Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pathogen transmission

Pathogen transmission encompasses the biological and physical processes by which infectious agents, including viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and helminths, are transferred from reservoirs—such as infected humans, animals, or environmental sources—to susceptible hosts, thereby perpetuating cycles of infection and disease.^[1] This transfer occurs through a chain involving the pathogen's exit from the reservoir, transport via specific modes, and entry into the new host, with the efficiency determined by factors like pathogen viability, host immunity, and environmental conditions.^[2] The principal modes of transmission are classified as direct or indirect: direct modes include person-to-person contact via skin or mucous membranes, droplet spread from respiratory expulsions over short distances, and airborne propagation of fine aerosols that can remain suspended longer; indirect modes involve vehicles such as contaminated food, water, or fomites, as well as vectors like insects that mechanically or biologically carry pathogens.^[3] Empirical data from outbreak investigations reveal marked heterogeneity in transmission rates, often following Pareto-like distributions where superspreading events—driven by high viral shedding, dense contacts, or behavioral factors—account for a disproportionate share of secondary infections across diverse pathogens.^[4] Such variability underscores the limitations of homogeneous models in epidemiology and highlights the need for targeted interventions focusing on high-risk interfaces rather than uniform measures.^[5] Key defining characteristics include the pathogen's intrinsic properties, such as infectivity and survival outside hosts, alongside extrinsic elements like population density and sanitation, which collectively shape epidemic potential and inform public health strategies aimed at breaking transmission chains.^[6] Controversies persist regarding the relative contributions of certain modes, particularly the underestimation of aerosol transmission in historical guidelines for respiratory pathogens, as retrospective analyses of empirical airflow and particle studies have demonstrated sustained infectivity in fine particulates under real-world conditions.^[7]

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Pathogen transmission is the process by which infectious agents, termed pathogens—such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, and multicellular parasites—are transferred from a source, including infected individuals, animals, or environmental reservoirs, to a susceptible host, enabling colonization, replication, and potential disease manifestation.^[6] This transfer hinges on the pathogen's viability during transit, sufficient infectious dose upon entry, and the host's immunological vulnerability, forming the causal basis for epidemic spread.^[2] In epidemiological terms, the scope of pathogen transmission extends to the study of propagation dynamics across populations, influenced by agent-specific traits like infectivity and survival outside hosts, alongside host factors such as immunity and density, and extrinsic variables including climate and human mobility.^[8] Transmission is delineated into direct modes, involving immediate host-to-host exchange via physical contact, droplets, or bodily fluids, and indirect modes, mediated by fomites, vehicles like food or water, or biological vectors such as arthropods.^[1] ^[9] This framework underpins interventions, from vaccination to sanitation, by targeting breakpoints in the chain of infection: reservoir, portal of exit, mode of conveyance, portal of entry, and susceptible recipient.^[2] The breadth of transmission also accounts for zoonotic origins, where over 60% of emerging human pathogens derive from animal reservoirs, as evidenced by outbreaks like SARS-CoV-2 in 2019, highlighting the interplay of ecological disruption and global connectivity in amplifying scope.^[6] Empirical quantification, via metrics like the basic reproduction number (R0)—averaging contacts yielding secondary cases—further delineates scope, with values exceeding 1 signaling potential outbreaks, as in measles (R0 ≈12-18).^[8]

Key Concepts and Metrics

Pathogen transmission refers to the process by which infectious agents pass from a reservoir to a susceptible host, often modeled through the epidemiologic triad of agent, host, and environment. The agent encompasses the pathogen's biological characteristics, such as virulence, infectivity, and dose required for infection; the host includes susceptibility factors like immunity, age, and behavior; and the environment involves external conditions facilitating contact, such as population density or sanitation.^[2] This framework underscores that transmission requires breaking at least one link in the chain of infection, which includes the pathogen reservoir, portal of exit, transmission mode, portal of entry, and susceptible host.^[10] Central metrics quantify transmission dynamics. The basic reproduction number (R₀) measures the average number of secondary infections produced by one infected individual in a fully susceptible population without interventions.^[11] For instance, measles has an R₀ of 12–18, reflecting high contagiousness via respiratory droplets.^[12] When R₀ exceeds 1, epidemics can occur; the herd immunity threshold approximates 1 - 1/R₀. The effective reproduction number (Rₜ) adjusts R₀ for partial immunity or control measures, indicating ongoing transmissibility.^[13] Other key metrics include the serial interval, the time between symptom onset in a primary case and its secondary cases, which proxies generation time—the interval between successive infections—and informs contact tracing timelines.^[14] For SARS-CoV-2, serial intervals averaged 4–5 days early in outbreaks.^[15] The secondary attack rate (SAR) quantifies transmission efficiency among contacts, calculated as infected contacts divided by total exposed contacts; household SAR for influenza can reach 10–30%.^[16] These metrics, derived from outbreak data, enable prediction of spread and evaluation of interventions like vaccination or distancing.^[8]

Pathogen	R₀ Estimate	Primary Transmission Mode
Measles	12–18	Respiratory droplets
Influenza	1.3–1.8	Respiratory droplets
SARS-CoV-2	2–3 (early)	Respiratory aerosols/droplets

Historical Development

Pre-Germ Theory Perspectives

In ancient Greek medicine, the humoral theory, articulated by Hippocrates around 460–370 BCE, posited that diseases arose from imbalances in the four bodily humors—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile—triggered by factors such as diet, climate, seasons, or lifestyle rather than interpersonal spread.^[17] This framework implied no direct transmission between individuals, viewing illness as a disruption of personal equilibrium influenced by external environments like air quality or seasonal changes, with remedies focused on restoration through purging or dietary adjustment.^[17] Similarly, early miasma concepts, also traced to Hippocrates and elaborated by Galen (c. 130–200 CE), attributed disease to inhalation of noxious vapors arising from decaying organic matter, such as in marshes or putrefying waste, emphasizing atmospheric pollution over person-to-person contact.^[18] By the medieval and early modern periods, miasma theory gained prominence as the primary explanation for epidemic diseases like plague and cholera, holding that foul air generated from sources including sewage, corpses, and stagnant water carried disease-causing particles into the body, disrupting vital functions.^[18] Proponents such as Edwin Chadwick in his 1842 sanitary report linked intense odors from urban filth directly to acute illnesses, advocating ventilation and waste removal to disperse miasmas, while Florence Nightingale in 1859 associated diseases like scarlet fever with effluvia from household drains.^[19] This view drove public health measures like sewerage systems in 19th-century Britain, which empirically reduced mortality from waterborne pathogens despite the flawed causal mechanism of airborne corruption rather than microbial agents.^[19] Emerging contagion perspectives challenged pure miasmatism by recognizing direct spread from affected individuals or materials. In 1546, Girolamo Fracastoro proposed in De Contagione that diseases propagated via invisible, seed-like entities (seminaria) transmitted through touch, fomites, or air over distances, multiplying within hosts and explaining outbreaks of syphilis and tuberculosis.^[20] Such ideas informed practical responses, including the 1377 quarantine ordinance in Ragusa (modern Dubrovnik) isolating plague ships for 30 days, extended to 40 days elsewhere, and isolation of lepers as described in Leviticus, which curbed spread through separation without identifying pathogens.^[18] These measures succeeded variably by interrupting contact, though attributed to preventing miasma accumulation or seed dissemination rather than germ transfer.^[18]

Germ Theory and Early Discoveries

The germ theory of disease, which asserts that specific microorganisms are the causative agents of many infectious illnesses and are transmitted between hosts, gained empirical traction in the mid-19th century through observational and experimental evidence challenging prevailing miasma theories of bad air. Ignaz Semmelweis, a Hungarian physician, observed in 1847 at Vienna General Hospital that puerperal fever mortality rates were three times higher in doctor-attended maternity wards (around 10-18%) compared to midwife-attended ones (under 3%), attributing this to cadaveric contamination transferred via physicians' unwashed hands after autopsies.^[21] Implementing mandatory handwashing with chlorinated lime solutions reduced mortality in the doctor ward to below 2% within months, demonstrating direct contact transmission of an invisible agent preventable by hygiene, though Semmelweis lacked identification of the microbial culprit and faced professional rejection.^[22] Louis Pasteur's experiments in the 1860s provided foundational causal evidence by disproving spontaneous generation, showing that microbial growth in sterilized nutrient broth exposed to air via swan-neck flasks originated from airborne contaminants rather than arising de novo.^[23] These findings, extended to fermentation processes in wine and beer spoilage studied from 1856, implied that similar airborne or contact-transmitted microbes could invade wounds or bodily fluids to cause disease, influencing pasteurization techniques that halted microbial transmission in liquids by heating to 60-70°C.^[24] Pasteur's work shifted focus to living pathogens as transmissible entities, though initial applications targeted preservation over human infection. Robert Koch's isolation of Bacillus anthracis in 1876 marked a pivotal advancement, using pure culture techniques on sheep blood agar to demonstrate that this rod-shaped bacterium, forming resilient spores, was consistently present in anthrax-afflicted animals and transmissible via inoculation or spore inhalation, fulfilling early criteria for microbial causality later formalized as Koch's postulates.^[25] Koch's methods proved specific germs caused discrete diseases, revealing transmission routes like spore survival in soil enabling livestock-to-human spread, and extended to tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 1882) via sputum and airborne droplets.^[26] Joseph Lister, inspired by Pasteur, introduced antiseptic surgery in 1867 at Glasgow Royal Infirmary, applying carbolic acid (phenol) sprays and dressings to wounds, reducing compound fracture infection rates from over 45% to under 15% by targeting airborne and contact microbes.^[27] This evidenced preventable transmission in surgical settings, validating germ theory's implications for iatrogenic spread and paving the way for sterile techniques, though carbolic acid's toxicity prompted refinements.^[28] These discoveries collectively established microbes as transmissible pathogens, prioritizing isolation, hygiene, and antisepsis over miasmatic interventions.

