Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bakerloo line extension

The Bakerloo line extension is a proposed extension of the London Underground's Bakerloo line from its current southern terminus at Elephant & Castle to Lewisham in southeast London, incorporating new underground stations at Burgess Park, Old Kent Road, and New Cross Gate, with safeguarded routes potentially allowing further extension toward Hayes.^[1]^[2] Initiated in planning during the late 2000s by Transport for London (TfL), the project builds on historical proposals dating back to the line's opening in 1906, aiming to alleviate overcrowding on existing services, enhance connectivity for underserved areas, and facilitate the development of approximately 20,000 new homes alongside job growth in the region.^[1]^[3]^[4] Progress has been hampered by funding constraints and prioritization of other infrastructure, leading to delays, though route alignments were formally safeguarded in 2021 to prevent development conflicts.^[1]^[5] As of 2025, TfL has advanced feasibility studies by appointing consultants AECOM and WW+P Architects to assess the four proposed stations, with construction potentially starting in 2030 and completion by 2040 contingent on securing funding and completing a prior line upgrade involving new rolling stock to increase train frequency from 20 to 27 per hour.^[6]^[2]^[7] The initiative has garnered strong public support across London, evidenced by consultation responses, and is integrated into broader growth strategies, though realization depends on government and private investment amid competing demands for transport capital.^[8]^[9]^[10] In the interim, TfL introduced the BL1 Superloop bus service in September 2025 to provide enhanced surface connectivity along the proposed corridor.

Historical Development

Pre-2000 Proposals

Proposals to extend the Bakerloo line southward from Elephant & Castle date to at least 1913, when initial considerations for further development beyond the line's then-planned terminus were discussed amid London's expanding suburban rail needs.^[11] More concrete plans emerged in the 1930s, aligned with the London Passenger Transport Board's ambitions to alleviate overcrowding and serve growing southern districts. In February 1931, a parliamentary bill sought authorisation for a two-station extension to Camberwell Green, with potential onward linkage to Denmark Hill, at an estimated cost of £1.87 million; this was approved under the London Electric Metropolitan District and Central London Railway Companies (Works) Act 1931.^[12]^[13] The extension was envisioned as a deep-level tube continuing from Elephant & Castle, passing beneath the Old Kent Road corridor to serve densely populated areas lacking efficient Underground access.^[14] However, integration into the broader New Works Programme of 1935–1940 prioritised northern expansions, such as to Stanmore, and resource constraints—including escalating construction costs and material shortages—delayed southern works.^[15] By 1937, a London Transport report revisited the route to Camberwell Green, proposing a junction just south of Elephant & Castle, but wartime priorities under the 1940 (Extension of Time) Act shifted focus to national defence, effectively shelving the project.^[16] Postwar revival efforts in the late 1940s formally proposed the Camberwell extension anew, aiming to connect with surface railways for broader regional links, including speculative onward routes toward Dartford via existing mainline alignments after surfacing near Camberwell.^[14]^[17] Despite technical feasibility studies and parliamentary extensions for land acquisition, chronic underfunding, competing infrastructure demands like the Victoria line, and doubts over ridership viability prevented construction; no further substantive proposals materialised before 2000, leaving the Bakerloo terminated at Elephant & Castle since 1906.^[13]^[18]

2000s Initiatives

In the early 2000s, proposals to extend the Bakerloo line southward from Elephant & Castle resurfaced amid urban regeneration efforts in south London, particularly in Opportunity Areas identified under the London Plan for high-density housing and employment growth. Transport for London (TfL) recognized the line's potential to alleviate overcrowding and support development along corridors like the Old Kent Road, where public transport capacity lagged behind projected demand. Discussions emphasized the route's alignment with existing rail alignments to minimize costs, targeting Lewisham as a terminus to connect underserved communities.^[18] By 2007, Mayor Ken Livingstone elevated the extension as a viable option among alternatives, such as extending the Victoria line or Northern line branches, to address capacity constraints south of the Thames. This initiative responded to surging ridership at Elephant & Castle, where passenger numbers had risen substantially since 2002 due to local redevelopment and regional commuting patterns. TfL's Transport 2025 strategy further underscored the need for enhanced Underground services in southeast London to accommodate an anticipated population increase of over 1 million by mid-century.^[19]^[20] Despite these advancements, the 2000s initiatives remained exploratory, with no secured funding or detailed engineering studies. Incoming Mayor Boris Johnson in 2009 questioned the project's prioritization amid competing infrastructure demands, though he acknowledged its alignment with long-term growth objectives. Progress stalled as economic pressures, including the 2008 financial crisis, shifted focus to maintenance over expansions, leaving the extension in conceptual limbo by decade's end.^[19]^[14]

2010s Advancements and Stalls

In October 2014, Transport for London (TfL) launched a public consultation on extending the Bakerloo line from Elephant & Castle to Lewisham, receiving 15,346 responses with 96% supporting the principle of extension to improve connectivity in underserved areas.^[21] The consultation evaluated route options, including variants along Old Kent Road or via Camberwell and Peckham, with preferences split between serving existing populations (64% for Camberwell route) and enabling new development (49% for Old Kent Road).^[21] By December 2015, TfL announced the preferred route via Old Kent Road, with new stations at Burgess Park and Old Kent Road, and upgrades at New Cross Gate and Lewisham, projecting construction start around 2023 and opening by 2030 to accommodate projected population growth to 10.1 million in London by 2036. This decision emphasized benefits like reduced journey times and reallocation of National Rail services for orbital routes, though it acknowledged the need for station upgrades at Lewisham to handle increased demand.^[21] Further consultations in 2017 reinforced the route's alignment with housing growth, estimating support for up to 50,000 new homes and job creation in south-east London, while a 2019 consultation on tunneling and potential extensions beyond Lewisham garnered 8,999 responses, 89% positive toward the core project and 82% favoring further reach to Hayes or Beckenham Junction.^[1] Progress stalled due to unresolved funding, with TfL lacking a committed package despite reliance on developer contributions and government support; no construction funding was secured by decade's end, as TfL prioritized existing commitments like Crossrail and tube upgrades amid fiscal constraints.^[21]^[1] High costs for tunneling and infrastructure, estimated at billions without full private or national backing, compounded delays, shifting focus to feasibility studies rather than advancement.^[21]

