Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Geomagnetic storm

A geomagnetic storm is a major disturbance of 's that occurs when there is a very efficient exchange of energy from the into the space environment surrounding . These storms are primarily triggered by events such as coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which expel billions of tons of and from the Sun's , arriving at in 18 hours to several days, or by high-speed streams from that create co-rotating interaction regions (CIRs). The interaction happens when the southward-oriented interplanetary magnetic field reconnects with 's , allowing energy to penetrate and drive intense electric currents in the and . Geomagnetic storms can significantly alter Earth's , leading to a range of effects on both natural phenomena and human technology. One prominent visible effect is the expansion of auroral displays, or northern and southern lights, which can be seen at lower latitudes during severe storms due to charged particles precipitating into the atmosphere. On the technological front, these storms induce (GICs) in power grids, pipelines, and communication systems, potentially causing voltage instability, transformer damage, and widespread blackouts, as seen in historical events like the 1989 Quebec blackout. Satellites in low-Earth experience increased atmospheric drag from ionospheric heating and expansion, which can lead to and loss, while high-frequency radio communications and suffer disruptions from and errors. Radiation belts around Earth also intensify, posing risks to astronauts and electronics. The severity of geomagnetic storms is quantified using indices like the disturbance storm time (Dst) index, which measures the strength of the ring current in the , and the planetary (Kp), which assesses global geomagnetic activity over three-hour intervals. NOAA's G-scale classifies storms from G1 (minor) to G5 (extreme), with thresholds based on the maximum Kp value; for example, a G5 storm (Kp=9) can cause visible as low as 40° geomagnetic latitude (e.g., and southern ) and potential transformer damage at all latitudes. Monitoring and forecasting these events are critical for mitigating impacts, with agencies like NOAA's Prediction Center providing alerts based on solar observations.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

A geomagnetic storm is a temporary disturbance of Earth's magnetosphere, triggered by variations in the solar wind that cause rapid fluctuations in the strength and direction of the geomagnetic field. These events arise from interactions between the incoming solar wind and Earth's magnetic field, leading to widespread perturbations that can affect regions far from the poles. Earth's magnetosphere and ionosphere serve as critical protective layers against solar activity, with the magnetosphere—a dynamic region extending tens of thousands of kilometers into space—deflecting most charged particles from the Sun, while the ionosphere, a layer of ionized gases in the upper atmosphere, further modulates these influences by conducting electric currents during disturbances. Geomagnetic storms disrupt this equilibrium, often resulting in enhanced particle precipitation into the atmosphere and induced geomagnetic currents. Key characteristics of geomagnetic storms include durations typically spanning from several hours to a few days, with global-scale effects that extend beyond the auroral zones to impact equatorial regions as well. They are commonly divided into phases: a sudden commencement marked by a sharp increase in geomagnetic activity, followed by the main phase where field intensity decreases significantly. These storms are frequently associated with vivid auroral displays, as accelerated particles collide with atmospheric gases, producing colorful lights visible at lower latitudes during intense events. Unlike solar flares, which are bursts of from the Sun's surface, geomagnetic storms specifically result from the magnetosphere's response to structures in the , such as coronal mass ejections, rather than direct effects. Storms are classified by intensity using the planetary (Kp): minor storms at Kp 5, moderate at Kp 6–7, and intense or severe at Kp 8 or higher, with intense storms (Kp ≥ 8) capable of producing geomagnetic field fluctuations of several hundred nanoteslas () at mid-latitudes, and extreme storms (Kp = 9) exceeding 500 .

Physical Causes

Geomagnetic storms arise primarily from the interactions between the , the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), and Earth's . The , a continuous stream of charged particles emanating from , carries the embedded IMF, which can couple with Earth's lines. When the IMF orientation is southward (opposite to Earth's northward field), occurs at the dayside , opening pathways for solar wind plasma and energy to penetrate the . This reconnection process is the key mechanism for transferring energy and momentum, initiating disturbances that propagate tailward and drive global magnetospheric reconfiguration. The primary solar events triggering these storms are coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and high-speed streams originating from . CMEs are massive eruptions of plasma and from the Sun's , propagating through interplanetary space at speeds typically ranging from 300 to 3000 km/s, with Earth-directed ones arriving in 1 to 5 days depending on their and the ambient conditions. These events often contain strongly southward IMF components, enhancing reconnection efficiency upon impact. In contrast, high-speed streams (often exceeding 600 km/s) emerge from persistent —regions of open magnetic field lines on —and can recurrently compress the every 27 days, the period, often forming co-rotating interaction regions (CIRs) where fast and slow interact, leading to prolonged or recurrent storm activity. The storm evolution unfolds in distinct phases driven by these interactions. During the initial onset or sudden storm commencement, the leading edge of a CME or stream compresses the magnetosphere, causing a brief positive perturbation in the surface geomagnetic field due to increased dynamic pressure. This transitions into the main phase, where enhanced reconnection injects plasma into the magnetotail, accelerating particles that populate and intensify the ring current—a toroidal population of energetic ions (primarily protons) encircling Earth at 3–7 Earth radii. The ring current generates a diamagnetic effect, depressing the equatorial geomagnetic field by tens to hundreds of nanoteslas, which defines storm intensity. Recovery follows as the ring current decays through charge exchange with neutral atoms and plasma diffusion into the ionosphere, typically lasting hours to days. Substorms serve as fundamental building blocks of larger storms, involving localized reconnection in the magnetotail that releases stored energy in bursts; multiple substorms can accumulate to form the sustained ring current enhancement of a full storm, whereas isolated events may produce only partial ring currents confined to dusk or dawn sectors. Recent observations from NASA's THEMIS mission have pinpointed multiple reconnection sites in the magnetotail, including near-Earth regions, confirming their role in substorm onset and storm development during southward IMF conditions. The energy budget of these storms quantifies the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, with power transfers reaching up to approximately $10^{12} during intense events. This input is estimated by Akasofu's epsilon parameter, \epsilon, which represents the rate of electromagnetic across the : \epsilon = \frac{V_{sw} B_{south}^2 l_0^2 \sin^4(\theta/2)}{\mu_0} where V_{sw} is the speed, B_{south} is the southward IMF component, l_0 \approx 7 R_E (with R_E Earth's radius) is a characteristic dimension, \theta is the IMF clock angle, and \mu_0 is the . This parameterization captures the reconnection-driven Poynting flux, with \epsilon values exceeding $10^{11} often correlating with substorm and storm activity, though actual dissipation efficiency varies due to magnetospheric feedback.

