Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Active electronically scanned array

An active electronically scanned array (AESA) is a type of radar antenna consisting of a large number of small radiating elements, each integrated with its own transmit/receive module (TRM), enabling electronic steering of the beam in multiple directions without any movement of the antenna structure. This allows for rapid beam agility, simultaneous tracking of multiple targets, and enhanced capabilities compared to traditional mechanically scanned radars. Unlike passive electronically scanned arrays (PESA), where a single centralized transmitter powers the entire , AESA distributes and phase control to individual elements via solid-state TRMs, typically based on or semiconductors, which improves reliability by eliminating single points of failure and enables graceful degradation if some modules fail. The is achieved by precisely controlling the phase and of signals fed to each element, allowing the to form, scan, and shape beams electronically at speeds far exceeding mechanical systems. Development of AESA technology originated in the 1960s, with early efforts by companies like Westinghouse Electric in the United States focusing on airborne applications to support air dominance missions. Significant advancements occurred in the 1970s and 1980s, driven by military needs for agile, low-observable radars, leading to the first operational production systems entering service in the late 1990s and early 2000s, such as Raytheon's AN/APG-77 for the F-22 Raptor fighter jet. Today, AESAs are widely deployed in advanced military platforms, including fighter aircraft (e.g., Eurofighter Typhoon's CAPTOR-E), naval vessels for air defense, and ground-based surveillance systems, offering benefits like low probability of intercept, resistance to jamming, and multifunctional operation for radar, electronic warfare, and communication tasks.

Fundamentals

Definition and Basic Principles

An active electronically scanned array (AESA) is a type of radar system in which each individual element is paired with its own dedicated transmit/receive (T/R) , allowing for of both and to steer the without any mechanical movement. This architecture contrasts with traditional s by distributing amplification and across the array, enabling high-performance operation through solid-state components integrated directly behind each radiating element. In basic operation, an AESA transmits and receives electromagnetic waves using a large number of small elements arranged in a planar or conformal . To form and direct the , the T/R modules adjust the of the signal at each element, creating constructive in the desired direction while minimizing it elsewhere. This electronic permits rapid scanning of the surveillance volume—often in milliseconds—by dynamically altering shifts across the , assuming foundational principles such as for target illumination and echo reception for detection. The shift required for is given by : \delta \phi = \frac{2\pi d \sin \theta}{\lambda} where d is the spacing between adjacent elements, \theta is the scan angle from broadside, and \lambda is the wavelength of the signal. Key to AESA functionality is the solid-state amplification within each T/R module, which provides independent gain control and low-noise performance for both transmission and reception, enhancing overall system reliability and dynamic range. Additionally, the per-element T/R modules support frequency agility, as each can generate and process waveforms at slightly different frequencies, allowing the array to operate across a broad bandwidth or form multiple simultaneous beams for multifunction tasks.

Comparison to Other Scanning Technologies

Passive electronically scanned arrays (PESA) represent a predecessor to AESA technology, utilizing a single central transmitter to generate signals that are distributed across the array via a corporate feed , with phase shifters enabling on both transmit and receive. This centralized architecture limits PESA systems to a single transmit beam at a time and lacks per-element transmit , constraining their agility and ability to perform simultaneous multi-beam operations, whereas AESA's of transmit/receive (T/R) modules per element allows for and the of multiple independent beams for enhanced multitasking. Mechanically scanned radars, by comparison, direct their beams through physical rotation or tilting of the antenna reflector or feed, resulting in scan times on the order of seconds for a full volume search and susceptibility to structural vibrations that can degrade performance in dynamic environments like . AESA overcomes these limitations with solid-state electronic steering, achieving beam repositioning in microseconds without moving parts, thereby enabling rapid, vibration-free operation and the "search-while-track" capability for maintaining on multiple targets concurrently. Hybrid approaches, such as semi-active arrays, serve as transitional technologies between PESA and AESA, where T/ modules are shared among a small number of elements (e.g., every two elements), providing partial distribution of transmit functions to improve upon PESA's centralization while avoiding the full complexity and cost of fully active designs. The following table summarizes key qualitative differences among these scanning technologies:
AspectAESAPESA Scanning
Scan SpeedInstantaneous (microseconds per beam shift)Rapid electronic (milliseconds per beam)Slow physical (seconds per full scan)
ReliabilityHigh (distributed T/ modules reduce single-point failures)Medium (central transmitter vulnerability)Low (prone to mechanical and )
CostHigh (due to numerous T/ modules)Moderate (simpler central )Low (basic mechanical components)
These distinctions highlight AESA's superior structural and functional agility for modern applications, though at increased complexity.

Historical Development

Early Concepts and Prototypes

The concept of active electronically scanned arrays (AESA) emerged from foundational research on antennas in the 1960s, driven by the need for electronic in systems. Early theoretical work focused on adaptive arrays to enhance and interference rejection, with Widrow's 1967 development of the least-mean-squares (LMS) providing a key method for dynamically adjusting array weights to optimize directional reception. This approach, detailed in Widrow's paper on adaptive antenna systems, laid the groundwork for the signal processing techniques essential to AESA functionality by enabling real-time adaptation to environmental changes. During the , prototype development accelerated in the United States and , transitioning from passive electronically scanned arrays (PESA) toward active architectures. In the U.S., Hughes developed the AN/APG-63 in the early 1970s for the F-15 Eagle, which was a PESA system. The conducted parallel experiments with X-band airborne phased arrays, including over 1,700-element designs by Tikhomirov NIIP, emphasizing agile for fighter applications amid air superiority demands. These efforts highlighted early challenges, such as high power requirements and limited reliability of tube-based amplifiers, which constrained . By the 1980s, breakthroughs in solid-state technology addressed these hurdles, shifting from amplifiers to (GaAs) transmit/receive modules for greater efficiency and . The U.S. achieved a milestone around 1985 with Northrop Grumman's Ultra Reliable Radar (URR), the first operational AESA prototype demonstrating active aperture capabilities in a naval context, paving the way for reliable electronic scanning without mechanical parts. This era marked the overcoming of key technical barriers, setting the stage for broader adoption while prioritizing conceptual validation over full-scale deployment.