Project Specifications

Core Route from Elephant & Castle to Lewisham

The core route of the Bakerloo line extension spans approximately 7.5 km from the existing Elephant & Castle station to Lewisham, constructed primarily in twin-bore tunnels beneath south London.^[22] ^[23] This underground alignment follows a path along the Old Kent Road corridor before connecting to New Cross Gate and terminating at Lewisham, aiming to enhance connectivity in densely populated areas lacking sufficient Tube access.^[1] New stations are proposed at Burgess Park, serving the park and surrounding residential areas; Old Kent Road, providing access to commercial and housing developments along this major thoroughfare; and a new Bakerloo line platform at New Cross Gate, integrating with existing London Overground services.^[1] ^[24] The terminus at Lewisham would introduce Underground services to a key interchange hub currently served by Docklands Light Railway and National Rail lines, facilitating transfers without surface-level disruptions.^[1] ^[25] Engineering for the route involves excavating tunnels from Elephant & Castle southward, navigating beneath urban infrastructure including roads and utilities, with station designs optimized for high passenger throughput—up to 27 trains per hour on the core section.^[26] Platform screen doors and step-free access are incorporated at new stations to meet modern safety and accessibility standards.^[20] The alignment avoids major geological challenges typical of London's clay substrata but requires precise mitigation for settlement risks near existing structures.^[27]

Technical and Engineering Details

The proposed extension involves twin-bore running tunnels constructed primarily using tunnel boring machines, with an excavated diameter of 6 meters and an internal diameter of 5 meters for the mainline tunnels, alongside smaller diameters for cross passages and station tunnels.^[28] These tunnels would connect the existing Elephant & Castle station—requiring a new below-ground station box linked via service tunnels to the current platforms—to the southeastern corridor via Old Kent Road, incorporating cut-and-cover methods for station excavations in urban settings with high utility densities.^[29]^[30] New underground stations are planned at Old Kent Road (with options for twin sites to optimize access) and Burgess Park, featuring platform screen doors for safety and compatibility with upgraded Bakerloo rolling stock, while New Cross Gate and Lewisham would see surface-level reconstructions of existing National Rail platforms to integrate Underground operations, including step-free access and interchanges.^[1]^[31] Engineering designs assume alignment with the Bakerloo line's deep-level tube standards, including 1,200 mm track gauge and third-rail electrification at 630 V DC, necessitating new substations and ventilation shafts to manage heat and air quality in extended tunnels.^[28] The extension integrates with the ongoing Bakerloo line upgrade, incorporating communications-based train control (CBTC) signaling to support up to 27 trains per hour, enabling automated operation and reduced headways compared to the current fixed-block system limited by 1972 stock constraints.^[21]^[32] Key challenges include navigating London Clay geology for stable boring, mitigating ground settlement risks near Victorian infrastructure, and coordinating with Overground and Southeastern services at interchanges, with feasibility studies addressing seismic resilience and flood protection in low-lying areas.^[31]^[28]

Potential Extensions Beyond Lewisham

Transport for London (TfL) has identified potential further extensions of the Bakerloo line beyond Lewisham to Hayes in the London Borough of Bromley and to Beckenham Junction, utilizing existing rail infrastructure south of Lewisham to enhance connectivity in southeast London.^[1]^[33] These options would likely involve converting sections of the Southeastern network's Hayes branch (via Ladywell, Catford, and stations toward Hayes) or the Mid-Kent line toward Beckenham, allowing Bakerloo trains to operate over National Rail tracks with upgraded signaling and potentially new tube-standard stations where interchanges are limited.^[34] Such extensions aim to serve growing residential areas, support over 53,000 new homes, and reduce car dependency by providing direct Underground access to central London, though they remain at the aspirational stage pending feasibility studies and funding.^[5] As of 2025, no detailed engineering designs or costed proposals for these beyond-Lewisham segments have been finalized, with TfL prioritizing the core Elephant & Castle to Lewisham route amid fiscal constraints.^[6] Preliminary estimates suggest an additional £1.9 billion for extensions past Lewisham, on top of the £5.2–8.7 billion for the initial phase, but these figures exclude potential overruns from integrating with existing overground services or mitigating disruptions to Southeastern commuters.^[6] Local stakeholders, including Bromley Council, have advocated for the Hayes route to alleviate pressure on radial rail lines, projecting up to 18 trains per hour extending south, yet critics argue that diverting Bakerloo resources from core capacity upgrades could exacerbate reliability issues on the aging line without guaranteed benefits.^[25]^[34] Alternative local proposals, such as a shorter extension via Catford Bridge and Lower Sydenham without reaching Hayes, have surfaced in political discourse to prioritize underserved wards in Lewisham, but lack TfL endorsement and formal assessment.^[35] Implementation of any beyond-Lewisham phase would require coordination with Network Rail, potential track-sharing agreements, and benefits-case justification under Department for Transport guidelines, with timelines extending at least a decade beyond the projected 2030s opening of the Lewisham terminus.^[33]^[36]

Economic and Fiscal Realities

Estimated Costs and Funding Mechanisms

The estimated cost for the core Bakerloo line extension from Elephant & Castle to Lewisham stands at £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion, based on 2021 prices adjusted for inflation and project scope.^[5] ^[37] This range reflects engineering assessments by Transport for London (TfL), incorporating tunneling, station upgrades, and signaling integration, with upward revisions from earlier 2017 estimates of £4.7 billion to £7.9 billion due to material cost increases and regulatory requirements.^[38] Potential extensions beyond Lewisham, such as to Hayes, would add £800 million to £1.9 billion.^[38] Funding remains unresolved, with TfL emphasizing the need for a viable package combining central government grants, local revenue mechanisms, and private contributions, amid ongoing fiscal constraints post-COVID-19.^[1] Discussions with the UK Government focus on fiscal devolution, enabling greater London control over taxes to support infrastructure.^[39] Land value capture (LVC) models, which leverage property value uplifts from improved connectivity—as demonstrated in the Northern line extension to Battersea—are proposed to generate revenue through developer levies or increased business rates in affected areas.^[40] A tax increment financing (TIF) approach, capturing additional residential and commercial taxes over 25 years, could unlock up to £4.5 billion for the Bakerloo extension alongside DLR and Overground projects, contingent on new powers granted to the Mayor of London.^[41] ^[42] TfL's 2025-26 budget submission highlights these options but notes dependency on government approval, with no committed central funding as of late 2025, leading to calls for accelerated devolution to avoid further delays.^[43]^[44] Critics argue such mechanisms risk overburdening local taxpayers if ridership benefits underperform projections.^[5]

Projected Economic Impacts

The Bakerloo line extension is projected to generate a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 2:1 to 3:1, indicating medium to high value for money under HM Treasury guidelines, based on assessments incorporating user benefits, agglomeration effects, and wider economic multipliers.^[45] The Greater London Authority estimates a total net national economic benefit of £4.6 billion once operational, driven primarily by journey time savings and enhanced connectivity for south London commuters.^[46] Transport for London's modelling, including Railplan for patronage forecasts and LUMIT for land-use integration, anticipates static agglomeration benefits of approximately £1 billion for Greater London over 60 years in 2024 prices, reflecting productivity gains from denser economic clustering without dynamic growth assumptions.^[47] Projections include unlocking up to 52,000 new homes and 108,500 jobs along the corridor by 2051 compared to a do-nothing baseline, facilitating regeneration in underutilised areas such as Old Kent Road and Lewisham.^[47] Local assessments for Southwark and Lewisham forecast 18,000 additional homes corridor-wide, including 10,800 in Southwark and 7,200 in Lewisham, alongside 137,800 square metres of business floorspace, yielding land value uplifts of £2.4–£2.5 billion in Southwark and £1.4–£1.5 billion in Lewisham over a 10-year post-opening period.^[48] Construction-phase activity is expected to support 6,300 direct jobs and 18,100 in the supply chain annually, generating £7.3 billion in gross value added (GVA) through direct, indirect, and induced effects, while operational and development phases could add 9,400 permanent jobs and up to £24.6 billion in total GVA across affected boroughs.^[48] Wider national impacts are estimated at £1.5 billion in annual GVA from new jobs, supply chains, and productivity enhancements by 2041, supporting London's projected population growth to 10 million and accommodating 145,000 additional residents in the seven affected boroughs.^[46] ^[32] These figures derive from input-output models like Hatch Regeneris and draw analogies to prior projects such as Crossrail, though they assume full scheme delivery including upgrades and exclude potential risks from funding delays or over-optimistic patronage uptake observed in some UK transport appraisals.^[48] ^[32] An additional £15 billion in productivity-linked benefits is projected over the scheme's lifecycle, emphasising causal links between improved radial connectivity and reduced economic leakage from south London to central hubs.^[45]

Cost-Benefit Scrutiny

The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) for the Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham has been estimated at approximately 1.4:1 in analyses by transport consultants, reflecting a marginal economic return under standard appraisal methodologies.^[49] ^[50] An alternative routing via Old Kent Road improves this to 1.9:1, primarily due to anticipated reductions in journey times for users accessing central London.^[49] These figures, derived from early 2010s data including the London Mayor's Transport Strategy and Network Rail's regional plans, incorporate user benefits such as time savings and capacity relief for parallel National Rail services at London Bridge, but exclude the costs of the prerequisite Bakerloo line fleet and signalling upgrade.^[49] Construction costs for the core phase from Elephant & Castle to Lewisham/Catford are projected at £2.06 billion to £2.34 billion, encompassing tunnelling (£180 million per mile), station builds (£30-100 million each), and additional infrastructure like new trains (£10 million per unit).^[49] Quantified benefits emphasize regeneration, with local assessments forecasting enablement of 18,000 additional homes (including 7,200 in Lewisham), 9,400 permanent jobs from new commercial space (137,800 square meters corridor-wide), and £24.6 billion in total gross value added (GVA) across direct construction, supply chain, and induced effects in Southwark and Lewisham.^[48] Proponents highlight further multipliers, such as £1.5 billion annual UK-wide GVA and 150,000 extra daily public transport trips, positioning the extension as a catalyst for southeast London growth.^[51] Scrutiny of these appraisals underscores methodological constraints and external benchmarks. The UK Department for Transport (DfT) applies a 2:1 BCR threshold for new schemes, deeming ratios below this as insufficient for national priority amid competition from higher-return projects like Crossrail 2 or HS2.^[49] ^[50] Assumptions on development uplift and demand—such as 47,500 homes across opportunity areas—rely on professional judgments at early design stages and may overestimate net additionality, as baseline growth could proceed via enhanced bus services or Overground expansions without tube investment.^[48] As of 2025, post-pandemic cost inflation and TfL's funding shortfalls have not prompted BCR revisions, leaving the project's viability dependent on optimistic regeneration revenues and Section 106 developer contributions, which remain unproven at scale.^[49] Independent reviews classify the scheme's value as "fair" at best, questioning its alignment with fiscal realism given unaddressed opportunity costs for maintenance elsewhere in the network.^[50]

Controversies and Stakeholder Perspectives

Political and Local Opposition

Local opposition to the Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham has primarily centered on anticipated construction disruptions and impacts on community amenities, as documented in Transport for London's 2019 public consultation. Respondents raised concerns about noise, vibration, and potential structural settlement from tunnelling near residential areas, particularly at proposed sites like New Cross Gate, where the loss of a Tesco supermarket was highlighted due to the absence of nearby alternatives and broader community effects.^[52] Similar issues were noted for Catford and Hither Green sites, including environmental degradation, road network congestion, and the permanent loss of recreational or educational spaces designated as Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC).^[52] Overall, approximately 7% of consultation respondents expressed negative views on the core proposal, with additional worries about temporary traffic disruptions and business interruptions during the estimated five-to-seven-year build phase.^[52] Gentrification fears have also surfaced sporadically among Elephant & Castle residents, linked to associated redevelopment rather than the extension itself, with some citing displacement of existing communities akin to prior local regeneration projects.^[53] In January 2025, anonymous posters appeared along Old Kent Road warning that the project would exacerbate housing costs and displace locals, though area residents largely dismissed them as unsubstantiated or potentially misleading, attributing no credible organized campaign behind the effort.^[54] Politically, opposition has been more pronounced regarding potential extensions beyond Lewisham, particularly from Bromley Council, which in January 2025 reiterated its stance against incorporating the Hayes National Rail branch into the Underground network.^[55] Councillor Nicholas Bennett argued that such a move would prove "disruptive and costly," severing direct Overground connections to Charing Cross and Cannon Street while failing to address peak-hour demand patterns favoring National Rail over Tube frequencies.^[55] This position echoes the council's long-standing preference for preserving existing rail services over conversion, a view contested by Lewisham councillors who labeled Bromley’s resistance "bonkers" given the potential for capacity relief on congested lines. For the core route, political hurdles have stemmed less from outright rejection and more from UK government reluctance to allocate the required £1.5 billion in capital funding, with prior Conservative administrations citing fiscal constraints amid competing national priorities like Northern rail upgrades, effectively stalling progress despite local Labour-led councils' advocacy.^[56]^[57] In the 2019 consultation, 9% opposed further extensions to Hayes or Beckenham Junction, reflecting similar cost and service disruption apprehensions.^[52]