Measurement and Monitoring

Intensity Scales

Geomagnetic storms are quantified using several standardized indices that measure perturbations in , primarily derived from ground-based data. These scales provide a framework for assessing storm intensity, enabling comparisons across events and informing forecasts. The most widely used indices focus on global and regional geomagnetic variations, with thresholds that classify storms from minor disturbances to extreme events. The , or planetary K-index, is a quasi-logarithmic scale ranging from 0 (quiet conditions) to 9 (extreme storm), calculated every three hours based on the maximum variations observed at 13 globally distributed observatories. It estimates the range of the horizontal component of the (ΔH) in a standardized unit, capturing substorm activity and overall planetary disturbance levels. The Kp index is particularly useful for its global perspective, though it can exhibit local biases due to the uneven distribution of observatories, which may underrepresent activity in the . The Dst index, or disturbance-storm time index, measures the strength of the ring current in Earth's by analyzing hourly averages of the horizontal deviations at four low-latitude observatories, typically yielding negative values in nanoteslas () during storms, where more negative values indicate greater intensity. For instance, Dst values below -100 signify moderate to intense storms, while values exceeding -250 classify as severe. Developed in the , the Dst index focuses on symmetric equatorial disturbances but has limitations, such as its equatorial bias that overlooks high-latitude effects and partial cancellation by other currents during intense events. Complementary metrics include the (auroral electrojet) index, which quantifies substorm-related activity in the auroral oval by differencing upper and lower envelope magnetic variations from a chain of observatories in the , providing insights into electrojet currents. The SYM-H index offers a higher-resolution (1-minute) alternative to Dst, derived from mid-latitude magnetometers to track symmetric ring current variations more precisely during rapid storm developments. For practical applications, the NOAA Prediction Center employs the G-scale, a five-level classification from G1 (minor, =5) to G5 (extreme, =9), directly tied to Kp values to alert on potential technological impacts. The 1989 Quebec blackout, for example, corresponded to a G5 storm with a Dst minimum of -589 nT, disrupting power grids across . These scales integrate into space weather alert systems, where real-time monitoring combines Kp and Dst for comprehensive warnings. Recent advancements include models, such as LiveDst, which predict the Dst index in by incorporating parameters, improving forecast accuracy for operational use as demonstrated during the May 2024 G5 storm.
G-Scale LevelKp RangeTypical Dst (nT)Description
G1 (Minor)5-50 to -100Weak power grid fluctuations can occur
G2 (Moderate)6-100 to -200High-latitude power systems may experience voltage alarms; long-duration storms may cause transformer damage
G3 (Strong)7-200 to -350Voltage corrections may be required; false alarms triggered on some protection devices
G4 (Severe)8-350 to -500Possible widespread voltage control problems; some protective systems will trip out key assets from the grid
G5 (Extreme)9< -500Widespread voltage control problems and protective system issues can occur; some grid systems may experience complete collapse or blackouts; transformers may experience damage

Detection Instruments

Ground-based instruments form the backbone of geomagnetic storm detection, primarily through networks of magnetometers that measure variations in Earth's magnetic field components. Fluxgate magnetometers, which detect the three orthogonal components (X, Y, Z) of the geomagnetic field using saturation induction in ferromagnetic cores, are widely deployed for their sensitivity to rapid changes during storms. Proton precession magnetometers, operating on the principle of nuclear magnetic resonance in proton-rich fluids like kerosene, provide absolute measurements of the total field intensity with high accuracy, often sampling at 10-second intervals. These instruments are integrated into global networks such as INTERMAGNET, which coordinates over 120 observatories worldwide to deliver standardized, high-quality data for real-time storm monitoring. SuperMAG, another collaborative effort involving more than 300 stations, enhances resolution by providing vector magnetic field data at sub-minute cadences, enabling detailed mapping of storm-induced perturbations across latitudes. Space-based instruments complement ground observations by capturing upstream solar influences and magnetospheric dynamics. Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), operated by , include magnetometers that monitor solar wind magnetic fields and particle fluxes from their fixed position over Earth, offering early warnings of storm onset. The Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), positioned at the L1 Lagrange point, provide continuous upstream measurements of solar wind plasma and interplanetary magnetic field strength, crucial for correlating solar ejecta with geomagnetic disturbances. The European Space Agency's () Swarm constellation, launched in 2013, consists of three satellites in low-Earth orbit equipped with vector magnetometers and accelerometers to map the magnetosphere's response during storms, achieving spatial resolutions down to hundreds of kilometers. Historical detection relied on early magnetographs, mechanical devices that recorded field variations on photographic paper or charts, established in a global chain of observatories starting in the mid-19th century. These instruments, such as those at the Helsinki Observatory operational since 1844, captured baseline data for major events like the 1859 , though with limitations in sensitivity and sampling. Modern enhancements include global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers, like those in GPS networks, which infer ionospheric total electron content (TEC) from signal delays, revealing storm-driven electron density enhancements or depletions with vertical TEC accuracies of 1-2 total electron columns per square centimeter. Data from these instruments are integrated and processed in real-time through World Data Centers (WDCs), such as the WDC for Geomagnetism in Kyoto, which aggregate observations from INTERMAGNET and other sources for global dissemination. Typical sampling rates range from 1 to 60 seconds, with vector accuracies of ±1 nT, allowing for prompt derivation of storm indices and alerts. Amateur radio enthusiasts contribute via very low frequency (VLF) monitoring networks, such as the AAVSO Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance (SID) program, which tracks signal amplitude changes from distant transmitters to detect ionospheric perturbations during storm-related solar activity. Emerging low-Earth orbit platforms, including CubeSat missions like launched in 2015, enable cost-effective tracking of storm effects through integrated sensors for ionospheric and magnetospheric profiling, filling gaps in traditional coverage.

