Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wobbe index

The Wobbe index, also known as the Wobbe number, is a key parameter in gas engineering that quantifies the interchangeability of fuel gases such as natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and town gas by measuring the effective heat release through a fixed orifice or nozzle in combustion systems. It is defined as the ratio of the gas's higher (or lower) heating value to the square root of its specific gravity relative to air, with the formula WI = \frac{HV}{\sqrt{SG}}, where HV is the heating value in units like MJ/m³ or Btu/scf, and SG is the specific gravity. This metric accounts for both the energy content and density of the gas, ensuring consistent thermal input and combustion performance despite variations in gas composition. Developed in 1927 by Goffredo Wobbe, the index originated from studies on burner output, , and calorific value relationships, providing a standardized way to evaluate quality for industrial and residential applications. In practice, typical values for U.S. pipeline range from 1310 to 1390 Btu/scf, with pure at approximately 1363 Btu/scf, at 1739 Btu/scf, and at 2046 Btu/scf, highlighting how heavier hydrocarbons increase the index. For example, a gas with a heating value of 1000 Btu/cu.ft and specific gravity of 0.6 yields a Wobbe index of 1291 Btu/cu.ft. The importance of the Wobbe index lies in its role in maintaining and in gas-fired equipment, such as boilers, turbines, and engines, by minimizing the need for adjustments to air-fuel ratios when switching between gas sources like domestic and imported LNG. It is particularly critical for controlling emissions, as deviations can lead to incomplete , higher or levels, and equipment wear; specifications typically limit variations to within ±4-5% for interchangeability. Modern gas analyzers measure it in using techniques like catalytic and oxygen detection, achieving response times under 5 seconds and accuracies of ±0.1-0.5%. Overall, the Wobbe index serves as a primary indicator of quality in pipelines and distribution networks worldwide, supporting regulatory standards from bodies like the American Gas Association.

Definition and Fundamentals

Formula and Derivation

The Wobbe index (WI) is derived from the physical principles governing gas flow through a fixed orifice in burners, where the heat input to the appliance must remain consistent for safe and efficient operation despite variations in gas composition. Under steady-state, incompressible, and inviscid flow assumptions, Bernoulli's principle describes the relationship between pressure, velocity, and density in the gas stream. For a fixed upstream pressure drop \Delta p across the orifice, the volumetric flow rate \dot{V}_f of the fuel gas is given by \dot{V}_f = A_2 \sqrt{\frac{2 \Delta p}{\rho_f}}, where A_2 is the orifice area and \rho_f is the fuel gas density. The heat input rate \dot{q} is then \dot{q} = \dot{V}_f \cdot (H_v), where (H_v) is the calorific value of the gas. Substituting the flow rate expression yields \dot{q} = A_2 \sqrt{2 \Delta p} \cdot \frac{(H_v)}{\sqrt{\rho_f}}. Since \rho_f = sg_f \cdot \rho_{air} (with \rho_{air} constant), the heat input simplifies to \dot{q} \propto \frac{(H_v)}{\sqrt{sg_f}}, where sg_f is the specific gravity relative to air. Thus, the Wobbe index, defined as WI = \frac{(H_v)}{\sqrt{sg_f}}, provides a direct measure of the effective heat delivery through the orifice. The calorific value (H_v) in the formula may refer to either the higher (gross) heating value (HHV), which includes the of water vapor condensation, or the lower (net) heating value (LHV), excluding it; the choice depends on the application and used. Specific gravity sg_f is the ratio of the gas to that of dry air at the same and , typically under conditions like 15°C and 101.325 kPa. Common units for WI include /m³ () or BTU/ft³ (), matching those of (H_v), ensuring dimensional consistency in the derivation. To illustrate the calculation, consider a typical methane-dominated natural gas with a gross calorific value of 39 MJ/m³ and specific gravity of 0.6 relative to air. First, compute the square root of the specific gravity: \sqrt{0.6} \approx 0.7746. Then, divide the calorific value by this value: WI = \frac{39}{0.7746} \approx 50.4 MJ/m³. This example demonstrates how the formula balances energy content against flow resistance due to density, yielding a single metric for interchangeability assessment.

Variants and Units

The Wobbe index is defined in two primary variants: the higher Wobbe index (WI⁺ or WS), which uses the higher heating value (HHV) of the gas, and the lower Wobbe index (WI⁻ or Wi), which uses the lower heating value (LHV). The distinction arises because HHV includes the of from produced during , whereas LHV excludes it, assuming the vapor remains gaseous. For , this results in WI⁺ being approximately 10% higher than WI⁻, reflecting the typical HHV-LHV difference due to effects. Measurement units for the Wobbe index vary by region and . In systems, it is commonly expressed in megajoules per cubic meter (MJ/m³) or kilowatt-hours per cubic meter (kWh/m³), with 1 kWh/m³ equivalent to 3.6 MJ/m³. In imperial systems, British thermal units per (BTU/ft³) is . Conversion between units is straightforward, with 1 MJ/m³ ≈ 26.85 BTU/ft³. For non-ideal gases under high-pressure conditions, a modified Wobbe index accounts for deviations from ideal behavior by incorporating the compressibility factor Z into the relative density as d_r \approx SG \times (1 / Z) (assuming Z_{air} \approx 1), yielding WI = CV / \sqrt{d_r} \approx (CV / \sqrt{SG}) \times \sqrt{Z}. This adjustment, detailed in standards like ISO 6976, ensures accuracy in pipeline and combustion applications where compressibility impacts energy delivery. In practice, Wobbe indices are specified within tolerance bands to ensure gas interchangeability without affecting appliance performance. A deviation of ±5% from a nominal value is generally accepted as the threshold for full interchangeability, allowing minor compositional variations while maintaining consistent input and characteristics.

Historical Development

Invention and Early Use

The Wobbe index was invented in the by Goffredo Wobbe, an Italian engineer and physicist based in . Working on improving the efficiency of gas appliances, Wobbe sought to address the challenges posed by variations in town gas compositions, including and , which affected burner performance and required frequent redesigns for fuel substitution. His approach focused on creating a standardized metric that would enable consistent heat output from different gases without altering appliance hardware. Wobbe first detailed the index in a 1926 publication titled "La definizione della qualità del gas," appearing in the engineering L'industria del gas e degli acquedotti; this work, often attributed to in secondary sources, outlined the index as a key indicator for assessing interchangeability, emphasizing its role in predicting gas flow and energy through fixed orifices in burners. The concept derived from observations that burner heat release is proportional to the gas's calorific value and inversely related to the of its specific gravity. This early application helped combustion engineers and gas utilities compare fuel qualities and ensure appliance compatibility in regions reliant on variable synthetic gases.

Adoption in Gas Standards

Following , the Wobbe index became integral to the standardization of networks in , facilitating the expansion of interconnected systems amid growing demand for reliable fuel interchangeability. In the and , international and regional bodies began formalizing its use; for example, early national standards in countries like the incorporated Wobbe index bands to maintain consistent gas quality, with a narrow range for low-calorific gas from sources such as the field. The (ISO) advanced this through ISO 6976 (first edition 1983), which defined methods for calculating the Wobbe index from gas composition, while the (CEN) later embedded it in EN 437 (1993 onward) for classifying test gases by Wobbe ranges, such as Group H (45.7–54.7 MJ/m³). Key milestones marked broader institutional adoption. In , the American Gas Association () built on 1940s research in Bulletin 36 to evaluate fuel gas interchangeability, with the Wobbe index gaining use in standards by the late . By the late , ASTM D3588 (first published ) provided a standardized practice for Wobbe index calculations alongside heating value and , supporting operations across the continent. In Europe, Directive 2009/73/EC established a framework for the internal gas market, tasking CEN with harmonizing quality parameters by 2012; this indirectly reinforced the Wobbe index for cross-border trade, as differences in gas quality (including Wobbe values) could otherwise restrict flows, per accompanying Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 on network access. Recent efforts as of 2025 include proposals for wider Wobbe bands to accommodate blending in renewable gas transitions. Global variations emerged as the Wobbe index spread beyond and . In , adopted it within (JIS) for quality by the 1980s, aligning with LNG imports starting from 1969; for instance, maintained a specification of 45 ± MJ/m³ to ensure compatibility in urban distribution. These adaptations reflected regional needs, with JIS emphasizing precise calorific and controls for imported fuels. The Wobbe index's integration into standards profoundly impacted infrastructure, enabling the blending of (LNG) with domestic supplies without extensive retrofits. In the , (NTS) specifications adopted in the —during the network's construction and gas rollout—used a Wobbe band of 47.2–51.41 MJ/m³, allowing seamless transitions from town gas to while accommodating early LNG trials at sites like . This approach minimized appliance adjustments and supported efficient cross-network flows, setting a for modern blending operations.

Practical Applications

Ensuring Gas Interchangeability

The Wobbe index serves as a fundamental metric for verifying the interchangeability of fuel gases in appliances, particularly those equipped with fixed-orifice burners. Gases exhibiting similar Wobbe indices provide comparable input rates and characteristics, as the index accounts for both the calorific value and the gas's specific gravity, ensuring that the energy flow through the burner orifice remains consistent. This compatibility prevents operational issues such as incomplete , formation, lift, or flashback, which could arise from substituting one gas for another without adjustment. Testing protocols for gas interchangeability in burners often incorporate the Wobbe index as a primary parameter within established criteria, such as Weaver's indices developed for assessing substitution in domestic and . Weaver's criteria evaluate multiple factors, including , incomplete potential (limited to less than 0.48), and sooting tendency (below 0.60), with the Wobbe index forming the core measure of thermal input equivalence. Allowable deviations in the Wobbe index are typically constrained to 5-10% from the baseline gas composition to maintain safe performance across a range of , as determined through standardized tests involving and simulations. Practical examples of Wobbe index application include the substitution of propane-air mixtures for in residential heating systems, where blending propane at approximately 10% can adjust the index by about 6% to match the original gas's characteristics without requiring burner modifications. Similarly, in vehicle fuel conversions, the Wobbe index guides the adaptation of (CNG) and (LPG) systems, often necessitating air dilution of LPG to align its index with CNG for consistent engine performance and emissions control. From a safety perspective, maintaining Wobbe index similarity mitigates risks associated with over-firing (from higher-index gases), which can appliances through excessive , or under-firing (from lower-index gases), leading to inefficient and elevated carbon monoxide production. These safeguards are essential in end-use settings, where deviations beyond tolerated limits could result in hazardous conditions like incomplete fuel burnout or toxic emissions buildup.

Pipeline and Blending Operations

In pipeline transmission networks, the Wobbe Index (WI) is monitored in real-time to maintain consistent gas quality and ensure safe, efficient flow across interconnected systems. Online analyzers, such as gas chromatographs (e.g., ABB NGC8200 series) and optical monitors (e.g., MKS Precisive 5-282), provide continuous composition analysis, enabling WI calculations at key points like compressor stations and entry/exit interfaces. These devices detect deviations from specified bands, such as 37.6–44.4 MJ/m³ for low-calorific (L-gas) networks in , allowing operators to respond promptly and avoid disruptions. Blending operations rely on WI to integrate diverse gas sources, particularly when incorporating (LNG) into existing pipelines. Operators adjust blends by injecting to increase WI (raising heating value) or to decrease it (lowering ), ensuring the final mixture falls within tariff specifications. In the United States, interstate pipelines under (FERC) oversight maintain WI variations within ±4% of historical averages through such strategies, facilitating LNG send-out without compromising network integrity. In Europe's GRTgaz network, plays a critical role in managing cross-border flows, where agreements enforce quality parameters to prevent mismatches between national grids. With increased reliance on LNG and imports following reductions in supplies, operators have emphasized blending and real-time monitoring to manage potential WI variations and sustain transmission flows. Effective control yields economic benefits by optimizing operations and avoiding penalties. Stable WI reduces the need for frequent adjustments at turbine-driven stations, where gas shifts can alter and requirements, thereby lowering and costs. Additionally, prevents tariff penalties for out-of-specification gas, which pipelines may impose or reject under regulatory s, ensuring reliable revenue streams for transporters. As of , advancements in AI-driven have further enhanced predictive blending for volatile supply conditions.

Typical Values and Specifications

Wobbe Indices for Common Gases

The Wobbe indices for common fuel gases serve as reference points for assessing their delivery characteristics in applications. These values are calculated under standard conditions (typically 0°C and 1 for measurements) and vary slightly based on reference temperatures for heating values. Representative data for pure components and typical mixtures are provided below, focusing on higher (WI⁺) and lower (WI⁻) variants. The higher Wobbe index (WI⁺) employs the higher heating value (HHV), accounting for latent heat of condensation, while the lower Wobbe index (WI⁻) uses the lower heating value (LHV), excluding this heat.
GasHHV (MJ/Nm³)SG (relative to air)WI⁺ (MJ/Nm³)WI⁻ (MJ/Nm³)
12.80.07048.340.7
39.90.55353.348.0
70.01.0568.362.5
1011.5581.274.6
Natural Gas (typical)38–400.58–0.6048–5644–51
In town gas mixtures, derived from , impurities such as CO₂ (specific gravity 1.52) and N₂ (specific gravity 0.97) lower the Wobbe index by diluting the heating value of combustible components like H₂, CH₄, and , without significantly altering the overall specific gravity. Typical town gas compositions include 5–10% CO₂ and 2–10% N₂, resulting in WI⁺ values around 45–50 MJ/Nm³, compared to purer gases. High-Wobbe gases (H-gas), often from richer sources with higher C₂+ content, exhibit WI⁺ values typically in the 49–55 MJ/Nm³ range, enabling efficient delivery in high-pressure pipelines. In contrast, low-Wobbe gases (L-gas), associated with leaner or manufactured sources like reformed gases, fall in the 43–49 MJ/Nm³ range, reflecting lower and requiring separate distribution networks in some regions. For calculation verification, consider a sample blend of 95% CH₄ and 5% C₂H₆. The volumetric blend yields an HHV of approximately 41.0 /Nm³ and SG of 0.57, resulting in a WI⁺ of about 54.3 /Nm³, consistent with component-based computations from standard gas property data.

Regional and Compositional Variations

In , is classified into high-calorific (H-gas) and low-calorific (L-gas) categories based on Wobbe index ranges to ensure compatibility with transmission and distribution networks. H-gas, typically sourced from fields, maintains a Wobbe index of 49.9–55.7 /Nm³, reflecting its higher methane content and lower inert fractions. In contrast, L-gas from the field in the operates at 43.46–44.41 /Nm³ due to elevated levels (around 14%), which lower the effective calorific value. The EN 437 specifies test gas ranges for appliances, with group H gases covering 45.7–54.7 /m³ to accommodate these variations while ensuring safe combustion performance. In , particularly the , pipeline typically exhibits a Wobbe index of 1,310–1,390 BTU/scf (approximately 49–52 MJ/m³), aligning with higher purity in domestic supplies. This range supports interchangeability across vast networks, but variations arise from source differences: from regions like the Marcellus or Permian basins tends toward the lower end due to its lean composition with minimal and , while imported (LNG) from sources like can push the index higher by up to 7.5% owing to richer profiles. Compositional differences significantly influence Wobbe index values across global sources. Middle Eastern natural gases, such as those from or the UAE, often contain higher concentrations (up to 10–15 mol%), which elevate the Wobbe index above /m³ by increasing both heating value and . Conversely, admixtures in renewable-natural gas blends lower the index due to high CO₂ content (typically 30–50 vol% in raw ), reducing the effective heating value; upgrading processes, such as amine-based CO₂ removal, are essential to raise the index to standards of at least /m³. Looking ahead, European hydrogen blending initiatives aim to integrate up to 10% by volume by 2030, with potential extensions to 20% post-2030, while maintaining Wobbe index compatibility through adjustments like addition to counteract 's lower and heating value impact. These targets, outlined in gas quality recommendations, prioritize network stability amid decarbonization goals.

