Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Amfac

Amfac Inc., originally established as H. Hackfeld & Company in in 1849 by German immigrant Heinrich Hackfeld, began as a trading firm focused on exporting Hawaiian and importing goods, evolving into a major sugar factor that handled significant portions of the islands' . During , due to its German ownership, the U.S. government seized the company in 1918 under the Alien Property Custodian, auctioning it to American investors who renamed it American Factors, Ltd., marking its transition to U.S. control. By the mid-20th century, it had renamed to Amfac Inc. in 1966 and solidified its position as one of Hawaii's "" corporations, which collectively dominated the industry, shipping, banking, and politics in the . At its peak, Amfac controlled vast sugar plantations spanning 60,000 acres, operated retail chains like Liberty House department stores, and diversified into hotels, , and , acquiring over 50 companies since 1967 to expand beyond Hawaii's declining agriculture sector. Notable achievements included pioneering suburban communities such as Mililani in 1968 and Waikele in the , generating substantial revenue from land development while managing water resources critical to the islands. However, the company faced challenges from volatile markets, posting significant losses in the and , and encountered controversies including a 1974 Federal Trade Commission price-fixing accusation that resulted in multimillion-dollar settlements. Amfac's influence waned with the broader collapse of Hawaii's , leading to its 1988 acquisition by for $920 million, subsequent restructuring into Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C. in 1998, and eventual filing in 2002, after which assets like its headquarters were sold. Despite these setbacks, its legacy endures in Hawaii's , from infrastructural contributions during the plantation era to modern shaped by its diversification efforts.

Founding and Early Development

Origins as H. Hackfeld & Co.

H. Hackfeld & Co. was established in , , in late 1849 by Heinrich Hackfeld, a ship captain born in 1821 in , near . Hackfeld arrived on September 26, 1849, aboard his 156-ton Wilhelmine following a 238-day voyage from , accompanied by his wife Marie and her brother Johann Carl Pflueger. Intending initially to trade and resupply, Hackfeld purchased a store on Queen Street from Charles Barstow and opened a general merchandise operation focused on importing and retailing goods such as clothing, stationery, crockery, hardware, and kitchenware to meet demand from the and the North Pacific whaling fleet. The firm's early activities centered on supplying ships with essentials like food, timber from , and sailcloth, capitalizing on Honolulu's role as a provisioning hub for whalers and traders. By 1850, Hackfeld relocated the store to Fort Street, dubbing it "Hale Kilika" () for its imported fabrics, and expanded to wholesale distribution while Hackfeld traveled internationally to source merchandise. Pflueger managed operations during these absences, and the business incorporated agency roles for foreign consulates of , , and by 1855. In , Pflueger formally joined as a partner, renaming the enterprise H. Hackfeld & Co., which marked its transition from to a structured amid growing volumes. The company also began importing machinery and supplies for Hawaii's emerging , laying groundwork for future factoring services, though its primary focus remained and mercantile exchange in the 1850s. By the early 1860s, it had shipped 781 tons of , reflecting initial forays into commodity export tied to plantation needs.

Initial Retail and Factoring Operations

H. Hackfeld & Co. was established in 1849 by German ship captain Heinrich Hackfeld in , , initially operating as a general merchandise store on Queen Street. The firm imported and retailed dry goods such as clothing, stationery, crockery, and kitchenware, primarily serving local residents, plantation laborers, and vessels in the North Pacific whaling trade. By 1852, the company expanded with a retail branch on Fort Street, capitalizing on demand from the and whaling activities by supplying ships and trading whale oil and bone. As Hawaii's emerged in the 1850s, H. Hackfeld & Co. shifted toward mercantile services supporting plantations, importing machinery and supplies while exporting raw . The company became a commissioned for sugar producers, providing essential financing through credit advances to secured against future crop harvests. This factoring model involved advancing operational funds for planting, harvesting, and shipping, with deductions from eventual sales proceeds handled by the firm. By 1863, H. Hackfeld & Co. had shipped 781 tons of sugar, representing approximately 30% of 's total exports that year, underscoring its growing dominance in plantation agency roles. Early clients included Kōloa Plantation on , for which the firm served as commercial agents starting in 1851, managing exports, insurance, and overseas shipping. This integration of retail imports with factoring services positioned the company as a key enabler of agricultural expansion during the Kingdom of era.

Entry into Agriculture and Sugar

Acquisition of Plantations

In the late , H. Hackfeld & Co. transitioned from its primary role as a sugar factor—exporting raw and importing machinery and supplies for Hawaiian plantations—to direct in agricultural operations by acquiring stakes. This shift allowed the firm to secure greater control over production and mitigate risks associated with volatile markets. By the early 1900s, Hackfeld held a majority interest in the Kōloa Sugar Company on , which had been one of the islands' pioneering plantations since 1835. The company also entered partnerships, such as becoming silent partners with limited liability in the Ookala Sugar Plantation Company in 1881. These early acquisitions were facilitated by Hackfeld's established networks among German immigrants and plantation managers, enabling share purchases that aligned with the expanding demand for sugar under the 1875 Reciprocity Treaty, which granted duty-free access to U.S. markets. However, full ownership remained limited, as the firm prioritized factoring commissions over outright control of vast landholdings during the Kingdom era. The 1918 reorganization into American Factors, Ltd., following the seizure of Hackfeld's alien-owned assets during , accelerated plantation ownership. American Factors immediately acquired the prior Hackfeld stakes, including the controlling interest in Kōloa Sugar Company. In , it further consolidated its position by purchasing 3,026 shares to gain control of the Līhuʻe Plantation Company, another major operation spanning thousands of acres. These moves marked a strategic pivot toward integrated production, with American Factors investing in irrigation, milling infrastructure, and labor systems to boost yields amid post-war economic pressures.

Growth During the Kingdom and Republic Eras

H. Hackfeld & Co., established in 1849, initially focused on general merchandise but progressively deepened its involvement in Hawaii's burgeoning sugar sector during the Kingdom era by acting as commercial factors for plantations, importing machinery, supplies, and labor necessities while exporting raw sugar. The firm served as agents for early operations such as Kōloa Sugar Company starting in 1851, handling logistics that supported the transition from small-scale to industrialized production. This role expanded in the 1860s and 1870s as sugar plantations proliferated, with Hackfeld establishing branch offices in New York and San Francisco to streamline exports and imports. The pivotal 1875 Reciprocity Treaty between the Kingdom of Hawaii and the , effective from September 1876, eliminated U.S. tariffs on Hawaiian sugar, catalyzing explosive industry growth—exports to the U.S. surged from under 20 million pounds annually pre-treaty to over 40 million pounds by , drawing heavy capital investment and plantation expansion. H. Hackfeld & Co. capitalized on this boom, amplifying its factoring services for growing plantations like the Oahu Sugar Company (incorporated around 1883), where it managed procurement and sales from inception, thereby scaling its revenue through heightened trade volumes without direct ownership dominance. By the , the firm had solidified as a key player among the precursors to Hawaii's "" mercantile houses, controlling significant agency interests amid industry consolidation. During the short-lived (1893–1898), following the overthrow of the monarchy, H. Hackfeld & Co. sustained its momentum amid political instability and the push toward U.S. , benefiting from sustained sugar demand and infrastructural investments like expanded and systems on client plantations. The period saw no major disruptions to its operations, with the firm's German-rooted networks facilitating continued supply chains until wartime pressures later altered its structure; overall, sugar output rose steadily, underpinning Hackfeld's entrenched position in the economy.