Historical Context

Early Observations

Early observations of geomagnetic storms emerged in the 18th century through reports linking auroral displays to disturbances in Earth's magnetic field. In 1770, Swedish scientist Johann Wilke noted that auroral rays aligned with the geomagnetic field lines during a display in northern Sweden, providing one of the first hints of a physical connection between the aurora and magnetic variations. Similar anecdotal accounts from explorers in high-latitude regions described compass needles deflecting erratically amid vivid auroras, though systematic recording was absent at the time. The 19th century marked significant milestones in documenting geomagnetic storms, culminating in the 1859 , the most intense on record. This event, triggered by a massive solar flare observed by on September 1, produced widespread auroras visible at unusually low latitudes, including the Caribbean and Hawaii, and induced strong geomagnetic fluctuations globally. Simultaneous magnetometer readings from observatories coordinated by in Britain and in Germany captured dramatic deflections, with horizontal intensity variations exceeding 1,000 nT in some locations, confirming the storm's planetary scale. These synchronized observations from multiple sites, including in India and , underscored the uniform nature of the disturbance. Key figures advanced the understanding of these phenomena through dedicated measurements. Alexander von Humboldt conducted systematic geomagnetic surveys during his 1799–1804 expedition to South America, mapping magnetic declination and inclination across diverse latitudes and noting diurnal variations potentially linked to solar influences. Later, in the 1830s, Humboldt organized international networks of observatories to monitor magnetic elements continuously, laying groundwork for storm detection. Balfour Stewart, director of the Kew Observatory, contributed to identifying correlations between solar activity and geomagnetic disturbances, notably through his analysis of magnetic records during the major 1872 geomagnetic storm, which he linked to solar influences. The 1859 Carrington Event highlighted early technological impacts, sparking interest in telegraphy amid widespread disruptions. Induced currents from the geomagnetic fluctuations surged through telegraph lines, sometimes melting wires and igniting paper insulation, while operators reported shocks and fires at stations across North America and Europe. In some cases, systems operated without batteries due to the strong geomagnetically induced currents (GICs), but many lines failed entirely, halting communications for hours and prompting inquiries into electromagnetic vulnerabilities. Non-Western records provide additional context for the 1859 event, including Chinese astronomical annals documenting low-latitude auroras. Observations from September 2–3 described crimson lights illuminating the sky from dusk to dawn in regions like Beijing, interpreted as "red vapors" or anomalous glows, aligning with global reports of the storm's auroral expansion.

Theoretical Evolution

In the 19th century, early theories linking geomagnetic disturbances to solar activity emerged without knowledge of the magnetosphere, focusing instead on empirical correlations between sunspot cycles and magnetic variations. Johann von Lamont identified a roughly 10-year periodicity in geomagnetic activity in the 1850s, which he connected to solar influences. Independently, Edward Sabine demonstrated in 1852 that the 11-year sunspot cycle paralleled global geomagnetic storm frequency, using extensive observations from multiple observatories to establish this synchronization. These findings suggested a solar origin for storms but lacked mechanistic explanations, attributing disturbances vaguely to solar emissions affecting Earth's magnetism. The early 20th century brought foundational models incorporating plasma interactions. In 1931, Sydney Chapman and Vincenzo C. A. Ferraro proposed a theory where streams of charged particles from solar flares compress Earth's magnetic field, initiating the sudden commencement phase of storms by forming a current sheet at the sunward boundary. This compression model explained the diamagnetic cavity around Earth and the initial field enhancement observed in magnetograms, marking a shift toward viewing storms as responses to solar corpuscular radiation rather than purely internal processes. A major breakthrough occurred in 1961 with James W. Dungey's reconnection theory, which introduced the concept of an open magnetosphere where magnetic field lines from the interplanetary medium reconnect with Earth's field lines, enabling efficient energy and momentum transfer from the solar wind. This mechanism resolved limitations in closed-field models by allowing plasma entry through dayside reconnection under southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, driving convective flows and substorms that energize . The space age in the 1970s provided direct evidence for key storm components through satellite observations. Explorer 45 and other missions discovered the ring current as a westward toroidal flow of energetic ions (primarily protons and oxygen) in the inner magnetosphere, peaking during the main phase of storms and causing the observed depression in the horizontal magnetic field component. This confirmed the ring current's role in storm intensity, with energies up to tens of keV sourced from the plasma sheet. Concurrently, Syun-Ichi Akasofu refined energy coupling concepts in the 1970s and 1980s, introducing the ε parameter as ε = V_{SW} B_{SW}^2 sin^4(θ/2) l_0, where V_{SW} is solar wind speed, B_{SW} the interplanetary magnetic field magnitude, θ its clock angle, and l_0 a scaling length, to quantify power input to the magnetosphere. Later refinements, such as adjustments for ionospheric contributions and dawn-dusk asymmetries, improved ε's correlation with storm proxies like the AL index, highlighting reconnection-driven energy loading. Modern theoretical frameworks rely on magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations to model the global dynamics of the magnetosphere during storms, capturing compressional responses, flow patterns, and current systems under varying solar wind conditions. These simulations incorporate foreshock processes, such as ultra-low-frequency waves generated upstream of the bow shock that propagate into the magnetosphere to excite substorms, and magnetotail dynamics, including plasma sheet thinning and reconnection bursts that inject particles into the ring current. By solving coupled Navier-Stokes-like equations for plasma flows, MHD models reveal how tailward energy transport sustains prolonged storm phases. Key debates in storm generation centered on the relative roles of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) versus corotating interaction regions (CIRs), with CMEs driving intense, short-lived storms via high-speed, magnetic-flux-rope structures, while CIRs produce recurrent, moderate storms through prolonged high-pressure streams at heliospheric current sheet crossings. Multi-spacecraft studies in the 2000s, using data from missions like Wind, ACE, and Cluster, resolved these by quantifying CMEs' greater geoeffectiveness due to stronger southward fields and densities, though CIRs contribute significantly to annual storm budgets through cumulative effects. Recent advances integrate machine learning into storm modeling, enhancing traditional physics-based approaches with data-driven predictions. NASA-supported studies in 2023 demonstrated deep learning models using solar wind parameters to forecast SYM-H indices hours ahead, achieving correlations up to 0.9 by identifying nonlinear patterns in interplanetary magnetic field data that refine energy coupling estimates.

Patterns and Prediction

Frequency and Cycles

Geomagnetic storms exhibit a strong dependence on the 11-year , with their frequency peaking during when activity is highest. During these periods of elevated , and high-speed streams become more prevalent, driving an increased occurrence of storms. In contrast, see significantly fewer events. This cyclical pattern has been observed consistently across multiple , with storm intensity and number correlating closely with . Historical records of geomagnetic indices, such as the Kp index since the 1930s and the Dst index from the 1960s, provide a robust dataset for quantifying storm frequency. According to NOAA classifications, minor G1 storms (Kp=5) occur more than 100 times per year on average, while severe G4 storms (Kp=8) number about 100 per solar cycle, and extreme G5 events (Kp=9) are rarer, with roughly 4 instances per cycle. These statistics underscore the relative commonality of weaker disturbances versus the infrequency of major events, with data spanning over eight decades revealing a baseline of hundreds to thousands of minor storms annually across all cycles. Beyond solar cycle modulation, geomagnetic storms display distinct patterns in their temporal distribution. Seasonally, activity peaks around the equinoxes in March and September, a phenomenon attributed to the Russell-McPherron effect, where the alignment of Earth's magnetic field with the interplanetary magnetic field enhances reconnection efficiency during these periods. Hemispheric asymmetries also emerge. For instance, records from solar cycles 23 and 24 show a weakening correlation between sunspot activity and storm frequency compared to earlier cycles. The 1859 Carrington Event serves as a benchmark for extreme geomagnetic storms, representing a roughly 1-in-100-year occurrence based on historical proxy data. Probability models employing Weibull distributions for inter-event times estimate the likelihood of such super-intense storms (Dst < -800 nT) at about 0.5–2% per decade, highlighting their rarity yet potential for significant recurrence. In the context of Solar Cycle 25, which began in 2019, activity has exceeded initial predictions, with a delayed but pronounced peak observed in late 2024 extending into 2025, leading to heightened storm frequencies during this phase. For example, the May 2024 geomagnetic storm reached G5 intensity, the strongest since 2003, highlighting the elevated activity.

