Podcast Episode 434: The New Generation Of Independent Journalists · Journalism. from the going-solo dept. Tue, Oct 14th 2025 01:30pm - Leigh Beadon.
  40. [40]
    Techdirt Podcast Episode 434: The New Generation Of Independent ...
    Techdirt Podcast Episode 434: The New Generation Of Independent Journalists. Journalism. from the going-solo dept. Tue, Oct 14th 2025 01:30pm - Leigh Beadon.
  41. [41]
    Techdirt Podcast Episode 377: Protocols, Not Platforms
    Techdirt Podcast Episode 377: Protocols, Not Platforms. Content Moderation. from the panel-discussions dept. Thu, Jan 25th 2024 01:30pm - Leigh Beadon.
  42. [42]
    So to Speak podcast: Techdirt's Mike Masnick - FIRE
    On today's episode of So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast, we speak with Techdirt.com founder and editor Mike Masnick. Since founding Techdirt in 1997, ...
  43. [43]
    Nobel Prize Winning Economist: Intellectual Property Reinforces ...
    Jul 15, 2013 · The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel... Mike Masnick: Oh interesting. I had a friend who had built something knda like ...
  44. [44]
    Why Do Patents Tend To Cause More Harm Than Good? - Techdirt.
    though all of it is for their internal use. We do not do any public advocacy ...
  45. [45]
    The Dangerous Rise Of Unproductive Entrepreneurship - Techdirt.
    Aug 18, 2017 · >>> Pretty simplistic view, right, no so different than white supremacists or Techdirt supremacists who also disrespect and disconsider whole ...
  46. [46]
    What Kind Of Innovation Do Patents Encourage? - Techdirt.
    Sep 28, 2009 · Is Ignoring RIAA Lawsuit Cheaper Than Going To Trial? Follow Techdirt ...
  47. [47]
    Techdirt's Mike Masnick | The Foundation for Individual ... - FIRE
    Since founding Techdirt in 1997, Masnick has written nearly 50,000 blog posts for the publication and covered many of tech's hottest free speech controversies.
  48. [48]
    About Floor64
    In order to deliver both Techdirt and these corporate blogs more efficiently, the company built a series of "insight platforms" and an underlying core enabling ...Missing: Inc structure
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Catherine R. Gellis for Floor64, Inc. d/b/a the Copia Institute in ...
    The Copia Institute is the think tank arm of Floor64, Inc., the privately-held small business behind Techdirt.com ("Techdirt"), an online publication that has ...
  50. [50]
    Karl Bode's Techdirt Profile
    Karl Bode is a Seattle-based freelance reporter focused on tech, telecom, media, politics and consumer rights.
  51. [51]
    Karl Bode's Profile | Freelance Journalist - Muck Rack
    I write about tech, media, politics, corruption, consumer rights, and sustainable, locally-owned alternatives to telecom monopoly power.
  52. [52]
    Leigh Beadon's Techdirt Profile
    Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via Apple Podcasts or Spotify, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes ...
  53. [53]
    Leigh Beadon's Profile | Techdirt Journalist - Muck Rack
    Find Leigh Beadon of Techdirt's articles, email address, contact information, Twitter and more. ... Leigh Beadon. Verified. Editor, Writer and Designer ...
  54. [54]
    Timothy Geigner's Techdirt Profile
    I am a technology consultant, contributor here at Techdirt, and an author. I hope to someday get enough people reading the books I sell to garner a scathing ...
  55. [55]
    Techdirt Survival Fund: I Support Journalism
    We have now set up a Techdirt Survival Fund at ISupportJournalism.com, which will allow us to continue our reporting on issues related to free ...
  56. [56]
    An Only Slightly Modest Proposal: If AI Companies Want ... - Techdirt.
    Apr 11, 2024 · The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel... John Roddy: So yeah, a drop from $4 to $2 is pretty severe, but they' ...
  57. [57]
    Podcast stories at Techdirt.
    Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast about the latest news in online ... This Week In Techdirt History: October 12th - 18th (0). More arrow. ×. Email ...
  58. [58]
    Newspaper Drops Paywall, Moves To Reader Patronage, Generates ...
    Jun 12, 2024 · Techdirt could implement something like this. I can't contribute with $5 atm because my currency is too devalued against the dollar but I can ...
  59. [59]
    Man who claims to have invented email has filed a lawsuit that could ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · Last month, Ayyadurai filed a $15-million libel suit against Techdirt in Boston federal court, asserting that he had been defamed by its ...Missing: timeline facts<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    17-10011 - Ayyadurai v. Floor64, Inc. et al - Content Details - - GovInfo
    28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander. Party Names. Leigh Beadon ... Techdirt, Defendant Shiva Ayyadurai, Plaintiff. Skip back to top. Browse. A to ...Missing: 2017-2019 settlement
  61. [61]
    Our Legal Dispute With Shiva Ayyadurai Is Now Over - Techdirt.
