Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

AMC V8 engine

The AMC V8 engine is a family of overhead-valve, pushrod V8 automobile engines developed and manufactured by the () from 1956 to 1991, featuring iron blocks and heads with displacements ranging from 250 to 401 cubic inches (4.1 to 6.6 liters). These engines powered a wide array of AMC passenger cars, pony cars, muscle cars, and later Jeep SUVs and trucks, evolving through three distinct generations to address cost constraints, performance needs, and emissions regulations during AMC's independent era and its eventual acquisition by . Known for their compact "mid-block" design and adaptability, the AMC V8s were engineered on limited budgets, utilizing shared bore spacing from earlier designs while achieving outputs from around 190 horsepower in early models to over 340 horsepower in high-performance variants. The first generation, introduced in 1956 after AMC's split from and a rapid in-house design effort led by engineer David Potter, consisted of cu in (4.1 L), 287 cu in (4.7 L), and 327 cu in (5.4 L) versions with a and varying bores (3.50 in for , 3.75 in for 287, 4.00 in for 327). These engines used forged crankshafts and rods, with the employing solid lifters and the larger two hydraulic lifters; power ratings included up to 225 for the with a four-barrel and 255 for the 327 with a four-barrel , while a planned but unproduced fuel-injected 327 was rated at 288 in prototypes. They debuted in and models, later appearing in Rambler Rebels, Classics, and Ambassadors through 1966, as well as early and Gladiator prototypes like the 327-powered "." The second generation, launched in 1966, shifted to a lighter thin-wall cast-iron block design on 4.75-inch bore centers to reduce weight to about 540 pounds, introducing 290 cu in (4.8 L), 343 cu in (5.6 L), and 390 cu in (6.4 L) displacements with front-mounted distributors and oil pumps in an aluminum housing. This era emphasized performance, powering AMC's lineup including the , AMX, and , with the 390 achieving up to 340 in the 1970 Rebel Machine and over 520 in rare Hurst-tuned versions. Production of these short-deck engines continued until 1969, bridging AMC's focus with emerging competition. The third generation, refined in 1970 with taller decks (9.208 inches versus 9.165 inches), dogleg exhaust ports on revised cylinder heads, and displacements of 304 cu in (5.0 L), 360 cu in (5.9 L), 390 cu in (6.4 L), and 401 cu in (6.6 L), marked the AMC V8's integration into vehicles following AMC's 1970 acquisition of the brand. The 360, stroked from the 343, delivered up to 290 hp and 395 lb-ft of torque in 1970 applications like the SST and J-Series trucks, though outputs fell to 144 hp by the 1980s due to emissions controls and net ratings; it persisted as the 5.9L in metric form from 1980. These engines equipped iconic models such as the AMX, Rebel Machine, , and , with the 360 remaining in production until 1991 in the final Grand Wagoneer, outlasting AMC's independence under ownership.

Overview

Development and introduction

The (AMC) was formed on May 1, 1954, through the merger of and under the leadership of . In the mid-1950s automotive industry, where overhead-valve V8 engines had become essential for competitive powertrains following Chevrolet's influential 1955 small-block introduction, AMC initially lacked an in-house V8 design. To address this, the new company arranged for Studebaker- to supply 320 cubic-inch V8 engines starting with the 1955 model year for larger and models, avoiding the immediate need for proprietary development. The supplier arrangement proved unsustainable, as the Studebaker-Packard partnership dissolved amid Packard's financial difficulties, terminating V8 supply by late 1956 and exposing AMC to high procurement costs and supply risks. Romney responded by directing a crash in-house development program around , aiming to create a versatile V8 family to bolster AMC's lineup and reduce dependency on external sources. This decision aligned with broader industry trends toward V8 power while reflecting AMC's post-merger focus on cost efficiency amid limited resources. Development proceeded under engineer David Potter, who joined AMC from and contributed insights from their earlier, abandoned 288 cubic-inch V8 project, enabling rapid progress from design to production in under 18 months. Economic pressures shaped the engine's compact block , optimized for shared tooling across multiple configurations to support AMC's emphasis on economical . The inaugural AMC V8 was introduced in mid-1956 for larger and models, with the high-performance variant debuting in 1957, signifying AMC's independent entry into V8 production.

Core design features

The AMC V8 engine family employed an overhead valve (OHV) configuration with pushrod actuation, generally using hydraulic lifters (solid lifters on the 250 cu in version), featuring a 90-degree V-angle between cylinder banks for balanced operation. The block and heads were constructed from , providing durability while maintaining a relatively lightweight design for the era. Later generations incorporated a front-mounted , allowing for efficient and maintenance accessibility across the engine lineup. The second- and third-generation AMC V8s employed thin-wall casting techniques in the iron block, which reduced the overall block weight to around 540 pounds (a reduction of about 120 pounds from the first generation's 661 pounds) and lowered production costs without compromising structural integrity. Early generations incorporated —shared walls between adjacent bores—to further minimize material usage and enhance compactness. To enable scalability across displacements, the AMC V8 design emphasized interchangeable components, including crankshafts with consistent 2.747-inch main journal diameters and compatible cylinder heads where bore sizes aligned. This modularity allowed engineers to derive multiple engine sizes from a common architecture, with variations primarily in bore and stroke dimensions. Bore centers remained fixed at 4.75 inches throughout, facilitating parts commonality. Deck height evolved to accommodate larger bores and strokes: the first and second generations used a short-deck measurement of 9.165 inches for compactness, while the third generation adopted a taller 9.208-inch deck to support increased displacement without excessive block modifications. The cooling system featured a distinctive front-mounted water pump integrated into an aluminum timing chain cover housing, alongside the oil pump and distributor, which optimized space in AMC's transverse-oriented engine bays. Radiator hose routing was uniquely configured with a prominent upper hose connecting the thermostat outlet directly to the radiator top, and a bypass hose linking the water pump to the intake manifold for efficient coolant circulation, tailored to the engine's layout.

