Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Webometrics

Webometrics is the study of the quantitative aspects of the construction and use of information resources, structures, and technologies on the World Wide Web, drawing on bibliometric and informetric methods. The term was coined in 1997 by researchers Tomas Almind and Peter Ingwersen to describe the application of informetric analyses to web-based data. As a subfield of informetrics within library and information science, webometrics encompasses several core areas of investigation, including the analysis of web page content, hyperlink structures, user behaviors through log files and search results, and underlying web technologies such as search engine performance. Key methodologies involve measuring elements like the number of web pages, hyperlinks (including inlinks, outlinks, and reciprocal links), and web impact factors, which assess a site's visibility and influence analogous to citation counts in traditional bibliometrics. Early developments focused on link analysis to evaluate academic and institutional impact, evolving into broader applications such as web citation tracking for scholarly communication and keyword analysis for mapping online concepts and trends. In practice, webometrics has been instrumental in creating ranking systems, such as the , which evaluates institutions based on web presence indicators like site size, visibility through , and the richness of scholarly file types (e.g., PDFs). It also extends to the , analyzing platforms like for quantitative insights into information diffusion, user engagement, and network structures, while cautioning against direct analogies to offline metrics due to the web's dynamic nature. Overall, webometrics provides tools for understanding the web as a communication medium, supporting research in social sciences, policy evaluation, and digital strategy.

Definition and Scope

Definition

Webometrics is a field within that applies quantitative methods to analyze the . The term was coined in 1997 by Tomas Almind and Peter Ingwersen to describe the extension of informetric techniques to web-based information systems. In their seminal work, they introduced webometrics as a means to study network-based communication through informetric measures, treating hyperlinks as analogous to citations in traditional scholarly networks. At its core, webometrics involves the quantitative analysis of web resources, encompassing hyperlinks, content, structural features, and usage patterns. This approach emphasizes measuring the scale, connectivity, and impact of information on the WWW, such as the volume of linked pages or the density of web structures, to uncover patterns in information dissemination and organization. Unlike qualitative studies of web content or user behavior, webometrics prioritizes measurable indicators to assess the quantitative dimensions of digital information ecosystems. Almind and Ingwersen defined webometrics as "the study of the quantitative aspects of the construction and use of information resources, structures and technologies on the WWW."[](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235287027_Informetric_analyses_on_the_world_wide_web_Methodological_approaches_to_%27webometrics%27) This definition highlights its focus on empirical metrics rather than interpretive analysis, positioning it as a rigorous tool for evaluating web phenomena. Webometrics evolved from bibliometrics, adapting citation-based quantification to the hyperlinked environment of the web.

Scope and Objectives

Webometrics seeks to quantify key dimensions of the World Wide Web to understand its scale, impact, and informational value. Its primary objectives include measuring the size of web entities, such as the total number of pages or sites within a domain; assessing visibility through indicators like inbound hyperlinks, which reflect a site's influence or authority within the digital ecosystem; and evaluating richness by analyzing the depth and variety of content, including multimedia elements and file types that contribute to informational density. These goals enable researchers to apply bibliometric-like principles to digital networks, providing insights into web growth and connectivity without delving into operational details of data collection. The scope of webometrics is delimited to the of web-specific phenomena, encompassing three core aspects: web structure, which examines networks and domain interconnections; , focusing on textual, bibliographic, and resources; and web usage, which involves patterns of and derived from logs or search behaviors, though the latter receives comparatively less emphasis due to data accessibility challenges. This framework prioritizes the WWW as its domain, distinguishing it from broader studies that might include non-hypertext protocols like or file transfers. Importantly, webometrics excludes non-quantitative dimensions, such as aesthetic evaluations of or subjective studies, which fall under fields like human-computer interaction. It also avoids in-depth explorations of non-web artifacts, maintaining a focused lens on hyperlink-driven, publicly accessible web resources to ensure methodological rigor and comparability with informetric traditions.