Capacity, Reliability, and Service Criticisms

Critics have argued that the proposed Bakerloo line extension would strain the existing line's limited capacity, as the core section from Waterloo to Elephant & Castle already experiences severe overcrowding during peak hours, with load factors exceeding 100% on many services.^[58] The 1972 stock trains, averaging over 50 years old, provide approximately 720 passengers per six-car unit at crush capacity, and without the separate Bakerloo line upgrade—encompassing new rolling stock and signaling—the extension to Lewisham could propagate delays further along the route, amplifying bottlenecks at interchanges like Oxford Circus.^[59] Transport for London consultation responses acknowledge raised concerns that the extension might induce overcrowding on adjacent Underground lines, such as the Northern and Jubilee, due to modal shift from buses and National Rail without sufficient parallel capacity enhancements.^[21] Reliability critiques center on the line's documented decline, with 630,500 lost customer hours in 2022/23—a 370% increase from 2012—stemming from 589 cancellations linked to aging infrastructure and frequent signal failures.^[58] Extending the route by 4.7 km to Lewisham, critics contend, would extend the vulnerability to single points of failure, as the Bakerloo's tight curvatures and outdated power supply already contribute to slower recovery from disruptions compared to modern lines.^[52] Stakeholders, including local rail users, have highlighted that construction phases could disrupt National Rail services on parallel routes, potentially reducing overall system resilience during the projected 6-8 year build period.^[21] Service provision faces scrutiny for potentially diminishing the quality offered by current Southeastern National Rail operations to Lewisham, which utilize 8-10 car formations accommodating up to 1,000+ passengers per train versus the Bakerloo's shorter units.^[55] Consultation feedback noted fears of reduced direct access, increased interchange crowding at Lewisham, and loss of amenities like bicycle space on National Rail, with proposed Bakerloo frequencies of 22-27 trains per hour cited as compensatory but insufficient for peak demand surges without upgraded train interiors.^[52] Bromley Council representatives have warned that converting branches beyond Lewisham to tube operation would halve effective capacity per service, leading to rush-hour overcrowding and longer journey discomfort on standing-only trains.^[55] These concerns persist amid TfL's assurances of net capacity gains through higher throughput, though independent analyses question the feasibility absent full fleet renewal.^[21]

Delays and Opportunity Costs

The Bakerloo line extension project, first formally consulted on by Transport for London (TfL) in 2013-2014, has faced repeated delays, with initial construction targets for the late 2020s pushed back indefinitely due to funding shortfalls exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic's fiscal impacts.^[1] By September 2025, London Mayor Sadiq Khan indicated that completion would take at least a decade, contingent on securing new trains for the line beforehand, as the existing 1972 stock requires costly life extensions estimated at over £500 million by the mid-2030s to maintain service reliability.^[33] ^[51] Primary causes of delay include the scheme's unfunded status in TfL's business plan, requiring central government support amid competing priorities such as DLR and Northern line upgrades, which were advanced in TfL's 2025 plans over the extension.^[60] ^[61] Pre-construction activities, including station feasibility studies awarded in October 2024, have progressed slowly, with no firm timeline for tunneling or full funding commitment as of late 2025.^[36] Planning efforts have incurred notable costs, including local authority allocations such as Southwark Council's £2.4 million in Community Infrastructure Levy funds in January 2025 for project mitigation, alongside TfL's ongoing design and consultation expenses, though exact total pre-construction outlays remain undisclosed in public reports.^[62] These sunk costs represent opportunity expenditures that could have addressed immediate capacity strains on the existing Bakerloo line, where peak-hour frequencies are limited by aging infrastructure. Opportunity costs extend to foregone economic and connectivity gains from alternative investments; for instance, the funds earmarked for the extension's £5.2-8.7 billion total (2021 prices) might yield higher returns via shorter-term upgrades like the Northern line extension, which cost around £1 billion and delivered measurable ridership increases, or bus rapid transit enhancements such as the September 2025 Bakerloop service providing interim relief along the proposed route.^[37] ^[63] Delays have perpetuated regional disparities, with southeast London areas like Lewisham experiencing sustained overcrowding and limited access to central employment hubs, potentially costing billions in unrealized growth as estimated net benefits of £4.6 billion hinge on eventual delivery.^[46] ^[64]

Interim and Alternative Solutions

Bakerloop Bus Service Implementation

The Bakerloop bus service, designated as route BL1, was introduced by Transport for London (TfL) on 27 September 2025 as an express electric bus route mirroring the safeguarded alignment of the proposed Bakerloo line extension.^[65]^[66] Operating as part of TfL's Superloop network, it connects Waterloo Station to Lewisham Centre, stopping at Elephant & Castle, Old Kent Road, New Cross Gate, and New Cross, thereby providing interim rapid transit along the corridor pending the underground extension's uncertain timeline, which TfL has indicated could be at least a decade away.^[67]^[68] Services run daily from 05:00 to 00:30 using fully electric double-decker buses, with timetabled journeys averaging 27 minutes for the 8.6 km route, emphasizing limited stops to achieve faster travel times compared to existing local buses.^[69] Free travel was offered during the first week of operation to encourage uptake and familiarize users with the service.^[66] The initiative followed positive public consultation feedback and was enabled by over £5 million in developer contributions secured by Southwark Council, highlighting a pragmatic funding approach reliant on section 106 agreements rather than central government grants.^[69]^[70] Proponents, including TfL and local authorities, position the Bakerloop as a means to "bring to life" the extension route early, potentially building public support and demonstrating demand through real-world usage data, while addressing immediate connectivity gaps in southeast London exacerbated by the underground project's delays. However, critics have questioned whether such bus-based interventions could inadvertently reduce urgency for the full rail extension by offering a partial substitute, potentially complicating future business cases that rely on evidenced overcrowding on alternative routes like the Overground or existing buses.^[68] Early operational data remains limited as of October 2025, but the service integrates with TfL's broader electrification efforts, aligning with emission-reduction goals without requiring extensive infrastructure beyond bus priority measures at key junctions.^[69]