Modern Advancements and Adoption

In the 1990s, breakthroughs in (GaAs) transmit/receive (T/R) modules paved the way for the first production active electronically scanned array (AESA) , enabling reliable solid-state performance in operational systems. A key example was the developed by for the U.S. F-22 Raptor, which utilized GaAs-based T/R modules to achieve multifunction capabilities including low-probability-of-intercept modes and electronic . This entered operational service with the F-22 in December 2005, marking the transition from experimental prototypes to fielded technology. During the 2000s and 2010s, AESA technology shifted toward gallium nitride (GaN) materials, offering higher power output, improved efficiency, and greater thermal management compared to GaAs, which facilitated broader adoption in advanced fighter platforms. The AN/APG-81 radar for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, also GaAs-based but incorporating scalable GaN elements in later upgrades, achieved initial operational capability in the early 2010s, providing integrated air-to-air and air-to-ground modes with enhanced electronic warfare resistance. Similarly, China's Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter integrated an indigenous AESA radar, such as the Type 1475 (KLJ-5 variant), developed in the 2010s by the Nanjing Research Institute of Electronic Technology, enabling long-range detection and tracking in contested environments. In Europe, the Captor-E AESA, led by Leonardo, progressed from mechanical scanned predecessors to production readiness for the Eurofighter Typhoon, with initial deliveries in the mid-2010s enhancing multirole mission flexibility. By the 2020s, AESA systems evolved to address emerging threats like hypersonic weapons through enhanced tracking precision and integration with (AI) for adaptive , allowing dynamic adjustment of radar beams to optimize in real time. For instance, AI-driven algorithms enable cognitive radar behaviors, such as interference mitigation and , improving detection of fast-maneuvering targets. India's DRDO achieved production clearance in 2023, with flight integration on the Mk1A fighter demonstrating indigenous multiband operation for beyond-visual-range engagements. In the United States, the (NGAD) program projects scalable AESA arrays by 2025, featuring modular designs for multi-function apertures that combine , communications, and electronic attack in open-architecture frameworks. In 2025, the U.S. selected the F-47 as the NGAD platform, featuring scalable AESA arrays in a for multi-function operations, with first flight expected in 2028. Global adoption of AESA in new radars has increased significantly by 2025, driven by modernization programs across major powers and advancements in (MMIC) integration that streamline T/R module fabrication. This widespread integration, from U.S. F-35 fleets to emerging platforms in and , underscores AESA's role as the standard for fifth-generation and beyond air superiority.

Technical Components

Transmit/Receive Modules

The transmit/receive (T/R) module serves as the core hardware unit in an active electronically scanned array (AESA), integrating active components directly behind each antenna element to enable independent signal amplification and phase control. Typically, each T/R module comprises a (LNA) for the receive path to minimize signal degradation, a power (PA) for the transmit path to boost output power, a phase shifter for , an attenuator for adjustment, and a to isolate transmit and receive signals. These components are usually implemented using monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs) for compact integration and high performance at frequencies. Early T/R modules predominantly utilized (GaAs) semiconductors due to their suitability for high-frequency operation and low-noise characteristics, which are essential for sensitive reception. Since the 2010s, (GaN) has emerged as the preferred material for advanced modules, offering significantly higher power density—up to 100 per module—and efficiencies exceeding 50%, compared to GaAs's lower limits of around 10-20 and 30-40% efficiency. GaN's superior thermal management and enable more robust performance in high-power applications without excessive size or cooling requirements. The primary functionality of T/R modules lies in their ability to handle transmit and receive operations independently for each element, allowing simultaneous multi-beam formation and rapid electronic scanning without mechanical movement. This per-element autonomy supports advanced features like frequency hopping, typically over a 5-20% instantaneous , enhancing agility against interference. The module's overall is expressed as G = G_{tx} \times G_{rx}, where G_{tx} and G_{rx} are the transmit and receive gains, respectively; control is achieved via a phase shifter, often with 4-bit providing steps of \phi = 22.5^\circ for precise 360° coverage.

Beamforming and Signal Processing

In active electronically scanned arrays (AESAs), digital beamforming is achieved through (DSP) that post-processes the received signals from each , allowing for flexible and formation without mechanical movement. This approach contrasts with analog beamforming by performing phase and amplitude adjustments in the digital domain after , enabling the array to generate multiple simultaneous beams—typically 4 to 8—for tasks such as simultaneous target tracking and electronic countermeasures. The transmit/receive (T/R) modules in each provide the initial analog signals, which are then routed to a central for digital manipulation. Key beamforming techniques in AESAs include phase-only steering and time-delay steering, selected based on the required scan angle and . Phase-only steering applies fixed shifts to align signals for a specific , which is effective for operations but suffers from squint—distortion at off-center frequencies or wide scan angles greater than 60 degrees—leading to reduced and sidelobe degradation. In contrast, time-delay steering uses true time delays (TTD) per element to maintain integrity across wide angles and broad bandwidths, as the delay compensates for differences independently of , though it requires more complex hardware like switched delay lines. Adaptive nulling complements these methods by dynamically adjusting weights to place nulls in the direction of sources, rejecting unwanted signals while preserving the main ; this is accomplished via algorithms like least mean squares (LMS) that minimize power based on estimates from the array signals. The signal processing chain in an AESA begins with analog-to-digital conversion () at each or subarray to sample the received RF signals, converting them into streams for further handling. These samples are then processed using (FFT) algorithms to form beams by computing weighted sums across elements, effectively implementing spatial filtering in the digital domain. The array factor, which describes the overall , is given by: AF(\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} e^{j (k d \sin\theta + \phi_n)} where N is the number of elements, k = 2\pi / \lambda is the wavenumber, d is the element spacing, \theta is the angle from broadside, and \phi_n is the progressive phase shift applied to the n-th element. This formulation allows precise control over beam direction and shape through the choice of \phi_n. Recent advancements in AESA beamforming incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly post-2020, to handle dynamic environments with rapid changes in interference or targets. (DRL), for instance, optimizes adaptive nulling weights in real-time by treating beamforming as a , where the agent learns policies to maximize signal-to-interference ratios under uncertainty, outperforming traditional methods in non-stationary scenarios.