First-Generation Engines (1956–1966)

250 cu in (4.0 L)

The 250 cu in (4.0 L) V8, introduced in 1956, marked 's entry into in-house V8 production, designed specifically as a compact, efficient powerplant for its smaller vehicles to compete in the burgeoning V8 market. Developed under engineer Dave Potter, it displaced 250 cubic inches through a bore of 3.50 inches and a of 3.25 inches, utilizing a cast-iron block with a deep-skirted configuration for added rigidity. The engine featured a forged five-main-bearing , solid lifters in early versions, and chambers with large squish zones and tight 0.040-inch quench at top dead center to promote thorough fuel burn and . A standard two-barrel fed the 8.0:1 compression setup, delivering 190 horsepower at 4,900 rpm and approximately 240 lb-ft of torque at 2,500 rpm. This base V8 served as an optional upgrade from the inline-six in Rambler models, powering vehicles like the 1956 Rambler Custom and . Starting in 1958, a four-barrel variant boosted output to 215 horsepower at 4,900 rpm and up to 260 lb-ft of torque with an 8.7:1 . Its relatively design—around 40 pounds less than comparable competitors—suited the compact Rambler's front-wheel-drive-derived , enabling brisk for the , such as 0-60 mph in about 12 seconds. The engine's vertical placement and aluminum pistons further contributed to its smooth operation and economy-focused tuning, making it ideal for everyday driving in models like the Special and Special during the 1956 model year. Production of the 250 cu in V8 concluded after the 1962 model year, as AMC transitioned to larger displacements like the 327 cu in version to address consumer preferences for greater power and to streamline its engine lineup amid increasing . Despite its short run, the 250 established key elements of 's V8 architecture, including the overhead valve valvetrain shared across the first-generation family, influencing subsequent designs through 1966.

287 cu in (4.7 L)

The AMC 287 cu in (4.7 L) V8 engine debuted in mid-1963 as part of the first-generation AMC V8 family, serving as a direct replacement for the outgoing 250 cu in version to address customer demand for a more potent economy-oriented powerplant in mid-size Rambler vehicles. It achieved its through a larger bore of 3.75 in (95 mm) while retaining the 3.25 in (83 mm) stroke of its predecessor, yielding improved without altering the . This design incorporated thin-wall casting techniques for reduced weight, consistent with core features of the first-generation engines. Equipped exclusively with a two-barrel and hydraulic valve lifters—an upgrade from the solid lifters in the —the 287 delivered 198 (148 kW) at 4,600 rpm and 280 lb-ft (380 N⋅m) of at 2,600 rpm, providing smoother operation and better low-end response for everyday driving. No factory four-barrel "Super" variant was offered, positioning it firmly as the intermediate economy V8 between the base six-cylinder and the high-performance 327 cu in option, with enhancements in breathing achieved via the increased bore size for more efficient airflow. The engine powered a range of AMC models, including the Rambler Classic, Ambassador, and Rebel sedans and hardtops from 1963 to 1966, where it contributed to balanced performance in both civilian and select police fleet applications requiring reliable mid-range torque. Its versatility supported automatic and manual transmissions, emphasizing fuel efficiency alongside adequate acceleration for the era's compact-to-intermediate cars. Production of the 287 ended after the 1966 model year, supplanted by the second-generation short-deck V8 lineup that offered greater displacement options and modernized components for AMC's evolving performance needs.

327 cu in (5.4 L)

The AMC 327 cu in (5.4 L) V8 served as the flagship powerplant of the first-generation engine family, introduced in 1957 for high-performance applications in the Rambler Rebel and full-size Ambassador models. It displaced 327 cubic inches through a bore of 4.00 in (102 mm) and a stroke of 3.25 in (83 mm), created by boring out the existing 287 cu in (4.7 L) block while maintaining the same crankshaft dimensions for compatibility and cost efficiency. The cast-iron block incorporated reinforced main bearing caps and a forged five-main-bearing crankshaft to handle increased stresses from higher output configurations. Output ranged from 250 (186 kW) and 345 lb⋅ft (468 N⋅m) in the base two-barrel carbureted form to 270 (201 kW) and 360 lb⋅ft (488 N⋅m) with a four-barrel , with high-compression "E-Stick" variants—featuring an electro-magnetic automatic clutch for easier shifting—approaching 300 in performance-oriented setups. From 1963 to 1966, the engine powered luxury and sporty mid-size vehicles including the , , and models, where it provided robust acceleration and towing capability as the top engine choice. The cylinder heads featured large squish zones with a 0.040 in (1.0 mm) quench distance and centrally located spark plugs to promote efficient and reduce . Intake manifolds were displacement-specific, typically designs optimized for low- to mid-range , often mated to Holley four-barrel carburetors in higher-output versions for balanced airflow. Total production remained modest, with around 1,500 units installed in the 1957 alone, and overall numbers limited by the shift toward smaller-displacement engines and emissions-compliant second-generation designs by the late 1960s, making surviving examples rare today.

Second-Generation Short-Deck Engines (1966–1969)

290 cu in (4.8 L)

The 290 cu in (4.8 L) AMC V8 served as the entry-level powerplant in the second-generation short-deck engine lineup, introduced in 1966 specifically for compact vehicles seeking improved efficiency and handling. This engine represented a key evolution from the first-generation tall-deck V8s, adopting a shorter deck height of 9.165 inches to lower the overall engine profile. The reduced height contributed to a lower center of gravity and better front-to-rear weight distribution in lightweight chassis, enhancing stability and performance in economy-oriented cars. With a bore of 3.75 inches and a of 3.28 inches, the 290 displaced precisely 290 cubic inches while maintaining compatibility with the family's modern, lightweight for smoother operation at higher revs. The standard configuration featured a two-barrel , delivering 200 horsepower at 4,600 rpm and 285 lb-ft of at 2,800 rpm, with a of 8.7:1 optimized for delivery in low-rpm ranges ideal for urban driving and light-duty applications. An optional four-barrel variant boosted output to 225 horsepower, providing modest performance gains without sacrificing fuel economy. Initially launched in the 1966 , including the sporty trim, the 290 V8 was produced in limited numbers—approximately 625 units for the alone—reflecting its niche role as a replacement for outdated first-generation engines in compact models. It remained exclusive to the 1966–1967 and lineups, where its torque-focused character supported responsive acceleration in these subcompact platforms. By 1968, production ended as AMC shifted emphasis to larger-displacement second-generation variants better suited to the evolving mid-size and performance markets.

