Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bivariate data

Bivariate data refers to a comprising paired observations on two variables, typically used in statistics to investigate potential relationships or associations between them. This form of data contrasts with univariate data, which involves only a single variable, by enabling analyses that compare aspects such as and or and level across individuals. Bivariate datasets can include quantitative variables (measurable numerical values) or categorical variables (non-numerical classifications), and their study forms a foundational step in . The types of bivariate data are categorized based on the nature of the variables involved: two categorical variables, one categorical and one quantitative variable, or two quantitative variables. For instance, two categorical variables might examine the association between and status, while a categorical-quantitative pair could explore average income by , and two quantitative variables might analyze the between years of experience and salary for auto mechanics. Visual representations are crucial for bivariate data, including scatterplots for quantitative pairs to reveal patterns like linear trends, tables for categorical pairs to show joint distributions, and plots or charts for mixed types to highlight differences across categories. In statistical practice, bivariate data underpins techniques such as analysis, which quantifies the strength and direction of linear relationships (e.g., via the ranging from -1 to +1), and for modeling predictions between variables. These methods help identify dependencies, such as a positive between rainfall and , but do not imply causation, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation in fields like , social sciences, and natural sciences. Overall, provides essential insights into variable interactions, serving as a building block for more complex multivariate studies.

Fundamentals

Definition and types

Bivariate data refers to a collection of observations involving exactly two variables, where each observation consists of a pair of values, often denoted as (X_i, Y_i) for i = 1 to n, with n representing the number of observations. This form of data arises when measurements or categorizations are recorded simultaneously on two attributes for the same subjects or units, such as recording both and for individuals in a study. Unlike univariate data, which pertains to a single variable (e.g., heights alone), bivariate data allows for the examination of potential associations between the two variables. In contrast, multivariate data extends this to three or more variables, complicating the analysis beyond pairwise relationships. The types of bivariate data are classified based on the nature of the variables involved, which can be numerical (quantitative, involving measurable values) or categorical (qualitative, involving non-numeric categories). Numerical-numerical bivariate data features two quantitative s, either both continuous (e.g., and measurements, where values can take any point on a scale) or both (e.g., number of siblings and number of pets). An example is pairing scores with final grades, both of which are continuous numerical values, to assess performance patterns. Numerical-categorical bivariate data pairs a quantitative with a categorical one, such as levels (numerical) and (categorical, e.g., doctor, engineer, teacher), enabling analysis of how categories influence numerical outcomes. Categorical-categorical bivariate data involves two qualitative variables, both discrete and non-ordered or ordered into categories, often summarized in contingency tables. For instance, (male, female) paired with income bracket (low, medium, high) illustrates how demographic categories may relate to socioeconomic groupings. Another example is cell phone usage (user, non-user) versus speeding violations (yes, no), where frequencies in each category pair reveal potential behavioral associations. Bivariate data serves as a foundational prerequisite for , as it establishes the framework for exploring relationships between , such as whether changes in one correspond to changes in the other, without assuming directional like dependent or roles. This by variable types guides the selection of appropriate analytical techniques in subsequent steps.

Dependent and independent variables

In bivariate data analysis, the independent variable, also known as the predictor or explanatory variable, is the presumed to influence or explain variations in another variable; it is often denoted as X and may be manipulated in experimental settings or selected as the input in observational studies. Conversely, the dependent variable, referred to as the response or outcome variable, is the factor expected to change in response to the independent variable; it is typically denoted as Y and represents the target of or . This directional pairing forms the foundation of bivariate datasets, where pairs of observations (X_i, Y_i) are analyzed to explore potential relationships, such as in numerical pairs like and or categorical pairs like type and status. The concept of , central to , was introduced by Sir Francis Galton in his 1885 study of parent-child height relationships, where he observed that offspring heights tended to revert toward the population average regardless of parental extremes. This work established a framework for treating one variable (e.g., parental height as ) as influencing another (e.g., child height as dependent). This usage has since permeated statistical practice, influencing modern in fields like and , though it evolved from Galton's focus on natural inheritance rather than controlled manipulation. A common example illustrates these roles in regression contexts: time serves as the independent variable (X) when predicting stock prices as the dependent variable (Y), where historical price data is modeled against elapsed time to forecast future values. However, misconceptions often arise, such as assuming that a strong association between variables implies causation; in reality, correlation between an independent and dependent variable does not establish that the former causes the latter, as confounding factors or reverse causality may be at play. Additionally, the term "independent variable" can confuse with the statistical concept of independence, which refers to random variables having no probabilistic dependence (e.g., P(X,Y) = P(X)P(Y)), whereas in bivariate modeling, the independent variable need not be uncorrelated with the dependent variable or errors—only directionality is emphasized.

