Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Assibilation

Assibilation is a phonological sound change in which a non-sibilant consonant, typically a stop such as /t/ or /k/, is transformed into a sibilant consonant, often an affricate like /ts/ or /tʃ/ or a fricative like /s/ or /ʃ/, usually as the culminating stage of palatalization triggered by a nearby high front vowel or glide.^[1]^[2] This process involves articulatory adjustments, such as fronting of the consonant's place of articulation and narrowing of the oral constriction, which increase airflow turbulence and produce strident acoustic properties characteristic of sibilants.^[2] Phonetically motivated by coarticulation and perceptual cues, assibilation is a common diachronic phenomenon across language families, contributing to dialectal variation and the evolution of consonant inventories.^[3]^[2] The process is particularly well-documented in Indo-European languages, where it often affects coronal and velar obstruents before front vowels. For instance, in Romance languages, Latin velar stops palatalize and assibilate before /i/ and /e/, as in centum evolving to Italian cento [ˈtʃɛnto] "hundred."^[2] Similarly, in Quebec French, dental stops assibilate before /i/, yielding forms like /pʦi/ for "small."^[1] In non-Indo-European contexts, Korean exhibits /t/ → /ʣ/ before /i/, as in mat-i → maʣi "first child," while Japanese shows /t, d/ → /ts, dz/ before high vowels.^[1] These changes highlight assibilation's role in historical phonology, where intermediate stages like palatal stops (e.g., or [tʲ]) may persist or further evolve, influencing prosodic and morphological patterns in affected languages.^[2]^[3] Assibilation differs from related processes like simple palatalization, which adds a secondary palatal articulation without necessarily introducing sibilance, and spirantization, which produces non-sibilant fricatives; however, it frequently chains with these in sound shifts.^[1] Its acoustic basis—such as heightened burst frequencies around 2500–3500 Hz—underpins perceptual reinterpretations by speakers, driving the change across generations.^[2] In contemporary linguistics, studies of assibilation inform models of phonetic naturalness and constraint-based phonology, revealing how universal articulatory tendencies interact with language-specific grammars.^[1]^[4]

Definition and Mechanisms

Definition

Assibilation is a phonological sound change in which a non-sibilant consonant, typically a stop, develops into a sibilant consonant, including realizations like /s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /t͡s/, or /d͡z/.^[5] This transformation typically involves increased frication with a hissing quality due to the turbulent airflow associated with sibilants.^[6] The term "assibilation" originates from the Latin verb assibilāre, meaning "to hiss at" or "to whisper to," reflecting the distinctive hissing articulation of the resulting sibilant sounds.^[7] Unlike broader fricativization, which converts stops or affricates into any type of fricative, assibilation is distinguished by its specific outcome of sibilant consonants, often conditioned by adjacent high front vowels or glides.^[8] It frequently represents the culminating phase of palatalization processes.^[9]

Phonetic and Phonological Processes

Assibilation involves phonetic triggers rooted in articulatory adjustments that promote frication, particularly through tongue raising or fronting, which narrows the vocal tract and generates turbulent airflow akin to that in sibilants, often during the release phase of stops where fricative noise emerges.^[10] This increased constriction, typically near the alveolar ridge, facilitates the transition from a complete closure to a sibilant-like hiss, driven by coarticulatory influences from adjacent high front elements. Phonologically, assibilation commonly occurs in specific environments, such as before high front vowels (/i/, /j/) or in syllable coda positions, where it can be formalized as a rule like /C/ → [sibilant] / _[front vowel], reflecting a universal tendency for occlusives to develop sibilant properties in fronting contexts. These rules often capture regressive assimilation effects, where the consonant anticipates the articulatory features of the following segment, leading to manner changes without altering place entirely.^[11] Acoustically, assibilation results in heightened high-frequency noise characteristic of sibilants, concentrated in the 4-8 kHz range, produced by the intense turbulence from a precise constriction near the alveolar ridge or palate, distinguishing sibilants from non-sibilant fricatives by their sharper, more resonant spectral peaks. The process typically unfolds in progressive stages, beginning with a stop that develops an affricate intermediate due to delayed release and partial frication, eventually simplifying to a full fricative sibilant as the stop closure diminishes over time. Palatalization often serves as an initial articulatory trigger for these developments.^[12]

