Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mosquito control

Mosquito control encompasses systematic strategies to suppress populations of mosquitoes, which serve as vectors for diseases including malaria, dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and West Nile virus, thereby mitigating human health risks.^[1]^[2] These strategies integrate source reduction by eliminating standing water breeding sites, chemical interventions such as larvicides and adulticides, biological agents like Gambusia fish that prey on larvae, and environmental management to disrupt mosquito life cycles.^[3]^[4] Pioneered in the early 20th century, mosquito control achieved landmark successes with the advent of synthetic insecticides like DDT in the 1940s, which facilitated malaria elimination in the United States by 1951 through drainage, habitat modification, and targeted spraying.^[5]^[6]^[7] DDT's indoor residual spraying proved highly effective in reducing malaria transmission, credited with saving millions of lives globally, though its widespread agricultural use prompted concerns over persistence in ecosystems and non-target effects, culminating in regulatory restrictions in many nations by the 1970s.^[6]^[8]^[9] Contemporary efforts continue to yield progress, as evidenced by China's 2021 WHO certification as malaria-free following decades of vector surveillance, habitat control, and insecticide deployment.^[10]^[11]

Background and Importance

Global Disease Burden

Mosquitoes serve as primary vectors for multiple vector-borne diseases, accounting for the majority of the estimated 700,000 annual deaths from such illnesses worldwide, with malaria, dengue, and yellow fever comprising the heaviest toll.^[12] These pathogens impose a disproportionate burden on tropical and subtropical regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, where underreporting due to limited surveillance in low-resource settings likely underestimates true incidence.^[12] Malaria, transmitted primarily by Anopheles species, resulted in an estimated 263 million cases and 597,000 deaths globally in 2023, with over 95% of fatalities occurring in children under five in Africa.^[13] This represents a stagnation in progress, as case numbers rose by 11 million from 2022 levels despite interventions, exacerbated by factors including insecticide resistance and disrupted health services.^[14] Dengue fever, vectored by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, reached record levels in 2024 with over 14 million reported cases and approximately 10,000 to 12,000 deaths, a more than twofold increase from prior years driven by urbanization, climate variability, and viral serotype dynamics.^[15] ^[16] Severe cases, characterized by hemorrhagic manifestations, disproportionately affect endemic areas in Asia and the Americas, though global surveillance gaps persist.^[15] Yellow fever, also transmitted by Aedes species, causes an estimated 200,000 cases and 30,000 deaths annually, with 90% concentrated in Africa despite available vaccines; case-fatality rates exceed 50% in severe infections lacking supportive care. Outbreaks in the Americas, such as 61 confirmed cases with 30 deaths in 2024 across five countries, highlight ongoing risks from sylvatic cycles spilling into human populations.^[17]

Disease	Primary Vector(s)	Estimated Annual Cases	Estimated Annual Deaths	Predominant Regions
Malaria	Anopheles spp.	263 million (2023)	597,000 (2023)	Sub-Saharan Africa
Dengue	Aedes aegypti, A. albopictus	>14 million (2024)	10,000–12,000 (2024)	Asia, Americas
Yellow Fever	Aedes and Haemagogus spp.	200,000	30,000	Africa, South America

Other mosquito-borne threats, including Zika, chikungunya, and Japanese encephalitis, contribute additional morbidity—such as congenital defects from Zika or neurological sequelae from encephalitis—but their mortality burden remains lower, with millions of cases annually yet deaths numbering in the thousands.^[12] Collectively, these diseases generate billions in economic losses through direct healthcare costs and indirect productivity declines, underscoring the imperative for effective vector control.^[12]

Ecological and Evolutionary Role of Mosquitoes

Mosquitoes occupy multiple trophic levels in ecosystems, functioning primarily as prey for a diverse array of predators. In aquatic habitats, larvae are consumed by fish, amphibians, predatory insects, and other invertebrates, providing a high-protein food source that supports higher trophic levels. Adult mosquitoes serve as prey for birds, bats, dragonflies, spiders, and lizards, with their abundance—over 3,500 species worldwide—making them a numerically significant but not uniquely irreplaceable component of diets.^[18]^[19]^[20] Although often cited for ecological contributions beyond predation, mosquitoes lack evidence of keystone status; experimental and observational data show predators readily shift to alternative insect prey, such as midges or flies, preventing ecosystem collapse in their absence. Larval filter-feeding on detritus, algae, and bacteria aids nutrient cycling and water clarification in temporary wetlands and ponds, while adults obtain sugars from nectar, honeydew, and plant exudates, occasionally transferring pollen among certain flowers like orchids and grasses. However, peer-reviewed assessments confirm mosquito pollination is incidental and minor, with no plant species dependent on them as primary pollinators.^[21]^[22]^[23]^[24] Evolutionarily, mosquitoes (family Culicidae) trace their origins to the Mesozoic era, with the oldest confirmed fossils—two male specimens preserving proboscis structures—dating to approximately 130 million years ago in the Early Cretaceous. Molecular phylogenies estimate crown-group divergence around 197 million years ago in the Early Jurassic, though fossil evidence postdates this. Their adaptive radiation involved key innovations, including aquatic larval respiration via siphons or spiracles, and repeated evolution of blood-feeding in females via elongated proboscides and salivary anticoagulants, enabling high fecundity but also positioning them as pathogen vectors.^[25]^[26]^[27] Recent phylogenomic analyses indicate many disease-transmitting lineages, such as those in Aedes and Anopheles, diversified primarily in the Cenozoic, post-dinosaur extinction, reflecting responses to angiosperm expansion and host availability rather than ancient specialization.^[28] These traits underscore mosquitoes' evolutionary success through opportunistic niche exploitation, with ecological roles emerging as byproducts of life-history strategies rather than engineered dependencies.^[27]

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Efforts

In antiquity, human societies employed rudimentary mechanical barriers and environmental modifications to counter mosquito bites and associated fevers, drawing on empirical links between stagnant waters and illness without knowledge of vector transmission. Mosquito nets or veils, woven from fine materials to exclude biting insects during sleep, appear in historical accounts from classical civilizations; Greek texts reference khōnōps (gnat or mosquito) protections, while similar devices were used in ancient Rome and likely Egypt for elite sleeping arrangements.^[29]^[30] Habitat reduction through drainage represented a primary large-scale strategy, particularly in marshy regions tied to endemic malaria. Roman emperors initiated such projects under the miasma theory, which attributed diseases to "bad air" from swamps but incidentally targeted mosquito breeding sites; Augustus drained the Codetan Marshes near Ravenna around 42 BC, and Nero undertook works on the Pontine Marshes southeast of Rome in AD 62, channeling waters to the sea via canals and embankments.^[31]^[32] These efforts, though partially successful in reclaiming arable land, faced repeated failures due to silting and flooding, with revivals attempted by medieval popes and Renaissance rulers in Italy.^[33] By the 19th century, drainage initiatives intensified in Europe amid industrialization and public health reforms, still framed by miasma but yielding measurable reductions in fever incidence. Napoleon's engineers drained portions of the Pontine Marshes from 1810 to 1812, constructing dikes and pumps, though incomplete execution limited impact; similar projects occurred in Britain's fens and Netherlands polders, eliminating thousands of hectares of standing water.^[32]^[31] Personal protections persisted, including smoke from burning herbs, sulfur, or olive oil mixtures applied to skin in Mediterranean areas, and covering cisterns or wells to prevent larval development—methods observed in urban settings like 19th-century Paris and rural American settlements.^[34]^[30] These interventions, while not eradicative, demonstrated causal efficacy in lowering mosquito densities through source elimination, as later vector studies confirmed.^[35]

DDT Revolution and Malaria Eradication Campaigns

The insecticidal properties of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) were first demonstrated in 1939 by Swiss chemist Paul Hermann Müller, who later received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1948 for this discovery. During World War II, DDT was deployed extensively by Allied forces to combat insect-borne diseases, particularly typhus and malaria, through applications such as dusting clothing and spraying dwellings, which significantly reduced mortality among troops and civilians in affected regions.^[36]^[37]^[38] Following the war, DDT's efficacy in indoor residual spraying (IRS) revolutionized mosquito control by targeting resting adult Anopheles vectors inside homes, interrupting malaria transmission cycles with applications lasting 6-12 months. In the United States, the National Malaria Eradication Program, initiated in 1947, relied primarily on DDT IRS, reducing reported cases from 15,000 in 1947 to 2,000 by 1950, achieving elimination by 1951 with certification by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1970.^[5]^[39] The WHO launched its Global Malaria Eradication Programme in 1955, emphasizing DDT IRS alongside antimalarial drugs like chloroquine, which spurred nationwide campaigns covering millions of households across endemic areas. In Sri Lanka (then Ceylon), DDT spraying from the late 1940s onward dramatically lowered incidence, from approximately 2.8 million cases in the mid-1940s to 29 cases by 1964, demonstrating the intervention's capacity to near-eliminate transmission in tropical settings.^[40]^[41]61609-2/fulltext) By the program's height, malaria had been eradicated from southern Europe, parts of North Africa, the Middle East, and over 30 countries globally, with DDT's persistence and low cost enabling scalable operations that saved millions of lives through empirical reductions in vector density and parasite prevalence.^[42]61609-2/fulltext)

Post-DDT Shifts and Resistance Emergence

Insecticide resistance to DDT in mosquitoes emerged shortly after its widespread deployment for vector control in the 1940s, driven by high-intensity selective pressure from repeated applications in indoor residual spraying (IRS) and agricultural use. The first reports of DDT resistance in Anopheles species, key malaria vectors, appeared in the early 1950s, including in Anopheles sundaicus populations in Java where IRS efficacy declined rapidly, allowing malaria resurgence among infants despite prior suppression.^[43] By 1959, resistant strains were confirmed in Indian mosquito populations, marking a global pattern where metabolic detoxification enzymes and target-site alterations enabled survival at lethal doses.^[44] This resistance, initially localized, proliferated due to gene flow and ongoing exposure, with surveys indicating widespread occurrence in Anopheles gambiae across Africa by the mid-1960s.^[45] The accumulation of DDT resistance contributed significantly to the setbacks in the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Malaria Eradication Programme (GMEP), initiated in 1955 with DDT as the cornerstone of IRS in over 50 countries. By the late 1960s, resistance in vectors like Anopheles stephensi and An. gambiae reduced IRS kill rates from over 90% to below 50% in affected areas, compounded by logistical challenges and incomplete coverage, prompting the WHO to abandon global eradication goals in 1969 and pivot to sustained national control efforts.^[46] In regions where eradication succeeded, such as parts of Europe and North America, low vector density and complementary measures like drainage aided outcomes, but in tropical endemic zones, resistance halted progress, with malaria cases rebounding in areas like Sri Lanka from near-zero in 1963 to over 1 million by 1969.^[41] These developments necessitated strategic shifts away from DDT monotherapy toward diversified integrated vector management (IVM). In the United States, the 1972 EPA ban on DDT for most uses accelerated transitions to short-residual organophosphates like malathion and fenitrothion for adulticiding, alongside expanded larviciding with temephos and habitat modification, reducing reliance on persistent chemicals to mitigate environmental persistence concerns.^[6] Globally, the 1970s saw adoption of carbamates (e.g., propoxur) and, from the mid-1970s, synthetic pyrethroids like permethrin, which offered lower mammalian toxicity and were scaled for IRS and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs); WHO endorsed pyrethroids for ITNs in 1982, leading to their dominance by the 1990s.^[8] However, cross-resistance mechanisms, such as knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations conferring tolerance to both DDT and pyrethroids, began emerging—first noted in An. gambiae in Côte d'Ivoire in 1993—necessitating rotation of chemical classes and integration with non-chemical tools like biological larvicides to delay further resistance.^[47] Despite these adaptations, persistent resistance has elevated operational costs, with IRS efficacy dropping 20-50% in high-resistance zones, underscoring the evolutionary arms race in vector control.^[48]

Monitoring and Surveillance

Traditional Population Assessment

Traditional mosquito population assessment relies on manual sampling techniques developed primarily in the early to mid-20th century to estimate density, species composition, and behavioral patterns of mosquito vectors. These methods, foundational to vector surveillance programs, include larval surveys and adult trapping, which provide direct measures of abundance but are labor-intensive and prone to human error or bias. Larval assessments involve visual inspection and dipping in potential breeding sites, such as water-holding containers or natural habitats, to quantify immature stages and calculate indices like the Breteau index (number of positive containers per 100 houses) or container index, which have been used since the 1940s for Aedes species control.^[49] These indices correlate with adult emergence but underestimate cryptic habitats and require consistent field protocols to ensure reproducibility.^[50] For adult populations, human landing catches (HLC) serve as the historical gold standard, involving trained collectors who expose their legs or arms to attract and manually capture host-seeking females using aspirators or tubes, typically conducted from dusk to dawn in paired indoor-outdoor sites. Employed since at least the 1920s in malaria surveillance, HLC directly measures biting rates and vectorial capacity but poses ethical risks due to potential disease transmission to collectors, necessitating protective measures like prophylaxis.^[51] Light traps, such as the New Jersey light trap introduced in 1932, represent another cornerstone, utilizing ultraviolet light, fans, and collection bags to capture nocturnal species attracted to wavelengths mimicking moonlight, with standardized operation from evening hours to quantify relative abundance.^[52] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap, refined in the 1960s, similarly employs light and suction but often incorporates dry ice for carbon dioxide bait to enhance anthropophilic species capture, though catch efficiency varies by mosquito behavior and environmental factors like moonlight interference.^[53] These techniques enable estimation of population dynamics, such as peak activity periods and parity rates (via dissection for ovarian development), informing targeted interventions like spraying timing. However, limitations include under-sampling of exophilic or crepuscular species in light traps and variability in HLC due to collector attractiveness or fatigue, prompting calibration against multiple methods for accuracy.^[54] Historical data from such assessments, for instance, supported the Global Malaria Eradication Program's (1955–1969) vector density thresholds, where reductions below 1–2 bites per person-night via HLC signaled progress.^[55] Despite their persistence in resource-limited settings, traditional methods yield qualitative rather than absolute density estimates, as trap catches reflect relative rather than true population sizes influenced by meteorological conditions and trap saturation.^[56]

