Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tire war

A tire war is a period of intense between tire manufacturers supplying a motorsports series. The Tire War was a period of fierce among tire manufacturers in NASCAR's Winston Series during the late 1980s and early 1990s, primarily between dominant supplier and challenger , which spurred technological advancements in tires but also raised significant safety issues due to tire failures and inconsistent performance. This rivalry emerged after decades of relative stability in NASCAR tire supply; Firestone had been the primary provider from the series' inception in 1948 until withdrawing in 1974, leaving Goodyear as the unchallenged sole supplier for over a decade. Hoosier entered the fray in 1988, offering bias-ply tires that provided quicker initial grip, allowing teams like those of Neil Bonnett and Morgan Shepherd to secure early wins and poles, such as Bonnett's victory at Rockingham and Shepherd's pole at Richmond. The competition intensified in 1989 when Goodyear introduced radial tires at the Daytona 500, aiming for greater speed and durability, though initial versions suffered failures that prompted manufacturer withdrawals and driver concerns. A pivotal moment came at the 1989 spring race at , where refined radials enabled to dominate, lapping Hoosier-shod cars like Rusty Wallace's and securing victory after over 100 green-flag laps, demonstrating the radials' superior endurance. exited the series mid-1989 amid struggles with tire durability and market share but returned in 1994 with its own radial tires, reigniting the war; however, this phase was marred by multiple high-profile accidents and fatalities, including that of driver , amid controversies over tire performance and softer compounds used by . By the end of 1994, withdrew permanently due to insufficient team adoption and competitive pressures, restoring 's . In 1997, it signed an exclusive deal that has been extended multiple times, including a multi-year agreement announced in 2022, keeping as the sole supplier as of 2025. The Tire War ultimately accelerated tire innovation, transitioning to radial technology still used today, but it highlighted the risks of open competition, with drivers decrying being treated as "guinea pigs" amid the rapid testing of unproven designs. Similar "tire wars" occurred in other series, such as the rivalry between Firestone and in racing, which drove performance gains at events like the but contributed to tire-related controversies and failures.

Overview

Definition and Characteristics

A tire war in motorsports refers to a period of intense among multiple tire manufacturers that supply tires to racing teams within the same series, where each supplier aims to develop superior products to gain an advantage in performance and market dominance. This typically arises when series regulations permit teams to select tires from different providers, fostering an environment of ongoing innovation and rivalry. Key characteristics of tire wars include an arms-race style development process, where manufacturers rapidly iterate on tire compounds, tread patterns, and internal constructions to enhance , speed, or . Teams often face strategic decisions in choosing between suppliers, balancing factors like outright speed for qualifying sessions against for sustained race performance, which can create significant disparities in lap times and overall competitiveness. Economic incentives drive this dynamic, as success on the track translates to broader brand prestige and sales in the , though it also heightens the risk of tire failures from aggressive, less-tested designs pushed to their limits. These wars introduce "tire choices" as a core strategic element, allowing teams to tailor setups and plans around specific characteristics, such as softer compounds for short bursts of pace versus harder ones for . However, the resulting variability and potential concerns from inconsistent behavior have often prompted regulatory shifts toward single-supplier models in contemporary series to ensure and reliability.

Historical Significance and Decline

Tire wars played a pivotal role in advancing by compelling manufacturers to innovate in rubber , incorporating materials like silica and to optimize grip and durability under extreme conditions. These competitions also integrated tire design more closely with and handling, enabling better and larger contact patches that enhanced overall . Furthermore, they elevated manufacturer prestige through high-profile sponsorships and brand visibility, while prompting governing bodies to refine regulations for equitable competition and enhanced safety standards. The benefits of tire wars were substantial, as the intense rivalry accelerated efforts that often translated to consumer products. For instance, advancements in construction and rubber formulations tested in improved street tire longevity and efficiency, with technologies like enhanced trickling down to everyday vehicles. On the track, they fostered greater unpredictability and strategic depth in races, as differing tire performances created varied pit strategies and closer competition among teams. However, tire wars carried notable drawbacks, including exorbitant costs for development and testing—potentially tripling expenses for manufacturers and teams due to the need for track-specific compounds and extensive validation. Safety risks arose from experimental tires prone to failures under high loads, occasionally leading to hazardous incidents that disrupted events. Additionally, supplier withdrawals could destabilize series, forcing abrupt rule changes and uneven access to optimal tires across teams. The decline of tire wars accelerated in the post-2000s era, driven by a shift toward single-supplier models to curb escalating costs and standardize safety protocols across championships. Economic pressures on manufacturers, coupled with regulatory mandates from bodies like the FIA, emphasized exclusivity to promote parity and reduce rubber waste, as seen in Formula One's adoption of a sole provider after 2006. Today, while limited competitions persist in lower-tier series, major leagues such as Formula One—where Pirelli has been the exclusive supplier since 2011—prioritize controlled tire parity over manufacturer rivalries to ensure fair and sustainable racing.

In NASCAR

Early History

Goodyear emerged as the primary tire supplier for in the 1960s, following its initial entry into the sport in 1954 with testing at . By the late 1960s, intense competition with Firestone culminated in high-profile events, such as the 1969 tire war at , where Goodyear's more durable tires enabled the race to proceed after drivers protested Firestone's failures. Firestone's withdrawal from racing tire production in 1974 left Goodyear as the unchallenged sole supplier, securing exclusive contracts that provided stability to the series but arguably stifled by eliminating competitive pressures. These arrangements ensured consistent tire performance across events, supporting 's expansion while teams relied uniformly on Goodyear's bias-ply designs. The regulatory environment in NASCAR during the late 1970s and early 1980s permitted open tire supply, allowing teams to source from any manufacturer, though Goodyear's dominance deterred significant challengers. Limited interest from other companies surfaced sporadically, reflecting the high in developing specialized oval-track s, but no major rival emerged to disrupt the . This period of fostered reliability in racing but highlighted a lack of diversity in , as teams had little incentive to experiment beyond Goodyear's offerings. NASCAR's rapid growth in the , fueled by increased television coverage and larger audiences, attracted new entrants eager to leverage the sport's visibility for marketing gains. , a specialist in oval-track tires with roots in Midwest short-track success since the , saw an opportunity to promote its brand through high-profile NASCAR participation. Motivated by the potential for oval-track victories to boost commercial exposure, positioned itself as a viable alternative to . Key precursors to full competition unfolded in 1987, when NASCAR rules continued to allow multiple suppliers, enabling to begin supplying tires in the . This entry prompted initial testing and experiments by teams in preparation for potential Winston Cup involvement, as some squads evaluated Hoosier's performance on ovals to assess advantages in grip and durability. These trials set the stage for broader rivalry, highlighting how the open regulatory framework and 's rising profile encouraged innovation through competition.

