Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Aedes

Aedes is a of mosquitoes within the family Culicidae, subfamily , tribe Aedini, comprising approximately 932 as of recent taxonomic assessments. These insects are characterized by their slender bodies, often with silvery-white scale patterns on legs and , and a propensity for breeding in small, artificial water-holding containers such as tires and flower pots. Predominantly found in tropical and subtropical regions, within the genus exhibit varying degrees of anthropophily, with females actively seeking meals during daylight hours to support production. Several Aedes species, particularly Aedes aegypti (subgenus Stegomyia) and Aedes albopictus, function as primary vectors for arboviruses transmitted to humans via bites, including dengue virus, chikungunya virus, Zika virus, and yellow fever virus. A. aegypti, often termed the yellow fever mosquito, thrives in urban environments closely associated with human habitation, facilitating efficient pathogen transmission cycles that have led to millions of annual cases of vector-borne diseases globally. A. albopictus, an invasive species originating from Southeast Asia, has expanded its range through international trade, demonstrating adaptability to temperate climates and serving as a secondary vector for the same suite of pathogens. The public health impact of these vectors underscores ongoing challenges in mosquito surveillance, genetic control strategies, and habitat management to mitigate disease outbreaks.

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Systematics

The genus Aedes Meigen, 1818, is placed in the Culicidae Latreille, 1809, subfamily Meigen, 1818, and Aedini Theobald, 1903, representing approximately one-quarter of all known mosquito species. This classification derives from morphological assessments of adult and larval structures, supplemented by that confirm the monophyly of Aedini based on shared synapomorphies such as specific thoracic setal arrangements and gonostylar modifications in males. Aedes comprises over 900 valid , distributed across more than 70 plus additional species of uncertain placement, with prominent disease-vector species including A. aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) and A. albopictus (Skuse, 1894) assigned to the subgenus Stegomyia , 1901. The subgenus Stegomyia, historically recognized at the generic level due to its association with urban vectors exhibiting container-breeding habits and bold scutal patterns, has been reintegrated into Aedes following cladistic analyses that prioritize consistent larval and pupal chaetotaxy over isolated adult traits. Early 21st-century revisions, such as those elevating Lynch-Arribálzaga, 1899, to generic status based on female cibarial armature and male claspette structures, faced challenges from subsequent DNA-based phylogenies demonstrating when excluding core Aedes lineages; current consensus subordinates these as subgenera within a broadened Aedes to reflect empirical in wing venation and genitalic sclerites. Morphological distinctions from confamilial genera like Linnaeus, 1758 (tribe Culicini Dyar, 1921) include upright, forked thoracic scales in Aedes adults versus appressed scales in , alongside larval traits such as a stout, short with pecten teeth extending beyond the siphonal index in Aedes compared to the slender, extended in Culex. These characters, validated through and , enable reliable generic delimitation despite convergence in habitat preferences.

Evolutionary Origins and Relationships

The genus Aedes belongs to the subfamily within the family Culicidae, with phylogenetic analyses indicating that diverged from Anophelinae during the early to mid-Jurassic period, approximately 150-200 million years ago, based on estimates calibrated against data. The two primary lineages within Aedes are estimated to have originated near the -Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary around 66 million years ago, coinciding with a period of rapid diversification following the that eliminated non-avian dinosaurs and altered global ecosystems. evidence for mosquitoes dates to the Lower , with the earliest known specimens exhibiting piercing mouthparts adapted for blood-feeding, though genus-level s specific to Aedes remain absent, as the is defined by modern morphological and molecular criteria. Molecular phylogenies derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences reveal Aedes as paraphyletic, with multiple clades showing close affinities to other genera like , while maintaining a basal separation from in Anophelinae; this supports an early split where both subfamilies independently evolved mammalophily, facilitating host-switching events from reptilian or ancestors to mammals post-K-Pg. Within Aedes, the Aegypti Group, including the vector , traces its common ancestor to approximately 16 million years ago in the southwestern region, likely tied to Gondwanan wetland habitats that persisted into the . Evidence of adaptive radiations is evident in repeated convergences toward container-breeding habitats from ancestral ground-pool usage, driven by ecological opportunism rather than single-origin specialization. Speciation within Aedes has been causally linked to paleoclimatic shifts and factors, such as the end of the around 5,000 years ago, which prompted rapid divergence of human-specialized forms like domestic A. aegypti from forest-dwelling generalists through reduced dispersal and preference for human-modified water sources. and trade routes subsequently facilitated out-of-Africa expansions, with genetic signatures indicating domestication in West African human settlements adjacent to forests, rather than a singular translocation event. These dynamics underscore climate-driven and host availability as primary evolutionary pressures, independent of unsubstantiated narratives of uniform anthropic causation.

Morphology and Physiology

Physical Characteristics

Aedes mosquitoes possess a typical mosquito body structure divided into three segments: a head bearing compound eyes, antennae, and mouthparts; a thorax supporting three pairs of legs, wings, and ; and an elongated . The body is covered in fine scales, often forming dark brown to black backgrounds accented by white or silvery patches, particularly on the legs, which exhibit characteristic banding patterns that distinguish the genus from others like . In key vector species such as , adults measure 4–7 mm in length, with females displaying a silvery-white, lyre-shaped scale pattern on the dorsal (scutum) and alternating black-and-white leg bands. The in females is slender and elongated, approximately as long as the height of the head, enabling penetration of mammalian skin for blood meals. shares similar banding but features a prominent white longitudinal stripe along the midline of the , with overall body size comparable at 5–9 mm. Sexual dimorphism is pronounced, with females larger (up to 20% heavier in some populations) and possessing less plumose antennae and longer maxillary palpi adapted for nectar feeding and host location via chemosensory cues. Males exhibit bushy, plumose antennae with elongated setae for acoustic detection of female wing beats, alongside more slender abdomens and clasping genitalia. These traits reflect adaptations for reproductive roles, with female supported by specialized maxillary and labial structures forming the piercing . The wings are scaled with fringes but lack distinctive patterns beyond subtle venation, while legs taper to tarsi with white apical bands, enhancing the genus's visual identification. Compound eyes occupy much of the head, providing wide-field vision, complemented by ocelli in some for detection.

Life Cycle and Reproduction

Aedes mosquitoes undergo holometabolous (complete) , consisting of four distinct stages: , , , and . The stage is terrestrial and desiccation-resistant, allowing embryos to survive dry periods of weeks to months until flooding triggers hatching; eggs are laid singly by females on substrates above the water line in habitats, rather than in rafts as in some other mosquito genera. Larval stages are and obligately so, comprising four instars during which individuals filter-feed on microorganisms and in standing ; development duration varies with , typically spanning 4–7 days under tropical conditions (25–30°C). The pupal stage is also and non-feeding, lasting 1–3 days, serving primarily as a transitional before emergence of the terrestrial . Under optimal tropical temperatures (around 28°C), the full immature development from egg to adult requires 7–10 days, enabling rapid generational turnover and population proliferation in urban environments with abundant artificial water sources like tires, buckets, and flower pots. Oviposition site preferences favor such small, sunlit containers with organic infusions (e.g., or ), which provide chemical cues attracting gravid females and suitable conditions for larval survival; this behavior facilitates exploitation of human-modified habitats over natural ones. Egg hatching is synchronized by environmental cues like submersion in water and temperature fluctuations, with higher temperatures accelerating embryonation but potentially reducing viability if excessive. Reproduction involves insemination during flight, often in male swarms near breeding or host sites, where among males and female choice determine mating success; Aedes females typically mate once but can remate under certain conditions, storing sperm for multiple gonotrophic cycles. varies by species, nutrition, and temperature, with females producing 50–200 eggs per batch after a , potentially totaling several hundred over 2–4 cycles in their 2–4 week lifespan; larger females exhibit higher egg output, reflecting to . Skip-oviposition—distributing eggs across multiple sites—enhances survival odds by hedging against localized hazards like predation or drying.