Visualization techniques

Scatter plots

A scatter plot, also known as a scatter diagram or scatter graph, is constructed by plotting individual data points as coordinates (x_i, y_i) on a Cartesian plane, where the horizontal axis (x-axis) represents one variable and the vertical axis (y-axis) represents the other. Each point corresponds to a paired observation from the bivariate dataset, allowing for a visual representation of how the values of the two variables relate to each other. Axes are labeled with the variable names and appropriate units, and the scale is chosen to encompass the range of the data without distortion. Interpretation of a scatter plot involves assessing the overall pattern of the points to infer the nature of the relationship between the variables. The direction can indicate a positive (points trending upward from left to right) or negative (points trending downward); the strength is gauged by how closely the points align along a potential trend line, with tighter clusters suggesting stronger relationships and more dispersed points indicating weaker ones; the form reveals whether the association is linear, curved, or clustered; and outliers are identified as points that deviate substantially from the main pattern. By convention, variable is often plotted on the x-axis and the dependent variable on the y-axis to reflect potential causal directions. Common patterns in scatter plots include linear trends, where points approximate a straight line; nonlinear trends, such as or curves; clusters, indicating subgroups within the data; or no apparent , characterized by a random scatter of points with no discernible trend. These visual cues help identify trends, gaps, or anomalies that might warrant further investigation. Scatter plots offer several advantages as a visualization tool for bivariate data, including their ability to reveal non-linear relationships and the full distribution of points at a glance, which alone might obscure, and their simplicity in highlighting outliers or data density without requiring complex computations. The earliest known scatter plot is attributed to John F. W. Herschel in 1833, who used it to study the orbits of double stars, while its popularization in statistics came through Francis Galton's 1886 work on , where it facilitated the discovery of and concepts. Implementation of scatter plots is straightforward in common statistical software; for example, in , the base plot() function or ggplot2's geom_point() can generate them, and in , the matplotlib library's scatter() function provides similar capabilities.

Other graphical methods

In addition to scatter plots, which are primarily suited for pairs of continuous variables, other graphical methods provide effective visualizations for bivariate data involving categorical variables or mixed types, enabling the exploration of distributions, proportions, and associations without requiring numerical summaries. These techniques emphasize comparative displays and proportional representations, making them valuable when data is high or when one variable is . Side-by-side box plots are particularly useful for examining the distribution of a quantitative variable across levels of a categorical variable. In construction, the quantitative variable is plotted on the y-axis, while the categorical variable defines groups along the x-axis, with each group's box summarizing the median, quartiles, and potential outliers through parallel box-and-whisker diagrams. This method facilitates visual comparison of central tendencies, spreads, and skewness, such as assessing average income (quantitative) by employment sector (categorical), where differences in medians or interquartile ranges highlight distributional shifts. It is especially applicable in cases where scatter plots become cluttered due to the discrete nature of one variable, though it is less effective for purely continuous pairs without grouping, as it obscures individual data points and relies on aggregated summaries. For bivariate data where both variables are categorical, stacked bar charts offer a straightforward way to depict joint frequencies or proportions. Construction involves placing one on the x-axis to form the bars, with the second variable represented as stacked segments within each bar, where segment heights are proportional to subcategory counts or percentages relative to the total bar height. Interpretation focuses on overall bar heights for marginal distributions and segment compositions for conditional associations, for instance, illustrating (one category) broken down by region (the other), revealing how subproportions vary across groups. These charts excel in use cases involving part-to-whole relationships with limited categories, but they limit direct cross-bar segment comparisons due to varying baselines, making them suboptimal for complex hierarchies. Mosaic plots extend this approach for categorical-categorical by creating a rectangular where tile areas are proportional to joint cell frequencies in a , recursively subdividing rows and columns to reflect marginal and conditional distributions. To construct, the plot begins with a full square divided horizontally by the first variable's proportions, then vertically within each row by the second variable's conditional proportions, often implemented via software like R's mosaicplot function. Visually, it identifies modes through tile sizes and associations via deviations from (e.g., shaded residuals), as seen in analyzing treatment outcomes by patient demographics. Developed and popularized in works on categorical , mosaic plots are ideal for high-cardinality where charts oversimplify, yet they can become cluttered with many levels and struggle to convey uncertainty without additional shading. Heatmaps provide another aggregated view, particularly for tables in bivariate categorical contexts, where values are encoded by color rather than heights. Construction maps the two variables to rows and columns, with colors scaled to represent frequencies or standardized associations, such as deeper shades indicating higher joint occurrences in survey responses by age group and preference. This allows quick identification of patterns like concentration in specific , useful when spatial or matrix-like overviews aid interpretation over plots. However, for strictly bivariate pairs, heatmaps are limited to a single or small grid and are less intuitive for continuous variables unless discretized, potentially masking fine-grained spreads.

