Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Explosive device

An is any , mixture, or device the primary or common purpose of which is to function by , generally through a rapid exothermic that generates high-pressure gases. These devices encompass a range from simple blasting charges to complex assemblies incorporating detonators, fuzes, and payloads, enabling applications that harness for mechanical effects like fragmentation or shockwave propagation. Explosive devices serve critical roles in industrial operations, such as quarrying and tunneling where controlled blasts fracture rock to facilitate extraction, and in structural to precisely buildings with minimal . In military contexts, they form the core of including bombs, grenades, and missiles, designed to defeat targets through , , or incendiary effects. While regulated stringently to mitigate hazards like unintended initiation from impact or static discharge, their dual-use nature has led to proliferation in improvised variants employed by non-state actors for and . Notable advancements include the development of safer high explosives like in the , which stabilized for reliable industrial deployment, reducing accident rates in blasting operations. Controversies surrounding explosive devices often center on regulatory enforcement challenges, as evidenced by federal oversight aimed at preventing diversion to illicit assembly, alongside forensic efforts to trace post-detonation residues for attribution in investigations. Empirical data from oversight agencies underscore that the vast majority of explosive materials are consumed in commercial blasting rather than destructive misuse, though media emphasis on the latter can distort public risk perceptions.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

An explosive device is any apparatus incorporating a , mixture, or material engineered to function through , defined by regulatory bodies as having the primary purpose of undergoing rapid energy release via or . This distinguishes it from incendiary devices, which prioritize sustained burning over instantaneous pressure generation, though hybrid effects can occur in practice. At its core, an in such devices arises from an exothermic that decomposes the explosive material into hot, high-volume gases, expanding against surroundings to produce a or pressure pulse capable of fragmentation, , or structural disruption. Low explosives, like black powder, operate via —a front propagating subsonically through , yielding progressive burning suitable for in firearms or , with reaction speeds typically under 400 m/s. High explosives, such as or PETN, instead detonate, sustaining a supersonic (often 1,000–9,000 m/s) that compresses and ignites adjacent material, enabling near-instantaneous energy release and for breaching or . The efficiency of these principles depends on factors like —where the explosive's allows complete without external air—and to , calibrated to prevent accidental discharge while ensuring reliable triggering via mechanical, electrical, or chemical stimuli. Confinement within the device amplifies pressure buildup, converting into kinetic and thermal outputs governed by the Chapman-Jouguet detonation theory, which models the steady-state propagation of the reaction zone at the sonic velocity relative to the products. Empirical testing, such as cylinder expansion or gap tests, verifies these behaviors, confirming detonation pressures exceeding 10 GPa in primary high explosives.

Classification of Explosives

Explosives are classified primarily based on their and rate, distinguishing between low explosives, which undergo —a process propagating through —and high explosives, which detonate via a supersonic exceeding 1,000 meters per second. Low explosives produce lower pressures, typically below 100 megapascals, and are used in applications requiring controlled burning, such as propellants in firearms or . High explosives generate peak pressures above 1 gigapascal and velocities up to 9,000 meters per second, enabling rapid energy release for shattering effects in blasting or munitions. Low explosives include black powder, composed of approximately 75% , 15% , and 10% , which burns at rates under 400 meters per second and has been used since the for propulsion. Smokeless powders, such as nitrocellulose-based variants developed in the late , offer higher and lower visible residue, replacing black powder in modern ammunition. These materials are less sensitive to initiation, requiring confinement or a source to sustain reaction, and are regulated separately from high explosives due to their lower in storage. High explosives are further subdivided by sensitivity to initiation stimuli like shock, friction, or heat. Primary high explosives, highly sensitive and used as detonators, include lead azide (detonation velocity around 5,000 meters per second) and mercury fulminate, which can initiate from minimal impact but produce limited due to small charge sizes. Secondary high explosives, moderately sensitive, serve as main charges or boosters; examples include trinitrotoluene (, detonation velocity 6,900 meters per second, melting point 80.35°C) and cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (, velocity 8,750 meters per second), valued for stability under handling. Tertiary high explosives, the least sensitive, such as ammonium nitrate-fuel oil () mixtures, require a strong booster for reliable and are common in due to low cost and bulk use. Additional classifications consider chemical composition, such as nitroaromatic (e.g., ), nitramine (e.g., ), or nitrate ester (e.g., ) types, influencing and performance. Regulatory frameworks, like those from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), group materials into high explosives (e.g., ), low explosives (e.g., black powder), and blasting agents (e.g., ) for storage and transport based on hazard potential. Sensitivity testing, including drop hammer impact or friction sensitivity per standards like UN Series 2 tests, quantifies these differences, with primary explosives showing initiation energies below 10 joules.

Historical Development

Ancient and Early Modern Periods

The earliest explosive devices emerged in with the invention of in the CE, formulated by Taoist alchemists during experiments for an immortality elixir involving saltpeter, , and . Initially applied to and incendiary mixtures, these compositions produced rapid ; by the 10th century, refinements enabled true explosive propulsion and fragmentation in military contexts during the (960–1279 CE). Archaeological evidence, including shell casings from the , confirms the deployment of hand grenades and bombs in sieges against Jurchen and Mongol forces. The Song-era military manual (1044 CE) documents specific devices like the "," a charge encased in paper or bamboo with added iron pellets for , ignited via fuses to hurl fragments and create concussive blasts. Iron-cased variants appeared by the late 12th to early , enhancing lethality through stronger containment and directed explosions, as evidenced by battlefield remnants and textual accounts of their use in repelling invasions. These innovations prioritized causal —rapid gas expansion shattering casings—over mere burning, distinguishing them from prior incendiaries like , though the latter's Byzantine deployment from the involved pressurized flammables without reliable . Gunpowder disseminated westward through Mongol campaigns by the 13th century, reaching where initial 14th-century adaptations focused on before standalone bombs. In the early modern era (c. 1500–1800), European engineers refined portable explosives: , conical metal pots holding 5–6 pounds (2.3–2.7 kg) of with chain attachments for securing to gates, originated in 16th-century for breaching fortifications via timed blasts. Hand grenades—hollow iron spheres of 1–5 pounds (0.45–2.3 kg) filled with black powder, fragmented by internal nails or casings—gained prevalence in sieges, with fuse-lit variants thrown by dedicated grenadiers emerging in the late 17th century during conflicts like the (1688–1697). Operational risks persisted, as inconsistent ignition often caused operator casualties, limiting widespread adoption until improved fusing in the .

Industrial and Military Advancements

The mid-19th century marked a pivotal shift in explosive technology driven by industrial demands for safer and more efficient blasting agents. patented in 1867, consisting of absorbed into kieselguhr (), which stabilized the highly volatile liquid explosive discovered by in 1847. This innovation drastically reduced handling risks, enabling widespread use in , quarrying, and infrastructure projects; by the late 1860s, facilitated breakthroughs like rapid tunnel boring, with production scaling to millions of kilograms annually across and . Concurrently, advancements in high explosives emerged from chemical research. In 1863, German chemist Julius Wilbrand synthesized trinitrotoluene (TNT) during experiments for yellow dyes, initially overlooking its explosive potential due to insensitivity requiring a primary detonator. TNT's stability and power later proved superior for industrial casting and loading, surpassing dynamite in controlled detonations by the 1870s, though full commercialization awaited improved initiation methods. Nobel's 1865 blasting cap, using mercury fulminate, further enhanced reliability across these materials. Military applications accelerated with propellants suited for modern firearms and . In 1884, French chemist Paul Vieille invented , the first viable from gelatinized , delivering three times the energy of black powder with minimal residue, adopted by the in 1886 for rifles and guns. This propelled velocities exceeding 600 m/s, transforming and tactics by enabling sustained fire without obscuring vision. High explosives like gained prominence in shells during late 19th-century conflicts, with velocities around 6,900 m/s enabling armor-piercing effects undreamt in black powder eras. World War I intensified production and refinement, with TNT-filled shells comprising the bulk of over 1.5 billion rounds fired by Allied forces, underscoring explosives' role in trench stalemates. Post-war, military research yielded compositions like (TNT-ammonium nitrate mixes) for cost efficiency, while industrial variants supported massive civil projects, such as the Canal's completion in 1914 using derivatives. These dual-use advancements prioritized and safety, with pressures reaching 200,000 atm in optimized formulations.

