Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Contact patch

The contact patch is the area of real contact between two bodies under load, such as a 's tread and the road surface or a and a , forming a dynamic essential for performance in vehicles and machinery. In pneumatic s, this patch is often roughly the size of an adult's hand and typically rectangular or oval in shape depending on conditions, transmitting longitudinal, lateral, and vertical forces between the tire and to enable traction, , braking, and . In terms, the contact patch arises from the deformation of the contacting surfaces under , influenced by factors such as inflation (for pneumatic tires), vertical load, and material properties and geometry. For instance, underinflation increases the patch's width but reduces due to excessive sidewall flex, while overinflation narrows it, potentially compromising ; optimal ensures even distribution for maximum contact area. The patch's shape and size also vary with motion—expanding during braking or cornering—and are modeled using theories like Hertzian contact for non-conformal surfaces, where it approximates an under low loads and becomes more rectangular at higher ones. The contact patch's characteristics directly impact vehicle safety and handling, as inadequate traction here can lead to reduced on wet, dry, or uneven surfaces. Tread , including siping and , further optimizes the patch for specific conditions, such as all-season versatility or high-performance , underscoring its role in modern . Proper , like regular checks and alignments, preserves the patch's effectiveness, preventing uneven and enhancing overall stability.

Fundamentals

Definition and Formation

The contact patch refers to the area of actual physical contact between a , , or and the supporting surface, serving as the critical for load transmission and interaction. In the context of pneumatic tires, this patch typically assumes an elliptical shape when the wheel is stationary, transitioning to more rectangular or trapezoidal forms under dynamic conditions or modeling approximations. For railroad wheels, the contact patch is significantly smaller, often comparable to the size of a due to the rigid materials involved. The formation of the occurs through the deformation of the or material under vertical load, where the compliant structure compresses against the surface to distribute the vehicle's weight. This process is primarily governed by the elasticity of the materials, with Hertzian contact theory offering an initial approximation for predicting the geometry and stress distribution in the for elastic bodies like rubber and road surfaces. The theory, developed by in 1881, assumes small deformations and no , providing a foundational model for understanding how curved surfaces conform under load to create the patch. For a typical passenger car tire under standard load conditions, the contact patch measures approximately 15-20 cm in length (along the rolling direction) and 10-15 cm in width, yielding an area of around 200-250 cm² per tire. These dimensions vary with load but establish the scale of the interface responsible for traction. The study of the contact patch emerged in the early alongside the widespread adoption of pneumatic tires, following John Boyd Dunlop's 1888 patent for an air-filled that revolutionized road vehicle mobility.

Physical Principles

The physical principles governing the contact patch arise from , particularly Hertzian theory for non-conforming surfaces such as wheel-on-rail interfaces. In these systems, the contact area forms an under elastic deformation, with the maximum at the center given by \sigma_{\max} = \frac{3P}{2\pi ab}, where P is the normal load, and a and b are the semi-axes of the elliptical contact patch. This can be approximated as proportional to \frac{P}{\text{area}}, specifically \sigma_{\max} = \frac{3}{2} \frac{P}{\text{area}} for elliptical contact under Hertzian assumptions, with the semi-axes scaling as a, b \propto P^{1/3}. For pneumatic tires, the pressure distribution within the contact patch is non-uniform due to the viscoelastic nature of the rubber and sidewall flexibility, with peak pressures occurring at the leading and trailing edges from and deformation. The average contact pressure for passenger car tires typically ranges from 200-300 kPa under standard loads, approximating the tire's inflation pressure while accounting for tread voids and geometric variations. This distribution influences load-bearing capacity, as higher edge pressures can exceed 1.5 times the average in static conditions. Friction in the contact patch follows the basic model, where the maximum tangential F_t is limited by F_t \leq \mu F_n, with \mu as the coefficient of (typically 0.5-1.0 for dry rubber-road interfaces) and F_n as the normal load integrated over the patch. This model assumes sliding independent of apparent contact area, though actual \mu varies with surface conditions, temperature, and slip rate within the patch. Shear stresses are thus distributed non-uniformly, peaking where normal pressures are highest. Elastic deformation plays a key role in shaping the contact patch, driven by the low of rubber compounds, which ranges from 5-10 for typical tread materials reinforced with fillers. This allows significant under load, leading to of the contact patch in the rolling —often 10-20% longer than in the lateral —due to compressive flattening at the front and recovery at the rear. Such deformation dissipates energy through , affecting overall patch geometry without permanent distortion.