Advantages

Low Probability of Intercept and Detection

Active electronically scanned arrays (AESAs) enhance low probability of intercept (LPI) and low probability of detection (LPD) primarily through their inherent distributed transmission architecture, which differs markedly from conventional using a single high-power transmitter. In AESAs, power is apportioned across numerous transmit/receive (T/R) —often thousands—each emitting low peak power levels, typically in the range of watts per module rather than kilowatts from a centralized source. This distribution ensures that the signal appears as low-level from any specific direction or point, complicating detection by enemy radar warning receivers (RWRs) that rely on identifying high-peak-power pulses. To further reduce detectability, AESAs leverage waveform design techniques such as spread-spectrum modulation, which disperses the transmitted energy over a broad , thereby lowering the spectral and allowing the signal to blend with . Frequency agility complements this by enabling rapid frequency hopping across pulses, often changing carrier multiple times per scan, which limits the on any single band and hinders interceptors tuned to narrow ranges. , achieved through phase- or frequency-coded waveforms, permits the use of longer-duration, lower-peak-power pulses that maintain high energy for target detection while compressing in the to provide fine without elevating the instantaneous power. These methods collectively exploit the AESA's beamforming capabilities to shape the effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP), minimizing and directing energy precisely toward the target area. The impact on detection metrics is profound: AESAs achieve substantially lower probabilities of intercept compared to mechanical scanned radars, as the distributed low-power emissions evade traditional RWR thresholds due to their noise-like signatures. This is underscored in the adapted radar range equation, where received power P_r depends critically on transmit power P_t: P_r = \frac{P_t G_t G_r \lambda^2 \sigma}{(4\pi)^3 R^4} Here, the low P_t per T/R element is offset by the array's high antenna gain G_t and receiver gain G_r, along with \lambda, target radar cross-section \sigma, and R, enabling effective performance without compromising LPI. These LPI attributes have significant implications, permitting AESA-equipped platforms to perform and targeting in highly contested environments without revealing their positions, thereby supporting stealthy tactics and suppressing enemy air defenses during covert operations.

Jamming Resistance and Reliability

Active electronically scanned arrays (AESAs) demonstrate robust resistance through advanced (ECCM) techniques, including adaptive beam nulling that dynamically steers nulls toward jammer locations to suppress while maintaining beam performance on targets. This capability leverages the array's to adjust weights in real-time. Additionally, the architecture supports formation of multiple independent beams, allowing simultaneous search, acquisition, and tracking functions even in contested electromagnetic environments with active . Reliability in AESAs is bolstered by their distributed , which eliminates single points of failure and enables graceful ; failure of multiple transmit/receive (T/R) modules causes minimal overall , in contrast to mechanically scanned or single-transmitter radars that may experience total outage. T/R modules themselves exhibit high (MTBF) in the thousands of hours due to solid-state components and . High jamming margins are facilitated by frequency and rapid hopping across the array's operational to evade barrage or deceptive . Recent advancements in ()-based T/R modules further enhance thermal reliability, supporting high-duty-cycle operations up to 30% without significant derating (as of 2022), thereby extending system endurance in prolonged engagements. This distributed complements the low probability of intercept features of AESAs by ensuring operational continuity under electronic attack.

Limitations

Cost and Complexity

Active electronically scanned array (AESA) systems incur high and costs primarily due to the requirement for thousands of transmit/receive (T/R) modules per array, particularly in applications where arrays often comprise 1,000 to 2,000 modules. Each T/R module, incorporating (GaAs) or (GaN) monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs), costs between $1,000 and $3,000, resulting in module-related expenses alone exceeding $1 million for a typical radar array. These modules account for approximately 30-50% of the total array , with additional expenses arising from assembly, testing, and integration. Economies of scale achieved through increased production volumes and technological maturation have significantly lowered unit costs over time; early AESA radars in the 1990s, such as the AN/APG-77 for the F-22, approached $10 million per unit, while contemporary systems like the AN/APG-81 for the F-35 have declined to $2-5 million per unit by the 2020s. This reduction is attributed to advancements in GaN-based MMICs, which offer higher efficiency and power density, enabling smaller, more affordable modules without sacrificing performance. The engineering complexity of AESA systems stems from the intricate integration of RFICs for signal amplification and phase shifting, sophisticated cooling systems to dissipate heat from densely packed modules, and automated processes to ensure accuracy across the . MMIC fabrication yields remain a challenge, typically ranging from 60% to 70% from to functional , which elevates costs due to higher rates and process iterations. To address these issues, designers have adopted modular architectures that allow for scalable subarrays and easier upgrades, minimizing the need for complete overhauls during system evolution. Since the , the incorporation of (COTS) components, such as standardized RFICs and power supplies, has further mitigated costs by reducing custom fabrication and enabling 20-30% savings in module production. Compared to (PESA) systems, AESA radars were initially 5-10 times more expensive owing to the distributed T/R module architecture versus PESA's centralized transmitter. Nonetheless, the solid-state reliability of AESA reduces long-term ownership costs through lower maintenance needs and extended operational life.

