Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Winter moth

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) is a species of geometrid moth native to , western , and much of , distinguished by its adults' activity in late autumn and early winter, one of the few s active during that period in temperate regions. The males are light tan with a of 22–28 mm and fully developed wings for flight, while s are wingless, grayish, and crawl up trunks to attract mates using pheromones. Eggs, laid singly 150–350 per female in crevices from to (though often clustered close together), overwinter and hatch in (–May) coincident with host plant bud break. Larvae are green inchworms up to 18–25 mm long, with pale yellow stripes, that feed voraciously on new foliage before pupating in the soil by early summer. Accidentally introduced to independently in the 1930s in , the 1950s in , and around 1970 in , and subsequently spreading to the , the winter moth has established as an invasive pest in coastal areas of Plant Hardiness Zones 5b and warmer. It is highly polyphagous, attacking over 100 host species including trees like , , and , as well as fruit crops such as apple, , and , and occasionally evergreens. Larval feeding causes defoliation, stunted growth, and in severe outbreaks, up to 40% mortality in red oak stands or significant economic losses in production. Dispersal occurs primarily through wind-blown larvae on silk threads or human-mediated transport like infested nursery stock and . Ecologically, the winter moth's success as an invader stems from its flexible and lack of native predators in new ranges, though biological control efforts using the Cyzenis albicans—introduced from —have been successful, establishing at over 40 sites and reducing winter moth densities significantly in the northeastern U.S. as of 2021. also includes sticky bands to crawling females, targeted insecticides during egg hatch, and regulatory measures like quarantines on movement to curb spread. Ongoing research emphasizes to mitigate its impacts on forests and agriculture while preserving beneficial .

Taxonomy and nomenclature

Classification

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) is classified in the kingdom Animalia, phylum Arthropoda, class Insecta, order Lepidoptera, superfamily Geometroidea, family Geometridae, subfamily Larentiinae, tribe Operophterini, genus Operophtera, and species O. brumata. This placement situates the species within the diverse family Geometridae, which comprises over 23,000 species of moths characterized by their looping larval locomotion, with O. brumata specifically in the subfamily Larentiinae, a group encompassing many temperate and boreal geometrids. The genus Operophtera is phylogenetically distinct from closely related genera like Epirrita (also in Larentiinae and Operophterini), based on molecular and morphological analyses revealing separate evolutionary lineages, including variations in female wing morphology and genitalic structures.

Etymology

The "winter moth" alludes to the species' distinctive adult flight period in late autumn and early winter, when males are active in seeking out wingless females despite low temperatures. Other s include "European winter moth" and "common winter moth." The scientific binomen Operophtera brumata has several historical synonyms, including Cheimatobia brumaria (Esper, 1783), Cheimatobia vulgaris (Stephens, 1831), Cheimatobia myricaria (Cooke, 1884), Phalaena grisearia (Villers, 1789), and Thysanodes phryganea (Rambur, 1833). The species was originally described by as Phalaena brumata in his 1758 Systema Naturae. The genus Operophtera was later established by Jacob Hübner in 1825. The specific epithet brumata derives from the Latin brūma, denoting the or the period of shortest days, which corresponds to the timing of adult emergence and activity. In , the closely related native species Operophtera bruceata (the Bruce spanworm) has been noted to hybridize with O. brumata, leading to occasional taxonomic confusion in identification of intermediate forms.

Morphology and description

Adult morphology

The adult winter moth (Operophtera brumata) exhibits pronounced , with males possessing functional wings for flight and females bearing only vestigial wings, rendering them flightless. This dimorphism influences mating, as females rely on chemical signals rather than mobility to attract partners. Male adults are small moths with a typically ranging from 22 to 30 mm. Their forewings are light brownish-gray to beige-brown, often featuring subtle markings such as a faint darker central band, while the hindwings are paler and both pairs exhibit a fringed appearance due to elongate scales along the margins. These moths are nocturnal, emerging in late autumn to and flying actively on nights when temperatures exceed freezing to locate females via pheromones. Female adults lack functional wings, possessing only short, non-operational stubs, and have a plump, gray to gray-brown body approximately 8-10 mm long. Upon emergence, they crawl up trunks or nearby vertical surfaces to release pheromones, attracting males for before ascending further to deposit eggs in crevices.