Importance in Vehicle Performance

Role in Traction and Handling

The contact patch serves as the critical where frictional forces enable vehicle traction, generating both longitudinal forces for and braking and lateral forces for cornering. These forces arise from the deformation of the rubber within the patch, where the tire's tread elements interact with the road surface to resist relative motion. The combined magnitude of longitudinal (F_x) and lateral (F_y) forces is constrained by the ellipse, a conceptual boundary representing the tire's force capacity under a given load (F_z), typically modeled as (F_x / (μ_x F_z))^2 + (F_y / (μ_y F_z))^2 ≤ 1, where μ_x and μ_y are the friction coefficients in each direction. This limit ensures that simultaneous demands, such as braking while cornering, cannot exceed the available without slip occurring across the patch. At low slip angles, typically below 5-7 degrees, the contact patch maintains near-peak utilization, approaching 100% of the maximum lateral capacity as the tire's deformation aligns the tread elements to optimize resistance. This deformation involves the rubber and tread twisting within the patch, creating strain that generates lateral forces through molecular-level and , with the pressure distribution across the patch influencing the force vector's direction. Beyond this range, excessive slip leads to partial sliding in the patch, reducing efficiency as transitions from static to kinetic. The pneumatic trail further enhances handling by creating a self-aligning that aids control, defined as the longitudinal offset between the tire's geometric center and the point where the resultant lateral force acts within the contact patch. This offset, arising from the asymmetric deformation and pressure distribution in the patch during cornering, typically measures 1-3 cm for passenger car tires at small slip angles, producing a that helps the return to straight-line travel. The trail diminishes as slip angles increase, eventually reaching zero at the onset of full sliding, which reduces . In high-performance applications like Formula 1 racing, compounds and construction are optimized to maximize the contact patch's on dry asphalt, achieving coefficients of friction exceeding 1.5 through specialized rubber formulations that enhance and without excessive wear during dynamic loads. This allows sustained high traction for rapid , braking, and cornering, where the patch's effective area and deformation characteristics are tuned for track-specific conditions.

Impact on Safety and Wear

The contact patch plays a critical role in by determining the effective area available for traction, particularly in adverse conditions like wet roads where accumulation can reduce the patch's contact with the , leading to hydroplaning. Hydroplaning occurs when a thin layer of builds up between the and road surface, effectively diminishing the patch area and causing loss of control; the critical speed at which this happens can be approximated by the V_p \approx 10.4 \sqrt{p}, where V_p is the hydroplaning speed in and p is the in , assuming sufficient depth. This phenomenon heightens accident risk, as the reduced patch area limits and braking response, contributing to skids or spins on highways during . Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) enhance safety by modulating brake pressure to prevent wheel lockup, thereby preserving the tire's rolling contact patch and maintaining during emergency stops. By rapidly pulsing the brakes—up to 15 times per second—ABS ensures the patch remains dynamically engaged with the road surface, allowing the driver to retain even on slippery conditions where static would otherwise fail. This modulation optimizes the patch's distribution, reducing stopping distances by 10-30% compared to locked-wheel braking on wet or dry surfaces. Uneven pressure distribution within the contact accelerates tire wear, with underinflation causing excessive sidewall flex that shifts load to the shoulders, resulting in premature wear patterns. In underinflated tires, the deforms into a more elongated , concentrating on the outer ribs and leading to feathering or scalloping along the tread edges. Globally, tire wear from such inefficiencies and normal usage releases approximately 6 million tons of microplastic particles annually into the , primarily through in the contact , contributing to atmospheric and pollution. Friction in the contact patch generates significant , often raising surface temperatures to 80-100°C during prolonged driving or high-speed maneuvers, which softens the rubber and alters its . This effect reduces the coefficient of (\mu) by 20-30% when temperatures exceed the optimal range of 60-90°C, as the rubber transitions from viscoelastic to slippery sliding due to decreased molecular bonding with the road. Regulatory standards address these safety and wear implications through standardized testing, such as ISO 28580, which evaluates performance under simulated contact patch conditions using testers to measure and indirectly inform wet traction capabilities. These tests replicate patch loading on a rotating with controlled application, ensuring tires meet minimum thresholds to mitigate hydroplaning and risks in real-world scenarios.

