Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Income

Income is the monetary flow of resources received by individuals, households, or other entities over a defined period, typically derived from labor compensation, capital returns, entrepreneurial profits, or government transfers, excluding irregular capital gains and non-monetary benefits.^[1]^[2] It represents the primary means by which economic agents acquire purchasing power to meet consumption needs, accumulate savings, or invest, serving as a foundational metric in assessing material welfare and economic productivity.^[3] The principal types of income include labor income—such as wages, salaries, and self-employment earnings—which forms the bulk for most recipients; property income encompassing interest, dividends, and rents from assets; and transfer income like social security or unemployment benefits, which do not directly correspond to current production.^[2]^[4] Income is measured in various forms to capture different facets of economic reality: gross income totals all receipts before deductions; net income subtracts certain exclusions or allowances; and disposable income, calculated as gross income minus taxes and mandatory contributions, indicates the amount available for spending or saving, directly influencing household consumption patterns and overall economic demand.^[5]^[6] In empirical analyses, disposable personal income has been tracked as a key aggregate, with U.S. levels in 2025 reflecting adjustments for inflation and policy changes, underscoring its role in gauging real living standards amid varying tax regimes and transfer systems.^[6]

Definitions and Conceptual Foundations

Economic Definitions

In economics, income is conceptualized as the flow of monetary returns accruing to the owners of factors of production—labor, land, capital, and entrepreneurship—for their contributions to the creation of goods and services. This view posits income as the value generated by these factors in market production, distinct from mere transfers or windfalls, and rooted in the causal link between resource deployment and output valuation.^[7] The primary components include wages and salaries for labor services, rents for the use of land and natural resources, interest for the provision of capital, and profits for entrepreneurial risk-bearing and organization.^[8] These factor payments sum to national income in aggregate accounts, reflecting the total value added before adjustments for depreciation or indirect taxes.^[9] A comprehensive theoretical framework for individual income is provided by the Haig-Simons definition, which measures it as the sum of consumption expenditures during a period plus the change in net worth, equivalent to the maximum amount that could be consumed while preserving capital intact.^[10] This approach captures accretions to economic power from all sources, including unrealized gains, aligning with first-principles accounting of productive flows rather than cash receipts alone. In neoclassical models, such incomes are determined by the marginal productivity theory, whereby each factor receives a return equal to the value of its marginal product—the incremental revenue from employing one more unit of the factor, assuming competitive markets and diminishing returns.^[11] Empirical validation stems from observed market equilibria where factor prices approximate these marginal contributions, as evidenced in production function estimations across industries.^[11] Critiques of conventional income measurement highlight omissions that distort the representation of true economic value created. Standard metrics often exclude imputed rents for owner-occupied housing, which estimate the rental equivalent of housing services consumed without market transactions, leading to underestimation of consumption-based income for homeowners; the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis imputes such values at approximately 8% of GDP annually to reflect this productive flow.^[12] Furthermore, factor returns like wages typically ignore psychic costs—the non-monetary disutilities of effort, risk, or foregone leisure inherent in labor and entrepreneurship—yielding a gross measure that overstates net value after accounting for these causal sacrifices in human capital deployment.^[13] These gaps underscore the need for adjusted metrics to align definitions more closely with underlying production realities, though practical data limitations persist.

Legal and Tax Definitions

In the United States, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) defines gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 61 as "all income from whatever source derived," encompassing compensation for services, business income, gains from property dealings, interest, rents, dividends, and other items, unless specifically excluded by another provision of law.^[14] This statutory definition emphasizes a broad scope but requires realization—meaning the taxpayer must have control over the accession to wealth—for taxation, distinguishing it from theoretical economic income that might include unrealized appreciation.^[15] The U.S. Supreme Court in Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. (1955) reinforced this by interpreting "income" to include any "undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion," thereby extending the concept to punitive damages and certain settlements previously contested as nontaxable.^[16] Key exclusions narrow the taxable base relative to comprehensive economic income; for instance, IRC Section 102 excludes gifts and inheritances from gross income for the recipient, though the donor may face gift tax implications if exceeding annual exclusions. Similarly, Section 103 exempts interest on obligations of states, local governments, or U.S. territories (such as municipal bonds) from federal taxation, reflecting policy incentives for public financing rather than a pure income accrual standard. These statutory carve-outs create enforceable boundaries, enabling legal tax avoidance through structures compliant with the code, while evasion—such as underreporting realized gains—remains prosecutable under anti-fraud provisions. Internationally, legal definitions of taxable income diverge from the U.S. model, with domestic laws varying in inclusion criteria like realization requirements or imputation of deemed income (e.g., benefits in kind).^[17] The OECD Model Tax Convention influences bilateral treaties by standardizing interpretations of income categories for cross-border flows—such as business profits or dividends—but does not dictate uniform domestic bases, leading to differences like broader inclusions of unrealized gains in some jurisdictions (e.g., certain capital gains taxes) versus exclusions elsewhere.^[18] These variations underpin treaty negotiations to mitigate double taxation while highlighting tensions between national revenue goals and avoidance strategies exploiting definitional gaps.^[19]

Accounting Definitions

In financial accounting, income is defined as the net result of revenues earned minus expenses incurred during a reporting period, with revenues recognized under the accrual basis when they are realized or realizable and earned, meaning control of goods or services has transferred to the customer and collection is reasonably assured.^[20] Under U.S. GAAP, ASC 606, effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, establishes a five-step model for revenue recognition from contracts with customers: identifying the contract, performance obligations, transaction price, allocation to obligations, and recognition upon satisfaction, emphasizing verifiable transfer over mere intent or accrual hypotheses.^[21] Similarly, IFRS 15, issued in 2014 and effective from January 1, 2018, mirrors this core principle, requiring revenue depiction of promised goods or services transferred at the transaction price, excluding unrealized gains from routine operations unless fair value changes apply to specific assets like trading securities.^[22] Unrealized gains and losses, such as mark-to-market adjustments on available-for-sale debt or equity securities, are generally excluded from the income statement under GAAP (ASC 320, formerly FAS 115) and reported in other comprehensive income to avoid distorting periodic earnings with hypothetical values not yet realized through sale or settlement.^[23] This realization principle prioritizes verifiable cash flows or enforceable claims over speculative appreciations, though exceptions exist for items like trading portfolios where unrealized changes flow through net income to reflect ongoing intent to trade.^[24] Non-cash items, such as depreciation or amortization, further adjust gross inflows to net income, while metrics like EBITDA exclude these to assess operational cash generation, but they remain non-GAAP and require reconciliation to statutory income.^[25] Corporate accounting applies these standards rigorously for entity-wide financial statements, mandating audited compliance with GAAP or IFRS for public reporting, whereas personal accounting lacks formal GAAP equivalence and typically relies on simplified accrual or cash methods for individual financial planning or fiduciary statements, omitting complex revenue models like ASC 606's performance obligations.^[26] Despite standardization efforts, critiques highlight persistent earnings management, where managers exploit estimation discretion in areas like reserves or revenue timing to smooth results or meet benchmarks, as evidenced by studies showing manipulation incentives undiminished post-ASC 606.^[27] These standards promote consistency in verifiable transactions but may undervalue long-term value creation by deferring recognition of multi-period contracts until control transfers, potentially understating sustainable income streams in innovative sectors.^[28]

Income versus Wealth

Income constitutes a flow of monetary resources received over a specified period, such as labor earnings, investment returns, or transfers accruing to individuals or households on an annual basis.^[29] Wealth, by contrast, denotes the stock of accumulated assets net of liabilities—encompassing real estate, financial holdings, and other valuables—valued at a particular point in time.^[29] This fundamental distinction arises from first-principles accounting: income drives potential changes in wealth via the equation where net worth at time t equals prior net worth plus income minus expenditures, taxes, and losses, yet high inflows do not invariably translate to elevated stocks absent disciplined saving or favorable returns.^[30] The interchangeability of the concepts often falters in practice, as evidenced by cases where substantial income fails to build wealth due to elevated consumption or debt servicing. For instance, professionals in high-earning fields like finance or medicine may report six-figure annual incomes but maintain low net worth if lifestyle expenditures outpace savings rates, a pattern observed in household balance sheet analyses showing negative correlations between discretionary spending and asset accumulation in peak earning years.^[31] Empirical decoupling intensifies in aging societies, where wealth stocks persist or grow through intergenerational transfers like inheritances, independent of diminished income flows post-retirement. In the United States, Federal Reserve data from the 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances reveal median net worth for households aged 65–74 at $409,900, far exceeding that of younger groups despite median household incomes for those over 65 averaging approximately $50,000 annually, underscoring reliance on prior accumulations rather than current earnings.^[32] Policy conflations of income flows and wealth stocks have prompted critiques, particularly regarding taxation. Wealth taxes, which impose annual levies on net asset values, are frequently characterized as double taxation since the underlying assets derive from income already subjected to prior levies, including personal income taxes on earnings and capital gains taxes on appreciation, thereby penalizing thrift without capturing ongoing economic activity.^[33] ^[34] Analyses from organizations like the Tax Foundation argue that such measures erode incentives for capital formation, advocating income metrics as superior for evaluating dynamic processes like productivity and growth, which hinge on recurrent resource generation rather than static holdings.^[33] This perspective aligns with causal observations that taxing flows incentivizes behavioral adjustments in production, whereas stock taxation risks capital flight or undervaluation without commensurate revenue gains, as seen in the repeal of wealth taxes in countries like Sweden and France due to administrative burdens and negligible yields.^[33]

Exclusions and Non-Income Items

Certain items are excluded from economic definitions of income to ensure measurement reflects only additions to economic value through production, exchange, or capital returns, rather than adjustments, transfers, or non-market allocations. Debt forgiveness, for example, constitutes a liability reduction without generating new productive output or net worth increase beyond insolvency thresholds; under principles of balance sheet equity, it aligns with recognizing prior overstatement of assets rather than accruing fresh income. This exclusion holds particularly when the debtor's liabilities exceed assets, as the relief offsets negative equity without causal contribution to economic flow. Psychic income, referring to intangible benefits like personal fulfillment or social prestige from activities, is systematically omitted from verifiable economic accounts due to its non-monetary, subjective character, which defies empirical quantification and market valuation. Economists distinguish such psychic elements from measurable flows, as including them would conflate welfare proxies with objective exchange values, undermining causal analysis of production-driven growth. Historical precedents reinforce this boundary; for instance, during World War II, government-issued rations in the United States and United Kingdom—such as limited allocations of meat, sugar, and fats—were not counted as income, functioning instead as scarcity-mitigating distributions unrelated to individual labor or capital yields.^[35] Transfers like gifts or inheritances similarly fall outside income categorization, as they redistribute pre-existing wealth without originating from current economic activity, preserving the focus on endogenous value creation over exogenous reallocations. These exclusions maintain analytical rigor by excluding unverifiable or non-productive elements, aligning income metrics with observable market transactions and output contributions.

Sources and Composition of Income

Labor Income

Labor income encompasses wages, salaries, and related compensation derived from human labor input, distinct from returns to capital or passive sources. In competitive labor markets, these earnings theoretically approximate the marginal revenue product of labor (MRPL), defined as the additional revenue generated by employing one more unit of labor, enabling firms to maximize profits by hiring until the wage equals MRPL.^[36]^[37] Empirical studies affirm a strong historical linkage between aggregate wage growth and productivity, with deviations often attributable to temporary market frictions rather than systemic decoupling.^[38]^[39] The composition of labor income typically includes base pay for standard hours, overtime premiums for excess hours, and variable elements such as bonuses tied to performance or firm results. Under the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act, non-exempt workers receive overtime at 1.5 times the regular rate for hours beyond 40 per week, comprising a notable share in sectors like manufacturing and services.^[40] Bonuses vary by industry, averaging 5-15% of total compensation in technology and up to 20.9% in finance, reflecting incentives aligned with output contributions.^[41] These components collectively reward effort and productivity, with base pay forming the core and supplements addressing variability in hours or results. Wages exhibit substantial variation by worker skill, sector, and institutional factors, rooted in differences in MRPL. Higher-skilled labor commands premiums—often 20-50% above unskilled rates—due to superior productivity, as evidenced by firm-level data showing skill acquisition via training boosting output more than wages initially, with compression resolving over time.^[42] Sectoral shifts, such as the gig economy's expansion, have altered structures: the share of gig workers in U.S. firms rose 15% from 2010 to 2019, emphasizing flexible, task-based pay over fixed salaries but frequently yielding lower hourly equivalents after accounting for self-provided benefits.^[43] Union presence elevates wages for members by approximately 10-20% through collective bargaining, per meta-analyses, yet often correlates with reduced employment probabilities for non-members and marginal workers due to rigidities above equilibrium levels.^[44]^[45] In competitive markets characterized by low unemployment, real labor income growth has outpaced inflation, challenging narratives of pervasive stagnation. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicate median usual weekly real earnings for full-time wage and salary workers increased by about 12% from 2000 to 2023 in constant dollars, accelerating post-2015 amid tight labor conditions that enhanced bargaining power.^[46]^[47] This aligns with productivity gains, where firm-level evidence links 15% of productivity dispersion to wage premia, underscoring causal ties from output to pay in dynamic sectors.^[48] Such patterns hold particularly for roles in high-productivity industries, where market forces ensure remuneration tracks value added.