343 cu in (5.6 L)

The AMC 343 cu in (5.6 L) V8 engine was introduced in 1967 as part of the second-generation short-deck V8 family, serving as a mid-range powerplant for intermediate vehicles during the peak of the era. It featured a bore of 4.08 in (104 mm) and a stroke of 3.28 in (83 mm), displacing 343 cubic inches and enabling robust performance in a compact package. The engine's design included a cast-iron block with a short deck height of 9.165 in (233 mm), which contributed to a lower center of gravity compared to taller-deck competitors, enhancing handling in sporty applications. Power outputs varied by configuration, with the base two-barrel version rated at 235 hp (175 kW) at 4,400 rpm and 345 lb-ft (468 N⋅m) of torque at 2,600 rpm, using an 8.7:1 . The optional four-barrel intake setup, paired with high-compression 10.0:1 pistons, boosted performance to 280 hp (209 kW) at 4,800 rpm and 365 lb-ft (495 N⋅m) at 3,000 rpm, positioning it as a competitive option for enthusiasts seeking torque-heavy acceleration. These ratings reflected AMC's emphasis on reliable, high-revving capability, with the larger bore than the 290 cu in sibling allowing for reinforced main bearings and improved rigidity to handle elevated engine speeds up to 5,500 rpm in tuned variants. Primarily applied in AMC's intermediate lineup from 1967 to 1969, the 343 powered models such as the , , and , often in performance-oriented packages that included dual exhausts and heavy-duty suspensions for enhanced road dynamics. In the , it delivered quarter-mile times around 15 seconds, while the leveraged its torque for agile rivalry against contemporaries like the . The engine's versatility extended to optional four-speed manual or Torque Command automatic transmissions, underscoring its role in AMC's push for affordable muscle. Production of the 343 ended in 1969 as AMC transitioned to the third-generation tall-deck V8 architecture, which offered greater flexibility for emissions controls and larger displacements without altering the short-deck's core siamesed-bore design. This shift marked the conclusion of the short-deck era, leaving the 343 as a hallmark of AMC's brief but potent V8 lineup.

390 cu in (6.4 L)

The AMC 390 cu in (6.4 L) V8 was the largest displacement in the second-generation short-deck engine family, introduced in to power AMC's performance-oriented intermediates and pony cars. Featuring a bore of 4.165 in (106 mm) and a of 3.574 in (91 mm), it displaced 390 cubic inches in a compact cast-iron block with the characteristic 9.165 in (233 mm) deck height, maintaining the lightweight design at around 580 pounds. The base two-barrel version produced 290 (216 kW) at 4,800 rpm and 380 lb-ft (515 N⋅m) of at 3,200 rpm with an 8.5:1 , while the optional four-barrel setup increased output to 315 (235 kW) at 5,200 rpm and 415 lb-ft (563 N⋅m) at 3,400 rpm using 10.2:1 , with high-performance variants like the AMX reaching 340 . These gross ratings highlighted the 390's emphasis and rev potential up to 6,000 rpm, supported by forged steel and robust connecting rods. Deployed in 1968-1969 models including the AMX, SST, and SST/Machine prototypes, the 390 enabled quarter-mile times under 14 seconds in tuned configurations and served as AMC's top V8 for competition. Approximately 10,000 units were produced across its short-deck run. In 1970, the 390 transitioned to the third-generation tall-deck block for continued use through 1974, with detuned outputs to meet emissions standards.

Third-Generation Tall-Deck Engines (1970–1991)

304 cu in (5.0 L)

The 304 cu in (5.0 L) , the smallest in American Motors Corporation's third-generation tall-deck lineup, was introduced for the 1971 model year to provide efficient power for light trucks and economy-oriented vehicles during the emerging emissions regulations era. It featured a bore of 3.75 inches and a stroke of 3.44 inches, yielding its 304 cubic-inch displacement on the taller deck height that allowed for improved breathing and serviceability compared to prior generations. Initial output stood at 210 horsepower and 300 lb-ft of torque, but by the mid-1970s, ratings dropped to around 150 horsepower and 250 lb-ft to comply with stricter emissions standards, reflecting the era's shift toward cleaner-burning engines. The emphasized low , typically at 8.4:1, paired with a standard 2-barrel for reliable, fuel-efficient operation under varying loads. This engine found primary application in Jeep models, powering the CJ-5 from 1972 to 1981 and the Wagoneer from 1971 to 1974, where its compact size suited off-road and utility demands. It also served in the sedan from 1971 to 1978, offering balanced performance for mid-size passenger cars. Engineered with a focus on longevity for rugged use, it included reinforced components like robust main bearings to handle the stresses of truck and off-road service. Production of the 304 continued through 1980, primarily to support ongoing Jeep service needs, ensuring availability for maintenance in the field.

360 cu in (5.9 L)

The AMC 360 cu in (5.9 L) V8 engine debuted in 1970 as a key member of the third-generation tall-deck engine lineup, offering a and for both passenger cars and light trucks. Derived from the preceding 343 cu in (5.6 L) design, it achieved its through a longer 3.44-inch stroke while retaining the 4.08-inch bore, resulting in a compact yet potent configuration with a 9.208-inch deck height. This iteration featured redesigned cylinder heads with dogleg-shaped exhaust ports to enhance and combustion efficiency, alongside standard hydraulic lifters that reduced maintenance needs and improved valve train reliability compared to earlier solid-lifter setups. Power and torque outputs for the 360 varied significantly across its production run, reflecting evolving emissions standards and tuning priorities, with gross ratings in early years giving way to net figures later on. Initial 1970-1971 models delivered up to 285 gross horsepower and 380 lb-ft of in high-performance configurations, such as those with a four-barrel , while two-barrel versions produced around 245 horsepower. By the mid-1970s, net ratings had declined to 175-220 horsepower and 285-315 lb-ft due to stricter regulations, though the engine maintained strong low-end suitable for applications. Special variants included a emissions-compliant version with adjusted compression and carburetion for , as well as a four-barrel police interceptor package rated at up to 225 net horsepower for duties. The 360's versatility shone in its wide array of applications, powering AMC passenger cars from 1970 to 1974, including the pony car, sedan and wagon, and subcompact, where it provided spirited acceleration in models like the SC/360. In the Jeep lineup, it became a staple starting in 1970, equipping full-size trucks such as the J10 and J20 pickups through 1988, as well as SUVs including the (1974-1983), CJ-5 and CJ-7 (1972-1986), and notably the Grand Wagoneer until its 1991 discontinuation—the longest production span of any AMC V8. This enduring use in off-road and utility vehicles underscored the engine's robust construction and adaptability, even as it transitioned into the era post-1987 acquisition.

