Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tompkins Table

The Tompkins Table is an annual, unofficial ranking of the 29 undergraduate colleges of the , ordered by the academic performance of their students in final-year examinations, excluding postgraduate-only institutions such as Darwin College and Clare Hall. Established in 1981 by Peter Tompkins, a student at Trinity College, the table originated as a student-led initiative to benchmark college achievements and was initially published in newspaper before being taken over by the Cambridge student newspaper in 2016. Unlike official university metrics, it focuses solely on classifications and has become a notable, though controversial, point of reference for prospective students and college comparisons. The ranking is calculated using a points-based system applied to degree outcomes: five points for a first-class , three points for an upper second-class (2:1), two points for a lower second-class (2:2), and one point for a third-class , with zero for ordinary or failed degrees; scores are then weighted against subject-specific averages to normalize for variations in grading rigor across disciplines and expressed as a of the maximum possible points. This methodology aims to provide a fair inter-college comparison, though it does not account for non-honours degrees or broader factors like student intake size or socioeconomic diversity. In recent years, the table has highlighted shifts in performance, with Trinity College reclaiming the top position in 2024 and 2025 after Christ's College held it from 2018 to 2023; the 2025 edition placed Trinity first, followed closely by Christ's, Selwyn, Churchill, and Queens', while and experienced notable drops to 15th and 16th, respectively. Trinity's consistent success is often attributed to its substantial endowment exceeding £2 billion as of 2023, which supports enhanced academic resources. The Tompkins Table has faced criticism for potentially fostering inter-college rivalries and undue pressure on students, with the Cambridge Students' Union condemning it in 2018 for promoting a "poor academic culture" that overlooks and equity. Despite these concerns, it remains influential in shaping perceptions of college prestige and aiding applicants in decision-making.

Background

Origins and History

The Tompkins Table was established in 1981 by Peter Tompkins, a third-year undergraduate at Trinity College, . As a graduate from the , Tompkins created the ranking as an informal compilation based on undergraduate exam results, aiming to highlight variations in academic performance across Cambridge's colleges. He personally calculated and released the first edition that year, using publicly available class lists to produce a simple ordered list of the 29 undergraduate colleges. Tompkins continued to compile the table annually for over three decades, maintaining it as a volunteer effort outside official channels. The evolved from its basic origins into a more refined tool, with refinements in the introducing weighted scoring to account for degree class distributions and provide greater precision in comparisons. This development solidified its role as an unofficial but influential benchmark within the community. However, the table's publication was disrupted in later years: no editions appeared in 2020 or 2021 due to COVID-19-related changes in formats and result reporting, and availability issues prevented release in 2023. The table resumed publication in 2022 and continued in 2024 and 2025. A pivotal moment came in 2016, when Tompkins declared the edition might be the "last ever" amid criticism from the University Students' Union (CUSU), which argued the table exacerbated competitive pressures and inter-college rivalries. Despite this announcement and ongoing student union opposition, the tradition endured, with —the university's independent student newspaper—assuming responsibility for its production and publication starting that year. Tompkins' persistence, rooted in his background as a alumnus and later career as a consulting , reflected a commitment to transparently documenting college-level academic disparities through empirical analysis of exam outcomes.

Purpose and Publication

The Tompkins Table ranks the undergraduate colleges of the according to their students' aggregate performance in final-year examinations, offering a comparative measure of that assists prospective students in making informed choices about college applications. Despite the collegiate university's structure, where lectures and much of the teaching are centralized at the university level, the table underscores variations in and pastoral support that may influence outcomes, thereby filling a perceived gap in official guidance for applicants. The table holds no official status and receives no endorsement from the , having been independently compiled since its inception in 1981 by Peter Tompkins, a former student at Trinity College. It draws exclusively on publicly available data from class lists published in the Cambridge University Reporter, which detail examination results without identifying individual students by name. Graduate-only institutions such as Darwin College and Clare Hall are excluded from the rankings, as they admit no undergraduates and thus generate no relevant data. The table is typically published annually in the summer, coinciding with the release of examination results, although exceptions occurred in 2020, 2021, and 2023; it has been handled by the student newspaper since 2016, while prior to that, Tompkins self-published the table, and it appeared in for several years. This process ensures wide accessibility through online and print formats, targeting primarily prospective undergraduates but also serving colleges for internal of and performance monitoring.