Design and Components

Explosive Charges

The explosive charge constitutes the core energetic material in an device, engineered to undergo a rapid exothermic that converts solid or liquid matter into high-pressure gases, generating a , heat, and potential fragmentation effects. High explosives dominate in destructive devices due to their behavior, where the reaction front propagates supersonically through the material at velocities exceeding 1,000 m/s, producing and far superior to low explosives, which deflagrate subsonically and are suited primarily for rather than blast. , density, and sensitivity to initiation are key properties dictating charge performance, with higher values enabling more efficient energy release in confined volumes. Explosive charges are structured in tiers to ensure reliable initiation: primary explosives, highly sensitive to shock or heat, serve in detonators to start the reaction; booster charges, moderately sensitive secondary explosives like , amplify the signal; and the main charge, composed of less sensitive secondary high explosives, delivers the primary destructive yield. This explosive train prevents premature activation while achieving full-order of the main . Main charges may be , pressed, or polymer-bound for and moldability, with formulations adjusted for specific applications such as armor or volume . Common military and industrial main charge materials include 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (), cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (), and cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine (), often in mixtures to balance power, stability, and castability. For instance, comprises approximately 59% , 39% , and 2% wax, offering enhanced velocity over pure while remaining pourable. Polymer-bonded explosives (PBX) incorporate or in a plastic matrix for , reducing accidental detonation risks.
ExplosiveTheoretical Maximum Density (g/cc)Detonation Velocity (m/s)Typical Use
1.6536,942 @ 1.637 g/ccCast main charges, benchmarks
1.8068,639 @ 1.767 g/ccBoosters, plastic explosives like C-4
1.9029,110 @ 1.89 g/ccHigh-performance warheads
PETN1.7788,260 @ 1.76 g/ccBoosters,
Civilian blasting charges often employ , a low-cost mixture of 94% prilled and 6% , detonating at around 3,200-4,500 m/s depending on confinement, though it requires a high-explosive booster for reliable initiation. , stabilized absorbed into an inert matrix like , provides a portable high-explosive option for , with velocities up to 6,000-7,000 m/s. ![Diagram of a dynamite stick showing internal structure][float-right] Charge mass and configuration directly influence yield; for example, scales with the of mass, while shaped charges concentrate energy via liners to achieve jet velocities exceeding 8,000 m/s for . Sensitivity is tuned via , binders, and desensitizers to mitigate handling risks, as smaller crystals increase reactivity but demand careful processing.

Initiation Systems

Initiation systems in explosive devices are mechanisms designed to deliver sufficient energy to trigger the of the main explosive charge, converting an external input such as , electrical , or shock into a high-velocity capable of sensitizing less reactive secondary explosives. These systems typically consist of a or blasting cap containing a primary explosive, which is highly sensitive to initiation stimuli, and a transmission medium like a to propagate the signal from the operator to the charge. Primary explosives, such as lead azide or , undergo rapid transition from to upon stimulation, generating the necessary pressure wave. Non-electric initiation systems rely on physical transmission of energy without electrical components, reducing risks from stray currents or . Safety fuses, composed of a of black powder surrounded by a protective covering, burn at a uniform rate of approximately 30-40 seconds per foot to convey flame to a blasting cap, which is then crimped securely to ensure reliable ignition. , loaded with high explosive like (PETN) at densities of 2-400 grains per foot, propagates a wave at velocities exceeding 22,000 feet per second, allowing simultaneous or sequenced of multiple charges via trunk and branch lines. tubes, thin plastic tubes coated internally with a light-sensitive explosive mixture of and aluminum, transmit a low-energy at 6,500-7,000 feet per second to activate non-electric detonators, offering immunity to electrical hazards while minimizing and residue. Electric initiation systems use to heat a bridgewire or embedded in a within the detonator, igniting the primary explosive with a minimum firing of 0.25 amperes to prevent misfires. These systems, including instantaneous and delay variants (e.g., delays up to 500 ms for blasting sequencing), connect via lead wires to a blasting that delivers controlled pulses, but require shunting unused legs to mitigate premature from as low as 0.05 amperes or interference. Electronic detonators advance precision with programmable delays accurate to ±1 , incorporating security features like keys or passcodes, and enable advanced blast management through centralized control units. Blasting caps, also termed detonators under regulatory definitions, encapsulate the initiating charge and are classified as high explosives due to their mass-detonating potential when unconfined, necessitating separate storage from main charges to prevent . In applications, must account for factors like hole depth, requiring dual downlines of for reliable energy transfer in deep blasts, with attachments positioned at least 6 inches from cord ends per safety guidelines. These systems prioritize reliability and safety, with non-electric options preferred in environments prone to electrical hazards, though all demand strict protocols to avoid accidental from , , or environmental factors.

Casings and Delivery Mechanisms

Casings in explosive devices primarily contain the explosive charge, providing confinement to enhance and pressure while directing blast energy or generating fragments for lethality. is a prevalent material due to its strength, for controlled fragmentation, and ability to withstand handling stresses; for instance, general-purpose aerial bombs feature aerodynamically shaped bodies weighing hundreds of kilograms, optimized for or blast effects. In improvised devices like pipe bombs, or iron pipes—typically 1-2 inches in and threaded with end caps—serve as casings, where wall thickness (e.g., schedule 40 vs. heavier) determines fragment size, velocity, and dispersion range, with thinner walls yielding smaller, faster projectiles up to 100 meters. Designs may incorporate scoring, pre-fragmentation grooves, or liners to tailor effects, as thicker casings prioritize containment for shaped charges, while thinner ones maximize in anti-personnel munitions. Delivery mechanisms refer to systems propelling or positioning the cased explosive at the target, varying by scale and intent. Hand-thrown devices, such as grenades, rely on manual projection for short-range delivery (up to 40 meters), with casings incorporating fins or for stability. Artillery shells and rounds use charges within gun barrels to achieve velocities exceeding 800 m/s, embedding fuzes and casings in streamlined bodies for aerodynamic flight over kilometers. Aerial bombs, dropped from at altitudes up to 10,000 meters, employ or retarded parachutes for precision, often augmented by guidance kits like GPS for under 5 meters in modern systems. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) frequently employ static or delivery, including command-placement along routes or vehicle-borne variants (VBIEDs) using cars or trucks to payloads exceeding 500 kg of s to checkpoints, as documented in over 10 U.S. incidents since 2009 demonstrating vehicular adaptation for mass-casualty intent. Emerging military applications integrate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for loitering munitions, delivering cased warheads via kamikaze dives or precision drops, enhancing standoff range beyond 10 km while minimizing operator risk. These mechanisms prioritize reliability under environmental stresses, with casings often reinforced to survive launch accelerations up to 10,000 g.

