Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

weev

Andrew Auernheimer, better known by his online handle "weev", is an hacker and internet provocateur recognized for discovering and publicizing security flaws in major systems, as well as for his role in online trolling and associations with extremist online communities. In 2010, Auernheimer led in uncovering a configuration error in 's servers that exposed the email addresses of over 100,000 users, including high-profile individuals such as government officials and celebrities, prompting to patch the vulnerability after the data was shared with media outlets like . This incident drew widespread attention to potential overreach in the (CFAA), with advocates arguing it exemplified prosecutorial misuse of the law against security research rather than malicious intrusion. Auernheimer was convicted in 2012 of and to access a computer without authorization under the CFAA, receiving a 41-month prison sentence in 2013, though his conviction was vacated in 2014 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on grounds of improper venue in rather than resolution of the underlying legal merits. Post-release, he has maintained a prominent online presence, serving as for The Daily Stormer, a site promoting white nationalist views, and engaging in actions such as remotely printing anti-Semitic and racist materials on college campus printers across the U.S. in , which he publicly claimed responsibility for. Auernheimer has also received substantial donations linked to his advocacy, totaling over $1 million in by 2017, and has expressed unapologetic views on racial and ethnic matters in interviews, framing his trolling as a form of cultural resistance. His activities have sparked debates on free speech boundaries, with supporters viewing them as provocative challenges to institutional norms and critics highlighting their role in amplifying .

Early Life and Background

Childhood and Upbringing

Andrew Auernheimer, known online as weev, was born Andrew Alan Escher Auernheimer around 1985 and grew up in . He hails from a large, mixed-race family with Jewish ancestry on both sides, as confirmed by his mother, Alyse Auernheimer. Details of Auernheimer's childhood remain sparse in , but his upbringing has been characterized in reports as originating from trailer-park circumstances in , aligning with self-descriptions and contemporary accounts portraying him as a "trailer-park troll." He has been estranged from his mother for over a decade, limiting familial insights into his early years. No verified accounts detail specific events, schooling, or formative experiences from this period, though his red-headed appearance was noted in profiles of his background.

Education and Early Influences

Auernheimer was born on September 1, 1985, in . He attended during his late teens or early twenties. Public records provide limited details on his formal schooling beyond this enrollment, with no evidence of degree completion. His technical proficiency in and appears to have developed primarily through practical with online systems rather than structured academic programs. Early exposure to and communities shaped his approach to vulnerability discovery and digital exploration, as seen in his pre-2010 involvement in security research groups like .

Initial Online Activities

Entry into Hacking Scenes

Auernheimer developed an early interest in computing and during his teenage years in the late and early , acquiring his first computer through and conducting personal exploits such as compromising ATMs, activities he contrasted with typical adolescent pursuits like sports or television viewing. After enrolling at at age 14 around 1999 but dropping out at 15 to live independently, he focused on self-taught programming, describing code as a medium for expressive speech and crediting use for intensifying his dedication to technical pursuits. His formal entry into hacker-adjacent scenes occurred through involvement with the (GNAA), a trolling collective founded in 2007 on that specialized in disruptive online operations, including spam floods, hoax campaigns, and technical pranks targeting platforms like and . Auernheimer rose to prominence within GNAA, eventually becoming its president by 2010, bridging trolling antics with rudimentary exploit techniques that appealed to underground forums and IRC channels. These activities positioned him in grey-hat circles emphasizing provocation over pure security research, predating his leadership in and laying groundwork for later vulnerability disclosures through networks cultivated in anonymous online communities.

Trolling and Early Exploits

Auernheimer began engaging in online trolling during his teenage years, including hacking into ATMs and exploring network vulnerabilities independently after dropping out of at age 15 around 2000. He participated in schoolyard pranks that involved seeding to incite conflicts, which foreshadowed his later digital activities. In the mid-2000s, Auernheimer joined the (GNAA), an trolling collective active from approximately 2002 that specialized in provocative disruptions such as defacing websites, flooding IRC channels with shock images like the infamous "Goatse" , and targeting bloggers with denial-of-service attacks and offensive content. By around 2007, he had risen to become president of the group, under which it continued operations including propagation and coordinated pranks. Notable early exploits included collaborating with the Bantown LiveJournal community to post fabricated suicide notes attributed to users, aiming to elicit emotional reactions and site bans. He also authored scripts that manipulated Amazon's recommendation algorithms to delist books on gay and lesbian topics by simulating negative user feedback loops, an action framed as a technical prank exposing vulnerabilities. These activities established Auernheimer's reputation in underground hacking and trolling circles as a provocateur who prioritized disruption over in his pre-2010 endeavors.

AT&T Vulnerability Exposure (2010)

Technical Method of Discovery

In June 2010, Andrew Auernheimer and collaborators in the group identified a in 's used for provisioning iPads. The application included an endpoint that accepted HTTP requests containing an ICCID (Integrated Circuit Card Identifier, a unique for the iPad's ) as a and, for valid entries, returned the associated (Unique Device Identifier) and the registered to the device without requiring , , or . AT&T had allocated ICCIDs for iPad 3G SIM cards in sequential blocks from predictable ranges, enabling attacks. Auernheimer's team developed a —reportedly in —to automate queries across these ranges: it generated successive or patterned ICCID values, submitted them via repeated GET or POST requests to the (accessible at a URL like an AT&T developer or provisioning portal), and parsed responses to extract valid only when the confirmed a match. This process yielded approximately 114,000 unique records, including emails of high-profile users such as officials and military personnel, before AT&T patched the flaw on June 9, 2010. The vulnerability stemmed from inadequate input validation and lack of protections against automated scraping, such as or IP-based throttling, in a backend designed for limited, trusted queries (e.g., from Apple). No evidence indicates sophisticated exploits like or buffer overflows; rather, the method relied on basic scripting to exploit exposed, enumerable parameters, a common web flaw known as "" or parameter-based enumeration.

Data Release and Immediate Aftermath

On June 7, 2010, members of , including Andrew Auernheimer (known as weev) and Daniel Spitler, provided a sample of approximately 1,000 addresses extracted from AT&T's servers to , which published an article on June 9 disclosing the vulnerability and listing high-profile affected individuals such as former CIA director Michael Hayden and Rahm . The group had used a script called "iPad 3G Account Slurper" to query AT&T's website with valid ICC-IDs, exploiting a flaw that returned associated addresses without , yielding over 114,000 unique emails from elite 3G users between June 5 and June 9. AT&T acknowledged the breach on June 9, 2010, stating it affected a subset of users who used their own addresses for registration, and confirmed the company had disabled the vulnerable function earlier that day to prevent further access. The carrier emphasized that no other personal data like names or billing information was exposed, attributing the issue to a feature intended to streamline device logins via IMEI/ICC-ID submission, but critics noted the absence of or input validation enabled the automated scraping. Media outlets rapidly amplified concerns over potential , , and targeted attacks on the disclosed emails, particularly given the prominence of affected users including politicians, executives, and journalists, prompting discussions on corporate in securing user identifiers. committed to notifying impacted customers, though the full scope remained unclear initially as the group withheld the complete dataset to avoid broader dissemination. The exposure highlighted risks in carrier-device integrations shortly after the iPad's April 2010 launch, with security researchers debating whether the method constituted or merely poor .

Federal Investigation and Charges

The investigation into Andrew Auernheimer, known as "weev," stemmed from Goatse Security's of a in AT&T's website, which enabled the extraction of approximately 114,000 ICC-IDs linked to email addresses of iPad users, including high-profile individuals. The (FBI) initiated the probe shortly after AT&T confirmed the flaw on 8, , and patched it, focusing on Goatse Security members who had released sample data to media outlets like to highlight the issue. On June 15, 2010, FBI agents executed a search warrant at Auernheimer's residence in , as part of the breach inquiry, uncovering controlled substances that led to his immediate arrest on four state felony drug possession charges and one . The drug charges were later dropped, but the search yielded evidence tying Auernheimer to the breach, including his leadership role in and communications with co-conspirator Daniel Spitler. Prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of built the case around server logs and witness statements indicating unauthorized script-based access to 's protected resources. Auernheimer and Spitler were indicted on January 13, 2011, by a federal grand jury in , on charges of one count of conspiracy to violate the (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(B)(ii), and one count of aggravated under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). The indictment alleged that their actions involved intentional unauthorized access to AT&T's computers to obtain protected data, with venue justified by the servers' location in and the harm's manifestation there. Spitler pleaded guilty in December 2011 and cooperated as a witness, while a superseding against Auernheimer refined the conspiracy details.

Trial Proceedings and Conviction

Auernheimer was indicted in June 2011 in the U.S. District Court for the District of on charges related to his role in exploiting an server vulnerability to obtain email addresses of approximately 114,000 users. A superseding returned by a on August 16, 2012, charged him with one count of conspiracy to access a protected computer without in violation of the (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, and one count of aggravated under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. The trial, presided over by Judge Susan D. Wigenton, began in November 2012 and lasted five days. Auernheimer's defense challenged the venue, arguing that the alleged access occurred outside , but the court denied motions to dismiss or transfer, finding sufficient ties to the district through AT&T's servers and affected users. Prosecutors presented evidence that Auernheimer, along with co-defendant Daniel Spitler, developed and executed a to scrape unprotected ICC-IDs from AT&T's servers, leading to unauthorized access and subsequent data publication on . The defense contended the data was publicly accessible without bypassing technical barriers, but the rejected this, convicting Auernheimer on both counts on November 20, 2012. Post-trial motions for acquittal or a were denied on March 18, 2013. Auernheimer was sentenced that same day to 41 months in , three years of supervised release, restitution of $73,253.50 to , and forfeiture of computer equipment. The sentence reflected guidelines enhancements for the volume of data accessed and intended loss to , despite no evidence of financial harm or further misuse beyond publication.

Imprisonment and Prison Experience

Auernheimer was sentenced on March 18, 2013, by U.S. District Judge Faith S. Hochberg in , to 41 months in , three years of supervised release, and joint restitution of $73,253.60 to for conspiring to access a protected computer without and one count of in connection with the 2010 data exposure. He began serving his sentence shortly thereafter at the low-security Federal Correctional Institution in . During his incarceration, Auernheimer reported engaging in self-directed activities including reading , listening to , smelting jewelry, and initiating a small-scale Greek yogurt production venture within the facility. In mid-February , he was transferred to the prison's Secured Housing Unit () for disciplinary reasons after authorities deemed his reading materials and music preferences indicative of potential "terrorist-white supremacist" affiliations, despite their nature as poetry and classical compositions. He noted federal prison rules provided protections for inmates convicted of child-related offenses, limiting retaliatory actions against them. Auernheimer maintained limited public communication from , including early live-tweeting of his and advocating post-release for inmates' to access web publishing platforms, citing penalties imposed on those who published content during confinement. He described his overall stance toward imprisonment as , viewing it as a temporary constraint on American freedoms outside walls. Auernheimer served approximately 13 months before his release in April 2014 following the vacating of his conviction.

Appeal Process and Release

Auernheimer filed an appeal of his November 2012 conviction and March 2013 sentence to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, represented by counsel including the (EFF). On April 11, 2014, the Third Circuit vacated the conviction in United States v. Auernheimer, 748 F.3d 525 (3d Cir. 2014), ruling that the District of constituted improper venue under 18 U.S.C. § 3237(b), which governs non-localized offenses like conspiracy. The court determined that the core unauthorized access to AT&T's servers occurred at their physical location in , not New Jersey, and that publication of the data online did not produce substantial effects in New Jersey sufficient to establish venue there. The opinion explicitly declined to reach the substantive validity of the (CFAA) charges or the identity fraud count, focusing solely on procedural venue grounds. The vacatur order directed Auernheimer's immediate release from , where he had served approximately 13 months since his January 2013 . Federal authorities complied, and Auernheimer was freed on April 11, 2014, prompting celebrations among supporters who viewed the outcome as a rebuke to overreach in CFAA prosecutions. The U.S. Department of Justice subsequently declined to refile charges in the Eastern District of Virginia, where venue might have been proper, effectively ending the prosecution without a retrial or further incarceration. This resolution highlighted ongoing debates over CFAA's scope but left unresolved whether Auernheimer's scripting of AT&T's email addresses constituted a violation, as the appeals court remanded only for potential dismissal or transfer without endorsing the underlying conduct.

Post-Release Activities

Relocation and Personal Circumstances

Following his release from on April 11, 2014, Auernheimer relocated to , where he resided for several years amid ongoing involvement in online technical and ideological activities. By late 2017, Auernheimer had moved to , a -supported breakaway territory between and that maintains independence but lacks international recognition beyond . He has continued residing in Russian-aligned areas of as of 2024, including or comparable territories, facilitating remote administration of websites and security-related work. Auernheimer's personal circumstances abroad have involved limited disclosure, with reports indicating a focus on self-sustaining pursuits rather than formal or in the ; he has referenced challenges adapting to life in these areas but has not detailed or dependents post-release.

Business and Technical Ventures

Following his release from in April 2014, Auernheimer established TRO LLC, a short equity targeting companies deemed vulnerable to cybersecurity breaches. The fund's strategy relied on Auernheimer's technical expertise to identify exploitable flaws in corporate systems, anticipating stock price drops upon public disclosure of such weaknesses. Auernheimer positioned the venture as a financial extension of his hacking background, aiming to profit from what he described as widespread negligence in practices among publicly traded firms. The name TRO LLC was derived from "Troll," reflecting Auernheimer's self-described persona as an provocateur, with plans to apply similar disruptive tactics to financial s. He stated intentions to hire researchers for assessments, shorting positions before notifying affected companies or regulators to trigger market reactions. Legal observers noted potential risks under supervised release terms prohibiting unauthorized computer access, though Auernheimer maintained the approach would comply with disclosure protocols.

Additional Data Releases and Security Findings

In May 2015, Auernheimer analyzed the data from the breach, which exposed millions of user accounts earlier that month, and publicly identified users with .gov email addresses via , highlighting potential security risks among U.S. personnel. This selective drew attention to the presence of federal employees in the compromised dataset, though the original breach was conducted by unrelated hackers. In October 2015, following threats from federal s involved in his prior case, Auernheimer released personal details from the breach data, including information on at least one whom he accused of . He claimed to have compiled lists of dozens of U.S. s and government employees from the leaked and databases, publishing subsets to expose their alleged use of the sites. These actions were framed by Auernheimer as retaliatory against perceived injustices in his prosecution, rather than traditional security research disclosures. Following his 2014 release, Auernheimer founded TRO LLC, a intended to identify and exploit corporate vulnerabilities by shorting stocks of affected companies prior to public disclosure of flaws. The venture positioned vulnerability discovery as an , but no specific findings or data releases from this effort were publicly detailed beyond the initial announcement.

Ideological Positions and Public Engagements

Development of Political Views

Auernheimer, known online as weev, has stated that his political beliefs began forming in his mid-teens, around age 14 or 15, though he has not detailed specific formative events from that period beyond general exposure to perceived threats against populations globally. His early online activities in the late centered on trolling through groups like the (GNAA), which employed shock humor targeting racial, sexual, and cultural taboos to provoke reactions, often framed as against authority rather than explicit . By 2010, prior to his 2012 conviction, Auernheimer expressed views in public forums, criticizing central banking as a tool for economic destruction via "cheap money bubbles," decrying movement as controlled opposition to channel anti-government sentiment ineffectually, and advocating revolutionary violence against corrupt elites, including bankers and media figures. He also articulated strong anti-Zionist positions, calling for the removal of "Zionist elements in our government, media and ... by any means necessary," while identifying as a Christian whose philosophy drew from the but rejected Pauline theology as villainous. These statements reflected a blend of anarcho-libertarian skepticism toward institutions and conspiratorial rhetoric against perceived Jewish influence, though his pre-prison focus remained primarily on for data exposure and free-information advocacy, such as the 2010 iPad vulnerability disclosure, without overt calls for racial violence. Auernheimer has claimed in later interviews that he was already a "dedicated public white nationalist" before his imprisonment, attributing his racial views to observations of demographic displacements where "blacks have supremacy in and Asians in " but whites face unique deprivation of homelands. However, contemporaneous accounts and his own earlier outputs suggest a progression from trolling-oriented provocation to more structured white nationalist ideology post-release in 2014, intensified by his 41-month federal sentence and periods of , which he later described as catalyzing desires for "violent revolution" and explicit endorsements of groups like . Following prison, he assumed technical roles with neo-Nazi outlets like , amplifying rhetoric advocating genocide against non-whites and anti-Semitic activism, marking a shift from implicit racial edginess in GNAA-era work to overt, ideological extremism.

Associations with Dissident Right Groups

Auernheimer has served as the webmaster and system administrator for , a neo-Nazi website founded and operated by that promotes white supremacist ideology and antisemitic content. In this capacity, he has managed the site's technical infrastructure, including efforts to maintain its online presence amid repeated by hosting providers following the 2017 Charlottesville rally. He has also contributed articles and technical assistance to the publication, aligning with its advocacy for racial separatism and opposition to . Auernheimer has publicly identified as a "white nationalist hacktivist" and engaged in actions supportive of such groups, including a of networked printers at over 200 colleges to distribute flyers promoting and criticizing Jewish influence. These efforts were explicitly framed by Auernheimer as advancing white nationalist messaging, though they drew condemnation from mainstream outlets and advocacy groups for inciting hate. His associations extend to broader dissident right networks through collaborative activities, such as facilitating donations for , which amassed over $1 million in from supporters by October 2017 to fund operations amid financial pressures from lawsuits and bans. Auernheimer's technical expertise has been credited with enabling the site's resilience, including migrations to alternative domains and mirrors, reflecting tactical alliances within online white nationalist communities. While primary sources confirm these operational ties, characterizations of his as neo-Nazi often stem from advocacy organizations with documented left-leaning biases, though Auernheimer's own statements and actions provide direct evidence of alignment with explicit racialist positions.

Notable Activism and Controversies

Auernheimer has served as the technical administrator and webmaster for , a neo-Nazi website founded by , where he has managed infrastructure to sustain its operations amid repeated deplatforming efforts by domain registrars and hosting providers. Following the 2017 Unite the Right rally in , which prompted major tech companies including and to terminate services for the site due to content mocking the rally's fatal victim, Auernheimer contributed to relocating its hosting to foreign servers in locations such as to evade shutdowns. This role has positioned him as a key figure in maintaining online platforms for white nationalist content, which he has defended as resistance to perceived by tech monopolies. In March 2016, Auernheimer publicly claimed responsibility for exploiting vulnerabilities in approximately 30,000 internet-connected printers across U.S. college campuses to automatically print anti-Semitic and racist fliers promoting and urging readers to "join the fight against cultural ." The fliers featured imagery of ovens and gas chambers alongside calls to action against Jewish influence, framing the act as distributed propaganda rather than mere disruption. This incident drew scrutiny for potential violations of the (CFAA) and fax broadcasting regulations, though no formal charges were filed against him at the time. Auernheimer's online activities have included promoting white supremacist views through paid advertisements, such as in May 2015 when suspended his promoted tweets containing and slurs after complaints from groups. He has also participated in cryptocurrency fundraising for far-right causes, with bitcoin donations linked to exceeding $1 million by 2017, enabling sustained operations despite financial isolation from mainstream payment processors. In public statements, such as a 2017 interview, he described internet trolling as a "national sport" integral to his ideological , emphasizing unfiltered expression of anti-Semitic and racial separatist positions. These efforts have been criticized by organizations like the as incitement, while Auernheimer portrays them as exposing systemic biases in media and tech platforms.

Broader Impact and Legacy

Contributions to Security Research

Auernheimer, operating under the pseudonym weev and leading the informal hacking collective Goatse Security, uncovered a critical vulnerability in AT&T's iPad 3G customer data portal in early June 2010. The defect resided in a web service endpoint that accepted International Circuit Card Identifier (ICC-ID) numbers—unique identifiers for cellular devices—without adequate authentication or input validation, enabling scripted queries to retrieve linked email addresses from AT&T's backend database. By automating requests with randomly generated or enumerated ICC-IDs, the group accessed records for over 114,000 iPad users, including emails of prominent figures such as White House staff, New York Times reporters, and celebrities. Goatse Security privately notified of the flaw before public disclosure on June 8, 2010, via platforms like , which prompted the carrier to patch the endpoint by restricting unauthorized access. confirmed the remediation, stating the issue affected only users who had opted into for service and involved no further data compromise beyond emails. This exposure demonstrated how insufficient server-side controls on public-facing could leak sensitive user data, influencing subsequent improvements in mobile carrier web security protocols. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and various security experts have described the effort as legitimate research that enhanced overall system security by forcing AT&T to address the oversight, arguing it aligned with practices of identifying and reporting flaws to prevent exploitation by malicious actors. Despite Auernheimer's later conviction under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act—subsequently overturned on venue grounds in April 2014—the incident is cited in security analyses as an example of how aggressive disclosure can drive fixes, though it raised concerns about legal risks deterring similar findings.

Influence on Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) Debates

Auernheimer's 2012 conviction under the (CFAA) for accessing AT&T's servers via a configuration error that exposed approximately 114,000 users' addresses without barriers exemplified ongoing tensions over the statute's application to security research. The case centered on whether exploiting a publicly accessible vulnerability constituted "access without authorization" under 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2), as prosecutors argued the data retrieval violated AT&T's intended controls despite no password or encryption bypass. This interpretation fueled debates, with critics contending it blurred lines between mere technical probing and criminal hacking, potentially deterring vulnerability disclosures essential for cybersecurity improvements. The Third Circuit's 2014 vacatur of the conviction on venue grounds—ruling the alleged offense occurred in , not the trial's district—sidestepped substantive CFAA interpretation but amplified calls for statutory clarification. Security researchers and organizations like the () highlighted the ruling's implications, arguing it underscored CFAA's vagueness in distinguishing authorized system use from policy violations, a position echoed in amicus briefs urging narrower readings to protect ethical hacking. Auernheimer's appeal brief, authored by legal scholar , contended the CFAA should not criminalize accessing data viewable without overcoming technical barriers, influencing academic and policy discourse on reforming "exceeds authorized access" provisions. Post-vacation, the case contributed to broader CFAA reform advocacy, paralleling high-profile prosecutions like Aaron Swartz's and prompting coalitions of activists, academics, and technologists to push for amendments limiting the law's scope to true unauthorized intrusions rather than terms-of-service breaches or flaw exploitation. In a interview, Auernheimer himself advocated for targeted revisions to prevent overreach against researchers, framing the CFAA as an outdated 1986 statute ill-suited to modern architectures. While not directly catalyzing legislative changes, the proceedings informed subsequent scrutiny in Van Buren v. United States (2021), where the Court rejected expansive CFAA readings akin to those in Auernheimer's prosecution, citing risks to routine data access. Proponents of strict enforcement, including federal prosecutors, maintained the case demonstrated necessary deterrence against , even if publicly exposed, though this view faced criticism for prioritizing corporate interests over empirical cybersecurity needs.

Reception Across Ideological Spectrums

Auernheimer has elicited starkly divergent responses from liberal and mainstream institutions, which predominantly frame him as a dangerous extremist. The describes him as a neo-Nazi white supremacist known for trolling and rhetoric advocating the genocide of non-whites. Coverage in outlets like and has emphasized his claimed responsibility for hacking college printers to distribute anti-Semitic and racist fliers in March 2016, portraying these actions as emblematic of his hateful activism. The similarly identifies him as a white supremacist and anti-Semite central to alt-right trolling efforts. In contrast, far-right and alt-right circles celebrate Auernheimer for leveraging his expertise to sustain neo-Nazi platforms amid pressures. As technical administrator for since around 2017, he has been credited with engineering workarounds to keep the site operational after providers like severed ties in August 2017 following the Charlottesville rally. Adherents in these communities, including in interviews where he equates trolling with the as a form of ideological resistance, view him as a resilient "white nationalist hacktivist" whose skills advance their cause against perceived . Libertarian and tech-freedom advocates initially expressed support for Auernheimer's 2012-2014 CFAA conviction over the AT&T iPad breach, seeing it as emblematic of overreach in U.S. cyber enforcement; The Guardian likened his plight to Aaron Swartz's in critiquing prosecutorial excess. This sympathy waned post-release amid his overt alignment with white nationalism, leading to his effective exclusion from broader hacker and open-internet communities despite earlier acclaim for security disclosures.