Statistical analysis

Summary statistics

In bivariate data analysis, summary statistics begin with marginal measures, which treat each variable independently as in univariate analysis. The sample mean for variable X is calculated as \bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i, providing the central tendency of X across the n paired observations. Similarly, the sample median of X is the middle value when the ordered x_i are arranged, robust to outliers. The sample variance for X is s_x^2 = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2, measuring spread around the mean, with the standard deviation s_x = \sqrt{s_x^2}. These marginal statistics are computed analogously for the paired variable Y, yielding \bar{y}, median of Y, s_y^2, and s_y. For one and one quantitative variable, involve computing measures of the quantitative variable (such as means, medians, and standard deviations) separately for each category of the . This allows comparison of the quantitative variable's distribution across groups, for example, average salary by education level. These grouped summaries are often displayed in tables showing the statistic for each category along with sample sizes. Joint extend these to capture the relationship between the two variables. The sample , \operatorname{cov}(X, Y) = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y}), quantifies how X and Y vary together: positive values indicate that deviations from their means occur in the same , while negative values show . This measure of joint variability forms the basis for understanding co-movement but depends on the units of measurement. For example, consider a of 5 students' hours studied (X: 3, 5, 2, 7, 4) and test scores (Y: 70, 80, 60, 90, 75). The means are \bar{x} = 4.2 and \bar{y} = 75, with \operatorname{cov}(X, Y) = 21.25 > 0, indicating positive joint variability as more study hours align with higher scores. In contrast, for rainfall (X: 0, 1, 2, 3) and outdoor hours (Y: 8, 6, 4, 2), the is negative, reflecting that higher rain reduces outdoor time. When both variables are categorical, use contingency tables to display joint and marginal frequencies. A two-way table arranges counts of occurrences for each combination of categories, with row and column totals as marginal frequencies (e.g., total males or total PC purchases). Proportions are then derived: marginal proportions from row/column totals divided by the grand total (e.g., proportion of males = 106/223 ≈ 0.475), and joint proportions from cell frequencies over the grand total. These summaries reveal the distribution of one variable across levels of the other without assuming . Together, these marginal, joint, and categorical summaries provide a foundational descriptive overview of bivariate data, informing interpretations of patterns before exploring more advanced relational measures.