Technological Innovations Including AI

Technological innovations have transformed mosquito surveillance from labor-intensive manual methods to automated, data-driven systems, enabling real-time population tracking, species identification, and predictive modeling. These advancements leverage sensors, artificial intelligence (AI), and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to address limitations in traditional trapping, such as subjectivity in identification and sparse coverage. For instance, AI algorithms trained on large image datasets can classify mosquito species, sex, and physiological states with accuracies exceeding 95%, reducing reliance on scarce entomological expertise.^[57]^[58] AI-enabled tools predominate in automated identification and citizen science integration. The VectorCAM system, a mobile AI application, processes images to distinguish mosquito species, sex, and female feeding status instantaneously, supporting malaria vector surveillance in resource-limited settings. Similarly, the VectorBrain convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture concurrently identifies species, sex, and gonotrophic cycle stage from trap samples, outperforming traditional microscopy in speed and scalability.^[59]^[58] In citizen-driven platforms like Mosquito Alert's AI module (AIMA), smartphone-submitted photos undergo real-time species verification via deep learning, enhancing spatial coverage while filtering user errors through model confidence scores. Predictive models, such as neural networks for Aedes abundance, integrate environmental covariates like temperature and rainfall to forecast outbreaks from local surveillance data, bypassing slower process-based simulations.^[60]^[61] Internet of Things (IoT)-integrated smart traps facilitate continuous, remote monitoring. Devices like MosquIoT employ TinyML on ovitraps to detect and classify eggs or adults via embedded cameras, transmitting data wirelessly for population density mapping without constant human intervention. An IoT trap with computer vision identifies live Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus in real-time using deep learning, enabling targeted responses in urban areas. Commercial systems, such as Moskeet traps, autonomously speciate mosquitoes on-site, aggregating data into dashboards for anomaly detection. These networks scale surveillance across large regions, with AI algorithms processing trap indices to model spatial Aedes dynamics via auto-Markov chains.^[62]^[63]^[64]^[65] UAVs, or drones, augment ground-based efforts by surveying inaccessible habitats. Equipped with multispectral cameras, drones map larval sites and vegetation indices indicative of breeding suitability, achieving precise geospatial data for vector risk assessment. In surveillance applications, they conduct rapid inventories of standing water in rural or sensitive ecosystems, informing larviciding priorities without environmental disturbance. Integration with AI allows post-flight image analysis for automated detection of breeding hotspots, though adoption remains limited by regulatory hurdles and battery constraints.^[66]^[67] Overall, these technologies converge in hybrid platforms, such as the Dragonfly robot, which combines AI vision with mobility for dynamic population mapping, promising scalable, evidence-based surveillance amid rising vector-borne disease pressures.^[68]

Habitat and Source Reduction

Mechanical and Environmental Interventions

Mechanical interventions for mosquito control encompass physical methods to capture, exclude, or eliminate mosquitoes without relying on chemical agents. These include the deployment of traps, such as barrier screens and mass-trapping devices, which mechanically capture adult mosquitoes. For instance, barrier traps have demonstrated reductions in Aedes caspius abundance by 34% to 55% across study sites in coastal environments, targeting nuisance species effectively when placed strategically.^[69] Similarly, mass-trapping strategies, often combining mechanical suction with attractants like carbon dioxide, have been supported by systematic reviews as efficacious in lowering vector populations when integrated with other controls, with field trials showing sustained reductions in mosquito density.^[70] Window and door screens, typically constructed from fine mesh (e.g., 18x16 mesh per inch), serve as exclusion barriers, preventing adult entry into human habitats; their efficacy is enhanced by regular maintenance to seal gaps, as evidenced by integrated pest management guidelines recommending them as a primary non-chemical defense in residential settings.^[71] Fans directed at entry points further disrupt mosquito flight patterns, reducing indoor biting rates by creating air currents that deter host-seeking females.^[72] Environmental interventions focus on habitat modification and source reduction to disrupt mosquito breeding cycles at the larval stage, targeting standing water as the primary causal factor in proliferation. Source reduction involves physical alterations such as draining puddles, filling tire tracks or ditches, and eliminating artificial containers that accumulate rainwater, which collectively diminish oviposition sites and larval survival. A Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled trials found that habitat manipulation, including these techniques, significantly lowers immature mosquito densities compared to no intervention, with effect sizes varying by context but consistently favoring reduction in Aedes and Anopheles species.^[73] In urban settings, waste management campaigns—such as community clean-ups to remove discarded containers—have proven effective; for example, covering or eliminating water-holding waste reduced Aedes aegypti breeding sites by targeting high-risk items like flower pots and buckets.^[74] Vegetation management complements these efforts by thinning dense foliage and trimming shrubs to minimize adult resting harborage, as dense plant cover provides shade and humidity conducive to mosquito persistence; California best management practices report that such landscaping adjustments can decrease harborage by up to 50% in treated areas.^[75] These interventions are most effective when applied prophylactically and integrated into broader surveillance systems, as their success hinges on consistent implementation to counter mosquito adaptability. Empirical data from long-term programs indicate that source reduction yields economical, sustained control, often outperforming reactive measures by preventing population rebounds; for instance, permanent modifications like canal lining or improved drainage infrastructure have historically curtailed breeding in endemic zones.^[76] Challenges include scalability in resource-limited areas and the need for community adherence, but causal analyses confirm that eliminating larval habitats directly interrupts transmission chains, independent of vector resistance issues plaguing chemical methods. Handheld mechanical aspirators offer targeted removal from resting sites, capturing adults without broadcast application, though their use is labor-intensive and best suited for surveillance augmentation rather than standalone control.^[78] Overall, mechanical and environmental approaches prioritize prevention through physical and ecological disruption, aligning with principles of integrated mosquito management that emphasize non-toxic, site-specific tactics.^[72]

Community-Led Initiatives and Case Studies

Community-led initiatives for mosquito habitat and source reduction emphasize resident participation in identifying and eliminating breeding sites, such as standing water in containers, tires, and discarded debris, through education, clean-up campaigns, and behavioral modifications like covering water storage. These efforts aim to foster local ownership and sustainability, often outperforming solely governmental interventions by leveraging community knowledge of micro-environments. Success depends on awareness of mosquito life cycles, targeting high-risk sites, and integrating enforcement with incentives.^[79]^[80] In coastal Kenya, a 2016 study across 10 villages in Kwale County surveyed 444 households and identified 2,452 container habitats, with 55.2% of Aedes aegypti immatures in no-purpose items like tires (producing 28% of immatures despite comprising <1% of containers) and laundry buckets (37.4%). Community practices were limited, with low adoption of source reduction due to prioritization of bed nets for malaria and unawareness of day-biting Aedes; however, covering containers reduced mosquito presence by over 80%, and recommendations included targeted clean-ups and repurposing tires to lower indices (Container Index: 1.9%; Breteau Index: 7.7; House Index: 5.4%).^[79] Singapore's dengue control program, initiated in the 1960s, integrates community engagement with source reduction via house-to-house inspections, public education on eliminating larval habitats, and a "carrot and stick" approach combining voluntary participation with fines for non-compliance. This has sustained low transmission rates, with preventive surveillance and larval elimination credited for interrupting outbreaks; for instance, community campaigns promote routine checks of water-holding items, contributing to epidemiological control over five decades despite urban density.^[81]^[82] In Ghana's coastal areas, community-led environmental initiatives, including clean-up campaigns targeting waste accumulation and stagnant water, have been assessed for vector-borne disease mitigation as of 2023, showing potential reductions in breeding sites through resident-driven waste management and sanitation improvements, though sustained efficacy requires ongoing training and integration with local governance.^[83]

Chemical Control Methods

Larviciding and Adulticiding Practices

Larviciding involves the application of insecticides to aquatic habitats to target mosquito larvae and pupae before they emerge as adults.^[84] Common microbial larvicides include Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti), which produces toxins lethal to mosquito larvae but harmless to most non-target organisms, and has been used effectively for over 30 years.^[84] Other agents encompass insect growth regulators like methoprene and spinosad, as well as bacterial options such as Bacillus sphaericus.^[85] These are deployed as liquids, granules, or sustained-release formulations directly into breeding sites like ponds, ditches, and catch basins, often reducing larval densities by over 98% within 72 hours in field trials.^[86] Larviciding preferentially targets immature stages to prevent adult populations from establishing, with empirical data showing substantial reductions in emerging adults when breeding habitats are treated.^[87] Adulticiding targets flying adult mosquitoes through space sprays or residual applications to interrupt transmission.^[88] Primary adulticides include organophosphates such as naled and malathion, alongside synthetic pyrethroids and natural pyrethrins, applied via ultra-low volume (ULV) fogging, truck-mounted sprayers, or aerial operations.^[88] ULV methods produce fine droplets under 20 micrometers for optimal efficacy, achieving over 90% reduction in adult females and egg-laying in controlled studies.^[89] ^[90] Aerial adulticiding has demonstrated direct reductions in human West Nile virus cases, with evidence of lowered illness and mortality post-intervention.^[91] However, adulticiding provides short-term knockdown without addressing larval sources, necessitating integration with larviciding for sustained control, as combined applications yield greater area-wide reductions in Aedes populations.^[92] Insecticide resistance poses challenges to both practices, prompting recommendations for rotation among chemical classes like temephos, methoprene, and Bti to maintain efficacy.^[85] Microbial larvicides exhibit lower resistance potential compared to synthetic chemicals, supporting their prioritization in integrated programs.^[93] While effective, adulticiding can impact non-target invertebrates, though regulatory assessments deem approved agents safe for public health applications when used as directed.^[94]^[95]

DDT's Empirical Efficacy and Ban Controversies

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), synthesized in 1874 but recognized for insecticidal properties in 1939 by Paul Müller, revolutionized mosquito control during World War II through its efficacy against lice and mosquitoes carrying typhus and malaria. Post-war, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched global malaria eradication campaigns in 1955, heavily relying on indoor residual spraying (IRS) with DDT, which reduced malaria incidence dramatically in many regions by targeting adult Anopheles mosquitoes resting on treated walls. Empirical data from these efforts showed DDT's persistence on surfaces for months, providing prolonged protection and interrupting transmission cycles, with meta-analyses confirming higher effectiveness in high-prevalence areas when applied in multiple rounds.^[96] In the United States, DDT spraying contributed to the elimination of malaria by the early 1950s, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) noting certification of eradication by WHO in 1970, following a decline from over 400,000 cases annually in the 1920s to near zero. Similarly, in Sri Lanka (then Ceylon), malaria cases plummeted from 2.8 million in the late 1940s to just 17 by 1963 after DDT IRS implementation, eliminating deaths and enabling economic development. Comparable successes occurred in Europe, such as Italy and Greece, where DDT curbed epidemics post-WWII, and in parts of Latin America, underscoring DDT's causal role in averting millions of infections through direct mosquito mortality and reduced vector density.^[5]^[97] Environmental concerns escalated in the 1960s, catalyzed by Rachel Carson's 1962 book Silent Spring, which highlighted DDT's persistence, bioaccumulation in food chains, and associations with avian eggshell thinning in species like peregrine falcons, attributing these to endocrine disruption despite concurrent factors like calcium deficiencies. These claims, amplified by emerging evidence of DDT's biomagnification in aquatic ecosystems, prompted regulatory scrutiny, though critics argued the risks were overstated relative to benefits, with the U.S. National Academy of Sciences estimating DDT had prevented over 500 million human deaths from malaria by 1970. In 1972, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned DDT for agricultural use after contentious hearings where the administrative law judge found insufficient evidence of human carcinogenicity or imminent hazard, yet the agency overruled this based on broader ecological precautionary principles, influencing global perceptions despite DDT's targeted IRS application posing minimal direct human exposure.^[98] Human safety debates center on epidemiological data showing no conclusive link between IRS-level exposures and cancer or reproductive harm, with reviews noting weakened associations due to confounding variables like smoking or diet, and acute toxicity profiles indicating low risk—lethal doses exceeding 30 grams for adults. Peer-reviewed assessments affirm DDT's non-genotoxic nature and lack of clear causal ties to adverse outcomes at operational doses, contrasting with laboratory high-dose studies on wildlife, though associations with preterm birth or diabetes in some cohorts remain under investigation without establishing causation.^[99]^[100] The 1972 U.S. ban and subsequent restrictions in other nations correlated with malaria resurgences, notably in Sri Lanka where DDT phase-out in 1964 led to cases exploding to over 2.5 million by 1969 from vector rebound, necessitating reintroduction. Similar patterns emerged in Madagascar and Zambia, where policy-driven DDT avoidance amplified mortality, with estimates suggesting post-ban malaria deaths exceeded any verifiable DDT-attributable environmental harms, highlighting tensions between developed-world ecological priorities and public health in endemic areas—a disparity critiqued as prioritizing non-human species over human lives amid institutional biases favoring restriction.^[101]^[97] Today, DDT remains WHO-recommended for IRS in resistant-free zones, permitted under the 2001 Stockholm Convention for disease vector control, with ongoing use in Africa demonstrating sustained efficacy where alternatives fail, though resistance emergence necessitates rotation—affirming its empirical value when deployed judiciously despite lingering controversies over legacy pollution.^[102]

Modern Alternatives and Resistance Management

Following the phase-out of DDT for most applications, pyrethroids emerged as primary chemical alternatives for mosquito control, particularly in insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), owing to their rapid knockdown effect, low mammalian toxicity, and cost-effectiveness in resistance-susceptible populations.^[8] Pyrethroids such as permethrin and deltamethrin constitute approximately 70-80% of global insecticide use for vector control, applied via space spraying for adult mosquitoes and larviciding formulations.^[103] Organophosphates, including malathion and pirimiphos-methyl, serve as alternatives for adulticiding and IRS, with the latter demonstrating prolonged efficacy in IRS campaigns against malaria vectors in Africa, achieving over 80% mortality in susceptible strains for up to six months.^[104] Carbamates and neonicotinoids contribute smaller shares, around 4.5% and 0.1% respectively, often in targeted larviciding or as synergists.^[103] Insecticide resistance, particularly to pyrethroids, has compromised these alternatives' efficacy worldwide, with metabolic and target-site mechanisms reducing ITN protection by up to 50% in high-resistance areas and elevating malaria transmission risks.^[105]^[106] Cross-resistance between pyrethroids and DDT persists due to shared voltage-gated sodium channel mutations (kdr), while organophosphates retain higher susceptibility in many regions, though emerging resistance threatens their utility.^[107]^[104] Resistance management integrates surveillance via standardized bioassays, such as the WHO tube test or CDC bottle bioassay, to detect shifts in susceptibility thresholds early, enabling proactive adjustments.^[108]^[109] Core strategies encompass rotating chemical classes across seasons or sites to disrupt selection pressures, mosaicking treatments by applying different insecticides in adjacent areas, and deploying mixtures or synergized formulations to overcome metabolic detoxification.^[110] These approaches, embedded within integrated vector management (IVM), have delayed resistance escalation in programs monitoring polygenic traits, though agricultural insecticide runoff exacerbates off-target selection, necessitating regulatory coordination.^[103]^[111] Empirical models simulating dynamic pressures underscore that sequences alone yield inferior outcomes to rotations or mixtures in sustaining long-term control.^[110]

Biological Control Strategies

Natural Predators and Pathogens

Aquatic predators primarily target mosquito larvae in breeding sites. Larvivorous fish such as Gambusia affinis and Gambusia holbrooki have been extensively introduced for biological control, consuming larvae at rates up to hundreds per day under laboratory conditions.^[112] However, field studies demonstrate limited efficacy in natural habitats, as these fish preferentially consume alternative prey like zooplankton and fish larvae when available, failing to suppress mosquito populations significantly.^[113]^[114] Moreover, Gambusia introductions often lead to ecological disruptions, including predation on native amphibians and competition with indigenous species, outweighing mosquito control benefits in many ecosystems.^[115]^[116] Other aquatic predators include macroinvertebrates such as copepods, odonate nymphs, and backswimmers, which exhibit high predation rates on early-instar larvae in controlled settings.^[117] For instance, predatory mosquito larvae of the genus Toxorhynchites specifically consume larvae of container-breeding species like Aedes aegypti, with releases reducing populations by up to 80% in small-scale trials.^[118] Comparative assessments favor native fish species, such as the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), over Gambusia for sustained control in ponds, achieving greater larval reductions without invasive risks.^[119] Aerial predators exert pressure on adult mosquitoes but contribute minimally to population regulation. Dragonflies and damselflies prey on flying adults, with individual dragonflies capturing up to 95% of targeted insects including dozens of mosquitoes daily; however, their overall impact remains insufficient for large-scale control due to low specialization on mosquitoes.^[120] Bats and insectivorous birds, such as purple martins, consume mosquitoes as a minor dietary component—less than 1% in many analyses—rendering bat houses and bird feeders ineffective for meaningful suppression.^[121]^[122] Pathogenic microorganisms offer targeted alternatives, infecting mosquitoes via ingestion or contact. Entomopathogenic fungi, including Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae, penetrate the cuticle or gut, causing mortality within 3-7 days, with field applications reducing adult emergence by 70-90% in treated areas.^[123]^[124] These fungi synergize with insecticides, enhancing susceptibility in resistant strains, as shown in trials where pre-exposure shortened lethal times by over 50%.^[125] Combinations of Beauveria and Metarhizium species yield additive effects against Culex quinquefasciatus, achieving higher kill rates than single agents.^[126] While viruses and nematodes show promise in lab settings, fungal pathogens demonstrate greater field persistence and specificity, minimizing non-target impacts compared to broad-spectrum predators.^[127]

Sterile Insect Technique Applications

The sterile insect technique (SIT) for mosquito control involves mass production of male mosquitoes, sterilization through gamma or X-ray irradiation to induce dominant lethal mutations in sperm, and aerial or ground release of these males into target areas, where they compete with wild males for mates, resulting in non-viable eggs from sterile matings.^[128] This species-specific approach minimizes non-target effects and avoids chemical residues, making it suitable for urban environments where mosquitoes like Aedes aegypti—vectors of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya—thrive.^[129] Unlike broad-spectrum insecticides, SIT disrupts reproduction at the population level, with efficacy depending on release ratios, sterile male competitiveness, and integration with source reduction.^[130] Field applications have targeted Aedes aegypti in dengue-endemic regions, with trials demonstrating population suppression when sterile males achieve sufficient mating success. In Jacobina, Brazil, releases of irradiated males from 2013 onward reduced wild A. aegypti densities by over 95% in treated neighborhoods compared to untreated controls, as measured by trap indices and egg viability assays.^[131] Similarly, in California, Orange County Vector Control District initiated SIT releases in 2021, deploying over 100 million sterile males annually, which correlated with localized reductions in adult mosquito captures exceeding 80% in release zones.^[132] In French Polynesia, a 2023 trial in Tahiti involved breeding and irradiating billions of male Aedes for open release to curb dengue transmission, building on prior small-scale tests showing induced sterility rates above 70% in wild females.^[133] Advanced variants enhance SIT's impact on mosquito vectors. Boosted SIT, which preconditions larvae with actinomycin D to improve post-irradiation competitiveness, achieved 71-100% suppression success rates (defined as >80% trap reduction) in urban trials in Réunion Island and Spain in 2024-2025, outperforming standard radiation-only releases.^[134] Combined with Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility (IIT-SIT), interventions in trial sites yielded 62-91% female population declines over 18 months, with sustained effects requiring at least six months of consistent releases.^[135] One integrated project reported near-eradication of Aedes albopictus on an island, highlighting SIT's potential in isolated settings, though scalability challenges persist due to mass-rearing costs and variable sterile male dispersal.^[131] Despite these successes, standalone SIT often requires ratios of 10:1 sterile-to-wild males for meaningful suppression, limiting standalone use in expansive areas without adjunct methods.^[136]

Wolbachia-Based Methods and Incompatible Insect Technique

Wolbachia pipientis is an obligate intracellular bacterium that naturally infects a wide range of arthropods, including up to 60% of insect species, and has been harnessed for mosquito control due to its ability to manipulate host reproduction and inhibit pathogen transmission.^[137] In Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, which vector dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, specific Wolbachia strains—such as wMel and wAlbB—induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), where matings between infected males and uninfected or incompatibly infected females yield non-viable offspring, while infected females transmit the bacterium maternally to nearly 100% of progeny.^[138] Additionally, Wolbachia reduces mosquito vector competence by limiting viral replication within the insect, with laboratory and field data showing over 90% inhibition of dengue virus transmission in infected populations.^[139] These properties enable two primary strategies: population replacement, which establishes self-sustaining Wolbachia-infected mosquito populations resistant to arboviruses, and suppression techniques like the incompatible insect technique (IIT).^[140] Population replacement involves releasing Wolbachia-infected female mosquitoes to spread the bacterium through maternal inheritance, gradually replacing susceptible wild populations. The World Mosquito Program has deployed this method in over 10 countries, including Australia, Brazil, and Indonesia, with releases starting as early as 2011 in Cairns, Australia, achieving near-complete establishment (>80% infection rates) within 2-3 years via rear-and-release operations.^[141] A 2021 cluster-randomized controlled trial in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, involving 24 subdistricts and over 300,000 residents, demonstrated a 77% reduction in virologically confirmed dengue cases two years post-release compared to untreated areas, with sustained effects through 2020.^[142] Similar quasi-experimental studies in Townsville, Australia, reported a 69% drop in notified dengue cases following deployments from 2011-2014.^[143] Modeling indicates that establishment thresholds require initial infection frequencies above 10-20%, after which CI drives rapid spread, though cooler climates or genetic drift can delay fixation.^[139] The incompatible insect technique (IIT) leverages CI for direct population suppression by mass-releasing Wolbachia-infected males incompatible with local females, causing progressive fertility declines without needing female releases or genetic modification. In field trials, IIT has achieved suppressions of 70-95% in Aedes aegypti populations; for instance, weekly releases of 20,000-50,000 wAlbB-infected males derived from Aedes albopictus into Cairns, Australia, from 2016-2018 reduced egg trap indices by over 90% across treated sites.^[144] A 2022 standalone IIT trial in Changsha, China, targeting Aedes albopictus, suppressed urban populations by 80-90% after 12 weeks of releases at densities of 1,000-5,000 males per hectare, with no dengue emergence reported post-intervention.^[145] In Singapore, a 2024 study combining IIT with sterile insect technique in high-rise estates yielded 95% Ae. aegypti suppression over 18 months, using irradiated Wolbachia-infected males released biweekly.^[135] Optimization models suggest IIT efficacy depends on release ratios exceeding 10:1 (males:wild females) and seasonal adjustments, with costs estimated at $1-2 per house annually in endemic areas.^[146] Unlike replacement, IIT requires ongoing releases to prevent rebound, but it avoids ecological replacement risks by not establishing persistent infections.^[147] Both methods have shown no evidence of adverse environmental impacts in monitored trials, with Wolbachia remaining localized to target species and no vertebrate health risks observed after billions of releases globally.^[148] Challenges include strain-specific compatibility barriers, potential for rare bidirectional CI leakage, and the need for regulatory approvals, but empirical data from over 15 field programs affirm their causality in arbovirus reductions via direct vector control rather than incidental factors.^[149] Integration with other strategies, such as larviciding, enhances durability, as demonstrated in hybrid models predicting 80-100% dengue suppression.^[150]

Genetic and Biotechnological Approaches

Gene Editing and Population Suppression

Gene editing technologies, particularly CRISPR-Cas9, enable the development of synthetic gene drives designed to suppress mosquito populations by propagating heritable modifications that impair reproduction or survival. These drives target essential genes, such as doublesex (dsx), which controls sexual differentiation, biasing inheritance rates beyond the natural 50% Mendelian probability to spread rapidly through populations. In laboratory settings, a CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive disrupting dsx in Anopheles gambiae—the primary malaria vector in Africa—resulted in female sterility and complete population elimination within caged environments after several generations. Similarly, large-cage trials demonstrated suppression of reproductive capacity, with modified alleles reaching fixation and populations collapsing within months.^[151] Population suppression strategies often induce sex-ratio distortion, producing predominantly non-biting males incapable of sustained vector transmission, or incorporate sterility factors that reduce female fecundity. For instance, researchers at the University of California San Diego engineered a CRISPR-based system in Anopheles gambiae that suppresses population growth by disrupting fertility genes, showing modeled efficacy in halting malaria spread.^[152] Modeling studies predict that low-threshold gene drives could eradicate local vector populations if released at sufficient densities, though efficacy depends on factors like migration and resistance evolution.^[153] Unlike self-limiting genetic modifications, such as those from Oxitec's Friendly™ Aedes aegypti strains—which rely on tetracycline-repressible lethal genes for temporary suppression without drive mechanisms—true gene drives offer potential for self-sustaining, area-wide control but raise concerns over uncontrollability.^[154] Initiatives like Target Malaria have advanced gene drive candidates for Anopheles gambiae, focusing on modifications that bias offspring toward males or induce infertility, with contained laboratory releases confirming inheritance bias exceeding 99%.^[155] However, progress toward open-field applications remains limited; no suppression gene drives have been deployed in natural ecosystems as of 2025, due to ecological risks including unintended spread to non-target species and potential for evolutionary resistance.^[156] In August 2025, Burkina Faso suspended Target Malaria's activities following public and governmental scrutiny, halting facilities with modified mosquitoes despite prior ethical approvals and community engagement efforts.^[157] Empirical data from cage trials underscore the technology's potency, yet field validation is absent, with critics noting overreliance on simulations that may underestimate real-world complexities like heterogeneous biting rates and gene flow.^[158]

Key Projects and Field Trials

One prominent project involves Oxitec's genetically modified Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, engineered with a self-limiting lethal gene activated in female offspring, leading to population suppression through mating with wild females. Field trials in Grand Cayman Islands from 2010 demonstrated up to 80% reduction in wild A. aegypti populations over multiple releases.^[159] In Jacobina, Brazil, between 2013 and 2015, sustained releases achieved over 90% suppression in treated areas, with independent monitoring confirming the decline.^[160] A 2019 trial in Indaiatuba, Brazil, using second-generation OX5034 strain, reported up to 96% suppression in urban settings, validated through egg trap monitoring.^[159] These results were corroborated in a 2022 peer-reviewed study showing 95% female suppression persisting post-release.^[161] In the United States, the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District initiated releases in April 2021 following EPA approval for up to 750 million male OX5034 mosquitoes over two years, targeting Zika and dengue vectors, with ongoing monitoring for efficacy and non-target effects.^[162]^[163] Target Malaria, a multinational consortium, has advanced genetic tools for Anopheles gambiae malaria vectors using CRISPR-based gene drives to bias inheritance and suppress populations. While full gene drive releases remain in contained lab and cage trials—such as a 2019 study achieving complete suppression in caged A. gambiae via doublesex targeting—preparatory open releases of non-drive GM mosquitoes occurred in Burkina Faso starting August 2025 to assess logistics and community engagement.^[164]^[165] These trials were halted in September 2025 amid public opposition and a government raid on facilities, disrupting progress toward field gene drive testing despite modeling predicting 71-98% vector reduction when combined with existing interventions.^[157]^[166] Other efforts include Verily's Debug project, which deploys automated systems for mass-rearing and releasing GM or sterile male A. aegypti in California, with the 2017 Fresno trial reducing local populations through incompatible insect technique integration, though primarily leveraging bacterial sterilization over direct gene editing.^[167] Broader field applications of CRISPR gene drives for malaria control remain limited to simulations and contained tests as of 2025, due to ecological containment requirements and regulatory hurdles, with no widespread open releases reported.^[156]^[168] These projects emphasize containment genetics to prevent unintended spread, with efficacy measured via mark-release-recapture and oviposition traps.^[169]

Safety Assessments and Long-Term Effects

Safety assessments for genetic and biotechnological mosquito control methods, including gene drives, sterile insect technique (SIT), and Wolbachia infections, emphasize laboratory evaluations, modeling, and regulatory reviews to identify hazards such as unintended gene spread, non-target effects, and ecological disruptions. For gene drive systems targeting mosquito populations, conceptual risk assessments have identified potential pathways to harm, including altered mating behaviors or impacts on non-target species, but lab studies comparing modified strains to wild types show no evidence of increased fitness advantages or toxicity in vertebrates.^[170] ^[171] Target Malaria's evaluations, including bioinformatics for toxicity and allergenicity, conclude that engineered Anopheles strains pose low risk to human health, with no predicted allergenic proteins from inserted genes.^[172] Oxitec's genetically modified Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, which carry a self-limiting lethal gene, underwent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) review under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, determining them safe for humans and the environment after a two-year assessment, with field trials in multiple countries showing over 90% population suppression without detectable ecological harm.^[173] ^[154] The sterile insect technique (SIT), involving radiation-sterilized males, has demonstrated minimal non-target impacts and no toxic residues in applications against mosquitoes, with theoretical resistance risks rarely observed empirically due to the technique's reliance on overwhelming sterile mating rather than selection pressure.^[128] Wolbachia-based methods, which induce cytoplasmic incompatibility to suppress populations or block pathogen transmission, have been deemed to pose negligible risks to humans and ecosystems through independent analyses, with releases in diverse settings showing stable establishment without adverse effects on biodiversity.^[174] Long-term effects remain under study, with Wolbachia deployments in cities like Niterói, Brazil, achieving sustained dengue incidence reductions over five years post-release, though modeling highlights potential evolutionary adaptations in host-virus-Wolbachia dynamics that could affect persistence, necessitating ongoing monitoring.^[175] ^[176] For gene drives, interdisciplinary reviews stress the need for reversible or threshold-dependent designs to mitigate irreversible spread, as simulations indicate possible ecosystem shifts if suppression alters predator-prey balances, though field data is limited to contained trials.^[177] SIT applications have shown no observed negative environmental consequences over decades of use in other insects, with mosquito-specific trials confirming population declines without rebound or collateral biodiversity loss, supporting its integration into broader control strategies.^[178] Overall, while empirical evidence supports safety in controlled releases, long-term ecological modeling underscores the importance of site-specific surveillance to detect rare events like resistance emergence or gene flow beyond targets.^[179]

Policy, Legal, and Eradication Efforts

Regulatory Frameworks and International Guidelines

The World Health Organization (WHO) established the Global Vector Control Response (GVCR) framework in 2017, spanning 2017–2030, to enhance global efforts against vector-borne diseases including those transmitted by mosquitoes, targeting a 75% reduction in mortality and 60% reduction in disease incidence by 2030 through improved surveillance, innovation, and integrated approaches.^[180] This framework emphasizes core interventions such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) for malaria prevention, while promoting pesticide stewardship to combat insecticide resistance.^[181] WHO's guidelines also include standardized protocols for monitoring insecticide resistance, such as the CDC bottle bioassay updated in 2024, to ensure data-driven decision-making in vector control programs.^[182] Under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, effective since 2004, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) remains permissible for indoor residual spraying against malaria vectors in regions lacking viable alternatives, though its production and use are strictly restricted to disease vector control to minimize environmental persistence and bioaccumulation.^[38] Parties to the convention must report DDT usage annually and prioritize resistance management and alternative insecticides, reflecting a balance between public health imperatives and ecological risks.^[183] The WHO's International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management, updated in recent years, provides overarching principles for safe procurement, application, and disposal of vector control pesticides globally, mandating risk assessments and integrated vector management (IVM) to reduce reliance on chemical interventions.^[55] In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates mosquito control pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), requiring registration, labeling, and efficacy testing for adulticides and larvicides used in public health programs, with determinations that approved products pose minimal risk when applied per guidelines.^[184]^[185] In the European Union, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) coordinates surveillance under Regulation (EC) No 851/2004, while the European Mosquito Control Association (EMCA) issued guidelines in 2024 for urban mosquito management, advocating evidence-based surveillance of invasive species like Aedes albopictus and integrated control to address emerging threats such as dengue and West Nile virus.^[186]^[187] These frameworks collectively prioritize IVM, harmonizing national regulations with international standards to optimize efficacy against mosquito vectors while mitigating resistance and non-target effects.

Proposals for Total Eradication

Fred L. Soper, director of the Rockefeller Foundation's health initiatives, led campaigns in the 1930s to eradicate the invasive Anopheles gambiae mosquito from northeastern Brazil, achieving success through systematic larviciding and environmental modifications that eliminated the species from over 100,000 square kilometers by 1940.^[188] In the 1947–1970s, under the Pan American Health Organization, Soper extended eradication efforts to Aedes aegypti, the primary yellow fever vector, across the Americas using DDT spraying, larvicides like Paris Green, and house inspections; this temporarily succeeded in countries such as Brazil (declared free in 1958) but ultimately failed due to reinfestation from untreated borders and insecticide resistance.^[189] In a 2003 New York Times opinion piece, evolutionary biologist Olivia Judson proposed "specicide"—the deliberate extinction of mosquito species that transmit diseases to humans—targeting approximately 30 species, including Anopheles for malaria and Aedes for dengue and yellow fever, arguing that such action could prevent around one million human deaths annually with minimal ecological disruption given the 3,500+ mosquito species worldwide.^[190] Judson suggested genetic engineering to introduce self-propagating lethal traits, estimating that modified mosquitoes could eradicate a target species like the malaria vector within 10 years of release.^[190] Contemporary proposals leverage gene drive technologies, such as CRISPR-based systems, to suppress or replace vector populations toward eradication; for instance, suppression drives in Anopheles gambiae aim to bias sex ratios toward males or induce sterility, potentially driving local extinctions scalable to regional levels if containment is maintained.^[191] Projects like Target Malaria explore low-threshold gene drives for Anopheles species in sub-Saharan Africa, with modeling indicating feasibility for population crashes exceeding 99% in isolated trials, though global eradication remains unproposed due to migration risks and the need for multi-species targeting.^[156] These approaches prioritize vector species with negligible non-human ecological roles, supported by empirical data showing limited biodiversity impacts from past regional suppressions.^[189]

Integrated Management Programs

Integrated mosquito management (IMM) programs coordinate multiple control strategies to suppress mosquito populations and mitigate disease transmission, drawing on mosquito biology, life cycles, and local ecology to prioritize non-chemical interventions while reserving pesticides for targeted use.^[72] This approach, endorsed by health authorities, aims to reduce reliance on any single tactic, thereby curbing insecticide resistance, minimizing environmental impacts, and optimizing resource allocation.^[3] Surveillance forms the foundation, involving routine trapping of adults, larval sampling, and monitoring of sentinel species like birds or pools for pathogens such as West Nile virus, enabling data-driven decisions on intervention thresholds.^[192] Core tactics include source reduction—eliminating or modifying breeding sites like discarded containers, clogged drains, or unmanaged water bodies—and habitat manipulation, such as introducing larvivorous fish or encouraging natural predators in compatible ecosystems.^[3] Biological controls, including bacterial agents like Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis applied to larval habitats, target mosquitoes selectively without affecting non-target organisms.^[193] Chemical measures, such as larvicides for persistent sites and ultra-low-volume adulticiding during outbreaks, are integrated judiciously, often guided by resistance monitoring to preserve efficacy; for instance, programs rotate active ingredients and apply treatments only when surveillance indicates elevated risk.^[192] Public engagement, through education on personal protection and community cleanups, further amplifies program impact.^[194] The World Health Organization promotes integrated vector management as a rational framework combining interventions for greater efficiency and ecological sustainability, particularly in endemic areas for diseases like dengue and malaria.^[55] In the United States, local districts implementing IMM have reported sustained reductions in mosquito abundance and virus circulation; for example, frameworks like the CDC's Building Resilience Against Climate Effects (BRACE) have supported West Nile virus mitigation by integrating surveillance with proactive controls.^[195] Evaluations indicate IMM outperforms standalone chemical spraying in long-term vector suppression, with lower resistance rates and reduced non-target exposure, though success depends on consistent funding and interagency coordination.^[196] Challenges include adapting to climate-driven shifts in mosquito ranges, necessitating ongoing refinement of surveillance and tactic integration.^[72]

Controversies and Debates

Environmental Trade-Offs vs. Public Health Priorities

Mosquito control methods, particularly insecticide-based interventions, have demonstrably reduced vector-borne disease mortality, with the World Health Organization estimating over 700,000 annual deaths from such diseases, predominantly malaria at approximately 597,000 in 2023.^[12]^[13] Historical use of DDT in indoor residual spraying eradicated malaria from large regions, including the United States by the early 1950s, and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences credited it with saving 500 million lives globally by 1970 through malaria prevention.^[98] These public health gains underscore the causal priority of suppressing mosquito vectors to avert human suffering, as untreated malaria incapacitates millions and disproportionately affects children in sub-Saharan Africa. However, environmental concerns arise from insecticide persistence and non-target effects, such as DDT's bioaccumulation leading to eggshell thinning in raptors like bald eagles, contributing to population declines documented in the 1960s and prompting its 1972 U.S. ban.^[6] Modern pyrethroids and organophosphates used in control can harm aquatic organisms and pollinators via runoff, with studies indicating toxicity to beneficial insects and potential waterway contamination from aerial applications.^[197]^[198] Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti), a biological alternative, shows lower ecological disruption but requires integration to combat resistance, highlighting trade-offs where chemical efficacy must balance against biodiversity risks. Debates intensify in policy arenas, where prioritizing eradication in high-burden areas justifies targeted insecticide use despite ecological costs, as evidenced by the resurgence of malaria post-DDT restrictions in regions like Sri Lanka, where cases spiked from near-zero to millions in the 1960s.^[199] Ethical analyses argue that DDT's human benefits—preventing an estimated 25 million deaths since World War II per WHO assessments—outweigh environmental harms when applied judiciously indoors, critiquing absolute bans influenced by advocacy groups emphasizing unquantified ecosystem services over verifiable mortality data.^[200] Recent innovations, like dual-insecticide nets averting 13 million cases in Africa, sustain health priorities while mitigating resistance, yet underscore the realism that incomplete control perpetuates cycles of disease and economic loss exceeding localized environmental perturbations.^[201] In causal terms, mosquito suppression directly averts human deaths without evidence of irreversible global ecological collapse, favoring integrated programs that adapt to context-specific burdens.

Criticisms of Over-Reliance on Non-Chemical Methods

Non-chemical methods, such as biological agents and genetic interventions, have been promoted as sustainable alternatives to insecticides, yet empirical evidence highlights their limitations in achieving rapid, widespread suppression of mosquito populations, particularly during disease outbreaks. Biological controls like larvivorous fish (e.g., Gambusia spp.) and copepods (e.g., Mesocyclops spp.) target larval stages in confined habitats but fail to address adult dispersal or diverse breeding sites, with field studies showing inconsistent efficacy and ecological disruptions including predation on non-target species such as amphibians.^[202]^[203] For instance, copepods eradicated Aedes aegypti in select Vietnamese sites by 2000 but proved ineffective against Culex or Anopheles species prevalent in malaria-endemic regions.^[202] Microbial agents, including Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (Bti), provide targeted larvicidal action but exhibit variable performance in urban or large-scale applications, with documented resistance in species like Culex quinquefasciatus as early as 1997, reducing long-term viability without complementary measures.^[202] Entomopathogenic fungi, while promising, suffer from slow kill rates, spore instability, and high costs, rendering them impractical for standalone use in high-transmission scenarios. Over-reliance on these can delay outbreak responses, as they lack the immediate knockdown effect of adulticides, contributing to sustained vector density and disease persistence, as observed in arbovirus contexts where non-chemical efforts alone yielded low community-level effectiveness.^[204]^[205] Genetic approaches, including the sterile insect technique (SIT) and Wolbachia-based incompatible insect technique (IIT), demand repeated mass releases and specialized infrastructure, with irradiated SIT males showing reduced mating competitiveness that hampers population suppression over expansive areas. Wolbachia infections, effective against some arboviruses, fail against malaria (Plasmodium-transmitting Anopheles) and are susceptible to environmental factors like temperature, necessitating ongoing interventions rather than self-sustaining control.^[206]^[204] Field trials since 2000 have demonstrated preliminary reductions in Aedes populations but lack robust evidence of epidemiological impact on disease incidence, underscoring scalability barriers in resource-limited settings where chemical methods remain essential for emergencies despite resistance challenges.^[205] These constraints illustrate that exclusive dependence on non-chemical strategies risks vector resurgence, as historical malaria campaigns revealed failures without integrated insecticide use.^[205]