History

Origins

Webometrics emerged in the mid-1990s, coinciding with the rapid expansion of the following its public release by on April 30, 1993, which placed the underlying software in the and spurred widespread adoption and growth. This explosive development of online content and connectivity created a pressing need for quantitative tools to assess and analyze the web's structure and impact, drawing researchers to apply established informetric principles to this new environment. Early conceptual foundations were laid by Peter Ingwersen, who explored the application of informetrics to hypertext systems and the emerging around 1996-1997, recognizing the web as a dynamic hyperlinked information space amenable to quantitative study. These initial efforts built on informetric traditions to investigate web phenomena, such as document interlinkages and information flows, in response to the web's burgeoning scale. The term "webometrics" was first formally introduced in 1997 by Tomas C. Almind and Peter Ingwersen in their seminal paper, "Informetric analyses on the : methodological approaches to 'webometrics'," published in the Journal of Documentation. In this work, they defined webometrics as the quantitative analysis of the web's construction and use, emphasizing methodological adaptations from informetrics to handle web-specific features like hyperlinks. The paper's demonstrated practical approaches to web document analysis, establishing webometrics as a distinct subfield. From its inception, webometrics focused on hyperlink studies, treating web links as analogous to citations in traditional scholarly literature to measure influence, connectivity, and impact within the . This perspective drew briefly from , the quantitative study of publications and citations, adapting its core ideas to the 's non-linear, interactive nature.

Key Developments

In the early 2000s, webometrics saw significant institutional and methodological advancements building on its foundational concepts from 1997. Mike Thelwall played a pivotal role by founding the Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group at the University of Wolverhampton in 2000, which became a leading center for quantitative web analysis and contributed to the field's growth through software development and empirical studies on hyperlink networks and web usage patterns. This group advanced web impact factors, originally proposed in 1998, by refining their calculation and application to evaluate academic websites, enabling more robust comparisons of online visibility and influence. A key milestone was the launch of the Ranking Web of World Universities in 2004 by the Cybermetrics Lab at CINDOC-CSIC in Spain, which introduced composite web metrics to rank over 10,000 institutions biannually and promoted open scholarly communication. The mid-2000s also marked the emergence of dedicated forums for the field, with the first International Workshop on , Informetrics, and Scientometrics held in 2005, fostering international collaboration on quantitative web studies. As the decade progressed, webometrics shifted toward accessible data sources, exemplified by the development of indicators for ranking repositories in 2008, which emphasized the evaluation of freely available digital content to support global knowledge dissemination. Entering the 2010s, webometrics matured through integration with techniques and , expanding its scope to include interactions and alternative impact measures. Thelwall's historical review in the Bulletin of the ASIS&T highlighted the field's evolution from niche analyses to a mature discipline with practical applications in research evaluation, underscoring advancements in data crawling and statistical modeling. This period saw increased adoption of metrics, such as Twitter citations and blog mentions, as complements to traditional web links, with Thelwall's subsequent work detailing their validation for assessing scholarly impact. The ongoing emphasis on data sources further accelerated, enabling scalable analyses of vast web corpora without proprietary barriers and aligning webometrics with broader initiatives. In 2025, the underwent methodological updates due to challenges in accessing citation data from , with proposals to incorporate alternative sources like OpenAlex to maintain the ranking's continuity and relevance.

Theoretical Foundations

Relation to

is the quantitative study of publications, citations, and their patterns within scholarly literature, providing insights into the structure and impact of academic communication. Webometrics extends this framework by applying similar quantitative methods to the , treating hyperlinks as analogous to traditional citations, or "web citations," to analyze digital scholarly interactions and broader . This adaptation allows for the evaluation of influence in online environments, where links represent endorsements or references similar to bibliographic citations in print media. A key adaptation in webometrics involves shifting from the analysis of static documents, such as journal articles, to dynamic, networked web structures that evolve over time and incorporate and interactive elements. This enables broader connectivity analysis, capturing not only direct influences but also indirect relationships across vast, distributed online resources, which cannot address due to its focus on fixed publication records. Historically, both fields draw parallels in employing co-citation analysis—measuring documents or sites cited together—and bibliographic coupling—linking documents or sites that cite common sources—but webometrics uniquely incorporates domain-level aggregation to assess impacts at institutional or topical scales rather than individual papers. For instance, while assesses citation impact in academic s to gauge scholarly influence, webometrics evaluates link impact among websites to measure the visibility and authority of digital , such as interlinking between university departments. A seminal example is the development of web impact factors, proposed as a counterpart to impact factors, calculated from incoming hyperlinks to a site's pages relative to its total pages, applied to national domains for comparative analysis. Another application involves studying university departmental interlinking, where patterns of hyperlinks reveal collaborative networks and disciplinary differences, extending bibliometric insights into online interactions.

