Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

What Ever Happened to...

What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? is a 1991 American directed by David Greene and adapted from Henry Farrell's 1960 of the same name, serving as a of the 1962 theatrical .) The story is set in the late 1980s and follows two reclusive elderly sisters in a decaying mansion: former child star (Lynn ), whose career ended after childhood, and her sister Blanche Hudson (Vanessa ), a once-successful actress now wheelchair-bound after a car accident years earlier. As Jane's mental state deteriorates, she begins psychologically and physically tormenting the dependent Blanche, exploring themes of , guilt, and faded stardom through flashbacks to their and careers.) The film stars real-life sisters and in the lead roles, previously played by and in the 1962 version, with supporting performances by John Glover as Blanche's caregiver, as a delivery man, and as a neighbor. Produced by Steve White Productions, the Aldrich Group, and Spectacor Films, and distributed by , it premiered on October 20, 1991, with a runtime of 100 minutes in color. Filming took place primarily in , updating the original's setting while retaining its gothic atmosphere. It received no major award nominations but earned praise for the Redgraves' intense sibling chemistry, though critics often viewed it as an unnecessary retelling overshadowed by the original. What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? drew modest viewership and contributed to discussions on remakes of classic horror, highlighting the enduring appeal of the source material's themes of resentment and decline.) Its campy elements and focus on aging actresses have maintained interest as a curiosity in the "hagsploitation" tradition, though it lacks the cultural impact of the 1962 film.

Background

Source Material

The novel What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? was written by and first published in 1960 by Rinehart & Company. The story centers on the intense between Jane Hudson, a faded child star still obsessed with her "Baby Jane" persona from the 1910s, and her younger sister Blanche Hudson, a former leading lady left paralyzed after a mysterious automobile accident in the 1930s. Set in a decaying in contemporary 1960s , the narrative explores themes of , , and psychological torment as the reclusive sisters confront their shared past amid escalating abuse and delusion. Though initially modest in sales, the novel developed a , particularly after its adaptation, for its incisive portrayal of faded stardom and familial dysfunction in the entertainment industry. The novel served as the basis for the 1962 film adaptation directed by Robert Aldrich and produced by Warner Bros., which starred Bette Davis as Baby Jane Hudson and Joan Crawford as Blanche Hudson. Released on October 31, 1962, the black-and-white film closely followed the novel's premise while amplifying its gothic horror elements through Aldrich's direction and the stars' intense performances, capturing the sisters' claustrophobic existence in their rundown Hollywood home. It received widespread critical acclaim, earning five Academy Award nominations—including Best Actress for Davis, Best Supporting Actor for Victor Buono, Best Cinematography (Black-and-White) for Ernest Haller, and Best Sound—while winning for Best Costume Design (Black-and-White) by Norma Koch. Commercially, the film was a major success, grossing approximately $9 million at the worldwide and ranking as the 14th highest-grossing film of , which helped revive the careers of its aging leads and sparked in their real-life . Over time, it became a cultural touchstone in the horror-thriller genre, celebrated as a camp classic for its melodramatic tension, iconic imagery—like Davis's makeup and Crawford's wheelchair-bound vulnerability—and its exploration of decline, influencing subsequent works in psycho-biddy and cinema. The and film's combined legacy established the story as an enduring emblem of Hollywood's dark underbelly, blending suspense with social commentary on fame's toll, and paved the way for later adaptations including the 1991 television remake.

Development

In the late 1980s, ABC greenlit a made-for-television remake of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? to capitalize on the original 1962 film's enduring popularity as a psychological thriller exploring sibling rivalry and faded stardom. Producer Barry Bernardi led the project, with executive producers William Aldrich, Christopher DeFaria, and Steve White overseeing development. Screenwriter Brian Taggert crafted a new script based on Henry Farrell's 1960 novel, modernizing elements to fit the 1990s setting, including the sisters' mansion lifestyle, references to recordings of old films, and contemporary aids for the wheelchair-bound character. The emphasized psychological tension over outright , updating cultural touchstones to reflect the era's blend of and . The production team selected real-life sisters Vanessa and Lynn Redgrave for the lead roles of Blanche and Jane Hudson, respectively, marking their first on-screen collaboration and drawing parallels to the original film's real-life feud between and to heighten the sibling dynamic's authenticity. Director David Greene was brought on board due to his expertise in handling intense psychological narratives, as demonstrated in prior television projects like the miniseries Fatal Vision (1984) and (1979). William Aldrich, son of the original film's director , served as an additional executive producer, connecting the remake to its cinematic predecessor. The script was finalized by 1990, aligning with the network's push for star-driven event programming typical of early 1990s TV movies.

