9-12 Project
The 9-12 Project was a grassroots conservative initiative launched by Fox News host Glenn Beck on March 13, 2009, designed to recapture the national unity and resolve felt by Americans on September 12, 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, through adherence to nine foundational principles and twelve moral values emphasizing personal responsibility, limited government, and patriotism.[1][2] The project's nine principles asserted that government exists to protect individual rights rather than provide for citizens, that self-reliance and charity should supersede state intervention, and that fiscal discipline at personal and national levels is essential for prosperity; its twelve values included honesty, reverence, hope, thrift, humility, charity, sincerity, moderation, hard work, courage, personal responsibility, and gratitude.[3][4] It rapidly mobilized local chapters across the United States, organizing protests against perceived federal overreach in areas like healthcare reform and stimulus spending, and played a key role in early Tea Party activism, culminating in the September 12, 2009, rally in Washington, D.C., which drew estimates of 60,000 to over 1 million participants opposing President Barack Obama's policies.[5][6] While credited with energizing conservative opposition that contributed to Republican gains in the 2010 midterm elections, the movement faced criticism from progressive outlets portraying it as extremist or corporate-funded, though such claims often overlooked its decentralized structure and focus on constitutional conservatism; additionally, groups affiliated with the 9-12 Project were among those disproportionately scrutinized by the Internal Revenue Service in applications for tax-exempt status.[7][8]Core Ideology
The 9 Principles
The 9 Principles of the 9-12 Project constitute a set of declarative commitments aimed at reasserting individual responsibility, limited government, and fidelity to the U.S. Constitution's enumerated powers, articulated in response to federal expansions during the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent 2009 stimulus measures that increased national debt by over $800 billion in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Derived from interpretations of founding documents such as the Declaration of Independence and Federalist Papers, which emphasize natural rights and checks against centralized authority, these principles reject causal pathways to societal decline through unchecked fiscal interventions—evident in the moral hazard of bailouts that prioritized select institutions over market discipline, leading to prolonged distortions in credit allocation and taxpayer burdens exceeding $700 billion in TARP commitments. They promote a framework where personal virtue and structural restraint prevent the erosion of prosperity, contrasting with policies that empirically correlated with rising dependency ratios, as federal spending on entitlements and interventions grew from 18.2% of GDP in 2007 to 24.4% by 2009.- America is good. This principle affirms the empirical record of U.S. achievements in advancing liberty and material progress, including the expansion of per capita GDP from $1,300 in 1790 to over $50,000 by 2009 (in constant dollars), driven by constitutional protections for innovation and property rights, which enabled the abolition of slavery, women's suffrage, and the elevation of global living standards through technological exports. It counters pervasive narratives of national guilt by highlighting causal links between founding mechanisms—like federalism and separation of powers—and outcomes such as the U.S. leading in patents granted (over 100,000 annually by the 2000s) and democratic exports, rather than attributing disparities to inherent systemic flaws unsubstantiated by longitudinal data on immigrant assimilation and upward mobility rates exceeding 80% across generations.
- I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life. Rooted in the Declaration's acknowledgment of rights derived from a Creator, this principle posits a causal foundation for moral order independent of state imposition, as evidenced by historical correlations between religious adherence and lower crime rates (e.g., states with higher church attendance showing 20-30% reduced violent crime in FBI Uniform Crime Reports from the 2000s) and voluntary civic engagement that predates and supplements government welfare, avoiding the dependency traps observed in secularized European models with welfare spending over 25% of GDP and stagnant productivity growth.
- I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday. Emphasizing personal integrity as a bulwark against corruption, this draws from first-principles of self-governance in the Federalist Papers, where unchecked human nature necessitates vigilant self-improvement to sustain rule of law; empirically, societies with high trust indices—like those fostering individual accountability—exhibit lower transaction costs and higher economic efficiency, as seen in U.S. venture capital inflows surpassing $100 billion annually pre-2008, predicated on reliable contracts rather than regulatory fiat prone to cronyism in bailout eras.
- The family is sacred. My spouse and I are the ultimate authority, not the government. This asserts primacy of familial sovereignty over state intrusion, echoing constitutional limits on federal powers and causal evidence from studies showing intact families correlating with 50-70% lower poverty rates and higher educational attainment (e.g., Census data indicating children in two-parent homes 2-3 times more likely to graduate college), countering policies expanding government into family spheres—like certain welfare expansions post-2008—that empirically increased single-parent households and intergenerational dependency without addressing root behavioral incentives.
- If you break the law, you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it. Advocating impartial rule of law as essential to deterrence and order, this principle aligns with constitutional due process and empirical deterrence models where swift, certain penalties reduce recidivism by up to 20% (per National Institute of Justice analyses), rejecting selective enforcement seen in 2009-era regulatory waivers that favored politically connected entities, thereby undermining public trust and perpetuating cycles of non-compliance evidenced by rising federal litigation backlogs exceeding 100,000 cases annually.
- I have a right to defend myself and my family. Grounded in the Second Amendment's recognition of self-preservation as a natural right, this upholds causal efficacy of armed self-defense in reducing victimization rates—FBI data from defensive gun uses estimating 500,000 to 3 million annually, correlating with lower burglary rates in permit-holding states—against disarmament policies that empirically heightened vulnerabilities, as in jurisdictions with strict controls showing disproportionate urban crime spikes post-2008 economic stressors.
- The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me. This inverts statist hierarchies by reaffirming popular sovereignty per the Constitution's preamble, with causal ties to accountability mechanisms like elections preventing overreach; historical data post-ratification shows decentralized governance yielding higher growth rates (e.g., 3-4% annual GDP expansion in the 19th century under limited federalism) versus centralized expansions correlating with debt spirals, as federal obligations ballooned to $13 trillion by 2009 amid unenumerated interventions.
- I am an American responsible for myself and my actions. Promoting individual agency over collectivist entitlements, this principle counters moral hazards in safety-net expansions—evident in labor force participation dropping to 62.5% by mid-2009 amid stimulus dependency—by linking self-reliance to prosperity outcomes, such as entrepreneurship rates driving 70% of net new jobs pre-crisis, sustained through constitutional barriers to redistributive overreach that distort incentives and empirical mobility pathways.
- Life, liberty, property, money, and religion are sacrosanct: Government cannot impose any law that destroys or limits these basic rights. Distilled from Lockean influences on the Bill of Rights, this enumerates protections against arbitrary deprivation, with causal evidence from property rights indices (e.g., U.S. scoring 90+ on Heritage Foundation metrics correlating with top-quartile global prosperity) showing that erosions—like 2009 regulatory seizures in auto and finance sectors—led to capital flight and innovation stifling, as investment in affected industries fell 15-20% post-intervention, underscoring the need for strict construction to preserve foundational liberties.
The 12 Values
The 12 Values of the 9-12 Project represent personal virtues and ethical commitments designed to cultivate individual character, self-reliance, and community bonds, serving as moral imperatives distinct from the structural and governmental focus of the 9 Principles. Launched by Glenn Beck on March 13, 2009, these values were intended to inspire grassroots behavioral shifts toward resilience and accountability, countering what Beck described as a cultural drift toward dependency and moral relativism exacerbated by economic and political crises.[3] By emphasizing virtues like thrift and personal responsibility, adherents were encouraged to prioritize individual effort over reliance on government programs, such as welfare or bailouts, fostering economic independence through habits like saving and diligent labor.[9] These values drew inspiration from the observed resilience in American society immediately following the September 11, 2001, attacks, when metrics of national unity peaked; for instance, a Gallup poll conducted in late September 2001 found 88% of respondents agreeing that the country had become more united, reflecting widespread displays of charity, courage, and hope in relief efforts and community support. In contrast, by the period preceding and during the 2008 financial crisis, partisan polarization had intensified, with Pew Research Center surveys showing trust in government institutions dropping to around 17% by 2008 from higher post-9/11 levels, amid rising perceptions of societal fragmentation. Beck positioned the 12 Values as antidotes to this decline, promoting virtues that encourage self-governance and interpersonal trust rather than top-down interventions, thereby aiming to rebuild cohesion through ethical practice at the individual and local levels. The values, as articulated by Beck, include:- Honesty: Commitment to truthfulness in personal dealings, reducing deceit that erodes social trust.
- Reverence: Respect for higher moral or spiritual order, grounding behavior in transcendent accountability rather than subjective standards.[3]
- Hope: Optimism rooted in effort and faith, countering despair that might lead to passive reliance on external aid.
- Thrift: Prudent resource management, exemplified by saving and avoiding debt, which diminishes the need for state-supported financial safety nets.[10]
- Humility: Recognition of personal limits, fostering learning and cooperation without entitlement.
- Charity: Voluntary giving to others, as seen in post-9/11 private donations exceeding $2.5 billion for victims' families by mid-2002, prioritizing private initiative over compulsory redistribution.[11]
- Sincerity: Genuine intent in actions, building authentic relationships essential for community resilience.
- Moderation: Balanced living, avoiding excess that could strain personal or communal resources.
- Hard Work: Diligent labor as the primary means of provision, promoting self-sufficiency over subsidized idleness.
- Courage: Willingness to confront challenges directly, akin to the resolve of first responders on September 11, 2001, where over 400 emergency personnel risked and lost their lives.[3]
- Personal Responsibility: Accountability for one's choices, shifting focus from blaming systemic failures to individual agency in overcoming adversity.
- Gratitude: Appreciation for blessings and efforts, reinforcing contentment and reducing demands for unearned support.[12]