Factors Influencing Size and Shape

Load and Inflation Pressure

The dimensions of the contact patch in pneumatic tires are primarily determined by the vertical wheel load W and the tire's internal inflation pressure P. A widely used approximation for the contact patch area A is given by A \approx \frac{W}{P}, where W is expressed in Newtons and P in Pascals, yielding A in square meters. This formula assumes uniform pressure distribution equivalent to the inflation pressure across the patch, providing a practical estimate for engineering applications. For instance, in a typical passenger car weighing 1600 kg (total vertical load approximately 15,700 N, or about 4000 N per tire at standard axle distribution) with an inflation pressure of 200–250 kPa, the contact patch area per tire is roughly 0.016–0.020 m². However, the relationship between load and contact patch area is nonlinear due to the tire's deformation characteristics, where increased load causes greater sidewall flexing and tread flattening beyond simple proportionality. Experimental studies on passenger car tires demonstrate that doubling the vertical load typically increases the contact patch area by 90–100%, rather than exactly doubling, as the average contact rises slightly above the inflation in the central while remaining lower at the edges. This nonlinearity arises from the tire's vertical deflection \delta, which can be approximated as \delta \approx \frac{W}{k \times A}, where k represents the effective radial per unit area influenced by the tire's structural properties and inflation. For a representative 205/55R16 summer tire under a load of 2000 N and inflation of 220 kPa, experimental measurements yield a contact patch area of approximately 0.005 m², smaller than the basic approximation of 0.009 m² due to higher average contact from these deformation effects. Inflation pressure exerts a countervailing influence on the contact , with lower P enlarging A by allowing greater sidewall deflection and tread distortion, while higher P reduces A by increasing overall and limiting deformation. This trade-off is critical for performance: reduced pressure enhances traction through a larger but compromises handling responsiveness and increases due to softer vertical ; conversely, optimal pressures (typically 200–250 kPa for tires) balance patch size with structural rigidity to maintain both and efficiency. These effects stem from fundamental principles governing pneumatic behavior under load.

Tire Design and Surface Conditions

Tire tread and sidewall designs significantly influence the size, shape, and performance of the contact patch by optimizing load distribution and interaction with the road surface. Asymmetric tread patterns, which feature different designs on the inner and outer shoulders, enhance water evacuation and in wet conditions, effectively increasing the usable contact area for traction by improving hydroplaning resistance. Radial-ply tires, with their cords running to the direction of travel, provide a more uniform contact patch shape compared to bias-ply constructions, where crossed plies at angles lead to greater sidewall flex and less even pressure distribution across the patch. This uniformity in radials results from better stress distribution, reducing variations in patch pressure and improving overall handling stability. Road surface conditions further modify the contact patch by altering the actual area of rubber-to-road interaction beyond nominal dimensions determined by load and inflation. On rough pavements, surface irregularities can reduce the true contact area to approximately 60-70% of the nominal patch, as asperities prevent full conformity between the tire tread and , leading to localized peaks and valleys. In snowy or icy conditions, contaminants in the contact patch drastically lower the friction coefficient (μ) to 0.1-0.3, primarily due to the formation of a low-shear-strength or layer that diminishes and resistance at the . Advanced tire materials play a key role in preserving contact patch characteristics under challenging scenarios. Run-flat tires, reinforced with stiff sidewall inserts, maintain patch integrity and shape even with up to 50% pressure loss, allowing continued vehicle control by preventing excessive sidewall collapse and uneven load bearing. Silica compounds in tread rubber enhance wet patch adhesion by increasing the material's affinity for water-dispersing surfaces, improving through better molecular flexibility and reduced loss without compromising dry performance. To quantify these effects, measurement techniques such as pressure-sensitive films provide detailed mapping of the contact patch. Prescale film, for instance, captures distributions at resolutions capable of detecting variations as low as 0.1 , revealing tread-induced nonuniformities and surface-induced reductions in contact area through color density analysis post-application.

