Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

User experience

User experience (UX) is a person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use or anticipated use of a , encompassing emotional, cognitive, and behavioral aspects of interaction. According to the (ISO 9241-210:2019), UX arises as a consequence of factors such as brand image, presentation, functionality, performance, interactive behavior, and assistive capabilities, whether the is in use or anticipated. This holistic concept extends beyond mere functionality to include how users feel about their engagement, influencing satisfaction, loyalty, and overall effectiveness of the interaction. The term "user experience" gained prominence in 1993 when Donald A. Norman, then Vice President of the Advanced Technology Group at Apple Computer, adopted it to describe the full spectrum of user interactions with technology. Norman's work built on earlier foundations in human-computer interaction (HCI) and mid-20th-century studies on human factors, with contributions from researchers like Jakob Nielsen, who later co-founded the to advance UX research. By the late , UX had emerged as a distinct discipline, integrating principles from , , and to prioritize human-centered approaches in product development. Key components of UX include , defined by Nielsen as the ease with which users can learn, efficiently perform tasks, remember how to use the system, make few errors, and find the experience satisfying; , ensuring inclusivity for diverse users including those with disabilities; and , which addresses affective responses to enhance engagement and delight. UX processes typically follow methodologies outlined in ISO 9241-210, involving iterative activities like understanding user contexts, specifying requirements, prototyping, and evaluating outcomes through methods such as and user interviews. These elements collectively aim to create intuitive, efficient, and enjoyable interactions that align with user needs and expectations. In contemporary practice, UX has become integral to digital and physical across industries, from software and websites to consumer goods, driven by the recognition that positive experiences drive user retention, reduce support costs, and boost business outcomes. Pioneering research from the emphasizes empirical validation through evidence-based techniques, ensuring designs are not only functional but also empathetic to user behaviors and contexts. As technology evolves with advancements like and immersive interfaces, UX continues to adapt, focusing on ethical considerations such as and inclusivity to foster sustainable, user-trusting ecosystems.

Core Concepts

Definitions and Scope

User experience (UX) is formally defined in the ISO 9241-210:2019 as "the user’s perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a , product, or ." This emphasizes that UX encompasses a broad range of subjective elements, including emotions, beliefs, preferences, perceptions, physical and psychological comfort, , and accomplishments that arise before, during, and after interaction. It is shaped by factors such as the 's brand image, , functionality, , interactive , and assistive capabilities, as well as the user's internal state (e.g., prior experiences, attitudes, skills, abilities, and personality) and the broader context of use. The provides a complementary , describing UX as "all aspects of the end-user's with the company, its services, and its products." This holistic view extends beyond the immediate to include the entire of touchpoints, highlighting UX as an overarching construct that integrates practical and experiential dimensions of engagement. The term "user experience" was coined in the early 1990s by and his colleagues at Apple Computer, specifically in 1993 when Norman formed The User Experience Architect’s Office as part of Apple's Advanced Technology Group. This naming aimed to broaden the focus from mere functionality and to the full spectrum of a user's encounter with , elevating considerations to a core pillar alongside and marketing. The scope of UX delineates clear boundaries by incorporating pre-use expectations (such as and influences), during-use interactions (encompassing perceptions and responses), and post-use reflections (including and long-term attitudes). Within this framework, UX distinguishes between pragmatic aspects, which center on , efficiency, and task fulfillment, and hedonic aspects, which involve pleasure, stimulation, novelty, and emotional appeal. This distinction, originally articulated by Marc Hassenzahl, underscores that while pragmatic qualities address instrumental goals, hedonic qualities contribute to the subjective enjoyment and motivational pull of the experience. UX overlaps with but extends further to include these affective and contextual layers.

Key Components

Usability forms a foundational component of user experience, defined as the extent to which a , product, or can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with , , and in a specified context of use. refers to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve their goals, measures the resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness of those goals, and encompasses the users' comfort and of the . Accessibility ensures that user experience is inclusive for diverse users, including those with disabilities, by removing barriers to interaction and perception. Key standards like the 2.2, published in 2023, provide success criteria for making web content perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust, such as requiring sufficient color contrast ratios (at least 4.5:1 for normal text) to aid users with low vision. Aesthetics and delight involve visual and sensory elements that foster emotional , enhancing the overall and memorability of interactions. At the visceral level, immediate aesthetic impressions influence users' initial perceptions and tolerance for minor issues, while deeper delight arises from designs that evoke positive through harmonious form and sensory feedback. Utility and functionality address how well a system meets users' core needs by providing the necessary features and capabilities, distinct from the ease of using those features. A product with high delivers relevant functions that solve real problems, forming the prerequisite for a positive user experience, whereas functionality ensures these features operate reliably to fulfill intended purposes. These components are interdependent, where deficiencies in one can diminish the others; for instance, inadequate color contrast not only violates standards but also reduces by making text illegible for all users in varying lighting conditions, thereby undermining overall satisfaction and effectiveness. Similarly, neglecting may fail to engage users emotionally, even if utility and usability are present, while strong functionality without accessibility excludes segments of users, limiting the system's broad experiential value.