    May 17, 2019 · The legal dispute, in which Shiva Ayyadurai sued us for defamation over 14 posts on Techdirt, has been settled.
  62. [62]
    Ayyadurai v. Floor64, Inc. - Global Freedom of Expression
    Scientist Shiva Ayyadurai brought a claim against Floor64, owner of the “Techdirt” website, its editor and writer, for allegedly defamatory statements.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  63. [63]
    Case Dismissed: Judge Throws Out Shiva Ayyadurai's Defamation ...
    Sep 6, 2017 · ... Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email ... Case Dismissed: Judge Throws Out Shiva Ayyadurai's Defamation Lawsuit Against Techdirt”.
  64. [64]
    Techdirt's Mike Masnick Defeats $15M Libel Lawsuit From Self ...
    Headed to Supreme Court in Defamation Battle.
  65. [65]
    Free Speech Wins: A Massachusetts Federal District Court ...
    Sep 12, 2017 · Shiva Ayyadurai sued a website known as TechDirt, its founder Michael Masnick and one of its reporters Leigh Beadon for defamation and infliction of emotional ...
  66. [66]
    US judge dismisses email invention claim - BBC
    Sep 7, 2017 · Shiva Ayyadurai sued news website Tech Dirt earlier this year after it published several articles denying his claim. The judge overseeing the ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  67. [67]
    Self-Described Email Inventor Loses Defamation Claim
    Shiva Ayyadurai claimed that Techdirt's reporters knowingly relied on false information, but U.S. District Judge Dennis Saylor dismissed the lawsuit Wednesday ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  68. [68]
    Joint Press Statement On Behalf Of Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai And ...
    May 14, 2019 · ... Techdirt") are pleased to announce that they have reached a settlement of the defamation lawsuit filed by Dr. Ayyadurai against Techdirt in ...Missing: details rulings<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Defamation lawsuit brought by self-proclaimed email 'inventor' settles
    May 17, 2019 · A defamation lawsuit against tech news website Techdirt filed by a Massachusetts man who questionably claimed to have invented email in numerous articles has ...
  70. [70]
    Game Dev Derek Smart (Again) Responds To A Negative Review ...
    Feb 19, 2014 · There's the legal threat again! How can you say that you don't make legal threats when at least half of the comments you've made here and on ...
  71. [71]
    Dark Souls Modder Gets Copyright Threat From Game Developer ...
    Dec 23, 2014 · Comments on “Dark Souls Modder Gets Copyright Threat From Game Developer For Some Reason” ... Techdirt Deals. Techdirt Insider Discord. The latest ...
  72. [72]
    Attacker Has Techdirt Reclassified As Phishing Site, Proving ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · Attacker Has Techdirt Reclassified As Phishing Site, Proving Masnick's Impossibility Law Once Again. Content Moderation. from the oh-hey,-that's ...Missing: misclassification | Show results with:misclassification
  73. [73]
    Masnick's Impossibility Theorem: Content Moderation At Scale Is ...
    Nov 20, 2019 · Masnick's Impossibility Theorem: Content Moderation At Scale Is Impossible To Do Well. Say That Again. from the a-little-philosophy dept. Wed ...
  74. [74]
    Anti-slapp stories at Techdirt.
    Jul 2, 2025 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt.
  75. [75]
    Techdirt - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
    It focuses on intellectual property, patent, information privacy, and copyright reform in particular. ... In review, although Techdirt is a technology blog, its ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    An Updated Analysis: Why SOPA & PIPA Are A Bad Idea ... - Techdirt.
    Jan 18, 2012 · Re: The History of Anti Innovative legislation ... Why not go back hundreds of years? http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111005/03430716204/riaa- ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  77. [77]
    Remembering The Fight Against SOPA 10 Years Later ... - Techdirt.
    Jan 18, 2022 · This Techdirt Greenhouse special edition is all about the 10 year anniversary of the fight that stopped SOPA. On January 26th at 1pm PT, we'll ...
  78. [78]
    The logical fallacies of Mike Masnick: A series
    Aug 20, 2013 · Promotion of science and the useful arts is the GOAL of the IP system. The question is HOW does copyright promote science and the useful arts?Missing: bias | Show results with:bias
  79. [79]
    https://illusionofmore.com/masnick-own-irrelevance/
  80. [80]
    Enough With The Myth That Big Tech Is 'Censoring' Conservatives ...
    Aug 2, 2019 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt. TechDirt · GreenHouse ... Tech bias & censorship.” But that's misleading claptrap in its own ...
  81. [81]
    Censorship industrial complex stories at Techdirt.
    Nov 21, 2024 · Substackerati's 'Grave Concerns' About White House/Big Tech Collusion Have Disappeared With Elon's Ascension ; 13:30, Techdirt Podcast Episode ...
  82. [82]
    New Study Shows Majority Of Americans Against SOPA - Techdirt.