Legitimate Applications

Military and Defensive Uses

Explosive devices form a core component of conventional military arsenals, employed primarily to neutralize enemy personnel, equipment, and infrastructure through rapid energy release via detonation. High-explosive (HE) warheads, which convert chemical energy into blast waves and fragmentation, are standard in artillery projectiles, aerial bombs, and grenades for offensive operations. For instance, artillery shells filled with HE materials generate overpressure and shrapnel to inflict casualties and destroy fortifications, as detailed in U.S. military doctrine on blast effects. Hand grenades, such as the M67 fragmentation type used by U.S. forces, contain approximately 6.5 ounces of Composition B explosive to produce lethal radius effects in close-quarters combat. Aerial bombs, including general-purpose variants like the Mk 84 with up to 945 pounds of HE filler, enable precision strikes from aircraft against hardened targets. In , explosive warheads integrate with guided systems, such as missiles and rockets, where (HEAT) charges use shaped explosive liners to penetrate armored vehicles via focused jet formation, achieving velocities exceeding 8,000 m/s. Emerging applications include munitions—drone-delivered explosives like those in the U.S. Army's Family of Drone Munitions, which carry small HE payloads for targeted strikes against time-sensitive threats, enhancing standoff capabilities since their fielding in the 2020s. These systems prioritize blast and fragmentation for area denial or direct impact, with detonation initiated by fuzes responsive to impact, proximity, or time. Defensively, explosive devices such as landmines and naval mines create barriers to channel or halt enemy advances, protecting fixed positions and flanks. Landmines, emplaced in patterns per U.S. Army field manuals, detonate upon pressure or tiltrod activation to incapacitate or vehicles, thereby disrupting assaults and buying time for counteraction; for example, anti-personnel mines like the M18A1 direct fragmentation in a 60-degree arc over 50 meters. Naval mines, self-contained underwater explosives, have historically sunk over 1,000 ships in conflicts like , functioning via magnetic, acoustic, or contact triggers to deny sea lanes. Doctrine emphasizes mines' role in obstacle integration, where they complement wire and ditches to multiply defensive depth, though post-conflict clearance remains critical due to unexploded remnants.

Industrial and Commercial Uses

Explosive devices are primarily utilized in the industry for rock fragmentation through controlled blasting, enabling the extraction of and minerals. Ammonium nitrate-fuel oil () mixtures dominate these applications, comprising over 80% of explosives consumed in mining operations due to their high energy output, low cost, and adaptability to large-scale blasts. In quarrying, similar techniques employ ANFO and other blasting agents to break down rock faces for aggregate production, supporting infrastructure development by providing essential materials like and . These processes involve precise of boreholes, loading with explosive charges and detonators, and sequenced initiation to minimize overbreak and optimize fragment size. In the oil and gas sector, perforating equipped with explosive devices create targeted perforations in well casings and formations to establish fluid flow paths from reservoirs. These charges typically incorporate secondary high explosives such as (cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine) or (cyclotetramethylenetrinitramine), detonated to penetrate steel casing and concrete up to several meters into the surrounding rock. Each may house dozens of such charges, with explosive quantities ranging from 6 to 32 grams per charge, ensuring efficient extraction while adhering to downhole and constraints. Explosive welding represents another commercial application, where controlled detonations bond dissimilar metals without melting, producing clad plates for corrosion-resistant equipment in chemical processing and . This solid-state process uses explosives to accelerate a flyer plate onto a at high velocity, creating a metallurgical joint ideal for applications requiring incompatible material combinations, such as to . Industries leverage this technique for transition joints and pressure vessels, prioritizing it for its ability to achieve strong, leak-proof bonds unattainable by conventional .

Civil Engineering and Demolition

are employed in primarily for rock excavation through operations, where holes are drilled into rock formations, loaded with explosives such as or emulsions, and detonated to fragment material for removal in projects like quarrying, tunneling, and road construction. Production blasting utilizes large, widely spaced charges to maximize fragmentation of the burden rock between the face and drill holes, enabling efficient . In tunneling, techniques such as perimeter or blasting apply charges in closely spaced holes along the excavation boundary to minimize overbreak and maintain structural integrity of the surrounding rock. Dynamite, invented by in 1867, significantly advanced by providing a safer, stable high explosive for controlled blasting, replacing volatile in projects like . For instance, during the project in , completed in 1875 after 25 years, the introduction of and pneumatic drills accelerated progress through hard rock, reducing reliance on manual labor. In quarrying, blasting breaks rock into processable sizes, with modern operations using precise charge calculations based on rock type, burden, and spacing to optimize yield while controlling flyrock and . In structural demolition, controlled blasting implodes buildings by strategically placing linear shaped charges on key support columns and detonating in a sequenced delay to direct inward, minimizing damage to adjacent structures. A notable example is the 2017 implosion of the 165-meter (541-foot) building in , the tallest structure demolished by explosives to date, executed by placing charges to sever columns progressively from bottom to top. Earlier, the 439-foot (134-meter) AfE Tower in , , built in 1972, was imploded in 2014 using similar techniques after 42 years of service, demonstrating the method's efficacy for urban site clearance. These operations require detailed and vibration monitoring to ensure safety, with explosives selected for their and to achieve precise cuts.

Safety Measures and Risks

Operational Safety Protocols

Operational safety protocols for explosive devices emphasize preventing accidental initiation through rigorous personnel , equipment controls, and procedural safeguards, as mishandling has contributed to numerous incidents, including seven mining fatalities from flyrock, misfires, and toxic fumes since 2010. Competent is mandatory, with only qualified, non-intoxicated personnel authorized to handle, load, or fire explosives, ensuring adherence to manufacturer guidelines and site-specific plans. programs must cover hazards, safe operating procedures, emergency responses, and annual certification for manufacturing operations involving or explosives. Handling Procedures
  • Prohibit smoking, open flames, matches, firearms, or spark-producing devices within 50 feet of explosives; use non-sparking tools exclusively for package opening or .
  • Inspect explosives for or deterioration before use, discarding any compromised materials and consulting manufacturers for guidance; maintain clean, dry storage areas with proper ventilation to prevent degradation.
  • Employ (PPE) such as helmets, gloves, and conductive footwear; ground all equipment to mitigate during pneumatic loading via semiconductive hoses.
Storage Protocols
Explosives must be stored in locked, bullet-resistant magazines classified by quantity (Class I for over 50 pounds, Class II for 50 pounds or less), with a 25-foot clear zone, sloped drainage, and separation of detonators from bulk charges to minimize sympathetic detonation risks. Inventory checks are required, with unused materials promptly returned; rotate stock on a first-in, first-out basis to avoid instability from age.
Transportation Requirements
Vehicles transporting explosives must be in optimal condition, equipped with at least two 10-B-C fire extinguishers, and operated solely by trained, licensed drivers who avoid congested areas, railways, or passenger routes; markings such as "Explosives A" or "B" are mandatory, with no smoking or open flames permitted. Segregate incompatible explosives during transit to prevent interactions, and secure loads against movement or impact.
Operational Use and Blasting Protocols
Blasting operations occur between sunrise and sunset, halting during electrical storms; evacuate and guard blast zones with signals, flags, or barricades, conducting post-blast inspections for misfires, which require waiting 15-30 minutes before re-entry and professional disposal if unresolved. In congested areas, cover charges with mats to contain flyrock; notify utilities 24-48 hours prior for operations near , and use wooden tamping rods to avoid . Process hazard analyses identify risks like unintended , with mechanical integrity inspections ensuring equipment reliability per recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. Emergency procedures include immediate evacuation, fire suppression, and coordination with local authorities for toxic fume dispersion.

Historical Accidents and Lessons Learned

The on December 6, 1917, occurred when the French munitions ship SS Mont-Blanc, laden with approximately 2,300 tons of high explosives including , , and guncotton, collided with the Norwegian vessel SS Imo in , . Sparks from the collision ignited vapors from the Mont-Blanc's cargo, leading to a equivalent to 2.9 kilotons of that killed nearly 2,000 people, injured over 9,000, and devastated the city. Key causes included navigational errors, inadequate wartime port traffic controls, and failure to warn nearby vessels or shore populations after the fire started, as crews evacuated without alerting authorities. Lessons emphasized stricter adherence to collision regulations, mandatory separation distances for munitions ships in congested harbors, and immediate public alerting systems for hazardous cargo incidents, influencing later international safety codes. In the Port Chicago disaster on July 17, 1944, at the U.S. Naval Magazine in , an explosion obliterated two liberty ships loaded with over 4,600 tons of munitions, including bombs, depth charges, and incendiary devices, killing 320 personnel and injuring 390 others. The blast, likely initiated by mishandling during rushed loading operations under wartime pressure—such as dropping heavy projectiles or improper stacking—propagated through of adjacent stockpiles on piers and ships. Contributing factors were insufficient training for stevedores, lack of segregation between types, and overloaded piers without blast barriers. Post-incident investigations led to reforms in naval handling, including mandatory specialized training, quantity-distance standards to limit stockpiles near loading areas, and improved segregation protocols to prevent chain reactions, which were codified in subsequent U.S. safety manuals. The on April 16, 1947, involved the detonation of about 2,300 tons of fertilizer aboard the SS Grandcamp at , triggered by a hold that firefighters exacerbated by using high-pressure water streams, converting the cargo into a powerful explosive. The primary blast killed at least 581 people, injured over 5,000, and caused secondary explosions in nearby facilities, with debris traveling miles and igniting further fires. Root causes included improper storage of near combustibles, lack of suppression knowledge for oxidizer-based materials, and port zoning that clustered hazardous cargoes. This event prompted U.S. regulatory changes, such as enhanced classification of as a Class 1 explosive under DOT rules, mandatory inert atmosphere firefighting for fertilizer holds, and zoning laws requiring buffer zones between industrial explosives storage and populated areas. The PEPCON disaster on May 4, 1988, at the Pacific Engineering and Production Company plant near Henderson, Nevada, saw a fire in a mixing room ignite stockpiles of over 4,000 tons of ammonium perchlorate rocket fuel oxidizer, resulting in multiple detonations that killed two workers, injured 372, and damaged structures up to 10 miles away. The incident stemmed from inadequate housekeeping allowing propellant residue accumulation, electrical sparks as ignition sources, and storage in unbarricaded bins that permitted blast propagation across the site. Lessons included stricter OSHA and ATF requirements for oxidizer facilities, such as grounded equipment to prevent static discharge, regular residue removal protocols, and reinforced quantity-distance separations with blast walls, which reduced U.S. production vulnerabilities in defense-related explosives manufacturing. These accidents collectively underscore the primacy of empirical risk assessment in explosive handling, where human factors like training gaps and procedural oversights often amplify material hazards, driving iterative improvements in standards despite persistent challenges in enforcement.

International Treaties and Standards

The (CCW), adopted on 10 October 1980 and entering into force on 2 December 1983, serves as a primary framework under to prohibit or restrict the use of specific conventional weapons, including explosive devices deemed excessively injurious or indiscriminate. Its protocols directly address explosive ordnance: Amended Protocol II, adopted on 3 May 1996 and entering into force on 3 December 1998, imposes restrictions on the use, detection, clearance, and destruction of mines, booby-traps, and other devices, explicitly covering improvised explosive devices (IEDs) while prohibiting their use in populated areas or perfidious employment. Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War, adopted on 28 November 2003 and entering into force on 12 November 2006, obligates states to clear , mitigate risks to civilians, and promote information exchange on explosive remnants from prior conflicts, defining such remnants as conventional munitions containing explosives that have been primed, fuzed, or armed but failed to detonate. Additional treaties target specific explosive device categories. The (Ottawa Treaty), adopted on 18 September 1997 and entering into force on 1 March 1999, prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of anti-personnel landmines, which function as victim-activated explosive devices, with 164 states parties as of 2023 committing to destruction of stockpiles totaling over 55 million mines. The , adopted on 30 May 2008 and entering into force on 1 August 2010, bans cluster munitions—air-dropped or ground-launched explosive submunitions that disperse to cover an area—with 112 states parties required to clear contaminated areas and assist victims, addressing the high failure rates (up to 40% in some cases) that leave hazardous duds. The International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, adopted on 15 December 1997 and entering into force on 23 April 2001, establishes for the unlawful and intentional delivery, placement, or use of or other lethal devices against persons or to cause or serious injury in terrorist acts, with 170 states parties as of 2023. The , adopted on 2 April 2013 and entering into force on 24 December 2014, regulates international trade in conventional arms, , and parts, requiring states to assess risks of diversion to non-state actors or use in , with 113 states parties emphasizing controls on explosive materials to prevent illicit . International standards complement these treaties by focusing on safe handling and transport. The Recommendations on the Transport of (Model Regulations, known as the "Orange Book"), revised periodically with the 22nd edition in 2021, classify explosives as Class 1 with six divisions based on hazard types (e.g., Division 1.1 for mass risk), providing globally harmonized criteria for , labeling, and adopted by bodies like the International Maritime Code and ICAO Technical Instructions. The International Technical Guidelines (IATG), developed by the SaferGuard Programme and first issued in 2011 with updates through version 4.0 in 2023, establish non-binding standards for management, including explosive hazard classification, storage to prevent unplanned detonations, and disposal to mitigate risks from unstable stockpiles estimated at over 800 million tons globally. These instruments prioritize empirical over restrictive narratives, though implementation varies due to non-universal and enforcement challenges in conflict zones.

Domestic Regulations and Controls

In the United States, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) enforces regulations on explosive materials under Title 18, , Chapter 40, and 27 CFR Part 555, which govern the manufacture, importation, distribution, , and use of explosives to prevent unlawful diversion and misuse. Persons engaging in business activities involving explosives must obtain a explosives or permit, with specific requirements for user permits limited to verified needs such as or , and all facilities required to meet ATF-approved standards for and quantity limits based on explosive class. or of explosives must be reported to ATF within 24 hours of discovery, and annual reporting of facilities to local fire authorities was proposed in 2023 to enhance oversight. laws may impose additional restrictions, such as permitting and recordkeeping, but authority preempts interstate commerce. In the , the Explosives Regulations 2014 (ER2014) consolidate controls on civil explosives, requiring licenses or registrations from local authorities or the () for manufacture, storage exceeding specified quantities, sale, and use, with separation of requirements for low- and high-hazard sites to prioritize risk-based safety. Security provisions mandate risk assessments for "relevant explosives" like detonators and plastic explosives, including intruder detection and personnel vetting, while transfers within require compliance with separation distances and emergency planning. Certificates are mandatory for acquiring, possessing, or transferring explosives, enforced by under the Firearms Act integration. Canada's Explosives Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. E-17) and Explosives Regulations, 2013, administered by , regulate all aspects from manufacture to importation, prohibiting unauthorized possession and requiring licenses or permits for activities like acquisition for sale, storage, and transport, with specific standards for fireworks, ammunition, and blasting agents. Import/export permits involve border verification by the , and amendments as recent as 2024 address storage security and prohibited components. In the , domestic controls supplement Regulation (EU) 2019/1148 on explosives precursors, which restricts sales of regulated chemicals like above 1.2 kg to licensed professionals, with member states enforcing reporting of suspicious transactions and end-user declarations to curb home-made explosives. National implementations vary, such as the UK's alignment with precursor reporting under the Poisons Act. In , regulations are primarily state-based, with licenses required for possession and use under frameworks like New South Wales' Explosives Regulation 2024, mandating security clearances for access and prohibiting transport on public passenger vehicles. These measures emphasize licensing, secure storage, and traceability to mitigate risks from both accidental and intentional misuse.