Historical Development

Early Foundations

The foundations of user experience (UX) trace back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when industrial efficiency became a central concern in human-machine interactions. Frederick Winslow Taylor's , published in 1911, introduced systematic methods to optimize worker productivity by analyzing tasks and standardizing tools, emphasizing the integration of human labor with machinery to minimize waste and enhance output. This approach laid early groundwork for considering human capabilities in system design, influencing subsequent efforts to align technology with user needs. Similarly, Henry Ford's implementation of the in 1913 at the Highland Park plant revolutionized manufacturing by breaking down complex vehicle assembly into sequential, repetitive tasks, reducing production time for a Model T from over 12 hours to about 93 minutes and highlighting the importance of ergonomic workflow in human-system interfaces. Post-World War II developments accelerated the formalization of human factors , building on wartime necessities to design equipment that accommodated human limitations and strengths. During and after the war, psychologists and engineers addressed issues like pilot errors in cockpits, leading to interdisciplinary on in complex systems. The establishment of the Human Factors Society in 1957 marked a pivotal moment, with the term "human " gaining prominence to describe the application of scientific principles to improve the fit between and technology, focusing on safety, efficiency, and in military and industrial contexts. This era shifted attention from purely mechanical optimization to incorporating human physiological and psychological factors, setting the stage for broader UX principles. In the , early usability studies emerged as a bridge to more user-focused design, particularly through Ben Shneiderman's influential work on direct manipulation interfaces. In his 1983 paper, Shneiderman proposed interfaces that allow users to interact with objects on screen as if manipulating physical entities, using continuous representations and rapid, reversible actions to reduce and enhance intuitiveness—principles demonstrated in early graphical user interfaces like those in systems. This approach prioritized user control and visibility, influencing the evaluation of system effectiveness beyond mere efficiency. The transition to user-centered approaches in the 1970s and 1980s drew heavily from , notably Philip N. Johnson-Laird's theory of mental models outlined in his 1983 book Mental Models: Towards a of , , and . Johnson-Laird argued that individuals construct internal representations of external systems to reason and interact, emphasizing the need for designs that align with these models to facilitate comprehension and reduce errors in human-technology interactions. This cognitive framework encouraged designers to anticipate user expectations, paving the way for methodologies that integrate psychological insights into interface development.

Modern Evolution

The modern evolution of user experience (UX) began in the early 1990s with the formalization of the term itself. In 1993, Donald Norman, while working at Apple Computer, coined "user experience" to describe a holistic approach to that encompassed more than just interfaces, including emotional and cognitive aspects of interaction. This shift was reflected in his 1993 book Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, where he explored cognitive artifacts—tools and representations that extend human cognition—and emphasized experiential thinking over purely functional . Norman's framework broadened UX beyond efficiency-focused human factors, integrating perceptual and emotional elements to make technology more intuitive and human-centered. The marked a boom in UX driven by the internet's expansion and . , characterized by and interactive platforms emerging around 2004, demanded more engaging and participatory designs, shifting UX toward collaborative and social interfaces. The launch of the in 2007 revolutionized touch-based interactions, introducing gestures and app ecosystems that prioritized seamless, gesture-driven over physical buttons, influencing global standards for mobile UX. Concurrently, agile methodologies, formalized in the 2001 Agile Manifesto, integrated UX practices into iterative development cycles, enabling and user feedback to refine experiences in fast-paced digital environments. In the , UX achieved greater standardization and professional recognition. The (ISO) adopted ISO 9241-210 in 2010, providing a framework for processes throughout interactive system lifecycles, which was updated in 2019 to incorporate contemporary and guidelines. This standardization supported the profession's growth, with the number of UX practitioners expanding from approximately 1,000 in 1983 to about 1 million by 2017, fueled by demand in tech industries for specialized roles in and prototyping. The 2020s have seen UX evolve amid technological and societal shifts, particularly post-pandemic. (AI) has enabled personalized and adaptive interfaces, such as those in tools like companions launched around 2023, which dynamically tailor responses and layouts based on user behavior to enhance engagement and relevance. (VR) and (AR) experiences surged following the 2020 hype, with Meta's 2021 rebranding accelerating immersive applications; by 2025, AR/VR user penetration is projected to reach 54.1%, transforming UX into spatial and multisensory interactions. The further emphasized remote and digital inclusivity, prompting designs that accommodate diverse access needs, such as voice navigation and low-bandwidth adaptations, to ensure equitable experiences in hybrid work and virtual environments.

Factors Affecting UX

User and Contextual Influences

User characteristics significantly shape perceptions of user experience (UX), with influencing behaviors and preferences. Older adults often exhibit slower task completion times and higher rates in use compared to younger users due to differences in perceptual speed and capacity. For instance, middle-aged adults (46–59 years) demonstrate more cautious and reliance on familiar interfaces than younger adults (20–29 years), affecting overall and efficiency. Expertise level further modulates UX through variations in learning curves and interface familiarity. Novice users prioritize ease of initial learning and require more guided tutorials, while experts favor efficiency features like shortcuts and customizable workflows to minimize cognitive effort. This distinction is evident in human-computer interaction (HCI) studies, where novices experience steeper learning curves but benefit from progressive disclosure, whereas experts achieve faster performance on complex tasks with minimal hand-holding. Cultural background alters UX by shaping expectations around interface aesthetics, navigation, and communication styles. High-context cultures, such as those in , prefer indirect cues and harmonious designs, leading to preferences for subtle icons and collective-oriented features, while low-context cultures like those favor explicit, individualistic layouts with bold calls-to-action. These differences impact perceived usability, as mismatched cultural elements can increase frustration and abandonment rates. Cognitive abilities, including , , and processing speed, directly affect how users interpret and respond to digital interfaces. Individuals with lower capacity struggle more with multitasking in apps, resulting in higher and reduced engagement, whereas those with stronger navigate complex information hierarchies more fluidly. Research confirms that cognitive predictors account for a significant portion of variance in everyday computer task performance, underscoring the need to account for these traits in UX evaluation. Contextual elements, such as the physical environment, profoundly influence UX by constraining interaction possibilities and user attention. Mobile use in dynamic settings like demands thumb-friendly gestures and concise content, contrasting with desktop scenarios that support expansive multitasking and precise input via and . Users on devices report higher frustration with dense layouts due to screen size limitations, highlighting how environmental portability alters expectations for speed and . Social settings modify UX through the demands of and interpersonal dynamics. In group-oriented tools like shared document editors, users experience heightened satisfaction when interfaces facilitate and presence indicators, fostering a of co-presence and reducing . However, overcrowded social features in collaborative platforms can overwhelm introverted users, emphasizing the role of social context in balancing individual with group efficiency. Temporal factors, including time pressure and emotional states like , dynamically alter UX by compressing and amplifying error sensitivity. Under , users perceive interfaces as more cumbersome, with elevated heart rates correlating to distorted and reduced tolerance for , as seen in studies where acute prolongs task durations. This temporal lens reveals how momentary stressors, such as deadlines, can degrade overall experience quality. Usage scenarios illustrate how context shifts user expectations, particularly regarding . In public settings, such as shared workspaces, users exhibit greater caution with due to visibility risks, preferring granular controls to mitigate exposure, whereas private environments allow more permissive behaviors with reduced privacy salience. This framework posits that privacy norms vary by setting, with violations in public scenarios eroding and UX more severely than in isolated ones. Recent developments as of 2025 highlight the influence of work on UX for remote tools, exacerbated by digital from prolonged and tool overload. Post-2023 studies indicate that workers report higher levels from constant video calls and app switching, leading to diminished engagement and in remote platforms. Mitigation through simplified interfaces has shown to reduce by enhancing , though persistent hyperconnectivity remains a key challenge in this evolving work paradigm.