390 cu in (6.4 L)

The third-generation AMC 390 cu in (6.4 L) carried over from the second-generation design starting in 1970, retaining the same 4.165 in (105.7 mm) bore and 3.574 in (90.7 mm) dimensions but now built on the taller 9.208 in (233.8 mm) deck height block introduced for the new family of engines. This configuration displaced 390 cu in (6.4 L) and delivered output ranging from 190 to 255 hp (142 to 190 kW) and 320 to 390 lb⋅ft (434 to 529 N⋅m) of torque across its production run, reflecting progressive detuning to meet evolving federal standards. To comply with 1970s emissions regulations, the engine featured low-compression pistons with dished tops (approximately 24 cc volume) reducing the to around 8.0:1 or lower in later years, along with the addition of (EGR) systems starting in 1973, which significantly curtailed performance and marked the end of the high-output era for AMC V8s. The block remained largely compatible with second-generation components, allowing some interchangeability, though revisions to the oiling system—such as improved oil galleries and pump modifications—addressed lubrication shortcomings observed in earlier short-deck versions. Primarily applied in passenger cars, the 390 powered models like the and from 1970 to 1974, where it served as an optional V8 for mid-level performance before being overshadowed by the larger 401 cu in (6.6 L) variant. It saw limited use in trucks during this period, mainly in heavier-duty configurations prior to the 401's dominance in those roles, but overall adoption waned as fuel economy concerns grew amid the . The engine was phased out after 1974, supplanted by smaller-displacement options better suited to (CAFE) mandates and shifting market demands for efficiency.

401 cu in (6.6 L)

The AMC 401 cu in (6.6 L) , the largest in American Motors Corporation's third-generation tall-deck lineup, was introduced for the to provide robust for heavier vehicles. It featured a bore of 4.165 inches (105.8 mm) and a of 3.68 inches (93.5 mm), yielding its signature through an increase in stroke length over the preceding 390 cu in engine. This prioritized low-end for applications in sedans and trucks, with gross ratings spanning 228 to 330 horsepower and 300 to 435 lb-ft of across various tunings. Marketed with an emphasis on its torque characteristics—often paired with the "Torque Command" for seamless power delivery—the 401 was available with a 4-barrel and a of 9.5:1 in 1971 models, dropping to 8.25:1 by 1972 due to emissions requirements. These configurations delivered strong pulling power suitable for and in full-size vehicles, with the engine's forged crankshaft reinforced to withstand heavy-duty loads. The longer stroke not only boosted but also enhanced low-rpm response, distinguishing it from smaller V8s in the family. In passenger cars, the 401 powered the and from 1971 to 1974, where it served as the top engine option for models seeking superior over outright speed. It transitioned to truck applications starting in 1972, equipping the and various J-series pickups through 1979, where its durability proved valuable for utility roles. Passenger car usage ended in 1974 amid shifting market demands and fuel economy standards, but the engine persisted in commercial and trucks until its phase-out in 1979.

Service Replacement Engines

Production and design

began producing service replacement blocks for its V8 engines in 1970 to supply rebuildable bare blocks following the end of standard production lines. These blocks served as essential components for engine repairs and rebuilds in AMC vehicles, particularly addressing part shortages in popular applications like Jeeps and classic automobiles. They were also sold as heavy-duty racing options due to their reinforced design. Designed in the tall-deck third-generation style akin to the 360 cu in and 401 cu in variants, the service blocks featured a standard 4.080 in bore with thick walls that permitted up to 4.125 in (or further to 4.17 in for 401 cu in capacity) for flexibility in options. Cast using high-nickel iron for superior strength and resistance to wear, they were engineered for compatibility with internals from earlier third-generation engines, facilitating straightforward overhauls without major modifications. The tall-deck configuration provided enhanced core rigidity compared to prior designs. These bare blocks excluded any rotating assembly, prioritizing the foundational durability of the casting itself to extend the service life of aging V8 installations. Production emphasized robust construction suitable for high-stress environments, such as off-road use in models.

Compatibility across generations

The tall-deck service replacement blocks, introduced in the third , are designed with a capacity for 401 cubic inches and can accept from first- and second-generation V8 engines, allowing machinists to achieve displacements ranging from approximately 340 cu in (with first-generation crankshafts) to 401 cu in through appropriate boring and stroking. These blocks facilitate the use of earlier-generation components by incorporating machined provisions for adapters on the main bearings and oil galleries, enabling compatibility with 2.09-inch rod journal cranks from the 304 and 360 engines or larger 2.248-inch journals from the 390 and 401, though external balancing may be required for optimal performance. A key advantage of the AMC V8 family lies in its uniform bolt patterns across all generations for the bellhousing and intake manifold, which simplifies engine swaps into vehicles like Jeeps and classic models without requiring or accessory modifications. This shared 6-bolt flange and perimeter-mount bellhousing pattern ensures that components from 1966 through 1991 models interchange seamlessly in most applications. However, certain limitations exist, particularly with cylinder heads; first-generation polyspherical (wedge-style) heads are not directly interchangeable with third-generation canted- heads due to differences in angles and configurations, often necessitating custom or kits to align the head patterns and avoid . In practice, these service s are commonly employed to rebuild 360 or 401 engines using second-generation 390 parts, such as pistons and rods (often after decking the to the second-generation height of 9.165 inches), to achieve higher ratios. Even after production ceased in 1991, these compatible components remain relevant for Jeep restorations and hot rod builds, where enthusiasts leverage the to upgrade older engines with later tall-deck parts for improved durability and power.

Special Variants and Applications

Electronic fuel injection systems

The (AMC) planned to introduce one of the earliest systems on its 327 cu in (5.4 L) V8 engine for the 1957 , utilizing the Bendix Electrojector, a pioneering intermittent port injection setup designed to replace carburetors for improved performance and efficiency. This system aimed to deliver 288 horsepower from the 327 V8, offering smoother power delivery and better fuel economy compared to the carbureted version's 255 hp, targeting performance-oriented applications like the Rebel . The Bendix Electrojector employed speed-density metering with a transistorized electronic control unit (ECU) that processed inputs from sensors monitoring manifold vacuum pressure, engine temperature, engine speed via a modified Delco distributor, and throttle position for acceleration enrichment. Fuel was delivered through solenoid-operated port injectors—one per cylinder—at low pressure (around 20 psi) from an electric pump, with pulse widths varying from 1.0 to 4.5 milliseconds to adjust air-fuel ratios dynamically. However, the system suffered from significant reliability challenges, including inconsistent injector flow rates (varying by up to 6%), slow solenoid response leading to evaporative fuel losses, poor cold-start performance below 50°F (10°C), and ECU signal decay at high RPMs above 4,000, often resulting in vapor lock-like symptoms and hesitation. Despite extensive testing, including a few prototype installations on 327 V8-equipped Rebels, AMC canceled production before any customer vehicles were released, citing the system's complexity, high cost (estimated at $600–$1,000 extra), and unresolved issues that made carburetors more practical and superior in reliability at the time. Only a handful of test mules were built, with no serial production for AMC, though the technology saw limited use by Chrysler in about 35–50 units across 1958 models, where similar problems led to quick discontinuation and retrofits to carburetors. Historically, the AMC-Bendix Electrojector effort marked one of the first attempts to bring electronic port fuel injection to a production American , predating widespread adoption and influencing later systems like Bosch's D-Jetronic in the ; its failure underscored the technological hurdles of early electronics in automotive applications but paved the way for modern EFI dominance.

