Teleparallelism

Teleparallelism, also known as teleparallel gravity, is a geometric framework in theoretical physics that reformulates the description of gravity using a flat affine connection with torsion instead of the curved Levi-Civita connection of general relativity, while remaining dynamically equivalent to Einstein's theory at the classical level.^[1] In this approach, spacetime is equipped with tetrad fields that connect the manifold to a local Minkowski space, and the Weitzenböck connection ensures zero curvature but non-vanishing torsion, which encodes the gravitational effects through a torsion scalar T.^[2] The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) arises when the action is constructed from this torsion scalar, differing from the Einstein-Hilbert action only by a four-divergence boundary term, leading to identical field equations.^[1] The origins of teleparallelism trace back to the early 20th century, when Albert Einstein explored it as a basis for unifying gravity and electromagnetism in his unified field theory attempts during the late 1920s.^[3] Einstein's work, influenced by Élie Cartan's ideas on torsion^[4] and published in papers from 1928 to 1930, introduced "absolute parallelism" or "distant parallelism," where vectors at distant points can be parallel-transported without rotation, aiming to incorporate electromagnetic fields via an additional geometric structure.^[3] Although Einstein's unification efforts did not succeed, the framework laid foundational ideas, later revived in the 1960s by Christian Møller and others who recognized its potential as an alternative to general relativity.^[2] By the 1970s, researchers like Kiyoshi Hayashi and Takahisa Shirafuji developed it further as a gauge theory of the translation group, emphasizing its gauge-theoretic structure akin to Yang-Mills theories for internal symmetries.^[2] In modern contexts, teleparallelism extends beyond TEGR to modified theories such as f(T) gravity, where the torsion scalar is replaced by a general function f(T), introducing new degrees of freedom that can address cosmological phenomena like dark energy and inflation without invoking exotic matter.^[2] These extensions maintain second-order field equations, avoiding higher-derivative issues common in some metric-based modifications, and have been applied to model late-time cosmic acceleration, bouncing cosmologies, and resolutions to tensions in observational data such as the Hubble constant discrepancy.^[2] Key advantages include a clearer definition of gravitational energy-momentum via the superpotential tensor and potential insights into quantum gravity, as the torsion-based geometry may simplify quantization compared to curvature formulations.^[1] Ongoing research explores its implications for black holes, gravitational waves, and astrophysical structures, positioning teleparallelism as a vibrant alternative paradigm in gravitational physics.^[2]

Historical Development

Einstein's Early Attempts

In the late 1920s, Albert Einstein sought to develop a unified field theory that would encompass both gravity and electromagnetism, leading him to propose the concept of distant parallelism, or Fernparallelismus, in 1928. This approach extended Riemannian geometry by introducing a tetrad field, consisting of four orthonormal vector fields (an orthonormal basis at each point of spacetime), to define a notion of absolute parallelism over finite distances. Unlike general relativity's local parallelism via the Levi-Civita connection, Einstein's framework employed a flat affine connection, allowing vectors at distant points to be compared directly without rotation, thereby providing additional degrees of freedom to incorporate electromagnetic effects. Einstein's initial formulation appeared in two notes published in June 1928 in the Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. In the first, he outlined the geometric structure, emphasizing the preservation of the metric while introducing parallelism. The second note proposed field equations derived from a variational principle, interpreting the antisymmetric part of the connection as related to the electromagnetic field. Over the following years, Einstein refined this in several papers: a 1929 note on the variational approach, another in January 1929 deriving equations from the parallelism condition, a March 1929 paper addressing compatibility issues, and a comprehensive 1930 article in Mathematische Annalen where he introduced the teleparallel condition explicitly. These works aimed to yield unified equations by treating the 16 components of the tetrad (compared to the 10 of the metric tensor) as dynamical variables for both gravitational and electromagnetic potentials. The teleparallel condition, central to this effort, is expressed as

e^a{}_\mu(x) \partial_\nu e_a{}^\lambda(x) = 0,

ensuring local flatness of the tangent space and a curvature-free connection.^[3] This endeavor was motivated by the limitations of earlier unification attempts, such as Theodor Kaluza's and Oskar Klein's five-dimensional theories, which Einstein revisited to exploit extra degrees of freedom without compactifying an extra dimension. However, by 1931, Einstein and his collaborator Walther Mayer acknowledged the approach's shortcomings, including the inability to derive unique field equations that naturally reproduced observed electromagnetic phenomena as a tensor-like entity, leading to its abandonment in favor of other unified field strategies.