    Nov 15, 2011 · and they will shut your pirate site down. So wait… you think TechDirt should be legally shut down? A site that actually never hosts or links to ...Missing: 2012 | Show results with:2012
  83. [83]
    10 Years Later: SOPA Protests Were A Turning Point, But ... - Techdirt.
    Jan 20, 2022 · This Techdirt Greenhouse special edition is all about the 10 year anniversary of the fight that stopped SOPA. On January 26th at 1pm PT, we'll ...
  84. [84]
    Wikipedia Considers Blackout To Protest SOPA - Techdirt.
    Dec 12, 2011 · Re: Re: Re: Re: Nice to see that for Techdirt, like so many other of the piracy apologists, it's all about the money. The high-minded rhetoric ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    How The SOPA Blackout Happened - Techdirt.
    Jan 18, 2022 · This Techdirt Greenhouse special edition is all about the 10 year anniversary of the fight that stopped SOPA. On January 26th at 1pm PT, we'll ...
  86. [86]
    Another View On The Patent Trolling Situation - Techdirt.
    Mar 5, 2007 · The post we had about patent trolls on Friday sure kicked off a lively debate both here and various other places in the blogworld.
  87. [87]
    Former Patent Troll Admits That Patent Trolls Are Bad For Business ...
    Jun 13, 2016 · He also has no problem admitting the reality of most patent trolling: that it's not about quality patents. In fact, crappy patents are pretty ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  88. [88]
    New USPTO Memo Makes Fighting Patent Trolls Even Harder
    Mar 27, 2025 · By filing lawsuits in these troll-friendly courts, patent owners can game the system—forcing companies to pay up rather than risk millions in ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  89. [89]
    Congress Poised To Bring Back Unfettered Patent Trolling - Techdirt.
    Sep 19, 2024 · Have you been missing patent trolls destroying innovation and making products you like more expensive? Have you felt that, maybe, some ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  90. [90]
    As Net Neutrality Debate Reheats, Remember The Real Problem Is ...
    Sep 20, 2023 · Net neutrality rules were an imperfect, stopgap measure to stop powerful telecom monopolies from abusing their market power to harm consumers ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  91. [91]
    Telecom Monopolies Are Once Again Funding Covert, Sleazy Local ...
    Jan 18, 2024 · We've long established that U.S. broadband is expansive, patchy, and slow thanks to mindless consolidation, regulatory capture, ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  92. [92]
    We Just Keep Throwing Billions At Telecom Monopolies ... - Techdirt.
    Jun 17, 2022 · We can't measure broadband gaps accurately. We can't track where subsidies go very well. We can't protect consumers from very obvious telecom ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  93. [93]
    Monopolized U.S. Telecom Industry Eyes More Consolidation ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · U.S. broadband is a patchwork of regional monopolies, coddled by corrupt federal and state lawmakers, who've worked tirelessly to demolish ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  94. [94]
    https://www.techdirt.com/2025/10/21/techdirt-podcast-episode-435-an-insiders-view-of-decentralized-social-media/
  95. [95]
    Perhaps It's Not The Entertainment Industry's Business Model That's ...
    Feb 22, 2007 · ... Mike Masnick Did you hear about Link being banned? It's just that he was banned on a different PDS, not on bsky.social. How are we supposed ...
  96. [96]
    The Sky Is Rising 2024 Edition: Rather Than Destroying ... - Techdirt.
    Jan 22, 2024 · The latest report suggests quite the opposite: that the internet has saved those industries and basically become the lifeblood of all creative industries.
  97. [97]
    World Is Catching On That Creativity And Creative Jobs Have Been ...
    Aug 21, 2015 · ... entertainment industry has been stating, the sky was rising, not falling ... posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter! We don't ...Missing: openness | Show results with:openness
  98. [98]
    How Mark Warner's 'SAFE TECH Act' Will Make Many People A Lot ...
    Mar 26, 2021 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt. TechDirt · GreenHouse · Free Speech ... unintended consequences · 25 CommentsLeave a Comment.Missing: contributions discourse
  99. [99]
    The Silver Lining Of Internet Regulation: A Regulatory Impact ...
    Aug 11, 2020 · Techdirt. Sign In · Register · Preferences. Techdirt. TechDirt · GreenHouse · Free Speech ... unintended consequences. Europe's General Data ...Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse
  100. [100]
    Against The New Feudalism Of Algorithms And Oligarchs - Techdirt.
    Oct 16, 2025 · Comment Options: · Techdirt Daily Newsletter.
  101. [101]
    Empowering Users, Not Overlords: Overcoming Digital Helplessness
    Jan 27, 2025 · Techdirt Podcast Episode 435: An Insider's View Of Decentralized Social Media · Techdirt Podcast Episode 429: The Eternal September · Mastercard ...
  102. [102]
    We're Walling Off The Open Internet To Stop AI—And It May End Up ...
    A longtime open internet activist recently asked me whether I'd reversed my position on internet openness and copyright because of AI.