Marine adaptations

The first-generation 327 cu in (5.4 L) AMC V8 was adapted for marine propulsion by Gray Marine Motor Company as the Fireball V8, with production spanning from 1957 to 1968, and these engines were commonly installed as inboards in Chris-Craft boats. These marinized versions incorporated a reverse-rotation camshaft in configurations for twin-engine setups to achieve counter-rotation without additional transmission modifications, alongside water-cooled exhaust manifolds designed to mix cooling water with exhaust gases for temperature control and noise reduction. Rated between 220 and 270 horsepower depending on the carburetion and tuning, the 327 featured corrosion-resistant cast-iron exhaust manifolds to combat saltwater degradation and an integrated oil cooler to maintain lubrication under sustained loads. Key design changes included a freshwater cooling loop option for closed-circuit operation, which isolated the engine's internal components from corrosive while using for external heat exchange, and reinforced engine mounts to handle the constant and thrust encountered in applications. Primarily employed as inboard powerplants in Chris-Craft wooden and hulls, these engines were valued for their durability in both freshwater lakes and saltwater environments, providing reliable for and planing of the era. Adaptations were confined to the first-generation V8 architecture, as later generations prioritized automotive emissions standards that complicated certification; nonetheless, aftermarket firms continued to marinize subsequent V8 variants for custom installations into the and beyond.

Racing developments (Indy 209)

The AMC Indy 209 was a specialized racing variant of the company's V8 engine, developed in the mid-1970s as an affordable stock-block option for the USAC IndyCar series under the organization's pushrod "stock block" rules. Inspired by connecting rod specialist Fred Carrillo, the engine was engineered by Dick Jones at Champion Spark Plugs, utilizing a de-stroked third-generation (Gen 3) 304 cu in (5.0 L) production block to achieve the required 209 cu in (3.4 L) displacement while adhering to USAC's displacement limits for turbocharged pushrod engines, with a bore of 3.75 in (95 mm) and a stroke of 2.3625 in (60 mm). This design emphasized cost-effectiveness, reportedly priced at about half the cost of contemporary purpose-built racing engines like the Cosworth DFX, making it accessible for smaller teams. The engine featured dry-sump lubrication for high-revving oval track performance, mechanical fuel injection, and a flat-plane crankshaft for improved balance and firing order in its 90-degree OHV configuration with 16 valves. Later iterations allowed up to a 4.125 in (105 mm) bore under rule interpretations. Turbocharged setups enabled outputs up to approximately 1,080 hp, though supercharger options were explored but not widely raced. Heads were aluminum Brodix castings with large valves to support high airflow, and the block was initially cast iron before transitioning to an aluminum variant produced by General Motors in 1978 for weight reduction. These features positioned the Indy 209 as a rugged, high-potential unit optimized for the sustained high speeds of Indianapolis-style ovals, though its heavier stock-block architecture presented handling challenges compared to lighter exotic designs. The engine saw limited applications primarily in the Indianapolis 500 from 1976 to 1979, campaigned by teams such as Carrillo Racing and National Engineering under Champion Spark Plugs sponsorship. Notable entries included Jerry Grant's #73 Eagle 74 at the , where it qualified but suffered a DNF due to mechanical failure after 35 laps, and subsequent runs by drivers like Roger McCluskey in 1977 and 1978, often ending in retirements from issues like blown pistons, failures, or fuel leaks. Despite occasional strong qualifying efforts—such as McCluskey's top-20 starts—the engine's poor reliability stemmed from the stresses of turbocharging on production-derived components, limiting it to backup or mid-pack roles without a single full-race completion at Indy. No verified use appears in 1968–1970 attempts, contrary to some anecdotal reports; its racing debut aligned with USAC's evolving stock-block incentives in the late 1970s. Though innovative in democratizing IndyCar powertrains, the Indy 209 influenced subsequent AMC racing efforts by demonstrating the viability of modified production blocks but was ultimately discontinued by the early 1980s due to escalating development costs and dominance by specialized engines like the Ilmor 209. Surviving examples, particularly the rare aluminum-block units, are highly sought after as collector items among AMC and motorsport enthusiasts, valued for their historical role in bridging street-derived technology with elite oval racing.

Technical Specifications

Block construction and dimensions

The AMC V8 engine block was cast from iron, providing durability. Blocks featured five main bearings, with journal diameters of 2.5 inches for first-generation engines and 2.747 inches for second- and third-generation engines. First-generation blocks (1956–1966) featured a heavier design with forged crankshafts and rods, a deck height of approximately 9.20 inches, 4.75-inch bore centers, and a maximum bore capacity of around 4.00 inches for the 327 variant. These blocks included oil galleries for and multiple freeze plugs. Overall dimensions measured approximately 24.12 inches in width, 27.75 inches in length, and 24 inches in height, with a bare block weight of around 220 pounds. The head bolt pattern consisted of 14 bolts per side, using 7/16-inch diameter fasteners. Second-generation blocks (1966–1969) employed a short-deck height of 9.165 inches, measured from the centerline to the deck surface, with 4.75-inch bore centers and a maximum bore capacity of 4.165 inches. These thin-wall cast-iron blocks included galleries for lubrication and multiple freeze s—typically or —for core removal and coolant access, with a 21-piece kit covering expansion, cup, and threaded types. Overall dimensions measured approximately 21.25 inches in width, 28.5 inches in length, and 20.75 inches in height, with a bare block weight ranging from 180 to 220 pounds. The head bolt pattern consisted of 14 bolts per side, using 7/16-inch diameter fasteners. Third-generation blocks (1970–1991) adopted a taller deck height of 9.208 inches to accommodate longer strokes, maintaining the same 4.75-inch bore centers but supporting bores up to 4.17 inches for larger displacements. Dimensions were 21.50 inches in width, 28.75 inches in length, and 21.75 inches in height, with bare weights of 180 to 220 pounds. Head patterns shifted to 14 per side with 1/2-inch diameter , and the design retained similar oil gallery and freeze plug configurations for consistent assembly and maintenance. Compared to the Chevrolet small-block V8, the AMC block's narrower profile and integrated design offered advantages in packaging within compact AMC chassis, despite similar displacement capabilities.