Misuse and Controversies

Improvised Explosive Devices in Terrorism

Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) constitute a primary in terrorist arsenals due to their from readily available materials, such as commercial fertilizers, , and scavenged components, enabling non-state actors to inflict mass casualties without specialized . These devices typically incorporate an charge, a power source, a , and a —often improvised from cell phones, timers, or command wires—allowing deployment via vehicle-borne (VBIED), person-borne, or roadside configurations. Terrorist groups favor IEDs for their low cost, estimated at under $100 per unit in many cases, and high psychological impact, as they target civilian infrastructure, public gatherings, and to sow fear and disrupt societies. The tactical evolution of IEDs in terrorism traces to groups like the (PIRA), which during the conflict from 1969 to 1998 refined vehicle-borne and remote-detonated variants to counter British countermeasures, including under-vehicle mirrors and blast barriers. This innovation influenced Islamist networks, with employing truck bombs in the 1993 attack—using from , killing six and injuring over 1,000—and the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in and , which detonated approximately 2,000 pounds of , resulting in 224 deaths. The (ISIS) scaled IED production industrially during its 2014–2019 , establishing workshops in and to manufacture thousands of pressure-plate and victim-operated devices, contributing to over 10,000 coalition casualties in and through asymmetric ambushes. In Western contexts, IEDs have featured in high-profile lone-actor and cell operations, such as the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, where brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev assembled pressure cooker bombs from black powder, nails, and remote detonators, killing three and wounding 264. Similarly, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing by Timothy McVeigh utilized a 4,800-pound ammonium nitrate-fuel oil (ANFO) truck bomb, the deadliest domestic terrorist act in U.S. history with 168 fatalities. Empirical analyses of U.S. federal terrorism charges indicate person-borne pipe bombs as the predominant IED form, often in plots targeting soft targets like events or transit hubs. Globally, data from incident databases show IEDs involved in roughly 20–30% of attacks causing fatalities, with suicide variants amplifying lethality by ensuring delivery proximity. Counter-IED efforts have driven terrorist adaptations, such as electronic countermeasures to evade jammers, yet IEDs persist as a resilient threat due to their decentralized fabrication and deniability. In regions like and the , seizures of precursor materials—exceeding 28,000 kg of explosives and 3,400 IEDs in a 2024 Interpol operation—underscore ongoing proliferation among narco-terrorist hybrids and jihadist remnants. These devices' asymmetry favors perpetrators with limited resources, perpetuating their role in campaigns by groups including affiliates, who integrate them with drones and chemical enhancers for compounded effects.

Ethical and Strategic Debates

Ethical debates surrounding explosive devices primarily revolve around their compatibility with just war theory's principles of and , which require distinguishing between combatants and civilians while ensuring that anticipated military gains outweigh civilian harms. Critics argue that many explosive weapons, such as unguided shells or improvised explosive devices, inherently produce wide-area effects that risk indiscriminate harm, potentially violating prohibitions on attacks expected to cause excessive incidental civilian damage relative to concrete military advantage. For instance, has been contested for entangling noncombatants in warfare, contravening their protected status under . Proponents of restraint, including organizations like the International Committee of the Red Cross, highlight empirical data from urban conflicts showing that explosive weapons in populated areas account for up to 90% of civilian casualties in some cases, fueling calls for enhanced precautions or restrictions. In applying , just theorists assess whether the destructive scale of explosives—often involving , fragmentation, and structural —justifies their deployment; for example, innovations like precision-guided munitions aim to minimize excess harm by enabling targeted strikes, yet debates persist over whether even these can reliably avert disproportionate outcomes in dense environments. Ethical scrutiny extends to dual-use targets, such as power grids supporting both military and civilian functions, where striking with explosives may yield strategic denial effects but at the cost of widespread deprivation, prompting doctrinal questions about acceptable trade-offs. Academic analyses emphasize that proportionality demands empirical weighing of harms against goods, rejecting blanket prohibitions in favor of case-specific evaluations, though revisionist interpretations critique traditional frameworks for inadequately accounting for long-term societal costs like . Strategically, explosive devices offer militaries decisive firepower for breaking fortified positions or denying terrain, as evidenced by their role in operations from carpet bombing to modern , where they enable against numerically superior foes. However, in asymmetric conflicts, their use—particularly improvised variants—has sparked debates over blowback effects, such as radicalizing populations through or eroding international support, as seen in analyses of IED campaigns in and that prolonged insurgencies despite tactical successes. Precision explosives mitigate some risks by reducing sortie requirements—e.g., one modern guided bomb equating to thousands of unguided drops in efficacy—but strategic overreliance on them assumes technological superiority, vulnerable to countermeasures like electronic jamming or urban concealment. Debates on restricting explosives in populated areas, crystallized in the political declaration endorsed by over 70 states, advocate avoiding wide-area effect weapons to curb civilian harm, drawing on data from and where such munitions exacerbated humanitarian crises. Counterarguments from military perspectives assert that outright curbs undermine legitimate defense, as urban warfare's realities—e.g., combatants embedding in civilian zones—necessitate explosives for proportionality under existing law, provided targeting protocols are followed; empirical reviews indicate that lawful use remains feasible despite grim outcomes, rejecting bans as politically driven rather than causally grounded in IHL. These tensions underscore broader strategic realism: while explosives enhance deterrence and operational tempo, their ethical constraints demand rigorous intelligence and alternatives like non-lethal options to align with long-term victory conditions.