System and Design Influences

System properties such as interface clarity, mechanisms, and error handling play a pivotal role in shaping user experience by ensuring intuitive interactions and minimizing frustration. Interface clarity involves designing elements that align with users' mental models, using familiar metaphors and consistent layouts to reduce ; for instance, Jakob Nielsen's of "match between system and the real world" emphasizes employing language and conventions that resonate with everyday experiences to enhance comprehension. mechanisms provide immediate and informative responses to user actions, such as status indicators or progress bars, which keep users informed about system operations and build trust in the interface; Nielsen's "visibility of system status" principle underscores the need for the system to always inform users of what is happening through appropriate . Error handling focuses on prevention and graceful , with clear, non-technical messages that explain issues and suggest solutions, as outlined in Nielsen's heuristics for recognition and , which advocate for user-friendly diagnostics over cryptic codes. A key example of these properties in practice is progressive disclosure in navigation, a technique that reveals information incrementally to avoid overwhelming users with excessive options at once. Introduced as a core strategy, progressive disclosure defers secondary features to sub-menus or contextual triggers, thereby improving learnability and reducing errors in complex interfaces like dashboards or catalogs. This approach aligns with broader (UCD) processes, which prioritize iterative prototyping and user involvement throughout development to refine system properties based on real-world testing. Seminal UCD principles, as articulated by Gould and Lewis, stress early user participation, iterative evaluation, and integrated to ensure designs address from the outset. Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics, originally derived in 1994 from of expert evaluations, remain foundational for UCD, guiding iterative refinements like prototyping to validate interface clarity and feedback efficacy. Technological influences further modulate UX through performance attributes like and load times, which directly affect perceived and . In applications, responsive design ensures seamless adaptation across devices, maintaining interface clarity and feedback consistency; delays in can disrupt flow, leading users to abandon tasks. Load times critically impact initial impressions, with research showing that even a one-second delay can reduce page views by 11% and by 16%, as demonstrated in Google's analysis of performance. Optimizing these factors, such as through efficient rendering, enhances the overall sense of system reliability. Modern advancements in integrations address gaps in traditional system properties by enabling predictive UX, particularly in , where algorithms anticipate user needs to reduce . For example, -driven predicts preferences based on behavior, dynamically adjusting interfaces with tailored recommendations and proactive feedback, thereby streamlining navigation and error prevention. A 2025 study on in platforms like and found that such predictive features increased purchase intent by up to 20% through reduced search friction and enhanced relevance. These integrations build on UCD by incorporating into loops, allowing systems to evolve feedback mechanisms in while maintaining core principles of clarity and user control.

Emotional and Evaluative Dimensions

Momentary vs. Cumulative Experience

Momentary user experience encompasses the immediate emotional responses triggered by specific interactions within a product or system. These reactions occur in during use and can significantly influence instant satisfaction or dissatisfaction. For instance, micro-interactions such as a laggy click that introduces even a brief delay can evoke , disrupting the and leading to negative affective states like or . Studies show that response delays beyond 1 second heighten user anxiety and , as they break the of seamless and immediacy in the . In contrast, cumulative user experience represents the holistic assessment formed over multiple exposures to a product, integrating repeated interactions into a broader that shapes long-term attitudes such as . This overall view is not a simple aggregation of momentary feelings but involves memory reconstruction, where users recall experiences selectively based on psychological heuristics. A key example is the peak-end rule, which posits that retrospective evaluations prioritize the most intense (peak) moments and the ending of an experience over its duration or average quality. As outlined in seminal work, people judge past episodes—such as a series of product uses—primarily by their emotional highs or lows and how they conclude, often reconstructing memories to favor these elements over comprehensive details. This process contributes to sustained engagement or abandonment, as positive cumulative perceptions foster loyalty while negative ones erode it. External factors further modulate cumulative UX by altering perceptions beyond direct interactions, such as through coverage or peer reviews that anticipated and remembered experiences. Social influences from peers, for example, significantly shape perceived ease of use, , and motivational aspects of a product, with empirical showing strong correlations (e.g., β=0.351 for ease of use). Peer opinions and narratives can amplify or mitigate direct experiences, leading to holistic views that diverge from isolated uses. In contemporary contexts like 2025, short-form content platforms such as exemplify this dynamic, where algorithms prioritize videos eliciting strong momentary emotional highs—such as or —to boost immediate , thereby enhancing cumulative retention through habitual viewing patterns. indicates that these emotional peaks drive prolonged platform use, as positive affective responses correlate with higher audience retention rates in short-video environments.