Performance characteristics

The AMC V8 engines exhibited robust low-end torque characteristics suited to their applications in trucks and passenger vehicles, with peak torque typically occurring between 2,000 and 3,000 rpm in truck-oriented variants like the 360 cu in (5.9 L) displacement, delivering around 285 lb⋅ft (386 N⋅m) at 2,400 rpm under SAE net ratings. In muscle car configurations, such as the 401 cu in (6.6 L) in the Javelin, power curves extended to higher revs, with peak horsepower reaching up to 330 hp (246 kW) at approximately 5,000 rpm and torque of 430 lb⋅ft (583 N⋅m) at 3,200 rpm in gross ratings before emissions adjustments. These curves emphasized strong mid-range pull for acceleration, though rev limits generally capped at 5,500–6,000 rpm in stock form to balance durability and performance. Emissions regulations introduced in the early significantly impacted output, with the 1972 switch from gross to net ratings alone causing apparent drops of up to 100 across V8s, including the AMC 360, which fell from 290 gross in 1970 to 175 net by 1972 due to inclusion of accessories and exhaust backpressure in testing. Further detuning from 1975 onward, including lower compression ratios (down to 8.0:1), (EGR), and catalytic converters, reduced net horsepower on the 360 to as low as 125 by the late , while the 401 cu in (6.6 L) variant was discontinued in partly due to these compliance costs. Aftermarket enhancements have revitalized AMC V8 performance, with stroker kits converting the 401 to 408 cu in (6.7 L) by using a longer-throw crankshaft, often yielding 50–100 additional horsepower alongside improved torque through increased displacement. Aluminum cylinder heads, such as Edelbrock Performer RPM units, can add over 50 hp on a 360 by improving airflow and allowing higher compression, while camshaft upgrades and intake manifolds like the Air-Gap design boost peak output to 450–480 hp at 6,000 rpm in built examples. Common issues in second-generation engines include oil pump failures from wear, often addressed via high-volume aftermarket pumps during rebuilds. Fuel economy for stock AMC V8s ranged from 10–15 mpg combined in 1970s applications, with the 304 cu in (5.0 L) in lighter vehicles like the Gremlin achieving up to 16 mpg EPA combined, though larger displacements like the 360 in trucks typically averaged 12 mpg due to their torque-focused tuning and weight. Since production ended in 1991, AMC V8s have remained popular for engine swaps, where modern electronic (EFI) conversions, such as Howell kits, restore drivability and yield 300+ hp while improving economy by 4–5 mpg over carbureted setups.

