Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Van Allen Probes

The Van Allen Probes were a pair of identical NASA spacecraft designed to investigate the dynamics of Earth's Van Allen radiation belts, regions of high-energy charged particles trapped by the planet's magnetic field.^[1] Launched on August 30, 2012, aboard an Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral, Florida, the probes—named after physicist James Van Allen, who discovered the belts in 1958—orbited in a highly elliptical path with apogees of about 30,000 kilometers and perigees near 600 kilometers, allowing them to sample the inner and outer belts simultaneously.^[2] The mission, managed by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL), exceeded its planned two-year duration, operating for over seven years and yielding more than 600 scientific publications by mission end, with data continuing to support research on space weather hazards to satellites and astronauts.^[3] The spacecraft were decommissioned in 2019 due to dwindling fuel reserves, with Probe B shutting down on July 23 and Probe A on October 18, after which they re-entered and burned up in Earth's atmosphere.^[4] Equipped with five instrument suites—including the Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS), the Electric Field and Waves (EFW) instrument, and the Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (ECT) suite—the probes measured electric and magnetic fields, plasma waves, and particle energies to address core questions about how solar activity accelerates, scatters, and removes particles from the belts.^[2] Orbiting in tandem but gradually separating, the spacecraft provided stereo measurements, enabling scientists to track rapid changes over timescales from seconds to years.^[1] Key objectives focused on identifying acceleration mechanisms, loss processes like precipitation into the atmosphere, and the belts' response to geomagnetic storms, informing models for protecting technology in near-Earth space.^[5] Among the mission's most notable discoveries was the identification of a transient third radiation belt in September 2012, formed by solar activity and lasting several weeks, revealing the belts' dynamic nature beyond the traditional inner (proton-dominated) and outer (electron-dominated) zones.^[6] The probes also detected "zebra stripe" patterns in electron distributions caused by Earth's rotational electric fields, electrostatic double layers accelerating electrons to millions of electron volts, and the role of whistler-mode chorus waves in rapidly energizing particles during storms.^[5] Further findings included the absence of ultra-relativistic electrons in the inner belt, the influence of very low-frequency radio emissions from human activity creating a protective "bubble" against radiation, and periodic plasmasphere fluctuations tied to the Sun's 27-day rotation.^[5] These insights, supported by coordinated observations from ground-based and other space assets, have enhanced predictive models for radiation belt variability and supported NASA's broader Living With a Star program.^[3]

Mission Background

Historical Context

The Van Allen radiation belts were discovered in 1958 by American physicist James Van Allen through analysis of data from Explorer 1, launched on January 31, 1958, and Explorer 3, launched on March 26, 1958, which carried Geiger counters designed to measure cosmic radiation. These instruments unexpectedly recorded high fluxes of charged particles, revealing two doughnut-shaped zones of energetic particles trapped and accelerated by Earth's geomagnetic field, encircling the planet in a toroidal configuration.^[7]^[8]^[9] Follow-up observations from Pioneer 3, launched December 6, 1958, and subsequent satellites like Explorer 4 and Explorer 7 refined the belts' structure, confirming distinct inner and outer regions separated by a relatively low-density slot region. The inner belt, centered around 1.5 to 2 Earth radii (approximately 1,000 to 6,000 km altitude), is dominated by high-energy protons (>10 MeV) primarily produced via cosmic ray albedo neutron decay (CRAND), where galactic cosmic rays interact with the upper atmosphere to generate neutrons that decay into protons. The outer belt, extending from about 3 to 7 Earth radii (roughly 13,000 to 45,000 km altitude), consists mainly of relativistic electrons (up to several MeV) sourced from solar wind injections into the magnetosphere, with additional contributions from substorm injections and wave-particle interactions. These early measurements established the belts' overall extent from ~1,000 km to 60,000 km altitude but highlighted their role as a hazardous environment, where intense particle fluxes can damage satellite electronics and pose risks to astronauts through ionizing radiation exposure.^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]^[14]^[15]^[16]^[17] By the late 20th century, foundational surveys had mapped the belts' baseline properties, yet substantial knowledge gaps persisted concerning their temporal dynamics, including rapid changes driven by solar wind variations, geomagnetic storms, and internal magnetospheric processes. Limited in-situ data from short-duration or low-resolution missions left uncertainties about particle acceleration mechanisms—such as radial diffusion, wave-induced energization, and local stochastic heating—and loss pathways, including precipitation into the atmosphere via electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves or magnetopause shadowing. These unresolved questions underscored the need for prolonged, high-fidelity observations to elucidate storm-time variability and the belts' response to solar activity, ultimately motivating modern dedicated investigations like the Van Allen Probes to bridge these gaps.^[18]^[19]^[20]

Objectives and Scope

The Van Allen Probes mission, originally known as the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP),^[21] formed a key component of NASA's Living With a Star (LWS) program, which seeks to explore the Sun-Earth connection and its effects on near-Earth space.^[22] The principal investigator was Harlan Spence of the University of New Hampshire, while the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHUAPL) served as the mission's manager and primary spacecraft developer.^[23] This initiative built upon the foundational discovery of Earth's radiation belts in 1958, aiming to address longstanding uncertainties in their dynamic behavior.^[1] The mission's primary scientific objectives centered on quantifying the acceleration, radial transport, and loss mechanisms for charged particles within the radiation belts, including how these processes balance during geomagnetic activity.^[24] Additional goals included measuring the electromagnetic waves and fields that energize and redistribute particles, as well as evaluating radiation risks to spacecraft electronics and human explorers in the inner magnetosphere.^[25] These investigations particularly emphasized the inner and outer belts, along with the slot region separating them, with a focus on relativistic electrons and protons reaching energies up to 10 MeV.^[24] In scope, the mission deployed two identical spacecraft in complementary orbits to enable stereoscopic observations of belt dynamics across multiple spatial and temporal scales.^[23] Originally planned as a two-year baseline mission following the August 2012 launch, operations extended to seven years until fuel depletion in 2019, allowing prolonged monitoring through multiple solar cycle phases. The effort also incorporated collaboration with the BARREL balloon campaign, which provided ground-based conjugate measurements to study particle precipitation into the atmosphere.^[26]

Launch and Operations

Launch Details

The twin spacecraft, originally designated as the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP), underwent final integration and processing at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida following their arrival on May 1, 2012.^[27] This phase included rigorous environmental testing, such as vibration and shock simulations, to verify structural integrity under launch conditions, building on prior tests conducted at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.^[28] Each spacecraft had a launch mass of approximately 665 kg, comprising a dry mass of 609 kg plus 56 kg of hydrazine propellant for attitude control.^[29] The mission's launch was originally targeted for August 23, 2012, but faced multiple delays. The first postponement to August 24 occurred due to a signal drift in the Atlas V's C-band tracking beacon system, requiring engineering checks.^[30] Subsequent delays to August 30 stemmed from adverse weather conditions, including upper-level winds and cloud cover exceeding launch criteria, compounded by the approach of Tropical Storm Isaac, which posed risks of high winds and potential damage to the launch infrastructure.^[31] These logistical challenges highlighted the need for flexible scheduling in hurricane-prone launch windows at Cape Canaveral. On August 30, 2012, at 04:05 EDT, the RBSP mission lifted off from Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V 401 rocket, configured with a 4-meter dual-payload fairing to accommodate both spacecraft in a stacked arrangement.^[32] The ascent proceeded nominally, with the fairing jettisoned approximately 3 minutes and 50 seconds after liftoff to reduce mass as the vehicle climbed through the atmosphere.^[30] Following upper-stage burn and Centaur coast, the probes separated sequentially: RBSP-A at T+78 minutes 50 seconds and RBSP-B at T+91 minutes 4 seconds, achieving initial elliptical orbits with spin stabilization initiated at a nominal rate of 5 revolutions per minute for three-axis attitude control.^[30]^[29] In a post-launch tribute, NASA renamed the RBSP mission the Van Allen Probes on November 9, 2012, honoring physicist James Van Allen, who discovered Earth's radiation belts in 1958.^[33] This dual-probe effort, part of NASA's Living With a Star program, marked a key step in coordinated heliophysics observations.^[29]

Orbital Configuration and Timeline

The Van Allen Probes were inserted into highly elliptical Earth orbits immediately following their launch on August 30, 2012, with an initial perigee altitude of approximately 600 km (radial distance of 1.1 Earth radii, or R_E) and an apogee altitude of about 30,000 km (6 R_E), at an inclination of 10° and an orbital period of roughly 9 hours.^[29]^[2] This configuration allowed the probes to traverse the heart of the Van Allen radiation belts multiple times per orbit, providing comprehensive coverage of the inner and outer belts.^[1] The two identical spacecraft, designated Probe A and Probe B, were deployed into nearly identical orbits but phased approximately 180° apart in true anomaly to enable simultaneous, stereoscopic observations of dynamic phenomena in the belts.^[2] Slight differences in their apogees—Probe A at roughly 30,540 km and Probe B at 30,500 km—ensured the probes lapped each other 4–5 times per year, varying their separation from about 100 km to 5 R_E for multi-point measurements.^[29] Over the initial months of operations, onboard hydrazine thrusters were used to fine-tune the orbits, adjusting apogees by ±75 km to optimize the lapping rate from an initial 67 days to 35 days while maintaining the overall 1.1 × 6 R_E envelope and 10° inclination.^[2] The spacecraft spun at 5 revolutions per minute, with their axes oriented sunward (within 15° of the sun direction) to support solar array performance and instrument calibration.^[34] Following launch aboard an Atlas V rocket, the probes underwent a 60-day commissioning phase that concluded on October 28, 2012, verifying subsystems and beginning nominal science operations on November 1, 2012.^[35] The prime mission ran for two years until October 31, 2014, after which a bridge phase extended operations through September 2015, followed by a formal extended mission approved for November 1, 2015, to at least January 1, 2019.^[2] Fuel-efficient station-keeping maneuvers, using minimal hydrazine propellant, preserved the orbits throughout the mission until depletion.^[3] In February–March 2019, a series of de-orbit burns lowered the perigee altitudes to approximately 300 km to increase atmospheric drag and hasten natural reentry, marking the transition to end-of-life operations.^[33] Probe B was deactivated on July 19, 2019, and Probe A on October 18, 2019, concluding a total mission duration of 7 years, 1 month, and 19 days from launch.^[4]^[3]

Mission Conclusion

The Van Allen Probes mission concluded due to the exhaustion of propellant reserves, specifically hydrazine used for attitude control maneuvers. Probe B was deactivated on July 19, 2019, at 1:27 p.m. EDT, following the transmission of a shutdown command by mission operators. Probe A followed on October 18, 2019, at approximately 12:30 p.m. EDT, marking the end of active operations after seven years in orbit.^[4]^[3] Prior to deactivation, both spacecraft underwent final maneuvers to enter safe mode, ensuring no operational anomalies occurred during the transition. Operators continued data downlink until the last contact with each probe, confirming the successful capture of scientific observations that exceeded the mission's original two-year objectives. The spacecraft experienced no significant engineering issues throughout their extended operations, demonstrating robust design resilience in the harsh radiation environment.^[4]^[3] As of 2025, the deactivated probes remain in orbit, with their paths decaying naturally due to atmospheric drag at perigee. In early 2019, mission controllers performed de-orbit burns to lower the perigee of both spacecraft to approximately 300 km, facilitating controlled orbital decay without requiring additional fuel. This configuration ensures the probes will reenter Earth's atmosphere and disintegrate in the mid-2030s, complying with NASA's orbital debris mitigation guidelines. Post-mission data from the probes are archived and publicly accessible through NASA's Coordinated Data Analysis Web (CDAWeb) at the Space Physics Data Facility.^[33]^[29]^[36]

Spacecraft Design

Structural Features

The Van Allen Probes consisted of two identical twin spacecraft, designated RBSP-A and RBSP-B, designed and built by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) for NASA's Living With a Star program. Each probe featured a compact, spin-stabilized bus with an octagonal forged aluminum central cylinder serving as the primary load-bearing structure, measuring approximately 1.3 meters in height and 1.8 meters in diameter. The bus incorporated aluminum honeycomb panels with composite face sheets for mounting components, along with multilayer insulation using conductive Kapton and germanium black Kapton radiators to manage thermal loads in the extreme radiation environment. Deployable booms extended antennas and sensors away from the main body, including electric field antennas up to 100 meters in length, to minimize interference while operating within the Van Allen belts.^[37]^[38] The spacecraft achieved three-axis stabilization through continuous spin at a nominal rate of 5.5 revolutions per minute (rpm), with the spin axis maintained 15° to 27° off the Sun direction for optimal power generation and thermal balance; this configuration ensured stable pointing without additional thruster firings beyond periodic nutation control. The dry mass of each probe was 609.4 kilograms, increasing to a fueled wet mass of 665.4 kilograms with 56 kilograms of hydrazine propellant. Power was provided by a 30-volt direct energy transfer bus, supported by a 50 ampere-hour lithium-ion battery and four solar array panels totaling 3.2 square meters, utilizing triple-junction gallium arsenide cells with 28.5% efficiency.^[37]^[29] Radiation hardening was a core aspect of the design, tailored to withstand the intense particle fluxes in the belts, including protons and electrons exceeding 10 MeV. Electronics were encased in aluminum shielding 8.9 to 12.7 millimeters (350 to 500 mils) thick, providing protection against total ionizing dose levels up to 34 kilorads (Si) for components, with the mission environment projected at 15.4 kilorads including a factor-of-two margin. The central processor utilized a radiation-hardened BAE Systems RAD750 single-board computer operating at 33 MHz (50 MIPS), featuring triple modular redundancy for fault tolerance, while memory systems included 16 MB SRAM and 16 gigabits of SDRAM with error detection and correction (EDAC) and hardware scrubbing to mitigate single-event upsets. No components susceptible to linear energy transfer below 80 MeV·cm²/mg were used, and surfaces were grounded to prevent electrostatic charging.^[37]^[38]

Key Subsystems

The Van Allen Probes relied on a monopropellant hydrazine propulsion subsystem to perform orbit-raising maneuvers, attitude adjustments, spin rate changes, and eventual de-orbit operations. The system featured eight 0.9 N Aerojet MR-103G thrusters fed by 56 kg of hydrazine stored in three 25.6-liter Inconel 718 tanks operating in a blowdown configuration with a maximum pressure of 400 psi at 50°C. This setup provided a total delta-V capability of approximately 183 m/s, sufficient for the mission's operational needs in the radiation belts.^[37] Power generation and distribution were handled by a direct energy transfer system designed for reliability in the harsh radiation environment. Four deployable solar array panels, totaling 3.2 m² in area and equipped with triple-junction gallium arsenide cells at 28.5% efficiency, provided the primary power source, supplemented by an 8-cell, 50 Ah lithium-ion battery for eclipse periods up to 114 minutes. The nominal bus voltage ranged from 24 to 32 V, supporting an average orbital load of 277 W in normal mode and 233 W in safe mode, with fault-tolerant distribution ensuring continuous operation of critical systems.^[37] Communications were facilitated through an S-band transponder with an 8 W solid-state power amplifier, enabling high-rate science data downlink up to 2 Mbps (turbo-coded at rates of 125, 250, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 kbps) and lower-rate engineering telemetry, achieving an average instrument data rate of 72 kbps for a daily downlink of ≥6.7 Gbits. Two low-gain, broad-beam antennas with -4 dBic gain and 70° field of view were mounted on the top and bottom decks, relaying data via the NASA Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) during commissioning and emergencies at 1 kbps, with primary support from the 18-m antenna at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, and additional stations in the NASA Near Earth Network (e.g., Hawaii and Australia).^[37] Thermal control employed a cold-biased passive design to maintain component temperatures between -25°C and +55°C, utilizing multilayer insulation blankets, local radiators for heat rejection, and minimal active heaters powered by the main bus, with no cryocoolers or complex cryogenics required. Attitude determination and control were achieved through spin stabilization at a nominal rate of 5.5 rpm, with the spin axis oriented 15° to 27° from the Sun direction for optimal solar array illumination; sensors included a dual-head Sun sensor assembly (0.125° resolution) and the fluxgate magnetometer from the EMFISIS instrument suite, providing attitude knowledge accuracy of ≤1° (3σ), while thruster firings handled precession, nutation damping, and spin rate adjustments to ±0.25 rpm, without reaction wheels. The spin-stabilized configuration, integrated with the spacecraft's structural design, contributed to a high operational reliability, including near-complete science data return throughout the mission.^[37]

Instruments

Particle Measurement Instruments

The Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (ECT) suite, with principal investigator Geoffrey Reeves from Los Alamos National Laboratory, comprised three coordinated instruments designed to measure the full spectrum of energetic electrons and ions in the radiation belts, providing comprehensive coverage from low to relativistic energies. The suite utilized solid-state detectors and foil-based spectrometers to achieve energy resolutions of approximately 15-25% across its components, enabling detailed characterization of particle fluxes, compositions, and pitch-angle distributions over 4π steradians. The Helium, Oxygen, Proton, and Electron (HOPE) mass spectrometer measured differential fluxes of ions (H+, He+, O+) and electrons from 1 eV to 50 keV in 36 logarithmically spaced energy steps, employing a top-hat electrostatic analyzer with foil time-of-flight mass spectrometry and channel electron multiplier detectors for species identification.^[39] HOPE provided full pitch-angle coverage through five polar and up to 16 azimuthal bins per spacecraft spin, with an energy resolution of ΔE/E ≈ 15%.^[39] The Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) detected electrons from ~20 keV to >1 MeV and protons from ~100 keV to ~10 MeV, using magnetic focusing with solid-state detectors to separate particles by rigidity and energy.^[40] Four units per spacecraft (low-, medium-, and high-energy electron sensors, plus a medium-energy proton sensor) ensured broad coverage, with energy resolutions of ~20-25% and pitch-angle resolution supporting full distribution mapping via spin-averaged sampling.^[40] The Relativistic Electron Proton Telescope (REPT) focused on high-energy particles, measuring electrons from 1.8 MeV to 20 MeV and protons from 3.4 MeV to 17 MeV using stacked silicon solid-state detectors behind a collimator, achieving an energy resolution of ΔE/E ≈ 25%. REPT provided directional measurements perpendicular to the spacecraft spin axis, enabling reconstruction of pitch-angle distributions with a geometric factor of ~0.2 cm² sr. The Radiation Belt Storm Probes Ion Composition Experiment (RBSPICE), led by principal investigator Barry Mauk at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, consisted of an ion composition sensor and an electron sensor to probe ring current dynamics and particle sources.^[41] The ion sensor employed time-of-flight versus total energy techniques with solid-state detectors to resolve H+, He+, and O+ ions up to ~2 MeV/nucleon from thermal to suprathermal energies (~20 keV to 2 MeV/nuc), while the electron sensor covered 20 eV to 2 MeV in two modes for varying time resolutions.^[41] RBSPICE achieved energy resolutions of ~10% and pitch-angle resolutions of ~22.5°, providing full-sky coverage through multiple viewing directions.^[41] The Relativistic Proton Spectrometer (RPS), with principal investigator J. Bernard Blake from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, targeted ultra-relativistic particles using a combination of eight stacked silicon solid-state detectors and a Cherenkov radiator to measure protons from ~60 MeV to 2 GeV and electrons above ~100 MeV.^[42] RPS offered directional sensitivity with an instantaneous angular resolution of 30° (deconvolved to 5°), enabling full pitch-angle distribution coverage and flux accuracies of ~10%, with energy resolutions improving from ~30% at lower energies to broader bands at higher energies.^[42]

Fields and Waves Instruments

The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS), led by principal investigator Craig Kletzing at the University of Iowa, consisted of a fluxgate magnetometer, search-coil magnetometer, and waves receiver to measure DC magnetic fields and plasma waves from 10 Hz to 400 kHz.^[43] The fluxgate magnetometer (MAG) provided triaxial vector measurements of the magnetic field from DC to 30 Hz with 0.1 nT accuracy over a ±4096 nT range, using three sensors on a 3-meter boom for spin-axis and orthogonal components. The search-coil magnetometer measured wave magnetic fields from 10 Hz to 12 kHz with a sensitivity of 3 × 10^{-11} nT²/Hz at 1 kHz. The waves instrument (WAVES) included electric field measurements from 10 Hz to 12 kHz (vector) and up to 400 kHz (single channel) with a sensitivity of 3 × 10^{-17} V² m^{-2} Hz^{-1} at 1 kHz, utilizing signals from the EFW antennas. A central data processing unit handled on-board processing, including fast Fourier transforms, with 512 MB memory for data products like spectral matrices and wave normal angles. EMFISIS achieved full vector coverage and supported studies of wave-particle interactions and magnetic field evolution in the radiation belts.^[43] The Electric Field and Waves (EFW) instrument, with principal investigator John Wygant at the University of Minnesota, measured three-dimensional quasi-static and low-frequency electric fields and waves using double-probe antennas.^[44] It featured two pairs of 100 m tip-to-tip spin-plane booms with spherical sensors for ±500 mV/m DC fields (up to 256 Hz) and two 12-14 m axial booms for the spin-axis component (±1 V/m). The instrument operated in survey mode at 32 samples/s for electric fields and 16 samples/s for spacecraft potential (estimating plasma densities of 0.1-100 cm^{-3} with 50% accuracy), and burst modes up to 16.4 ksamples/s for high-resolution waveforms. Resolutions were approximately 0.3 mV/m (or 10%) for spin-plane fields and better than 0.1 mV/m sensitivity. EFW provided analog signals to EMFISIS for joint wave analysis and supported investigations of electric fields driving particle acceleration, transport, and loss during geomagnetic storms.^[44]

Scientific Results

Radiation Belt Structure and Dynamics

The Van Allen radiation belts comprise two main zones: a stable inner belt extending from approximately L = 1.1 to 2.0 Earth radii (R_E), dominated by energetic protons with energies up to hundreds of MeV primarily sourced from cosmic ray albedo neutron decay, and a dynamic outer belt spanning L ≈ 3 to 6 R_E, characterized by relativistic electrons (0.1–10 MeV) that exhibit intense spatial and temporal variations.^[45] Van Allen Probes measurements using the Relativistic Electron Proton Telescope (REPT) have shown that the inner belt is largely devoid of relativistic electrons (>1 MeV), with fluxes below detectable limits (>0.1 cm⁻² s⁻¹ sr⁻¹ keV⁻¹), revising earlier models that assumed a significant electron population there.^[46] Instead, lower-energy electrons (<1 MeV) fill this region sporadically via penetration from the slot region during rare events.^[45] The slot region, separating the inner and outer belts at L ≈ 2–3, is narrower than previously estimated, particularly for higher-energy electrons, as the inner boundary shifts inward with increasing energy due to differential loss processes, effectively merging aspects of the belt structure at ultra-relativistic levels. In the outer belt, electron fluxes at MeV energies can vary by up to four orders of magnitude (10,000-fold) over days, driven by rapid changes in radial transport and local intensities peaking near L = 4, highlighting the belts' responsiveness to solar wind conditions. Radial diffusion rates in this zone, mapped across L = 2–6, show structured enhancements during quiet periods, contributing to the belts' overall configuration.^[45] A key discovery was the transient third belt of high-energy electrons (>2 MeV) observed between the inner and outer belts following an interplanetary shock from a solar coronal mass ejection on August 31, 2012, forming a stable storage ring that persisted for about four weeks before decaying through interactions with the atmosphere and waves. This event demonstrated the belts' capacity for ephemeral structures, with the third belt's electrons confined primarily to L ≈ 2.5–3.5. Observations also revealed asymmetries in belt structure, including azimuthal variations due to longitudinal particle drift and dawn-dusk differences in electron intensities, as corroborated by multi-spacecraft data. Baseline measurements from the Van Allen Probes between 2014 and 2019, spanning the declining phase of solar cycle 24, established quiescent-state profiles that partially validate pre-2012 models, such as the radial extent and proton dominance of the inner belt, while underscoring greater outer belt dynamism than anticipated.^[45] These long-term datasets, with fluxes mapped across energies and L-shells, provide a foundational reference for distinguishing baseline structure from transient features.^[45]

Particle Acceleration and Loss Mechanisms

The Van Allen Probes observations have elucidated the primary mechanisms for particle acceleration in Earth's radiation belts, including radial transport driven by ultra-low-frequency (ULF) waves and local stochastic heating through wave-particle resonances. Radial diffusion transports electrons from regions of higher phase space density (PSD) to lower L-shells, leading to adiabatic energization as particles conserve their first adiabatic invariant while encountering stronger magnetic fields. This process is quantified by the radial diffusion equation for PSD f,

\frac{\partial f}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{L^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial L} \left( L^2 D_{LL} \frac{\partial f}{\partial L} \right),

where PSD gradients \partial f / \partial L < 0 drive inward flux, and the diffusion coefficient D_{LL} typically ranges from $10^{-6} to $10^{-4} R_E^2/day, with the electric field component dominating by 1–2 orders of magnitude over the magnetic one.^[47] ULF wave power, measured by the probes' EMFISIS and EFW instruments, correlates with enhanced diffusion rates during periods of geomagnetic activity, facilitating the buildup of relativistic electron populations in the outer belt.^[48] Local acceleration occurs predominantly via gyroresonant interactions with whistler-mode chorus waves, which scatter seed electrons (initially ~10–100 keV from substorm injections) to relativistic energies exceeding 1 MeV on timescales of hours.^[49] These interactions involve nonlinear trapping and acceleration within chorus wave packets, with single-wave encounters boosting electron energies by ~50–200 keV in milliseconds, compounding over multiple resonances to achieve MeV levels efficiently.^[49] Chorus wave growth is driven by the free energy in temperature anisotropy of suprathermal electrons, with temporal growth rates \gamma on the order of 10^{-2} to 10^{-1} \omega_{ce} (where \omega_{ce} is the electron cyclotron frequency), as derived from probe measurements of wave amplitudes and electron distributions.^[50] VLF hiss waves, prevalent in the plasmasphere, contribute to local heating through pitch-angle scattering, broadening electron distributions and indirectly supporting energization by maintaining resonant populations.^[51] Particle losses counteract acceleration, primarily through magnetopause shadowing and wave-induced precipitation. During magnetospheric compressions, outward radial transport exposes outer-belt electrons to the magnetopause, leading to shadowing losses where particles drift into the magnetosheath without scattering.^[52] Van Allen Probes data show these losses depleting >1 MeV electrons across L ~5–7, with lifetimes on the order of days for relativistic populations.^[53] Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves drive precipitation by resonantly scattering relativistic electrons into the loss cone, enhancing pitch-angle diffusion rates that remove ~10–100 keV to MeV electrons via atmospheric entry.^[54] Probe observations confirm EMIC activity in the dusk sector correlates with rapid flux dropouts, with scattering efficiencies peaking for energies above 1 MeV.^[55] Key observational signatures include "butterfly" pitch-angle distributions (PADs), characterized by depleted fluxes at 90° pitch angles and peaks at lower angles, which indicate dominant radial diffusion over local acceleration in certain regimes.^[56] These PADs, observed extensively by the RBSPICE instrument, arise from betatron acceleration during inward transport, with flattening linked to chorus wave activity.^[57] Additionally, data from 2015–2018 revealed specific wave-particle resonance conditions under low plasma densities, enabling enhanced chorus-driven acceleration with resonance widths broadening to encompass a wider energy range.^[58] These findings underscore the interplay of transport and local processes in shaping belt dynamics.

Interactions with Geomagnetic Storms

The Van Allen Probes provided critical observations of enhanced particle injections during the March 2015 geomagnetic storm, also known as the St. Patrick's Day event, where solar wind pressures compressed the magnetosphere and drove rapid inward transport of plasma.^[59] This storm, one of the most intense in the past decade, featured a minimum Dst index of approximately -223 nT, reflecting significant magnetospheric disturbance.^[60] During the main phase, the probes detected intensified ring current formation, primarily driven by oxygen (O+) ions from the ionosphere, which contributed substantially to the overall energy input and pressure buildup in the inner magnetosphere.^[60] A hallmark of geomagnetic storms observed by the Van Allen Probes was the rapid dropout of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt, often attributed to outward radial diffusion and loss across the magnetopause during magnetospheric compressions.^[61] For instance, during the March 2015 event, electron fluxes at energies above 1 MeV decreased by several orders of magnitude within hours as particles were transported beyond the magnetopause. Subsequent recovery involved rapid refilling of the belts through substorm-associated injections, where bursty electric fields accelerated seed populations of electrons inward from the plasma sheet, restoring fluxes in as little as one to two days. The probes' measurements in 2016 further elucidated the ring current's energy dynamics during storms, revealing total energy contents on the order of 10¹⁵ joules, with contributions from both ions and electrons varying by phase.^[62] In the recovery phase, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves played a key role in suppressing relativistic electron populations by scattering them into the atmosphere, particularly in regions of high proton anisotropy, thereby limiting post-storm enhancements.^[63] Collaborative efforts with the THEMIS mission provided broader spatial context for these storm interactions, combining Van Allen Probes' inner magnetosphere data with THEMIS's tail observations to map global plasma injections and wave activity during events like the 2015 storm.^[64] Post-mission analyses from 2022 and 2023 have leveraged Van Allen Probes datasets to develop and validate storm forecasting models, such as machine learning frameworks for predicting radiation belt electron fluxes and data assimilation techniques for real-time ring current nowcasting.^[65]^[66] These models incorporate probe observations to improve predictions of storm-driven belt variability, enhancing space weather applications.^[67] Analyses using Van Allen Probes data continued into 2024 and 2025, including surveys of the inner magnetosphere and integrations with other mission datasets to refine space weather models.^[68]^[69]

Legacy

Contributions to Space Weather Understanding

The Van Allen Probes mission significantly advanced hazard assessment for satellites operating in Earth's radiation belts by providing high-fidelity data that updated key radiation environment models, such as AE9/AP9, used for designing electronics in GPS and communication satellites. These models incorporate measurements from the probes' Relativistic Electron Proton Telescope (REPT) and Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS), enabling more accurate quantification of trapped particle fluxes and their variability, which helps mitigate risks like single-event upsets and total ionizing dose effects in satellite components. For instance, the inclusion of Van Allen Probes datasets in AE9/AP9 version 1.50 refined flux maps, offering improved spatial resolution and uncertainty estimates that better represent dynamic conditions in the belts, thereby reducing over- or under-design margins for missions traversing these regions.^[70]^[71] In space weather forecasting, the probes' observations of wave-particle interactions facilitated the development of predictive models for relativistic electron fluxes, which have been integrated into operational tools at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Space Weather Prediction Center. Data from the Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) revealed how chorus and hiss waves drive electron acceleration and loss, allowing for enhanced nowcasting and 24-72 hour predictions of belt enhancements during geomagnetic storms, with comparisons to GOES satellites showing substantial improvements in flux estimates at energies above 2 MeV. This integration supports timely alerts for satellite operators, improving the accuracy of radiation belt specifications by incorporating near-real-time Van Allen Probes measurements into NOAA's anomaly attribution systems.^[72]^[73] For astronaut safety on lunar and Mars missions, the probes' detailed measurements of proton events and energetic particle distributions in the inner radiation belt informed radiation exposure models, highlighting the belts' role as dynamic barriers that can both pose risks and modulate incoming solar energetic particles. Observations during the mission's 2019 decommissioning phase underscored how belt variability affects transit trajectories, providing data to optimize shielding and timing for deep-space voyages while quantifying proton fluxes that contribute to acute radiation hazards. These insights have directly supported NASA's human exploration planning by refining dose estimates for crewed missions beyond low Earth orbit.^[23]^[5] Beyond Earth, the mission's elucidation of radiation belt physics— including particle acceleration mechanisms and magnetospheric responses—has broader implications for understanding exoplanet magnetospheres, informing models of habitability around magnetized worlds by analogizing Earth's dynamic belts to those potentially encircling other stars. This foundational work on wave-driven transport and loss processes aids in interpreting remote observations of extrasolar systems, enhancing predictions of radiation environments that could impact planetary atmospheres and surfaces.^[45]^[74]

Data Utilization and Follow-on Research

The data from the Van Allen Probes mission are publicly archived through NASA's Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF) and accessible via the Coordinated Data Analysis Web (CDAWeb), providing multi-instrument datasets spanning the mission's duration from 2012 to 2019.^[36]^[75] These archives include high-resolution measurements of particles, fields, and waves, enabling coordinated analyses with other heliophysics missions. Researchers can access the data using tools such as Python-based libraries developed for SPDF services, facilitating efficient processing and visualization of the over seven years of observations.^[76] Post-mission analyses have continued to yield insights into radiation belt phenomena. In 2022, a comprehensive calibration of the Electric Field and Waves (EFW) instrument data was published, improving the accuracy of electric field measurements for ongoing studies of wave-particle interactions.^[34] By 2023, statistical surveys of electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves using the full dataset revealed occurrence rates of approximately 2.4% overall, with rising tone EMIC waves detected only 0.2% of the time, highlighting their role in electron precipitation during geomagnetic storms.^[77]^[78] In 2024, reanalysis techniques applied to the archives uncovered previously undetected features in electron distributions within the belts, such as enhanced fluxes during quiet periods, advancing models of particle dynamics.^[79] Collaborations with the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency's (JAXA) Arase mission have extended observations beyond the Van Allen Probes' end-of-life, leveraging complementary datasets for inner magnetosphere studies. Joint analyses since 2019 have validated cross-calibrations between instruments like MagEIS on Van Allen Probes and HEP on Arase, enabling multi-spacecraft views of electron acceleration during substorms.^[80]^[81] These efforts have produced detailed mappings of "killer electron" hotspots, informing radiation hazard predictions.^[82] The mission's legacy has influenced subsequent small satellite programs, including CubeSat initiatives that build on its radiation belt characterizations. For instance, NASA's CIRBE CubeSat, launched in 2023, detected two temporary radiation belts formed after the May 2024 solar storm, sandwiched between the inner and outer Van Allen belts, using techniques refined from Probes-era data.^[83] By 2025, Van Allen Probes data had contributed to over 500 peer-reviewed publications, establishing foundational datasets for radiation belt modeling. Looking forward, archived data support deorbit monitoring efforts, with orbital tracking confirming the spacecraft's controlled reentry in 2019 and ongoing assessments of debris risks.^[84] Integration with the Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (IMAP), launched in 2025, provides heliospheric context by combining Van Allen Probes' inner magnetosphere measurements with IMAP's outer heliosphere observations, enhancing understanding of solar wind influences on belt dynamics.^[85]