Measurement and Assessment Methods

Measurement and assessment of user experience (UX) involve a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches to evaluate , , and with digital products and services. These methods help identify pain points, strengths, and opportunities for improvement by capturing user perceptions and behaviors. Qualitative techniques provide in-depth insights into user motivations and frustrations, while quantitative tools offer measurable benchmarks for comparison across iterations or competitors. Advanced and emerging metrics incorporate physiological and AI-driven data to gauge subtle aspects like emotional responses, bridging momentary interactions with long-term cumulative experiences. Qualitative methods emphasize exploratory understanding through direct user . User interviews involve structured or semi-structured conversations to gather detailed on experiences, allowing researchers to probe reasons behind behaviors and preferences. Think-aloud protocols require participants to verbalize their thoughts in while performing tasks, revealing cognitive processes, hesitations, and intuitive interpretations of interfaces. Journey mapping visualizes the end-to-end user path, highlighting touchpoints, emotions, and barriers across stages of to inform holistic UX strategies. Quantitative tools provide standardized, scalable evaluations of perceived UX quality. The (SUS), developed in 1986, is a 10-item yielding a score from 0 to 100, where scores above 68 indicate above-average ; it remains widely adopted in 2025 for its reliability in benchmarking interfaces across industries. The User Experience (UEQ), introduced in 2008, assesses six dimensions—attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty—via 26 items, enabling nuanced comparisons of hedonic and pragmatic qualities. Advanced metrics extend beyond self-reports to objective indicators of and . The (NPS) measures user by asking how likely they are to recommend a product on a 0-10 scale, categorizing responses as promoters (9-10), passives (7-8), or detractors (0-6), with the score calculated as the percentage of promoters minus detractors; in UX contexts, it correlates with overall satisfaction and retention. , particularly eye-tracking, quantify in the 2020s by analyzing gaze patterns, fixation durations, and saccades to assess attention allocation and during interactions. Emerging methods in 2025 leverage and automation for efficient, data-rich assessments. -driven processes session data—such as video recordings, chat logs, or behavioral metrics—to detect emotional tones and patterns automatically, reducing manual review time while identifying subtle frustrations or delights. audits using tools like , updated in 2024 to enhance contrast checking and support for complex elements, scan web content for with standards like WCAG, flagging issues such as missing text or barriers to ensure inclusive UX evaluation.

Ethical and Inclusive Practices

Challenges and Critiques

One significant challenge in user experience (UX) design arises from the tension between profit-driven motives and user well-being, particularly through the use of dark patterns—deceptive designs that manipulate users into unintended actions, such as subscribing to services or sharing data without full awareness. These patterns often employ manipulative nudges, like disguised subscription buttons or fake urgency timers in mobile apps, prioritizing revenue over . The European Union's (DSA), adopted in 2022, explicitly critiques and prohibits such practices, defining dark patterns as interfaces that impair users' ability to make free and informed decisions, with enforcement mechanisms to fine platforms up to 6% of global turnover for violations. Bias and exclusion further undermine UX by perpetuating inaccessible designs due to underrepresentation in user testing and , leading to systemic failures for marginalized groups. For instance, early facial recognition systems exhibited error rates up to 100 times higher for individuals with darker skin tones compared to lighter ones, resulting in misidentifications that disproportionately affected ethnic minorities in applications like security screening. These issues stemmed from training data skewed toward homogeneous demographics, exacerbating exclusion before mitigation efforts, such as diverse expansions, gained traction around 2023. A 2023 U.S. study highlighted ongoing risks, noting that unaddressed biases in UX testing continue to produce interfaces that fail to accommodate diverse ethnicities, genders, and ages, thereby limiting equitable access. Overreliance on simplified metrics in UX evaluation often masks deeper issues, as seen in critiques of the (), a 10-item intended for quick assessments but prone to oversimplification. Originally described as a "quick and dirty" , the SUS generates a single score that aggregates perceptions of usability without detailing specific points, potentially leading designers to overlook learnability or flaws. Factor analyses have revealed a hidden "learnability" dimension in SUS responses, indicating that its unidimensional scoring underrepresents multifaceted experiences. Compounding this, addictive design elements like infinite scroll—where content loads endlessly without pagination—foster digital addiction by exploiting variable reward loops, similar to slot machines, which increase session times but contribute to compulsive use and strain. In 2025, emerging critiques of AI-integrated UX emphasize risks from algorithmic bias in personalized feeds, where recommendation systems amplify echo chambers and discriminatory outcomes. Studies show that AI-driven personalization can reinforce biases through opaque training data, limiting content diversity and exposing users to homogeneous viewpoints that entrench stereotypes. The EU AI Act, entered into force in August 2024 with phased implementation through 2026, addresses these by classifying UX-relevant AI (e.g., personalization) by risk and requiring transparency, bias mitigation, and oversight for high-risk systems. Recent analyses underscore the need for transparency in these systems, as unchecked biases not only impair UX but also perpetuate societal divisions in algorithmically curated environments. Challenges in generative AI personas for human-computer interaction include risks of biased user representations that limit diversity and accessibility.