Post-Einstein Formulations

Following Einstein's explorations, teleparallelism experienced a significant revival in the mid-20th century through independent efforts to formulate viable gravitational theories using tetrad fields and torsion. Christian Møller initiated this resurgence in the 1940s and 1950s, developing a tetrad-based framework for teleparallel gravity that emphasized conservation laws in general relativity.^[5] By assuming a connection with vanishing curvature, Møller's approach positioned torsion as the sole gravitational variable, allowing the geometry to encode gravitational effects without relying on spacetime curvature.^[5] Møller's investigations culminated in papers such as his 1958 work on energy localization and 1961 further remarks, where he explored the localization of energy-momentum in teleparallel geometry, providing a rigorous path to dynamics and addressing limitations in earlier attempts by focusing on energy-momentum conservation in a flat affine connection.^[6] Building on Møller's foundations, C. Pellegrini and J. Plebański provided the first Lagrangian formulation of teleparallel gravity in 1963, deriving field equations by varying a Lagrangian constructed from the torsion tensor, establishing a consistent teleparallel equivalent compatible with observational tests of general relativity. In the 1960s, K. Hayashi extended these ideas by framing teleparallelism within a gauge-theoretic context. In a 1967 collaboration with T. Nakano, they introduced an extended translation invariance, associating gauge fields with infinitesimal translations and laying groundwork for interpreting teleparallel gravity as a precursor to modern gauge theories of gravity.^[7] Building on this, Hayashi and T. Shirafuji advanced the formulation in the late 1960s and 1970s, developing a torsion-based action that incorporated a superpotential derived from the torsion tensor to ensure antisymmetry and gauge invariance. Their approach yielded field equations equivalent to those of general relativity while highlighting torsion's role in gravitational interactions.

Modern Gauge Interpretations

In the 1970s and 1980s, Friedrich W. Hehl, Peter von der Heyde, and Gary D. Kerlick advanced the gauge-theoretic formulation of teleparallelism by embedding it within the broader structure of Poincaré gauge theory, emphasizing the gauging of local translations as the fundamental mechanism for gravity.^[8] Their work established teleparallelism as a constrained version of this gauge approach, where the translational subgroup of the Poincaré group is gauged, leading to a geometry characterized by torsion but vanishing curvature.^[8] This reinterpretation bridged classical teleparallel ideas—building briefly on Christian Møller's earlier tetrad-based extensions of general relativity—with modern particle physics paradigms, treating the coframe (tetrad) as the translational gauge potential and torsion as its associated field strength.^[8] Central to this development is the concept of the "new translation gauge theory," in which gravity emerges directly from the local gauging of spacetime translations in a flat background, without invoking the full Lorentz group as dynamical.^[9] Here, the spin connection is interpreted as a purely inertial artifact, arising from the choice of reference frame rather than as a propagating degree of freedom, allowing the theory to recover general relativity in the torsionless limit for spinless matter.^[9] This framework highlights teleparallelism's potential for unification with gauge theories of the fundamental interactions, as the translational gauging aligns with the Yang-Mills structure used in the standard model.^[8] Subsequent contributions in the 1980s by Eric A. Lord and Milan Blagojević further refined the reduction of the full Poincaré gauge theory to its teleparallel limit. Lord's analysis of linearized Poincaré gauge theories demonstrated how the teleparallel sector isolates the massless graviton mode while suppressing higher-spin propagators through specific Lagrangian constraints. Blagojević, in exploring quadratic Lagrangians and Hamiltonian structures, showed that imposing the teleparallel condition—vanishing curvature—yields consistent field equations equivalent to Einstein's for torsion-free cases, while accommodating spin couplings via hypermomentum. These derivations underscored teleparallelism's viability as a gauge theory, with applications to cosmological models incorporating fermionic spin densities. A key distinction in these modern interpretations lies between "pure" teleparallelism, which employs a vanishing spin connection (Weitzenböck gauge) to enforce full translational invariance, and more general gauge-invariant versions that retain a non-vanishing but flat spin connection to ensure local Lorentz covariance.^[9] The pure form simplifies computations by fixing the gauge, yet the full version preserves the theory's diffeomorphism invariance and compatibility with spinning matter, avoiding inconsistencies in the presence of fermions.^[8] This duality has influenced subsequent extensions, emphasizing teleparallelism's flexibility in gauge-theoretic gravity.^[9]

