Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ars Conjectandi

Ars Conjectandi (Latin for "The Art of Conjecturing") is a foundational book on combinatorics and mathematical probability authored by Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli (1655–1705). Written primarily between 1684 and 1689, with possible later revisions, the work was published posthumously in 1713 in Basel, Switzerland, edited by his nephew Nicolaus Bernoulli and printed by the Thurneysen Brothers, eight years after Bernoulli's death. The book represents the first systematic treatment of probability theory, extending concepts from games of chance to broader applications in civil, moral, and economic affairs, and introducing key ideas that shaped modern statistics. The text is divided into four parts. The first part provides a commentary on Christiaan Huygens's earlier work De Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae (1657), expanding on and introducing the through problems involving repeated trials. Part two delves into combinatorial mathematics, covering permutations, combinations, and the enumeration of possibilities, while also defining Bernoulli numbers, which later proved essential in and . The third part applies probabilistic methods to 24 specific games of chance, such as dice and card games, demonstrating practical calculations of odds and expectations. The fourth and most influential part, left unfinished at Bernoulli's death, shifts focus to the applications of probability beyond , treating it as a measure of certainty in uncertain events. Here, Bernoulli presents his , termed the "golden theorem," which asserts that as the number of trials increases, the observed frequency of an event converges to its theoretical probability, providing a rigorous foundation for in empirical sciences. This theorem, along with Bernoulli's definition of probability as a degree of belief between impossibility and certainty, influenced subsequent mathematicians like and , establishing Ars Conjectandi as a of . The first complete English translation appeared in 2006, edited by Edith Sylla, making the work more accessible to modern readers.

Historical Context

Origins of Probability

The origins of probability theory trace back to the 16th century, when Italian mathematician explored gambling odds in his unpublished manuscript Liber de ludo aleae, composed between the 1520s and 1560s. In this work, Cardano analyzed dice games, calculating the likelihood of various outcomes and recognizing that random events follow mathematical patterns, marking an early systematic approach to quantifying chance. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1654 through the correspondence between and , who addressed the ""—determining a fair division of stakes in an interrupted dice game. Their exchange, prompted by the gambler Chevalier de Méré, developed methods to enumerate possible outcomes and compute equitable shares, laying foundational principles for solving division problems in games of chance. In 1657, published De ratiociniis in ludo aleae, the first treatise dedicated to probability, where he formalized the concept of as the weighted average of possible outcomes in games. Huygens demonstrated this through examples like fair divisions in dice throws, establishing that the value of a chance equals what one would pay to secure equivalent prospects. His key formulation for the E(X) of a X is given by E(X) = \sum p_i \cdot a_i, where p_i represents the probability of outcome a_i. Extending these ideas beyond gaming, John Graunt's 1662 book Natural and Political Observations Made upon the applied statistical techniques to analyze London's death records, estimating population sizes, birth-death ratios, and impacts from aggregated data. Graunt's work pioneered by using ratios and comparisons across years to infer patterns in human mortality and fertility. Jacob Bernoulli was aware of these foundational developments, which informed his later contributions to probability.

Bernoulli's Early Influences

was born on December 27, 1654, in , , into a prominent family of spice merchants and magistrates. Despite his father's expectations for a career in commerce or , Bernoulli pursued studies in and at the , earning a in in 1671 and a licentiate in in 1676. However, he secretly immersed himself in mathematics and astronomy during his university years, driven by a passion that led him to tutor in Geneva in 1676 and travel across France, the Netherlands, England, and Germany from 1677 to 1682, where he engaged with leading scientists and self-studied advanced topics. Appointed as a lecturer in mechanics at the in 1683 and promoted to professor of mathematics there in 1687, Bernoulli established himself as a key figure in European mathematics, laying the groundwork for his later probabilistic inquiries. Bernoulli's early mathematical development was profoundly shaped by foundational works in probability and statistics. He deeply studied Christiaan Huygens' De ratiociniis in ludo aleae (1657), the seminal treatise on in games of chance, which served as the primary basis for his own expansions in and combinatorial analysis. Bernoulli was unaware of Blaise Pascal's Traité du triangle arithmétique (1665) until shortly before his death. He engaged with Pascal's ideas on probability indirectly via the Logique de Port-Royal (1662), influencing his foundational thinking. Additionally, Bernoulli drew on John Graunt's Natural and Political Observations Made upon the (1662), particularly its demographic life tables summarized in the 1666 , adopting relative frequencies as a method for estimating probabilities in applications like annuities and mortality risks, as evidenced in his 1686 paper on a . From the 1680s, Bernoulli recorded his burgeoning ideas on probability in his personal notebooks known as Meditationes, begun in 1677 and spanning 1684 to 1689, where he first sketched concepts like the as limits of relative frequencies. These notes formed the core preparatory research for Ars Conjectandi, integrating infinitesimal methods from his studies. His correspondence with , intensifying from 1703, further linked calculus to probabilistic limits; Bernoulli shared proofs of convergence in repeated trials (e.g., dice throws), while Leibniz critiqued the approach's applicability to natural variability, stimulating refinements in Bernoulli's theory of moral certainty. Bernoulli died on August 16, 1705, in , leaving Ars Conjectandi unfinished.

Development and Publication

Composition Process

Jacob Bernoulli began composing Ars Conjectandi in 1684 and continued the primary work through 1689, primarily in , , where he held the position of of at the from 1687 onward. This manuscript formed part of his ambitious, unfinished larger project known as the Meditationes, a collection of mathematical reflections intended to encompass diverse topics. The structure of Ars Conjectandi evolved considerably during this period, starting with a focused treatment of games of chance—drawing briefly from the foundational ideas of and —and expanding to include systematic explorations of as well as practical applications of probability to civil, moral, and economic affairs. Bernoulli's approach emphasized inductive methods, transforming isolated problems in chance into a cohesive for reasoning under . Throughout the composition, Bernoulli encountered substantial obstacles, including interruptions from his professorial responsibilities such as teaching and , mentoring students, and participating in , which began intensifying after he secured his in 1687. His health also deteriorated progressively; an illness in 1692 left him with chronic joint afflictions that worsened over time, contributing to repeated delays and preventing full completion by his death in 1705. Surviving manuscripts reveal incomplete sections, notably those awaiting empirical like mortality tables to illustrate probabilistic applications. Bernoulli wove in personal conjectures on natural phenomena, using probabilistic tools to analyze irregular patterns such as those potentially linked to periodic events in , thereby extending the work beyond . He chose the title Ars Conjectandi—"The Art of Conjecturing"—to underscore inductive inference as the core of the discipline, defining probability as "a degree of " to guide in uncertain domains.

Posthumous Editing and Release

Following Jacob Bernoulli's death on August 16, 1705, his unpublished manuscripts, including the nearly complete draft of Ars Conjectandi, were discovered among his papers by family members. His nephew, (1687–1759), played a key role in preparing the work for publication, having been entrusted with the manuscripts shortly after 1705 and contributing significantly to their organization despite his youth and ongoing studies. The publication faced an eight-year delay due to family disputes over access to Bernoulli's unpublished works, particularly tensions between Jacob's widow, Judith Stupanus, and his brother , which excluded Johann from editorial involvement and led the family to hire external editors—a and an unemployed minister—with limited mathematical expertise for and . Nicolaus I, who had used portions of the manuscript in his 1709 dissertation, advocated for its release, corresponding with scholars like Pierre Rémond de Montmort and Jakob Hermann to build support, though he was not the primary editor. Editorial decisions preserved the manuscript's core content with minimal alterations; Nicolaus added a explaining the work's and an errata list to address printing errors, while leaving some sections, particularly in Part IV, unfinished as Bernoulli had intended to revise them further based on additional data like mortality tables. The book was released on September 9, 1713, in by the Thurneysen brothers (Impensis Thurnisiorum Fratrum), comprising 348 pages including two folding tables and one folding plate. Initial distribution was limited to academic circles across , with copies circulated among mathematicians and scholars through personal networks, reflecting the era's small print runs for specialized works. The first complete English translation appeared in 2006 as The Art of Conjecturing, Together with Letter to a Friend on Sets in Court Tennis, edited and translated by Edith Dudley Sylla.

Book Contents

Part I: Expected Value in Games

Part I of Ars Conjectandi comprises approximately 71 pages and serves as an extensive commentary on Christiaan Huygens's 1657 treatise De ratiociniis in ludo aleae, reprinting the original text alongside Bernoulli's annotations and solutions to its problems. Bernoulli expands Huygens's foundational framework for calculating expectations in games of chance, particularly those involving outcomes that occur equally easily or with known ratios of ease, by providing detailed rules and tables for practical application. This section shifts the focus from mere expectation to probability as a measurable degree of certainty, defining it as "Probabilitas enim est gradus certitudinis" (probability is a degree of certainty). A key contribution is Bernoulli's elaboration on fair division of stakes in interrupted games, building directly on Huygens's propositions for the "problem of points." He includes tables illustrating equitable distributions for two and three players, such as after Proposition VII (for two players) and Proposition IX (for three players), ensuring that each participant's reflects their remaining chances of winning. These rules address scenarios where a game is abandoned prematurely, prioritizing moral fairness over arbitrary splits. Bernoulli introduces the concept of trials with binary outcomes—now known as Bernoulli trials—where each event has a constant success probability p and failure probability $1 - p, repeated over n trials. He formalizes the E for games with multiple possible outcomes as E = \frac{\sum p_i a_i}{\sum p_i}, where p_i represents the probability (or "ease") of outcome i and a_i its associated gain or loss; this generalizes Huygens's weighted averages by normalizing over total probabilities. For instance, in a toss with fair odds (p = 1/2), Bernoulli demonstrates how expectations balance over repeated plays, using tables to enumerate outcomes and their values. The section applies these principles to specific problems, including dice expectations (e.g., Propositions X–XIV on throws with unequal chances) and lotteries modeled as card draws with fixed favorable outcomes. Bernoulli emphasizes moral certainty arising from repeated trials, arguing that frequent repetitions—such as drawing from an urn with a 3:2 ratio of white to black pebbles thousands of times—yield probabilities approaching certainty, as "it becomes ten times, one hundred times, one thousand times, etc., more probable" to observe the true ratio. Tables throughout the part tabulate these outcomes, aiding computation for gamblers and decision-makers under uncertainty.

Part II: Combinatorial Foundations

Part II of Ars Conjectandi provides a systematic exposition of , laying the groundwork for probabilistic reasoning by detailing methods to count possible outcomes in discrete scenarios. structures this section as a on permutations and combinations, drawing on earlier works but extending them with rigorous derivations suitable for calculations. Spanning approximately 66 pages, it emphasizes practical rules for arranging and selecting objects, which views as essential for determining probabilities in games and lotteries. Bernoulli begins with permutations, defining the number of ways to arrange n distinct objects in a as n!, the product n \times (n-1) \times \cdots \times 1. He extends this to cases involving indistinguishable objects, where the count adjusts to n! / (k_1! k_2! \cdots k_m!) for multiplicities k_i of identical types, ensuring overcounting is avoided. For circular arrangements, he derives the formula (n-1)! by fixing one position to account for . These definitions enable precise of ordered outcomes, crucial for probability assessments. In treating combinations, Bernoulli shifts to unordered selections, introducing the binomial coefficient C(n,k) = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!} as the number of ways to choose k items from n without regard to order. He connects this to figurate numbers, such as triangular numbers for k=2 (C(n,2) = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}) and tetrahedral numbers for higher k, illustrating geometric interpretations. Bernoulli presents these through a discussion of the arithmetical triangle—now known as —where entries represent C(n,k), generated row by row to compute sums and selections efficiently. This tool facilitates rapid calculation of combinatorial quantities without direct factorial computation. Bernoulli further develops a triangle analogous to Pascal's but tailored to permutations, termed the triangulum permutationum, where entries accumulate factorial-based sums for arrangements of varying sizes. This structure serves as a generating device for permutation counts, allowing recursive computation of totals like the sum of permutations up to n, akin to how Pascal's triangle generates binomial sums. He employs generating functions here, such as exponential series expansions, to derive closed forms for these aggregates, bridging combinatorial enumeration with algebraic manipulation. A pivotal innovation in Part II occurs in a scholium to the chapter on combinations, where Bernoulli introduces the Bernoulli numbers B_m to express sums of powers of integers in combinatorial terms. He derives a formula for \sum_{k=1}^n k^m = \frac{1}{m+1} \sum_{j=0}^m C(m+1,j) B_j n^{m+1-j} (adjusted for his convention), providing a systematic method for higher-order enumerations. Bernoulli computes the first ten Bernoulli numbers explicitly (using the convention B_1 = +1/2), presenting them in a table that reveals patterns like the vanishing of odd-indexed terms beyond B_1 (note: modern convention often uses B_1 = -1/2 for consistency with the generating function \frac{x}{e^x - 1} = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} B_m \frac{x^m}{m!}):
mB_m
01
1+1/2
21/6
30
4−1/30
50
61/42
70
8−1/30
90
105/66
These values, calculated using finite differences and combinatorial identities, mark the first systematic tabulation of the sequence, though Bernoulli notes the increasing complexity for higher m. Bernoulli applies these combinatorial tools to count favorable outcomes in scenarios like lotteries, where permutations determine ticket arrangements and combinations identify winning subsets. For instance, in a lottery with n positions and k prizes, he uses P(n,k) = n! / (n-k)! to tally possible draws, adjusting for symmetries in identical prizes. Similarly, for arranging objects into groups, combinations yield the number of distinct partitions, informing probability ratios of success. These methods underscore the section's utility in quantifying uncertainty without delving into specific game mechanics. Notably, Part II contains Bernoulli's first rigorous, non-inductive proof of the binomial theorem for positive integers, (a + b)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n C(n,k) a^{n-k} b^k. He establishes this combinatorially by interpreting the expansion as counting ways to choose k factors of b from n terms in the product (a + b)^n, equating it directly to C(n,k). This proof integrates seamlessly with the surrounding discussion of combinations, reinforcing their foundational role in algebraic identities relevant to probability.

Part III: Specific Chance Problems

Part III of Ars Conjectandi applies the probabilistic and established in earlier sections to a series of practical problems involving games of chance, demonstrating how theoretical frameworks can resolve real-world uncertainties in controlled scenarios. Bernoulli presents 24 worked examples, ranging from simple lotteries to complex wagering systems, to illustrate the computation of probabilities and expected values in finite games. These problems emphasize the equitable division of stakes and the evaluation of advantages or disadvantages for participants, often drawing briefly on combinatorial counting techniques from Part II to enumerate possible outcomes. By solving these cases explicitly, Bernoulli bridges abstract theory with tangible applications, showing how ratios of favorable to unfavorable events determine and potential gains or losses. A significant portion of the examples focuses on dice problems, where Bernoulli calculates probabilities for specific sums or sequences in throws with multiple dice. For instance, in analyzing two standard six-sided dice, he determines the probability of rolling a sum of 7 as 6 out of 36 possible outcomes, or \frac{1}{6}, by enumerating the favorable pairs (1+6, 2+5, 3+4, 4+3, 5+2, 6+1). He extends this to multiple dice, providing methods to find the number of ways to achieve a given sum m with n dice, equivalent to the coefficient of u^m in the expansion of (u + u^2 + u^3 + u^4 + u^5 + u^6)^n. Problem 10, for example, computes the expected number of trials needed to roll a six with a single die, highlighting repeated independent trials. These calculations underscore the reliability of probability in predicting outcomes over many plays, without delving into asymptotic behaviors. Bernoulli also includes tables listing outcomes and probabilities for throws involving dice with sides from 4 to 14, facilitating quick reference for varying game setups and demonstrating the scalability of his methods to non-standard dice. Card games receive detailed treatment, with Bernoulli examining conditional probabilities in popular 17th-century games such as , ombre, bassette, cinq et neuf, and trijaques. In ombre, a , he assesses the chances of particular card distributions and the advantage of holding certain suits, using combinatorial enumeration to compute the probability that a player receives a specific given the deal. For , another partnership , Bernoulli analyzes scenarios like the likelihood of leading a suit or following suit, incorporating dependencies between players' hands to evaluate strategic edges. These problems introduce explicitly, such as the probability of an event given prior information from played cards, and reveal how incomplete knowledge affects expected success. Through these examples, Bernoulli illustrates how probability informs optimal play, quantifying risks in multiplayer settings where outcomes depend on opponents' actions. Roulette and other wagering systems are addressed in problems that compute expected losses or gains over repeated plays, often introducing the ratio of success to failure as a key metric for assessing fairness. In Problem 19, evaluates a variant where a banker has an advantage due to more winning than losing cases, calculating the to show the house's long-term profit despite individual uncertainties. For a with 32 pockets numbered 1 to 8 repeated four times, and four balls drawn, he computes the and prize, finding an slightly above the 4-franc stake, though later analyses corrected minor arithmetic errors in his table of outcomes. In stroller's games and lotteries, derives the ratio of favorable to unfavorable events, such as in Problem 24, where he shows the against the player, leading to expected losses that diminish the appeal of repeated wagers. These analyses emphasize practical decision-making, advising on when to enter or exit games based on computed expectations. Overall, the 24 problems in solve over a hundred subcases through systematic and expectation formulas, solidifying probability as a for everyday chance encounters in .

Part IV: Broader Applications

Part IV, left unfinished at Bernoulli's death, of Ars Conjectandi extends the principles of probability beyond games of chance to practical domains in civil life, emphasizing their utility in achieving "moral certainty"—a high degree of assurance approaching but not equaling absolute truth, often quantified as probabilities like 0.99 or 0.999. He argues that probabilistic reasoning can guide decisions in , where judges must evaluate evidence and testimonies to determine guilt or innocence, as illustrated in his analysis of a hypothetical case involving a witness named Titius, whose testimony is weighed against potential biases and corroborating factors. Similarly, Bernoulli applies these methods to assessing the reliability of multiple testimonies, such as in a case of alleged fraud, where he proposes rules for combining independent arguments to estimate the overall probability of truth, drawing on earlier ideas like those in Arnauld and Nicole's La Logique ou l'art de penser. Bernoulli further explores economic and financial applications, particularly in insurance and annuities, where probability informs and premium setting based on mortality rates. He references the Dutch statesman Johan de Witt's 1671 calculations for life annuities, which used empirical data to estimate survival probabilities across age groups, enabling insurers to achieve profits without undue risk when dealing with large populations. In this context, Bernoulli discusses how probabilistic expectations can mitigate financial risks in ventures like —echoing his nephew Niklaus Bernoulli's 1709 computations—or personal annuities tied to , advocating for decisions that maximize under . These conjectures underscore a dimension, urging individuals and institutions to weigh testimonies and risks rationally to avoid errors in economic dealings, much like safer choices in everyday dilemmas. A cornerstone of Part IV is Bernoulli's conjecture on repeated trials, positing that in a large number of independent experiments, the empirical frequency of an event will approach its true underlying probability, providing a foundation for reliable inference in real-world scenarios. This idea, later formalized as the weak , allows for practical applications such as population forecasting through "political arithmetic," a term inspired by John Graunt's 1662 Natural and Political Observations on mortality bills, which Bernoulli adapts to predict demographic trends and life expectancies using aggregated data. By critiquing superstitious practices like , Bernoulli contrasts their unfounded certainties with the empirical rigor of probability, arguing that only observable frequencies in repeated trials can yield justifiable conjectures about uncertain events.