Principles for Ethical and Inclusive Design

Ethical frameworks in user experience (UX) design emphasize protecting user and preventing manipulative practices to foster and fairness. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), enacted in 2018 by the , mandates that UX designers incorporate principles, ensuring that collection is transparent, minimized, and user-consented from the outset of digital product development. This includes features like clear consent interfaces and data access controls to comply with GDPR's requirements for lawful processing, thereby reducing risks of data breaches and enhancing user autonomy in interfaces. Complementing this, the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, adopted in 2018, explicitly prohibits deceptive practices such as misleading claims or manipulative interfaces that could harm users, urging computing professionals—including UX designers—to prioritize honesty and avoid designs that coerce unintended actions. This code, which remains the guiding standard without a formal 2023 update but continues to influence ethical discourse, applies to UX by discouraging "dark patterns" like hidden opt-outs, promoting instead transparent interactions that respect . Inclusive design in UX extends these ethical foundations by applying universal design principles to create accessible digital experiences for diverse users, regardless of ability, age, or background. Originating from the work of architect Ron Mace, the seven principles of universal design—equitable use, flexibility in use, simple and intuitive use, perceptible information, tolerance for error, low physical effort, and size and space for approach and use—were formalized in 1997 and have since been adapted to digital contexts to guide UX prototyping and evaluation. For instance, equitable use ensures interfaces are appealing and usable by people with diverse abilities, such as through scalable text and alternative input methods, while perceptible information leverages multimedia cues like audio descriptions for visual impairments. The European Accessibility Act (EAA), effective June 28, 2025, mandates compliance with accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1 for digital products and services in the EU, requiring UX designs to accommodate users with disabilities. To implement inclusivity effectively, UX teams must employ diverse user testing panels that represent varied demographics, including underrepresented groups in terms of disability, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, allowing for iterative feedback that uncovers biases and barriers early in the design process. Sustainability in UX design addresses environmental impacts by promoting eco-friendly practices that extend product longevity and minimize resource consumption, aligning with emerging standards to combat e-waste. Recent guidelines, such as the Web Sustainability Guidelines (WSG) published by the (W3C) in 2025, advocate for energy-efficient interfaces, such as optimized animations and reduced data loads, to lower the of digital interactions without compromising . These standards emphasize designing for device longevity through modular updates and repairable software, which reduces by encouraging users to retain devices longer rather than upgrading frequently. In practice, UX designers can integrate sustainability metrics, like energy usage audits during prototyping, to ensure designs support circular economies and align with 2024-2025 trends toward green hosting and minimalistic layouts that decrease server demands. Practical implementation of these principles involves collaborative methods like co-design, where users actively participate in ideation and prototyping to ensure ethical and inclusive outcomes. Co-design workshops enable end-users to contribute directly through activities such as sketching interfaces or prioritizing features, fostering ownership and revealing nuanced needs that solo design might overlook. For AI-integrated UX, ethics toolkits provide structured approaches to bias mitigation, such as the Toolkit, which identifies and counters biases in datasets and interactions by recommending diverse training data and fairness audits during development. These toolkits guide UX teams in creating transparent explanations, like decision-logging features, to build user trust while adhering to broader ethical standards.

Related Disciplines

Developer Experience

Developer experience (DX), also known as DevEx, refers to the overall usability and satisfaction developers encounter when interacting with tools, processes, APIs, and workflows in their daily work, directly influencing their productivity and . This encompasses the ease of to new systems, the intuitiveness of integrated development environments (IDEs) such as , and the seamlessness of building and deploying software. Unlike end-user experience, DX prioritizes elements that enable efficient coding and collaboration, reducing friction in tasks like and . Key components of effective include high-quality documentation, clear error messaging, and straightforward integration capabilities, particularly in software-as-a-service () platforms. Comprehensive documentation provides detailed guides, code examples, and references that allow developers to quickly understand and implement features without extensive trial-and-error. Error messages should be actionable and descriptive, offering specific insights into issues rather than generic alerts, which helps developers resolve problems faster and maintain momentum. Integration simplicity, such as plug-and-play SDKs and automated workflows in platforms like , minimizes setup time and supports modular development practices. The concept of gained prominence in the 2010s alongside the movement, which emphasized automation, , and collaborative tools to streamline software delivery pipelines. By the mid-2010s, initiatives like DX introduced command-line interfaces and source-driven development to enhance developer workflows. Entering 2025, DX has increasingly incorporated AI-assisted coding tools, with exemplifying improvements through real-time code suggestions and natural language explanations integrated into editors like VS Code, enabling 80% of new developers to adopt it within their first week. A strong yields significant benefits, including heightened and, consequently, superior end-user experiences through faster iteration and higher-quality software outputs. Organizations prioritizing report reduced and quicker time-to-market, as developers spend less time on tooling overhead and more on innovative features. This efficiency cascade ultimately enhances the reliability and usability of applications for final users, fostering a virtuous cycle of improved development practices.

Distinctions from Adjacent Fields

User experience (UX) emphasizes the holistic, process-oriented aspects of a user's with a product or system, focusing on , , and overall satisfaction derived from the entire journey. In contrast, (UI) design concentrates on the visual and tactile elements that users directly engage with, such as layouts, buttons, colors, and , serving as the artifact-focused layer that implements UX principles. While UX is confined to interactions with specific products or digital interfaces, customer experience (CX) encompasses the broader journey across all touchpoints with a , including , sales, support, and post-purchase services. For instance, a seamless represents strong UX, but CX would also account for the user's perception of responsiveness or . Human-computer interaction (HCI) serves as an that systematically studies the theoretical and empirical foundations of user-system interactions, often through controlled experiments and models like . UX, however, functions as an industry-applied practice that translates HCI insights into practical design solutions under real-world constraints like budgets and timelines. In 2025, advancements in are increasingly blurring these boundaries, particularly through conversational interfaces and adaptive systems that extend UX elements like personalized recommendations into broader CX journeys, such as emotion-aware chatbots that integrate product use with ongoing brand support. This convergence prompts UX teams to rebrand toward "experience design," aligning more closely with CX to address holistic needs in AI-driven ecosystems.