Measures of association

Measures of association quantify the strength and direction of the between two variables in bivariate data, providing a numerical summary beyond simple or marginal statistics. These measures are essential for understanding whether variables tend to vary together, and they form the basis for more advanced analyses like . For continuous numerical variables, measures assume certain distributional properties, while non-parametric alternatives handle ordinal or non-normal data. For categorical variables, is assessed through tests of and derived coefficients. For bivariate numerical data, the , denoted r, measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables X and Y. It is defined as r = \frac{\cov(X, Y)}{s_X s_Y}, where \cov(X, Y) is the and s_X, s_Y are the standard deviations. The value of r ranges from -1 to 1, with 1 indicating a perfect positive linear relationship, -1 a perfect negative linear relationship, and 0 no linear relationship. This coefficient was introduced by in his foundational work on the mathematical . Key assumptions include between the variables and joint normality of the data distribution for valid . When the relationship is monotonic but potentially non-linear, or when data violate normality assumptions, , denoted \rho, is used as a . It assesses the monotonic by correlating the ranks of the variables and is given by \rho = 1 - \frac{6 \sum d_i^2}{n(n^2 - 1)}, where d_i are the differences in ranks for each observation and n is the sample size. Developed by , this measure ranges from -1 to 1, similar to Pearson's r, but is more robust to outliers and non-normal distributions. It assumes a monotonic relationship but not strict linearity. For bivariate categorical data, the chi-square test of independence evaluates whether the distribution of one variable depends on the other in a . The test statistic is \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_{ij} - E_{ij})^2}{E_{ij}}, where O_{ij} are observed frequencies, E_{ij} are expected frequencies under independence, and the sum is over all cells. Introduced by , this non-parametric test follows a chi-square distribution under the of independence, with equal to (rows - 1)(columns - 1). For 2x2 tables, the \phi, a standardized measure of association, is derived as \phi = \sqrt{\chi^2 / n}, where n is the total sample size; it ranges from -1 to 1 and equals the Pearson correlation for binary variables. Interpretation of these measures focuses on both magnitude and . The strength of association is often gauged by absolute values: |r| or |ρ| from 0 to 0.19 indicates very weak, 0.20–0.39 weak, 0.40–0.59 moderate, 0.60–0.79 strong, and 0.80–1.00 very strong; similarly, for , values around 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 denote small, medium, and large effects. For the chi-square test, larger values suggest stronger deviation from . Significance is tested via s, typically using a t-test for Pearson and Spearman correlations (t = r √((n-2)/(1-r²)) under the null of no , with n-2 ) or the distribution for categorical data; a below 0.05 rejects the of no association at the 5% level. These measures have notable limitations. Pearson's r is highly sensitive to outliers, which can inflate or deflate the coefficient and mislead interpretations, necessitating scatterplot checks. All correlation measures, including Spearman's rho and phi, cannot establish causation, as association may arise from variables or reverse relationships. For example, in a study of 354 adults, the Pearson correlation between (in inches, ranging 55.00–84.41) and (in pounds, ranging 101.71–350.07) was computed as = 0.513 (p < 0.001), indicating a moderate positive linear association where taller individuals tend to weigh more.

Regression models

Regression models in bivariate data analysis primarily involve , which establishes a predictive relationship between an independent variable X and a dependent variable Y. This approach models the of Y as a of X, allowing for , , and about the relationship. The concept of originated with , who in 1886 described the phenomenon of "regression towards mediocrity" in the context of hereditary stature, observing that offspring of parents at the extremes of tended to be closer to the . further formalized the mathematical framework in the 1890s, developing the method of for fitting the regression line and linking it to the . The model is expressed as Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X + \epsilon, where \beta_0 is the , \beta_1 is the , and \epsilon is the random error term with mean zero. The parameters are estimated using ordinary least squares, minimizing the sum of squared residuals. The slope estimator is \hat{\beta_1} = r \frac{s_y}{s_x}, where r is the , s_y is the standard deviation of Y, and s_x is the standard deviation of X; the intercept is \hat{\beta_0} = \bar{y} - \hat{\beta_1} \bar{x}, with \bar{y} and \bar{x} denoting sample means. Interpretation focuses on the slope \beta_1, which represents the expected change in Y for a one-unit increase in X, assuming other conditions hold; the intercept \beta_0 is the predicted value of Y when X = 0. The R^2 = r^2 quantifies the proportion of variance in Y explained by X, providing a measure of model fit. Valid inference requires four key assumptions: (the relationship between X and Y is linear), (observations are independent), homoscedasticity (constant variance of residuals across X values), and (residuals are normally distributed). Violations can bias estimates or invalidate tests. Model diagnostics, such as plots, are essential for verifying these assumptions; for instance, a plot of residuals versus fitted values should show no patterns for and homoscedasticity, while a Q-Q plot assesses . For bivariate cases where the outcome is binary, extends the framework by modeling the log-odds of success as a of the predictor: \log\left(\frac{p}{1-p}\right) = \beta_0 + \beta_1 X, where p is the probability of the outcome being 1. This approach, introduced by David Cox in 1958, accommodates non-normal binary responses while maintaining interpretability through odds ratios derived from \exp(\beta_1). In practice, might be applied to a of hours (X) and exam scores (Y), yielding a fitted line such as \hat{Y} = 50 + 5X, indicating that each additional hour of predicts a 5-point score increase, with R^2 = 0.64 explaining 64% of score variance. Predictions, like estimating a score of 75 for 5 hours, follow by substituting into the equation, though confidence intervals account for uncertainty.

