Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

April 2018 inter-Korean summit

The April 2018 inter-Korean summit was a diplomatic meeting held on 27 April 2018 between South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the Peace House in Panmunjom, within the Demilitarized Zone, representing the first such encounter between the heads of state of the two Koreas since 2007. The summit culminated in the signing of the Panmunjom Declaration, in which the leaders pledged to cease all hostile acts, pursue complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, formally end the Korean War through peace regime establishment, and promote economic cooperation and reunification efforts. While hailed for its symbolic breakthrough in thawing decades-long tensions amid North Korea's nuclear advancements, the agreement's vague commitments on verifiable denuclearization drew immediate skepticism regarding enforcement, as subsequent North Korean missile activities and stalled U.S.-North Korea talks underscored limited tangible progress.

Historical Background

Prior Inter-Korean Summits and Relations

The Korean peninsula was divided along the 38th parallel in 1945 following Japan's defeat in , with the administering the north and the the south, setting the stage for ideological confrontation. This division escalated into the , which began on June 25, 1950, when North Korean forces invaded the South, leading to intervention by forces under U.S. command and Chinese troops supporting the North. The conflict ended with an armistice signed on July 27, 1953, establishing the (DMZ) near the original border, but no peace treaty was concluded, leaving the two Koreas technically at war. Inter-Korean relations remained frozen for decades, punctuated by sporadic military incidents, defections, and proxy diplomatic efforts through third parties, with pursuing self-reliance under ideology and aligning closely with the U.S. alliance amid economic development. Initial high-level contacts emerged in the 1970s, including Red Cross talks leading to the July 4, 1972, Joint Statement on principles for reunification, though progress stalled amid mutual suspicions and North Korean provocations like the 1976 axe murder incident at . Prime ministerial talks commenced in 1990, yielding agreements on non-aggression and reconciliation by 1991-1992, but collapsed due to North Korea's nuclear ambitions revealed in 1994, prompting the U.S.-brokered for denuclearization aid. South Korea's , initiated by President in 1998, emphasized engagement over confrontation, facilitating economic projects like the Kaesong Industrial Complex and paving the way for the first inter-Korean summit. The inaugural summit occurred in Pyongyang from June 13 to 15, 2000, where South Korean President met North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, issuing the June 15 North-South Joint Declaration committing to reconciliation, cooperation, and a non-nuclear future without specifying timelines or verification. Outcomes included family reunions for war-separated kin starting in 2000 and the establishment of the in 2004, employing thousands of North Korean workers with South Korean investment, though these initiatives faced interruptions from political shifts. A second summit followed in Pyongyang from October 2 to 4, 2007, between South Korean President and Kim Jong-il, producing the October 4 Declaration with eight points advancing prior agreements, including nuclear resolution, a peace regime, and expanded economic ties like cross-border railways. However, implementation faltered after Roh's term, as North Korea conducted nuclear tests in 2006 and 2009, sank the South Korean corvette in 2010 killing 46 sailors, and shelled Yeonpyeong Island that year, prompting South Korea's conservative governments to condition aid on denuclearization and bolster U.S.-aligned deterrence. Relations hit lows by 2017, with mutual military escalations and severed hotlines, underscoring the fragility of prior diplomatic gains amid unresolved security dilemmas.

Nuclear Escalation and Olympic Diplomacy

In 2017, North Korea intensified its nuclear and missile programs, conducting 23 ballistic missile launches, including its first successful intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) tests capable of reaching the United States mainland. Notable events included the February 12 launch of the Pukguksong-2 medium-range ballistic missile, a March 5 salvo of four Scud-extended range missiles traveling over 600 miles, the July 4 Hwasong-14 ICBM test, the September 3 sixth nuclear test—claimed by Pyongyang as a thermonuclear detonation with a yield estimated at 100-250 kilotons—and the November 29 Hwasong-15 ICBM launch, which demonstrated potential range to cover the entire U.S. These actions prompted international condemnation, tightened UN sanctions, and escalated rhetoric, with U.S. President Donald Trump warning of "fire and fury" in response to threats against Guam. The escalation appeared to culminate in a strategic pivot by North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, who in his January 1, 2018, New Year's address asserted that the country had achieved a " state" status but expressed willingness for inter-Korean dialogue, specifically proposing to send a delegation to the upcoming Pyeongchang Winter Olympics in to reduce tensions. Kim emphasized refraining from or missile tests during the Games and urged to facilitate North Korean participation, framing it as a step toward "national reconciliation and unity" while maintaining deterrence against the U.S. President responded positively, offering high-level talks on Olympic cooperation, which commenced on January 9—the first inter-Korean dialogue in over two years—and resulted in agreement for a North Korean delegation including athletes, performers, and officials. The Pyeongchang Olympics, held from February 9 to 25, 2018, served as a platform for symbolic and substantive diplomacy amid the nuclear standoff. fielded 22 athletes, a 230-member cheering squad, and a high-level delegation led by , Kim Jong-un's sister, who met President Moon on February 9 and conveyed a personal letter from Kim Jong-un expressing interest in a U.S.- summit and improved inter-Korean ties. The two Koreas marched together under a unified at the , fielded a women's team, and held talks on to implement a temporary and near the border, easing immediate risks of miscalculation. These interactions, dubbed "Olympic diplomacy," contrasted sharply with 2017's hostilities and built momentum for direct leadership engagement. The Olympic thaw directly precipitated the April 2018 inter-Korean summit, as dispatched special envoys to in late , who secured Jong-un's commitment to denuclearization talks and a leaders' meeting by late April. This sequence underscored how leveraged the Games—initially intended as a showcase for South Korean —to project normalcy internationally while advancing its strategic goals, though skeptics noted the absence of verifiable restraint during the period.

Preparations and Context

Venue Selection and Logistics

The venue for the April 2018 inter-Korean summit was the in , situated on the South Korean side of the within the [Korean Demilitarized Zone](/page/Korean_Demilitarized Zone) (DMZ). was selected following North Korea's proposal during high-level talks in on March 5-6, 2018, where South Korean Office Director announced the agreement for a late-April summit at this location, emphasizing its role as a longstanding neutral site for armistice-related discussions since the 1953 truce. The choice reflected practical considerations, including Kim Jong-un's limited travel outside and the site's symbolic significance for reconciliation efforts, as it had hosted prior inter-Korean meetings without requiring either leader to enter the other's territory extensively. Logistical preparations involved working-level consultations between the two sides, including a meeting on April 5, 2018, focused on security protocols, transportation, and event sequencing at the DMZ site. On April 27, Kim Jong-un traveled south by car to the border, crossed the on foot—marking the first such entry by a North Korean leader into South -controlled territory since the war—and was greeted by with a before proceeding to the for talks, a welcoming ceremony, and a subsequent banquet. These arrangements ensured controlled access amid heightened DMZ security, with both delegations adhering to protocols minimizing cross-border movements.

Pre-Summit Negotiations and Agenda

Pre-summit negotiations began with a high-level South Korean delegation's visit to on March 5, 2018, led by National Security Office Director and National Intelligence Service Director Suh Hoon. The group met directly with Kim Jong-un, where expressed willingness to hold an inter-Korean summit by late April and to engage in dialogue with the on denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Kim also pledged a moratorium on and tests during negotiations. Following the Pyongyang visit, traveled to on March 8, 2018, to brief U.S. President , securing U.S. support for the planned summit and potential U.S.- talks. Preparatory logistics were addressed in high-level inter-Korean talks at on March 29, 2018, where both sides agreed on the summit date of April 27 and selected the venue as the on the southern side of the . The agenda centered on achieving lasting peace, complete denuclearization, and normalized inter-Korean relations, building on North Korea's overtures during the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics. Discussions emphasized mutual commitments to reduce military tensions, pursue a peace regime to formally end the , and foster economic cooperation, though specific provisions were finalized during the summit itself. No additional high-level envoy visits occurred immediately before , with working-level coordination handling remaining details like security protocols.

The Summit Proceedings

Participants and Protocol

The principal participants at the April 27, 2018, inter-Korean summit held at the in were South Korean President and North Korean Chairman of the State Affairs Commission . Kim's wife, , attended select portions including the concluding banquet, while Moon's spouse was absent from the proceedings. South Korea's delegation comprised key figures such as National Security Office Director , National Intelligence Service Director Suh Hoon, and Unification Minister Cho Myoung-gyon, who joined for the expanded plenary session following initial private talks. North Korea's accompanying officials included Kim Yo-jong, first vice director of the Workers' Party of Korea's , and , vice chairman of the State Affairs Commission. Protocol for the event was established through a series of working-level inter-Korean talks commencing on April 5, 2018, at , focusing on security arrangements, ceremonial order, and media access. The proceedings opened at approximately 9:30 a.m. with Kim Jong-un crossing the on foot—the first such traversal by a North Korean leader—followed by a handshake with at the border line, during which Kim invited Moon northward for a symbolic step before both proceeded south to the venue. A formal welcoming ceremony ensued, featuring a joint honor guard performance, wreath-laying by two uniformed children representing both nations, and inspections of troops from the rival Koreas standing in formation. The leaders then held a private luncheon, an expanded meeting with delegations, a tree-planting ceremony using soil from Mount Paektu (North) and (South) along with a pine sapling symbolizing peace, signing of the , a joint press appearance, and a banquet featuring traditional performances. These elements emphasized reconciliation and mutual respect, adhering to agreed-upon customs without full national anthems or flags in the initial greeting to underscore inter-Korean parity.

Core Discussions and Interactions

The leaders commenced with a private meeting lasting 100 minutes from 10:15 a.m. to 11:55 a.m., followed by an additional 30-minute private walk across the where invited to step briefly into South Korean territory. In these initial exchanges, expressed intent to end the history of confrontation between the two Koreas, apologized for prior and tests that had "kept awake at night," and affirmed 's commitment to denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula provided mutually agreed security guarantees were in place. conveyed U.S. President Donald Trump's eagerness for a personal summit with to discuss denuclearization and peace, emphasizing that such steps could lead to sanctions relief and economic opportunities for . The discussions then expanded to include senior aides, focusing on practical measures to reduce military hostilities, such as ceasing provocative acts like leaflet scattering and loudspeaker broadcasts across the DMZ, and initiating dialogue between military chiefs to prevent accidental clashes. Humanitarian concerns were addressed, including swift resolution of divided family reunions and North Korea's cooperation on South Korean nationals detained or abducted. Economic cooperation emerged as a key topic, with proposals for joint projects in like and connections across the , and collaborative efforts in sectors such as , , and to foster mutual prosperity. A working lunch hosted by featured dishes symbolizing unity, during which the leaders continued deliberations on advancing inter-Korean relations, with highlighting North Korea's shift toward economic development over nuclear pursuits. The afternoon involved full delegations, where North Korea's Ri Yong-ho and South Korea's Suh Hoon engaged on implementation timelines, though specifics remained preliminary pending the joint declaration. Throughout, interactions demonstrated rapport, with praising Moon's mediation role and both leaders stressing irreversible progress toward a war-free , though North Korean commitments were conditioned on verifiable reciprocity from the U.S. and allies.

Notable Symbolic Elements

The summit opened with a highly choreographed handshake at the Military Demarcation Line (MDL) in the Joint Security Area of Panmunjom, where South Korean President Moon Jae-in crossed to the northern side to greet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, symbolizing a mutual step toward dialogue. Kim then stepped across the MDL into South Korean territory—the first such crossing by a North Korean leader since the Korean War armistice—followed by Moon inviting him further south for photographs, after which both leaders briefly crossed into North Korean territory at Kim's suggestion. These border crossings underscored themes of reciprocity and reduced hostility, staged for global visibility amid heightened tensions over North Korea's nuclear program. A central symbolic act was the joint tree-planting ceremony, where the leaders planted a sapling sourced from North Korea's sacred Mount Paektu, using soil from South Korea's Mount Halla and North Korea's Mount Paektu, watered with river water from the South's Han River and the North's . The , emblematic of longevity and resilience in Korean culture, was planted near the "" pavilion on a site linked to the 1953 armistice, evoking hopes for enduring and denuclearization. They inscribed a stone monument with the message "Planting and prosperity" dated April 27, 2018, reinforcing the summit's optics of reconciliation despite the absence of immediate verifiable concessions on North Korea's arsenal. Additional gestures included Moon presenting Kim with strawberries from Yeonpyeong Island—site of a deadly 2010 North Korean artillery attack—as a pointed symbol of forgiveness and normalized exchange, alongside a reproduction of a Joseon-era royal guards . Moon wore a blue tie matching the , while the leaders' informal walk along the DMZ paths, during which Moon inquired about visiting and they briefly held hands, projected personal rapport broadcast live worldwide. These elements, drawn from shared Korean heritage, aimed to humanize the leaders and foster public sentiment for inter-Korean cooperation, though critics noted their primarily performative nature given persistent asymmetries and unaddressed issues in .

The Panmunjom Declaration

Key Provisions and Language

The , formally titled "Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification of the Korean Peninsula," was structured as a joint statement comprising a and ten numbered paragraphs, emphasizing mutual aspirations for reconciliation over enforceable obligations. It opened with the leaders' solemn affirmation that "there will be no more war on the Korean Peninsula and thus a new era of has begun," framing the document as a "historic turning point" toward lasting , prosperity, and unification driven by Koreans themselves. The language throughout employed declarative and aspirational phrasing, such as "will reconnect," "will make joint efforts," and "agreed to actively pursue," which conveyed intent without specifying timelines, verification mechanisms, or penalties for non-compliance. Paragraphs 1 through 3 focused on foundational principles, committing the two sides to recognize their shared bloodline, ease military tensions through halting "hostile acts against each other," and transform the (DMZ) into a "zone of peace." Specific provisions included prohibiting radio broadcasts, leaflet scattering, and border incursions, with an agreement to establish a joint military committee for verification and implementation. The declaration's wording here prioritized symbolic , stating the two Koreas "will endeavor to make the DMZ a peace zone," but omitted details on reducing troop numbers or weaponry along the border, reflecting a cautious approach to immediate . Subsequent provisions in paragraphs 4 through 7 addressed practical cooperation, pledging to hold regular high-level meetings, reunite separated families on an ongoing basis, and revive economic projects like reconnecting railways and roads across the border, alongside tourism to and the Kaesong Industrial Complex. Humanitarian and cultural exchanges were highlighted, including sports collaborations for the and efforts to combat infectious diseases and drug issues. The language invoked "common prosperity and unification" as a "firm goal," yet conditioned progress on "phased" implementation tied to improved relations, avoiding quantification of economic investments or family reunion scales. The declaration's core security commitments appeared in paragraphs 8 and 9, where the leaders vowed to "work toward a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula" through "complete denuclearization" and to "actively seek the support and cooperation of the " for establishing a permanent peace regime, potentially replacing the 1953 with a . This phrasing echoed North Korea's longstanding interpretation of denuclearization as encompassing the withdrawal of U.S. extended nuclear deterrence from , rather than solely dismantling Pyongyang's arsenal, without clarifying definitions or sequencing. Paragraph 10 outlined follow-up mechanisms, including a joint secretariat and ministerial talks by May 2018, underscoring the document's emphasis on dialogue continuity over unilateral concessions. Overall, the declaration's provisions prioritized bilateral goodwill and incremental steps, with language that analysts have described as deliberately vague to allow flexibility amid unresolved trust deficits.

Specific Commitments on Security and Cooperation

The , signed on April 27, 2018, included targeted pledges to de-escalate military hostilities and build cooperative frameworks. Both leaders committed to an immediate cessation of all hostile acts, encompassing propaganda broadcasts, leaflet scattering, and defector-related activities across the (MDL), with implementation to follow bilateral agreements. In parallel, they agreed to establish no-fly zones north and south of the MDL—prohibiting flights by all military aircraft, including drones, up to 20 km from the line—to avert aerial incidents. Military extended to buffer zones along the MDL and (NLL). South and pledged to halt live-fire artillery exercises and naval maneuvers within 5 km of the MDL and 10 nautical miles of the NLL, respectively, while verifying compliance through joint inspections. These steps aimed to eliminate risks of armed conflict, with follow-up general-level military talks scheduled by May 2018 to detail verification protocols and non-aggression pacts. On denuclearization, the declaration reaffirmed the goal of complete dismantlement of nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula, with both sides vowing joint efforts to garner international backing, though without specifying timelines or verification mechanisms. For broader security architecture, the leaders resolved to pursue a permanent peace regime, declaring the cessation of the "state of war" and initiating multi-party dialogues involving the , , and other stakeholders to replace the 1953 Armistice Agreement with a . Recovery of remains was prioritized, with commitments to coordinate excavations and exchanges starting in May 2018. Cooperation extended to humanitarian domains, mandating prompt family reunions for those separated by the division, building on prior patterns from and but without fixed quotas. Economic and infrastructural cooperation was framed as supportive to security goals, with agreements to reconnect severed and links—initiating feasibility studies immediately and targeting by year's end—to symbolize irreversible . These initiatives were positioned as precursors to broader inter-Korean ventures, contingent on progress in denuclearization talks.

Immediate Reactions

South Korean Domestic Response

The April 27, 2018, inter-Korean summit generated broad public enthusiasm in , with millions tuning in to live broadcasts of the handshake and joint declaration between President and Kim Jong-un. Contemporary reports described widespread emotional responses, including tears and cheers in public spaces, as citizens expressed hope for an end to decades of hostility and a potential peace regime on the peninsula. President Moon's approval ratings spiked dramatically in the summit's aftermath, reaching 83% in a poll released on May 10, 2018, up from 73% the prior week, attributed directly to the perceived diplomatic success and optimistic tone of the . This surge reflected strong backing for Moon's engagement policy, particularly among progressive voters, though overall public perception of began softening even before the event, with pre-summit polls showing improved favorability toward Kim Jong-un compared to prior years. Conservative opposition parties and groups voiced caution, arguing that the summit overlooked North Korea's history of broken promises on denuclearization and abuses, potentially rewarding without verifiable concessions. Leaders from the criticized the event as overly conciliatory, warning it could undermine alliances with the and embolden North Korean aggression. Small protests by anti-North activists occurred in near the DMZ on the summit day, numbering in the hundreds, calling for cancellation due to distrust of Kim's regime and fears of naive diplomacy. Despite such dissent, which remained marginal amid the national mood of cautious optimism, the domestic response underscored a societal willingness to prioritize over confrontation, bolstered by economic inter-Korean projects like the Kaesong Industrial Complex in mind, though skeptics noted that public support hinged on tangible progress in subsequent verifications.

North Korean and International Perspectives

North Korean state media, through the (KCNA), portrayed the summit as a "historic" and "groundbreaking" achievement, crediting Kim Jong-un's "bold decision" and leadership for initiating the dialogue and fostering a "new milestone" in inter-Korean relations. KCNA emphasized the leaders' "candid and open-hearted exchange" on denuclearization, peace, and prosperity, framing the as a product of Pyongyang's proactive stance toward ending hostilities. This narrative aligned with North Korea's domestic propaganda, which rarely acknowledges external concessions and instead highlighted the event as validation of Kim's strategic diplomacy amid prior nuclear advancements. Internationally, reactions were predominantly optimistic but tempered by historical skepticism toward North Korean commitments. The , via President , hailed the summit as a "very special event" and "great progress," viewing it as a precursor to direct U.S.-North Korea talks scheduled for June in . , North Korea's primary ally, described the meeting as a "very important step" toward regional , with Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang expressing hope for concrete implementation. welcomed the dialogue as contributing to "security and " on the peninsula, per Foreign Ministry statements. Japan's response was supportive yet cautious, with Prime Minister congratulating the leaders while stressing the need for verifiable denuclearization and resolution of Japanese abductee cases from prior decades. United Nations Secretary-General praised the summit as a "significant step" toward , urging follow-through on the declaration's pledges. European leaders, including EU foreign policy chief , expressed encouragement for the thaw but underscored the importance of addressing empirically, given Pyongyang's pattern of non-compliance in past agreements like the 1994 . Overall, while immediate global commentary focused on the symbolic breakthrough—marked by the leaders' border crossing and joint tree-planting—analysts in outlets like noted underlying tensions, as North Korea's vague denuclearization language avoided timelines or inspections, raising doubts about causal links to lasting disarmament.

Long-Term Impact and Evaluation

Links to US-North Korea Engagements

The April 2018 inter-Korean summit served as a critical precursor to direct U.S.- engagements by demonstrating leader Kim Jong-un's willingness to pursue denuclearization and peace, which South Korean President conveyed to U.S. President . Following the summit's on April 27, 2018—which committed both Koreas to complete denuclearization of the peninsula and efforts to end the formally— met at the on May 22, 2018, to brief him on the outcomes and relay Kim's assurances of proceeding toward denuclearization without preconditions. This meeting reinforced momentum from earlier , where 's envoys had already prompted Kim's March 2018 invitation for a summit, positioning the inter-Korean dialogue as a bridge to bilateral U.S.-DPRK talks. The summit's success facilitated U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's preparatory visit to on May 8-9, 2018, where he secured the release of three American detainees and advanced logistics for the -Kim meeting. Moon's administration emphasized "tight linkage" between inter-Korean reconciliation and U.S.-North Korean negotiations, arguing that reduced tensions on the peninsula enabled 's diplomatic pivot from "maximum pressure" sanctions to summitry. This approach culminated in the June 12, 2018, Singapore summit between and , whose joint statement explicitly reaffirmed the Panmunjom Declaration's denuclearization pledge, committing the DPRK to work toward "complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula." Subsequent U.S.- interactions, including a second Trump-Kim summit in on February 27-28, 2019, referenced the inter-Korean framework indirectly through ongoing trilateral coordination, though breakdowns occurred over verification and sanctions relief. continued facilitating post-Singapore by hosting a third inter-Korean summit on September 18-20, 2018, where reiterated denuclearization commitments tied to U.S. engagement. Despite these links, U.S. officials noted that while the April summit de-escalated immediate risks—such as halting tests since November 2017—sustained progress hinged on DPRK actions beyond symbolic gestures, with State Department briefings highlighting the need for concrete steps like declaring nuclear sites.

Breakdowns in Follow-Through and Verification

Following the Declaration's commitments to cease hostile acts effective May 1, 2018, and pursue denuclearization, conducted tests on May 4 and 9, 2019, which South Korean officials and analysts viewed as violations of the agreement's intent to reduce military tensions, though framed them as exercises not targeting the South. The September 19, 2018, Comprehensive Military Agreement, intended to implement 's military provisions through demilitarized buffer zones, no-fly areas, and halted live-fire drills near the DMZ, faced repeated breaches; fired artillery and missiles into prohibited zones multiple times between 2019 and 2020, prompting South Korea's defense assessments to document over a dozen such incidents by early 2023, eroding trust without effective mutual verification protocols. Verification challenges were evident in North Korea's partial dismantlement of the in July 2018, publicized as a denuclearization , but confirmed reconstruction of key facilities, including the engine test stand, beginning in late February 2019 shortly after the failed Hanoi summit, highlighting the reversibility of unilateral actions absent intrusive inspections or international oversight like IAEA access, which the declaration did not mandate. Economic cooperation pledges, such as reconnecting rail and road links, saw initial test runs in October 2018 but stalled due to UN sanctions prohibiting joint ventures without verified denuclearization progress, creating a causal where demanded sanctions relief upfront while refusing transparency on its nuclear program, as noted in UN Panel of Experts reports. By mid-2020, breakdowns escalated with North Korea's demolition of the Kaesong Industrial Complex liaison office on June 16, citing South Korean activists' propaganda leaflets as a violation, though the declaration lacked enforceable mechanisms for such non-military disputes, leading to suspended family reunions after a single event in August 2018 and no further progress on humanitarian exchanges. The absence of standardized verification—relying instead on goodwill and satellite monitoring—allowed to expand enrichment at Yongbyon, as evidenced by commercial imagery and U.S. intelligence, undermining claims of compliance and revealing the declaration's structural weakness in enforcing causal linkages between concessions and irreversible steps.

Criticisms of Efficacy and Human Rights Oversights

Critics of the April 2018 inter-Korean summit contended that the Panmunjom Declaration's provisions on denuclearization and peace were vague and unenforceable, lacking specific timelines, verification protocols, or penalties for non-compliance, which allowed to evade substantive concessions. The declaration's call for "complete denuclearization" failed to reconcile divergent interpretations—South Korea and its allies emphasizing irreversible dismantlement of 's arsenal, versus Pyongyang's insistence on a security guarantee without preconditions—resulting in no verifiable reductions in 's estimated 20-60 warheads or capabilities by the summit's conclusion. Empirical outcomes underscored these shortcomings, as North Korea conducted short-range missile tests on May 4, 2019, and escalated rhetoric against joint military exercises, halting promised liaison office operations and infrastructure projects like rail reconnection by late 2019 due to sanctions adherence and Pyongyang's demands for unilateral concessions. Conservative analysts in South Korea argued that President Moon Jae-in's emphasis on symbolic gestures distracted from North Korea's strategic intransigence, weakening deterrence without advancing unification or security, as evidenced by the resumption of cross-border hostilities and the 2020 demolition of the Kaesong Industrial Complex liaison office. The summit's oversight of North Korea's abuses drew sharp rebuke from advocates, who noted the declaration's silence on political prison camps (kwanliso) detaining 80,000-120,000 individuals under forced labor and execution for perceived disloyalty, as documented in inquiries predating the event. Moon Jae-in's administration, despite his background as a , deprioritized these issues to foster , blocking domestic broadcasts of defector testimonies and criticizing international reports as impediments to engagement, a stance described as backtracking from South Korea's prior advocacy. This approach enabled to condition economic aid on sanctions relief without reciprocal reforms, perpetuating abuses such as public executions and systems affecting 25 million citizens, with no post-summit improvements reported by monitors. Critics, including South Korean conservatives and international observers, asserted that sidelining legitimized Kim Jong-un's regime, prioritizing illusory over causal links between internal repression and external aggression, as 's nuclear pursuits correlated with domestic control mechanisms rather than genuine peace overtures.

References

  1. [1]
    Nuclear Negotiations with North Korea | Congress.gov
    Dec 11, 2023 · The two Koreas agreed to hold a leaders' summit in April 2018 in Panmunjom, located in the joint security area of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) ...
  2. [2]
    Panmunjom Declaration for Peace | NCNK
    Apr 27, 2018 · The two leaders solemnly declared before the 80 million Korean people and the whole world that there will be no more war on the Korean Peninsula and thus a new ...
  3. [3]
    Seven Takeaways from the April 27 Inter-Korean Summit: Issues ...
    May 21, 2018 · 1. Sanctions-lifting: Kim Jong-un created optimistic conditions for peace, prosperity, and unification in South Korea during the course of the ...
  4. [4]
    Expert Opinions on the Inter-Korean Summit > Issue Briefs
    May 9, 2018 · The nuclear-related sentences of the April 27 Declaration are abstract, general, and confusing, which means North Korea's real intention will be ...
  5. [5]
    North Korea profile - Timeline - BBC News
    Apr 26, 2019 · A chronology of key events: 1945 - After World War II, Japanese occupation of Korea ends with Soviet troops occupying the north, and US troops the south.
  6. [6]
    The Korean War | The United States Army
    The Korean War, often referred to as "The Forgotten War," was fought from June 25, 1950, to July 27, 1953.1950-1953 · Conflict Timeline · U.S. Army ComponentsMissing: verifiable | Show results with:verifiable
  7. [7]
    Armistice ends Korean War hostilities | July 27, 1953 - History.com
    The armistice, signed on July 27, established a committee of representatives from neutral countries to decide the fate of the thousands of prisoners of war on ...What Is The Korean... · Also On This Day In History · Related Articles
  8. [8]
    Inter-Korean Relations | NCNK
    Inter-Korean talks, initially held under the auspices of the Red Cross, led to the first Joint Statement on reunification, issued on July 4, 1972.
  9. [9]
    Factbox: History of inter-Korean summits - Reuters
    Feb 10, 2018 · The meeting led to a series of reunions of families separated by the 1950-53 Korean War, as well as the launch of a joint factory park in the ...
  10. [10]
    North Korea's prolific year for missile tests - CNN
    Mar 7, 2018 · In 2017, the country launched 23 missiles, including its first intercontinental missiles that it said had a long enough range to reach the United States ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Fact Sheet: North Korea Missile Activity in 2017
    February 12, 2017 – Medium Range Ballistic Missile Launch · Pukguksong-2, also known as the KN-15 ; March 5, 2017 – Salvo Launch of Medium Range Ballistic ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  12. [12]
    A look at every North Korean missile test in 2017 - ABC News
    March 5. In early March, North Korea launched five medium-range Scud-er (extended range) missiles. Four traveled more than 600 miles, the ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  13. [13]
    Timeline of North Korea's nuclear tests - Al Jazeera
    Sep 3, 2017 · September 2017 – A magnitude 6.3 quake is detected in Kilju county, where the country's nuclear test site – Punggye-ri – is located. The latest ...
  14. [14]
    Kim Jong Un's 2018 New Year's Address | NCNK
    Jan 1, 2018 · Greeting the hope-filled new year, I wish the families across the country good health, happiness, success and prosperity.
  15. [15]
    Kim Jong Un sends nuclear warning to U.S., but overture to South ...
    Jan 1, 2018 · The North Korean leader on Monday warned Washington that Pyongyang could reach the entire US mainland with nuclear weapons at anytime.
  16. [16]
    Kim Jong Un's 2018 New Year's Speech: Self-Confidence After a ...
    Jan 3, 2018 · In his 2018 New Year's Speech, Kim Jong Un acknowledges the effects of the toughest ever sanctions against North Korea but refuses to yield.
  17. [17]
    South Korea offers to talk with North on Olympic cooperation - Politico
    Jan 2, 2018 · In a closely watched New Year's address, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said Monday that he was willing to send a delegation to the ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Olympic dialogue: What's realistic for the two Koreas? | Brookings
    Jan 9, 2018 · Kim Jong-un's recent New Year's Day address repeats his desire for 2018 to be a year of economic modernization and “improving the people's ...
  19. [19]
    The Quiet Diplomacy to Save the Olympics in a Nuclear Standoff
    Feb 8, 2018 · But getting North Korea to attend the Games was a diplomatic puzzle in itself, especially amid escalating tensions. Those interested in a ...
  20. [20]
    Diplomacy Through Sport: The 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang
    Jan 29, 2018 · The idea of integration of the two Koreas at the PyeongChang Winter Olympics after North Korea's multiple nuclear and missile tests seem controversial.
  21. [21]
    Inter-Korean Summit: Third Time Lucky? - Comparative Connections
    May 10, 2018 · 9, 2018: President Moon opens the XXIII Olympic Winter Games in PyeongChang. The North and South Korean teams enter the stadium jointly, to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    'Sports diplomacy' at the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics
    Jan 16, 2018 · The governments of North and South Korea have agreed to begin formal negotiations and military talks aimed at reducing tensions on the peninsula ...
  23. [23]
    From Peace Olympics to Olympic Peace - Global Asia
    The special envoys confirmed Kim Jong Un's resolve to denuclearize and agreed to an inter-Korean summit in late April. After Pyongyang, the South Korean ...
  24. [24]
    Olympics Make Peace Possible on the Korean Peninsula
    Apr 9, 2018 · Diplomacy. The 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang were a rare moment to see North Korea participating on the world stage in cooperative ...
  25. [25]
    What North Korea's Participation Means for the PyeongChang ...
    Jan 23, 2018 · Backed by support from the United States along with Russia and China, North Korea's participation has the potential to drive peace initiatives ...
  26. [26]
    READ: Full declaration of North and South Korean summit - CNN
    Apr 27, 2018 · ... Inter-Korean Summit Meeting at the 'Peace House' at Panmunjom on April 27, 2018. The two leaders solemnly declared before the 80 million Korean ...Missing: venue selection logistics
  27. [27]
    What you need to know about the high-stakes inter-Korean summit
    Apr 25, 2018 · The summit will take place at the Peace House on the southern side of Panmunjom; It includes a welcoming ceremony, a banquet dinner, and a ...Missing: logistics | Show results with:logistics
  28. [28]
    Everything you need to know about the inter-Korean summit
    Apr 26, 2018 · The site was created at the end of the 1950-53 Korean War as a meeting point to discuss the uneasy truce that ended the conflict. There are six ...
  29. [29]
    Korea 2018: The Beginning of the End of the Post-1990 World Order?
    Mar 7, 2018 · It returned with plans for a summit meeting at Panmunjom—a neutral place—in April and even the promise of a moratorium on nuclear and missile ...
  30. [30]
    Trump-Kim summit: what's in the venue? - Lowy Institute
    May 6, 2018 · North Korea gets a vote on venue too. Panmunjom is a practical option as the easiest location for Kim Jong-un to access outside of his country.
  31. [31]
    Two Koreas hold working-level talks on upcoming Panmunjom summit
    Apr 5, 2018 · The two Koreas on Thursday held working-level talks on logistics for an upcoming summit between DPRK leader Kim Jong Un and ROK President ...
  32. [32]
    North Korea's Kim Jong Un crosses DMZ line for historic meeting ...
    Apr 26, 2018 · North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has crossed the line dividing the demilitarized zone to meet with South Korean President Moon Jae-in in what's being described ...
  33. [33]
    Korea Talks Begin as Kim Jong-un Crosses to South's Side of DMZ
    Apr 26, 2018 · North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-un, walked across the inter-Korean border to meet the South's president, Moon Jae-in. No North Korean leader ...
  34. [34]
    2018 Inter-Korean Summit
    ... Panmunjom, is the venue for the Inter-Korean Summit slated for April 27. The last stop on the tour was the Inter-Korean Transit Office ...Missing: logistics | Show results with:logistics
  35. [35]
    South Korean Officials Meet Kim Jong Un To Pave The Way For U.S. ...
    Mar 5, 2018 · The South Korean envoys flew a direct route from Seoul to Pyongyang by government plane. They'll stay for two days. The last South Korean ...
  36. [36]
    South Korea delegation meets Kim in Pyongyang before historic talks
    Mar 4, 2018 · A high-ranking South Korean delegation has met the North Korean dictator in Pyongyang on a historic visit aimed at reducing nuclear tensions and ...
  37. [37]
    North Korea open to abandoning its nuclear program, Seoul says
    Mar 6, 2018 · The group included South Korea's national intelligence chief Suh Hoon and its unification minister, Cho Myong-gyon. ... North Korea, March 5, 2018 ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Kim Jong-un's Play at the Inter-Korean Summit
    Apr 26, 2018 · Kim's opening act came in the form of a 2018 New Year's speech in which he proposed working with South Korean authorities to reduce peninsular ...
  39. [39]
    South, North Korea to hold summit in April: South Korea says - CNBC
    Mar 6, 2018 · North Korea is willing to hold talks with the U.S. on denuclearization and will suspend nuclear tests while those talks are under way, ...Missing: agenda | Show results with:agenda
  40. [40]
    South Korean officials leave for US with message from North Korea ...
    Mar 8, 2018 · The two diplomats recently returned to South Korea from an unprecedented meeting with North Korea's Kim in Pyongyang, believed to be the ...
  41. [41]
    North and South Korea Set a Date for Summit Meeting at Border
    Mar 29, 2018 · Kim Jong-un and South Korea's president, Moon Jae-in, will hold talks on April 27 at the so-called truce village of Panmunjom, ...
  42. [42]
    North and South Korea schedule talks at Panmunjom within days
    Mar 24, 2018 · The two Koreas are to hold high-level talks on 29 March to prepare for an April summit between both countries' leaders, Kim Jong-un and Moon Jae-in.
  43. [43]
    2018 1st Inter-Korean Summit - KBS WORLD Radio
    A five-member South Korean delegation, including National Security Adviser Chung Eui-yong and National Intelligence Service Director Suh Hoon, visited North ...
  44. [44]
    Blue House declares its intention to hold regular inter-Korean ...
    Apr 18, 2018 · ... Suh Hoon could visit North Korea again before the summit on Apr. 27 to hammer out key agenda items, such as arranging regular inter-Korean ...
  45. [45]
    https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/brd/m_5478/view.do?seq=319130
  46. [46]
    President Moon, Chairman Kim have historic first meeting - Korea.net
    Greeted by two children with wreaths, the two leaders walked together to the official welcoming ceremony venue, accompanied by a traditional honor guard. They ...Missing: attendees | Show results with:attendees
  47. [47]
    North and South Korea vow to end the Korean War in historic accord
    Apr 27, 2018 · South Korean President Moon Jae-in, right, toasts Ri Sol Ju, wife of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at a banquet that concluded the summit.Missing: attendees | Show results with:attendees
  48. [48]
    South Korea's Moon to meet North Korea's Kim at border for summit
    Apr 26, 2018 · Also in the delegation are Ri Su Yong, a member of the North's politburo and Ri Myong Su, the chief of the general staff of the Korean People's ...
  49. [49]
    https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20180405000724
  50. [50]
    The historic Kim-Moon meeting as it unfolded - The Washington Post
    Apr 27, 2018 · Kim and Moon repeatedly appeared to deviate from the carefully prepared schedule and the official choreography. After the two shook hands while ...
  51. [51]
    [2018 Inter-Korean summit] Ceremonies add sentiment to summit
    Apr 27, 2018 · The ceremony was carried out upon South Korea's request, which was accepted by the North. Soil collected from the South's Hallasan on Jeju and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    2018 Inter-Korean Summit
    President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un finished the first session of their summit, lasting 100 minutes from 10:15 a.m. to 11:55 a.m.
  53. [53]
    North meets South in historic summit of the Koreas - CNBC
    Apr 27, 2018 · North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un leaves the Peace House after the Inter-Korean Summit and dinner on April 27, 2018 in Panmunjom, South Korea.Missing: venue logistics
  54. [54]
    Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in at inter-Korean Summit - CNBC
    Apr 26, 2018 · South Korean President Moon Jae-in (L) and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (2nd L) attend an official welcome ceremony ahead of the Inter Korean ...Missing: members | Show results with:members
  55. [55]
    https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20180427000723
  56. [56]
    Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification of the ...
    In this context, President Moon Jae-in agreed to visit Pyongyang this fall. 27 April 2018. Done in Panmunjom (Signed) Kim Jong Un (Signed) Moon Jae-inMissing: summary | Show results with:summary
  57. [57]
    Kim, Moon Pledge Denuclearization Of Peninsula And End To ...
    Apr 27, 2018 · Kim, Moon Pledge Denuclearization Of Peninsula And End To Korean War. April 27, 201812:39 AM ET. Heard on All Things Considered. By. Elise Hu.
  58. [58]
    In pictures: The historic Korean summit - CNN.com
    The two leaders shook hands at the line, and then, in a symbolic move, Moon joined Kim on the northern side of the line before they crossed into the southern ...
  59. [59]
    Inside the Korea summit: the hidden meanings behind a carefully ...
    Apr 27, 2018 · It had been a PR coup for Kim and Mr Moon from the get-go, with the leaders working their way through a series of highly symbolic gestures ...
  60. [60]
    Deciphering symbols at the inter-Korean summit - Lowy Institute
    Apr 28, 2018 · Moon wore a blue tie, the colour of the Korean Unification Flag, to greet Kim at the demarcation line. He also gave Kim a Joseon royal guards ...
  61. [61]
    Korean leaders bond over handshakes and 'a lot of pictures'
    Apr 27, 2018 · Moments after Kim crossed into the South, Moon asked when he would be allowed to visit the North and in an unscripted moment the two held hands ...
  62. [62]
    The Panmunjom Declaration: What it wasn't supposed to be
    May 1, 2018 · It proposed abolishing the US nuclear umbrella protecting the South and prohibiting the storage of any US nuclear weapons on South Korean soil.
  63. [63]
    Full text of Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and ...
    Apr 27, 2018 · Full text of Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification of the Korean Peninsula ... Panmunjom on April 27, 2018. The two leaders ...
  64. [64]
    Here's How Some Koreans Reacted to the Historic Summit in South ...
    Apr 30, 2018 · "I am confident a new era of peace will unfold on the Korean peninsula," Moon said to his aides. Much of the meeting's fanfare and focus ...
  65. [65]
    South Koreans dare to hope of once unthinkable peace with Kim
    A historic summit between Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae-in has left South Koreans contemplating a peace plan that seemed improbable if not ...
  66. [66]
    South Korea's Moon Jae-in is more popular than ever - USA Today
    May 10, 2018 · Moon garnered an 83% approval rating, buoyed by his April summit meeting with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, according to an opinion poll released Thursday.
  67. [67]
    Why some South Koreans feel more positive about Kim Jong-un
    May 16, 2018 · A poll taken ahead of last month's meeting indicated the South Korean public's perception of Kim Jong-un and North Korea in general had already started to ...
  68. [68]
    North Korea leader Kim Jong Un scores surprising favorability ...
    May 4, 2018 · South Korean President Moon Jae-in's approval ratings surged to 83 percent this week, a 10-point boost from the week before, according to a poll conducted by ...
  69. [69]
    In South Korea, Summit With North Korea Is Greeted With Hope
    Apr 27, 2018 · South Koreans opposed to the summit protest on Friday in Paju, South Korea, near the meeting site in Panmunjom. Publicly, Kim hailed the ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  70. [70]
    Koreas summit: All the latest updates | News - Al Jazeera
    Apr 27, 2018 · Anti-North Korea protests have been taking place in Paju, South Korea, with demonstrators demanding Moon cancels the summit. There's also been a ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  71. [71]
    [PDF] The 2018 Inter-Korean Summit and South Korean Society
    Feb 15, 2019 · Judging from opinion polls and the like, the South Korean public has become more conciliatory overall, but they could not be described as ...
  72. [72]
    North Korean state media praises 'historic' Kim-Moon summit - CNN
    Apr 28, 2018 · As he and Moon shook hands, planted a symbolic tree and worked their way through a day of choreographed events that were beamed around the world ...
  73. [73]
    North Korea hails 'new milestone' and credits Kim with summit success
    Apr 28, 2018 · In a separate report, KCNA said the two leaders had a “candid and open-hearted exchange of views” on issues including “ensuring peace on the ...Missing: reaction | Show results with:reaction
  74. [74]
    Koreas summit: North Korean media hail 'historic' meeting - BBC
    Apr 28, 2018 · In a rare move, state-run TV and the official KCNA news agency hailed the talks and the leaders' commitment to seek "complete denuclearisation".
  75. [75]
    Six-party countries react to inter-Korean summit - NK News
    Apr 27, 2018 · The leaders of the two Koreas on Friday morning shared a handshake along the Military Demarcation Line (MDL) at the Panmunjom Peace Village to ...
  76. [76]
    North and South Korean leaders promise 'lasting peace' for peninsula
    Apr 27, 2018 · Moon applauded Kim's “courage and determination” and vowed that “there will be no going back” to an era of tension and provocation that has ...Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic
  77. [77]
    World reacts to historic Korea summit - Arab News
    Apr 27, 2018 · PARIS: World leaders and governments hailed the historic summit Friday between the leaders of North and South Korea as a step toward peace, ...
  78. [78]
    Donald Trump Meets with Moon Jae-in of South Korea in ... - Roll Call
    May 22, 2018 · Donald Trump talked 1559 seconds of a total of 2105 seconds. ... Moon Jae-in said 35 sentences of a total of 421 sentences. ... Moon Jae-in said 563 ...
  79. [79]
    North Korea's May 16, 2018 Statements and Their Implications for a ...
    May 16, 2018 · North Korean authorities issued two separate statements on May 16, 2018, that have been reported to cast doubt on prospects for the Trump-Kim summit.
  80. [80]
    Remarks With Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha ...
    May 11, 2018 · We spoke on April 28th right after the momentous inter-Korean summit, and today we met just after Secretary Pompeo's return from Pyongyang.
  81. [81]
    Joint Statement of President Donald J. Trump of the United States of ...
    Jun 12, 2018 · Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.Missing: inter- | Show results with:inter-
  82. [82]
    Moon Jae-in's Mediation in the U.S.–DPRK Crisis (2017–2018)
    Dec 3, 2024 · From the outset, President Moon Jae-in relentlessly worked to facilitate diplomatic dialogue between the United States and the DPRK, establish ...
  83. [83]
    Department Press Briefing - May 3, 2018 - state.gov
    May 3, 2018 · So not on detainees, but – so at the Inter-Korean Summit, both Moon and Kim said that they want to make an effort to end the Korean war. So ...
  84. [84]
    Timeline: North Korean Nuclear Negotiations
    In the third summit between Kim and Moon, this time in Pyongyang, the leaders sign a joint declaration outlining steps toward reducing tensions, expanding inter ...
  85. [85]
    The Failure of the 9/19 Comprehensive Military Agreement - 38 North
    Mar 1, 2024 · The CMA was essentially a political agreement between North and South Korea, representing the implementation of the Panmunjom Declaration in the ...Missing: compliance 2018-2020
  86. [86]
    Sohae Launch Facility Update: North Korean "Snapback" After Hanoi
    Mar 7, 2019 · The rebuilding activities at Sohae demonstrate how quickly North Korea can easily render reversible any steps taken towards scrapping its WMD ...
  87. [87]
    North Korea rebuilds rocket launch site, in ominous signal about ...
    Mar 6, 2019 · The rebuilding work at the Sohae Satellite Launching Station began between Feb. 16 and March 2, according to satellite imagery, meaning it ...
  88. [88]
    A Tragedy of Collateral Damage? The Impact of Sanctions on Inter ...
    Dec 9, 2024 · Although the sanctions sent clear warning signals to Pyongyang, they failed to achieve what they set out to do, and a vicious cycle of ...
  89. [89]
    Back to square one for inter-Korean relations - East Asia Forum
    Jun 23, 2020 · But the statement also targeted the Moon administration for its failure to contain the leaflets in contravention of the April 2018 Panmunjom ...<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Has Moon Jae-in's North Korea Peace Process Failed? - The Diplomat
    May 4, 2022 · Has Moon Jae-in's North Korea Peace Process Failed? Conservatives – including President-elect Yoon – argue that the initiative damaged the South ...Missing: unfulfilled | Show results with:unfulfilled
  91. [91]
    Korean summit lays out a path to peace but short on details - PBS
    Apr 27, 2018 · South Korean conservative politicians criticized the joint statement as letting North Korea off the hook by failing to secure a clear commitment ...
  92. [92]
    Moon's Failed Balancing Act - The Asan Forum
    Aug 28, 2019 · ... failure to deepen inter-Korean relations would likely weaken Seoul's bargaining leverage in trilateral talks. Successful realization of ...
  93. [93]
    South Korean President Moon Jae-in's Failed North Korea Policy
    Jan 14, 2022 · Pyongyang's systematic abuse of human rights is a prime example that supports this argument. Under the Kim Jong-un regime alone, North Korea ...
  94. [94]
    Inter-Korean Summit fails to recognize human rights oppression in ...
    Plans for peace talks between the leaders of North and South Korea fail to solve all conflicts there, some experts say, ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  95. [95]
    South Korea: Don't Sideline Rights During Inter-Korean Summit
    Apr 24, 2018 · On March 31, 2018, North Korea criticized Kang Kyung-hwa, South Korea's foreign minister, for asking North Korea to abandon its nuclear program ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  96. [96]
    South Korea: Reprioritize Human Rights
    Jan 14, 2020 · “President Moon Jae-in, who started his legal career fighting for human rights, is in several ways failing to promote them now,” said John ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Moon Jae-in risks his human rights reputation for North Korea
    without results. The South Korean president faces growing criticism as he ...
  98. [98]
    The Urgency of Addressing North Korean Human Rights
    Feb 16, 2023 · While there are valid concerns about how Pyongyang may react, it is also true that past efforts have failed to achieve progress on nuclear ...Missing: oversights | Show results with:oversights