References

  1. [1]
    A Formal Analysis of the ISO 9241-210 Definition of User Experience
    The UX concept was also referred by ISO 9241: a person's perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service.
  2. [2]
    ISO 9241-210:2019
    ### Extracted Definition of User Experience from ISO 9241-210:2019
  3. [3]
    The Definition of User Experience (UX) - NN/G
    Aug 8, 1998 · "User experience" (UX) encompasses all aspects of the end-user's interaction with the company, its services, and its products.
  4. [4]
    Where did the term User Experience (UX) come from? - JND.org
    Apr 15, 2023 · Where did User Experience become abbreviated as UX? I don't know. My memory is that we never used UX at Apple during the time I was there.
  5. [5]
    A 100-Year View of User Experience (by Jakob Nielsen) - NN/G
    Dec 24, 2017 · The Dawn of UX. In 1993 Don Norman coined the term “user experience” for his group at Apple Computer. · 100 Years of Growth for the UX Profession.
  6. [6]
    UX Basics: Study Guide - NN/G
    Mar 26, 2023 · The main goal of user experience (UX) is creating and improving people's experiences in their everyday life and work.The Definition of User... · UX vs. UI · Don Norman on the Term "UX" · Mental Models
  7. [7]
    Usability 101: Introduction to Usability - NN/G
    Jan 3, 2012 · Usability is how easy user interfaces are to use, and it includes methods for improving ease-of-use during design. It is defined by 5 quality  ...Why Usability Is Important · How To Improve Usability · When To Work On Usability
  8. [8]
    What Is User Experience (and What Is It Not)? - Nielsen Norman Group
    encompassing perceptions, emotions, and interactions — between a person and a product, service, ...
  9. [9]
    User Experience vs. Customer Experience: What's the difference?
    Jul 6, 2023 · Definiton: The concept of a user experience (UX) encompasses all aspects of a person's interaction with a company, its services, and its ...
  10. [10]
    10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design - NN/G
    Apr 24, 1994 · Jakob Nielsen's 10 general principles for interaction design. They are called "heuristics" because they are broad rules of thumb and not specific usability ...Jakob Nielsen · User Control and Freedom · Jakob's Law of Internet User...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    ISO 9241-11:2018 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction
    In stockISO 9241-11:2018 provides a framework for understanding the concept of usability and applying it to situations where people use interactive systems.
  12. [12]
    Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion - W3C
    For example, Web Accessibility Benefits People With and Without Disabilities describes accessibility benefits for: people with low literacy or not fluent in the ...
  13. [13]
    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 - W3C
    Dec 12, 2024 · Abstract. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 covers a wide range of recommendations for making web content more accessible.How to Meet WCAG (Quickref... · Translations of W3C standards · WCAG22 history
  14. [14]
    The Aesthetic-Usability Effect - NN/G
    Feb 3, 2024 · Impact on User Experience. When users have a positive emotional response to visual design, it makes them more tolerant of minor usability issues ...Impact on User Experience · Usability-Testing Challenges... · Interpreting Positive...
  15. [15]
    Emotion & Design: Attractive things work better - JND.org
    Nov 17, 2008 · Products designed for more relaxed, pleasant occasions can enhance their usability through pleasant, aesthetic design. Aesthetics matter: attractive things ...
  16. [16]
    The Principles of Scientific Management - Project Gutenberg
    Nov 4, 2011 · The Principles of Scientific Management. by. FREDERICK WINSLOW TAYLOR, M.E., Sc.D. 1911. INTRODUCTION. President Roosevelt in his address to the ...
  17. [17]
    Assembly Line Revolution | Articles - Ford Motor Company
    Sep 3, 2020 · After much trial and error, in 1913 Henry Ford and his employees successfully began using this innovation at our Highland Park assembly plant.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] stories from the first 50 years - Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
    The Human Factors Society came into official being in 1957 at a meeting in Tulsa,. Oklahoma. But things didn't move on with any semblance of organization ...
  19. [19]
    HFES History
    The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society is an interdisciplinary nonprofit organization of professional people who are involved in the human factors field.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Direct Manipulation: - UMD Computer Science
    N.J., to appear in 1983. 30. Ben Shneiderman, "A Computer Graphics System for. Polynomials," The Mathematics Teacher, Vol. 67, No.
  21. [21]
    Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language ...
    Mental Models offers nothing less than a unified theory of the major properties of mind: comprehension, inference, and consciousness.
  22. [22]
    Donald Norman - Stanford HCI Group
    Norman chose the phrase user experience to emphasize that his office's concern was not just the interface. It was more than menus and icons; it was everything ...
  23. [23]
    The Evolution of UX Process Methodology | by Ian Armstrong
    Mar 2, 2018 · De-obfuscating modern UX requires understanding the history of both design and development since the 1990s. They're intrinsically linked, so it helps to start ...The Ux Process Is Confusing... · Get Ian Armstrong's Stories... · 2020 Addendum<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    ISO 9241-210:2010 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction
    ISO 9241-210:2010 provides requirements and recommendations for human-centred design principles and activities throughout the life cycle of computer-based ...Missing: adoption UX profession growth
  25. [25]
    Enhancing User Experience through AI-Driven Personalization in ...
    Nov 19, 2024 · This research explores the integration of AI-driven personalization in user interfaces to enhance user experience (UX), focusing on adaptive design, predictive ...
  26. [26]
    https://globalresearchandinnovationpublications.com/HCI/article/view/74
  27. [27]
    150+ UX (User Experience) Statistics and Trends (Updated for 2025)
    Discover the latest UX statistics that highlight the impact of user experience on business success, conversion rates, AI-driven design, and future trends.
  28. [28]
    Age- and experience-related user behavior differences in the use of ...
    Here, we examined technology interaction behavior differences between younger adults (20–29 years of age) and middle-aged adults (46–59 years of age).
  29. [29]
    Novice vs. Expert Users - NN/G
    Feb 5, 2000 · Web usability has traditionally been focused on increasing ease of learning for the novice users. This makes great sense and should continue to ...
  30. [30]
    How culture impacts UX Design - UX Collective
    May 3, 2020 · How culture impacts UX · 1. Power Distance · 2. Individualism versus collectivism · 3. Masculinity versus femininity · 4. Uncertainty avoidance · 5.
  31. [31]
    Cognitive abilities predict performance in everyday computer tasks
    Cognitive abilities predict people's ability to complete common tasks with computers. Their effect is significant, independent, and broad-based.
  32. [32]
    Mobile vs. Desktop UI Design: Key Differences and Best Practices
    Sep 9, 2024 · Desktops offer large screens with plenty of space for content, while mobile devices have much smaller screens, requiring a more compact design.
  33. [33]
    How to make collaboration apps human centered - UX Collective
    Dec 9, 2020 · Human-centered collaboration apps should elicit emotion, show presence, allow less formal conversation, provide orientation, fluidity, and  ...
  34. [34]
    The influence of social stress on time perception and ...
    Jan 31, 2017 · Research indicates that people tend to experience perceived time distortion in response to negative or aversive stimuli across a number of ...
  35. [35]
    A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online
    The essay lays out an alternative approach to addressing the problem of privacy online based on the theory of privacy as contextual integrity.
  36. [36]
    (PDF) Digital Fatigue and Employee Engagement in Hybrid Work
    May 20, 2025 · The hybrid work model, which blends remote and in-office modalities, has intensified reliance on digital tools and subsequently elevated ...Missing: UX 2023
  37. [37]
    The impact of digital fatigue on employee productivity and well-being
    Mar 17, 2025 · This scoping review explores the contributing factors, consequences, and mitigation strategies related to digital fatigue in professional settings.
  38. [38]
    Progressive Disclosure - NN/G
    Dec 3, 2006 · Progressive disclosure defers advanced or rarely used features to a secondary screen, making applications easier to learn and less error-prone.Applications vs. Websites · Benefits of Progressive... · Usability Criteria for...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] AI-Driven Personalization in E-Commerce - Scirp.org.
    Mar 12, 2025 · This study aims to investigate how Amazon and Shopify employ artificial intel- ligence driven customization to enhance online purchasing ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Anticipated, Momentary, Episodic, Remembered: the many facets of ...
    Jul 10, 2016 · Momentary UX refers to any perceived change during the interaction in the very moment it occurs. Episodic UX is an appraisal of a specific usage ...
  41. [41]
    user perceptions of operation latency in cross-device interaction
    Relevant studies have consistently shown that users' anxiety, frustration and annoyance increase significantly with delay duration increases (Chen, 2015; ...
  42. [42]
    When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End
    Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.Missing: original | Show results with:original<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x
  44. [44]
    Examining how emotions affect online audience retention
    This study develops a research model to gauge the relationship between emotion and audience retention.
  45. [45]
    The addiction behavior of short-form video app TikTok - Frontiers
    Sep 5, 2022 · This study finds that TikTok addiction is determined by users' mental concentration on the medium and its content.<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Guidelines 3/2022 on Dark patterns in social media platform interfaces
    Mar 14, 2022 · These Guidelines offer practical recommendations to designers and users of social media platforms on how to assess and avoid so-called “dark ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] dark commercial patterns | oecd
    The DSA, EU legislation adopted in 2022 that will place new obligations on online platforms and intermediaries, defines dark patterns as follows in its preamble ...
  48. [48]
    GSA undertaking study to examine racial bias in facial recognition tech
    Aug 18, 2023 · The study comes after major concerns over equity were one of several concerns raised by a May watchdog report highlighting failures in the ...
  49. [49]
    Is the SUS Too Antiquated? - MeasuringU
    Mar 19, 2024 · In Brooke's original description of the SUS, he called it a “quick and dirty usability scale.” It has proven to be reasonably quick, but it's ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale - Digital Healthcare Research
    This chapter describes the System. Usability Scale (SUS) a reliable, low-cost usability scale that can be used for global assessments of systems usability.
  51. [51]
    Misguided by research — The two dimensions of SUS - Medium
    Jun 5, 2022 · The System Usability Scale is largely considered unidimensional. Lewis and Sauro performed factor analysis to uncover a “hidden” dimension; learnability.The Usability Dimension · The Learnability Dimension · Responses (2)
  52. [52]
    https://medium.com/%40geormelissourgos/leveraging-the-full-potential-of-the-sus-the-two-dimensions-b5846facec3
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Algorithmic Bias in Algorithm-Driven User Interfaces - CEUR-WS.org
    May 5, 2025 · Algorithmic bias in UIs can lead to unfair experiences, discriminatory practices, manipulative design, content exclusion, and economic ...Missing: feeds | Show results with:feeds
  54. [54]
    Generative AI Personas Considered Harmful? Putting Forth Twenty ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Research on data-driven personas demonstrates that algorithmic approaches can systematically underrepresent minority groups, particularly when ...
  55. [55]
    Privacy UX: Privacy-Aware Design Framework - Smashing Magazine
    Apr 25, 2019 · Include privacy in the initial research and ideation during the design stage, and decide on defaults, privacy settings, and sensitive ...
  56. [56]
    ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
    Making deliberately false or misleading claims, fabricating or falsifying data, offering or accepting bribes, and other dishonest conduct are violations of the ...Code 2018 Update Project · Using the Code · Historical Archive of the ACM... · 1972Missing: UX | Show results with:UX
  57. [57]
    Ethical Tensions in UX Design Practice: Exploring the Fine Line ...
    This paper examines the tension between persuasive UX practices and manipulative designs. UX/UI design professionals (n=22), split into eight focus groups, ...