Mathematical Foundations

Tetrad Formalism

In teleparallelism, the tetrad formalism provides the foundational framework for describing spacetime geometry through a set of orthonormal basis vectors, known as tetrads or vierbeins, denoted as e^a_\mu, where a labels the internal Lorentz index and \mu the spacetime coordinate index. These fields relate the curved spacetime metric g_{\mu\nu} to the flat Minkowski metric \eta_{ab} via the relation g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{ab} e^a_\mu e^b_\nu, ensuring that the tetrads encode the local geometry while maintaining Lorentz invariance in the tangent space.^[10] This construction allows for a decomposition of the gravitational field into rotational and translational components, central to the teleparallel approach. The tetrads satisfy orthogonality and completeness relations that guarantee their role as a complete basis for the tangent space: e_a^\mu e^a_\nu = \delta^\mu_\nu and e_a^\mu e^b_\mu = \delta_a^b, where e_a^\mu is the inverse tetrad field. These relations ensure that the tetrads form an orthonormal frame at each point, with the lowered index version e_a^\mu = \eta_{ab} g^{\mu\nu} e^b_\nu preserving the metric structure. Conceptually, the tetrads represent local inertial frames adapted to observers' worldlines, where the timelike tetrad component e^{(0)}_\mu aligns with the four-velocity, facilitating the interpretation of gravity in terms of inertial effects without curvature.^[10] A key feature of the tetrad formalism in teleparallelism is the imposition of the teleparallel condition, or absolute parallelism, which requires the covariant derivative of the tetrad to vanish: \nabla_\lambda e^a_\mu = 0. This condition enables the parallel transport of vectors over arbitrary distances using a global frame, contrasting with the path-dependent transport in standard general relativity and allowing for a flat affine connection compatible with the metric. Historically, Einstein introduced tetrads in 1928 as a bridge between the Riemannian metric structure and an affine connection, aiming to unify gravity and electromagnetism through this "distant parallelism" framework.^[11]^[10]

Connections and Torsion Tensor

In teleparallelism, the geometric structure is defined by the Weitzenböck connection, which is constructed from the tetrad fields and ensures a flat affine connection with vanishing curvature tensor R^\rho_{\sigma\mu\nu}(\Gamma) = 0. This connection is given by

\Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\nu} = e^\lambda_a \partial_\nu e^a_\mu,

where e^a_\mu are the tetrad components and e^\lambda_a their inverses, satisfying the orthogonality condition e^a_\mu e^\lambda_a = \delta^\lambda_\mu. The Weitzenböck connection is metric-compatible, preserving the metric tensor under parallel transport, \nabla_\rho g_{\mu\nu} = 0, but introduces torsion as the primary descriptor of gravitational effects rather than curvature.^[12] The torsion tensor arises as the antisymmetric part of the Weitzenböck connection and fully characterizes the geometry in teleparallel spacetimes,

T^\rho_{\mu\nu} = \Gamma^\rho_{\nu\mu} - \Gamma^\rho_{\mu\nu} = e^\rho_a \left( \partial_\mu e^a_\nu - \partial_\nu e^a_\mu \right).

This tensor is antisymmetric in its last two indices, T^\rho_{\mu\nu} = -T^\rho_{\nu\mu}, and in teleparallel frameworks, it encodes all gravitational information, with the connection's flatness implying that parallel transport along closed paths yields no holonomy from curvature. In standard teleparallel spacetimes, the torsion tensor can exhibit full antisymmetry under certain gauge choices, facilitating its role in dynamical equations.^[12] The contorsion tensor relates the Weitzenböck connection to the torsion-free Levi-Civita connection ^0\Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\nu} of general relativity,