Goodyear vs. Hoosier (1988–1989)

In 1988, entered the Winston Cup Series as a challenger to 's long-standing , debuting with bias-ply tires that were softer and cheaper, providing superior initial grip and allowing underdog teams to achieve competitive speeds on shorter tracks. targeted smaller teams with aggressive pricing and performance advantages, securing early victories such as Bonnett's wins at Richmond International Raceway and North Carolina Speedway, where the tires enabled pole positions and broke 's streaks of 247 consecutive poles and 526 consecutive wins. In response, refined its compounds to emphasize durability, particularly for high-banked ovals, offering loyalty incentives to major teams while maintaining a focus on safety and longevity to counter 's speed-oriented approach. The rivalry intensified with safety concerns emerging from tire wear, as both brands' softer compounds led to frequent failures during high-stress races. At the 1988 TranSouth Financial 400 at , won on , but incidents like multiple blowouts at the in highlighted vulnerabilities, including a tire failure that caused Rudd's crash and a severe injury. tires proved particularly prone to issues on superspeedways; during the , teams using them experienced shortages and durability problems, though successes like Bill Elliott's victory at the Firecracker 400 in —after 's tires were disqualified for being 0.15 inches too wide—underscored the unpredictability. By mid-1988, approximately 20-30% of the field experimented with , often switching mid- for advantages, but the softer tires contributed to crashes and driver demands for intervention. Entering 1989, escalated by supplying more underdog outfits, yielding surprise wins like Darrell Waltrip's at the on Hoosier tires, but failures persisted on intermediate tracks. At and , Hoosier-equipped cars suffered multiple tire disintegrations, exacerbating safety risks and leading to race cautions, while debuted radial tires at the —though initially withdrawn due to testing issues—before succeeding with them at North Wilkesboro Speedway's First Union 400, where dominated for a pivotal victory. By mid-1989, around 30% of teams used Hoosiers, but the brand's limited resources strained supply amid escalating demands. NASCAR responded with heightened inspections and temporary bans on non-compliant tires from both manufacturers, such as disqualifying Goodyear's at and 's at for dimensional violations, aiming to enforce uniformity and mitigate risks from experimental compounds. These measures, combined with driver petitions for safer options, pressured , which withdrew from the series after the May 1989 Winston 500 at Talladega due to unsustainable costs and performance gaps. The 1988-1989 competition markedly increased race unpredictability, with securing nine victories in 1988 and two in 1989, often by underdogs, but retained over 70% through superior reliability and radial innovation, ultimately ending the war and restoring a single-supplier dynamic.

Goodyear vs. Hoosier (1994)

After a period of exclusivity for from 1990 to 1993, Racing Tire re-entered the Winston Cup Series in 1994, bringing improved designs aimed at competing more effectively while incorporating softer, more aggressive compounds to prioritize speed and grip. This return built on lessons from the earlier , with focusing on enhanced durability through radial construction to address past vulnerabilities. Early in the season, demonstrated strong performance, particularly at short tracks where the company's expertise originated; for instance, at the Goodwrench 200 in Rockingham, -equipped drivers and claimed the top two qualifying positions, shattering the Grand National track record with speeds of 148.257 mph and 147.802 mph, respectively. , driving for Team SABCO on tires, secured multiple poles and contributed to the supplier's early momentum, highlighting 's advantages in qualifying and short-track scenarios. As the season progressed, Hoosier's tires faced significant challenges with degradation and safety, exemplified by mid-season incidents at tracks like Darlington and Charlotte, where excess wear, blowouts, and cut tires became prevalent due to the aggressive compounds pushed by both suppliers in pursuit of speed. These issues prompted NASCAR interventions, including rules mandating that both Hoosier and Goodyear supply sufficient tires—up to 1,200 per race—to outfit the entire field if one supplier's product proved unsafe, thereby escalating costs and logistical demands. Hoosier emphasized short-track performance for competitive edges, securing 12 poles (half with record speeds) and three wins for Bodine at Pocono, Michigan, and North Wilkesboro, while approximately 20 teams occasionally used their tires, leading to divided pit strategies that complicated race dynamics. In response, Goodyear advocated for standardized tires to ensure parity and safety, lobbying against the ongoing competition that fragmented the field and heightened risks. The rivalry reached its climax in the late season amid mounting controversies over tire failures, including fatal practice crashes at Daytona involving Neil Bonnett and Rodney Orr, which, though cleared by investigation, amplified safety concerns and scrutiny on Hoosier's softer compounds. Further blowouts during the Hooters 500 at Atlanta, affecting Hoosier drivers like Bodine, Sacks, and Allen, underscored the unsustainable pressures, culminating in Hoosier's announcement of withdrawal on November 14, 1994, just after the season finale. The final races featured mixed supplier fields, with teams switching between Hoosier and Goodyear based on track conditions and strategy, but Hoosier's exit restored Goodyear's monopoly, driven by the smaller company's inability to sustain high production costs and limited team adoption despite competitive results.

Aftermath and Legacy

Following Hoosier's withdrawal from at the conclusion of the 1994 season, all competing teams reverted to tires for the campaign, effectively ending the multi-supplier era in the top series. , unable to sustain the financial and logistical demands of supplying a full field under 's rules, exited entirely and redirected its efforts to other motorsports, including serving as the exclusive provider for the ARCA Racing Series from to 2015. In 1997, formalized 's role as the official and sole supplier across its national series, a status that persisted for over two decades and provided operational stability after the chaotic competitions of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The wars underscored significant concerns, as both manufacturers pushed softer compounds for superior , resulting in frequent tire failures and multi-car incidents on ovals. In response, implemented stricter tire testing protocols, including on-site inspections and requirements for suppliers to provide sufficient stock for the entire field to mitigate risks from unproven products. These measures evolved into modern spec tire mandates, where uniform compounds and designs are enforced to prioritize reliability and prevent the kind of experimental failures seen during the rivalries, ultimately enhancing overall track . The competitions left a lasting legacy by accelerating advancements in oval-specific tire technology, particularly the widespread adoption of radial constructions that offered greater durability and consistent performance compared to bias-ply predecessors. This innovation wave bolstered Goodyear's market position, yielding substantial economic benefits through its unchallenged supply role until the agreement's extension in the 2020s. Serving as a cautionary example of the perils of unrestricted —including hazards and logistical strains—the era reinforced NASCAR's shift toward exclusive supplier contracts to maintain control and equity. On a broader scale, the tire wars cemented 's reputation as a venue for high-stakes manufacturer battles, fostering intense rivalries that captivated audiences with unpredictable outcomes and elevated racing drama. This period indirectly amplified fan interest by showcasing the sport's technical edge and competitive fervor, influencing subsequent regulatory philosophies across motorsports toward controlled innovation.