Modern Advances and Milestones

In the 1930s, William F. Wells conducted pioneering experiments distinguishing between large respiratory droplets, which settle quickly, and smaller droplet nuclei that evaporate and remain suspended in air, enabling prolonged airborne transmission of pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis.^[29] This work, published in 1934, laid the foundation for recognizing aerosol-mediated spread in respiratory infections, influencing later ventilation and disinfection strategies.^[30] Mid-20th-century public health interventions dramatically curtailed transmission of many bacterial and viral pathogens through sanitation improvements, antibiotic discovery, and widespread vaccination, resulting in U.S. morbidity reductions exceeding 90% for diseases like diphtheria, pertussis, and polio by 1999.^[31] The establishment of the World Health Organization's global disease-tracking service in 1947 enhanced real-time surveillance of transmission patterns via telex-reported outbreaks, facilitating coordinated international responses.^[32] The 1983 isolation of HIV at the Pasteur Institute elucidated key non-respiratory transmission routes, including sexual contact, blood exposure, and perinatal transfer, prompting evidence-based prevention like screening and barrier methods that reduced incidence in high-risk groups.^[33] Concurrently, the invention of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by Kary Mullis in 1983 revolutionized detection and genotyping, allowing molecular epidemiology to trace transmission chains with genetic resolution.^[34] In the 21st century, the 2003 SARS outbreak demonstrated aerosol and fomite transmission dynamics through contact tracing of over 8,000 cases, with rapid genome sequencing in February 2003 enabling variant tracking.^[35] The 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic highlighted direct contact via bodily fluids, informing protocols that lowered case fatality via isolation and PPE.^[36] SARS-CoV-2 studies from 2020 onward provided empirical data on aerosol persistence, with viable virus detected in air samples up to 3 hours post-aerosolization, shifting guidelines toward ventilation and masking for long-range spread.^[37] Phylogenetic analyses during these events reconstructed transmission trees, revealing superspreading events where 10-20% of infectors caused 80% of cases.^[38]

Routes of Transmission

Direct Contact Transmission

Direct contact transmission involves the physical transfer of pathogens from an infected person to a susceptible individual via immediate skin-to-skin, mucous membrane, or sexual contact, without an intervening medium such as air or fomites.^[2]^[6] This route requires sufficient pathogen viability on the infected person's surfaces or fluids and adequate contact duration or pressure to enable adhesion or invasion at the recipient's site.^[3] Unlike droplet or airborne spread, direct contact demands proximity and tactile interaction, often occurring in households, healthcare settings, or close social activities.^[39] Mechanisms vary by pathogen type. Bacterial agents like Staphylococcus aureus (causing skin infections such as impetigo or methicillin-resistant strains) transfer via abraded skin contact, where microbes colonizing the infected person's epidermis adhere to the recipient's compromised barrier.^[40]^[41] Viral pathogens, including herpes simplex virus (HSV-1 via oral contact or HSV-2 sexually), exploit mucosal entry points during kissing or intercourse, with transmission efficiency linked to viral shedding loads exceeding 10^4 plaque-forming units per milliliter.^[42]^[43] Parasitic examples include scabies mites (Sarcoptes scabiei), which burrow into skin during prolonged body-to-body contact, with females depositing eggs that hatch and perpetuate infestation; a single gravid female can initiate transmission.^[41]^[40] Fungal dermatophytes (e.g., Trichophyton species causing ringworm) spread through shared skin scales in wrestling or contact sports, thriving in warm, moist environments.^[41] Sexual contact exemplifies high-risk direct transmission for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Treponema pallidum (syphilis) penetrates intact or micro-abraded genital mucosa during intercourse, with primary chancre formation occurring 10-90 days post-exposure; untreated cases show 30-50% transmission per partnership in early stages.^[6]^[42] Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhea) similarly invades columnar epithelia via direct fluid exchange, with per-act risks estimated at 20-50% for females from infected males.^[6] Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6/11 or 16/18 transmit cutaneously or mucosally, contributing to warts or oncogenic risks, with meta-analyses indicating 40-60% seroconversion after first exposure in discordant couples.^[42] Ebola virus, while rare, demonstrates direct contact feasibility through blood or secretions during caregiving, as evidenced in the 2014-2016 West Africa outbreak where 80% of cases involved household touch without barriers.^[40] Ectoparasites like head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) rely on direct head-to-head contact for egg and nymph transfer, with transmission rates doubling in crowded settings like schools; a 2010 study reported 1.9 million U.S. cases annually, predominantly via siblings or playmates.^[40]^[41] Conjunctivitis (bacterial or viral) spreads via hand-to-eye or direct ocular contact, with adenovirus strains causing epidemic keratoconjunctivitis in outbreaks where secondary attack rates reach 50% among close contacts.^[40] These examples underscore that direct contact efficiency correlates with pathogen dose, host susceptibility (e.g., skin breaks increasing risk 10-fold for staphylococci), and behavioral factors like hygiene lapses.^[39] Empirical data from contact tracing, such as in ICU studies, indicate direct contact accounts for 20-40% of nosocomial pathogen spread when hand hygiene compliance falls below 60%.^[44]

Respiratory Transmission: Aerosols and Droplets

Respiratory transmission of pathogens involves the expulsion of infectious particles from the respiratory tract of an infected individual, primarily through coughing, sneezing, talking, or breathing, which can then be inhaled by others. These particles are categorized as droplets or aerosols based on size, with droplets generally exceeding 5 μm in diameter and aerosols being smaller than 5 μm. Larger droplets settle quickly under gravity, typically within 1-2 meters of the source, limiting transmission to close proximity, while aerosols remain airborne longer, evaporate into droplet nuclei, and can disperse over greater distances via air currents.^[45]^[37] The distinction between droplets and aerosols has historically guided infection control, but evidence indicates a continuum of particle sizes contributes to transmission rather than a strict dichotomy. For instance, particles emitted during exhalation range from 0.1 to 1000 μm, with viral load often higher in smaller aerosols capable of deep lung deposition. Evaporation rapidly reduces droplet size, potentially converting them into aerosols, influenced by ambient humidity and temperature; lower humidity accelerates this process, enhancing aerosol persistence.^[46]^[47] Influenza viruses demonstrate significant aerosol transmission, with studies detecting viable virus in fine aerosols (≤5 μm) exhaled by infected individuals, and animal models confirming infection via airborne routes over distances exceeding short-range droplet limits. SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, similarly transmits via aerosols, as evidenced by viral RNA detection in room air samples from patient areas and superspreading events in poorly ventilated indoor spaces, where aerosol accumulation outweighed droplet proximity effects. Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) relies predominantly on aerosol transmission through droplet nuclei, with infectious doses as low as 1-10 bacteria sufficient for inhalation-based infection, explaining its persistence in crowded, enclosed environments despite low bacterial expulsion rates.^[37]^[48]^[49] Ventilation, filtration, and masking reduce aerosol concentrations effectively, as validated in controlled chamber experiments showing exponential decay of infectious particles with increased air exchange rates. Early public health guidance often emphasized droplet precautions, potentially underestimating aerosol risks for pathogens like SARS-CoV-2, a perspective revised following accumulating empirical data from 2020 onward.^[50]^[51]

Fomite and Indirect Contact Transmission

Fomite transmission involves the transfer of pathogens from contaminated inanimate objects, or fomites, to susceptible hosts via indirect contact, typically through hand-to-surface-to-mucosal membrane pathways. Pathogens deposit onto surfaces from infected individuals via respiratory secretions, skin shedding, or bodily fluids, persisting until touched and transferred, often requiring subsequent self-inoculation by the recipient touching their eyes, nose, or mouth. This route contrasts with direct contact by involving an intermediary environmental reservoir, with transfer efficiency influenced by factors like viral load on the surface and hand hygiene practices.^[52]^[53] Pathogen survival on fomites varies by microbial characteristics and extrinsic conditions. Non-enveloped viruses such as norovirus and adenovirus endure longer—up to weeks on stainless steel or plastics—due to robust capsids resistant to desiccation, whereas enveloped viruses like influenza A or SARS-CoV-2 degrade faster, often within hours, owing to lipid membrane vulnerability to drying and oxidants. Surface properties play a key role: non-porous materials like metal or glass support higher viability than porous fabrics or paper, which absorb and inactivate agents more rapidly; environmental humidity above 40% extends persistence by limiting evaporation, while elevated temperatures accelerate decay. Bacterial spores, as in Clostridium difficile, exhibit exceptional resilience, surviving months on hospital surfaces.^[54]^[48]^[55] Outbreak investigations substantiate fomites' contributions in specific contexts. Norovirus epidemics in closed settings, such as schools or long-term care facilities, frequently trace to contaminated doorknobs, toys, or linens, with studies modeling up to 20-30% of cases attributable to surface routes in high-touch environments. In healthcare, patient-care items like stethoscopes and blood pressure cuffs have fueled clusters of MRSA and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, with one review of 50 outbreaks identifying fomites as reservoirs in 40% of cases. Rhinovirus transmission in households similarly relies on indirect contact via shared objects, supported by viral shedding data showing surface contamination in 50-70% of infected homes.^[56]^[57]^[58] Quantitative assessments reveal limitations in fomite efficacy for many pathogens. Transfer rates from surface to finger typically range from 0.1-10%, dropping further to mucous membranes, rendering this pathway insufficient alone for sustained epidemics in low-density settings; mathematical models for influenza estimate fomite contributions below 10% relative to droplets or aerosols. For SARS-CoV-2, while viable virus was cultured from hospital fomites early in the pandemic (e.g., 13% of samples in one 2020 study), epidemiological reconstructions of superspreading events prioritized airborne over surface routes, with surface disinfection yielding marginal risk reduction. These findings underscore that fomite risks amplify in scenarios of poor sanitation, high occupant density, and frequent surface-hand interactions, but over-reliance on this mode can misallocate interventions away from dominant transmission vectors.^[59]^[60]^[61]

