Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Vincenzo Peruggia

Vincenzo Peruggia (8 October 1881 – 8 October 1925) was an Italian glazier and housepainter infamous for stealing Leonardo da Vinci's from the Museum in . Employed at the Louvre to install protective glass cases, Peruggia exploited his access on 21 August 1911 by hiding overnight in a storage closet, removing the unsecured painting from its wall in the , concealing it beneath his worker's smock, and walking out unnoticed. The theft went undetected until the following Monday, triggering a massive and global media frenzy that elevated the Mona Lisa's status from an admired but not singularly iconic artwork to a cultural phenomenon. Peruggia, driven by patriotic conviction that the painting—purchased legally by from Leonardo in 1516 but mythologized in his mind as Napoleonic plunder—belonged in , stashed it behind a trunk in his modest garret for over two years. In December 1913, seeking to "return" it, he contacted Florentine antiquarian Alfredo Geri via postcard, agreeing to a at the Hotel Tripoli-Italiana, where he produced the artwork from a wooden crate but was promptly arrested after Geri alerted authorities. Tried in Florence, Peruggia testified that national honor, not personal gain, motivated his act, earning public sympathy and a lenient sentence of one year and fifteen days' imprisonment, of which he served only seven months amid wartime distractions. Released in 1914, he rejoined his fiancée in , operating a paint shop in until his death on his 44th birthday from a combination of and heart issues. Though a convicted thief, Peruggia's exploit inadvertently cemented the Mona Lisa's enduring fame, transforming a portrait into the world's most recognized painting.

Early Life

Birth and Upbringing in Italy

Vincenzo Peruggia, born Pietro Vincenzo Antonio Peruggia, entered the world on October 8, 1881, in Dumenza, a small village in the province of Varese, Lombardy, situated on the pre-Alpine slopes rising from the northern shores of Lake Maggiore in northern Italy. He was the son of Giacomo Peruggia, a mason, and Celeste Rossi, and grew up as the eldest of five children in a modest, impoverished household typical of rural working-class families in the region during the late 19th century. Peruggia's early years were marked by economic necessity, leading him to leave formal education behind and begin working at age twelve as a house painter in nearby , where he honed basic skills in manual labor and . He also pursued amateur as a personal interest, reflecting an early affinity for artistic endeavors amid the constraints of his socioeconomic background. These formative experiences in shaped his trade-oriented path before his eventual emigration.

Move to France and Initial Employment

In 1908, at the age of 27, Vincenzo Peruggia emigrated from to , part of a larger influx of Italian laborers drawn by economic opportunities in . Upon arrival, he resumed his trade as a house painter, a profession he had pursued since age 12 in , leveraging skills in decoration, glasswork, and . Soon after settling in , Peruggia contracted —likely from paint exposure—leading to hospitalization and a period of recovery that delayed his full integration into the workforce. Once recuperated, he secured employment with the A. Gobier firm, a longstanding since responsible for maintaining the Louvre's windows, cases, and related installations. In this capacity, Peruggia performed tasks such as cutting and cleaning for protective coverings over artworks, including Italian masterpieces, which familiarized him with museum operations.

Employment at the Louvre

Role as Decorator and Familiarity with the Museum

Peruggia secured employment at the shortly after arriving in in , working as a and decorator skilled in glasswork and . His duties encompassed installing protective glass cases over valuable paintings to safeguard them from damage, a task that required handling fragile materials and accessing restricted areas of the galleries. This role was contracted through a firm specializing in such museum maintenance, granting him routine entry even on days when the public was excluded. In 1910, Peruggia participated in the specific installation of the glass protective barrier for the Mona Lisa in the Salle des États, one of five laborers tasked with cutting, fitting, and cleaning the panels. These responsibilities familiarized him with the painting's exact mounting—nailed directly to the wall without an alarm or elaborate frame—and the surrounding room's layout, including entry points, guard routines, and minimal security measures like unlocked doors between sections. Beyond glasswork, his job extended to cleaning and reframing other artworks, affording broad navigation of the Louvre's collection and observation of staff protocols during off-hours. This hands-on involvement, sustained through , enabled Peruggia to blend seamlessly into the museum environment, exploiting lapses such as infrequent patrols and the absence of modern surveillance. His technical expertise and repeated exposure thus positioned him advantageously for intimate operational knowledge, distinct from that of casual visitors or external observers.

