Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Triple option

The triple option is a running play in in which the , upon receiving the , reads the defensive end's reaction to decide among three potential ball carriers: handing off to the (or B-back) diving inside, keeping the ball and running himself, or pitching the ball to a trailing halfback (or A-back) on the perimeter. This scheme emphasizes misdirection, precise blocking, and rapid by the , leaving key defenders unblocked to force defensive hesitation and exploit gaps. Originating in the mid-20th century, the triple option gained prominence through formations like the in the 1960s and 1970s, particularly under coaches such as Paul "Bear" Bryant at the , where it powered national championships by maximizing mobility and option reads. It evolved into variants like the flexbone offense, which aligns two slotbacks to enhance perimeter threats, and became a staple at U.S. service academies due to its effectiveness with undersized, disciplined players who excel in execution over raw athleticism. In modern football, the triple option remains a run-heavy system, often comprising 70-80% rushing plays, and is most notably employed by teams like the under coach and the under coach Brian Newberry, where it has led to top national rushing rankings—such as Navy's No. 1 in FBS rushing yards per game during the 2025 season. While less common in the due to its demands on skills and defensive countermeasures, it persists in and high school levels for its simplicity in teaching fundamentals and ability to neutralize superior defenses through balanced options.

Fundamentals

Play Mechanics

The triple option is a run play in that provides the with three potential ball carriers: the on a dive, the on a keep, or the halfback on a . This forces the to account for multiple threats, often by leaving key defenders unblocked to exploit their reactions. The play requires precise timing and execution from the backfield and offensive line to create lanes and maintain deception. Execution begins at the mesh point, where the and meet immediately after the to simulate a handoff. The places the ball against the 's midsection while reading the play-side (the first ). If the maintains outside or stays home to contain the edge, the hands off the ball for the dive option, allowing the to burst straight through an interior created by the offensive line. The 's path is direct and powerful, aiming to exploit the A or B between the center and guard. If the crashes inside toward the , the pulls the ball back and transitions to the keep or option, reading the second key—typically the or linebacker. The then runs parallel to the , angling toward the edge while the offensive line reaches or pulls to block second-level defenders. For the option, if the second key attacks the , the ball is pitched backward on an arc to the halfback trailing at a 45-degree ; the halfback catches and accelerates upfield along the perimeter. The occurs no deeper than five yards behind the line to minimize fumble risk and maintain momentum. Blocking schemes are tailored to support each option while preserving the read element. For the dive, the offensive line uses inside zone blocking or traps, with the center and guards double-teaming interior linemen to seal the dive lane, often leaving the unblocked. Perimeter blocking for the pitch involves the playside tackle reaching the end or a pulling leading to , while wingbacks or receivers crack block safeties. The keep relies on "read blocking," where linemen engage without committing to the first key, allowing the quarterback's path to develop based on defensive flow. These assignments create numerical advantages by forcing two defenders to cover three potential runners. Field positioning typically occurs from under center for traditional setups, with the quarterback aligned directly behind the center, the fullback two yards deeper on the midline, and the halfback offset 4-5 yards to the playside. In shotgun variations, the quarterback lines up 4-5 yards back, adjusting the mesh point accordingly. The offensive line aligns in a balanced stance, with guards and tackles positioned to angle blocks toward the playside, creating a corridor approximately 4-6 yards wide for the options to unfold. Backfield paths form a triangular pattern: the fullback's straight-ahead dive, the quarterback's lateral sweep arc, and the halfback's trailing pitch route, all converging near the line before diverging based on the decision. This geometry ensures the defense must stretch horizontally and vertically to defend all threats effectively. In text-based diagram terms, envision the offensive line as a horizontal row (-LG-C--RT), with the (F) positioned directly behind (C) at the . The (QB) rides the fullback from the side, while the halfback (H) flares wide. Arrows indicate: F → straight through C's gap; QB → 45-degree angle past ; H → arc behind QB toward the sideline. The unblocked (DE) stands opposite the , dictating the initial branch.

Quarterback Decision-Making

In the triple option offense, the 's primary read focuses on the 's reaction to determine whether to hand off to the on the or pull the ball for the keep or options. If the crashes inside toward the 's path, the pulls the ball and advances, reading the key—typically the strong safety or outside linebacker—to decide between pitching to the halfback or keeping possession. This sequential process forces the defense to account for multiple threats simultaneously, creating numerical advantages for the offense. If the opts to keep the ball after the primary read, a secondary read evaluates the box defenders, such as the or middle linebacker, to assess pursuit angles and potential gaps for the quarterback run, ensuring the decision aligns with the blocking scheme's support. The dive option takes priority as the initial commitment, with the following a clear path behind the pulling guard; the quarterback rides the fullback at the mesh point—typically 3-4 yards behind the line—and pulls away only if the primary read indicates the is pursuing the dive, maintaining precise timing to avoid fumbles. Blocking schemes, such as reach or base blocks, provide the framework for these reads by isolating the defensive end unblocked. Common errors in quarterback decision-making include over-reading the pitch key, which delays the pull and exposes the ball carrier to unblocked pursuit, and late pitches that allow defenders to close on the halfback, often resulting in negative yardage. Tactical adjustments for these mistakes involve emphasizing "attack the read" cues to force quicker reactions and practicing "no-pitch" scenarios where the turns upfield immediately on a bad secondary read. To mitigate such issues, quarterbacks must avoid handing off on a crashing or pitching off the dive key, instead defaulting to the keep and exploiting secondary gaps. Developing these skills requires rigorous footwork drills, such as the toe-replace-heel progression where practice the first two steps at a 45-degree angle to reach the mesh point efficiently, using sideline markers at five-yard intervals to simulate game speed and ensure eyes stay on the read key. Film study is essential for honing reads, involving slow-motion analysis of defensive alignments and reactions from prior games to identify patterns in movements and refine anticipation without over-committing. These practices build the necessary intelligence and explosiveness, enabling of varying builds to execute decisions in under two seconds under live pressure.