Forecasting Methods

Upstream monitoring of solar wind conditions at the L1 Lagrange point provides short-lead-time warnings for geomagnetic storms, typically 15 to 60 minutes in advance. Satellites such as NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) and NOAA's Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) measure key parameters like solar wind speed, density, and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) components, particularly the southward Bz component, which drives magnetospheric disturbances when negative. These real-time data streams enable operational alerts by detecting coronal mass ejection (CME) shocks or magnetic clouds approaching Earth. Numerical models simulate the propagation and interaction of solar transients with Earth's magnetosphere to forecast storm onset and intensity. The Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA)-ENLIL model, operated by , couples a coronal model (WSA) with a heliospheric propagation code (ENLIL) to predict CME trajectories, arrival times, and magnetic field orientations from solar surface observations. For magnetospheric responses, the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) integrates magnetohydrodynamic simulations to model ionospheric and ring current dynamics, often coupling IMF Bz forecasts with disturbance storm time (Dst) index predictions for quantitative storm severity estimates. Probabilistic approaches address forecast uncertainties by employing ensemble modeling techniques, generating multiple simulations with varied initial conditions to produce probability distributions for storm occurrence. For instance, ensemble variants of WSA-ENLIL+Cone have demonstrated improved reliability in predicting moderate geomagnetic activity (Kp > 5), achieving accuracies around 70-80% over 1-3 day horizons depending on phase. These methods quantify risks, such as the likelihood of G2-level storms, enhancing for . Operational forecasting systems integrate these models with observational data to issue timely alerts. The NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) provides 1-3 day probabilistic geomagnetic forecasts, including and G-scale predictions, with lead times up to 72 hours and verification using metrics like the Heidke skill score (HSS), which measures improvement over climatological baselines—recent evaluations show HSS values exceeding 0.5 for 24-hour forecasts during active solar periods. Similarly, the European Space Agency's (SSA) program employs comparable modeling for continental alerts, emphasizing ensemble outputs for uncertainty assessment. Advancements in and have introduced data-driven methods for longer-term outlooks. (LSTM) neural networks, trained on over 20 years of and geomagnetic indices from satellites like , enable 1-3 day predictions of storm indices such as Dst, outperforming traditional physics-based models in capturing nonlinear dynamics with errors reduced by up to 20%. Recent integration of data from NASA's , particularly from its 2024-2025 close solar approaches, is enhancing heliospheric models like by providing unprecedented in-situ measurements of near-Sun plasma and magnetic structures, improving CME propagation forecasts through refined boundary conditions.

Societal and Environmental Impacts

Technological Disruptions

Geomagnetic storms induce (GICs) in conductive structures and disrupt the , leading to widespread technological vulnerabilities in power systems, communications, , and assets. These effects arise primarily from rapid changes in Earth's magnetic field, which drive low-frequency that couple into long conductors, and from ionospheric variations that scatter radio signals. Power grids are particularly susceptible to GICs, which flow through lines and grounding points, causing cores to saturate and leading to overheating, harmonic distortions, and potential . During the , with a minimum Dst index of -589 nT, GICs up to 100 A induced a nine-hour in Quebec's system, affecting 6 million people and halting industrial operations across . Similar vulnerabilities were evident in the May 2024 Gannon storm (G5 level), where grid operators in and implemented emergency measures to mitigate voltage instability and prevent cascading failures. Communications systems face blackouts in high-frequency (HF) radio propagation due to ionospheric scintillation, where plasma density irregularities cause signal fading and multipath propagation, severely impacting aviation, maritime, and military links at high latitudes. Satellite transponders also experience interference from enhanced particle precipitation, disrupting geostationary communications during intense storms. The 2024 Gannon storm exacerbated these issues, with reports of scintillation affecting 5G infrastructure reliant on satellite backhaul and ground-based relays in polar regions. Navigation systems, including GPS, suffer from total electron content (TEC) enhancements during storms, which delay and refract signals, increasing positioning errors by up to 100% in severe cases and rendering real-time kinematic (RTK) services unreliable for and . Aviation compasses may deviate by several degrees due to perturbations, complicating polar routes. Satellites in () encounter increased atmospheric drag from storm-induced thermospheric expansion, altering orbits and requiring frequent corrections, while geostationary satellites risk surface charging from high-energy particles, leading to electrostatic discharges and operational anomalies. The 2003 Halloween storms, peaking at Dst -383 nT, disabled over 10 satellites through charging events and dragged others into decay, costing millions in replacements and lost services. Long metallic infrastructure like oil pipelines and railway systems experiences accelerated from quasi-DC GICs, which shift potentials and promote electrochemical degradation over pipelines spanning thousands of kilometers. In railways, GICs induce signaling faults by superimposing on track circuits, potentially causing false occupancy detections and safety risks. Severe geomagnetic storms can cause daily global economic losses estimated up to $7 billion in indirect impacts, with the U.S. alone facing up to $41.5 billion in daily losses from widespread blackouts in extreme scenarios. Mitigation strategies include installing blocking devices, such as capacitors, at neutrals to impede GIC flow without affecting operations; these have been tested and deployed in vulnerable grids.