Variations Across Applications

Pneumatic Tires

In pneumatic tires, the contact patch forms when the air-filled rubber structure deforms under vehicle load, distributing pressure across the road surface to enable traction and support. For typical passenger car applications, the contact patch area ranges from 150 to 200 cm² per , determined primarily by the vertical load and inflation pressure, where area approximates load divided by average pressure. In contrast, heavy tires exhibit larger patches, up to 500 cm², to accommodate higher loads such as approximately 20,000 per tire in dual-wheel configurations, ensuring stability under substantial weight while maintaining manageable ground pressure. During dynamic maneuvers, the contact patch undergoes significant shape changes that influence performance. In cornering, lateral forces cause the patch to elongate sideways, as the tire sidewall and tread to generate cornering forces, optimizing distribution across the patch. While rolling, in the rubber compound—arising from viscoelastic energy dissipation—slightly reduces the effective contact area by distorting the patch shape, with the trailing edge lifting prematurely due to delayed rebound, which contributes to but is minimized in low- designs. Aircraft pneumatic tires represent an extreme in contact patch , optimized for brief, high-intensity ground contacts during . Main gear tires on a , inflated to around 1.4 , produce patches of approximately 650–700 cm² under peak loads, balancing high pressure for minimal deflection with sufficient area to distribute forces without excessive pavement stress; this design prioritizes short-duration load-bearing over sustained rolling efficiency. Recent innovations in the seek to replicate pneumatic benefits without air retention vulnerabilities. Michelin's Uptis, an airless prototype tested on passenger vehicles since 2020, employs a flexible composite structure that forms a contact patch mimicking traditional pneumatic deformation under load, eliminating puncture risks while preserving traction characteristics. As of 2025, it remains in testing with partners such as and , with production plans targeted for later in the decade.

Non-Pneumatic and Solid Tires

Solid tires, which lack internal air pressure and rely on the rigidity of their rubber or for load support, produce a fixed rectangular contact patch that remains relatively consistent under varying conditions. This shape arises from the tire's uniform deformation without the compliant sidewall flexure seen in pneumatic designs, resulting in a more predictable . Unlike pneumatic tires, tire patches are prone to heat buildup during operation, as there is no circulating air for cooling, leading to potential thermal degradation over prolonged use. Non-pneumatic tires, such as those featuring flexible or spoked structures, offer an alternative to traditional solid designs by incorporating deformable elements that mimic some pneumatic behaviors while eliminating air dependency. Michelin's , introduced in , exemplifies this approach with its spokes and shear band, enabling flexible deformation to form a contact patch that supports effective load distribution. These designs achieve within 5% of comparable pneumatic tires, enhancing efficiency without the risk of deflation. A key advantage of both solid and non-pneumatic tires is their ability to maintain contact patch integrity during punctures or impacts, making them ideal for applications like forklifts and military vehicles where downtime must be minimized. However, their higher overall compared to pneumatic tires can transmit more , increasing levels during operation. Contact across the patch remains near-constant, typically in the 300-400 kPa range for solid rubber variants, promoting uniform load bearing that reduces hydroplaning risk but limits dynamic traction adjustments.

Railroad Wheels and Rails

In railroad systems, the contact between and rails forms a Hertzian line contact, approximating an elliptical patch with an area of approximately 1 to 2 cm² per . This configuration generates high stresses, typically ranging from 1000 to 1500 MPa, which contribute to the formation of ellipses on both wheel and rail surfaces due to repeated rolling and sliding. The size and position of the contact patch are influenced by wheel conicity, a standard taper of 1:20 that allows the patch to shift laterally under applied loads, promoting self-steering of the wheelset without additional mechanisms. Typical dimensions include a of 10-15 mm in the rolling direction and a width of 1-2 mm across the , enabling the patch to accommodate minor surface irregularities while transmitting vertical and lateral forces. In curved track sections, lateral displacement can cause the wheel to engage the gauge face, creating a secondary contact alongside the primary tread contact. This alters load , and if load exceeds 50% to the outer wheel, it heightens the risk of climb by reducing vertical support on the . in the contact is monitored using ultrasonic mounted on the , which detect , , and surface in real time during vehicle pass-bys. For high-speed trains like the , profile optimization and maintenance strategies achieve rates below 0.5 mm³/m, minimizing material loss and extending component life.