Mathematical Innovations

Bernoulli Numbers and Series

The appendix to Ars Conjectandi, added by the editor Nikolaus Bernoulli, consists of a 50-page tract reprinting five dissertations by on infinite series, originally published between 1686 and 1704. These works represent Bernoulli's significant contributions to early , shifting focus from finite combinatorial methods to analytic techniques involving infinite expansions, thereby bridging with broader . Central to this appendix is Bernoulli's introduction of the Bernoulli numbers B_m, a of rational numbers essential for expressing and series expansions. He defined them recursively with B_0 = 1 and, for m \geq 1, B_m = -\frac{1}{m+1} \sum_{k=0}^{m} \binom{m+1}{k} B_k, derived from his analysis of power sums S_m(n) = \sum_{k=1}^n k^m. This recursion allowed Bernoulli to compute the first ten terms explicitly: B_0 = 1, B_1 = -\frac{1}{2}, B_2 = \frac{1}{6}, B_3 = 0, B_4 = -\frac{1}{30}, B_5 = 0, B_6 = \frac{1}{42}, B_7 = 0, B_8 = -\frac{1}{30}, B_9 = 0, B_{10} = \frac{5}{66}, marking the first systematic calculation of these numbers up to that order. Bernoulli applied these numbers to derive important series expansions, particularly for . A key result is the partial of the angent: \pi \cot(\pi z) = \frac{1}{z} + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^k 2^{2k} B_{2k} \pi^{2k}}{(2k)!} z^{2k-1}, which he obtained through and infinite product representations, with analogous forms for the . These expansions facilitated approximations in and laid groundwork for later developments in . Bernoulli's work on these numbers and series profoundly influenced subsequent mathematicians, notably Leonhard Euler, who in the 1730s extended them via the generating function \frac{x}{e^x - 1} = \sum_{k=0}^\infty B_k \frac{x^k}{k!} and applied them to the Euler-Maclaurin formula and evaluations. Euler's 1755 formalization built directly on Bernoulli's computations, establishing the numbers' enduring role in and .

Law of Large Numbers

In Ars Conjectandi, established the foundational theorem now known as the weak , specifically for independent Bernoulli trials with fixed success probability p. The theorem states that if S_n denotes the number of successes in n such trials, then the sample proportion \hat{p}_n = S_n / n satisfies P(|\hat{p}_n - p| > \varepsilon) \to 0 as n \to \infty, for any fixed \varepsilon > 0; in other words, \hat{p}_n converges in probability to p. This result, derived over more than two decades of work and published posthumously in 1713, marked the first rigorous limit theorem in . Bernoulli initially demonstrated the theorem for the symmetric case p = 1/2, such as in tosses, before generalizing it to arbitrary p \in (0,1). He tied this convergence to empirical induction, arguing that sufficiently large samples provide "moral certainty" for inferring true probabilities from observed frequencies, bridging theoretical probability with practical observation in fields like games of chance and natural phenomena. Bernoulli's proof centers on the S_n \sim \text{Bin}(n, p), leveraging combinatorial expansions to analyze the probabilities of deviations. To bound the tail probability P(|\hat{p}_n - p| > \varepsilon), he employed a method akin to modern exponential inequalities, examining the ratios of consecutive coefficients \binom{n}{k} to show that the mass of the distribution concentrates around np. By partitioning the deviation into upper and lower tails and using inductive arguments on these ratios, demonstrated that the probability of large deviations decays exponentially with n. This approach, while combinatorial in nature, yields a Chernoff-like bound on the error, establishing that for sufficiently large n, the deviation exceeds \varepsilon with arbitrarily small probability. The proof's rigor lay in explicitly computing the sample size n_0 required for a given and level, such as ensuring P(|\hat{p}_n - p| > \varepsilon) < 1/(c+1) for large c. The key inequality in Bernoulli's exposition bounds the upper tail probability, for instance, as P\left( \hat{p}_n > p + \varepsilon \right) \leq \left( \frac{p}{p + \varepsilon} \right)^{n(p + \varepsilon)} \left( \frac{1 - p}{1 - p - \varepsilon} \right)^{n(1 - p - \varepsilon)}, which simplifies to an form involving terms like e^{n h(\varepsilon, p)}, where h(\varepsilon, p) captures the logarithmic deviation (a precursor to relative entropy in ). For the full deviation, the bound becomes P(|\hat{p}_n - p| > \varepsilon) \leq 2 \max \left[ (1 - \varepsilon)^{n(1 - p)}, \left( \frac{p}{p + \varepsilon} \right)^{n(p + \varepsilon)} \right], highlighting the with base less than 1. These parameters emphasize that the decreases superexponentially in n, with the required n_0 growing logarithmically in the desired c and inversely with \varepsilon^2, as seen in examples like n > 25,000 for p = 3/5 and \varepsilon = 1/50 to achieve exceeding :1. This formulation not only proved convergence but also provided practical tools for determining sample sizes in probabilistic inference.

Legacy

Early Mathematical Reception

The immediate impact of Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi, published posthumously in 1713, was marked by an unfavorable review in the 1714 issue of Acta Eruditorum, authored anonymously by Leibniz, which critiqued aspects of its contributions to the doctrine of chances and combinatorial analysis. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a correspondent of the Bernoulli family, had earlier urged Bernoulli to advance probability theory and appreciated aspects of his combinatorial work in pre-publication letters, placing it alongside the foundational efforts of Pascal and Fermat. Abraham de Moivre directly engaged with 's ideas in his 1718 The Doctrine of Chances, where he developed an approximation formula for probabilities, explicitly citing 's theorem from Ars Conjectandi as a key precursor to understanding distribution's role in large-sample limits. Similarly, Rémond de Montmort's second edition of Essay d'analyse sur les jeux de hazard (1713) incorporated extensive correspondence with Nicolas , incorporating solutions and discussions that built upon the calculations, combinatorial methods, and specific chance problems in Parts I through III of Ars Conjectandi. Despite these endorsements, the work faced criticisms for its incomplete state, particularly the unfinished fourth part, which Nicolas Bernoulli noted in the as lacking final tables and broader applications; this incompleteness limited its immediate utility for practical extensions. The treatise's dissemination was further constrained by its publication in Latin and the advanced mathematical complexity, which overshadowed its innovative content among many 18th-century readers and delayed wider adoption beyond specialist circles.

Long-Term Influence

In the 19th century, Pierre-Simon Laplace's Théorie Analytique des Probabilités (1812) significantly expanded Bernoulli's , generalizing it to broader classes of distributions and applying it to problems in astronomy, demographics, and error theory, thereby establishing probability as a rigorous analytical tool. further advanced this foundation in his 1837 Recherches sur la Probabilité des Jugements en Matière Criminelle et en Matière Civile, developing limit theorems that extended Bernoulli's results to scenarios involving and approximations, influencing the study of in probability distributions. The 20th century saw Ars Conjectandi's principles underpin the foundations of modern statistics, as Ronald Fisher and Jerzy Neyman developed parametric inference and hypothesis testing frameworks that relied on Bernoulli's probabilistic innovations for handling uncertainty in experimental data. Andrey Kolmogorov's 1933 axiomatization of probability theory in Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung explicitly referenced Bernoulli's contributions, integrating them into a measure-theoretic framework that formalized the discipline and enabled rigorous treatments of random processes. In contemporary applications, Bernoulli's ideas form the roots of , which updates beliefs with new evidence and powers algorithms for tasks like and under . In finance, the from Ars Conjectandi supports risk modeling, such as in portfolio diversification and actuarial calculations, where large-scale simulations approximate expected outcomes for and strategies. Bernoulli numbers, introduced in Ars Conjectandi, have a lasting legacy in ; Leonhard Euler used them to evaluate the at even integers, ζ(2k) = (-1)^{k+1} B_{2k} (2π)^{2k} / (2 (2k)!), while later extended this to the , linking the numbers to deep properties of prime distributions. In physics, these numbers appear in series expansions for quantum systems, such as the energy levels of the via the Euler-Maclaurin formula, aiding approximations in and statistical physics. The tercentenary of Ars Conjectandi in 2013 highlighted its foundational role in through conferences and publications, underscoring its ongoing relevance; modern texts continue to validate Bernoulli's through simulations, demonstrating in computational experiments with massive datasets.

References

  1. [1]
    Ars conjectandi three hundred years on - Edwards - 2013
    Jun 20, 2013 · Bernoulli's Ars conjectandi appeared posthumously in 1713, eight years after its author's death. It was written in Latin; it was published in ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi and Its Pedagogical Implications
    Ars Conjectandi (The Art of Conjecturing), Jacob Bernoulli's seminal work, was written between 1684 and 1689. The book was finally published in 1713, eight ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Significance of Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi - Glenn Shafer
    More than 300 years ago, in a fertile period from 1684 to 1689, Jacob Bernoulli worked out a strategy for applying the mathematics of games of chance to the ...
  4. [4]
    The Book on Games of Chance: The 16th-Century Treatise on ...
    Dec 16, 2015 · Gambling led Cardano to the study of probability, and he was the first writer to recognize that random events are governed by mathematical laws.
  5. [5]
    The Book on Games of Chance: The 16th-Century Treatise on ...
    Jun 14, 2016 · In Chapter 12, Cardano considers the probabilities when rolling three dice. He again exhibits his understanding of the multiplication principle ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] FERMAT AND PASCAL ON PROBABILITY - University of York
    The problem was proposed to Pascal and Fermat, probably in 1654, by the Chevalier de Méré, a gambler who is said to have had unusual ability “even for the ...
  7. [7]
    July 1654: Pascal's Letters to Fermat on the "Problem of Points"
    Jul 1, 2009 · Fermat's approach rested on a complete enumeration of the possible outcomes. For example, if the winner of a coin toss game needs to win the ...Missing: dice | Show results with:dice
  8. [8]
    [PDF] CHRISTIANI HUGENII LIBELLUS DE RATIOCINIIS IN LUDO ALEAE ...
    If I have an equal Chance to 3 or 7, then my Expectation is, by this Proposition, worth 5, and it is certain I can with 5, again procure the same Expectation: ...
  9. [9]
    De Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae
    ... Expectation of $a$, $b$, or $c$, Therefore putting $3x - b - c = a$, we shall find $x = \frac{a + b + c}{3}$, for the value of my Expectation. \textit ...
  10. [10]
    Natural and political observations mentioned in a following index ...
    Natural and political observations mentioned in a following index, and made upon the bills of mortality by John Graunt.
  11. [11]
    Epidemiology's 350th Anniversary: 1662–2012 - PMC
    The 1662 publication by Graunt combined population thinking and comparisons of population data across time, in an unprecedented fashion.
  12. [12]
    Jacob Bernoulli (1655 - 1705) - Biography - University of St Andrews
    Jacob Bernoulli was a Swiss mathematician who was the first to use the term integral. He studied the catenary, the curve of a suspended string. He was an early ...
  13. [13]
    The difficult birth of stochastics: Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi ...
    Jacob Bernoulli (1654–1705) did most of his research on the mathematics of uncertainty – or stochastics, as he came to call it – between 1684 and 1690.Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  14. [14]
    Bernoulli, Jakob - Encyclopedia of Mathematics
    Mar 25, 2023 · He formulated and proved the weak law of large numbers, the cornerstone of modern probability and statistics.
  15. [15]
    None
    ### Summary of Correspondence Between Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli
  16. [16]
    A short history of probability and statistics: 18th century
    Oct 23, 2007 · It contains large parts of text that are directly copied from Jacob Bernoulli's Meditationes and the Ars Conjectandi. 1710, John Arbuthnot ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability
    See the solutions of that problem in Part 1 and of Problem 5 from Part 3 of. Jakob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi. ... natural phenomena. And thus the period ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Ars conjectandi three hundred years on - James Hanley
    It explains how aircraft wings give lift, is the basis of fluid dynamics, and was discovered by Jacob's nephew Daniel Bernoulli. Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705).Missing: 1684-1689 | Show results with:1684-1689<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Nicholas Bernoulli and the Publication of James Bernoulli's Ars ...
    1. J. Bernoulli, Fourth Part of “Ars Conjectandi”, translated from the French by Ya. V. Upenskii, CPb.: Imp. Akademiya Nauk, 1913
  20. [20]
    Mathematical Treasures - Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi
    This is the title page of Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi (The Art of Conjecturing), published posthumously in 1713 by his nephew Nicolaus I Bernoulli.Missing: composition process 1684-1689
  21. [21]
    Ars conjectandi, opus posthumum. Accedit Tractatus de seriebus ...
    The first significant book on probability theory: it set forth the fundamental principles of the calculus of probabilities and contained the first suggestion
  22. [22]
    The Art of Conjecturing, Together with Letter to a Friend on Sets in ...
    Here, Edith Dudley Sylla offers the first complete English translation of this monumental work. Part I reprints and reworks Huygens's On Reckoning in Games ...
  23. [23]
    Chapter 7 The arithmetical triangle | Combinatorics - Oxford Academic
    Part Two of Jacob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi (Art of Conjecturing) of 1713 is Doctrina de Permutationibus & Combinationibus (A Treatise on Permutations and ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Introduction on Bernoulli's numbers
    Jun 12, 2002 · They first appeared in Ars Conjectandi, page 97, a famous (and posthumous) treatise published in 1713, by Jakob Bernoulli (1654-1705) when he ...
  25. [25]
    The Origin of the Bernoulli Numbers: Mathematics in Basel and Edo ...
    Jul 23, 2021 · The Bernoulli numbers were named after the Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli (1654–1705; Figure 1), whose posthumous book Ars Conjectandi ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The Bernoulli Numbers: A Brief Primer - Whitman College
    May 10, 2019 · In this primer, we explore the diverse properties of a rational sequence known as the Bernoulli numbers. Since the discovery of the numbers ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Aesthetic Analysis of Proofs of the Binomial Theorem
    Aug 16, 1999 · The combinatorial proof of the binomial theorem originates in Jacob Bernoulli's Ars. Conjectandi published posthumously in 1713. See [2] p ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    [PDF] MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF PROBABILITY
    The problems in the first three parts of the Ars Oonjectandi cannot be considered equal in importance or difficulty to those which we find investigated by ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Oscar Sheynin Theory of Probability. A Historical Essay - arXiv
    part”, the application of the art of conjecturing to civil life; ... The Law of Large Numbers. Bernoulli proved a proposition that, beginning with Poisson ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Jakob Bernoulli On the Law of Large Numbers Translated into ...
    Therefore, the art of conjecturing or stochastics {ars conjectandi sive stochastice}. 2.1 is defined as the art of measuring the probability of things as ...Missing: inference | Show results with:inference
  31. [31]
    [PDF] THE LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS and
    The first immortal book on probability theory was also posthumous: James BERNOULLI (1654-1705), Ars conjectandi, ... English translation was included in the 1738.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] A Tricentenary history of the Law of Large Numbers - arXiv
    The Weak Law of Large Numbers is traced chronologically from its inception as Jacob Bernoulli's Theorem in 1713, through De Moivre's Theorem, to ultimate forms ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    (PDF) Mathematics Systematical Concepts draft - Academia.edu
    5 Reading notes Anonymous, Review of Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi, in: Acta Eruditorum, 1714 (GW II 38. Arana, Andrew, On formally measuring and eliminating ...
  35. [35]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the early reception of Jacob Bernoulli's *Ars Conjectandi*, consolidating all information from the provided segments into a comprehensive response. To retain maximum detail efficiently, I will use a table in CSV format for key aspects (Reviews and Praises, Influences, Criticisms) and supplement it with a narrative overview for additional context and details not easily tabularized. The response includes all mentions of individuals, works, page references, and URLs as provided.
  36. [36]
    De Montmort: "Essay d'Analyse" - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    M de Montmort obviously has very little idea of what Jacob Bernoulli was going to put in the fifth part of the Ars Conjectandi. The first edition of the Essai d ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Bernoulli News, Volume 13 (Number 2) 2006.
    Abstract. In 1655, the theologian, natural scientist and mathematician Jakob Bernoulli was born in Basel, and passed away in 1705, again in his hometown.Missing: influences Graunt
  38. [38]
    A Tricentenary history of the Law of Large Numbers - Project Euclid
    The Weak Law of Large Numbers is traced chronologically from its inception as Jacob Bernoulli's Theorem in 1713, through De Moivre's Theorem, ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] The Tricentenary of the Weak Law of Large Numbers.
    Jul 8, 2013 · • The first (1812) and the second (1814) edition of Laplace's. Théorie analytique des probabilités span the centenary year of Bernoulli's ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    A History of Parametric Statistical Inference from Bernoulli to Fisher ...
    Dec 18, 2006 · 2012. It is generally held that R.A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman and Egon ... Mutual Influence between Different Views of Probability and Statistical ...
  41. [41]
    (PDF) The Inference Fallacy From Bernoulli to Kolmogorov
    Only Kolmogorov's (1933) axiomatization made it possible to adequately frame statistical inference within probability theory. This paper argues that a key ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Aspects of likelihood inference - Department of Statistical Sciences
    Jakob Bernoulli's Ars Conjectandi established the field of probability theory, and founded a long and remarkable mathematical development of deducing ...
  43. [43]
    3.5 Law of large numbers - Financial Mathematics - Fiveable
    Applications in finance · Law of Large Numbers underpins many financial models and risk management strategies · Enables more accurate predictions and estimations ...
  44. [44]
    The Euler-Maclaurin formula, Bernoulli numbers, the zeta function ...
    Apr 10, 2010 · The Riemann zeta function {\zeta(s)} is defined in the region {\hbox{Re}(s)>1} by the absolutely convergent series.
  45. [45]
    Bernoulli Numbers and the Harmonic Oscillator | The n-Category Café
    or comparing the classical harmonic oscillator ...
  46. [46]
    IMS Presidential Address: Ars Conjectandi—300 Years Later
    Aug 29, 2013 · Jacob Bernoulli did the main work on his Ars Conjectandi from 1684 to 1689, but he did not publish it during his lifetime. He died in 1705, and ...Missing: focus | Show results with:focus