Biological and Health Effects

Geomagnetic storms can elevate for humans, particularly during high-altitude commercial flights, where increased particle flux from penetrates the atmosphere more readily during intense events. For instance, crew members on polar routes during severe storms may receive elevated doses from solar particle events associated with geomagnetic disturbances, contributing to annual totals of 1.8–7.1 mSv, depending on flight duration, altitude, and , as modeled in studies. Epidemiological analyses have linked exposure to such elevated cosmic in to a modestly increased of certain cancers, including and . At poleward latitudes, l activity during geomagnetic storms exposes ground-level populations to prompt electrons from the , resulting in localized dose rates that can reach up to 100 μSv/h in severe cases, though typically brief and confined to high geomagnetic latitudes. These exposures, while not posing immediate acute risks, contribute to cumulative doses for residents in regions. Health correlation studies have identified weak but statistically significant associations between geomagnetic storm indices and increased cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarctions, with relative frequency rising by approximately % during disturbed periods, particularly among women aged 31-60. Hypotheses suggest that storm-induced electromagnetic fluctuations may suppress production in nocturnal excretion, potentially disrupting circadian rhythms and exacerbating stress responses via modulation. Astronauts aboard the face heightened radiation risks during G3+ geomagnetic storms, prompting protocols to relocate crew to more shielded modules, such as the Destiny or Zvezda compartments, to minimize exposure to solar protons and electrons funneled by the disturbed . In animals, geomagnetic storms disrupt , leading to navigation errors; for example, pigeons exhibit homing inaccuracies and scattered orientations during storms, as their magnetic senses field perturbations. Similarly, strandings in the , such as events involving sperm whales, have been correlated with solar storms, showing up to fourfold increases in likelihood due to interference with geomagnetic navigation cues. Veterinary reports document distress during intense geomagnetic storms, including behavioral anomalies like increased agitation in and sheep, potentially linked to variations affecting their magnetoreceptive systems.

Geophysical Consequences

Geomagnetic storms induce significant disturbances in the Earth's , primarily through enhancements in during the storm's main phase, driven by prompt penetration from magnetospheric . These enhancements can lead to the formation of equatorial bubbles (EPBs), which are large-scale depletions in density extending from the to mid-latitudes, often observed post-sunset during moderate to intense storms. Traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs), propagating as wave-like perturbations in , are also generated, with medium-scale TIDs (wavelengths 100-500 km) commonly triggered by auroral activity and at high latitudes. In the atmosphere, geomagnetic storms cause in the due to increased electric currents interacting with the neutral background, resulting in of neutral winds and significant expansion of the . This heating elevates thermospheric densities and temperatures, with expansions reaching up to 300 km in altitude during intense events, as observed in global models and satellite measurements. The drives equatorward neutral winds, altering composition and circulation patterns in the upper atmosphere for hours to days post-storm. Auroral precipitation intensifies during geomagnetic storms as enhanced magnetospheric funnels more energetic particles into the atmosphere, expanding the auroral oval equatorward by several degrees of . This particle influx deposits fluxes ranging from 10^11 to 10^15 erg/cm² in the E- and F-regions, primarily via electrons (energies 0.1-20 keV), leading to localized and heating. The expanded oval shifts precipitation boundaries, increasing global input to the polar upper atmosphere by factors of 10-100 compared to quiet times. Over longer timescales, geomagnetic storms contribute to changes in upper through particle precipitation that produces odd (NOx), which can deplete in the and via catalytic reactions. Enhanced NOx levels from storm-induced precipitation can persist for weeks, influencing recovery and potentially linking to minor variations in through altered , though the overall solar forcing contribution remains small compared to other factors. These chemical perturbations highlight the storms' role in modulating atmospheric composition on seasonal to decadal scales. A notable geophysical consequence is the acceleration of satellite orbit decay due to increased thermospheric drag from storm-induced density expansions; for instance, during the February 2022 geomagnetic storms, 38 satellites were lost shortly after launch because enhanced drag at low altitudes prevented them from reaching operational orbits. Correlations between geomagnetic storms and seismic activity have been proposed, suggesting possible lithospheric triggering via , but these links remain debated due to inconsistent statistical evidence and confounding factors like tidal influences. Recent data from NASA's mission at Mars, observing ionospheric responses to solar storms, provide analogies for Earth's geospace dynamics, illustrating how unmagnetized planetary atmospheres react to similar energy inputs without a global field. The November 2025 G4 geomagnetic storm (as of November 19, 2025), the strongest of the year, produced an X5.1 leading to radio blackouts over and enhanced auroral displays visible as far south as , with potential disruptions to GPS and satellite operations but no major power outages reported.

References

  1. [1]
    Geomagnetic Storms | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
    A geomagnetic storm is a major disturbance of Earth's magnetosphere that occurs when there is a very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the ...
  2. [2]
    Solar Storms and Flares - NASA Science
    When directed toward Earth, a solar storm can create a major disturbance in Earth's magnetic field, called a geomagnetic storm, that can produce effects such as ...
  3. [3]
    NOAA Space Weather Scales
    Geomagnetic Storms ; G 2, Moderate. Power systems: High-latitude power systems may experience voltage alarms, long-duration storms may cause transformer damage.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] CME link to the geomagnetic storms - CDAW
    A geomagnetic storm occurs when the southward magnetic field component (Bs) of an interplanetary (IP) structure reconnects with Earth's magnetic field thereby ...
  5. [5]
    Coronal Mass Ejections - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
    Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are large expulsions of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun's corona. They can eject billions of tons of coronal material.
  6. [6]
    Solar Wind | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
    Coronal holes produce solar wind of high speed, ranging from 500 to 800 kilometers per second. The north and south poles of the Sun have large, persistent ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Geomagnetic Responses to the Solar Wind and to Solar Activity
    This paper presents a unified overview of our present knowledge of the geomagnetic response to the dynamic solar wind. Physical understanding rather than ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Magnetospheric energy budget and the epsilon parameter - Koskinen
    Nov 30, 2002 · Questions Arising From the Definition of ε. [13] The epsilon parameter was introduced in a paper by Perreault and Akasofu [1978]. ... Download PDF.
  10. [10]
    (PDF) Magnetic Monitoring of Earth and Space - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The geomagnetic field is used to explore the dynamics of Earth's interior and its surrounding space environment, and geomagnetic data are used ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Geomagnetic Observatories: Monitoring the Earth's Magnetic and ...
    Operating nearby and in parallel, a GEM Systems GSM-90 proton precession magnetometer samples the magnitude, or intensity, of the field at a 10-second ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Magnetic monitoring of Earth and space - Intermagnet
    Feb 3, 2008 · Ground-based fluxgate networks, some- times called variometer networks, and satellite- based magnetometers fill niches that are comple-.Missing: SuperMAG | Show results with:SuperMAG
  13. [13]
    About SuperMAG
    The purpose of SuperMAG it to help scientists, teachers, students and the general public have easy access to measurements of the Earth's magnetic field.Missing: fluxgate proton precession
  14. [14]
    ESA - Swarm - European Space Agency
    ESA's three-satellite Swarm mission is dedicated to unravelling one of the most mysterious aspects of our planet: the magnetic field.Missing: based SOHO
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Results of Russian geomagnetic observatories in the 19th century
    Apr 12, 2010 · The. Helsinki observatory started its operations in 1844 and they continued, largely unchanging, with the same magnetic in- strumentation for ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Geomagnetic storm effects on GPS based navigation - ANGEO
    May 7, 2009 · The radio signals used in this process must pass through the ionosphere, which in- troduces a propagation delay that depends on the ionospheric.
  17. [17]
    B1: Operational Platforms | The National Geomagnetic Initiative
    Capabilities of available instruments make it possible to have observatory data with good baseline control, resolution of 0.1 nanotesla, and 1.0-second sampling ...
  18. [18]
    Sudden Ionospheric Disturbances (SIDs) - aavso
    The AAVSO SID Program consists of solar observers who monitor very low frequency (VLF) radio stations for sudden enhancements of their signals.Missing: storms | Show results with:storms
  19. [19]
    GRIFEX (GEO-CAPE ROIC In-Flight Performance Experiment)
    Feb 2, 2015 · GRIFEX is a 3U CubeSat technology demonstration project, a collaborative mission of the University of Michigan with NASA ESTO (Earth Science Technology Office) ...
  20. [20]
    (PDF) Historical Perspectives on Exceptional Climatic Years at the ...
    This interdisciplinary study presents a human perspective on climatic variations by combining documentary, discursive, instrumental, and proxy data.Missing: geomagnetic | Show results with:geomagnetic
  21. [21]
    Magnetic Field Measurements From Rome During the August ...
    Apr 15, 2020 · The geomagnetic storm (or “Carrington event”) of 1–2 September 1859 is one of the largest geomagnetic disturbances on record.
  22. [22]
    Millennium of Geomagnetism - PWG Home - NASA
    Jan 31, 2003 · When Gauss and Weber began organizing a global magnetic survey, the Rosses and Sabine (later Sir Edward Sabine) became their leading lobbyists ...
  23. [23]
    Alexander von Humboldt's charts of the Earth's magnetic field - HGSS
    Nov 18, 2010 · Alexander von Humboldt efforts in measuring and charting the Earth's magnetic field are recounted and the maps of declination, inclination and ...Missing: 1800s | Show results with:1800s
  24. [24]
    Popular Science Monthly/Volume 1/June 1872/The Spots on the Sun
    Aug 29, 2025 · "It was found," says Dr. Balfour Stewart, "that a magnetic storm had broken out at the very moment when this singular appearance had ​been ...
  25. [25]
    The Carrington Solar Flares of 1859: Consequences on Life - NIH
    Oct 30, 2014 · The situation changed with Gauss (Stern, 1989) who for the first time associated magnetic and auroral observations, discovering magnetic storms ...Missing: magnetometer | Show results with:magnetometer
  26. [26]
    East Asian observations of low-latitude aurora during the Carrington ...
    3.1 Aurora observations during 1859/08/28–09/04. As also commented in the previous section, in total we found one record in China and six aurora records in ...
  27. [27]
    (PDF) GEOMAGNETIC PULSATIONS AND TUNGUSKA-1908 ...
    For the Tunguska event we assumed correlations between the phenomena of the solar eclipse on 28 June, 1908 and ULF-pulsations which prof. L. Weber registered in ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Johann von Lamont (1805-1879): A pioneer in geomagnetism
    of the 19th century. ... The cirumdecadal periodicity in the geomagnetic field was first identified by Lamont and was subsequently correlated with sunspots and ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Edward Sabine links the geomagnetic and sunspot cycles
    Skepticism over the link between the sun and Earth, arising partly out of discrepancies between the timing of sunspots and magnetic disturbances on time scales ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] AN EXTENSION OF THE CHAPMAN-FERRARO THEORY OF ...
    According to this model for a geomagnetic storm, the onset of the main phase should correspond to an increased velocity in the solar stream. The main- phase.
  31. [31]
    A Review of Studies of Geomagnetic Storms and Auroral ... - Frontiers
    Jan 7, 2021 · The study by Chapman and Ferraro (1931) was basically on how a plasma stream interacts with a dipole magnetic field. They found that the Earth ...
  32. [32]
    Jim Dungey, The Open Magnetosphere, and Space Weather
    Jun 17, 2016 · The energy transferred into the magnetosphere by magnetic reconnection drives geomagnetic storms, during which the most rapid variations in the ...Missing: entry | Show results with:entry
  33. [33]
    A Brief History of Magnetospheric Physics During the Space Age
    Nov 25, 2001 · The Open Magnetosphere​​ Reconnection was first applied to magnetospheric physics by Dungey [1961], as the key ingredient of his alternative ...Missing: entry geomagnetic storms
  34. [34]
    A Historical Introduction to the Ring Current - Stern - 2005
    Jan 1, 2005 · This chapter contains sections titled: Discovery of the Ring Current. How Do they Enter? The Electric Field E. Acceleration Processes.
  35. [35]
    Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere
    The finding of this particular expression epsilon indicates how the solar wind couples its energy to the magnetosphere; the solar wind and the magnetosphere ...
  36. [36]
    An SOC Approach to Study the Solar Wind‐Magnetosphere Energy ...
    Feb 6, 2019 · A number of solar wind energy coupling functions had been presented (Akasofu, 1981; Finch & Lockwood, 2007; Gonzalez, 1990; Gonzalez et al ...
  37. [37]
    Global Magnetohydrodynamic Magnetosphere Simulation With an ...
    Aug 19, 2022 · We perform a geomagnetic event simulation using a newly developed magnetohydrodynamic with adaptively embedded particle-in-cell (MHD-AEPIC) model.Introduction · Methods · 3D Global Simulation With... · Conclusions and Discussions
  38. [38]
    3-D global hybrid simulations of magnetospheric response to ...
    Jul 5, 2021 · The simulation results show that the foreshock disturbances from the Q-|| shock can excite magnetospheric ultralow-frequency waves, among which ...
  39. [39]
    Differences between CME‐driven storms and CIR‐driven storms
    Jul 26, 2006 · CME-driven storms pose more of a problem for Earth-based electrical systems; CIR-driven storms pose more of a problem for space-based assets. 1.
  40. [40]
    Differences between CME-driven storms and CIR-driven storms - ADS
    CME-driven storms are brief, have denser plasma sheets, have strong ring currents and Dst, have solar energetic particle events, and can produce great auroras.
  41. [41]
    Forecasting Geomagnetic Storm Disturbances and Their ...
    Nov 13, 2023 · In this work we aim at predicting the SYM-H index characterizing geomagnetic storms multiple-hour ahead, using public interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) data.Abstract · Data Set Selection and... · Deep-Learning Model · Results and Discussion
  42. [42]
    Solar cycle phase and occurrence of intense geomagnetic storms
    Oct 29, 2024 · The occurrence of intense geomagnetic storms roughly follows solar cycle variations. However, intense geomagnetic storms occur even in the solar ...
  43. [43]
    Geomagnetic Storm Occurrence and Their Relation With Solar Cycle ...
    Aug 18, 2021 · Also, the SCs with the less number of sunspots (SC20 and SC24), as expected exhibit less geomagnetic storm activity.
  44. [44]
    Seasonal and diurnal variation of geomagnetic activity: Russell ...
    Nov 29, 2012 · [1] The Russell-McPherron (R-M) effect is one of the most prevailing hypotheses accounting for semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity.
  45. [45]
    Seasonal features of geomagnetic activity: a study on the solar ...
    Oct 18, 2021 · We present a detailed analysis of the annual and semi-annual variations and their dependencies on the solar activity cycles separated as the odd, even, weak ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Extreme Space-Weather Events and the Solar Cycle | Solar Physics
    May 20, 2021 · Space weather has long been known to approximately follow the solar cycle, with geomagnetic storms occurring more frequently at solar maximum than solar ...
  47. [47]
    Detailed understanding of reduced geoeffectiveness of solar cycle ...
    May 8, 2025 · The Perrault-Akasofu coupling function (ε) is a fundamental parameter used to estimate energy transfer into the magnetosphere during ...
  48. [48]
    Probability estimation of a Carrington-like geomagnetic storm - Nature
    Feb 20, 2019 · This work proposes a counting process with Weibull inter-occurrence times in order to estimate the probability of extreme geomagnetic events.
  49. [49]
    Solar Cycle Progression - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
    There is roughly a 25% chance that the smoothed sunspot number will fall within the darkest shaded region at a particular time in the future. Similarly, there ...
  50. [50]
    Real Time Solar Wind - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
    Real-Time Solar Wind (RTSW) data comes from spacecraft upwind of Earth, typically at the L1 point, tracked by the Real-Time Solar Wind Network.ACE · DSCOVR Schedule Tracking · Index of /products/solar-windMissing: methods | Show results with:methods
  51. [51]
    ACE Real-Time Solar Wind - Space Weather Prediction Center
    The NASA Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite enables SWPC to give advance warning of geomagnetic storms. Geomagnetic storms are a natural hazard ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
  52. [52]
    Implementing an Operational Cloud‐Based Now‐ and Forecasting ...
    May 15, 2025 · We include examples from a G5 geomagnetic storm to ... solar wind measurements from the ACE or DSCOVR satellites at the L1 Lagrange point.
  53. [53]
    WSA-Enlil-at-SWPC 3 - NASA CCMC
    WSA provides input boundary conditions for Enlil, which then computes the quasi-steady ambient solar wind and transient CME disturbances propagating toward ...
  54. [54]
    Verification of real-time WSA−ENLIL+Cone simulations of CME ...
    Mar 26, 2018 · The Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA)−ENLIL+Cone model is used extensively in space weather operations world-wide to model coronal mass ejection (CME) ...
  55. [55]
    Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF)
    The SWMF/Geospace produces virtual magnetometer simulations during code execution using Biot-Savart integrals to find the total surface magnetic perturbation at ...
  56. [56]
    Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for ... - AGU Journals
    Dec 30, 2005 · The Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) provides a high-performance flexible framework for physics-based space weather simulations, ...Physics Domains and Their... · Architecture of the SWMF · Test Simulations
  57. [57]
    Ensemble Modeling of CMEs Using the WSA-ENLIL+Cone Model
    The real-time ensemble modeling of CME propagation uses the Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA)-ENLIL+Cone model installed at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center ( ...
  58. [58]
    Ensemble forecasting of coronal mass ejections using the WSA ...
    Jan 12, 2013 · ENLIL can accept the output of the Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA) coronal model to form the inner boundary condition in the finite-difference ...4 Results · 4.2 Cone Parameters · 4.3 Propagation Time
  59. [59]
    3-Day Geomagnetic Forecast - Space Weather Prediction Center
    A daily deterministic and probabilistic forecast, for next three days, of geomagnetic activity. · Three-day forecast of Ap, Kp, and Geomagnetic Storm levels · The ...
  60. [60]
    Verification of the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Solar ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · Across all lead times (24hr, 48hr, and 72hr), the SWPC model achieves the highest accuracy and lowest Brier scores. However, these metrics can ...
  61. [61]
    Probabilistic prediction of geomagnetic storms and the Kp index
    Jul 30, 2020 · This paper provides a sample methodology to generate a 3-hour-ahead K p prediction with uncertainty bounds and from this provide a probabilistic geomagnetic ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Forecasting of the Geomagnetic Activity for the Next 3 Days Utilizing ...
    Feb 22, 2025 · This study offers a new approach for 3-day geomagnetic disturbance forecasting using a deep neural network.
  63. [63]
    Forecasting Geomagnetic Storms for Earth Using LSTM with Solar ...
    The method uses an LSTM neural network with data from NASA’s ACE and NOAA’s DSCOVR satellites to forecast geomagnetic storms.Missing: L1 | Show results with:L1
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    Heliolab 2025 — Frontier Development Lab USA
    The recent Parker Solar Probe (PSP) mission provides unprecedented data from closer to the Sun than ever before, but the sheer volume and complexity of this ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Space weather effects on technology
    Such a sequence of events led to the Quebec blackout of March 13, 1989, which left the whole province without power for over 9 hours. How GIC affect power ...Power System · Electrostatic Discharge · Cost Of Magnetic Storms
  67. [67]
    A 21st Century View of the March 1989 Magnetic Storm - Boteler