Capital Income

Capital income refers to earnings derived from the ownership of capital assets, distinct from labor compensation, encompassing interest payments on bonds and loans, dividends distributed by corporations to shareholders, rental yields from real property, and realized capital gains from the sale of appreciating assets such as stocks or real estate.^[49] These forms arise from the deployment of saved resources into productive investments, where returns reflect the time value of money, opportunity costs, and risks borne by capital providers.^[50] In economic systems, capital income plays a pivotal role in resource allocation by channeling savings toward enterprises with the highest anticipated productivity, as determined by competitive markets that price assets based on future cash flow expectations and scarcity signals. Efficient capital markets thus direct funds to innovations and expansions that enhance overall output, with prices serving as decentralized mechanisms for evaluating alternative uses of scarce resources.^[51] This process incentivizes deferred consumption and risk-taking, as higher yields on riskier assets—such as equities over fixed-income securities—compensate for uncertainty and potential losses, fostering long-term growth through entrepreneurial initiative.^[52] Historical data underscore the attractiveness of capital income streams: U.S. stocks, including dividends and capital gains, have delivered geometric average annual returns of approximately 10% nominally from 1928 to 2024, equating to about 7% in real terms after inflation, with an equity risk premium of roughly 6% over long-term government bonds.^[53] This premium persists despite periodic downturns, empirically validating risk-adjusted rewards that encourage foresight in identifying undervalued opportunities and deploying capital toward value-creating ventures, thereby justifying disparities in capital returns as outcomes of differential contributions to productivity rather than mere windfalls.^[53] Critics highlight issues such as the double taxation of equity returns—where corporate profits are taxed before distribution as dividends—but empirical evidence of sustained premiums indicates that such frictions do not erase the causal primacy of entrepreneurial capital allocation in driving innovation and wealth creation, as ventures with superior risk foresight consistently outperform safer alternatives over extended horizons.^[54]

Transfer and Other Income

Transfer income consists of payments received by individuals or households without a corresponding provision of goods, services, or labor in the current period, distinguishing it from earnings derived from productive economic activity. These include government social benefits such as unemployment insurance, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) allotments, as well as public pensions like Social Security retirement benefits. Unlike labor or capital income, transfers represent a redistribution of existing resources, typically funded through taxation or government borrowing, embodying a zero-sum dynamic where gains for recipients correspond to losses elsewhere in the economy through reduced disposable income for payers or future fiscal burdens. In U.S. national accounts, personal current transfer receipts from governments totaled approximately 18 percent of total personal income in 2022, up from historical averages around 10-12 percent pre-2000, reflecting expanded entitlement programs.^[55]^[56] Family remittances, another form of transfer, involve funds sent by migrants to relatives in their home countries or domestically, often without expectation of direct repayment or productive quid pro quo. In the U.S., inflows from abroad constitute a minor share of aggregate household income, estimated at less than 1 percent nationally, though they can represent significant portions for specific low-income recipient households dependent on expatriate earnings. Other non-governmental transfers, such as private pensions or employer-provided severance, similarly pass through prior accumulations rather than generating new value. These mechanisms do not expand the overall economic pie but reallocate portions, with empirical evidence indicating that high effective marginal tax rates from transfer phase-outs—often exceeding 100 percent in combined federal, state, and program cliffs—can deter labor supply by making additional earnings net negative for recipients. Randomized experiments, such as those testing financial incentives for welfare-to-work transitions, have demonstrated that simplifying phase-outs or adding work subsidies mitigates such distortions, increasing employment rates among eligible participants by 5-10 percentage points.^[57] Windfall transfers like inheritances and lottery prizes exemplify irregular, unearned inflows that do not stem from ongoing production. The average U.S. household inheritance stands at about $46,200 over lifetimes, concentrated among higher-wealth families where recipients in the top income decile are twice as likely to receive bequests compared to the bottom half. Lottery winnings, while totaling billions annually in prizes, affect a tiny fraction of the population—fewer than 1 in 300 million for major jackpots—with studies of winners showing initial consumption spikes but frequent long-term depletion due to poor financial management, underscoring their unsustainability as income sources. Expanded transfers during the COVID-19 period, including $1.9 trillion from the American Rescue Plan in 2021, temporarily boosted disposable income by over 10 percent for many households but coincided with a persistent drop in labor force participation from 63.4 percent in February 2020 to 62.2 percent by mid-2022, attributable in part to extended unemployment benefits offering up to $1,400 weekly in some states, exceeding median low-wage earnings and delaying workforce reentry.^[58]^[59]^[60]^[61]

Measurement in Economic Accounts

Individual and Household Measures

Individual income is commonly measured through metrics such as personal income, which encompasses wages, salaries, supplements to wages, proprietor income, rental income, personal interest, personal dividend income, and personal current transfer receipts, excluding contributions for social insurance and taxes on production and imports.^[62] In the United States, adjusted gross income (AGI) represents total gross income from all sources minus specific adjustments like educator expenses, student loan interest, and certain business deductions, serving as a key figure for tax purposes and eligibility determinations.^[63] For instance, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported personal income growth across all 50 states and the District of Columbia in the second quarter of 2025, with quarterly changes ranging from 0.9% in Arkansas to 10.4% in Kansas, driven by factors including wage gains and transfer payments.^[62]^[64] Household income aggregates earnings from all members, often adjusted for size and composition to enable cross-household comparisons. Equivalized household income divides total household resources by a scale accounting for economies of scale, such as the OECD-modified equivalence scale, which assigns a weight of 1.0 to the household head, 0.7 to additional adults aged 14 and over, and 0.5 to children under 14, yielding a per-equivalent-adult measure.^[65] This adjustment reflects that larger households require less than proportionate increases in income to maintain equivalent living standards, with applications in poverty thresholds and welfare analysis across OECD countries.^[66] Measurement relies on survey data, such as the U.S. Current Population Survey (CPS), which collects self-reported earnings but requires imputations for nonresponse and underreporting, as CPS income totals are typically 20-30% below Bureau of Economic Analysis benchmarks due to omissions in capital income and transfers.^[67] Administrative data from tax records (e.g., IRS Form 1040) and social security administrations provide more precise tracking of reported wages and benefits, often used to validate or correct survey estimates through statistical matching techniques.^[68] Challenges include income volatility from job changes, bonuses, or economic shocks, which can distort annual snapshots and necessitate multi-year averaging for stability assessments. In developing economies, informal sector earnings—often cash-based and unregistered—remain undercounted in both surveys and administrative records, comprising up to 60% of GDP in some regions and biasing downward individual income estimates.^[69]^[70]

National Income Accounting

National income accounting provides a systematic framework for aggregating an economy's production and income flows, with the United States' National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA), maintained by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), serving as a primary example. These accounts compile data from business surveys, tax records, and other sources to produce measures such as gross domestic product (GDP) on the production and expenditure sides, and gross domestic income (GDI) on the income side, ensuring double-entry consistency where total output equals total income generated.^[71]^[72] The resulting aggregates reveal verifiable flows of value added across sectors, linking production to factor incomes and enabling assessment of economic health through trends in real output and income growth.^[73] Pioneered by economist Simon Kuznets in the early 1930s under the National Bureau of Economic Research and the Department of Commerce, initial U.S. national income estimates were published in 1934 to analyze the Great Depression's impact, with the full NIPA framework formalized and released in a 1947 supplement to the Survey of Current Business.^[74]^[75] National income, derived from GDI after adjustments, sums key components: compensation of employees (wages, salaries, and supplements like employer contributions to pensions); proprietors' income (earnings of unincorporated businesses, adjusted for inventory valuation); rental income of persons (net returns from land and buildings); corporate profits (with adjustments for inventory and capital consumption); and net interest and miscellaneous payments.^[72] These elements capture income distributed to labor, self-employment, property, and capital, derived from value added in industries ranging from manufacturing to services.^[76] Adjustments ensure measures reflect sustainable economic activity rather than nominal changes. Consumption of fixed capital (depreciation) is subtracted from GDP to yield net domestic product, accounting for the wear on produced assets like machinery and structures during the period.^[72] Change in private inventories contributes to gross domestic investment on the expenditure side, but inventory valuation adjustment (IVA) removes holding gains or losses from price fluctuations on the income side, isolating true production changes; for example, if inventories rise due to higher prices rather than increased output, IVA deducts the unrealized gain to avoid inflating income.^[77] Capital consumption adjustment further refines corporate profits by using economic depreciation estimates over tax-based ones, aligning with replacement costs.^[72] Empirically, NIPA data underpin economic forecasting by providing quarterly benchmarks for growth rates; for instance, personal income and disposable income components inform short-term projections, with historical revisions incorporating annual data to refine estimates of potential output.^[78] Analysts use income-side aggregates to cross-validate expenditure measures, detecting discrepancies that signal inventory cycles or measurement errors, thus aiding predictions of business investment and consumption trends.^[73] Critiques highlight omissions in capturing total welfare. Household production, such as unpaid cooking, cleaning, and childcare, is excluded as it occurs outside market transactions, potentially understating aggregate activity; estimates suggest this non-market output equals 20-50% of measured GDP in developed economies, depending on valuation methods like opportunity cost.^[79] Environmental costs, including pollution and resource depletion, are not deducted, leading to overstatement of net income; for example, extraction of non-renewable resources boosts current GDP but erodes natural capital without corresponding subtractions, as noted in efforts toward green accounting that adjust for degradation via satellite data on deforestation or emissions.^[80]^[81] These gaps arise from the market-centric focus, prioritizing observable transactions over broader sustainability.^[82]

Relation to GDP and Productivity

In national income accounting, aggregate income generated within an economy closely approximates gross domestic product (GDP) under the closed-economy assumption, where total output equals the sum of factor incomes including wages, profits, rents, and interest, as measured by gross domestic income (GDI), which theoretically equals GDP.^[83] This equivalence holds because every unit of production contributes to income claims, though adjustments for depreciation, indirect taxes, and net foreign factor payments yield net national income as a refined measure slightly below GDP.^[84] The labor share of national income—compensation of employees as a percentage of GDP—remained relatively stable at around 62-65% in the United States from 1947 through the late 1970s, encompassing wages, salaries, and benefits before exhibiting a gradual decline to about 58% by the 2010s amid shifts toward capital-intensive sectors and globalization.^[85] ^[86] This stability underscores that labor income constitutes the predominant component of total income, with capital income filling the remainder, though recent trends reflect productivity-enhancing capital deepening rather than a structural erosion of labor's claim.^[87] Causally, sustained rises in labor productivity—output per hour worked—drive real income growth, as post-World War II U.S. expansions from 1947 to 1973 demonstrated, with annual productivity gains averaging 2.1% fueling median real wage increases of comparable magnitude through technological adoption in manufacturing and services.^[88] Claims of a "decoupling" between productivity and pay since the 1970s often arise from inconsistent price deflators or exclusion of non-wage benefits, but reconciled series using output prices for both metrics reveal near-complete alignment in net trends over four decades, affirming productivity as the fundamental source of income elevation.^[89] ^[90] As of October 2025, forecasts project U.S. GDP growth moderating to 1.8-2.0% for the year, down from 2.8% in 2024, due to tighter monetary policy and fiscal adjustments, thereby constraining aggregate income expansion and highlighting productivity's role in sustaining per capita gains amid demographic pressures.^[91] ^[92]

Distribution and Inequality

Methods of Measurement

The Gini coefficient serves as a primary statistical tool for quantifying income inequality, derived from the Lorenz curve to measure the proportional deviation of actual income distribution from perfect equality, yielding values from 0 (complete equality) to 1 (one individual holds all income).^[93] It incorporates the full income distribution, rendering it scale-independent and applicable across populations of varying sizes.^[93] Unlike simplistic ratios such as the top-to-bottom quintile share, which overlook middle-income variations, the Gini provides a summary statistic sensitive to overall dispersion but exhibits limitations in distinguishing inequality sources or prioritizing extreme tails.^[94] Alternative indices address specific shortcomings of the Gini; the Theil index, rooted in information theory entropy, excels in decomposability, partitioning total inequality into within-group and between-group components to reveal subgroup dynamics such as regional or demographic disparities.^[93] This property enables targeted analysis of inequality drivers, unlike the aggregation in Gini values.^[95] The Theil's mean-log deviation variant proves particularly responsive to top-income shifts, enhancing robustness for skewed distributions where Gini underperforms.^[95] For capturing fat-tailed upper extremes, Pareto distributions model income beyond observed data thresholds via power-law tails, where the tail index α governs concentration—the lower α, the heavier the tail and greater inequality among top earners.^[96] Generalized Pareto variants extend this for threshold exceedances, improving fits to empirical tails truncated by data limits and yielding more precise top-share estimates than uniform assumptions.^[97] Such parametric approaches prove essential when non-parametric indices like Gini compress tail information. Data for these metrics derive from household surveys offering broad coverage of incomes and demographics, contrasted with tax records that excel in tracing high earners through mandatory reporting but exclude non-filers and embed definitional discrepancies like deductions.^[98] Surveys systematically underreport top incomes—often by factors of 30-50% for the uppermost percentiles—necessitating adjustments via reweighting to match tax aggregates or direct replacement of tail observations with administrative benchmarks.^[99] Measurement distinctions between pre-tax (gross market earnings before transfers and levies) and post-tax (disposable after taxes and benefits) incomes yield divergent inequality profiles, with post-tax variants typically 20-40% lower due to progressive systems compressing dispersion.^[100] Cross-sectional snapshots inherent to these indices further abstract from temporal dynamics, capturing point-in-time spreads without accounting for mobility that averages lifetime outcomes.^[93]

Empirical Trends and Data

Global median per capita income, adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) in 2021 international dollars, stood at approximately $3,400 as of 2021 estimates, reflecting absolute gains driven by economic growth in developing regions.^[101] This figure marks a continuation of upward trends, with faster income growth in Asia—where medium-term prospects show convergence through structural shifts and demographic factors—and Africa, exhibiting annual income convergence rates of around 2% fueled by industrialization and services expansion.^[102]^[103] In developed economies, post-2020 recovery patterns are evident; U.S. real median household income rose to $83,730 in 2024, up from $81,580 in 2020 and showing modest gains amid inflation adjustments.^[104] Within-country income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, has remained relatively stable in the U.S. at approximately 0.418 in 2023, consistent with levels around 0.4 over recent years.^[105] The United Nations World Social Report 2025 indicates that income inequality is rising within two-thirds of countries, affecting 65% of the global population through exclusion and polarization trends.^[106] Counterbalancing this, between-country income disparities have narrowed, as poorer nations in Asia and Africa experience higher growth rates relative to advanced economies, contributing to global convergence.^[107]^[108]

Year	U.S. Real Median Household Income (2024 $)
2020	81,580
2021	81,270
2022	79,500
2023	82,690
2024	83,730

Causes, Debates, and Mobility

Skill-biased technological change (SBTC) has empirically driven much of the rise in wage inequality since the 1980s by increasing demand for high-skilled labor relative to low-skilled, particularly through advancements in information and communication technologies that complement cognitive abilities while substituting routine tasks.^[109]^[110] This shift is evidenced by plant-level retooling data showing greater wage dispersion post-adoption of skill-intensive technologies, such as computer systems, which reward workers with higher education and adaptability.^[111] Globalization has compounded this effect in advanced economies by expanding trade with low-wage countries, exerting downward pressure on unskilled wages through import competition and offshoring of routine manufacturing jobs, as seen in heightened skilled-unskilled wage gaps following trade liberalization episodes.^[112]^[113] Debates over inequality's origins center on whether disparities primarily reward meritocratic productivity—such as innovation and risk-taking—or stem from rent-seeking, where elites capture unearned gains via regulatory capture or cronyism. Proponents of the merit view argue that top income shares rise with breakthrough innovations by entrepreneurs and incumbents, signaling efficient allocation of rewards that incentivize socially beneficial risk, as modeled in frameworks where entrant-driven technological progress boosts growth despite widening gaps.^[114] Empirical critiques of rent-seeking dominance highlight limited evidence for its outsized role in broad inequality trends compared to market dynamics, with studies showing growth declines more from institutional barriers to competition than from baseline disparities.^[115] Left-leaning narratives often emphasize stagnation and systemic barriers, yet causal analysis reveals inequality as a byproduct of productive incentives, where high returns to scalable innovations—evident in sectors like technology—drive absolute welfare gains over envy-driven redistribution that may blunt entrepreneurship.^[114] Income mobility provides a dynamic lens on inequality, with U.S. intergenerational income elasticity estimated at approximately 0.4 using long-term averages, indicating moderate persistence where children's incomes correlate with parents' but allow for substantial variation.^[116] Relative mobility, captured by this elasticity, contrasts with absolute mobility, where successive generations experience higher real incomes due to overall economic growth, yielding upward rates exceeding 50% for recent cohorts despite static snapshots like the Gini coefficient suggesting entrenched divides.^[117] This distinction underscores that inequality metrics overlook opportunity when growth enables broad absolute advances, countering views of rigid class structures by highlighting how policy-induced expansions in education and markets enhance transitions across income ranks.^[118]

Determinants of Income Levels

Human Capital and Skills

Human capital, defined as the stock of skills, knowledge, and attributes embodied in individuals that enhance productivity, serves as a primary micro-level determinant of income disparities. Investments in education and training augment an individual's capacity to generate economic value, leading to higher earnings through improved efficiency and specialization. Empirical analysis via the Mincer earnings function, which regresses log wages on years of schooling and experience, consistently estimates private returns to an additional year of schooling at approximately 8-10%, implying a wage premium of 7-10% for a 10% increase in schooling relative to baseline levels.^[119]^[120] These returns vary by context but hold across diverse datasets, with experience terms capturing on-the-job learning that further boosts wages quadratically up to mid-career peaks.^[121] Cognitive skills, proxied by standardized assessments such as OECD's PISA tests in reading, mathematics, and science, exhibit strong positive correlations with individual income outcomes. Cross-national data reveal that higher PISA scores predict elevated wages, with one standard deviation improvement in math or reading proficiency linked to 10-15% higher earnings in adulthood, reflecting causal channels via enhanced problem-solving and adaptability.^[122]^[123] This association underscores the productivity value of foundational skills over mere credentials, as evidenced by longitudinal tracking of test performance into labor market entry. In the 2020s, advancements in artificial intelligence and automation have intensified returns to complementary human skills, particularly adaptability, data literacy, and creative problem-solving, widening premiums for those possessing them. Workers proficient in AI-related tasks commanded a 56% wage premium in 2025, up from 25% the prior year, as firms prioritize skills that augment machine capabilities over routine labor.^[124]^[125] This skill-biased shift amplifies income gaps between adaptable high-skill workers and those in substitutable roles, though empirical models suggest AI may eventually compress traditional skill premiums if it democratizes certain cognitive tasks.^[126] Critiques of credential-focused human capital accumulation highlight the signaling theory, where education primarily certifies innate ability rather than imparting productive skills, as supported by "sheepskin effects" showing disproportionate wage jumps at degree completion irrespective of grades.^[127] Empirical tests, including employer learning models, indicate that signaling explains a nontrivial portion of returns, particularly for non-vocational degrees, rendering full attribution to productivity enhancement unresolved without experimental isolation.^[128] Nonetheless, direct skill enhancements via targeted training yield verifiable productivity gains, distinguishing genuine human capital from mere filtration mechanisms.^[129]

Market Dynamics and Innovation

Market dynamics in competitive economies propel income levels upward primarily through entrepreneurship and the Schumpeterian process of creative destruction, wherein innovations render existing technologies and firms obsolete, thereby enhancing productivity and reallocating resources to higher-value uses. This mechanism, integral to long-term economic expansion, generates widespread income gains by expanding the pie of total output rather than merely redistributing it. Empirical analyses confirm that creative destruction underpins firm dynamics and technological progress, correlating with elevated per capita incomes in innovating sectors.^[130]^[131] Freer market environments, which reduce barriers to entry and competition, empirically link to superior income growth trajectories. Countries advancing in economic freedom indices—encompassing deregulation, secure property rights, and open trade—achieve higher per capita GDP growth rates, with improvements yielding sustained real income rises over decades. In the United States and United Kingdom, post-1980s deregulations in airlines, trucking, telecommunications, and finance intensified competition, catalyzing productivity surges and real GDP per capita increases; U.S. real median household income, for example, climbed from about $60,000 in 1984 (in 2023 dollars) to roughly $68,000 by 2000, amid broader economic acceleration that added jobs and entrepreneurial opportunities.^[132]^[133]^[134]^[104] Innovation rents from breakthroughs further amplify incomes for value creators in dynamic markets, as seen in the 2010s tech expansion where firms like Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google scaled novel platforms, amassing trillions in enterprise value and enabling engineer compensations routinely surpassing $300,000 annually through salaries, bonuses, and equity tied to productivity gains. Such rents arise from temporary advantages in superior technologies, incentivizing risk-taking and matching high-talent individuals to frontier opportunities, which elevates outlier earnings while diffusing benefits via lower consumer costs and spillover jobs.^[135]^[136] Labor market evidence counters monopsony narratives of uniform wage compression, revealing instead substantial dispersion consistent with competitive forces: heterogeneous worker abilities and firm productivities yield varied marginal contributions, with markets efficiently assigning premiums to scarce skills in innovative settings, as firm-level productivity spreads mirror wage variances without implying systemic employer power. This talent-matching dynamic sustains income mobility and growth, as barriers to competition would homogenize pay downward, whereas observed spreads align with value-added differentials in expanding economies.^[137]^[138]

Policy and Institutional Factors

Inclusive economic institutions, characterized by secure property rights, enforcement of contracts through rule of law, and constraints on executive power, have been empirically linked to higher long-term income levels across countries. Research by Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson demonstrates that such institutions foster prosperity by enabling investment and innovation, with colonial-era institutional variations explaining persistent differences in GDP per capita; for instance, former colonies with inclusive institutions like Australia and Canada exhibit incomes far exceeding those with extractive institutions like Sierra Leone or Congo.^[139]^[140] Their instrumental variable approaches, using settler mortality rates to isolate institutional effects from geography or culture, confirm that better property rights institutions raise current economic outcomes by limiting expropriation risks and promoting broad-based participation.^[141] High marginal tax rates distort work and investment incentives, reducing income growth as evidenced by Laffer curve dynamics where revenue peaks at moderate rates. Empirical estimates place the revenue-maximizing top marginal tax rate in the United States around 58 percent on average income, beyond which further increases diminish taxable income through behavioral responses like reduced labor supply or evasion.^[142] Reviews of dynamic scoring models similarly find optimal top rates between 49 and 73 percent, incorporating endogenous growth effects, with historical U.S. tax cuts in the 1980s boosting revenues by enhancing incentives.^[143] Excessive government regulation imposes compliance costs that stifle entrepreneurship and productivity, empirically correlating with slower GDP growth. Cross-country panel studies reveal that higher regulatory burdens, such as entry barriers and labor market rigidities, reduce annual growth rates by 0.5 to 1 percentage point, with causal evidence from regulatory accumulation showing negative effects on output per worker.^[144] In the U.S., federal regulatory expansions have been associated with diminished investment in affected sectors, amplifying overregulation's drag on aggregate income.^[145] Fiscal stimuli in the early 2020s, including U.S. packages totaling over $5 trillion from 2020 to 2022, provided short-term income boosts via direct payments but fueled inflation and potential dependency. These measures raised disposable incomes for low earners, yet contributed substantially to post-pandemic price surges, with fiscal shocks accounting for up to two-thirds of U.S. inflation through demand pressures amid supply constraints.^[146]^[147] Extended unemployment benefits and transfers correlated with prolonged labor force withdrawal, delaying income recovery via market work and embedding reliance on government support.^[148]

Policy Interventions and Debates

Income Taxation Principles

Income taxation principles emphasize economic neutrality, verifiability of income, and minimizing distortions to incentives for work, saving, and investment. A foundational concept is the Haig-Simons definition of income, which treats taxable income as the sum of consumption expenditures plus the change in net worth over a period, aiming to tax all accretions to economic power regardless of form.^[149] This broad base promotes neutrality by avoiding favoritism toward specific income sources, such as taxing realized capital gains while exempting unrealized ones or certain fringe benefits, which can otherwise encourage inefficient resource allocation.^[150] Neutrality seeks to ensure that tax liabilities do not systematically alter pre-tax economic decisions, thereby preserving efficiency in market outcomes.^[151] Rate structures further influence these principles, with flat rates generally imposing lower marginal disincentives than progressive schedules featuring high top rates. Empirical analyses indicate that increases in top marginal rates reduce long-term growth by curbing investment, total factor productivity, and labor supply, particularly among high earners; for instance, exogenous tax hikes equivalent to 1% of GDP have been associated with 2-3% declines in real GDP.^[152]^[153] Progressive systems with steep gradients can exacerbate deadweight losses, as evidenced by reduced capital reallocation and wage growth following rate hikes, though the precise magnitude varies with base breadth and enforcement.^[154] In contrast, broad-base, low-rate models, such as Estonia's flat 20-22% personal income tax introduced in 1994, have sustained revenue-to-GDP ratios around 32% while fostering rapid post-reform GDP growth exceeding 5% annually in the late 1990s and early 2000s, outperforming many progressive-tax peers in efficiency and compliance.^[155]^[156] Tax code complexity undermines these principles by enabling loopholes and sophisticated avoidance strategies that disproportionately benefit high-wealth individuals capable of exploiting overlaps in provisions, such as deductions spanning multiple income categories.^[157] Empirical evidence shows that convoluted rules, including tax expenditures like preferential rates on certain capital income, result in effective rates far below statutory levels for the affluent, who leverage professional advice unavailable to average taxpayers, thereby eroding base neutrality and fostering inequality in burden-sharing.^[158] Simpler structures, by contrast, enhance verifiability and reduce evasion, as third-party reporting and minimal exemptions align reported income more closely with Haig-Simons ideals.^[159]

Basic Income Proposals and Trials

Milton Friedman's negative income tax (NIT) proposal, outlined in his 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom, advocated for cash transfers to low-income households that phase out gradually as earnings rise, aiming to replace fragmented welfare programs while preserving work incentives through a guaranteed minimum income without universal payments.^[160] In contrast, full universal basic income (UBI) provides unconditional cash to all individuals regardless of income or employment, eliminating phase-outs but raising concerns over administrative simplicity versus targeted efficiency.^[161] Implementing a UBI of approximately $1,000 monthly for every U.S. adult would cost around $3 trillion annually, equivalent to roughly three-quarters of federal tax revenue, necessitating major tax increases or spending cuts.^[162] The largest U.S. UBI experiment to date, funded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman through OpenResearch, provided $1,000 monthly to 1,000 low-income participants in Illinois and Texas from 2020 to 2023, compared to $50 monthly for a control group of 2,000.^[163] While recipients reported improved financial stability and mental health, total household income excluding transfers fell by an average of $2,500 annually due to reduced employment and earnings, with labor supply dropping 1.3 to 1.4 hours per week.^[164] These findings indicate crowding out of market earnings, as transfers substituted for work rather than supplementing it, yielding no net economic growth.^[165] A 2025 German pilot, conducted from 2021 to 2024, gave €1,200 monthly to 122 randomly selected participants versus a control group, finding no significant reduction in weekly work hours and improved self-reported well-being, challenging fears of a "social hammock" effect.^[166] However, the study's small sample size limits generalizability, and it did not assess broader macroeconomic impacts or long-term behavioral shifts.^[167] Similarly, the Baby's First Years trial, providing $333 monthly to low-income mothers in four U.S. cities starting at birth, showed no measurable improvements in child cognitive, emotional, or brain development outcomes after two years, despite reduced maternal employment.^[168]^[169] Empirical evidence from these and prior negative income tax experiments consistently reveals work disincentives, with transfers leading to 5-15% reductions in labor participation among recipients, particularly prime-age adults, as income effects dominate substitution incentives.^[170] This crowding out erodes self-sufficiency without fostering entrepreneurship or skill development, underscoring UBI's failure to sustain employment or productivity gains in scaled implementations.^[160]

Redistribution versus Incentive Effects

Empirical analyses indicate that extensive income redistribution through progressive taxation and transfers often entails efficiency costs, as conceptualized in Arthur Okun's 1975 "leaky bucket" metaphor, where resources transferred from higher to lower earners result in losses due to administrative inefficiencies, distorted incentives, and reduced productivity.^[171] Validation of this framework through econometric models shows that such leakages can exceed 30-50% of transferred amounts in real-world applications, depending on policy design and economic context.^[172] Comparative data from 1980 to 2020 reveal that the United States, with relatively lower redistribution (post-tax Gini coefficients around 0.37 versus Europe's 0.28-0.30), achieved higher GDP per capita growth—averaging 1.8% annually versus Europe's 1.2%—contributing to broader absolute income gains despite greater pre-tax inequality.^[173]^[174] High marginal tax wedges in redistributive systems demonstrably dampen labor supply and investment. Meta-analyses of microeconomic studies estimate the compensated elasticity of labor supply to net-of-tax wages at 0.2-0.5 for prime-age workers, implying that a 10 percentage point increase in marginal tax rates reduces hours worked or participation by 2-5%.^[175] Macro-level evidence reinforces this, with aggregate elasticities reaching 0.5-1.0 when accounting for dynamic responses like reduced entrepreneurship, as observed in cross-country panels where higher effective tax rates on top incomes correlate with slower productivity growth.^[176] In Europe, where average marginal tax rates on labor exceed 50% for middle-to-high earners, these distortions have contributed to persistent productivity stagnation relative to the U.S., widening the per capita income gap from $10,000 in 1980 to over $20,000 by 2020.^[177] Debates emphasize that market-driven growth prioritizes absolute poverty alleviation over relative equality. Cross-national data from 1980-2010 show that episodes of rapid economic expansion in less redistributive environments, such as East Asia's export-led booms, halved absolute poverty rates (defined as below $1.90/day PPP) faster than redistribution-focused policies in stagnant economies, with growth elasticities of poverty reduction around -2.0 versus near-zero impacts from transfers alone.^[178]^[179] While redistribution can mitigate short-term hardship, sustained poverty declines—evident in the U.S. lifting 20 million from absolute poverty via 1990s-2010s growth—rely on expanding the economic pie through incentives rather than reallocating a smaller one, as transfers often fail to address underlying skill or capital shortages.^[180] This perspective underscores that policies minimizing incentive distortions foster long-term mobility out of poverty, outperforming equality-focused interventions in verifiable welfare metrics.^[181]

Philosophical and Ethical Perspectives

Earning, Desert, and Moral Claims

Philosophical defenses of income as a moral desert emphasize that individuals rightfully claim earnings proportional to the value they create through labor and innovation, rooted in natural rights to self-ownership and the fruits of productive effort.^[182] John Locke's labor theory posits that by mixing one's labor with unowned resources, a person acquires property rights therein, provided sufficient resources remain for others, establishing income from such labor as deserved rather than a mere allocation.^[182] This view rejects presumptions of equal shares, holding that moral claims arise from voluntary production and exchange, not egalitarian redistribution, as unearned portions lack legitimate entitlement absent violation of others' rights. Robert Nozick extended this framework in his entitlement theory of justice, arguing that holdings are just if acquired through legitimate initial appropriation (echoing Locke) and transferred via consent, without regard to resulting patterns of inequality.^[183] Under this principle, income qualifies as desert insofar as it stems from productive contributions valued in market exchanges, such as an athlete commanding high pay for entertaining fans who willingly part with their money. Nozick critiques patterned theories (e.g., equality-focused distributions) for overriding these process-based entitlements, maintaining that desert aligns with earning through effort, risk, and value addition rather than compensating for natural endowments or chance, which individuals deploy responsibly in a free system.^[183] Empirical patterns reinforce this, with substantial wealth arising from innovation and entrepreneurship rather than inheritance alone; for instance, 67% of individuals on the 2024 Forbes 400 list of America's richest were characterized as self-made, deriving fortunes primarily from building enterprises.^[184] Among newly minted global billionaires in 2025, nearly 70% achieved status through personal ventures, underscoring risk-bearing—such as investing time and capital in uncertain innovations—as a key justifier of disparate outcomes over mere luck or legacy.^[185] Claims of "undeserved" inequality often overlook this causal link, where moral desert attaches to bearing the uncertainties of value creation that benefit society via goods, jobs, and progress, distinct from static endowments.^[186]

Trade-offs Between Equality and Liberty

Philosophers have long debated the tension between egalitarian demands for income equality and libertarian defenses of individual liberty in acquisition and exchange. John Rawls, in his theory of justice, posits that rational agents behind a "veil of ignorance" would select principles maximizing the position of the worst-off, permitting inequalities only insofar as they benefit the least advantaged through the difference principle. Robert Nozick counters with an entitlement theory, holding that justice in holdings arises from just initial acquisition and voluntary transfers, rejecting any patterned distribution like Rawls' as violating individual rights regardless of outcomes. Nozick argues that redistributive schemes to enforce equality treat people as means, akin to forced labor, prioritizing historical processes over end-state patterns. Empirical assessments favor liberty-oriented frameworks, as indices of economic freedom—encompassing secure property rights, free markets, and limited intervention—strongly predict higher per capita GDP growth compared to equality-focused metrics like Gini coefficients adjusted for redistribution.^[187] ^[188] Countries improving economic freedom scores by 3.5 points experience 6-8% higher GDP over five years, suggesting liberty causally expands prosperity by incentivizing production and innovation, whereas coercive equalization often contracts the total economic "pie."^[188] This aligns with critiques that Rawlsian redistribution, by overriding entitlements, undermines the voluntary exchanges driving growth.^[189] Utilitarian approaches, aiming to maximize aggregate welfare, face criticism for potentially endorsing equality via diminishing marginal utility while neglecting incentive distortions from redistribution, which empirically reduce output and long-term utility.^[190] High marginal tax rates or wealth transfers, intended to equalize, create moral hazard by weakening work and investment motives, as agents anticipate gains being confiscated; cross-country data show such policies correlate with slower growth than liberty-preserving alternatives.^[191] Critics contend utilitarianism's consequentialism overlooks these causal feedbacks, where liberty's preservation of incentives generates greater total welfare than enforced sharing.^[192] Historical socialist experiments illustrate these trade-offs, as efforts to impose income equality through central planning in the 20th-century USSR led to systemic failures via eroded incentives and moral hazard.^[193] Despite abolishing private property to eliminate inequality, the Soviet economy stagnated by the 1980s, with growth rates falling below 2% annually amid shortages and inefficiency, as state control removed personal stakes in productivity.^[194] This outcome stemmed from planners' inability to replicate market signals, fostering shirking and misallocation—classic moral hazards absent in liberty-based systems—ultimately collapsing the model by 1991 without delivering promised equality or abundance.^[195] Such evidence underscores liberty's primacy in causal realism, as coerced equality sacrifices dynamic gains for static fairness.^[196]

Empirical Associations and Outcomes

Income and Health Correlations

Higher income levels are consistently associated with longer life expectancy in observational data from the United States. Analysis of tax records covering over 1.4 billion person-year observations from 1999 to 2014 reveals a life expectancy gap of 14.6 years (95% CI, 14.4-14.8 years) for men and 10.1 years (95% CI, 9.9-10.3 years) for women between the top and bottom 1% income percentiles at age 40, with the gradient present across the entire income distribution and steepest at lower incomes.^[197] ^[198] This implies that, particularly among lower-income groups, increments of approximately $10,000 in annual income correlate with gains of about 1-2 additional years of life expectancy, though the relationship is nonlinear and influenced by factors such as geography and demographics.^[199] Similar patterns hold internationally, but U.S. gradients are notably steeper than in many other high-income nations, potentially reflecting differences in healthcare access, behavioral risks, and social factors.^[200] Debates over causality center on whether higher income directly improves health through mechanisms like better nutrition, reduced stress, or superior medical access, or if selection effects dominate, whereby inherently healthier individuals (due to genetics or early-life conditions) achieve higher earnings. Twin studies, which control for shared genetics and family environment, provide evidence favoring selection: within monozygotic twin pairs discordant for income, health differences are smaller than population-level correlations suggest, indicating that unobserved endowments like fetal origins or cognitive abilities drive both income and health outcomes more than income itself.^[201] ^[202] Reverse causation also confounds associations, as illness or disability can reduce earning capacity, creating a feedback loop independent of direct causal paths from income to health.^[203] Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) offer limited but direct tests of causality, with recent evidence indicating modest effects. In a 2024 RCT providing guaranteed income to 1,000 low-income U.S. adults, cash transfers improved self-reported mental health measures but showed negligible impacts on physical health outcomes like chronic conditions or biomarkers, suggesting that unconditional income boosts may not substantially alter health trajectories without accompanying behavioral or targeted interventions.^[204] ^[205] Critiques emphasize that behaviors such as smoking, diet, and exercise—often correlated with but not fully explained by income—account for a larger share of variance in health than income alone, as evidenced by twin designs where lifestyle factors persist as predictors even after income controls.^[201] These findings underscore confounders like genetic predispositions and early-life exposures, which may inflate observational correlations beyond true causal income effects.^[202]

Causality, Confounders, and Critiques

Observational studies linking higher income to better health outcomes often overlook confounders such as genetic factors, where polygenic scores associated with socioeconomic status (SES) predict both income and health metrics like body mass index, blood pressure, and depression risk, indicating pleiotropic effects rather than direct causation.^[206] Genetic analyses reveal that variants influencing educational attainment and income also correlate with reduced mortality and disease susceptibility, but within-family designs attenuate these associations, suggesting environmental and assortative mating confound cross-sectional estimates.^[207] Similarly, genetic fortune for higher income improves health partly through intervenable pathways like education, but shared genetic endowments explain a substantial portion of the income-health gradient independent of income itself.^[208] Cultural and social factors further confound the relationship, as norms around health behaviors, family structure, and community cohesion—varying independently of income—shape outcomes like life expectancy and chronic disease prevalence.^[209] For instance, health selection effects, where baseline health influences earning potential more than vice versa, dominate in younger cohorts and certain European contexts, reversing the assumed social causation direction.^[210] These confounders imply that naive correlations overestimate income's causal role, with cultural individualism-collectivism indices correlating with health disparities after controlling for economic variables.^[211] Instrumental variable (IV) approaches, such as using financial credits or policy-induced income shocks, yield weaker causal estimates than ordinary least squares regressions, often finding null or modest effects on physical health after addressing endogeneity.^[212] Genetic IVs in Mendelian randomization studies similarly suggest that income's direct impact on depression and mortality is attenuated compared to correlational data, highlighting omitted variables like motivation and cognitive ability. Critiques of the "income fixes health" narrative point to lottery winner studies, where large prizes improve mental health and life satisfaction but show no consistent gains in self-reported physical health or habits like smoking cessation, even a decade post-win.^[213]^[214] Post-2020 data from the COVID-19 pandemic underscore these issues, as income losses correlated with heightened psychological distress, yet causal models reveal confounders like pre-existing job precariousness and behavioral responses (e.g., compliance with restrictions) drove much of the variance, not income alone.^[215] Analyses isolating pandemic shocks from baseline trends indicate that education and intelligence—proxies for unmeasured confounders—exert stronger causal protection against severe outcomes than income fluctuations, challenging redistribution-focused interventions.^[216] Overall, these methods reveal that while income enables health investments, confounders account for 50-80% of observed associations in rigorous designs, necessitating caution against policy overreach based on correlations.^[217]

Historical Evolution

Pre-Modern and Early Modern Views

In ancient Greek thought, Aristotle conceptualized oikonomia—derived from oikos (household) and nomos (management)—as the art of organizing household resources for self-sufficiency, emphasizing the production and allocation of necessities like food and shelter rather than monetary accumulation.^[218] He distinguished this natural form of acquisition, aimed at meeting household needs, from chrematistike, an unnatural pursuit of unlimited wealth through trade or usury, which he deemed dehumanizing and contrary to virtue.^[219] This framework treated household flows of goods as the basis of sustenance, with surplus limited to what supported the polis (city-state) without fostering avarice. Medieval scholasticism, building on Aristotelian principles, viewed economic exchanges through the lens of justice, particularly the justum pretium (just price) articulated by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica (c. 1265–1274). Aquinas argued that prices should reflect the common estimation of a good's value, incorporating labor and costs to avoid exploitation, thereby constraining merchants' surpluses beyond reasonable compensation.^[220] This doctrine implicitly capped income-like gains from trade to align with commutative justice, prohibiting sales above what the market or seller's expenses warranted, as excessive profit equated to quasi-theft (laesio enormis).^[221] Such views prioritized moral limits on accumulation, subordinating personal gain to communal equity in agrarian feudal economies. Early modern mercantilism, prevalent from the 16th to 18th centuries, proxied national income through accumulations of bullion (gold and silver), advocating policies like export surpluses and colonial monopolies to amass precious metals as the measure of wealth.^[222] Proponents such as Thomas Mun in England's Treasure by Forraign Trade (written c. 1630, published 1664) treated international trade as a zero-sum contest, where one nation's monetary inflows directly diminished another's, ignoring productive capacities beyond hoarding.^[223] This static, stock-based conception contrasted with emerging dynamic ideas, critiqued later for overlooking mutual gains from specialization. A pivotal transition occurred with the Physiocrats in mid-18th-century France, who reconceived income as flows of produit net (net product), the agricultural surplus after subsistence costs, as outlined in François Quesnay's Tableau Économique (1758).^[224] Quesnay posited that only land yielded true income, with advances by cultivators generating this net output to circulate through sterile classes (manufacturers, traders), modeling the economy as an interdependent circulatory system rather than mere bullion stocks.^[225] This emphasized reproducible surpluses from nature's bounty, laying groundwork for viewing income as periodic yields supporting societal maintenance.

Classical Economics and Industrial Era

In An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), Adam Smith formalized the view that national income originates from the productive powers of labor, divided among wages for workers, profits for capital owners, and rents for landowners, with the division of labor as the primary engine of productivity gains and economic expansion.^[226] Smith argued that specialization through division of labor exponentially increases output per worker, as exemplified by the pin factory where ten workers, uncoordinated, might produce few pins daily, but coordinated via specialization, could produce thousands, thereby elevating overall income levels.^[227] This process, constrained by market extent, drives growth through self-interested exchanges guided by the "invisible hand," where individuals pursuing personal gain unintentionally allocate resources to societal benefit without central direction.^[228] David Ricardo, in On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (1817), extended classical analysis by incorporating diminishing returns on fixed land supplies, positing that as population and capital expand, marginal agricultural productivity falls, squeezing profits and driving wages toward a natural subsistence level sufficient only for worker reproduction.^[229] Similarly, Thomas Malthus's An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) contended that population grows geometrically while food production increases arithmetically, ensuring wages revert to subsistence amid resource pressures, with any temporary rises prompting population surges that erode gains.^[230] These models implied stagnant or declining per capita income in the long run, as land scarcity imposed a Malthusian trap. Karl Marx, critiquing classical distribution in Capital (Volume I, 1867), retained the labor theory of value but framed profits as surplus value extracted from unpaid labor time, portraying capitalist income shares as inherent exploitation where workers receive only subsistence equivalents while generating value appropriated by owners.^[231] However, empirical data from the British Industrial Revolution contradict subsistence wage persistence: real wages for building craftsmen rose approximately 30% from 1780 to 1850, and even unskilled laborers saw gains averaging 0.5% annually amid rapid population growth, reflecting productivity surges from technological adoption and market expansion that outpaced Malthusian constraints and enabled mutual income advancements across classes.^[232]^[233]

20th-21st Century Developments

In the mid-20th century, John Maynard Keynes's The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936) shifted economic thinking toward aggregate demand as the primary driver of national income, positing that government spending could amplify output through multipliers exceeding one-for-one effects, thereby boosting employment and wages during slumps.^[234]^[235] This framework influenced post-World War II policies, such as expansive fiscal measures in the United States and Europe, which correlated with rapid GDP growth and rising real incomes from 1945 to 1973, averaging 4-5% annually in advanced economies. However, critics contended that Keynesianism undervalued supply-side incentives, potentially distorting labor markets and investment by prioritizing demand stimulation over productivity-enhancing reforms.^[236] The 1960s introduced human capital theory, pioneered by Gary Becker, which framed income disparities as returns on investments in education, skills, and training rather than mere endowments or demand fluctuations. Becker's 1964 analysis empirically linked formal education to higher lifetime earnings, estimating returns of 10-15% per additional year of schooling in the U.S., integrating individual choices into aggregate income models and countering purely macroeconomic views.^[237] This supply-oriented perspective gained traction amid the 1970s stagflation, prompting shifts toward incentive-based policies like tax cuts, which empirical studies later associated with accelerated income growth in the 1980s, though debates persist on causality versus confounding factors like technological diffusion. The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw data-driven refinements, exemplified by Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014), which leveraged digitized tax records and national accounts from multiple countries to document rising top-end income inequality since the 1980s, attributing it to capital returns outpacing labor income growth (r > g).^[238] Yet, methodological caveats abound: Piketty's emphasis on inherited wealth overlooks human capital accumulation and entrepreneurship as countervailing forces, with critics noting data inconsistencies in extrapolating pre-20th-century trends and a relative neglect of supply-side innovations driving median incomes.^[239] In the digital era, big data enabled finer inequality tracking, but post-2008 analyses revealed decoupling between GDP gains and median household incomes, stagnant in real terms in the U.S. from 2000-2019 despite 2% average GDP per capita growth. By the 2020s, debates intensified over artificial intelligence's potential to reshape income via productivity surges, with projections suggesting generative AI could impact 40% of current U.S. GDP through task automation, potentially elevating wages for skilled workers while displacing others.^[240] Empirical evidence remains mixed, as AI investments have yet to yield broad productivity accelerations akin to past computing revolutions, amid concerns of an "AI bubble" inflating expectations without commensurate income effects. Global trends signal caution: World Bank forecasts indicate GDP growth slowing to 2.3% in 2025—the weakest outside crises since 2008—while OECD data show household income per capita barely advancing at 0.1% in early 2025, highlighting risks of policy-induced distortions and the limits of demand-focused models in sustaining income growth amid technological and geopolitical headwinds.^[241]^[242]

References

[1]
About Income - U.S. Census Bureau
Jun 13, 2025 · Money income is defined as income received on a regular basis (exclusive of certain money receipts such as capital gains) before payments for personal income ...
[2]
Introduction to U.S. Economy: Personal Income - Congress.gov
Feb 27, 2025 · Income is a measure of resources accruing to an individual over a period of time. In general, individuals receive income from their labor, assets, and ...
[3]
Income & Saving | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
Feb 7, 2024 · It's the amount that U.S. residents are able to spend, save, or invest. This number is important not just to individuals' well-being but also to ...
[4]
Understanding Types of Income - IMPLAN - Support
Feb 19, 2020 · In IMPLAN, there are five types of income that can be identified: Personal Income, Labor Income, Household Income, disposable income, and household spending.Defining Income Types · Where To Find Income In... · Income In Economic Impact...
[5]
What Is Disposable Income, and Why Is It Important? - Investopedia
Disposable income is a net amount. It is the amount of money an individual or family has left to spend or save after all taxes are deducted from gross income.
[6]
Disposable Personal Income - Bureau of Economic Analysis
Sep 26, 2025 · The formula is simple: personal income minus personal current taxes. Learn More. Contact Personnel. Personal Income. (301) 278-9083.
[7]
What Is Factor Income? Definition and vs. Non-Factor Income
Factor income on the use of land is called rent, income generated from labor is called wages, and income generated from capital is called profit.
[8]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-are-the-main-factor-incomes
[9]
Income Approach – Principles of Macroeconomics
The income approach starts with the sum of wage income plus interest, rent, and profit income. This sum equals net domestic income at factor cost . To change ...
[10]
[PDF] OVERVIEW OF THE DEFINITION OF INCOME USED BY THE ...
Feb 8, 2012 · Economic income includes the annual flow of all resources at the command of an individual and represents an individual's total well-being.<|separator|>
[11]
The Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution (With Diagram)
According to this theory, the price (or the earnings) of a factor tends to equal the value of its marginal product. Thus, rent is equal to the value of the ...
[12]
[PDF] Imputing Rents to Owner-Occupied Housing by Directly Modelling ...
The space rent on owner-occupied housing is considered to be “imputed” because it is not directly measured but is inferred on the basis of its assumed ...Missing: psychic | Show results with:psychic
[13]
[PDF] Measuring Income and Income Inequality
The paper discusses measuring income inequality, starting with the Haig-Simons income concept, and evaluates different income metrics and data sources.
[14]
26 U.S. Code § 61 - Gross income defined - Law.Cornell.Edu
Gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
[15]
[PDF] Part I Section 61.–Gross income defined 26 CFR 1.61-1(a) - IRS
Section 61(a) provides that, except as otherwise provided by law, gross income means all income from whatever source derived. Under § 61, Congress intends to ...
[16]
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. | 348 U.S. 426 (1955)
Money received as exemplary damages for fraud or as the punitive two-thirds portion of a treble damage antitrust recovery must be reported by a taxpayer as " ...
[17]
[PDF] Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital | OECD
Nov 21, 2017 · These are the main purposes of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, which provides a means of settling on a uniform basis the ...
[18]
OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital
The OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital is a model for the negotiation, interpretation and application of bilateral tax conventions, ...
[19]
[PDF] Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital | OECD
Jul 15, 2014 · This is the main purpose of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on. Capital, which provides a means of settling on a uniform basis the ...
[20]
Revenue Recognition: Principles and 5-Step Model - NetSuite
Mar 4, 2025 · The GAAP core principle for revenue recognition is that companies should recognize revenue when goods or services are transferred to customers, ...
[21]
ASC 606 how-to guide: Revenue recognition in five steps - Stripe
Jun 4, 2024 · 1. Identify the contract with a customer · 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract · 3. Determine the transaction price · 4.What is ASC 606? · Why does ASC 606... · The five-step model for ASC...
[22]
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
IFRS 15 establishes the principles that an entity applies when reporting information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows ...
[23]
Summary of Statement No. 115 - FASB
... unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of shareholders' equity. This Statement does not apply to ...
[24]
9.5 Investments – Equity securities - PwC Viewpoint
Mar 12, 2025 · ASC 321-10-50-4 requires reporting entities to disclose the amount of unrealized gains and losses for all equity investments for each period in ...
[25]
Revenue vs Income - Difference, Example, Statement
Revenue is the sales amount a company earns from providing services or selling products (the “top line”). Income can sometimes be used to mean revenue.What is Revenue vs Income? · Examples of Revenue vs Income
[26]
5 Steps for Revenue Recognition Under ASC 606 | BDO Insights
Step 1: Identify the Contract · Step 2: Identify Separate Performance Obligations · Step 3: Determine the Transaction Price · Step 4: Allocate the Transaction ...
[27]
By Scott B. Jackson and Marshall K. Pitman - The CPA Journal Archive
Critics contend that managers abuse the discretion afforded them by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and intentionally distort information ...
[28]
Earnings Management Just as Bad under IFRS as U.S. GAAP
Oct 6, 2016 · An academic study demonstrates that earnings management is pervasive across U.S., European and Asian companies, whether they're using U.S. GAAP ...
[29]
'What's the difference between income and wealth?' and other ...
Jul 23, 2021 · Income is the sum of earnings from a job or a self-owned business, interest on savings and investments, payments from social programs and many ...
[30]
9.2 Income and wealth – Microeconomics - The Economy 2.0
Wealth is the amount (stock) of water in the tub, while income is the flow of water into the tub. The inflow is measured by litres (or gallons) per minute.
[31]
Wealth vs. Income: What's the Difference? - SmartAsset.com
Jun 24, 2024 · Wealth encompasses the total value of all of the assets you own, whereas income refers to money earned on a regular basis from sources like salaries, dividends ...
[32]
[PDF] Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2019 to 2022
Median and mean net worth rose for all age groups. The largest growth was among families younger than 35 years old, who saw their median and mean net worth ...
[33]
The High Cost of Wealth Taxes - Tax Foundation
Jun 26, 2024 · Wealth taxes raise little revenue, create high administrative costs, and can damage economic growth. Explore wealth tax impact research.
[34]
Taxing the wealthy: the choice between wealth and capital income ...
Aug 18, 2023 · When combined with a tax on capital income, a wealth tax effectively becomes a 'double tax' on the normal return. This can lead to ...Taxing The Wealthy: The... · Ii. Conceptual Issues · Iii. Empirical Evidence
[35]
Rationing | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
In 1943 for example, a pound of bacon cost about 30 cents, but a shopper would also have to turn in seven ration points to buy the meat. These points came in ...Missing: income | Show results with:income
[36]
Marginal Revenue Product (MRP): Definition and How It's Predicted
A marginal revenue product (MRP) is the market value of one additional unit of input. It is also known as a marginal value product.
[37]
[PDF] Labor and Wages - UC Berkeley
It is composed of two pieces: • Marginal product of labor (mpL. ): The extra output produced by one more worker. • Marginal revenue (mr): The extra revenue from ...
[38]
[PDF] The Link Between Wages and Productivity Is Strong | Aspen Institute
Feb 3, 2019 · The paper argues that the link between productivity and wages is strong, contrary to some public debate, and recent evidence supports this.
[39]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES PRODUCTIVITY AND WAGES
Average wage growth is closely related to aggregate productivity growth, and there is a direct and unequivocal empirical link between wages and productivity.<|separator|>
[40]
Fact Sheet #56C: Bonuses under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
This fact sheet provides general information regarding bonuses and the regular rate of pay under the FLSA for non-exempt employees.
[41]
Average Bonus Percentage: An Industry Guide - ShareWillow
Apr 30, 2024 · Average bonus percentages vary widely by industry. Tech is 5-15%, finance is around 20.9%, healthcare is 1.1-5%, and retail is 2.5% for sales ...
[42]
Skill, Productivity, and Wages: Direct Evidence from a Temporary ...
We find that skill acquired through training and learning by doing increases productivity more than wages, with such wage compression accounting for half of the ...
[43]
Gig economy grows 15% over past decade: ADP report - CNBC
Feb 4, 2020 · The share of gig workers at U.S. businesses swelled 15% since 2010, according to the ADP Research Institute.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[44]
[PDF] The Economics of Trade Unions: A Study of a Research Field and its ...
Rather than undertaking a new meta-analysis of wage effects, we rely on Lewis and. Jarrell and Stanley (1990), who found modestly lower wage effects than Lewis.
[45]
[PDF] What Do Unions Do to Productivity? A Meta-Analysis
These include (1) the extensive body of literature exploring the impact of unions on wages, (2) studies that explore the links between unions and employ- ment, ...
[46]
Median usual weekly real earnings: Wage and salary workers: 16 ...
Data measure usual weekly earnings of wage and salary workers. Wage and salary workers are workers who receive wages, salaries, commissions, tips, ...
[47]
Real Earnings Archived News Releases - Bureau of Labor Statistics
Sep 11, 2025 · Archived News Releases | Real Earnings The Real Earnings news release presents data from the Current Employment Statistics program.
[48]
[PDF] The firm-level link between productivity dispersion and wage ...
The results suggest that around 15% of cross-firm differences in productivity are passed on to differences in firm wage premia.
[49]
Capital income: Meaning, Criticisms & Real-World Uses
Oct 18, 2025 · Capital income refers to any income derived from the ownership of capital assets, rather than from labor or services.
[50]
Capital Gains: Definition, Rules, Taxes, and Asset Types
Capital gains are the profits that are realized by selling an asset for a profit, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate. Long-term capital gains taxes are lower ...What Is a Capital Gain? · How It Works · Capital Gains Tax · Mutual Funds
[51]
Financial markets and the allocation of capital - ScienceDirect.com
A fundamental job of the economy is to allocate capital efficiently. To achieve this, capital is supposed to be invested in the sectors that are expected to ...
[52]
[PDF] Capital Allocation - Morgan Stanley
Dec 15, 2022 · The primary job of senior management is to create value over the long term. This entails taking inputs, including capital and labor,.
[53]
Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills: 1928-2024 - NYU Stern
Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills: 1928-2024. Data Used ... S&P 500 (includes dividends), US Small cap (bottom decile), 3-month T.Bill, US ...
[54]
[PDF] Capital Taxation - Harvard University
1) Capital income is about 25% of national income (labor income is 75%) but. distribution of capital income is much more unequal than labor income. Capital ...
[55]
[PDF] The Great “Transfer”-mation - Economic Innovation Group
Nationally, Americans received $3.8 trillion in government transfers in 2022, accounting for 18 percent of all personal income in the United States. That share ...
[56]
The Contributions of Government Transfer Payments to Personal ...
Jan 26, 2024 · The relative share of government transfers to personal income has increased over the past 50 years, growing from 7.3% in 1969 to 17.6% in 2022 ...
[57]
[PDF] evidence from a randomized social experiment for welfare recipients
This paper summarizes early findings from a social experiment that provided financial incentives for new welfare recipients to leave welfare and work full ...
[58]
The Average Inheritance Revealed: Here's How Much Most People ...
Sep 4, 2024 · According to the Federal Reserve data, on average, American households inherit $46,200.1 However, this number is inflated by large amounts ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[59]
How inheritance data secretly explains U.S. inequality
Nov 10, 2023 · Folks in the bottom 50 percent of earners inherit at half the national rate, while those in the top 1 percent are twice as likely to inherit ...
[60]
U.S. Economic Recovery in the Wake of COVID19: Successes and ...
May 31, 2022 · The labor force participation rate has fallen from 63.4% before the pandemic to 62.2% in April 2022. Economic growth slowed in the second half ...<|separator|>
[61]
[PDF] Labor Force Participation: A Major Obstacle to Rebuilding the Post ...
Some employers also suggest that unemployment benefits and economic impact payments, or stimulus checks, create a disincentive for workers to rejoin the labor ...
[62]
Personal Income by State | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
Sep 26, 2025 · Personal income increased in all 50 states and the District of Columbia in the second quarter of 2025. State-level changes ranged from a 10.4 ...
[63]
Definition of adjusted gross income | Internal Revenue Service
Jul 8, 2025 · Your adjusted gross income (AGI) is your total (gross) income from all sources minus certain adjustments listed on Schedule 1 of Form 1040.
[64]
State GDP and Personal Income in Q2 2025 - Haver Analytics
Sep 26, 2025 · Personal income growth rates ranged from 10.4% in Kansas to 0.9% in Arkansas. In the majority of states, perhaps most notably Massachusetts, ...
[65]
Glossary:Equivalised income - Statistics Explained - Eurostat
... OECD equivalence scale. This scale attributes a weight to all members of the household: 1.0 to the first adult;; 0.5 to the second and each subsequent person ...
[66]
Compare Your Income | OECD
In only a few clicks, you can see where you fit in your country's income distribution. Compare Your Income also allows you to have a say in what areas of ...Income inequality definition · Why is income measured at...
[67]
Comparability of Current Population Survey Income Data with other ...
May 17, 2023 · The income data presented in CPS reports are not directly comparable with estimates of aggregate personal income prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.Missing: underreporting | Show results with:underreporting
[68]
[PDF] The Effect of Survey Reference Periods on Income Reporting
Exploiting this random assignment, we identify the effect of the reference period on the accuracy of income data by comparing the agreement of survey responses ...
[69]
Measuring the Informal Economy in: Policy Papers ... - IMF eLibrary
Feb 2, 2021 · This paper proposes a framework for measuring the informal economy that is consistent with internationally agreed concepts and methodology for measuring GDP.
[70]
[PDF] The Long Shadow of Informality: Challenges and Policies
This highly informative and timely book compiles various measures of the informal economy in a comprehensive global data set. Its analysis of informality's ...
[71]
NIPA Handbook: Concepts and Methods of the U.S. National Income ...
Dec 16, 2024 · The NIPA Handbook begins with introductory chapters that describe the fundamental concepts, definitions, classifications, and accounting framework
[72]
[PDF] Concepts and Methods of the U.S. National Income and Product ...
The US National Income and Product Accounts (NIPAs) are a set of economic accounts providing a framework for detailed measures of US output and income.
[73]
[PDF] An Introduction to the National Income and Product Accounts
This paper provides a comprehensive explanation of the conceptual basis and framework of the U.S. national income and product accounts (NIPAs).
[74]
[PDF] A Guide to the National Income and Product Accounts of the United ...
The U.S. national income and product statistics were first presented as part of a complete and consis tent accounting system in the July 1947 supplement to the ...
[75]
[PDF] the history of the united states national income and product accounts ...
The purpose of this article is to record the history of the national income and product accounts of the. United States, concentrating on the period 1932-47.
[76]
[PDF] A Guide to the NIPA's - Cornell eCommons
The NIPA's are revised estimates of national income and product accounts, presented in a two-volume publication with 147 tables.
[77]
[PDF] Chapter 7: Change in Private Inventories
In the NIPAs, the IVA is also used on the income side of the accounts in order to exclude the inventory holding gains (or losses) from business income in the ...
[78]
What Is National Income Accounting? How It Works and Examples
Jun 23, 2025 · National income accounting is used to measure economic growth and activity. It can also be helpful in tracking trends and guiding monetary ...
[79]
[PDF] Inthis chapter, we consider the implications for the National Income ...
The most serious omission is the failure to count home production. In his accounting, Colin Clark (1958) found that including housework would raise the value of ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[80]
[PDF] CHAPTER 8 National Income and Environmental Accounting
Start with gross national saving. Make a deduction to account for the depreciation of fixed capital to obtain net national saving. Adjust for education ...<|separator|>
[81]
Green National Accounting by William D. Nordhaus - Project Syndicate
Sep 3, 2021 · The point is worth considering: measures of national output do not adequately correct for pollution or other spillover effects of the economy.
[82]
[PDF] National Income Accounts and the Environment