References

  1. [1]
    Contact Patch - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A contact patch is the area of mutual contact between two bodies pressed together, typically under a constant or monotonically increasing force.
  2. [2]
    Understanding the Contact Patch and Why It Matters - Les Schwab
    As your tires roll, the contact patch is the area where the tread makes contact with the road surface. Those contact patches impact how well your vehicle ...Missing: definition engineering
  3. [3]
    Contact Patch: What It Is & How It Works | SimpleTire
    ### Summary of Tire Contact Patch Content
  4. [4]
    Timeout for Tech: Wheel/Rail Contact and Wheel Load Attenuation
    May 23, 2023 · This deformation results in the formation of a “contact patch” between the wheel and rail that is roughly the size of a U.S. dime—0.4 square ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    The Tire Contact Patch - Vehicle Dynamics Institute
    Jan 25, 2014 · The tire contact patch is the only point of contact between a vehicle and the road, creating traction and feedback to the driver.
  6. [6]
    Hertz Contact Theory: Key Concepts Explained | About Tribology
    Hertz Contact Theory describes the stresses and deformations that occur when two curved surfaces come into contact. It is widely used in mechanical engineering ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Dunlop´s pneumatic tyre - DPMA
    In 1888, John Boyd Dunlop can no longer watch his son struggle on a tricycle with hard rubber tyres on the bumpy road surface in Belfast and invents the air- ...
  8. [8]
    Calculation Schemes for Determining Contact Stresses in Railway ...
    This work presents the basic formulas for a simplified analytical solution to the contact problem based on Hertz's theory, which is still widely used in many ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Pneumatic Tire - Safety Research & Strategies, Inc.
    This document covers tire technology, rubber properties, tire cords, composite materials, load capacity, stress analysis, and contact patch.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Comparison of a steady-state Magic Formula tire model with a ...
    Oct 3, 2014 · Using Coulomb's friction law as a general rule of thumb, the maximum shear stress due to dry friction is the normal load times the friction ...Missing: mu | Show results with:mu
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Tyre dynamics - Racecar Engineering
    Jan 29, 2020 · Whenever slip angle is introduced, the contact patch deforms as lateral forces act on the tyre. This deformation generates strain (elongation) ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  13. [13]
    Pneumatic Trail - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Higher tyre loads increase deflection and accordingly enlarge the contact patch so that the pneumatic trail is extended. Correspondingly this causes a rise ...1.3. 3 Nonlinear... · Non-Steady-State... · 5.3 The Stretched String...
  14. [14]
    Tire friction overview - Automotive Papers
    Feb 13, 2023 · For tires the main friction coefficient values are µ = 1.00 in dry conditions and 0.80 in wet ones. Racing cars as F1 usually operates with a ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Automobile Tire Hydroplaning - What Happens* - Purdue e-Pubs
    Based on hydrodynamic theory, a simplified equation has been developed to predict the hydroplaning speed of a pneumatic tire; namely, Vp = 10.2 V P> where Vp = ...Missing: risk reduction
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Review of vehicle hydroplaning and tire-pavement interactions
    Abstract: This paper deals with the review of vehicle hydroplaning. The physics of hydroplaning, factors influencing hydroplaning and effective methods for ...
  17. [17]
    The Science of Aircraft Hydroplaning - Pilot Institute
    Jun 16, 2023 · The speed at which the tire loses contact is called the Hydroplaning speed (Vp). Vp depends primarily on the pressure to which the aircraft's ...
  18. [18]
    Antilock Brake System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The antilock brake system (ABS) ensures the vehicle's steering control, shortens the braking distance, and prevents abnormal tire wear by preventing the wheels ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    How Anti-Lock Braking Systems Enhance Vehicle Safety
    May 2, 2025 · ABS prevents wheel lock-up by modulating brake pressure, allowing the tires to maintain traction with the road. This helps the vehicle stop ...
  20. [20]
    Understanding ABS Braking Systems - Motorist Assurance Program
    ABS, or Anti-lock Braking System, prevents your wheels from locking up during hard braking, thereby securing safety and control. It utilizes wheel speed.
  21. [21]
    Irregular Tire Wear 101 - MICHELIN COMMERCIAL TIRES
    Localized wear patch on the shoulder rib of the tire. This patch can repeat around the circumference of the tire. Faulty shocks, lateral runout, loose wheel ...
  22. [22]
    Tire Air Pressure and Treadwear
    Overinflated tires cause the center tread area to balloon outward, reducing the contact patch and forcing the center area to support the weight of the vehicle.Missing: uneven | Show results with:uneven<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Prioritise tackling toxic emissions from tyres, urge Imperial experts
    Feb 23, 2023 · Six million tonnes of tyre wear particles are released globally each year, and in London alone, 2.6 million vehicles emit around nine thousand ...
  24. [24]
    Road Hazard: Evidence Mounts on Toxic Pollution from Tires
    Sep 19, 2023 · The report says that tires generate 6 million tons of particles a year, globally, of which 200,000 tons end up in oceans. According to Emissions ...
  25. [25]
    Temperature Gradients in Tire Rubber Can Reduce/Increase ... - MDPI
    For a typical road tire compound, the peak friction occurs around 60–90 °C, depending on speed/load, while above 100–120 °C, the friction drops due to excessive ...Missing: patch | Show results with:patch
  26. [26]
    Tyre grip - Racecar Engineering
    Jan 2, 2020 · This friction depends on an array of factors including the roughness of the track as well as the type, temperature and therefore behaviour of ...
  27. [27]
    ISO 28580:2009 - Methods of measuring rolling resistance
    ISO 28580:2009 specifies methods for measuring rolling resistance, under controlled laboratory conditions, for new pneumatic tyres designed primarily for use ...Missing: wet traction patch simulation<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Automobile Tyre test device - Wheel Energy
    Drum diameter 2000 mm. Test format: Load 100 – 4000 kg. Velocity from 60.0 km/h up to 100.0 km/h. Tyre pressure 1.0 bar – 10.0 bar. Or: ISO 28580.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Calculating Tire Contact Area | Boeing
    Tire contact area is calculated by dividing single wheel load by tire inflation pressure. The footprint is a 1.6 ellipse, with minor axis = .894 x sq root of  ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Effects of Tire Size and Inflation Pressure on Tire ...
    The shape of the contact patch is assumed to be a circle with an area equal to the ratio of the wheel load over the inflation pressure. In reality, the pressure.
  31. [31]
    (PDF) Experimental Studies of the Size Contact Area of a Summer ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The parameters affecting the field of contact with the ground is the value of the tire pressure and load on each wheel unit. Depending on the ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Estimation of vertical load on a tire from contact patch length and its ...
    Jun 1, 2010 · Vertical load on a tire is estimated using accelerometers to measure contact patch length, then an equation relating patch length to load is ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIRE INFLATION PRESSURE AND ...
    Under normal conditions, contact pressure is less than inflation pressure, and is a function of both inflation pressure and wheel load. The relationship is ...Missing: patch | Show results with:patch
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Effect of Tire Inflation Pressure on Rolling Resistance, Contact Patch ...
    Apr 2, 2017 · It was observed that the contact patch area of tire and rolling resistance of vehicle are inversely proportional to the tire inflation pressure.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] VERTICAL AND LATERAL STIFFNESS CHARACTERISTICS OF ...
    Using such techniques, vertical force-deflection data reduces quite well for an extremely large range of tire sizes, ply ratings and inflation pressures.
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Pros and Cons of Radial vs. Bias-Ply Tires in Construction
    "Radial tires have a bigger footprint, stiffer tread and distribute weight in a more uniform manner," says Mills. "This gives a steady and consistent contact ...Missing: uniformity | Show results with:uniformity
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Truck Tire Pavement Contact Pressure Distribution Characteristics ...
    This report presents experimental data on how tire inflation pressure and static wheel load affect contact pressure distribution for 18-22.5 and 11R24.5 tires.
  39. [39]
    A Study on the Contact Characteristics of Tires–Roads Based ... - NIH