References

  1. [1]
    1910.109 - Explosives and blasting agents. | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    ### Summary of Key Operational Safety Protocols for Explosives and Blasting Agents (OSHA 1910.109)
  2. [2]
    Explosives | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ... - ATF
    Explosives are any chemical compound, mixture, or device, the primary or common purpose of which is to function by explosion.Binary Explosives · Explosives Q&As · Is black powder subject to... · Fireworks
  3. [3]
    Glossary – 3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program - DOD DENIX
    (See military munitions / ammunition). Ammunition (Ammo). Generic term related mainly to articles of military application consisting of all kinds of bombs ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 9 MILITARY ENERGETIC MATERIALS: EXPLOSIVES AND ...
    (Today, the most important inorganic nitrate explosive is ammonium nitrate, which is used in demolition and construction.) Inorganic nitrates formed the basis ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Federal Explosives Law and Regulations - ATF
    would be required to obtain any explosive device, such as detona- tors, used to initiate the mixed binary explosives. In addition, transportation of any ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] IED Attack: Improvised Explosive Devices - Homeland Security
    Because they are improvised, IEDs can come in many forms, ranging from a small pipe bomb to a sophisticated device capable of causing massive damage and loss of ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The need to identify the characteristics of - Department of Justice
    Explosives and hazardous devices examination is a forensic discipline based on the premise that physical evidence from the scene of a bombing includes the ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Module 1 - Explosives
    “High explosives” detonate, whereas “low explosives” deflagrate or burn. A high-explosives detonation provides both shock, which fractures (or breaks) the ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Chapter 2 EXPLOSIVES
    A lower heat of explosion means a lower energy output and thereby less efficient blasting. Antacids. Antacids are added to an explosive compound to increase its ...
  10. [10]
    Deflagration - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Deflagration refers to a type of combustion explosion where the reaction front propagates slower than the speed of sound in the unreacted gases, ...
  11. [11]
    Introducing the combustion continuum to define the transition points ...
    Dec 28, 2024 · Within the field of explosives, it is normal to talk about the velocity of detonation and brisance to describe any given explosive and to ...
  12. [12]
    Principles of Explosives Analysis - Forensic Science Simplified
    An explosive device employs either a liquid, a powder, or a solid explosive material; an incendiary device is flammable and is intended to start a fire.
  13. [13]
    Probing deflagration to better understand detonation
    Apr 10, 2025 · In a new study, researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) conducted laser ignition experiments in a diamond anvil cell.
  14. [14]
    Properties of Selected High Explosives - PacSci EMC
    Explosives which detonate and propagate at velocities greater than 1000 m/s, are high explosives and include the secondary explosives RDX, HMX, HNS, DIPAM, ...Definitions · Properties & Characteristics · Stability Tests · Chemical Data
  15. [15]
    What are the classes of explosive materials for storage purposes?
    There are 3 classes of explosive materials: (a) High explosives (for example, dynamite, flash powders, and bulk salutes); (b) Low explosives (for example, ...Missing: tertiary | Show results with:tertiary
  16. [16]
    Explosive - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    One simple method is to separate explosives into three groups: (1) primary explosives, (2) secondary explosives, and (3) tertiary explosives. 8.2.1 Primary ...
  17. [17]
    Gunpowder: Origins in the East - Brown University
    Chinese monks discovered the technology in the 9th century CE, during their quest for a life-extending elixir. The key ingredient, saltpeter, had been in use by ...
  18. [18]
    Gunpowder - Song Dynasty China | Asia for Educators
    Song military engineers found gunpowder to be helpful in siege warfare, leading to the development of early types of rockets, cannons, bombs, and mines.
  19. [19]
    Gunpowder in Medieval China – Science Technology and Society a ...
    By the 12th and 13th centuries, true bombs and cannons had emerged. Excavations in China have uncovered hand-cannon barrels and shell casings from the 1100s– ...
  20. [20]
    WORLD'S FIRST GUNPOWDER, BOMBS AND ROCKETS
    In 1398, gunpowder weapons were used to expel the Mongols. In the 16th century Chinese used rock bombs made from pieces of stone fitted together and packed 70 ...History of Gunpowder in China · Early Fireworks and Bombs in...
  21. [21]
    Evolution of Early Gunpowder Weaponry - from Ancient China to ...
    Aug 31, 2025 · The iron bomb, developed in the late 1100s–early 1200s, was designed to kill with explosive shrapnel. Mongols adopted and spread these ...
  22. [22]
    The irony of gunpowder | OUPblog
    Oct 21, 2016 · In the 14th century, Europeans experimented with various powders and guns, seeking to harness the power of this chemical mixture for military ...
  23. [23]
    Iron Petard from La Belle | Bullock Texas State History Museum
    A petard is a bucket-shaped device which is filled with explosives and hung against a wall or gate before being exploded. This one came to Texas on the ship ...
  24. [24]
    The Modern Grenade: A Brief History
    Grenades evolved from the Middle Ages into the modern era, giving soldiers an easily delivered and effective close-range weapon.
  25. [25]
    NPS Interpretive Series: Artillery Through the Ages
    Sep 11, 2003 · Petards were used frequently in King William's War of the 1680's to force the gates of small German towns. But on a well-barred, double gate the ...
  26. [26]
    About History: Grenade!
    Jan 10, 2024 · Hand grenades were in such general use from the late 17th- to early 18th-century that selected soldiers in many European armies were trained as ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  27. [27]
    How Alfred Nobel's Invention of Dynamite Reshaped the World
    Apr 17, 2025 · Dynamite lit the fuse of the Second Industrial Revolution and transformed civil engineering, mining, warfare and revolutionary movements.
  28. [28]
    Alfred Nobel's dynamite companies - NobelPrize.org
    For hundreds of years, black powder was the only explosive available for civilian as well as military purposes. Alfred Nobel's invention of the detonator ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Alfred Nobel | Science History Institute
    The founder of the prestigious Nobel Prizes made his fortune with a big bang by inventing dynamite, a stabilized form of nitroglycerin.Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  30. [30]
    About Our Industry - Institute of Makers of Explosives
    In the 1860s, Alfred Nobel, for whom the Nobel Prize was named, invented dynamite, a safer alternative to black powder, and the blasting cap required to make it ...
  31. [31]
    The Invention Of TNT - Sciencing
    or TNT as it is most commonly known — was first created in 1863 by German chemist Joseph Wilbrand ...
  32. [32]
    Paul Vieille - Spartacus Educational
    In 1886 Vieille invented a smokeless gunpowder called Poudre B. Made from gelatinized nitrocellulose mixed with ether and alcohol, it was passed through ...
  33. [33]
    American Production Of Military High Explosives And Their Raw ...
    Practically speaking, no substance is considered as a military high explosive unless the velocity of detonation is at least three thousand meters per second.
  34. [34]
    Explosives - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · The detonation velocity of an explosive is dependent on the density, ingredients, particle size, charge diameter, and degree of confinement.
  35. [35]
    Appendix M | Containing the Threat from Illegal Bombings: An ...
    M Components of Explosive Systems. The characteristics of primary and secondary explosives are exploited in the design of the "explosive train." Briefly, the ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  36. [36]
    [PDF] EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS ...
    This subclass covers all mechanical and materials aspects of ammunition of all calibres, explosive charges, fireworks, non-firearm projectiles/missiles. It also ...
  37. [37]
    Explosive materials - Chemring Group
    The Chemring Nobel range of high energy materials includes HMX, RDX, NTO and Alkyl-NENA energetic plasticisers.
  38. [38]
    49 CFR 173.59 -- Description of terms for explosives. - eCFR
    A blasting explosive containing no essential ingredients other than prilled ammonium nitrate and fuel oil. Ammunition. Generic term related mainly to articles ...
  39. [39]
    Shaped Charge - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jun 12, 2017 · A shaped charge is a concave metal hemisphere or cone (known as a liner) backed by a high explosive, all in a steel or aluminum casing.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Overview of Explosive Initiators - DTIC
    Electric blasting caps (fig. 4, bottom) are configured very similarly to non electric, the only difference being the use of a hotwire-embedded initiation charge ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Module 2 - Initiation Systems