World War I Transition

Anti-German Measures and Name Change to American Factors

In the context of , the government, acting under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, implemented measures against businesses owned by individuals from enemy nations, including . H. Hackfeld & Co., a major sugar factoring and mercantile firm in with significant German ownership and control—stemming from founder Heinrich Hackfeld's Bremen-based family interests—faced heightened scrutiny as escalated following U.S. entry into the war in April 1917. This included broader restrictions on German residents in , such as of prominent figures, asset freezes, and public renaming of German-associated sites, like Hackfeld Street in , amid widespread hysteria over potential . By mid-1918, as Allied victory loomed, the Alien Property Custodian seized H. Hackfeld & Co.'s assets on July 21, classifying the firm as enemy due to its ties to nationals who held majority stock and managerial roles. The confiscation targeted the company's extensive operations, including sugar plantations, factoring services for over 20,000 acres of cane lands, and retail outlets, which had positioned it as Hawaii's largest independent sugar agency outside the emerging "" . American buyers, including principals from rival firms such as and , acquired the assets through a custodian-supervised sale, effectively transferring control to U.S. interests and diluting influence in the islands' . The reorganized entity emerged as American Factors, Ltd., incorporated on July 20, 1918, with the name deliberately chosen to signal alignment with and to capitalize on wartime , distancing the business from its origins amid boycotts of German-linked enterprises. This transition preserved the firm's operational continuity while integrating it into the American-dominated ; initial capitalization stood at $3.5 million, backed by the purchased assets valued at approximately $7 million. Heinrich Hackfeld's heirs contested the and reorganization in U.S. courts, alleging improper and undervaluation, but their claims were ultimately rejected, affirming the legality of the custodian's actions under wartime powers. The move solidified the Big Five's near-monopoly on Hawaii's sugar exports, as American Factors joined their ranks, handling about 15% of the territory's output by the early .

Reorganization Under American Ownership

In 1918, amid heightened following the ' entry into , the federal Alien Property Custodian seized control of H. Hackfeld & Co., a German-owned firm with extensive operations in including sugar factoring, retail, and shipping. The seizure targeted enemy alien properties under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, aiming to neutralize potential wartime risks from German commercial influence in the . Assets valued at approximately $10 million, encompassing warehouses, plantations agency contracts, and retail outlets like the flagship store on Fort Street, were placed under custodianship pending disposal to interests. To facilitate the transfer, a consortium of Hawaii-based American and British businessmen incorporated American Factors, Ltd., on July 20, 1918, specifically to purchase and reorganize the seized operations. Major shareholders included executives from established haole firms such as , Theo. H. Davies & Co., and , which provided capital and expertise to ensure continuity in services while aligning ownership with U.S. nationals. By late July 1918, physical rebranding began, with workers removing "H. Hackfeld & Co." signage from buildings and replacing it with "American Factors," symbolizing the shift to domestic control. The sale proceeded through a federal process, with American Factors acquiring the core business lines—factoring for over a dozen sugar plantations, merchandise distribution, and holdings—for an effective price reflecting the firm's pre-war profitability, though exact terms remained confidential to prioritize operational stability. Under the new ownership, American Factors retained much of Hackfeld's operational structure but introduced American management practices, including diversified board representation to mitigate risks from over-reliance on . Key appointees, such as C.B. Hofgaard as a transitional figure and later figures tied to the buyer , focused on integrating the firm into Hawaii's "" oligopoly, where it competed and collaborated in controlling inter-island commerce. This reorganization preserved economic continuity for Hawaiian agriculture, as American Factors quickly renewed agency contracts with plantations like Kekaha Sugar Company, which had previously relied on Hackfeld for shipping and supplies. By 1919, the entity stabilized, distributing proceeds from the sale to former German shareholders via custodianship while establishing itself as a fully American-controlled successor, free from alien property restrictions.

Interwar Expansion

Dominance as Part of the Big Five

American Factors Ltd. (later Amfac) emerged as a core member of Hawaii's during the interwar years, alongside , , C. Brewer & Co., and Theo. H. Davies & Co., collectively wielding near-total control over the territory's -dominated economy. By 1920, the group managed 94% of Hawaii's sugar crop, coordinating production, factoring services, shipping, and merchandising to minimize competition and stabilize profits through informal price agreements and shared infrastructure like the Matson Navigation Company for exports. American Factors specialized in agency services for multiple plantations, handling advances, supplies, and sales that locked growers into dependency, while its ownership stakes in mills and lands—spanning thousands of acres—reinforced across the islands. This dominance extended beyond sugar into ancillary sectors, insulating the firms from market volatility. In the boom, fueled by U.S. protections and rising demand, American Factors expanded its warehousing and retail operations, benefiting from the Big Five's on inter-island transport via subsidiaries like the Inter-Island Steam Navigation Company, which controlled 90% of domestic shipping tonnage. The oligopoly's structure deterred entrants by controlling key chokepoints, including and banking ties, enabling collective responses to external pressures like the 1920-1921 sugar price crash, where coordinated inventory management preserved revenues. During the 1930s , American Factors and its peers adapted by acquiring distressed assets and pivoting into pineapple processing, capturing roughly half of Hawaii's canning output through joint ventures and land leases. Despite federal scrutiny over antitrust concerns—prompted by the group's 60-70% grip on territorial exports—the Big Five's interlocking directorates and political influence in the Republican-dominated territorial government thwarted reforms, sustaining dividends and employment in core operations. American Factors' role exemplified this resilience, as its diversified factoring portfolio buffered plantation failures, with the firm reporting steady earnings amid broader economic contraction.

Diversification into Shipping and Warehousing

American Factors Limited, as a key member of Hawaii's , extended its influence during the interwar years (1918–1939) by deepening involvement in shipping and warehousing, sectors integral to the islands' import-dependent economy and sugar export trade. The company held equity stakes in Matson Navigation Company, a among four firms that controlled approximately 80% of inter-island and trans-Pacific cargo shipping by the 1920s, facilitating the transport of raw sugar outbound and essential goods inbound. This shipping engagement complemented American Factors' core factoring role, where it acted as agent for multiple plantations, handling for cargoes amid rising volumes—Hawaii's output grew from 700,000 tons in 1919 to over 1 million tons by 1929—while mitigating risks from volatile ocean freight rates. Warehousing operations expanded concurrently, with the firm operating large facilities for storing imported merchandise such as building materials, foodstuffs, and hardware, which supplied up to 90% of retail inventories across the territory through wholesaling dominance. A notable pre-interwar precursor was the 1916 construction of a substantial lumber warehouse in Honolulu by its predecessor H. Hackfeld & Co., later repurposed under American Factors for diversified storage needs, underscoring infrastructural investments that persisted into the 1920s and 1930s amid economic pressures like the Great Depression. These activities reinforced the company's vertical integration, reducing dependency on external carriers and distributors while exploiting Hawaii's geographic isolation for monopolistic pricing power in logistics. By the late 1930s, such diversification buffered sugar market fluctuations, with warehousing alone handling diverse commodities beyond agricultural outputs.

Post-World War II Modernization

Name Change to Amfac and Corporate Restructuring

On April 30, 1966, American Factors, Ltd. officially changed its name to Amfac Inc., shortening the moniker to create a more concise, memorable, and modern corporate identity suitable for an expanding enterprise. This rebranding reflected the company's evolution beyond its origins as a sugar factoring house, aligning with post-World War II economic shifts in Hawaii, including the 1959 statehood that spurred tourism and land development opportunities. The coincided with broader corporate aimed at modernization and diversification away from volatile agricultural dependencies, particularly plantations that had dominated the firm's operations since the early . In the , Amfac had begun upgrading hotel properties and liquidating undeveloped land to capitalize on jet-age growth, generating capital for reinvestment. By , under newly appointed Henry A. Walker Jr., the company initiated aggressive reorganization directives to geographically diversify, enlarge operations, and diminish 's proportional revenue share, which had exposed vulnerabilities to market fluctuations and labor unrest. This restructuring accelerated in the late 1960s, with Amfac acquiring key assets to build a structure, including the Fred Harvey and chain in 1968, the Island Holiday resorts group, and the retail chain for $31 million in 1969. These moves, overseen by , quadrupled revenues to $578 million by 1972 and positioned Amfac for projected billion-dollar sales, transforming it from a Hawaii-centric into a national player in hospitality, retail, and . However, early diversification efforts, such as the later sale of underperforming units like in the 1970s, underscored the challenges of rapid expansion amid varying sector profitability.

Initial Moves into Tourism and Hotels

In the post-World War II era, American Factors Limited, seeking to diversify beyond declining sugar and pineapple operations, leveraged its extensive land holdings to enter the burgeoning tourism sector. By the late 1950s, Hawaii's tourism industry was expanding rapidly following statehood in 1959 and the advent of jet travel, prompting the company to repurpose agricultural lands for resort development. In 1959, American Factors initiated master planning for Kāʻanapali Beach Resort on approximately 1,800 acres of former pineapple fields in West Maui, marking its first major foray into structured tourism infrastructure. The Kāʻanapali project opened in 1962 as Hawaii's inaugural master-planned resort community, featuring a mile-long beachfront, courses, and integrated and developments designed to attract mainland visitors. American Factors constructed Lahaina as the resort's anchor property that year, with 194 rooms emphasizing Polynesian-themed architecture and amenities like pools and gardens to capitalize on the islands' appeal. This initiative not only generated revenue through land sales and leases but also positioned as a pioneer in transforming plantation-era assets into hospitality venues, with subsequent phases adding properties like the Sheraton in 1963. Building on Kāʻanapali's success, American Factors—rebranded as Amfac Inc. in 1966—accelerated its hospitality expansion through acquisitions. In 1968, Amfac purchased the , a historic chain with hotels, restaurants, and food services primarily on the U.S. mainland but extending Amfac's operational expertise into national-scale . Shortly thereafter, in 1969, it acquired the Island Holidays group, incorporating prominent Hawaiian properties such as the on , thereby consolidating control over a portfolio of beachfront hotels and enhancing its dominance in the local visitor industry. These moves reflected a calculated shift toward as a stable revenue stream amid agricultural volatility.

Mainland and Diversified Growth (1960s–1980s)

California and Continental U.S. Ventures

In the late , under the leadership of Henry A. Walker Jr., Amfac pursued aggressive diversification beyond Hawaii to mitigate reliance on sugar plantations, acquiring 42 companies over four years through securities and cash transactions that extended operations to the . This included the purchase of the hotel chain, known for its historic Harvey House restaurants and lodgings along U.S. rail lines, expanding Amfac's hospitality footprint into the market. Retail expansion featured prominently, with Amfac acquiring the chain in 1969 for $31 million, a high-end retailer that bolstered its presence in and other states. Concurrently, the Liberty House brand, originally a operator, entered the mainland via the 1969 acquisition of Rhodes Western stores, leading to new outlets such as a multi-level store at Stockton and O'Farrell in opened in 1970 and another in San Jose by 1971. By 1972, these efforts contributed to Amfac operating 90 locations across the U.S. Wholesale distribution grew through Amfac Distribution Corp., which extended networks for electrical, medical, industrial, and agricultural supplies into continental markets, complementing retail operations. In , the 1971 acquisition of Lamb-Weston, a major producer of frozen and based in the , added significant mainland capacity, later supplemented by Monterey Mushrooms for specialized production. Financial services marked a targeted entry, with Amfac's Financial Development Corporation acquiring interests in the state's savings and loan sector by 1971 to leverage and lending opportunities. These ventures collectively diversified revenue streams, with mainland and forming core pillars alongside and agribusiness processing.

Challenges in Non-Hawaiian Operations

Amfac's expansion into mainland operations during the and encompassed sectors such as , retailing, , hotels, and wholesale distribution, aiming to reduce dependence on Hawaiian production. These ventures, led by CEO Henry A. Walker Jr. over approximately 15 years starting around 1968, transformed the company into a conglomerate with roughly 80% of its businesses outside by the early 1980s, including activities on the , in , and . Despite achieving net earnings of $44.2 million in 1981, non-Hawaiian operations yielded unpredictable profits, exacerbated by heavy reliance on non-recurring gains from asset sales, such as land and hotel dispositions primarily at Kaanapali Resort in , which obscured weaker core performance in diversified mainland segments. The early 1980s recession severely impacted these areas, leading to profit erosion and highlighting vulnerabilities in the conglomerate structure. Strategic challenges included unclear corporate direction, with observers describing Amfac as "groping around" amid overextension into disparate industries, contributing to investor skepticism evidenced by the company's stock trading at $26 per share—below its $33 , despite analysts estimating realizable exceeding $100 per share. These issues prompted a leadership change in April 1983, with Myron Du Bain replacing as CEO, alongside the relocation of administrative headquarters from to , signaling a shift toward mainland-focused but underscoring operational disconnects from the company's origins.

Acquisition and Hawaii Refocus (1980s–2000s)

JMB Realty Buyout

In May 1988, Amfac management proposed a leveraged buyout at $41 per share, valued at approximately $800 million, prompting the board to solicit competing bids from eight potential acquirers. On July 26, 1988, Amfac's board approved an offer from Chicago-based Corp., a major firm, selecting it over alternatives due to its higher valuation and strategic fit with Amfac's extensive Hawaiian landholdings. The agreement stipulated a purchase of all outstanding Amfac shares at $49 each, totaling $920 million, reflecting a premium over the initial management bid and Amfac's recent trading prices. Amfac, then headquartered in with primary operations in —including sugar plantations, resorts, and —represented a key diversification for JMB beyond mainland U.S. properties, leveraging Amfac's status as Hawaii's largest private landowner. Shareholders ratified the transaction on November 19, 1988, with the deal closing three days later on November 22, after which Amfac became a of . The acquisition aligned with JMB's aggressive expansion strategy in the late , following purchases like Canada's for $3.8 billion, though it exposed the combined entity to Hawaii's maturing agricultural and tourism sectors amid rising operational costs.

Bankruptcy Proceedings and Asset Sales

Amfac Hawaii LLC and certain subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois on February 27, 2002, at the direction of its parent company, JMB Realty Corp., which had acquired Amfac in 1988 for nearly $1 billion. The filing stemmed from persistent liquidity constraints, including unmanageable debt service obligations exacerbated by approximately $120 million in cumulative losses from agricultural operations since 1989, attributed to depressed commodity prices for sugar and pineapple, elevated local production costs, and structural challenges in Hawaii's plantation economy. At the time, Amfac employed about 135 workers, a sharp decline from nearly 1,000 in 1996, reflecting prior divestitures of retail and other non-core units like the Liberty House department store chain. The reorganization plan, developed in coordination with secured creditors, centered on exiting unprofitable agriculture—such as shutting down the power plant later in 2002—and pivoting to as the primary value driver, particularly on 's Kaanapali properties. An amended disclosure statement outlined creditor treatment, emphasizing asset maximization through phased land sales and development rather than outright , with no immediate reductions beyond operational wind-downs. The plan aimed for a debt-free emergence, converting into stakes for creditors like Northbrook Corporation (a JMB affiliate), while junior claimants such as City of (C.O.L.A.) bondholders risked minimal recovery absent reorganization. Confirmation orders were issued on July 29 and October 30, 2002, with the plan becoming effective on November 13, 2002, resulting in Amfac Hawaii's rebranding as Kaanapali Land LLC, focused on approximately 5,000 acres of developable land. Asset dispositions during and preceding the proceedings involved selective sales to shed non-strategic holdings and fund creditor repayments, including the prior transfer of 18,000 acres on to Time Warner chairman for $25 million. The parks and resorts division, encompassing concessions, was retained by JMB and restructured as Xanterra Parks & Resorts, decoupled from Hawaii operations. Post-emergence, Kaanapali Land pursued incremental land monetization, such as developing and selling lots in the Kaanapali Coffee Farms project starting in 2008, though broader divestitures had already reduced the portfolio significantly by 2001. These steps preserved core value amid 's shifting economy, where agriculture's decline necessitated a refocus on tourism-adjacent development.

Core Business Operations

Land Development and Real Estate

Amfac held extensive land assets in Hawaii, peaking at approximately 60,000 acres during its operational height, which supported diversification into development following the decline of agricultural operations. By the late 1980s, after acquisition by JMB Realty, the company's Hawaiian subsidiary managed around 43,000 acres across Oahu, Maui, Kauai, and the Big Island, primarily earmarked for residential, commercial, and resort projects rather than continued farming. This refocus aligned with post-statehood tourism growth, where Amfac began selling undeveloped parcels for profit as early as 1959 while initiating structured developments. A prominent example was the Waikele master-planned community on , developed on former sugar plantation lands above Waipahu starting in the and substantially completed by the early 1990s. The project encompassed 2,700 residential units, including single-family homes and , alongside a retail commercial center—Hawaii's first outlet mall—and the 18-hole , generating over $275 million in revenue by 1994. Amfac Property Development Corp. led rezoning and infrastructure efforts, transforming vacant agricultural tracts mauka of into a mixed-use area that revitalized the surrounding plantation town with new housing, schools, and economic hubs. On Maui, Amfac pursued similar ventures in the , including a 280-unit and a 1,700-unit affordable-housing initiative targeted at state residents, leveraging owned lands for low- to moderate-income units. The company also managed additional 18-hole courses, such as those in Kaanapali, integrating recreational amenities into broader plans. Earlier, Amfac redeveloped its headquarters into the Amfac Center between 1968 and 1971, constructing marble-faced skyscrapers for commercial use on parcels. These efforts positioned Amfac as a key developer of , , and residential properties, with ongoing projects like Kaanapali 2020 marking its final major Hawaiian initiative before restructuring.

Agricultural and Resort Holdings

Amfac's agricultural operations in Hawaii primarily revolved around sugar cane production, managed through subsidiaries including Kekaha Sugar Company on Kauai, Oahu Sugar Company on Oahu (encompassing 10,500 acres before its closure in 1995), Pioneer Mill Company on Maui, and Puna Sugar Company on the Big Island. The company controlled approximately 43,000 acres of land across Oahu, Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii Island, supporting extensive irrigation needs with rights to 300 million gallons of water per day. As Hawaii's largest sugar producer by the early 1980s, Amfac's plantations contributed significantly to the state's agricultural output, though operations faced pressures from rising costs and market shifts, leading to closures like Oahu Sugar's in the mid-1990s. In addition to sugar, Amfac diversified into other crops, including coffee production via Kaanapali Estate Coffee on Maui. These holdings underpinned the company's role in Hawaii's plantation economy, with land assets later repurposed amid declining sugar viability. Amfac's resort holdings expanded through acquisitions and development, beginning with the 1968 purchase of the Fred Harvey hotel chain and the Island Holiday group, bolstering its presence in Hawaii's burgeoning tourism sector. Key properties included the Kaanapali Beach Resort on Maui, spanning 1,300 acres and featuring golf courses, as well as the Royal Lahaina Resort in the same area, where Amfac developed employee housing alongside tourism facilities. The company also opened the Keauhou Beach Hotel in 1970 on Hawaii Island, marking the first hotel in the Keauhou complex. Under Amfac Resorts, Inc., the portfolio grew to encompass 17 hotels totaling around 8,000 rooms by the late , including operations in premier destinations like Kaanapali and Poipu. Additional amenities such as the Kaanapali and Waikele courses supported resort activities, with developments like a planned 280-unit on reflecting ongoing expansion into leisure properties. These holdings positioned Amfac as a pivotal player in Hawaii's shift from to tourism-driven .

Economic and Social Impact

Contributions to Hawaiian Infrastructure and Employment

Amfac's subsidiaries, including Oahu Sugar Company, developed critical irrigation infrastructure on by drilling wells and constructing ditches to transport from mountainous sources to plantation fields, enabling the expansion of cultivation from the late onward. Through its Waiahole Irrigation Company subsidiary, Amfac managed the Waiahole Ditch system, which channeled across Oahu's Ko'olau Mountains to support leeward agricultural lands, exemplifying the engineering feats required for large-scale sugar production. These systems, integral to Amfac's water division, controlled rights to over 100 million gallons of daily by 1997, sustaining -dependent agriculture amid Hawaii's variable rainfall. In transportation , Amfac plantations employed narrow-gauge railroads, such as those operated by Oahu Sugar Company, to haul harvested cane efficiently from fields to mills and ports, reducing reliance on animal-drawn carts and facilitating export growth in the early . Later diversification into saw Amfac contribute to and ; for instance, the early 1990s Waikele master-planned community on included residential units, retail centers, and water systems, generating infrastructure investments tied to over $275 million in revenues by 1994. Amfac's operations provided substantial employment in Hawaii's and related sectors, with the company's broader workforce reaching 22,550 employees by the late , a significant portion in island-based , , and processing activities. Its Hawaii-focused employed 2,500 workers in 1997 across , , and , reflecting a shift from field labor to diversified roles. Historically, Amfac plantations hired thousands of immigrant laborers—, , , and —for cane cutting, mill operations, and maintenance, supporting Hawaii's multicultural workforce during the plantation era from the 1870s to mid-1900s.

Role in Statehood-Era Development

Following Hawaii's statehood on August 21, , Amfac accelerated the islands' economic pivot from plantation agriculture toward and urban expansion, capitalizing on its vast landholdings—spanning over 43,000 acres across multiple islands—to fund diversification efforts. The simultaneous introduction of long-range passenger jetliners enhanced mainland accessibility, spurring a surge that Amfac addressed by upgrading properties and divesting undeveloped parcels for , thereby injecting capital into non-agricultural ventures amid declining sugar profitability. Amfac's most transformative statehood-era project was the Kāʻanapali Beach on , launched in 1962 on former pineapple fields. As Hawaii's inaugural master-planned , it encompassed a one-mile beachfront with luxury hotels, two 18-hole golf courses, residential units, and commercial spaces, establishing a blueprint for tourism-driven growth that supplanted agricultural reliance in West and generated sustained economic activity through visitor . This initiative not only pioneered coordinated but also stimulated ancillary , including and transportation upgrades to accommodate rising guest volumes. In parallel, Amfac advanced urban infrastructure via the Amfac Center in , constructed in two phases from 1968 to 1971. The complex featured twin 20-story marble-clad towers—the Amfac Tower (1968) and Hawaii Tower (1971)—erected after demolishing the firm's 1902 headquarters, thereby modernizing the city's waterfront skyline and providing expanded reflective of post-statehood and service-sector expansion. These efforts underscored Amfac's adaptation to jet-age demographics, fostering in , , and while bridging the gap between legacy influence and 's emerging diversified economy.