Ethical and Socioeconomic Dimensions

Mosquito control measures, particularly those targeting disease vectors like Anopheles species, raise ethical questions about prioritizing human welfare over species preservation, given that malaria alone caused an estimated 249 million cases and 608,000 deaths globally in 2022.^[207] Proponents argue that eradication of specific mosquito populations is morally justifiable when the species inflicts severe, preventable harm without substantial ecological contributions, as mosquitoes serve primarily as pollinators or prey in redundant food webs where alternative insects suffice.^[208]^[209] This view holds that the low moral status of individual mosquitoes—lacking sentience or intrinsic value comparable to vertebrates—does not preclude interventions like gene drives, which could avert hundreds of thousands of annual deaths while empirical assessments indicate negligible risks to biodiversity.^[209] Critics invoke precautionary principles, citing potential unintended ecosystem disruptions or "playing God" through technologies like CRISPR-based drives, though such objections often overlook causal evidence that only a fraction of mosquito species transmit human pathogens and their removal has not historically collapsed food chains in controlled trials.^[210] Ethical frameworks emphasize inclusive governance, requiring stakeholder consent and transboundary risk evaluation for releases, to mitigate concerns over equity in decision-making for affected communities.^[208] Nonetheless, the disproportionate human suffering from vector-borne diseases provides a compelling moral imperative for suppression, outweighing abstract species rights absent demonstrated net ecological benefits.^[209] Socioeconomically, effective mosquito control yields high returns by alleviating the malaria burden, estimated at a cumulative $497 billion macroeconomic loss in sub-Saharan Africa from 2000 to 2022, equivalent to 1.58% of regional GDP.^[211] Vector interventions such as insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying prove cost-effective, with median annual protection costs ranging from $1.18 to $5.70 per person and disability-adjusted life years averted at approximately $52 per intervention in systematic reviews.^[212]^[213] Achieving 90% malaria reduction by 2030 could add $126 billion annually to Africa's GDP through enhanced productivity, reduced healthcare expenditures, and tourism recovery.^[214] However, implementation disparities exacerbate inequalities, as wealthier districts in regions like Florida allocate more resources to control, leaving lower-income areas with higher mosquito burdens and disease incidence.^[215] In developing contexts, programs must balance upfront costs—such as $1.6 per person annually for spraying in Sudan—with long-term gains, while socioeconomic factors like urban poverty correlate with elevated Aedes populations due to breeding sites in substandard housing.^[216]^[217] Integrated approaches, weighing nuisance reduction against environmental trade-offs, underscore the need for tailored, evidence-based strategies to maximize net socioeconomic value without undue reliance on any single method.^[218]

Recent Advances and Future Prospects

Emerging Technologies Post-2023

Since 2023, advancements in genetic engineering have accelerated mosquito control efforts, particularly through CRISPR-Cas9-based modifications aimed at suppressing populations or rendering vectors incapable of transmitting pathogens like Plasmodium parasites. In July 2025, researchers demonstrated that a single amino acid substitution in the Anopheles mosquito's AGAP007237 gene, engineered via CRISPR, conferred resistance to malaria infection without impairing mosquito fitness, preventing transmission in lab tests.^[219] Similarly, in March 2025, Imperial College London reported gene drive systems that spread anti-parasite traits through Anopheles populations, potentially enabling localized elimination of malaria vectors by biasing inheritance of refractory genes.^[220] These approaches build on self-sustaining gene drives, which override Mendelian inheritance to propagate modifications rapidly, though field deployment remains limited by ecological containment concerns and regulatory hurdles.^[158] Wolbachia symbiont technologies have seen scaled-up implementation post-2023, leveraging bacterial incompatibility or pathogen-blocking effects to reduce Aedes aegypti populations and dengue incidence. In July 2025, Brazil inaugurated the world's largest mosquito biofactory, operated by the World Mosquito Program and Fiocruz, capable of releasing millions of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes weekly across dengue-endemic regions, following trials that achieved up to 77% dengue reduction in treated areas.^[221] The U.S. EPA registered WB1 male Wolbachia strains for commercial Aedes suppression in all states and territories on April 14, 2024, enabling broader releases that induce cytoplasmic incompatibility, crashing wild populations without affecting non-target species.^[173] Singapore's National Environment Agency expanded Project Wolbachia in October 2024 to additional sites, with ongoing trials confirming efficacy in curbing Aedes breeding.^[222] Biopesticides derived from microbial sources have emerged as resistance-breaking alternatives to synthetic insecticides. A December 2024 study in Science Advances detailed Chromobacterium sp. PNG-P64A (Csp_P), a bacterial extract lethal to insecticide-resistant Anopheles at low doses, which also inhibits Plasmodium development and synergizes with pyrethroids, showing 90-100% mortality in field-relevant assays across Africa and Asia.^[223] Early field tests in malaria-endemic villages validated its transmission-blocking potential even at sublethal exposures, positioning it as a complement to bed nets and IRS without the environmental persistence of organochlorines.^[224] These developments prioritize specificity and minimal off-target effects, though scalability and cost remain challenges for widespread adoption.^[225]

Evaluations of Integrated Approaches

Integrated vector management (IVM) approaches, which combine surveillance, source reduction, biological controls, larvicides, and targeted adulticiding, have been rigorously evaluated in multiple field trials and longitudinal studies, demonstrating superior efficacy over standalone methods in reducing mosquito densities and vector-borne disease transmission. A 2025 review of 14 studies on IVM for malaria control reported positive outcomes across all interventions, with six showing statistically significant reductions in malaria incidence and Anopheles mosquito populations compared to single-method controls, attributing success to adaptive, evidence-based decision-making that minimizes unnecessary insecticide use.^[226] Similarly, longitudinal evaluations in Uganda, Ethiopia, and Nigeria from 2015–2023 documented sustained 40–70% declines in malaria cases and vector biting rates following IVM implementation, linked to integrated larviciding, indoor residual spraying, and community-driven habitat management.^[227] For Aedes-transmitted diseases like dengue, IVM evaluations highlight context-specific effectiveness when tailored to local ecology. In Chitwan, Nepal, a 2024–2025 IVM program integrating source reduction, Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) larviciding, and community education reduced Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus larval indices by 65–85% over 12 months, correlating with zero dengue cases in treated villages versus 12 in controls, though sustained monitoring was emphasized to prevent rebound.^[228] A 2021 cluster-randomized trial in southern Switzerland found IVM, combining mechanical removal of breeding sites, public awareness campaigns, and selective insecticides, lowered Aedes albopictus abundance by 50–75% in intervention areas relative to untreated municipalities, with no evidence of resistance development due to reduced chemical reliance.^[229] These results underscore IVM's adaptability, as proactive community engagement in the Nepalese study amplified compliance, yielding cost savings estimated at 30% over chemical-only strategies through decreased adulticide applications.^[228] Despite broad successes, evaluations reveal limitations in scalability and evaluation rigor, particularly in resource-limited settings. A 2023 systematic review of 52 mosquito control studies noted that while IVM reduced populations in 80% of cases, inconsistent surveillance—present in only 40% of trials—hindered long-term impact assessment, with some programs failing due to inadequate baseline data or external factors like climate variability.^[230] In Matatang village, China, a 2023–2024 IVM initiative decreased mosquito density by 60% and improved resident knowledge scores from 45% to 82%, but persistent challenges included uneven participation in rural areas, suggesting that socioeconomic barriers can undermine integration without targeted incentives.^[231] Overall, meta-analyses indicate IVM achieves 20–50% greater disease suppression than isolated interventions, but efficacy hinges on evidence-based thresholds for action and multi-sectoral coordination to address non-compliance and emerging resistance.^[230]^[226]