Integration with Existing Rail Infrastructure

The proposed Bakerloo line extension incorporates interchanges with existing rail networks to bolster southeast London's connectivity. At the intermediate New Cross Gate station, new Bakerloo platforms would enable seamless transfers to London Overground services on the East London line, which connect to Highbury & Islington and Crystal Palace, as well as Southeastern National Rail trains serving London Bridge and beyond.^[1]^[71] This design addresses current limitations in the existing above-ground station, which lacks direct Underground access.^[1] At the terminus in Lewisham, the extension would upgrade interchange facilities for passengers transferring to Docklands Light Railway (DLR) services toward Stratford and Bank, and Southeastern [National Rail](/page/National Rail) routes to Dartford, Orpington, and Kent coastal destinations.^[72]^[71] Lewisham's current rail setup relies on these DLR and heavy rail options, which offer peak frequencies of around 6-10 trains per hour but face capacity constraints during surges; the Bakerloo integration aims to add high-frequency Underground access, potentially every 2-3 minutes.^[72] As an alternative to constructing the full tunnelled extension to Lewisham, interim reliance on existing National Rail infrastructure along the Old Kent Road corridor sustains service, with Southeastern lines from Lewisham providing 4-8 trains per hour to central London terminals like London Bridge and Charing Cross, albeit with journey times 10-15 minutes longer than projected Bakerloo services due to differing stopping patterns and signalling.^[38] For potential expansion beyond Lewisham, Transport for London has evaluated integrating Bakerloo operations onto existing heavy rail tracks toward Hayes and Beckenham Junction, which would leverage Southeastern's quadruple-track corridor while requiring platform upgrades and train compatibility adjustments to achieve metro-style frequencies without extensive new builds.^[73]^[38] This approach, outlined in feasibility studies since 2021, prioritises cost efficiency by minimising tunnelling but demands coordination between TfL and Network Rail to mitigate service disruptions.^[73]

Current Status and Future Outlook

Recent Developments as of 2025

In early 2025, Transport for London (TfL) announced the selection of experts to assess the feasibility of constructing four new Bakerloo line stations as part of the extension from Elephant & Castle to Lewisham, signaling preparatory work amid ongoing funding challenges.^[6] Independent polling commissioned by local authorities in May revealed strong public support across London for the project, with proponents emphasizing its potential to enable 53,000 new homes and improved connectivity in southeast London.^[74] Southwark Council allocated approximately £2.4 million from Community Infrastructure Levy funds in January to advance planning for the Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension (BLUE), marking a modest local commitment despite the absence of central government backing.^[62] By July 2025, the Elephant & Castle station upgrade reached a key milestone, incorporating infrastructure such as three new escalators and five lifts designed to future-proof for Bakerloo extension services, though the extension itself remained unfunded.^[75] The London Assembly's Budget and Performance Committee held hearings that month to explore alternative financing mechanisms, including public-private partnerships and land value capture, as TfL sought pathways to cover the estimated £4.7–£7.9 billion cost (in 2017 prices).^[5]^[1] In September, Mayor Sadiq Khan indicated that completion would likely take at least a decade even if funding materialized, citing prerequisites like new train procurement and rollout before extension operations could commence.^[33] TfL launched the Bakerloop BL1 express bus service on September 27 as an interim measure to link Lewisham with central London, offering free travel initially to gauge demand while the rail project stalled.^[64] As of October 2025, the extension's status remained in limbo, with TfL prioritizing capital renewals over new builds due to constrained budgets, including £2.2 billion in government funding allocated for maintenance rather than expansions through 2029–30.^[76] The February London Growth Plan referenced the project as a means to unlock 20,000 homes but deferred substantive action, underscoring persistent delays tied to fiscal uncertainty.^[3] No firm construction timeline or full funding decision had been secured, reflecting broader critiques of opportunity costs in TfL's infrastructure pipeline.^[60]

Conditions for Revival or Cancellation

The revival of the Bakerloo line extension project hinges primarily on securing a viable funding package, estimated at £5.2–£8.7 billion for construction plus £800 million–£1.9 billion for necessary line upgrades (in 2021 prices), through negotiations between Transport for London (TfL) and the UK central government.^[5] ^[1] TfL has indicated that central government contributions, potentially around £1.5 billion, are essential, as local and developer funding alone—such as the £2.4 million in Community Infrastructure Levy allocated by Southwark Council in January 2025—cannot cover the full scope without risking fiscal strain on the authority.^[56] ^[62] Additional prerequisites include finalizing construction contracts to satisfy Grampian conditions in local planning agreements, which currently restrict development of approximately 10,500 homes along the Old Kent Road corridor until the project advances.^[32] Sustained political support from the Mayor of London and borough councils, evidenced by cross-party endorsements and public pledges, would further enable revival by facilitating supplementary financing mechanisms like borrowing against anticipated business rate uplifts from enabled growth in housing and jobs.^[77] ^[40] Demonstrable economic benefits, such as unlocking southeast London's transport connectivity to support projected population increases, must outweigh ongoing capacity constraints on the existing Bakerloo line, which require parallel upgrades to maintain service reliability post-extension.^[28] As of September 2025, Mayor Sadiq Khan projected at least a decade for completion assuming funding materializes, underscoring that timely fiscal commitments during national spending reviews—such as the June 2025 allocation of £2 billion to TfL without extension-specific earmarks—remain critical triggers.^[33] ^[78] Cancellation or indefinite deferral could occur if central government funding is withheld amid competing national priorities, as TfL's capital budget constraints preclude self-financing the project without risking operational deficits elsewhere in the network.^[1] Escalating costs beyond current estimates, driven by inflation or construction delays, might erode the project's benefit-cost ratio, particularly if interim measures like the BL1 Bakerloo Line Extension bus route (launched in 2025) demonstrably mitigate demand pressures in the interim.^[40] ^[79] Political shifts, such as reduced emphasis on London-specific infrastructure in post-2024 national budgets, or failure to align with broader priorities like net-zero transitions without additional subsidies, could formalize abandonment, though no explicit cancellation has been announced as of October 2025.^[80] Local opposition tied to disruption during construction or perceived over-reliance on taxpayer funds might amplify calls for alternatives, such as DLR extensions, if revival funding talks stall beyond 2026.^[40]