Power and Size Constraints

Active electronically scanned arrays (AESAs) impose significant power demands, particularly in airborne applications where total prime power requirements often range from 10 to 50 kW to support high-performance radar operations. This power level accounts for the distributed amplification across thousands of elements, with each transmit/receive (T/R) module typically consuming 10 to 50 W during peak operation, depending on the semiconductor technology and duty cycle. Such per-module consumption necessitates the use of efficient DC-DC converters to step down high-voltage supplies while minimizing losses and heat generation in constrained platform environments. Thermal management presents another critical constraint for AESAs, as the high from T/R modules generates substantial that must be dissipated to maintain reliability. Gallium nitride ()-based devices, increasingly adopted for their efficiency, reduce overall thermal output compared to gallium arsenide counterparts but still require advanced cooling solutions like liquid circulation to handle effectively. Junction temperatures in these GaN modules must be kept below 200°C to prevent degradation and ensure long-term operation, often achieved through integrated heat sinks and coolant loops that interface directly with the array structure. Size limitations in AESAs arise primarily from the need for element spacing of approximately λ/2 (half-wavelength) to avoid grating lobes and ensure unambiguous beam steering across wide angles. This spacing constrains the overall aperture size, especially on compact platforms like aircraft, where larger arrays would increase drag or structural demands. To mitigate this, conformal array designs—curved or shaped to match the platform's surface—can reduce radar cross-section (RCS) by minimizing protrusions, though they introduce added complexity in phase calibration and manufacturing. These size constraints lead to inherent trade-offs in performance, as smaller apertures directly reduce antenna gain, approximated by the formula G \approx \frac{4\pi A}{\lambda^2}, where A is the effective aperture area and \lambda is the wavelength, limiting range and resolution in power-constrained scenarios. Emerging techniques, such as of waveguide-based antenna structures in the , offer pathways to more compact AESA designs by enabling intricate, lightweight geometries that optimize space without sacrificing electrical performance.

Applications and Systems

Airborne Systems

Active electronically scanned arrays (AESAs) have become integral to modern , providing enhanced and combat capabilities through rapid and multi-target tracking. The radar, integrated into the since achieving initial operational capability in 2005, represents an early milestone in airborne AESA deployment, enabling long-range detection and low-probability-of-intercept operations for air superiority missions. Similarly, the AN/APG-81 AESA on the , which entered service in 2015, features approximately 1,676 transmit/receive (T/R) modules to support simultaneous air-to-air and air-to-ground engagements, with advanced integration for fifth-generation operations. The AESA's compatibility with beyond-visual-range missiles has expanded its tactical utility in European fighter platforms. The MBDA Meteor air-to-air missile, equipped with an active radar seeker, has been successfully integrated with AESA radars on aircraft such as the and , allowing for mid-course updates via two-way datalinks to extend engagement ranges beyond 100 km while maintaining low . This integration enhances networked warfare, where the radar's electronic scanning supports launches against multiple threats. In and (UAV) applications, AESA upgrades address evolving mission demands for precision strike and . The U.S. Air Force's B-1B Lancer is undergoing upgrade with the Scalable Agile Beam Radar-Global Strike (SABR-GS) AESA, with contract awarded in December 2023 and completion expected by 2028, replacing legacy systems to improve mapping and ground-moving target indication for standoff munitions delivery. For UAVs, the General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper employs the Lynx Multi-Mode Radar as a (SAR) , offering high-resolution imaging through adverse weather for , , and (ISR) missions up to 50,000 feet altitude. Recent advancements project further AESA evolution in next-generation platforms. The U.S. (NGAD) program, with the contract awarded to for the F-47 in March 2025, anticipates first flight in 2028 and operational deployment in the late 2020s, incorporating (GaN)-based AESA arrays to achieve 360-degree coverage, enhancing and adaptive for contested environments. In parallel, China's stealth fighter was reportedly equipped with the Type 1475 (KLJ-5) AESA radar by 2023, according to some analysts, featuring a high number of T/R modules for extended detection and integration with electro-optical targeting systems. Typical performance metrics for fighter-borne AESAs include detection ranges of 200-400 km against targets with a 5 m² cross-section (), depending on altitude, band, and environmental factors, underscoring their role in achieving first-look, first-kill advantages.