K^\mu_{\nu\rho} = \frac{1}{2} \left( T_\nu{}^\mu{}_\rho + T_\rho{}^\mu{}_\nu - T^\mu_{\nu\rho} \right),

such that \Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\nu} = ^0\Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\nu} + K^\lambda_{\mu\nu}. This decomposition highlights how torsion modifies the standard geodesic structure, with the contorsion contributing to the deviation between teleparallel and metric formulations while maintaining equivalence in the dynamics of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity.^[12] The torsion tensor admits an irreducible decomposition under the Lorentz group into three parts: the vector (trace), axial (pseudovector), and tensor (traceless) components, each playing distinct roles in the gravitational dynamics. The vector part is defined by the torsion vector T^\rho = T^\mu{}_\mu{}^\rho, capturing the trace and contributing to scalar invariants like T_{\text{vec}} = T^\mu T_\mu, which influences energy-momentum conservation and frame-dependent effects. The axial part is given by the axial vector a^\rho = \frac{1}{6} \epsilon^{\rho\mu\nu\sigma} T_{\mu\nu\sigma}, a pseudovector that couples to spin densities and axial invariants T_{\text{axi}} = a^\mu a_\mu, relevant for parity-violating extensions and precession phenomena. The tensor part comprises the remaining traceless, antisymmetric components,

t_{\rho\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2} (T_{\rho\mu\nu} + T_{\mu\rho\nu}) + \frac{1}{6} (g_{\nu\rho} T_\mu + g_{\mu\nu} T_\rho) - \frac{1}{3} g_{\rho\mu} T_\nu,

encoding pure shear-like distortions and entering quadratic torsion actions to drive nonlinear field equations. These parts collectively determine the torsion scalar and ensure the theory's covariance under local Lorentz transformations.^[12]^[13]

Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity

Action and Field Equations

In the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR), the dynamics of gravity are formulated through a Lagrangian that depends on the torsion tensor rather than the curvature tensor, while maintaining dynamical equivalence to the Einstein-Hilbert action of general relativity. The core quantity is the torsion scalar T, which is constructed from contractions of the torsion tensor T^\rho_{\mu\nu}. This scalar is given by

T = \frac{1}{4} T^{\rho\mu\nu} T_{\rho\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{2} T^{\rho\mu\nu} T_{\nu\mu\rho} - T^\rho_{\ \mu\rho} T^{\nu\mu}_{\ \ \nu},

where the torsion tensor components arise from the Weitzenböck connection in the teleparallel geometry.^[2] To facilitate the construction of the action and field equations, the superpotential tensor S_\rho^{\mu\nu} is introduced, which encodes the antisymmetric properties of the torsion and relates to the contorsion tensor K^{\mu\nu}_\rho. The superpotential is defined as

S_\rho^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2} \left( K^{\mu\nu}_\rho + \delta^\mu_\rho T^\alpha_{\ \alpha\nu} - \delta^\nu_\rho T^\alpha_{\ \alpha\mu} \right),

with S_\rho^{\mu\nu} = -S_\rho^{\nu\mu}. This tensor plays a crucial role in the variation of the action, as it appears in the expressions for conserved currents and the gravitational energy-momentum pseudotensor in teleparallelism.^[2]^[1] The TEGR action is formulated in terms of the tetrad fields e^a_\mu, with the determinant e = \det(e^a_\mu) = \sqrt{-g}, where g is the metric determinant. The total action is

S = -\frac{1}{16\pi G} \int e \, T \, d^4x + S_\text{matter},

where G is Newton's gravitational constant and S_\text{matter} incorporates the standard Lagrangian for matter fields coupled to the metric and tetrads. This action is invariant under local Lorentz transformations and diffeomorphisms, reflecting the gauge structure of teleparallel gravity. The torsion scalar T serves as the gravitational Lagrangian density, replacing the Ricci scalar of general relativity.^[2]^[1] The field equations of TEGR are obtained by varying the action with respect to the tetrad fields e^a_\lambda, yielding second-order differential equations analogous to the Einstein field equations. The variation results in

$4\pi G \, \Sigma^a_\lambda = \frac{1}{4} e^a_\lambda \, T + e \, e^a_\mu \left[ \frac{1}{2} S^{\mu\nu\lambda} T^\rho_{\nu\rho} + \partial_\nu (e S^{\nu\mu\lambda}) / e - K^{\mu\nu}_\lambda T^\rho_{\nu\rho} \right],

where \Sigma^a_\lambda is the matter energy-momentum tensor derived from the variation of S_\text{matter}, and the terms involving S^{\mu\nu\lambda} and K^{\mu\nu}_\lambda arise from the torsion contributions. These equations describe how the torsion field responds to the distribution of matter and energy, providing a complete set of dynamics for the gravitational field in the teleparallel framework.^[2]^[1]

Equivalence to GR

The torsion scalar T in the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) admits a fundamental decomposition that establishes its dynamical equivalence to general relativity (GR): T = -R + B, where R denotes the Ricci scalar constructed from the Levi-Civita connection of the metric, and B = \frac{2}{e} \partial_\mu (e T^\sigma_{\ \sigma}{}^\mu) represents a total divergence term that qualifies as a boundary contribution upon integration over spacetime.^[10] This relation arises because the Weitzenböck connection, which defines the torsion in TEGR, differs from the Levi-Civita connection solely by a contorsion tensor, leading to the scalar T encoding the same geometric content as R modulo surface effects.^[14] The action principle in TEGR, given by S = -\frac{1}{2\kappa^2} \int T \, e \, d^4x (up to matter contributions), thus matches the Einstein-Hilbert action S = \frac{1}{2\kappa^2} \int R \, e \, d^4x up to a boundary integral -\frac{1}{2\kappa^2} \int B \, e \, d^4x, which vanishes under standard asymptotic conditions or compact manifolds without boundary.^[10] Variation with respect to the tetrad field therefore yields field equations identical to those of GR, confirming that TEGR reformulates gravity using torsion in place of curvature while preserving the theory's core structure and local Lorentz invariance.^[14] As a result, TEGR reproduces all predictions and exact solutions of GR, including black hole spacetimes like the Schwarzschild metric, which admits tetrad representations satisfying the TEGR equations equivalently to the metric formulation. In this framework, gravitational phenomena are encoded through the torsion tensor rather than spacetime curvature, offering an alternative geometric interpretation without altering physical outcomes. This equivalence is specific to the linear form of the torsion scalar in the action; nonlinear extensions, such as those depending on arbitrary functions of T, introduce deviations from GR dynamics.^[15]

Modified Teleparallel Theories

f(T) Gravity

f(T) gravity represents the simplest extension of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) by replacing the linear torsion scalar T in the action with an arbitrary differentiable function f(T), thereby introducing new gravitational dynamics while preserving the underlying torsion-based geometry. This modification arises naturally within the teleparallel framework, where the Weitzenböck connection defines torsion without curvature, and the theory reduces to TEGR in the limit f(T) = T. Proposed as a potential explanation for the observed late-time cosmic acceleration without invoking a cosmological constant, f(T) gravity has garnered attention for its ability to mimic dark energy effects through the functional form of f(T). The action for f(T) gravity is given by

S = \frac{1}{16\pi G} \int e \, f(T) \, d^4x + S_\text{matter},

where e = \det(e^a_\mu) is the determinant of the tetrad e^a_\mu, G is Newton's gravitational constant, and S_\text{matter} accounts for the matter sector. Varying this action with respect to the tetrad yields the field equations

e^{-1} \frac{\delta(e f)}{\delta e^a_\mu} = 8\pi G \, \Theta^a_\mu,

which in coordinate basis take the form

e^{-1} \partial_\mu (e S_\rho^{\mu\nu} f_T) + T^\lambda_{\mu\lambda} S_\rho^{\nu\mu} f_T + \frac{1}{4} f(T) \delta_\rho^\nu = 8\pi G \Theta_\rho^\nu,

where f_T = df/dT, S_\rho^{\mu\nu} is the superpotential involving the torsion tensor, and \Theta^a_\mu (or \Theta_\rho^\nu) is the matter energy-momentum contribution. These equations are second-order in the derivatives, contrasting with the fourth-order nature of analogous f(R) theories, which simplifies both analytical and numerical treatments.^[2] A notable feature of f(T) gravity is its maintenance of local Lorentz invariance when formulated with appropriate "good" tetrad-spin connection pairs, though some diagonal tetrad choices can introduce spurious extra degrees of freedom or invariance violations, necessitating careful selection in applications.^[2] The theory avoids Ostrogradsky instabilities due to its second-order structure and has been shown to propagate the same two gravitational wave modes as general relativity, without additional tensor perturbations. As a viable alternative to dark energy, f(T) models can reproduce the \LambdaCDM expansion history at late times while allowing deviations that address observational discrepancies, such as the effective dark energy density \rho_\text{DE} \propto -f/6 + T f'/3.^[2] Recent advancements in f(T) cosmologies have focused on resolving the Hubble constant (H_0) tension, the ~4-5\sigma discrepancy between early-universe CMB measurements (~67 km/s/Mpc from Planck) and late-universe supernova/cepheid observations (~73 km/s/Mpc from SH0ES). Parameterized f(T) forms, such as power-law or exponential models, when fitted to combined datasets including CMB, baryon acoustic oscillations, Pantheon supernovae, and cosmic chronometers, yield H_0 values bridging the gap (e.g., reducing tension to ~1.9\sigma) while maintaining consistency with other cosmological parameters. Bayesian machine learning analyses of these models further confirm their efficacy in fitting CMB power spectra and supernova luminosity distances, suggesting f(T) gravity as a torsion-driven resolution to the tension without fine-tuning.

Symmetric Teleparallel Extensions

Symmetric teleparallelism represents a geometric framework for gravity where the spacetime connection is flat in both curvature and torsion, such that the Riemann tensor and torsion tensor vanish identically, while gravitational effects arise solely from non-metricity. In this setup, the connection is symmetric and teleparallel, analogous to the Weitzenböck connection in torsion-based teleparallelism but with the roles reversed: non-metricity Q_{\rho\mu\nu} = \nabla_{\rho} g_{\mu\nu} encodes the gravitational interaction, measuring the failure of the covariant derivative to preserve the metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}. The non-metricity scalar Q is constructed as a quadratic invariant Q = Q_{\rho\mu\nu} P^{\rho\mu\nu}, where P^{\rho\mu\nu} is the non-metricity superpotential, defined as P^{\rho\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{4} \left( -Q^{\rho\mu\nu} + 2 Q^{(\mu|\rho|\nu)} - Q^{\rho} g^{\mu\nu} - \tilde{Q}^{\rho} g^{\mu\nu} + 2 Q^{(\mu} \delta^{\nu)\rho} \right) with traces Q^{\rho} = Q^{\rho\mu}{}_{\mu} and \tilde{Q}^{\rho} = Q^{\mu\rho}{}_{\mu}. The symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (STEGR) is formulated through the action S = \frac{1}{2} \int Q \, \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x, where the factor of 1/2 aligns with units where $8\pi G = 1, and this action is dynamically equivalent to the Einstein-Hilbert action up to a total divergence boundary term that does not affect the bulk field equations. The resulting field equations recover general relativity, confirming that non-metricity alone suffices to describe gravitational phenomena without invoking curvature or torsion. Extensions to modified symmetric teleparallel theories replace the linear Q in the action with an arbitrary function, yielding f(Q) gravity via S = \frac{1}{2} \int f(Q) \, \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x + S_m, where S_m is the matter action. Varying this action produces modified field equations f_Q \left( 2 \nabla_{\alpha} (\sqrt{-g} P^{\alpha\mu\nu}) - \sqrt{-g} (Q^{\alpha\mu\beta} P_{\alpha\beta}{}^{\nu} - Q^{\alpha\beta\mu} P_{\alpha\beta}{}^{\nu}) \right) + \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-g} g^{\mu\nu} (f - Q f_Q) = - \sqrt{-g} T^{\mu\nu}, alongside a constraint from connection variation, introducing extra degrees of freedom beyond those in general relativity and enabling deviations in gravitational dynamics. Recent applications of symmetric teleparallel extensions, particularly f(Q) models, have explored extradimensional braneworld scenarios to localize fermionic fields on the brane while incorporating modified gravity effects that contribute to cosmic acceleration without fine-tuning.^[16] Similarly, in warm inflation contexts, f(Q) gravity unifies early-universe inflation with late-time acceleration by driving dissipative energy transfer from the non-metricity sector to radiation, consistent with observational constraints on the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio.^[17]

Applications

Cosmological Implications

In teleparallel gravity, the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric for a flat universe yields a torsion scalar that evolves as T = -6 H^2, where H is the Hubble parameter representing the expansion rate of the universe.^[18] This relation arises from the tetrad formalism adapted to the homogeneous and isotropic cosmology, providing a torsion-based description equivalent to the curvature-driven expansion in general relativity.^[18] In modified teleparallel theories such as f(T) gravity, the Friedmann equations are altered to incorporate nonlinear dependence on the torsion scalar, with a key form given by $12 H^2 f_T + f = 16 \pi [G](/page/Gravitational_constant) \rho, where f(T) is the modified function, f_T = df/dT, G is the gravitational constant, and \rho is the matter-energy density.^[18] This modification introduces an effective torsion contribution that can drive accelerated expansion, mimicking dark energy behaviors such as phantom-like evolution—crossing the phantom divide w = -1 in the equation-of-state parameter—without introducing ghosts or singularities, unlike some scalar-tensor models.^[18] Recent advancements from 2023 to 2025 have explored how f(T) and symmetric teleparallel f(Q) models address observational tensions in cosmology. These theories alleviate the Hubble tension (H_0) by yielding higher values of the present-day Hubble constant consistent with local measurements (around 73 km/s/Mpc), while also mitigating the S_8 tension (related to matter clustering amplitude) through adjusted growth rates that align with weak lensing data. Specifically, f(Q) models fitting the latest Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillation data and Planck cosmic microwave background observations demonstrate improved consistency across datasets, reducing discrepancies by up to 2-3σ without invoking new particles.^[19] Similarly, nonminimally coupled f(T) extensions reconcile early- and late-universe probes by modifying the sound horizon and clustering parameters.^[20] A notable application involves coupling quintessence—a scalar field with a potential—to teleparallel gravity, facilitating late-time cosmic acceleration. In this framework, the nonminimal interaction between the scalar field and torsion leads to stable attractor solutions where the effective equation of state approaches w \approx -1, driving the observed expansion without fine-tuning, as demonstrated in dynamical system analyses of boundary-coupled models.^[21]

Non-Gravitational Contexts

Teleparallel structures find applications beyond gravitational theories, particularly in modeling defects within condensed matter systems such as crystals and elastic media. In the geometric theory of defects, developed by Katanaev and Volovich in the early 1990s, the torsion tensor is interpreted as representing translational defects known as dislocations, where the torsion vector directly corresponds to the Burgers vector quantifying the lattice mismatch around a defect line. This analogy arises because teleparallel spacetimes, characterized by vanishing curvature but non-zero torsion via the Weitzenböck connection, mimic the geometry of solids with pure dislocation distributions, without rotational defects (disclinations) that would introduce curvature.^[22] Such frameworks allow for the description of continuous defect densities, providing a unified geometric treatment of elastic deformations in materials.^[23] Extensions to metric-affine geometries, which include non-metricity alongside torsion, further enrich these analogies by associating the non-metricity tensor with dislocation and disclination densities in elastic media. Specifically, the non-metricity tensor Q_{\lambda\mu\nu} = \nabla_\lambda g_{\mu\nu} captures deviations from metric compatibility, analogous to metric anomalies induced by point defects or inhomogeneous strain distributions that lead to internal stresses without external loads.^[24] In symmetric teleparallel theories, where torsion vanishes and non-metricity drives the dynamics, this corresponds to modeling elastic media dominated by such defects, offering insights into material inhomogeneities like those in amorphous solids or biological tissues.^[24] In quantum field theory, teleparallel backgrounds enable the formulation of covariant derivatives using the Weitzenböck connection for both fermionic and bosonic fields, facilitating the study of matter quantization in torsionful spacetimes. For Dirac fermions, the spinorial covariant derivative incorporates the torsion contributions, ensuring local Lorentz invariance while differing from the Levi-Civita connection used in standard general relativity. Bosonic fields, such as scalars or vectors, similarly employ this connection, leading to one-loop renormalization analyses that reveal how torsion modifies quantum corrections without altering the classical equivalence to general relativity. These approaches highlight teleparallelism's utility in exploring quantum effects in non-Riemannian geometries relevant to condensed matter analogs. A recent development in 2024 reformulates continuum defects—dislocations and disclinations—within general teleparallel geometry using exterior algebra, extending symmetric teleparallel frameworks to simulate defect dynamics in material science. This approach integrates non-metricity and torsion to model complex elastic responses, potentially aiding simulations of defect propagation in crystalline materials under stress.^[25]