References

[1]
Bakerloo line extension - Transport for London
We are considering extending the Bakerloo line to improve transport connections in southeast London and to enable growth in homes and jobs.
[2]
Bakerloo line extension latest and what TfL is doing in 2025
Dec 27, 2024 · New trains on the Bakerloo line will need to be built and rolled out before the route is extended from Elephant and Castle to Lewisham, Sadiq Khan has said.
[3]
London Growth Plan: Bakerloo and DLR extensions, Crossrail 2 ...
Feb 28, 2025 · The Bakerloo line extension will reportedly unlock 20,000 homes, according to the London Growth Plan. This will be a major engineering ...
[4]
This is how we pay for the Bakerloo Line extension - James O'Malley
Aug 25, 2025 · Since the line first opened in 1906, numerous plans have been made to extend the line deeper into South London, which have so far amounted to ...
[5]
Finding funding for the Bakerloo line extension | London City Hall
Jul 21, 2025 · Transport for London (TfL) has proposed an extension of the Bakerloo line from Elephant and Castle, to Lewisham, including the potential for ...
[6]
These Are TfL's 2025 Plans For The Bakerloo Line Extension
Jan 3, 2025 · The stations in question are Burgess Park, Old Kent Road, New Cross Gate, and Lewisham. AECOM and WW+P Architects will be conducting studies to ...
[7]
Urgent call to set the signals green on Bakerloo Line Upgrade and ...
Mar 20, 2025 · TfL are seeking to upgrade the line with new rolling stock, which would enable the line to run 27 trains per hour rather than the current 20 (a ...
[8]
Bakerloo Line Extension: New Report Shows Londoners ... - Time Out
Jun 1, 2025 · If the project gets the official blessing and funding it needs, TfL says it could begin in 2030 and be complete by 2040. Get the latest and ...
[9]
Overwhelming London-wide support for Bakerloo Line Upgrade and ...
May 28, 2025 · TfL's proposed Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension is a shovel-ready infrastructure project that will unlock the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
Bakerloo Line extension back in business as Khan sets out 10-year ...
Mar 3, 2025 · Current plans for the line being drawn up by Aecom and WW&P would include four new stations at Burgess Park, Old Kent Road, New Cross Gate ...
[11]
Bakerloo line extension - Wikipedia
Since the late 2000s, Transport for London (TfL) has been planning an extension of the line, with a route to Lewisham via Old Kent Road safeguarded in 2021. TfL ...History · Prior proposals · Current project · Proposed route
[12]
Burgess Park - diamond geezer
Feb 14, 2013 · It's 100 years since an extension of the Bakerloo line south of Elephant & Castle was first proposed. So how come we still haven't got one?
[13]
Bakerloo line extension southwards announced — again - ianVisits
Sep 30, 2014 · One of the earliest proposals was made in February 1931, when a Bill was proposed for a £1.87 million extension of the line to Camberwell Green.
[14]
[PDF] Bakerloo Line Extension Consultation Report - London - TfL
Mar 4, 2015 · As far back as 1931 an extension to Camberwell was ... proposed extension of the Bakerloo line via Camberwell and Peckham Rye (Option.
[15]
The Bakerloo line | London Transport Museum
Plans to extend the Bakerloo south from Elephant & Castle were first proposed in the 1930s and 1940s (to Camberwell), and again in the 2000s (to Lewisham).Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[16]
[PDF] Research Guide No 31: A Brief History of the Bakerloo Line - TfL
In 1900, authorisation was secured for extensions northbound to Paddington and southbound to E lephant & C astle. As such, the new tube would serve two.
[17]
The History of the Bakerloo Line
Fifteen trains were replaced by 1959 Stock trains from the Northern Line between December 1982 and June 1983. All twenty were taken out of service. On 25th ...
[18]
How the London Underground tried to extend the Bakerloo line to ...
Mar 31, 2020 · The idea was to extend the Bakerloo line in a tunnel from Elephant and Castle, via Camberwell Green and then rise to the surface and join the mainline railway.Missing: 1940s | Show results with:1940s
[19]
Death, Taxes and Lewisham - London Reconnections
The idea of extending the Bakerloo Line southwards is almost as old as the Bakerloo Line itself. We look at TfL's latest proposal to do exactly that.
[20]
Boris Moots Bakerloo Line Extension - Londonist
Feb 26, 2009 · Ken Livingstone mentioned it two years ago, and TfL's own Transport 2025 document highlights the need for an Underground service in this area.
[21]
[PDF] Bakerloo line extension - TfL Consultations
extension of the Bakerloo line, including options for the extension route. ... since 2002 demand at the station has increased considerably. As a result ...
[22]
[PDF] Bakerloo line extension - Response to issues raised - TfL
The proposed extension would follow a sustained period of transport investment to support the growth that is occurring across London. This includes projects ...
[23]
Bakerloo Line Extension, London - Railway Technology
Feb 21, 2017 · The Bakerloo Line extension project is a proposed expansion of the London Underground Bakerloo line from its existing terminal station at Elephant & Castle to ...Missing: 1900-1999 | Show results with:1900-1999
[24]
London's Bakerloo Line extension moves forward
Running in twin-bore tunnels for its entire 7.5km length, the extension will continue the Bakerloo line beyond its current terminus at Elephant & Castle, where ...
[25]
Bakerloo Line: the extension project - We Build Value
May 15, 2024 · The line extension project involves extending its route to Lewisham, with the construction of two new stations (Burgess Park and Old Kent Road)Missing: initiatives 2000-2009
[26]
Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension - Invest in Lewisham
Aug 29, 2025 · TfL is considering upgrading and extending the Bakerloo line from Elephant and Castle via Lewisham and eventually to Hayes, to improve London's connectivity ...
[27]
TfL plans for Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham explained
Aug 3, 2025 · There would be 27 trains per hour on the core section of the line between Queen's Park and Lewisham, with at least 18 trains per hour extended ...
[28]
[PDF] Bakerloo line extension - London - TfL
Bakerloo line platforms on a new tunnel route between Elephant and Castle and ... Proposed route of extension tunnels from Elephant and Castle to Lewisham. 6.8 ...
[29]
[PDF] Bakerloo line extension information for developers - TfL
This document provides guidance for developers on the Bakerloo line extension, including tunnel size, design assumptions, and local planning authority ...
[30]
TfL reveals more tunnel details for Bakerloo line extension
Sep 13, 2018 · TfL is planning a redevelopment of Elephant and Castle station, plus two new underground stations at Lambeth North and Old Kent Road and three other new ...
[31]
Major milestone reached in vital Elephant & Castle Tube station ...
Sep 30, 2024 · TfL is progressing work on plans to upgrade and extend the Bakerloo line. TfL's immediate priority is securing the long-term capital funding ...
[32]
Bakerloo Line Extension: Aecom and WW+P appointed for feasibility ...
Oct 10, 2024 · Aecom and architects WW+P have been selected by Transport for London (TfL) to author a feasibility study on four new stations to be built as part of the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[33]
[PDF] Moving-London-Forward-The-Bakerloo-Line-Upgrade-and ...
The Bakerloo Line Extension is the proposed extension of the. Bakerloo Line from the current southern terminus at Elephant. & Castle to Lewisham (Phase 1) and ...
[34]
At least a decade until completed Bakerloo line extension, says Mayor
Sep 24, 2025 · The Bakerloo line extension would also extend the line from Waterloo to Lewisham, with a potential further extension to Hayes and Beckenham ...
[35]
Do you think the Hayes extension is a good idea or should Bakerloo ...
Jul 28, 2025 · A multi-billion pound Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham remains on track – and could go as far as Beckenham and Hayes, TfL has said. www.
[36]
The Bakerloo Line Extension: A Fairer Future for Lewisham
Sep 20, 2025 · By extending the line to Ladywell, Catford Bridge and Lower Sydenham, we connect the communities that need it most. Without Phase 2, we stop ...
[37]
Bakerloo line extension pre-contracts awarded - London - ianVisits
Oct 14, 2024 · TfL has previously awarded contracts to the engineering consultancies Dr. Sauer & Partners and Arup to prepare feasibility studies for five ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[38]
Bakerloo line extension plans examined further - BBC
Oct 16, 2024 · It is estimated the extension would cost between £5.2bn and £8.7bn, based on figures from 2021. The line would be extended south from ...
[39]
Call to release billions for Bakerloo line upgrade - BBC
Aug 17, 2024 · The cost of the extension was estimated at £5.2bn to £8.7bn at 2021 prices, plus a further £800m to £1.9bn to reach Hayes. Mr Butt argued ...
[40]
Bakerloo Line Extension - Greater London Authority
TfL is in discussion with the Government over both fiscal devolution and land value capture options for London. These funding mechanisms could go some way ...
[41]
Bakerloo Line extension - can London "stand on its own two feet"?
Aug 17, 2025 · In the case of the Northern Line Extension to Battersea Power Station, TfL was able to borrow against the presumption of higher business rates ...
[42]
Innovative funding model could unlock £4.5bn for new transport ...
Jan 31, 2025 · The report maps how the residential TIF model could raise as much as £4.5bn over 25 years to support delivery of three priority projects in ...
[43]
Tax financing model could unlock £4.5bn for TfL's Underground ...
Jan 31, 2025 · Extensions to the Bakerloo line, Docklands Light Railway (DLR) and London Overground could be funded through a tax revenue model that could unlock up to £4.5bn.
[44]
[PDF] TfL Mayor's Budget Submission 2025-26 - London
Oct 30, 2024 · The schemes considered are a DLR extension to Thamesmead directly unlocking 25,000 new homes, the Bakerloo Line Extension aimed at improving ...
[45]
New fundraising powers 'could unlock billions' for Tube projects
Jan 31, 2025 · Billions of pounds to help pay for extensions to London's Tube network could be unlocked if the Government granted Sir Sadiq Khan new fundraising powers.
[46]
Cost Benefit Ratios - Greater London Authority
In addition, there is an estimated £15 billion in wider economic benefits arising from productivity gains. Bakerloo line Extension: BCR: 2:1 to 3:1 (Extension ...Missing: projected | Show results with:projected
[47]
Bakerloo Line Extension (1) - Greater London Authority
Nov 26, 2024 · Bakerloo Line Extension (1), 2025/0067, 16 January 2025. Bakerloo line extension, 2009/0815, 25 March 2009. Previous Question · Next Question ...
[48]
[PDF] BLU Outline Business Case - TfL
30 Back the Bakerloo Line - Pledge your support for the Bakerloo Line Extension & Upgrade. 31 Moving London Forward: Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension ...
[49]
[PDF] Bakerloo Line Extension Local Economic Impact Assessment
3.27 TfL have completed a range of analytical work to inform the emerging business case for the BLE project. This includes Railplan modelling that forecasts ...
[50]
[PDF] Bakerloo Line Extension War - Lewisham Council
Members were informed that a Bakerloo extension is in the London Mayor's transport strategy as a possibility, but that it is competing for funding and was ...Missing: stalls | Show results with:stalls
[51]
[PDF] Bakerloo Line Extension Prospects Article
This would cost £3.5-. 4billion and have a high level Benefit Cost Ratio. (BCR) of 1.4:1.An option via the Old Kent Road offers a shorter journey time with a ...Missing: projected | Show results with:projected
[52]
How will the Bakerloo Line Upgrade & Extension benefit you?
Enhancing connectivity for 48% of those living within reach of the existing line within the top 30% most deprived communities in England, extending the line ...
[53]
[PDF] Bakerloo line extension Response to Issues Raised Report - TfL
1.1 Overview. This report details our response to the issues raised in the public consultation held between 14 October and 22 December 2019 on our proposals ...
[54]
r/london - People are actually opposing the Bakerloo Line extension
Jan 20, 2025 · I think that's main opposition from people further down the line in Hayes - that the journey will be overall longer even if more frequent.No government support for new Bakerloo line trains @ Spending ...Why do people oppose extending train lines in south London? - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
[55]
Old Kent Road residents dismiss mysterious posters opposing the ...
Jan 18, 2025 · Old Kent Road residents have dismissed mysterious posters that have appeared opposing the Bakerloo line extension and claiming the project will price out ...
[56]
Bakerloo Line Extension Won't Meet Local Travel Demands, Warn ...