Production

Casting

The lead roles in the 1991 television remake of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? were awarded to real-life sisters as the wheelchair-bound former star Blanche Hudson and as the unhinged former child star . William M. Aldrich selected Lynn for the demanding role of Baby Jane, citing her suitability for the grotesque character, while Vanessa portrayed Blanche; Vanessa endorsed her sister's casting, expressing confidence in her performance. Vanessa's selection drew on her acclaimed dramatic range, including her Academy Award-winning turn in Julia (1977), to capture Blanche's vulnerability and elegance. The decision to cast the Redgraves together marked their first on-screen collaboration in a major production, leveraging their genuine sibling bond—forged over more than four decades—to infuse the sisters' fraught dynamic with authentic emotional layers, thereby enhancing the film's psychological intensity and contrasting the original version's off-screen tensions between and . The supporting cast featured as the handyman and physical therapist Dominick, John Glover as the exploitative video store manager and con artist Billy Korn, as Blanche's friend Connie Trotter, John Scott Clough as Connie's husband Frank. These choices complemented the leads by providing grounded, character-driven presences that amplified the central conflict without overshadowing it, contributing to a tone that balanced campy horror with interpersonal realism. The casting process emphasized the inherent contrasts between the Redgrave sisters—physical, emotional, and experiential—to mirror the characters' disparities, though no formal auditions for the leads were detailed in production accounts. Preparation focused on immersion in the source material and adaptation to the roles; the sisters studied the original film and Henry Farrell's 1960 novel for insight, while Lynn worked to embody Baby Jane's childlike regression through nuanced mannerisms. Both also shed their British accents to adopt American inflections, ensuring seamless integration into the updated, contemporary setting. No significant controversies arose during , with the Redgraves' evident chemistry serving as a key promotional element to highlight the project's familial authenticity over the original's storied rivalries. This approach ultimately shaped a more intimate tone, prioritizing relational subtlety amid the thriller elements.

Filming

for the 1991 television adaptation of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? took place in , utilizing various local exteriors to capture the seedy underbelly of . Key locations included the Hudson sisters' mansion exterior at 501 South Hudson Avenue, evoking the gothic decay of faded stardom, and nearby 166 South McCadden Place for adjacent neighborhood shots. Additional filming occurred at Venice Beach for flashback and climactic beach confrontation scenes, Vidiots video store on 302 in Santa Monica to reflect the era's video rental culture, and other sites such as Schrader Avenue and 119 North Larchmont Boulevard for street and bank sequences. Director David Greene, known for his work on television dramas like and Fatal Vision, adopted a broader visual scope than the claustrophobic original, venturing outside the central mansion to depict a gritty contemporary while preserving the story's grotesque elements, such as disturbing meals prepared by Jane. Interiors were likely constructed on Los Angeles soundstages to replicate the confined, atmospheric tension of the Hudson home, though specific studio details remain undocumented. The production schedule aligned with typical made-for-TV timelines, wrapping in time for the film's February 1991 ABC premiere. Cinematographer Stevan Larner employed lighting techniques to emphasize shadows and within the domestic settings, enhancing the psychological unease between the sisters. by Paul Dixon focused on maintaining through measured pacing, balancing intimate character moments with external explorations. The original score was composed by Peter Manning Robinson, incorporating modern orchestral elements to underscore the themes of obsession and decline without directly replicating Henry Mancini's motifs.