Historical Development

Origins in Mid-20th Century

The triple option play emerged from the broader evolution of option-based offenses in during the mid-20th century, building on earlier innovations in the single-wing and T-formations. , head coach at the , is credited with pioneering the foundational option concept in 1941 through his Split-T formation, which emphasized reads and misdirection inspired by basketball's two-on-one . This system, while initially a double option ( keep or pitch to a halfback alongside a dive), laid the groundwork for more complex reads. It gained traction in the 1950s under coaches influenced by Faurot, such as at , who used split-T variants to sustain success. The full triple option involving integrated dive, keep, and pitch reads emerged in the 1960s with the veer offense, developed by at the in 1964. A pivotal early adoption occurred with the 1953 Army Cadets under head coach Earl "Red" Blaik, who integrated option principles into the T-formation by adapting elements from the single-wing offense, such as deceptive ball handling and unbalanced lines to exploit defensive alignments. Blaik's approach addressed 's talent limitations at the service academy, emphasizing execution over size, and helped the team achieve a 7-1-1 record that season, signaling the play's potential against superior opponents. This marked one of the first notable implementations of option-heavy schemes in major , predating wider veer integrations. Key developments in the late 1950s further enabled the triple option's growth, including the NCAA's rule change legalizing two-point conversions after touchdowns, which contributed to increased overall scoring in . The Army-Navy game exemplified this era, as Blaik's Cadets showcased an unbalanced T-formation with option reads—featuring the innovative "Lonesome End" flanker split—en route to a 22-6 victory over , rushing for over 200 yards and highlighting the offense's deceptive power. Despite these showcases, the triple option faced slow adoption in the early amid a league-wide shift toward passing offenses, driven by rule liberalizations favoring aerial attacks and the rise of pro-style schemes that prioritized protection over run options. Programs like sustained success with Split-T variants (e.g., a 47-game winning streak from 1953-1957), but many teams viewed the option as outdated against evolving defenses, limiting its spread until veer refinements in the mid-.

Key Innovators and Spread

, as offensive coordinator for the University of Texas under , introduced the featuring the triple option in 1968, revolutionizing the Longhorns' offense and leading to undefeated seasons and national championships in 1969 and 1970. This implementation transformed Texas into a dominant force, achieving a 30-game from 1968 to 1971 and emphasizing the triple option's ability to exploit defensive alignments through quarterback reads on the dive, keep, and pitch phases. Paul "Bear" Bryant adopted the triple option at the in 1971, shifting from a to counter recruiting disadvantages against integrated programs like , which propelled the to multiple successes including the 1973 national championship with a 12-0 record. Bryant's adaptation refined the scheme for play, incorporating misdirection and speed to average over 300 rushing yards per game in key seasons, culminating in additional titles in 1978 and 1979. At the Academy, coaches and later implemented veer-triple option hybrids starting in 1980, leveraging the service academy's emphasis on discipline and smaller, agile players to achieve consistent success through the , including three straight appearances from 1983 to 1985 with records of 10-2 each. This veer-based variation, which integrated midline and inside veer complements to the triple option, allowed to outmaneuver larger opponents, rushing for over 3,000 yards in multiple seasons and establishing the triple option as a hallmark of academy . The triple option's spread to other service academies amplified its national prominence in the 1980s and 1990s, with the U.S. Naval Academy under coaches like George Welsh achieving a 9-3 record in 1978 and multiple bowl berths, while the U.S. Military Academy at West Point saw successes such as Army's 8-3-1 mark and 1984 Cherry Bowl victory, both relying on the scheme's execution demands to level talent disparities. Navy and Army's dominance in service academy rivalries during this era, including frequent wins over each other and appearances, underscored the offense's adaptability to underdog programs, with combined rushing averages exceeding 350 yards per game in peak years. Bellard's contributions extended beyond the field through instructional materials, including his 1975 publication detailing the triple option, which served as a foundational playbook for coaches nationwide and influenced the scheme's proliferation across college programs. This resource outlined blocking schemes, reads, and play variations, enabling widespread adoption and refinement of the triple option during its peak expansion.