Larval and pupal stages

The larvae of the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) are typical geometrid or inchworms, characterized by an elongated with only two pairs of prolegs located on abdominal segments 6 and 10, which enables their distinctive looping locomotion and distinguishes them from similar species like the fall cankerworm (Alsophila pometaria), which has three pairs. Newly hatched larvae measure approximately 2.5 mm in length and are initially blackish, transitioning to pale green or light green to brownish-green coloration as they develop, often with faint white longitudinal stripes along the sides of the and a dark brown head. Over a six-week feeding period in spring, larvae grow to full maturity, reaching lengths of 20-25 mm, during which they skeletonize leaves of host trees such as oaks and maples. A key feature of early-instar larvae is their ability to produce threads for ballooning dispersal immediately after hatching, allowing them to be carried by the wind between trees and facilitating rapid spread within and beyond host stands. This aerial dispersal occurs primarily in to in temperate regions, coinciding with bud break on plants. Upon reaching maturity in late May or early June, larvae descend to the ground and pupate in earthen cocoons within or leaf litter, forming a non-feeding stage that lasts 4-6 months until adult emergence in late fall. Pupae are light brown in color and measure 7.5-10 mm in length, remaining dormant through summer and overwintering in this form.

Distribution

Native distribution

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) is native to northern and , ranging from in the north to the Mediterranean in the south, and extending eastward across temperate to the . This broad Eurasian distribution reflects its adaptation to diverse ecosystems, where it has been a natural component of woodlands for centuries. Historical records document the winter moth's widespread presence in deciduous forests across its native range since at least the 19th century, with populations fluctuating in response to environmental conditions. Periodic outbreaks have been noted in the United Kingdom, particularly in England and Scotland, where defoliation events have affected oak and other broadleaf trees. In Germany, long-term monitoring in northern regions has revealed recurrent outbreaks since the mid-20th century, building on earlier historical data from the previous century that highlight its role as an occasional forest pest. The species thrives in temperate climates, where temperatures during adult active periods (late fall) remain above freezing, facilitating its univoltine and egg-laying on host trees before winter .

Invasive distribution

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) has become established as an across parts of , with primary populations in the and , as well as the . The earliest confirmed introduction occurred in , , in the 1930s, where it was initially mistaken for the native Bruce spanworm due to morphological similarities. From there, it spread southward along the into , with defoliation outbreaks first noted in eastern in the late , and is now established in and , though without becoming a major pest in these areas. In the , separate introductions established populations in during the 1950s and in by the 1970s, likely via distinct source populations. These western infestations have persisted on the south coast of and in the , remaining confined to moderate temperate climates without significant inland expansion. Genetic analyses indicate at least four independent invasions across , originating from different regions, which has contributed to the species' adaptability in non-native habitats. As of 2025, the winter moth's range in the northeastern U.S. includes confirmed presence in Maine, where it was first detected in 2012 along the southern coast from Kittery to Bar Harbor, and in New York, with detections reported in coastal and urban areas since the early 2000s. Populations are actively monitored in urban forests and woodlands across these regions, particularly where they overlap with deciduous tree stands. No major northward or inland expansions have occurred in Atlantic Canada over the past 50 years, though ongoing surveillance tracks potential shifts linked to climatic suitability. In its invasive North American range, the winter moth hybridizes with the native Bruce spanworm (Operophtera bruceata), producing low levels of F1 hybrids and backcrosses, primarily in the northeastern U.S. Hybrid zones show asymmetric favoring the winter moth, with rates typically around 1% but reaching up to 10% locally; however, genomic exchange remains limited overall. This interbreeding occurs across all invaded northeastern sites but has not been linked to substantial enhancements in .