    Electric detonators are used frequently in surface coal mines to initiate detonating- cord trunk lines. Accordingly, their safe use will be discussed in this ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  42. [42]
    General Purpose Bombs - JPEO A&A - Army.mil
    Their cases (bomb body) are aerodynamically designed and are relatively light. ... This bomb has a slender body made of steel with a well in the nose ...
  43. [43]
    Experimental fragmentation of pipe bombs with varying case thickness
    Among all the improvised explosive devices (IEDs) known, pipe bombs are one of the most popular devices used by terrorists. They are simple to use, ...
  44. [44]
    Fragments dispersion characteristics of the casing with the ...
    Abstract. The shell of the conventional casings filled with explosives is often in a good matching state with the charged explosive, but the conventional ...Missing: types | Show results with:types
  45. [45]
    Terrorism and Conventional Weapons
    Conventional terrorist weapons include manufactured and improvised firearms, bombs and other explosives. The UN Terrorism Prevention Branch describes ...Missing: munitions | Show results with:munitions
  46. [46]
    Bomb | Types, Uses, Bunker Busters, & Smart Bombs | Britannica
    Sep 3, 2025 · The casing of such a bomb is composed of magnesium, a metal that itself burns at a high temperature when ignited by thermite. Intensive-type ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device (VBIED) - DNI.gov
    Jul 10, 2018 · VEHICLE BORNE IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (VBIED): PREPAREDNESS, RECOGNITION, AND RESPONSE (continued). OVERVIEW. Motorcycle, 50 lbs. Car, 500 ...
  48. [48]
    Munitions Modernization: The Family of Drone Munitions - Army.mil
    Oct 17, 2024 · Drone munitions is revolutionizing modern warfare. Small, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can carry a variety of explosive payloads.
  49. [49]
    Explosives Ordnance Engineering MSc - Cranfield University
    This course meets the requirements of the Level 7 Ordnance Munitions and Explosives Specialist and can therefore be taken as an Apprenticeship.
  50. [50]
    Chapter 13 WARHEADS
    A blast warhead is one that is designed to achieve target damage primarily from blast effect. When a high explosive detonates, it is converted almost instantly ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  51. [51]
    [PDF] EXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTS - GICHD
    Jul 20, 2006 · The five weapon systems reviewed are 122 mm multi barrel rocket launchers,. 81-120 mm mortars, 152-155 mm artillery guns, 115-125 mm tank guns ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Organizations - PL Joint Ammunition and Weapon Systems - Bombs
    Lead Joint Ammunition and Weapon Systems is responsible for recurring production procurement of US Air Force and Navy conventional bomb bodies, plugs, lugs and ...Missing: examples devices
  53. [53]
    High-explosive anti-tank warhead - Military Wiki - Fandom
    High-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warheads are made of an explosive shaped charge that uses the Munroe effect to create a very high-velocity partial stream of ...Heat Projectile... · History · Variations
  54. [54]
    Loitering Munitions And Its Role In Modern Warfare.
    Apr 6, 2024 · (c) High Explosive Anti-Tank Warhead (HEAT) - is a type of munition designed to penetrate armoured vehicles, such as tanks, by directing a ...
  55. [55]
    part one. mine operations - GlobalSecurity.org
    MINE-WARFARE CONCEPTS. Mines are explosive devices that are emplaced to kill, destroy, or incapacitate enemy personnel and/or equipment. They can be employed ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Naval Mine Warfare - Naval History and Heritage Command
    May 30, 2024 · A naval mine is a self-contained explosive device placed in the water deemed to destroy submarines and surface vessels.Missing: doctrine | Show results with:doctrine
  57. [57]
    [PDF] JP 3-15 Joint Doctrine for Barriers, Obstacles, and Mine Warfare
    Feb 24, 1999 · The threat of terrorist employment of mines, explosives, and booby traps may necessitate defensive measures to reduce the vulnerability of US ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] LANDMINES, EXPLOSIVE REMNANTS OF WAR AND IED SAFETY ...
    abandoned munitions and military equipment, unexploded ordnance and other explosive remnants of war (ERW), as well as improvised explosive devices (IEDs) pose a ...
  59. [59]
    Economic impact study illustrates benefits of commercial explosives
    May 21, 2024 · As IME describes, commercial explosives are essential for quarrying the aggregates required to build the nation's infrastructure.Missing: production | Show results with:production
  60. [60]
    FAQ Aggregate Blasting - Illinois Department of Natural Resources
    ANFO, ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, is the most common explosive. ANFO, pound for pound is as powerful as dynamite and is less expensive per pound and less ...
  61. [61]
    The Defining Series: Perforating Fundamentals - SLB
    Sep 9, 2015 · Most explosives used for perforating are referred to as secondary explosives, meaning another source must initiate their detonation.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Casing Perforating Overview | EPA
    The three main explosives used in a shaped charge are RDX (Cyclotrimethylene Trinitramine),. HMX (Cyclotetramethylene Trinitramine), and HNS (Hexanitrosilbene).
  63. [63]
    Shaped Charges For Oil Well Perforating - Drilling Manual
    Dec 20, 2023 · The amount of explosive used is small – typically in the range of 6 to 32 g (0.2–1.1 oz), although smaller charges are available for very small- ...
  64. [64]
    Explosion Welding | NobelClad
    Customers often turn to explosion welding to reliably clad steel with alloy metals, such as stainless steel, brass, nickel, silver, titanium, or zirconium. Our ...
  65. [65]
    Fundamentals of Explosion Welding - ASM International
    The most common utilization of explosive bonding is the production of clad metals for the purpose of corrosion resistance and for transition joints that are ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
    The Ultimate Guide to Drilling and Blasting - JOUAV
    Mar 27, 2024 · This technique involves strategically drilling holes into the rock and then using explosives to break it into manageable pieces. While seemingly ...
  68. [68]
    Blasting Methods - FHWA - Center for Local Aid Support - Publications
    Production blasting uses large explosive charges, widely spaced, that are designed to fragment a large amount of burden (the rock that lies between the existing ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Blasting and Explosives Quick Reference Guide 2010
    Perimeter blasting is a technique to reduce the overbreak/backbreak on a blast. It usually utilises decoupled charges in closely spaced blastholes. The ...
  70. [70]
    How Dynamite Revolutionized Tunnel Excavations - Forbes
    Oct 31, 2016 · In 1867, Nobel invented dynamite, which stabilized the highly explosive nitroglycerin by mixing it into porous diatomaceous earth.
  71. [71]
    New explosives, pneumatic drills aid decadeslong tunnel construction
    Jan 8, 2024 · A 25-year effort to cut a tunnel through the Hoosac Mountain turned a corner when new explosives and pneumatic drills appeared.
  72. [72]
    Blasting | Quarrying and the environment | Foundations of the Mendips
    Blasting is necessary to break rock from the ground, prior to it being taken for processing. In the early days of aggregate quarrying, explosives were not used.
  73. [73]
    Quarrying | Process and Equipment | Applications - Epiroc
    With few exceptions, modern quarries rely on drilling and blasting to fragment the rock, which is then loaded onto off-highway trucks or belt conveyors for ...
  74. [74]
    How Controlled Demolitions Work And When To Use Them
    Jan 16, 2024 · Controlled demolition employs a serious of small explosions, strategically placed within a structure, progressively detonated encouraging a ...
  75. [75]
    Tallest building demolished using explosives (controlled demolition)
    The tallest building demolished using explosives (controlled demolition) is 165.032 m (541.44 ft), and was achieved by MODON Properties (UAE), in Abu Dhabi, ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  76. [76]
    7 of the Biggest Controlled Demolitions - Popular Mechanics
    Mar 1, 2017 · At 381 feet tall, the 1972-built AfE Tower became the tallest building to ever be demolished using explosives when it came down in Frankfurt, ...
  77. [77]
    Construction Blasting Fundamentals - IRMI
    Nov 1, 2008 · A blast can be initiated with high-sensitivity explosives by using a detonator. Low-sensitivity explosives, such as ANFO emulsion blends, ...Explosives Defined · Explosives Classification · Ignition Systems
  78. [78]
    MNM Safety Alert - Explosive and Blasting Safety
    ### Summary of Explosive and Blasting Safety in Mining
  79. [79]
    1926.900 - General provisions. | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    ### Summary of General Provisions for Blasting and Use of Explosives in Construction (OSHA 1926.900)
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Process Safety Management for Explosives and Pyrotechnics ...
    Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing.
  81. [81]
  82. [82]
    [PDF] The Collision of the SS Mont-Blanc and the Halifax Explosion - NASA
    Jan 7, 2013 · The SS Mont-Blanc, carrying munitions, collided with the SS Imo in Halifax. Sparks ignited the Mont-Blanc's cargo, causing a massive explosion.
  83. [83]