Context of the Mona Lisa's Presence and Historical Acquisition

The (also known as or La Joconde), an oil-on-poplar-panel portrait painted by primarily between 1503 and 1506 with possible retouches until 1517, originated in as a commission for Francesco del Giocondo, a wealthy , to portray his wife Lisa Gherardini. Da Vinci, however, retained the unfinished work in his studio rather than delivering it to the patron, carrying it with him during travels and continuing refinements. In 1516, da Vinci accepted an invitation from King to serve as premier peintre, ingénieur et architecte du roi, relocating to the near and bringing the among his possessions to the French court. Francis I, a noted patron of Renaissance artists, acquired the painting for the royal collection around 1518—prior to da Vinci's death on May 2, 1519 at —reportedly purchasing it directly from the artist for 4,000 écus d'or, though some accounts place the transaction posthumously through da Vinci's estate. The work joined other da Vinci pieces like in royal holdings, displayed in palaces such as and Versailles under subsequent monarchs, reflecting France's integration of treasures through diplomatic and cultural acquisition rather than conquest. This legitimate distinguished it from looted artworks, embedding it firmly in patrimony by the . The of 1789 nationalized royal properties under the Convention Nationale, transferring the to the nascent Musée Central des Arts at the by 1797, following the museum's public opening on August 10, 1793. It endured temporary displacements, including I's personal appropriation for his Tuileries bedroom quarters around 1800 before repatriation to the in 1804, and wartime evacuations in later centuries, but otherwise remained a fixture in the . By , its placement on the second floor of the Louvre's Denon Wing, behind minimal security like a simple nail and glass case, underscored its status as a core national asset, protected yet accessible amid growing visitor traffic exceeding 100,000 annually.

The Theft of the Mona Lisa

Planning and Execution on August 21, 1911

Vincenzo Peruggia, having worked as a and decorator at the from around 1908 to 1909, possessed intimate knowledge of the museum's layout, including the gallery where the was displayed and the relative laxity of security measures at the time. He planned the theft over several months, motivated by a belief that the painting, acquired by during the , rightfully belonged to , and intended to return it there without accomplices. Peruggia dressed in a white worker's apron to impersonate a Louvre employee, exploiting the absence of strict identity checks for familiar tradesmen. On the evening of Sunday, August 20, 1911, Peruggia entered the undetected and concealed himself in a storage closet or broom cupboard adjacent to the , remaining hidden overnight as the museum closed. The following morning, Monday, August 21, 1911—a day when the was closed to the public but staff were present—Peruggia emerged around 7:15 a.m. and proceeded to the , which hung unprotected save for a simple frame and glass covering easily removable by someone with his expertise. He lifted the painting from its wall hooks, carried it to a nearby service stairwell, and there detached the canvas from the frame while discarding the glass and wooden supports, rolling the unprimed poplar panel (measuring approximately 77 by 53 centimeters) for concealment. Peruggia then tucked the rolled under his apron and attempted to exit via a side door, but finding it locked, solicited assistance from a passing or painter on site, who obligingly unlocked it without raising alarm, assuming Peruggia was a legitimate worker. He departed the premises around 8:00 a.m., transporting the artwork back to his nearby apartment without immediate detection; the empty frame was not noticed until later that morning by a museum attendant. Peruggia later confessed to these steps in detail to art dealer upon attempting to sell the painting in , maintaining throughout his trial that he had acted single-handedly.

Concealment in Paris and Evasion of Initial Searches

Following the theft on August 21, 1911, Vincenzo Peruggia concealed the by removing it from its frame and glass case, then hiding it beneath his worker's smock before exiting the undetected. He transported the painting to his one-room apartment on the outskirts of , where he stored it in a wooden trunk equipped with a false bottom, ensuring it remained out of sight for over two years. During this period, Peruggia occasionally viewed the artwork in private, later recounting to authorities, “I fell a victim to her smile and feasted my eyes on my treasure every evening.” Paris authorities launched an extensive investigation upon discovering the theft on August 22, , including interviews with former employees like Peruggia, who was questioned twice but not regarded as a suspect due to lack of incriminating evidence. Police conducted searches, ransacking Peruggia's apartment in late , yet failed to locate the painting, as its placement in the trunk's concealed compartment evaded detection. The manhunt involved checkpoints and broader scrutiny across , but these efforts proved fruitless initially, allowing Peruggia to maintain a low profile in without drawing further suspicion. Peruggia's evasion succeeded through the painting's secure hiding method, his unremarkable daily existence, and investigators' oversight in not probing deeper despite his prior museum access. He remained in the city until late 1913, when financial pressures prompted him to travel to in an attempt to sell the artwork, ending his concealment.

Recovery and Arrest

In late November 1913, Vincenzo Peruggia, using the pseudonym "Leonardo," contacted Alfredo Geri, a antiquarian who had advertised for art acquisitions, offering to return the stolen to for 500,000 lire, framing it as a patriotic from possession. Geri, suspecting the claim's authenticity but intrigued, consulted Poggi, director of the Gallery, who advised involving authorities while proceeding cautiously to verify the painting. On December 10, 1913, Peruggia arrived in and met Geri at his Via Borgo Ognissanti office around 3:15 p.m., presenting a letter reiterating his intent to sell the artwork exclusively to the Italian state for display in the , citing Leonardo da Vinci's Italian origins and alleged Napoleonic-era looting as justification. Peruggia then led Geri to his room at the Hotel Tripoli-Italia (Room 20), where he unveiled the painting, still in its original frame and protected by glass, allowing initial inspection that confirmed its appearance matched published descriptions and photographs. Geri feigned agreement to the terms, securing the under the pretense of appraisal while Peruggia awaited payment, which enabled further expert examination by Poggi later that day, who authenticated it through visible Louvre markings and varnish details. The attempted transaction highlighted Peruggia's persistent belief in a nationalistic motive over personal profit, though his demand for a substantial sum raised questions about underlying financial incentives, as he had concealed the painting in his apartment for over two years without prior sale efforts. Following verification, the temporarily housed the recovered work for public viewing starting December 1913, drawing massive crowds before its to France in 1914.

Investigation Leading to Capture in Florence

Following Peruggia's presentation of the to Alfredo Geri and Poggi on December 10, 1913, the two men closely inspected the artwork, confirming its authenticity through the visible stamp from the on the reverse of the frame and canvas. They removed the painting from Peruggia's hotel room at the Hotel Tripoli-Italia under the pretense of further evaluation, securing it at the Uffizi Gallery for additional verification and safekeeping. Rather than proceeding with the sale, Geri and Poggi promptly notified authorities of the painting's recovery and Peruggia's involvement, providing details of his identity, alias "Leonardo," and the trunk concealing the artwork. police, acting on this information, conducted a swift targeted operation, arresting Peruggia at his hotel the following day, December 11, 1913, without resistance. Upon , Peruggia confessed to the 1911 , reiterating his stated motive of repatriating the , though authorities noted inconsistencies suggesting potential profit-seeking. The brevity of the investigation stemmed from the direct evidence provided by the artwork itself and Peruggia's voluntary disclosure during the sale attempt, obviating the need for broader searches that had eluded French detectives for over two years. News of the arrest and recovery spread rapidly, with the Mona Lisa briefly displayed at the Uffizi before its return to France.

Trial and Imprisonment

Peruggia was arrested on December 11, 1913, in following his attempt to sell the to officials at the Gallery, who alerted authorities after recognizing the painting. He was charged with under Italian law and held in custody pending trial. The trial commenced on June 4, 1914, in a court, where Peruggia entered a guilty plea to the charge, shifting the proceedings toward an examination of his motives rather than factual guilt. During testimony, he maintained that his actions were driven by patriotism, asserting that the rightfully belonged to and had been illicitly taken by Napoleon Bonaparte from Leonardo da Vinci's heirs, framing the as an act of to restore national heritage. The court proceedings drew significant public attention, with Peruggia's narrative eliciting sympathy among some Italian nationalists who viewed the Louvre's holdings as spoils of conquest. On June 29, 1914, the court convicted Peruggia of but imposed a lenient sentence of one year in , influenced by his professed patriotic intent and lack of prior , despite evidence suggesting potential profit motives from the sale attempt. The presiding explicitly cited Peruggia's stated goal of returning the artwork to as mitigating the severity of the crime, though French officials protested the mildness of the penalty given the international ramifications of the . No additional charges, such as or , were pursued, as Peruggia acted alone in the recovery phase.

Time Served and Early Release

Peruggia was sentenced to one year and fifteen days in prison following his conviction for the theft of the Mona Lisa. He ultimately served only seven months of the sentence, securing early release through a successful that accounted for time already detained and mitigating factors related to his professed patriotic intentions. Public sentiment in , where Peruggia was viewed by many as a national hero for attempting to repatriate what he considered an Italian artwork improperly held in , contributed to the leniency; upon return to , he received widespread acclaim rather than condemnation.

Motivations and Controversies

Claimed Patriotic Intent and Napoleonic Grievances

Peruggia asserted that his theft of the Mona Lisa on August 21, 1911, was driven by patriotic duty to return an Italian masterpiece to its homeland, claiming the painting had been unjustly taken from by Napoleon Bonaparte during his military campaigns in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. He maintained this narrative upon his arrest in on December 11, 1913, insisting that Leonardo da Vinci's work rightfully belonged in and that French possession symbolized historical plunder. This grievance echoed broader Italian nationalist sentiments against Napoleon's looting of artworks, such as the Horses of Saint Mark from and numerous pieces from , which fueled resentment over 's retention of looted treasures in the . During his 1914 trial in , Peruggia and his defense emphasized this purported altruism, portraying the act as restitution rather than criminality, which contributed to his relatively lenient sentence of one year in prison, of which he served only seven months. However, Peruggia's attribution of the Mona Lisa's acquisition to Napoleonic theft was factually erroneous; the painting was purchased legally by King from around 1516–1519 while the artist resided in , entering the royal collection voluntarily and never part of Napoleon's Italian campaigns (1796–1814), which targeted other artifacts but not this one. Despite the inaccuracy, his claims resonated with Italian audiences, briefly elevating him to folk-hero status amid post-unification pride in reclaiming from foreign powers.

Skepticism: Evidence of Profit Motive and Possible Forger Connections

Historians have expressed skepticism regarding Peruggia's claimed patriotic motives, citing his attempt to sell the painting for 500,000 lire to officials at the Gallery in on , 1913, as evidence of a profit-driven agenda rather than selfless . If repatriation were the sole intent, Peruggia could have anonymously donated the work to an Italian institution or contacted authorities without seeking compensation, actions inconsistent with prolonged concealment in his apartment for over two years. Further indications of financial incentive include letters Peruggia sent to his father from Paris, in which he alluded to impending wealth, suggesting premeditated personal gain predating the theft on August 21, 1911. Peruggia's modest background as a Piedmontese glazier and former Louvre employee, coupled with his unemployment and financial struggles in the years leading to the crime, aligns with opportunistic theft for resale value rather than ideological restitution. Theories linking Peruggia to operations propose he was recruited by Argentine entrepreneur de Valfierno and French forger Yves Chaudron to steal the , enabling the production and sale of high-value replicas during its absence from the . According to this account, Valfierno orchestrated the heist to capitalize on the painting's notoriety, commissioning Chaudron to create up to six forgeries sold to wealthy collectors under the pretense of , with the genuine work retained as or leverage. While unproven and reliant on anecdotal reports, the scheme's plausibility is bolstered by contemporaneous attempts exploiting the theft's publicity, though no ties Peruggia to Chaudron or confirms executed sales of such copies. Peruggia's solo and lack of accomplices in undermine the conspiracy's credibility, yet the persists as an alternative to his post-capture patriotic narrative.

Later Life

Return to France Post-Release

Following his early release from prison in December 1913 after serving approximately seven months of a one-year sentence, Peruggia enlisted in the and fought during , where he was reportedly captured by Austrian forces before returning home. Postwar economic difficulties in , including widespread , prompted his relocation around 1919–1920, where he adopted the alias Pietro Peruggia—his brother's name—to evade notoriety from the . In , Peruggia settled in the rural region of , opening a small shop in the village of Saint-Maurice-de-Roingt (now part of Chamonix area locales) to support himself through house painting and related labor, drawing on skills from his pre-theft Louvre employment. Under this assumed identity, he married a local woman named Rina Rossi in the early , establishing a modest family life away from public scrutiny and refraining from further criminal activity or boasts about the . This period marked a shift to obscurity, with Peruggia avoiding media attention and focusing on manual work, though some accounts suggest lingering health issues from lead exposure in his painting trade may have affected him.

Death and Burial

Vincenzo Peruggia died on October 8, 1925, at the age of 44 from a heart attack in , a suburb east of , . The date coincided with his birthday. Following his early release from in 1914, Peruggia had resettled in , where he married Rirette Jean and worked as a house painter and decorator, maintaining a low-profile life until his sudden death. He was interred in the Condé Cemetery in , . Original burial records placed him in a designated plot, though his remains were later exhumed in the and transferred to the cemetery due to space constraints, with a modern memorial marking the site. No public ceremonies or notable tributes accompanied his burial, reflecting his obscurity in later years despite the international notoriety of his 1911 .

Legacy

Impact on the Mona Lisa's Fame and Museum Security

The theft of the Mona Lisa on August 21, 1911, transformed the painting from a relatively obscure work appreciated primarily by art connoisseurs into a global cultural phenomenon. Prior to the incident, despite its acquisition by the in and gradual recognition among intellectuals since the 1860s, the painting was not the Louvre's most prominent attraction and lacked widespread public acclaim outside specialist circles. The disappearance, discovered the following day, sparked immediate international media frenzy, with newspapers worldwide publishing headlines and mobilizing public interest through stories of intrigue and international detective efforts. This coverage, combined with the two-year mystery of its whereabouts, amplified its mystique and embedded it in popular imagination, leading to reproductions in cartoons, advertisements, and songs upon its recovery in December 1913. Following its return to the Louvre in January 1914, the painting drew over 120,000 visitors in the first two days alone, underscoring the surge in popularity triggered by the heist. Exhibitions in Italy, including Florence and Rome, attracted massive crowds, further cementing its status as an icon of mass appeal rather than elite art. Today, it accounts for much of the Louvre's 8 million annual visitors, a direct legacy of the theft's publicity. The heist also exposed critical vulnerabilities in the Louvre's security protocols, which at the time relied on approximately 200 guards for over 400 rooms, with even fewer during overnight hours and no alarm systems or protective enclosures for individual artworks. Vincenzo Peruggia, a former , exploited employee access to hide in the , remove the unsecured painting from its frame, and exit undetected during regular hours the next morning. The incident prompted a week-long closure for and highlighted systemic lapses, such as inadequate monitoring of and lack of checks, fueling and official . While immediate overhauls were limited, the theft contributed to broader awareness of risks, influencing gradual enhancements like increased guard presence, stricter access controls, and eventual adoption of protective measures, including the painting's later placement in a climate-controlled, case. Peruggia's theft of the Mona Lisa on August 21, 1911, inspired immediate cultural responses in and , including satirical postcards mocking the Louvre's security lapses, cabaret songs lampooning the scandal, and at least one early capitalizing on public fascination with the missing masterpiece. These depictions framed the event as a blend of nationalistic and comedic incompetence, transforming the from an elite artwork into a mass-media phenomenon before its recovery. In modern literature, the story features prominently in novels like Jonathan Santlofer's The Last (2020), a historical thriller that fictionalizes Peruggia's act through the lens of a descendant uncovering forged connections and profit-driven motives behind the heist. Non-fiction accounts, such as Richard Kurin's The Thefts of the (2024), examine the theft's role in elevating the painting's global icon status while portraying Peruggia as a misguided opportunist rather than a calculated criminal . Film and documentary treatments, including the 2015 project Missing, dramatize his solitary concealment of the painting in a for two years, emphasizing the simplicity of the crime over sophisticated plotting. Historians assess Peruggia not as a patriotic hero but as an unskilled laborer whose bungled attempt—hiding overnight in the Louvre and walking out with the unframed canvas under his smock—exposed institutional vulnerabilities without achieving repatriation, as the painting returned to France after brief display in Florence. His claimed Napoleonic grudge, invoking the 1797 seizure of Italian art by French forces, is widely dismissed by scholars due to Peruggia's prior petty theft convictions and lack of evidence for accomplices or forgery schemes, suggesting instead a failed bid for quick profit amid economic hardship. The heist's primary legacy, per art historians, lies in inadvertently amplifying the Mona Lisa's fame through worldwide press coverage, shifting it from relative obscurity to cultural ubiquity, though Peruggia himself gained no lasting acclaim and died in obscurity in 1925. Italian sympathy during his 1914 trial, resulting in a reduced sentence of one year (served seven months), reflected temporary nationalist fervor rather than endorsement of his actions, which courts treated as straightforward larceny.

References

  1. [1]
    Pietro Vincenzo Antonio Peruggia (1881 - 1925) - Genealogy - Geni
    Feb 26, 2025 · Vincenzo Peruggia (October 8, 1881 – October 8, 1925) was an Italian thief, most famous for stealing the Mona Lisa on 21 August 1911. Born in ...
  2. [2]
    Vincenzo Peruggia (1881-1925) - Memorials - Find a Grave
    Birth: 8 Oct 1881. Dumenza, Provincia di Varese, Lombardia, Italy ; Death: 8 Oct 1925 (aged 44). Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, Departement du Val-de-Marne, Île-de- ...
  3. [3]
    Theft of "Mona Lisa" is discovered | August 22, 1911 - History.com
    Earlier in the day, in perhaps the most brazen art theft of all time, Vincenzo Peruggia had walked into the Louvre, removed the famed painting from the wall, ...
  4. [4]
    How Did Vincenzo Peruggia Steal the Mona Lisa? - TheCollector
    Sep 13, 2022 · Vincenzo Peruggia Had Two Henchmen. mona lisa theft louvre The empty space on the Louvre wall where the Mona Lisa once hung, before being stolen ...
  5. [5]
    The Heist that Made the Mona Lisa Famous - History.com
    Aug 19, 2016 · Peruggia, meanwhile, was charged with theft and put on trial in Italy. During his testimony, he claimed that national pride had inspired him to ...
  6. [6]
    This Day in History: August 21 - Terrebonne Parish Library System
    Peruggia believed the painting to be stolen from Italy by France during the Napoleonic Era and it was up to him to return the portrait to its rightful place.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    The man who stole the Mona Lisa | Art theft - The Guardian
    Aug 5, 2011 · Perruggia was sentenced to 12 months in 1914. Eventually he returned to France and opened a paint shop in Haute-Savoie; the Mona Lisa was given ...
  8. [8]
    Vincenzo Peruggia - The World Journal
    Mar 20, 2025 · Pietro Vincenzo Antonio Peruggia was born on October 8, 1881, in a small town in northern Italy. In his early years, he didn't really do too much.
  9. [9]
    Vincenzo Peruggia (1881–1925) - Ancestors Family Search
    Vincenzo Peruggia was born on 8 October 1881, in Dumenza, Como, Lombardy, Italy as the son of Giacomo Perugia and Celeste Rossi. He died on 8 October 1925 ...
  10. [10]
    Vincenzo Peruggia – art thief | Italy On This Day
    Oct 8, 2017 · Peruggia's home village of Dumenza, in the province of Varese, is situated in the pre-Alpine slopes that rise from the northern shores of Lake ...Missing: family background<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Vincenzo Peruggia: The Man Who Walked Out with the Mona Lisa
    Nov 12, 2024 · Peruggia, born in the northern Italian village of Dumenza near the Swiss border, came from modest beginnings. His father worked as a mason ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  12. [12]
    Episode 192 - Vincenzo and Lisa - Part Three in the Story of the ...
    Jan 28, 2024 · When his case was settled he was sentenced to 1 year and 15 days. On July 28 World War I was declared, the next day Peruggia's case was reduced ...
  13. [13]
    Hue Jackson's Hall of Fame Scammers: Vincenzo Peruggia
    Apr 8, 2021 · Born in 1881 in the village of Dumenza, in Italy's northern Lombardy region, Peruggia was also an artist himself. In addition to his painting, ...Missing: family background
  14. [14]
    The False Bottom | Claiborne Parish Journal
    Aug 28, 2024 · Pietro Vincenzo Antonio Peruggia was born on October 8, 1881, in Dumenza, Italy, about 50 miles north of Milan. Vincenzo was an amateur painter, ...Missing: family background
  15. [15]
    Vincenzo Peruggia, the Man Who Stole the Mona Lisa
    Aug 20, 2011 · On August 21, 1911, Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa was stolen from the Louvre by Vincenzo Peruggia, an Italian laborer living in Paris.Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  16. [16]
    The world's most famous missing painting - BBC News
    Dec 9, 2013 · The Italian immigrant worker had been at the Louvre in 1910 and had installed the glass-door that was protecting the masterpiece. He had the ...
  17. [17]
    Is the Mona Lisa a Fake? (Listener's Favorite #3, Part One)
    Aug 31, 2020 · And of course, having worked at the Louvre, Peruggia had the advantage of a) being familiar with the museum's layout, and b) himself being a ...
  18. [18]
    The travels and travails of the Mona Lisa - About JSTOR
    Dec 8, 2014 · After the French Revolution the Mona Lisa moved to its new home at the Louvre—after a slight detour: Napoleon borrowed the painting to decorate ...
  19. [19]
    Mona Lisa — Part 1 | Richard Nilsen
    Jul 26, 2024 · ... Francis I, primarily as a military engineer. The king bought the Mona Lisa, probably in 1518, and it wandered around various palaces after ...
  20. [20]
    A Lineup of the Suspects in the Mona Lisa Art Heist - Artists Network
    After Leonardo's death in May 1519, the painting was bought by Francis for 4,000 écus. The Mona Lisa was hung in all the right places: the Château de ...
  21. [21]
    The Mona Lisa is stolen from the Louvre | History Today
    Aug 8, 2011 · The king bought it and at the French Revolution it was placed in the Louvre. Napoleon took it away to hang in his bedroom, but it was returned ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Mona Lisa: The theft that created a legend - CNN
    Nov 19, 2013 · This reconstruction shows how Peruggia perpetrated the greatest art theft of the 20th century. After hiding in a closet overnight, he simply ...Missing: employee method
  24. [24]
    The Louvre has a wild history of being robbed in broad daylight
    ### Summary of Vincenzo Peruggia Hiding the Mona Lisa and Evading Police
  25. [25]
    Florence: The Theft of the Century - Mona Lisa - Walks in Rome
    However, in late November, 1913, he wrote to an antique-dealer in Florence, Alfredo Geri, offering to 'return' the Mona Lisa to Italy. Writing as 'Leonardo ...
  26. [26]
    Stolen “Mona Lisa” recovered in Florence | December 12, 1913
    After the recovery of The Mona Lisa, Peruggia was convicted in Italy of the robbery and spent just 14 months in jail. The Mona Lisa was eventually returned ...
  27. [27]
    100 YEARS AGO TODAY - PERUGGIA HANDS OVER THE MONA ...
    Dec 11, 2013 · Then at 3:15 pm, Peruggia, who had presented himself to Geri as "Léonard " (French for Leonardo da Vinci), entered the shop. They exchanged few ...
  28. [28]
    100th anniversary of the recovery of the Mona Lisa - Robert M. Edsel
    Dec 10, 2013 · The Mona Lisa after it was recovered on December 10, 1913. It was Monday, August 21, 1911, when Vincenzo Peruggia, an Italian worker ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    The Mona Lisa is recovered in Florence - a picture from the past
    Dec 12, 2013 · On 12 December 1913, the Mona Lisa was recovered from Italian Vincenzo Peruggia's hotel room in Florence. A former employee of the Louvre, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Mona Lisa theft :: painting of Mona Lisa - Uffizi Gallery, Florence
    Vincenzo Peruggia was the author of the brave feat: he left the museum with the painting hidden under his coat and he kept it with him for two years. Why did he ...
  31. [31]
    The Day the Mona Lisa Was Stolen - ThoughtCo
    Jul 17, 2019 · Vincenzo Peruggia was caught after attempting to sell the Mona Lisa in 1913, revealing his theft. The theft of the Mona Lisa made it far ...
  32. [32]
    The Theft of the Mona Lisa - Aux Trois Crayons
    Jul 23, 2019 · His trial started on June 4, 1914. Peruggia had admitted his guilt, so at this time, the trial was more of an inquisition to determine his ...
  33. [33]
    Vincenzo Perugia, Thief of the Mona Lisa - Encyclopedia.com
    Although Perugia alleged patriotism as a motive for his theft of the Mona Lisa, the motive for most art theft is the motive for most other theft: money.
  34. [34]
    The Mona Lisa Theft in 1911 that Propelled the Painting to Fame
    Apr 15, 2024 · Despite being sentenced to one year and 15 days, he was released after serving only seven months. Peruggia is considered a criminal, yet some ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Missing Mona Lisa: the story behind the 1911 theft of Leonardo's ...
    Feb 6, 2024 · Charney questions the motives of Peruggia, who claimed that the robbery was driven by patriotism and the idea that he was righting a historical ...
  36. [36]
    The Incredible 1911 Theft of the Mona Lisa | Barnebys Magazine
    Jul 22, 2022 · Florentine antique dealer Alfredo Geri, who had published an ad to buy works of art, was contacted by Peruggia on December 10, 1913, but he ...
  37. [37]
    The Mona Lisa stolen by Napoleon: the origins of a hoax
    Sep 28, 2014 · The theft was motivated by, so to speak, “patriotic” reasons: Peruggia was convinced that the Mona Lisa was part of the paintings stolen by ...
  38. [38]
    The art heist that made the Mona Lisa arguably the most famous ...
    Apr 13, 2025 · While his true motivations remain unproven, Peruggia's theft had one unforeseen consequence: It turned the Mona Lisa into a household name. "It ...
  39. [39]
    How the Mona Lisa Became Famous (Via Burglary) | Cracked.com
    Aug 21, 2022 · He'd orchestrated the theft, he said, because forgeries of the Mona Lisa would fetch higher prices while it was missing. ... 1 Peruggia's Fate.
  40. [40]
    10 Facts About the Audacious Theft of the Mona Lisa - History Hit
    1. The painting was stolen by the Louvre's odd-job man, Vincenzo Peruggia · 2. The theft was surprisingly easy to carry out · 3. It wasn't until the following day ...
  41. [41]
    The curious story of the man who stole the Mona Lisa
    May 19, 2023 · The Mona Lisa was stolen from the Louvre Museum in Paris in 1911. Its disappearance led to an investigation and sparked worldwide attention at the time.
  42. [42]
    Stealing the Mona Lisa | The Week
    Jan 8, 2015 · Peruggia later returned to France and opened a paint shop in a village in Haute-Savoie. He died there in 1925, aged 44, perhaps from the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    The Theft That Made The 'Mona Lisa' A Masterpiece - NPR
    Jul 30, 2011 · After the Louvre announced the theft, newspapers all over the world ran headlines about the missing masterpiece. "60 Detectives Seek Stolen ' ...
  44. [44]
    Stolen: How the Mona Lisa Became the World's Most Famous Painting
    Jun 15, 2011 · Satirical postcards, a short film and cabaret songs followed—popular culture seized upon the theft and turned high art into mass art. Perugia ...
  45. [45]
    The Last Mona Lisa by Jonathan Santlofer | Goodreads
    Rating 3.7 (6,980) From the beginning, Santlofer says that Vincenzo Peruggia stole the MONA LISA, the most famous painting in the world. But it wasn't the most famous painting in ...
  46. [46]
    The Thefts of the Mona Lisa - Bloomsbury Publishing
    Free delivery over $35Feb 6, 2024 · This book recounts the story of that crime and delivers a complete portrait of the famous painting, including its role in popular culture.
  47. [47]
    The Story of the Film: A 35-Year-Long Obsession
    Jul 19, 2015 · Acting alone, an Italian immigrant house painter named VINCENZO PERUGGIA took the painting from The Louvre and kept her in his one-room ...Missing: movies literature
  48. [48]
    Happy Birthday to the Man Who Stole the Mona Lisa and Took It to ...
    Oct 7, 2022 · Vincenzo Peruggia, the man who stole the Mona Lisa from France and returned it to Italy, was born on Oct. 8, 1881 and died on Oct. 8, 1925.Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing<|separator|>