Ecology and Distribution

Habitat and Behavior

Aedes mosquitoes preferentially oviposit in small volumes of stagnant, water, often in artificial such as discarded tires, flower pots, buckets, and jars that accumulate rainwater or household wastewater. This habitat selection is driven by the larvae's intolerance for polluted or flowing water, favoring sites with low organic content and stable temperatures around 25–30°C for optimal development. Eggs are typically laid in rafts or singly above the water line on container walls, exhibiting resistance that allows embryonic survival during dry periods until flooding triggers hatching. Aedes aegypti shows a marked to peridomestic environments, concentrating in close proximity to dwellings where artificial containers predominate, reflecting evolutionary shifts toward anthropogenically modified niches. In comparison, Aedes albopictus displays broader ecological plasticity, in both natural tree holes and artificial sites, which enables persistence in rural, suburban, and urban landscapes. This flexibility extends to larval feeding, where Ae. albopictus tolerates a wider range of and microorganisms than more specialized congeners. Adults of the exhibit diurnal host-seeking behavior, with biting activity peaking at dawn and dusk to align with outdoor routines, though some extension into early night occurs under artificial light influence. Both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus are predominantly anthropophilic, prioritizing blood meals for female gonotrophic cycles, though Ae. albopictus opportunistically feeds on other mammals, enhancing its invasive potential in varied settings. Resting behaviors favor shaded, humid microhabitats indoors or under vegetation, minimizing risk during non-active periods.

Global Range and Invasion Dynamics

Aedes aegypti, the primary vector among the genus, originated in , where its ancestral form utilized tree holes for breeding and fed on non-human hosts, before domesticating and spreading globally via human trade routes to tropical and subtropical regions. Today, it inhabits urban and peri-urban areas worldwide in warm climates, with established populations across , , the , and parts of , though absent from colder temperate zones without human-mediated transport. Aedes albopictus, native to , has similarly expanded to over 126 countries, favoring container habitats in human-modified environments from to temperate fringes. In the Americas, A. aegypti was largely eradicated through coordinated campaigns by the from 1947 onward, eliminating it from most countries by the 1960s, including southern U.S. states where federal efforts ceased in the early 1970s. Reinfestation began in the late 1970s, originating from persistent and northern South American foci, and spread southward via commerce and travel, reestablishing in by the 1980s and most municipalities today. A. albopictus invaded the U.S. in the 1980s through international shipments, while in , it first appeared in in 1979 and has since established in 16 countries across 369 regions as mapped by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in June 2025. Invasion dynamics are driven primarily by human factors, including global trade in used tires and vehicles that eggs, alongside creating artificial breeding sites like discarded containers, with warming facilitating in newly reached latitudes by extending suitable ranges. In , A. albopictus continues northward expansion, with empirical records showing accelerated establishment in and linked to milder winters. Modeled projections indicate potential northward shifts in , where A. albopictus suitable could reach approximately 2.38 million square kilometers by 2030 under ongoing warming trends, though actual spread depends on opportunities rather than climate alone.

Role as Disease Vectors

Transmitted Diseases and Pathogens

Aedes mosquitoes, primarily and , serve as vectors for key arboviruses, facilitating transmission through blood meals where viruses replicate in the mosquito's before disseminating to salivary glands, enabling injection into new hosts after an extrinsic (EIP) generally ranging from 3-14 days depending on the and environmental conditions. Ae. aegypti excels as an urban vector due to its preference for hosts and breeding in artificial containers. The primary pathogens include (DENV, all four serotypes), (ZIKV), (CHIKV), and (YFV), with empirical evidence from field outbreaks and laboratory transmission studies confirming vector competence. Dengue transmission exhibits an EIP of 8-12 days, allowing infected mosquitoes to spread the virus efficiently in endemic areas. Globally, dengue causes an estimated 390 million infections annually, though reported cases in 2024 reached over 14 million, underscoring its burden in tropical regions. ZIKV and CHIKV similarly rely on Aedes for cycles, with ZIKV EIP varying from 9.6 days at 26°C to longer at cooler temperatures, supported by experimental infections demonstrating invasion and . YFV urban transmission is predominantly by Ae. aegypti, with historical and ongoing outbreaks linked to this in and the . Secondary roles exist for pathogens like Mayaro virus (MAYV), where laboratory studies show Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus competence, though primary sylvatic vectors are Haemagogus species; field detection in Aedes suggests potential bridge transmission. Limited evidence indicates Aedes capability for (WNV) transmission, primarily a Culex-vectored , but with documented potential in lab settings without widespread epidemiological confirmation.
DiseasePathogenPrimary Aedes VectorsKey Transmission EvidenceEstimated Global Burden
Dengue (DENV 1-4)Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictusField outbreaks, lab replication in glands~390 million infections/year
Zika (ZIKV)Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictusExperimental EIP 3-14 days, urban cyclesMillions in 2015-2016 epidemics
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV)Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictusOutbreak-linked transmissionsPeriodic large outbreaks
Yellow fever virus (YFV)Ae. aegypti (urban)Historical urban epidemics~200,000 cases/year, mostly sylvatic

Vector Competence Factors

Vector competence in Aedes mosquitoes is determined by a series of intrinsic barriers that govern acquisition, replication, , and . Upon of an like (DENV), the primary infection barrier limits initial viral attachment and replication in epithelial cells, while the subsequent escape barrier restricts viral egress into the for systemic spread. Successful then faces salivary gland infection and escape barriers, which must be overcome for the virus to replicate in and be expelled from salivary glands during blood feeding. These barriers exhibit heritable variation, with lab studies showing that only 10-50% of Ae. aegypti individuals typically achieve full to salivary glands depending on viral strain and mosquito . Genetic factors significantly modulate these intrinsic barriers, particularly in Ae. aegypti. A 2025 study identified variants in the gene CYP4G15 as causal drivers of DENV susceptibility differences across wild populations, with promoter alleles altering expression levels that affect detoxification and efficiency. Such polymorphisms contribute to observed variability, where refractory alleles reduce rates by up to 70% in susceptible strains, independent of extrinsic pressures. Extrinsic environmental factors influence efficiency by modulating barrier permeability and kinetics. Optimal temperatures for DENV by Ae. aegypti peak at approximately 29°C, where extrinsic incubation periods shorten to 10-12 days, enhancing to salivary glands compared to suboptimal ranges below 20°C or above 32°C, which elevate mortality and reduce . Larval imposes density-dependent effects on fitness, with high densities reducing per-capita potential through stressed that impairs integrity and , as evidenced by field-derived cohorts showing 20-40% lower under crowded rearing conditions. Species-level differences underscore variable within the . Ae. aegypti generally exhibits higher DENV competence than Ae. albopictus, with infection rates exceeding 80% and dissemination to salivary glands reaching 60% in aegypti strains versus 40-50% and 20-30% in albopictus under comparable lab conditions, attributable to weaker barriers in the former. This disparity holds across serotypes, though albopictus may compensate in cooler climates where aegypti activity declines.

Genetic Research

Genome Sequencing and Annotation

The genome of Aedes aegypti, the principal species within the , was first sequenced as a draft assembly in 2007 using , yielding approximately 1.38 gigabase pairs (Gbp) across three chromosomes, with about 60% repetitive content complicating assembly. This initial effort annotated over 15,000 protein-coding , including expanded families implicated in competence such as immunity pathways (e.g., and IMD signaling) and olfaction (e.g., 117 odorant receptors and 135 ionotropic receptors), which underpin and host-seeking behaviors. Subsequent refinements, including a 2018 improved reference incorporating long-read data, enhanced accuracy for multi-gene families like enzymes and transposons, revealing evolutionary expansions linked to susceptibility. Advancements in assembly technologies led to chromosome-scale references, such as the 2022 anchored of the laboratory strain at 1.39 Gbp, facilitating precise mapping of sex-determining regions and inversion polymorphisms that influence phenotypic variation. In 2025, sequencing of A. aegypti formosus from its native West African range in produced the first chromosome-scale assembly from wild sylvatic populations, using PacBio HiFi and methods to capture ~1.4 Gbp and highlight structural variants absent in domesticated strains, including novel rearrangements in immunity loci. These annotations underscore genetic bottlenecks in invasive lineages, with reduced heterozygosity in domesticated forms compared to sylvatic ones. Comparative genomics across Aedes species, including A. albopictus, has identified invasion-associated adaptations such as sweeps in olfactory and metabolic clusters, enabling exploitation and ; for instance, analyses of A. aegypti populations reveal selective signatures in diapause-related genes correlating with temperate range expansions. Interspecies contrasts further delineate conserved traits, like expanded salivary gland proteins for blood-feeding efficiency, against species-specific divergences in antiviral RNAi pathways that modulate dissemination. These genomic insights, derived from high-coverage resequencing, emphasize standing variation over mutations in facilitating rapid adaptation to novel environments.

Applications in Population Studies

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers derived from whole-genome sequencing have enabled precise reconstruction of invasion pathways, confirming its domesticate form's origins in and subsequent dispersal to tropical regions worldwide via human-mediated transport. For instance, analysis of over 1,200 genomes from diverse populations identified from ancestral lineages into invasive fronts, highlighting bottlenecks during colonization events in the and around 150-400 years ago. These markers facilitate real-time surveillance by distinguishing source populations and detecting admixture, as demonstrated in tracking pyrethroid-resistant incursions in urban settings. Metagenomic sequencing has proven effective for monitoring dynamics in Aedes populations, particularly natural infections that modulate competence and . In field-collected and , metagenomic profiling revealed strain-specific prevalence varying by geography and host density, with implications for biocontrol efficacy where infections reduce dengue transmission potential. This approach integrates microbial community data to identify cassettes, enhancing population-level beyond traditional morphology-based trapping. Recent genomic surveillance in has correlated Aedes abundance with environmental drivers, using SNPs to link local adaptation to urbanization and precipitation patterns. In , surveys from 2023 documented Aedes aegypti relative abundances up to 44%, with genomic variants indicating adaptive shifts tied to habitat density and rainfall variability. Complementary studies in nearby regions, such as , reported elevated larval densities in urban communes, where topo-climatic SNP signals predict outbreak hotspots by integrating abundance metrics with invasion genetics. These tools prioritize empirical tracking over predictive models, informing targeted interventions by quantifying gene-environment interactions in endemic zones.

Control and Eradication Strategies

Conventional Methods

Source reduction remains a foundational conventional strategy for , focusing on the physical elimination or modification of sites, particularly artificial containers holding stagnant in and peri-urban environments. This method targets the mosquitoes' preference for small, domestic water collections, such as flower pots, tires, and discarded receptacles, which facilitate larval development. Public campaigns and community participation are integral to its implementation, as consistent removal of these sites can significantly reduce population densities without chemical inputs. Chemical interventions complement source reduction through larvicides and adulticides. Larvicides like temephos, an , are applied directly to potential waters to larval and pupation, often via sustained-release formulations for prolonged in treated sites. Adulticides, predominantly pyrethroids such as or , are deployed via ultra-low volume (ULV) fogging or space spraying from ground or aerial equipment to target emergent adults during outbreaks. These insecticides act on the , causing rapid knockdown and mortality in exposed mosquitoes. Historical applications demonstrated substantial efficacy; between 1947 and the 1960s, PAHO-coordinated campaigns employing as a residual insecticide eradicated from 18 countries and territories across the , including much of and the , by systematically treating homes and eliminating vectors from ports of entry. By 1962, this effort had certified vector-free status in nearly 20 Latin American nations, markedly curtailing and dengue transmission. Integrated vector management (IVM) frameworks, incorporating these tactics with surveillance, later sustained reductions in vector indices in regions like during the 1950s-1970s. Despite these achievements, limitations persist. Insecticide resistance has evolved rapidly; populations exhibit resistance ratios to temephos exceeding 27-fold in some areas due to metabolic and target-site mutations, compromising larvicidal efficacy. Similarly, resistance, driven by voltage-gated alterations, is widespread, with knockdown resistance detected in over 90% of tested strains in parts of and . Logistical hurdles in densely populated urban settings exacerbate challenges, as pervasive artificial breeding sites resist comprehensive surveillance and treatment, leading to reinfestation post-eradication, as observed after the 1970s phase-out. IVM successes thus depend on adaptive rotation of chemicals and rigorous monitoring, yet incomplete coverage often yields suboptimal control.

Innovative Biological and Genetic Approaches

The release of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes transinfected with Wolbachia endosymbionts represents a prominent biological control strategy, leveraging cytoplasmic incompatibility to suppress wild populations. Incompatible males mate with wild females, yielding non-viable eggs, while Wolbachia-infected females produce offspring that spread the bacterium maternally, facilitating population replacement. Field trials in Australia demonstrated strong suppression of both wild and Wolbachia-carrying A. aegypti through repeated releases of incompatible males, with sustained establishment in treated areas. In northern Queensland, such interventions correlated with reduced dengue incidence, including a reported 77% drop in notifications in Townsville following widespread deployment, attributed to both incompatibility and pathogen-blocking effects of strains like wMel. Cluster-randomized trials in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, further evidenced efficacy, with Wolbachia deployments reducing dengue cases by up to 77% over control areas. The (SIT) involves mass-rearing and radiation-sterilization of male A. aegypti, which compete with wild males for mates but produce no offspring, driving population decline. Boosted SIT variants, enhancing male competitiveness via genetic or nutritional optimizations, achieved substantial suppression in field sites; for instance, a 2025 trial in La Réunion reported strong reductions in adult A. aegypti densities without observed non-target impacts on other species. Combined incompatible insect technique-SIT (IIT-SIT), integrating -induced sterility with irradiation, yielded mean reductions of 62% in wild female A. aegypti within three months and 78% by six months across multiple sites, based on of randomized releases. These methods prioritize male-only releases to avoid biting females, minimizing ecological disruption, with empirical data confirming 80-95% suppression in targeted urban zones when release ratios exceed 10:1 sterile-to-wild males. Genetic modifications, such as those from Oxitec's OX513A strain, employ self-limiting transgenes where female offspring die post-eclosion due to a tetracycline-repressible lethal effector, while males survive to mate. Sustained releases in reduced wild A. aegypti populations by 80-95% over 27 months in treated neighborhoods, with no detectable non-target effects on non-Aedes or metrics. Similar outcomes occurred in the , where interventions suppressed local vectors by over 60% in initial phases, scaling to near-elimination in high-release zones, corroborated by egg-trap monitoring and absence of ecological spillover. CRISPR/Cas9-edited strains for gene drives, designed to bias of suppressors or refractoriness traits, have shown >95% in cage trials but remain pre-field for A. aegypti as of 2025, with confinable variants mitigating spread risks in simulations. These approaches collectively demonstrate causal population suppression via randomized and quasi-experimental designs, emphasizing scalability in endemic regions.

Controversies and Debates

Environmental and Regulatory Challenges

Environmental groups have raised concerns over potential ecological disruptions from releasing genetically modified Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, including risks of gene flow to wild populations and unintended impacts on non-target species, often drawing on predictive models rather than empirical field data from long-term releases. For instance, organizations like the Center for Food Safety have argued that such interventions could exacerbate health and environmental issues by altering mosquito ecosystems without sufficient evidence of safety. Public opposition has been significant, with approximately 75% of comments submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2017 opposing trials of Oxitec's genetically modified mosquitoes due to fears of disturbing natural balances. Regulatory frameworks vary globally, contributing to delays in deployment. In , the National Technical Commission on Biosafety (CTNBio) granted full biosafety approval for Oxitec's Friendly™ Aedes aegypti technology on May 27, 2020, enabling a commercial launch in November 2021. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency cleared releases in and in June 2020, classifying the mosquitoes as pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, though local approvals and public pushback have protracted implementation. The has adopted a more precautionary stance, with no commercial approvals granted as of 2021, reflecting stricter oversight on genetically modified organisms amid ongoing debates over environmental release permits. Ethical critiques of genetic technologies for often invoke concerns about human hubris, such as "playing " by engineering or altering evolutionary processes, as articulated in philosophical discussions around gene drives and transgenic releases. These viewpoints, while not empirically grounded in observed harms, have influenced regulatory caution and public discourse, paralleling broader skepticism toward interventions. Such challenges have coincided with heightened disease transmission periods, including the 2015-2016 outbreak across the , where regulatory and oppositional delays limited the timely scaling of genetic control methods despite prior trials in regions like the and . This temporal alignment underscores trade-offs between precautionary restraint and urgent vector suppression needs, though causal links remain debated absent direct epidemiological tying of delays to surge magnitudes.

Empirical Evidence vs. Precautionary Critiques

Empirical data from field trials of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti releases demonstrate sustained population suppression and dengue reduction without verified ecological collapses. In Yogyakarta, Indonesia, releases initiated in 2016 resulted in a 77% decrease in dengue incidence over three years, with Wolbachia persisting at high frequencies (>80%) and no observed disruptions to non-target species or broader ecosystems after monitoring through 2023. Similarly, sterile insect technique (SIT) applications in Réunion Island achieved up to 79% suppression of wild A. aegypti adults and 59% egg density decline in treated areas, with post-trial assessments showing no long-term biodiversity losses or irreversible environmental shifts. These outcomes align with risk assessments identifying negligible hazards, as Wolbachia effects are cytoplasmic and reversible upon cessation of releases, allowing natural recolonization without permanent genetic alterations. Precautionary critiques of these interventions often emphasize hypothetical risks, such as unintended or destabilization, yet lack causal evidence from over a decade of deployments across sites like , , and . For instance, concerns about Wolbachia-induced fitness costs or off-target effects have not materialized in longitudinal studies, where the bacterium's and rates remained stable for 10+ years post-release, with minimal to other . SIT critiques similarly invoke potential residues or mating disruptions cascading to pollinators, but field data from irradiated releases show confined impacts to target s, with no documented collapses in sympatric species after trials concluded. Such arguments prioritize unverified worst-case scenarios over observed profiles, where crashes prove self-limiting and recoverable, as sterile matings yield no heritable changes. Cost-benefit analyses underscore the causal prioritization of human health gains, with deployments averting thousands of dengue cases at costs far below traditional spraying—e.g., $1-3 per prevented case in modeled Vietnamese scales—while low-probability harms remain unsubstantiated. In , , city-wide releases sustained epidemiological benefits for years, reducing vector indices without ecological trade-offs, affirming that empirical reductions in disease burden (e.g., 70-90% in hotspots) empirically outweigh speculative detriments absent causal proof. This contrast highlights how data-driven evaluations, tracking metrics like infection rates and surveys, refute overcautious stances by demonstrating reversibility and net positive outcomes in real-world applications.

References

  1. [1]
    Molecular techniques for the taxonomy of Aedes Meigen, 1818 ...
    There has been a significant increase in subgenera within the genus Aedes, currently encompassing 932 species, divided into 79 subgenera and distributed in the ...
  2. [2]
    Aedes aegypti - Factsheet for experts - ECDC
    Jan 2, 2023 · Aedes aegypti is a known vector of several viruses including yellow fever virus, dengue virus, chikungunya virus, and Zika virus.Missing: count | Show results with:count
  3. [3]
    Aedes - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Aedes refers to a genus of mosquitoes that transmit significant arboviral pathogens affecting humans, such as yellow fever, dengue fever, Chikungunya fever, ...Missing: taxonomy | Show results with:taxonomy
  4. [4]
    GENETIC CONTROL OF AEDES MOSQUITOES - NCBI - NIH
    Aedes mosquitoes include important vector species such as Aedes aegypti, the major vector of dengue. Genetic control methods are being developed for several ...Missing: count | Show results with:count
  5. [5]
    Making Mosquito Taxonomy Useful: A Stable Classification of Tribe ...
    Jul 30, 2015 · Aedini, with 1,261 species, is the largest of the 11 tribes within Culicinae. The genus Aedes in the tribe Aedini is one of three best-known ...
  6. [6]
    Culicidae Classification - Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory
    Feb 11, 2008 · Culicinae is the largest subfamily of mosquitoes, containing 3,203 extant species in 110 genera and two groups of incertae sedis, ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Zootaxa,The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification ...
    Dec 21, 2007 · Fewer than 150 species, largely confined to genera Anopheles, Aedes (traditional broad sense) and Culex, are the indirect cause of more ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Entomological Surveillance of the Invasive Aedes Species at Higher ...
    Oct 31, 2022 · The genus Aedes has the highest number of species, with 33 species of uncertain subgeneric status and 900 species classified into 72 subgenera ...
  9. [9]
    Subgenus Stegomyia Theobald, 1901 - Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory
    Jul 20, 2012 · Classification: Subfamily Culicinae, tribe Aedini, genus Stegomyia. Subgenus Stegomyia includes five species. Subgenus abbreviation – Stg.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Zootaxa, Diptera, Culicidae, Aedes (Stegomyia) - Magnolia Press
    Oct 27, 2004 · Stegomyia is one of the most dominant subgenera of the genus Aedes Meigen in the. Afrotropical Region, as indicated by the number of species ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] new classification for the composite genus aedes
    ABSTRACT The composite gents Aedes is divided into 2 genera, Aedes and, Ochlerotatus, on the basis of consistent primary characters of the female and male ...
  12. [12]
    The Culicidae (Diptera): A Review Of Taxonomy, Classification And ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The taxonomy, classification and phylogeny of family Culicidae are reviewed. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic analysis has revealed ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Morphology of Adult and Larval Mosquitoes
    The shape of the head may be elongate (as in Anopheles and Uranotaenia) or broad (Aedes and Culex). The head bears two eyes, two antennae and brush- or comb- ...Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Know your Mosquito! - GLOBE Observer
    Aedes and Culex rest at an angle to the surface, suspended from the surface of the water by their siphon. They breathe through the siphon. Pupae: Comparison.
  15. [15]
    Numerical Classification of the Canadian Species of the Genus ...
    The relationships of 42 Canadian species of the mosquito genus Aedes were investigated by numerotaxonomic techniques, using the method of matching coefficients.
  16. [16]
    Phylogenomics redefines the evolutionary history of mosquitoes
    Most hypotheses for mosquito evolution favor a Triassic origin (~220 Mya), with an early to mid-Jurassic split between the Anophelinae and Culicinae subfamilies ...
  17. [17]
    Phylogenomics reveals the history of host use in mosquitoes - Nature
    Oct 6, 2023 · Although the two lineages of Aedes originated near the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (K-Pg), a rapid lineage diversification in both ...
  18. [18]
    Report The earliest fossil mosquito - ScienceDirect.com
    Dec 4, 2023 · We report the discovery, in Lower Cretaceous amber from Lebanon, of two conspecific male mosquitoes unexpectedly with piercing mouthparts.
  19. [19]
    Culicidae evolutionary history focusing on the Culicinae subfamily ...
    Nov 2, 2020 · In summary, the Aedes genus is a paraphyletic group showing several phylogenetic incongruences even considering studies that used different ...
  20. [20]
    Genetic evidence for the origin of Aedes aegypti, the yellow fever ...
    Aug 30, 2020 · Our estimates suggest a common ancestor of the Aegypti Group in the southwestern Indian Ocean 16 MYA (95% HPD: 7–28 MYA). Subsequent divergence ...
  21. [21]
    convergent evolution of habitat and phenotype in Aedes mosquitoes
    Dec 19, 2017 · We show that habitat specialization has evolved repeatedly from ancestral ground pool usage to specialization in container habitats.
  22. [22]
    Dating the origin and spread of specialization on human hosts in ...
    Mar 10, 2023 · The mosquito Aedes aegypti is thought to have originated as an ecological opportunist in forested areas of sub-Saharan Africa, and extant ...Introduction · Discussion · Methods
  23. [23]
    History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti--a review
    This review integrates data on Aedes aegypti's domestication, including genetics, behavior, morphology, ecology, and biogeography, with human history.
  24. [24]
    Recent History of Aedes aegypti: Vector Genomics and ...
    Oct 31, 2018 · A more likely scenario is that Ae. aegypti became domesticated in situ in West Africa when human settlements began to form adjacent to forests. ...Abstract · Origin of the domestic form · Asia/Australia/Pacific · Conclusions
  25. [25]
    History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti - A Review
    Here we integrate the available information including genetics, behaviour, morphology, ecology and biogeography of the mosquito, with human history.Missing: fossil | Show results with:fossil
  26. [26]
    The Yellow Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti - Center for Vector Biology
    Adult Description. Ae. aegypti is a medium-sized blackish mosquito easily recognized by a silvery-white 'lyre-shaped" pattern of scales on its scutum.
  27. [27]
    Asian Tiger Mosquito - Illinois Department of Public Health
    It has a white stripe running down the center of its head and back with white bands on the legs. Note that other Illinois mosquitoes also have banded legs.Missing: morphology | Show results with:morphology
  28. [28]
    Aedes albopictus | INFORMATION | Animal Diversity Web
    Aedes albopictus has a black proboscis, eyes, and labium all at the anterior end of the insect, while the black scutum contains a white line dissecting the ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Sexual Dimorphism in Aedes Nigromaculis Adults with Descriptions ...
    The plumose antennae, long bushy maxillary palpi, hairy slender abdomen, and the large terminalia are the most conspicuous and well recognized dimorphic ...
  30. [30]
    Sexual dimorphism in the behaviour and sensory systems of ...
    Here, we discuss sexual dimorphism in mosquitoes, whose males and females exhibit distinct anatomical, physiological, and behavioural differences. We focus on ...
  31. [31]
    Examination of the genetic basis for sexual dimorphism in the Aedes ...
    Oct 21, 2014 · To date, the analysis of mosquito sexual dimorphism has primarily focused on understanding differences between adult female and male mosquitoes, ...
  32. [32]
    Anopheles, Aedes or Culex: how to tell mosquito species apart?
    Aug 7, 2024 · In terms of appearance, Aedes mosquito show a black and white pattern due to the presence of white/silver scale patches against a black ...
  33. [33]
    Life Cycle of Aedes Mosquitoes - CDC
    Apr 16, 2024 · Adult female Aedes mosquitoes lay eggs on the inner walls of containers that hold water. · Larvae hatch from mosquito eggs and live in water.
  34. [34]
    Rearing Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes in a Laboratory Setting - NIH
    Nov 4, 2020 · Unlike some other mosquito species that lay a cluster of several hundred eggs in a raft on the water surface, the Aedes aegypti lay their eggs ...
  35. [35]
    Desiccation Tolerance of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus Eggs ...