    1944 - Port Chicago Naval Magazine Explosion
    Mar 4, 2025 · In the holds of E. A. Bryan or on the pier ready to be loaded were 4,606 tons of antiaircraft ammunition, aerial bombs, high explosives, and ...
  84. [84]
    The Port Chicago Story - National Park Service
    The SS E.A. Bryan, fully loaded with munitions, and the SS Quinault Victory, in the process of being loaded, were at the center of the blast.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] The Texas City Disaster
    The Texas City disaster occurred on April 16, 1947, involving a ship carrying ammonium nitrate fertilizer, which caught fire and caused an explosion. Another ...
  86. [86]
    Texas City Fire - Army Corps of Engineers
    The explosion immediately killed more than 500 people and wounded more than 5,000, as tons of steel flew in all directions, landing and igniting additional ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    From Rockets to Ruins - Office of Safety and Mission Assurance
    Nov 5, 2012 · The 1988 PEPCON disaster involved an ammonium perchlorate explosion, caused by a spark igniting residue, killing two employees. The explosion ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] MANAGING CRISES IN DEFENSE INDUSTRY: THE PEPCON AND ...
    This account of two actual emergencies provides lessons on how statutory procedures could be improved, regulations clarified, the government data base expanded, ...
  89. [89]
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
    9. International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings
    In accordance with its article 21(1), the Convention will be open for signature by all States on 12 January 1998 until 31 December 1999 at United Nations ...
  92. [92]
  93. [93]
  94. [94]
    27 CFR Part 555 -- Commerce in Explosives - eCFR
    This part contains the procedural and substantive requirements relative to: (1) The interstate or foreign commerce in explosive materials;<|separator|>
  95. [95]
    Report Explosives Theft or Loss - ATF
    Any person who has knowledge of the theft or loss of any explosive materials from their stock must report such theft or loss within 24 hours of discovery to ...Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic
  96. [96]
    Annual Reporting of Explosive Materials Storage Facilities to the ...
    Aug 23, 2023 · The Department of Justice is proposing to amend Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ("ATF") regulations to require that any ...
  97. [97]
    ACQUIRING AND POSSESSING EXPLOSIVES
    May 8, 2013 · The federal and state laws governing these explosives address licensing and permitting, storage, transport, and recordkeeping.Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic
  98. [98]
    The Explosives Regulations 2014 - Legislation.gov.uk
    “firearm” has the meaning given in section 57(1) of the Firearms Act 1968 M13;. “fireworks” means the explosive articles assigned in accordance with the United ...
  99. [99]
    Explosives Regulations 2014 - HSE
    Jun 30, 2025 · It has brought together the requirements of health and safety related explosives legislation into a framework based around common topics.
  100. [100]
    Transfer of explosives - HSE
    Jun 12, 2025 · This page contains information on the controls that apply to the transfer of civil explosives into and within Great Britain under regulation 8 of the ...
  101. [101]
    Explosives | Metropolitan Police
    By law you must have a certificate to acquire, keep, transfer, store or manufacture explosives. We issue explosives certificates in accordance with the ...
  102. [102]
    Explosives Act and regulations - Natural Resources Canada
    Jan 10, 2025 · Under the Explosives Act, you may need a licence, certificate, permit or enrolment to work with explosives or restricted components, depending on the type and ...
  103. [103]
    Memorandum D19-6-1: Import, export and in transit requirements of ...
    Apr 25, 2025 · This memorandum outlines the policies and procedures relating to the import, export and in transit movement of explosives.
  104. [104]
    Regulations Amending the Explosives Regulations, 2013
    May 22, 2024 · May 22, 2024, Part 2, Volume 158, Number 11, Canada Gazette.
  105. [105]
    Legislation on chemicals used in Home Made Explosives
    Explosives used by terrorists or criminals are often so-called 'Home Made Explosives (HME)', produced illegally in makeshift kitchen laboratories with easily ...
  106. [106]
    What you need to know about the EU Explosives Precursors ...
    European Union (EU) Regulation 2019/1148 aims to better control the illicit manufacture of explosives and ensure that chemicals used legitimately are not ...
  107. [107]
    The Control of Explosives Precursors and Poisons Regulations 2023
    These Regulations concern the supply of regulated and reportable substances (see section 2 of the Poisons Act 1972 (c. 66) (“the 1972 Act”) for definitions ...
  108. [108]
    Explosives Regulation 2024 - NSW Legislation
    (1) A person must not transport explosives by public passenger vehicle. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units. (2) This section does not apply to the following—.
  109. [109]
    Requirements for explosives licences - WorkSafe WA
    Jul 30, 2025 · Accessing explosives. People with unsupervised access to explosives require a security clearance (typically a dangerous goods security card).Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic<|separator|>
  110. [110]
    IED Attack Fact Sheet | Homeland Security
    May 19, 2022 · An improvised explosive device (IED) attack is the use of a "homemade" bomb and/or destructive device to destroy, incapacitate, harass, or distract.
  111. [111]
    Summary | Countering the Threat of Improvised Explosive Devices ...
    Read chapter Summary: Attacks in London, Madrid, Bali, Oklahoma City and other places indicate that improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are among the weap.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  112. [112]
    2 Precursor Chemicals Used to Make Homemade Explosives
    Read chapter 2 Precursor Chemicals Used to Make Homemade Explosives: Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are a type of unconventional explosive weapon tha.
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Addressing Improvised Explosive Devices UNIDIR RESOURCES
    226. 16 Some governments are reluctant to accept data from civil society organizations. 17 “United Nations Overview of the Improvised Explosive Device Situation ...<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    Boston Marathon Bombing - FBI
    Two self-radicalized brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, executed the largest terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11.
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Investigating Terrorist Use of Improvised Explosive Devices in the ...
    Jun 2, 2025 · The most common form of device employment observed across the dataset is the person-borne IED, primarily involving pipe bombs and pressure ...
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Developing An Empirical Understanding of Improvised Explosive ...
    Aug 28, 2009 · We used data from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) to determine which incidents involved the terrorist use of an IED. Coding of the IED- ...
  117. [117]
    More than 28,000 kg of explosives, 3,400 IEDs seized in South ...
    Dec 5, 2024 · BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – An operation in South America has resulted in the seizure of more than 28,000kg of explosive materials, ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  118. [118]
    The Ethics of Bombing - Army University Press
    The commonest objection to air bombardment is that it involves civilians in war, whereas they have a right to be treated as noncombatants.
  119. [119]
    Explosive weapons in populated areas - ICRC
    Armed conflicts are increasingly fought in urban areas, but often with weapon systems that were originally designed for use in open battlefields.
  120. [120]
    Explosive weapons in populated areas - OCHA
    The use of explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) is a major cause of civilian deaths and injuries during armed conflict.<|control11|><|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Proportionality, Just War Theory and Weapons Innovation - PubMed
    Sep 18, 2008 · Just wars are supposed to be proportional responses to aggression: the costs of war must not greatly exceed the benefits.
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Bombing Dual-Use Targets: Legal, Ethical, and Doctrinal Perspectives
    A. US stealth fighter with a single, laser-guided bomb, for example, can now destroy a target that in. WWII required 4500 B-17 sorties dropping 9000 bombs.1 ...Missing: devices | Show results with:devices
  123. [123]
    Proportionality in the Morality of War
    Just war theory, the most widely accepted theory of the morality of war, contains two proportionality conditions that say a war or an act in war is justified ...Proportionality Conditions · II. Relevant Goods · IV. Weighing Goods and Evils...
  124. [124]
    The Enduring IED Problem: Why We Need Doctrine - NDU Press
    Jan 1, 2016 · As the Services and joint force update their doctrine after nearly a decade and a half of counter–improvised explosive device (IED) ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
  127. [127]
    Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas | Human Rights Watch
    Civilians account for the vast majority of people who are killed or injured when aerial bombs, rockets, artillery projectiles, mortars, and missiles are used in ...