Ecology and life history

Life cycle

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) exhibits a univoltine , completing one generation per year, with strongly influenced by temperature regimes. Adult moths emerge from pupae in the during late to early , depending on location and weather conditions. Upon emergence, flightless females crawl up trunks to locate males, and occurs immediately, often on the same night. Each female then lays 150–350 eggs singly or in clusters on trunks, branches, or crevices, typically in to . These eggs overwinter in , enduring cold temperatures until spring. Eggs hatch in early , from mid-March to mid-May, when average temperatures reach approximately °C (55°F), synchronizing with host budbreak. The larval begins upon hatching, with young caterpillars feeding on expanding buds and foliage for about 6 weeks, during to . Larvae disperse to new hosts via ballooning, dropping from trees on silken threads carried by . By late May, mature larvae descend to the or litter, where they pupate in earthen cocoons, remaining in this for 4–6 months until the following autumn. Recent studies highlight temperature-driven shifts in , such as earlier egg hatching due to warmer winters, which can disrupt synchrony with . For instance, research from 2024 demonstrates that ambient overrides photoperiod in regulating hatching timing, potentially altering the ' life history under .

Habitat and host plants

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) primarily inhabits temperate regions with moderate climates, favoring woodlands, forests, and orchards where host trees are abundant. It thrives in areas classified under Plant Hardiness Zones 5b and warmer, such as coastal and inland sites in its native European range and invasive North American populations, but is limited by colder conditions that prevent northward expansion. Preferred environments include oak-dominated forests and mixed stands, as well as suburban landscapes with shade and fruit trees. The species is highly polyphagous, with larvae feeding on over 150 species of woody plants, predominantly broadleaf deciduous trees and shrubs, though it occasionally affects conifers. Key host genera include Quercus (oaks), Acer (maples), Betula (birches), and Ulmus (elms), with a particular preference for early-budding species that align with larval emergence in spring. Fruit trees such as Malus (apples), Crataegus (hawthorns), and Prunus (cherries) are also common hosts, especially in orchards, alongside understory plants like blueberries (Vaccinium). Larvae exhibit specialized feeding behavior by mining into swelling buds shortly after hatching in early spring, transitioning to consume expanding leaves and young foliage, which provides high-nitrogen content suitable for their development. Adults are non-feeding, relying on stored energy from the larval stage, while flightless females climb host tree trunks and branches in late fall to deposit eggs in bark crevices or under scales, ensuring proximity to buds for the next generation's hatching. This oviposition strategy reinforces the moth's adaptation to deciduous hosts in temperate habitats.

Invasiveness

Introduction history

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata), native to and parts of , was accidentally introduced to on at least four separate occasions from . The first was in , , during the 1930s through the movement of infected nursery stock from . This initial human-mediated introduction likely occurred via imported plants carrying pupae in the , as the species' allows eggs and pupae to hitchhike undetected on horticultural materials. The infestation was not identified as the winter moth until 1949, when it was distinguished from the similar native spanworm (Operophtera bruceata), after causing noticeable defoliation in the southeastern coastal areas of . By the early 1950s, the winter moth had established populations and begun to cause significant outbreaks, particularly affecting apple orchards, shade trees, and oak forests in the region. These early outbreaks intensified through the 1950s and early 1960s, leading to widespread defoliation before biological control efforts, including the of parasitoids, contributed to collapses by the mid-1960s. The pest's spread within accelerated during this period, with accidental transport on stock and possibly vehicles facilitating movement from infested sites. Populations reached by the early 1970s, marking a key early expansion beyond and into adjacent provinces like . This establishment reflected ongoing human-assisted dispersal pathways from and within , setting the stage for further invasions. Subsequent spread patterns are detailed elsewhere.