In Formula One

Early Multi-Supplier Competition (1950s–1980s)

In the and early , featured a diverse array of suppliers, with no single manufacturer dominating the field, allowing teams to select tires based on specific performance needs and partnerships. provided tires exclusively to Ferrari, contributing to their championship successes from 1952 to 1953, while supplied teams like and BRM, introducing the innovative R5 racing tire in 1958 that improved grip on varied track surfaces. Englebert equipped Maserati cars, and other suppliers such as Firestone and also participated, fostering an era of experimentation with bias-ply compounds suited to the era's road-biased courses for better handling on uneven surfaces. The mid-1960s marked an escalation in competition as American manufacturers entered the market, intensifying the multi-supplier dynamic. debuted in Formula One in 1965, supplying and teams, and achieved its first victory at the Mexican Grand Prix with Richie Ginther driving the RA272, demonstrating superior durability on high-speed circuits. Firestone followed in 1966, partnering with for the M2B car and focusing on development for the new 3.0-liter engine formula, which emphasized tire longevity during longer races. This period culminated in a brief but fierce three-way rivalry from 1969 to 1970 involving , , and Firestone, where aggressive development led to significantly faster lap times—often by several seconds per lap—but also introduced handling instabilities and safety concerns due to overly soft compounds that overheated under stress. By the 1970s, established dominance following Dunlop's withdrawal after the 1970 season, becoming the primary supplier to most teams and enabling consistent performance gains, such as Tyrrell's championship wins in 1971 and 1973 under . This near-monopoly persisted until 1977, when entered with radial slick tires, supplying Renault's turbocharged RS01 at its debut at the and securing the team's first victory in 1979 at the . The 1979–1981 rivalry between Goodyear's bias-ply tires and Michelin's radials proved pivotal for ground-effect aerodynamics, as the latter's superior lateral grip and heat resistance allowed teams like to excel, with the JS11 securing multiple wins including the 1979 season opener in . Michelin exited after the 1984 season. also re-entered in 1981, supplying teams such as and achieving several victories before withdrawing after 1991. Goodyear became the exclusive provider from 1992 to 1998, effectively ending the multi-supplier era.

Michelin vs. Bridgestone (2001–2006)

The tire war between and in began in 2001 when re-entered the series after a hiatus, challenging 's monopoly that had existed since Goodyear's withdrawal at the end of 1998. supplied Ferrari, , Sauber, Arrows, , and , while provided tires to Williams, , Benetton, Prost, and . This competition immediately spurred innovation and performance gains, with -shod Williams securing victory at the season-opening and further wins at , marking the French company's swift return to contention. The rivalry achieved a degree of in 2002 and 2003, though Bridgestone-backed Ferrari dominated the former year, with winning the Drivers' Championship and the team claiming the Constructors' title. In 2003, tires proved particularly strong in qualifying and on certain track surfaces, enabling teams like Williams and to secure multiple race victories, despite Ferrari retaining both championships through consistent reliability. regulations during this period allowed teams eight sets per race weekend, fostering strategic depth as suppliers tailored compounds to specific conditions like temperature and grip. By 2004, had adapted effectively, powering Ferrari to another double championship triumph amid escalating technological battles over sidewall stiffness and degradation rates. Tensions heightened in 2004 and 2005 as encountered durability challenges on high-downforce circuits, where stresses amplified performance disparities. The conflict peaked at the in , where tires suffered sidewall failures on the high-speed banked Turn 13, exacerbated by standing waves under load and speed. Following Ralf Schumacher's heavy crash in practice due to a , determined their compounds could not safely endure the corner without modifications, but the FIA rejected proposals for a citing track and fairness concerns. All 10 -equipped teams withdrew after the formation lap on safety grounds, leaving only six Bridgestone-shod cars—Ferrari, , and —to contest the race, which Ferrari won amid widespread controversy over FIA rulings and supplier inequities. These events strained relations between , the teams, and the FIA, highlighting political frictions in the tire war. In 2006, as a single-supplier mandate loomed for 2008, teams like excelled under revised rules permitting mid-race changes, with securing the Drivers' Championship and the Constructors' title. announced its withdrawal on December 14, 2005, citing dissatisfaction with the shift to a control formula, which undermined the competitive incentives of the war, and broader strategic misalignment with F1's direction. The departure concluded the era after the final race in , leaving as the sole supplier until 2010 and forcing teams to adapt strategies, such as McLaren's switch from , while incidents like the underscored the war's impact on race participation and governance.

In IndyCar

Firestone vs. Goodyear Origins (1964–1970)

Firestone had maintained a dominant supply position for tires at the Indianapolis 500, equipping every winning car from 1920 to 1963 and contributing to 44 consecutive victories at the Brickyard with their bias-ply designs optimized for the demanding oval conditions. This dominance stemmed from Firestone's early innovations in durable, high-grip compounds suited to the track's brick surface and high-speed banking, allowing teams to push lap times while minimizing failures under extreme heat and load. Goodyear disrupted this dominance with its debut at the , supplying tires for several entries during practice sessions using wider, lower-profile prototypes adapted from superspeedway technology to handle Indy's ovals. Although no Goodyear-shod cars raced that year— with securing victory on Firestones at a record average speed of 147.35 mph— the presence of the competitor signaled the start of intense rivalry, as Goodyear invested heavily to match Firestone's performance. By 1965, Goodyear expanded to 12 cars at Indy, including strong showings with six of the top 10 finishers, though Jim Clark's dominant Lotus-Ford win went to Firestone tires; this breakthrough forced Firestone to accelerate development of their own low-profile bias-ply tires for improved and grip. The rivalry intensified from 1966 to 1970, marked by alternating Indy 500 victories that highlighted each manufacturer's strengths: Firestone claimed wins in 1966 () and 1968–1969 ( and , respectively), while triumphed in 1967 () and 1970 (). These years saw mutual innovations in tire compounds and profiles, with both companies introducing smaller aspect ratios to reduce sidewall flex and enhance cornering stability on s, contributing to lap speeds exceeding 170 mph in qualifying. The competition divided teams, as Firestone-aligned squads focused on traditional oval dominance while Goodyear supporters experimented more on road courses within the USAC schedule, fostering diverse strategies. By 1970, the tire war's impacts were evident in elevated performance, exemplified by Al Unser's Indy 500 victory at an average race speed of 155.749 mph— the first to surpass 150 mph overall— driven by refined durability and grip that allowed sustained high speeds over 500 miles. This era's innovations not only boosted speeds but also pressured both manufacturers to prioritize safety features like reinforced inner liners amid rising stresses on the tires.

Peak Rivalry and Key Events (1971–1986)

The rivalry between Firestone and reached its zenith in the early 1970s, as both manufacturers vied for supremacy in racing through aggressive development and team sponsorships. Firestone claimed its last victory in 1971, with powering the Special to an emotional come-from-behind win after leading only the final two laps at an average speed of 157.735 mph. This success underscored Firestone's emphasis on durable tire compounds optimized for the endurance requirements of 500-mile races, allowing consistent performance over prolonged high-stress conditions. Goodyear countered forcefully by bolstering sponsorships, including a key partnership with , which propelled to victory in the aboard the Double Oil Filter Eagle-Offy. Qualifying speeds that year pushed the limits, with capturing at 198.413 mph on Goodyear tires, demonstrating the manufacturer's advantage in softer compounds that provided superior initial grip and speed for short, high-intensity sessions. From 1972 to 1978, Goodyear tires carried winners to seven straight Indy 500 triumphs— in 1972, in 1973, in 1974 and 1976, in 1975, in 1977, and in 1978—solidifying their technical edge in the evolving era of turbocharged engines and slicks. The escalating financial demands of the tire war, including massive R&D investments and exclusive team deals, forced Firestone to exit motorsports entirely after the 1974 season, leaving Goodyear as the unchallenged supplier to USAC events. However, the rivalry's repercussions lingered, contributing to broader industry strains that fueled the 1979 schism when prominent team owners formed (CART) to gain more control over scheduling and costs. Goodyear extended support to both the new CART series and the incumbent USAC, supplying tires for parallel championships and races, which deepened the divide by fragmenting driver lineups and track resources. In the , under 's monopoly, tire performance remained a critical factor in the bifurcated series, with notable challenges at high-banking ovals like . The 1982 exemplified these issues, as rough pavement and aggressive setups led to multiple tire failures, high attrition rates, and several severe crashes, prompting enhanced pre-race inspections and compound adjustments by engineers. Strategies shifted toward balancing durability for 500-mile endurance with the demands of turbo power, but incidents highlighted the ongoing risks of single-supplier dependency. The period from 1984–1986 saw mounting operational costs for , which occasionally withdrew specific tire variants from select events to mitigate failures and expenses. At the 1985 , Goodyear pulled radial tires following testing concerns and provided bias-ply alternatives instead, averting potential disasters but underscoring the financial toll of supporting dual series. Despite these pressures, Goodyear tires powered all Indy 500 winners through 1986, including Bobby Rahal's dominant 1986 triumph, maintaining their pivotal role until Firestone's return in the 1990s.

Innovations, Safety Issues, and Resolution

The tire war between Firestone and spurred significant technological advancements in radial slick tires during the and 1980s, with both manufacturers developing compounds that enhanced traction and durability for high-speed open-wheel racing. Radial construction, featuring cords arranged perpendicular to the direction of travel, allowed for greater flexibility and consistency compared to earlier bias-ply designs, enabling lap times to drop by up to 6 mph annually at tracks like . Firestone pioneered wider low-profile radials in the early , which Goodyear quickly matched, contributing to the adoption of slick treads devoid of grooves by the mid-1970s; these eliminated the need for hand-cut grooves previously used to manage debris but proved slower on clean surfaces. These tire innovations directly supported the evolution of ground-effect chassis in during the late 1970s and early 1980s, where underbody generated reliant on precise tire to maintain at speeds exceeding 200 mph. The superior lateral stiffness of radial slicks allowed teams to optimize setups for ground-effect cars like the 1980 Chaparral 2K, which used venturi tunnels to channel air beneath the chassis, amplifying the tires' role in cornering forces. Compound rivalries between Firestone and drove iterative improvements in rubber formulations, enabling qualifying speeds at the to surpass 210 mph for the first time in 1980, when averaged 210.029 mph on his pole run—a that highlighted the tires' contribution to overall vehicle performance gains of nearly 20 mph over the decade. Safety concerns escalated during the 1970s and 1980s due to frequent tire blowouts under the extreme loads of turbocharged engines and oval racing, often triggered by sidewall flexing or debris impact at speeds over 200 mph. Notable incidents included crashes at the , where mechanical and impact issues contributed to high-speed accidents, exacerbating a season marred by three fatalities in events associated with the Speedway ( in practice, in the race, and pit crew member Armando Teran). These issues stemmed from the aggressive compounds developed for speed, which prioritized grip over longevity, leading to rapid wear and structural vulnerabilities in the sidewalls. In response, by 1987, manufacturers implemented sidewall reinforcements using additional plies and thicker inner liners to distribute heat and stress more evenly, reducing blowout rates and improving overall tire integrity without sacrificing performance. Firestone's withdrawal after the 1974 season left as the sole supplier through 1994, providing stability but limiting competition. The tire war reignited in 1995 when Firestone returned to supply teams, leading to a split-supplier dynamic at the and other events. This late-1990s rivalry saw teams divided by tire preference, with Firestone offering better grip on road courses and excelling on ovals, but also sparking safety debates over inconsistent wear and failures. The competition contributed to the -IRL split's tensions, culminating in 's full withdrawal from in 1999 due to escalating costs from the sanctioning feud, restoring Firestone's exclusivity since 2000. The long-term effects of the tire war profoundly shaped modern regulations, with Firestone securing exclusivity in 2000 after outlasting in the late-1990s rivalry, a that continues today and emphasizes joint engineering for reliability. As of September 2024, Firestone signed a multi-year extension as 's sole supplier, continuing through at least 2030. Technologies like reinforced radials and heat-resistant compounds developed during the competition transferred to consumer products, influencing everyday designs for better wet traction and puncture resistance in passenger vehicles. This legacy underscored the value of controlled supplier dynamics, reducing incident rates and enabling consistent performance across the series.

In Other Series

CART and Champ Car Conflicts

Following the formation of (CART) in 1979 as a breakaway series from USAC, emerged as the dominant and effectively sole tire supplier for the new open-wheel championship, providing tires for all entrants through the 1980s and into the early 1990s without significant competition. This allowed to refine its technology tailored to CART's high-speed ovals and road courses, supporting consistent performance across the grid. Firestone, absent from major open-wheel racing since the mid-1970s amid the earlier USAC tire wars, re-entered the fray in 1995 under the ownership of Bridgestone, which provided technical backing to revive the brand's racing pedigree. By 1996, Firestone tires were adopted by leading CART teams, including Chip Ganassi Racing and Newman/Haas Racing, marking the onset of a heated rivalry that pressured Goodyear's long-held dominance. Firestone's compounds offered superior grip and durability on diverse track surfaces, enabling Jimmy Vasser to secure the 1996 CART drivers' championship and Alex Zanardi to claim back-to-back titles in 1997 and 1998, while Firestone-shod cars won 60 of 72 races between 1996 and 1999. In contrast, a shrinking number of Goodyear loyalists, such as Patrick Racing and some midfield outfits, persisted with the incumbent supplier until the end of the decade, highlighting tactical team choices in a supplier split that echoed the innovation-driven battles of prior IndyCar eras but focused on CART's evolving chassis and engine regulations. The rivalry peaked amid escalating costs and performance disparities, culminating in Goodyear's announcement in October 1999 to withdraw from (and the rival ) after the 1999 season, citing unsustainable development expenses in a fragmented open-wheel landscape. Firestone assumed exclusivity in 2000, but this shift coincided with broader scrutiny over reliability, exacerbated by the high-profile tread separation issues in Firestone's tires that year. In , these concerns manifested during crossover attempts at the IRL-sanctioned , where Firestone-equipped entries experienced multiple failures during 2000 qualifying, prompting investigations and temporary restrictions on usage. Tensions escalated in 2001 with the introduction of radial s optimized for 's 1.5-mile ovals, contributing to concerns and debates over under extreme loads, fueling discussions on supplier accountability amid the ongoing recall crisis. A similar debacle unfolded at Motor Speedway's Firehawk 600, where excessive G-forces from the radial tires—reaching 5.5Gs—led to a driver and race postponement, with Firestone facing blame for inadequate adaptation to the track's banking and 's aero packages. Bridgestone's formal entry as a branded supplier in 2000 offered a brief , testing alternative compounds for select events, but it ultimately reinforced Firestone's position as the tires were produced under the same corporate umbrella. By 2002–2003, federal probes into Firestone's manufacturing—linked to over 200 consumer fatalities—strained racing operations, resulting in reduced tire allocations and heightened safety protocols for teams. These investigations contributed to Firestone's temporary scaling back, though rebranded the supply in 2003 as restructured into the , securing exclusivity through 2007. This period of instability, marked by safety lapses and supplier consolidation, undermined Champ Car's financial viability, accelerating its 2008 merger with the and ending the open-wheel schism that had amplified tire competition's role in series divergence.

Sports Car and International Examples

In sports car racing, the IMSA GT Championship during the 1980s and 1990s featured multi-supplier competition, allowing teams to select tires from manufacturers like , , and for prototype and GT vehicles, which spurred advancements in grip and handling tailored to American endurance events. At the 24 Hours in the 1980s, tire manufacturers engaged in fierce rivalry, with achieving dominance from 1977 to 1987 by powering Porsche's prototypes to 10 overall victories, briefly interrupted by 's success with the Rondeau in 1980. reentered the fray in the late 1980s through its partnership with the Sauber-Mercedes team, securing a breakthrough win in 1989 despite challenges like tire bursts from ground-effect , leading to a three-way contest among , , and that lasted until 1999. Internationally, Japan's series exemplified tire wars from the mid-1990s into the 2010s, where , , , and supplied competing GT500 teams, promoting balanced performance and strategic tire management in high-stakes sprint-endurance races. In the during the 1980s and 1990s, multiple suppliers including — which claimed titles through its ADVAN tires—and supported diverse manufacturer entries, contributing to the era's intense battles. Endurance-focused series like prioritized tire durability and heat resistance over outright speed, as compounds needed to withstand 24-hour demands without excessive degradation, influencing designs that balanced longevity with competitive lap times. A notable incident occurred at the 1999 , where Toyota's GT-One prototypes suffered repeated tire punctures—attributed to debris and high loads—eliminating both cars and igniting discussions on tire integrity versus track safety. In Asian markets, such as , economic incentives drove aggressive investment by domestic firms like and to capture consumer visibility through racing success. Today, escalating costs have prompted a shift toward exclusive deals, with serving as the sole tire supplier for ' top prototypes since 2001, though limited multi-supplier scenarios persist in GT classes for added competition.

References

  1. [1]
    How the 'tire war' was won - at North Wilkesboro - NASCAR.com
    Sep 29, 2016 · The tire war eventually ended – Hoosier pulled out of the sport in mid-1989, returned for the '94 season with its own radial tire, but ...
  2. [2]
    Goodyear vs. Hoosier: Remembering the NASCAR Tire Wars
    Feb 17, 2021 · So, there was certainly a lot going on, but who actually won the tire war? Let's look at a breakdown of how everything played out. Following ...
  3. [3]
    Firestone signs multi-year extension as IndyCar's sole tire supplier
    Sep 12, 2024 · ... tire war in NASCAR are always what people cite when arguing against tire competition. What they forget is how great the Firestone vs. Goodyear ...
  4. [4]
    Why tyre wars are largely a thing of the past in motorsport
    Oct 10, 2023 · "When you have a tyre war, you're doing both car set-up and tyre development and the car set-up gets hampered. You're too busy keeping the car ...
  5. [5]
    Insight: SUPER GT's Tire War Under Threat - by Jamie Klein
    Jan 11, 2024 · The number of top-level championships in worldwide motorsport that still feature a tire war can virtually be counted on one hand.
  6. [6]
    The Evolution Of Tire Technology In Motorsports - Motorz.ca
    Sep 22, 2025 · The late 20th and early 21st centuries were defined by intense tire wars, particularly in Formula 1 and Tire Technology in Motorsports. Tire ...The Early Days: Crude Rubber... · The Birth Of The Racing Tire · The Modern Era: Tire Wars...
  7. [7]
    Why we should restart a F1 Tire War
    Rating 5.0 (1) Aug 21, 2023 · The tire war has been a prominent feature in Formula 1 history, contributing to some of the sport's most exciting and competitive seasons. The ...Restarting F1 Tire War · Weighing The Pros And Cons · F1 Tire War: The Path...
  8. [8]
    The Great Acceleration: How the Horsepower Wars Changed Tires
    The Pattern Repeats. Recent decades have seen dynamic leaps forward in tire technology, especially in the manufacturing techniques and rubber compounding areas.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  9. [9]
    Why F1 won't go back to having a tyre war - RaceFans
    Sep 23, 2018 · According to Pirelli motorsport director Mario Isola, costs are a strong argument against allowing competition between tyre suppliers. At ...
  10. [10]
    The beginner's guide to F1 tyres | Formula 1®
    Tyres are the only parts of a Formula 1 car that actually touch the racetrack and, as such, serve as a crucial reference point for drivers.
  11. [11]
    The Complete History of Goodyear Tires in NASCAR
    Apr 12, 2024 · Goodyear became the sole tire supplier in 1997. Since then, Goodyear has provided some much-needed stability to the sport. No tire war has happened since.
  12. [12]
    NASCAR True Tire History - RacelineCentral.com
    Goodyear remains the sole supplier until 1987, when a company from Indiana, Hoosier, starts supplying racing tires, first in the NASCAR Busch Grand National ...
  13. [13]
    Goodyear Celebrates 60th Anniversary Supplying Tires to NASCAR
    Feb 13, 2014 · Goodyear's dedication to tire performance led to purpose-built treaded bias race tires in 1957, to slick bias race tires in 1974, to the first ...Missing: dominance | Show results with:dominance
  14. [14]
    About - Hoosier Racing Tires
    Never one to rest on his laurels, Bob led the Hoosier Tire Team into the NASCAR Winston Cup Series in 1988. In the first year at the highest level of American ...
  15. [15]
    Tire Wars, Innovation Highlight Goodyear's Relationship with NASCAR
    Jan 15, 2018 · The company has been the sole tire supplier for the sport since 1997. There may never be another tire provider for NASCAR (more on that later), ...
  16. [16]
    NASCAR's Infamous 'Tire War' Witness & Pioneer Overwhelms Fans ...
    Nov 29, 2024 · During the 1988 season, teams learned that Hoosier tires were softer and faster, while Goodyears were more durable and safer. So the latter ...
  17. [17]
    Waid's World: Competition Was Hot, Heavy & Dangerous in 1988 ...
    Feb 20, 2023 · For both manufacturers, the strategy seemed simple: Prepare the superior tire for each race and thereby fill its roster with as many Cup teams ...Missing: debut | Show results with:debut
  18. [18]
    Auto Racing Notebook - UPI Archives
    Jul 23, 1988 · The Hoosier tires quickly became popular when Neil Bonnett won two races on them early in the year, and the standard procedure now is for ...
  19. [19]
    Waid's World: Tire Wars Escalate & The Casualties Begin to Mount
    Feb 27, 2023 · When the Tire Wars between Hoosier Tire Co. and the giant Goodyear began in earnest with the start of the 1988 NASCAR Cup Series season, the ...
  20. [20]
    NASCAR In 1988 — The 75 Years Edition - SPEED SPORT
    Jun 23, 2023 · Elliott won the race on Hoosier Tires after Goodyear was forced to sit out the race because its tires were .15 inches too wide. Ken Schrader ...Missing: blowouts | Show results with:blowouts
  21. [21]
    NASCAR'S TIRE WARS REKINDLED AT ROCKINGHAM - Daily Press
    Mar 5, 1989 · ... Hoosier battled Goodyear on even terms through half the Winston Cup season. Each company had illegal tires banned (Goodyear from Pocono, Hoosier ...
  22. [22]
    Recalling Goodyear's first radial win at North Wilkesboro | NASCAR
    May 20, 2023 · Dale Earnhardt's North Wilkesboro victory in April 1989 signaled a halt to the tire wars, marking Goodyear's first Cup Series win on ...
  23. [23]
    HOOSIER WITHDRAWS FROM NASCAR RACING - Daily Press
    May 10, 1989 · Bob Newton has waved the white flag and retreated from the NASCAR tire war that erupted in February of 1988. Newton, president of the small, ...
  24. [24]
    The Biggest Battle in NASCAR Wasn't Between Drivers
    Sep 11, 2014 · Long before Goodyear was known as the “official tire of NASCAR,” teams found their own tires to bring to the track each weekend. Goodyear ...Missing: suppliers dominance pre-
  25. [25]
    AUTO RACING; New Rivalry Erupts for the Stock-Car Season
    Feb 13, 1994 · The teams that do buy tires may now have to buy extra sets to hedge their bets on whether Goodyear or Hoosier will be faster at a particular ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    HOOSIER HITS A HOME RUN AT ROCKINGHAM
    Time trials at North Carolina Motor Speedway became a sweep for Hoosier Tire drivers Friday when Robert Pressley, mimicking Geoff Bodine's record run in ...
  27. [27]
    Tire Wars in NASCAR: The Goodyear-Hoosier Controversy
    Dec 27, 2023 · Just during Hoosier's final season in 1994, Bodine was able to rack up 12 pole positions along with multiple wins but the overwhelming financial ...
  28. [28]
    HOOSIER TIRE WITHDRAWS - The Washington Post
    Nov 14, 1994 · Both companies were consistently developing new, faster tires, but blowouts, cut tires and excess tire wear also became more common as the war ...Missing: Darlington degradation
  29. [29]
    NASCAR TIRE WAR ENDS AS HOOSIER PULLS OUT
    NASCAR TIRE WAR ENDS AS HOOSIER PULLS OUT. Throughout the 1994 Winston Cup season, fans and competitors alike wondered how the Hoosier Racing Tire company ...
  30. [30]
    HOOSIER FLATTENS UNDER PRESSURE - Daily Press
    Nov 15, 1994 · Hoosier won 12 poles, half with record speeds. Bodine won on them at Pocono, Pa., in July, at Brooklyn, Mich., in August and at North Wilkesboro ...
  31. [31]
    HOOSIER RACING TIRE BOWS OUT OF NASCAR - Orlando Sentinel
    Nov 15, 1994 · Hoosier, which first tried to challenge Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. in a 38-race stretch in 1988-89, was plagued by problems in its latest stint ...Missing: failures 1989
  32. [32]
    The History of Formula One Tyres - EssentiallySports
    Jan 4, 2019 · From its inaugural season in 1950 until the 1960 season, F1 tyres were manufactured by 5-6 companies, Pirelli, Firestone, Dunlop, Englebert, ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  33. [33]
    Formula One Tyres | 1950 - 1980
    Apr 3, 2018 · Formula One tyres are currently supplied by premium tyre manufacturer Pirelli. Pirelli have been the sole supplier of Formula One tyres ...
  34. [34]
    Formula 1 tyres – cars' shoes - Scuderia Ferrari Club Riga
    During the 1950s and 1960s, Formula One tyres were supplied by Dunlop, Firestone, Continental and Goodyear. In 1958, Dunlop introduced its R5 racing tyre ...
  35. [35]
    History of Formula One Goodyear Dunlop Tyres UK
    In the period from 1958 to 1965 Dunlop took the forefront and even became one of the suppliers of the king of motorsports. At that time the wheels became bigger ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  36. [36]
    From F1 domination to Le Mans wins - Newsroom Goodyear EMEA
    May 10, 2023 · 1965 Goodyear enters Formula 1, winning the Mexican GP with Richie Ginther and Honda. 1965 Goodyear's first Le Mans win, with Ferrari. 1965 ...Missing: Lotus | Show results with:Lotus
  37. [37]
    1966 Formula One - Sportscars.tv
    McLAREN RACING Engine: McLaren-Ford V-8 Est. HP: 350 Designer: Robin Herd Tires: Firestone Team Manager: Ted Mayer. Bruce McLaren,. McLAREN RACING Engine ...
  38. [38]
    F1's tyre wars - RaceFans
    Apr 22, 2010 · Goodyear became F1's most successful tyre supplier in 1976. Tyre ... Late in 2003 a change in the tyre rules forced Michelin to change their tyre ...Missing: 1970s 1980s
  39. [39]
    The history of tyres - TNF's Archive - The Autosport Forums
    It all started with a company called M&H who made tires for drag racing. They were first used in about 1958 and by 1961 had most of the bugs worked out.Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  40. [40]
    Michelin Stars — How a French Automotive Giant Revolutionised F1 ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · A French automotive giant revolutionised F1 and ignited the first Great Tyre War. George Wright (@F1Buff)
  41. [41]
    Michelin's first Formula 1 world titles
    Oct 17, 2019 · Despite suffering a variety of setbacks in the wake of its F1 debut at Silverstone in 1977, the turbo-engined Renault R10 harvested its first ...
  42. [42]
    Tire war controversy brews up as Michelin flexes its muscles
    Jan 23, 2001 · Since 1998, when Goodyear bowed off the scene, the F1 business has enjoyed Bridgestone's tire supply monopoly. This ensured that everybody ...
  43. [43]
    Pirelli v Bridgestone: Why F1 won't have another tyre war - PlanetF1
    Aug 6, 2023 · From 2001 to 2006 they were locked in a tense battle for supremacy with Michelin, and before that, they disrupted Goodyear's Formula 1 dominance ...
  44. [44]
    The 2005 US GP farce: The full inside story - Motorsport.com
    So an hour or so after FP2 it became obvious that there was an issue with the tyre. Michelin called a meeting, and they said we've got to work overnight to ...
  45. [45]
    Michelin: exit won't affect performance - Autosport
    Michelin announced it will quit Formula One at the end of 2006 because it was unhappy about the move to a single tyre supplier in the sport in 2008. Shorrock ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    When Goodyear and Firestone went to war at the Indianapolis 500
    Apr 9, 2017 · The first skirmishes in the tire war broke out in 1963, with the Lotus and Thompson teams in the center of the fight.
  47. [47]
    1960s Tire Wars - First Super Speedway
    By 1964, Goodyear Tire & Rubber was tired of Firestone's domination of the Indianapolis 500. The last time Goodyear won was in 1919. In subsequent years, they ...Missing: debut radial prototypes
  48. [48]
    Firestone's winning Indianapolis 500 history parallels that of ...
    May 25, 2016 · Verizon IndyCar Series tire supplier Firestone competed in the first Indianapolis 500 in 1911 and will be there for the 100th on May 29.Missing: 1934-1963 | Show results with:1934-1963
  49. [49]
    Goodyear vs Firestone Tires - G reat Rivalries - MotorTrend
    Aug 28, 2009 · Goodyear won Le Mans in 1965, the F1 world championship in 1966, and, finally, the Indy 500 in 1967 - with none other than Foyt behind the ...Missing: 1966-1970 alternating
  50. [50]
    The 1964 Indy 500 Tire Wars, part 1: Four become three - Hemmings
    May 7, 2017 · A softer tire with deeper tread may allow for faster laps, but the tires also wear out quicker as they rub against the track surface in the ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    The Evolution of Tires at Indy - Road & Track
    Jun 6, 2013 · An informal analysis of tire technology at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum provides a look at 100+ years of evolution in state of the art race cars.<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Firestone vs Goodyear: The 20-year Tire War - LinkedIn
    Feb 25, 2025 · Brand competition is nothing new in organized sports, but this tire war was particularly cutthroat because one company disrupted the other's ...
  53. [53]
    Parnelli: Unser-Bignotti Pairing Helped Johnny Lightning Special ...
    May 8, 2020 · Unser was the fastest in practice during the month at 171.233 mph, won the pole with a four-lap average speed of 170.221 and led 190 laps en ...
  54. [54]
    Indianapolis Motor Speedway, 30 May 1970 « Indy Car
    Unser dominated the 1970 Indy 500 ... The Eagle was tested on 9 May but ran 4 mph off the pace of Al Unser's Colt and a little slower even than the Gerhardt.
  55. [55]
    Gaining Speed: A History of the Indy 500 Racing Tire
    May 24, 2019 · The story starts in 1911, with the first tires to win the Indy 500, 4.5-inch-wide Firestone tires with just 2.5 inches of actual tread hitting the road when ...Missing: 1966-1970 | Show results with:1966-1970
  56. [56]
    Indianapolis 500 Race Winners
    Indianapolis 500 Race Winners ; 1960, 2, 4, Jim Rathmann, Ken-Paul/Watson/Offy ; 1961, 7, 1, A.J. Foyt, Bowes Seal Fast/Bignotti Trevis/Offy ...All-Time Race Records · Margin Of Victory · Fastest Race Lap
  57. [57]
    U.E. Pat Patrick - Motorsports Hall of Fame
    His teams won three Indy 500s and two IndyCar titles. Patrick began as a sponsor in 1967. By 1970 he was a partner in a team and by 1973 owned his own operation ...Missing: Goodyear | Show results with:Goodyear
  58. [58]
    Former CART Boss Says Without IRL/CART Split, IndyCar Would Be ...
    May 27, 2021 · Andrew Craig was CART's top executive during the CART/IRL split 25 years ago. CART officials and team owners balked at George's insistence.
  59. [59]
    Video: The Wild Story of the 1979 USAC-CART Split
    Jul 5, 2019 · In 1979, Indy Car racing split into two separate series: USAC and CART. Struggling to find tracks, USAC scheduled a race at Talladega for August ...
  60. [60]
    MICHIGAN 500 IS POSTPONED - The New York Times
    Jul 21, 1985 · Goodyear officials said they would withdraw the radial tires and provide bias-ply tires like those used in the two 1984 Michigan Indy-car races.Missing: IndyCar 1980s
  61. [61]
    Insider Knowledge: A look at the tires used on the IndyCar circuit
    Mar 12, 2016 · Each Indy team will go through approximately 200 sets of tires: 52 for road courses (primary and alternate compound), 60 sets for street courses, 36 sets at ...
  62. [62]
    Year-by-Year Indy 500 Race Recaps: 1980s
    May 27, 2020 · Sneva obliterated the qualifying records by steadily improving from 209.113 mph on his first lap all the way up to 210.029 mph. He broke five ...Missing: 210 | Show results with:210
  63. [63]
    Indy at 100: Fatalities mar the '70s - ESPN
    May 25, 2016 · The final piece of the puzzle was the tire war waging between Goodyear and Firestone that ultimately produced treadless slick racing tires.
  64. [64]
    Auto Racing Has Its Tires Deflated as Firestone Withdraws From ...
    Aug 18, 1974 · Firestone's decision was and is much more serious. It is symptomatic of a condition in racing. If Firestone goes today, there is no assurance ...
  65. [65]
    Goodyear Ends Indy Relations - CBS News
    Oct 26, 1999 · Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. quit Indy-car racing Tuesday, blaming the costly feud between the Indy Racing League and Championship Auto Racing Teams.Missing: vs USAC rivalry 1971-1986
  66. [66]
    Firestone: the tire that Indianapolis 500 and Verizon IndyCar Series ...
    May 28, 2016 · Goodyear has won 29 races, BFGoodrich won two, Michelin won one and Palmer Cord Tires won one. * The first winner on Firestone rubber was also ...Missing: 1966-1970 alternating
  67. [67]
    Don't Mess With The Firestone Partnership - Oilpressure
    Feb 23, 2018 · ... Firestone ran Goodyear out of both series – CART and the IRL. As I recall, there were no real disasters in the IndyCar tire war of the nineties.Missing: 1971-1986 | Show results with:1971-1986
  68. [68]
    Goodyear Tires of Indy-Car Feud - Los Angeles Times
    Oct 27, 1999 · Firestone, after being out of Indy car racing for 20 years, returned in 1995 and almost immediately made inroads into what had been a Goodyear ...<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Ganassi dynasty kick-started 20 years ago today at Homestead
    Mar 3, 2016 · ... Firestone, won the next 30 of 62 starts and swept four CART championships beginning with Vasser in 1996, Alex Zanardi in 1997 and 1998, and ...
  70. [70]
    Remembering tire manufacturers war in IRL and CART pre-2000
    Nov 22, 2022 · As Goodyear elected to focus on NASCAR and NHRA from 2000 onwards, CART and IRL began adopted single tire manufacturer partner and supplier that time.
  71. [71]
    Inside CART's 2001 Texas debacle: The invisible monster - RACER
    May 1, 2021 · Mauricio Gugelmin's "three-quarter-miler" crash and drivers privately confiding within each other on the forces that were affecting their bodies.
  72. [72]
    Inside CART's 2001 Texas debacle: The lead-up - RACER
    Apr 30, 2021 · A number of errors in CART's approach to preparing itself for TMS followed. CART's call on TMS's viability was based on a single-car test ...
  73. [73]
    60th anniversary website | Bridgestone Motorsport
    Tire supply from 1995 to 2007 to the CART/Champ Car World Series by Bridgestone and Firestone brand ... Started supporting two teams active on a full-entry basis ...
  74. [74]
    Goodyear Tire Fatalities Echo Firestone's Troubles
    Oct 25, 2000 · The Goodyear tire failures are the latest example of how deadly crashes caused by tread separations have transcended the Firestone-Ford Explorer ...Missing: rivalry | Show results with:rivalry
  75. [75]
    CART moves from Firestone to Bridgestone name; tires largely ...
    Nov 4, 2001 · Bridgestone Corp. will provide tires for CART beginning in 2002, but the change is largely a matter of names. Bridgestone's U.S. subsidiary ...
  76. [76]
    rpm.espn.com: Bridgestone good news for CART
    Nov 2, 2002 · CART cars will be exclusively powered by turbocharged Cosworth engines in 2003 ... The three-time CART champion's 2003 plans for CART ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    #019 Nissan Group C & IMSA GTP – ModelM43
    Bridgestone tires. Weight 940 kg. Aluminum ... Dunlop tires. Weight 920 kg. Aluminum monocoque ... Goodyear tires. Weight 900 kg. Aluminium monocoque ...
  78. [78]
    24 Hours Centenary – Michelin and Dunlop's monopoly
    Apr 7, 2023 · Audi chose Michelin in 1999 as tyre supplier for its participation in endurance races and the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Together, they claimed ...
  79. [79]
    ADVAN / HISTORY / 1981-1990
    ADVAN GLOBA, a high-performance radial tire, is launched. Starts to supply tires for FJ-1600 for the second time. Wins a title in the European Touring Car ...
  80. [80]
    Pirelli's History
    Oct 4, 2017 · The origin of Pirelli dates back to 1872, the year Giovanni Battista Pirelli founded a limited partnership, "GB Pirelli & C.", in Milan to produce elastic ...
  81. [81]
    The ill-starred Toyota that was quick but struck out at Le Mans
    Nov 5, 2022 · Toyota's GT-One was described as “the ultimate fast failure”, but such was its impact on Vincenzo Sospiri that he picks it as his favourite car.
  82. [82]
    How the spirit of Formula 1's tyre war lives on in Super GT
    Oct 22, 2020 · It's been almost 15 years since Formula 1 last had tyre competition, but the spirit of the famous 2000s battle between Bridgestone and Michelin lives on to ...Missing: history | Show results with:history