Methodology

Scoring System

The Tompkins Table utilizes a points-based scoring system to assess undergraduate academic performance across colleges, drawing directly from the honors degree classifications awarded in the university's examinations—the structured assessment framework for all undergraduate subjects. This approach ensures a standardized of student outcomes in diverse fields, from natural sciences to , without incorporating external factors such as course load or extracurriculars. Under the current system, points are allocated as follows: 5 points for a , 3 points for an (commonly known as a 2:1), 2 points for a (2:2), and 1 point for a ; degrees or mere passes receive 0 points. This allocation reflects the hierarchical prestige of Cambridge's degree classifications, emphasizing excellence in intellectual achievement. Historically, for classifications awarded before the 1990s, a "" degree—which was an undifferentiated second-class honors—was valued at 2.5 points to bridge the gap between upper and lower seconds. The employs straightforward point summation for each student, with no penalties, bonuses, or adjustments applied for variations in subject difficulty, ensuring parity across disciplines. Prior to 1997, rankings were derived exclusively from final-year results; since then, the system has shifted to a cumulative approach, incorporating from all years of study to better capture sustained academic progress. Individual points are aggregated at the level and normalized to yield an , facilitating direct comparisons between institutions.

Data Inclusion and Calculation

The data for the Tompkins Table is sourced exclusively from the official class lists published in the Cambridge University Reporter, which annually document the degree classifications achieved by undergraduates in all examinations across the . These lists capture results only for honors undergraduate programs, systematically excluding postgraduate degrees, non-honors qualifications, and any unclassified outcomes to maintain focus on comparable academic performance metrics. At the college level, results are aggregated by summing the assigned points for each examinee within the college, then normalizing against the maximum attainable score to produce a percentage-based . The core computes a college's score as \left( \frac{\sum \text{[student](/page/Student) points}}{5 \times \text{number of students}} \right) \times 100, where 5 represents the highest possible points per student, yielding a measure of overall performance relative to potential. This approach ensures rankings reflect efficiency in achieving top classifications across the cohort. To mitigate biases arising from differing subject difficulties and varying numbers of students per discipline, the aggregation incorporates subject-specific weighting. The effective college score is derived as \sum (\text{subject average} \times \frac{\text{subject students}}{\text{total students}}), standardizing performances to a common baseline and preventing skew toward colleges with disproportionate enrollment in high-averaging fields like or . Colleges must have at least 10 undergraduates sitting examinations in the given year to be included, promoting statistical robustness by excluding entities with insufficient sample sizes. For longitudinal analysis, annual results since 1997 are often averaged in multi-year tables, providing a cumulative view that smooths yearly fluctuations while adhering to the same inclusion and calculation principles. This methodology, originally devised by , emphasizes transparency and equity in compiling rankings from raw university data.