Jan 6, 2025 · Councillor Nicholas Bennett have warned that extending the Bakerloo from Lewisham to Hayes would be a disruptive, costly mistake which would cut links to the ...
[57]
London Labour councils call for Bakerloo line funding - BBC
Mar 20, 2025 · The planned upgrade would support 150,000 jobs in Goole, East Yorkshire—where the new trains would be built—under the current TfL proposals.Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms<|separator|>
[58]
No government support for new Bakerloo line trains @ Spending ...
Jun 9, 2025 · 'Reeves pledges funds for northern rail but London left short' · 219 upvotes · 36 comments ; This is how we pay for the Bakerloo Line extension.r/london - People are actually opposing the Bakerloo Line extensionLondon to lose out in UK government spending review, says City HallMore results from www.reddit.com
[59]
Bakerloo Line 'in state of managed decline' and at risk of 'critical ...
Feb 20, 2024 · The Bakerloo line clocked up a total of 630500 'lost customer hours' in 2022/23, up 370 per cent on 2012, due to 589 train cancellations.
[60]
Disparities of service reliability of the Bakerloo and Piccadilly with ...
Jul 22, 2024 · The 72 stock on the Bakerloo is certainly showing its age. Some of the cars are in a pretty poor condition inside and out, others still look pretty good.
[61]
Bakerloo line Extension to Lewisham (2) - Greater London Authority
The Bakerloo line extension is currently unfunded. TfL's immediate priority is securing the long-term capital funding certainty that would allow it to, among ...
[62]
Bakerloo Line Archives - London Reconnections
Sep 1, 2025 · TfL picks DLR & Northern line upgrades over CR2 & Bakerloo Extension ... Monday's Friday Reads – 6 October 2025 · Friday Reads – 3 October ...
[63]
£2.4m allocated for Bakerloo Line Extension - Old Kent Road
Jan 14, 2025 · Southwark Council has agreed to allocate more than £2.4m in CIL funding to ensure the Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension (BLUE) can go ahead.
[64]
r/london on Reddit: 'Fund Bakerloo line extension with new trains to ...
Aug 18, 2024 · 'Fund Bakerloo line extension with new trains to unlock new homes and economic boost', No10 urged : r/london.Work starts on Bakerloo Line extension engineering feasibility studyr/london - People are actually opposing the Bakerloo Line extensionMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: viability | Show results with:viability
[65]
Tfl launches Bakerloop BL1 express connecting Lewisham with ...
The BL1 will follow the route of the long-awaited Bakerloo line extension, running from Lewisham town centre via Lewisham station, New Cross ...
[66]
Brand new express 'Bakerloop' service launching this weekend with ...
Sep 24, 2025 · The new express electric bus service will provide quicker journey times, mirroring the proposed Bakerloo Tube line extension route, running ...
[67]
New Bakerloop bus route launches between Waterloo and Lewisham
Sep 27, 2025 · The Bakerloop will run between Waterloo station and Lewisham every 12 minutes during the day from Monday to Saturday and every 15 minutes in the ...Missing: core details
[68]
BL1 Bakerloop bus route - Transport for London
BL1. Bakerloop bus towards Waterloo. From: Lewisham Centre To: Waterloo Station / Waterloo Road.
[69]
Bakerloop express bus service launches in south London
Sep 23, 2025 · The Bakerloo line extension is at least a decade away and appears to have fallen behind the proposed DLR extension to Thamesmead in terms of ...
[70]
Brand new Bakerloop bus to launch on Old Kent Road | Southwark ...
Sep 24, 2025 · The new Bakerloop BL1 express bus will enter service on Saturday 27 September following positive consultation feedback and over £5 million ...
[71]
Brand new Bakerloop bus launched on Old Kent Road on 27 ...
Sep 27, 2025 · Thanks to over £5 million in developer contributions secured by Southwark Council, the Bakerloop BL1 will link Waterloo, Elephant & Castle, ...
[72]
Bakerloo line extension takes step forward as design work starts on ...
Oct 15, 2024 · The extended service would next stop at New Cross Gate, providing an interchange with the Overground, and then at Lewisham, currently served by ...
[73]
Bakerloo Line extension - Lewisham Council
Nov 27, 2024 · Transport for London have proposed to extend the Bakerloo line to Lewisham via Old Kent Road and New Cross Gate. The ...Missing: 1900-1999 | Show results with:1900-1999
[74]
[PDF] summary-report-further-extension-hayes-beckenham.pdf - TfL
The purpose of this report is to explain why we consider that an extension of the. Bakerloo line beyond Lewisham to Hayes and Beckenham Junction could ...
[75]
New independent research shows overwhelming London-wide ...
May 28, 2025 · TfL's proposed Bakerloo Line Upgrade and Extension is a shovel-ready infrastructure project that will unlock the homes, jobs and economic growth ...<|separator|>
[76]
Elephant & Castle capacity upgrade hits milestone, but what about ...
Jul 8, 2025 · The Bakerloo currently terminates at Elephant and Castle, but various options exist for extension into south-east London. Provision has been ...<|separator|>
[77]
TfL gets £2.2 billion for capital upgrades over the next four years
Jun 11, 2025 · In total, the government is offering TfL £2.2 billion between 2026-27 and 2029-30. This funding is for capital renewals only and won't be for ...
[78]
Back the Bakerloo Line - Pledge your support for the Bakerloo Line ...
Backed by £70.5 million from Southwark Council, the step-free station will connect to The Elephant development and future-proof the Bakerloo Line Extension to ...<|separator|>
[79]
TfL gets £2bn – but no timetable for Bakerloo Line and DLR extension
Jun 11, 2025 · TfL has welcomed a £2bn four-year funding settlement from the government as part of the long-awaited Spending Review.
[80]
The BL1 (Bakerloo Line Extension bus route) : r/transit - Reddit
Sep 28, 2025 · Hopefully the low number of stops in combination with the fact that it's still a relatively slow bus (timetabled at 27 minutes for 8.6km/5.3mi) ...Bakerloop express bus service launches in south London with free ...The TfL Three – Is the Bakerloo Line Extension to Hayes a ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: interim | Show results with:interim
[81]
The Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham could get official funding ...
Nov 29, 2024 · Since then, the project has gone through lots of ups and downs, with the latest update saying it could cost £8 billion and not be complete until ...