Traditional Formations

Wishbone Formation

The features a positioned under , with a aligned directly behind at approximately four to five yards, and two halfbacks split five yards behind the fullback and five yards outside the tackles, creating a Y-shaped backfield that resembles the bone of a . This alignment allows for quick execution of option plays while maintaining a compact structure for power runs. The offensive line is balanced, typically consisting of two tight ends attached to the tackles for added inside run support, along with guards and a using tight splits—often one foot between linemen—to facilitate double-team blocks at the point of attack. In the wishbone, the triple option is executed with the fullback dive as the primary choice, where the quarterback hands off to the charging straight ahead through the A or B gap, supported by double teams from the guards and tackles on defensive linemen. If the crashes inside on the dive, the quarterback pulls the ball and executes a keep option off-tackle, reading the end's movement, or pitches to the trailing halfback on the perimeter for an outside run with lead blocking from the other halfback. This sequence forces defenses to account for three potential ball carriers, leveraging the formation's backfield depth for misdirection and blocking angles. The wishbone's advantages lie in its power-running emphasis, derived from an I-formation foundation but enhanced by the split halfbacks for lateral stretch, enabling multiple blockers to overpower defenses at the point of attack and distribute carries among backs to wear down opponents. It gained prominence in the , where teams like used it to secure five straight titles from 1969 to 1973, achieving a school-record 30-game from 1968 to through relentless triple-option ground control. However, drawbacks include vulnerability to defenses stacking the box with eight or nine players against run-heavy attacks, compressing the formation and limiting outside plays due to contain leverage, which contributed to its decline by the late 1970s as opponents adapted with specialized counters.

Flexbone Formation

The flexbone formation represents an evolution of the traditional wishbone offense, adapting its triple option principles to a more spread-out structure that emphasizes speed and perimeter attacks. In this setup, the quarterback aligns in shotgun approximately 4-5 yards behind the center, allowing for quicker reads and snaps while maintaining the core option mechanics. The fullback is positioned offset slightly behind and to one side of the quarterback, serving as the primary dive option, while two slotbacks are flexed out wide, typically at the numbers or hashes, to create horizontal stretch and blocking angles on the perimeter. The offensive line in the flexbone is often configured in an unbalanced manner to facilitate pulls and traps, with and tackles reaching the second level for perimeter blocking on outside options. Linemen employ inside-out blocking schemes, where the center and backside double-team initially before releasing, creating lanes for the inside veer dive while enabling pulls from the playside and tackle to seal edges on pitches. This setup prioritizes quick movement over pure power, allowing smaller, more athletic linemen to compete against larger defenses by exploiting angles and misdirection. Triple option execution in the flexbone tweaks the classic veer by focusing on a midline read, where the quarterback first assesses the defensive tackle for the fullback's inside veer dive. If the tackle penetrates, the quarterback pulls and reads the defensive end; a crashing end triggers a pitch to the trailing slotback arcing outside, while containment allows the quarterback to keep up the gut. Slotbacks block the force defender or force a pitch decision, ensuring the offense maintains a numbers advantage on the perimeter. The flexbone gained significant popularity in the 1990s through Paul Johnson's implementation at , where his teams won consecutive NCAA Division I-AA national championships in 1999 and 2000, amassing over 62 wins in five seasons. Johnson's system, rooted in service academy traditions, emphasized relentless rushing attacks that averaged high yards per carry against superior competition. This success influenced widespread adoption in high school programs, particularly in the American South, where the formation's simplicity and effectiveness suited limited rosters and allowed for dominant ground games. Adaptations of the flexbone triple option include counters that incorporate play-action passes off the fake, where the rolls out after handing to the , reading a high-low concept to a or . These counters exploit over-pursuing defenses by using the option's misdirection to open intermediate routes, adding a vertical threat without abandoning the run-heavy identity.

Veer Formation

The veer formation serves as a streamlined variant of the triple option offense, characterized by its emphasis on lateral speed and simplicity without a . In this alignment, the lines up under , with two halfbacks positioned side by side in the backfield, typically 4 to 5 yards deep and offset slightly toward the playside, creating a split-back setup that allows for quick divergent paths. The offensive line is balanced, often featuring one on the playside and a or split end opposite, enabling rapid deployment against various defensive fronts while prioritizing agility over power blocking. The line setup in the veer relies on zone blocking principles tailored to the triple option reads, particularly for the inside veer play, where the playside and tackle execute an inside zone scheme to create a seam for the dive option, while the playside tackle often releases to the second level for the linebacker. The is left unblocked as the primary read , forcing the to diagnose pursuit in , which complements the formation's speed-oriented design by minimizing complex assignments and exploiting mismatches through misdirection. Execution unfolds with the snap to the , who immediately hands off to the lead halfback (dive back) on an inside path toward the ; if the crashes inward on the dive, the pulls the ball and keeps it on an outside arc, reading a secondary like the linebacker; otherwise, the pitches laterally to the trailing halfback (pitch back) for a sweep around the edge, maintaining three viable threats to stretch the defense horizontally. Originating in the mid-1960s, the veer was developed by at the as an adaptation to compensate for a struggling offensive line, debuting midseason in 1965 after an initial 1-4 start and transforming the Cougars' attack by leveraging backfield speed in a no-fullback configuration to isolate defenders. This innovation introduced the core triple option mechanics to modern , focusing on quick reads and agile ball carriers to generate explosive plays without relying on dominant interior blocking. In the 1980s, the veer influenced hybrid triple option systems at service academies, where and incorporated veer executions—such as inside veer reads—into their and emerging flexbone schemes to enhance speed against superior athletic opponents, contributing to 's national ranking of No. 2 in 1985.

I Formation

The I formation in the triple option offense aligns the under , with the positioned directly behind at approximately three to five yards, and the halfback (or tailback) aligned another three to five yards deeper, all in a straight vertical line to form the characteristic "I" shape in the backfield. This setup emphasizes a compact, power-oriented backfield that facilitates quick handoffs and reads while maintaining downhill running lanes. The offensive line typically employs a pro-style configuration, often featuring double tight ends on the strong side to provide additional blocking support for the dive option, enabling inside traps and reaches to seal off interior defenders. Blocking schemes prioritize gap-sound techniques, with the center and guards executing angle-down blocks to the play side, while the tight ends and tackles focus on drive blocking to create momentum for the fullback's dive path. In execution, the quarterback's first read targets the defensive end or linebacker responsible for the dive; if that defender crashes inside, the ball is handed to the fullback on a straight-ahead dive, exploiting the vacated edge. If the dive key holds or flows outside, the quarterback pulls and becomes the second option, reading a secondary force defender (often a safety or linebacker) for a keep run along the edge. The third and final option pitches the ball backward to the halfback arcing outside, who then attacks the perimeter based on the pitch key's leverage. This sequenced decision-making forces defenses to account for multiple threats without additional blockers, typically outnumbering them 6-on-5 at the point of attack. Historically, the triple option gained prominence in through under head coach , who adapted elements of the into the I setup starting in 1975 to blend power running with option principles. This evolution contributed to national championships for the Cornhuskers in 1994, 1995, and 1997, where the offense averaged over 300 rushing yards per game by leveraging the formation's linear backfield for direct, explosive runs. Similar I-based triple option schemes also powered to a 1990 national title, highlighting the formation's effectiveness in Big Eight and Big 12 play during the late . The strengths of the I formation triple option lie in its ability to generate downhill momentum through straightforward power execution, allowing larger fullbacks to thrive in short-yardage situations and overwhelming defenses with physicality. However, it offers limited misdirection compared to spread or split-back sets, as the linear alignment reduces pre-snap motion and angle options, making it more predictable against disciplined fronts that can assign consistent keys.

Modern Variations

Run-Pass Options

In run-pass options (RPOs) adapted to the triple option framework, the executes a post-snap read on a key defender, such as the edge rusher, to choose between handing off to the dive back, keeping for a quarterback run, or delivering a quick pass to exploit defensive positioning. This mechanic layers a passing threat onto the core option structure, compelling defenses to account for both run and short pass without additional blockers. A prominent hybrid form, the triple RPO, integrates the dive option with secondary reads for a bubble screen or slant route, where the quarterback pulls the ball if the edge defender crashes on the run, then targets the open receiver in the flat or underneath coverage. This design forces linebackers and safeties into conflicted assignments, as they must balance run support against horizontal passing routes. These RPO integrations gained prominence in during the 2010s, as spread offenses merged traditional option principles with Air Raid passing concepts to achieve greater balance and exploit defensive alignments. Coaches like and advanced this evolution, with Dykes at Louisiana Tech in 2011 using RPOs to attach quick passes to zone runs, reading conflict defenders like linebackers for run or throw decisions. For instance, Auburn's 2013 season showcased RPO-triple hybrids in their spread-option attack, where Nick Marshall's post-snap reads on zone plays led to pivotal passes, including a 39-yard in the that highlighted the scheme's balanced threat. Defenses respond to these plays with aggressive blitz packages aimed at disrupting the mesh point—the crossing area where the processes reads and receivers align—by overloading the box to force hurried throws or botched exchanges. Such pressures, often involving simulated blitzes from a 3-4 front, target the 's decision window to neutralize the option's multiplicity.

Hybrid and Pro Adaptations

In the 2020s, hybrid forms of the triple option have emerged by integrating read-option principles with runs within offenses, allowing teams to maintain the scheme's decision-making while enhancing spacing and explosiveness against modern defenses. These adaptations often feature the reading the backside through the mesh point before pulling the ball for a secondary read on the force defender, with the pitch option serving as a perimeter threat; this read with two backs combines inside blocking rules to create mismatches in formations. Such hybrids address the traditional triple option's limitations in passing efficiency by incorporating pre-snap motions and shifts, as seen in "neo-triple" playbooks that blend veer concepts with wide reads. In the NFL, the Baltimore Ravens exemplified pro adaptations with rookie quarterback Lamar Jackson starting in late 2018, incorporating read-option and veer packages from pistol and shotgun formations to leverage his rushing ability, with triple option elements like pitches becoming more prominent in 2019. Jackson, drawing from his college experience at Louisville where he amassed over 4,000 rushing yards using veer concepts, read the frontside for the give-pull decision before using the nickel corner as the pitch key, often aligning running backs Alex Collins and Kenneth Dixon simultaneously. This power-option framework, influenced by offensive coordinator Greg Roman's prior schemes, emphasized misdirection and quarterback runs while integrating triple option elements for unpredictability. To counter sophisticated defenses, coaches have adapted triple option elements with integrations and no-huddle operations, accelerating play delivery to disrupt substitutions and force reactive alignments. In spread no-huddle systems, wristband signaling—using colors for formations and numbers for plays—enables rapid option execution, with quarterbacks echoing calls to linemen and incorporating "tags" for blocking adjustments against defensive fronts. These tempo-driven hybrids, such as Spread system, combine inside zone runs and read-options with quick motions to maintain rhythm, wearing down opponents through sustained pace. Despite these innovations, implementing full triple option schemes in the pros faces significant challenges due to larger, faster defenders who can penetrate gaps and disrupt the quarterback's reads more effectively than at lower levels. The scheme's reliance on precise blocking angles and multiple decisions becomes riskier against athletic fronts, where cut blocks may not neutralize size advantages as reliably, often limiting its use to situational packages rather than a base offense.

Impact and Usage

Notable Teams and Coaches

In the 2000s, Paul Johnson revitalized Navy football by installing the flexbone triple option offense upon his arrival as head coach in 2002, leading to a 45-29 record over six seasons, including an 8-5 mark in 2007 with notable victories over (46-44 in triple overtime) and (42-38). Johnson's scheme emphasized quarterback decision-making and misdirection, enabling Navy to average over 300 rushing yards per game in 2007 while snapping a long losing streak against major opponents. Ken Niumatalolo succeeded Johnson at in 2007 and maintained the triple option as the program's cornerstone through 2022, compiling a 109-83 overall record, the most wins by any , with three West Division titles (2015, 2016, 2019) and a school-record 11 wins in 2015 that included a victory. Under Niumatalolo, achieved 10 victories against , the most in series history, and reached 10 bowl games, relying on the offense's run-heavy execution to control tempo and limit turnovers. Since 2024, Niumatalolo has served as at San Jose State, where he has shifted to a more pass-oriented , posting a 7-6 record in 2024 and 3-7 as of November 2025. Army experienced a triple option revival under head coach Jeff Monken starting in 2014, culminating in back-to-back double-digit win seasons of 10-3 in 2017 and 11-2 in 2018, the program's first such streak since the 1940s, with the flexbone scheme powering a nation-leading 301.8 rushing yards per game in 2018. This success reclaimed the Commander-in-Chief's Trophy for Army in 2017 and 2018, highlighting the offense's effectiveness against modern defenses through disciplined blocking and option reads. In 2024, Army achieved a 12-2 record, went undefeated in AAC play to win the conference championship, and finished ranked No. 21 in the final AP poll, with the triple option contributing to a 2nd-ranked national rushing success rate of 52.6%. At the high school level, the flexbone triple option has seen renewed dominance in the 2020s among programs leveraging it for consistent playoff runs, such as Savannah Christian Preparatory School in , which reached the 3A state finals in 2023 using the scheme to average over 35 points per game en route to an undefeated regular season. Similarly, Annville-Cleona High School in has sustained success under coach Gingrich's triple option attack, posting winning records and playoff appearances annually in the mid-2020s by emphasizing fullback dives and midline options to maximize undersized rosters. In the , Kliff incorporated option packages into the ' offense during his 2019 tenure as , blending run-pass options (RPOs) and read options with rookie to create defensive mismatches, as evidenced by the team's league-high 31% usage of 10-personnel sets that facilitated 105.7 rushing yards per game. These elements drew from Kingsbury's college roots, allowing Murray to extend plays and contributing to a 5-3-1 start before defensive injuries impacted the season. While no winner has emerged directly from a pure triple option offense in the 2000s or later, Stanford finished second in 2009 voting after rushing for 1,736 yards and 26 touchdowns in a scheme incorporating zone reads and power options under coach , earning the as the nation's top . Under Brian Newberry, who succeeded Niumatalolo at in 2023, the Midshipmen evolved the triple option in 2024 by integrating passing elements under offensive coordinator , resulting in an 8-5 , 407 points scored (a significant increase), and explosive plays including seven of 60+ yards; this hybrid approach continued into 2025.

Strategic Advantages and Challenges

The triple option offense excels at forcing defensive hesitation through its multiple threats, as the quarterback's read on the eliminates one potential tackler while the pitch option draws coverage away from the dive, creating numerical advantages in the . This misdirection places defenders in unfavorable 2-on-1 matchups, leveraging and to exploit gaps without requiring superior . Service academies, which frequently employ the scheme, have historically averaged 5.1 yards per carry and 360 rushing yards per game, enabling teams to control the clock and sustain drives against more athletic opponents. Despite these strengths, the triple option faces challenges from its run-heavy nature, which can become predictable in sets lacking passing threats, limiting explosiveness against pass-oriented defenses like the Air Raid. The reliance on a mobile for repeated carries heightens risk, as the position demands precise under physical duress without the protection afforded to pocket passers. Additionally, the scheme's execution requires exceptional from linemen and backs, where any breakdown in timing can lead to negative plays, though these occur less frequently than in non-option runs (7% vs. 12% since 2017). Defenses counter the triple option with stacked fronts like the 4-3, where ends crash to disrupt the pitch while linebackers "squeeze" to contain the and keeper. In a 3-4 , assigning a "spy" linebacker or to the neutralizes the read option, often paired with flow coverage to handle play-action passes. Pressures, such as double blitzes from inside linebackers on B-gaps, force early decisions and reduce the offense's ability to read keys effectively in a 4-down front. Analytics from the 2020s underscore the scheme's efficiency, with triple option runs averaging 5.5 yards per carry since 2017—outpacing non-option designed runs at 4.9—and achieving positive yardage on 87% of attempts. Army's 2024 performance highlights its viability against defenses, ranking 2nd nationally in rush success rate (52.6%), though it struggles for big plays beyond 20 yards. Looking ahead, the triple option is declining in professional football due to rule changes like the 2018 cut-block ban and preferences for pass-heavy schemes, but it endures in youth and levels for teaching fundamentals and controlling game pace. Adaptations, such as integrating run-pass options and spread formations, suggest potential resurgence by blending its core principles with modern explosiveness.