Rankings

Recent Rankings

The Tompkins Table rankings from 2018 to 2025 reflect evolving academic performance among colleges, with Christ's College dominating the period before Trinity's recent resurgence. No tables were produced for 2020 and 2021 amid the disruptions to examinations. These rankings, derived from weighted averages of degree classifications and published by , consistently show razor-thin margins at the top, often under 1 percentage point, highlighting the parity in undergraduate achievement across colleges. In the 2025 edition, Trinity College secured first place for the second consecutive year, extending its advantage over second-placed Christ's College to 1.65 percentage points—up from a mere 0.02 points the previous year. Selwyn climbed to third, Churchill to fourth, and Queens' to fifth, while plummeted from third to fifteenth and from fourth to sixteenth. This shift underscores Trinity's post-2019 revival, reclaiming leadership after a seven-year run at the top ended in 2018. ranked last, with only 18% of its undergraduates earning First-Class degrees. The following table summarizes the top five colleges for 2025:
RankCollegeScore (%)
174.58
2Christ's72.96
3Selwyn[Score not specified in primary source]
4Churchill[Score not specified in primary source]
5Queens'[Score not specified in primary source]
The table ended Christ's extended reign (2018–2022), as edged ahead with 73.48% compared to Christ's 73.46% and Corpus Christi's 72.2%. and Selwyn rounded out the top five. The following table summarizes the top five colleges for , illustrating the narrow gaps that define these competitions:
RankCollegeScore (%)
173.48
2Christ's73.46
372.2
471.12
5Selwyn70.16
In 2022, Christ's reclaimed the lead with 76.41%, well ahead of (72.32%) and St Catharine's (72.25%). Christ's also topped the 2019 table at 75.7%, narrowly beating 's 72.3%, and the 2018 edition at 73.0%, just 0.3 points clear of (72.7%) and 0.7 ahead of (72.3%). These results emphasize 's consistent contention for the top spot, with its 2024–2025 success marking a return to pre-2018 prominence. The Tompkins Table, initiated in 1981, revealed early patterns where College and consistently dominated the rankings through the , with securing multiple first-place finishes during this period due to strong performances across various triposes. These initial years highlighted the table's role in spotlighting academic excellence amid varying sizes, though rankings showed some year-to-year fluctuations influenced by smaller student numbers in certain colleges. In 1997, the methodology was updated to include grades from all examinations throughout the degree, rather than only final-year exams. Entering the 2000s, Gonville & Caius College and Pembroke College emerged as frequent high achievers, often placing in the top five, reflecting shifts in student intake and supervision quality that contributed to their upward trajectory. Variability remained a key feature, particularly for colleges with smaller cohorts, where isolated strong or weak performances could significantly alter positions, underscoring the table's sensitivity to sample size. Overall, maintained its historical edge, accumulating over 15 first-place finishes by 2017, far surpassing other institutions. From 2010 to 2017, Christ's College demonstrated notable dominance in several years, challenging the established leaders and exemplifying how sustained academic strategies could yield consistent top-tier results. Broader patterns showed mid-tier stability for colleges like St John's, which reliably ranked in the upper half without extreme swings, benefiting from balanced admissions and resources. Methodological adjustments, such as the inclusion of all-year grades, influenced these trends by emphasizing overall performance metrics over raw points, occasionally amplifying differences between large and small colleges. For instance, Trinity's 2024 victory continued this legacy of periodic resurgence among traditional powerhouses.

Criticisms and Impact

Academic and Social Effects

The Tompkins Table influences academic practices at colleges by incentivizing the of high-achieving students, as colleges seek to enhance their rankings through strong undergraduate performance cohorts. This focus correlates with perceptions of superior quality in higher-ranked colleges, despite the university-wide of lectures and much of the formal . However, the table's emphasis on results overlooks variations in student support that contribute to outcomes, leading some colleges to invest in academic resources to maintain or improve their standings. Socially, the table heightens inter-college , fostering a that permeates student life and traditions such as supervisions and application processes. It influences "jockeying" among applicants, who often prioritize higher-ranked colleges for perceived prestige, while creating stigma for lower-ranked ones through stereotypes of lesser "worthiness" or academic rigor. This competitive dynamic can exacerbate stress in Cambridge's intense environment, though it also promotes a of excellence among peers. In admissions, prospective students frequently consult the Tompkins Table when selecting colleges, viewing it as an indicator of academic environment. The advises applicants to base choices on factors like location, size, and facilities, emphasizing the collegiate system's uniformity in academic opportunities. The table's broader influence extends to motivating welfare enhancements in lower-performing colleges, as they address retention and support to boost exam results and climb the rankings—holding institutions accountable for providing comprehensive student tools beyond academics.

Controversies and Calls for Change

In 2016, Peter Tompkins, the table's creator and a alumnus, published what he described as the last edition of the Tompkins Table, citing pressure from the University Students' Union (CUSU) over its role in exacerbating intercollegiate inequalities. CUSU had campaigned against the table as part of broader efforts to abolish public class lists, arguing that such rankings fostered unhealthy competition and stigmatized lower-performing colleges. Despite this announcement, , 's independent student newspaper, took over publication of the table that same year and has continued annually thereafter, ensuring its survival amid . Critics have highlighted several fairness issues with the table's methodology, noting that it fails to adjust for variations in subject mixes across colleges, where some disciplines inherently yield higher grade distributions than others. It also overlooks differences in student intake selectivity, with wealthier or more prestigious colleges often attracting higher-achieving applicants, and ignores socioeconomic factors that can influence access to preparatory resources. Additionally, the reliance on small annual cohorts per college leads to significant volatility in rankings, where minor fluctuations in performance can dramatically alter positions year-over-year. CUSU has repeatedly called for the table's discontinuation, contending that it undermines the collegiate system's emphasis on diversity by promoting a hierarchical view of institutions and contributes to mental health strains through intensified academic pressure on students. In 2025, ongoing criticisms have focused on the table's role in perpetuating a culture of overwork and placing undue pressure on students. The University of Cambridge has adopted a neutral position, refusing to endorse or provide official data for the table while allowing its informal circulation. The table's persistence stems from sustained public demand among prospective students, media outlets, and current undergraduates seeking performance benchmarks; no official alternative has emerged, though the university employs internal Baxter tables for confidential college assessments.

Cambridge-Specific Tables

Within the University of Cambridge, the Baxter Tables serve as a prominent internal ranking system for assessing performance based on undergraduate examination results. Compiled by Dr. Martin Baxter, a financial and former member of Trinity , these tables utilize classified results provided directly by the university to generate rankings. Unlike the publicly available Tompkins Table, the Baxter Tables were not officially released and were instead distributed privately to tutors and college bursars for internal use in self-assessment and strategic planning. The Baxter Tables differ from the Tompkins Table in their and scope, emphasizing raw percentages of classifications across colleges rather than a points-based aggregation, and providing breakdowns by subject and year to highlight performance variations, such as strengths in sciences versus . Some versions incorporated limited postgraduate data, offering a broader view of academic output beyond undergraduate finals, though with less weight on final-year results compared to earlier Tompkins iterations. These features allowed bursars and administrators to identify trends in subject-specific excellence and allocate resources accordingly, fostering college-level improvements without . By the early 2020s, the Baxter Tables were discontinued as an official internal tool, with the university shifting to public dashboards of raw examination statistics by college, rendering the tables obsolete. Alongside the Baxter system, various informal and ad-hoc compilations have emerged within , often produced by societies or alumni groups using publicly available data; however, these lack standardization and are not widely recognized or used for institutional purposes.

Broader University Comparisons

The Norrington Table functions as the primary equivalent to the Tompkins Table at the , ranking its 30 undergraduate colleges annually based on the academic performance of their students in final examinations. Developed in the 1960s by Sir Arthur Norrington, former President of Trinity College, the table converts degree classifications into numerical scores—assigning 5 points for a first-class , 3 for an upper second-class, 2 for a lower second-class, and 1 for a third-class—to compute an aggregated percentage score for each college. This system, first implemented in 1963, emphasizes raw exam outcomes and has provided a consistent for over six decades, though it was officially discontinued by the Conference of Colleges in November 2024 due to concerns about exacerbating inter-college competition and . Historically, the table incorporates data from multiple years in some analyses, offering a more stable view of performance compared to single-year snapshots, with colleges like Merton (top in 2021) and St John's frequently ranking highly. Jesus College, founded in 1571, has also demonstrated strong results in various iterations, underscoring the table's role in highlighting enduring academic strengths within Oxford's collegiate structure. In contrast, the College League Table, launched by in 2020, extends comparisons beyond exam-focused metrics by evaluating 59 colleges across and on a composite scale that integrates (via Tompkins and Norrington scores), entry standards, financial resources, quality, extracurricular offerings, and student satisfaction derived from the National Student Survey (NSS). This holistic approach aims to assist prospective students in assessing overall college appeal, rather than isolating degree results. Colleges such as , and , have consistently excelled; for example, St John's secured the top overall position in the 2021 edition, reflecting its robust performance in both academic and non-academic categories. Key distinctions between these rankings illuminate broader patterns in Oxbridge evaluation. The Norrington Table, with its origins in the early and former official endorsement (published until 2022), carries a more traditional and authoritative weight, focusing exclusively on classifications without weighting for difficulty or external factors. The Telegraph table, however, introduces diversity by incorporating NSS satisfaction scores and entry tariffs, providing a rounded perspective that mitigates the exam-centric bias of tables like Tompkins or Norrington. These comparisons reveal the unique collegiate dynamics of and , where such rankings fuel rivalry and inform choices, yet also prompt scrutiny over their emphasis on quantifiable metrics amid the ' shared emphasis on tutorial-based and interdisciplinary pursuits.

References

  1. [1]
    Tompkins Table 2024, a Cambridge Colleges Rankings
    Jan 31, 2025 · The Tompkins Table is a yearly ranking report of the Colleges of the University of Cambridge in order of their undergraduate students' ...
  2. [2]
    Tompkins Table 2025: Trinity widens gap on Christ's - Varsity
    Aug 19, 2025 · The table, established in 1981 by then-mathematics student Peter Tompkins, ranks each college according to the exam performance of its ...
  3. [3]
    The Tompkins Table 2016: Christ's has risen - Varsity
    Jul 23, 2016 · It has been put together annually by Trinity alumnus Peter Tompkins since 1981, when he was an undergraduate mathematics student. Tompkins says ...Missing: origins founding
  4. [4]
    CUSU goes Marxist: Tompkins Table in danger as Comrade Priscilla ...
    The academic rankings have been a Cambridge tradition over the last 34 years, after Peter Tompkins launched his table in 1981 during his days as a mathmo ...Missing: origins founding
  5. [5]
    Tompkins Table 2022: the resurrection of Christ's - Varsity
    Sep 10, 2022 · The last official Tompkins Table was published in 2019. Due to Covid-19 exam mitigations, the data for 2020-2021 was impacted by changes to how ...
  6. [6]
    St Edmund's shoots up inter-collegiate ranking
    Jul 28, 2017 · Compiled by Peter Tompkins since 1981, the Table classes all BA Tripos results with points of 5 for a first, 3 for a 2:i, 2 for a 2:ii and 1 for ...Missing: origins founding
  7. [7]
    LAST EVER TOMPKINS' TABLE - University of Cambridge
    Jul 23, 2016 · Peter Tompkins has released what may well be – if CUSU has its way – the last ever Tompkins Table, ending a 30-year-old tradition of being ...Missing: computing officer
  8. [8]
    Trinity tops 2024 Tompkins Table as Christ's is toppled - Varsity
    Sep 23, 2024 · Christ's long-standing dominance as the highest-achieving Cambridge college has ended with Trinity taking the top spot, according to the ...
  9. [9]
    Publication Scheme for Trinity College
    The Tompkins Table documents the comparative performance of Colleges in undergraduate examinations. Tompkins Table. GOVERNMENT AND REGULATORY REPORTS. There ...
  10. [10]
    Class-Lists, 2018–19 / Scholarships and Prizes, 2018–19 - For staff
    Dec 19, 2019 · Preliminary Examinations and Tripos Examinations ; Anglo-Saxon, Norse, and Celtic Tripos · Archaeology Tripos · Architecture Tripos ; Geographical ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Analysis of Tripos Results
    The data is obtained from the class lists in the Cambridge University Reporter, published by CUP and available in the University Libraray. It covers all ...
  12. [12]
    Data - College Performance Tables
    The purpose of the Good Degree table is to present the information in a consistent manner to the Baxter tables, including a measure of statistical significance.
  13. [13]
    CUSU denounces the Tompkins Table – but can it do anything to ...
    Jul 24, 2018 · In its statement, CUSU condemned the decision by one college tutor to calculate the table using Peter Tompkins' formula, in its failure “to ...Missing: pressure | Show results with:pressure
  14. [14]
    Results by College Dashboard | Information Hub
    **Summary of Undergraduate Exam Results Usage for College Performance:**
  15. [15]
    Exclusive: Christ's triumphant in 2019 Tompkins Table - Varsity
    Aug 1, 2019 · As is common, the Tompkins Table saw narrow margins of difference between the scores of the vast majority of colleges. This year, for example, ...Missing: disparities | Show results with:disparities
  16. [16]
    Christ's and Pembroke victorious over Trinity in Tompkins Table
    Jul 21, 2018 · The Tompkins Table typically sees narrow margins of difference between both overall scores and proportions of firsts for the majority of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    College Performance Tables
    2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013. Table Type ... From classified exam results published by the University of Cambridge. BAXTER ...
  18. [18]
    EXCLUSIVE: Trinity tops Tompkins Table for seventh straight year
    Jul 27, 2017 · The Tompkins Table, which has been compiled by Peter Tompkins annually since 1981, classes all BA Tripos results with a score of 5 for a first, ...Missing: system history pre-
  19. [19]
    Time's up for the Tompkins Table - Varsity
    Aug 22, 2025 · Of course, the continued publication of the Tompkins Table feeds into well-established controversy over Cambridge's 'culture of overwork'. I ...Missing: 2023 data
  20. [20]
    Given that there is no teaching in the colleges of Cambridge ... - Quora
    May 1, 2022 · On the annual degree outcome assessment (the Norrington Table in Oxford, and the Tompkins Table in Cambridge), fluctuations between years are ...Missing: disparities | Show results with:disparities
  21. [21]
    Topped Tompkins? Good for you – but praising it ignores ... - The Tab
    Jul 27, 2018 · The Tompkins table, for high performing colleges, justifies these methods. ... Five reasons why Medwards is the best college at Cambridge ...Missing: calculation | Show results with:calculation
  22. [22]
    The reality of the Tompkins Table rankings - Varsity
    Sep 3, 2025 · The lack of university endorsement, focus only on academic achievements, and the undue pressure it places on students, suggests the Tompkins ...Missing: takeover 2016
  23. [23]
    The Best Cambridge Colleges — Getting in - Personal Statement
    Mar 18, 2021 · Cambridge colleges are ranked on the Tompkins Table. This is a ... Most recently, Christ's College topped the table, closely followed by Trinity ...
  24. [24]
    Choosing a College - Undergraduate Study - University of Cambridge
    Find out which Colleges offer your course. We suggest shortlisting around 3 to 5 Colleges to start. Consider criteria that is relevant to you.
  25. [25]
    Why college ranking tables have to go | Varsity
    Nov 13, 2015 · Indeed, the Tompkins Table would have us believe that students at the women's and mature colleges are not academically worthy, while rewarding ...Missing: pressure | Show results with:pressure
  26. [26]
    University confirms proposed abolition of Class Lists from next year
    May 18, 2016 · “Abolishing the Tompkins table will remove a key incentive for Colleges and leave us at a disadvantage to Oxford, which still publishes its ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Report of Discussion - Cambridge University Reporter 6430 - For staff
    Jun 15, 2016 · There will be no Tompkins table this year. The Baxter tables are constructed by a third party on the basis of class-lists supplied by a College.
  28. [28]
    Lies, damn lies, and the Tompkins Table - Varsity
    Oct 13, 2007 · In any case, there is hardly any difference between the Tompkins percentages of the top 50% of colleges, making the use of statistical tests on ...Missing: Peter motivation
  29. [29]
    Trinity Tops Tompkins Table - Take Two - University of Cambridge
    Aug 10, 2012 · The Tompkins Table, which has had its methodology criticised in the past, ranks degree results by allocating 5 points for a First, 3 for a 2:1, ...
  30. [30]
    Tripos Results 2022 - Outstanding Performance
    Aug 30, 2022 · The old Baxter Tables and Tompkins Tables no longer exist. Many ... Cambridge, CB2 3BU, UK Phone: 01223 334900. Registered Charity ...
  31. [31]
    Baxter tables - The Student Room
    Jul 12, 2009 · Baxter tables are used by the university to rank college exam performance for each subject and year. They are not made public so if we want to see them we'll ...
  32. [32]
    Undergraduate Degree Classifications | University of Oxford
    The Norrington score, developed by Sir Arthur Norrington, former President of Trinity, in the 1960s, provides a way of measuring the performance of students ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  33. [33]
    Which Oxford Colleges Are Best? | Mystudenthalls.com
    Mar 7, 2023 · The Norrington Table points are awarded as such: 5 points to 1st, 3 to 2:1, 2 to 2:2, 1 to 3rd and 0 to pass/honours pass.Missing: data | Show results with:data
  34. [34]
    College heads scrap the Norrington Table - Cherwell
    Nov 27, 2024 · The Norrington Table, which ranked undergraduate colleges by their students' degree results, has been discontinued by the Conference of Colleges.
  35. [35]
    Best Colleges at Oxford - 2025
    Feb 8, 2025 · We used the latest Norrington scores to rank all 31 Oxford colleges that accept undergraduate students.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Oxbridge College League Table - The Telegraph
    Below, the table outlines which factors are included in each of the scores and how each score is calculated. This includes the data which is being used in the ...Missing: methodology | Show results with:methodology
  38. [38]
    St John's College, Oxford, is the Best Oxbridge College
    Mar 20, 2021 · St John's College, Oxford, has been ranked as the best Oxbridge college by a new ranking in The Telegraph.