Relation to Palatalization and Spirantization

Assibilation frequently serves as the terminal phase of palatalization, in which a palatalized stop, such as /kʲ/, undergoes affrication to yield a sibilant like /t͡s/ or /t͡ʃ/. This progression arises from phonetic turbulence during the release of the palatalized consonant in contexts adjacent to high front vocoids, leading to the perceptual reanalysis of the segment as possessing a sibilant quality.^[1] Such front vowel contexts often trigger the initial palatalization, providing a phonetic bridge to assibilation. Assibilation overlaps with spirantization in that both processes can result in fricative outcomes from stops or affricates, but assibilation is distinguished by its production of sibilants characterized by high-intensity noise, whereas spirantization may yield non-sibilant fricatives, as in the change /p/ → /f/. For instance, spirantization of an affricate may further evolve the sibilant product of assibilation into a pure fricative, but the sibilant specificity of assibilation emphasizes stridency over general continuancy. In generative phonology, assibilation is analyzed through feature geometry, where the [strident] feature spreads from a palatal or coronal trigger to the target stop, restructuring its articulatory and acoustic properties to include sibilant turbulence.^[1] Within optimality theory, markedness constraints prioritize sibilant perceptibility by penalizing low-salience stop-high vocoid sequences, such as *[t i], thereby favoring assibilated outputs that enhance auditory contrast in those environments. Exceptions occur when assibilation proceeds independently of palatalization, often as part of lenition in intervocalic positions, where stops weaken to sibilants without a preceding palatal trigger.^[13] In such cases, the process aligns more closely with general weakening patterns rather than palatal-induced affrication.

Assibilation in Indo-European Languages

Germanic Languages

Assibilation played a prominent role in the phonological evolution of Germanic languages, particularly through the High German consonant shift, a series of sound changes that distinguished Upper German dialects from other West Germanic varieties. This shift, which primarily affected voiceless stops, involved the affrication of /t/ to /ts/ followed by further spirantization to /s/ in specific environments, such as after short vowels and in geminate positions, south of the Benrath line.^[14] The process exemplifies assibilation as a progression toward sibilant fricatives, driven by syllable structure preferences for bimoraic stressed syllables.^[14] A classic illustration of this assibilation is seen in the development of Proto-Germanic *watōr 'water' to Modern Standard German Wasser, where the intervocalic /t/ undergoes affrication to /ts/ and subsequent delabialization to /s/, resulting in the double fricative /ss/.^[14] This change was not uniform across all positions; initial /t/ typically remained as /t/ or became /ts/, while word-final /t/ often affricated without full sibilantization. The High German shift as a whole is dated to approximately the 6th through 8th centuries CE in continental Germanic territories, predating the earliest Old High German texts from the 9th century and marking a key divergence from Low German and Dutch.^[15] In Frisian languages, assibilation manifests differently, targeting velar stops /k/ and /g/ in palatalizing contexts, leading to affricates such as /tʃ/ and /dʒ/ or fricatives /ʃ/ and /ʒ/ that set Frisian apart from adjacent Dutch and Low German dialects. This process, shared to some extent with Old English, involved palatalization before front vowels, resulting in affricates or palatal fricatives that exhibit strident tendencies, though not always full sibilantization.^[16] For instance, West Germanic *kēsan 'to choose' yields Old Frisian *tʃēsa, where the velar affricates to /tʃ/; similarly, *kirikō > tsjerke 'church', highlighting Frisian's unique retention of these sibilant-influenced traits amid broader West Germanic lenition patterns.^[16]

Greek

In Ancient Greek, assibilation primarily involved the transformation of voiceless dental stops in sequences with yod (/j/) or before high front vowels, particularly in East and South Greek dialects such as Attic-Ionic and Arcado-Cypriot. The cluster *ty and *thy developed into the affricate /ts/, which often simplified to /s/ through intermediate gemination (/ts/ > /ss/ > /s/), while *ti shifted to /si/ in verbal and nominal endings. For instance, the Proto-Indo-European *totyos "so much" yielded Homeric and dialectal tóssos via affrication of *ty to *ts, followed by sibilant simplification, as seen in forms like τόσος in Attic. Similarly, *ti in third-person plural verbs like *bheronti "they bear" became phérousi in Attic-Ionic, contrasting with non-assibilated -ti in West Greek dialects like Doric.^[5] This process originated as an early Proto-Greek innovation around the 2nd millennium BCE, evidenced in Mycenaean texts and marking a key isogloss separating Southern Greek from Northwest Greek dialects, where assibilation did not occur. By the classical period, particularly the 5th century BCE, the changes were well-established in literary Attic and Ionic, with *ti > /si/ consistently applied in inflectional morphology, though word-initial or geminated contexts sometimes resisted full simplification.^[5]^[17] In the transition to Modern Greek, assibilation continued through a palatalization chain affecting dentals before yod or front vowels, where /t/ + /j/ first affricated to /ts/ and subsequently reduced to /s/ in many contexts, driven by phonetic fronting. This is evident in derivations from ancient clusters, such as continuations of *ti > /si/ in modern forms like φέρουν (phéro̱n) "they bear" from ancient *bheronti. Dialectal variation persists, notably in Tsakonian, a Doric descendant spoken in the Peloponnese, which retains /ts/ (e.g., in reflexes of historical *tj) where Standard Modern Greek has merged to /s/, reflecting conservative resistance to further delabialization.^[18]^[19]^[20] These developments extended into the Byzantine period (ca. 4th–15th centuries CE), with ongoing sibilant mergers and secondary palatalizations reinforcing affricate formations amid dialectal divergence, though primary dental assibilation had stabilized earlier.^[21]

Romance Languages

Assibilation in the Romance languages primarily occurred during the transition from Vulgar Latin to the early Romance vernaculars between the 3rd and 9th centuries CE, as part of broader palatalization processes triggered by front vowels or glides. This period saw two main phases: an initial stage in the 3rd–5th centuries CE affecting clusters like /kj/ and /tj/, leading to affricates, followed by a second phase in the 6th–8th centuries CE extending to other velars and resulting in further sibilant developments across Western and Eastern Romance varieties. These changes were driven by articulatory and perceptual factors, with dental and velar stops before /i/ or /j/ progressively weakening into affricates and fricatives. In Italian and Spanish, a key example of assibilation involves the Vulgar Latin cluster /tj/ in suffixes like -tio, which evolved into /ts/ during the early medieval period. For instance, Latin *natiōnem developed into Italian nazione [naˈtsjoːne] and Spanish nación [naˈθjon], where the /t/ affricated before the palatal glide /j/, forming an alveolar affricate that persisted in these languages. This process, part of the first Romance palatalization phase, affected nominal and verbal forms derived from Latin, contributing to the characteristic sibilant suffixes in modern Ibero-Romance and Italo-Romance. French exhibits distinct assibilation patterns, including the development of /sj/ into /ʃ/ in certain lexical items during the Old French period. A representative case is the verb blesser "to wound," derived from Vulgar Latin *blessingāre (influenced by Germanic substrates), where the sibilant cluster palatalized and affricated to a postalveolar fricative [ʃ]. In modern Quebec French, a more recent innovation involves the assibilation of dentals /t/ and /d/ to [ts] and [dz] before high front vowels /i/ and /y/, as in petit pronounced [pətsi], a feature that enhances vowel contrast perception and production in this variety.^[22]^[23] In Iberian Romance, particularly Portuguese, /tj/ underwent affrication to /tsj/, often overlapping with spirantization in fricative outcomes. For example, Latin factiōnem > fação [fɐˈsɐ̃ũ] "faction," where /tj/ affricates to /tsj/ then simplifies to /ʒ/ or /s/, distinguishing Portuguese developments from the alveolar [ts] in neighboring Spanish. This variation highlights regional articulatory differences in the second palatalization phase.

Slavic Languages

In Proto-Slavic, assibilation affected dental consonants /t/, /d/, /s/, and /z/, transforming them into postalveolar affricates and fricatives /t͡ʃ/, /d͡ʒ/, /ʃ/, and /ʒ/ when preceding /j/ or front vowels, as part of the iotation (yod-palatalization) process.^[24]^[25] This change, which occurred during the Common Slavic period approximately between the 6th and 9th centuries CE after the Balto-Slavic split, created new sibilants that distinguished Slavic phonology from its Balto-Slavic ancestor.^[24]^[25] A representative example is *noktь "night," where the dental /t/ before the front yer /ь/ assibilated to /t͡ʃ/, yielding *nočь across descendant languages.^[24] This assibilation intertwined with broader palatalization shifts, particularly the third palatalization of velars, contributing to the systematic front-vowel harmony in the consonant inventory.^[25] In West Slavic languages like Polish, the resulting postalveolars often further evolved into alveolo-palatals, such as /t͡ɕ/ and /d͡ʑ/, preserving a softer articulation; for instance, *tьma "darkness" (also "moth" in modern usage) became Polish *ćma with the affricate /t͡ɕ/.^[24]^[25] In contrast, East Slavic (e.g., Russian) and South Slavic languages retained the postalveolar affricates and fricatives longer, with less fronting toward alveolo-palatals. Russian *peťь "furnace," from earlier dental + /j/, surfaces as *pečь with /pʲet͡ɕ/, while South Slavic cognates like Serbo-Croatian *peć exhibit similar /t͡ɕ/ retention but without Polish's full alveolo-palatal merger.^[24] These branch-specific outcomes reflect post-Proto-Slavic divergences, where Russian and South Slavic emphasized affricate stability amid ongoing yers' weakening around the 10th century.^[25]

Assibilation in Non-Indo-European Languages

Semitic Languages

In Semitic languages, assibilation is prominently observed in the dialectal evolution of Arabic, where interdentals from Classical Arabic frequently shift to sibilants in various regional varieties. In Levantine and other Mashreqi Arabic dialects, the voiceless interdental fricative /θ/ and voiced /ð/ commonly assibilate to /s/ and /z/, respectively, reflecting a phonetic adaptation that simplifies articulation while maintaining functional contrast. For instance, the Classical Arabic word /θaqāfa/ "culture" is pronounced as /saqāfa/ in certain Levantine contexts.^[26] This process is documented in sedentary urban dialects and is linked to post-7th century CE developments following the spread of Arabic, where contact with substrate languages influenced fricative realizations.^[27] Another notable case involves the evolution of the letter ǧīm, derived from Proto-Semitic *g, which entered Arabic as the affricate /d͡ʒ/. In many urban Levantine dialects, such as those in Syria and Palestine, this affricate undergoes further palatalization and assibilation to the fricative /ʒ/, as in /ʒaːʔa/ for 'he came' (جَاءَ) instead of Classical /d͡ʒaːʔa/.^[28] This shift, while rooted in earlier palatalization, exemplifies assibilation as a spirantizing mechanism in vernacular forms, particularly in prestigious urban centers post-Islamic expansion. Similar patterns of assibilation appear in other Semitic branches, notably Aramaic and Syriac, where historical interdentals exhibit shifts to sibilants or stops under areal influences. In Neo-Aramaic dialects, including Syriac varieties, /θ/ and /ð/ often merge with /s/, /z/, or emphatic counterparts due to prolonged contact with non-Semitic languages lacking interdentals, a process accelerating after the 7th century CE.^[29] Sociolinguistically, these vernacular realizations in Arabic and related languages contrast sharply with the prestige norm of Classical Arabic, which retains original interdentals in formal and religious contexts, leading to diglossic variation where speakers code-switch based on setting.

Niger-Congo Languages

In the Niger-Congo language family, assibilation is a key phonological process observed primarily in the Bantu subgroup, where velar stops like *k in Proto-Bantu underwent changes to sibilants before high vowels, influenced by vowel height harmony systems. This assibilation typically transformed *k into /s/ or /t͡ʃ/ in environments preceding /i/ or /u/, affecting noun class prefixes and stems during the early stages of Bantu divergence.^[30]^[31] The process contributed to the morphological marking of noun classes, with the class 7 prefix *ki- serving as a classic example of this shift.^[32] Reconstructions place this assibilation within Proto-Bantu, associated with the Bantu expansion from West-Central Africa dated approximately 2000–1000 BCE, as Bantu speakers migrated southward and eastward, carrying these innovations.^[33] In Zulu (an Nguni language), the *ki- prefix evolved to isi-, yielding sibilant /s/ realizations, as in isihlalo "chair," reflecting the assibilated form from *kì- + *hlalo.^[32] Similarly, in Shona, *ki- became chi- (/t͡ʃi/), as evidenced in chi- (class 7) with stems like nhu "thing," producing chinhu "thing."^[34] Swahili largely preserves ki- for class 7, but sibilants emerge in derived forms, such as kisasa "modern" (class 7), where assibilation interacts with stem-initial consonants under high vowel influence.^[35] Variations occur across Bantu languages, with some retaining affricates like /t͡ʃ/ from *k before /i/, particularly in Nguni varieties such as Zulu and Xhosa, where the process did not fully progress to fricatives in all morphological contexts.^[32] This retention highlights the gradient nature of assibilation, tied to local phonological rules favoring affricates in prefix-stem junctures before front high vowels.^[31]

Uralic Languages

In the Finnic languages, a branch of the Uralic family, assibilation prominently manifests as a historical sound change affecting stem alternations, particularly the shift of Proto-Finnic *ti to *ci and subsequently to /si/ in many descendants. This process typically occurred in environments involving high front vowels or palatal contexts, resulting in paradigmatic alternations within nominal and verbal stems. For instance, Proto-Finnic *weti "water" developed into Finnish vesi, where the intervocalic t assibilated to /s/ before the high vowel i. Similarly, Proto-Finnic *cika "pig" (from earlier *ti-) yields Finnish sika, illustrating how this change integrated into core lexicon and morphology.^[36]^[37] Dialectal variations within Finnic highlight incomplete or retained stages of this assibilation. In South Estonian, an intermediate /ts/ stage is preserved in certain forms, such as tsiga "pig", contrasting with the full /si/ development in Finnish sika and Standard Estonian siga. This retention suggests that assibilation did not uniformly progress across all dialects, preserving affricate realizations in southern varieties. Further advancements appear in Estonian and Votic, where /si/ occasionally shifts to /ʃi/ in loanwords or specific dialects, as seen in forms like ši derivations, reflecting ongoing sibilant evolution in peripheral Finnic languages.^[36] These changes postdate Proto-Finnic, emerging during the dialectal diversification phase approximately between 1000 and 1500 CE, after the common ancestor had already split into distinct branches. This timing aligns with broader phonological innovations in Finnic, where assibilation contributed to stem alternations without affecting initial positions or certain consonant clusters. The process is briefly linked to palatalization before close vowels, enhancing sibilant production in these contexts.^[37]

Reverse Assibilation

Definition and Mechanisms

Reverse assibilation, also termed desibilization, refers to a phonological process whereby sibilant consonants—characterized by their turbulent, high-intensity frication—evolve into non-sibilant consonants, such as stops, affricates, or non-sibilant fricatives.^[38] This change reverses the typical direction of assibilation, where non-sibilants like stops develop sibilant frication, often under palatal influence.^[1] Desibilization typically involves a reduction in the continuant nature of the sibilant, transforming its sustained airflow into a more occluded articulation.^[38] Phonetically, the primary mechanism driving reverse assibilation is the loss or attenuation of frication, achieved either through the insertion of a complete oral closure (resulting in a stop or affricate) or by backing and weakening the articulation to a less turbulent fricative like or .^[39] This process frequently arises in unstressed syllables, where articulatory reduction diminishes the precision required for sibilant production, or via analogical extension across paradigms to regularize irregular forms.^[38] Perceptually, the intense spectral energy of sibilants can lead to reanalysis during language acquisition, favoring simpler non-sibilant targets when acoustic cues weaken.^[39] Phonologically, reverse assibilation is often conditioned by adjacent segments, such as occurring before back vowels or within consonant clusters that favor occlusion.^[40] A generalized rule can be represented as [+sibilant] \to C / \_\{[+back]\}, where C denotes a non-sibilant obstruent, reflecting contextual pressures that promote articulatory simplification.^[38] These triggers align with broader patterns of lenition, though the shift to stops represents a partial fortition in manner.^[39] This sound change is comparatively rare relative to forward assibilation, owing to the perceptual stability of sibilants, which stems from their robust acoustic cues—such as high center-of-gravity frequencies and intense noise—that resist misperception and merger.^[39] Cross-linguistic inventories confirm sibilants' persistence over millennia, with desibilization limited to specific dialects or contact-induced scenarios, unlike the frequent palatal-driven assibilations in many families.^[38]

Examples Across Languages

In the Austronesian language family, reverse assibilation is exemplified by the desibilization of Proto-Malayo-Polynesian *s to /t/ in Gorontalo, a process that transforms a sibilant fricative into a non-sibilant stop. This change occurred across the Gorontalic subgroup, including Gorontalo proper, and is illustrated by reflexes such as Proto-Austronesian *siku "elbow" yielding ti'u in Gorontalo.^[41] The innovation likely spread areally through language contact among formerly adjacent varieties in Sulawesi, Indonesia, rather than purely through genetic inheritance.^[41] Among Indo-European languages, historical desibilization appears in the evolution of Spanish sibilants, where the voiced postalveolar fricative /ʒ/ first devoiced to /ʃ/ and subsequently retracted to the non-sibilant velar fricative /x/ in Peninsular varieties during the early modern period (16th–17th centuries). This shift affected words like Latin fīlium "son," which passed through Old Spanish fijo [ˈfiʒo] to modern [ˈfixo], marking a loss of sibilancy through velarization.^[42] In contrast, some Judeo-Spanish dialects retained /ʒ/ and /ʃ/ due to isolation from these mainland changes.^[42]

References

[1]
[PDF] Coronalization as Assibilation by Corey Stuart Telfer
4 Assibilation as an acoustic process. There are not many phonological accounts of assibilation, perhaps because it is difficult to account for this process by ...
[2]
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/phonetic-causes-of-sound-change-9780198845010
[3]
(PDF) Assibilation - Academia.edu
Assibilation is a phonological change where a sound transforms into a fricative or sibilant, particularly evident in Greek linguistics.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
[PDF] Assibilation or analogy?: Reconsideration of Korean noun stem ...
This paper discusses two approaches to the nominal stem-endings in Korean inflection including loanwords: one is the assibilation approach, represented by ...
[5]
Velar assibilation | Phonetic Causes of Sound Change
Sep 17, 2020 · Phonetic Causes of Sound Change: The Palatalization and Assibilation of Obstruents. Daniel Recasens, Oxford University Press (2020).<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
The phonetic motivation for phonological stop assibilation
Aug 6, 2025 · From this perspective, Hall et al. (2006, p. 60) define the assibilation of stops as "processes whereby stops become sibilant affricates or ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[7]
Daniel Recasens (2020). Phonetic causes of sound change
Dec 23, 2021 · The book investigates the phonetic motivation for the palatalisation and assibilation ('softening') of velars and labials, and proposes an articulation-based ...
[8]
Assimilation and opacity in Cotentinois and Island Norman
... lenition has taken the form of assibilation. Finally, Section 4 illustrates ... intervocalic /r/ is normally assibilated…. In Sercquiais, however ...
[9]
Toward a Progression Theory of the Old High German Consonant Shift
Sep 1, 2008 · According to that view, the shift in the Rhineland was probably influenced by external factors such as the borrowing of an assibilation rule ...
[10]
https://academic.oup.com/book/36888/chapter/322107736
[11]
[PDF] Palatalization in West Germanic - University Digital Conservancy
and assibilated to t(s)j. The timing of this change is conspicuous. It seems to have started around the same time when Dutch establishes dominance over the ...
[12]
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/phonology/article/daniel-recasens-2020-phonetic-causes-of-sound-change-the-palatalization-and-assibilation-of-obstruents-oxford-studies-in-diachronic-and-historical-linguistics-42-oxford-oxford-university-press-pp-xviii-203/DD6BCB73235D985F28B6B903127B3D5D
[13]
The Prehistory of the Greek Dialects - jstor
(e.g., assibilation of *-ti); where it happened (Peloponnese, etc.); when ... During this long period of SG unity changes I (*ti > si) 2 (rpo's) 4b (-ai in.
[14]
Palatalization and glide hardening in Greek and its dialects | Glossa ...
Jul 22, 2016 · We start with a description of palatalization, using Standard Modern Greek and other Greek dialects as an empirical basis.
[15]
(PDF) Tsakonian - ResearchGate
Feb 10, 2020 · Tsakonian (Tsak.) is an outlying, highly divergent Modern Greek dialect that is spoken today · that it is the only modern variety of Greek that ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
[16]
[PDF] greek ts/dz as internally complex segments - OSU Linguistics
This evidence shows that the best analysis recognizes these sounds as single segments but with internal complexity, as suggested, but not overtly argued for, in ...
[17]
(PDF) Velar fronting in Modern Greek Dialects - ResearchGate
suffixes in Byzantine, Medieval, and Modern Greek. Αthens: Academy of ... assibilation of velar stops (referred to commonly as 'velar softening', as ...
[18]
Revis(it)ing French palatalization | Glossa
Jun 29, 2016 · This paper explores the diachrony of French and reconsiders the classical analysis of French palatalizations.Missing: /sj/ > /ʃ/ blesser
[19]
The Impact of L2 Dialect on Learning French Vowels: Native English ...
Aug 30, 2010 · These vowels differ across the two varieties, both acoustically and because of assibilation of /t-d/ before /i-y/ for QF versus EF. As a ...
[20]
On the reconstruction of contrastive secondary palatalization in ...
Sep 8, 2023 · ... articulation had already occurred before the simplification of ... Phonetic Causes of Sound Change: the Palatalization and Assibilation of.
[21]
On the Iotation of Dentals in West Slavic - Academia.edu
Proto-Slavic's voiceless noncontinuants evolved into ... KI *k', like IE *k' and BdC *k', assibilated to a palatoalveolar affricate *č', thus to ɔtrɔč'ε.
[22]
https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/4821/
[23]
(PDF) Arabic Interdentals: Variation and Linguistic Change
Palestinian Arabic, among others). This paper investigates processes of variation and change a ecting the inter-. dental variables ...Missing: realization | Show results with:realization
[24]
Jīm - Brill Reference Works
This phoneme is realized as a post-alveolar/palato-alveolar fricative [ʒ], mainly in most urban dialects of Syria, with the exception of Aleppo; in Palestine ...
[25]
https://www.academia.edu/29874860/On_the_Iotation_of_Dentals_in_West_Slavic
[26]
None
Summary of each segment:
[27]
[PDF] pɗɑ Phonological Data & Analysis Volume 2, Article 6: 1–29 (2020)
Thus, stereotypical palatalization processes are alternations such as ti→tʲi, ti→tʃi, or ki→tʃi – alveolars and/or velars becoming (alveo)-palatal before a ...
[28]
The Consonant Inventory of Proto-Tsonga-Copi - MDPI
The Southern Bantu language group consists of ~80 living languages (Maho, 2009) divided among six subgroups: Shona (S10), Venda (S20), Sotho-Tswana (S30), Nguni ...
[29]
Phylogeographic analysis of the Bantu language expansion ... - PNAS
Aug 1, 2022 · The Bantu expansion transformed the linguistic, economic, and cultural composition of sub-Saharan Africa. However, the exact dates and routes ...
[30]
[PDF] BANTU PHONOLOGY
Jun 14, 2022 · In some Bantu languages the mid vowels /o/ and /e/ also glide before. V's. Ekegusii: /o-ko-ar-a/ → o-kw-aar-a 'to spread'; /e-a-om ...
[31]
[PDF] Bantu Orthography Manual - SIL Global
It offers a strategy for orthography development, combined with a list of resources for Bantu linguistic information and the condensed advice of a coterie of.
[32]
https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/9/215
[33]
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2112853119
[34]
[PDF] Natural and Unnatural Sound Patterns: A Pocket Field Guide
This study pro- vides a brief history of the study of natural and unnatural sound patterns from antiquity forward. Definitions of natural and unnatural sound ...
[35]
[PDF] The Phonetics and Phonology of Sibilants - Rutgers Optimality Archive
May 28, 2021 · ... sound shifts. Here and in the first subsubsection on assibilation (A.), I claim that the inputs of assibilating sound shifts and their ...
[36]
http://www.sgr.fi/sust/sust266/sust266_kallio.pdf
[37]
[PDF] Shared sound changes in the Gorontalic language group
The Gorontalic languages provide an excellent case of areal spread of sound changes among languages which were once, but in some cases are no longer, ...
[38]
History of Spanish consonants
To understand the origins of the modern Spanish consonantal system, one must examine consonant pronunciation in Latin.
[39]
/t/ becoming /ʧ/ - English Pronunciation
The sound /tʃ/, historically derived from /t/ + /j/, has become the only possibility. This is what happens, for example, with the word nature.
[40]
Sibilant fricative merging in Taiwan Mandarin - PMC - NIH
In Taiwan Mandarin, retroflex [ʂ] is allegedly merging with dental [s], reducing the traditional three-way contrast between sibilant fricatives (i.e., dental [s] ...
[41]
[PDF] GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION OF THE MERGING BETWEEN ...
This study investigated the geographical variation of the merging between dental and retroflex sibilants in. Taiwan Mandarin. Different from previous studies.
[42]
An experimental approach to debuccalization and supplementary ...
Debuccalization is a weakening phenomenon whereby various consonants reduce to laryngeals. Examples include Spanish s-aspiration (s becomes h word-finally) ...