Labor Relations and Controversies

Union Strikes and Plantation Conditions

Amfac, as one of Hawaii's "" conglomerates, controlled several major sugar plantations including the Lihue Plantation Company on , Kekaha Sugar Company on , and Oahu Sugar Company on , where workers faced grueling conditions typical of the industry before widespread unionization. Laborers endured 10- to 12-hour shifts six days a week in scorching fields, performing backbreaking tasks such as planting, weeding, irrigating, and harvesting cane under hazardous conditions including , machete injuries, and exposure to pesticides. Wages averaged around 27 cents per hour in the mid-1940s, equating to roughly $587 annually for field workers, with families allocating over 50% of income to food amid reliance on overpriced company stores that perpetuated cycles. Housing consisted of cramped, unsanitary bunkhouses plagued by , while enforced strict paternalistic rules governing personal lives, including prohibitions on leaving without permission and racial hierarchies in pay scales that disadvantaged non-white ethnic groups. These exploitative practices, likened by contemporaries to , fueled resentment and sporadic early strikes, such as those at Amfac-affiliated Waipahu and Aiea plantations in organized by ethnic-specific groups like and Filipino workers seeking better pay and hours. The pivotal labor confrontations escalated with the rise of the (ILWU) in the 1940s, which targeted Amfac and other entities through industry-wide actions. The 1946 Sugar Strike, commencing September 1, involved approximately 26,000 workers across 33 of Hawaii's 34 plantations, including Amfac's operations at Lihue, Kekaha, and Sugar, halting production for 79 days in a unified demand for higher wages, an end to racial wage disparities, and improved benefits. Organized by the ILWU against the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association (representing Amfac and peers), the strike withstood employer resistance including injunctions and public pressure, ultimately yielding a 17.6% wage increase, standardized pay scales regardless of ethnicity, and enhanced provisions that dismantled pre-war discriminatory practices. This event marked a turning point, empowering ILWU representation at Amfac facilities and shifting bargaining power toward workers, though subsequent disputes persisted, such as ILWU-led sugar strikes in 1958 that disrupted yields at Amfac plantations amid demands for mechanization adjustments and cost-of-living raises. Post-1946, plantation conditions at Amfac sites improved markedly due to , with average daily wages rising to over $37 by the late —supplemented by fringes exceeding $22 daily—reflecting Amfac's status as Hawaii's largest producer owning five of 15 major companies. However, tensions lingered over automation's displacement effects and contract negotiations, as seen in ILWU actions during the and that pressured Amfac for severance and retraining amid declining cane viability. By the 1980s, as Amfac diversified into resorts and , labor relations stabilized under JMB ownership, evidenced by settlements like the 1990s payout of nearly $1 million in severance to 60 workers formerly tied to Amfac operations, underscoring a transition from plantation-era strife to negotiated closures. These developments, while advancing worker welfare, contributed to the eventual phase-out of operations, with Amfac exiting the by the early 2000s.

Allegations of Monopolistic Control and Political Influence

Amfac, operating as American Factors within the "Big Five" oligopoly—alongside Castle & Cooke, Alexander & Baldwin, C. Brewer & Co., and Theo H. Davies & Co.—faced persistent allegations of monopolistic control over Hawaii's economy from the late 19th century through the mid-20th century. Critics contended that the group coordinated to dominate sugar production, which constituted the islands' primary export, handling approximately 94% of the sugar crop by 1920 through interlocking directorates, shared shipping arrangements via Matson Navigation Company, and control of factoring services that set grower prices and suppressed competition. These practices, attributed to the Big Five collectively, were accused of enabling price-fixing, wage suppression, and barriers to new entrants in agriculture, shipping, and wholesale trade, as detailed in contemporary analyses like Hal F. Hanna's 1945 pamphlet Big Five Monopoly in Hawaii, which highlighted cartel-like behaviors without evidence of formal antitrust convictions against Amfac specifically. Labor organizations, including the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union (ILWU), amplified these claims during major strikes, such as the 1946 sugar strike involving 26,000 workers, arguing that the 's economic leverage allowed them to dictate labor conditions and resist , often through unified resistance backed by territorial authorities. While no major federal antitrust actions dismantled Amfac's operations akin to mainland trust-busting, territorial probes in the and , including the Eagan Report, documented (white) corporate dominance, including election manipulation and resource control, fueling perceptions of undue rather than verifiable illegal . Amfac's defenders, including industry historians, countered that such concentration arose from in remote island agriculture and efficient , not predatory intent, though empirical data on market shares underscored the oligopolistic structure. On political influence, Amfac and the were accused of wielding outsized sway over 's territorial government through campaign financing, lobbying via the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association (HSPA), and alignment with interests to secure tariff protections, water rights, and anti-union legislation. For instance, the HSPA lobbied to maintain sugar quotas under the Underwood Tariff and later Smoot-Hawley Act, preserving high prices for Hawaiian producers amid mainland competition, while territorial records from the 1930s revealed Big Five executives influencing gubernatorial appointments and legislative votes on labor laws. Post-World War II, as Democratic and union-backed forces rose, allegations persisted that Amfac contributed to political machines resisting statehood reforms until 1959, though evidence primarily reflects economic interdependence rather than overt corruption; critics like ILWU leader Jack Hall described this as a "sugar-coated fortress" sustaining elite control. Such influence waned with diversification and land sales in the –, but legacy claims highlight how concentrated ownership shaped policy favoring agribusiness over broader development.

Legacy and Successors

Influence on Modern Hawaii Economy

Amfac's pioneering development of in 1962 marked a pivotal shift in 's economy from toward and , transforming former plantation lands into the state's first master-planned resort community on Maui's . This project, spanning over 1,300 acres, included hotels, golf courses, and residential areas, setting a model for integrated resort development that spurred visitor industry growth and reduced reliance on exports, which had dominated until the mid-20th century. The company's extensive land holdings, peaking at 60,000 acres across the islands, facilitated ongoing diversification through strategic sales and leasing beginning in the late , funding expansions into and providing developable parcels that supported housing, commercial, and recreational projects. By the 1980s, after acquisition by , Amfac/JMB Hawaii focused on land management, operations (including Kāʻanapali and Waikele courses), and mixed-use developments like the Waikele community on , which encompassed 2,700 residential units, centers, and an 18-hole completed by 1994. These efforts contributed to repurposing, such as converting plantation-era systems for modern resort and uses, bolstering sectors that now drive over 20% of 's GDP through and . Post-2002 bankruptcy, Amfac's assets, including remaining lands reorganized under entities like Kāʻanapali Land LLC, continued influencing the economy via sales and development approvals, such as Maui projects for timeshares and affordable housing, amid Hawaii's transition to a service-based model where real estate and visitor spending predominate. This legacy underscores Amfac's role in enabling economic resilience against agricultural decline, though it also highlighted vulnerabilities in over-reliance on land monetization during market downturns.

Current Status of Amfac/JMB Hawaii

Amfac/JMB Hawaii, L.L.C., the primary successor to Amfac Inc.'s Hawaiian operations following the 1988 acquisition by Corp. for $920 million, focused on , , management, and ownership of approximately 43,000 acres across the islands. In 2002, Amfac Hawaii, L.L.C.—a key entity under the Amfac/JMB structure—filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection amid declining viability and heavy debt, leading to a reorganization plan that emerged debt-free by August of that year. The restructured entity, renamed , L.L.C. in 2005 upon closure, shifted emphasis to land holdings and selective , particularly in Maui's Kaanapali , where former plantation lands have been subdivided for residential and commercial uses. Land, L.L.C. (formerly Amfac Hawaii, L.L.C.), serves as a wholly-owned managing residual assets, including nonqualified arrangements for former Amfac executives. Agricultural operations, once central to Amfac's portfolio, have largely ceased, with properties repurposed or sold off post-reorganization. As of fiscal year 2024, reported in the March 2025 10-K filing, —a entity headquartered in and subsidiary of Pacific Trail Holdings, L.L.C.—maintains limited activities centered on entitlements, occasional land sales, and interest income, reflecting a diminished operational footprint from its historical scale. Quarterly results for the period ending June 30, 2025, show revenues of $0.82 million, down from prior periods due to reduced sales volume, underscoring a transition to passive rather than active development or resorts. No significant expansions or revivals of core Amfac-era businesses, such as or large-scale plantations, are evident in recent disclosures.

References

  1. [1]
    Hackfeld, Heinrich | Immigrant Entrepreneurship
    Feb 13, 2017 · H. Hackfeld & Co. of Honolulu, was one of a number of German mercantile businesses founded in Melanesia and Polynesia during the nineteenth century.Missing: key facts controversies
  2. [2]
    History of Amfac/JMB Hawaii L.L.C. – FundingUniverse
    The company was founded in 1969 when three Chicago accountants--Bob Juddelson, Judd Malkin, and Neil Bluhm--pooled $5,000 to invest in real estate. Following ...
  3. [3]
    Amfac Inc. | Encyclopedia.com
    Amfac had acquired over 50 companies since 1967, most of which were located on the mainland.
  4. [4]
    Amfac Center | Images of Old Hawaiʻi
    Oct 25, 2018 · They became known as the Big Five: C. Brewer (1826;) Theo H Davies (1845;) American Factors (Amfac) – starting as Hackfeld & Company (1849;) ...
  5. [5]
    H Hackfeld | Images of Old Hawaiʻi
    Jul 28, 2014 · On September 26, 1849, sea captain Heinrich (Henry) Hackfeld arrived in Honolulu with his wife, Marie, her 16-year-old brother Johann Carl ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  6. [6]
    Koloa, Birthplace of the Hawaiian Sugar Industry
    In 1851, Dr. Wood appointed H. Hackfeld & Co. of Honolulu as agents for the plantation. In 1871, Paul Isenberg, manager of the Lihue Plantation, bought ...
  7. [7]
    History of Later Years of the Hawaiian Monarchy, Page 9 - donch.com
    The firm of H. Hackfeld & Co. was established on October 1, 1849, by Captain Henry Hackfeld, a German, who had previously been trading between Honolulu and ...Missing: Heinrich | Show results with:Heinrich<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] MS45 Draft 2013 Lihue Plantation rewrite - Kauai Historical Society
    In 1922, American Factors, Ltd., successor company to H. Hackfield & Co., acquired control of Lihue. Plantation Company with the purchase of 3,026 shares of ...
  9. [9]
    Līhuʻe | Images of Old Hawaiʻi
    Apr 16, 2024 · In 1922, American Factors, Ltd (AmFac,) successor company to H Hackfield & Co, acquired control of Līhuʻe Plantation Company. The Līhuʻe ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Oahu Sugar Company - University of Hawaii System
    AmFac and its predecessor, H. Hackfeld & Co., have served as factors for Oahu Sugar. Co. since its inception. H. Hackfeld maintained branch offices in New ...Missing: factoring | Show results with:factoring
  11. [11]
    Sugar Changed the Social Fabric of the Islands - Images of Old Hawaii
    Sep 6, 2024 · As a result, the Reciprocity Treaty was negotiated in 1875 and put into effect on September 9, 1876. This agreement provided for the tariff-free ...Missing: predecessor | Show results with:predecessor
  12. [12]
    Part II, Chapter V, Hawaii - Econlib
    Before the treaty the imports of sugar had never risen to 20 million pounds. They touched that figure in the very first year (1876). Thereafter the rate of ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Hawai'i Turns to Sugar: The Rise of Plantation Centers, 1860—1880
    Hackfeld &. Company, and C. Brewer 8c Company quickly became powerful actors in Hawai'i's sugar industry. The plantation of the 1860s and 1870s was a different ...
  14. [14]
    “The Big Five” Once Dominated Hawai'i's Economy, Government ...
    Feb 21, 2025 · “The Big Five's power came about as sugar plantations became a more dominant part of the economy, and labor recruitment followed,” says social ...
  15. [15]
    https://oxfordre.com/economics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.001.0001/acrefore-9780190625979-e-687
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Effect of World War I on the German Community in Hawaii - CORE
    Under Paul Isenberg's leadership, H. Hackfeld & Co. became intimately connected with a second German community, one composed of plantation laborers. The impetus ...
  17. [17]
    “Effect of World War I on the German Community in Hawaii ...
    Hackfeld and Company, which American Factors took over during World War I. Indeed, since that war there has been little interest in the contribution of German ...Missing: Anti- measures
  18. [18]
    Liberty House History: Founding, Timeline, and Milestones - Zippia
    Jul 21, 2023 · In 1918 at the height of World War I, H. Hackfeld & Co. was seized by the American government as alien property (since many of the Hackfeld ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Historic Buildings - Honolulu - Fort Street Mall
    Hackfeld & Co. name from the Fort Street and Queen Street entrance, substituting the new name “American Factors.” As one of Hawaii's Big Five companies, Amfac ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    UHM Library Hawaiian Collection HSPA - Kekaha Sugar Co.
    Comparative Crop Reports for AmFac Plantations, 1920-1925 - These reports include costs, labor reports, quality of sugar, crop and some stable (ranch) reports ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] A.G.A. A.G.A. - Department of Accounting and General Services
    Hackfeld Company stock is sold to American. Factors and proceeds are distributed to stockholders. ... Correspondence with American Factors, 1918-1919.Missing: formation details
  22. [22]
    The Enigma of Hawai'i's "Big Five," 1898-194 - jstor
    Schweizer, Hawaii and the German Speaking Peoples (Honolulu, 1982). Simpich and. Schweizer tell the story of American Factors and its predecessor, H.
  23. [23]
    CORPORATIONS: Amfac's Wide Swing - Videos Index on TIME.com
    Jul 31, 1972 · The company was formed in 1849 by a German sea captain, Heinrich Hackfeld, to sell parasols, silk waistcoats, bird cages and window glass to ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Hawaiian Economy in the 1930s: The Successful Adjustment of ...
    Baldwin and American Factors, the Big Five now controlled about one-half of. Hawaii's pineapple industry. The other half of the industry was controlled by.Missing: Ltd | Show results with:Ltd
  25. [25]
    Hawaii: Sugar-coated fort - Fortune
    Hawaiian industry is largely controlled by the Big Five: Castle & Cooke, Alexander & Baldwin, American Factors, C. Brewer & Co., and Theo H. Davies & Co ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Hawaiian Interests Buy Control Of the 80‐Year‐Old Matson Line
    The three companies selling their stock interest in Matson were identified as Castle & Cook, Ltd., C. Brewer and Company and American Factors Ltd. Before the ...
  27. [27]
    The sugar barons who toppled a kingdom still haunt this Honolulu ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · Sugar plantations closed their gates across Hawaii in the 1970s as the industry lost money. Theo H.Davies & Co. sold out to Hong Kong company ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Hawaiʻi's Big Five - Images of Old Hawaii
    The company took BF Ehlers' name in 1862. Hackfeld developed a business of importing machinery and supplies for the spreading sugar plantations and exported raw ...
  29. [29]
    Kamakahonu circa 1930 ~ Kailua, Kona, Hawaii
    Jul 19, 2012 · Old timers in Hawaii know “Amfac” was originally known as H. Hackfeld & Co., founded back in 1849 by a German sea captain and trader, Heinrich ( ...Missing: origins business<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Cow Palace | Images of Old Hawaiʻi
    Sep 9, 2024 · “It was built in 1916 by a Hackfeld & Co as a lumber warehouse. The firm later was sold to the American Factors, now Amfac, and the building ...
  31. [31]
    Big Five had deep roots in Hawaii business and politics
    Aug 3, 2008 · The Big Five controlled consumer items through their plantation stores together with shipping, insurance and banking and, of course, politics.
  32. [32]
    Hawai'i's Top Business Leaders in the 1960s, '70s and '80s