Content

Plot

In the , the story unfolds primarily in a decaying mansion in , where the reclusive former child star lives with her wheelchair-bound sister, Blanche Hudson, whom she both cares for and psychologically torments out of long-simmering resentment. , still clinging to her outdated child film star persona, becomes increasingly unhinged when Blanche's classic films experience a brief resurgence in popularity through releases, reigniting Jane's jealousy over Blanche's past success as a leading lady. The narrative employs a linear structure interspersed with flashbacks depicting the sisters' early careers—'s brief fame as a precocious performer in the and , followed by Blanche's ascent in sound films—culminating in the mysterious car accident that left Blanche paralyzed decades earlier. Driven by delusions of a comeback, forges checks from Blanche's accounts and befriends Korn, a local and who recognizes her faded celebrity and agrees to accompany her in a performance; the attempt ends in humiliating failure, after which Jane kills Billy. Further fueling her instability, she escalates abuse toward Blanche, including confining her to rooms and serving her bizarre, inedible meals. Tension mounts when family friends and her husband arrive for a visit, raising suspicions about Blanche's well-being. Later, Blanche's loyal and physical Dominick discovers the abuse and attempts to free her, leading to a violent confrontation in which Jane stabs Dominick to death with . As Blanche struggles to escape her captivity, she finally confesses the truth about their shared trauma: in the , as Jane's career was poised for revival, Blanche deliberately caused the car accident by running her sister down, paralyzing herself in the process to permanently sabotage Jane's success and maintain her own dominance. In the climax, after the revelation, Jane takes the weakened Blanche to a nearby beach, where Blanche confesses in detail. Neighbors, alerted by the absence of the sisters, call , who arrive to find Blanche near death from . Shattered, Jane attempts to run into the ocean in a suicidal act but is stopped; following Blanche's full confession to authorities, Jane is arrested and implied to face institutionalization, leaving the pair's codependent bond of guilt, envy, and mutual destruction tragically exposed. Clocking in at , the television adaptation maintains a taut pace suited to its format, blending with dramatic revelations.

Cast

The 1991 television adaptation of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane...? features a cast anchored by real-life sisters and , whose familial bond lent authenticity to the portrayal of the antagonistic Hudson siblings. The principal roles are as follows:
ActorCharacterDescriptionNotable Background
Blanche HudsonReclusive, scheming invalid confined to a wheelchairAcademy Award winner for her dramatic supporting role in (1977), demonstrating her depth in intense character studies.
Baby Jane HudsonErratic, childlike tormentor clinging to faded stardomAcademy Award nominee for her comedic breakout in (1966), providing contrast to the role's psychological darkness.
DominickLoyal handyman and physical therapist to BlancheRecognized for his recurring role as Blank Reg in the cyberpunk series (1987–1988).
John GloverBilly KornGreedy opportunist scheming to exploit Jane's vulnerabilityVeteran stage with credits, including a Tony Award for Love! Valour! Compassion! (1995); prior film roles in (1988).
Connie TrotterSupportive friend offering concern for BlancheKnown for her lead role as Ginny in the slasher film (1981).
John Scott CloughFrankNaive victim drawn into the sisters' turmoilPrimarily a television with guest appearances in series like (1990s).
Samantha RyanBaby Jane (young)Child version of the title character in flashback sequencesChild performer with limited credits, appearing in family-oriented TV productions of the era.
Minor and uncredited roles, including figures like a film director (Pat Skipper) and agent (Vinny Argiro as Abe), serve to populate the backdrop and everyday interactions, enhancing the ensemble without driving the central narrative.

Differences from Source Material

From the

The 1991 adaptation significantly updates the temporal setting of Henry Farrell's 1960 novel, which unfolds in the early amid the fading glamour of post-war , to the late , infusing the narrative with modern technological and cultural elements. In the film, Blanche Hudson's attempted professional comeback involves producing and distributing tapes of her performances, a detail absent from the novel's era-specific context where such media did not exist. Similarly, the film incorporates contemporary accessibility aids like electric stairlifts to facilitate Blanche's mobility within the Hudson mansion, reflecting 1990s advancements in accommodations that contrast with the novel's more rudimentary depictions of her wheelchair-bound existence. Character alterations further modernize the story while diverging from the novel's characterizations. , a vaudeville sensation from the in Farrell's book, is recast in the film as a child movie star whose fame peaked in the , aligning her backstory with the updated timeline and emphasizing cinematic rather than stage origins. The novel's female handywoman, Edna, is replaced by a male counterpart named , shifting the dynamics of household support and introducing gender-specific interactions not present in the source material. Additionally, the exploiter figure Flagg—a socially awkward, mother-dependent man in the novel—is reimagined as Billy Korn, a aspiring artist seeking to capitalize on the sisters' fame, adding layers of identity absent from Farrell's original. The film's resolution deviates markedly from the novel's darker conclusion to suit television audiences. In Farrell's book, Jane drives Blanche to the beach, where Jane plays in in a delusional state while Blanche lies weak and near death from and ; then arrive, leading to . By contrast, the 1991 version ends with Jane's following intervention, allowing her survival and a more ambiguous, less fatalistic closure. These changes parallel some updates in the 1962 film adaptation but are amplified in the remake to emphasize redemption possibilities over despair.) Thematically, the adaptation reduces the novel's focus on the decline of show business and sibling codependence rooted in vaudeville-era resentments, instead highlighting obsessions with media proliferation and evolving representations of . The film's expansion beyond the mansion to depict a grittier underscores contemporary exploitation through video distribution and public scrutiny, while Blanche's portrayal incorporates modern to physical , contrasting the novel's more isolated, era-bound .

From the 1962 Film

The 1991 television remake of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? features real-life sisters as the unhinged and as the wheelchair-bound Blanche Hudson, directly paralleling the lead roles originated by and in the 1962 film. Unlike the original's casting of longtime rivals and Crawford, whose well-documented on-set tensions infused their performances with a venomous edge, the Redgraves' familial bond lent a warmer, more layered chemistry to the sibling dynamic, emphasizing psychological nuance over outright . Supporting roles also diverge, notably with the gender-swapping of the caretaker figure: the 1991 version replaces the original's female housekeeper Stitt (played by ) with a male counterpart named Dominick (), shifting the interpersonal conflicts in subtler, more contemporary directions. Stylistically, the remake adopts a brighter, color palette suited to television broadcast, contrasting the 1962 film's stark that amplified its gothic tension and campy elements. With a of compared to the original's 132 minutes, the 1991 adaptation streamlines the narrative by omitting extended subplots, such as the more elaborate interactions involving Jane's delusional attempts to revive her career, including a kidnapping-like confrontation that heightens the thriller aspects in the earlier version. This condensation reflects television production constraints, resulting in less emphasis on visceral and more on restrained domestic decay. Modernizations in the 1991 film incorporate cultural touches absent from the 1962 setting, such as references to recordings like tapes, which underscore Jane's obsession with her faded stardom in an era of accessible media replay. The ending further softens the original's tragic ambiguity—where Blanche's fate remains uncertain amid police intervention—by resolving with Jane's arrest, avoiding outright death and aligning with television's preference for less graphic conclusions. Overall, these changes shift the tone toward , bolstered by the Redgraves' empathetic portrayals, rather than the 1962 film's blend of and exaggerated menace.

Release and Reception

Broadcast and Viewership

The 1991 television of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? premiered on as a Sunday night TV movie event on February 17, . The broadcast was heavily promoted, capitalizing on the real-life sibling dynamic of stars Vanessa and in the lead roles originally played by and . Viewership was solid for a made-for-TV film of the era, earning a Nielsen household rating of 9.9 and a 15 share among households using television at the time. This performance equated to an estimated 20-25 million viewers, drawing interest from audiences curious about the remake and the Redgrave sisters' on-screen chemistry. An initial home video release followed shortly after the premiere, with ABC Video issuing the film on VHS in 1991. No official DVD or Blu-ray editions have been produced as of 2025, limiting physical availability to secondhand VHS copies and unofficial bootlegs. The movie has since become accessible via free streaming services, including full uploads on YouTube and ad-supported platforms like Tubi, though its public domain status has not been officially confirmed. Rare cable reruns have occasionally aired on networks such as Lifetime. Internationally, the film saw limited distribution.