References

  1. [1]
    3.1 Introduction to Bivariate Data – Significant Statistics
    The type of data described in these examples is bivariate data (“bi” for two variables). We could have: A categorical variable vs. another categorical variable ...
  2. [2]
    Univariate, Bivariate, Correlation and Causation - UTSA
    Oct 24, 2021 · Bivariate data is the comparing of two quantitative variables of an individual, and can be shown graphically through histograms, scatterplots, or dotplots.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] 8 Descriptive Statistics: Bivariate Data - Dept of Math, CCNY
    8.1 Scatter Plots. If each of a series of observation produces two measurements we say the collected data is bivariate. For example, suppose the height and ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 4 Exploratory Data Analysis
    Univariate methods look at one variable (data column) at a time, while multivariate methods look at two or more variables at a time to explore relationships.
  5. [5]
    Dependent and Independent Variables - National Library of Medicine
    Independent variables are what we expect will influence dependent variables. A dependent variable is what happens as a result of the independent variable.
  6. [6]
    What are Independent and Dependent Variables?-NCES Kids' Zone
    An independent variable is exactly what it sounds like. It is a variable that stands alone and isn't changed by the other variables you are trying to measure.
  7. [7]
    1.1.2 - Explanatory & Response Variables | STAT 200
    In an experimental study, the explanatory variable is the variable that is manipulated by the researcher. Explanatory Variable. Also known as the independent or ...
  8. [8]
    Regression Analysis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The term “regression” was first introduced by Sir Francis Galton in the ... variables, X the independent variable and Y the dependent variable. Where. n ...
  9. [9]
    (PDF) The History of Correlation - ResearchGate
    X‑axis is called the “independent variable” and the Y‑axis the “dependent. variable”. Example data sets include studies of the age of school children. (X) vs ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The use of correlation ... - NIH
    A FINAL CAUTION: CORRELATION DOES NOT MEAN CAUSATION​​ A relationship between two variables is sometimes taken as evidence that one causes the other.Missing: dependent | Show results with:dependent
  12. [12]
    In Regression Analysis, why do we call independent variables ...
    Jul 18, 2018 · In many ways, "independent variable" is an unfortunate choice. The variables need not be independent of each other, and of course need not be independent of ...
  13. [13]
    Scatterplots: Using, Examples, and Interpreting - Statistics By Jim
    Scatterplots show relationships between pairs of continuous variables, displaying symbols at X, Y coordinates, and are used to assess relationships and check ...
  14. [14]
    Scatterplots | Lesson (article) | Khan Academy
    A scatterplot displays data about two variables as a set of points in the ‍ -plane. Each axis of the plane usually represents a variable in a real-world ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  15. [15]
    Understanding and Using Scatter Plots - Tableau
    A scatter plot displays data points where two measures intersect, using Cartesian coordinates to show the relationship between two variables.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The early origins and development of the scatterplot - DataVis.ca
    However, the additional invention of the scatterplot cannot reasonably be attributed to Galton, partly because he was more concerned, in print, with the ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    ggplot2 scatter plots : Quick start guide - Data Visualization - STHDA
    This article describes how create a scatter plot using R software and ggplot2 package. The function geom_point() is used.
  19. [19]
    Scatterplot - Python Graph Gallery
    A scatter plot displays the relationship between 2 numeric variables, one being displayed on the X axis (horizontal) and the other on the Y axis (vertical).Scatterplots With Seaborn · ⏱ Quick Start (matplotlib) · Scatterplots With Matplotlib
  20. [20]
    3: Describing Data, Part 2 - STAT ONLINE
    The side-by-side boxplots allow us to easily compare the median, IQR, and range of the two groups. The dotplots with groups and histograms with groups allow us ...
  21. [21]
    2.1.2 - Two Categorical Variables - STAT ONLINE - Penn State
    A stacked bar chart is also known as a segmented bar chart. One categorical variable is represented on the x-axis and the second categorical variable is ...Missing: bivariate | Show results with:bivariate
  22. [22]
    More on Categorical Data
    ### Mosaic Plots for Categorical Bivariate Data
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Visualizing Categorical Data - DataVis.ca
    This paper outlines a general framework for data visualization methods in terms of communi- cation goal (analysis vs. presentation), display goal, and the ...