    Feb 10, 2025 · After taking his role in 1967, Walker oversaw explosive growth at American Factors (later Amfac), turning the Big Five sugar company into Hawai' ...
  33. [33]
    History of AMFAC - Facebook
    Mar 16, 2023 · The first of many changes at American Factors occurred on April 30, 1966. The company's name changed to Amfac Inc., Then, a few years before ...
  34. [34]
    Kāʻanapali | Images of Old Hawaiʻi
    Sep 24, 2022 · The land set-aside by Amfac became Hawaiʻi's first master-planned resort. When it opened in 1962, it became known as the Kāʻanapali Beach Resort ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  35. [35]
    Kaanapali Beach Resort Association Fact Sheet
    Mar 11, 2025 · ... Kaanapali was developed by American Factors, Inc., (Amfac) beginning in 1959. Ka'anapali Resort opened in 1962. Today, the resort is managed ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  36. [36]
    What Vanished From Maui's First Resort Town Will Shock You
    Apr 27, 2025 · In 1962, Amfac launched Kaanapali Beach Resort on Maui's west side. It was Hawaii's first master-planned resort community and sat on former ...
  37. [37]
    https://substack.com/home/post/p-65950230
  38. [38]
    The Rise and Fall of the Legendary Coco Palms Hotel
    Jun 24, 2016 · Though Guslander sold the Island Holidays chain of hotels, including the Coco Palms, in 1969, to Amfac, Buscher remained at the helm of the Coco ...
  39. [39]
    CORPORATIONS: Amfac's Wide Swing - Time Magazine
    Jul 31, 1972 · This was the 42nd acquisition that Amfac has made in just four years, using securities or cash to expand from the middle of the Pacific basin to ...
  40. [40]
    Liberty House, San Francisco, California
    Liberty House came to the mainland in 1970, and built this multi-level store at the corner of Stockton and O'Farrell in San Francisco
  41. [41]
    MAN IN BUSINESS - The New York Times
    Mar 7, 1971 · Its initial acquisition outside Hawaii was its purchase of the Fred Harvey group of restaurants, in‐flight and industrial food services, hotels ...
  42. [42]
    AMFAC AT A TROPICAL CROSSROAD - The New York Times
    Apr 10, 1983 · He bought 97 companies and sold 11 to wean Amfac from Hawaii and an addiction to uncertain sugar profits. Today only 25 percent of the company' ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  43. [43]
    JMB to Pay $920 Million for Amfac - The New York Times
    Jul 27, 1988 · Since December, Amfac has divested itself of nearly all operations in the continental United States, receiving a total of about $1.6 billion.
  44. [44]
    Amfac/JMB Hawaii L.L.C. - Encyclopedia.com
    In 1849 a German ship captain named Heinrich Hackfeld docked his 156-ton ... Hackfeld's company became one of the largest in Hawaii, operating retail ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  45. [45]
    Amfac Gives Nod to JMB Realty's $920-Million Bid
    Jul 27, 1988 · Amfac, a diversified company with major interests in Hawaii, agreed Tuesday to be acquired in a $920-million deal by JMB Realty Corp.Missing: reorganization | Show results with:reorganization
  46. [46]
    JMB SET TO ACQUIRE AMFAC INC. - Chicago Tribune
    Jul 27, 1988 · Chicago`s JMB Realty Corp., one of North America`s largest real estate development firms, is on the verge of acquiring Honolulu-based Amfac Inc.
  47. [47]
    COMPANY NEWS; Amfac Holders Back Bid by JMB
    Nov 19, 1988 · Shareholders of Amfac Inc., Hawaii's largest private landowner, approved a $49-a-share cash buyout, valued at $920 million, by the Chicago-based JMB Realty ...
  48. [48]
    JMB TO BUY BIG HAWAIIAN LAND OWNER - AFR
    Jul 28, 1988 · Amfac Inc, one of the largest land owners in Hawaii, agreed on Tuesday to be acquired by the JMB Realty Corp of Chicago for $US49 a share, ...
  49. [49]
    JMB REALTY CLOSES ACQUISITION OF AMFAC – Chicago Tribune
    Chicago-based JMB Realty Corp. completed the acquisition of Amfac Inc. under which each Amfac shareholder will receive $49 a share. Amfac, based in San ...
  50. [50]
    Honolulu Star-Bulletin Business
    Sep 2, 2001 · By 1973, 71 percent of Amfac's revenues came from outside Hawaii. In 1983, its headquarters moved to San Francisco, but came back four years ...Missing: interwar shipping
  51. [51]
    Amfac Hawaii files for bankruptcy protection | The Honolulu Advertiser
    Feb 27, 2002 · Amfac Hawaii, once one of the largest companies in the state, filed for bankruptcy protection today, the company announced.
  52. [52]
    Bankrupt Amfac plans debt-free emergence - Pacific Business News
    Jun 2, 2002 · The company will send an amended plan to creditors in June, designed to help it emerge from Chapter 11 virtually debt-free, provided the Chicago ...
  53. [53]
    Second Amended Disclosure Statement for Joint Plan of ...
    This disclosure statement is issued by Amfac Hawaii, LLC, its subsidiaries, and FHT Corporation as part of their Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.
  54. [54]
    First Amended Disclosure Statement for Joint Plan of Reorganization
    The plan aims to maximize asset value, primarily through land development, and outlines how debts will be managed and how creditors will be repaid. The ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Honolulu Star-Bulletin Business
    Mar 23, 2002 · The deal was negotiated in the months before Amfac filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Feb. 27 and Amfac has agreed to incorporate the plan into ...
  56. [56]
    KAANAPALI LAND LLC (Form: 10-12G, Received - EDGAR Online
    The Plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court by orders dated July 29, 2002 and October 30, 2002 (collectively, the "Order") and became effective November 13, ...
  57. [57]
    Kaanapali Land, LLC - SEC.gov
    Dec 31, 2017 · KLC Land (formerly known as Amfac Hawaii, LLC and, previously, Amfac/JMB Hawaii, LLC) is a Hawaii limited liability company that is a wholly- ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  58. [58]
    Honolulu Star-Bulletin Hawaii News
    Feb 28, 2002 · The firm later sold 18,000 acres on the Garden Isle to Hawaii native Steve Case, chairman of AOL Time Warner, for $25 million. Amfac has also ...
  59. [59]
    New Big 5 May Be Emerging in Hawaii
    Apr 7, 2013 · The remnants of the Big Five, once the dominant companies in Hawaii, continued to shrink last year. The sale of more than 88,000 acres on ...Missing: oligopoly | Show results with:oligopoly
  60. [60]
    https://www.glabarre.com/item/AMFAC_Inc_Hawaiian_Land_Developing_Stock_Certificate/22762/pgc86
  61. [61]
    Waikele History: From Muddy Water to Modern Real Estate
    Oct 13, 2016 · The sugar company's backer, Amfac, immediately turned to the creation of a neighborhood on these heights above Waipahu that provided views of ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Waikele Development - Hawaii.gov
    Amfac Property Development Corp. Environmental Communications, Inc. Department of Land Utilization. 650 South King Street. Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. The project ...Missing: real | Show results with:real
  63. [63]
    Waikele | Kapolei - Honolulu Star-Bulletin Special
    Sep 28, 2003 · Waikele has revitalized the old plantation town of Waipahu with new affordable and single-family homes, the state's first outlet center, a new elementary ...Missing: ventures Kakaako
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Docket No#A82-530 - Hawaii.gov
    The Petitioner manages Amfac, Inc.'s extensive land holdings and is a developer and manager of resort, commercial, industrial and residential property in Hawaii ...
  65. [65]
    Five Sugar Plantations Close on the Big Island, Oahu - Travel Weekly
    Jan 29, 1997 · * Oahu Sugar Co., owned by Amfac/JMB, closed in the spring of 1995, with 200 people laid off. It was situated on 10,500 acres in west Oahu.