Critical Reception

The 1991 television remake of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? received mixed contemporary reviews, with critics praising the performances of sisters Lynn and Vanessa Redgrave while noting its inability to capture the original film's intensity. John J. O'Connor of The New York Times commended the Redgraves' on-screen chemistry in their first joint project, highlighting how they brought a fresh dynamic to the sibling roles, though he observed that the adaptation took a broader approach by exploring Los Angeles' underbelly, which diluted the story's focused creepiness compared to the 1962 version. Similarly, Ray Loynd in the Los Angeles Times lauded the sisters' "magical rapport," emphasizing their spontaneous and sensitive interplay that added emotional verisimilitude and subtlety to the psychological drama. However, Loynd acknowledged that the remake fell short of Robert Aldrich's iconic original, lacking the pungency and wit of key scenes and failing to match Bette Davis's towering performance as Jane. Aggregate user ratings reflect this , with holding a 5.7 out of 10 score on based on over 1,000 votes, indicating moderate appreciation but widespread recognition of its limitations as a made-for-TV production. Reviewers often highlighted strengths in the emotional depth of the sisterly bond and subtle modern updates, such as contemporary settings for supporting characters, which grounded the story in a more relatable era. Weaknesses centered on the toned-down elements and a shift toward sympathy for , which softened the macabre tone and campy edge that defined the source material, resulting in a less thrilling . In retrospective analyses, the film is viewed as a curiosity primarily appealing to fans of the , valued for standout moments like Lynn Redgrave's nuanced portrayal of Jane's vulnerability but ultimately dismissed as an unnecessary footnote overshadowed by the 1962 classic. Critics in later pieces appreciate its humanizing touches, such as the expanded relationship between Jane and her pianist, yet criticize the bland visuals and underutilization of Vanessa Redgrave's talents, reinforcing its status as a well-intentioned but non-definitive .

References

  1. [1]
    AFI|Catalog - American Film Institute
    132 mins | Drama | 1962 ; Cast: Bette Davis ; Director: Robert Aldrich ; Writer: Lukas Heller ; Producer: Robert Aldrich ; Cinematographer: Ernest Haller ...
  2. [2]
    Henry Farrell, 85; Writer of 'Baby Jane' Helped Fuel Genre of ...
    Apr 7, 2006 · Published in 1960, “What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?” was Farrell's second novel, and it would have a long and fruitful screen life.
  3. [3]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962) - TCM
    2h 12m 1962 What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? Brief Synopsis Read More A crazed, aging star torments her sister in a decaying Hollywood mansion.
  4. [4]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962) - Awards - IMDb
    5 wins & 11 nominations. Academy Awards, USA. Bette Davis. 1963 Nominee Oscar. Victor Buono. 1963 Nominee Oscar. Ernest Haller. 1963 Nominee Oscar.
  5. [5]
    How Successful Was 'Whatever Happened To Baby Jane ... - Bustle
    Mar 26, 2017 · The film grossed $9 million at the box office, making it the 14th highest-grossing film of the year, according to Box Office Mojo. (Lawrence ...
  6. [6]
    How What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? demonised older women
    Nov 3, 2022 · "Hagsploitation is a misogynist and ageist term applied to fading female movie stars that were reinvented as these grotesque spectres" says Dr ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? - Kirkus Reviews
    Farrell's groundbreaking tale of two elderly sisters caught up in a murderous web has been re-released. This volume includes three additional, ...Missing: plot summary<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? by Henry Farrell | Goodreads
    As Blanche's film career took off, a resentful Jane watched from the shadows as her own career faded into obscurity—until a tragic accident changed everything.
  10. [10]
    FFB: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? - Henry Farrell
    Mar 10, 2017 · What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1960) tells the story of two sisters who live together in relative seclusion following their previous success as actresses.
  11. [11]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962) - IMDb
    Rating 8/10 (66,444) "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" is a most unusual and impressive thriller. Director Robert Aldrich achieves a fantastic sordid and dark atmosphere at the ...Full cast & crew · Trivia · Plot · User reviews
  12. [12]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane 60th Anniversary - Fathom Events
    Academy Award® for Best Costume Design and nominated for four additional Academy Awards including best Actress (Bette Davis) and Best Actor in a Supporting ...
  13. [13]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? - TCM
    ... Oscar® winner usually added at least a million dollars to the box office receipts of a film. Since Joan and I each had a percentage of the movie, how Medean ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Reviews/Television; 2 Redgraves as Baby Jane and Her Sister
    Feb 14, 1991 · Now adapted for television in a new script by Brian Taggert, "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" -- Sunday at 9 P.M. on ABC -- is a vehicle for ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    INTERVIEW : The Redgrave Sisters: A Theory of Relativity
    Dec 16, 1990 · In ABC's version, set in the present, Vanessa Redgrave is the confined Blanche, and Lynn portrays the grotesque Baby Jane. “I think people ...
  17. [17]
    The Redgrave sisters -- that's what has happened to... - UPI Archives
    Feb 13, 1991 · Lynn and Vanessa Redgrave star in a remake of the 1962 black-and-white horror classic, 'What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?' in the roles originally played by ...
  18. [18]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (TV Movie 1991) - Full cast ...
    executive producer. Barry Bernardi · Barry Bernardi. producer. Christopher DeFaria · Christopher DeFaria. associate producer (as Chris DeFaria). Brian Taggert.
  19. [19]
    What Ever Happened To Baby Jane (1991) - Set-Jetter
    Feb 25, 2017 · Not many know that cult classic was remade in 1991 starring real-life sisters Lynn and Vanessa Redgrave.
  20. [20]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? - Full Cast & Crew - TV Guide
    An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.
  21. [21]
    TV Reviews : A Magical Rapport in 'Baby Jane' Remake
    Feb 16, 1991 · Sometimes--if, like the made-for-TV version of Robert Aldrich's 1962 Hollywood Grand Guignol shocker, “What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?
  22. [22]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (TV Movie 1991) - Plot - IMDb
    An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.
  23. [23]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (TV Movie 1991) - IMDb
    Rating 5.7/10 (1,060) An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? by Henry Farrell - LibraryThing
    Two sisters, both famous at one time, trapped together in a Hollywood mansion. Blanche was a big movie star in the 30's, but after a car accident left her in a ...Missing: details plot summary
  26. [26]
    Book Vs. Movie: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane
    Jul 25, 2022 · Book & Movie Differences. For the most part, the film version of What Ever Happened to Baby Jane stays pretty faithful to the book. Most of the ...
  27. [27]
    What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? 1991 Is A Flat Remake Of A ...
    Apr 30, 2020 · Directed by Robert Aldrich (The Dirty Dozen), What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? is based on the novel of the same name. The story concerns two ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    A Timeline of the Real Feud Between Bette Davis and Joan Crawford
    Feb 22, 2017 · As depicted in Feud, it was Crawford who persuaded Davis to sign onto What Ever Happened To Baby Jane?, the psychological horror story about a ...
  30. [30]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962) - Full cast & crew - IMDb
    Cast ; Bette Davis · Baby Jane Hudson ; Joan Crawford · Blanche Hudson ; Victor Buono · Edwin Flagg ; Wesley Addy · Marty McDonald ; Julie Allred · Baby Jane Hudson in ...
  31. [31]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? - stream online - JustWatch
    Rating 23% (39) What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? Watch Now. List. Grid. Canada. All Free ... Runtime. 1h 33min. Production country. United States. Cast.
  32. [32]
    'WHATEVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE?' (1991) - Daily Grindhouse
    Mar 17, 2017 · The 1991 version of BABY JANE takes on a slightly different tone than the original, even if it primarily sticks with the same general plot points.
  33. [33]
    abc sunday night movie: what ever happened to baby jane? (tv)
    TV - Promos - "thirtysomething". CREDITS. William Aldrich … Executive Producer; Steve White … Executive Producer; Barry Bernardi … Producer; Brian Taggert … Co- ...
  34. [34]
    What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? - TV Movie - TV Tango
    What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? ; Sunday, February 17, 1991, 9.9, 15 ; (Click any date to see TV listings for that day) ...
  35. [35]
    Psychological Thriller & Mystery VHS Tapes for sale - eBay
    Rating 5.0 (1) What Ever Happened to… Baby Jane? VHS 1991 Vanessa & Lynn Redgrave Suspense RARE.
  36. [36]
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane...? (1991) - Tubi
    Jane, a former child star, abuses Blanche, her wheelchair-bound sister, who's enjoyed success as a movie star. And Jane's envy is only growing.
  37. [37]
    What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? (1991) - YouTube
    Apr 28, 2020 · ... Directors: David Greene Starring: Vanessa Redgrave, Lynn Redgrave, Bruce A. Young, Amy Steel, John Scott Clough, John Glover, J. Michael ...