References

  1. [1]
    Triple Option Offense (Coaching Guide With Images)
    The Triple Option Offense is a run-heavy offense, and gets its name from the number of potential ball carriers on any given play – three.
  2. [2]
    Dissecting The Triple Option - Sportank
    The triple option is a run play where one of three players are going to get the ball and run upfield with it hence triple or three options.
  3. [3]
    ESPN.com: NCF - Football 101
    Triple-option plays​​ The base triple option to the split-end side involves the offensive tackle taking advantage of an angle and blocking down creating a double ...Missing: American explanation
  4. [4]
    Army Football 101: The Triple Option
    Jul 23, 2024 · The triple-option is Army Football's base play out of the Flexbone. There are many ways to run it. Three common ways are up the Midline, outside using the ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  5. [5]
    Flexbone Triple Option Football: Formation & Playbook Breakdown
    Apr 4, 2025 · It's an offensive scheme, and not just a formation. The quarterback reads defenders to decide the play. He can hand off to the fullback quickly.
  6. [6]
    What Is a Triple Option Anyway? - College and Magnolia
    Aug 29, 2017 · When two defenders are read, the play is a triple option. Leaving a defender unblocked creates a numerical advantage for the offense.Missing: mechanics | Show results with:mechanics
  7. [7]
    Shotgun Inside Zone Triple Option: Coaching The Little Things
    Feb 10, 2017 · Coach Hudspeth does an outstanding job explaining Quarterback and Running back mechanics and gives a full explanation on technique with coaching ...
  8. [8]
    Coaching the Quarterback in the Triple Option
    Mar 14, 2021 · The quarterback and his decision making is going to make or break this offense he needs 'football smarts' to make great decisions. He has to ...
  9. [9]
    Flexbone Triple Option Explained: When to Run It & How to Win with It
    Feb 16, 2025 · Coach Jones breaks down the fundamentals of running the Triple Option in the Flexbone offense, focusing on simplifying defensive identification ...
  10. [10]
    6 Drills to Teach Triple Option Mesh Mechanics - X&O Labs
    Jun 24, 2018 · The purpose of this drill is to work the quarterbacks' footwork, hand placement, eye progression as well as cadence.
  11. [11]
    The Past, Present and Future of the Triple Option - Sports Illustrated
    Sep 27, 2018 · 1941: Missouri coach Don Faurot derives the option play from the 2-on-1 fast break in basketball. Using Faurot's invention out of the Split-T ...
  12. [12]
    History of Offense, the Triple Option - The Newnan Times-Herald
    Aug 5, 2022 · The origins of the play date back to 1941 and coach Don Faurot of the Missouri Tigers. Faurot has been a basketball player in school, and he ...
  13. [13]
    History of Option Football - the beginning
    Apr 21, 2009 · After that game, Missouri coaching legend Don Faurot invented the Split-T, the genesis of option football, very much in use today. Disciples of ...
  14. [14]
    A triumph of imagination: The last golden season of Army football
    Sep 20, 2012 · Army coach Red Blaik's iconic Lonely End offensive scheme may have looked exotic in 1958, but it was grounded in simple, straight-ahead football ...
  15. [15]
    1958 college football season - Wikipedia
    On January 13, 1958, the eleven-man NCAA Rules Committee unanimously approved a resolution to allow teams to choose between kicking an extra point after a ...
  16. [16]
    Navy vs Army Box Score, November 29, 1958 - Sports-Reference.com
    Navy vs Army Box Score, November 29, 1958. Other Conference Games. MARQ, 18, Final · ASU, 42. NAVY, 6, Final · ARMY (5), 22. AFA (8), 20, Final.Missing: option | Show results with:option
  17. [17]
    Option football: The history and how it works - SB Nation
    Don Faurot at Missouri is credited for building the “option” as we know it. Faurot had nearly seen his passing quarterback, Paul Chrisman, win the Heisman in ...
  18. [18]
    Texas' iconic Wishbone offense, at 50, still influential in college football
    Jul 24, 2018 · Bellard's three-back, triple-option attack didn't have its name yet. But the "Wishbone" would go on to catapult Texas to back-to-back national ...
  19. [19]
    Bellard, Emory Dilworth - Texas State Historical Association
    Sep 16, 2015 · Texas won the 1969 and 1970 national championships and enjoyed a thirty-game winning streak from 1968 to 1970. ... Wishbone Wisdom: Emory Bellard— ...
  20. [20]
    Creation and Development of the Wishbone - Burnt Orange Nation
    Oct 8, 2019 · Bellard had won a pair of state championships at Breckenridge in North Texas in 1958 and '59, and was hired at San Angelo Central (over ...
  21. [21]
    https://www.burntorangenation.com/2019/10/8/20905811/creation-and-development-of-the-wishbone
  22. [22]
    Larger than life coaches, predictable powers dominate 1970s ...
    With mostly the same team in 1971, Alabama went to USC and won 17-10. The biggest difference in that game was Bryant's switch to wishbone and triple-option ...
  23. [23]
    AIR FORCE AND ARMY MAKE A WISHBONE FOR SUCCESS
    Oct 11, 1985 · Air Force chose this offense in 1980 because Ken Hatfield, then the coach ... The triple-option is the wishbone's key play, its core. The ...
  24. [24]
    Fisher DeBerry - Colorado Sports Hall of Fame
    DeBerry was head coach of the Air Force Academy football program from 1984 through 2006 and helped the Falcons notch 17 winning seasons.
  25. [25]
    Back To The Option Fearing the blitz, teams are adding the razzle ...
    Aug 31, 1998 · Washington awaiting the pitch. Air Force, Army, Navy--A clockwork option is the trademark of service academy football. Army and Navy have ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Reimagining the Triple Option Offense for Modern College Football
    Jun 4, 2025 · The triple option offense, an integral component of college football's schematic heritage, traces a rich lineage dating back over 80 years. To ...
  27. [27]
    The Multi-Option I-Bone Offense - American Football Monthly
    In 1975, during the week of the Aggies game against the arch-rival UT Longhorns, it was Smith s job as the attack team quarterback to run the Texas Wishbone ...
  28. [28]
    The Wishbone Formation Offense for Youth Football
    ### Summary of Wishbone Formation Offense from https://youthfootballonline.com/wishbone-offense/
  29. [29]
    Football: Complementary plays to the wishbone triple option
    Dec 30, 2010 · The wishbone triple option play is the base play within the greater wishbone-triple-option offensive philosophy.
  30. [30]
    3 Complementary Plays To The Wishbone Triple Option
    Execution: the quarterback is lined up directly behind the center. The fullback places his down hand exactly two yards behind the QB's feet. The two halfbacks ...
  31. [31]
    Big Woo and the Texas Wishbone - Goodyear Cotton Bowl Classic
    Mar 24, 2023 · "Big Woo" as the driving force behind Texas' Wishbone offense that carried the Longhorns to consecutive national championships in 1969 and 1970.
  32. [32]
    TEXAS OFFENSE A WISHBONE OF CONTENTION - Chicago Tribune
    Oct 19, 1986 · Alabama had run it with great success, but the formation declined in popularity in the late 1970s as defenses caught up with its triple option ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Flexbone Formations: Perimeter Run Concepts | X&O Labs
    Sep 8, 2019 · We ran our perimeter run plays out of Diamond and Navy formations. In our shotgun Flexbone offense, the QB has his heels at 4.5 yards.
  34. [34]
    Georgia Southern Option Offense - Paul Johnson | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (3) The read man's alignment on the offensive guard or tackle establishes the quarterback's one way decision-making process for reading triple option play. 3. Where ...
  35. [35]
    Jeff Monken, Army and the Pursuit of Modern Football Warfare
    Jun 29, 2023 · The triple option from the flexbone formation—a setup that mirrors football's ... Paul Johnson from 1997 to 2001 at Georgia Southern (an ...
  36. [36]
    Dual Dynasties | Georgia Southern Magazine
    Jan 17, 2024 · An architect of the Eagles' famed “triple option” flexbone offense, Johnson was instrumental in securing the program's first two FCS/IAA ...
  37. [37]
    Veer Explained - Coach Hugh Wyatt's
    It introduced to the game of football the concept of a triple option - the idea of reading (eliminating the need for blocking) two different defensive people, ...Missing: alignment execution<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Houston's Veer Option - by Patrick Mayhorn - The Outside Zone
    Jul 24, 2020 · Like a lot of things in college football, Bill Yeoman's creation and usage of the veer option offense was the result of a fear of being fired.
  39. [39]
    Understanding the Option and its Complementary Pass Game
    For a play to be termed as an “option”, there must be an option for the quarterback to either hand the ball to his running back, or to keep the ball and run.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  40. [40]
    ESPN.com: NCF - Football 101: I-formation football
    Oct 29, 2002 · The ninth day of class in Bob Davie's Football 101 season-long course breaks down the I-formation offense.
  41. [41]
    Where Have All The Option Teams Gone? | One Foot Down
    Aug 28, 2012 · The wishbone evolved into the I-bone (triple option plays run from the I-formation) and won national titles for Colorado in 1990 and Nebraska in ...
  42. [42]
    Understanding RPO - BLITZOLOGY
    Jun 13, 2019 · Triple - Triple RPO's use the pass as the third phase of a triple option concept. The third phase throw occurs post-snap. The play is a zone ...
  43. [43]
    The Quintessential Guide to Run-Pass Option (RPO) Plays
    May 27, 2024 · An RPO is a play where the quarterback can hand off, pass, or run, based on the defense's reaction post-snap.
  44. [44]
    The pass-first, triple option zone-read - Football Study Hall
    Jun 21, 2019 · When the 3-technique is in that B-gap, the cutback lane is diminished for the RB and he has to cut back to the C if he wants to hit a crease ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    RPO football: History and future explained by coaches
    Dec 5, 2018 · The history and future of the RPO, as explained by 12 coaches. Here's a free coaching clinic on where it came from, how hard it is to stop, and what's next.
  46. [46]
    How the RPO has brought the NFL and college football together in ...
    Nov 8, 2018 · Along with Rich Rod, Washington State coach Mike Leach is considered one of the forefathers of the RPO when he brought his Air Raid offense to ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    The 25 most important games in college football's spread revolution
    May 5, 2020 · The Air Raid offense developed by "mad scientists" Hal Mumme, right, and Mike Leach, center, hit the field at Iowa Wesleyan beginning in 1989.
  48. [48]
    Making it Rain: How Defenses 'Option' The Blitz
    Oct 28, 2021 · We think of the you-go-here-I-go-there designs that teams run in their RPO packages or through the quarterback reading a defender in the run ...