The consol- idated GNP account is a combination of production accounts in four sectors: industries, governments, households, and the environment (nature).
[83]
[PDF] Measuring the Economy: A Primer on GDP and the NIPAs
In addition to GDP, which is measured using the final expenditures approach, the NIPAs also present gross domestic income (GDI), which is GDP measured using ...
[84]
national income and gross domestic product - AmosWEB
The six main differences between gross domestic product and national income are (1) capital consumption adjustment, (2) indirect business taxes, (3) business ...
[85]
Labor share of output has declined since 1947 : The Economics Daily
Mar 7, 2017 · In the first quarter of 1947, the labor share was 65.8 percent; by the fourth quarter of 2000, it was 62.8 percent. The labor share declined ...
[86]
Trends in the Labor Share Post-2000
Dec 6, 2018 · The labor share of income declined sharply in the United States from 2000 to 2010 but seems to have stabilized since 2010.
[87]
Why Is the Labor Share Declining? | St. Louis Fed
Oct 22, 2020 · For much of the 20th century, the fraction of national income accruing to labor (the labor share, hereafter) remained more or less constant over ...
[88]
What is labor productivity, and how has it changed in the US over ...
Oct 31, 2023 · Over the decades, the growth rates of labor productivity and real wages have fluctuated. During the 1960s, workforce efficiency peaked at 2.29% ...
[89]
[PDF] Decoupling of Wage Growth and Productivity Growth? Myth and ...
We show that over the past 40 years that there is almost no net decoupling, although there is evidence of substantial gross decoupling in the US and, to a ...
[90]
[PDF] Working Paper 18-5: Productivity and Pay: Is the Link Broken?
We investigate the evidence on the linkage-delinkage question for both typical and average compensation. We find that periods of faster productivity growth over ...<|separator|>
[91]
OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report September 2025
Sep 23, 2025 · In the United States, growth is projected to fall sharply from 2.8% in 2024 to 1.8% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026 owing to higher tariff rates, ...Real Gdp Growth Projections... · Headline Inflation... · In The Same Series
[92]
World Economic Outlook Update, July 2025: Global Economy
Jul 29, 2025 · Global growth is projected at 3.0 percent for 2025 and 3.1 percent in 2026, an upward revision from the April 2025 World Economic Outlook.
[93]
Measuring income inequality - IZA World of Labor
The Gini coefficient uses information from the entire income distribution and is independent of the size of a country's economy and population.
[94]
Income inequality measures - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
The Gini coefficient's main weakness as a measure of income distribution is that it is incapable of differentiating different kinds of inequalities. Lorenz ...
[95]
[PDF] Getting the measure of inequality - IFS
Nov 18, 2022 · The Gini is a middle-sensitive inequality index, whereas the Theil index is more top-sensitive. Half the squared coefficient of variation ...
[96]
Generalized Pareto distribution and income inequality - AIMS Press
Apr 26, 2024 · The upper tail of the income distribution, which is referred to as the richest 1%~3% of the population, has been long known to be approximated ...
[97]
Pareto models for top incomes and wealth
Mar 28, 2022 · In this paper, we first show that modeling top incomes with Pareto Type I distribution can lead to biased estimation of inequality, even with millions of ...
[98]
How has income inequality within countries evolved over the past ...
Jul 6, 2023 · This area of research has developed methods for estimating income inequality based on income tax records, or summary tables released by tax ...
[99]
Underreporting of Top Incomes and Inequality: A Comparison of ...
Oct 11, 2022 · We compare the performance of the reweighting and replacing methods to address top incomes underreporting in surveys using information from tax records.
[100]
Income inequality before and after taxes: how much do countries ...
Jul 3, 2023 · The higher the Gini, the more unequal incomes are. We see that, after taxes and benefits, inequality in the US is reduced substantially: the ...
[101]
Median income or consumption per day, 2024 - Our World in Data
The median of monthly household per capita income or consumption expenditure from the survey in 2021 PPP. Median income or consumption per day. World Bank.
[102]
Dissecting Medium-Term Growth Prospects for Asia
Aug 22, 2025 · Comparing pattern-based forecasts with traditional projections highlights economic convergence and demographic headwinds. Results show that ...
[103]
Convergence in sectoral value-added and income per capita
Africa shows a 2.06% annual income convergence, driven by initial income, industrial expansion, and service modernization. Emerging markets have the fastest ...
[104]
Real Median Household Income in the United States
Real Median Household Income in the United States (MEHOINUSA672N) ; 2024: 83,730 ; 2023: 82,690 ; 2022: 79,500 ; 2021: 81,270 ; 2020: 81,580.
[105]
GINI Index for the United States (SIPOVGINIUSA) - FRED
GINI Index for the United States (SIPOVGINIUSA) ; 2023: 41.8 ; 2022: 41.7 ; 2021: 39.7 ; 2020: 40.0 ; 2019: 41.9.
[106]
World Social Report 2025 Builds Case for New Policy Consensus
May 13, 2025 · In addition, the report finds, 65% of the world's population lives in countries where income inequality is on the rise, leading to exclusion, ...
[107]
Inequality – Bridging the Divide | United Nations
Income inequality between countries has improved, yet income inequality within countries has become worse. Today, 71 percent of the world's population live in ...
[108]
Economic Inequality - Our World in Data
This data explorer provides a range of inequality indicators measured according to two different definitions of income obtained from different sources.The history of global economic... · How has income inequality... · Global
[109]
[PDF] Skill-Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality
The recent rise in wage inequality is usually attributed to skill-biased technical change (SBTC), associated with new computer technologies.
[110]
[PDF] Download a PDF - National Bureau of Economic Research
Many economists have argued that skill-biased technological change (sbtc) has contributed to rising wage inequality in many countries by shifting relative labor ...
[111]
Skill-Biased Technological Change and Wage Inequality
We find that indeed the retooling resulted in greater wage dispersion of the form predicted by the proponents of the skill-biased technological change argument.Missing: income | Show results with:income
[112]
Rising inequality: A major issue of our time - Brookings Institution
May 16, 2023 · Income and wealth inequality has risen in many countries in recent decades. Rising inequality and related disparities and anxieties have been stoking social ...
[113]
Does Globalization Lower Wages and Export Jobs?
There is no doubt that globalization has coincided with higher unemployment among the less skilled and with widening income inequality.
[114]
[PDF] Innovation and Top Income Inequality
In particular, this model predicts that: (i) innovation by entrants and incumbents increases top income inequality; (ii) innovation by entrants increases social ...
[115]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INEQUALITY AND GROWTH ...
The economy's growth rate is shown to fall with interest groups' rent-seeking abilities, as well as with the gap between rich and poor. It is not income.
[116]
Intergenerational Mobility in the United States: What We Have ...
Using up to five-year averages of fathers' income, Solon concluded that the IGE in the United States between fathers' and sons' income was 0.4 “or higher.” ...
[117]
Mobility: What Are You Talking About? - Brookings Institution
“Absolute mobility ignores rankings and simply considers whether adults tend to have higher, size-adjusted incomes than their parents did at the same age, after ...
[118]
[PDF] Relative and Absolute Income Mobility Variation in the United States
Relative mobility does not vary by race, but blacks have lower absolute mobility than their white counterparts, regardless of their childhood income.
[119]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES FIFTY YEARS OF MINCER ...
We explore the empirical importance of assumptions that are needed to equate the Mincer schooling coefficient with the internal rate of return to schooling, and ...
[120]
[PDF] The “Mincer Equation” Thirty Years after Schooling, Experience
May 16, 2025 · The paper evaluates the empirical performance of the standard Mincer earnings equation ... empirical college- high school wage gap on experience.
[121]
Chapter 7 Earnings Functions, Rates of Return and Treatment Effects
Mincer's model was developed to explain cross sections of earnings. While the model is no longer a valid guide for accurately estimating rates of return to ...
[122]
[PDF] PISA 2022 Results (Volume I) | OECD
Compared to 2018, mean performance fell by ten score points in reading and by almost 15 score points in mathematics, which is equivalent to three-quarters of a ...
[123]
[PDF] EDUCATIONAL QUALITY AND DISPARITIES IN INCOME AND ...
PISA test scores are also reported on a scale ranging from 0 to 1,000 and exhibit a high correlation with TIMSS scores. Specifically, for the 92 countries that ...
[124]
The Fearless Future: 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer - PwC
Jun 3, 2025 · Workers with AI skills command a 56% wage premium: up from 25% last year. The value that AI-powered workers bring is apparent in the wage ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[125]
Artificial intelligence, tasks, skills, and wages: Worker-level evidence ...
This paper examines how new technologies are linked to changes in the content of work and individual wages.
[126]
Artificial intelligence and the skill premium - ScienceDirect.com
We show that AI reduces the skill premium as long as it is more substitutable for high-skill workers than low-skill workers are for high-skill workers.Missing: 2020s studies
[127]
Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages
Workers with higher levels of education and more work experience tend to have higher wages. For some years, the most common explanation.Missing: credentials critiques
[128]
[PDF] Human Capital vs. Signaling is Empirically Unresolvable
Aug 13, 2018 · Using evidence on employer learning to inform theory about human capital and signaling assumes both that rapid learning could not erase human ...
[129]
Signaling or better human capital: Evidence from Colombia
We show that there is evidence in favor of the theory of signaling as opposed to the theory of human capital. · Most prestigious university do not added value in ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[130]
[PDF] creative destruction | MIT Economics
Evidence and models coincide in their conclusion that the process of creative destruction is an integral part of economic growth and fluctuations. Obstacles to ...
[131]
[PDF] Sustained economic growth through technological progress
Oct 13, 2025 · The empirical appeal of the creative destruction paradigm is that it not only speaks to the evidence on firm dynamics but connects the facts in ...<|separator|>
[132]
[PDF] 2025 index of - economic freedom - The Heritage Foundation
Feb 4, 2025 · Undeniably, countries moving toward greater economic freedom tend to achieve higher growth rates of per capita GDP over time. Throughout all ...
[133]
How Deregulation Can Increase Economic Growth
Oct 2, 2017 · Excessive regulation is a tax on the economy, costing the U.S. an average of 0.8 percent of GDP growth per year since 1980.
[134]
A Brief History of Regulation and Deregulation
The deregulation of transportation and telecommunications that occurred in the 1970s and 1980s succeeded in increasing competition, which lowered consumer ...
[135]
How Much Profit Is Too Much? Tech Companies and the Surprising ...
Feb 27, 2015 · Others argue that big tech companies cause income inequality by engaging in stock buybacks, charging exorbitant prices for minor technology ...
[136]
The Multiplier Effect of Innovation Jobs
Jun 6, 2012 · Because of a multiplier effect, each new high-tech job in the US creates five additional jobs in the service economy, says economist Enrico Moretti.
[137]
Is There Monopsony Power in U.S. Labor Markets? - Cato Institute
On inspection, many of the studies that are cited as evidence of this power are not convincing, and newer research finds relatively small markdowns on wages.Missing: dispersion | Show results with:dispersion<|separator|>
[138]
[PDF] Firms and Labor Market Inequality: Evidence and Some Theory
Several recent studies note that rising trends in the dispersion of productivity across firms mirror the trends in the wage inequality across workers. Two ...
[139]
[PDF] They provided an explanation for why some countries are rich and ...
Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson have uncovered a clear chain of causality. Institutions that were created to exploit the masses are bad for long-run growth, ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[140]
[PDF] INSTITUTIONS AS A FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF LONG-RUN ...
Abstract. This paper develops the empirical and theoretical case that differences in economic in- stitutions are the fundamental cause of differences in ...
[141]
Unbundling Institutions Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson - jstor
We estimate a large effect of property rights institutions on current economic outcomes. Countries with greater constraints on politicians and elites and more ...
[142]
Laffer Curve: Statutory vs. Effective Tax Rates in Europe
Sep 17, 2024 · [12] The authors find that the peak of the Laffer Curve in the United States is reached at an average tax rate of 58 percent, which would ...
[143]
Optimal Top Tax Rates: A Review and Critique - Cato Institute
... Laffer curve peaks at a top rate equal to 49 percent.” Jones (2019: 12) takes it further, adding Schumpeterian effects of top taxes on inventions ...
[144]
[PDF] The Impact of Economic Regulation on Growth: Survey and Synthesis
This study provides a survey of research that uses cross-country comparisons to examine how economic regulation affects growth. Studies in the peer-reviewed ...
[145]
McLaughlin's “The Causal Effect of Regulations on Economic Growth”
Jun 10, 2025 · Their findings align with several federal-level studies showing that regulations slow economic growth, while regulatory rollbacks can boost it.
[146]
[PDF] Quantifying the Inflationary Impact of Fiscal Stimulus Under Supply ...
Model calibrations show that aggregate demand shocks explain roughly two-thirds of total model-based inflation, and that the fiscal stimulus contributed half or ...
[147]
Post-pandemic US inflation: A tale of fiscal and monetary policy
Sep 17, 2024 · Empirical evidence suggests that at the beginning of 2020 and 2021, net tax revenue shocks were very important drivers of the inflation surge ( ...
[148]
The Impact of the CARES Act on Economic Welfare
It redistributed economic gains heavily toward low-income households, while middle-income households gained little from the stimulus package.
[149]
[PDF] Compendium of Tax Research 1987: Family Economic Income and ...
Under the Haig-Simons definition of income (named after its use by Haig (1921) and Simons (1938)), income is the amount that a family or individual consumes in ...
[150]
[PDF] OVERVIEW OF THE DEFINITION OF INCOME USED BY THE ...
Feb 8, 2012 · Broadly speaking, Haig-Simons income is defined as consumption plus changes in net worth. Increases in net worth are generally derived from ...
[151]
The Two Faces of Tax Neutrality: Do They Interact or are ... - SSRN
Jun 8, 2007 · Tax neutrality refers to tax provisions that conform to an ideal tax system. A tax provision that is consistent with such an ideal system is described as ...
[152]
Tax Increases Reduce GDP | NBER
Tax changes have very large effects: an exogenous tax increase of 1 percent of GDP lowers real GDP by roughly 2 to 3 percent.<|separator|>
[153]
Marginal tax rates and income in the long run - ScienceDirect.com
Lower tax rates lead to increased investment, capital reallocation, higher TFP, and boosted wages. Long-run tax elasticities are largest for the richest 1%.
[154]
Effects of Income Tax Changes on Economic Growth | Brookings
This paper examines how changes to the individual income tax affect long-term economic growth. The structure and financing of a tax change are critical to ...
[155]
Estonia Tax Rates and Rankings - Tax Foundation
Estonia ranks 1st overall on the 2024 International Tax Competitiveness Index, the same as in 2023. How does Estonia raise tax revenue? Explore the latest data ...
[156]
[PDF] Estonia: Taxation System and Implementation of Flat Income Tax - Loc
Estonia introduced a flat tax system in 1994, taxing all personal and corporate incomes at 26%, with reduced rates for the socially disadvantaged.
[157]
[PDF] The Unintended Consequences of Tax Code Complexity - SSRN
Nov 23, 2024 · This paper reveals how tax complexity, in the form of loopholes and assets overlapping differ- ent sections of tax returns, contributes to ...
[158]
Historical Tax Rates: The Rhetoric and Reality of Taxing the Rich
Mar 29, 2024 · The tax code is replete with tax expenditures (“loopholes”) that tend to confer higher benefits on those with higher incomes. In 2024, CBO ...
[159]
Complexity and the Tax Code: A Textual Analysis - Sage Journals
Mar 28, 2024 · Complexity in the tax law can cause information overload, confusion, uncertainty, and taxpayer frustration (Krause 2000; Abeler and Jäger 2015; ...
[160]
Universal Basic Income Has Been Tried Before. It Didn't Work.
Oct 9, 2018 · The Heritage Foundation has proposed ways to reform welfare programs to promote those goals. Evidence from the negative income tax experiment ...
[161]
[PDF] Universal Basic Income and Negative Income Tax
This article examines two redistributive policies: Negative Income Tax and Universal Basic Income. Its aim is to show that, although the two achieve the ...
[162]
Universal basic income won't save us from AI. Here's why
Oct 1, 2025 · How much would be paid? It is estimated that UBI of $10,000 annually would cost $3 trillion each year, equivalent to about three-fourths of the ...
[163]
Unconditional Cash Study - OpenResearch
Jul 21, 2024 · Our goal is to learn from participants' experiences and better understand both the potential and the limitations of unconditional cash transfers.Findings · Documentation · Participant Stories