  58. [58]
    The 7 Principles - Centre for Excellence in Universal Design
    The 7 Principles of Universal Design were developed in 1997 by a working group of architects, product designers, engineers and environmental design researchers.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] THE PRINCIPLES OF UNIVERSAL DESIGN 1 2 3 4 7 6 5
    These seven principles may be applied to evaluate existing designs, guide the design process, and educate both designers and consumers about the characteristics.
  60. [60]
    7 Principles of Inclusive Design for UX Teams | UXPin
    Apr 30, 2025 · Gather insights by consulting diverse user panels that include individuals of varying abilities, ages, and tech familiarity. This approach helps ...
  61. [61]
    Web Sustainability Guidelines (WSG) - W3C
    Oct 28, 2025 · The Web Sustainability Guidelines (WSG) cover a wide range of recommendations to make web products and services more sustainable.
  62. [62]
    Sustainable UX Trends 2025: Why UX needs to go green?
    Jan 8, 2025 · Key sustainable UX trends for 2025 include green design systems, energy-optimized interfaces, lifecycle-oriented UX, eco-metrics dashboards, ...
  63. [63]
    Sustainable UX Design: Principles and Practices for Eco ... - Designlab
    May 15, 2024 · This article explores the concept of sustainability in UX design, offering practical strategies for creating eco-friendly digital products that align with ...
  64. [64]
    Creativity-based Research: The Process of Co-Designing with Users
    Apr 24, 2012 · Co-design workshops help designers partner with users to include their perspective in knowledge development, idea generation, and product development.
  65. [65]
    AI for Bias Mitigation in Design: Creating Inclusive and Fair User ...
    Apr 3, 2025 · The Microsoft Inclusive Design Toolkit recognizes 5 bias types, including dataset, associations, automation, interaction, and confirmation bias.
  66. [66]
    Ethics & Algorithms Toolkit (beta)
    A practical toolkit for cities to use to help them understand the implications of using an algorithm, clearly articulate the potential risks, and identify ways ...Missing: UX | Show results with:UX
  67. [67]
    What is Developer Experience (DevEx)? - OpsLevel
    Sep 19, 2023 · Great developer experience (DevEx or DX) is what you get when developers can easily get in and maintain flow state at work. Flow state must be ...What Is Developer Experience... · What Is Flow State? · What Devex Is Not<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    GitHub Copilot in VS Code
    GitHub Copilot is an AI-powered coding assistant integrated into Visual Studio Code. It provides code suggestions, explanations, and automated implementations.Debug with AI · Setup · Code Completions · Customize chat to your workflow
  69. [69]
    Developer experience: What is it and why should you care?
    Jun 8, 2023 · DevEx—sometimes called DevX or DX—examines how the juxtaposition of developers, processes, and tools positively or negatively affects software ...What is the history of... · Why is developer experience... · What are key developer...
  70. [70]
    Enhancing Developer Experience Through Effective Documentation
    Discover how effective documentation enhances Developer Experience by boosting productivity, reducing technical debt, and supporting continuous learning.The Importance Of... · Supports Consistency And... · Key Components Of Effective...
  71. [71]
    Error Handling in APIs: Best Practices for Better Developer Experience
    Feb 23, 2025 · Key Components ; Error Code. Use consistent, unique identifiers; Make them readable and searchable; Group related errors systematically ; Message.
  72. [72]
    API Documentation: The Secret to a Great API Developer Experience
    Error messages are important because you want to get feedback when you're integrating with your API services in an incorrect way. Explain your error standards, ...Missing: elements | Show results with:elements
  73. [73]
    The Shift from DevOps to Developer Experience | iCert Global
    Oct 29, 2024 · Developer Experience, or DevEx, is a developer's use of tools, processes, and practices. These affect their coding experience. It goes beyond ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  74. [74]
    The Evolution of DevOps in Salesforce - What's Next?
    Sep 16, 2022 · Salesforce Developer Experience (SFDX or just DX) is a set of tools designed to improve the traditional developer's experience of building on ...Devops In Salesforce... · 2017: Salesforce Dx · 2022: Salesforce Devops...
  75. [75]
    Octoverse: A new developer joins GitHub every second as AI leads ...
    Oct 28, 2025 · Moreover, AI adoption starts quickly: 80% of new developers on GitHub use Copilot in their first week. TypeScript is now the most used language ...
  76. [76]
    What Is Developer Experience (DX) and Why It's Becoming as ...
    Companies that prioritize DX see tangible benefits in the form of faster time-to-market, reduced technical debt, and improved product quality. The Connection ...
  77. [77]
    Effective Developer Experience (DX) - UX Magazine
    Developers will be able to identify problems for end users before the problems affect UX, and they will often be able to suggest solutions. Acknowledging and ...
  78. [78]
    What are the Differences Between UX and UI? - SMU
    Feb 5, 2025 · UX is about how a product feels, while UI is about how a product looks. Design process - UX design usually starts first, beginning with ...Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
  79. [79]
    User Experience and Customer Experience - What’s the Difference?
    ### Summary of Differences Between User Experience (UX) and Customer Experience (CX)
  80. [80]
    User Experience (UX) vs. Customer Experience (CX): What's the Dif?
    Jul 7, 2014 · User Experience (UX) deals with people interacting with your product and the experience they receive from that interaction.<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    What Is the Relationship Between HCI Research and UX Practice?
    Aug 4, 2014 · While the intended outcomes, goals, and scopes of focus of academic HCI research and UX research can differ significantly, research in both ...
  82. [82]
    https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/user-experience-and-customer-experience-what-s-the-difference
  83. [83]
    The UX Reckoning: Prepare for 2025 and Beyond - NN/G
    Jan 10, 2025 · Summary: In 2025, reevaluate tactics; use AI to deliver user value; and develop deep UX skills, instead of relying on toolkits.<|control11|><|separator|>
  84. [84]
    2025 CX trends: Personalisation, AI, and what's next | Wonderful
    2025 CX trends: Personalisation, AI, and what's next · 1. Personalisation Goes Next-Level · 2. AI Gets Smarter—and Friendlier · 3. Seamless, Everywhere Experiences.