    This study examines the desiccation tolerance of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus eggs, two major arbovirus vectors, in a subtropical region of ArgentinaMissing: rafts | Show results with:rafts
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Aedes Mosquito Life Cycle - CDC
    Jun 29, 2022 · They develop into pupae in as few as 5 days. Pupae live in water. They develop into adult, flying mosquitoes in. 2–3 days.
  37. [37]
    OVIPOSITION PREFERENCES OF AEDES AEGYPTI IN ...
    Aedes aegypti showed the highest oviposition response to banana infusion, followed by neem and grass infusions. Coconut infusion had the lowest response.Missing: resistance | Show results with:resistance
  38. [38]
    Influence of climatic factors on the life stages of Aedes mosquitoes ...
    Higher temperature shortens the developmental duration in Aedes species. It allows larvae to grow and develop more quickly to the pupal stage during emergence ...
  39. [39]
    Mosquito sexual selection and reproductive control programs - PMC
    Male mating success is highly variable in swarms and evidence suggests it is likely determined by both scramble competition between males and female choice.
  40. [40]
    Evaluating the mating competency of genetically modified male ...
    Feb 12, 2023 · Aedes aegypti males are developmentally competent for mating around 24 hours post emergence and swarm near blood-meal sources around sunrise ...
  41. [41]
    Differential Hatching, Development, Oviposition, and Longevity ...
    Jun 10, 2022 · In this study, egg development times ranged from 1.22 to 2.49 days, with the populations from Bello and Neiva being the fastest to hatch (Table ...
  42. [42]
    Influence of adult body size on blood feeding behavior and eggs ...
    May 22, 2024 · About 64.8% of small females deposited all eggs, whereas 35.2% kept some eggs (Table 2, Figures 10 and 11). The data revealed that small Ae.Missing: per | Show results with:per
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Comparative Skip-Oviposition Behavior Among Container Breeding ...
    Skip- oviposition behavior likely contributes to the global invasion success of Aedes spp. mosquitoes through desiccation-resistant eggs that can survive ...
  44. [44]
    Different approaches to characterize artificial breeding sites of ...
    Jul 31, 2020 · Breeding sites are usually artificial containers that accumulate water, e.g. bottles, buckets, tanks, and tires. Since 2013, the viruses ...
  45. [45]
    Physicochemical Characteristics of Aedes Mosquito Breeding ...
    The Aedes breeding sites and mosquito density were significantly influenced by water salinity, DO, temperature, pH, and turbidity.
  46. [46]
    Urbanization is a main driver for the larval ecology of Aedes ...
    Our data revealed that the pattern of Aedes mosquito breeding sites changes substantially from natural containers to artificial containers along a rural-to- ...
  47. [47]
    The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus - PubMed Central
    In addition, Ae. albopictus shows ecological plasticity in different traits such as larval breeding sites, feeding behavior, and climatic adaptation that ...
  48. [48]
    Aedes albopictus abundance and phenology along an altitudinal ...
    albopictus is a zoophilic tree-hole breeder in its native range, its strong physiological and ecological plasticity allow it to feed on alternative food sources ...
  49. [49]
    Bionomic aspects of dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes ...
    Apr 27, 2022 · In both vectors, biting patterns denoted a typical diurnal pattern with two peaks of host-seeking and biting activity in the morning and ...
  50. [50]
    Review of the ecology and behaviour of Aedes aegypti and Aedes ...
    In Western Africa, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus appear to be mainly anthropophilic and to bite predominantly during the day, but further research is needed.
  51. [51]
    Biology and Behaviour of Aedes aegypti in the Human Environment
    Feb 27, 2023 · Outdoor biting activity has also been described in some human bait studies [125,126,127], and in Southern Mexico, it was reported to be more ...
  52. [52]
    Global Distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in a ... - NIH
    Jan 3, 2023 · Originally native to southeast Asia, Ae. albopictus is now known to occur in 126 countries world-wide [16]. It's range is also expected to ...
  53. [53]
    Success and Failure in Controlling the Mosquito Aedes aegypti in ...
    The United States supported the 1947 program for continental eradication of Aedes. In 1957, the US Public Health Service started a pilot program to test the ...
  54. [54]
    Tracking the return of Aedes aegypti to Brazil, the major vector of the ...
    Our results support re-invasion; mosquitoes from the non-eradicated areas in Venezuela invaded North Brazil, later expanding their distribution southwards. We ...
  55. [55]
    Aedes albopictus - current known distribution: June 2025 - ECDC
    Jul 1, 2025 · In the EU/EEA*, Aedes albopictus is known to be established in 369 regions in the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, ...
  56. [56]
    World Mosquito Day 2025: Europe sets new records for ... - EurekAlert!
    Aug 20, 2025 · The mosquito that can spread chikungunya virus (Aedes albopictus) is now established in 16 European countries and 369 regions, up from just 114 ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus ...
    aegypti is restricted to warm, urban environments where it breeds in human-made containers in and around houses. Further, it bites during the daytime ...Missing: native | Show results with:native
  58. [58]
    Aedes albopictus Is Rapidly Invading Its Climatic Niche in France
    Aug 20, 2025 · Aedes albopictus is invading Western Europe, causing autochthonous ... Aedes aegypti is currently absent in Western Europe (ECDC 2024a) ...
  59. [59]
    (PDF) Future geographical distribution of Aedes albopictus in China ...
    Aug 11, 2025 · The suitable habitat area for Ae. albopictus is increasing annually and can reach approximately 2.38 million square kilometers by 2030. Compared ...
  60. [60]
    Accelerating invasion potential of disease vector Aedes aegypti ...
    May 1, 2020 · To simplify the life cycle, the model merges and re-divides development into four sub-stages: (1) egg hatching, (2) immature development (larvae ...
  61. [61]
    A Review: Aedes-Borne Arboviral Infections, Controls and ...
    Aedes-Borne Arboviruses. Aedes-transmitted arboviruses can be life-threatening when contracted by human hosts depending on the infection severity [37,38,39,40].
  62. [62]
    Vector-borne diseases - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Sep 26, 2024 · Other viral diseases transmitted by vectors include chikungunya fever, Zika virus fever, yellow fever, West Nile fever, Japanese ...
  63. [63]
    The Extrinsic Incubation Period of Zika Virus in Florida Mosquitoes ...
    Sep 28, 2021 · The EIP of ZIKV has an average range of 3–14 days, although under some conditions, the EIP of ZIKV has been found to take as long as 21 days ...
  64. [64]
    Globe-Trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: Risk Factors for ...
    This mosquito vector is able to transmit at least 22 arboviruses, including dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya, Rift Valley fever, Japanese encephalitis, West ...
  65. [65]
    The overlapping global distribution of dengue, chikungunya, Zika ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · Arboviruses transmitted mainly by Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Ae. albopictus, including dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses, and yellow ...
  66. [66]
    Zika, Chikungunya, and Other Emerging Vector-Borne Viral Diseases
    ... Aedes aegypti, mediate human-to-human transmission. Dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya, and Zika viruses have undergone such urban emergence. We focus mainly ...
  67. [67]
    Mosquito-borne Transmission - CDC
    Extrinsic Incubation Period (8-12 days). Following an 8–12 day extrinsic incubation period, the DENV-infected female mosquito is able to during its one-month ...Missing: Zika | Show results with:Zika
  68. [68]
    Dengue: Symptoms, Treatment, and Prevention
    Each year, an estimated 390 million dengue infections occur around the world, resulting in up to 36,000 deaths. 3How is dengue spread?More About Dengue · Fact Sheet · Our Stories
  69. [69]
    Global dengue epidemic worsens with record 14 million cases and ...
    In 2024, 14.1 million dengue cases were reported globally, surpassing the historic milestone of 7 million observed in 2023.
  70. [70]
    Impact of temperature on the extrinsic incubation period of Zika virus ...
    Mar 18, 2020 · At 26°C, EIP50 was 9.6 days. At 18°C, only 15% transmitted by day 31 so EIP50 could not be estimated. This is among the first studies to ...
  71. [71]
    Impact of temperature on the extrinsic incubation period of Zika virus ...
    Mar 18, 2020 · In this study, we provide estimates for median Zika virus extrinsic incubation periods at the temperatures tested as well as the logistic ...
  72. [72]
    expansion of the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti) and ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · Aedes aegypti (L.) is the primary vector of several arboviruses, including chikungunya, dengue, Zika, and yellow fever viruses.
  73. [73]
    Vector competence of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex ...
    Apr 14, 2020 · Here, we test this hypothesis by determining the vector competence of Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, and Cx. quinquefasciatus to Mayaro (MAYV) ...
  74. [74]
    Vector competence of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex ...
    Apr 14, 2020 · The present study demonstrated that Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes can be competent laboratory vectors for MAYV.
  75. [75]
    Intrinsic factors driving mosquito vector competence and viral evolution
    These are: 1) midgut infection barrier, 2) midgut escape barrier, 3) salivary gland infection barrier and 4) salivary gland escape barrier (Hardy et al., 1983; ...
  76. [76]
    The Genetic Basis for Salivary Gland Barriers to Arboviral ...
    Jan 15, 2021 · Arbovirus transmission from mosquitoes can be modulated by salivary gland infection barriers (SGIBs) and salivary gland escape barriers (SGEBs).
  77. [77]
    Variation in Vector Competence for Dengue Viruses Does Not ...
    The midgut escape barrier hinders the ability of virus to exit and disseminate ... Intrinsic factors affecting vector competence of mosquitoes for arboviruses.
  78. [78]
    Dengue virus susceptibility in Aedes aegypti linked to ... - Nature
    Aug 12, 2025 · Variability in DENV susceptibility among wild Ae. aegypti populations is governed by genetic factors, but specific causal variants are unknown.
  79. [79]
    Temperature affects viral kinetics and vectorial capacity of Aedes ...
    Feb 19, 2024 · aegypti optimal temperature for viral transmission peaks at 29.1 °C ... aegypti competence with temperature from 27 to 32 °C (Fig. 4a, b) ...
  80. [80]
    Density‐dependent population dynamics in Aedes aegypti slow the ...
    Feb 6, 2016 · We demonstrate that mosquito population growth is regulated by strong larval density-dependent variation in mosquito fitness components.
  81. [81]
    Comparative analysis of the susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and ...
    Nov 2, 2023 · The Japanese Ae. albopictus colonies were susceptible to all DENV serotypes. Its infection and dissemination rates were significantly lower than those of Ae. ...
  82. [82]
    Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector - PMC
    We present a draft sequence of the genome of Aedes aegypti, the primary vector for yellow fever and dengue fever, which at ~1.38 Gbp is ~5-fold larger in size.
  83. [83]
    Aedes aegypti: Trends in Genetics - Cell Press
    Apr 26, 2019 · There are >14 600 annotated protein-coding genes in the Ae. aegypti genome, including 117 odorant receptors (ORs), 135 ionotropic receptors (IRs) ...
  84. [84]
    Improved reference genome of Aedes aegypti informs arbovirus ...
    Nov 14, 2018 · Large multi-gene families are very difficult to assemble and correctly annotate, because recently duplicated genes typically share high sequence ...
  85. [85]
    chromosome-level assembly of the widely used Rockefeller strain of ...
    Sep 10, 2022 · The ROCK strain of A. aegypti has a large, repetitive genome (1.2-1.4 Gbp, 60% repeats) with 3 chromosomes. The assembly is 1.39 Gbp, longer ...
  86. [86]
    From Macro to Micro: De Novo Genomes of Aedes Mosquitoes ...
    To better understand the genetic architecture of Ae. aegypti and their sister species, we developed two de novo chromosome-scale genomes with sequences sourced ...
  87. [87]
    Adaptive genomic signatures of globally invasive populations of the ...
    Mar 28, 2025 · It has long been speculated that self-domestication in Ae. aegypti has strong genomic bases because this mosquito appears to have a high genetic ...
  88. [88]
    Comparative genomics suggests local adaptations in the invasive ...
    Oct 26, 2021 · We here explored genetic bases for the adaptation of invasive species to novel environments. The identified genes may directly contribute to the ...
  89. [89]
    Population genomics of two invasive mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti ...
    This study analyses the population genomics of 480 of these mosquitoes sampled from 27 locations in the Indo-Pacific. We investigated patterns of genome-wide ...
  90. [90]
    Genomic signatures of local adaptation in recent invasive Aedes ...
    Jun 10, 2023 · Here, we integrate whole-genome sequencing data from 96 Aedes aegypti mosquitoes collected from various sites in southern and central California ...
  91. [91]
    1206 genomes reveal origin and movement of Aedes aegypti driving ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · Ae. aegypti is a major threat to public health and also a useful model for the study of domestication, the evolution of human blood feeding, and ...
  92. [92]
    Sequencing 1206 genomes reveals origin and movement of Aedes ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · We sequenced Ae. aegypti genomes from around the globe to identify the historical shifts and genetic changes underlying the explosive global invasion of this ...
  93. [93]
    Population structure and invasion history of Aedes aegypti (Diptera ...
    Mar 25, 2023 · This study revealed additional spatial population genetic structure of Ae. aegypti in Southeast Asia and Australasia compared with previous ...
  94. [94]
    Metagenomic exploration of the bacteriome reveals natural ... - bioRxiv
    Mar 11, 2025 · Metagenomic exploration of the bacteriome reveals natural Wolbachia infections in yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti and Asian tiger mosquito ...
  95. [95]
    Aedes aegypti microbiome composition covaries with the density of ...
    Nov 17, 2023 · Wolbachia is a widespread bacterial endosymbiont that can inhibit vector competency when stably transinfected into the mosquito, Aedes ...
  96. [96]
    Midgut microbiota diversity and interactions shift when field Aedes ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · In Delia radicum (fly), Wolbachia infection significantly decreased the bacterial community diversity and changed the microbiota composition.
  97. [97]
  98. [98]
    Widespread distribution of Aedes aegypti larvae, a potential risk of ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · A total of 52,768 Ae. aegypti larvae were collected across the 13 communes of Grand Lomé. The highest incidence of Ae. aegypti larvae was ...
  99. [99]
    Genome resequencing and genome-wide polymorphisms ... - Nature
    Oct 2, 2024 · We compared genomes of the Indian Aedes mosquito with their respective reference genomes to understand the genomic variations specific to India.
  100. [100]
    Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne ... - NIH
    Dec 6, 2018 · Aedes control cannot be successful without effective and sustained intra- and intersectoral collaboration [4, 13, 46]. Within the health sector, ...
  101. [101]
    Larvicides | Mosquitoes - CDC
    May 14, 2024 · Homeowners can use mosquito dunks or bits that contain larvicide. Larvicides can be applied by hand to small bodies of water in the yard and ...
  102. [102]
    Adulticides | Mosquitoes - CDC
    Aug 13, 2025 · Adulticides are types of insecticides used to kill adult mosquitoes. · Adulticides may be applied by a mosquito control program, a licensed pest ...Overview · Information For... · Types Of Adulticides Used By...<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    Pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti - Parasites & Vectors
    Oct 14, 2025 · Pyrethroids target and alter the function of voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) in the insect nervous system, leading to paralysis and death.
  104. [104]
    Zika in the United States of America and a Fateful 1969 Decision
    May 26, 2016 · By 1962 the Ae aegypti mosquito was eradicated in almost 20 Latin American countries, including Brazil and all of the Central American countries ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Washington, D.C. 15-19 June 1970 - iris.paho.org.
    Eradication of Aedes aegypti infestations was proven feasible and practical when eighteen countries and territories of the Americas achieved this goal.
  106. [106]
    Resistance Status to the Insecticides Temephos, Deltamethrin, and ...
    High levels of resistance to neurotoxic insecticides were detected in almost all populations: RR95 to temephos varied between 4.0 and 27.1; the lowest RR95 to ...
  107. [107]
    The History of Dengue Outbreaks in the Americas - PMC