  24. [24]
    Section 4: Bivariate Distributions - STAT ONLINE
    To learn a shortcut, or alternative, formula for the covariance between two random variables \(X\) and \(Y\). To learn a formal definition of the correlation ...
  25. [25]
    Covariance: Formula, Definition & Example - Statistics By Jim
    The covariance formula reveals whether two variables move in the same or opposite directions. Covariance is like variance in that it measures variability.Missing: bivariate marginal
  26. [26]
    Contingency Table: Definition, Examples & Interpreting
    A contingency table displays frequencies for two categorical variables. Use two-way tables to see relationships between the variables.Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  27. [27]
    Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups – Categorical ...
    Categorical variables are commonly represented as counts or frequencies. For analysis, such data are conveniently arranged in contingency tables.Missing: bivariate summary
  28. [28]
    2.5 Numerical Summaries for Bivariate Data
    The covariance will be positive if the two variables tend to have large/positive value at the same time, and small/negative values at the same time.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew ...
    Skew Variation in. Homogeneous Matterial. By KARL PEARSON, University College, London. Communicated by Professor HENRhcI, F.R.S.. Received December 19, 1894,- ...
  30. [30]
    User's guide to correlation coefficients - PMC - NIH
    A negative r means that the variables are inversely related. The strength of the correlation increases both from 0 to +1, and 0 to −1. When writing a manuscript ...
  31. [31]
    Spearman Rank Correlation - Zar - 2005 - Wiley Online Library
    Jul 15, 2005 · 19 Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of correlation between two things, American Journal of Psychology 15, 72–101.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Karl Pearson a - McGill University
    Karl Pearson a a University College, London. Online Publication Date: 01 July 1900. To cite this Article Pearson, Karl(1900)'X. On the criterion that a given ...
  33. [33]
    Effect Size Chi-square Test | Real Statistics Using Excel
    Phi is the measure of effect size that is used in power calculations even for contingency tables that are not 2 × 2 (see Power of Chi-square Tests). Commonly ...
  34. [34]
    11. Correlation and regression - The BMJ
    If we wish to label the strength of the association, for absolute values of r, 0-0.19 is regarded as very weak, 0.2-0.39 as weak, 0.40-0.59 as moderate, 0.6- ...Calculation Of The... · Calculator Procedure · The Regression Equation
  35. [35]
    Conducting a Hypothesis Test for the Population Correlation ...
    If the P-value is smaller than the significance level α, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. · If the P-value is larger than the ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    4.7: Understanding Limitations of Correlation Analysis
    ### Limitations of Correlation Coefficients
  37. [37]
    LibGuides: SPSS Tutorials: Pearson Correlation - Kent State University
    Nov 3, 2025 · In the sample data, we will use two variables: “Height” and “Weight. ... Pearson correlation coefficient for height and weight is .513 ...
  38. [38]
    Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature - jstor
    The experiments showed further that the mean filial regression towards mediocrity was directly proportional to the parental devia- tion from it. This ...
  39. [39]
    VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents
    Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Karl Pearson ... Published:01 January 1895https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041. Abstract.
  40. [40]
    Linear Least Squares Regression - Information Technology Laboratory
    Practically speaking, linear least squares regression makes very efficient use of the data. Good results can be obtained with relatively small data sets.Missing: authoritative source
  41. [41]
    17.2 - Relationship between the slope and the correlation
    The slope tells you the rate of change between the two variables. When the correlation is negative, the slope will be negative; when correlation is positive, ...
  42. [42]
    Testing the assumptions of linear regression - Duke People
    The dependent and independent variables in a regression model do not need to be normally distributed by themselves--only the prediction errors need to be ...
  43. [43]
    The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences - jstor
    The logistic formula is simply a convenient way of writing the transition probabilities, so as to obtain results similar to those of earlier sections. Page 27 ...
  44. [44]
    12.3 - Simple Linear Regression - STAT ONLINE
    Recall, the equation for a simple linear regression line is y ^ = b 0 + b 1 x where b 0 is the y -intercept and b 1 is the slope. Statistical software will ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary