Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

20 July plot

The 20 July plot was a failed assassination attempt against orchestrated by senior German military officers on 20 July 1944 at his headquarters in Rastenburg, (now , ). Colonel Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, who had initially supported the Nazi regime but grew disillusioned amid mounting military defeats, placed a in a during a briefing; the explosion killed four others but only wounded Hitler due to a shifted table and sturdy construction of the room. Codename , the plot repurposed an existing emergency plan for mobilizing the Reserve Army to secure government functions, with the aim of arresting Nazi leaders like and , installing a new administration under figures such as as chancellor and General as head of state, and negotiating an armistice with the Western Allies to avert total defeat and . The conspirators, drawn from conservative nationalist circles within the and civil service rather than broad ideological opposition, sought to preserve core German territorial gains from earlier wars while ending the conflict that had turned disastrous after Stalingrad and ; their motivations stemmed primarily from pragmatic recognition of inevitable loss under Hitler's absolute control, not uniform moral revulsion against Nazi crimes, though some like cited ethical qualms in private. Hitler's survival, confirmed via radio to co-conspirators in who hesitated to launch the coup, triggered immediate purges: and key allies were shot that evening, while the executed over 7,000 suspects in show trials and torture-extracted confessions, decimating internal dissent but failing to alter the war's trajectory toward Germany's collapse ten months later. , the plotters were rehabilitated in as symbols of moral resistance, though historical scrutiny reveals their earlier complicity in the regime's conquests and limited focus on racial policies, reflecting a selective that overlooks the broader elite's initial alignment with Hitler's . The event underscored the regime's and control, yet highlighted fractures in loyalty driven by strategic desperation rather than principled overthrow from inception.

Historical Context

Development of German Military Resistance

The opposition within the German military to Adolf Hitler's leadership emerged primarily among senior conservative officers rooted in the Prussian military tradition, who initially tolerated the Nazi regime's rearmament efforts but grew alarmed by its reckless expansionism and subordination of the armed forces to political control. In 1937, General , Chief of the Army General Staff since 1935, resisted Hitler's directives for invading , deeming the timing premature and strategically unwise. This tension escalated in 1938 amid preparations for the invasion of ; Beck warned that such aggression risked a could not sustain, authoring memoranda to high command leaders and urging a collective resignation of generals to force Hitler to reconsider, an effort that failed due to lack of unified support. Beck formally resigned on August 1, 1938, becoming the symbolic leader of nascent military resistance, forging links with civilian conservatives like Carl Goerdeler and participating in early coup planning, including a aborted 1938 scheme by officer to arrest Hitler during the Sudeten crisis. Parallel networks formed within the , Germany's military intelligence agency, where Oster, appointed deputy chief in 1937 under , leveraged the organization's autonomy to shield opponents, leak information to Allies, and facilitate early plots; Oster's anti-Nazi stance solidified after the 1934 , viewing the regime as a threat to military professionalism and ethical conduct. Concurrently, commanders like , Beck's ally and predecessor as , faced via fabricated homosexuality charges in 1938, further eroding trust in Hitler's reliability and highlighting the regime's use of blackmail against disloyal officers. These pre-war stirrings reflected not outright ideological rejection of —many officers shared nationalist aims—but pragmatic concerns over Hitler's amateurish strategy and the erosion of Kadavergehorsam (blind obedience) in favor of personal loyalty to the . The invasion of the on June 22, 1941, marked a turning point, as mounting defeats exposed Hitler's strategic errors, galvanizing field commanders into active subversion. Henning von Tresckow, chief of staff to Army Group Center under Fedor von Bock, emerged as the pivotal organizer on the Eastern Front from late 1941, recruiting officers disillusioned by atrocities and logistical failures while coordinating with Beck and Oster for bomb plots, including a failed March 13, 1943, attempt to destroy Hitler's plane using smuggled British explosives procured via channels. Tresckow's network emphasized pragmatic motives—averting national catastrophe—over moral outrage at , though some members aided covertly; by 1943, as Stalingrad's surrender in February signaled irreversible decline, he consolidated ties between Eastern Front resisters and plotters, advocating tyrannicide as a duty to preserve Germany's honor. The 's protective role waned after Canaris's dismissal in February 1944, but military dissent had evolved into a loose coalition, culminating in the adaptation of contingency plans like for regime overthrow, driven by the Allies' refusal to negotiate and the Wehrmacht's collapse on multiple fronts.

Strategic Situation on the Eastern and Western Fronts in 1944

On the Eastern Front, the Wehrmacht confronted escalating Soviet offensives that shattered its defensive posture in mid-1944. Following earlier setbacks at Stalingrad and Kursk, the Red Army initiated Operation Bagration on June 22, 1944, a massive assault involving over 1.6 million Soviet troops, 5,800 tanks, and 5,300 aircraft against German Army Group Center. This operation, executed across Belarus, inflicted approximately 390,000 German casualties—including killed, wounded, and captured—within nine weeks, effectively annihilating 28 of 34 divisions in Army Group Center and enabling Soviet advances of up to 350 miles. By late July 1944, Soviet forces had overrun Minsk on July 3 and pushed toward the Polish border, forcing the remnants of German forces to retreat to the borders of East Prussia and the Reich itself, with reserves critically depleted and unable to reconstitute coherent defenses. The scale of these losses—surpassing those at Stalingrad—stemmed from intelligence failures, Hitler's prohibition on tactical withdrawals, and the Soviet exploitation of numerical superiority in manpower and armor, which overwhelmed positions through deep penetrations and encirclements. morale plummeted as divisions were reduced to strength, supply lines stretched beyond capacity, and the prospect of a Soviet into the heartland loomed, compelling field commanders to question the feasibility of prolonged resistance without political capitulation. On the Western Front, the Allied invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944—codenamed —involved 156,000 troops landing across five beaches, rapidly expanding into a lodgment despite German counterattacks led by Field Marshal . By July 20, 1944, the front had stabilized into grueling hedgerow combat in the region, where American, British, and Canadian forces numbered over 1 million supported by air supremacy, while German defenders under Rommel (wounded June 17) and successor committed 38 divisions but suffered from divided command and inadequate reinforcements diverted from the East. Allied forces had captured harbor by late June and partially secured , inflicting mounting attrition on German units, with total casualties in reaching toward 290,000 by campaign's end, including over 200,000 captured. Hitler's directive to hold fixed positions, coupled with V-1 and V-2 reprisals failing to disrupt Allied logistics, strained German resources as panzer divisions were mauled in futile counteroffensives like the one at , foreshadowing the breakout on July 25 that would liberate much of . This convergence of Allied momentum—bolstered by 12,000 aircraft and overwhelming —exposed the Reich's vulnerability to invasion from the , mirroring Eastern collapses and amplifying perceptions among senior officers of an imminent total defeat absent leadership change.

Key Participants and Motivations

Central Figures and Their Backgrounds

Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, the officer who carried out the assassination attempt on 20 July 1944, was born on 15 November 1907 into a Catholic noble family in Jettingen, Bavaria. He entered the Reichswehr as a lieutenant in 1926 after training at cadet schools in Schliechersee and Bamberg, and advanced through staff positions, including service in the 17th Cavalry Regiment. Stauffenberg saw combat in the 1939 invasion of Poland with the 6th Panzer Division and in the 1940 Western campaign, where he received the Iron Cross First Class on 31 May 1940 for his role in operations against French forces. Transferred to North Africa in 1942 as operations officer for the 10th Panzer Division under Rommel, he was severely wounded on 7 April 1943 by Allied aircraft, losing his left eye, right hand, and two fingers on his left hand, which ended his frontline duties but did not halt his career ascent. By June 1944, he served as chief of staff to the Replacement Army commander, General Friedrich Fromm, granting him access to Hitler and positioning him centrally in resistance planning. Ludwig Beck, designated as the interim head of state in the plotters' post-assassination government, was born on 29 June 1880 in Riesadorf, , and began his military service as a cadet in the in March 1888. A career staff officer, he commanded infantry regiments during and rose in the , becoming Chief of the Army General Staff on 1 September 1935. Beck resigned on 18 August 1938 in protest against Hitler's aggressive foreign policy, particularly the planned invasion of , viewing it as risking a premature could not win. Post-resignation, he coordinated civilian-military opposition networks, authoring memoranda warning of Nazi overreach and maintaining contacts with foreign diplomats to advocate for a negotiated peace. Henning von Tresckow, a chief architect of earlier assassination schemes that informed the July plot, was born on 11 October 1901 into a Prussian family and commissioned as a lieutenant in the infantry in 1924. He served on the Eastern Front from 1941 as operations officer for Army Group Center under , organizing multiple failed attempts on Hitler's life, including a March 1943 bomb plot disguised as liquor bottles. Tresckow's influence extended to recruiting and adapting for a coup, leveraging his staff expertise to build a network among officers disillusioned by defeats at Stalingrad and . Transferred to counter-espionage duties after suspicions arose, he committed on 21 July 1944 near to evade capture. Field Marshal , slated to command the post-coup, was born on 4 December 1881 in Breslau and joined the as a in the 7th Grenadier Regiment on 23 March 1901. A veteran who commanded a regiment by 1918, he retained his commission in the reduced , advancing to command I Military District in 1930 and the 2nd Infantry Division. Promoted to field marshal on 19 July 1940 after leading Army Group D's occupation forces in , Witzleben grew antagonistic toward Hitler over strategic blunders and the Night of the Long Knives, joining the resistance by 1938 and coordinating with . Retired in 1942 but recalled for plot logistics, he was arrested after the failure. Carl Friedrich Goerdeler, a civilian counterpart envisioned as chancellor, was born on 31 July 1884 in Neidenburg, , and pursued a career, becoming of in 1920 and in 1930. Appointed Reich Price Commissioner in 1931 under Chancellor , he continued under the Nazis until resigning in 1935 over economic policy disputes and opposition to rearmament's inflationary risks. Goerdeler traveled abroad from 1937, leaking intelligence on Nazi intentions to and contacts while drafting post-Hitler constitutional plans emphasizing and anti-totalitarianism, though his conservative monarchist views clashed with some military plotters.

Ideological and Personal Drivers

The conspirators in the 20 July plot were driven by a combination of ideological opposition to Nazi totalitarianism and personal experiences of the regime's failures and moral depravities. Many, including Claus von Stauffenberg and Ludwig Beck, initially aligned with Hitler's early nationalist and anti-Versailles policies but grew disillusioned by the regime's unchecked power, corruption, and deviation from traditional German conservative values such as the rule of law, military honor, and Christian ethics. Their resistance emphasized restoring a post-Hitler order that prioritized national survival over ideological purity, often envisioning an authoritarian but non-totalitarian government—potentially under a restored monarchy or military dictatorship—rather than liberal democracy. This stance reflected a patriotic imperative to avert Germany's complete destruction, influenced by strategic realism amid mounting defeats on the Eastern Front after Stalingrad in February 1943 and the Allied invasion of Normandy on 6 June 1944. Ideologically, figures like Carl Goerdeler opposed the Nazis' racial extremism and anti-Semitic policies, viewing them as antithetical to civilized governance and economically ruinous, though their primary focus was salvaging German sovereignty through honorable negotiations with the Western Allies while continuing resistance against the . , who resigned as on 18 1938 over Hitler's aggressive plans for , saw the Führer's leadership as a path to national suicide, prioritizing professional military judgment and constitutional principles over absolutism. Christian influences were prominent, particularly among Catholic and Protestant circles; Stauffenberg's exposure to the Kreisau Circle's ethical discussions reinforced a duty to act against the regime's program (, initiated in 1939) and SS atrocities, framing resistance as rooted in rather than . On a personal level, Stauffenberg's transformation was catalyzed by his severe wounding in on 7 April 1943—losing his left eye, right hand, and two fingers on his left hand—which deepened his contempt for Hitler's strategic incompetence and the Wehrmacht's subjugation to party ideologues. Influenced by his brothers and wife , who shared anti-Nazi sentiments, he rejected the regime after witnessing Eastern Front brutalities and internal purges, declaring in that "the system as a whole must be destroyed" to rebuild ethically. Beck's personal driver stemmed from principled isolation after resignation, collaborating with Goerdeler to network conservative elites disillusioned by the Night of the Long Knives in June 1934 and the SS's rise, viewing inaction as complicity in catastrophe. Goerdeler's global travels as price commissioner exposed him to the regime's economic mismanagement and diplomatic isolation, fueling a personal crusade against Hitler's "criminal folly" by 1941. These drivers converged in a resolve for , justified not by abstract but by causal necessity: removing Hitler to enable a coup that could activate and sue for peace before became inevitable.

Planning and Preparation

Adaptation of Operation Valkyrie

, originally designated Unternehmen Walküre, was a developed by the High Command to enable the Reserve Army to suppress internal disturbances, such as potential uprisings by foreign forced laborers or breakdowns in civil order resulting from Allied bombing campaigns; had personally approved the plan to ensure functions during such crises. Conspirators within the German military resistance, recognizing the plan's potential for rapid mobilization of forces under army control, began modifying it in 1943 to serve as the framework for a following Hitler's assassination. General , deputy commander of the Reserve Army, initiated revisions to expand the plan's scope, which Colonel further developed in August and September 1943 by drafting supplementary orders that authorized the army to disarm SS and police units, occupy key government buildings, and neutralize officials under the pretext of quelling a fabricated SS-led insurrection. By mid-1944, Colonel , appointed Chief of Staff of the Reserve Army on July 1, refined these adaptations to address evolving wartime conditions, including the Allied invasion of Normandy, ensuring the orders could be issued swiftly from the in to activate Reserve Army districts across . The modified directives instructed commanders to seize telecommunications centers, radio stations, and administrative hubs in major cities; arrest high-ranking SS leaders like and Heinrich Müller, as well as propaganda minister ; and proclaim a new led by Carl Goerdeler as Chancellor and as head of state, with the aim of negotiating an end to the war. These alterations transformed from a defensive measure into an offensive instrument for , bypassing the to Hitler by framing the post-assassination actions as a response to "terrorist" elements within the SS and Party, thereby legitimizing army intervention without immediate declaration of Hitler's death until control was secured. The final version included coded signals—""—to initiate operations, with and Olbricht prepared to issue them upon confirmation of the on , 1944.

Coordination Among Conspirators

The core coordination among the 20 July plot's conspirators centered on a small group of high-ranking officers who leveraged their official positions for covert collaboration, primarily through face-to-face meetings in Berlin's headquarters of the Reserve Army. Colonel , appointed of the Reserve Army on 1 July 1944, collaborated directly with General , his superior at the General Army Office since Stauffenberg's transfer there in September 1943, and Olbricht's chief of staff, Colonel , to modify —a pre-existing for quelling internal unrest—into a mechanism for seizing key government sites and disarming SS units following Hitler's assassination. Major General , serving with Army Group Center on the Eastern Front, served as an early architect and coordinator, working with Olbricht to refine elements as far back as 1943 and dispatching trusted aides to to align 's operational role with broader resistance efforts; in mid-July , Tresckow personally reinforced Stauffenberg's commitment via intermediaries, emphasizing the moral imperative to act amid Germany's collapsing fronts. Retired General , the plot's intended head of state, participated in strategic discussions with this military nucleus, providing non-operational guidance drawn from his pre-war General Staff experience, though his influence waned as Stauffenberg assumed tactical leadership. To minimize detection by the , communication avoided written records, relying instead on verbal agreements during Stauffenberg's frequent visits, coded references in official military correspondence, and select couriers for frontline-to-capital relays; this approach enabled aborted attempts on 15 July and earlier dates but exposed vulnerabilities, as prior failures stemmed from incomplete synchronization, such as unconfirmed Hitler sightings or hesitancy among peripheral allies. Efforts to expand coordination involved approaching commanders of the 17 Wehrkreise (military districts) for implementation, with Olbricht and Mertz von Quirnheim dispatching preparatory orders under guises of routine exercises, though many district leaders—wary of unverified Hitler death reports—required direct phone confirmation from , revealing the plot's dependence on rapid post-assassination verification via severed Eastern Front communications. The inner circle's trust-based model, forged through shared frontline disillusionment and anti-Nazi convictions, facilitated 's adaptation but faltered under time pressures, as 's dual roles in Rastenburg briefings and command necessitated last-minute adjustments without full network rehearsal.

Execution of the Assassination Attempt

Events at the Wolf's Lair on 20 July 1944

On 20 July 1944, Colonel , chief of staff to General , commander of the Reserve Army, arrived at the (Wolfsschanze), Adolf Hitler's forward headquarters near Rastenburg in , accompanied by his aide Lieutenant . They had flown from earlier that morning, with Stauffenberg carrying a containing a timed composed of two 1-kilogram blocks of and a . Due to time constraints during the flight preparations, only one was fully armed in a nearby washroom shortly before the 12:30 p.m. briefing, as a guard interrupted the process of arming the second. The daily military briefing, attended by Hitler and about 20-24 officers including Field Marshal , General , and others, began approximately 30 minutes early at around 12:40 p.m. in the wooden conference barrack, prompted by the summer heat with windows left open for ventilation. entered the room, placed the briefcase on the floor under the heavy oak conference table near Hitler while pretending to adjust maps, positioning it as close as possible to the Führer amid the crowded space. Moments later, citing a need to answer a phone call, excused himself and left the barrack with Haeften, who carried the disarmed second bomb. The bomb detonated at precisely 12:42 p.m., creating a massive blast that demolished much of the conference room, shattered windows, and ignited fires, killing four men outright—General (Hitler's chief adjutant), (who had unwittingly moved the briefcase slightly farther from Hitler to make room for another attendee, placing it against a thick leg), General Walter Scherff (Hitler's military chronicler), and the stenographer Heinz Berger—and severely injuring several others, including and . Hitler survived with minor injuries, including perforated eardrums, burns, and shredded trousers, largely because the solid support of the conference absorbed and deflected the bulk of the explosion's force away from him, while the open windows dissipated the blast pressure that might otherwise have confined and intensified the shockwave in a sealed room. The wooden construction of the barrack, though splintering lethally in some directions, contributed to the uneven distribution of the blast compared to a . In the immediate aftermath, ensued as guards and staff rushed to the ; Hitler emerged from the shaken but alive, reportedly exclaiming about divine and crediting architectural features for his . and Haeften, having retrieved a under the pretext of the "attack," witnessed the explosion's smoke plume from afar and departed the compound by plane around 1:00 p.m., heading back to under the assumption—based on initial reports of total destruction—that Hitler had been killed. Confirmation of Hitler's reached the plotters only after their return, as security tightened at the Lair but initial communications delays hindered rapid dissemination.

Simultaneous Actions in Berlin and Elsewhere

As Colonel departed the following the 12:42 p.m. explosion on 20 July 1944, co-conspirators in prematurely initiated around 4:00 p.m. under Generals and at the headquarters of the Reserve Army. arrived shortly thereafter via Rangsdorf airfield, joining efforts to issue teletype orders mobilizing Reserve Army units to secure the government quarter, communication centers, and transportation hubs while arresting key Nazi figures such as and . , the military district commander, directed troops to advance on central , but implementation faltered due to conflicting signals, hesitation among subordinate officers loyal to the Nazis, and failure to seize radio stations for propaganda control. Simultaneously, parallel measures unfolded in occupied territories to neutralize and elements. In , Military Governor Karl-Heinrich von Stülpnagel exploited orders to direct the arrest of approximately 1,200 and SD personnel between 9:30 and 10:30 p.m., targeting sites like and Boulevard Lannes, temporarily disempowering these forces for several hours. In , , and , local commanders initially complied with directives in the early evening, arresting and functionaries to consolidate military authority, though these actions dissolved amid confusion from dueling telexes confirming Hitler's survival. The decentralized rollout relied on pre-distributed Valkyrie protocols adapted for coup purposes, aiming to portray the moves as responses to fictitious unrest while sidelining Nazi loyalists. However, delays in —exacerbated by General Friedrich Fromm's vacillation and the plotters' inability to suppress news of Hitler's survival via a 6:28 p.m. radio broadcast—cascaded failures outward, prompting reversals and releases by late evening as loyalty to the regime reasserted itself. In , for instance, detainees were freed upon verification of the Führer's condition, underscoring the plot's dependence on rapid, unified execution across disparate commands.

Failure and Immediate Aftermath

Reasons for the Plot's Collapse

The failure of the assassination attempt initiated the plot's collapse. At 12:42 p.m. on 20 July 1944, the single detonated bomb exploded in the briefing room, killing four others but inflicting only minor injuries on , including shredded trousers, a perforated eardrum, and superficial burns. The briefcase had been repositioned by Colonel away from Hitler to accommodate a large , placing it behind a thick table leg that absorbed much of the blast's force. The room's wooden walls and open windows further dissipated the explosion's energy upward and outward, reducing its confined lethality. Stauffenberg had armed only one of two planned bombs due to time constraints from an interrupting phone call to . Stauffenberg's hasty departure compounded the issue. Having exited the room minutes earlier for the call, he witnessed the explosion's smoke from outside and inferred Hitler's death without inspection. He bluffed past three security checkpoints at the en route to an airfield, then flew approximately miles to 's Bendlerblock headquarters to activate . This assumption-driven exit precluded on-site confirmation and allowed Hitler's aides to stabilize him and initiate contact with Berlin. In , operational delays and indecision stalled the coup. Conspirators, including General , partially mobilized the Reserve Army for arrests of Nazi officials but withheld full implementation pending assassination verification. Communication lags—exacerbated by reliance on couriers and uncertain phone lines—fueled hesitation amid unconfirmed reports. Hitler telephoned Propaganda Minister around 4:00 p.m., and a radio address by Hitler's voice at approximately 6:30 p.m. broadcast his survival, prompting immediate defections. General , peripherally aware but uncommitted, ordered the arrest of Stauffenberg, Olbricht, and others upon hearing the broadcast, executing Stauffenberg by firing squad that evening to distance himself. Residual military loyalty and incomplete coordination sealed the failure. Many commanders disregarded Valkyrie orders due to allegiance to Hitler or skepticism of the plot, while the rapid purge of suspected resisters—totaling nearly 200 executions in ensuing weeks—prevented resurgence. The absence of broader high-level buy-in, such as from field marshals, limited the coup's geographic reach beyond .

Hitler's Response and Initial Countermeasures

Following the explosion at 12:42 p.m. on 20 July 1944, Adolf Hitler emerged from the briefing room at the Wolf's Lair with minor injuries, including perforated eardrums, burns to his legs, and bruising to his right arm, but he wasted no time in demonstrating his survival and issuing directives. Despite the blast's severity—which killed four men and injured others—Hitler proceeded with his afternoon schedule, personally escorting Italian leader Benito Mussolini through the damaged conference room later that day to underscore his unscathed leadership and the plot's failure. This meeting, originally planned, served as an immediate propaganda countermeasure, projecting resilience amid the chaos. Hitler promptly communicated his survival via secure channels to , confirming it directly around 3:30 p.m. to halt any coup activities, as news of his death had initially spurred partial activation of by conspirators. He instructed Propaganda Minister to manage public messaging and mobilized the under to launch an urgent investigation into the bombing, directing them to identify and detain suspects without delay. This triggered immediate arrests at the , including scrutiny of officers like , who had unknowingly carried the bomb-laden briefcase, and extended to by evening, where SS forces secured key sites and apprehended early plotters such as Claus von Stauffenberg's associates. On 21 July 1944, at 1:00 a.m., Hitler broadcast a national radio address from the , declaring, "I am unhurt," attributing his escape to "the grace of ," and vowing merciless retribution against the "small clique of ambitious, conscienceless, and criminal elements" responsible. In the address, he announced structural reforms, including Himmler's appointment as of the (Ersatzheer), a role designed to purge disloyal elements from reserves and prevent future insurrections by centralizing oversight of military replacements. These steps, combined with heightened security protocols at —such as expanded guards and loyalty oaths—aimed to reassert control and deter further resistance in the plot's chaotic aftermath.

Repressions and Consequences

Arrests, Interrogations, and Executions

Following the failure of the plot, Colonel , General , Lieutenant , and General were arrested at the in on the evening of 20 July 1944 after loyalist forces reasserted control. General , who had attempted twice with his pistol, was shot by an officer to end his suffering. Stauffenberg and the others were executed by firing squad in the Bendlerblock courtyard shortly after midnight on 21 July. The , under Heinrich Himmler's direction, initiated widespread arrests beginning immediately after confirmation of the plot's collapse, targeting known conspirators, their associates, and even individuals suspected on minimal evidence. Over 7,000 people were detained in the ensuing months, including military officers, civilians, and family members, with arrests extending beyond direct participants to settle old scores or suppress potential dissent. Interrogations were brutal, often involving to extract confessions and implicate others, as documented in Gestapo records that revealed coerced admissions used to expand the investigation. Executions followed rapidly, with approximately 200 core conspirators put to death in the initial wave, though total reprisal killings reached around 4,980, many on flimsy pretexts. Prominent figures faced show trials in presided over by , after which dozens were hanged using piano wire from meat hooks in , with proceedings filmed for Adolf Hitler's private viewing to maximize humiliation. Field Marshal , implicated indirectly through associations, was forced to commit suicide on 14 October 1944 to avoid broader family persecution.

Broader Purges and Impact on German Society

Following the failure of the 20 July plot, the and expanded reprisals beyond the approximately 200 core conspirators to encompass thousands suspected of indirect involvement, sympathy, or mere association, resulting in over 7,000 arrests across . These purges, ordered by Hitler and coordinated by , targeted military officers, civilians, and even peripheral figures in the and civilian administration, with investigations lasting months and often relying on minimal or fabricated evidence. In total, nearly 5,000 individuals were executed, many via public hangings in or other sites, designed to deter opposition through spectacle and filmed documentation sent to Hitler. A key element of these broader measures was the intensified application of , or kin liability, formalized in directives issued on 2 August 1944, which held families collectively responsible for perceived treason. Under this policy, enforced by the SS, local Gauleiters, and courts, hundreds of relatives—including spouses, children, and extended kin of plotters—were arrested without individual charges; for instance, Clarita von Trott, wife of conspirator , was detained on 17 August 1944, and similar actions struck the von Stauffenberg and von Hofacker families. While executions of family members were rare, detentions in concentration camps like Ravensbrück led to harsh conditions, property confiscations, and social ostracism, amplifying the policy's deterrent effect despite its inconsistent enforcement across regions. These purges profoundly eroded trust within the German military, as investigations implicated high-ranking officers like , who was forced to commit on 14 October 1944 despite limited evidence of direct involvement, fostering paranoia and self-censorship among commanders. In society at large, the threat of and mass arrests cultivated pervasive fear, stifling potential dissent and reinforcing Nazi control amid mounting wartime defeats, as Himmler's 21 July 1944 speeches emphasized to prevent future resistance. The removal of experienced officers and the elevation of ideologically rigid loyalists further hampered operational effectiveness, contributing to declining morale and cohesion in the as the Eastern and Western Fronts collapsed.

Controversies and Historical Debates

Assessments of the Plotters' Complicity in Nazi Atrocities

The plotters of the 20 July 1944 assassination attempt against , primarily drawn from the German military officer corps and conservative civilian elites, have been subject to historical scrutiny regarding their roles in the Nazi regime's atrocities, including and war crimes on the Eastern Front. While none of the core conspirators were SS members directly implementing extermination policies, many served in units that facilitated or participated in invasions enabling mass killings, such as the 1939 Polish campaign and in 1941, where German forces executed tens of thousands of civilians and POWs under the and other directives. Historians like have documented the 's systematic involvement in atrocities, arguing that officers like those in the plot bore indirect responsibility through command structures that tolerated or ordered reprisals against partisans and , with over 500,000 Soviet POWs dying in German custody by 1942 due to deliberate neglect. Claus von Stauffenberg, the plot's operational leader, exemplified this ambiguity: as a staff officer in the 6th Panzer Division, he participated in the 1939 invasion of Poland, which triggered widespread executions and ghettoizations, and later served on the Eastern Front in 1940–1941, witnessing but not documented as intervening against early massacres. His brother Berthold and other aristocrats in the circle shared a conservative nationalist worldview that included anti-Semitic prejudices common in pre-Nazi German elites, though they rejected the regime's racial fanaticism and total war by 1942–1943, motivated partly by reports of Einsatzgruppen killings. Henning von Tresckow, a key ideological driver, commanded intelligence in Army Group Center during Barbarossa, where his units conducted anti-partisan operations resulting in civilian deaths exceeding military targets, as verified in post-war trials; he later expressed remorse but had not resigned his post earlier. Critics, including leftist historians, contend the plotters' complicity stemmed from prolonged loyalty to the regime's expansionist goals, only shifting to action after Stalingrad (1943) exposed strategic failure, allowing post-war narratives in to portray them as untainted patriots absolving broader German society of collective guilt—exemplified by Chancellor Helmut Kohl's speech framing their resistance as proof Hitler failed to corrupt the nation entirely. Defenders, such as Peter Hoffmann, highlight personal ethical turning points, like Stauffenberg's outrage at Allied bombings and Eastern Front horrors, positioning the group as causal realists who prioritized to halt further crimes, despite their authoritarian leanings and intent to negotiate with the Western Allies while continuing anti-Soviet fighting. from declassified records and survivor testimonies underscores that while the plotters avoided direct genocidal roles, their military service sustained the system perpetrating 6 million Jewish murders and millions more civilian deaths, complicating hagiographic commemorations.

Debates on Timing, Motives, and Potential Outcomes

Historians have debated the timing of the 20 July plot, noting that earlier attempts by the same networks occurred as far back as , with intensified efforts from onward, yet decisive action only crystallized in mid-1944 after the Allied on 6 June exposed Germany's impending collapse on multiple fronts. Critics, including some analyses of military correspondence, argue that the delay stemmed from plotters' initial hope for a reversal of fortunes on the Eastern Front or in the West, reflecting a reluctance to act until overrode ideological qualms, rather than a consistent against Nazi excesses witnessed since 1941. Proponents of the resisters counter that pervasive surveillance and the need for broad military buy-in necessitated waiting for a moment of operational feasibility, such as Stauffenberg's access to Hitler via his Chief of Staff role in the , achieved only after his 1943 wounding in . The motives of key figures like remain contested, with evidence from personal letters and interrogations indicating a evolution from early sympathy for Nazi expansionism—Stauffenberg praised the regime's anti-communist stance in 1939—to disillusionment after observing atrocities in the and Hitler's strategic blunders, such as the 1943 Stalingrad defeat. However, assessments emphasize that for many officers, including those implicated in war crimes like Karl-Heinrich von Stülpnagel, the primary driver was pragmatic: averting national catastrophe amid Allied advances, rather than atonement for complicity in or programs, which some had tolerated or enabled earlier. This view aligns with post-war analyses questioning the plotters' selective outrage, as conservative nationalists like Carl Goerdeler prioritized restoring a pre-Nazi order over dismantling the regime's racial policies outright. Potential outcomes of a successful plot are speculative but hinge on the plotters' plan to activate emergency military controls, arrest SS leaders, and form a under as and Goerdeler as , aiming for separate peace negotiations with the Western Allies while possibly continuing resistance against the . Historians argue this overlooked the Allies' January 1943 demand for , rendering armistice overtures futile and likely provoking internal civil war, as loyalist Wehrmacht elements under or SS forces under could rally to sustain the fight, potentially installing and prolonging the conflict into 1945 with similar devastation. Even if the coup consolidated power swiftly—doubtful given Otto Ernst Remer's rapid suppression of operations—Germany's depleted resources and fanatical rear-guard resistance would have precluded a swift end, saving few lives overall while complicating post-war divisions.

Long-Term Impact and Legacy

Influence on the End of World War II

The failure of the 20 July 1944 assassination attempt on ensured his continued personal direction of the German war effort, which historians attribute to strategic irrationality that extended the conflict's duration beyond what a post-Hitler might have negotiated, though demands by the Allies—formalized at the on 14–24 January 1943—limited realistic prospects for regardless. The plotters, including , envisioned as a means to seize control, arrest SS leaders, and seek terms primarily with Western Allies while resisting Soviet advances, but their conservative military orientation and lack of broad support precluded swift capitulation even in success. Empirical assessments of German military performance post-July indicate no abrupt decline attributable to the plot; offensives like the Vistula–Oder in early 1945 and the Rhine crossings proceeded amid prior losses from (22 June–19 August 1944), which obliterated , underscoring that Allied logistical dominance—evidenced by 2.5 million Soviet troops committed in Bagration versus Germany's depleted reserves—drove the timeline to VE Day on 8 May 1945. Subsequent Gestapo repressions, involving over 7,000 arrests and approximately 4,980 executions or suicides by late 1944, targeted suspected sympathizers across the , civilian bureaucracy, and nobility, removing mid-level officers and administrators who might have facilitated earlier de-escalation but whose absence did not measurably impair frontline cohesion given Hitler's pre-existing micromanagement and SS infiltration of commands. These purges intensified internal paranoia, as Hitler invoked "providential" survival in broadcasts on 20 July 1944 to rally loyalty, yet causal analysis reveals negligible impact on operational effectiveness; for example, the failed Counteroffensive (16 December 1944–25 January 1945) faltered due to fuel shortages and air inferiority rather than leadership vacuums from executions. Allied , aware of the plot via decrypted communications, viewed it as an internal German affair without altering strategic bombing or ground campaigns, confirming that the war's end hinged on material —Germany produced 40,000 in 1944 against Allied 130,000—over political intrigue. Debates among historians, such as those in analyses of dynamics, posit that the plot's collapse reinforced Nazi , delaying potential fractures in elite cohesion that could have accelerated collapse in spring 1945, but primary evidence from war diaries and surrender records attributes prolongation to Hitler's no-retreat orders, as in the defense of the (16–19 April 1945), independent of July purges. Overall, the event's influence remained secondary to the inexorable Allied convergence on , with Germany's defeat sealed by multi-front exhaustion rather than the absence of a successful coup.

Post-War Commemoration and Interpretations

In the , commemoration of the 20 July plot began shortly after the war's end, with a memorial plaque installed at the execution site in 1952 and a monument unveiled there on 20 July 1953 by Mayor to honor and fellow conspirators shot that night. The , established at the complex—a former military headquarters central to the plot's planning—documents opposition to the Nazi regime, emphasizing the 1944 coup attempt as a pivotal act of defiance, with exhibits opened to the public from the onward. Federal observances include an annual solemn ceremony on 20 July, organized by the government since the 1950s and formalized with nationwide flag displays at public buildings; these events rotate between the and Plötzensee Memorial Center, where over 2,800 regime opponents were executed between and , to evoke remembrance of resistance and reconciliation with 's past. In unified , such commemorations portray the plotters as exemplars of moral courage, with figures like Olaf Scholz in 2024 describing the attempt as proof that "a better " remained possible amid , framing it as a cornerstone of democratic self-understanding. Post-war interpretations have emphasized the plot's role in demonstrating internal German opposition to Hitler, countering narratives of universal complicity, though debates persist over the conspirators' motives and character. Many, including Stauffenberg, had sworn loyalty oaths to Hitler and participated in the regime's early military expansions, with shifts toward resistance accelerating after Stalingrad in 1943 due to perceptions of strategic folly, ideological disillusionment, and fears of national annihilation rather than early principled rejection of Nazi racial policies or totalitarianism. Proposed successors like Carl Friedrich Goerdeler envisioned a conservative-authoritarian state prioritizing anti-communism, potential armistice with the West, and continuity of anti-Bolshevik warfare, raising questions about compatibility with full democratization or unconditional surrender demands. While West German accounts from the 1950s onward mythologized the plotters as proto-democratic patriots restoring honor to the Wehrmacht, subsequent scholarship highlights their aristocratic, Prussian-conservative worldview and limited broader societal support, attributing the coup's isolation to widespread war-weariness and regime entrenchment.

References

  1. [1]
    Operation Valkyrie 1944 | Cambridge University Library
    The most famous assassination attempt on the life of Adolf Hitler took place on July 20th 1944 at the Wolfsschanze or Wolf's Lair headquarters near Rastenburg, ...
  2. [2]
    The July 20, 1944, Plot to Assassinate Adolf Hitler
    Jul 20, 2025 · The July 20 plot was a failed attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler in 1944. It involved a number of both civilian and military officials.
  3. [3]
    Operation Valkyrie: 81st anniversary of plot to kill Hitler - DW
    On July 20, 1944, Adolf Hitler cheated death when military officers planned an assassination attempt. It took a long time until the Germans came to honor those ...
  4. [4]
    Nuance and Honesty: The German Treatment of WWII History - U.OSU
    May 31, 2023 · ... Stauffenberg's plot to assassinate Hitler were the exceptions within a ... motivations behind the July 20th assassination attempt came ...
  5. [5]
    This German General Made a Deal with the Devil - HistoryNet
    Jan 23, 2024 · General Ludwig Beck initially embraced Hitler as a means to make Germany great again. Eventually he resigned from the Wehrmacht and joined a plot to kill the F ...
  6. [6]
    GDW-Berlin: Biographie
    ### Summary of Ludwig Beck's Role in Military Resistance
  7. [7]
    Colonel Hans Oster - Warfare History Network
    In 1933, Oster accepted a job with the Abwehr. In 1934, he turned against the Nazis when the SS murdered his good friend and former Abwehr chief Maj. Gen.
  8. [8]
    Henning von Tresckow - GDW-Berlin: Biographie
    Tresckow strengthened the connections between the military resistance and Ludwig Beck and Carl Goerdeler and assumed a dominant position among the officers ...
  9. [9]
    Operation Bagration: The Greatest Military Defeat Of All Time?
    Operation Bagration saw the Soviet Union capture hundreds of kilometres of territory and defeat an entire German Army Group in just three weeks.
  10. [10]
    Immeasurable Brutality, the Nazi–Soviet War 1941–1945
    Jun 19, 2024 · The Germans suffered approximately 390,000 losses in nine weeks of fighting, surpassing the defeats at Stalingrad and Tunis as the costliest ...
  11. [11]
    Soviet Operation Bagration Destroyed German Army Group Center
    Overwhelmed by the Soviet's Operation Bagration in June 1944, German Army Group Center fell back to the Third Reich's eastern frontier.
  12. [12]
    The German Response to D-Day | Imperial War Museums
    In total, the Germans suffered 290,000 casualties in Normandy, including 23,000 dead, 67,000 wounded and around 200,000 missing or captured. Some 2,000 tanks ...
  13. [13]
    The Great Battle for Normandy, 1944
    May 1, 2012 · The 1944 battle for Normandy was the most important battle between the western Allies and German forces on the continent of Europe in World ...
  14. [14]
    Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg - TracesOfWar.com
    Jan 19, 2025 · Von Stauffenberg did not only focus on his military career. He spoke Russian and English fluently and he also mastered French, Greek and Latin. ...Youth and pre war career · The General Staff and Africa · Out of hospital and in the...
  15. [15]
    Claus von Stauffenberg | World War II Database
    He was awarded the Iron Cross First Class on 31 May 1940 at the end of the campaign in France. On 1 Jan 1943, he was promoted to lieutenant colonel and was soon ...Missing: career | Show results with:career<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Claus von Stauffenberg: The Man Who Tried to Kill Hitler - HistoryNet
    Jul 20, 2022 · In June 1944, Stauffenberg was named Replacement Army chief of staff. This was a key post, giving him regular access to Hitler at the führer's ...
  17. [17]
    Ludwig Beck - GDW-Berlin: Biographie
    In the summer of 1938 Beck unsuccessfully called upon the senior generals to resign simultaneously to prevent the impending war in Europe. He stepped down from ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Forgotten Faces of Operation Valkyrie: Major-General Henning ...
    Jul 20, 2025 · Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg's name has become synonymous with the July. 20, 1944 plot to assassinate Hitler and topple the Nazi regime.
  19. [19]
    Another plot to kill Hitler foiled | March 21, 1943 - History.com
    Henning von Tresckow, a member of Gen. Fedor von Bock's Army Group Center, was the leader of one of many conspiracies against Adolf Hitler. Along with his ...
  20. [20]
    Erwin von Witzleben - Jewish Virtual Library
    Erwin von Witzleben was born in Breslau, Germany on December 4, 1881. He joined the German Army in March 1901 as a second lieutenant in the 7th Grenadier ...
  21. [21]
    Erwin von Witzleben - GDW-Berlin: Biographie
    A career officer, Erwin von Witzleben was among those allowed to remain in service in the Reichswehr after the First World War. He was married to Else ...
  22. [22]
    Erwin von Witzleben - TracesOfWar.com
    Jan 19, 2025 · On November 10, 1938, Von Witzleben was appointed commander-in-chief of Heeresgruppe 2 after General Wilhelm Adam had fallen into disgrace. With ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  23. [23]
    Carl Friedrich Goerdeler - GDW-Berlin: Biographie
    Goerdeler initially criticized specific manifestations of Hitler's armaments and economic policy in numerous memoranda during the late 1930s, warning that ...
  24. [24]
    Carl Goerdeler - Jewish Virtual Library
    Goerdeler provided information about Nazi Germany and encouraged governments not to make too many concessions to Hitler. He was appalled by the Munich Agreement ...
  25. [25]
    Why Operation Valkyrie—the July Plot to Kill Hitler—Failed | TIME
    Jul 19, 2019 · For many of them, it was simply a way to avoid military defeat, while others wanted to salvage at least a part of the country's morality.Missing: primary sources
  26. [26]
    The 1944 Plot to Assassinate Hitler - World History Encyclopedia
    Dec 6, 2024 · The conspirators were against Hitler's conduct of the Second World War (1939-45) and Nazism in general and wanted an honourable surrender while ...Missing: motivations | Show results with:motivations<|separator|>
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Operation Valkyrie - The "July Plot" to Assassinate Hitler
    The plot was developed as a modification of Operation Valkyrie (Unternehmen Walküre), which was approved by Hitler for use if Allied bombing of German cities or ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    9 Stauffenberg and the Assassination Attempt of July 20, 1944
    Together with his friend Albrecht Ritter Mertz von Quirnheim, he made fevered attempts to win over high-ranking officers in the military districts for the coup.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] July 20, 1944: Strategic Narrative for the Federal Republic of ... - DTIC
    Mar 23, 2020 · The socialist regime belittled the conspiracy of July 20, 1944 and earmarked this event as a reactionary imperialist plot directed against the ...
  31. [31]
    Albrecht von Mertz von Quirnheim - Jewish Virtual Library
    Quirnheim played important supporting role on July 15, 1944 when Stauffenberg went to the Wolf's Lair to stage a second assassination attempt against Hitler.
  32. [32]
    11 The Attempted Coup of July 20, 1944 - GDW-Berlin
    After landing in Berlin, Stauffenberg tried desperately to gain support for the coup from other officers, along with Mertz and Olbricht. In Berlin and the ...
  33. [33]
    GHDI - Document
    On Thursday, July 20, 1944, Stauffenberg, in his capacity as chief of staff to the Commander of the Reserve Army [Befehlshaber des Ersatzheeres, BDE], flew to ...
  34. [34]
    The Conference Room at the “Wolf's Lair” after the Assassination ...
    The discussion of the military situation (at which Stauffenberg detonated two bombs) took place 30 minutes ahead of schedule.
  35. [35]
    Coup by Teleprinter – DHM-Blog | Deutsches Historisches Museum
    Jul 19, 2019 · The explosive device in the Wolf's Lair detonated at 12.42 pm, killing four people, but failing to kill the German leader. Stauffenberg arrived ...
  36. [36]
    Hitler assassination plan - The National Archives
    In 1944 Hitler was actually injured in an attempt on his life which really should have killed him. He managed to survive only with damage to his hearing. After ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Invisible Coup: A Failed Attempt to Assassinate Hitler - HistoryNet
    Feb 14, 2017 · “It” was the implementation of a plot by German military officers to blow Adolf Hitler to pieces and overthrow the Nazi regime. The plotters ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Assassination plot against Hitler fails - History.com
    On July 20, 1944, Hitler cheats death as a bomb planted in a briefcase goes off, but fails to kill him. High-ranking German officials had made up their minds ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    German officers attempt to assassinate Hitler | Anne Frank House
    On 20 July 1944, during a meeting with Adolf Hitler, German officer Claus von Stauffenberg placed a bomb under the table.<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Hitler's radio proclamation about the assassination attempt on 20 ...
    Jul 14, 2019 · The text below was pronounced by Adolf Hitler on the German radio at 1:00 am on 21 July 1944, after the attack and coup of 20 July 1944.
  42. [42]
    “Do You Recognize My Voice?”: The Question That Ended ...
    CENTER: General Erich Fellgiebel, chief of signals for the high command of the armed forces, was responsible for severing communications between Wolf's Lair and ...
  43. [43]
    The Largest Plot to Kill Hitler? – Operation Valkyrie
    The plot to kill Hitler, code-named Operation Valkyrie, of July 20, 1944 almost succeeded and helped intensify the war.Missing: motivations primary
  44. [44]
    RG 263 Detailed Report, Heinrich Mueller | National Archives
    Mueller's zeal in countering the 20 July plot earned him the rare military decoration of the Knight's Cross to the War Service Cross with Swords in October ...
  45. [45]
    Hitler to Germany: "I am unhurt" | July 21, 1944 | HISTORY
    On July 21, 1944, Adolf Hitler takes to the airwaves to announce that the attempt on his life—code-named Operation Valkyrie—has failed and that “accounts ...
  46. [46]
    Execution of the conspirators of July 20, 1944 - TracesOfWar.com
    Mar 13, 2023 · The main character, Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg was executed in the inner courtyard of the Bendlerblock, the HQ of the Wehrmacht in Berlin along with ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Stauffenberg's Execution after Operation Valkyrie's Failure
    Jul 21, 2020 · On this day, 76 years ago, in the early hours of 21 July 1944, Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg was summarily executed by firing squad in the courtyard of ...
  48. [48]
    July Plot | History, Leaders, Executions, & Facts - Britannica
    July Plot, abortive attempt on July 20, 1944, by German military leaders to assassinate Adolf Hitler, seize control of the government, and seek more favourable ...
  49. [49]
    Sippenhaft, Terror and Fear in Nazi Germany: Examining One Facet ...
    Feb 1, 2007 · This paper attempts to analyse the implementation of Sippenhaft (family liability punishment) after the 20 July 1944 assassination plot against Hitler.Missing: purges | Show results with:purges
  50. [50]
    The July Plot: When German Elites Tried to Kill Hitler - History.com
    Jul 30, 2019 · Fed up with Hitler, though only partially for moral reasons, high-level German resisters nearly succeeded in assassinating him in July 1944.
  51. [51]
    Re-evaluating the Complicity of the Wehrmacht in Nazi Germany
    ... crimes of Nazi Germany. Furthermore, in his evaluation of why the Wehrmacht kept fighting when the war was clearly turning against Germany, Bartov ...
  52. [52]
    How the Stauffenberg Plot Became an Alibi for German Crimes
    Jul 20, 2024 · On July 20, 1944, Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg led a failed bid to assassinate Adolf Hitler. In the postwar years, the coup attempt was ...
  53. [53]
    The Cases of Stauffenberg, Tresckow, and Schulenburg - jstor
    The historiography of the German opposition to Hitler involved in the putsch on 20 July 1944 ... Nazi crimes, Stauffenberg,. Tresckow, Schulenburg. On 20 July ...
  54. [54]
    Balancing assessments of German churches under Nazism - jstor
    of the world since 1945 has condemned Nazi Germany for its crimes. However ... of Stauffenberg's 20th of July attempt on Hitler' life, according to Hoffmann,.
  55. [55]
    What If the July 20 Bomb Plot to Kill Hitler Had Succeeded?
    Apr 26, 2018 · Many have argued that but for the tiniest quirks of chance, Hitler would have died that day, the war in Europe would have ended nearly a year ...Missing: potential | Show results with:potential<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    The Six Men Who Were Behind the July 20th Plot to Assassinate Hitler
    Dec 5, 2017 · Many historians debate to this day what the reasons behind the coup were ― at first it was seen as a genuine human effort to end the ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Should we be glad the 1944 July Plot to kill Hitler failed? - HistoryExtra
    Jan 26, 2022 · In the 1944 'July Plot', the German officer Claus von Stauffenberg narrowly failed to assassinate the Nazi leader.
  58. [58]
    Domestic Protocol Office of the Federal Government - 20 July
    On 20 July of each year, in commemoration of the resistance to the National Socialist reign of terror in Berlin, the Federal Government holds a solemn ceremony.
  59. [59]
    GDW-Berlin: Historical Site - Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand
    The Bendler Block is a historic building complex near Tiergarten park, used by the military, and the site of the 1944 attempt to overthrow the Nazi regime.
  60. [60]
    Germany's Scholz commemorates 'Valkyrie' plot against Hitler - DW
    Jul 20, 2024 · While "Operation Valkyrie" failed to kill Adolf Hitler in July 1944, the plotters showed a better Germany was possible, said Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
  61. [61]
    The Motives of the Men Who Sought Hitler's Life - Providence
    Jul 20, 2021 · The integrity and motives of the conspirators of the July 20th attempt to do away with Hitler are still doubted by many.Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  62. [62]
    The Twentieth of July in the History of the German Resistance - jstor
    July 20 conspiracy offers rewarding insights into the Germans' own war ex- ... article, "The Background of the Hitler Plot," Contemporary Review, October, 1945.<|separator|>