References

  1. [1]
    Ultimate AMC 360 Engine Guide - Specs, History, Top Mods, & More
    The first generation had 250, 287, and 327 cid V8 engines, and lasted until 1965–1967. The second generation AMC V8 lasted from 1966–1969, and featured a brand ...Missing: credible sources
  2. [2]
    The Novak Guide to the AMC / Jeep V8 Engines
    ### Summary of AMC V8 Engine
  3. [3]
    Inside The American Motors Gen 2/Gen 3 V8, 1966-91
    Mar 25, 2025 · According to a few sources, American Motors produced one family of V8s from 1956 on, even though the automaker introduced a completely new V8 in ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  4. [4]
    Generation One Nash, Hudson, Rambler V8 (1956-1966)
    The 250 had a 3.50″ bore, 3.25″ stroke, and used solid lifters. It did come in two and four-barrel carburetor varieties, but in year one, it used a 4-barrel ...
  5. [5]
    Rambler Joins the V8 Race: The 1956-66 AMC V8
    May 22, 2023 · The AMC V8 was created in 18 months, with a 250 cubic inch 190hp version in 1956, and 327 cubic inch 255hp version in 1957. It had a deep- ...
  6. [6]
    How Did the AMC Generation 1 Engine Come to Be?
    V8 advertised 190 hp 4900 rpm with a 2 bbl. carburetor and 8.0:1 compression ratio, it was later upped to 200 hp @ 4900 rpm because the compression was raised ...
  7. [7]
    Don't Ditch That AMC V-8! - MotorTrend
    Jun 12, 2019 · CEO George Romney ordered the original AMC V-8 to be built in 1954. Less than two years later, the AMC executive had his new V-8 ready to debut ...
  8. [8]
    Specifications for the Gen 2 and Gen 3 V-8 Engines
    All AMC V-8 cranks have 2.747″ main journals. The 290-360 cranks are cast nodular iron units, while 390 and 401 cranks are forged steel – stronger than the cast ...
  9. [9]
    Gen 2 Short-Deck AMC V8 - General Information
    This new generation of AMC V8s was first introduced in 1966 at 290 cu. in. It is sometimes referred to as the “GEN-2” AMC V-8. All three engine sizes that ...Missing: credible sources
  10. [10]
    AMC Marlin by Rambler 287 V8 Specs - Ultimate Specs
    The 1965 AMC Marlin by Rambler 287 V8 has 201 PS / 198 bhp / 148 kW. How much does a AMC Marlin by Rambler 287 V8 weighs? The AMC Marlin by Rambler 287 V8 ...Missing: introduction | Show results with:introduction
  11. [11]
    1966 AMC Rambler Classic 770 Sedan 287 V-8 Flash-O-Matic (aut. 3)
    Engine specifications · 4706 cm3 / 287.2 cui · 147.5 kW / 201 PS / 198 hp (SAE gross) · 380 Nm / 280 ft-lb · 73 watt/kg / 33 watt/lb (estimated by a-c) · 98 watt/kg ...
  12. [12]
    AMC V8 engine - Autopedia | Fandom
    American Motors Corporation (AMC) produced a series of widely-used V8 engines from the mid-1950s before being absorbed into Chrysler in 1987.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  13. [13]
    AMC 327 Engine Specifications - The AMC Forum - Page 1
    Mar 28, 2022 · AMC 327 Engine Specifications ; Here is what I can find: BORE = 4.00" ; STROKE = 3.250". CTR. TO CTR OF CONNECTING ROD = 6.375" ; HEAD GASKET BORE ...327 Build and Modification Questions - The AMC Forum - Page 2AMC 327 Engine Specifications - The AMC Forum - Page 2More results from theamcforum.com
  14. [14]
    AMC Marlin by Rambler 327 V8 Specs - Ultimate Specs
    Bore x Stroke : 4 x 3.25 inches 101.6 x 82.6 mm. Number of valves : 16 Valves.
  15. [15]
    With a 327 V-8 & 4-Speed, 1966 Rambler Rebel Showed Signs of ...
    Jun 15, 2019 · AMC introduced the Rambler Rebel in 1957, in the process creating what many automotive historians consider to be the very first muscle car, ...
  16. [16]
    History: Gen 2 and Gen 3 AMC V-8s (1966 - 1991)
    Mar 10, 2023 · Gen 2 AMC V-8s (1966-1967) started with a 290 cu. in. design, then upgraded to 343 and 390 cu. in. Gen 3 (1968-1991) included 304, 360, and 401 ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  17. [17]
    1966 AMC Rambler American 440 Sedan 290 V-8 Flash-O-Matic ...
    Engine specifications ; 85 watt/kg / 39 watt/lb (estimated by a-c) · 114 watt/kg / 52 watt/lb · 11.7 kg/kW / 8.6 kg/PS / 19.2 lbs/hp (estimated by a-c) · 8.8 kg/kW ...
  18. [18]
    Can You Stroke an AMC 290 V8 using Larger AMC Engine Parts??
    Sep 5, 2013 · We answer Robert Stefanik's question on if you're able to stroke an AMC 290 V8 using parts from larger AMC engines.Missing: interchangeable components
  19. [19]
    1969 AMC Rebel SST Station Wagon 343 V-8 2-Barrel Shift ...
    All specifications, performance and fuel economy data of AMC Rebel SST Station Wagon 343 V-8 2-Barrel Shift-Command automatic (175 kW / 238 PS / 235 hp), ...
  20. [20]
    AMC Engine Specifications | Gans's AMC Info - Purpleized home
    Deck height, 9.531, 9.531/9.281 ; Bore spacing, 4.38 ; Main journal, 2.5, 2.5 ; Rod journal, 2.095, 2.095 ; Piston pin diameter ...
  21. [21]
    AMC V-8 Engine - Tech Articles - Jp Magazine - MotorTrend
    Feb 2, 2005 · Brandes says AMC engines are not compression-sensitive, and he has run stock cast-iron heads at 11.25:1 without spark-knock on premium pump gas.Missing: overhead 90
  22. [22]
    The AMC Javelin < Page 4 of 4 < Ate Up With Motor
    13 mar 2010 · This 1972 Javelin AMX has the 401, which had a lower compression ratio (8.5:1 rather than 9.5:1) and a net rating of 255 hp (190 kW). The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Jeep V-8 Engine History: Every V-8 Ever Used in a Jeep - MotorTrend
    Oct 29, 2024 · The AMC 304 V-8 made 210 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque at its debut before output was cut to meet particulate control regulations. By 1981 ...Missing: applications - | Show results with:applications -
  24. [24]
    https://www.jeeptech.com/engine/amc304.html
  25. [25]
    AMC 304 max hp | Jeep Enthusiast Forums
    Dec 16, 2007 · ... HP and Torque specs for AMC 304's from 71 to 81. 71 started out at 210 Hp and 300 ft/lbs torque. 80/81 ended up at 125HP 220 ft/lbs. Since ...
  26. [26]
    Jeep Engine: AMC 304 V8
    Jeep Engine: AMC 304 V8 ; Compression Ratio, 8.4:1 ; Horsepower (net), 125@3200 ; Torque (net), 220@2400 ; Main Bearings, 5.Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  27. [27]
    Every Vehicle Powered By The AMC 304 V8 Engine - SlashGear
    Oct 4, 2024 · AMC used it between 1971 and 1981, which means it was around during the Clean Air Act that hampered V8 power during the 1970s. Thus, at its peak ...
  28. [28]
    1972 AMC Matador Hardtop V-8 304 automatic (aut. 3)
    AMC 304 V8. Engine type: spark-ignition 4-stroke. Fuel type: gasoline (petrol) ... AMC Matador 1st generation years, types and editions catalogue (1971-1973).
  29. [29]
    AMC V8 Engines | Allpar Forums
    The 400 V8: Final Mopar Big Block Engine The first B engine was launched in the 1958 model year, in 350 and 361 cubic inch versions. Similar in some ways to the ...
  30. [30]
    Identifying the Gen 2 and Gen 3 V-8 Engines
    Blocks should have the engine size cast into them on each side between the freeze plugs behind the mounting plates. 304 engines contain many heads, but all use ...
  31. [31]
    Every Vehicle Powered By The AMC 360 V8 Engine - SlashGear
    Sep 22, 2024 · The 360 cubic inch V8 that replaced a 343 cubic inch V8 in 1970 and would go on to power a range of AMC and Jeep vehicles over the next two decades.
  32. [32]
    AMC 401 Build Questions & Advise. CR and Cam - Jeep Forum
    Aug 9, 2015 · First year for AMC 401 was 1971 with 10.2:1 CR ,early & 9.5:1 CR ,late. 1972 to 1978(last year) CR= 8.25:1, probably for NOX emissions ...Missing: options | Show results with:options