Surface and Naval Systems

Active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars in surface and naval applications leverage their to support large-scale deployments on ships and platforms, enabling enhanced , extended ranges, and robust in harsh maritime and terrestrial environments. These systems prioritize multi-functionality for air and , surface tracking, and integration with command networks, often featuring fixed or rotating arrays that provide comprehensive coverage without mechanical vulnerabilities. Unlike more compact airborne variants, surface and naval AESAs accommodate greater power budgets and array sizes to achieve superior sensitivity and discrimination against complex threats such as ballistic missiles and low-observable targets. In naval contexts, the radar exemplifies AESA integration into the U.S. Navy's , serving as the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) since achieving initial operational capability in 2023. This S-band AESA features four fixed-array faces, each comprising 37 radar modular assemblies (RMAs) with a total of over 20,000 transmit/receive (T/R) modules across the system, delivering 360-degree surveillance and significantly improved range—up to 30 times greater sensitivity than legacy radars—for simultaneous air and . Deployed on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, it supports (IAMD) by detecting, tracking, and guiding interceptors against advanced threats in all weather conditions. Similarly, the Thales Sea Fire radar, introduced in the 2020s for the French Navy's Frégate de Défense et d'Intervention (FDI) frigates, employs a four-panel solid-state AESA configuration with over 1,000 elements to enable simultaneous air and surface , control, and support. This fully digital S-band system, first delivered in 2021, generates more than 100 simultaneous beams for multi-threat engagement, offering twice the availability of mechanically scanned predecessors while maintaining weather-resistant operation across high-sea states. Its modular design allows scalability for corvettes and frigates, enhancing missile and panoramic coverage up to 250 km. On the ground, the AN/TPY-2 radar provides critical support for the U.S. (THAAD) system, operational since the 2000s as an X-band AESA for defense. This transportable array detects and tracks threats at ranges exceeding 1,000 km in forward-based mode, switching to terminal mode for precise THAAD interceptor guidance, with high-resolution discrimination of warheads from decoys in adverse weather. Its mobility on C-17 aircraft enables rapid deployment for theater-level protection. Israel's system has incorporated AESA upgrades in the 2020s, enhancing its multi-mission radar to counter drones, cruise missiles, and rockets with improved tracking accuracy and 360-degree coverage, achieving over 90% intercept success in operational scenarios. Recent advancements include the UK's program, slated for service entry in the late 2020s with potential future AESA radar upgrades, featuring a 3D fixed-array for anti-submarine and air defense roles that supports 360-degree on these global combat ships. In August 2025, selected the Type 26 design for at least five frigates. In parallel, Germany's TRML-4D, fielded in the for mobile army air defense, uses a C-band AESA on truck-mounted platforms to track over 1,500 targets simultaneously at ranges beyond 120 km, including supersonic missiles, with quick setup times under 15 minutes for expeditionary operations. These systems often scale to arrays with 10,000 or more T/R elements, facilitating full 360-degree surveillance through multi-face or rotating configurations, while ()-based designs ensure weather resistance and reliability against environmental stressors like salt corrosion and high winds. Power constraints remain a consideration, as larger arrays demand efficient cooling to sustain performance during extended missions.

Emerging and Space-Based Systems

Active electronically scanned arrays (AESAs) are increasingly integrated into space-based platforms for , leveraging their electronic for high-resolution imaging under diverse conditions. For instance, the constellation employs X-band satellites equipped with active antennas, enabling sub-meter resolution imaging with electronic to cover areas up to 500 km swaths while maintaining flexibility in revisit times as short as hours. These systems operate in , providing all-weather, day-night monitoring for applications like and maritime surveillance, with each satellite's AESA facilitating multiple imaging modes such as and stripmap. Emerging military applications extend AESA technology to challenging environments, including hypersonic vehicles where thermal resilience and rapid scanning are critical. Developments in conformal AESA designs aim to equip hypersonic platforms with onboard radars capable of tracking targets at + speeds, using (GaN) modules to withstand extreme heat while providing multi-function capabilities like and . In parallel, DARPA-funded initiatives explore miniature AESAs for swarms, such as the PhantomStrike low-cost array, which integrates into small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for collaborative sensing in swarm operations, enabling distributed radar networks for beyond-visual-line-of-sight targeting. These efforts, projected for fielding in the mid-2020s, emphasize scalability and low size, weight, and power (SWaP) to support tactics involving hundreds of s. Civilian sectors have adopted AESA principles for enhanced sensing in dynamic environments. In automotive advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), 77 GHz AESAs provide high-resolution imaging for features like and detection, with arrays offering below 1 degree over ranges up to 300 meters to support Level 3+ autonomy. Companies like and are deploying multi-chip AESA modules that fuse data with for robust object classification in adverse weather. Similarly, 5G base stations utilize active antennas operating in mmWave bands (24-40 GHz), where AESA enables massive to achieve gigabit-per-second throughput and serve up to 64 simultaneous users per sector, improving in urban deployments. Looking toward the 2030s, AESA systems are poised for enhancements through quantum technologies and . Quantum-enhanced AESAs, incorporating entangled photon sources for illumination, promise detection of stealth targets at lower power levels with reduced noise, potentially extending range by 50% while minimizing intercept probability; prototypes from research consortia like those in and indicate operational viability by the early 2030s for both and communications. Integration with metamaterials further enables operation, as seen in Echodyne's MESA radars, where engineered structures achieve bandwidths exceeding 20% for simultaneous multi-band sensing, reducing size by up to 70% compared to traditional arrays and facilitating conformal designs for diverse platforms. These advancements prioritize with AI-driven to address congestion and evolving threats.