Limitations and Alternatives

Key Shortcomings

One primary limitation of the Wobbe index (WI) is its insensitivity to key combustion properties beyond energy delivery, such as , ignition energy, and formation potential. While WI effectively measures the heat input through the ratio of calorific value to the square root of , it does not account for variations in flame propagation characteristics that can lead to operational issues like flashback or incomplete in . For instance, gases with high olefin content may match WI specifications but produce excessive due to their tendency to form carbon-rich residues during burning, potentially burners or increasing particulate emissions. This overemphasis on density and calorific value in the WI formula can mask differences in laminar burning velocities, particularly when comparing fuels like and . Although syngas-natural gas blends may have similar WI values, syngas's higher content results in significantly faster burning velocities, leading to risks such as lifting or oscillations in systems. To address this, supplementary indices like the Schuster index—defined as WI divided by laminar burning velocity—have been proposed to better capture these discrepancies, highlighting WI's inadequacy as a standalone metric for interchangeability in high-performance applications like gas turbines. Practical implementations have revealed further shortcomings with biogas integration, where impurities like (H₂S) or residual moisture can alter combustion dynamics, promote corrosion, or disrupt flame stability even when WI limits are met. Such contaminants underscore WI's focus on physical energy metrics at the expense of chemical purity assessments. Additionally, the WI exhibits environmental gaps by neglecting (GHG) emissions profiles and toxicity risks, which are critical in renewable gas transitions. It provides no insight into lifecycle CO₂ equivalents or the presence of toxic compounds like H₂S in , limiting its utility for evaluating in blends with or biomethane where emission reductions are prioritized over mere energy equivalence. This omission complicates regulatory compliance in decarbonization efforts, as WI-matched gases may differ substantially in their net environmental impact.

Complementary Metrics

The methane number (MN) serves as a key complementary metric to the (WI), quantifying the anti-knock properties of gaseous s in spark-ignition engines by rating their resistance to auto-ignition under compression, analogous to the octane number for liquid fuels. Unlike WI, which primarily ensures consistent heat input and burner performance, MN addresses combustion stability and engine durability, particularly for fuels with higher hydrocarbons or additives that promote knocking; for instance, pure has an MN of 100, while pure has an MN of approximately 43. In (CNG) vehicle applications, MN is essential alongside WI to prevent efficiency losses or damage, with standards like those from the requiring MN ≥ 70 for reliable operation. Assessment methods, such as those developed by the Gas Technology Institute, integrate WI with detailed compositional analysis—including content, which can lower MN—to evaluate overall fuel suitability for engines. Interchangeability indices like the X-factor and Z-factor extend WI by incorporating combustion dynamics for precise burner evaluations, mitigating WI's limitations in predicting flame stability and emissions. The X-factor measures the ratio of to rate, influencing ignition and lift-off in premix burners, while the Z-factor assesses the completeness of through the ratio of actual to stoichiometric air requirements, helping quantify incomplete burning risks for varied gas compositions. These factors are applied in standards testing, such as those for domestic appliances, where WI sets the baseline energy equivalence, but X- and Z-factors ensure safe operation by limiting deviations that could cause sooting or flashback; for example, gases with high content may require Z-factor adjustments to maintain efficiency above 95%. Advanced analytical tools enhance WI accuracy by providing detailed compositional insights beyond its aggregate nature. (GC) enables full breakdown of components—such as , , and inert gases—to compute WI precisely, supporting and with uncertainties below 0.5% for heating value derivations. Optical sensors, including fiber-enhanced and analyzers, offer real-time WI monitoring without physical sampling, detecting multiple species simultaneously for dynamic pipeline adjustments; these systems also account for humidity effects by integrating moisture measurements, as can alter effective and calorific value by up to 2% in humid conditions. As of 2024, standards for hydrogen- blends emphasize alongside additional metrics to manage safety and performance, with EU Regulation 2024/1789 limiting blends to 2% mol H₂ for grid injection to address sensitivity to 's lower and higher . Guidelines from organizations like Marcogaz specify that blends must maintain within ±5% of base to ensure appliance compatibility, often requiring content limits and complementary indices like potential to prevent instability. For instance, a 20% blend reduces by approximately 4-6%, but such levels exceed current grid limits and necessitate real-time monitoring to avoid exceeding interchangeability thresholds in existing networks. In 2025, regulatory updates in reduced the lower WI limit to 46.5 MJ/m³ at select entry points effective April 6, facilitating integration of varied gas sources like biomethane while maintaining interchangeability.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The Wobbe Index and Natural Gas Interchangeability
    The Wobbe Index is actually the correct representa- tion of the heating value of natural gas arriving, from the gas line, at the orifice where a burner is ...
  2. [2]
    Natural Gas Quality - DieselNet
    Wobbe index is a measure of rate of thermal input through a fixed orifice or nozzle in a stationary burner. It is the primary measure used to assess the ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Wobbe Index and Calorimeters - Hobré Solutions
    Wobbe Index: The Wobbe Index (WI) is the main indicator of the interchangeability of fuel gases and is frequently defined in the specifications of gas supply ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Implications of Increased Renewable Natural Gas on Appliance ...
    By using the. Wobbe Index definition, the flow from the fuel orifices of the appliances can easily be calculated. Due to the similarity in Wobbe Index ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6976
    Aug 15, 2016 · relative density, gross Wobbe index and net Wobbe index of natural gases, natural gas substitutes and other combustible gaseous fuels, when ...
  6. [6]
    Learn About Natural Gas - Enbridge Gas
    Specific Gravity, 0.58, 0.57 - 0.59. Gross Heating Value (MJ/m3), dry basis *, 38.9, 38.5 - 39.3. Wobbe Number (MJ/m3), 50.9, 50.7 - 51.3. * The gross heating ...
  7. [7]
    Wobbe Index – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis
    The Wobbe Index is a measure of the interchangeability of different fuels in gaseous form, indicating the changes required to the fuel system.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Technical Statement on Commercial Natural Gas in CNG- and LNG
    Similar to LHV and HHV, the Wobbe Index can be expressed as either net or gross; whereby the Net Wobbe Index is determined by the LHV normalized by the square ...
  9. [9]
    GLOSSARY AND CONVENTIONS | Coal: Energy for the Future
    The difference is smallest for coal (where LHV is roughly 4 percent less than HHV) and greatest for natural gas (where LHV is about 10 percent lower).<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Heating Value and Wobbe Index Measurement in Natural Gas for ...
    Wobbe index is calculated from heating value and specific density, according ISO EN 6976-2005. Both configurations are only suitable for analysis of natural ...Missing: formula derivation basis
  11. [11]
    Convert Megajoule/cubic Meter to Btu (IT)/cubic Foot - Unit Converter
    Megajoule/cubic Meter to Btu (IT)/cubic Foot Conversion Table ; 1 megajoule/cubic meter, 26.8391919932 Btu/ft^3 ; 2 megajoule/cubic meter, 53.6783839864 Btu/ft^3.Missing: Wobbe index
  12. [12]
    Recent progresses in H2NG blends use downstream Power-to-Gas ...
    Jan 2, 2024 · In Table 4 the volumetric LHV, the relative density and the Wobbe index values associated to eight different natural gas compositions have been ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] gas quality: how it impacts questar gas - PSCdocs
    Oct 13, 2004 · most common interchangeability metric. • Gas is generally considered interchangeable when the. Wobbe number lies within a +/- 5% tolerance band.
  14. [14]
    What is the unit called a Wobbe number? - Sizes
    Nov 5, 2020 · The Wobbe number is named for the Italian engineer Goffredo Wobbe, who in 1926 published a paper³ defining a measure of fuel gas “quality”, with ...Missing: invention history
  15. [15]
    Introduction to natural gas: A comparative study of its storage, fuel ...
    This paper discusses the science of natural gas, its composition and ways to determine and coherently express its physical and chemical properties.
  16. [16]
    0604gasinterchangeabilitystaffpa...
    Goffredo Wobbe.37 English translations of Wobbe's original work are rare, but his work was quickly adopted by practical combustion investigators because of
  17. [17]
    evolution of the gas industry
    Feb 2, 1977 · standpoint the development of Dutch natural gas in the 1960s and 1970s must ... WOBBE INDEX The gross calorific value of the gas divided by ...
  18. [18]
    CEN - EN 437 - Test gases - Test pressures - Appliance categories
    Apr 1, 2021 · The document makes recommendations for the use of the gases and pressures to be applied for the tests of appliances burning gaseous fuels. NOTE ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Guidebook to Gas Interchangeability and Gas Quality
    (LHV, same as Net Calorific Value where the heat of vaporisation is not ... which may be sensitive to rate of change of Wobbe Index. Network modelling ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Can the current EU regulatory framework deliver decarbonisation of ...
    Jun 1, 2020 · Trading of gas is based on energy content, but the physical gas quality (calorific value, Wobbe Index value, percentage of other gases such as ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Lessons Learnt: Past Energy Transitions in the Gas Industry
    The LPG was mixed with air to give it the same Wobbe Index as natural gas. (Anon 1968). 5.7.1 The industrial conversion process. Early on, the conversion ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Fuel Interchangeability Considerations for Gas Turbine Combustion
    Interchangeability Factors. Wobbe Index. The Wobbe index is a single index parameter that by itself is a measure of the heat input of a fuel to a given burner ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    CNG vs LPG - Difference and Comparison - Diffen
    Only gases that have the same Wobbe index are interchangeable. For LPG to have the same Wobbe index as CNG, it has to be mixed with air.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] united states of america - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    These interim guidelines provide for: (1) use of the local average historical Wobbe Index average with an allowable range of variation of plus or minus four ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  26. [26]
    Natural Gas Chromatographs - ABB
    The NGC 8200 series represents the most rugged, economical, versatile, and high-precision on-line gas chromatographs in the industry.N2 to C6+ NGC8206 · N2 to C6+ Portable NGC8206 · C6+ to C9+ NGC8209
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Precisive® 5-282 Natural Gas Calorific Value/Wobbe Index Monitor
    the Precisive® 5-282 is designed specifically for on-line quality monitoring of natural gas products. it provides fast and accurate measurement of calorific ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures ... - EUR-Lex
    Jun 14, 2018 · Wobbe index, Gas ... (a) No specific limits that apply network wide, normally within the range of 36,9 MJ/m3 and 42,3 MJ/m3 but the Wobbe Index ...Missing: m³ | Show results with:m³
  29. [29]
    [PDF] GHG Emissions from LNG Operations - API.org
    Conversely, to decrease natural gas heating value, nitrogen can be injected. Blending different gas or regasified LNG streams can also lead to adjustment of the ...
  30. [30]
    Gas Turbine Efficiency Boosting by Real-Time Gas Analysis
    Most modern turbines can only withstand variations of ± 5% in Wobbe Index, which has fast and significant variations in premixed mode of combustion. Therefore, ...
  31. [31]
    Fuel Gases - Wobbe Index - The Engineering ToolBox
    Wobbe index for fuel gases like propane, butane, methane and more. ; Natural Gas, 12,837, 11,597 ; Propane, 19,376, 17,814 ; Propylene, 18,413, 17,180 ; n-Butane ...
  32. [32]
    Wobbe index - chemeurope.com
    In details, the above equation can be translated into Wobbe Index = higher heating value/(square root of gas specific gravity). The Wobbe Index is used to ...Missing: physical input burner orifice
  33. [33]
    Wobbe Index - Neutrium
    Feb 9, 2016 · Wobbe Index Values for Common Fuels ; Ethane, 63.6, 1708 ; Propane, 74.8, 2008 ; Butane, 84.4, 2266 ; Pentane, 92.5, 2482.
  34. [34]
    Coal_gas
    ### Summary of Town Gas Composition, Wobbe Index, and Effects of Impurities
  35. [35]
    Gas quality and metering - Gasunie Transport Services
    GTS is transporting, in separate transmission networks, two different qualities of gas: high-calorific gas (H- gas ) and low-calorific gas (L- gas ).
  36. [36]
    [PDF] GAS_QUALITY_Wobbe_Index_i...
    Mar 31, 2014 · In order to compare practical experiences with existing Wobbe Index ranges as proposed by. EASEEgas and CEN TC 234 WG 11 the European Commission ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] decarbonisation options for the dutch onshore gas and oil industry
    Oct 11, 2022 · The L-gas has a Wobbe index in the range of 43.46 – 44.41 MJ/Nm3 whereas the. Wobbe index for H-gas is in the range of 49.9 – 55.7 MJ/Nm3 (IEA ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] D4.3 – considerations on test gases and appliance standards ...
    May 31, 2023 · group H Defined by EN 437 as a specified range of Wobbe indices within that of the 2nd family (natural gases) going from 45,7 up to 54,7 MJ:m³ ...
  39. [39]
    Meeting Gas Quality Challenges - Power Engineering
    May 1, 2008 · Once tuned to a particular number, most turbines can tolerate only a 4 percent to 5 percent Wobbe Index shift without affecting operations.Missing: bands | Show results with:bands
  40. [40]
    Experimental Study of Biogas–Hydrogen Mixtures Combustion in ...
    Jul 15, 2021 · As expected, the Wobbe Index lowers as carbon dioxide is blended into natural gas (Figure 4a). ... Wobbe Index analysis of biogas and biogas– ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Principles for EU Gas Qualities, handling of hydrogen and CO
    Apr 29, 2020 · Differentiation between Wobbe Index range at entry and exit ... • Recommendation to set an EU wide target of 10% by 2030 and 20% beyond in.
  42. [42]
    How natural-gas fuel variability impacts GT operation
    There is a relationship between some of these operability issues and Wobbe Index—for example, higher ethane and propane contents in fuel leads to a higher fuel ...
  43. [43]
    Gas Characteristic - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    An increased higher hydrocarbon content could lead to combustion problems such as increased carbon monoxide emissions, soot formation, engine knock or ...
  44. [44]
    Substitution of Natural Gas by Biomethane: Operational Aspects in ...
    Jan 11, 2023 · This study describes a gas quality analysis with regard to the use of biomethane in industrial equipment, mixed or not mixed with NG.
  45. [45]
    Biogas impurities: environmental and health implications, removal ...
    For example, according to the Wobbe index, the calorific value of biogas with 70% and 100% methane and biomethane content yields 21.5 and 35.8 MJ/Nm3, ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Combustion Optimisation using Methane Number and Wobbe Index ...
    High numbers of MN means high efficiency and hence lower CO2. If MN is too low, knock can cause damage or loss in efficiency and performance.Missing: complement | Show results with:complement
  47. [47]
    Calculated methane number and Wobbe index for the original gas...
    This combination satisfies the Euromot standards for a methane number of 70.0 or more and a Wobbe index ranging from 49 to 52.7 MJ/m 3 . ... Influence of ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Formulas and graphs for representing the interchangeability of fuel ...
    F= a factor used in computing flame speed S. H = heating value of gas in Btu per cubicfoot. I = "input", or rate at which heat is produced.
  49. [49]
    Assessment of the interchangeability of coal-biomass syngas with ...
    Aug 1, 2023 · This study assesses syngas-natural gas interchangeability in atmospheric burners via the combustion potential and the corrected Wobbe index ...
  50. [50]
    (PDF) Effect of various gas compositions on gas interchangeability ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The applicability of Weaver and AGA index on the CO emission prediction was also analyzed. ... CO emission was found to be increasing with ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    Monitoring the Wobbe Index of Natural Gas Using Fiber-Enhanced ...
    The Wobbe index is used as a measure for the interchangeability of fuel gases and indicates their combustion energy. Currently, Fourier transform infrared ...Missing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Hydrogen quality for blending with natural gas - Marcogaz
    Jun 9, 2022 · Note 1: Calorific Value and Wobbe index are set for the real dry gas at ISO reference conditions of 15°C (combustion) and 15 °C and 101,325 kPa ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Admissible hydrogen concentrations in natural gas systems - Gerg
    The W range is 13.8 kWh/m3-15.4 kWh/m3 for the gases without hydrogen admixture and 13.5-15.0 kWh/m3 if 10 % hydrogen is admixed (Wobbe index reference.