References

[1]
Mosquito Control in a Community - CDC
Oct 15, 2024 · Why mosquito control is important. Some mosquitoes are harmful and can spread viruses like West Nile, dengue, Zika, and parasites like malaria.
[2]
Mosquito control - Mosquitopia - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
The main objective of mosquito control is to reduce human–mosquito contact. With the loss of effective insecticides for many vector species, ...Vector control: where, when... · The future of control against...
[3]
Success in Mosquito Control: An Integrated Approach | US EPA
Remove Mosquito Habitats; Use Structural Barriers; Control Mosquitoes at the Larval Stage; Control Adult Mosquitoes. 1. Remove Mosquito Habitats. An important ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
Mosquito Control - CDC
Everyone can help control mosquitoes. Learn about the importance of mosquito control, community efforts, and what you can do. Female Aedes albopictus ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[5]
The History of Malaria in the United States - CDC
Oct 26, 2024 · Mosquito breeding sites were reduced by controlling water levels and insecticide applications. Malaria Control in War Areas (MCWA) (1942-1945).Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
[6]
DDT - A Brief History and Status | US EPA
Sep 11, 2025 · DDT was the first of the modern synthetic insecticides, developed in the 1940s. It helped control diseases such as typhus and malaria.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[7]
The Long, Torturous Struggle with Mosquitoes - NIH
Oct 19, 2016 · Field tests in early 1943 confirmed DDT's potency against lice, mosquito larvae, and adult mosquitoes.
[8]
Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to ...
Since the introduction of DDT for mosquito control in 1946, DDT resistance at various levels has been reported from > 50 species of anopheline mosquitoes, ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[9]
WHO Calls for Spraying Controversial DDT to Fight Malaria
The spraying of DDT has led to a sharp reduction in malaria cases in the few countries where it has been used, such as South Africa. Malaria experts say it is ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[10]
From 30 million cases to zero: China is certified malaria-free by WHO
Jun 30, 2021 · The country also made a major effort to reduce mosquito breeding grounds and stepped up the use of insecticide spraying in homes in some areas.
[11]
Global Fight against Malaria: Goals and Achievements 1900–2022
Sep 24, 2024 · This article examines the historical and ongoing efforts to fight malaria, a parasitic disease caused by Plasmodium species and transmitted by Anopheles ...
[12]
Vector-borne diseases - World Health Organization (WHO)
Sep 26, 2024 · It causes an estimated 249 million cases globally, and results in more than 608 000 deaths every year. Most of the deaths occur in children ...
[13]
Malaria - World Health Organization (WHO)
Dec 11, 2024 · The estimated number of malaria deaths stood at 597 000 in 2023 compared to 600 000 in 2022.World malaria report 2024 · Global Malaria Programme · World Malaria Day 2024
[14]
World malaria report 2023 - World Health Organization (WHO)
Nov 30, 2023 · In 2022, the global tally of malaria cases reached 249 million – well above the estimated number of cases before the COVID-19 pandemic, and an ...
[15]
Dengue - Global situation - World Health Organization (WHO)
May 30, 2024 · As of 30 April 2024, over 7.6 million dengue cases have been reported to WHO in 2024, including 3.4 million confirmed cases, over 16 000 severe cases, and over ...
[16]
Annual Review 2024 - World Mosquito Program
2024 was a terrible year for dengue – the worst on record – with more than 10,000 dengue-related deaths worldwide. Driven by climate change, globalisation and ...
[17]
Yellow fever - Region of the Americas
May 16, 2025 · In 2024, 61 human cases of yellow fever were confirmed in the Americas, resulting in 30 fatalities, distributed across five countries.
[18]
The mosquito has its day … from annoying pest to valuable resource
Aug 18, 2023 · There are more than 3,500 species of mosquito worldwide, and they can be an important food source for animals. For example, mosquitoes appear in ...
[19]
Mosquito Science - GLOBE Observer
They are food sources for many species of fish, birds, amphibians and reptiles. Some mosquitoes are pollinators and so they help to make fruits and vegetables.
[20]
Mosquitoes in the Natural Environment
Mosquitos provide an important food source for predators. The complexity of natural habitat provides hiding places, food sources, breeding sites, and hunting ...
[21]
What Would Happen If We Eliminated The World's Mosquitoes?
Sep 13, 2017 · As you noticed, there are no keystone species in mosquitoes. No ecosystem depends on any mosquito to the point that it would collapse if they ...
[22]
Are mosquitoes a keystone species? - Homework.Study.com
Answer and Explanation: Mosquitoes are not a keystone species. This is because there is no ecosystem in which they play such a vital role that the health of ...
[23]
[PDF] Unmasking the diverse ecological roles of mosquitoes (Diptera
Sep 7, 2023 · Mosquito larvae and full-grown adults replenish nutrition for a variety of species, assist in pollination, serve as environmental filters, and ...
[24]
Mosquito pollination of plants: an overview of their role and an ...
Aug 22, 2024 · Mosquitoes visit flowers to obtain sugar or other nutrients and therefore possibly serve as major or minor pollinators of some plant species.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[25]
Report The earliest fossil mosquito - ScienceDirect.com
Dec 4, 2023 · Molecular estimates for the initial split and divergence of the crown-group mosquitoes have recovered an Early Jurassic age (ca. 197.5 million ...
[26]
Oldest mosquito fossil comes with a bloodsucking surprise - Reuters
Dec 5, 2023 · Researchers said they have discovered the oldest-known fossils of mosquitoes - two males entombed in pieces of amber dating to 130 million years ...
[27]
Phylogenomics reveals the history of host use in mosquitoes - PMC
Oct 6, 2023 · This age precedes that of any existing mosquito fossil, the oldest being Priscoculex burmanicus from the Early Upper Cretaceous30.
[28]
Current mosquitoes evolved more recently than previously thought
Oct 10, 2025 · Understanding the evolutionary history of these insects is important for learning how best to control them. Mac Pierce at the University of ...
[29]
Kaya 蚊屋 Mosquito Netting | Vegder's Blog - WordPress.com
May 15, 2009 · In Greece it was a referred to as a khonopeion from the word khōnōps which meant gnat or mosquito. Shipley tells that that is the origin of the ...<|separator|>
[30]
The long arc of mosquito control - Mosquitopia - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Mosquito control evolved from early repellents and habitat reduction to synthetic insecticides like DDT, and now includes genetically modified mosquitoes. ...
[31]
Efforts of Malaria Control
The use of chemicals to control troublesome insects so as to save food crops started by mid 19th century. Paris green was used as an insecticide in 1867 ...
[32]
The Roman fever: observations on the understanding of malaria in ...
Dec 12, 2016 · Throughout history, numerous attempts were made to drain the Pontine Marshes, including by Julius Caesar, various Popes, Napoleon, and Mussolini ...<|separator|>
[33]
6 The Pontine Marshes | Malaria and Rome - Oxford Academic
It was these seasonal, open marshes which were so lethal as a source of malaria, as Palladius understood. The interior of the Pontine forest itself, although ...
[34]
The Evolution of Pest Control - Mosquito Sheriff
Natural Deterrents · Ancient Egypt: The Egyptians used catmint and other herbs to repel pests, and cats themselves played a pivotal role in controlling rodents.
[35]
History of Mosquitoborne Diseases in the United States ... - CDC (.gov)
Efforts to control mosquitoes by draining mosquito larval habitat sites have been undertaken since 1930 by the US government (13). However, such efforts ...
[36]
DDT Regulatory History: A Brief Survey (to 1975) | About EPA
Sep 14, 2016 · The decline in DDT usage was the result of (1) increased insect resistance; (2) the development of more effective alternative pesticides; (3) ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[37]
DDT and Silent Spring: Fifty years after - JMVH
8 This was but the beginning of DDT's march to glory. In August 1943, DDT was first tried against mosquitoes that carried malaria.
[38]
DDT Overview - Stockholm Convention
DDT was first used during the World War II to combat malaria and typhus among civilians and troops. Subsequently it was used as an agricultural and household ...
[39]
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) for Indoor Residual Spraying ...
In 1955, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Malaria Eradication Campaign based on the periodic use of IRS with DDT for 3–5 years to ...
[40]
Rear-view mirror: 7 decades of malaria
Apr 17, 2018 · With the creation of WHO in 1948, and the optimism generated by these new tools, the Global Malaria Eradication Programme was launched in 1955.
[41]
Some Lessons for the Future from the Global Malaria Eradication ...
Jan 25, 2011 · Jose Najera and colleagues identify lessons from the Global Malaria Eradication Programme (1955–1969) relevant to current elimination and eradication efforts.
[42]
World Malaria Day 2014: Lessons from the past - Malaria Consortium
Apr 24, 2014 · The Global Malaria Eradication Programme (GMEP) of the 1950s and 1960s was highly successful in eliminating malaria from several regions of the ...
[43]
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/265749/PMC2538268.pdf
[44]
Impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vector competence - NIH
Jan 17, 2023 · Since its first report in Anopheles mosquitoes in 1950s, insecticide resistance has spread very fast to most sub-Saharan African ...
[45]
Insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae: data from the first year ...
Dec 17, 2009 · Resistance to the organochlorines DDT and the now obsolete dieldrin was first reported in African malaria vectors in the 1950s and 1960s [3, 4].
[46]
[PDF] From malaria control to eradication: The WHO perspective
When the potent tools DDT and chloroquine became available, WHO launched the Global Malaria. Eradication Programme in 1955, which led to a campaign to ...
[47]
After 40 years, the most important weapon against mosquitoes may ...
Oct 13, 2016 · Mass spraying of DDT led mosquitoes to develop resistance. ... First detected in Ivory Coast in 1993, resistance to pyrethroids was ...
[48]
Consequences of insecticide resistance on malaria transmission - NIH
Sep 7, 2017 · We present 5 facts about insecticide resistance in regards to malaria control when the epidemiological and ecological contexts are considered.
[49]
Mosquito Surveillance Software - CDC
May 28, 2024 · Easy-to-use programs for calculating IR estimates from mosquito pool data using methods that do not require the assumption used in the MIR calculation.
[50]
The toolbox for mosquito vector research - Parasites & Vectors
Sep 24, 2025 · We highlight traditional approaches and recent innovations in the study of mosquito biology, ecology, and host–pathogen interactions, ...
[51]
A Review of the Surveillance Techniques for Aedes albopictus - PMC
Human landing catch (HLC) is a traditional gold standard method for adult mosquito surveillance. It is also the most efficient surveillance method for highly ...Bgs Trap · Gravid Aedes Trap · Mosquito Magnet
[52]
The New Jersey Light Trap: An Old Standard for Most Mosquito ...
The New Jersey Light Trap has been used by Mosquito Control Agencies, Rutgers University and the New Jersey Department of Health since 1934.Missing: catches | Show results with:catches
[53]
Centers for Disease Control Light Traps for Monitoring Anopheles ...
All mosquitoes caught by light trap or landing catch were negative for P. falciparum sporozoites. Preliminary analysis showed that CDC light traps tended to ...
[54]
Comparison of four outdoor mosquito trapping methods as potential ...
Jun 12, 2021 · CDC light traps are battery powered with a motorized fan, light bulb and a mosquito collection cup. The trap can be used with CO2 to mimic ...
[55]
Vector control - World Health Organization (WHO)
Proven, cost-effective vector control tools and interventions include long-lasting insecticidal nets, indoor residual spraying, space sprays, larvicides, ...
[56]
Which trap is best? Alternatives to outdoor human landing catches ...
Dec 9, 2022 · We believe there is an over representation in the literature of results indicating that alternative traps are superior to outdoor HLC.
[57]
VectorCAM: The AI Tool Improving Mosquito Detection
VectorCAM, a pocket-sized device, uses machine learning to differentiate species with 95% accuracy, enhancing malaria surveillance efforts.
[58]
Towards transforming malaria vector surveillance using VectorBrain
Oct 10, 2024 · We present a novel CNN-based architecture, VectorBrain, designed for identifying the species, sex, and abdomen status of a mosquito concurrently.
[59]
VectorCam Innovation for Mosquito Surveillance Lauded by Bill Gates
VectorCam is an AI-based software application on a mobile device that instantly identifies mosquitoes by species, sex, and if female, its feeding and ...
[60]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436525000519
[61]
Aedes-AI: Neural network models of mosquito abundance
In this article, we develop artificial neural network models that are significantly faster than MoLS and can produce abundance estimates directly from local ...
[62]
MosquIoT: A System Based on IoT and Machine Learning for ... - arXiv
Jan 29, 2024 · It is based on traditional ovitraps with embedded Internet of Things (IoT) and Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) technologies, which enable the ...
[63]
An IoT-based smart mosquito trap system embedded with real-time ...
This smart trap uses computer vision technology and deep learning networks to identify features of live Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus in real-time.
[64]
Moskeet: Smart Mosquito Surveillance - TrakITNow
Moskeet is the world's first commercially available mosquito trap that can autonomously detect the mosquito species.
[65]
An AI-based gravitrap surveillance for spatial interaction analysis in ...
Aug 6, 2025 · In this study, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for gravitrap index to dynamically map the population densities of Aedes ...Aedes Density Measurement · Auto-Markov Models · An Ai Gravitrap Index
[66]
The use of drones for mosquito surveillance and control
Dec 16, 2022 · Drones can be effective for accurately conducting surveillance, assessing habitat suitability for larval and/or adult mosquitoes and implementing interventions.
[67]
[PDF] unmanned aerial systems (uas) in mosquito and vector control
The most common uses for UAS by mosquito control professionals are to perform larvicide applications in rural areas and survey for standing water in these ...<|separator|>
[68]
AI-Enabled Mosquito Surveillance and Population Mapping Using ...
Jun 29, 2022 · This work presents an AI-enabled mosquito surveillance and population mapping framework using our in-house-developed robot, named 'Dragonfly'.Missing: era | Show results with:era
[69]
Evaluation of a mass trapping strategy to prevent mosquito nuisance ...
Jul 11, 2024 · Barrier traps effectively targeted Ae. caspius, reducing total mosquito abundance in two of the three study sites by 34% and 55%. This study ...Missing: screens | Show results with:screens
[70]
Current evidences of the efficacy of mosquito mass-trapping ...
Mar 6, 2023 · This review supports the efficacy of mass trapping in combination with classical integrated vector control on the reduction in mosquito vector populations.
[71]
IPM Action Plan for Mosquitoes - School Integrated Pest Management
Physical/Mechanical Control Measures. Make sure window and door screens are in good repair; Place fans at doorways if mosquitoes are still entering buildings ...
[72]
Integrated Mosquito Management - CDC
Apr 20, 2024 · IMM uses methods to control mosquitoes based on an understanding of mosquito biology, the mosquito life cycle, and the way mosquitoes spread viruses.
[73]
Mosquito aquatic habitat modification and manipulation ...
Habitat manipulation and modification may reduce the density of immature mosquitoes compared to no intervention.
[74]
Environmental methods for dengue vector control - PubMed Central
Jul 11, 2019 · Specifically, we focus on: (a) container covers with and without insecticides, (b) waste management and clean-up campaigns, and (c) elimination ...
[75]
[PDF] Best Management Practices for Mosquito Control in California
Minimize harborage for adult mosquitoes by maintaining landscape vegetation. (e.g., thinning branches, trimming and pruning ornamental shrubs, and keeping grass ...
[76]
[PDF] 1 PHILOSOPHY OF MOSQUITO CONTROL The underlying ...
Source reduction ranges from the simple overturning of a discarded bucket or disposing of waste tires to complex water level manipulations in marshes. The ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[77]
Mosquito aquatic habitat modification and manipulation ... - PubMed
Nov 11, 2022 · We examined the effectiveness of habitat modification or manipulation (or both), with and without larviciding. This is an update of a review ...
[78]
[PDF] Surveillance and Control of Aedes aegypti andAedes albopictus in ...
Handheld or backpack mechanical aspirators can be used to remove mosquitoes from natural resting harborage or artificial resting structures (e.g., wooden ...<|separator|>
[79]
Source reduction with a purpose: Mosquito ecology and community ...
May 11, 2020 · This research aimed to identify productive Ae. aegypti mosquito breeding habitats in coastal Kenya and to understand household mosquito management behaviors.Missing: modification | Show results with:modification
[80]
Community-based intervention in mosquito control strategy
Commonly applied interventions included community-driven vector population control and community education. Overall, the studies reported improvements in ...
[81]
The example of the Singapore dengue control programme
Aug 27, 2020 · Community engagement programmes encourage source reduction, and house-to-house inspections accompanied by a strong legislative framework ...
[82]
A greener vision for vector control: The example of the Singapore ...
Aug 27, 2020 · Another success factor may be the use of a 'carrot and stick' approach to source reduction with community engagement and behaviour change ...
[83]
(PDF) Assessing the Efficacy of Community-led Environmental ...
Oct 21, 2023 · Examples of such initiatives include the distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets, environmental clean-up campaigns, and the promotion of ...
[84]
Larvicides | Mosquitoes - CDC
May 14, 2024 · Larvicides are a type of insecticide used to control mosquitoes indoors and outdoors. ... Using mineral oils and films are the only effective ...
[85]
[PDF] Insecticides Recommended for Mosquito Control
The recommendations for 2012 include the use of spinosad (Natular®) as a larvicide, the use of etofenprox (Zenivex®), the observational use of synergized ...
[86]
Influence of larval growth and habitat shading on retreatment ...
Jan 10, 2024 · By targeting mosquitoes in their aquatic stages, LSM has the potential to control vectors capable of evading indoor vector control interventions ...
[87]
Controlling Mosquitoes at the Larval Stage | US EPA
Mar 6, 2025 · Larvicide treatment of breeding habitats helps reduce the adult mosquito population in nearby areas. Liquid larvicide products are applied directly to water.
[88]
Adulticides | Mosquitoes - CDC
Aug 13, 2025 · The main types of adulticides available for use in the United States are organophosphates, natural pyrethrins, and synthetic pyrethroids.
[89]
Ultra‐low‐volume space sprays in mosquito control: a critical review
Jan 11, 2012 · Several studies have found that for ULV to be efficacious the optimal droplet size should be less than 20 µm in diameter. Using scanning ...
[90]
Efficacy of ULV and thermal aerosols of deltamethrin for control of ...
Nov 23, 2016 · In contrast, hand-held thermal foggers were highly effective, with more than 90% reduction of both laid eggs and females.<|separator|>
[91]
Efficacy of Aerial Spraying of Mosquito Adulticide in Reducing ...
Our results provide direct evidence that aerial mosquito adulticiding is effective in reducing human illness and potential death from WNV infection.
[92]
Truck‐mounted area‐wide applications of larvicides and adulticides ...
Oct 2, 2018 · Our results indicate that a combination of larviciding and adulticiding can be an effective method for area-wide management of Aedes ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[93]
Long-lasting microbial larvicides for controlling insecticide resistant ...
Nov 26, 2020 · Microbial larvicides so far are the preferred larvicides over chemical adulticides for mosquito control. Microbial larviciding has several ...
[94]
Persistent mosquito fogging can be detrimental to non-target ... - NIH
Oct 1, 2020 · Our Bayesian models unequivocally demonstrate that fogging has detrimental effects on one pollinator order and non-target invertebrate orders.
[95]
[PDF] Larviciding and Adulticiding Fact Sheet - Miami-Dade County
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, aerial spraying using the pesticide naled is a safe, quick and efficient method for mosquito control.
[96]
Reduction of Malaria Prevalence by Indoor Residual Spraying
Jul 1, 2012 · The meta-regression analysis indicates that IRS is more effective with high initial prevalence, multiple rounds of spraying, use of DDT, and in regions
[97]
The Legacy of the DDT Ban - PERC
Jun 1, 2001 · In Sri Lanka, malaria cases fell from 2.8 million and 7,300 deaths per year before DDT spraying, to 17 cases and no deaths (Roberts, Manguin, ...
[98]
Bring Back DDT | Cato Institute
Apr 26, 2016 · The most potent of these is DDT. The US National Academy of Sciences estimated DDT had saved 500 million lives from malaria by 1970.
[99]
DDT and human health - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · This review considers the epidemiological evidence for possible adverse effects of human exposure to DDT. Much of this research is weakened ...
[100]
DDT (PIM 127) - INCHEM
Baselt (1982) states that in general, DDT is relatively safe with an estimated lethal dose of 30 g in an adult. Fats and oils enhance the toxicity of DDT by ...
[101]
[PDF] The Demise of DDT and the Resurgence of Malaria - Hoover Institution
Some developing countries imposed a complete ban on the pesticide, as Sri Lanka did in1964, when officials believed the malaria problem was solved.
[102]
The Pine River Statement: Human Health Consequences of DDT Use
DDT continues to be used for malaria control in several African and Asian countries (Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants 2008). In 2001, more ...
[103]
Recent trends in global insecticide use for disease vector control ...
Dec 13, 2021 · Insecticide operational use was highest for control of malaria, followed by dengue, leishmaniasis and Chagas disease.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[104]
Pyrethroid and DDT Resistance and Organophosphate ... - CDC
Nov 17, 2015 · This study found high resistance to pyrethroid insecticide in all 7 study populations, no resistance to organophosphate, and patchy distribution ...
[105]
The Impact of Pyrethroid Resistance on the Efficacy of Insecticide ...
This meta-analysis found that ITNs are more effective than UTNs regardless of resistance. There appears to be a relationship between resistance and the RD for ...
[106]
The impact of pyrethroid resistance on the efficacy and effectiveness ...
Aug 22, 2016 · Mosquitoes with high levels of pyrethroid resistance reduce the ability of bednets to protect those using them and the wider community, ...
[107]
Pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti - Parasites & Vectors
Oct 14, 2025 · Pyrethroids target and alter the function of voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) in the insect nervous system, leading to paralysis and death.
[108]
Manual for monitoring insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors and ...
Jun 22, 2022 · This document provides guidance on how to assess insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors and is aimed at field entomologists and biologists.
[109]
CDC Bottle Bioassay | Mosquitoes
Jul 25, 2025 · Insecticide resistance can occur in mosquitoes. Conduct testing to prevent or delay resistance.
[110]
Insecticide resistance management strategies for public health ...
The three primary IRM strategies evaluated are sequences, rotations, and mixtures. Illustrative examples for each IRM strategy are given in Figure 3. Sequences: ...
[111]
Fighting Insecticide-Resistant Mosquitoes: How You Can Help
The most effective strategy for controlling mosquitoes and reducing the spread of mosquito-borne diseases is an Integrated Mosquito Management (IMM) program.
[112]
Eastern Mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki, for Control of Mosquito ...
This EDIS publication details the use of eastern mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki, for mosquito control purposes.<|separator|>
[113]
Biological mosquito control is affected by alternative prey - PMC
We investigated prey selectivity patterns of Gambusia affinis (mosquitofish) preying on larvae of the two Indian major carps (Catla catla and Labeo rohita) in ...
[114]
Biological mosquito control is affected by alternative prey
Jul 30, 2015 · The present results suggest that mosquito immatures are not the preferred food of mosquitofish when fish larvae are present in their natural habitats.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[115]
(PDF) Plague Minnow or Mosquito Fish? A Review of the Biology ...
Aug 6, 2025 · indicated that Gambusia are generally ineffective at controlling mosquitoes (Lloyd 1986). More recently, studies with adequate sample sizes and ...
[116]
[PDF] state of michigan department of natural resources
Our review of the scientific, peer- reviewed literature shows that Gambusia have not provided effective mosquito control in any natural setting, despite being ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[117]
Comparative efficacy of natural aquatic predators for... - LWW
Young mosquito instars are preyed upon by many aquatic organisms including fish 5, amphibians 6, copepods 7, odonate young instars 8, water bugs 9 and even ...
[118]
Nature's Solution to Aedes Vectors: Toxorhynchites as a Biocontrol ...
Jun 21, 2024 · This review summarizes the predatory potential of Toxorhynchites mosquitoes as biological control agents for Aedes vectors.
[119]
[PDF] comparative efficacy of the threespine stickleback (gasterosteu s ...
Comparison of the effectiveness of the three-spined stickleback (Gas te rosteus aculeatus) and the mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) for mosquito control.
[120]
Nature's Pest Control: Animals & Insects That Protect Us - Oh Deer
Apr 8, 2025 · Dragonflies have a near 95% hunting success rate, making them one of the most efficient insect predators on the planet.
[121]
American Mosquito Control Association
An efficient way to control mosquitoes is to find and eliminate their larval habitat. Eliminating large larval development sites (source reduction) such as ...
[122]
Biological Control | MRCU - Cayman Islands Government
Because mosquitoes make up only a small portion of their diet, bats are not considered a major predator of mosquitoes.
[123]
Entomopathogenic fungi for mosquito control: A review - PMC
This review presents an update of published data on mosquito-pathogenic fungi and mosquito-pathogen interactions, covering 13 different fungal genera.
[124]
Recent Advancements in Pathogenic Mechanisms, Applications and ...
Jul 13, 2023 · Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) have emerged as highly promising alternative agents to chemical mosquitocides for controlling mosquitoes at all ...
[125]
Entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium... - Wellcome Open Research
Specifically, when fungi were applied earlier than deltamethrin, mosquitoes became more sensitive to insecticide with a minimum Lethal Time to kill at least 50% ...
[126]
Evaluation of synergistic effect of entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria ...
Sep 6, 2024 · These findings suggested that combining the two fungi can be a more effective way in controlling the population of Culex quinquefasciatus.<|separator|>
[127]
Delivery and effectiveness of entomopathogenic fungi for mosquito ...
In this article, we provide an overview on current knowledge about the role of EPFs for mosquito and tick management to assess solutions improving the delivery ...
[128]
Sterile-Insect Methods for Control of Mosquito-Borne Diseases
SIT is a species-specific and environmentally nonpolluting method of insect control that relies on the release of large numbers of sterile insects.
[129]
Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) and Its Applications - PMC - NIH
Jul 13, 2021 · More recently, the SIT has been considered as a tool to suppress mosquito species transmitting major human pathogens, such as the yellow fever ...
[130]
Irradiated Mosquitoes - CDC
May 14, 2024 · SIT is a non-patented pest control method that uses radiation to sterilize male mosquitoes. Male mosquitoes are bred and sterilized using the same radiation ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
[131]
Current status of the sterile insect technique for the suppression of ...
Sep 26, 2024 · This review indicates that a substantial number of projects illustrate the efficacy of SIT in suppressing Aedes populations, with one project even ...
[132]
Sterile Insect Technique (SIT)
Our SIT project utilizes an environmentally safe and biologically sound approach to mosquito control that fights mosquitoes with mosquitoes.Missing: Brazil | Show results with:Brazil<|control11|><|separator|>
[133]
Scientists in Tahiti prepare to release sterilized mosquitoes to ...
May 16, 2023 · The Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) is a form of insect birth-control using irradiation. The process involves breeding and segregating billions ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
[134]
The boosted sterile mosquito technique: a success in urban areas in ...
May 22, 2025 · The success rate (proportion of traps with a suppression rate of more than 80%) was up to 71% in Réunion and 100% in Spain. Compared to the non- ...
[135]
Articles Effectiveness of Wolbachia-mediated sterility coupled with ...
Wolbachia-based IIT-SIT reduced female A aegypti populations by 62% at 3 months, 78.4% at 6 months, and 91.32% at 18 months. At least 6 months of intervention ...<|separator|>
[136]
Incompatible and sterile insect techniques combined eliminate ...
The radiation-based sterile insect technique (SIT) has successfully suppressed field populations of several insect pest species, but its effect on mosquito ...
[137]
A Review: Wolbachia-Based Population Replacement for Mosquito ...
May 22, 2020 · Here, we review the properties of the Wolbachia strategy as an approach to control mosquito populations in comparison with genetically modified control methods.
[138]
Wolbachia-Based Approaches to Controlling Mosquito-Borne Viral ...
Nov 30, 2024 · This review delves into the current applications of Wolbachia in mosquito control ... Review of machine learning techniques for mosquito control ...
[139]
Using Wolbachia for dengue control: insights from modelling - NIH
Wolbachia, introduced into mosquitoes, reduces their ability to transmit dengue by reducing mosquito population density/lifespan and vector competence.
[140]
A comprehensive review of Wolbachia-mediated mechanisms to ...
It makes Wolbachia the best tool to inhibit arboviral transmission (25). Investigating mosquito interactions with microorganisms, particularly with Wolbachia, ...
[141]
Wolbachia Dramatically Reduces Dengue Cases - Peer reviewed ...
Trial results published in The New England Journal of Medicine show 77% reduction in dengue incidence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
[142]
Efficacy of Wolbachia-Infected Mosquito Deployments for the Control ...
Jun 9, 2021 · Reduced dengue incidence following deployments of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a quasi-experimental trial ...
[143]
Effectiveness of Wolbachia-infected mosquito deployments in ...
The authors used controlled interrupted time series analysis to show that Wolbachia deployments were associated with a 69% reduction in dengue cases notified to ...
[144]
Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression across ...
Oct 4, 2021 · Regular releases of Aedes aegypti males infected with a Wolbachia from Aedes albopictus was shown to drive strong population suppression in mosaic populations.
[145]
A standalone incompatible insect technique enables mosquito ...
Dec 27, 2022 · We tested a standalone incompatible insect technique (IIT) to control A. albopictus in the urban area of Changsha, an inland city where dengue recently emerged.
[146]
Wolbachia incompatible insect technique program optimization over ...
Nov 21, 2024 · Wolbachia incompatible insect technique (IIT) programs have been shown in field trials to be highly effective in suppressing populations of ...
[147]
The optimal strategy of incompatible insect technique (IIT) using ...
Jul 21, 2023 · Our study proves that IIT could be a promising method to control mosquito-borne diseases without perfect suppression of vector mosquito population regardless ...
[148]
How Wolbachia bacteria could help us tackle some of the world's ...
Sep 22, 2025 · There have been no reported health risks associated with exposure to it. Wolbachia programs reduce the number of dengue infections by more than ...
[149]
Developing Wolbachia-based disease interventions for an extreme ...
Wolbachia strains can block the transmission of dengue and other arboviruses transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes and are being introduced around the world for ...
[150]
Updates on traditional methods for combating malaria and emerging ...
Apr 23, 2024 · This review explores the incorporation of traditional vector control techniques with emerging Wolbachia-based interventions.
[151]
Gene-drive suppression of mosquito populations in large cages as a ...
Jul 28, 2021 · CRISPR-based gene-drives targeting the gene doublesex in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae effectively suppressed the reproductive capability of mosquito ...
[152]
New Genetic Technology Developed to Halt Malaria-Spreading ...
Jul 5, 2023 · Using CRISPR technology, UC San Diego scientists have engineered a new way to genetically suppress populations of Anopheles gambiae, ...
[153]
Modelling the suppression of a malaria vector using a CRISPR ...
Aug 11, 2020 · A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nat Biotechnol ...
[154]
Our Technology — Oxitec
The self-limiting gene is at the heart of the Oxitec method of pest control and is tuned to work optimally in each target species. When our Friendly™ males are ...
[155]
How gene drive works | Target Malaria