Vector-Borne Transmission

Vector-borne transmission occurs when pathogens are conveyed from an infected host to a susceptible one via an intermediate organism, known as a vector, which typically does not suffer disease from the pathogen itself.^[62] Common vectors include arthropods such as mosquitoes, ticks, fleas, and sandflies, which acquire the pathogen during a blood meal from an infected vertebrate host and subsequently transmit it biologically—through replication or developmental stages within the vector—or mechanically via contaminated mouthparts.^[63] This mode contrasts with direct transmission by requiring the vector's active role in pathogen dissemination, often influenced by environmental factors like temperature and humidity that affect vector biology and range.^[64] In biological transmission, prevalent among mosquitoes and ticks, the pathogen undergoes extrinsic incubation within the vector before becoming infective; for instance, in mosquito-borne flaviviruses like dengue virus, the pathogen replicates in the vector's midgut and salivary glands, enabling injection into a new host during feeding.^[65] Ticks transmit pathogens such as Borrelia burgdorferi, causative agent of Lyme disease, primarily through saliva during prolonged attachment, with rapid transmission possible within minutes for some agents due to pre-existing infection in the tick's salivary glands.^[66] Mechanical transmission, rarer but documented in fleas carrying Yersinia pestis (plague), involves passive transfer of pathogens on the vector's exterior without internal development.^[67] Major vector-borne pathogens include protozoa like Plasmodium species transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes causing malaria, viruses such as dengue virus via Aedes mosquitoes, and bacteria like Borrelia burgdorferi via Ixodes ticks for Lyme disease.^[68] Historical discoveries elucidated these pathways: Ronald Ross identified mosquito transmission of malaria avian models in 1897, confirmed for humans by 1898, while yellow fever's mosquito vector was verified in 1900 by Walter Reed's experiments.^[69] Recent outbreaks underscore ongoing risks; for example, dengue cases reached 14.1 million globally in 2024, exceeding the 2023 record of 7 million, primarily in tropical regions.^[70] Epidemiologically, vector-borne diseases comprise over 17% of infectious diseases worldwide, resulting in more than 700,000 deaths annually, with malaria alone causing over 600,000 fatalities yearly as of 2024 estimates.^[63] Transmission dynamics are amplified by vector competence—species-specific ability to harbor and transmit pathogens—and human factors like urbanization, which expand Aedes habitats, as seen in chikungunya and Zika surges since 2014.^[63] Control hinges on interrupting vector-pathogen-host cycles through insecticides, habitat management, and surveillance, though emerging resistance and climate-driven range expansions pose challenges.^[64]

Fecal-Oral and Waterborne Transmission

Fecal-oral transmission occurs when pathogens excreted in the feces of an infected individual are ingested by another person, typically through contaminated hands, food, water, or surfaces.^[71] This route is facilitated by inadequate sanitation and hygiene practices, allowing fecal matter to transfer via the "F-diagram" pathways: fluids (water), fingers, fields (food), flies, and fomites.^[72] Common pathogens include viruses such as hepatitis A virus, norovirus, and rotavirus; bacteria like Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Shigella spp.; and protozoan parasites including Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum.^[73] Waterborne transmission represents a subset of fecal-oral spread where contaminated water serves as the primary vehicle, often through ingestion during drinking, bathing, or recreational activities.^[74] Pathogens enter water supplies via sewage leakage, agricultural runoff, or animal feces, surviving in aquatic environments due to their resilience to environmental stressors. In the United States, waterborne diseases impact over 7 million people annually, incurring healthcare costs exceeding $3 billion, with biofilm-forming bacteria accounting for a significant portion of hospitalizations.^[74] Globally, at least 1.7 billion people rely on drinking water sources contaminated with feces as of 2022, elevating risks for enteric infections.^[75] Notable outbreaks underscore the route's public health impact; for instance, Vibrio cholerae causes cholera epidemics in regions with poor water treatment, as seen in Yemen's 2017 outbreak exceeding 1 million cases linked to conflict-disrupted sanitation.^[74] Similarly, Cryptosporidium outbreaks from contaminated recreational water affected hundreds in Milwaukee in 1993 and persist in modern settings due to chlorine-resistant oocysts.^[76] Prevention hinges on interrupting transmission chains through improved water chlorination, filtration, boiling, and sanitation infrastructure; handwashing with soap reduces risk by removing fecal pathogens; and vaccination, such as for hepatitis A, provides targeted immunity.^[71]^[77] Empirical evidence from intervention studies confirms that combined water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programs significantly lower incidence rates in endemic areas.^[72]

Surveillance and Tracking

Traditional Epidemiological Methods

Traditional epidemiological methods for surveilling pathogen transmission rely on systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data from reported cases to identify patterns, infer transmission routes, and implement controls. These approaches, formalized in the mid-19th century and refined through public health practice, emphasize descriptive and analytic techniques to map disease spread without molecular tools. Core elements include passive and active surveillance systems, where passive reporting involves mandatory notifications from clinicians and labs to health authorities, while active surveillance entails proactive case ascertainment during outbreaks. For instance, the U.S. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, established in 1887 and expanded by the CDC in the 20th century, tracks reportable infections like tuberculosis and measles to detect transmission clusters based on incidence trends.^[78]^[79] Outbreak investigations form a cornerstone, following standardized steps: verifying the existence of an unusual cluster, defining cases via clinical, lab, and epi criteria, and conducting descriptive epidemiology to characterize the "person, place, and time" dimensions of spread. This reveals transmission dynamics, such as common-source point outbreaks (e.g., a single contaminated meal) versus propagated person-to-person chains, by calculating attack rates and generating epidemic curves—line graphs plotting case onsets over time to distinguish point-source (sharp peak) from continuous transmission (gradual rise). Analytic methods, like cohort or case-control studies, test hypotheses on risk factors, such as exposure histories, to confirm routes like droplet spread in influenza clusters. Surveillance and investigations often suffice to pinpoint modes of transmission and enact measures like isolation, as seen in early 20th-century smallpox control.^[80]^[81] Contact tracing exemplifies targeted tracking, involving identification, listing, and monitoring of exposed individuals to interrupt chains, with roots in 19th-century quarantine practices and formalized in modern guidelines. Tracers interview cases to recall contacts within the pathogen's incubation period (e.g., 2-14 days for SARS-CoV-1), assess risks via proximity and duration, and enforce quarantine or testing, yielding metrics like secondary attack rates to quantify transmissibility. The method's efficacy depends on timeliness—ideally completing listings within 48 hours of case identification—and coverage, historically achieving 80-90% in well-resourced systems like those for Ebola in 2014. Limitations include underreporting in asymptomatic cases and resource intensity, prompting reliance on the agent-host-environment triad to contextualize findings, where host susceptibility and environmental factors inform transmission hypotheses.^[82]^[83]^[2] These methods integrate field data with basic statistics, such as the basic reproduction number (R0), estimated from serial interval and generation times in traced chains—e.g., R0 ≈ 2-3 for seasonal influenza derived from household studies. While effective for endemic tracking, they struggle with cryptic transmission in low-incidence settings, historically leading to delays in recognizing airborne routes, as in early tuberculosis surveillance before sputum microscopy standardization in the 1880s. Overall, traditional epidemiology prioritizes real-time, population-level insights to guide interventions, forming the backbone of global systems like WHO's International Health Regulations.^[84]

Genomic and Phylogenetic Approaches

Genomic approaches, particularly whole genome sequencing (WGS), enable high-resolution subtyping of pathogens by generating complete genetic profiles, surpassing traditional methods like pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in discriminatory power.^[85] WGS identifies single nucleotide polymorphisms and other variants to link cases in outbreaks, facilitating the distinction between point-source introductions and ongoing community transmission. For instance, the FDA's GenomeTrakr network, established in 2015 and expanded by 2025, has sequenced over 1 million isolates from foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella and Listeria, allowing real-time tracking of transmission chains across global supply networks.^[86] This method has resolved outbreaks, such as a 2023 E. coli incident traced to contaminated produce via shared genomic clusters exceeding 99% identity.^[87] Phylogenetic analysis complements WGS by constructing evolutionary trees from aligned sequences, inferring ancestral relationships and transmission directions. Tools like Bayesian phylogeographic models integrate temporal and spatial data to reconstruct outbreak origins, as demonstrated in a 2023 review of viral epidemics where tree topologies revealed migration patterns with posterior probabilities above 0.95 for key branches.^[88] In bacterial epidemiology, phylogenetic clustering thresholds—often set at fewer than 10 single nucleotide variants—define transmission clusters, aiding in hospital outbreak investigations; a 2025 study of healthcare-associated infections used real-time WGS-phylogenetics to detect Clostridium difficile clusters within 48 hours, reducing secondary cases by 30%.^[89] Within-host diversity, captured via low-coverage sequencing, refines these inferences by accounting for intrahost evolution, improving accuracy in transmission tree estimation for pathogens like HIV and influenza.^[90] Integration of these approaches in surveillance systems, such as the CDC's Advanced Molecular Detection program since 2016, has enhanced pathogen tracking by combining genomic data with epidemiological metadata.^[85] For vector-borne diseases, phylodynamics model spatiotemporal spread; a 2025 analysis of Escherichia coli in One Health contexts used phylogenetic parameters to estimate transmission rates across animal, human, and environmental reservoirs, revealing livestock-to-human jumps with effective reproduction numbers (R_e) ranging from 1.2 to 2.5.^[91] Challenges include computational demands and the need for standardized variant calling, but advances in real-time platforms have enabled containment of antimicrobial-resistant strains, as in a 2024 phage therapy framework linking phylogenetics to precision interventions.^[92] These methods underscore causal links in transmission, prioritizing empirical genomic evidence over assumption-based models.