References

  1. [1]
    What is an Active Electronically Scanned Array or AESA?
    Aug 13, 2019 · AESA is a phased array system in which the beam of signals can be steered electronically in any direction, without physically moving the antenna.
  2. [2]
    AESAs: Active Electronically Steered Arrays - JEM Engineering
    Primarily used in radar systems, an AESA is a type of computer-controlled phased array antenna in which the beam of radio waves can be electronically steered ...
  3. [3]
    AESA vs. PESA Radar: Key Differences Explained - RF Wireless World
    AESA radar uses an electronically controlled array antenna where the radio wave beam can be electronically steered, pointing in different directions without ...
  4. [4]
    An introduction to digital Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA ...
    AESA – also known as E-scan – gives aircrew the ability to track multiple targets with very high accuracy and power, which is critical for modern air-to-air ...
  5. [5]
    Development of phased array antennas - Radartutorial.eu
    1965 Westinghouse Electric (USA) begins work on an AESA radar for aircraft. 1976 Hughes Aircraft develops the AN/APG-63, the first series-produced AESA radar ...
  6. [6]
    APG-33 to PhantomStrike: 80 years of RI&S radars | Raytheon - RTX
    Seeing the success of a first operational AESA at the outset of 2000, Raytheon engineers pioneered the development of a more advanced radar – the APG-82 for F- ...
  7. [7]
    Evolution of AESA Radar Technology - Microwave Journal
    Aug 14, 2012 · The first “modern” operational production phased array radars were the German VHF-Band GEMA FuGM41 Mammut or “Hoarding” series of air and sea ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Radar Development for Air and Missile Defense - Johns Hopkins APL
    An AESA uses T/R modules placed at each element of the array. A typical radar T/R module (Fig. 8) provides several stages of RF power amplification on transmit, ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Active Phased Array Radar Analysis. - DTIC
    Ideally, the T-R module would contain amplifiers for transmit and receive states as well as for electronic phase shifting for both states. Thus it would carry ...
  10. [10]
    Microwaves101 | Phased Array Antennas - Microwave Encyclopedia
    The phase shift to line up waves before combining is 2π(d/λ) sinθ where d is the array element spacing, λ is the wavelength, and θ is pointing angle direction. ...
  11. [11]
    F/A-18 AESA - New Technology Revolutionizes Radar Benefits
    The electronically scanned array uses a "search while track" methodology that significantly improves track quality of multiple targets with little or no ...
  12. [12]
    AN/APG Active Electronically Scanned Array AESA
    Jul 24, 2011 · Conventional, electronically scanned arrays and phased arrays are realized in two geometries, including a passive electronically scanned array ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Adaptive Antenna Systems
    This paper describes a method of applying the techniques of adaptive Btering['] to the design of a receiving antenna system which can extract directional ...Missing: Bernard | Show results with:Bernard
  14. [14]
    AN/APG-63 Radar System - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 24, 2011 · The AN/APG-63 is a pulse doppler, X-band, multi-mode radar used in the F-15A/B/C/D aircraft. Hughes Aircraft Company estimated in 1983 that, ...
  15. [15]
    AN/APG-81 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)
    Starting in 1985 with the first generation Ultra Reliable Radar (URR), Northrop Grumman continues its legacy of excellence to this day with active ...
  16. [16]
    Airborne AESA Fighter Radars - Armada International
    May 10, 2022 · Because it can scan at a very high rate it can produce more power in this more 'dense' lobe, and with reduced latency. But because it can ...Missing: credible
  17. [17]
    F-22 Raptor History | Lockheed Martin
    Oct 1, 2020 · The Air Force would declare the F-22 operational in 2005. “The very existence of this airplane—your airplane—has altered the strategic landscape ...
  18. [18]
    Typhoon Radar | Leonardo in the UK
    In the late 1990s, we delivered the Captor-M, a mechanically scanned array radar for the Eurofighter Typhoon, which entered service in 2003. Building on the ...Missing: GaAs | Show results with:GaAs
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    AESA Adaptive Beamforming Using Deep Learning
    A review of the most recent advances in deep learning (DL) as applied to electromagnetics (EM), antennas, and propagation is provided. It is aimed at giving ...
  21. [21]
    Uttam Radar not so Uttam for Tejas? HAL picks imported Israeli ...
    Jun 30, 2025 · However, DRDO officials disagree with HAL's explanation, stating that the Uttam AESA radar was cleared for production in 2023. According to DRDO ...
  22. [22]
    How NGAD Will Sense, Communicate, And Jam Could Be ...
    Aug 9, 2023 · NGAD's potential use of multi-function arrays that combine radar, communications, and electronic warfare functions could be a game changer.
  23. [23]
    Active Phased-Array Radar T/R Module Technology - ALLPCB
    Sep 11, 2025 · The receive channel typically contains a limiter, LNA, phase shifter, and a variable-gain amplifier or attenuator. This module architecture ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Simulation and Evaluation of an Active Electrically Scanned Array ...
    An Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) is an active antenna consisting of a large number of radiating elements and is commonly used in today's radar ...
  25. [25]
    X-Band Radar in Defense | GaN & GaAs Beamforming - Qorvo
    Feb 20, 2025 · GaN-based transmit/receive modules offer higher output power and improved efficiency, while GaAs contribute essential low-noise performance ...
  26. [26]
    The benefits and challenges of using GaN technology in AESA radar ...
    Oct 11, 2019 · Not only does GaN offer high power density, but when compared to GaAs, the higher bias voltage of GaN simplifies the process of designing a ...
  27. [27]
    Transmit-Receive Multi Modules - T/R Modules for Phased Array ...
    Based on GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology, the TRMM delivers high efficiency in a compact size with a 100W Peak Transmit Power Capability per channel. The ...
  28. [28]
    Active Electronically Scanned Array Technology | Request PDF
    An active electronically scanned array (AESA) amplifies and phase shifts the transmit and receive signals by placing the active components at the elements.
  29. [29]
    Transmit/Receive Modules - Microwave Encyclopedia
    GaN LNAs routinely are reported to withstand 10 watts peak incident power, you are lucky if you can get a GaAs LNA to withstand 100 mW. The phase shifter ...
  30. [30]
    (PDF) Improving Power Efficiency of AESA System with GaN Supply ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · This paper presents an analysis of using GaN supply-modulated (SM) power amplifier (PA) in an active electronically scanned array (AESA) ...
  31. [31]
    Digital beam forming on transmit and receive with an AESA FMCW ...
    This paper describes an active electronically scanned array (AESA) FMCW radar with eight transceivers. Each transceiver has its own Direct Digital Synthesizer ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    True Time Delays and Phase Shifters - Analog Devices
    Jun 16, 2022 · This article reviews the strengths and weaknesses of two electronic beamforming techniques: phase shifters (PSs) and true time delays (TTDs).
  34. [34]
    Beamforming & AESA Antennas in SATCOM - Qorvo
    Jan 22, 2025 · Part 3 delves into how beamforming and AESA antennas are shaping satellite communication design trends and benefiting engineers in the field.Missing: per | Show results with:per<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] AnAdaptive Nulling - Antenna for Military Satellite Communications
    Using adaptive nulling, an antenna system can reconfigure the receive antenna to produce nulls at the locations of any interference sources.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Multi-Beam Radio Frequency (RF) Aperture Arrays Using ... - DTIC
    Next, the obtained downconverted based band signal is processed using a digital hardware through analog-to-digital conversion (ADC). In digital processing, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Phased Array Antenna Patterns—Part 1 - Analog Devices
    The array factor is calculated based on array geometry (d for our uniform linear array) and beam weights (amplitude and phase). Deriving the array factor for a ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Detection and Jamming Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) Radars
    The LPI radar is thus able to exploit the time bandwidth product by reducing its peak transmitted power to bury itself in the environmental noise. Due to ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] FREQUENCY AGILITY FOR RADAR TARGET DETECTION AND ...
    A frequency-agile waveform consists of a series of pulses, each of which is transmitted on a differ- ent carrier frequency. For each frequency, the re-.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Electronic Warfare and Radar Systems Engineering Handbook - DTIC
    This handbook is designed to aid electronic warfare and radar systems engineers in making general estimations regarding capabilities of systems. This handbook ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Netted LPI RADARs - DTIC
    The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the performance of netted LPI radar systems. To do so, it commences with establishing the theoretical background for ...Missing: breakthroughs | Show results with:breakthroughs<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    22 CFR Part 121 -- The United States Munitions List - eCFR
    (i) An Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) fire control radar;. (ii) ... adaptive null attenuation greater than 35 dB with convergence time less ...
  43. [43]
    Strip Map - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    1.6 GRACEFUL DEGRADATION. An AESA antenna keeps its performance with up to 5% of the TRM failed (i.e., 50 out of 1000). If more TRM fail, the performance ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] 8B.2 AN AIRBORNE PHASED ARRAY RADAR CONCEPT FOR ...
    Present generation X-band T/R modules for airborne applications cost between $1000 - $3000 and were capable of producing 10 W of peak power at duty cycles of up ...Missing: fighter | Show results with:fighter
  45. [45]
    Transmit and Receive Module - Cyient
    Cyient design and develop the transmit and receive (TR) module for aerospace and defence industry. TR modules are also the building blocks for AESA radars.Missing: support frequency hopping bandwidth<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    [PDF] AN/APG-80 Agile Beam Radar - Teal Group
    Costs. Unit cost could be between $6-7 million in 2004, perhaps $5 million for follow-on buys after UAE full- rate production. Program Overview. History. APG ...Missing: per | Show results with:per
  47. [47]
    [PDF] AESA Radar - :::::: AEL ::::::
    An Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) is an active antenna consisting of a large number of radiating elements and is commonly used in today's radar ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    F/A-18 fighter-bomber's next-generation radar technology uses ...
    Feb 28, 2006 · AESA designers took advantage of many (COTS) components. “Our goal was to go out and buy a new radar for about the same price as the ...
  49. [49]
    How X-Band Transmit Receive Modules are Impacting the AESA ...
    Dec 18, 2019 · TRMs provide the capability to electronically steer the beams and control radiated power. The main functions of the T/R Module are: Amplify ...Missing: independent hopping bandwidth
  50. [50]
    AESA Radar Market Size, Share, Trends | Report [2031] - Extrapolate
    Jul 7, 2025 · AESA Radar Market size is projected to reach USD 10.60 Billion by 2031 from USD 4.94 Billion in 2024, exhibiting a CAGR of 11.5% during ...Missing: percentage MMIC
  51. [51]
    [PDF] PDF - GovInfo
    provide on the order of 20-30 kW prime power to the radar. This power requirement is based on a relatively conservative overall T/R module efficiency of 15%.
  52. [52]
    (PDF) On the use of AESA (Active Electronically Scanned Array ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Considering GaAs TRMs of 10W each, the peak power is of the 10 kW class. Liquid cooling is used inside the radar, in order to remove the waste ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] X-Band Quad Beamforming TR Module - Spectrum Control
    The QTRM is available in three power output options of 1, 5 and 10W per channel. Each channel can support pulsed and intermittent CW applications. 5 and 10W/ ...
  54. [54]
    A 10W GaN based X-band T/R module for AESA - IEEE Xplore
    The module is supposed to operate in the band from 9 GHz to 10 GHz. GaAs technology core chip is applied and it is used to drive power amplifiers based on GaN ...Missing: consumption 50W
  55. [55]
    Some Aspects of AESA Power Supply Management
    Feb 28, 2019 · This article considers several features of AESA power supply systems that are useful for engineers specialized in the development of AESAs and their power ...
  56. [56]
    Fighter Radars Poised For Gallium Nitride Breakthrough
    Jun 28, 2021 · Although the array of the APG-79(V)4 is smaller than the APG-79, the application of GaN, a significantly more efficient semiconductor than GaAs, ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Channel Temperature Determination for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC ...
    4 to 6) for device failure or permanent damage, have indicated failures occur when the channel temperature rises into the 200 to 300 °C range. However, reports ...Missing: AESA | Show results with:AESA
  58. [58]
    High Performance S-Band GaN T/R Module Using Hybrid ...
    Mar 27, 2024 · The T/R module is realized and evaluated for transmit and receive parameters, i.e., output power, receiver gain, noise figure, power consumption ...
  59. [59]
    Phased Array Antenna Patterns—Part 2: Grating Lobes and Beam ...
    If the beam is steered completely to the horizon, then θ = ±90°, and an element spacing of λ/2 is required (if no grating lobes are allowed in the visible ...
  60. [60]
    Method and arrangement for a low radar cross section antenna
    It is also well-known that an Active Electrically Scanned Antenna (AESA) offers a lower RCS value than the flat-plate antenna. ... reduce scattering adding ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] 3D conformal antennas for radar applications
    Feb 1, 2019 · plane to prevent the radiation from going through the array antenna structure. The first considered radiating element design is composed of ...
  62. [62]
    Antenna Gain and Effective Area: Formulas and Types
    ... formulas for different antenna types to clarify the gain and effective area relationship. Antenna Gain (G). G = 4 π A e λ 2 = 4 π f 2 A e c 2 G = \frac{4 \pi ...
  63. [63]
    3D printed antenna: High complexity – simply manufactured
    Researchers at Fraunhofer FHR are developing radar-compatible 3D-printed waveguide-based antenna array systems that are significantly more compact and easier ...
  64. [64]
    AN/APG-77 Radar System - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · The active, electronically scanned array (ESA) configuration has a wider transmit bandwidth while requiring significantly less volume and prime ...
  65. [65]
    AN/APG-81 - Radartutorial.eu
    AN/APG-81. The AN/APG-81 is an X-Band fire-control radar with an active phased array antenna consisting of approximately 1676 transmit/receive modules ...
  66. [66]
    F-35B Has Flown With Meteor Long-Range Air-To-Air Missile
    Feb 28, 2025 · Along with its ramjet motor, the Meteor boasts a two-way datalink, supplementing the missile's active X-band radar seeker. The datalink provides ...
  67. [67]
    antennas radar B-1 bomber | Military Aerospace
    Late-model B-1 aircraft have received upgrades to install the Northrop Grumman Scalable Agile Beam Radar-Global Strike (SABR-GS).Missing: AESA 2020s<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Lynx® Multi-Mode Radar | General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc.
    A high-performance system that provides high-resolution, photographic-quality imagery that can be captured through clouds, rain, dust, smoke and fog.
  69. [69]
    Flying into the Future: An Update on the Air Force's NGAD Program
    Jan 29, 2025 · This article will look at developments to the NGAD program in 2024, congressional concerns for the program, and what to expect from NGAD in 2025.
  70. [70]
    Radar Cross Section (RCS) - GlobalSecurity.org
    The US airborne warning and control system (AWACS) radar system was designed to detect aircraft with an RCS of 7 m2 at a range of at least 370 km and typical ...Missing: AESA 400km 5m²
  71. [71]
    U.S. Navy's SPY-6 Family of Radars | Raytheon - RTX
    4 array faces – each with 37 RMAs – providing continuous, 360-degree situational awareness · Significantly enhanced range and sensitivity compared to the radar ...
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    Thales delivers first Sea Fire fully digital radar with active antenna ...
    May 18, 2021 · Launched in 2014, the first of the five Sea Fire AESA digital radars for French Navy's future Frégate de Défense et d'Intervention (FDI) arrived ...
  74. [74]
    France qualifies Sea Fire radar ahead of FDI combat system ...
    Oct 22, 2021 · According to Thales, element-level digital beamforming enables the Sea Fire radar to generate more than 100 simultaneous beams.
  75. [75]
    AN/TPY-2: Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance | Raytheon
    The AN/TPY-2 is a missile defense radar that can detect, track and discriminate ballistic missiles. It operates in the X-band of the electromagnetic spectrum.
  76. [76]
    Israel Upgrades Iron Dome Air Defense System to Counter Drones ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · As aerial threats to Israel continue to escalate, the Ministry of Defense announced on March 21, 2025, an upgrade to the Iron Dome air defense ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  77. [77]
    Buying the Type 26 Frigate Might Make Sense - U.S. Naval Institute
    It has a 5" gun, eight SSMs, 32-cell VLS, two CIWS (or substitute ESSMs), two triple torpedo tubes, one helicopter, towed sonar array, and 3D AESA radar for ...
  78. [78]
    TRML-4D - Hensoldt
    This air defence radar offers surveillance and tracking of more than 1,500 targets in parallel, including fighter aircraft (track range > 120 km) and supersonic ...
  79. [79]
    Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Radars
    Northrop Grumman's airborne radars deliver strategic and tactical surveillance capabilities that operate effectively through all weather conditions in any ...Missing: 1985 | Show results with:1985
  80. [80]
    ICEYE Microsatellites Constellation - eoPortal
    ICEYE SAR satellites, each with a mass of 85 kg, are side-looking X-band SAR sensors utilizing active phased array antenna (electronically steerable) technology ...Missing: AESA | Show results with:AESA
  81. [81]
    [PDF] iceye microsatellite sar constellation status update - arXiv
    ICEYE SAR SENSOR SPECIFICATIONS AND. IMAGING MODES. ICEYE SAR satellites are side-looking X-band SAR sensors utilizing active phased array antenna technology.
  82. [82]
    PhantomStrike Low-Cost Lightweight AESA Radar Flies For First Time
    May 6, 2025 · Not only does Raytheon promise that PhantomStrike will be cheaper than other AESA options, but it's designed to be integrated in a wide range of ...
  83. [83]
    Hypersonics | Raytheon - RTX
    AN/APG-79 AESA Radar · AN/APG-82(V) ... Design and subsystem testing has progressed, and it is time to maximize testing and begin flying hypersonic vehicles.
  84. [84]
    Bringing Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Radar ...
    May 12, 2025 · Today's most conventional automotive radars operate at 24 GHz or 77 GHz frequency bands and are built with relatively low-resolution hardware.
  85. [85]
    5G and AESAs - Anokiwave
    Active antennas are key to success of 5G networks​​ Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) antennas have been used in military phase-array radar systems for ...
  86. [86]
    Quantum Sensing and the Future of Warfare: Five Essential Reforms ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · More likely, quantum radar will evolve into hybrid systems, paired with conventional radar and signal processing, to improve detection in ...
  87. [87]
    Metamaterials Radar for Counter-UAS - Echodyne
    Echodyne's metamaterials-based MESA radar delivers high-performance detection and tracking in compact, low-cost systems. Trusted by the U.S. Army and DHS, ...