Spread patterns

The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) disperses in invasive regions primarily through larval ballooning, adult male flight, and human-mediated transport. Newly hatched larvae produce threads to balloon on currents, enabling dispersal distances of up to 1 km depending on weather conditions, which allows rapid colonization of nearby host trees. Male adults, the only flying sex, actively seek out wingless females over distances up to 2 km, facilitating local and population establishment. Human activities greatly amplify long-distance spread, with infested nursery stock, ornamental plants, and vehicles transporting eggs or pupae across broader landscapes. In eastern , the winter moth has expanded at rates of approximately 6 km per year since the early , based on trap surveys and defoliation mapping, corresponding to 60 km per decade and enabling southward progression from to over recent decades. This rate reflects the front's advance post-initial establishment, with cumulative displacement reaching hundreds of kilometers since introduction. The represents a separate pathway, likely via direct imports of European nursery materials in the 1950s–1970s, followed by comparable expansion rates of about 7.4 km per year in areas like . Hybridization with the native Bruce spanworm (Operophtera bruceata) further influences spread dynamics in eastern North America by enhancing the invader's adaptability. Interbreeding occurs primarily along the invasion front, yielding viable F1 hybrids at frequencies around 4.8% of captured moths, which likely mitigates Allee effects in low-density pioneering populations and promotes sustained expansion.

Environmental impacts

Defoliation and ecological effects

Winter moth (Operophtera brumata) infestations cause significant defoliation of hardwood trees, particularly oaks (Quercus spp.), maples (Acer spp.), and other deciduous species in invaded regions like the northeastern United States. In Massachusetts, annual defoliation affected between 2,266 and 36,360 hectares of forests and urban shade trees from 2003 to 2015, leading to widespread canopy loss during spring outbreaks. This defoliation reduces tree radial growth, with studies showing up to a 47% decrease in annual growth rates for Quercus species in eastern Massachusetts, as larvae consume expanding buds and young leaves, limiting photosynthesis and carbon allocation to wood production. Following successful biological control introductions, defoliation declined sharply, becoming undetectable in Massachusetts from 2016 to 2018 and remaining low as of 2021, allowing for ecological recovery in affected stands. The trophic consequences of winter moth defoliation extend beyond direct host plant damage, disrupting food webs across multiple levels. For insectivorous birds, such as tits (Parus spp.), outbreaks can provide abundant larvae as nestling food, enhancing breeding success in some years, though severe defoliation may indirectly reduce foliage-based foraging habitat in prolonged scenarios. Additionally, larval frass deposition enriches soil nutrient cycling by adding nitrogen and organic matter, accelerating decomposition and increasing nutrient availability in affected forest floors, though excessive inputs from outbreaks may lead to temporary imbalances in microbial communities. Outbreaks of winter moth contribute to shifts in forest and composition, favoring more tolerant to repeated defoliation. In invaded forests, heavy browsing pressure from winter moth larvae promotes proliferation while stressing sensitive like oaks, potentially leading to dominance by more resilient such as maples and pines over time. These changes reduce overall in affected stands, as repeated defoliation weakens competitive ability of preferred hosts and alters successional trajectories. Economic costs associated with such impacts, including reduced timber yield, are substantial but addressed through targeted .

Climate change interactions

Climate change is altering the phenological dynamics of the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) primarily through warming temperatures that advance egg and host plant budburst, often leading to potential mismatches in larval-host synchrony. However, populations exhibit fine-scale local via evolutionary shifts in hatching timing, enabling better alignment with variable conditions. A 2025 integrative analysis () of genomic and phenological data across populations revealed strong evidence of local genetic to climate-driven variability, where moths in warmer locales evolved earlier hatching to maintain synchrony despite advancing budburst. This underscores the species' capacity to respond to ongoing warming without solely relying on plastic responses. Experimental studies confirm that exerts a dominant influence over photoperiod in controlling egg and . In controlled trials simulating historical (1973) and recent (1999) conditions, a modest 1.36 °C increase accelerated by 19.92 days, an effect eight times stronger than photoperiod shifts of 2–4 weeks, which only delayed by 1.4–2.5 days in early-season setups. These findings indicate that as warming intensifies, sensitivity will drive further phenological advancement in winter moth eggs, potentially overriding traditional day-length cues and facilitating in invaded ranges. Warming climates are also enabling range expansion of winter moth outbreaks into novel northern habitats, including Low Arctic shrub . On Norway's Varanger Peninsula, field surveys documented larval densities exceeding 100 per 10 branches up to 20 km into stands, with experimental enclosures confirming full life-cycle completion on native hosts like Salix . This northward push, first noted around 2017, correlates with a ~5-day per advancement in spring since 1991, likely improving hatching-budburst alignment and aiding wind-dispersed larvae in colonizing beyond boreal birch forests. Milder winters associated with climate change enhance overwintering egg survival by reducing cold-induced mortality (lethal below approx. –35 °C), thereby elevating outbreak risks in both native and invasive ranges. The species' trophic generalism—feeding on diverse deciduous hosts including oaks, birches, and willows—further bolsters resilience against phenological disruptions, allowing larvae to exploit variable budburst timings across plant species. A 2024 study modeling host-moth interactions demonstrated that this broad diet buffers against climate-induced asynchrony, maintaining larval performance even when primary hosts flush early. Recent research (2020–2025) emphasizes context-dependent abundance responses, where climate effects on winter moth populations vary by local habitat and host availability, with stronger positive impacts in shrub-dominated systems.