Gene drive works by increasing the likelihood that a modified gene will be inherited by its offspring. Normally, genes have a 50/50 chance of being inherited, ...
[156]
Considerations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for ...
May 22, 2024 · Monitoring needs for gene drive mosquito projects: lessons from vector control field trials and invasive species. Front Genet. 2021;12 ...
[157]
After 'humiliating' raid, Burkina Faso halts 'gene drive' project to fight ...
Sep 3, 2025 · Target Malaria was founded in 2012 with the aim of developing genetically modified mosquitoes to help fight malaria, which kills more than ...
[158]
Gene drives: an alternative approach to malaria control? - Nature
Jul 22, 2024 · Laboratory trials have demonstrated elimination of mosquito populations within 20 weeks and highlight the potential application of RIDL in ...
[159]
Oxitec Successfully Completes First Field Deployment of 2nd ...
Jun 3, 2019 · First field trial achieved up to 96% suppression of target disease-transmitting mosquito populations in dense urban settings in Brazil.
[160]
Field trial of genetically modified mosquitoes gets approval in Florida
Nov 19, 2016 · In field trials in locations including Brazil and Panama, Oxitec mosquitoes have helped cut the mosquito population by up to 90 percent in the ...
[161]
New gene-editing tools may help wipe out mosquito-borne diseases
Jan 26, 2024 · Scientists say gene-editing technology may eradicate a mosquito in the U.S. that spreads dengue and other diseases.Missing: friendly | Show results with:friendly
[162]
Florida — Oxitec
Following an established, decade-long relationship, the Florida Keys Mosquito Control (FKMCD)-Oxitec Mosquito Project began in April 2021, releasing and ...
[163]
750 Million Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes Approved for ...
Aug 19, 2020 · The approval permits the release of 750 million GE mosquitoes over a two-year period in Monroe County, Florida, which may begin in 2021.
[164]
CRISPR technologies for the control and study of malaria ...
Jul 3, 2025 · A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nat Biotechnol ...
[165]
Release of genetically modified mosquitoes: a new step in the ...
Aug 13, 2025 · Target Malaria is a not-for-profit research consortium that aims to develop and share new, cost-effective and sustainable genetic technologies ...Missing: projects | Show results with:projects
[166]
[PDF] New mathematical modelling study demonstrates gene drives could ...
Nov 20, 2024 · The study projects that gene drives could reduce mosquito malaria vector populations by 71% to 98%, leading to significant decreases in ...<|separator|>
[167]
Oxitec and MosquitoMate in the United States: lessons for the future ...
Genetically modified mosquitoes could be released in Florida Keys by spring; In fight against Zika, British company Oxitec must seek approval from FDA for ...
[168]
The potential of gene drives in malaria vector species to control ...
Oct 17, 2024 · Gene drives are a promising means of malaria control with the potential to cause sustained reductions in transmission.
[169]
ENY-2066/IN1326: Genetically Modified Mosquitoes - Ask IFAS
Aug 16, 2021 · In trials conducted in Brazil and the Cayman Islands, the Oxitec technology reduced the local Ae. aegypti mosquito population size by more than ...<|separator|>
[170]
Conceptual risk assessment of mosquito population modification ...
Oct 25, 2023 · A series of workshops held to identify potential hazards specific to mosquito population modification strains carrying gene-drive systems.
[171]
Assessment of the potential for toxicity and allergenicity from our ...
Nov 14, 2023 · Target Malaria is a not-for-profit research consortium that aims to develop and share new, cost-effective and sustainable genetic technologies ...
[172]
Bioinformatic and literature assessment of toxicity and allergenicity ...
Aug 14, 2023 · A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nat Biotechnol ...
[173]
Emerging Mosquito Control Technologies | US EPA
Modified male mosquitoes carry a gene that results in female offspring not surviving. ... Genetically modified male mosquitoes developed by Oxitec ...Missing: friendly | Show results with:friendly<|control11|><|separator|>
[174]
How WMP's Wolbachia method works - World Mosquito Program
Wolbachia is safe for humans and the environment. Independent risk analyses indicate that the release of Wolbachia mosquitoes poses negligible risk to humans ...
[175]
Long-Term Durability and Public Health Impact of City-Wide wMel ...
Our findings show that city-wide Wolbachia coverage in Niterói provided sustained population-level reduction in dengue incidence throughout the five years post- ...
[176]
Evolutionary Ecology of Wolbachia Releases for Disease Control
Long-term disease suppression may be affected by evolutionary changes in the mosquito host, virus, or Wolbachia and by a public commitment to maintain ...
[177]
Gene drives, mosquitoes, and ecosystems: an interdisciplinary ...
Field trials in the Cayman Islands and Brazil with Aedes aegypti RIDL males (Oxitech OX153A GE line) showed that the local mosquito population decreased by 80% ...
[178]
Review of the role of sterile insect technique within biologically ...
Feb 25, 2022 · So far, no negative environmental effects have been observed as a result of the release of sterile insects but the absence of research efforts ...
[179]
Engagement on risk assessment for gene drive mosquitoes by EFSA ...
We reflect on the actions of a risk assessor (the European Food Safety Authority, EFSA) and a gene drive developer (Target Malaria) to understand:
[180]
Global vector control response 2017–2030
Oct 2, 2017 · The Global vector control response 2017–2030 (GVCR) provides a new strategy to strengthen vector control worldwide through increased capacity, improved ...Missing: mosquito | Show results with:mosquito
[181]
Updated WHO guidance for controlling vector-borne diseases ...
Feb 15, 2024 · To prevent malaria, WHO recommends 2 vector control interventions for large-scale use: insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying ( ...
[182]
[PDF] Global Manual for Evaluating Insecticide Resistance Using the CDC ...
Aug 27, 2025 · This manual is an update of the 2011 document entitled, 'Guideline for Evaluating Insecticide Resistance in Vectors. Using the CDC Bottle ...
[183]
Stockholm Convention continues to allow DDT use for disease ...
It recommended that the use of DDT in Indoor Residual Spray should be limited only to the most appropriate situations based on operational feasibility, ...
[184]
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA ... - EPA
Jan 31, 2025 · A structure to limit the control of pests such as rodents or cockroaches; Ground areas or water to control weeds, insects, or mosquitoes; Food ...
[185]
Pesticides Used To Control Adult Mosquitoes | US EPA
Adulticides can be used for public health mosquito control programs without posing risks of concern to the general population or to the environment when ...
[186]
EMCA Guidelines for Mosquito Control in Built-up Areas in Europe
Nov 5, 2024 · These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for effective mosquito surveillance and control in response to the rising threat of mosquito-borne ...
[187]
Organisation of vector surveillance and control in Europe - ECDC
Dec 13, 2021 · This report provides an overview of how vector surveillance and control is organised in European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries.
[188]
A land filled with mosquitoes: Fred L. Soper, the Rockefeller ...
The success of Fred Soper and the Rockefeller Foundation's International Health Division in eradicating the Anopheles gambiae mosquito from Northeast Brazil
[189]
Could we/should we eradicate mosquitoes? - Mosquitopia - NCBI
But could certain “Soperian moments” suggest ways for reimagining some methods of dealing with mosquitoes, short of the utopian dream of complete eradication?
[190]
Opinion | A Bug's Death - The New York Times
Sep 25, 2003 · The proposed extinction technology could eradicate the malaria mosquito, and malaria with it, within 10 years of the time mosquitoes modified to ...
[191]
Control of malaria-transmitting mosquitoes using gene drives
Dec 28, 2020 · Gene drives are selfish genetic elements that can be re-designed to invade a population and they hold tremendous potential for the control of mosquitoes that ...
[192]
What Mosquito Control Programs Do - CDC
Aug 13, 2025 · IMM uses a combination of methods to control mosquitoes based on an understanding of mosquito biology and the mosquito life cycle. IMM uses ...
[193]
Integrated Pest Management
Integrated Pest Management ... In order to accomplish long-range, intelligent, and environmentally sound mosquito control, the management of mosquitoes must use ...
[194]
Hitting Mosquitoes with All Available Tools | Dengue - CDC
May 22, 2025 · This combination, known as integrated mosquito management (IMM), can help slow the spread of dengue and other mosquito-borne viruses.
[195]
[PDF] Evidence on the use of Integrated Mosquito Management to Reduce ...
By using the BRACE framework to address vector borne diseases such as West. Nile Virus, health departments can ensure they are performing mosquito reduction.
[196]
Expanding integrated vector management to promote healthy ...
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) depends upon: (i) monitoring pest populations; (ii) using nonchemical and limited chemical control methods; and (iii) ...
[197]
[PDF] The Health Effects of Pesticides Used for Mosquito Control
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified it as a human carcinogen and it has been shown to cause immune system damage as well as birth ...
[198]
Overkill: Why Backyard Mosquito Sprays Are Bad for the Environment
Aug 4, 2023 · According to the National Wildlife Federation, the most widely used residential mosquito sprays are also highly toxic to native pollinators such ...
[199]
DDT and Malaria Prevention: Addressing the Paradox - PMC - NIH
The pro-DDT viewpoint considers DDT safe to use in IRS when applied correctly and promotes DDT to be used as IRS in malaria control where it is still effective.
[200]
Beyond Silent Spring: An Alternate History of DDT
Feb 14, 2017 · DDT was banned in the United States in 1972, a development largely credited to Carson and the environmental movement she helped inspire.
[201]
New nets prevent 13 million malaria cases in sub-Saharan Africa
Apr 17, 2024 · New nets prevent 13 million malaria cases in sub-Saharan Africa · Compared to standard nets, the introduction of 56 million state-of-the-art ...
[202]
Biological Control of Mosquito Vectors: Past, Present, and Future
Oct 3, 2016 · Biological control of mosquitoes using vertebrates has mostly focused on the role of larvivorous fish that consume the aquatic larval stage of ...
[203]
A review of applications and limitations of using aquatic ...
Jun 12, 2024 · We reviewed the literature on the use of aquatic macroinvertebrate predators for biocontrol of malaria vectors from the An. gambiae sl complex.
[204]
[PDF] Mosquito control methods and their limitations - Semantic Scholar
Jul 13, 2019 · After facing the limitations of genetic methods of controlling mosquitoes, the biological methods are more conveniently in use till date. The ...
[205]
Mosquito control: Success, failure and expectations in the context of ...
Dec 22, 2022 · This chapter reviews control methods for arbovirus vectors by highlighting successes, limits, failures and expectations.<|control11|><|separator|>
[206]
[PDF] The Evolution And Effectiveness Of Sterile Insect Technique For ...
Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) has emerged as an important tool in the control of vector- borne diseases, providing an alternative to traditional chemical ...
[207]
Malaria's Impact Worldwide - CDC
Apr 1, 2024 · Globally, an estimated 249 million malaria cases occurred in 2022, leading to 608,000 malaria deaths in a single year. Malaria is one of the ...Key Points · Overview · Geography<|separator|>
[208]
Study Finds Ethical Justification To Eradicate Certain Harmful Species
Jun 11, 2025 · A team of researchers, including a Texas A&M professor, argues that deliberate full extinction is acceptable, but only rarely.
[209]
Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene ...
Mosquito-borne diseases represent a significant global disease burden; we thus have a significant moral reason to seek to eradicate the vectors of these ...
[210]
The innocent mosquito? - Mosquitopia - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
In any proposal for specicide, as represented by mosquito eradication, one must acknowledge that this involves a complex set of moral trade-offs.The moral landscape · Why mosquitoes matter · Adding context · Self-defence
[211]
Spatiotemporal patterns and climate-induced macroeconomic ...
May 29, 2025 · The cumulative macroeconomic burden of malaria is estimated at USD 497.06 billion from 2000 to 2022, equivalent to 1.58% of SSA's total GDP.
[212]
Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions
The median provider economic cost of protecting 1 person per year ranged from $1.18 to $5.70 with vector control and from $0.53 to $5.97 with chemoprevention.
[213]
Cost-effectiveness of malaria interventions: a systematic review
Here, we conduct a review of studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of several malaria prevention interventions, including vaccines, vector control, ...
[214]
Tackling malaria can boost Africa's GDP by $16bn a year
Jun 20, 2024 · Meeting global targets to reduce malaria by 90% by 2030 will not only save thousands of lives, but also add $126 billion to Africa's GDP.
[215]
How mosquito control could exacerbate public health disparities
Jul 1, 2025 · Special districts established to control mosquitos in parts of Florida claim significantly more funding and expertise than county-run programs.
[216]
Cost effectiveness of malaria vector control activities in Sudan
Mar 15, 2024 · The highest cost per person per year was 1.6 US$ for IRS activity followed by 0.85 US$ for LLINs while the lowest cost per person per year was ...
[217]
Do socioeconomic factors drive Aedes mosquito vectors and ... - NIH
In general, associations between socioeconomic conditions and both Aedes-borne diseases and Aedes mosquitoes are highly variable and often location-specific.
[218]
Environmental and socioeconomic effects of mosquito control in ...
Jul 1, 2020 · Bti has been used in mosquito control programs to reduce nuisance in Europe for decades and is generally considered an environmentally-safe, effective and ...
[219]
A Single Genetic Tweak Stops Mosquitoes from Spreading Malaria
Jul 23, 2025 · Mosquitoes engineered to swap out an amino acid in a key protein were resistant to malaria infection, preventing them from transmitting the disease.
[220]
Gene drive modified mosquitoes offer new tool for malaria ...
Mar 13, 2025 · Genetic technology co-developed at Imperial could help to eliminate malaria by making mosquitos resistant to the parasite that spreads the disease.Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
[221]
Brazil opens the world's largest mosquito biofactory
Jul 23, 2025 · The technology consists of introducing into mosquitoes a bacterium -- called Wolbachia -- that prevents them from transmitting dengue and other ...
[222]
Wolbachia-Aedes Mosquito Suppression Strategy - Singapore - NEA
Oct 3, 2024 · The initial results from the multi-site field study indicate that residents living in these sites are about 75 per cent less likely to be ...
[223]
Chromobacterium biopesticide overcomes insecticide resistance in ...
Dec 4, 2024 · The Csp_P biopesticide effectively kills Anopheles mosquitoes that are resistant to various insecticides, and at a sublethal dose, it restores ...
[224]
Natural 'Biopesticide' Against Malaria Mosquitoes Successful in ...
Dec 4, 2024 · Powder made from dead cells of soil-dwelling bacterial species also kills mosquitoes resistant to chemical pesticides.
[225]
Project : USDA ARS
Research Project: Environmentally-Friendly, Microbial and Plant-Based Agents for Mosquito Control. Location: Crop Bioprotection Research. 2024 Annual Report.
[226]
Integrated vector management for malaria control: a review of ...
Aug 23, 2025 · Integrated strategies consistently demonstrated greater effectiveness than single interventions, with six studies reporting statistically ...
[227]
Integrated vector management for malaria control - PubMed
Aug 23, 2025 · Longitudinal studies from Uganda, Ethiopia and Nigeria showed sustained reductions in malaria cases and vector populations, while large-scale ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
[228]
Effectiveness of Integrated Vector Management for Controlling ...
Jul 21, 2025 · The study evaluated the effectiveness of tailored Integrated Vector Management (IVM) in controlling Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquito ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
[229]
Effectiveness of integrated Aedes albopictus management in ...
Aug 16, 2021 · The results of the survey strongly support the efficacy of the IVM programme implemented in southern Switzerland compared to municipalities without defined ...
[230]
A systematic review of published literature on mosquito control ...
Mar 3, 2023 · Evidence-based action thresholds to initiate or intensify control activities have been identified as essential in reducing mosquito populations ...
[231]
Integrated mosquito control in Matatang village, Northern Zhejiang ...
This study evaluated the effectiveness of mosquito control in Matatang village by assessing mosquito abundance, villagers' knowledge, behaviors, perceptions