Connections to Informetrics

Informetrics encompasses the quantitative study of information production, dissemination, and use in any form and across any social group, extending beyond traditional scholarly contexts to include diverse media and communication patterns. Webometrics emerges as a specialized branch within this broader field, applying informetric principles specifically to the World Wide Web by analyzing the quantitative aspects of web-based information resources, structures, and technologies. Coined by Almind and Ingwersen in 1997, webometrics draws directly on informetrics to quantify web phenomena, such as content creation and access patterns, while adapting methods to the web's unique digital environment. The two fields share foundational methods, including statistical modeling of information networks and , which informetrics pioneered for tracking knowledge flows in various media. Webometrics builds on these by incorporating topology as a core element, treating links as indicators of influence and connectivity akin to citations but within the web's interconnected structure. This extension allows webometrics to model not only formal references but also informal associations, enhancing informetrics' toolkit for dynamic, non-linear . A pivotal conceptual shift occurs in webometrics' expansion from informetrics' emphasis on structured communication—often rooted in scientific or bibliographic systems—to the broader diffusion of across non-academic spaces, such as platforms and sites. While informetrics remains medium-agnostic, evaluating flows irrespective of , webometrics is inherently web-centric, integrating usage metrics like page views and hits to capture and accessibility. , as a subset of informetrics focused on recorded scholarly outputs, provides a narrower foundation that webometrics transcends by addressing the web's informal and ephemeral content.

Methods and Techniques

Data Collection Methods

Web crawling represents a fundamental method for collecting data in webometrics, involving automated bots or scripts that systematically traverse websites to index pages, hyperlinks, and other structural elements. Open-source tools such as , developed by the , are widely employed for archival-quality crawls, enabling researchers to capture comprehensive snapshots of web content while respecting configurable parameters like crawl depth and politeness policies to minimize server load. Custom scripts, often built using libraries like or BeautifulSoup in , allow tailored data extraction for specific webometric studies, such as mapping link networks between academic sites. However, challenges arise with dynamic content generated by or , which traditional crawlers may fail to render fully, necessitating headless browsers like or to simulate user interactions and access rendered pages. APIs and search engine data provide alternative avenues for webometric data acquisition, offering structured access to web metrics without full-site traversal. The Google Custom Search API, for instance, enables programmatic search queries using advanced operators to retrieve web results, though it imposes daily limits (typically 100 queries per day for free tiers) and may return approximate results due to algorithmic opacity. To circumvent such restrictions, researchers increasingly utilize large-scale datasets like , a publicly available repository launched in 2008 that archives billions of web pages monthly, facilitating analysis of structures and content distribution across the web. For backlink analysis, researchers often turn to specialized services like or Ahrefs APIs, or process data to extract structures, circumventing limitations. Server log file analysis serves as an internal data collection approach in webometrics, capturing usage metrics such as visitor counts, page views, and referral paths directly from web server records like or IIS logs. These logs record timestamps, addresses, user agents, and HTTP status codes, allowing quantification of patterns while requiring anonymization techniques—such as masking—to protect user in compliance with regulations like GDPR. Ethical considerations are integral to webometric data collection, emphasizing respect for site owners' directives and resource constraints. Compliance with files, which specify disallowed paths for crawlers, is a standard practice to avoid unauthorized access and potential denial-of-service issues, as non-adherence can strain servers or violate implied contracts. Additionally, researchers must implement in crawlers (e.g., delays between requests) to prevent overload and ensure transparency by documenting data sources and methods in publications.