    Oct 3, 2012 · Between 1962 and 1972 only three additional countries or territories eliminated the vector despite PAHO's reiterated commitment to the ...
  108. [108]
    First national-scale evaluation of temephos resistance in Aedes ...
    Jul 11, 2022 · The development of resistance against insecticides in Aedes aegypti can lead to operational failures in control programs.
  109. [109]
    Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression ... - NIH
    Oct 4, 2021 · Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression across populations of wild and Wolbachia-carrying Aedes aegypti in Australia.
  110. [110]
    Efficacy of Wolbachia-Infected Mosquito Deployments for the Control ...
    Jun 9, 2021 · Reduced dengue incidence following deployments of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a quasi-experimental trial ...
  111. [111]
    Suppression of Aedes mosquito populations with the boosted sterile ...
    May 21, 2025 · Boosted SIT suppressed Aedes populations in each treated site. In La Reunion (site 1), a strong efficacy was observed in adult A. aegypti (Fig.
  112. [112]
    Effectiveness of Wolbachia-mediated sterility coupled with ... - PubMed
    We found that Wolbachia-based IIT-SIT reduced wild-type female A aegypti populations by a mean of 62·01% (95% CI 60·68 to 63·26) by 3 months.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  113. [113]
    Current status of the sterile insect technique for the suppression of ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · This review indicates that a substantial number of projects illustrate the efficacy of SIT in suppressing Aedes populations, with one project even ...
  114. [114]
    Suppression of a Field Population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by ...
    Sustained release of transgenic male mosquitoes reduced the wild Aedes aegypti population by 80-95% in Brazil, potentially preventing dengue epidemics.
  115. [115]
    Cayman - Oxitec
    Oxitec uses OX513A mosquitoes in the Cayman Islands to control Aedes aegypti, which spread diseases, and has shown significant population suppression.
  116. [116]
    Closing the gap to effective gene drive in Aedes aegypti by ... - Nature
    Jan 20, 2023 · CRISPR/Cas9-based homing gene drives have emerged as a potential new approach to mosquito control. While attempts have been made to develop ...
  117. [117]
    Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) field trial targeting the suppression of ...
    Mar 26, 2024 · Pilot trials are being conducted to assess the viability and efficacy of SIT as a method for controlling mosquito populations, specifically ...
  118. [118]
    Study on DNA spread by genetically modified mosquitoes prompts ...
    Sep 17, 2019 · For 10 years, the company Oxitec has been testing whether genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes can suppress populations of their natural ...
  119. [119]
    Residents Concerned About Use of Genetically Modified ...
    Jun 6, 2016 · The most common objection was a concern over disturbing the local ecosystem by eliminating mosquitoes from the food chain.<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    Planned Release of Genetically Engineered Mosquitos Ignores ...
    Mar 7, 2022 · GE mosquitoes could result in far more health and environmental problems than they would solve," said Dana Perls, Food and Technology Program ...
  121. [121]
    Genetically engineered mosquito meets public opposition - Healio
    Aug 22, 2017 · New findings suggest that nearly 75% of people who submitted comments to the FDA opposed a trial that would use a genetically modified ...
  122. [122]
    Oxitec's New Friendly™ Aedes aegypti Mosquito Technology ...
    May 27, 2020 · Following a full scientific evaluation, Brazil's national regulatory authority, CTNBio, approved the biosafety of Oxitec's new generation of ...
  123. [123]
    Oxitec Announces Ground-breaking Commercial Launch of Its ...
    Nov 3, 2021 · RELEASE DATE: 3 November 2021. Oxitec Announces Ground-breaking Commercial Launch of Its Friendly™ Aedes aegypti Solution in Brazil.
  124. [124]
    Fact check: EPA clears genetically modified mosquitoes for US release
    Jun 9, 2020 · Biotech company Oxitec has been cleared by EPA to release genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida and Texas, but local approval is needed ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] GeneWatch UK response to OGR re Oxitec - fin
    Only one of these countries (Brazil) has subsequently given Oxitec a commercial permit (although, it should be noted that Oxitec does not have the approval from ...<|separator|>
  126. [126]
    Playing God with mosquitoes? We humans have loftier aims
    Dec 2, 2015 · 'Playing God'. Yet, there has been a degree of moral concern about genetically modifying mosquitoes. This is perhaps in part due to the use ...
  127. [127]
    The Ethics of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes and Gene-Drive ...
    Dec 2, 2015 · Indeed, the 'playing God' objection is familiar from the GM food debate. The standard response to the objection in this context is that ...
  128. [128]
    GM mosquitoes fire first salvo against Zika virus - Nature
    Mar 10, 2016 · And even if mosquito populations are reduced drastically, it's not clear what effect that will have on transmission of Zika. It seems logical ...
  129. [129]
    Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Released in Florida to Combat ...
    May 6, 2025 · After years of regulatory delays and public opposition, bioengineered male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were introduced into the environment.
  130. [130]
    The Zika outbreak of the 21st century - PMC - PubMed Central
    The network noted that beginning in January 2012, there was a sudden increase in mosquito-borne diseases including dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus. The ...
  131. [131]
    Wolbachia Dramatically Reduces Dengue Cases - Peer reviewed ...
    Trial results published in The New England Journal of Medicine show 77% reduction in dengue incidence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  132. [132]
    A decade of stability for wMel Wolbachia in natural Aedes aegypti ...
    Long-term monitoring shows that wMel has persisted in Ae. aegypti populations at high frequencies for many years [16,17,21], though in some locations the ...Wmel Density Remains Stable... · Fig 1. Wmel Density Remains... · Wolbachia Infection...
  133. [133]
    Suppression of Aedes aegypti by the sterile insect technique on ...
    The study demonstrated a population reduction of up to 79% in wild adults and a 59% decline in egg densities in the primary intervention area.Missing: ecological | Show results with:ecological
  134. [134]
    Risk Associated with the Release of Wolbachia-Infected Aedes ...
    Here, we describe the tools, process, and methodology used in the risk analysis to identify and assess potential hazards of releasing Ae. aegypti mosquitoes ...
  135. [135]
    Risk Assessment on the Release of Wolbachia-Infected Aedes ...
    May 6, 2025 · aegypti was carried out. The results showed that the release of Wolbachia-infected Ae. aegypti led to negligible risk (0.0088). Abstract ...
  136. [136]
    Genetic stability of Aedes aegypti populations following invasion by ...
    Dec 14, 2021 · We found that the genomes of mosquito populations mostly remained stable after Wolbachia release, with population differences tending to reflect the geographic ...
  137. [137]
    Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) against Aedes Species Mosquitoes
    Feb 24, 2021 · To control the abundance and spread of these arboviral pathogen vectors, the sterile insect technique (SIT) is emerging as a powerful complement ...
  138. [138]
    Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) against Aedes Species Mosquitoes
    In a pilot SIT trial they can be enhanced to reduce the local mosquito population, thus creating improved conditions for SIT, which is more effective at lower ...
  139. [139]
    Simulation-based economic evaluation of the Wolbachia method in ...
    Jan 20, 2025 · The results of this study contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness of the Wolbachia method for dengue ...
  140. [140]
    Long-Term Durability and Public Health Impact of City-Wide wMel ...
    We report the long-term entomological and epidemiological effectiveness of city-wide deployment of wMel-strain Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti in Niterói, a ...2.2. Mosquito Production · 3. Results · 4. Discussion
  141. [141]
    Releasing Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti to prevent the spread ...
    The purpose of their study is to find a trade-off between reaching replacement by Wolbachia and minimum time with minimum cost of control effort. Their model ...Missing: trials | Show results with:trials