  33. [33]
    OK... AMC V8 Service Replacement Block - IFSJA Forum.
    Mar 26, 2023 · AMC V8 Service Replacement Block. 06-11-2012, 05:11 PM. I only know a bit about these blocks... trying to find out some more info. Short story: I went to ...AMC 4 bolt mains back in production - IFSJA Forum.304360390401 AMC.....all the same! - IFSJA Forum.More results from forums.ifsja.org
  34. [34]
    Service Block Identification - The AMC Forum
    Jun 21, 2019 · Service blocks, available around 1971, have a 360 bore with thick walls, and are identified by a stamp like *S 26493 69* and are available to ...Service Block ID ? - The AMC Forum - Page 2Factory Engine Block Stampings - The AMC Forum - Page 1More results from theamcforum.comMissing: history | Show results with:history
  35. [35]
    https://forums.ifsja.org/forum/tire-kickin/street-performance/115335-ok-amc-v8-service-replacement-block
  36. [36]
    AMC V8 head compatability - Pirate 4x4
    Oct 13, 2003 · This was done so intake manifolds wouldn't be swapped from the short deck height 66-69 290/343/390's, and the 1970+ 304/360/390/401's.<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    AMC V8 Gurus Needed. - CJ-8
    Aug 21, 2012 · I have been looking up different sources of info regarding AMC V8 Block casting numbers. One source states that all 67 and newer AMC V8 blocks are cast, bored ...Missing: siamesed | Show results with:siamesed
  38. [38]
    Building an AMC Brute - HOT ROD
    Oct 19, 2005 · The practical limit of the plebian AMC 401 is about 500 hp at 7,500 rpm. The main caps will begin to walk above that, so limit these engines ...Missing: emphasis end
  39. [39]
    AMC Performance Engine Parts | The Online Automotive Marketplace
    Sep 24, 2018 · We will discuss internal block and valve train parts that can be used in conjunction with the performance parts we have already featured, as well as some crate ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Electrojector and D-Jetronic: Early Electronic Fuel Injection
    Feb 24, 2024 · The first production electronic fuel injection system was the Bendix Electrojector, offered briefly by Chrysler for 1958. It was dropped due to unreliability.Missing: V8 | Show results with:V8
  41. [41]
    The First Electronic Fuel Injection: 1957 Bendix Electrojector
    Jan 2, 2024 · The first automaker to take a swing at the Electrojector was American Motors, which planned to use it on the 1957 Rambler Rebel.with its 327 ...
  42. [42]
    The Rambler Rebel's fuel injection - The Dream and the Legend
    Jun 25, 2017 · The Bendix company decided to explore the concept of an electronic fuel injection system as a replacement for the standard carburetor.Missing: V8 | Show results with:V8
  43. [43]
    The Car(s) That Invented Electronic Fuel Injection - CarBuzz
    Dec 22, 2024 · First introduced in 1958 · Built by the Bendix Corporation · Pioneered electronic fuel injection systems · First installed in an automobile by AMC ...
  44. [44]
    AMC V8 development - The AMC Forum
    Apr 14, 2013 · Back in the 1980's a family friend had old wooden 34 or 38 foot houseboat I think it was a old Chris Craft and it had twin Rambler 327s in it ...Proof that 327's are cool. - The AMC Forum - Page 6250 v8 Engine Specs for a restauration - The AMC ForumMore results from theamcforum.comMissing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  45. [45]
    Gray Marine 327 Engine 225hp - The Jalopy Journal
    Jun 14, 2012 · Sometimes they will slip in a reverse rotation cam, especially if it is being used in a twin motor application. If you pull the exhaust ...
  46. [46]
    Gray Marine 327 Fireball V8 Test Firing 516-13 - YouTube
    May 17, 2013 · The 1949, 22' Shepherd, barrel-back came into the shop powered by a 1956 Gray Marine 327 Fireball V8; (The reference to 1929 in the clip is ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  47. [47]
    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/gray-marine-327-engine-225hp.707520/
  48. [48]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAYO6bwD-Q0
  49. [49]
    Rambler engine you're referring to—a 1956 Gray Marine Fireball ...
    Oct 19, 2025 · The Fireball 327 was an overhead-valve V8 displacing 327 cubic inches (5.4 liters), distinct from the later Chevrolet 327 despite sharing the ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  50. [50]
    Changing Carbs on an AMC 327 Fireball V-8 - Boat Buzz
    Mar 2, 2010 · Side draft carbs like on your Gray were condemed by the insurance underwriter in the '60s. I don't know which manifold was used in the ...
  51. [51]
    Proof that 327's are cool. - The AMC Forum - Page 6
    May 15, 2013 · Old memories, my grandpas friend had this setup in an old Chris Craft 327 Fireball AMC Velvet drive...Missing: 1965-1967 | Show results with:1965-1967<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    327 Modification - The AMC Forum - Page 13
    Aug 3, 2020 · His gripe was he could only get the Gray Marine intake to allow him to rev to about 4000 rpm. With the Holley, he could go to 5000-5500 rpm.
  53. [53]
    Brass & Galvanized Steel Freeze Expansion Plug Kit, 21-Piece Kit ...
    Material: Brass (except for pipe plugs & camshaft plug which are galvanized steel) ; Quantity: 21-piece kit ; Fits: All AMC & Jeep V-8 from 1966-91 ; Installation ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] American Motors Muscle Car Cylinder Heads - Engine Professional
    before and beginning of 1970 and up.
  55. [55]
    AMC V8 Block Engine - Mopar Muscle Magazine - Hot Rod
    Jan 1, 2005 · Indy Cylinder Head, makers of all things Mopar, just released a new AMC block carved out of aluminum, able to support a whole lot of cubes.Missing: Wagonaire | Show results with:Wagonaire
  56. [56]
    Jeep Engine: AMC 360 V8
    AMC 360 V8. Bore x Stroke, 4.08" x 3.44". Displacement, 360(5.89L). Compression Ratio, 8.5:1. Horsepower (net), 175@4000. Torque (net), 285@2400. Main Bearings ...Missing: stock | Show results with:stock
  57. [57]
    The Biggest Displacement V8 Engine Ever In An AMC Muscle Car
    Aug 8, 2024 · Starting off with a 290 ci displacement, the engine was steadily developed until it reached its peak size of 390 ci by 1968. Feeling the design ...
  58. [58]
    What Killed Horsepower In The 1970s And 1980s? - Hemmings
    Apr 21, 2025 · Lowered compression ratios and emissions equipment demanded for air quality control, government mandates for fuel economy, public concerns about ...
  59. [59]
    Oddball AMC 401 Engine Build: Lightin' Fires and Burnin' Tires for ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · For the street, Gossett recommends the Speed-Pro 2382P piston, a forged 0.030-inch factory replacement that retains the stock 10.2:1 compression ...
  60. [60]
    AMC 360 Engine Build - 370-Inch 480HP AMC - HOT ROD
    Dec 17, 2007 · It's all American Motors with a 4.08 bore and 3.44-inch stroke destined for the big-body Javelin, 360 Hornet, and a healthy mix of Wagoneers and other vehicles.Missing: overhead degree iron
  61. [61]
    AMC Gremlin 1970 304 V8 Auto X Specs, Performance, Comparisons
    AMC Gremlin 1970 304 V8 Auto X Specs ; Fuel Consumption - Economy - EPA Combined ( - 2008):, 16 MPG 19 MPG UK 14.7 L/100 km ; Range (EPA):, 338 miles / 544 km.
  62. [62]
    Howell Fuel Injection AMC V-8 Kit - 50-State Freedom - MotorTrend
    Mar 1, 2008 · Jeeps R Us tells us the fuel economy has gone up 4-5 mpg since the EFI swap-a huge increase! Also gone were cold starts, stuttering, and any ...