  66. [66]
    A WAY OF LIFE IN HAWAII IS THREATENED BY SQUEEZE IN THE ...
    Jun 1, 1982 · Here on the island of Hawaii, Amfac Inc., the state's largest sugar producer, and one of its oldest, which is aggressively diversifying into ...
  67. [67]
    Native Hawaiians Don't Own Many Local Hotels. Here's Why That ...
    Jun 12, 2024 · Another Native Hawaiian-owned hotel was the 318-room Keauhou Beach Hotel. Amfac opened the hotel in 1970, and it was the first hotel in ...
  68. [68]
    About Landmark Hotels Group & Charles Sweeney
    He headed Amfac's Hotel Division at a time when such destinations as Kaanapali and Poipu were unheard of and grew the hotel portfolio to 17 hotels with 8,000 ...Missing: holdings | Show results with:holdings
  69. [69]
    UHM Library Hawaiian Collection HSPA - Oahu Sugar Co.
    The idea of a 10,000-acre sugar company was inspired by a prospectus written by Benjamin F. Dillingham in 1894. The idea took root, and, led to the ...
  70. [70]
    Waiahole Water: Where Will It Go When Sugar Is Gone?
    Oct 29, 2014 · Waiahole Water Co. changed its name to Waiahole Irrigation Co. in 1970, but it remains a wholly owned subsidiary of Amfac/JMB-Hawai`i, Inc.).
  71. [71]
    [PDF] modeling a plantation railroad: oahu sugar company
    Mar 4, 2017 · The system commonly used is known as the. Hawaiian Furrow System, by which water flows to the field through a concrete canal, and is distributed ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    History of Agriculture in Hawaii
    Jan 31, 2013 · This is a first attempt to assemble a history of agriculture in Hawaii. A history of US agriculture can be found here and we have used their format.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Maui News - Kaanapali Land Management Corp.
    Jul 9, 2006 · Kaanapali Development is the residue of Amfac's Pioneer Mill, which dominated economic activity in West Maui for the century from about 1860 to ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Ordinance No. 1268 - Maui County
    Nov 18, 1982 · In 1976 Amfac identified a need for addi-. 23 tional sewage treatment capacity for the development of its. 24 lands at Kaanapali. As a result, ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  75. [75]
    History of Labor in Hawai'i - University of Hawaii System
    Industrial production of sugar began at Kōloa Plantation on Kaua'i in 1840. It soon became clear that it required a lot of manpower, and manpower was in short ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  76. [76]
    LIVING STANDARDS OF PLANTATION WORKERS | Hawaii Division
    The average sugar worker earned about 27 cents an hour, or $587 a year. Most of the plantation families had to spend 50% of their income for food and the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Peter Carlisle: The Last Luna's Memories of Hawaii's Plantation Era
    Dec 23, 2014 · In those early days, plantation workers endured some horrible conditions. Some were comparable to slavery. Their food was barely edible and ...
  78. [78]
    Sept. 1, 1946: Hawaiian Sugar Plantation Workers Stage Mass Strike
    On September 1, 1946, sugar workers on 33 of Hawai'i's 34 plantations went on strike, which lasted almost three months and led to substantial improvements ...Missing: Amfac | Show results with:Amfac
  79. [79]
    Rationalization of Sugar Production in Hawaii, 1946-1960 - jstor
    The sugar planters had few problems with organized labor prior to the Second World War. Workers were imported from China, Japan, the Philippines and, in smaller ...
  80. [80]
    Hawaii Fearful for Future of Sugar, Its Main Crop
    Jan 21, 1977 · Among its massive diversified holdings, Amfac owns five of .the 15 major Hawaiian sugar companies, making it the largest producer in the islands ...
  81. [81]
    Hawaiʻi Labor History Timeline
    -Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc. begin a two-year shut down of O'ahu Sugar Company's Waipahu Sugar Mill. -September, the Honolulu Symphony Society declares impasse ...
  82. [82]
    Hawaii unions say “no” to George W. Bush - ILWU Local 142
    KAANAPALI, Maui—Sixty workers of the Kaanapali Golf Course will receive almost one million dollars in severance and vacation pay from former owner Amfac-JMB, as ...
  83. [83]
    Big Five (plus 2) | Images of Old Hawaiʻi
    Oct 6, 2021 · ... Amfac Founded: 1849; Heinrich Hackfeld and Johann Carl Pflueger (German Merchants) Incorporated: 1897 (H Hackfeld & Co;) American Factors ...Missing: origins predecessor
  84. [84]
    Big Five Monopoly in Hawaii - Hal F. Hanna - Google Books
    Title, Big Five Monopoly in Hawaii ; Author, Hal F. Hanna ; Compiled by, Hal F. Hanna ; Published, 1945 ; Original from, Northwestern University.
  85. [85]
    1946 Sugar Strike - University of Hawaii System
    Before 1946, Hawai'i's economy, politics and social structures were completely dominated by a corporate elite known as the Big Five (Alexander & Baldwin, ...Missing: monopoly | Show results with:monopoly<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    The Eagan Report - University of Hawaii System
    The “Big Five” is able through its henchmen to control elections in the Islands. To give you one example, during the 1st general election, in a race for ...Missing: political | Show results with:political
  87. [87]
    Hawaii | US House of Representatives - History, Art & Archives
    By 1870 these American descendants had become the “Big Five” sugar companies: Ladd & Company, H. Hackfeld & Company, C. Brewer & Company, Castle & Cooke, and ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    The Sugar-Coated Fortress-II | The New Yorker
    Mar 4, 1972 · Within a few months after it had begun negotiations, Sears' directors were given to understand by Amfac that the Matson Lines, which monopolized ...
  89. [89]
    Amfac - Wikipedia
    At its peak, it owned 60,000 acres (24,000 ha) of land, was a dominant sugar company in Hawaii, and was the founder of one of its best known department store ...History · California businesses in the... · 1980s–2000s
  90. [90]
    A Look Back at 1982, a Pivotal Year in the Transition to Today's ...
    Feb 20, 2025 · The issues faced in 1982 sound familiar, more than four decades later: a blowback against tourism, high interest rates that stifle expansion and development.Missing: hospitality | Show results with:hospitality
  91. [91]
    Honolulu Star-Bulletin News
    Feb 28, 2002 · Amfac's bankruptcy petition and a list of creditors were not immediately available. Amfac is represented in the bankruptcy by the Jones Day ...Missing: Inc | Show results with:Inc
  92. [92]
    Kaanapali Land, LLC - SEC.gov
    The Kaanapali 2020 Development Plan includes a mix of residential (including workforce affordable housing), commercial, quasi-public facilities, recreation, ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] KAANAPALI LAND LLC Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2025-03-24
    Mar 24, 2025 · reorganized entity resulting from the Joint Plan of Reorganization of Amfac Hawaii, LLC (now known as KLC Land ... reference the Amfac Hawaii, LLC ...
  94. [94]
    Kaanapali Land, LLC (KANP) Company Profile & Facts
    The company was incorporated in 2002 and is based in Chicago, Illinois. Kaanapali Land, LLC is a subsidiary of Pacific Trail Holdings, LLC. Corporate Governance.Missing: Amfac | Show results with:Amfac
  95. [95]
    KAANAPALI LAND LLC SEC 10-Q Report - TradingView
    Aug 13, 2025 · Financial Highlights · Total Revenues: $0.82 million, reflecting a decrease compared to the previous year due to lower sales and interest income.
  96. [96]
    Kaanapali Land, LLC - SEC.gov
    Service Agreement, dated November 18, 1988, between Amfac/JMB Hawaii, Inc., and Amfac Property Development Corp.; Amfac Property Investment Corp.; Amfac ...