    Oct 10, 2019 · On 13 March 1989, the largest magnetic storm of the last century caused widespread effects on power systems including a blackout of the Hydro-Québec system.Introduction · Solar Activity · Ground Magnetic Field and... · Discussion
  68. [68]
    Ionospheric Scintillation - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
    Scintillation of radio waves impacts the power and phase of the radio signal. Scintillation is caused by small-scale (tens of meters to tens of km) structure ...
  69. [69]
    Space weather impact on radio communication and navigation
    Jan 26, 2024 · Space weather can cause significant disruptions to modern communications and navigation systems, leading to increased safety risks, economic losses, and ...
  70. [70]
    citizen science observations during the geomagnetic superstorm of ...
    Dec 20, 2024 · The 10 May 2024 geomagnetic storm, referred to as the Gannon Storm in this paper, was one of the most extreme to have occurred in over 20 ...
  71. [71]
    Analysis of geomagnetic storm shows need for mitigation during ...
    Jul 8, 2025 · During the geomagnetic storm that took place May 10–11, 2024, GPS users reported significant positioning errors and outages.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Intense Space Weather Storms, October 19 – November 07, 2003
    Oct 30, 2025 · Spacecraft operations: surface charging may occur on satellite components, drag may increase on low-Earth-orbit satellites, and corrections ...
  73. [73]
    Remembering the Great Halloween Solar Storms | News
    Oct 31, 2023 · In late October 2003, the sun unleashed a massive solar storm that affected a variety of technological systems around the world.
  74. [74]
    Currents induced by geomagnetic storms on buried pipelines as a ...
    The results of our study indicate that geomagnetic effects can introduce significant disturbances on buried pipelines, increasing their risk of corrosion.Missing: railways | Show results with:railways
  75. [75]
    Geomagnetically induced currents during magnetic storms
    In buried pipelines, GIC can enhance corrosion and interfere with corrosion control surveys. Telecommunication systems as well as railway equipment may also ...
  76. [76]
    Space weather climate impacts on railway infrastructure
    Jun 17, 2020 · This paper gives a review of space weather effects on railways and other transportation systems and provide some of the mitigation measures.
  77. [77]
    Quantifying the daily economic impact of extreme space weather ...
    Jan 17, 2017 · This leads to an estimated potential economic loss of $41.5 billion per day to the U.S. economy (100% of daily U.S. GDP), combined with a daily ...Introduction · Methodology · Results · Conclusions
  78. [78]
    Geomagnetic Disturbance (GMD) Neutral Blocking Device Analysis
    A capacitor presents a high impedance to GIC, and therefore alters both its flow and magnitude. As such, capacitors are often used to block the flow of GIC.
  79. [79]
    2025 Geomagnetic Storms:Protect and Maintain EV Charging ...
    Mar 8, 2025 · GICs can destabilize the power grid, which can result in: Voltage swings: Charging sessions can stop or supply variable power.
  80. [80]
    Assessing the Impact of the May 2024 'Gannon' Geomagnetic Storm ...
    The May 2024 'Gannon' geomagnetic storm provides a critical case study for understanding the impacts of extreme space weather on terrestrial infrastructures ...
  81. [81]
    Characterization of Radiation Exposure at Aviation Flight Altitudes ...
    Apr 23, 2024 · For a corporate airline crew flying 400 hr per year, it is estimated that the crew would be exposed to a total of 7.1 mSv (5.3 mSv ambient dose) ...
  82. [82]
    Aircrew and Cosmic Ionizing Radiation | Aviation - CDC
    Sep 11, 2024 · At flight altitudes, passengers and crewmembers are exposed to higher levels of cosmic radiation. ... exposure to 0.36 millisieverts (mSv) ...Missing: storm | Show results with:storm
  83. [83]
    [PDF] NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Radiation Advisories for ...
    Two effective dose rate thresholds have been set for ICAO radiation advisories: a moderate (MOD) threshold of 30 μSv/hr, and a severe. (SEV) threshold of 80 μSv ...
  84. [84]
    Influence of geomagnetic disturbances on myocardial infarctions in ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · Here we show that geomagnetic conditions have an impact on MI cases, particularly for women. The rate of relative frequency of MI cases during ...
  85. [85]
    Geomagnetic disturbances are associated with reduced nocturnal ...
    Geomagnetic disturbances are associated with reduced nocturnal excretion of a melatonin metabolite in humans - ScienceDirect.
  86. [86]
    Solar Storm causes I.S.S crew to take extra precautions to avoid ...
    May 15, 2024 · NASA asked the crew aboard the international space station to avoid low shielded areas during the solar storm that produced Auroras across ...
  87. [87]
    Natural geomagnetic anomalies and homing in pigeons
    The results of these experiments as a whole suggest that some aspect of the earth's magnetic field affects the pigeons' navigational system. Previous article ...Missing: disruptions errors
  88. [88]
    How Storms on the Sun Interfere With Whale Migration
    Feb 26, 2020 · The team found that strandings were twice as likely on days with high sun spot counts, and four times as likely on days when the sun is putting ...
  89. [89]
    Geomagnetic activity affects animal myocardial ischemia/reperfusion ...
    Jan 10, 2024 · This study suggested that weak GMA had a limiting effect on MI/RI rat models, whereas severe GMA exacerbated injury in MI/RI rats.
  90. [90]
    A Systematic Review of the Impact of Electromagnetic Waves on ...
    Aug 17, 2025 · The findings demonstrated that EMFs negatively affect a wide array of biological systems of living organisms, including mechanisms of oxidative ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Variability and Distribution of Nighttime Equatorial to Mid Latitude ...
    In the low and mid latitudes, these irregularities can include Equatorial Plasma Bubbles (EPBs) and. Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances (TIDs). EPBs are ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Geomagnetic storm effects in the low
    These ions collide with the neutral gas increasing neutral wind speed and driving intense Joule heating. This heating causes an initial upwelling around the ...
  93. [93]
    The 2022 Starlink Geomagnetic Storms: Global Thermospheric ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · This paper examines how the air density of the upper atmosphere changed globally in response to space weather energy being deposited at high latitudes.
  94. [94]
    [PDF] GOLD Observations of the Thermospheric Response to the 10–12 ...
    May 12, 2024 · Expansion of the polar neutral atmosphere is induced by particle and Joule heating at high latitudes. This expansion produces equatorward winds ...
  95. [95]
    Comparison of Empirical and Theoretical Models of ... - AGU Journals
    Sep 22, 2023 · During geomagnetic storms, a large amount of energy in the form of Joule heating and particle precipitation is deposited in the high ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Manuscript_5dfbbf1e313a1ca0d...
    Sep 8, 2017 · during the geomagnetic storms caused the expansion of the auroral oval to the south, which. 333 pushed the mid-latitude trough equatorward ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Determining Latitudinal Extent of Energetic Electron Precipitation ...
    Precipitating medium-energy electrons (MEE) (≥30 keV) amplify the local production of odd nitrogen (NOx: ... the atmosphere: Recovery from a geomagnetic storm.
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Space Weather Science and Observation Gap Analysis for the ...
    The excessive Joule and particle heating during geomagnetic storms causes the atmosphere to expand, leading to increases in neutral mass density and also ...
  99. [99]
    Space Weather During SpaceX Starlink Satellite Loss
    On 3 February 2022, SpaceX Starlink launched and subsequently lost 38 of 49 satellites due to enhanced neutral density associated with a geomagnetic storm.
  100. [100]
    Modelling of ULF Pc4 - Pc5 Pulsations with solar winds and ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · Anagnostopoulos et al. (2010) found that an increase in seismicity on earth is influenced by geomagnetic storms caused by high solar wind speeds ...