[164]
Universal Basic Income—Not the Panacea It's Advertised As
Aug 19, 2024 · UBI recipients experienced an average reduction of $2,500 in their annual household income (excluding the UBI transfers). 2. Less work was used ...
[165]
Universal Basic Income: High Cost, Low Returns, and Unintended ...
Aug 12, 2025 · The findings are hard to ignore: Participants receiving the $1,000 monthly payments reduced their labor supply by 1.3 to 1.4 hours per week on ...
[166]
Basic Income Pilot Project | Study results
What does a universal basic income really achieve? Find the results of the first long-term German study here.Study Design · Labour · Unexpected effects · Self-determination
[167]
First German long-term study on basic income - Frankfurt School
Apr 9, 2025 · Almost 1,700 people took part, 122 received €1,200 per month from June 2021 to May 2024. The randomised controlled study design enables reliable ...
[168]
Universal Basic Income Has Failed Before, but Can It Help ...
Jun 27, 2025 · A study by 15 scientific scholars found that the “Baby's First Years” universal basic income trial had zero impact on child outcomes.
[169]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE EFFECT OF A MONTHLY ...
The Baby's First Years study tests whether monthly unconditional cash transfers to low- income mothers beginning shortly after birth affect children's ...Missing: UBI | Show results with:UBI
[170]
Universal Basic Income Harms Recipients and Increases ...
Feb 14, 2018 · By removing work requirements from welfare, UBI would decrease work among the poor and increase dependence on government. Increase pressure ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[171]
[PDF] Quantifying Okun's Leaky Bucket - David Koll
Apr 16, 2025 · In addition, we cross-validate our model by comparing it to existing empirical evidence. 2We abstract from paternal labor supply decisions ...
[172]
Calculating the leak in Okun's bucket - Equitable Growth
Oct 22, 2015 · To put this in Okun's terms, are we okay with $0.56 or $0.34 leaking out of the bucket in this case? Of course, redistribution is just one way ...
[173]
Why Is Europe More Equal than the United States?
Contrary to a widespread view, we demonstrate that Europe's lower inequality levels cannot be explained by more equalizing tax and transfer systems.Missing: empirical high stagnation 2020s<|separator|>
[174]
Economics: why Europe is falling behind the USA
Jun 11, 2024 · Between 2010 and 2023, the cumulative GDP growth rate reached 34% in the United States, compared with just 21% in the European Union.Missing: empirical redistribution 1980s- 2020s
[175]
[PDF] A Review of Recent Research on Labor Supply Elasticities
Oct 25, 2012 · The substitution elasticity is the percentage change in hours worked resulting from a 1 percent change in the after-tax marginal wage rate, ...
[176]
Own-wage labor supply elasticities: variation across time and ...
Oct 31, 2016 · We highlight the key role of time changes, documenting the incredible fall in labor supply elasticities since the 1980s not only for the USA but also in the EU.
[177]
[PDF] The Past, Present and Future of European Productivity
European productivity has experienced a marked deceleration since the 1970s, with the productivity gap between the Euro area and the United States widening.Missing: redistribution 2020s
[178]
Publication: Economic Growth, Inequality, and Poverty
Economic growth reduces poverty because growth has little impact on income inequality. In the data set income inequality rises on average less than 1.0 percent ...Missing: redistribution | Show results with:redistribution
[179]
Macroeconomic Policy and Poverty Reduction
Economic growth is the single most important factor influencing poverty, and macroeconomic stability is essential for high and sustainable rates of growth.
[180]
Growth Versus Poverty Reduction: A Hollow Debate
The real question is not whether growth is good for poverty reduction or vice versa, but whether the well-being of the poor should enter into the equation as an ...
[181]
[PDF] When growth does – and does not – reduce poverty
– Growth anywhere in an economy will reduce poverty if there are strong enough economic linkages to the livelihoods of people living in poverty. These linkages ...
[182]
Property: John Locke, Second Treatise, §§ 25--51, 123--26
For this Labour being the unquestionable Property of the Labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough ...
[183]
Nozick on Distributive Justice and the Difference ... - Libertarianism.org
Oct 22, 2024 · Desert, Entitlement, and Natural Assets · People are entitled to their holdings. · If people are entitled to something, then they ought to have it ...
[184]
The Forbes 400 List 2025 - The Richest People in America Ranked
Forbes' 2025 list of the 400 Richest People in America ranks U.S. billionaires and the wealthiest people in the United States by their net worths.Self-Made Scores · The Youngest Billionaires On... · The Forbes Philanthropy Score
[185]
Meet The World's Self-Made Billionaires - Forbes
Apr 1, 2025 · While many of the world's billionaires inherited their wealth, nearly 70% of the newest names on this year's list are self-made, meaning they ...
[186]
How Wealth Fuels Growth | Cato Institute
Sep 29, 2021 · This study examined the important role played by wealthy individuals in providing funding and guidance to startup businesses.
[187]
[PDF] WHY ECONOMIC FREEDOM MATTERS - The Heritage Foundation
Undeniably, countries moving toward greater economic freedom tend to achieve higher growth rates of per capita GDP over time. Throughout all the time periods ...
[188]
The causal relationship between economic freedom and prosperity
Sep 18, 2023 · A 3.5-point increase in economic freedom is associated with an increase in GDP over five years of approximately 6 to 8 percentage points. A 7- ...
[189]
The impact of economic freedom on economic growth in countries ...
Sep 17, 2024 · This article aims to analyze the impact of economic freedom on economic growth, considering the influence of varying regulatory qualities (RQ) among nations.
[190]
[PDF] a fundamental objection to tax equity norms: - a call for utilitarianism
because of the adverse effect of redistribution on incentives to work. The objection to utilitarianism is that it gives insufficient weight to equality. The ...
[191]
Economic freedom influences economic growth and unemployment
Mar 15, 2023 · This study analyses the effect of four components of economic freedom (business freedom, labour freedom, government integrity, tax burden) on the mean GDP ...
[192]
Utilitarianism as a lodestar (Constructive Criticism for Caplan)
Jul 10, 2016 · It's true that utilitarianism implies that the world would probably be a better place if I gave away most of my fortune to poor peasants in the ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[193]
[PDF] The Socialist Experiment: What Went Wrong
Underlying both the failures to provide appropriate incentives and effec- tive selection were two further failures-the failure to have an adequate accounting ( ...Missing: moral hazard
[194]
Assessing Soviet Economic Performance During the Cold War
Feb 8, 2018 · For years, scholars have argued that economists and the CIA failed to see that the Soviet Union's economy was headed toward collapse.<|separator|>
[195]
Disaster in Red: The Failure and Collapse of Socialism - FEE.org
Disaster in Red: The Failure and Collapse of Socialism. Walter Block · Richard ... A system which ignores private property rights, human rights and economic ...
[196]
The growth consequences of socialism - ScienceDirect.com
... collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent loss of political and economic support. ... socialism is universally associated with substantial economic failure ...Missing: USSR | Show results with:USSR
[197]
Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States
Apr 10, 2016 · Higher incomes are associated with longer life expectancy, but several aspects of the relationship between income and longevity remain unclear.
[198]
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United ...
Higher incomes are associated with longer life expectancy, but several aspects of the relationship between income and longevity remain unclear. First, little is ...
[199]
Life Expectancy and Rising Income Inequality - Brookings Institution
Oct 23, 2012 · A $10,000 increase in annual income does more to lift the life expectancy of someone who lives on a meager income than it does to boost the ...
[200]
The Relationship between Life Expectancy and Income in the United ...
Sep 1, 2015 · The gap in life expectancy at age 40 between the richest 1% of the population and the poorest 1% is 10.6 years for women and 14.8 years for men.
[201]
Money, schooling, and health: Mechanisms and causal evidence
Feb 18, 2010 · In this essay, we review the potential causal mechanisms linking schooling and income to health, and discuss the twin challenges to causal inference in ...
[202]
Do Education and Income Really Explain Inequalities in Health ...
Sep 22, 2015 · We apply a twin design to examine the relationship between health and education and income. The estimated associations between health and ...
[203]
Health Selection vs. Causation in the Income Gradient - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · In this paper, I examine graphical trends in mortality risk between low-income and higher-income people by age and gender. ese trends suggest ...
[204]
Does Income Affect Health? Evidence from a Randomized ...
Jul 18, 2024 · Our results imply that more targeted interventions may be more effective at reducing health inequality between high- and low-income individuals, ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[205]
[PDF] Does Income Affect Health? Evidence from a Randomized ...
Jul 21, 2024 · This paper provides new evidence on the causal relationship between income and health by studying a randomized experiment in which 1,000 ...
[206]
Associations between common genetic variants and income provide ...
Jan 28, 2025 · Extensive evidence shows that income is positively correlated with subjective well-being, overall health and life expectancy. For instance, the ...
[207]
Genetic correlates of socio-economic status influence the pattern of ...
They found that estimates of genetic effects were significantly reduced within families compared to between families, suggesting that unaccounted confounding ...
[208]
[PDF] Genetic Fortune: Winning or Losing Education, Income, and Health
We find that genetic fortune for higher income causes greater socio-economic status and better health, partly via intervenable environmental pathways such as ...<|separator|>
[209]
The Impact of Social and Cultural Environment on Health - NCBI - NIH
A growing body of research has documented associations between social and cultural factors and health (Berkman and Kawachi, 2000; Marmot and Wilkinson, 2006).
[210]
Does health selection or social causation dominate in Europe?
This study shows that both social causation and health selection are responsible for health inequalities; however, their relative importance changes with age.
[211]
Beyond the surface: accounting for confounders in understanding ...
Aug 9, 2023 · The high correlation between the subjective-culture individualism-collectivism index (reversed) and the controlled variables suggested shared ...
[212]
Using Financial Credits as Instrumental Variables for Estimating the ...
May 1, 2016 · Social epidemiologists are interested in determining the causal relationship between income and health.
[213]
Association Between Lottery Prize Size and Self-reported Health ...
Mar 19, 2020 · That study analyzed outcomes, such as mortality and health care utilization, measured up to 10 years after the lottery event. Despite excellent ...
[214]
Winning the lottery may not improve health - Healio
Mar 19, 2020 · Winning the lottery may not lead to more healthy habits or better overall health, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.
[215]
Income or Job Loss and Psychological Distress During the COVID ...
Jul 30, 2024 · These assumptions include common support and that there are no confounders associated with both early-phase pandemic income or job loss and ...
[216]
Causal effects of education, intelligence, and income on COVID-19
Feb 25, 2025 · Our findings indicated that EA could significantly reduce the risk and severity of COVID-19, regardless of intelligence and income.
[217]
Using Financial Credits as Instrumental Variables for Estimating the ...
Apr 7, 2016 · Social epidemiologists studying the causal relationship between income and health increasingly analyze natural income experiments by using instrumental ...
[218]
[PDF] AristotleTs Views on Economics - PhilArchive
Aristotle defines economics (oikonomia) as “household management”, focusing on household organization and the production and consumption of goods.Missing: income | Show results with:income
[219]
Retrospectives: What Did the Ancient Greeks Mean by Oikonomia?
Jan 29, 2016 · the term oikonomia referred to “household management” and while this was in some loose way linked to the idea of budgeting, it has little or ...
[220]
Thomas Aquinas on the Just Price - Public Discourse
Mar 19, 2019 · St. Thomas Aquinas's treatment of the question of the just price is often misunderstood by both Catholic integralists and classical liberals.
[221]
What Is a Just Price? - Econlib
May 4, 2020 · This essay explores the historic debate about what makes prices just and why economists by and large no longer ask that question.
[222]
Mercantilism - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Mercantilism is a set of rules, practical directions, and economic policy suggestions addressed to sovereigns to increase a country's wealth.
[223]
Adam Smith on Mercantilism - Marginal REVOLUTION
May 11, 2025 · Trade is not zero-sum: Mercantilists saw international trade as a zero-sum game where one nation's gain is another's loss. Smith argued ...Missing: proxy | Show results with:proxy
[224]
HET: The Physiocrats - The History of Economic Thought Website
The cornerstone of the Physiocratic doctrine was François Quesnay's (1759, 1766) axiom that only agriculture yielded a surplus -- what he called a produit net ( ...
[225]
ECON 307 - Physiocrats
The net product (in money terms – net income) is produced entirely by the first group and may be used to support its own activities or those of the other ...
[226]
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
Feb 5, 2018 · Adam Smith's An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations was first published in 1776. This edition of Smith's work is based on Edwin Cannan' ...Missing: income | Show results with:income<|separator|>
[227]
Division of Labor, Part 1 | Adam Smith Works
Aug 7, 2019 · Division of labor, according to Adam Smith, is a key concept that increases wealth by increasing the amount of stuff people can use and consume.Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
[228]
Adam Smith and "The Wealth of Nations" - Investopedia
The central thesis of Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" is that our individual need to fulfill self-interest results in societal benefit. He called the force ...
[229]
ECON 307 - Outline Sixteen - Ricardo
But high wages induce population growth, and pressure on food supply – fixed land – lead to diminishing returns to capital and labor in agriculture and the ...
[230]
An Essay on the Principle of Population, vol. 2 [1826, 6th ed.]
In this work Malthus argues that there is a disparity between the rate of growth of population (which increases geometrically) and the rate of growth of ...
[231]
Chapter Twenty-Four: Conversion of Surplus-Value into Capital
It will be remembered that the rate of surplus-value depends, in the first place, on the degree of exploitation of labour-power. Political Economy values ...
[232]
[PDF] Pessimism Preserved: Real Wages in the British Industrial Revolution
conclusion that the average real wage rose by about 30% between. 1780 and 1850. The 'pessimism' of the title was warranted, however, since real wage growth ...
[233]
[PDF] Real Wages in the First Industrial Revolution - WRAP: Warwick
Tony Wrigley sees real wage growth of around 0.5 per cent as a 'truly remarkable achievement' at a time of unprecedented population growth, which a century ...<|separator|>
[234]
What Is Keynesian Economics? - Back to Basics
Keynes argued that inadequate overall demand could lead to prolonged periods of high unemployment. An economy's output of goods and services is the sum of four ...
[235]
Keynesian Multiplier - Overview, Components, How to Calculate
A change in aggregate demand causes the greatest impact on the output and employment in the economy. Keynesian economic theory says that spending by ...
[236]
Supply-Side Economics in One Lesson - FEE.org
In essence, supply-side economists hold that “supply matters, too,” whereas the dominant Keynesian approach ignores this aspect of the economy.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques<|separator|>
[237]
Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special ...
Gary S. Becker ... Part Two investigates empirically the effect of one kind of human capital—formal education—on earnings and productivity in this country.
[238]
[PDF] CAPITAL - Thomas Piketty
Dec 4, 2013 · Piketty shows that modern economic growth and the diffusion of knowledge have allowed us to avoid inequalities on the apocalyptic scale pre-.Missing: big caveats
[239]
[PDF] Inequality in the Twenty-First Century (reviewing Thomas Piketty ...
Aug 4, 2014 · Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-. First Century, the most significant and probably best-received of these books, is provocative, data- ...Missing: 21st caveats
[240]
The Projected Impact of Generative AI on Future Productivity Growth
Sep 8, 2025 · We estimate that 40 percent of current GDP could be substantially affected by generative AI. Occupations around the 80th percentile of earnings ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[241]
Global Economy Set for Weakest Run Since 2008 Outside of ...
Jun 10, 2025 · Global growth is projected to slow to 2.3 percent in 2025, nearly half a percentage point lower than the rate that had been expected at the start of the year.Missing: median | Show results with:median
[242]
Growth and economic well-being: First quarter 2025 - OECD
Aug 7, 2025 · Real household income per capita in the OECD increased by 0.1% in the first quarter of 2025, mirroring the growth in real GDP per capita.Missing: median | Show results with:median