    Sep 21, 2023 · The results indicate that the contact area of grounding tires exhibits a nearly linear relationship with tire inflation pressure and load.Missing: patch | Show results with:patch
  40. [40]
    Tire Friction | About Tribology - Tribonet
    Oct 2, 2021 · Tire-Road Friction Coefficient ; Dry Asphalt, 0.8 ; Wet Asphalt, 0.6 ; Snow, 0.3 ; Ice, 0.1 ...
  41. [41]
    Run Flat Tires: How They Work
    Run flat tires are tires on which you can continue driving after a puncture so you can take time get to an auto shop or find a safe, level area to change your ...Missing: patch | Show results with:patch
  42. [42]
    Silica - A Filler with a Great Success Story - Continental Tires
    Wies: By using silica (instead of carbon black) as a filler in the tread compound, this massively improves the tire's wet grip as well as its rolling resistance ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Tire Contact Patch Characterization through Finite Element ...
    This is quite characteristic of a passenger car tire as discussed by Pottinger in [9]. Footprint Length: 97mm, Footprint Width: 141mm. Figure 5.6: FE ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    Tire Contact Area | Eng-Tips
    Apr 6, 2021 · Dear all, AASHTO LRFD for bridge design specifies the tire contact area for the design load as a 20in by 10in square. This dimension only ...
  46. [46]
    G.1619 Hysteresis losses in rolling wheels - The Contact Patch
    To preserve grip, we want high-hysteresis rubber in the tread, while to reduce rolling resistance we want low-hysteresis rubber in the tyre walls.
  47. [47]
    TWEEL: AN AIRLESS TIRE | MICHELIN USA
    MICHELIN UPTIS is an airless tire designed for passenger cars and light ... High-performance compounds and an efficient contact patch designed to ...
  48. [48]
    Airless tires: Structural concepts, mechanical design, and ...
    In 2019, Michelin collaborated with General Motors to develop the “Unique Puncture-proof Tire System” (Uptis) which integrates an aluminum wheel assembly with ...
  49. [49]
    How the Tweel Airless Tire Works - Auto | HowStuffWorks
    May 10, 2007 · Michelin reports that “the Tweel prototype… is within five percent of the rolling resistance and mass levels of current pneumatic tires.<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Three-dimensional contact stresses of a slick solid rubber tyre on a ...
    Measured lateral (Y) contact stresses for a slow-moving commercial slick solid rubber tyre were found to range between a minimum of 146 kPa and a maximum of 354 ...
  52. [52]
    A comprehensive review on non-pneumatic tyre research
    Michelin developed an airless integrated tyre (called Tweel), which used strip spokes instead of air pressure. The performance of a Tweel tyre is similar to ...
  53. [53]
    An Overview in use of Airless/ Non Pneumatic Tyres (NPTs) in ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · This paper investigates the implementation of airless or non-pneumatic tyres (NPTs) for Indian military vehicles, focusing on their design, ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] the Wheel-Rail-Contact
    The wheel-rail contact is crucial for railway vehicle simulations, handling load-bearing, guiding, and traction, and is a key part of the DLR library.
  55. [55]
    Understanding Hertzian Stress in Railway Wheels and Rails
    Hertzian stress is the pressure distribution when two curved elastic bodies contact under load, with maximum pressure at the contact center.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] and experimental - · determination of nonlinear ···wheel/rail ...
    tionality, called the wheelset conicity, is the wheel profile taper (usually. 1/20 or 0.05). As the wheels wear, the change in rolling radii difference with ...Missing: patch | Show results with:patch
  57. [57]
    R.1610 The wheelset - The Contact Patch
    With a diameter typically of 1.0 m or less, the tread is roughly 100 mm wide. Like a pneumatic tyre, the railway wheel must handle the various forces needed to ...
  58. [58]
    Flange Climb Derailment Criteria and Wheel/Rail Profile ...
    This document covers flange climb derailment criteria, wheel/rail profile management, and maintenance guidelines for transit operations.
  59. [59]
    Real-Time Measurement of Dynamic Wheel-Rail Contacts Using ...
    A rail mounted ultrasonic sensor was successfully used to measure the dynamic contact patch evolution. It is also possible to measure the contact pressure ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Correlations between rail wear rates and operating conditions in a ...
    In medium curves (400 m < R < 900 m) the profiles are CPG (high rail) and CPF (low rail) and for tight curves (R < 400 m) the profiles are HRC (high rail) and ...Missing: TGV mm3/