Evolutionary Dynamics

Virulence-Transmission Trade-Offs

The virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis proposes that pathogen evolution favors an intermediate level of virulence—the degree of host harm—as a balance between enhanced within-host replication, which boosts transmission via increased pathogen shedding, and the cost of accelerated host mortality or recovery, which curtails the infectious period.^[93] This framework assumes virulence arises as an unavoidable side effect of resource exploitation for replication, with natural selection optimizing the pathogen's basic reproduction number (R₀) under constraints where higher virulence does not proportionally increase transmission benefits.^[94] Theoretical models, including those incorporating host recovery rates and transmission probabilities, predict that virulence should decline over time in established host-pathogen systems as transmission opportunities stabilize, but rise during novel host invasions when rapid replication confers short-term advantages.^[94] Empirical tests, however, reveal limited support for a consistent negative relationship between virulence and transmission across diverse pathogen-host systems. A 2019 meta-analysis of 46 studies encompassing bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa found no overall trade-off, with effect sizes indicating frequent independence or even positive correlations in some cases, suggesting that virulence often does not impose a transmission penalty or that other factors like host immunity dominate.^[93] ^[95] For instance, in serial passage experiments with viruses such as vesicular stomatitis virus, increased virulence sometimes coincided with higher transmission without evident costs, challenging the universality of the hypothesis.^[93] Classic examples include the myxoma virus introduced to Australian rabbits in 1950, where initial strains killed over 99% of hosts within days, but field isolates by the 1950s-1960s showed attenuated virulence (e.g., Grade III strains with 70-99% lethality but longer host survival), correlating with improved rabbit resistance and sustained transmission via vectors like mosquitoes.^[96] Yet, genomic analyses of post-1999 Australian strains reveal punctuated evolution, with some lineages regaining higher virulence—killing laboratory rabbits faster than progenitors—indicating that trade-offs may shift with host adaptation or environmental pressures rather than following a unidirectional path to avirulence.^[97] ^[98] Similarly, in human pathogens like HIV, early attenuation hypotheses invoke trade-offs, but longitudinal data show virulence stabilization influenced by treatment rather than pure transmission dynamics.^[99] Critiques highlight that the hypothesis overlooks scenarios where virulence directly enhances transmission—such as tissue damage facilitating vector feeding or behavioral changes increasing host contact—without proportional costs, or where multiple infections and within-host competition select for unchecked replication.^[100] ^[101] Population divergence in parasite traits, as seen in rodent malaria (Plasmodium yoelii), further shows that trade-offs vary by host genotype or ecology, with immune evasion sometimes decoupling virulence from transmission.^[102] Recent reviews emphasize a hierarchy of hypotheses, incorporating spatial structure, coinfections, and anthropogenic interventions, to explain why pathogens do not invariably evolve toward benignity.^[103] ^[104] In zoonotic emergences, initial high virulence may reflect maladaptation to new hosts rather than optimized trade-offs, with subsequent evolution contingent on transmission modes like aerosols versus vectors.^[105]

Pathogen Adaptation and Host Co-Evolution

Pathogens and hosts engage in reciprocal evolutionary arms races, where selection pressures from transmission dynamics drive adaptations in both. Pathogens evolve traits that enhance infectivity, replication within hosts, and shedding to facilitate onward transmission, often via mutations in surface proteins or regulatory genes that circumvent host barriers such as mucosal immunity or cellular receptors. Hosts, in turn, develop genetic resistance, tolerance to infection, or behavioral avoidance, altering the selective landscape for pathogen transmission efficiency. This co-evolutionary process is shaped by the pathogen's transmission route; for instance, orally transmitted pathogens like Pseudomonas entomophila in Drosophila adapt through host-specific mechanisms such as epithelial barriers for oral routes versus systemic clearance for invasive routes, with adaptation occurring faster (within 3-5 generations) for route-matched infections and exhibiting no cross-protection between routes.^[106] Such route-contingent evolution underscores how transmission bottlenecks impose distinct selective filters, favoring pathogens that optimize exploitation of specific host entry points.^[106] A central feature of this co-evolution is the virulence-transmission trade-off, where pathogens balance the benefits of high replication (which boosts transmission via increased pathogen load and shedding) against the costs of excessive host damage that curtails transmission opportunities. Theoretical models predict intermediate virulence maximizes the basic reproduction number (R₀), as excessive lethality reduces host mobility and infectious period, while low virulence limits dissemination; empirical meta-analyses across bacterial, viral, and protozoan systems confirm a positive correlation between virulence proxies (e.g., host mortality) and transmission rates, supporting the trade-off in natural populations.^[94] Vertical or mixed transmission modes select for reduced virulence compared to horizontal routes, as seen in plant viruses where vertical passage favors host tolerance and lower pathogenicity.^[94] Host co-evolutionary responses, such as evolved immunity, can intensify this trade-off by punishing high-virulence strains, prompting pathogens to adapt subtler strategies like immune evasion to sustain transmission.^[94] Classic empirical examples illustrate these dynamics. In Australian rabbits, myxoma virus—introduced in 1950 with initial lethality exceeding 99%—rapidly attenuated to 70-95% case-fatality rates within 2-3 years through selection for less virulent strains that prolonged host survival and flea-mediated transmission, paralleled by rabbit populations evolving resistance via alleles like AKR1 that confer partial immunity, with parallel genetic convergence observed in independent outbreaks in Australia and Europe.^[107] Similarly, influenza A viruses adapting from avian to human hosts undergo hemagglutinin mutations shifting receptor preference from α2,3- to α2,6-linked sialic acids, enabling efficient upper respiratory replication and droplet/aerosol transmission; this host-jump adaptation, documented in pandemics like 1918 H1N1 and 2009 H1N1, involves co-evolutionary pressures from human immunity driving antigenic drift to maintain transmission chains.^[108] In cholera (Vibrio cholerae), waterborne environmental transmission correlates with higher toxin production and virulence relative to direct-contact strains, as prolonged host shedding in aquatic reservoirs outweighs rapid mortality costs.^[94] These cases highlight how co-evolution stabilizes transmission in endemic cycles but can precipitate emergence when imbalances, such as novel host jumps, disrupt equilibria.

Controversies and Empirical Debates

Airborne vs. Droplet Transmission Disputes

Distinctions between droplet and airborne transmission of respiratory pathogens hinge on particle size and persistence: droplets typically exceed 5–10 μm in diameter, projecting short distances (1–2 meters) before settling, while airborne transmission involves smaller droplet nuclei (≤5 μm) that evaporate rapidly, remain suspended in air currents, and enable long-range dissemination via inhalation.^[109]^[110] This binary framework, codified in guidelines by bodies like the CDC and WHO, has guided infection control, with droplet precautions emphasizing masks and distancing, whereas airborne protocols mandate N95 respirators, negative-pressure rooms, and enhanced ventilation.^[111]^[112] Disputes intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, as initial WHO assessments in March 2020 prioritized droplet and contact routes, downplaying aerosols despite laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 viability in fine particles for hours.^[110]^[113] Critics, including 239 scientists in a July 2020 open letter, cited superspreading events in poorly ventilated spaces, hospital outbreaks beyond 2 meters, and animal model studies demonstrating aerosol infectivity, arguing for broader airborne recognition to justify ventilation and high-filtration masks.00869-2/full)^[37] WHO partially conceded in December 2021 for high-risk settings but resisted universal airborne classification until a 2024 report abandoned the droplet-aerosol dichotomy, acknowledging inhalation of small particles as a primary mechanism across respiratory infections.^[114]^[115] For non-SARS-CoV-2 pathogens, similar tensions persist; influenza and RSV are categorized as droplet-transmitted despite field studies showing aerosol contributions in enclosed environments, with viral RNA detected in air samples up to 40 feet from sources.^[116]^[48] Historical precedents, like tuberculosis (unequivocally airborne via droplet nuclei), contrast with debates over measles and varicella, where aerosol evidence supports stricter precautions than droplet models imply.^[3] Resistance to reclassification often stems from implementation costs—airborne protocols demand infrastructure upgrades—and evidential thresholds favoring conservative epidemiology over emerging aerobiology data.^[117]^[118] Empirical challenges include arbitrary size cutoffs ignoring particle behavior (e.g., humidification effects altering trajectories) and under-sampling fine aerosols in real-world studies, which favor short-range observations.^[47]^[51] Proponents of unified "airborne" terminology argue it better reflects causal physics—evaporation concentrating pathogens in respirable sizes—urging policy shifts toward universal source control and airflow management, as validated by reduced transmission in ventilated settings during outbreaks.^[119]^[120] These debates underscore tensions between precautionary paradigms and resource allocation, with peer-reviewed syntheses increasingly favoring aerosol-inclusive models for accurate risk assessment.^[121]

Role of Surfaces and Fomites in Spread

Fomites, defined as inanimate objects or surfaces contaminated with viable pathogens, facilitate indirect contact transmission when individuals touch them and subsequently transfer the agent to mucous membranes, such as the eyes, nose, or mouth.^[55] Transmission via this route requires a sequence of events: deposition of pathogen-laden droplets or residues onto the surface, sufficient environmental persistence, transfer to hands or objects upon contact, and inoculation via self-touching behaviors, with overall efficiency often below 1% per chain in experimental models.^[122] While fomite-mediated spread is empirically documented for certain pathogens, its relative contribution remains debated, particularly for respiratory viruses where direct contact or aerosol routes predominate, as evidenced by outbreak reconstructions attributing fewer than 10% of cases to surfaces in controlled studies.^[123] For enteric pathogens like norovirus, fomites play a substantial role in outbreaks, with viable virus recoverable from surfaces such as door handles and utensils after inoculation doses as low as 50 microliters, enabling sustained transmission in settings like restaurants via hand-to-surface-to-hand chains.^[124] Epidemiological data from a 2017 cruise ship incident implicated fomite transfer during interpersonal interactions, such as handshaking, accounting for secondary cases beyond primary fecal-oral spread, with norovirus persisting on hard surfaces for days under typical indoor conditions.^[125] Experimental transfers demonstrate norovirus moving readily from contaminated fomites to clean ones, underscoring hygiene interventions like surface disinfection as critical for containment, though aerosolized vomit can amplify environmental loading.^[126] In contrast, for influenza viruses, surface survival reaches 24-48 hours on nonporous materials like stainless steel but drops to under 12 hours on fabrics, yet real-world transmission risk via dried fomites is negligible, with laboratory assays recovering minimal viable virus after finger-surface-nose simulations.^[127] A 2022 analysis of household materials found influenza A(H1N1) persisting detectably for weeks via PCR but infectious only briefly post-deposition, concluding fomite chains unlikely to drive epidemics without frequent re-inoculation.^[128] Similarly, quantitative models indicate transfer efficiencies too low—often 0.1-1%—to sustain outbreaks independently, prioritizing hand hygiene over exhaustive surface cleaning.^[123] Debates intensified during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, where early reports of viability up to 72 hours on plastics fueled fomite-focused guidelines, yet contact tracing in households and public spaces linked fewer than 1% of transmissions to surfaces, with agencies like the CDC deeming the risk "low" by 2021 absent high viral loads and immediate transfers.^[129] Experimental evidence supports theoretical possibility under moist conditions but refutes routine occurrence, as dried residues yield non-infectious particles unlikely to overcome mucosal barriers without co-factors like poor handwashing.^[130] Critics argue overreliance on fomite models diverted resources from ventilation, reflecting a precautionary bias in initial public health messaging despite sparse field confirmation, though niche high-touch environments like airports warrant targeted monitoring.^[131] Overall, while physicochemical factors like surface porosity and humidity modulate persistence—enhancing it on plastics versus cloth—empirical hierarchies place fomites secondary to direct routes for most airborne pathogens.^[53]