References

[1]
Van Allen Probes - NASA Science
Aug 5, 2024 · Van Allen Probes. Type: Probe. Launch: Aug. 30, 2012. Location: Earth orbit. Objective: Study the Van Allen Belts. Learn more about Van Allen Probes.
[2]
[PDF] Van Allen Probes Mission Overview and Discoveries to Date
A goal of the Van Allen Probes extended mission is to enable understanding of the relative importance of precipitation and magnetopause losses. The launch of ...
[3]
Mission Accomplished: Van Allen Probes Conclude Seven Years of ...
Oct 17, 2019 · On October 18, 2019, at about 12:30 p.m. EDT, spacecraft A of the Van Allen Probes mission will be shut down by operators at the Johns Hopkins ...
[4]
First of Two Van Allen Probes Spacecraft Ceases Operations - NASA
Jul 23, 2019 · On July 19, 2019, at 1:27 p.m. EDT, mission operators sent a shutdown command to one of two Van Allen Probes spacecraft, known as spacecraft ...
[5]
Ten Highlights From NASA's Van Allen Probes Mission
Oct 17, 2019 · But days after the Van Allen Probes launched, scientists discovered that during times of intense solar activity, a third belt can form.
[6]
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/rbsp/news/third-belt.html
[7]
What are the Van Allen Belts and why do they matter? - NASA Science
Jul 23, 2023 · Discovered in the 1950s Van Allen calculated that it was possible to fly through the weaker regions of radiation to reach outer space. In 1968, ...
[8]
Explorer 1 | Overview - NASA
The Van Allen Belts Data from Explorer 1 and Explorer 3 (launched Jan. 31 and March 26, 1958, respectively) detected the existence of charged particle ...
[9]
Explorer 1 - Earth Missions - NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
... Explorer Principal Investigator Dr. James Van Allen's discovery of radiation belts around Earth held in place by the planet's magnetic field. The findings ...
[10]
Brief History: Artificial Belts and Early Studies - NASA
Nov 25, 2001 · After the December 1958 flight of Pioneer 3, Van Allen and Frank [1959] concluded that there existed not one belt but two (Figure 3)--an "inner ...
[11]
[PDF] an environmental model for van allen belt protons
The two main sources of particles apparently are the decay of neutrons caused by cosmic ray interactions with the atmosphere, and the "leaking in" of solar ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[12]
Measurement of electrons from albedo neutron decay ... - NASA ADS
... inner Van Allen belt can vary greatly, while the neutron-decay rate ... cosmic-ray albedo neutron decay (CRAND). In this process, cosmic rays that ...
[13]
High‐energy radiation belt electrons from CRAND - Selesnick - 2015
Mar 19, 2015 · Cosmic ray albedo neutron decay, or CRAND, is the main source of ... Farley (1976), The physical mechanisms of the inner Van Allen belt, Fundam.
[14]
Space Radiation Source: SEP - Solar Energetic Particle - Events
The inner belt mainly contains protons with energies exceeding 10 MeV . The outer belt contains mainly electrons with energies up to 10 MeV .
[15]
From solar sneezing to killer electrons: outer radiation belt response ...
... solar wind streams and the associated stream interaction regions. This ... electrons, i.e. relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen belt. Numerous ...
[16]
Probing the Electric Space Around Earth - NASA Earth Observatory
Aug 30, 2012 · The inner belt, a blend of protons and electrons, can reach down as low as 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) in altitude. The outer belt, comprised ...
[17]
Studying the Van Allen Belts 60 Years After America's First Spacecraft
a Geiger counter strapped to a miniature tape recorder — was registering radiation levels a thousand times ...
[18]
Things we do not yet understand about solar driving of the radiation ...
May 26, 2016 · Van Allen Probes data are filling in gaps in knowledge about the strength and extent of waves and particles.
[19]
Acceleration of Particles to High Energies in Earth's Radiation Belts
Oct 25, 2012 · This highly dynamic region of near-Earth space provides an important natural laboratory for studying the physics of particle acceleration.Missing: gaps | Show results with:gaps
[20]
Discovering Earth's radiation belts - Physics Today
Dec 1, 2017 · Later renamed the Van Allen Probes, the dual-spacecraft mission was designed to explore the spatial structure and dynamics of the radiation ...
[21]
Living With a Star Program Missions - NASA LWS
Van Allen Probes (RBSP) is being designed to help us understand the Sun's influence on Earth and Near-Earth space by studying the Earth's radiation belts on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
Mission - Van Allen Probes
The Van Allen Probes will help us understand the sun's influence on the Earth and near-Earth space by studying the planet's radiation belts on various scales ...Missionoverview · Nasa Launched The Van Allen... · Missionthe Team
[23]
Science Objectives and Rationale for the Radiation Belt Storm ...
Sep 7, 2012 · The NASA Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) mission addresses how populations of high energy charged particles are created, vary, and evolve in space ...
[24]
[PDF] History and Science Motivation for the Van Allen Probes Mission
Jul 26, 2016 · For further information on the work reported here, contact Barry Mauk. His e-mail address is barry.mauk@jhuapl.edu.
[25]
BARREL - NASA Science
The BARREL mission augmented the measurements of NASA's Van Allen Probes spacecraft that were launched on Aug. 30, 2012. BARREL's team also coordinated with ...
[26]
NASA's Radiation Belt Storm Probes Arrive at Kennedy Space Center
May 1, 2012 · RBSP will begin its exploration of Earth's Van Allen Radiation Belts with a predawn launch scheduled for Aug. 23, aboard a United Launch ...Missing: shock | Show results with:shock
[27]
Radiation Belt Storm Probes: Integration and Testing 2012 - YouTube
May 30, 2012 · ... Kennedy Space Center on May 1, 2012. Shown here are: -Solar array ... NASA's Van Allen Probes Discover Third Radiation Belt Around Earth.
[28]
Van Allen Probes - eoPortal
It aimed to explore the vital processes that operate within the solar system, particularly those affecting near-Earth space weather.<|control11|><|separator|>
[29]
Atlas V launches at the third attempt with RBSP spacecraft
Aug 29, 2012 · The launch of the Radiation Belt Storm Probes was just days after the tenth anniversary of the Atlas V's maiden flight on 21 August 2002. The ...
[30]
Tropical Storm Isaac Delays Launch of NASA Satellites - Space
Aug 25, 2012 · Tropical Storm Isaac forced NASA to delay its twin Radiation Belt Storm Probes launch to Aug. 30 to protect the $686 million satellites and ...
[31]
NASA Launches Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission
Jun 6, 2013 · NASA's Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP), the first twin-spacecraft mission designed to explore our planet's radiation belts, launched into the predawn skies.
[32]
NASA's Van Allen Probes Begin Final Phase of Exploration in ...
Feb 12, 2019 · These fast-moving particles create radiation that can interfere with satellite electronics and could even pose a threat to astronauts who pass ...
[33]
The Van Allen Probes Electric Field and Waves Instrument
Nov 25, 2022 · The Principal Investigator for the Van Allen Probe EFW instruments was John Wygant at the University of Minnesota. The instruments ...
[34]
NASA Renames Mission to Honor James Van Allen, Pioneering ...
Nov 9, 2012 · On Oct. 28, the Van Allen Probes completed their 60-day commissioning phase, and began their two-year primary science mission. Each Van Allen ...
[35]
SPDF - Coordinated Data Analysis Web (CDAWeb) - NASA
CDAWeb contains selected public non-solar heliophysics data from current and past heliophysics missions and projects.Mission Data & Orbits Services · Previous data & software... · + CDAWeb helpMissing: total | Show results with:total
[36]
[PDF] The Van Allen Probes Observatories: Overview and Operation to Date
The observatories are expected to operate beyond the 2-year extension, as they carry con- sumables to continue operation until early 2019. The mission was ...
[37]
Radiation Belt Storm Probes—Observatory and Environments
Dec 14, 2012 · Each RBSP observatory operates independently in a spin-stabilized mode at a 4–6 rpm nominal spin rate with the spin axis nearly Sun pointed and ...
[38]
Helium, Oxygen, Proton, and Electron (HOPE) Mass Spectrometer ...
Mar 8, 2013 · The HOPE mass spectrometer of the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) mission (renamed the Van Allen Probes) is designed to measure the in situ plasma ion and ...
[39]
The Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) Instruments ...
This paper describes the Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) instruments aboard the RBSP spacecraft from an instrumentation and engineering point of ...Missing: Van Allen
[40]
Radiation Belt Storm Probes Ion Composition Experiment (RBSPICE)
RBSPICE is a time-of-flight versus total energy instrument that measures ions over the energy range from ∼20 keV to ∼1 MeV. RBSPICE will also measure electrons ...
[41]
The Relativistic Proton Spectrometer (RPS) for the Radiation Belt ...