Core Metrics and Analysis Techniques

Webometrics employs several core metrics to quantify the scale, prominence, and content quality of web domains, drawing from informetric principles to assess digital footprints. The web size metric measures the total number of unique pages or files indexed within a domain, providing an indicator of a site's overall scale and presence on the . This is typically obtained through search engine queries that count indexed content, reflecting the breadth of information available from the domain. Visibility, another foundational metric, evaluates the inbound hyperlinks (inlinks) pointing to a from external sources, calculated as the total unique from a representative sample of the . Inlinks serve as proxies for a site's and reach, analogous to citations in , where higher counts suggest greater recognition or influence within the online . For instance, visibility is often derived from data limiting results to external domains to avoid self-referential inflation. The richness metric assesses the density of specialized content types per domain, such as PDFs, PostScript files, Word documents, Excel spreadsheets, and PowerPoint presentations, which indicate the depth and scholarly value of the site's resources. This metric emphasizes the proportion of high-quality, downloadable files relative to total pages, highlighting domains with substantive, non-transient content over mere volume. Rich files are queried via filetype-specific search operators (e.g., "filetype:pdf site:example.edu"), capturing the variety and permanence of informational assets. Key analysis techniques in webometrics build on these metrics to uncover relational structures. Co-link analysis examines pairs of sites or pages that are linked together from common external sources, inferring topical similarity or shared audience interest based on overlapping inlinks. This method, akin to co-citation analysis in , maps clusters of related web entities, where frequent co-linking signals conceptual proximity without direct content examination. A prominent derived metric is the Web Impact Factor (WIF), which normalizes visibility by size to gauge a domain's relative influence. Introduced by Ingwersen, WIF is computed as the ratio of unique external inlinks to the total number of pages in the domain, providing a standardized measure of hyperlink density. \text{WIF} = \frac{\text{Number of unique external links to the website}}{\text{Number of pages in the website}} This formula accounts for variations in domain scale, ensuring comparability across sites, though calculations require careful handling of search engine biases and duplicate links.

Applications

In Academic and Research Evaluation

Webometrics plays a significant role in evaluating academic institutions through rankings that emphasize online visibility and openness as proxies for scholarly impact and accessibility. The Ranking Web of Universities, launched in 2004 by the Cybermetrics Lab at the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), assesses over 30,000 institutions worldwide using four key indicators: presence (web size), visibility (external links received), openness (transparency via document types like PDFs and Word files), and excellence (top-cited scholarly outputs). These metrics prioritize web-based dissemination over traditional bibliometric measures, with biannual updates in January and July to reflect evolving digital footprints. This approach has influenced institutional strategies, encouraging universities to enhance their online profiles to improve standings and demonstrate research outreach. In researcher evaluation, webometrics extends beyond citation counts by analyzing hyperlink networks to quantify scholarly web presence and influence. Hyperlinks serve as indicators of recognition and collaboration, with in-link counts to personal or departmental pages correlating with research productivity and interdisciplinary connections. For instance, studies have shown that hyperlink patterns among academic websites reveal informal impacts not captured by formal citations, such as endorsements from peers or public engagement. Metrics like the Web Impact Factor (WIF) have been briefly applied here to normalize link counts by web size, providing a simple gauge of a researcher's online resonance. A representative case involves webometric analysis of repositories' link profiles to measure effectiveness. Studies of institutional repositories, such as those in agricultural sciences, use in-link counts and metrics to assess how openly shared content attracts external references, indicating wider academic and societal reach. For example, evaluations of Asian digital repositories revealed that higher link profiles correlate with greater impact on knowledge sharing, guiding improvements in repository design for better .

In Business and Digital Marketing

In and , webometrics provides tools for competitor by analyzing link profiles, particularly through co-link data, to assess and competitive positioning. Co-link measures the number of shared incoming links between websites, indicating similarity and rivalry within industries; for instance, in the sector, this method has mapped positions of 32 global firms, grouping them into subsectors like wireless and optical networking, with like and emerging as central players based on link overlaps. Such analyses are integral to audits, where profiles reveal a brand's online authority and relative to rivals, adapting bibliometric techniques to quantify hyperlink-based influence. Webometrics supports intelligence by tracking web mentions and structural interconnections to identify sector trends, such as the density of sites through link counts and co-citation patterns. queries can quantify mentions of entities, correlating higher link volumes with and , as seen in studies of prominence where incoming links signal site attractiveness and competitive standing. This approach enables firms to monitor evolving trends, like shifts in online presence within sectors, by analyzing networks for relational insights. In , webometric methods evaluate campaign effectiveness using usage-derived metrics, such as referral link volumes, to gauge referral traffic and engagement impact. By counting and classifying backlinks from promotional efforts, marketers can assess how campaigns enhance a site's and influence, with link impact factors serving as proxies for reach and conversion potential. Adapted from academic metrics, these techniques prioritize motivations to refine strategies, ensuring data-driven optimizations. Since the , corporations have applied webometric tools for merger by examining interconnections, such as co-link patterns, to evaluate potential synergies and competitive overlaps between acquiring and target entities. For example, of stock index companies has revealed relational structures useful for , highlighting interconnected web presences that predict post-merger integration challenges or opportunities.

Challenges and Future Directions

Current Limitations

One major limitation in webometrics stems from data incompleteness, as search engines typically index only a small fraction of the total . This partial coverage arises because crawlers prioritize popular or easily reachable pages, often overlooking dynamically generated content or sites behind paywalls. Furthermore, the hidden —or —comprising vast databases, intranets, and query-based resources, remains entirely excluded from standard indexing processes, severely restricting the scope of webometric analyses. Additionally, webometrics relies on external data sources like , which faced access disruptions in 2025, prompting adaptations to alternatives such as OpenAlex. Bias issues further undermine the reliability of webometric metrics. Language dominance, particularly English bias, skews results since major search engines like favor content in widely used languages, underrepresenting non-English materials despite their global significance. Additionally, manipulative practices such as link farming—networks of artificial inbound links designed to boost rankings—can inflate hyperlink-based indicators like impact factors or scores, leading to misleading assessments of online influence. Privacy and ethical concerns arise prominently in webometrics when incorporating usage data, such as visitor logs or behavioral , which may inadvertently capture . Since the implementation of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2018, practitioners must ensure compliance with stringent requirements for consent, minimization, and anonymization to avoid violations, yet challenges persist in balancing analytical needs with user rights. Technical limitations exacerbate these issues, particularly the rapid pace of web changes that outstrips crawling accuracy. Web content evolves continuously through updates, deletions, or JavaScript rendering, resulting in snapshots that quickly become obsolete and introducing inconsistencies in metrics derived from historical crawls. These challenges are inherent to data collection methods like web crawling, which struggle to achieve comprehensive and timely coverage amid the web's scale and volatility.

Emerging Trends and Prospects

Recent advancements in webometrics have increasingly incorporated () and techniques to enhance the analysis of web structures and content, particularly since 2020. models, including (), enable more accurate by identifying patterns in networks to forecast influential connections and site authority beyond traditional counting methods. Similarly, powered by extracts emotional tones from web content, allowing researchers to gauge public opinion and trends in online discussions with greater precision than rule-based approaches. These integrations address post-2020 challenges in handling dynamic web data, improving predictive capabilities for user behavior and digital impact. A growing focus in webometrics extends to the , where metrics are adapted for analyzing graphs that go beyond the static . Researchers apply network analysis techniques, such as measures, to social platforms' interaction graphs, quantifying through shares, mentions, and user connections rather than hyperlinks alone. For instance, webometric studies of university presence correlate platform engagement metrics with overall online visibility, revealing how dynamic interactions on sites like amplify institutional reach. This shift emphasizes temporal and relational data from social networks, enabling assessments of viral propagation and community structures in real-time environments. Synergies with resources have enabled global-scale webometric analyses, notably through datasets like , which provide petabyte-scale archives of web pages for longitudinal studies. 's indexed crawls, spanning over 100 billion pages, facilitate representative sampling for tracking web evolution, such as URI trends over time, without exhaustive processing of full archives. This approach supports webometrics by offering unbiased, large-scale data for impact measurement, enhancing reliability in cross-regional comparisons. Looking ahead, prospects for webometrics include the standardization of metrics to inform policy, particularly in addressing the . Standardized web indicators, such as site accessibility and technical quality scores, have been proposed to quantify disparities in online presence across corporations and regions, aiding policymakers in targeted interventions. Comparative web measurement frameworks further highlight infrastructural gaps between high- and low-income countries, promoting uniform benchmarks for global equity assessments. These developments position webometrics as a tool for evidence-based strategies.

References

  1. [1]
    A history of webometrics - Thelwall - 2012 - ASIS&T Digital Library
    Aug 21, 2012 · The term webometrics was coined in 1997 by Tomas Almind and Peter Ingwersen in recognition that informetric analyses could be applied to the web.Abstract · Link Analysis: Impact... · From Web Citation Analysis to...
  2. [2]
    (PDF) Toward a basic framework for Webometrics - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · According to Bjornebone and Ingwersen (2004) , webometrics is defined as the quantitative analysis of web resources, encompassing web content, ...
  3. [3]
    Advantages and Disadvantages of the Webometrics Ranking System
    According to [51], there are three key aspects that need to be measured in the academic web space: Size, i.e., quantity of published information. Visibility ...2. Webometrics Methodology · 2.2 Webometrics Tools For... · 3.1 Webometrics Ranking Of...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    [PDF] WEBOMETRICS RESEARCH METHODS ADOPTED IN LIBRARY ...
    Webometrics studies the web, measuring aspects like websites, pages, words, hyperlinks, and search results. It studies the web as a communication medium.
  5. [5]
    (PDF) Informetric analyses on the world wide web - ResearchGate
    As defined by Almind and Ingwersen (1997) , "Webometrics is the study of the quantitative aspects of the construction and use of information resources ...
  6. [6]
    Toward a basic framework for webometrics - Björneborn - 2004
    Aug 13, 2004 · In this article, we define webometrics within the framework of informetric studies and bibliometrics, as belonging to library and ...
  7. [7]
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077
  8. [8]
    https://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00176ED1V01Y200907ICR005
  9. [9]
    The birth of the Web - CERN
    On 30 April 1993, CERN put the World Wide Web software in the public domain. Later, CERN made a release available with an open licence, a more sure way to ...
  10. [10]
    Perspective of webometrics | Scientometrics
    A new research field, webometrics, investigating the nature and properties of the Web drawing on modern informetric methodologies.Missing: definition objectives
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Informetric analyses on the world wide web - Semantic Scholar
    Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to 'webometrics' · 591 Citations · 27 References.
  12. [12]
    Bibliometrics to webometrics - Mike Thelwall, 2008 - Sage Journals
    This article reviews the distance that bibliometrics has travelled since 1958 by comparing early bibliometrics with current practice.
  13. [13]
    Bibliometrics to webometrics (Chapter 15) - Information Science in ...
    Jun 8, 2018 · This article reviews the distance that bibliometrics has travelled since 1958 by comparing early bibliometrics with current practice, and by ...Missing: origins hyperlinks
  14. [14]
    Michael Thelwall wins the 2015 Derek John de Solla Price Medal
    Aug 6, 2015 · Mike Thelwall founded the Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group at the University of Wolverhampton in 2000; prior to then there had been ...
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Webometric Ranking of World Universities - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · This paper presents the Webometric Ranking of World Universities which is built using a combined indicator called WR that takes into account the number of ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Sixth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and ...
    Oct 19, 2025 · International Program Committee: Isidro Aguillo, Spain. Petra Ahrweiler, India. R. Ambuja, India. A. Amudhavalli, India. Subbiah Arunachalam ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    (PDF) Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories
    Aug 6, 2025 · The objective is to promote Open access initiatives (OAI) supporting the use of repositories for scientific evaluation purposes. A set of ...
  18. [18]
    (PDF) Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Mike Thelwall is the head of the Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group at the University of Wol-verhampton, UK.Missing: big | Show results with:big
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Webometrics Benefitting from Web Mining? An Investigation of ...
    1. Abstract. Webometrics and web mining are two fields where research is focused on quantitative analyses of the web. This literature review outlines ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Webometrics / Cybermetrics ... - ERIC
    Dec 31, 2018 · In the information science field of webometrics is “the study of the quantitative aspects of the construction and use of information resources,.
  21. [21]
    Heritrix - Wikipedia
    Heritrix is a web crawler designed for web archiving. It was originally written in collaboration between the Internet Archive, National Library of Norway ...
  22. [22]
    Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the ...
    Webometrics is concerned with measuring aspects of the web: web sites, web pages, parts of web pages, words in web pages, hyperlinks, web search engine results.Missing: key | Show results with:key
  23. [23]
    Scraping Scientific Web Repositories: Challenges and Solutions for ...
    Sep 19, 2016 · size‐limitations. of the result sets, dynamic contents, and access barriers. We briefly characterize the three obstacle categories in the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Google Web APIs – an Instrument for Webometric Analyses? - arXiv
    We have been testing the Google APIs as a scientific tool for web data gathering since last year. In scientific publications, Google APIs have until now.
  25. [25]
    Common Crawl - Open Repository of Web Crawl Data
    Common Crawl maintains a free, open repository of web crawl data that can be used by anyone. ; Free and open corpus since 2007. ; 10,000 research papers. ; 3–5 ...Examples Using Our Data · FAQ · Overview · Get Started
  26. [26]
    Using Web Server Logs in Evaluating Instructional Web Sites
    Web server logs contain a great deal of information about who uses a Web site and how they use it. Software exists to help analyze these logs, ...
  27. [27]
    Looking for Numbers with Meaning: Using Server Logs to Generate ...
    This paper explores the reasons behind the search for Web usage statistics, the limitations of Web server logs and the methods used to analyze them, and ...
  28. [28]
    Web crawling ethics revisited: Cost, privacy, and denial of service
    Aug 9, 2025 · Ethical aspects of the employment of web crawlers for information science research and other contexts are reviewed.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The Ethicality of Web Crawlers - C. Lee Giles
    Feb 18, 2021 · In this research, we investigate and define rules to measure crawler ethics, referring to the extent to which web crawlers respect the ...
  30. [30]
    https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007167
  31. [31]
    Ranking Web of Universities: Is Webometrics a Reliable Academic ...
    Aug 4, 2025 · Web-based indicators ranking (WR) offers results of comparable and similar quality to those of the six major global university rankings.<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Hyperlink Analyses of the World Wide Web: a Review
    Jul 1, 2003 · We conclude that hyperlinks are a highly promising but problematic new source of data that can be mined for previously hidden patterns of information.
  33. [33]
    Quality assessment of Spanish universities' web sites focused on the ...
    This work has analyzed and evaluated the dissemination of research done at Spanish universities through the World Wide Web (WWW)
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Webometric Analysis of Open Access Institutional Digital ...
    The Webometric is to measure the impact of websites by the number of links and followers. It can be defined as the ratio of web pages, self-link, in-link, ...Missing: profiles | Show results with:profiles
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Mapping Business Competitive Positions Using Web Co-link Analysis
    Nov 21, 2003 · Since similar or related businesses are competing businesses, the co-link data can be used to map business competitive positions. We selected 32 ...
  36. [36]
    Comparing business competition positions based on Web co-link data
    Jun 20, 2013 · Since similar or related businesses are competing businesses, the co-link data can be used to map business competitive positions. We selected 32 ...
  37. [37]
    Googling Companies — a Webometric Approach to Business Studies
    Dec 1, 2009 · This paper is intended to show how webometric techniques could be applied to business and management studies. Therefore, it describes a number ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  38. [38]
    Informetrics and webometrics for measuring impact, visibility, and ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The paper reports the application of classical bibliometric methods to evaluate the impact of scientific, political, and business ...
  39. [39]
    White Paper: The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value - DOI
    The deep Web is qualitatively different from the surface Web. Deep Web sources store their content in searchable databases that only produce results dynamically ...
  40. [40]
    https://ijbmm.com/paper/Sep2023/8340436493.pdf
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Privacy and Ethics in Web Analytics: Balancing User Data and ...
    Under the GDPR, organisations must ensure that personal data is gathered legally and under strict conditions, and those who collect and manage it are obliged to ...
  42. [42]
    The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · The GDPR was particularly effective in curbing privacy-invasive trackers that collect and share personal data, thereby strengthening user ...Missing: ethics | Show results with:ethics
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Web Crawling Contents - Stanford University
    1.1 Challenges​​ The basic web crawling algorithm is simple: Given a set of seed Uni- form Resource Locators (URLs), a crawler downloads all the web pages ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Enhanced Scientometrics, Webometrics, and Bibl - arXiv
    Abstract. Purpose: The study aims to analyze the synergy of Artificial Intelligence (AI), with scientometrics, webometrics, and bibliometrics to unlock and ...
  45. [45]
    a systematic review of cutting-edge techniques in AI-enhanced ...
    Oct 24, 2025 · The study aims to analyze the synergy of artificial intelligence (AI), with scientometrics, webometrics and bibliometrics to unlock and to emphasize the ...
  46. [46]
    Webometrics: evolution of social media presence of universities
    This paper aims at an important task of computing the webometrics university ranking and investigating if there exists a correlation between webometrics ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  47. [47]
    A webometric network analysis of electronic word of mouth (eWOM ...
    Oct 23, 2020 · This study explores the effectiveness of crisis response strategies for public response and perception in the context of social media by ...
  48. [48]
    Improved methodology for longitudinal Web analytics using ... - arXiv
    Apr 15, 2024 · Common Crawl is a multi-petabyte longitudinal dataset containing over 100 billion web pages which is widely used as a source of language data for sequence ...Missing: big synergies global- scale
  49. [49]
    https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00491-0
  50. [50]
    Measuring corporate digital divide through websites: insights from ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · Quality of the technical frameworks. Modern web development standards provide a better user experience and reflect more technical competencies.
  51. [51]
    Digital Disparities: A Comparative Web Measurement Study Across ...
    Apr 22, 2025 · In this work, we test this hypothesis by measuring differences in web development practices across the two groups of countries, using multiple dimensions.