Management strategies

Biological control

Biological control efforts against the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) primarily rely on the introduction of specialist , supplemented by native predators and occasional activity. The key agent is the tachinid fly Cyzenis albicans, a larval native to . This fly was first introduced to in between 1954 and 1965, where it established successfully and achieved rates exceeding 70% by 1961, contributing to population declines. Releases expanded to the on in the 1970s, and in the 2000s to , with over 44 sites in , , , and receiving 700–2,000 flies annually starting in 2005; by 2020, establishment occurred at 41 sites from southeastern Connecticut to coastal Maine. In successful establishment sites, C. albicans parasitizes 50–80% of winter moth larvae, as females oviposit eggs on foliage that larvae consume, leading to internal development and host death. Native predators also play a role in suppression, particularly during vulnerable life stages; insectivorous and spiders prey on late-instar larvae, while ground-dwelling (such as staphylinids and carabids) and target pupae, exerting density-dependent mortality at low population levels. The efficacy of C. albicans has been substantial in treated areas; in , winter moth densities declined by over 90% from peaks of 100–500 pupae/m² to 0–10 pupae/m² by the late , rendering defoliation undetectable since 2016. This classical biological control has transitioned populations from outbreak to endemic levels without reliance on chemical interventions.

Chemical and integrated pest management

Chemical management for winter moth primarily focuses on targeting eggs and early larval stages to minimize defoliation in affected trees. Dormant horticultural oil sprays, applied at a 2-3% concentration to trunks and branches during late winter before bud swell, suffocate overwintering eggs by coating them and preventing gas exchange. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) var. kurstaki, a microbial , is highly effective against young caterpillars and should be applied at budbreak when larvae are actively feeding on emerging foliage; it disrupts their digestive system without harming beneficial insects. Spinosad, derived from the bacterium Saccharopolyspora spinosa, provides control for early larvae through contact and ingestion, acting on the , and is often combined with oils for enhanced efficacy in and settings. Cultural practices offer non-chemical alternatives to disrupt the winter moth . Wrapping trunks with sticky bands or burlap in late to early November physically blocks flightless females from ascending to lay eggs on branches, trapping them and reducing egg deposition; these barriers should be checked and cleaned periodically to maintain effectiveness. Raking and removing infested leaf litter in fall and spring can decrease pupal survival in the soil, as winter moth pupae overwinter just below the surface and are vulnerable to exposure or . Integrated pest management (IPM) for winter moth combines monitoring, cultural methods, and targeted treatments to achieve sustainable control while reducing reliance on broad-spectrum chemicals. -baited traps, deployed in late fall, monitor adult male flight and , enabling timely interventions; action thresholds typically involve treating when trap catches exceed 10-20 moths per site, depending on host tree value. In 2025, updates from the Extension and the Invasive Species Council of stressed early detection via these traps and surveys, advocating minimal chemical applications integrated with biological agents for long-term suppression in urban and forested areas.

References

  1. [1]
    Winter moth - Trees, insects, mites, and diseases of Canada's forests
    May 14, 2025 · Winter moth gets its common name as one of the few moths visibly active in late autumn and early winter in northern environments. It is the ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] BIOLOGY, SPREAD, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WINTER ...
    The winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.; Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is an inchworm caterpillar that hatches coincident with bud-break on its hosts and feeds on a ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    winter moth (Operophtera brumata (Linnaeus)) - Invasive.Org
    Superfamily: Geometroidea ; Family: Geometridae ; Subfamily: Larentiinae ; Tribe: Operophterini ; Genus: Operophtera.
  6. [6]
    The Genome of Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) Provides a ...
    The winter moth (Operophtera brumata) is an insect species that belongs to the order of Lepidoptera (butterflies, moths, and skippers). It is a member of ...
  7. [7]
    Brume - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    "Brume" originates from Old French and Latin, meaning "fog" or "winter," derived from Latin bruma for "winter solstice," linked to brevissima, ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Biology, Spread, and Biological Control of Winter Moth in the ...
    The winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.; Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is an inchworm caterpillar that hatches coincident with bud-break on its hosts and feeds on a ...
  10. [10]
    Operophtera brumata : Insect & Mite Guide - UMass Amherst
    The Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) has a light brown male moth and a gray, almost wingless female. The female lays eggs on bark, and the caterpillars damage ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  11. [11]
    Operophtera brumata (winter moth) | CABI Compendium
    The male moth has fully-developed wings and flies. Forewings are light brownish-grey; hind wings are paler, the wingspan is 22-28 mm. The eggs are 0.5 x 0.4 mm, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Winter Moth Operophtera - CT.gov
    Adult male winter moths are a grayish brown with a 1-inch wingspan (Fig. 2). They fly when air temperatures are above freezing and are frequently encountered ...Missing: morphology | Show results with:morphology
  13. [13]
    Winter Moth Identification & Management : Landscape
    Mar 3, 2017 · As they feed and increase in size, they are pale green with a faint white longitudinal stripe running down both sides of the body.Missing: length | Show results with:length
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Operophtera brumata - Stewardship Centre for BC
    RANGE/KNOWN DISTRIBUTION. Winter Moth is native to northern Europe and northern. Asia. Winter Moth was introduced to North America through Nova.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Biology, spread, and biological control of winter moth in the eastern ...
    albicans puparium inside winter moth pupa, C) adult Agrypon flaveolatum,. D ... Marsh, M. M. and R. W. Carlson 1979. Superfamily. Ichnuemonidae, pp 143 ...
  16. [16]
    (PDF) Biology, Spread, and Biological Control of Winter Moth in the ...
    Feb 27, 2019 · The winter moth, Operophtera brumata (L.) is a forest defoliator native to Europe and Asia that has become invasive in North America. In ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Annotated Bibliography - Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team
    Sep 9, 2010 · 2 The present study focused on three closely-related geometrid moth species, autumnal Epirrita autumnata, winter Operophtera brumata and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Winter Moth in Massachusetts: History and Biological Control
    Mar 3, 2017 · ... adult males of the species fly in the wintertime. The identification of this species as winter moth, Operophtera brumata L, was confirmed by ...Missing: morphology | Show results with:morphology<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Operophtera brumata - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Adult O. brumata emerge from November through January, and the wingless females oviposit toward the top of the first vertical object they encounter, usually a ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Detections Winter Moth Defoliation Attracted to Lights - UNH Extension
    Winter moth is an exotic defoliator from Europe that was first reported in Nova Scotia in the 1930s and eastern. Massachusetts in the late 1990s.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Serial invasions of the winter moth, Operophtera brumata, to North ...
    May 10, 2021 · After collection, adult moths were placed in glassine envelopes. (Uline Corporation) and stored at either – 20 or – 80°C, and larval.Missing: pupal | Show results with:pupal
  22. [22]
    WINTER MOTH Operophtera brumata - Maine.gov
    This insect is very closely related to the native Bruce spanworm, Operophtera bruceata. It is extremely difficult, (and impossible in the field), to tell the ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Winter moth Operophtera brumata - Nursery Management
    Jan 15, 2016 · Adult moths are light brown to tan and all four wings are fringed with small elongate scales that give the hind margins a hairy appearance.
  24. [24]
    Forest & Shade Tree – Insect & Disease Conditions for Maine
    Aug 25, 2025 · In Midcoast Maine, winter moth remains a persistent defoliator, occupying the same peninsulas from the greater Bath area to Deer Isle.
  25. [25]
    Asymmetric hybridization between non-native winter moth ...
    Nov 23, 2016 · This species is known to hybridize with O. bruceata, the Bruce spanworm, a native species across North America, although it is not known if ...
  26. [26]
    Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) - UMass Amherst
    Moths emerge from the soil usually in late November and may be active into January. The male moths are light brown to tan in color and all four wings are ...
  27. [27]
    Temperature has an overriding role compared to photoperiod in ...
    Mar 23, 2024 · In the winter moth (Operophtera brumata), seasonal timing of egg hatching is strongly affected by ambient temperature and has been under ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Winter Moth ( Operophtera brumata (L - Mass Audubon
    The Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata (L.)) Insect Order: Lepidoptera. Family: Geometridae. Origin: Winter moth is an insect pest that was introduced to North ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Defoliation by Winter Moth - a Pest New to the Pacific Northwest ...
    The first North American infestation was detected in 1949 in the southeastern coastal area of Nova Scotia. By 1964, this infestation had spread into the ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Winter Moth - Maine.gov
    The larvae of winter moth defoliate deciduous trees and shrubs in early spring. Trees heavily defoliated by winter moth for three or more years can exhibit ...Missing: umber | Show results with:umber
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Invasion spread of Operophtera brumata in northeastern United ...
    Bruce spanworm is ubiquitous but nearly always remains at low density, whereas winter moth is an outbreak species, presumably because it has escaped many of the ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Effects of Invasive Winter Moth Defoliation on Tree Radial Growth in ...
    Winter moth, Operophtera brumata L. (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), has been defoliating hardwood trees in eastern Massachusetts since the 1990s.
  33. [33]
    Invasion of Winter Moth in New England: Effects of Defoliation and ...
    In eastern Massachusetts, winter moth defoliation caused a reduction in radial growth of individual Q. rubra and Q. velutina Lam. trees [21]. Radial growth ...Missing: 2003-2015 | Show results with:2003-2015
  34. [34]
    Effects of elevated temperature on multi‐species interactions: the ...
    Feb 23, 2002 · The effects of temperature on the Oak–Winter Moth–Tit food chain were studied at Wytham Wood, Oxford, and experimentally in the controlled ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Impacts of Exotic Pests on Forest Ecosystems: An Update
    Mar 18, 2023 · Canopy herbivory and frass deposition from native insects can affect soil nutrient dynamics [59] and nutrient cycling [20], but invasions ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Biological Control Success Against Winter Moth in the Northeastern ...
    Escape from pupal predation as a potential cause of outbreaks of the winter moth, Operophtera brumata. Oikos 98: 219–228. Roland, J. 1994. After the decline ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Natural enemies (Winter moth) - NIAB
    Bacillus thuriengiensis is a pathogen of winter moth larvae but infections are normally associated with applications of the bacterium as a biological control ...Missing: fungal entomophthorales
  38. [38]
    Winter moth - AGES
    Mar 21, 2025 · Encourage and protect natural counterparts, such as predatory insects, spiders, ichneumon flies, birds. Use of glue rings from late October ...
  39. [39]
    Natural Controls for Winter Moth | Garden Foreplay
    Nov 8, 2011 · In late winter, dormant oil spray can be applied to branches to suffocate the eggs. In early spring, Bacillus thuringiensis a.k.a. BT, a ...
  40. [40]
    Winter Moth Treatment And Prevention Tips - Seacoast Tree Care
    Jun 23, 2023 · A non-chemical option for dealing with the winter moth in New England is tree banding. This involves placing a sticky band around the trunk of the tree in ...Missing: wrapping litter
  41. [41]
    Winter moth - Invasive Species Council of British Columbia
    They are considered a threat to sensitive Gary Oak ecosystems on Southern Vancouver Island and are occasional pests in cranberry bogs. Winter moth are ...
  42. [42]
    Cost–Benefit Analysis of Monitoring Insect Pests and Aerial ... - MDPI
    This research conducts a cost–benefit analysis of monitoring insect pests and use of insecticides for 5600 ha of managed pine forests.