Anthropogenic Factors in Emergence and Spread

Human activities significantly contribute to the emergence of pathogens through increased contact between wildlife reservoirs and human or domestic animal populations, as well as to their subsequent global dissemination. Land-use changes, such as deforestation for agriculture and urbanization, disrupt ecosystems and elevate spillover risks; for instance, habitat fragmentation has been linked to outbreaks of vector-borne diseases like malaria and zoonoses including Nipah virus, where proximity to disturbed forests facilitates transmission from bats to humans or livestock.^[132]^[133] In regions like Southeast Asia and Africa, agricultural expansion has driven Nipah virus emergence via date palm sap contaminated by bat urine, with documented human cases rising post-1998 deforestation surges.^[134] Intensive livestock farming amplifies pathogen adaptation and spillover by concentrating animals in high-density environments, promoting viral reassortment and mutation; avian influenza A(H5N1) strains, for example, have spilled over from wild birds to poultry farms, leading to over 800 human cases globally since 2003, largely tied to industrial-scale operations in Asia.^[134] Similarly, swine production systems have facilitated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus evolution, with genetic analyses showing farm-level selection pressures enhancing transmissibility.^[135] These practices not only originate novel variants but also sustain endemic reservoirs, as evidenced by recurrent H7N9 outbreaks in China's live poultry markets from 2013 to 2017, infecting 1,568 people.^[136] Global human mobility, particularly air travel exceeding 4.7 billion passengers annually as of 2019, accelerates pathogen spread by seeding outbreaks across continents within days; SARS-CoV-2, detected in Wuhan on December 31, 2019, reached 213 countries by March 2020, with genomic tracking confirming multiple exportations via international flights.^[137]^[138] Trade in live animals and bushmeat further disseminates risks, as seen in the 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, where bushmeat hunting and markets contributed to initial zoonotic jumps from bats, followed by human-to-human spread amid conflict-disrupted infrastructure.^[139]^[140] Overuse of antimicrobials in agriculture, accounting for up to 70% of total antibiotic consumption in some countries, fosters resistance in environmental and commensal bacteria, enabling transfer to human pathogens; colistin-resistant Escherichia coli strains from livestock manure have contaminated crops and water, with plasmid-mediated resistance genes detected in 2015 Chinese pig farms and subsequently in European clinical isolates.^[141]^[142] The World Health Organization has noted that routine prophylactic use in healthy animals selects for multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, complicating treatments for infections like urinary tract disease, with global surveillance data from 2017 onward showing rising mcr-1 gene prevalence linked to agricultural sources.^[142]^[143]

Recent Developments

Advances in Drug-Resistant Pathogen Tracking

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a pivotal technology for tracking drug-resistant pathogens, enabling rapid identification of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and phylogenetic analysis to trace transmission chains. By analyzing the full genetic profile of bacterial isolates, WGS predicts resistance profiles more accurately than traditional phenotypic testing, with studies demonstrating its ability to detect resistance determinants in real-time during outbreaks.^[144] For instance, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) employs WGS to monitor resistant strains like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), facilitating outbreak investigations by linking isolates through shared genetic markers.^[145] This approach has reduced turnaround times from weeks to days, enhancing containment efforts in hospital and community settings.00285-9/fulltext) Global surveillance systems have integrated WGS to standardize AMR tracking across borders. The World Health Organization's Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS), established in 2015, now incorporates genomic data from over 110 countries, analyzing more than 23 million bacteriologically confirmed infections between 2016 and 2023 to map resistance trends in priority pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.^[146] The 2025 GLASS report highlights elevated resistance rates in low-resource settings, where Gram-negative bacteria exhibit the highest AMR burdens, underscoring the need for genomic tools to detect intercontinental spread via travel and trade.^[146] Complementary networks, such as the CDC's PulseNet, utilize WGS for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis replacements, achieving subtyping resolution that reveals clonal expansions of multidrug-resistant strains in foodborne transmission.^[147] Advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, including portable devices like Oxford Nanopore, further enable field-deployable tracking of resistant pathogens during epidemics. These technologies support metagenomic surveillance, identifying resistance in uncultured samples and predicting transmission dynamics through evolutionary modeling.^[148] Peer-reviewed analyses indicate that genomic surveillance has improved outbreak resolution by 50-70% compared to legacy methods, though challenges persist in data sharing and standardization across diverse laboratories.^[145] Ongoing efforts emphasize hybrid phenotypic-genomic workflows to validate predictions, ensuring robust tracking amid rising resistance pressures.00285-9/fulltext)

Emerging Surveillance Technologies

Wastewater surveillance has gained prominence as a non-invasive method for detecting pathogen circulation in populations, capturing shed viral, bacterial, and parasitic genetic material from infected individuals regardless of symptoms. This approach provides early warning of transmission dynamics, often preceding clinical surveillance by days to weeks, as demonstrated during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic where it tracked variant emergence across communities.^[149] By October 2024, programs in over 38 countries had identified infectious diseases in wastewater, expanding beyond respiratory viruses to include mpox, poliovirus, and influenza, with detection sensitivities varying by pathogen load and sewage dilution.^[150] Advances in multiplex PCR and metagenomic sequencing have improved resolution, enabling lineage-specific tracking; for instance, a 2024 study in Japan analyzed 47 pathogens, including 15 respiratory viruses, revealing correlations between wastewater signals and hospitalization rates.^[151] Genomic surveillance networks represent a cornerstone of real-time pathogen monitoring, integrating whole-genome sequencing to map transmission chains and evolutionary changes affecting spread. The World Health Organization's Global Genomic Surveillance Strategy, launched in 2022 and operationalized by 2024, coordinates data from over 100 countries to monitor pathogens with epidemic potential, standardizing protocols for sequencing coverage and variant classification.^[152] In low-resource settings, assessments in South and Southeast Asia as of September 2024 highlighted gaps in sequencing capacity but noted expansions via portable nanopore devices, which facilitate on-site analysis of transmission hotspots.^[153] Crowdsourced platforms, emerging in 2025, leverage decentralized sequencing to accelerate detection of novel strains, reducing reliance on centralized labs and enabling faster phylodynamic inference of dispersal patterns.^[154] These systems have quantified transmission trade-offs, such as enhanced airborne spread in SARS-CoV-2 Delta variants, through phylogenetic reconstructions linking mutations to epidemiological data.^[155] Artificial intelligence and machine learning augment these technologies by processing vast datasets for predictive analytics, outperforming traditional models in outbreak forecasting. A July 2025 UNLV study integrated AI with wastewater sampling to detect emerging viruses, achieving up to 90% accuracy in predicting incidence trends by analyzing temporal patterns in microbial signals.^[156] Protein language models, applied to genomic sequences as of January 2025, classify variants by transmissibility traits without prior labeling, drawing on evolutionary patterns to flag high-risk adaptations like immune escape.^[157] In maritime contexts, AI-driven analysis of ship wastewater in 2025 validated cross-border transmission tracking for SARS-CoV-2, correlating genetic clusters with travel logs.^[158] Hybrid systems combining AI with syndromic data from digital health records have reduced false positives in early warning, as evidenced by a June 2025 systematic review of 50+ studies showing improved specificity for respiratory pathogen surges.^[159] Despite these gains, implementation challenges persist, including data standardization and equity in access, particularly in resource-limited regions where genomic infrastructure lags.^[160]

References

[1]
Chain of Infection Components - CDC
The chain of infection has six components: microorganisms, risk factors, reservoir/source, portal of exit, modes of transport, and portal of entry.
[2]
Principles of Epidemiology | Lesson 1 - Section 10 - CDC Archive
The chain of infection involves an agent leaving a reservoir, exiting through a portal, transmitted by a mode, and entering a susceptible host through a portal.
[3]
I. Review of Scientific Data Regarding Transmission of Infectious ...
Nov 27, 2023 · Direct transmission occurs when microorganisms are transferred from one infected person to another person without a contaminated intermediate ...
[4]
Superspreading and the evolution of virulence - PMC
Sep 13, 2025 · Heterogeneity in pathogen transmission: mechanisms and methodology. ... Darwin review: the evolution of virulence in human pathogens. Proc ...Methods · Evolution Of Virulence · Results
[5]
The source of individual heterogeneity shapes infectious disease ...
Heterogeneity in pathogen transmission: mechanisms and methodology. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1606-1622. ( 10.1111/1365-2435.12645) [DOI] [Google Scholar]; 10. Yates ...2. Material And Methods · 3. Results · (b) . Evolutionary Emergence
[6]
Principles of Infectious Diseases: Transmission, Diagnosis ...
Pathogenicity refers to the ability of an agent to cause disease, given infection, and virulence is the likelihood of causing severe disease among those with ...
[7]
Routes of influenza transmission - PMC - NIH
The available evidence suggests that all routes of transmission (droplet, aerosol and contact) have a role to play; their relative significance will depend on ...
[8]
Epidemiology and Transmission Dynamics of Infectious Diseases ...
We explore the epidemiological characteristics for assessing the impact of public health interventions in the community setting and their applications.
[9]
Routes of Transmission : Acute and Communicable Disease
Diseases can spread through airborne, respiratory (droplet), sexual, animal/insect, food/water, and healthcare transmission.
[10]
Principles of Epidemiology | Lesson 1 - Section 8 - CDC Archive
Among the simplest of these is the epidemiologic triad or triangle, the traditional model for infectious disease. The triad consists of an external agent, a ...
[11]
Complexity of the Basic Reproduction Number (R0) - CDC
Nov 27, 2018 · R0 is affected by numerous biological, sociobehavioral, and environmental factors that govern pathogen transmission and, therefore, is ...
[12]
The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) of measles: a systematic review
The basic reproduction number, R nought (R0), is defined as the average number of secondary cases of an infectious disease arising from a typical case in a ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[13]
Interpretation of the Basic and Effective Reproduction Number - NIH
The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) is a term that describes the expected number of infections generated by 1 case in a susceptible population.
[14]
Serial Intervals of Respiratory Infectious Diseases - Oxford Academic
Oct 7, 2014 · The serial interval of an infectious disease represents the duration between symptom onset of a primary case and symptom onset of its secondary cases.
[15]
Rapid review and meta-analysis of serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 ...
Jun 26, 2023 · The serial interval is the period of time between symptom onset in the primary case and symptom onset in the secondary case.
[16]
Secondary Attack Rate, Transmission and Incubation Periods ... - NIH
We report the main epidemiologic characteristics of these cases, such as secondary attack rate (SAR), transmission period, incubation period, and serial ...
[17]
The Legacy of Humoral Medicine - AMA Journal of Ethics
Jul 1, 2002 · Humoral medicine's most compelling claim on our attention, though, is its belief that health and its opposite, dis-ease, were due to complex interactions.
[18]
[PDF] a historical approach to theories of infectious disease transmission
Witchcraft, demons, gods, comets, earthquakes were the first unproved theories, followed by tangible scientific ones such as miasma's theory, conta- gious ...
[19]
Death and miasma in Victorian London: an obstinate belief - NIH
In the Victorian period the “miasmatic” theory of disease causation took some strange forms among influential people. Dr John Snow's hypothesis of polluted ...
[20]
The Physician Who Presaged the Germ Theory of Disease Nearly ...
Jan 22, 2021 · Fracastoro believed that diseases were caused by imperceptible seedlike entities (seminaria) which could multiply rapidly, propagate quickly, ...
[21]
Ignaz Semmelweis and the Fight Against Puerperal Fever - PMC - NIH
Oct 17, 2024 · His pioneering work in antiseptic procedures significantly reduced the mortality rates from puerperal fever, a deadly infection that plagued ...
[22]
Ignaz Semmelweis, the doctor who discovered the disease-fighting ...
Apr 14, 2020 · A Hungarian obstetrician was the first to nail down the importance of handwashing to stop the spread of infectious disease.
[23]
1.1C: Pasteur and Spontaneous Generation - Biology LibreTexts
Nov 23, 2024 · Today spontaneous generation is generally accepted to have been decisively dispelled during the 19th century by the experiments of Louis Pasteur ...
[24]
Louis Pasteur, germ theory and the first life-saving vaccines
Dec 27, 2022 · From pasteurization to the first manufactured vaccines, Louis Pasteur made breakthrough discoveries in disease prevention and public health.
[25]
Robert Koch and the 'golden age' of bacteriology - ScienceDirect.com
Robert Koch's discovery of the anthrax bacillus in 1876 launched the field of medical bacteriology. A 'golden age' of scientific discovery ensued.
[26]
Robert Koch: From Anthrax to Tuberculosis – A Journey in Medical ...
Nov 4, 2024 · By 1876, Koch discovered that anthrax was caused by a single pathogen and uncovered the role of dormant spores, which could survive in harsh ...
[27]
Joseph Lister's antisepsis system - Science Museum
Oct 14, 2018 · Joseph Lister was the Victorian surgeon whose science-based standard of infection control, the antisepsis system, has saved countless lives.The challenge of surgical... · The science of germ theory · The antisepsis system
[28]
Joseph Lister: father of modern surgery - PMC - NIH
He began his antiseptic method with compound fracture wounds because the standard treatment of amputation was always available should his method fail. The ...
[29]
on air-borne infection*: study ii. droplets and droplet nuclei.
W. F. WELLS; ON AIR-BORNE INFECTION*: STUDY II. DROPLETS AND DROPLET NUCLEI., American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 20, Issue 3, 1 November 1934, Pages.Missing: transmission | Show results with:transmission
[30]
Respiratory droplets - Natural Ventilation for Infection Control ... - NCBI
According to Wells (1955), the vehicle for airborne respiratory disease transmission is the droplet nuclei, which are the dried-out residual of droplets ...
[31]
Achievements in Public Health, 1900-1999: Control of Infectious ...
Jul 30, 1999 · Disease control resulted from improvements in sanitation and hygiene, the discovery of antibiotics, and the implementation of universal childhood vaccination ...
[32]
Public health milestones through the years
1947. First-ever global disease-tracking service. WHO establishes the first-ever global disease-tracking service, with information transmitted via telex ...
[33]
40 years of HIV discovery: the virus responsible for AIDS is identified ...
May 15, 2023 · In 1983, HIV -the virus responsible for AIDS- was isolated by virologists from the Institut Pasteur. A first observation with a microscope in February was ...
[34]
Advances in Molecular Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases - NIH
Molecular epidemiology is a discipline that uses molecular microbiology tools to study the distribution and determinants of diseases in human populations ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[35]
Infectious disease in an era of global change - Nature
Oct 13, 2021 · In this Review, we consider the extent to which these recent global changes have increased the risk of infectious disease outbreaks.
[36]
Pandemics Throughout History - Frontiers
The understanding of the mechanisms of transmission of pathogens to humans allowed the establishment of methods to prevent and control infections. During ...
[37]
Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses - Science
Aug 27, 2021 · Several respiratory pathogens are known to spread through small respiratory aerosols, which can float and travel in air flows, infecting people who inhale them.
[38]
Epidemiologic data and pathogen genome sequences: a powerful ...
Nov 18, 2014 · This review highlights the range of epidemiological questions that can be addressed from the combination of genome sequence and traditional `line lists'.
[39]
Factors determining human-to-human transmissibility of zoonotic ...
Nov 28, 2016 · Direct contact transmission requires physical contact between an infected person and a susceptible person and the transfer of pathogens via ...
[40]
Direct Contact Diseases - Government of New Brunswick
Conjunctivitis (Pink-eye) · Creutzfeldt-Jacob (CJD) · Ebola Virus Disease · Erythema Infectiosum (Fifth disease) · Impetigo · Pediculosis (Head lice) · Polio · Roseola ...
[41]
Direct Contact vs. Airborne Illness - WebMD
Oct 17, 2024 · Norovirus, scabies, head lice, ringworm, and impetigo are all examples of illnesses you can spread through direct contact. Illnesses spread ...
[42]
Infectious Diseases: Modes of Transmission - MSK Library Guides
Direct contact transmission of diseases occur with direct physical (though NOT necessarily sexual) contact such as touching, hugging, kissing. It can also ...
[43]
Ways infectious diseases spread | SA Health
Spread by skin or mucous membrane contact · chickenpox · cold sores (herpes simplex infection) · conjunctivitis · hand, foot and mouth disease · head lice · molluscum ...
[44]
An epidemiological study assessing the relative ... - PubMed
An epidemiological study assessing the relative importance of airborne and direct contact transmission of microorganisms in a medical intensive care unit.Missing: review | Show results with:review
[45]
Droplets and aerosols: An artificial dichotomy in respiratory virus ...
May 7, 2021 · Droplets are large (d>5 μm) and deposit quickly, while aerosols are small (<5 μm) and can remain airborne longer. The traditional distinction ...
[46]
Respiratory aerosols and droplets in the transmission of infectious ...
Oct 12, 2023 · This review provides a critical consideration and synthesis of scientific knowledge on the number concentrations, size distributions, composition, mixing state ...
[47]
How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do ...
Oct 12, 2021 · First, droplet and aerosol transmission are currently defined on the basis of size: 'droplets' are considered to be emissions larger than 5 or ...Introduction · The swinging pendulum of... · Droplets versus aerosols and...
[48]
Transmissibility and transmission of respiratory viruses - Nature
Mar 22, 2021 · This basic design can be adjusted to study transmissibility for different modes of transmission: direct contact transmission studies are ...
[49]
Particle sizes of infectious aerosols: implications for infection control
A consistent finding in tuberculosis aerosol studies is the variability of infectious aerosol production from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. 33.
[50]
Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for ... - PNAS
Notably, the recommended physical separation for social distancing is beneficial to prevent direct contact transmission but is insufficient (without face ...
[51]
World Health Organization report removes the aerosol/droplet ...
Aug 20, 2024 · Adopting aerosol avoids the replacement of the previously misleading dichotomy in particle size (droplet nuclei vs droplet) with an unnecessary ...
[52]
Significance of Fomites in the Spread of Respiratory and Enteric ...
There is now growing evidence that contaminated fomites or surfaces play a key role in the spread of viral infections.
[53]
Fomite Transmission, Physicochemical Origin of Virus–Surface ...
Mar 5, 2021 · This review summarizes the current knowledge and underlying physicochemical processes of virus transmission, in particular via fomites, and common disinfection ...
[54]
Persistence of Pathogens on Inanimate Surfaces: A Narrative Review
Many pathogens require a living host to survive, while others may be able to persist in a dormant state outside of a living host. Nonetheless, all pathogens ...
[55]
Microbial Exchange via Fomites and Implications for Human Health
Aug 31, 2019 · Surface characteristics also influence microbial survival and rates of transfer to and from humans. ... Viral Pathogens on Fomite Surfaces.<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
Fomite-mediated transmission as a sufficient pathway
Oct 29, 2018 · Here we analyze fomite mediated transmission through a comparative analysis across multiple pathogens and venues.
[57]
Role of Patient Care Items as a Fomite in Healthcare-Associated ...
Patient-care items can serve as a source or reservoir for healthcare-associated pathogens in hospitals. We reviewed healthcare-associated outbreaks from ...
[58]
Significance of Fomites in the Spread of Respiratory and Enteric ...
There is now growing evidence that contaminated fomites or surfaces play a key role in the spread of viral infections (3,. 7, 38, 71). Viral transmission is ...
[59]
Fomites and the COVID-19 pandemic: An evidence review on its ...
Mar 23, 2021 · The model suggested that fomites play a smaller role in combined SARS-CoV transmission, and airborne transmission is the still predominate ...Background · Criticisms on current surface... · Cases, clusters, and outbreaks...
[60]
Role of fomites in SARS transmission during the largest hospital ...
In this study, a mechanism-based investigation was conducted to explore the role of the fomite route in the transmission of SARS-CoV infection. The results ...
[61]
Fomite workshop recommendations addressing the role of surfaces ...
Aug 20, 2025 · Fomite transmission is influenced by the nature of the built environment, population density and proximity, environmental factors (humidity, ...
[62]
About Vector-Borne Diseases - CDC
Jun 26, 2024 · Mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas that spread germs (pathogens) are called vectors. A person who gets bitten by a vector and gets sick could have a vector-borne ...
[63]
Vector-borne diseases - World Health Organization (WHO)
Sep 26, 2024 · Vector-borne diseases are human illnesses caused by parasites, viruses and bacteria that are transmitted by vectors.
[64]
Managing mosquitoes and ticks in a rapidly changing world - NIH
A major focus has been given on genetically modified vectors, eave tubes, attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) and biocontrol agents.
[65]
Vector Specificity of Arbovirus Transmission - Frontiers
Mosquitoes and ticks are the main vectors of arboviruses including flaviviruses, which greatly affect humans. However, all tick or mosquito species are not able ...<|separator|>
[66]
Potential Mechanisms of Transmission of Tick-Borne Viruses at the ...
Tick-host interaction plays an important role in the successful transmission of pathogens. The ticks' salivary glands are the main cellular machinery involved ...
[67]
About Division of Vector-borne Diseases | NCEZID - CDC
Apr 11, 2024 · Vector-borne pathogens are spread to people and animals primarily through the bite of an infected mosquito, tick, or flea. Only a few mosquito- ...Missing: transmission definition
[68]
Patterns, Drivers, and Challenges of Vector-Borne Disease ...
Major groups of arthropod vectors include insects such as mosquitoes, fleas, and kissing bugs, as well as arachnids such as ticks. There are nonarthropod ...
[69]
Resurgent Vector-Borne Diseases as a Global Health Problem - CDC
Not long after the 1877 discovery that mosquitoes transmitted filariasis from human to human, malaria (1898), yellow fever (1900), and dengue (1903) were shown ...Malaria · Lyme Disease · Yellow Fever
[70]
Global dengue epidemic worsens with record 14 million cases and ...
In 2024, 14.1 million dengue cases were reported globally, surpassing the historic milestone of 7 million observed in 2023.
[71]
Clinical Overview of Hepatitis A - CDC
Aug 29, 2025 · Hepatitis A is a highly contagious infection that spreads primarily through fecal-oral transmission. Vaccination is the best way to prevent ...
[72]
Group 1. Faecal-oral infections - Epidemic Control Toolkit - IFRC
Faecal-oral infections. Last update: 2022-05-03. fecal-oral infections icon ... Faecal-oral transmission occurs when microorganisms from an infected stool ...
[73]
Infections transmitted via the faecal–oral route: a simple score for a ...
Faecal-oral transmission refers to the process whereby disease is transmitted ... About 18 feco–oral agents are priority pathogens, including hepatitis A ...
[74]
Waterborne Disease in the United States - CDC
May 29, 2025 · Waterborne diseases affect over 7 million people in the US every year and cost our healthcare system over $3 billion.
[75]
Drinking-water - World Health Organization (WHO)
Sep 13, 2023 · In 2022, globally, at least 1.7 billion people use a drinking water source contaminated with faeces. Microbial contamination of drinking-water ...
[76]
Waterborne Pathogens: Detection Methods and Challenges - PMC
In the period of 1996 to 2006, 21 outbreaks and 507 cases of waterborne disease involving water not intended for dinking were reported. The etiologic agents ...
[77]
How Diseases Spread Through the Fecal-Oral Route - Verywell Health
Sep 30, 2024 · Fecal-oral transmission happens when an infected person's contaminated feces enters the body of another person. This can occur when an infected ...
[78]
[PDF] Principles of Epidemiology - CDC Stacks
In the mid- and late-1800's, many others in Europe and the United States began to apply epidemiologic methods to investigate disease occurrence. At that time, ...
[79]
Chapter 18: Surveillance Indicators - CDC
Jun 3, 2025 · Traditionally, communicable disease surveillance programs have relied on passive reporting, in which reports are received from physicians ...Role Of Surveillance In... · Indicators Of Reporting... · Additional Approaches And...
[80]
Section 2: Steps of an Outbreak Investigation - CDC Archive
This course covers basic epidemiology principles, concepts, and procedures useful in the surveillance and investigation of health-related states or events.
[81]
Principles of Epidemiology | Lesson 1 - Section 4 - CDC Archive
Surveillance and field investigations are usually sufficient to identify causes, modes of transmission, and appropriate control and prevention measures. But ...
[82]
Concepts of contact tracing - WHO guideline on contact tracing - NCBI
Dec 3, 2024 · Contact is defined as: an exposure to an infectious disease that involves interaction with an infected individual or contaminated environment ...
[83]
Infectious Disease Surveillance - PMC - PubMed Central
Infectious disease surveillance can have different approaches based on the epidemiology and clinical presentation of the disease and the goals of surveillance.
[84]
Traditional and syndromic surveillance of infectious diseases and ...
An inventory of the data, surveillance strategies, and surveillance systems developed worldwide for the surveillance of infectious diseases is presented herein.
[85]
Detecting Outbreaks with Whole Genome Sequencing | AMD - CDC
Mar 4, 2024 · Whole genome sequencing (WGS) gives us a much more detailed DNA fingerprint than PFGE. In public health, WGS transformed how epidemiologists and ...
[86]
GenomeTrakr Network - FDA
Sep 8, 2025 · The GenomeTrakr network is the first distributed network of laboratories to utilize whole genome sequencing for pathogen identification.
[87]
Advances in whole genome sequencing for foodborne pathogens
Apr 28, 2025 · Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a revolutionary tool in outbreak investigations, providing high-resolution, comprehensive genetic ...
[88]
Approaches and challenges to inferring the geographical source of ...
Nov 29, 2023 · In this Review, we provide an overview of phylogeographic approaches widely used for reconstructing the geographical sources of outbreaks of interest.
[89]
Real-time sequencing a promising tool for hospital outbreak ...
May 1, 2025 · Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has become an essential tool for helping hospitals identify outbreaks of healthcare-associated bacterial infections.
[90]
Within-host diversity improves phylogenetic and transmission ... - eLife
Sep 21, 2023 · The use of within-host pathogen genomic sequence data can be used to improve phylogenetic and transmission estimates.
[91]
Parameters for one health genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli ...
Jan 2, 2025 · Phylodynamic methods may be useful in this regard, but they require datasets with large spatiotemporal range; and accumulation of genomic ...
[92]
Genomic surveillance as a scalable framework for precision phage ...
Oct 17, 2024 · We combine large-scale phylogeographic analysis with high-throughput phage typing to guide the development of precision phage cocktails.
[93]
Virulence-driven trade-offs in disease transmission: A meta-analysis
The virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis suggests that increased virulence, due to replication, leads to a deceleration in transmission rate.Abstract · Methods · Results · Discussion
[94]
The adaptive evolution of virulence: a review of theoretical ... - NIH
The consensus from this theoretical work is that, under a transmission–virulence trade-off, virulence will be higher during the early stages of an epidemic, ...
[95]
Virulence-driven trade-offs in disease transmission: A meta-analysis
The virulence-transmission trade-off hypothesis proposed more than 30 years ago is the cornerstone in the study of host-parasite co-evolution.
[96]
Next step in the ongoing arms race between myxoma virus and wild ...
Aug 14, 2017 · A single strain of myxoma virus was released as a biocontrol agent against Australian rabbit populations in 1950. The subsequent coevolution has ...
[97]
Divergent Evolutionary Pathways of Myxoma Virus in Australia
Notably, some of these viruses killed laboratory rabbits more quickly than the progenitor strain, but this increase in virulence over the original progenitor is ...
[98]
Rabbit virus has evolved to become more deadly, new research finds
Oct 6, 2022 · Contrary to widespread belief that viruses get milder over time, researchers have found that myxoma has become more deadly over time. Credit: ...
[99]
A transmission-virulence evolutionary trade-off explains attenuation ...
Nov 5, 2016 · The virulence-transmission trade-off is a promising hypothesis to explain changes in virulence of HIV, but this hypothesis and its predictions ...
[100]
Virulence evolution and the trade‐off hypothesis: history, current ...
Jan 19, 2009 · The trade-off hypothesis states that virulence is an unavoidable consequence of parasite transmission; however, since the 1990s, this hypothesis ...Abstract · A history of virulence · The current debate · References
[101]
[PDF] Challenging the trade-off model for the evolution of virulence
The trade-off model suggests that lowering transmission will indirectly lower virulence, but this is questioned as the mechanism is weak for rapid changes. ...
[102]
Virulence-transmission trade-offs and population divergence ... - PNAS
... empirical evidence (19, 20). A small number of studies have shown positive ... virulence-transmission trade-off. Population differences in parasite ...
[103]
Trade-offs in virulence evolution: a Hierarchy-of-Hypotheses approach
The trade-off hypothesis is a relationship between virulence and transmission, where virulence is a reduction in host fitness. It is a complex set of ...
[104]
Trade-offs in virulence evolution: a Hierarchy-of-Hypotheses approach
Feb 11, 2025 · A central concept of virulence evolution is the so-called 'trade-off hypothesis', a seemingly straightforward relationship between virulence and ...
[105]
The three Ts of virulence evolution during zoonotic emergence
Aug 11, 2021 · The virulence–transmission trade-off predicts that these two traits are positively correlated, but the shape of this relationship is ...
[106]
Host Adaptation Is Contingent upon the Infection Route Taken by ...
Sep 26, 2013 · The transmission route taken by pathogens to infect their hosts has a profound impact on the evolution of host-pathogen interactions. A body of ...
[107]
Parallel adaptation of rabbit populations to myxoma virus - Science
Feb 14, 2019 · We found a strong pattern of parallel evolution, with selection on standing genetic variation favoring the same alleles in Australia, France, and the United ...Locating Myxomatosis... · Abstract · Genetic Variation In...
[108]
Influenza Virus Evolution, Host Adaptation and Pandemic Formation
Influenza viruses can cause zoonotic infections and adapt to humans leading to sustained transmission and emergence of novel viruses.
[109]
Appendix A: Glossary of Terms | Infection Control - CDC
Jan 11, 2024 · Airborne transmission. A means of spreading infection when airborne droplet nuclei (small particle residue of evaporated droplets ≤5 μm in size ...
[110]
Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for ...
Mar 29, 2020 · Airborne transmission is different from droplet transmission as it refers to the presence of microbes within droplet nuclei, which are generally ...
[111]
Transmission-Based Precautions | Infection Control - CDC
Transmission-based precautions are a second tier of infection control, used in addition to standard precautions, including contact, droplet, and airborne ...At A Glance · Resources · English Materials
[112]
III. Precautions to Prevent Transmission of Infectious Agents - CDC
Nov 22, 2023 · Droplet Precautions are intended to prevent transmission of pathogens spread through close respiratory or mucous membrane contact with ...
[113]
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention ...
Jul 9, 2020 · Current evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted between people via respiratory droplets and contact routes – although ...
[114]
Why the WHO took two years to say COVID is airborne - Nature
Apr 6, 2022 · “The virus that causes COVID-19 is mainly transmitted through droplets generated when an infected person coughs, sneezes or speaks.” “These ...<|separator|>
[115]
WHO Overturns Dogma on Airborne Disease Spread. The CDC ...
May 1, 2024 · The WHO concluded that airborne transmission occurs as sick people exhale pathogens that remain suspended in the air, contained in tiny ...
[116]
Controversy around airborne versus droplet transmission ... - PubMed
There is particular controversy over the importance of aerosol transmission and whether airborne precautions should be recommended for some respiratory viruses.Missing: scientific | Show results with:scientific
[117]
What were the historical reasons for the resistance to recognizing ...
Aug 21, 2022 · The question of whether SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted by droplets or aerosols has been highly controversial. We sought to explain this ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[118]
How did we get here: what are droplets and aerosols and how far do ...
First, droplet and aerosol transmission are currently defined on the basis of size: 'droplets' are considered to be emissions larger than 5 or 10 µm in ...
[119]
Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols
One could dispute that, unlike larger droplets, aerosols may pose a greater risk of the spread of the COVID-19 disease among many susceptible hosts positioned ...
[120]
Basic routes of transmission of respiratory pathogens—A new ...
Jan 21, 2021 · Droplets are transmission media in nearly all of the routes, except for the direct transfer of bodily fluids containing pathogens, for example, ...
[121]
Covid ignited a global controversy over what is an airborne disease ...
Apr 18, 2024 · Most respiratory pathogens were recognized to spread via “droplet transmission,” where infectious droplets are projected out of a sick ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
[122]
Fomite-mediated transmission as a sufficient pathway
Oct 29, 2018 · Water, food, and fomites can act as environmental reservoirs, enhancing pathogens' ability to be transmitted from host to host. A thorough ...
[123]
Minimal influenza virus transmission from touching contaminated ...
Aug 30, 2024 · This study, conducted in a laboratory setting, investigates this risk for influenza transmission by quantitatively assessing the transfer of viable viruses.
[124]
Recovery of Infectious Human Norovirus GII.4 Sydney From Fomites ...
Eleven (58%) of the 50 μl inoculum fomite-recovered swabs were positive for infectious HuNoV. The lowest fomite inoculum that resulted in recovery and detection ...<|separator|>
[125]
Airborne or Fomite Transmission for Norovirus? A Case Study ... - NIH
Dec 14, 2017 · In this outbreak, the fomite transmission of norovirus between people occurred mainly via interactive behaviors such as hand shaking and waiters ...
[126]
VIII. Evidence Review | Infection Control - CDC
Mar 25, 2024 · One basic science study demonstrated that norovirus on surfaces can be readily transferred to other fomites (telephones, taps, door handles) ...
[127]
Survival of influenza viruses on environmental surfaces - PubMed
Both influenza A and B viruses survived for 24-48 hr on hard, nonporous surfaces such as stainless steel and plastic but survived for less than 8-12 hr on cloth ...
[128]
Survival of Influenza A(H1N1) on Materials Found in Households
We conclude that influenza A transmission via fomites is possible but unlikely to occur for long periods after surface contamination (unless re-inoculation ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[129]
[PDF] Risk for Fomite-Mediated Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ... - CDC
However, the virus also persists for up to 28 days on surfaces (1–3), suggesting that surface-mediated (e.g., fomite) transmission might also occur.Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy<|separator|>
[130]
Low Risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 ...
Transmission of infectious SARS-CoV-2 via fomites is possible upon extensive moistening, but it is unlikely to occur in real-life scenarios and from droplet- ...
[131]
SARS Wars: the Fomites Strike Back - ASM Journals
Jun 11, 2021 · Testing for viral RNA on high-touch public surfaces led to a conclusion that “fomites play a minimal role in SARS-CoV-2 community transmission” ...
[132]
Outbreaks of Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases Are Associated ...
Not only the emergence of new diseases, but also epidemics of infectious diseases appear to be linked to deforestation as recently evidenced for malaria ...
[133]
The infectious disease trap of animal agriculture | Science Advances
Nov 2, 2022 · Infectious diseases originating from animals (zoonotic diseases) have emerged following deforestation from agriculture.
[134]
Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and ...
Both extensive and intensive farming practices can influence the likelihood of influenza virus spillover from wild birds to domestic birds and pigs and the ...
[135]
Drivers of Zoonotic Diseases - NCBI - NIH
Human migrations also drive land-use changes that, in turn, drive infectious disease emergence. Habitat Fragmentation. One of the key products of anthropogenic ...
[136]
Factors in the Emergence of Infectious Diseases - CDC
Responsible factors include ecological changes, such as those due to agricultural or economic development or to anomalies in climate; human demographic changes ...
[137]
Human Mobility and the Global Spread of Infectious Diseases
Greater human mobility, largely driven by air travel, is leading to an increase in the frequency and reach of infectious disease epidemics.
[138]
How global travel affects the spread of infectious disease
Feb 26, 2025 · Today, pathogens can reach virtually any corner of the world within 36 hours through air travel. With more than 4.7 billion airline passengers ...
[139]
Wildmeat consumption and zoonotic spillover - ScienceDirect.com
In this Review, we compile existing evidence from available literature on the conditions of spillover associated with wildmeat consumption.Review · Introduction · Towards Targeted Policy...
[140]
An Overview of Anthropogenic Actions as Drivers for Emerging and ...
In this article, we discuss the anthropic actions such as climate changes, urbanization, deforestation, the trafficking and eating of wild animals,
[141]
Antibiotic Use in Agriculture and Its Consequential Resistance in ...
Antibiotic resistance is of great public health concern because the antibiotic-resistant bacteria associated with the animals may be pathogenic to humans.
[142]
Stop using antibiotics in healthy animals to prevent the spread of ...
Nov 7, 2017 · WHO is recommending that farmers and the food industry stop using antibiotics routinely to promote growth and prevent disease in healthy animals.
[143]
Antimicrobial Resistance in Agriculture | mBio - ASM Journals
Apr 19, 2016 · In this article, the current knowledge and knowledge gaps in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in livestock and plants
[144]
Whole-genome Sequencing and the Race Against Antibiotic ... - CDC
Apr 7, 2025 · Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) helps scientists rapidly predict whether bacteria are resistant to antibiotics based on genetic information.
[145]
Genomics for antimicrobial resistance—progress and future directions
Apr 14, 2025 · Pathogen genomics has revolutionized the study of bacterial pathogens and provided deep insights into the mechanisms and dissemination of AMR, ...
[146]
Global antibiotic resistance surveillance report 2025
Oct 13, 2025 · This new WHO report presents a global analysis of antibiotic resistance prevalence and trends, drawing on more than 23 million bacteriologically ...
[147]
Successful Transition to Whole-Genome Sequencing and ... - CDC
Apr 14, 2025 · In 2022, the Arctic Investigations Program transitioned Streptococcus spp. workflows to WGS, enabling more rapid monitoring and prevention of invasive disease.
[148]
Antimicrobial Resistance | Detection with NGS - Illumina
Next-generation sequencing offers high-throughput capabilities to identify genomic changes associated with antimicrobial resistance.
[149]
Detection and Tracking of SARS-CoV-2 Lineages through National ...
May 2, 2025 · Wastewater pathogen genomic surveillance offers a timely, noninvasive, and cost-effective method for detecting pathogen genetic material in ...
[150]
Wastewater Surveillance for Infectious Disease: A Systematic Review
Infectious diseases and pathogens were identified in 100 studies of wastewater surveillance across 38 countries.Abbreviations · METHODS · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
[151]
Development of a wastewater based infectious disease surveillance ...
Oct 19, 2024 · Specifically, this study significantly expanded the sewage surveillance analysis for a total of 47 pathogens, including 15 respiratory viruses, ...
[152]
WHO global genomic surveillance strategy for pathogens with ...
Genomic surveillance is the process of constantly monitoring pathogens and analyzing their genetic similarities and differences. Recognizing the need for global ...
[153]
Pathogen genomic surveillance status among lower resource ...
Sep 24, 2024 · Here we developed a pathogen genomic surveillance assessment framework to assess capacity in low-resource settings in South and Southeast Asia.
[154]
Crowdsourced genomic surveillance for emerging pathogens
Jul 9, 2025 · Crowdsourced genomic surveillance is an important change in the public health strategy of 2025, offering early detection of newly emerging pathogens.
[155]
Pathogen genomics in healthcare: overcoming barriers to proactive ...
Dec 5, 2024 · Pathogen genomic surveillance in healthcare has the potential to enhance patient safety by detecting outbreaks earlier, thereby reducing morbidity and ...
[156]
How AI Can Enhance Early Detection of Emerging Viruses: UNLV ...
Jul 18, 2025 · A new UNLV-led study is moving that dream one step closer to reality by pairing wastewater sample surveillance with artificial intelligence.
[157]
Pathogen genomic surveillance and the AI revolution - ASM Journals
Jan 29, 2025 · We discuss how a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence approach called protein language models (pLMs) can be used for effectively analyzing pathogen genomic ...
[158]
Editorial: Global infectious disease surveillance technologies and ...
These findings validated the potential of maritime wastewater-based surveillance for tracking pathogen transmission across international boundaries, offering an ...
[159]
Artificial intelligence in early warning systems for infectious disease ...
Jun 23, 2025 · Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising tools to enhance crucial early warning systems (EWS) for disease surveillance. This systematic ...
[160]
Advancing pathogen genomics in resource-limited settings - PMC
Genomic sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool to enhance early pathogen detection and characterization with implications for public health and clinical ...