  49. [49]
    Attacking the Offense Away from the Back
    May 2, 2022 · Though the alignment of the overhang inhibited WR Screens and horizontal throws, it opened the defense up to Fin and Slant routes underneath. To ...
  50. [50]
    2 Ways to Enhance Multiple Spread with Triple Option - Chad Johnson
    Adding triple option to a multiple spread offense is extremely difficult to defend. Our video shows how to run zone read with 2 backs and with bubble ...
  51. [51]
    X's and O's: Different Ways the Ravens Could Use Lamar Jackson ...
    Jul 12, 2018 · Veer option would allow the Ravens to use Jackson and running backs Alex Collins and Kenneth Dixon in the game at the same time. Collins would ...
  52. [52]
    Lamar Jackson and the future of the Ravens' power-option offense
    Jan 12, 2020 · The idea is to read the edge defender for the option and give Jackson a lead escort around the edge if the contain isn't careful enough.
  53. [53]
    Post #2 in a Series of Blog Posts on No Huddle Concepts in an ...
    Dec 11, 2018 · In this blog post we will discuss the first of many ways teams mechanically get their option plays into their players within a No Huddle concept.
  54. [54]
    Triple Threat Spread No Huddle Tempo Offensive System
    Triple Threat Spread No Huddle Tempo Offensive System was created to give coaches a road map when installing a system. Triple Threat will enhance your ...
  55. [55]
    The triple option: an in-depth look - Cronkite Sports
    Sep 5, 2014 · Defensive linemen hate facing the triple-option because of the blocking used. Traditional triple-option teams like Georgia Tech and Navy use cut ...
  56. [56]
    2025 Key Trends in Sports: Training & Competitive Advantage
    Nov 25, 2024 · Explore 2025 sports trends, incl. wearable tech, AI analytics, VR training, & women's sports developments. Insights on the future of sports.
  57. [57]
    First-Year Wins with Titan GPS Trackers: A Coach's Playbook for ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · Why GPS Tracking Matters for High School Football. GPS tracking isn't just about collecting data—it's about protecting your athletes ...Missing: triple option 2024
  58. [58]
    Hall of Fame Coach Paul Johnson Turned Around the Fortunes of ...
    Oct 16, 2023 · Only five years earlier, with Johnson running Navy's triple option attack behind quarterbacks Chris McCoy and Ben Fay, Navy had won a 42-38 ...
  59. [59]
    Ken Niumatalolo - Football Coach - Naval Academy Athletics
    Niumatalolo also led Navy to a school-record 11 wins in 2015, which included sharing the West Division title with Houston in Navy's first year in the ...
  60. [60]
    Ken Niumatalolo will not return to Navy football after 15 seasons ...
    Dec 11, 2022 · Niumatalolo, the winningest coach in program history, led Navy to a 109-83 record. The Midshipmen were 10-5 against Army West Point and 7-7 ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  61. [61]
    2018 Army Black Knights football team - Wikipedia
    2018 Army Black Knights football team ; Triple option · Jay Bateman (5th season) · 3–4 · Cole Christiansen; Bryce Holland; Darnell Woolfolk.
  62. [62]
    The Resurging Triple Option | Score Atlanta
    Aug 27, 2024 · Smith implemented a flexbone-based triple option offense, and over his more than a decade in Danielsville, the team has made four playoff ...
  63. [63]
    Lebanon County high school football 2020s look back apart of PIAA
    Jul 23, 2025 · The Dutchmen have been as steady as any team in the area, and it comes from internal consistency. Coach Matt Gingrich's triple-option attack ...
  64. [64]
    Air Raid to the NFL: What to expect from Kingsbury's Cardinals - ESPN
    Jan 25, 2019 · From the foundational Air Raid pass concepts to the "GT" run game to run-pass options (RPOs) and misdirection, Kingsbury can blend his college ...
  65. [65]
    Kliff Kingsbury admits Cardinals may not rely as much in 2020 on ...
    Aug 5, 2020 · Kingsbury put his own wrinkle in innovating the NFL, running 10 personnel (four wide receiver sets) on a league-high 31% of the offense's snaps ...
  66. [66]
    For Stanford Back, Heisman Would Be Latest Achievement
    Nov 18, 2009 · Toby Gerhart, a senior tailback, who has insinuated himself into the Heisman conversation this month while leading Stanford to consecutive upsets of Oregon and ...
  67. [67]
    Toby Gerhart College Stats, School, Draft, Gamelog, Splits
    Toby Gerhart ; School: Stanford ; Position: RB ; Heisman Voting: 2nd in 2009 ; Draft: 2nd round, 51st overall of the 2010 NFL draft by the Minnesota Vikings.Missing: scheme | Show results with:scheme
  68. [68]
    How the Oregon Ducks utilized the triple option in their spread offense
    Jun 1, 2018 · This play helps to illustrate a few of the advantages of the triple option: The offense is able to eliminate two defenders by reading them.<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Why Kansas Should Embrace The Triple Option - Sports Info Solutions
    May 3, 2022 · Since 2017, triple option runs have averaged more yards per carry (5.5) than non-triple option designed runs (4.9). In addition, they have a ...
  70. [70]
    Defense: Stopping the Triple Option
    Oct 29, 2020 · In this article Coach Hickman discusses how to stop the triple-option offense. He uses the Navy vs. ECU game as a backstory.
  71. [71]
    How to Defend the Triple Option from a 4-Down Alignment
    Jul 13, 2022 · In this article, I will discuss multiple ways of defending the Triple-Option Offense in a 4-down front, a 6-1 look, and with pressures.Missing: formation | Show results with:formation