Aug 30, 2012 · This paper describes the Relativistic Proton Spectrometer (RPS) whose purpose is to answer scientific and applied questions about the inner Van ...
[42]
Earth's Van Allen Radiation Belts: From Discovery to the Van Allen ...
Nov 23, 2019 · The changing 30-day averaged flux of electrons with sunspot number and solar wind ... outer Van Allen belt. Science, 340(6129), 186–190 ...
[43]
Van Allen Probes show that the inner radiation zone contains no ...
Feb 2, 2015 · These MagEIS measurements clearly show that there are no significant fluxes, >0.1/(cm2 s sr keV), of MeV electrons in the inner radiation zone ...
[44]
Electric and magnetic radial diffusion coefficients using the Van ...
Aug 6, 2016 · The drift-averaged power spectral densities are used to derive the magnetic and the electric component of the radial diffusion coefficient. Both ...Missing: RE | Show results with:RE
[45]
[PDF] Contribution of ULF Wave Activity to the Global Recovery of the ...
Sep 22, 2014 · To investigate the contribution of the ULF waves, we searched the Van Allen Probes data for a period in which we can clearly distinguish the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[46]
Van Allen Probes observations of prompt MeV radiation belt electron ...
Dec 31, 2016 · It is found that resonant seed electrons with initial energies ∼1 MeV can gain ∼100 keV in a 10–20 ms interaction with a single chorus wave ...
[47]
Nonlinear Wave Growth Analysis of Whistler‐Mode Chorus ...
Jan 3, 2020 · We show the regions where nonlinear growth of whistler-mode chorus waves is preferred to occur in the inner magnetosphere.
[48]
Electron Scattering by Very‐Low‐Frequency and ... - AGU Journals
Jun 13, 2022 · Using Van Allen Probes observations, we perform a survey of the VLF and LF transmitter waves at frequencies from 14 to 200 kHz. The statistical ...
[49]
Contributions to Loss Across the Magnetopause During an Electron ...
Loss to the magnetopause during electron dropout events is due to magnetopause shadowing, outward radial transport, and Shabansky type 1 particles.
[50]
Empirically Estimated Electron Lifetimes in the Earth's Radiation Belts
We use measurements from NASA's Van Allen Probes to calculate the decay time constants for electrons over a wide range of energies (30 keV to 4 MeV) and L ...Missing: 10000x | Show results with:10000x
[51]
[PDF] Observations of radiation belt losses due to cyclotron
Recent Van Allen Probes observations have identified oxygen cyclotron harmonic waves as a common occurrence in the inner magnetosphere during geomagnetic storms ...
[52]
[PDF] EMIC-Wave Driven Electron Precipitation observed by CALET on ...
The study found that electron precipitation was driven by dusk-side EMIC waves, and radiation belt depletion was caused by wave scattering and outward losses.
[53]
Wave-driven butterfly distribution of Van Allen belt relativistic electrons
Oct 5, 2015 · Van Allen radiation belts consist of relativistic electrons trapped by Earth's magnetic field. Trapped electrons often drift azimuthally ...Missing: Stereo | Show results with:Stereo
[54]
Distinct Formation and Evolution Characteristics of Outer Radiation ...
Feb 11, 2020 · Using Van Allen Probes pitch angle-resolved electron flux data, we report intriguing events of electron butterfly pitch angle distributions ...
[55]
Gyroresonant wave-particle interactions with chorus waves during ...
Jan 29, 2021 · In this study, we show that extreme depletions of plasma density, observed by Van Allen Probes, create unique conditions for local acceleration ...
[56]
Cross‐scale observations of the 2015 St. Patrick's day storm ...
Dec 10, 2016 · About 15 min after a 0605 UT dayside southward turning, Van Allen Probes captured the onset of inner magnetospheric convection, as a density ...
[57]
Three‐Step Buildup of the 17 March 2015 Storm Ring Current ...
Jan 3, 2018 · The dependence of the ring current ion dynamics on ion energies has been extensively examined with data from Van Allen Probes, particularly on a ...
[58]
Explaining sudden losses of outer radiation belt electrons ... - Nature
Jan 29, 2012 · Geomagnetic storms driven by the solar wind can cause a dramatic drop in the flux of high-energy electrons in the Earth's outer Van Allen ...
[59]
Ring current electron dynamics during geomagnetic storms based ...
Apr 16, 2016 · (2015), The evolution of ring current ion energy density and energy content during geomagnetic storms based on Van Allen Probes measurements, J.
[60]
Persistent EMIC Wave Activity Across the Nightside Inner ...
Feb 29, 2020 · Wave activity occurs across the nightside of the inner magnetosphere during the recovery phase of a storm, where hot ions overlap an outwardly ...
[61]
Coordinated observations by Van Allen Probes, Arase, THEMIS and ...
Even though the series of CIRs resulted in relatively weak geomagnetic storms, the net effect of the outer radiation belt during each disturbance was different, ...
[62]
Opening the Black Box of the Radiation Belt Machine Learning Model
Apr 4, 2023 · Here, we tackle the issue of the interpretability of a high-accuracy ML model created to model the flux of Earth's radiation belt electrons.
[63]
Reconstruction of electron radiation belts using data assimilation ...
May 18, 2023 · We present a reconstruction of radiation belt electron fluxes using data assimilation with low-Earth-orbiting Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites (POES) ...
[64]
Global validation of data-assimilative electron ring current nowcast ...
Jan 28, 2024 · Assimilating data measured by the Van Allen Probes on the dayside also has a big effect on the electron flux on the nightside (see Supplementary ...
[65]
IRENE-AE9/AP9/SPM Factsheet - VDL
Later in 2017 the V1.50 release updated flux maps for AE9 and AP9 with Van Allen Probes data sets, plus other data sets including our first internationally ...
[66]
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1072795/full
[67]
None
### Summary of Van Allen Probes Contributions
[68]
Space Weather Operation at KASI With Van Allen Probes Beacon ...
Jan 25, 2018 · Barry Mauk,. Barry Mauk. orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-3797. Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD, USA. Search for ...Missing: principal | Show results with:principal
[69]
Scientists solve a decades-old mystery in the Earth's upper ...
Dec 18, 2013 · He thinks the new results from the detailed analysis of Earth will influence future modeling of other planetary magnetospheres. The Van Allen ...
[70]
Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF) Data Archives and Services in ...
SPDF is currently receiving and serving data from missions including Parker Solar Probe, Solar Orbiter, MMS, Van Allen Probes, THEMIS/ARTEMIS, GOLD, ICON ...
[71]
NASA Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF) Data Archive Services as ...
SPDF provides three main science-enabling services: Coordinated Data Analysis Web (CDAWeb), Satellite Situation Center Web (SSCWeb), and OMNI Web. SPDF also ...
[72]
Occurrence Rates of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) Waves ...
Overall, EMIC waves occurred during 2.4% of the time period considered, but rising tone EMIC waves were only found during 0.2% of the time period considered.
[73]
Understanding Quiet and Storm Time EMIC Waves—Van Allen ...
Jul 31, 2023 · EMIC waves occur 2.9 times more often during geomagnetic storms than during non-storm times. The majority (72%) of storm time EMIC waves occur ...
[74]
Secrets of the Van Allen belt revealed in new study - Phys.org
Mar 21, 2024 · The research focused on two bands of energetic particles in near-Earth space, referred to as the Radiation Belts, or the Van Allen Belts.Missing: relogging | Show results with:relogging
[75]
Collaborative Research Activities of the Arase and Van Allen Probes
Jun 21, 2022 · This paper presents the highlights of joint observations of the inner magnetosphere by the Arase spacecraft, the Van Allen Probes spacecraft, and ground-based ...<|separator|>
[76]
Using Van Allen Probes and Arase Observations to Develop an ...
Feb 25, 2023 · The Van Allen Probes hiss-inferred densities are first recalibrated and validated against Arase observations, using both a conjunction event and ...
[77]
Finding a killer electron hot spot in Earth's Van Allen radiation belts
Dec 13, 2019 · "The results of this study will improve the modelling and lead to more accurate forecasting of killer electrons in Van Allen radiation belts.".
[78]
NASA CubeSat Finds New Radiation Belts After May 2024 Solar Storm
Feb 6, 2025 · The energetic particles in these belts can damage spacecraft and imperil astronauts who pass through them, so understanding their dynamics is ...Missing: hazards | Show results with:hazards
[79]
(PDF) VAN ALLEN PROBES END OF MISSION NAVIGATION AND ...
Aug 28, 2020 · The satellites are in highly elliptical orbits, and the maneuvers decreased the perigee altitudes from roughly 600 km and 610 km to 260 km and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[80]
Interstellar Mapping And Acceleration Probe: The NASA IMAP Mission
Oct 30, 2025 · In particular, the IMAP Active Link for Real-Time (I-ALiRT; Lee et al. 2025) continuously telemeters real-time space weather data taken by SWAPI ...